diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a108f56345a33ab0aa78133f13bf8ebb3fdf129
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a9608830f67684d950f49ee62a9dce4e36d91483dfe1aba812ebe5e01a11fc8c
+size 19424
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e
+size 7392
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/53f1f7d17b3e7aae62169c41d2a88a77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/53f1f7d17b3e7aae62169c41d2a88a77_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9ac65c129b62b9d3e5d2d64630b098b0339ceb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/53f1f7d17b3e7aae62169c41d2a88a77_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:27035ce563f35e6062357bbb086222c61ebc150203c76838e8285ae89d13f0e4
+size 103272
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/88b0f3f4393228e9ea4d6542aef7c399_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/88b0f3f4393228e9ea4d6542aef7c399_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..650d3fcf78fc86f5afc81545a833bf5fdf19a2ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/88b0f3f4393228e9ea4d6542aef7c399_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8b39cde37837c85f3d4f164016bab532a7cc08b1ab22878c1509d85900210ccd
+size 63735
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4f3943321f5f56425df896dfe3a5be1e2c3c353
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c8399548f82352dc74600eb622afc9a077d1e63a907dd2bedf13a51505cdbdc6
+size 39174
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3fe5789fbd763c20dea6a6539cf2a525625262a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:00d12552309ba78076d7de68ad47601b75f18ddbebe7fc959304f2f17de2dabc
+size 64172
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb2292121800a3214cb6b15c0de3688f5d61b6dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/d4af765160d04ecef538e5066006dc77_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:73dacb7578d3a1d931f1547884fe57584f6b8655f10499f304c382fe7562ee74
+size 83364
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c601a1d2840cade6064f8d6ce5f476ff64a5e9fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/e6df2733626a85205c1db682e6259c46_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:64d5618f3285ea1171b03f21b24c645c6b5ad2de241cf7f151245ef1a8cbaa8b
+size 102707
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2dbf74856738cedb8807815ee4d550e3313446d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1001-198811-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:88732ef6985fa71795eb5ceeb83088227bcea9d16685ef8043eafb44ac43f928
+size 68634
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.107bis-199303-I_PDF-E/0236eff05bcb8f3a343ea7933aaa306b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.107bis-199303-I_PDF-E/0236eff05bcb8f3a343ea7933aaa306b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f07d99edd106c3689e586ee986865d09532a920
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.107bis-199303-I_PDF-E/0236eff05bcb8f3a343ea7933aaa306b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3edf497f6bbb3688cf3697e9eac9ce6cdae1467c25f69ff9ac325e7fb2b8432d
+size 28990
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.107bis-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.107bis-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d83486e18f51fde6851e57cca9787b23ab17e752
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.107bis-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:23852fa7e2c61a42045960f14dd0fa7ad89fb9b37982f241890afc6caeecbc59
+size 9519
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e
+size 7392
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8a1a3c0faaae8ae37f0b761f81764a927ca5026
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:05b7d34c0ec065a059ef8e4594bb1517f0b2a78da5baa5efe8027f66a4e454a6
+size 117787
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0912d8db5e54c8b6533ac5858980bed2e98bb46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e20bdb128a4b58e07a99718efd51cadaf68d44962a9735962d93628586e78e40
+size 73451
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/aa81b9b80bd1e3d723922b3a033564a2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/aa81b9b80bd1e3d723922b3a033564a2_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3a85a2460e63d016dce76e700d414d72694340f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/aa81b9b80bd1e3d723922b3a033564a2_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:dfcb0361c9e43603d6d2bc33d77fa7cbcd9d60584902d76f68994e4dd5ec8922
+size 11005
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3758c7dbe5b0ed1f7522a8c5948039cd10f90f1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/b3baf3a29b67c7425d2562ddbc52f0cc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9bbb5aa0f05a424862b999058d0423667f1825cc001aaad3522b0efebe760c42
+size 14155
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c847a01807bf5f0699b4c1585d5f8bf757e82ebe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e4dd83339558a572440ef7d2470638fd8431397a7dccba965166cd4066850d7c
+size 130012
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..279b1bb12accd61c8c9befa336401f8c7b1264dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/f6d72d7c790e7f585532140f3971639a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:098dea3994cad7ec6d6487fa7599acb79b14a6cadaf6202801332b2e03853e68
+size 13928
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/f89631cc38aa971e8d15cbffe28f1183_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/f89631cc38aa971e8d15cbffe28f1183_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5503fb6a95020619a5b70059decfe1704bc340b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1102-198811-I_PDF-E/f89631cc38aa971e8d15cbffe28f1183_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9fdd4c204206f8e698912d069b47096a1540baaaff184989ba4082c7b39acc32
+size 10649
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e
+size 7392
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2c82e3f373123b504686fecdcd66e63d1797c3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3948ad1990424a1a4dff0df7baac0bf62b6648941341637b879e3313929ad0dc
+size 48003
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..91fbf7c631a944cedd5fd9c4488af8a0a2a14aa4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:47793fd97159791e1079999e460da9ff1dbed4535d9ff50190ea356d9e67f16b
+size 134569
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cd802cee85b3f9badd02b574218a99bdc61fca14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/997233d405f0d4b89ddeb7683e047f66_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:91dd6332d878828d4d06bfde24b9c548a8951e8220fd7e3ac8cb9786af884336
+size 17774
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/9e6062272bbe3ddbb7c0606721d64cf0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/9e6062272bbe3ddbb7c0606721d64cf0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..966d6e5771e7fc49033c93c6359443c6f4679954
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/9e6062272bbe3ddbb7c0606721d64cf0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:524393f8503d9b1c6aadc54eb3aee0f7360478a800b995c6e87b6bb98697a928
+size 10828
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/b4a7906eddfd40aaa750e19e56c94a8b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/b4a7906eddfd40aaa750e19e56c94a8b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d8df10c384974aaf91e3868668021f4bb3c4426a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/b4a7906eddfd40aaa750e19e56c94a8b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:942dbb389cd45f5474dce2a9bf3a1c31cca711d35164152ea433d3f7999d9a51
+size 14736
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..872138751949b9812ac8cb363b79deb17041a1da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4970d39480eb0c4be2bb93773bcbfd906bb16eb584da71e7640b0f5dc7f5d419
+size 164160
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/f89631cc38aa971e8d15cbffe28f1183_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/f89631cc38aa971e8d15cbffe28f1183_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e72d220d42be12d1c0d75f2781ce3ae1b85a258
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1103-198811-I_PDF-E/f89631cc38aa971e8d15cbffe28f1183_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3725adabab63e4aa7b95e288e7ddc7fad5e04e56e746a3852bea0590d028c4e0
+size 11174
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..939eb6a57fac47a375526475ba6c31bf67e08b30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:52a289bbb49d106b16f646b5050f62e5c7cbe1bb201f8c767547c3039abbf359
+size 8245
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edc38adc374ed94df3a2e91ef67d276fd3982005
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/a5ee5c23b6dc52ec1d724b76d5a5f58f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:688ff4ea814701171bad94ce5141a808a93a93fc40890db84f80a2d0044199e0
+size 60014
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c520feb5e07beadba6e1c50b72a92db4c613cd3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c912f70637444262a0f4d8b24a21acfe3b3ae0ca86c4792ed9d93f3a5ee75c54
+size 64612
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e74534c6a8a6ccd1cad70141de2dfae5275551d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:417e492ca52c3a7a2fdb5780d8cb3345949b691a0a6213f5aa8506814e9467d6
+size 76490
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f79c98b0f45b324005b84cb7ee9e807bbbddf4b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.115.0-200212-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,434 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.115.0**
+
+(12/2002)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+Clauses applicable to ITU-T standard systems – Logic and protocols for the control of signal processing network elements and functions
+
+---
+
+**Protocols for the control of signal processing network elements and functions**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.115.0
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+| | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 |
+| General clauses | Q.100-Q.109 |
+| Transmission clauses for signalling | Q.110-Q.114 |
+| Logic and protocols for the control of signal processing network elements and functions | Q.115 |
+| Abnormal conditions | Q.116-Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 4 | Q.120-Q.139 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 5 | Q.140-Q.199 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250-Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310-Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400-Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 |
+| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 |
+| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900-Q.1999 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 |
+
+For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.
+
+## **ITU-T Recommendation Q.115.0**
+
+# **Protocols for the control of signal processing network elements and functions**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+Echo Cancellation and Voice Quality Enhancement have become a necessity not only in Circuit Switched Networks (wired and wireless) but also in Next Generation Networks. Signal processing network elements and functions are provided on a per-call basis to guarantee QoS for voice calls. This Recommendation describes the protocols to control, on a per-call basis, the signal processing functions. The protocols described in this Recommendation include TDM-based as well as IP-based protocol versions for TDM networks and IP networks.
+
+## **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.115.0 (2002) was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (2001-2004) and approved under the WTSA Resolution 1 procedure on 29 December 2002.
+
+## **Keywords**
+
+Automatic Level (Gain) Control, Echo cancellation, Echo control, Noise Reduction, Voice Quality Enhancement.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 2003
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|---|
+| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | References..... | 1 |
+| 3 | Definitions ..... | 1 |
+| 4 | Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 |
+| 5 | Conceptual model ..... | 2 |
+| 6 | Network scenarios ..... | 3 |
+| 6.1 | TDM: Standalone SPNE..... | 3 |
+| 6.2 | VoIP: SPNE integrated in or external to a media gateway ..... | 4 |
+| 7 | Protocols ..... | 5 |
+| 7.1 | TDM ..... | 5 |
+| 7.2 | VoIP..... | 5 |
+
+
+
+# Protocols for the control of signal processing network elements and functions
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+Echo Control (e.g., echo cancellation) and Voice Quality Enhancement (e.g., voice enhancement device) have become a necessity not only in Circuit Switched Networks (wired and wireless) but also in Next Generation Networks. Signal processing network elements and functions are provided on a per-call basis to guarantee QoS for voice calls. This Recommendation describes the protocols to control on a per-call basis the signal processing functions. The protocols described in this Recommendation include TDM-based as well as IP-based protocol versions for TDM networks and IP networks.
+
+The signal processing function specific logic, i.e. the logic that decides on the need for a signal processing function and the number of signal processing functions to be provided for a call, is defined in ITU-T Recs Q.115.x.
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation.
+
+- [1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.52 (2001), *Signalling between international switching centres and stand-alone echo control devices*.
+- [2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.55 (1999), *Signalling between signal processing network equipment (SPNE) and international switching centres (ISC)*.
+- [3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.56 (2001), *Signalling between signal processing network equipment (SPNE) and international switching centers over an IP network*.
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation H.248 (2000), *Gateway Control Protocol*.
+- [5] ITU-T Recommendation G.173 (1993), *Transmission planning aspects of the speech service in digital public land mobile networks*.
+
+# 3 Definitions
+
+This Recommendation defines the following terms:
+
+- 3.1 signal processing function specific logic:** A functional entity (part of call control) that decides if a signal processing function is required for this call.
+- 3.2 signal processing function:** A functional entity; examples are echo cancellation, noise reduction, automatic level (gain) control, etc.
+- 3.3 signal processing network element:** A physical entity that contains one or more signal processing functions assigned to one or more E1/T1 facilities.
+
+# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations:
+
+| | |
+|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| CAS | Channel associated signalling |
+| CCF | Call Control Function |
+| ECD | Echo Control Device |
+| ECF | Echo Control Function (echo cancellation, echo suppression) |
+| E1 | A transmission link operating at 2048 kbit/s, supporting 30 or 31 64 kbit/s channels. |
+| IP | Internet Protocol |
+| LAN | Local Area Network |
+| MG | Media Gateway |
+| MGC | Media Gateway Controller |
+| QoS | Quality of Service |
+| SPF | Signal Processing Function |
+| SPFCF | SPF Control Function |
+| SPFSF | SPF Switching Function |
+| SPFSL | SPF Specific Logic |
+| SPNE | Signal Processing Network Element |
+| TDM | Time Division Multiplex |
+| T1 | A transmission link operating at 1544 kbit/s supporting 24 speech channels. |
+| VoIP | Voice over IP |
+
+# 5 Conceptual model
+
+For each signal processing function SPF there exists a signal processing function specific logic added to call/bearer control; see Figure 1. Any SPF is provided on a per-call basis. A master slave relation exists between the SPF switching function and the SPF control function.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the conceptual methodology model across three planes:
+
+- Functional plane:** Contains SPFSF, SPFCF, and CCF/BCF (which includes SPFSL). SPFSF and SPFCF are connected by a relationship 'r'. CCF/BCF is connected to SPFSF by a dashed mapping line.
+- Physical plane:** Contains EXCHANGE, SPNE, and MG. EXCHANGE is connected to SPNE by a solid TDM line. EXCHANGE is connected to MGC in the VoIP plane by a dashed mapping line. SPNE is connected to MG by a solid IP line.
+- VoIP plane:** Contains MGC and SPNE. MGC is connected to MG by a solid IP line. SPNE is connected to MG by a solid TDM line.
+
+Mapping lines (dashed) connect functional entities to physical entities: SPFSF to EXCHANGE, SPFCF to SPNE, and CCF/BCF to EXCHANGE. A note indicates that SPF may be provided in the MG or in a standalone SPNE.
+
+**Legend:**
+
+- Physical /virtual connection
+- r Relationship between communicating pairs of functional entities
+- - - - Mapping
+
+Q.115.0\_F01
+
+Figure 1/Q.115.0 – Conceptual methodology model. A diagram showing three planes: Functional plane, Physical plane, and VoIP plane. Functional plane contains SPFSF, SPFCF, and CCF/BCF (with SPFSL). Physical plane contains EXCHANGE, SPNE, and MG. VoIP plane contains MGC and SPNE. Connections include IP, TDM, and relationships 'r'. A note indicates SPF may be provided in the MG or a standalone SPNE.
+
+**Figure 1/Q.115.0 – Conceptual methodology model**
+
+In the VoIP scenario where the MG controls the SPFs provided in a standalone (external) SPNE, the MG has an application protocol interworking function (H.248 SPNE package ↔ Q.52/Q.55/Q.56).
+
+# 6 Network scenarios
+
+## 6.1 TDM: Standalone SPNE
+
+Echo suppressors and echo cancellers provided as standalone equipment are considered to be a first generation of SPNE. The protocol to control standalone echo control devices is defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.52; see Figure 2.
+
+A platform providing one or more signal processing functions is referred to as SPNE. The protocols to control standalone SPNEs are defined in ITU-T Recs Q.55 and Q.56; see Figure 2.
+
+
+
+Q.115.0\_F02
+
+a SPFSF
+b SPFCF
+
+Figure 2/Q.115.0 – TDM scenarios and the control protocols. The diagram shows two scenarios. The top scenario shows an EXCHANGE connected to an ECD via E1, T1 lines. The EXCHANGE contains a box 'a' (SPFSF) and the ECD contains a box 'b' (SPFCF) within an ECF. A callout box 'Q.52' points to the connection. The bottom scenario shows an EXCHANGE connected to an SPNE via E1, T1 lines. The EXCHANGE contains a box 'a' (SPFSF) and the SPNE contains a box 'b' (SPFCF) within SPFs. A callout box 'Q.55' points to a 'CAS, SS7, LAN' connection between 'a' and the SPNE. Another callout box 'Q.56' points to a connection between the SPNE and an IP network (represented by an oval). A legend at the bottom left defines 'a' as SPFSF and 'b' as SPFCF. The label 'Q.115.0\_F02' is in the bottom right.
+
+**Figure 2/Q.115.0 – TDM scenarios and the control protocols**
+
+## 6.2 VoIP: SPNE integrated in or external to a media gateway
+
+H.248 is the media gateway protocol used between a media gateway controller and a media gateway in the decomposed architecture. The H.248 SPNE package defined in this Recommendations allows the control of signal processing functions; see Figure 3.
+
+
+
+Figure 3/Q.115.0 – VoIP Gateway (decomposed architecture); H.248 SPNE package (as defined in this Recommendation) is the control protocol. The diagram shows a Media Gateway Controller (MGC) connected to two Media Gateways (MG). The top MG is connected to an SPNE unit containing SPFs (Signal Processing Functions) labeled 'a' (SPFSF) and 'b' (SPFCF). The bottom MG is also connected to an SPNE unit with SPFs labeled 'b' (SPFCF). Both MGs are connected to an IP network via routers. The MGC is connected to the top MG via an H.248 SPNE package. The top MG is connected to the bottom MG via a Q.52, Q.55 package. The IP network is shown as a circle containing three routers. A legend indicates: 'a' SPFSF, 'b' SPFCF, and a double-headed arrow for interworking.
+
+**Figure 3/Q.115.0 – VoIP Gateway (decomposed architecture); H.248 SPNE package (as defined in this Recommendation) is the control protocol**
+
+# 7 Protocols
+
+## 7.1 TDM
+
+The protocol to control standalone Echo Control Devices is defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.52.
+
+The protocols (protocol family, including CAS, SS7 and LAN) to control one or more SPF of a SPNE is defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.55. If a "public" IP network is used for the transport of the control signalling, then ITU-T Rec. Q.56 could be used.
+
+## 7.2 VoIP
+
+This clause describes the Signal Processing Network Equipment (SPNE) package for H.248. It allows a Media Gateway Controller to control the SPFs of a SPNE equipment either integrated into or attached to a Media Gateway. The SPNE equipment may include echo cancellation (without non linear processor), automatic level control, noise reduction and frequency equalization.
+
+### SPNE Control Package
+
+PackageID: spne, (-----)
+
+Version: 1
+
+Extends: TDM Package (tdmc (0x000d) Version 1
+
+This package defines properties and events for SPNE functions controlled by or integrated into a media gateway. Note that echo cancellers associated with media gateways are assumed to be compliant with ITU-T Rec. G.168 as indicated in ITU-T Rec. G.177.
+
+Logic that determines which SPNE function is enabled or disabled during a call is outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+### 7.2.1 Properties
+
+#### **Non Linear Processing**
+
+PropertyID: nlp (0x0003)
+
+Controls the non-linear processing property of an ECD on the TDM termination.
+
+Type: enumeration
+
+Possible Values:
+
+DISABLE (0x0000)
+
+ENABLE (0x0001)
+
+Defined in: LocalControlDescriptor
+
+Characteristics: Read/Write
+
+#### **Comfort Noise Injection**
+
+PropertyID: cni (0x0004)
+
+This controls the comfort noise injection function of the ECD on the TDM termination.
+
+Type: enumeration
+
+Possible Values:
+
+DISABLE (0x0000)
+
+ENABLE (0x0001)
+
+Defined in: LocalControlDescriptor
+
+Characteristics: Read/Write
+
+#### **Automatic Level Control**
+
+PropertyID: alc (0x0005)
+
+This provides control information for incoming automatic level control on the TDM termination.
+
+Type: enumeration
+
+Possible Values:
+
+DISABLE (0x0000)
+
+ENABLE TYPE 0 (0x0001)
+
+ENABLE TYPE 1 (0x0002)
+
+ENABLE TYPE 2 (0x0003)
+
+ENABLE TYPE 3 (0x0004)
+
+Defined in: LocalControlDescriptor
+
+Characteristics: Read/Write
+
+#### **Frequency Equalization**
+
+PropertyID: fe (0x0006)
+
+This controls the frequency equalization function of a TDM termination. The characteristics of the frequency equalization type is determined and configured by manufacturer and/or carrier.
+
+Type: enumeration
+
+Possible Values:
+
+DISABLE (0x0000)
+ENABLE TYPE 0 (0x0001)
+ENABLE TYPE 1 (0x0002)
+ENABLE TYPE 2 (0x0003)
+ENABLE TYPE 3 (0x0004)
+
+Defined in: LocalControlDescriptor
+
+Characteristics: Read/Write
+
+#### **Noise Reduction**
+
+PropertyID: in-nrd (0x0007)
+
+This controls the incoming noise reduction function of a TDM termination. The characteristics of the incoming noise reduction function type is determined and configured by manufacturer and/or carrier.
+
+Type: enumeration
+
+Possible Values:
+
+DISABLE INCOMING (0x0000)
+ENABLE INCOMING TYPE 0 (0x0001)
+ENABLE INCOMING TYPE 1 (0x0002)
+ENABLE INCOMING TYPE 2 (0x0003)
+ENABLE INCOMING TYPE 3 (0x0004)
+
+Defined in: LocalControlDescriptor
+
+Characteristics: Read/Write
+
+PropertyID: out-nrd (0x0009)
+
+This controls the outgoing noise reduction function of a TDM termination. The characteristics of the outgoing noise reduction function type is determined and configured by manufacturer and/or carrier.
+
+Type: enumeration
+
+Possible Values:
+
+DISABLE OUTGOING (0x0000)
+ENABLE OUTGOING TYPE 0 (0x0001)
+ENABLE OUTGOING TYPE 1 (0x0002)
+ENABLE OUTGOING TYPE 2 (0x0003)
+ENABLE OUTGOING TYPE 3 (0x0004)
+
+Defined in: LocalControlDescriptor
+
+Characteristics: Read/Write
+
+Events: None
+
+Signals: None
+
+Statistics: None
+
+### **7.2.2 Procedures**
+
+#### **Echo Cancellation**
+
+When a MGC determines, through Q.115.1 echo control logic, a need to provide an echo control device (ECD) on a connection, it initiates a command to the MG. The MG, upon receipt of a property with the ECD indication, enables the echo control device associated with the specified termination if the value is ENABLE, or disables the echo control device if the value is DISABLE.
+
+#### **Non Linear Processing**
+
+Echo cancellers include a function called a non-linear processor (NLP). This operates as a smart attenuator, and eliminates residual echo during periods when only one party is speaking. In some cases the NLP function is automatically enabled when the ECD is enabled, however, in other network configurations, it is beneficial to speech quality to disable the NLP independent of the ECD. A network operator may determine that the NLP should be disabled for certain calls. When a MGC determines a requirement for disabling the NLP associated with a termination, it will send this package to the MG. How the MGC determines the requirement for use of the NLP is outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+#### **Automatic Level Control**
+
+When a MGC determines a requirement for automatic level control of the media stream, it will send a package to a MG to enable a selected Type ALC associated with the termination. How the MGC determines the requirement for use of the ALC is outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+#### **Frequency Equalization**
+
+When a MGC determines a requirement for frequency equalization of the media stream, it will send a property to a MG to enable a selected type of FE associated with the termination. How the MGC determines the requirement for use of the FE is outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+#### **Noise Reduction**
+
+When a MGC determines to insert a Noise Reduction Device/Function to reduce the amount of unwanted noise, it will enable a NRD associated with the termination by sending a property to the MG. How the MGC determines the requirement for use of the NRD is outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+
+
+## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communications |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37b0cfe33d071d13ba118b1a5906674be8c2a981
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cd74ca42acf9ead7ab5db28c41e935c618993b3543d491e1862790328285e249
+size 72298
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b9e09c225c71dac4613d034bf3a397a861b12bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:277596830f987ea9f05c37d3dda6822b563a27c5987e12a43f22cc865ab3905a
+size 47010
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..992c370341e209b797b60edb3ce3acb0d4a0d330
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2d1b8ef6f6b37a3c16b076ed96f824eddd63c3040883fe19d841894ba27b4397
+size 42486
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2c99457776a4e2630f7d0f3774553a960f156b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ad9c078ce82f5cafca4a16b7d05ef9f55495bc123eff3e17f5a0a66b7a8b94e2
+size 68333
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2b3a967f6ce4f23649be995a353e39f8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2b3a967f6ce4f23649be995a353e39f8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f414bfcd216f9d5a3d077066d969b202837b8210
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2b3a967f6ce4f23649be995a353e39f8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5d8df9a9a7136b60759126314a39488a13da1f04abee330f270f03c8b665e088
+size 46784
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07882e53216010a60e9a65c2269a1383f90fa8f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8d55bc1404a00110e016e59b37c568857c51417048eaede96b71d932cccb62e1
+size 8202
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cca63fb1e41d4a7396dff05203d890c1d74a3fd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ca720aac010de3515d1c9945e65deeb5d9f4b5ad41a91841af94ab3cf57485b6
+size 104206
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/399a5af4f606059626c92c92279d54b7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/399a5af4f606059626c92c92279d54b7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbfe5d216e4552e9f4c3869df19923a03960b67e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/399a5af4f606059626c92c92279d54b7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:092704115199c3ea1f0a2fb70930e715b0b3308f20bce25ea79f3c3f183cdeab
+size 107689
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/3d6f5edac3d5e7113d960c2202f1b0fa_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/3d6f5edac3d5e7113d960c2202f1b0fa_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99200cf393c31befd4ccca9ec2ee1d1aef73c3b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/3d6f5edac3d5e7113d960c2202f1b0fa_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:739b3b1bf376bffeea183e31ae5c29c7ab6dd34718d03ebb8b9fb129b100ea45
+size 54129
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0963bfed6768c256f1e435dbf4c594ed42f26af8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:78c2232481a21904113f3421f170d2d7727fe26cd1a728f80341711277a8c9bc
+size 60628
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bfa132a26ee00ed4f6618558a3eb2c283271c9d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5b8a756d9a71c35f17db8bcb90b438a3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:346d621728e941bde4a3f1aad24eb73814cd3f1ed1e67053c12409b09dae45b8
+size 65163
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5db6545aedab79741ebae9b27bb363b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5db6545aedab79741ebae9b27bb363b3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51878e585ff7e08309b152ae8d3c9c9d81893d26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5db6545aedab79741ebae9b27bb363b3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:11059c38d030f44cbf5d1fa3eff3cb523e6984b933eaff2b892a9816de3b71c5
+size 65153
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6f3b455da8dc1c09025d06d7ff99608fbce5a9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cd8ca59fb4383c42da6fe6d5c03e19d8f72330437fc4592b1b3af1a72a26495b
+size 112241
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1858f1f0670e15306411bc20280cb9e0daae2872
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4ac2e10001f42839a206cfd55cec51076e1baf2fa720dbab002529907056e275
+size 16727
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1733b01fc1cf8d819fe6230dccf64fd0cd908d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a6fc6955bb35e3c095010b4112bd9b75ad58afd83055b09588ec061ad54497e5
+size 91002
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53fb2aa19492c2287091fd6a3c2835a0a5515cac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d38ed8f27c5ecd7d10f714e08793098bd93ca97412ca063038d1bc260333158d
+size 143526
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/70a863dc6cd47bac82c12162a9479aac_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/70a863dc6cd47bac82c12162a9479aac_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed93297a41a9d8dbc5bd4ddc67d571af9714c4bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/70a863dc6cd47bac82c12162a9479aac_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:64a6ba6f0bfd64a1f9878ca8a0ab37fdf681cfb2cc36a76cc771471d1075987c
+size 120441
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c93286480a98c1273866577342e66465d32032a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ed54a1c207273a6e7228a2161cf038d9ebd1d9f291bf443346a6381da67bea0d
+size 74732
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..558804c3c2ecc6eb69e9759d19873acb6ddf6fd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:05179ec353c68365f472fe1e44efe2289100dec1837cedacf33b0cd010d9917a
+size 90588
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/7f5df81190b8dc50dad2604562ae0715_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/7f5df81190b8dc50dad2604562ae0715_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..039d41a5140a62d273f74802d361a9921f8ec82a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/7f5df81190b8dc50dad2604562ae0715_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4adf55394520a2da1562d3252f3fc4f99b4a932fe8d83760982e937ddb8411f1
+size 109088
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bc7e3b27aafcf5f11107085df767ebe1b2da114
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1ee4780c82e344f7298d9fa6a2793253761898805cd1da535347dc9a572319c6
+size 48316
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3151190f4006f34097cb17fa4d5444ba939a983c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6222a771d30aab24d7954f48069750dfc1e78a97f90c569a5e43a008a2f8e75f
+size 89065
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0170d2e2c9c7d590e1681d32f0120da4166d6502
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:738320a7cc904d2183bce1888e67af137019ad19837afd0e62b3cefbdf7c54d4
+size 55718
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3bb40a9f86f8f309eb933c91afa76fa52b94fd5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/9c6461e1e94afae4dec455e69a2ce152_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a65382a5ae1db96e4dfbc65468f4e8b24df83acc288942d513c14112bb3935a9
+size 39134
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1964bceeb03148a8f99f839d1f08a55d8eac24e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:50e875ea0fadcd73be33bb39bb2827f2db45941e40f4e0dc2df9391393d208c4
+size 101043
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/ae0a735d106290c594b0bafb1f5e72e7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/ae0a735d106290c594b0bafb1f5e72e7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..88f8b5e04680895d484dec4c076f79d19d397a8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/ae0a735d106290c594b0bafb1f5e72e7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3bf63ad21197dbe5f078f4073eb7d712427f5ae8bf73cc7e4ad8c1c503af7f8e
+size 84937
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1bc333c60d8e070bc7f926c18658b4fc8a866fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a484198252ec665820f0d68c9c65bc8b9f1b098f69a1f616c3726241eaa0ae92
+size 35583
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/bb4d2112ed07e2031c92fbff3494af9f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/bb4d2112ed07e2031c92fbff3494af9f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..782dd4894191aa79c0236fdc3e2c7c05aba778a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/bb4d2112ed07e2031c92fbff3494af9f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9c258182de2e82c5f12ac171adf5e788a23f5a369bf7cd227eca6ab3c5da6dd0
+size 108401
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2e9d415b883fe24e02bd4d885b935097bdfa266
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d30e7b6f1eee68a517c4189a270201e850714c9686743850d54fd2393ee7c1ca
+size 103782
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..805b9d6dab9bd44b85e026699061a07946e13743
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c5452f95f3b28f1bfe29e84fbc2e1267_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d4ea651a1441dde00c6981705c99f219e2d228ba817add2a8be66c9bf9cc44d4
+size 81950
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..600f8856d42928aa2b2d535b616563816f87c949
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5b5073a7586303552ea8e870bda6992ca483cea9cc79d218efe40d6569f94450
+size 84253
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdefaf7208b5d58378e224f285bc85bc2019796b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c939bf220c0beb1617e95b292167236ec3c15992a588225c0fbbe28aed2b2008
+size 101558
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d9ad73155743292a83558306ffa5e23607175f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b64136e877ff8cf825e6ed3f8a8d06fc093e1136f9a900d1b97c2789b1b23ea4
+size 117951
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0dbbed3268db032c60bae0960ead87a725802eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a63da10b652c5f7c1ddad6562bdebd1b631e1bdf560d1bb28c703b9459d95ebd
+size 105604
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6cf46a14e78b9ab0d66ebbc91cc6109897b96b6c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:799ec033725a146601350dd2663222a9bdd6acac777fbb47282ac79280c36ee5
+size 98291
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3b6cd893cb1dc3e185507ce619d323aae5cc348
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cc382c6ef93456a89ef31e10e994a13481ea6a75ec3aef8c85e96685335990f8
+size 15270
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8947296d397501410635a4dead81341f9113ca0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d50b4697f69a53a7ad0e2edadee9b9fde572b1ee888e7431bb4a0a2459fe00b6
+size 129767
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..929567bade8718ed7622281a6ef9857f10ef4436
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2a2ce02db9b247d10da696373a63928d38e9d803d65d092c915f24f3f3b39797
+size 119465
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07529d67eb67928fd41859ddb0fd224bc5ae183f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4e86fbe00787afaebd3400231c0e8d96dc1f0926901b6227fd5e1248366d19d0
+size 116895
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f7dc56ee73e4b0c87260d762e099af95bb3afeca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1152-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2087 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+**Q.1152**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+(03/93)
+
+# **INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS** ---
+
+# **PROCEDURES FOR INTERWORKING BETWEEN INMARSAT AERONAUTICAL MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEM AND THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK/ISDN**
+
+**ITU-T Recommendation Q.1152**
+
+(Previously "CCITT Recommendation")
+
+---
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.1152 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993).
+
+## --- NOTES
+
+1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector.
+
+In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms "CCITT, CCIR or IFRB" or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure.
+
+2 In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+| | Page |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 1 Introduction ..... | 1 |
+| 2 Conversion of information elements ..... | 1 |
+| 2.1 Signalling System R2..... | 1 |
+| 2.2 Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) ..... | 4 |
+| 2.3 Signalling System No. 5 ..... | 6 |
+| 3 Incoming INMARSAT aeronautical logic procedures (air-to-ground calls)..... | 6 |
+| 4 Outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical logic procedures (ground-to-air calls) ..... | 16 |
+| 5 Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system with itself..... | 21 |
+| 6 Interworking of incoming INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System R2..... | 23 |
+| 7 Interworking of Signalling System R2 to outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical ..... | 26 |
+| 8 Interworking of incoming INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) ..... | 29 |
+| 9 Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical ..... | 29 |
+| 10 Interworking of incoming INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System No. 5 ..... | 35 |
+| 11 Interworking of Signalling System No. 5 to outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical ..... | 35 |
+
+
+
+# PROCEDURES FOR INTERWORKING BETWEEN INMARSAT AERONAUTICAL MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEM AND THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORK/ISDN
+
+*(Melbourne, 1988; modified at Helsinki, 1993)*
+
+## 1 Introduction
+
+This Recommendation provides the detailed procedures for interworking between the INMARSAT aeronautical system and signalling systems of the public fixed network. For a brief description of the INMARSAT aeronautical system, see Appendix I/Q.1151.
+
+## 2 Conversion of information elements
+
+Tables 1 and 2 list the signals of the INMARSAT aeronautical system that are relevant for the purpose of interworking with the PSTN/ISDN. The forward interworking telephone events (FITEs) and backward interworking telephone events (BITEs), as defined in Annex A/Q.601-Q.608, that correspond to each of these signals is also provided in the tables.
+
+TABLE 1/Q.1152
+
+### INMARSAT aeronautical – forward signals
+
+| FITE No. | Message: information element: value |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
+| Ground-to-air calls | |
+| 1 | Call announcement: AES id: called terminal |
+| 17 | Call announcement: service: telephone |
+| 22 | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing |
+| Air-to-ground calls | |
+| 17 | Access request: message type: public/crew voice |
+| 18 | Access request: message type: crew distress voice |
+| 1 | Access request: address digits 0, 1 |
+| 1 | Call information: address digits 2 ... 17 |
+| 22 | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing |
+| NOTE – Signals required for interworking with Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) are for further study. | |
+
+Tables 3 to 18 give the relationship between signals of the fixed network signalling systems and the INMARSAT aeronautical system.
+
+### 2.1 Signalling System R2
+
+**2.1.1** Table 3 gives the relationship between messages in the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system and forward signals in Signalling System R2 for air-to-ground calls, i.e. interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System R2.
+
+Table 4 shows the relationship between forward signals in Signalling System R2 and messages in the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system for ground-to-air calls. In the comment column actions taken by the MSSC are indicated,
+
+in particular for signals of R2 which have no equivalent message in the INMARSAT aeronautical system.
+
+The signal numbers for forward signals of Signalling System R2 are those given in Table A.7/Q.601-Q.608.
+
+TABLE 2/Q.1152
+
+### **INMARSAT aeronautical – backward signals**
+
+| BITE No. | Message: information element: value |
+|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
+| Ground-to-air-calls | |
+| 5 | Test |
+| 22 | Connect |
+| 29 | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing |
+| 16 | Call attempt result: Cause: User busy |
+| 12 | Call attempt result: Cause: No channel available |
+| 17 | Call attempt result: Cause: Destination out of service |
+| Air-to-ground-calls | |
+| 22 | Connect |
+| 2 | Call attempt result: Address complete |
+| 29 | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing |
+| 20 | Channel release: Cause: Unspecified |
+| 16 | Channel release: Cause: User busy |
+| 15 | Channel release: Cause: Unassigned number |
+| 17 | Channel release: Cause: Destination out of service |
+| 12 | Channel release: Cause: No channel available |
+| 14 | Channel release: Cause: Invalid number format |
+
+NOTE – Signals required for interworking with Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) are for further study.
+
+TABLE 3/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of forward signals in the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System R2 Air-to-ground calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Signalling System R2
Signal name: information element | Signal No. |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Access request: message type | Calling party's category | |
+| – public voice | – subscriber/operator without forward transfer facility | 12 |
+| – crew voice | – subscriber/operator without forward transfer facility | 12 |
+| – crew distress voice | – subscriber/with priority | 14 |
+| Access request: address digits 0, 1 | Country code indicator (echo suppressor controls) | 10 |
+| Call information: digits 2 to 17 | Address signals/first digit | 1 |
+| Test | Not applicable | |
+| Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | Clear forward | 16 |
+
+NOTE – Signal No. 21, nature of circuit indicator: one satellite circuit in the connection, is generated by the MSSC, if required.
+
+TABLE 4/Q.1152
+
+#### **Conversion of forward signals in Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system Ground-to-air calls**
+
+| Signal No. | Signalling System R2
Signal name | INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Comments |
+|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
+| 1 | Address signals | Call announcement: AES identity, called terminal | |
+| 2-6 | Language digit: I-1, ... 5 | | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 7 | Discriminating digit | | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 8 | Country code indicator, outgoing
half suppressor required | | MSSC will insert echo control
device if needed |
+| 9 | Country code indicator, no echo
suppressor required | | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 10, 11 | Country code indicator, incoming
half echo suppressor required | | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 12 | Calling party's category, subscriber
or operator without forward transfer
facility | Call announcement
– service: telephone | |
+| 13 | Calling party's category, data
transmission control | | Not applicable |
+| 14 | Calling party's category, subscriber
with priority | Call announcement
– service: telephone, priority for further
study | |
+| 15 | Calling party's category, operator
with forward transfer capability | Call announcement
– service: telephone | |
+| 16 | Clear forward | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | |
+| 17 | Forward transfer | | Not applicable |
+| 18 | First digit: I-1, I-2 ... I-10 | | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 19 | Reply to A-14: I-1 ... I-10 | | Not applicable |
+| 20 | Reply to first A-13; I-13 | | Not applicable |
+| 21 | Reply to first A-13; I-14 | | Not applicable |
+
+**2.1.2** Table 5 gives the relationship between messages in the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system and backward signals in Signalling System R2 for ground-to-air calls, i.e. interworking of Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical.
+
+Backward signals in Signalling System R2 generated by the MSSC for unsuccessful ground-to-air calls are given in Table 5 *bis*. These signals are not related to any specific message received from the aircraft earth station.
+
+TABLE 5/Q.1152
+
+#### **Conversion of backward signals in the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System R2 Ground-to-air-calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Signalling System R2
Signal name: information element | Signal No. |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Test | International, subscriber line free, charge | 13 |
+| Connect | Answer signal | 11 |
+| Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | Clear back | 12 |
+| Call attempt result: Cause: | | |
+| – user busy | Subscriber line busy | 5 |
+| – no channel available | Congestion on the national network | 1 |
+| – destination out of service | Subscriber line out of order | 10 |
+| – others | International; send special info tone | 14 |
+
+TABLE 5 bis/Q.1152
+
+#### **Unsuccessful call events and backward signals in Signalling System R2 Ground-to-air-calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Event in INMARSAT system | Signalling System R2
Signal name: information element | Signal No. |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Congestion in MSSC | B4 – Congestion | 6 |
+| Incomplete AES number | B5 – Unallocated number | 7 |
+| Continuity test failure | B8 – Subscriber line out of order | 10 |
+| AES barred for incoming access | B2 – Send special info tone | 4 |
+| Called AES not logged on | B2 – Send special info tone | 4 |
+| No satellite channel frequency/equipment available | B4 – Congestion | 6 |
+
+Table 6 gives the relationship between backward signals in Signalling System R2 and messages in the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system for air-to-ground calls, i.e. interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System R2. The comments column indicates specific actions taken by the MSSC.
+
+The signal number of backward signals of Signalling System R2 are those given in Table A.11/Q.601-Q.608.
+
+### 2.2 Signalling System No. 7 (TUP)
+
+**2.2.1** Tables 7 and 8 are similar to Tables 3 and 4, respectively, and apply to forward signals in Signalling System No. 7 (TUP).
+
+The signal numbers for forward signals of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) are those given in Table A.5 bis/Q.601-Q.608.
+
+TABLE 6/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of backward signals in Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system Air-to-ground calls**
+
+| Signal No. | Signalling System R2
Signal name | INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Comments |
+|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
+| 1 | A4 – Congestion on the national network | Channel release: remote public network,
switching equipment
congestion | |
+| 2 | A6 – Address complete, charge, set up,
speech condition | Call attempt
result: address complete | |
+| 3 | A15 – Congestion in an international
exchange or at its output | Channel release: international network,
switching equipment
congestion | |
+| 4 | B2 – Send special information tone | Channel release: remote public network,
normal – unspecified | |
+| 5 | B3 – Subscriber line busy | Channel release: remote public network, user
busy | |
+| 6 | B4 – Congestion | Channel release: remote public network,
switching equipment
congestion | |
+| 7 | B5 – Unallocated number | Channel release: remote public network,
unassigned number | |
+| 8 | B6 – Subscriber line free, charge | Call attempt result: address complete | |
+| 9 | B7 – Subscriber line free, no charge | Call attempt result: address complete | No-charge information, used by
MSSC only |
+| 10 | B8 – Subscriber line out of order | Channel release: remote public network,
destination out of service | |
+| 11 | Answer | Connect | |
+| 12 | Clear back | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | Clearback
supervision
done by MSSC |
+| 13 | B1-B6 – International, subscriber line
free, charge | Call attempt result: address complete | |
+| 14 | B9, B10 – International, send special
information tone | Channel release: international network,
normal – unspecified | |
+| 15 | B11-B15– Congestion | Channel release: remote public network,
switching equipment
congestion | |
+
+**2.2.2** Tables 9, 9 *bis* and 10 are similar to Tables 5, 5 *bis* and 6, respectively, and apply to backward signals in Signalling System No. 7 (TUP).
+
+The signal numbers for backward signals in Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) are those given in Table A.9 *bis*/Q.601-Q.608.
+
+TABLE 7/Q.1152
+
+#### **Conversion of forward signals in INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 7 Air-to-ground calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Signalling System No. 7
Signal name: information element | Signal No. |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Access request: message type | Calling party's category indicator: | 13 |
+| Public voice/ | Ordinary subscriber/ | 13 |
+| Crew voice/ | Ordinary subscriber/ | 13 |
+| Crew distress voice/ | Subscriber with priority | 14 |
+| Access request: address digits 0, 1 | Address signals: Digit 1, 2 ... 0 | 1 |
+| | nature of address indicator, international number | 3 |
+| Call information: digit 2 to 17 | | |
+| Test | Continuity check performed on previous circuit | 22 |
+| Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | Clear forward signal | 16 |
+
+NOTE – Signal No. 5, nature of circuit indicator, one satellite in connection, is generated by the MSSC.
+
+### 2.3 Signalling System No. 5
+
+**2.3.1** Tables 11 and 12 are similar to Tables 3 and 4, respectively, and apply to forward signals in Signalling System No. 5.
+
+The signal numbers for forward signals of Signalling System No. 5 are those given in Table A.4/Q.601-Q.608.
+
+**2.3.2** Tables 13, 13 *bis* and 14 are similar to Tables 5, 5 *bis* and 6, respectively, and apply to backward signals in Signalling System No. 5.
+
+The signal numbers for backward signals in Signalling System No. 5 are those given in Table A.8/Q.601-Q.608.
+
+**2.4** The relationship between forward and backward signals of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) and messages of the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system is for further study.
+
+## 3 Incoming INMARSAT aeronautical logic procedures (air-to-ground calls)
+
+Figure 1 contains the procedures for the incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system.
+
+This description only includes those aspects of the INMARSAT aeronautical system which have to be implemented for interworking purposes. Internal procedures, such as those required for setting up and clearing satellite channels are not shown. This also applies to pre-emption procedures for assigning channels to distress calls.
+
+The following details should be noted:
+
+**3.1** The access request contains information elements for the required service, and the required network, plus two address digits. For some private networks, and/or subscription services on public networks, this information will be sufficient to determine the complete call routing. In all but the most exceptional cases, it will be enough information to select a circuit for onward routing from the MSSC.
+
+TABLE 8/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of forward signals in Signalling System No. 7 TUP to INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system Ground-to-air calls**
+
+| Signal No. | Signalling System No. 7
Signal name | INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Comments |
+|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
+| 1 | Address signals | Call announcement: AES ID, called terminal | |
+| 2 | Nature of address indicator, national significant number | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 3 | Nature of address indicator, international number | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 4 | Nature of circuit indicator, no satellite in connection | – | Ignored by MSSC |
+| 5 | Nature of circuit indicator, one satellite in connection | – | Ignored by MSSC |
+| 6 | Echo suppressor indicator, outgoing half-echo suppressor not included | – | MSSC will insert echo control device if needed |
+| 7 | Echo suppressor indicator, outgoing half-echo suppressor included | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 8-12 | Calling party's category indicator, language digit | Call announcement
– service: telephone | – |
+| 13 | Calling party's category indicator, ordinary calling subscriber | Call announcement
– service: telephone | – |
+| 14 | Calling party's category indicator, calling subscriber with priority | Call announcement
– service: telephone, priority for further study | – |
+| 15 | Calling party's category indicator, data call | – | Not applicable |
+| 16 | Clear forward | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | – |
+| 17 | Forward transfer | – | Not applicable |
+| 18 | Continuity proved | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 19 | Continuity check failure | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | – |
+| 20 | Continuity check not required on this circuit | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 21 | Continuity check not required on this circuit | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 22 | Continuity check performed on previous circuit | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 23 | Service information | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 24 | General set-up message | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+
+**3.2** The initial analysis of the request checks that the AES is authorized for the service requested and finds a suitable channel and channel unit, on which to service the call. The call is aborted if the AES is not an authorized user of the INMARSAT system.
+
+**3.3** In the cases where all of the required address information is contained in the access request signal unit, an address message is received by the incoming procedure, once continuity of the assigned satellite channel has been successfully tested.
+
+TABLE 9/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of backward signals in INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 7 TUP Ground-to-air calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Signalling System No. 7
Signal name | Signal No. |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Test | AFC: Address complete, subscriber free, charge | 4 |
+| Connect | ANC: Answer, charge | 16 |
+| Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | CLB: Clear back | 19 |
+| Call attempt result: Cause: | | |
+| – user busy | SGB: Subscriber busy | 12 |
+| – no channel available | CGC: Circuit group congestion | 8 |
+| – destination out of service | LOS: Line out of service | 13 |
+| – others | SST: Send special information tone | 14 |
+
+TABLE 9 bis/Q.1152
+
+#### **Unsuccessful events and backward signals in Signalling System No. 7 Ground-to-air calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Event in INMARSAT system | Signalling System No. 7
Signal name | Signal No. |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------|
+| Congestion in MSSC | SEC: Switching equipment congestion | 7 |
+| No satellite channel frequency/equipment available | NNC: National network congestion | 9 |
+| Incomplete AES number | ADI: Address incomplete | 10 |
+| Continuity test failure | LOS: Line out of service | 13 |
+| AES barred for incoming access | SST: Send special information tone | 14 |
+| Call AES not logged on | SST: Send special information tone | 14 |
+
+**3.4** The called address is analysed to verify its integrity. The satellite channel may be cleared at this point, either if the dialled address is incomplete or if the AES goes on-hook. The call may also be aborted if proper credit card data is not received from the AES.
+
+**3.5** The dialled digits are transferred to the interworking procedure, and the answer signal is awaited. The last digit may be withheld until receipt of credit card information. All successful address complete signals are converted to a call attempt result message, with the cause field set to address complete.
+
+**3.6** Unsuccessful call event signals (BITes 9-20) are transferred to the AES by the call attempt result message, with the cause field set appropriately.
+
+**3.7** On receipt of the answer signals, the connect message is sent to the AES.
+
+**3.8** The call is cleared in the normal way, either on receipt of a release message from the interworking procedure, or an indication of AES on-hook conveyed by means of a channel release message.
+
+TABLE 10/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of backward signals in Signalling System No. 7 TUP to INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system Air-to-ground calls**
+
+| Signal No. | Signalling System No. 7
Signal name | INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Comments |
+|------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
+| 1 | ADC: Address complete, charge | Call attempt result: Address complete | – |
+| 2 | ADN: Address complete, no charge | Call result: Address complete | No-charge information used by MSSC only |
+| 3 | ADX: Address complete, coinbox | Call result: Address complete | – |
+| 4 | AFC: Address complete, subscriber free, charge | Call result: Address complete | – |
+| 5 | AFN: Address complete, subscriber free, no charge | Call result: Address complete | No-charge information used by MSSC only |
+| 6 | AFX: Address complete, subscriber free, coinbox | Call result: Address complete | – |
+| 7 | SEC: Switching equipment congestion | Channel release: international network, switching equipment congestion | – |
+| 8 | CGC: Circuit-group congestion | Call result: international network, no channel available | – |
+| 9 | NNC: National network congestion | Call result: remote public network, switching equipment congestion | – |
+| 10 | ADI: Address complete | Call result: remote public network, invalid number format | – |
+| 11 | UNN: Unallocated number | Call result: remote public network, unassigned number | – |
+| 12 | SGB: Subscriber busy | Call result: remote public network, user busy | – |
+| 13 | LOS: Line out of service | Call result: remote public network, destination out of service | – |
+| 14 | SST: Send special information tone | Call result: international network, normal – unspecified | – |
+| 15 | CFL: Call failure | Call result: international network, normal – unspecified | – |
+| 16 | ANC: Answer, charge | Connect | – |
+| 17 | ANN: Answer, no charge | Connect | No charge information used by MSSC only |
+| 18 | RAN: Reanswer | Connect | – |
+| 19 | CLB: Clearback | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | Clearback supervision done by MSSC |
+| 20 | GRQ: General request message | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 21 | Call unsuccessful, access barred | Call attempt result: remote public network, normal – unspecified | – |
+| 22 | DPN: Call unsuccessful, digital path not provided | – | Not applicable |
+
+TABLE 11/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of forward signals in INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 5 Air-to-ground calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Signalling System No. 5
Signal name | Signal No. |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------|
+| Access request: message type | | |
+| – public voice | Discriminating digit 0 | 7 |
+| – crew voice | Discriminating digit 0 | 7 |
+| – crew distress voice | Discriminating digit 0 | 7 |
+| Access request: address digits: 0, 1 | Address digits | 1 |
+| Call information: digits 2 to 17 | | |
+| Test | Not applicable | – |
+| Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | Clear forward | 10 |
+
+TABLE 12/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of forward signals in INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 5 Ground-to-air calls**
+
+| Signal No. | Signalling System No. 5
Signal name | INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Comments |
+|------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
+| 1 | Address signals | Call announcement: AES identity,
called terminal | |
+| 2-6 | Language digit: 1 ... 5 | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 7 | Discriminating digit 0 | Call announcement
– service: telephone | |
+| 8 | Start of pulsing signal KP1 | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 9 | Start of pulsing signal KP2 | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 10 | Clear forward | Channel release: Cause: Normal
clearing | |
+| 11 | Forward transfer | – | Not applicable |
+
+TABLE 13/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of backward signals in INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 5 Ground-to-air calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Signalling System No. 5
Signal name | Signal No. |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------|
+| Test | Inform that ST has been sent | 5 |
+| Connect | Answer signal | 2 |
+| Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | Clear back | 3 |
+| Call attempt result: Cause: | | |
+| – user busy | Busy flash signal | 1 |
+| – no channel available | Busy flash signal | 1 |
+| – destination out of service | Information tone (Note) | – |
+| – others | Information tone (Note) | – |
+
+NOTE – May include appropriate recorded announcement.
+
+TABLE 13 bis/Q.1152
+
+#### **Unsuccessful call events and backward signals in Signalling System No. 5 Ground-to-air calls**
+
+| INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Event in INMARSAT system | Signalling System No. 5
Signal name | Signal No. |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------|
+| Congestion in MSSC | Busy flash | 1 |
+| No satellite channel frequency/equipment available | Busy flash | 1 |
+| Incomplete AES number | Information tone (Note) | |
+| Continuity test failure | Information tone (Note) | |
+| Called AES not logged on | Information tone (Note) | |
+| AES barred for incoming access | Information tone (Note) | |
+
+NOTE – May include appropriate recorded announcement.
+
+TABLE 14/Q.1152
+
+### **Conversion of backward signals in Signalling System No. 7 to INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system Air-to-ground calls**
+
+| Signal No. | Signalling System No. 5
Signal name | INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system
Message: information element: value | Comments |
+|------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
+| 1 | Busy-flash | Channel release: international network, unspecified | – |
+| 2 | Answer | Connect | – |
+| 3 | Clear back | Channel release: Cause: Normal clearing | – |
+| 4 | Proceed to send | – | Interpreted by MSSC |
+| 5 | Inform that ST has been sent | Call attempt result: address complete | |
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Idle0([0 Idle]) --> Request[/Request from AES/]
+ Request --> Store[Store request message]
+ Store --> Activate[Activate register SPITE 1]
+ Activate --> Check[/Check AES find channel Note 1/]
+ Check -- SP --> Await1([1 Await channel])
+ Await1 --> AESnotOK[/AES not OK/]
+ Await1 --> NoChannel[/No channel/]
+ Await1 --> ChannelAssigned[/Channel assigned SPITE 14/]
+ AESnotOK -- SP --> SetLoc[Set loc. & cause fields]
+ NoChannel -- SP --> SetLoc
+ SetLoc --> CallResult[/Call attempt result/]
+ CallResult --> Deactivate3[Deactivate register SPITE 3]
+ Deactivate3 --> Idle0
+ ChannelAssigned -- SP --> SetupSat[Setup satellite channel]
+ SetupSat --> Await2([2 Await address])
+ Await2 --> AddressMsg[/Address message/]
+ AddressMsg --> DigitAnalysis[/Digit analysis SPITE 12 Note 2/]
+ DigitAnalysis -- SP --> Connector1((1))
+ Await2 --> ChannelRelease[/Channel release/]
+ Await2 --> ContinuityFailure[/Continuity failure/]
+ Await2 --> AddressFailure[/Address failure/]
+ AddressFailure -- "2, 5" --> Deactivate3
+ Deactivate3 --> Connector4((4))
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls). The process starts at 'Idle' (0), receives a 'Request from AES', stores it, activates a register (SPITE 1), and checks for a channel. If 'AES not OK' or 'No channel', it sets location and cause fields and deactivates the register (SPITE 3) to return to 'Idle'. If 'Channel assigned (SPITE 14)', it sets up a satellite channel and waits for an address (2). From 'Await address', it handles 'Address message' (leading to digit analysis (SPITE 12) and then to connector 1), 'Channel release', 'Continuity failure', or 'Address failure' (leading to register deactivation (SPITE 3) and then to connector 4).
+
+## NOTES
+
+- 1 Analyse for authorized AES ID, availability of service requested, find a suitable satellite channel and channel unit.
+- 2 Includes translation of prefixes to the appropriate B-party number, and verification that the number is valid.
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 7)
+**Logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling
+ (air-to-ground calls)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 1((1)) --> CreditCard{Credit card?}
+ CreditCard -- No --> SP1[SP]
+ CreditCard -- Yes --> CreditCardData{{Credit card data}}
+ CreditCardData --> SP2[SP]
+ SP1 --> SP2
+ SP2 --> AwaitDigitAnalysis{{Await digit analysis}}
+ AwaitDigitAnalysis --> CircuitAvailable{{Circuit available
+(SPITE 14)}}
+ AwaitDigitAnalysis --> ChannelRelease{{Channel release}}
+ AwaitDigitAnalysis --> CallFailure{{Call failure
+(SPITE 13, 15-19)}}
+ CircuitAvailable -- SP --> ActivateInterworking{{Activate interworking procedure}}
+ ChannelRelease --> 2((2))
+ CallFailure -- SP --> 2
+ ActivateInterworking --> R((R))
+ R -- 3 --> SP3[SP]
+ SP3 --> SP2
+
+```
+
+The flowchart illustrates the logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls). It begins at connector 1, leading to a decision diamond 'Credit card?'. If 'No', it goes to a splice point (SP). If 'Yes', it proceeds to a process block 'Credit card data', which also leads to a splice point (SP). Both SP points merge and lead to a wait state 'Await digit analysis'. From this state, three paths emerge: 'Circuit available (SPITE 14)', 'Channel release', and 'Call failure (SPITE 13, 15-19)'. The 'Circuit available' path leads to a process block 'Activate interworking procedure', which then leads to connector R. The 'Channel release' and 'Call failure' paths both lead to connector 2. Connector R leads to connector 3, which then leads to another splice point (SP) that loops back to the merge point before 'Await digit analysis'. Vertical labels 1, 2, and R are on the left margin. A document code 'T1143160-92/d02' is in the bottom right.
+
+Flowchart for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls).
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 7)
+**Logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling
+ (air-to-ground calls)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ R2((R 2)) --> SC{Service category?}
+ SC --> Data[Data
+(FITE 19)]
+ SC -- Ordinary --> TO[Telephone
+ordinary
+(FITE 17)]
+ SC -- Priority --> TP[Telephone
+priority
+(FITE 18)]
+ Data --> DA{Digit
+available}
+ TO --> DA
+ TP --> DA
+ DA -- No --> C4_17((4 1, 7))
+ DA -- Yes --> TD[/Transfer
+digit
+(FITE 1)/]
+ TD --> MD{More digits?}
+ MD -- Yes --> TD
+ MD -- No --> C5((5))
+ C5 --> ACS([Await
+call setup])
+
+ C4_17 --> SLC[Set loc. &
+cause fields]
+ SLC --> CR[/Channel release/]
+ CR --> C4((4))
+ C4 --> ACC([Await channel cleared])
+ ACC --> CC[/Channel cleared/]
+ CC --> DC[Deassign
+channel]
+ DC -- SP --> C0((0))
+ C0 --> Idle([Idle])
+
+```
+
+T1142370-92/d03
+
+Flowchart showing logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling. The flow starts at connector 'R 2' leading to a 'Service category?' decision. Paths branch for 'Data (FITE 19)', 'Ordinary' (leading to 'Telephone ordinary (FITE 17)'), and 'Priority' (leading to 'Telephone priority (FITE 18)'). All paths converge at a 'Digit available' decision. If 'No', it exits to connector '4 1, 7'. If 'Yes', it enters a loop: 'Transfer digit (FITE 1)' followed by 'More digits?'. If 'Yes', it loops back to 'Transfer digit'. If 'No', it goes to connector '5' which leads to the 'Await call setup' state. A separate sequence starts at connector '4 1, 7', leading to 'Set loc. & cause fields', 'Channel release', connector '4', 'Await channel cleared' state, 'Channel cleared' input, 'Deassign channel' process, and finally through 'SP' to connector '0' and the 'Idle' state.
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1152 (sheet 3 of 7)
+**Logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling
+(air-to-ground calls)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 5((5)) --> A[Await call setup]
+ A --> F5((F 5))
+ A --> B[/Answer (BITE 22, 23)/]
+ A --> C[/Address complete (BITE 5-7, 27)/]
+ B --> D{Connect}
+ C --> E[Set loc. & cause fields]
+ E --> F[/Call attempt result/]
+ D --> L6((L 6))
+ F --> L6
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls) - sheet 4 of 7. The process starts at node 5 'Await call setup'. It branches into two parallel paths: 'Answer (BITE 22, 23)' and 'Address complete (BITE 5-7, 27)'. The 'Answer' path leads to 'Connect', which then leads to node 6 'L'. The 'Address complete' path leads to 'Set loc. & cause fields', which then leads to 'Call attempt result', which also leads to node 6 'L'. A connector 'F 5' is shown at the top right. Vertical lines on the left are labeled 'F' and 'L'. A reference code 'T1143170-92/d04' is at the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1152 (sheet 4 of 7)
+**Logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ F4((F 4)) --> A7((A 7))
+ F4 --> B[/Call unsuccessful (BITE 8-20)/]
+ F4 --> C[/Channel release/]
+ F4 --> D[/Credit card reject/]
+ F4 --> E[/BITE Z/]
+ B --> 2_1((2 1))
+ C --> F[Clear forward (FITE 22)]
+ F --> 2_1
+ D --> G[Clear forward (FITE 22)]
+ G --> 2_1
+ E --> 2_1
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls) - sheet 5 of 7. The process starts at node 4 'F' and ends at node 7 'A'. It branches into four parallel paths: 'Call unsuccessful (BITE 8-20)', 'Channel release', 'Credit card reject', and 'BITE Z'. The 'Call unsuccessful' path leads to node 2 '1'. The 'Channel release' path leads to 'Clear forward (FITE 22)', which then leads to node 2 '1'. The 'Credit card reject' path leads to 'Clear forward (FITE 22)', which then leads to node 2 '1'. The 'BITE Z' path leads directly to node 2 '1'. Vertical lines on the left are labeled 'F, A' and '2'. A reference code 'T1143180-92/d05' is at the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1152 (sheet 5 of 7)
+**Logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ L4((L 4)) --> SPITE4[Setup speech condition
+(SPITE 4)]
+ SPITE4 --> SPITE3[Deactivate register
+(SPITE 3)]
+ SPITE3 --> C6{{Connected 6}}
+ C6 --> U7((U 7))
+ C6 --> C10{{Connected}}
+ C10 --> C6
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls). The flow starts at connector 'L 4', proceeds to 'Setup speech condition (SPITE 4)', then 'Deactivate register (SPITE 3)'. It then enters a 'Connected' state (labeled '6'). From this state, one path leads to connector 'U 7' and another leads to a second 'Connected' state. A feedback loop connects the second 'Connected' state back to the entry point of the first 'Connected' state. The diagram is labeled 'T1143190-92/d06' at the bottom.
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1152 (sheet 6 of 7)
+**Logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls)**
+
+## 4 Outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical logic procedures (ground-to-air calls)
+
+Figure 2 contains the procedures for the outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system.
+
+This description only includes the aspects of the INMARSAT aeronautical system which have to be implemented for interworking purposes. Internal procedures, such as those required for setting up and clearing satellite channels are not shown. This also applies to pre-emption procedures for assigning channels to distress calls.
+
+The following details should be noted:
+
+**4.1** The outgoing INMARSAT procedure receives the calling party indicator, and address digits from the interworking process. It determines whether the addressed AES is an authorized user and if it is logged on in the same satellite region. BITE 15 is returned to the terrestrial network if the dialled AES number is invalid.
+
+
+
+The flowchart illustrates the logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls). It begins with a vertical timeline on the left marked 'A' at the top, '4' in the middle, and 'U' at the bottom. At the top, a circle labeled 'A' with the number '5' next to it points to a box labeled 'Release incoming side (BITE 29)'. Below this box, a circle labeled '4' with the number '3' next to it points down to a horizontal line. From this line, a circle labeled 'U' with the number '6' next to it points right into a series of five boxes: 'Clear back (BITE 25)', 'Channel release', 'Credit card reject', 'Signalling failure', and 'BITE Z'. Below the 'Credit card reject' box, the letters 'SP' are present. Below the 'Clear back (BITE 25)', 'Channel release', and 'Signalling failure' boxes, there are three boxes labeled 'Clear forward (FITE 22)'. Arrows from these three boxes point down to a horizontal line. From this line, a circle labeled '4' with the number '3' next to it points down to the bottom of the timeline. The text 'T1142380-92/d07' is located in the bottom right corner of the diagram area.
+
+Flowchart showing logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls).
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1152 (sheet 7 of 7)
+**Logic procedures for incoming INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (air-to-ground calls)**
+
+4.2 The MSSC attempts to assign a satellite channel to the call, and tests for continuity of the channel. National network congestion (BITE 12) signal is returned if no channel is available. Appropriate signals are returned to signify continuity failure and AES busy conditions.
+
+4.3 Answer signal is returned when the connect message is received from the AES.
+
+4.4 The call is cleared down in the usual manner, on receipt of either clear forward from the interworking process, or channel release from the AES.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Idle0([0
+Idle]) --> Activate[/Activate
+outgoing
+INMARSAT/]
+ Activate --> AwaitCPCI([1
+Await
+CPCI])
+ AwaitCPCI --> CPCI1719[/CPCI
+(FITE 17-19)/]
+ AwaitCPCI --> ClearForward1[/Clear
+forward
+(FITE 22)/]
+ AwaitCPCI --> FITEZ1[/FITE Z/]
+ CPCI1719 --> AwaitDigits([2
+Await
+digits])
+ ClearForward1 --> Idle0_2([0
+Idle])
+ FITEZ1 --> Idle0_2
+ AwaitDigits --> Digit[/Digit
+(FITE 1)/]
+ AwaitDigits --> ClearForward2[/Clear
+forward
+(FITE 22)/]
+ AwaitDigits --> FITEZ2[/FITE Z/]
+ Digit --> MoreDigits{More
+digits?}
+ ClearForward2 --> Idle0_3([0
+Idle])
+ FITEZ2 --> Idle0_3
+ MoreDigits -- Yes --> AwaitDigits
+ MoreDigits -- No --> NumberValid{Number valid?}
+ NumberValid -- No --> Unalloc[/Unalloc.
+number
+(BITE 15)/]
+ NumberValid -- Yes --> FindChannel[/Find
+channel/]
+ Unalloc --> Idle0_4([0
+Idle])
+ FindChannel --> AwaitChannel([3
+Await
+channel])
+
+```
+
+The flowchart illustrates the logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (ground-to-air-calls). It begins with an 'Idle' state (0), followed by an input/output action 'Activate outgoing INMARSAT', leading to state '1 Await CPCI'. From here, three paths are possible: 'CPCI (FITE 17-19)' leading to state '2 Await digits', or 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' or 'FITE Z' both leading back to an 'Idle' state (0). From '2 Await digits', three paths are possible: 'Digit (FITE 1)' leading to a 'More digits?' decision, or 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' or 'FITE Z' both leading to an 'Idle' state (0). If 'More digits?' is 'Yes', it loops back to '2 Await digits'. If 'No', it proceeds to a 'Number valid?' decision. If 'No', it goes to 'Unalloc. number (BITE 15)' and then to 'Idle' (0). If 'Yes', it goes to 'Find channel' and then to state '3 Await channel'.
+
+Flowchart for logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (ground-to-air-calls).
+
+T1142390-92/d08
+
+NOTE – Number valid? means is the AES in the region of the calling GES; i.e. logged on the same satellite.
+
+FIGURE 2/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 4)
+
+**Logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling
+(ground-to-air-calls)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start3((3 Await channel)) --> J1(( ))
+ J1 --> A1{Channel assigned (SPITE 14)}
+ J1 --> A2{No channel}
+ J1 --> A3{Clear forward (FITE 22)}
+ J1 --> A4{FITE Z}
+ A1 -- SP --> S1{Setup satellite channel}
+ A2 -- SP --> S2{Channel unavailable (BITE 12)}
+ A3 --> S3{Deassign channel}
+ A4 --> S3
+ S2 --> S3
+ S3 -- SP --> Idle0((0 Idle))
+ S1 --> S4((4 Await continuity))
+ S4 --> Q3((Q 3))
+ Q3 --> S5{Continuity OK}
+ S5 --> S6{Address complete (BITE 5)}
+ S6 --> S7((5 Await answer))
+ S7 --> T4((T 4))
+ T4 --> End4((4 T1143200-92/d09))
+
+```
+
+The flowchart illustrates the logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (ground-to-air-calls). It begins at state 3, 'Await channel', which leads to a decision point. From this point, four paths are possible: 'Channel assigned (SPITE 14)', 'No channel', 'Clear forward (FITE 22)', and 'FITE Z'. The 'Channel assigned' path leads to 'Setup satellite channel', which then leads to state 4, 'Await continuity'. The 'No channel' path leads to 'Channel unavailable (BITE 12)', which then leads to 'Deassign channel'. The 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' and 'FITE Z' paths both lead to 'Deassign channel'. From 'Deassign channel', the path leads to state 0, 'Idle'. From state 4, 'Await continuity', the path leads to a connector 'Q 3', which then leads to 'Continuity OK'. From 'Continuity OK', the path leads to 'Address complete (BITE 5)', which then leads to state 5, 'Await answer'. From state 5, the path leads to a connector 'T 4', which then leads to the end state 4, 'T1143200-92/d09'.
+
+Flowchart showing logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (ground-to-air-calls).
+
+FIGURE 2/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 4)
+**Logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling
+ (ground-to-air-calls)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Q2((Q 2)) --> CF[Clear forward
+(FITE 22)]
+ Q2 --> AB[AES busy]
+ Q2 --> FZ[FITE Z]
+ Q2 --> CFail[Continuity failure]
+ AB --> SB{Subscriber busy
+(BITE 16)}
+ CFail --> DOS{Dest. out of service
+(BITE 17)}
+ CF --> J1((1 4))
+ SB --> J1
+ FZ --> J1
+ DOS --> J1
+ J1 --> SL[Set loc. & cause fields]
+ SL --> CR[Channel release]
+ CR --> AC{Await channel cleared
+7}
+ AC --> CC[Channel cleared]
+ CC --> DC{Deassign channel}
+ DC --> SP[SP]
+ SP --> IDLE{Idle
+0}
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (ground-to-air-calls). The process starts at connector 'Q 2', branches through 'Clear forward (FITE 22)', 'AES busy' (leading to 'Subscriber busy (BITE 16)'), 'FITE Z', and 'Continuity failure' (leading to 'Dest. out of service (BITE 17)'). All paths converge at connector '1 4'. The subsequent steps are: 'Set loc. & cause fields', 'Channel release', 'Await channel cleared' (connector '7'), 'Channel cleared', 'Deassign channel', and finally 'Idle' (connector '0'). A 'SP' marker is present between 'Deassign channel' and 'Idle'. A vertical line on the left is labeled 'Q' at the top, '2' near the start, and '1' near the convergence point. A small '4' is near connector '1'.
+
+T1142400-92/d10
+
+FIGURE 2/Q.1152 (sheet 3 of 4)
+**Logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling
+ (ground-to-air-calls)**
+
+
+
+The flowchart illustrates the logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (ground-to-air-calls). It is divided into two main sections by a horizontal line, with a vertical timeline on the left indicating time intervals T, 2, 1, and 1,2.
+
+**Top Section (T to 1):**
+
+- Starts at point **T** (circle with 'T' and subscript 2).
+- Branches into five parallel paths:
+ - Connect** (parallelogram) → **Answer (BITE 22)** (parallelogram) → **Connected** (oval with subscript 6).
+ - Clear forward (FITE 22)** (parallelogram).
+ - FITE Z** (parallelogram).
+ - AES carrier off** (parallelogram) → **Clear back (BITE 25)** (parallelogram) → point **1** (circle with '1' and subscript 3).
+ - Channel release** (parallelogram) → point **2** (circle with '2' and subscript 4).
+- Arrows from **Clear forward (FITE 22)**, **FITE Z**, and **Clear back (BITE 25)** converge at point **1** (circle with '1' and subscript 3).
+
+**Bottom Section (1 to 1,2):**
+
+- From **Connected** (oval with subscript 6), the path branches into three parallel paths:
+ - FITE Z** (parallelogram).
+ - Clear forward (FITE 22)** (parallelogram) → point **1** (circle with '1' and subscript 3).
+ - Channel release** (parallelogram) → point **2** (circle with '2' and subscript 4).
+- An arrow from **FITE Z** points to the path between **Clear forward (FITE 22)** and **Channel release**.
+
+**Other elements:**
+
+- Point **7** (oval with subscript 7) contains the text "Await channel cleared".
+- Text "T1143210-92/d11" is located near point 7.
+
+Flowchart of logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling (ground-to-air-calls).
+
+FIGURE 2/Q.1152 (sheet 4 of 4)
+**Logic procedures for outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical signalling
+(ground-to-air-calls)**
+
+## 5 Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system with itself
+
+Figure 3 contains the procedures for interworking between the incoming and outgoing procedures of the INMARSAT aeronautical system. These procedures may also apply for interworking between INMARSAT aeronautical and the Standard-A and Standard-B systems.
+
+The following details should be noted:
+
+- 5.1 The outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical logic process is activated after receipt of the calling party category information, indicating whether the call is ordinary or priority.
+- 5.2 The called party address, excluding the INMARSAT country code, is transferred to the outgoing process. The process returns to idle on receipt of any unsuccessful BITE or the clear forward FITE.
+- 5.3 The call is cleared as normal, on either clearforward FITE or clearback BITE signals.
+- 5.4 The interworking procedure supervises the answer time (timer t1). The value of the timer is as follows:
+ $t1 = 2$ to $4$ minutes (as per 4.3.1/Q.118).
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 0_Idle([0 Idle]) --> A[Activate interwork procedure]
+ A --> 1_AwaitCPCI([1 Await CPCI])
+ 1_AwaitCPCI --> CPCI1718_1[CPCI (FITE 17, 18)]
+ CPCI1718_1 --> Outgoing[Activate outgoing INMARSAT]
+ Outgoing --> CPCI1718_2[CPCI (FITE 17, 18)]
+ CPCI1718_2 --> 2_AwaitAddrComplete([2 Await address complete])
+ 2_AwaitAddrComplete --> AC[Address complete (BITE 5)]
+ 2_AwaitAddrComplete --> U[Unsuccess. (BITE 12, 16, 17, 20)]
+ 2_AwaitAddrComplete --> CF[Clear forward (FITE 22)]
+ 2_AwaitAddrComplete --> D1[Digit (FITE 1)]
+ AC --> AC_D{{Address complete (BITE 5)}}
+ U --> U_D{{Unsuccess. (BITE 12, 16, 17, 20)}}
+ CF --> CF_D{{Clear forward (FITE 22)}}
+ D1 --> CC{Country code FITE?}
+ CC -- Yes --> OCF[Omit country code FITE]
+ CC -- No --> D2[Digit (FITE 1)]
+ OCF --> 2_AwaitAddrComplete
+ D2 --> 2_AwaitAddrComplete
+ AC_D --> T1[Start t1 (2-4 min)]
+ T1 --> 3_AwaitAnswer([3 Await answer])
+ U_D --> 0_Idle2([0 idle])
+ CF_D --> 2_AwaitAddrComplete
+
+```
+
+T1155890-93/d12
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system with itself. The process starts at state '0 Idle', proceeds through 'Activate interwork procedure', state '1 Await CPCI', 'CPCI (FITE 17, 18)', 'Activate outgoing INMARSAT', 'CPCI (FITE 17, 18)', and state '2 Await address complete'. From there, it branches into four paths: 'Address complete (BITE 5)' leading to 'Start t1 (2-4 min)' and state '3 Await answer'; 'Unsuccess. (BITE 12, 16, 17, 20)' leading to state '0 idle'; 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' leading to state '2 Await address complete'; and 'Digit (FITE 1)' leading to a decision 'Country code FITE?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Omit country code FITE' and then to state '2 Await address complete'. If 'No', it goes to 'Digit (FITE 1)' and then to state '2 Await address complete'. The diagram is labeled T1155890-93/d12.
+
+FIGURE 3/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 2)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system with itself**
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD
+ 3([3 Await answer]) --- L1[ ]
+ L1 --- A1>Answer BITE 22]
+ L1 --- CF1>Clear forward FITE 22]
+ L1 --- E>Expiry of t1]
+ L1 --- CB1>Clear back BITE 25]
+ A1 --> S1[Stop t1]
+ S1 --> A2{Answer BITE 22}
+ A2 --> 4([4 Answered])
+ CF1 --> S2[Stop t1]
+ S2 --> CF2{Clear forward FITE 22}
+ CF2 --> 0_1([0 Idle])
+ E --> RI{Release incoming BITE 29}
+ RI --> CF3{Clear forward FITE 22}
+ CF3 --> 0_2([0 Idle])
+ CB1 --> S3[Stop t1]
+ S3 --> CB2{Clear back BITE 25}
+ CB2 --> 0_3([0 Idle])
+ 4 --- L2[ ]
+ L2 --- CF4>Clear forward FITE 22]
+ L2 --- CB3>Clear back BITE 25]
+ CF4 --> CF5{Clear forward FITE 22}
+ CF5 --> 0_4([0 Idle])
+ CB3 --> CB4{Clear back BITE 25}
+ CB4 --> 0_5([0 Idle])
+ style L1 width:0px,height:0px
+ style L2 width:0px,height:0px
+ T1155900-93/d13
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system with itself. It starts at state '3 Await answer' and branches into four paths: 'Answer (BITE 22)', 'Clear forward (FITE 22)', 'Expiry of t1', and 'Clear back (BITE 25)'. The 'Answer' path leads to 'Stop t1' then 'Answer (BITE 22)' to state '4 Answered'. The 'Clear forward' path leads to 'Stop t1' then 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' to state '0 Idle'. The 'Expiry of t1' path leads to 'Release incoming (BITE 29)' then 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' to state '0 Idle'. The 'Clear back' path leads to 'Stop t1' then 'Clear back (BITE 25)' to state '0 Idle'. From state '4 Answered', it branches to 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' and 'Clear back (BITE 25)', which both lead to 'Clear forward (FITE 22)' and 'Clear back (BITE 25)' respectively, both ending at state '0 Idle'. A small text 'T1155900-93/d13' is present near the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+FIGURE 3/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 2)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system with itself**
+
+## 6 Interworking of incoming INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System R2
+
+6.1 Figure 4 contains the procedures for interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System R2.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 0((0 Idle)) --> A[/Activate interwork procedure/]
+ A --> 1((1 Await CPCI FITE))
+ 1 --> F17[/FITE 17/]
+ 1 --> F18[/FITE 18/]
+ F17 --> B[/Activate outgoing R2/]
+ F18 --> B
+ B --> C{Which CPCI FITE?}
+ C -- 17 --> F16[/FITE 16/]
+ C -- 18 --> F18b[/FITE 18/]
+ F16 --> D{SPITE 22?}
+ F18b --> D
+ D -- Yes --> E{SPITE 21?}
+ D -- No --> F22[/FITE 22/]
+ F22 --> G{SPITE 21?}
+ G -- Yes --> F7[/FITE 7/]
+ G -- No --> F4[/FITE 4/]
+ G -- No --> F5[/FITE 5/]
+ E -- Yes --> F8[/FITE 8/]
+ E -- No --> F7
+ F4 --> 2((2 Await address complete))
+ F5 --> 2
+ F7 --> 2
+ F8 --> 2
+ T1155910-93/d14
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System R2. The process starts at '0 Idle', followed by 'Activate interwork procedure', then '1 Await CPCI FITE'. It branches into 'FITE 17' and 'FITE 18', then 'Activate outgoing R2'. A decision 'Which CPCI FITE?' leads to 'FITE 16' (path 17) or 'FITE 18' (path 18). Both lead to 'SPITE 22?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'SPITE 21?'. If 'No', it goes to 'FITE 22'. From 'FITE 22', it goes to 'SPITE 21?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'FITE 7'. If 'No', it goes to 'FITE 4' or 'FITE 5'. All paths (FITE 7, FITE 8, FITE 4, FITE 5) lead to '2 Await address complete'. A small code 'T1155910-93/d14' is present near the end.
+
+FIGURE 4/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System R2**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([2 Await address complete]) --> FITE1_1[FITE 1]
+ Start --> BITE56[BITE 5, 6]
+ Start --> BITE2[BITE 2]
+ Start --> BITE1113151720[BITE 11-13, 15-17, 20]
+ Start --> FITE22_1[FITE 22]
+ BITE56 --> BITE5[BITE 5]
+ BITE2 --> BITE27[BITE 27]
+ BITE1113151720 --> BITE1113151720_2[BITE 11-13, 15-17, 20]
+ FITE22_1 --> FITE22_2[FITE 22]
+ BITE5 --> CountryCode{Country code FITE?}
+ BITE27 --> StartT1[Start t1
+(2-4 min)]
+ BITE1113151720_2 --> Idle_1([0 Idle])
+ FITE22_2 --> FITE22_3[FITE 22]
+ CountryCode -- Yes --> StartT1
+ CountryCode -- No --> SPITE22{SPITE 22?}
+ SPITE22 -- Yes --> FITE1_2[FITE 1]
+ SPITE22 -- No --> OmitCountryCode[Omit country code FITE]
+ FITE1_2 --> Start([2 Await address complete])
+ OmitCountryCode --> FITE1_3[FITE 1]
+ FITE1_3 --> Start([2 Await address complete])
+ StartT1 --> AwaitAnswer([3 Await answer])
+ AwaitAnswer --> BITE21[BITE 21]
+ AwaitAnswer --> ExpiryT1[Expiry of t1]
+ AwaitAnswer --> FITE22_4[FITE 22]
+ BITE21 --> BITE22[BITE 22]
+ ExpiryT1 --> BITE29[BITE 29]
+ ExpiryT1 --> StopT1_1[Stop t1]
+ FITE22_4 --> FITE22_5[FITE 22]
+ BITE22 --> StopT1_2[Stop t1]
+ BITE29 --> Answered([4 Answered])
+ StopT1_1 --> FITE22_6[FITE 22]
+ StopT1_1 --> Idle_2([0 Idle])
+ StopT1_2 --> Answered
+ Answered --> FITE22_7[FITE 22]
+ Answered --> BITE25[BITE 25]
+ FITE22_7 --> FITE22_8[FITE 22]
+ FITE22_8 --> Idle_3([0 Idle])
+ BITE25 --> StartT2[Start t2]
+ StartT2 --> ClearBack([5 Clear back])
+ StartT2 --> Idle_4([0 Idle])
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System R2. The process starts with 'Await address complete' (2), leading to a sequence of messages: FITE 1, BITE 5, 6, BITE 2, BITE 11-13, 15-17, 20, and FITE 22. A decision 'Country code FITE?' follows. If 'Yes', it leads to 'Start t1 (2-4 min)' and then 'Await answer' (3). If 'No', it leads to 'SPITE 22?'. If 'SPITE 22?' is 'Yes', it leads to 'FITE 1' and back to 'Await address complete' (2). If 'SPITE 22?' is 'No', it leads to 'Omit country code FITE', then 'FITE 1', and back to 'Await address complete' (2). From 'Await answer' (3), the sequence continues with BITE 21, 'Expiry of t1', and FITE 22. 'Expiry of t1' leads to 'BITE 29' and 'Stop t1', which then leads to 'Answered' (4). 'Answered' (4) leads to 'FITE 22' and 'BITE 25'. 'BITE 25' leads to 'Start t2' and then 'Clear back' (5). 'FITE 22' from 'Answered' leads to 'FITE 22' and then 'Idle' (0). 'Start t2' also leads to 'Idle' (0). 'BITE 11-13, 15-17, 20' from the initial sequence leads to 'Idle' (0).
+
+T1155920-93/d15
+
+FIGURE 4/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System R2**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 5((5 Clear back)) --> BITE21[BITE 21]
+ 5 --> FITE22_1[FITE 22]
+ 5 --> Expiry[Expiry of t2]
+ BITE21 --> StopT2_1[Stop t2]
+ FITE22_1 --> StopT2_2[Stop t2]
+ Expiry --> BITE25[BITE 25]
+ StopT2_1 --> 4((4 Answered))
+ StopT2_2 --> FITE22_2[FITE 22]
+ BITE25 --> FITE22_2
+ FITE22_2 --> 0((0 Idle))
+
+```
+
+T1155930-93/d 16
+
+Flowchart illustrating the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System R2. The process starts at state 5 (Clear back), which branches into three parallel paths: BITE 21, FITE 22, and Expiry of t2. BITE 21 leads to Stop t2, which then leads to state 4 (Answered). FITE 22 leads to Stop t2, which then leads to FITE 22, which then leads to state 0 (Idle). Expiry of t2 leads to BITE 25, which then leads to FITE 22, which then leads to state 0 (Idle).
+
+FIGURE 4/Q.1152 (sheet 3 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system
+ to Signalling System R2**
+
+6.2 The interworking procedure supervises the answer time and the clearback time, with timers t1 and t2 respectively. The values of the timers are as follows:
+
+t1 = 2 to 4 minutes (as per 4.3.1/Q.118)
+
+t2 = 1 to 2 minutes (as per 4.3.2/Q.118).
+
+## 7 Interworking of Signalling System R2 to outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical
+
+7.1 Figure 5 contains the procedures for interworking of Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system.
+
+7.2 The ringing tone towards the calling subscriber of the fixed network is initiated by the interworking procedure. The tone should have characteristics in accordance with Recommendation Q.35.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Idle0_1((0 Idle)) --> A[Activate interwork procedure]
+ A --> B[Activate outgoing INMARSAT]
+ B --> AwaitCPCI((1 Await CPCI FITE))
+ AwaitCPCI --> FITE14[/FITE 14/]
+ AwaitCPCI --> FITE16[/FITE 16/]
+ AwaitCPCI --> FITE18_1[/FITE 18/]
+ AwaitCPCI --> FITE22_1[/FITE 22/]
+ FITE14 --> FITE17_1[/FITE 17/]
+ FITE16 --> FITE17_2[/FITE 17/]
+ FITE18_1 --> FITE18_2[/FITE 18/]
+ FITE22_1 --> FITE22_2[/FITE 22/]
+ FITE17_1 --> AwaitDigits2((2 Await digits))
+ FITE17_2 --> AwaitDigits2
+ FITE18_2 --> AwaitDigits2
+ FITE22_2 --> Idle0_2((0 Idle))
+ AwaitDigits2 --> FITE1_1[/FITE 1/]
+ AwaitDigits2 --> FITE22_3[/FITE 22/]
+ FITE1_1 --> CountryCode{Country code FITE?}
+ CountryCode -- Yes --> AwaitAddress((3 Await address complete))
+ CountryCode -- No --> FITE1_2[/FITE 1/]
+ FITE1_2 --> LastDigit{Last digit?}
+ LastDigit -- Yes --> AwaitAddress
+ LastDigit -- No --> AwaitDigits2
+ FITE22_3 --> FITE22_4[/FITE 22/]
+ FITE22_4 --> Idle0_3((0 Idle))
+ T1_155940_93_d17[T1 155940-93/d17]
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical system. The process starts at state '0 Idle', proceeds through 'Activate interwork procedure' and 'Activate outgoing INMARSAT' to state '1 Await CPCI FITE'. It then branches through FITE 14, 16, 18, and 22, followed by FITE 17, 17, 18, and 22 respectively, leading to state '2 Await digits'. From there, it branches through FITE 1 and FITE 22. FITE 1 leads to a decision 'Country code FITE?'. If 'Yes', it goes to state '3 Await address complete'. If 'No', it goes through FITE 1 to another decision 'Last digit?'. If 'Yes', it goes to state '3 Await address complete'. If 'No', it goes to state '2 Await digits'. FITE 22 leads to another FITE 22 block, which then leads to state '0 Idle'. A reference 'T1 155940-93/d17' is noted near the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 5/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 2)
+**Interworking of Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical system**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ S3((3 Await address complete)) --> B12_15_17_20_1[BITE 12, 15-17, 20]
+ S3 --> F22_1[FITE 22]
+ S3 --> B5_1[BITE 5]
+ B12_15_17_20_1 --> B12_15_17_20_2{BITE 12, 15-17, 20}
+ F22_1 --> F22_2{FITE 22}
+ B5_1 --> B5_2{BITE 5}
+ B12_15_17_20_2 --> S0_1((0 Idle))
+ F22_2 --> S0_1
+ B5_2 --> SPITE6[SPITE 6 Ring tone]
+ SPITE6 --> S4((4 Await answer))
+ S4 --> B22_1[BITE 22]
+ S4 --> F22_3[FITE 22]
+ B22_1 --> B21{BITE 21}
+ F22_3 --> F22_4{FITE 22}
+ B21 --> SPITE7[SPITE 7 Ring tone]
+ F22_4 --> S0_2((0 Idle))
+ SPITE7 --> S5((5 Answered))
+ S5 --> B25_1[BITE 25]
+ S5 --> F22_5[FITE 22]
+ B25_1 --> B25_2{BITE 25}
+ F22_5 --> F22_6{FITE 22}
+ B25_2 --> S0_3((0 Idle))
+ F22_6 --> S0_3
+ T1155950-93/d18
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical system. The process starts at state 3 (Await address complete) and branches into two paths. The left path involves BITE 12, 15-17, 20 and FITE 22 leading to state 0 (Idle). The right path involves BITE 5, SPITE 6 (Ring tone), state 4 (Await answer), BITE 22, FITE 22, BITE 21, FITE 22, SPITE 7 (Ring tone), state 5 (Answered), BITE 25, FITE 22, BITE 25, FITE 22, and finally state 0 (Idle). A reference code T1155950-93/d18 is present near the end of the right path.
+
+FIGURE 5/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 2)
+**Interworking of Signalling System R2 to INMARSAT aeronautical system**
+
+## **8 Interworking of incoming INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System No. 7 (TUP)**
+
+Figure 6 contains the procedures for interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 7 (TUP).
+
+The following details should be noted:
+
+**8.1** The outgoing Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) is activated only after receipt of calling party category information.
+
+**8.2** Signals to inform whether continuity checking is required on the terrestrial link, whether an incoming half-echo suppressor should be inserted, and whether country code digits will be sent along with the called party address, are sent to the ISC. The ISC is also informed that continuity has been proven on the satellite link.
+
+**8.3** All address-complete backward signals are transferred through to the outgoing aeronautical procedure. The charge related information is interpreted and used by the MSSC for billing purposes, and a simple address complete message is sent to the AES.
+
+**8.4** All unsuccessful call indications received from the ISC are relayed to the INMARSAT system, by means of the call attempt result message with the cause value set appropriately.
+
+**8.5** Charge information contained in the answer message is again used by the MSSC for billing purposes.
+
+**8.6** Answer and clearback supervision is done by the MSSC with timers t1 and t2 respectively. The values of the timers are as follows:
+
+t1 = 2 to 4 minutes (as per 4.3.1/Q.118)
+
+t2 = 1 to 2 minutes (as per 4.3.2/Q.118).
+
+## **9 Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical**
+
+Figure 7 contains the procedures for interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system.
+
+The following details should be noted:
+
+**9.1** Calling party category information indicating the nature and priority of the call, is transferred through to the aeronautical system. The operator language indicator is interpreted and used by the MSSC.
+
+**9.2** The entire called party address, except the country code digits, are transferred through to the aeronautical system. The outgoing aeronautical logic process determines the validity of the addressed AES, and returns an unsuccessful call indication if necessary.
+
+**9.3** The call may also be aborted if:
+
+- no satellite voice channels are available;
+- the addressed AES subscriber is busy;
+- the continuity check is unsuccessful.
+
+**9.4** The MSSC returns audible ring tone, as per provisions in Recommendation Q.35, to the terrestrial network. The tone is applied on receipt of the address complete message from the AES, and removed upon receipt of the connect message.
+
+Connector reference
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD; subgraph Sheet1 [Sheet 1]; 0_0((0 Idle)); 0_0 --> 0_1[/Activate interwork procedure/]; 0_1 --> 0_2((1 Await CPCI FITE)); 0_2 --> 0_3[/FITE 17, 18/]; 0_3 --> 0_4[/Activate outgoing No. 7 TUP/]; 0_4 --> 0_5[/FITE 17, 18/]; 0_5 --> 0_6{SPITE 36?}; 0_6 -- Yes --> 0_7[/FITE 26/]; 0_6 -- No --> 0_8[/FITE 25/]; 0_7 --> 0_9[/FITE 24/]; 0_8 --> 0_9; 0_9 --> 0_10[/FITE 21/]; 0_10 --> 0_11((1)); end; subgraph Sheet2 [Sheet 2]; 1_0((1)); 1_0 --> 1_1{SPITE 22?}; 1_1 -- Transit --> 1_2[/FITE 3/]; 1_1 -- Terminal --> 1_3[/FITE 2/]; 1_2 --> 1_4{SPITE 21?}; 1_3 --> 1_4; 1_4 -- Req. --> 1_5[/FITE 5/]; 1_4 -- Not req. --> 1_6[/FITE 4/]; 1_5 --> 1_7((2 Await address complete)); 1_6 --> 1_7; end; 0_11 -- Connector reference --> 1_0;
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 7 TUP. The flow starts at state '0 Idle', proceeds through 'Activate interwork procedure', 'Await CPCI FITE', 'FITE 17, 18', 'Activate outgoing No. 7 TUP', 'FITE 17, 18', then a decision 'SPITE 36?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'FITE 26'; if 'No', it goes to 'FITE 25'. Both lead to 'FITE 24' then 'FITE 21', ending at connector '1'. A second connector '1' leads to decision 'SPITE 22?'. If 'Transit', it goes to 'FITE 3'; if 'Terminal', it goes to 'FITE 2'. Both lead to decision 'SPITE 21?'. If 'Req.', it goes to 'FITE 5'; if 'Not req.', it goes to 'FITE 4'. Both lead to state '2 Await address complete'.
+
+T1155960-93/d19
+
+FIGURE 6/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 7 TUP**
+
+
+
+Connector reference
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([2 Await address complete]) --> A((A))
+ A --> FITE1_1{{FITE 1}}
+ A --> BITE234{{BITE 2, 3, 4}}
+ A --> BITE57_1{{BITE 5-7}}
+ A --> BITE31{{BITE 31}}
+ FITE1_1 --> CC{Country code FITE?}
+ CC -- Yes --> SPITE22{SPITE 22?}
+ CC -- No --> FITE1_2{{FITE 1}}
+ SPITE22 -- Transit --> FITE1_2
+ SPITE22 -- Terminal --> Omit[Omit country code FITE]
+ Omit --> FITE1_2
+ FITE1_2 --> Start2([2 Await address complete])
+ BITE234 --> BITE27{{BITE 27}}
+ BITE27 --> StartT1{{Start t1 (2-4 min)}}
+ StartT1 --> Start3([3 Await answer])
+ BITE57_1 --> BITE57_2{{BITE 5-7}}
+ BITE31 --> SPITE48{{SPITE 48}}
+ SPITE48 --> FITE31{{FITE 31}}
+ FITE31 --> Start4([2 Await address complete])
+ Start2 --> A
+ Start3 --> A
+ BITE57_2 --> A
+ Start4 --> A
+ A --> BITE910[{{BITE 9, 10, 12, 14-17, 19, 20, 35, 36}}]
+ BITE910 --> FITE22_1{{FITE 22}}
+ FITE22_1 --> BITE910_2[{{BITE 9, 10, 12, 14-17, 19, 20, 35, 36}}]
+ BITE910_2 --> FITE22_2{{FITE 22}}
+ FITE22_2 --> Idle([0 Idle])
+ T1155970-93/d20
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 7 TUP. The process starts with 'Await address complete' (2) leading to connector 'A'. From 'A', it branches into four parallel paths: 1) FITE 1 -> Country code FITE? (Yes leads to SPITE 22?, No leads to FITE 1) -> SPITE 22? (Transit leads to FITE 1, Terminal leads to Omit country code FITE) -> FITE 1 -> Await address complete (2). 2) BITE 2, 3, 4 -> BITE 27 -> Start t1 (2-4 min) -> Await answer (3). 3) BITE 5-7 -> BITE 5-7. 4) BITE 31 -> SPITE 48 -> FITE 31 -> Await address complete (2). All four paths converge to connector 'A'. From 'A', the flow goes to BITE 9, 10, 12, 14-17, 19, 20, 35, 36 -> FITE 22 -> BITE 9, 10, 12, 14-17, 19, 20, 35, 36 -> FITE 22 -> Idle (0).
+
+FIGURE 6/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 7 TUP**
+
+
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> 3 : Await answer
+ 3 --> BITE_22_23 : BITE 22, 23
+ 3 --> Expiry_of_t1 : Expiry of t1
+ 3 --> FITE_22 : FITE 22
+ 3 --> BITE_10_12_19 : BITE 10, 12, 19
+ BITE_22_23 --> BITE_22 : BITE 22
+ Expiry_of_t1 --> BITE_29 : BITE 29
+ FITE_22 --> Stop_t1 : Stop t1
+ BITE_10_12_19 --> BITE_29 : BITE 29
+ BITE_22 --> Stop_t1 : Stop t1
+ Stop_t1 --> 4 : Answered
+ BITE_29 --> FITE_22 : FITE 22
+ FITE_22 --> 0 : Idle
+ 4 --> BITE_25 : BITE 25
+ 4 --> FITE_22 : FITE 22
+ BITE_25 --> Start_t2 : Start t2 (1-2 min)
+ FITE_22 --> FITE_22 : FITE 22
+ Start_t2 --> 5 : Clear back
+ FITE_22 --> 0 : Idle
+ 5 --> FITE_22 : FITE 22
+ 5 --> Expiry_of_t2 : Expiry of t2
+ 5 --> BITE_24 : BITE 24
+ FITE_22 --> Stop_t2 : Stop t2
+ Expiry_of_t2 --> BITE_25 : BITE 25
+ BITE_24 --> Stop_t2 : Stop t2
+ Stop_t2 --> 4 : Answered
+ BITE_25 --> FITE_22 : FITE 22
+ FITE_22 --> 0 : Idle
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 7 TUP. The diagram starts at state '3 Await answer' and branches based on events: BITE 22, 23; Expiry of t1; FITE 22; and BITE 10, 12, 19. It includes intermediate states like '4 Answered', '5 Clear back', and '0 Idle', and transitions like 'Stop t1', 'Start t2 (1-2 min)', and 'Stop t2'.
+
+T1155980-93/d21
+
+FIGURE 6/Q.1152 (sheet 3 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 7 TUP**
+
+
+
+Connector reference
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Idle0_1([0 Idle]) --> ActInt[Activate interwork procedure]
+ ActInt --> AwaitCPCI1([1 Await CPCI FITE])
+ AwaitCPCI1 --> FITE1718_1[/FITE 17, 18/]
+ AwaitCPCI1 --> FITE22_1[/FITE 22/]
+ AwaitCPCI1 --> FITE30[/FITE 30/]
+ FITE1718_1 --> ActOut[Activate outgoing INMARSAT]
+ ActOut --> FITE1718_2[/FITE 17, 18/]
+ FITE22_1 --> Idle0_2([0 Idle])
+ FITE30 --> AwaitCPCI2([1 Await CPCI FITE])
+ FITE1718_2 --> AwaitCont([2 Await continuity])
+ FITE22_1 --> FITE22_2[/FITE 22/]
+ FITE30 --> AwaitCont
+ AwaitCont --> FITE1[/FITE 1/]
+ AwaitCont --> FITE25[/FITE 25/]
+ AwaitCont --> FITE24[/FITE 24/]
+ AwaitCont --> FITE22_3[/FITE 22/]
+ FITE1 --> AnyFITE1{Any FITE 1 stored?}
+ FITE25 --> AnyFITE1
+ FITE24 --> AnyFITE1
+ FITE22_3 --> FITE22_4[/FITE 22/]
+ FITE22_4 --> Idle0_3([0 Idle])
+ AnyFITE1 -- No --> AwaitAddrComp3([3 Await address complete])
+ AnyFITE1 -- Yes --> CountryCode{Country code FITE?}
+ CountryCode -- Yes --> Omit[Omit country code FITE]
+ Omit --> FITE1_2[/FITE 1/]
+ CountryCode -- No --> FITE1_2
+ FITE1_2 --> Connector2_1((2 1))
+ Connector2_1 --> Idle0_1
+ Connector2_2((2)) --> LastDigit{Last digit?}
+ LastDigit -- No --> Connector3_1((3 1))
+ LastDigit -- Yes --> AwaitAddrComp2([3 Await address complete])
+ Connector3_2((3)) --> AwaitAddrComp3
+ T115599093d22[T1155990-93/d22]
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 TUP to INMARSAT aeronautical system. The process starts at state '0 Idle', proceeds through 'Activate interwork procedure' to state '1 Await CPCI FITE'. From there, it branches into three paths: 'FITE 17, 18' leading to 'Activate outgoing INMARSAT' then 'FITE 17, 18'; 'FITE 22' leading to state '0 Idle'; and 'FITE 30' leading to state '1 Await CPCI FITE'. All three paths converge to state '2 Await continuity'. From '2 Await continuity', it branches into 'FITE 1', 'FITE 25', 'FITE 24', and 'FITE 22'. 'FITE 1', 'FITE 25', and 'FITE 24' lead to a decision 'Any FITE 1 stored?'. If 'No', it goes to state '3 Await address complete'. If 'Yes', it goes to a decision 'Country code FITE?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Omit country code FITE' then to 'FITE 1' leading to connector '2' (reference 1). If 'No', it goes to 'FITE 1' leading to connector '2' (reference 1). 'FITE 22' leads to 'FITE 22' then to state '0 Idle'. A separate loop starts at connector '2', goes to decision 'Last digit?'. If 'No', it goes to connector '3' (reference 1). If 'Yes', it goes to state '3 Await address complete'. A small diagram on the right shows connector '3' leading to state '3 Await address complete'. A text label 'T1155990-93/d22' is at the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 7/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 2)
+**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 TUP to INMARSAT aeronautical system**
+
+Connector reference
+
+
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> S3_1: 3 Await address complete
+ S3_1 --> BITE5: BITE 5
+ BITE5 --> BITE5_in: BITE 5
+ BITE5_in --> SPITE6: SPITE 6 Ring tone
+ SPITE6 --> S4: 4 Await answer
+ S4 --> BITE22_1: BITE 22
+ BITE22_1 --> BITE22_in: BITE 22
+ BITE22_in --> SPITE7: SPITE 7 Ring tone
+ SPITE7 --> S5: 5 Answered
+ S5 --> BITE25: BITE 25
+ BITE25 --> BITE25_in: BITE 25
+ BITE25_in --> Idle_0_1: 0 Idle
+
+ S3_1 --> FITE1: FITE 1
+ FITE1 --> S1: 1
+
+ S3_1 --> BITE12: BITE 12, 15-17, 20
+ BITE12 --> BITE12_in: BITE 12, 15-17, 20
+ BITE12_in --> Idle_0_2: 0 Idle
+
+ S3_1 --> FITE22_1: FITE 22
+ FITE22_1 --> FITE22_in: FITE 22
+ FITE22_in --> Idle_0_2
+
+ S3_1 --> FITE31: FITE 31
+ FITE31 --> S3_2: 3 Await address complete
+ S3_2 --> T1156000-93/d23: T1156000-93/d23
+
+```
+
+State transition diagram for the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 TUP to INMARSAT aeronautical system. The diagram shows three main call flow paths starting from 'Await address complete' (3). Path 1 (BITE 5) leads to 'SPITE 6 Ring tone' -> 'Await answer' (4) -> 'SPITE 7 Ring tone' -> 'Answered' (5) -> 'Idle' (0). Path 2 (BITE 12, 15-17, 20) leads to 'Idle' (0). Path 3 (FITE 31) leads to 'Await address complete' (3). Connector reference 1 is shown on the left side of the diagram.
+
+FIGURE 7/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 2)
+
+### Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 TUP to INMARSAT aeronautical system
+
+## 10 Interworking of incoming INMARSAT aeronautical to Signalling System No. 5
+
+Figure 8 contains the procedures for interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 5.
+
+**10.1** The outgoing Signalling System No. 5 procedure is activated after receipt of the calling party category information, in the access request message from the AES.
+
+**10.2** Either KP2 or KP1 signal is sent by the MSSC, depending on whether the country code is to be outpulsed or not, respectively.
+
+**10.3** The artificial “send-finished” signal, received from the outgoing Signalling System No. 5 procedure, is interpreted as an address complete condition to convey back to the AES.
+
+**10.4** The “busy-flash” signal (unsuccessful call) received from the terrestrial network is transferred to the AES by means of the call attempt result message.
+
+**10.5** Answer and clearback timeout supervision is done by the MSSC, with timers t1 and t2, respectively. The values of the timers are as follows:
+
+t1 = 2 to 4 minutes (as per 4.3.1/Q.118)
+
+t2 = 1 to 2 minutes (as per 4.3.2/Q.118).
+
+## 11 Interworking of Signalling System No. 5 to outgoing INMARSAT aeronautical
+
+Figure 9 contains the procedures for interworking of Signalling System No. 5 INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system.
+
+The following details should be noted:
+
+**11.1** The KP2 or KP1 signal is received from the MSSC, depending on whether the country code is to be expected along with the called party address or not, respectively.
+
+**11.2** The “busy-flash” signal is sent to the ISC if the call cannot be completed for any of the following reasons:
+
+- called AES subscriber is busy;
+- no satellite channel is available;
+- the continuity check is unsuccessful.
+
+The special information tone is sent back to the ISC, if the call is unsuccessful for any other reasons.
+
+**11.3** Answer and clearback signals received from the AES are conveyed through to the terrestrial network as soon as they are received, and there is no timeout supervision required.
+
+*Addendum* – A recent change in the INMARSAT signalling system definition allows cause information to be carried in the channel release signal, thereby making it unnecessary to send the call attempt result signal for unsuccessful calls. The interworking procedures in this Recommendation do not reflect this change.
+
+**12** Figure 10 contains the procedures for the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) to the INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system.
+
+**13** Figures 11, 12 and 13 contain the procedures for the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical signalling system to Signalling System No. 7.
+
+
+
+Connector reference
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 0_Idle([0 Idle]) --> Act_Interwork[Activate interwork procedure]
+ Act_Interwork --> 1_Await_CPCI([1 Await CPCI FITE])
+ 1_Await_CPCI --> FITE_17_18[FITE 17 | FITE 18]
+ FITE_17_18 --> Act_Outgoing[Activate outgoing No. 5]
+ Act_Outgoing --> FITE_17[FITE 17]
+ FITE_17 --> SPITE_22_1{SPITE 22?}
+ SPITE_22_1 -- No --> FITE_2[FITE 2]
+ SPITE_22_1 -- Yes --> FITE_3[FITE 3]
+ FITE_2 --> 2_Await_Address_1([2 Await address complete])
+ FITE_3 --> 2_Await_Address_1
+ 2_Await_Address_1 --> FITE_1_BITE_27_BITE_8_FITE_22_1[FITE 1 | BITE 27 | BITE 8 | FITE 22]
+ FITE_1 --> 2_1((2))
+ BITE_27 --> BITE_27_2[BITE 27]
+ BITE_8 --> BITE_8_2[BITE 8]
+ FITE_22 --> FITE_22_2[FITE 22]
+ BITE_27_2 --> 1_2((1))
+ BITE_8_2 --> 0_Idle_2([0 Idle])
+ FITE_22_2 --> T1156010-93/d24
+ T1156010-93/d24 --> 1((1))
+ 1 --> 2((2))
+ 2 --> Country_Code{Country code FITE?}
+ Country_Code -- Yes --> FITE_1_2[FITE 1]
+ Country_Code -- No --> SPITE_22_2{SPITE 22?}
+ SPITE_22_2 -- Yes --> FITE_1_2
+ SPITE_22_2 -- No --> Omit_Country[Omit country code FITE]
+ Omit_Country --> 2_Await_Address_2([2 Await address complete])
+ FITE_1_2 --> 2_Await_Address_2
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 5. The process starts at state '0 Idle', proceeds through 'Activate interwork procedure', 'Await CPCI FITE', and various FITE and BITE messages. It includes decision points for 'SPITE 22?' and 'Country code FITE?'. The flow ends at state '0 Idle' via connector '1'.
+
+FIGURE 8/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 3)
+
+### Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 5
+
+Connector reference
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 1((1)) --> Start_t1[Start t1
+(2-4 min)]
+ Start_t1 --> 3((3
+Await answer))
+ 3 --> BITE_22_1[BITE 22]
+ 3 --> FITE_22_1[FITE 22]
+ 3 --> Expiry_t1[Expiry t1]
+ 3 --> BITE_8_1[BITE 8]
+ BITE_22_1 --> BITE_22_2[BITE 22]
+ FITE_22_1 --> Stop_t1_1[Stop t1]
+ Expiry_t1 --> BITE_29[BITE 29]
+ BITE_8_1 --> BITE_8_2[BITE 8]
+ BITE_22_2 --> Stop_t1_2[Stop t1]
+ Stop_t1_1 --> FITE_22_2[FITE 22]
+ BITE_29 --> FITE_22_3[FITE 22]
+ BITE_8_2 --> Stop_t1_3[Stop t1]
+ Stop_t1_2 --> 4((4
+Answered))
+ FITE_22_2 --> 0_1((0
+Idle))
+ FITE_22_3 --> 0_1
+ Stop_t1_3 --> Start_t3[Start t3
+(20-30 s)]
+ Start_t3 --> 6((6
+Await clear forward))
+ 6 --> FITE_22_4[FITE 22]
+ 6 --> Expiry_t3[Expiry of t3]
+ FITE_22_4 --> Stop_t3[Stop t3]
+ Expiry_t3 --> BITE_25[BITE 25]
+ Stop_t3 --> 0_2((0
+Idle))
+ BITE_25 --> 0_2
+ 4 --> BITE_25_1[BITE 25]
+ 4 --> FITE_22_5[FITE 22]
+ BITE_25_1 --> Start_t2[Start t2
+(1-2 min)]
+ FITE_22_5 --> FITE_22_6[FITE 22]
+ Start_t2 --> 5((5
+Clearance))
+ FITE_22_6 --> 0_3((0
+Idle))
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 5. The process starts at connector 1, proceeds through various signaling states (Await answer, BITE 22, FITE 22, Expiry t1, BITE 8, Stop t1, BITE 29, Answered, Idle, Start t3, Await clear forward, BITE 25, Start t2, Clearance) and ends at connector 0 (Idle).
+
+T1156020-93/d25
+
+FIGURE 8/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 5**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 5((5 Clearance)) --> FITE22_1[FITE 22]
+ 5 --> Expiry[Expiry of t2]
+ 5 --> BITE22[BITE 22]
+ FITE22_1 --> StopT2_1[Stop t2]
+ Expiry --> BITE25[BITE 25]
+ BITE22 --> StopT2_2[Stop t2]
+ StopT2_1 --> FITE22_2[FITE 22]
+ StopT2_2 --> 4((4 Answered))
+ FITE22_2 --> 0((0 Idle))
+ T1_156030_93_d26[T1 156030-93/d26]
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 5. The process starts at state 5 (Clearance) and branches into three parallel paths: FITE 22, Expiry of t2, and BITE 22. FITE 22 leads to Stop t2, which then leads to FITE 22, which finally leads to state 0 (Idle). Expiry of t2 leads to BITE 25. BITE 22 leads to Stop t2, which then leads to state 4 (Answered). A small note 'T1 156030-93/d26' is present below state 4.
+
+FIGURE 8/Q.1152 (sheet 3 of 3)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT aeronautical system to Signalling System No. 5**
+
+Connector reference
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Idle0_1([0 Idle]) --> ActInt[Activate interwork procedure]
+ ActInt --> AwaitCPCI1_1([1 Await CPCI FITE])
+ AwaitCPCI1_1 --> FITE91317[/FITE 9-13, 17/]
+ AwaitCPCI1_1 --> FITE22_1[/FITE 22/]
+ AwaitCPCI1_1 --> FITE1_1[/FITE 1/]
+ FITE91317 --> ActOut[Activate outgoing INMARSAT]
+ ActOut --> FITE17[/FITE 17/]
+ FITE22_1 --> Idle0_2([0 Idle])
+ FITE1_1 --> AwaitCPCI1_2([1 Await CPCI FITE])
+ FITE17 --> MoreDigits{More digits?}
+ MoreDigits -- No --> AwaitST2_1([2 Await ST signal])
+ MoreDigits -- Yes --> CountryCode{Country code FITE?}
+ CountryCode -- No --> FITE1_2[/FITE 1/]
+ CountryCode -- Yes --> STFITE{ST FITE?}
+ FITE1_2 --> C1((1))
+ C1 --> FITE1_3[/FITE 1/]
+ FITE1_3 --> C1_2((1))
+ STFITE -- No --> AwaitAddr3_1([3 Await address complete])
+ STFITE -- Yes --> AwaitAddr3_2([3 Await address complete])
+ AwaitST2_1 --> FITE1_4[/FITE 1/]
+ AwaitST2_1 --> FITE22_2[/FITE 22/]
+ AwaitST2_1 --> BITE12[/BITE 12/]
+ FITE1_4 --> C1_3((1))
+ FITE22_2 --> FITE22_3[/FITE 22/]
+ BITE12 --> BITE8[/BITE 8/]
+ FITE22_3 --> BITE8
+ BITE8 --> Idle0_3([0 Idle])
+ T1142410-92/d27
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 5 to INMARSAT aeronautical system. The process starts at an 'Idle' state (Connector 0), proceeds through 'Activate interwork procedure', then to 'Await CPCI FITE' (Connector 1). It then branches into three paths: FITE 9-13, 17 (leading to 'Activate outgoing INMARSAT' and then FITE 17), FITE 22 (leading to 'Idle' state at Connector 0), and FITE 1 (leading to 'Await CPCI FITE' at Connector 1). From FITE 17, the flow goes to a decision 'More digits?'. If 'No', it goes to 'Await ST signal' (Connector 2). If 'Yes', it goes to 'Country code FITE?'. If 'No' to 'Country code FITE?', it goes to FITE 1, which leads to a connector (1) and then to another FITE 1. If 'Yes' to 'Country code FITE?', it goes to 'ST FITE?'. If 'No' to 'ST FITE?', it goes to 'Await address complete' (Connector 3). If 'Yes' to 'ST FITE?', it goes to 'Await address complete' (Connector 3). From 'Await ST signal' (Connector 2), the flow branches to FITE 1, FITE 22, and BITE 12. FITE 1 leads to connector (1). FITE 22 leads to FITE 22, which leads to BITE 8. BITE 12 leads to BITE 8. Both BITE 8 and FITE 22 lead to the final 'Idle' state (Connector 0). Connector references 1 and 2 are marked on the left side of the diagram.
+
+FIGURE 9/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 2)
+**Interworking of Signalling System No. 5 to INMARSAT aeronautical system**
+
+
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> S3: 3 Await address complete
+ S3 --> B5: BITE 5
+ S3 --> B12_15_16: BITE 12, 15, 16
+ S3 --> B17_20: BITE 17, 20
+ S3 --> F22_1: FITE 22
+ B5 --> SP6_Ring: SPITE 6 Ring tone
+ B12_15_16 --> B8: BITE 8
+ B17_20 --> B28: BITE 28
+ F22_1 --> F22_2: FITE 22
+ SP6_Ring --> B27: BITE 27
+ B8 --> SP6_SI: SPITE 6 SI tone
+ B28 --> SP6_SI
+ F22_2 --> S0_1: 0 Idle
+ B27 --> S4: 4 Await answer
+ S4 --> B22_1: BITE 22
+ S4 --> F22_3: FITE 22
+ B22_1 --> B22_2: BITE 22
+ F22_3 --> F22_4: FITE 22
+ B22_2 --> SP7_Ring: SPITE 7 Ring tone
+ F22_4 --> S0_2: 0 Idle
+ SP7_Ring --> S5: 5 Answered
+ S5 --> F22_5: FITE 22
+ S5 --> B25_1: BITE 25
+ F22_5 --> F22_6: FITE 22
+ B25_1 --> B25_2: BITE 25
+ F22_6 --> S0_3: 0 Idle
+ B25_2 --> S0_3
+
+```
+
+T1142420-92/d28
+
+State transition diagram for the interworking of Signalling System No. 5 to INMARSAT aeronautical system. The diagram shows three main state transition paths starting from state 3 (Await address complete), state 4 (Await answer), and state 5 (Answered). Each path involves a series of transitions between states labeled with BITE, SPITE, and FITE messages, eventually leading to the Idle state (state 0).
+
+FIGURE 9/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 2)
+**Interworking of Signalling System No. 5
+ to INMARSAT aeronautical system**
+
+
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> 00
+ 00 --> 01
+ 01 --> 02
+ 02 --> 03
+ 03 --> 04
+ 04 --> 05
+ 05 --> 00
+
+```
+
+T1142430-92/d29
+
+State transition diagram showing six states (00 to 05) in a linear sequence. State 00 is Idle, 01 is Wait for call set-up information, 02 is Await continuity, 03 is Wait for address complete, 04 is Wait for answer, and 05 is Answered. Transitions are shown between consecutive states, and a feedback loop exists from state 05 back to state 00. A reference code T1142430-92/d29 is present below the diagram.
+
+| State number | State description | Sheet reference |
+|--------------|----------------------------------|-----------------|
+| 00 | Idle | 1 |
+| 01 | Wait for call set-up information | 1 |
+| 02 | Await continuity | 2 |
+| 03 | Wait for address complete | 3 |
+| 04 | Wait for answer | 4 |
+| 05 | Answered | 4 |
+
+FIGURE 10/Q.1152
+
+**State overview diagram for interworking of Signalling
+System No. 7 ISUP to INMARSAT-Aero**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Idle00_1([00 Idle]) --> Activate[Activate No. 7 ISUP INMARSAT-Aero]
+ Activate --> Wait01([01 Wait for call set-up information])
+ Wait01 --> FITE_A[/FITE A/]
+ Wait01 --> FITE_Z[/FITE Z/]
+ FITE_A --> SPITE_53[SPITE 53]
+ SPITE_53 --> Store[Store protocol control indicator]
+ FITE_Z --> Idle00_2([00 Idle])
+ Store --> CanService{Can service be provided?}
+ CanService -- No --> BITE_Z[/BITE Z/]
+ BITE_Z --> Idle00_3([00 Idle])
+ CanService -- Yes --> UserUser{User-user service?}
+ UserUser -- Yes --> Ignore[Ignore parameter]
+ UserUser -- No --> Connector2((2))
+ Ignore --> Connector2
+ Connector2 --- Ref2[2]
+ T1142440_92_d30[T1142440-92/d30]
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) to INMARSAT-Aero. The process starts with 'Idle' (00), followed by 'Activate No. 7 ISUP INMARSAT-Aero', then 'Wait for call set-up information' (01). It then branches into 'FITE A' and 'FITE Z'. 'FITE A' leads to 'SPITE 53' and 'Store protocol control indicator'. 'FITE Z' leads to 'Idle' (00). Both paths lead to a decision 'Can service be provided?'. If 'No', it goes to 'BITE Z' and then 'Idle' (00). If 'Yes', it goes to another decision 'User-user service?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Ignore parameter'. If 'No', it goes directly to connector '2'. Both 'Ignore parameter' and the 'No' path lead to connector '2'. Connector reference '2' is on the left. A label 'T1142440-92/d30' is near the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 11/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 4)
+**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)
+ to INMARSAT-Aero**
+
+Connector reference
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD; C1((1)) --> A[Activate outgoing INMARSAT-Aero]; A --> W{Which category?}; W --> F18_1[FITE 18]; W --> F18_2[FITE 18]; W --> F19[FITE 19]; F18_1 --> WC((02 Wait continuity)); F18_2 --> WC; F19 --> WC; WC --> F1_1[FITE 1]; WC --> F24[FITE 24]; WC --> F25[FITE 25]; WC --> FZ_1[FITE Z]; F1_1 --> C2((2)); F24 --> C2; F25 --> C2; FZ_1 --> FZ_2[FITE Z]; FZ_2 --> IDLE((00 Idle));
+```
+
+Flowchart showing interworking of Signalling System NO.7 (ISUP) to INMARSAT-Aero. It starts with connector 1, followed by 'Activate outgoing INMARSAT-Aero', a 'Which category?' decision leading to FITE 18, 18, or 19. These lead to a 'Wait continuity' state (02), then to FITE 1, 24, 25, or Z. FITE 24 leads to connector 2. FITE Z leads to another FITE Z state and then an 'Idle' state (00). Connector reference 2 is on the left.
+
+FIGURE 11/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 4)
+Interworking of Signalling System NO.7 (ISUP) to INMARSAT-Aero
+
+
+
+Connector reference
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start((2)) --> Q1{Any more FITE 1?}
+ Q1 -- No --> Wait[03 Wait for address complete]
+ Q1 -- Yes --> Q2{Country code FITE?}
+ Q2 -- No --> FITE1_1[/FITE 1/]
+ Q2 -- Yes --> Omit[Omit country code FITE]
+ Omit --> Q3{Last digit?}
+ FITE1_1 --> Q3
+ Q3 -- No --> Start
+ Q3 -- Yes --> Wait
+ Wait --> BITE5[/BITE 5/]
+ Wait --> FITE1_2[/FITE 1/]
+ Wait --> BITE12_15_16_17[/BITE 12, 15, 16, 17/]
+ Wait --> FITEZ_1[/FITE Z/]
+ BITE5 --> SPITE53_15[SPITE 53 (see Table 15)]
+ SPITE53_15 --> BITE_X[/BITE X/]
+ BITE_X --> End3((3))
+ FITE1_2 --> End4((4))
+ BITE12_15_16_17 --> SPITE53_16[SPITE 53 (see Table 16)]
+ SPITE53_16 --> BITE_Z[/BITE Z/]
+ FITEZ_1 --> FITEZ_2[/FITE Z/]
+ BITE_Z --> End00((00))
+ FITEZ_2 --> End00
+
+```
+
+2
+
+4
+
+4
+
+3
+
+T1142460-92/d32
+
+Flowchart for Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) to INMARSAT-Aero. The process starts at connector 2, checks for more FITE 1, then checks if a country code FITE. If no country code FITE, it sends FITE 1. If it is a last digit, it waits for address complete. Then it branches into four paths: BITE 5 (sending SPITE 53 and BITE X to connector 3), FITE 1 (to connector 4), BITE 12, 15, 16, 17 (sending SPITE 53 and BITE Z to connector 00), and FITE Z (to connector 00).
+
+FIGURE 11/Q.1152 (sheet 3 of 4)
+**Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) to INMARSAT-Aero**
+
+Connector reference
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD; Start((3)) --> Wait[04 Wait for answer]; Wait --> BITE22[BITE 22]; Wait --> FITEZ1[FITE Z]; Wait --> BITE25[BITE 25]; BITE22 --> SPITE53_17[SPITE 53 (see Table 17)]; SPITE53_17 --> BITEY[BITE Y]; BITEY --> Answered[05 Answered]; FITEZ1 --> FITEZ2[FITE Z]; FITEZ2 --> Idle1[00 Idle]; BITE25 --> SPITE53_16[SPITE 53 (see Table 16)]; SPITE53_16 --> BITEZ1[BITE Z]; BITEZ1 --> Idle2[00 Idle]; Answered --> FITEZ3[FITE Z]; Answered --> BITE25_2[BITE 25]; FITEZ3 --> FITEZ4[FITE Z]; FITEZ4 --> Idle3[00 Idle]; BITE25_2 --> SPITE53_2[SPITE 53]; SPITE53_2 --> BITEZ2[BITE Z]; BITEZ2 --> Idle4[00 Idle];
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) to INMARSAT-Aero. The process starts at connector reference 3, goes through 'Wait for answer' (04), then branches into BITE 22, FITE Z, and BITE 25. BITE 22 leads to SPITE 53 (see Table 17) then BITE Y to 'Answered' (05). FITE Z leads to another FITE Z then to 'Idle' (00). BITE 25 leads to SPITE 53 (see Table 16) then BITE Z to 'Idle' (00). From 'Answered' (05), it branches to FITE Z and BITE 25. FITE Z leads to another FITE Z then to 'Idle' (00). BITE 25 leads to SPITE 53 then BITE Z to 'Idle' (00).
+
+T1142470-92/d33
+
+FIGURE 11/Q.1152 (sheet 4 of 4)
+Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) to INMARSAT-Aero
+
+
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> 00
+ 00 --> 01
+ 01 --> 00
+ 01 --> 02
+ 02 --> 00
+ 02 --> 03
+ 02 --> 04
+ 03 --> 00
+ 03 --> 04
+ 04 --> 00
+ 04 --> 05
+
+```
+
+T1142480-92/d34
+
+State overview diagram showing six states (00 to 05) with transitions. State 00 is Idle, 01 is Wait for CPCI FITE, 02 is Await for address complete, 03 is Wait for answer, 04 is Answered, and 05 is Clear back. Transitions are: 00 to 01, 01 to 02, 02 to 03, 03 to 04, 04 to 05. There are also transitions from 01, 02, 03, and 04 back to 00. A transition from 02 to 04 is also shown. A label 'T1142480-92/d34' is present below the diagram.
+
+| State number | State description | Sheet reference |
+|--------------|----------------------------|-----------------|
+| 00 | Idle | 1 |
+| 01 | Wait for CPCI FITE | 1 |
+| 02 | Await for address complete | 2 |
+| 03 | Wait for answer | 3 |
+| 04 | Answered | 4 |
+| 05 | Clear back | 4 |
+
+FIGURE 12/Q.1152
+**State overview diagram for interworking of INMARSAT-Aero
+ to Signalling System No. 7 ISUP**
+
+Connector reference
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD; Idle1([00 Idle]) --> Act1[/Activate INMARSAT- Aero No. 7 (ISUP)/]; Act1 --> Wait1([01 Wait for CPCI FITE]); Wait1 --> FITE1719[/FITE 17, 18, 19/]; Wait1 --> FITE22[/FITE 22/]; FITE1719 --> ActOut[/Activate outgoing No. 7 (ISUP)/]; ActOut --> SPITE52[SPITE 52]; SPITE52 --> FITEA[/FITE A (see Table 18)/]; FITEA --> FITE24[/FITE 24/]; FITE24 --> C1((1)); FITE22 --> Idle2([00 Idle]);
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). The process starts with 'Idle' (00), followed by 'Activate INMARSAT- Aero No. 7 (ISUP)', then 'Wait for CPCI FITE' (01). It then branches into 'FITE 17, 18, 19' and 'FITE 22'. 'FITE 17, 18, 19' leads to 'Activate outgoing No. 7 (ISUP)', which leads to 'SPITE 52', then 'FITE A (see Table 18)', then 'FITE 24', and finally to connector '1'. 'FITE 22' leads to 'Idle' (00). Connector reference '1' is on the left, and connector reference '2' is at the bottom next to connector '1'. The diagram is labeled T1142490-92/d35.
+
+FIGURE 13/Q.1152 (sheet 1 of 5)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to
+Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)**
+
+
+
+Connector reference
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ 1((1)) -- "1, 3X2" --> W[02 Wait for address complete]
+ W --> S((S))
+ W --> BX[BITE X]
+ W --> BZ1[BITE Z]
+ W --> B48[BITE 48]
+ BX --> SP19[SPITE 53
+(see Table 19)]
+ SP19 --> BN[BITE n]
+ BN --> T1[Start t1
+2-4 min.]
+ T1 --> 2((2))
+ 2 -- "4" --> 2
+ BZ1 --> BZ2[BITE Z]
+ BZ2 --> ID[00 Idle]
+ ID --> 2
+ B48 --> SP21[SPITE 53
+(see Table 21)]
+ SP21 --> BJ[BITE J]
+ BJ --> BK[BITE k]
+ BK --> 3((3))
+ 3 -- "3" --> 3
+ 3 --> S
+
+```
+
+1
+
+S
+
+2, 3
+
+1, 3X2
+
+02
+
+Wait for address complete
+
+S
+
+3
+
+BITE X
+
+BITE Z
+
+BITE 48
+
+SPITE 53 (see Table 19)
+
+SPITE 53 (see Table 21)
+
+BITE n
+
+BITE Z
+
+BITE J
+
+Start t1 2-4 min.
+
+00
+
+Idle
+
+BITE k
+
+2
+
+4
+
+3
+
+3
+
+T1142500-92/d36
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP). The process starts at connector 1, proceeds to 'Wait for address complete', then branches into three paths: BITE X, BITE Z, and BITE 48. BITE X leads to SPITE 53 (see Table 19) and BITE n, ending at connector 2. BITE Z leads to BITE Z and Idle, ending at connector 2. BITE 48 leads to SPITE 53 (see Table 21), BITE J, and BITE k, ending at connector 3. Connector 3 also leads back to connector S.
+
+FIGURE 13/Q.1152 (sheet 2 of 5)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start((S)) -- 2 --> F1_1[/FITE 1/]
+ Start -- 2 --> F22[/FITE 22/]
+ Start -- 2 --> B30[/BITE 30/]
+
+ F1_1 --> CC{Country
+code FITE?}
+ CC -- No --> SP22{SPITE 22?}
+ CC -- Yes --> SP22
+
+ SP22 -- No --> M00[00] --> Idle([Idle])
+ SP22 -- Yes --> Omit[Omit
+country
+Code FITE]
+ Omit --> F1_2[/FITE 1/]
+ F1_2 --> C1((1))
+ C1 --- N1[2]
+
+ F22 --> FZ[/FITE Z/]
+ FZ -.- Note[see Note]
+ FZ --> M00
+
+ B30 --> C2((1))
+ C2 --- N2[2]
+
+ subgraph Margin
+ S_marg[S]
+ L1_top[1]
+ L1_bot[1]
+ end
+
+ T1143220-92/d37
+
+```
+
+Flowchart showing the interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP).
+
+NOTE – In principle, FITE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in the case where FITE 22 results from a time out expiry cause 127 should be sent.
+
+FIGURE 13/Q.1152 (sheet 3 of 5)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)**
+
+
+
+
+
+Connector reference
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Clearback : 4
+ Clearback --> FITE 22
+ Clearback --> t2_bar : t2-bar
+ Clearback --> BITE 24
+ FITE 22 --> Stop_t2_1 : Stop t2
+ t2_bar --> BITE 25
+ BITE 24 --> Stop_t2_2 : Stop t2
+ Stop_t2_1 --> FITE_Z : FITE Z
+ BITE 25 --> FITE_Z
+ Stop_t2_2 --> [*] : 3
+ FITE_Z --> Idle : 00
+
+```
+
+T1142520-92/d39
+
+State transition diagram for INMARSAT-Aero to ISUP interworking. The diagram shows states (ovals) and transitions (arrows). States include Clearback (05), FITE 22, t2-bar, BITE 24, Stop t2, BITE 25, FITE Z, and Idle (00). Transitions include Clearback to FITE 22, t2-bar, and BITE 24; FITE 22 to Stop t2; t2-bar to BITE 25; BITE 24 to Stop t2; Stop t2 to FITE Z; BITE 25 to FITE Z; and FITE Z to Idle. External connector references 4 and 3 are shown at the top and bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 13/Q.1152 (sheet 5 of 5)
+**Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP)**
+
+TABLE 15/Q.1152
+
+| | Received BITES |
+|---------------------------------|----------------|
+| Backward call indicators in ACM | 5 |
+| Charging indicator | 10 |
+| Called party's status | 01 |
+| Called party's category | 00 |
+| Interworking indicator | 1 |
+
+TABLE 16/Q.1152
+
+| Received BITES
(Release) | Cause sent | Location |
+|-----------------------------|------------|----------|
+| 12 | 34 | 1010 |
+| 15 | 1 | 1010 |
+| 16 | 17 | 1010 |
+| 17 | 27 | 1010 |
+| 25 | 16 | 1010 |
+
+TABLE 17/Q.1152
+
+| |
+|----------------------------------------------------|
+| Backward call indicators in ANM |
+| ANM without backward call indicators is to be sent |
+
+TABLE 18/Q.1152
+
+#### **FITE A construction – Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to ISUP**
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------------|----------------|--------------------------------|
+| Calling Party'S Category (CPC) | Received FITE | CPC |
+| | 17
18
19 | 1010
1011
1100 |
+| Continuity Check Indicator (CCH) | SPITE 36 | CCH |
+| | Yes
No | 01
00 |
+| Nature of Address Indicator (NAI) | SPITE 22 | NAI |
+| | Yes
No | 100
011 |
+| Satellite Indicator (SI) | SI = 1 | |
+| Echo Control Indicator (ECI) | SPITE 21 | ECI |
+| | Yes
No | 1
0 |
+| Transmission Medium Requirements (TMR) | Received FITE | TMR |
+| | 17
18
19 | 11
11
For further study |
+| Closed user group interlock code | SPITE 51 | |
+| | Yes
No | –
Set CUG
interlock code |
+
+TABLE 19/Q.1152
+
+##### **Bite X analysis – Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to ISUP**
+
+| Received BITE X | | | BITE n to be sent |
+|-----------------|----|-----|-------------------|
+| CH | ST | CAT | |
+| 00 | 00 | 00 | BITE 27 |
+| 00 | 00 | 01 | BITE 27 |
+| 00 | 00 | 10 | BITE 27 |
+| 00 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 |
+| 00 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 |
+| 00 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 |
+| 01 | 00 | 00 | BITE 27 |
+| 01 | 00 | 01 | BITE 27 |
+| 01 | 00 | 10 | BITE 27 |
+| 01 | 01 | 00 | BITE 6 |
+| 01 | 01 | 01 | BITE 6 |
+| 01 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 |
+| 10 | 00 | 00 | BITE 27 |
+| 10 | 00 | 01 | BITE 27 |
+| 10 | 00 | 10 | BITE 27 |
+| 10 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 |
+| 10 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 |
+| 10 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 |
+
+CH Charge indicator
+ST Called party's status indicator
+CAT Called party's category indicator
+
+TABLE 20/Q.1152
+
+##### **Bite Y analysis – Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to ISUP**
+
+| Received BITE Y | BITE to be sent |
+|-----------------|-----------------|
+| CH | |
+| – | BITE 22 |
+| 00 | BITE 22 |
+| 01 | BITE 23 |
+| 10 | BITE 22 |
+
+CH Charge indicator
+
+TABLE 21/Q.1152
+
+#### **CONNECT analysis – Interworking of INMARSAT-Aero to ISUP**
+
+| Received CONNECT fields | | | BITE j | BITE k |
+|-------------------------|----|-----|---------|---------|
+| CH | ST | CAT | | |
+| 00 | 00 | 00 | BITE 27 | BITE 22 |
+| 00 | 00 | 01 | BITE 27 | BITE 22 |
+| 00 | 00 | 10 | BITE 27 | BITE 22 |
+| 00 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 |
+| 00 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 |
+| 00 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | BITE 22 |
+| 01 | 00 | 00 | BITE 27 | BITE 23 |
+| 01 | 00 | 01 | BITE 27 | BITE 23 |
+| 01 | 00 | 10 | BITE 27 | BITE 23 |
+| 01 | 01 | 00 | BITE 6 | BITE 23 |
+| 01 | 01 | 01 | BITE 6 | BITE 23 |
+| 01 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | BITE 23 |
+| 10 | 00 | 00 | BITE 27 | BITE 22 |
+| 10 | 00 | 01 | BITE 27 | BITE 22 |
+| 10 | 00 | 10 | BITE 27 | BITE 22 |
+| 10 | 01 | 00 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 |
+| 10 | 01 | 01 | BITE 5 | BITE 22 |
+| 10 | 01 | 10 | BITE 7 | BITE 22 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dadba845dc75c3c0dc13323643e4cc7aa77618ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:763504eea0996cfc68294f64c0fd91fad77b4c6261ee8c46028cd112ec1f02a4
+size 8295
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a3bb2868c0c069b986ad4407345956aa12d3ffd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f120eabffe96af3f0b4f8739242a76c9cde225a1b5d06cbd391bae037121286c
+size 57811
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6fc11c8c8b95a7476223b0f239314c4f19535bdd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:15fadad459659361ac319abf586abe28465c696e7381bd31f95e308aa9cd9d71
+size 150863
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c87aec8af4aaebc9f9fde72c235adac32b56380
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/7efae06af3af43ffe5d4b956a679cf54_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b5ca5ac133865d0953b30611f9f1b765d4c23d62443f6093beb5d42feeac59b2
+size 100958
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/844077b3034f0030b404207db0ad76b4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/844077b3034f0030b404207db0ad76b4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65f44ee9e69e17c2f9fa3915a7e91042548b3097
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/844077b3034f0030b404207db0ad76b4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9b0985223b401c14746d7ed30ab9f327240164d22956833d64a04b22e439f8fb
+size 109447
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f651623956961712d43c71a32967ab0c8dd47ece
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e67ce1aa07221a004a4f15001abec58c30c71256a09f12e91962f49be367f051
+size 33835
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/b235edb1dbe659e2782c9a0e47775ca4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/b235edb1dbe659e2782c9a0e47775ca4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc0dd64744010a2597262474096ba0a08df95e6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/b235edb1dbe659e2782c9a0e47775ca4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a257874a4c94ba0f24c9126c9e559458c04227e49544f8960675d7c1fd8be90f
+size 83121
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/b90144cfbb81a2d610d920240fda689d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/b90144cfbb81a2d610d920240fda689d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b100dddac43f80b94a741604db467d5ee8940987
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/b90144cfbb81a2d610d920240fda689d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:11cab5bddd4ad2e9f88626c555ac3a66318ba7f6b2f5cb4aa2792a15bd1708ba
+size 19528
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eaa8d025b5f724b35f8045b7f9b836f6ec1d0fb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bd11bb9963d76cc1732454de25ec62a07b47e8da5c2d81bc8728c93304df9238
+size 30348
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de9272702287e8ec0871a7e83a253de4662c17a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/d26959f4514c26ca19c3d6f00da85956_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3faec314041ef3936422004a69b4143f24042ee46c857516d3a27c6775dac715
+size 16737
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2bfcf4e7cf182a0619b474148306409c7df4fd68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1204-199303-I_PDF-E/e9314c83043183351ed74908e9bf2f90_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3ce53fc5138c6d499e5f7bbe4d7068030d547ca85006105e45265a46de1d6cf5
+size 17053
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7622fc758cbc32d08f2c838921cadd831be4fc18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5b9d5c20618a2684d4a01ddbc4aa514e91412d732141c26511676988073ba06c
+size 8198
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..571edce4e596785be207292a1d1b52c29f011632
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:00552a4b62ac81d6ae7cad8db20bae10f7747250c4993589214b66b0b0b0ac85
+size 93114
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..727d76733c644768bcf1ad2150ffdf8832db20a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/547f726730e589392f239257a833ede3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ee5abca8edb01c9cd5cbc26fda865ad7462cbfa97a64889ec735947616f73590
+size 42977
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b62b0b1c0874747873a715cdd8e13a580ab3a06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/76b0cd79baaedd942af4dc42f2e764b8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:db9391605e5d0ff92d02b42428d060158d8ed370d67f250235135ead717512a3
+size 43511
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76b7cda8c33f86b00f66c9475d3abbeb47aa5e05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2b5f8e7983c4cf42e84b4eb249a31def35e6958f5e6cc371c3bb7738b089bbe5
+size 64682
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b70baf53fd3d2a2a37c3b7f84a3c6b39773f7b6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1211-199303-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0be094f266a82e7d139d7a18eaf0d1f3addc2f2544c7561f683fa466e6f3f531
+size 59887
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/04f51626e2e10a16e3eb2c4b33cb2742_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/04f51626e2e10a16e3eb2c4b33cb2742_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..414891ee28e5e50095ffec4b4ab397658fe5ea23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/04f51626e2e10a16e3eb2c4b33cb2742_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fe6ae4983374c2416cb7aa7b20b682f899f675cc8cdc2286f8332a0e13128413
+size 20430
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/0977b81510f7649846289ee785d20e74_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/0977b81510f7649846289ee785d20e74_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56287f987f55e5eb5ff182b4c9c2a04e6babb541
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/0977b81510f7649846289ee785d20e74_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4fefb8deedb089b2e086659ffefb0f08395bddffa9fd574e6672f2c3666942eb
+size 27443
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/24b1ac9eb58a2f22801620b9e2ea8bd3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/24b1ac9eb58a2f22801620b9e2ea8bd3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..71ff4c2c7726366aac70d38559a0b10ef4dd0bfe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/24b1ac9eb58a2f22801620b9e2ea8bd3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f355308f7ac1a3bb6d42bdc74f074c1b0d656c6fc455aab4599c12f1d1556274
+size 20636
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/29f586959675cafdf81cf934954908eb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/29f586959675cafdf81cf934954908eb_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1c9860dc453fb9bf264aae9b1d2111ba9cfd8fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/29f586959675cafdf81cf934954908eb_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3bc7258f5365d89c6bd03a9429b8bdc6484a515cf4e89ced1a1914fc86a5ff9f
+size 22824
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/2ba086df3506f81bae3a9b53725dcfea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/2ba086df3506f81bae3a9b53725dcfea_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2cfa50e2788c5d1cd39193b1a4ff0eaf5c7cdf6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/2ba086df3506f81bae3a9b53725dcfea_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:23c67596e3c9c62cec51c855165e4e166084c5c33a581cbecb5fc2b13bdb7d0d
+size 17187
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31fc1fc2798375070e87409ba3ca5989b2557849
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:be8fc7613476751cb71176bd62aa88b879640389ef6af3464b78db8e5cf52118
+size 8279
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/4cc7cdce3d498d8b0ba033a9be24ade5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/4cc7cdce3d498d8b0ba033a9be24ade5_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2dbb82b6f7861d74fecdb500d8fc0b3a9a2f51cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/4cc7cdce3d498d8b0ba033a9be24ade5_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ea21d45ae31a7a663099a6990229e5ced8188c5a02c6de675ff4b204a973974c
+size 18540
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bd6becc94b42429c925fb827cdcc6724a29d611
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:623220569f0299ee3000dcdd00a5e7a9e391e03df51080c5c8e514e5f7d5acc8
+size 31488
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54b51949b962ece0a4e35cfd550954ba08dad237
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ac46cf0682875f0e7813488d65d11f04571783206ad01db0015f34dad9584611
+size 30485
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5388ec0eba08c86ca7e05c4b03bcc620f5b0e86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7d2d1d3870cd224c4430d19334557716_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b3d8b55d77f3302a0c5ee26051e2b84547815e2028d0235e2f758c0ba1cd0d4e
+size 41497
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9a321e9d3d4628e7ab2975ea2a8cb6054b22ea6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/7e670a2b556b53ea9002dfff3a420e08_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b9897a320d68284e7f9666851e90f24e3b11f3fe55686c6282fa6965abbf5347
+size 18536
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67cb6258e0981079fb3366ba55c49735384bc41b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5b702d38da9641c7fb955acf8d1130eeaf4aa2b1aafc72fa33ff78fe060774fb
+size 27368
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/a7c51c18111139f9aca2805114108565_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/a7c51c18111139f9aca2805114108565_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea342aabbcf86c8f184f93f0aad8bb19266bec19
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/a7c51c18111139f9aca2805114108565_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:163f495eb704cf3f70763b674ac5efecd80b292ccff76cbb074c40ab43f11776
+size 25385
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ef78ee2c4368baf44456cb1bb3690e933e0939c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/c914f51f4427bc672dd0526cfc90ebe9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e93897d6384d1d6abeacfc63f0db0be02a535c0c1a661b2b8b84263f33841d65
+size 23370
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d4536afc9d1da1410f4fa872c45345cdb23c231
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d87e93fd2af3f7247fc5cd0e65f126421c338ab7693795b1038143e2eb97bcbb
+size 132778
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/d999c095be67473b31693fab5e475f01_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/d999c095be67473b31693fab5e475f01_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bc00ff052e444db3a84f4c660a0b525ef403a27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/d999c095be67473b31693fab5e475f01_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cf31758703e9ed4e16974a8dab53276312e29ceda23e93dfcfa6a2817beaff05
+size 32967
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/e38206fcefa2045af01d494b2956775a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/e38206fcefa2045af01d494b2956775a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..439d812f4797e4fb4c4f3565860c332c939efe87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/e38206fcefa2045af01d494b2956775a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:527459bf882c18bcac84678fe3d23cee9c4c594f85c7bf7bc4e14b6c3661981b
+size 23635
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eab2f3e61f4306dd564f57be78673db70812170e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f71740e83bf7b3f10be98b1dcbddb7b09602f0f65259d899cbeb054ac7a6a317
+size 29518
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/f5a5f52bc25d95a7f616290c99e88ae6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/f5a5f52bc25d95a7f616290c99e88ae6_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a195b645a03c0c8330d1fe39cb245c357e1f7d0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/f5a5f52bc25d95a7f616290c99e88ae6_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d02e53470871c9252306369aab70d64ad82001bd6d8ff242ce31f26ef126a91a
+size 71277
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..003f2a7c095b1574e0cfc46b744a5ab8de39ff23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e5ba3991856e65829d29709637cb509fb6e95b93abbaeba2dc1ac921b203171d
+size 19159
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b17bd311b7ed0093b38e3428e788b3f428059d6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1213-199510-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2064 @@
+
+
+
+
+The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with intersecting lines.
+
+ITU logo
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+**Q.1213**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+(10/95)
+
+**INTELLIGENT NETWORK**
+
+---
+
+**GLOBAL FUNCTIONAL PLANE
+FOR INTELLIGENT NETWORK CS-1**
+
+**ITU-T Recommendation Q.1213**
+
+(Previously "CCITT Recommendation")
+
+---
+
+# FOREWORD
+
+The ITU-T (Telecommunication Standardization Sector) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993).
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.1213 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1993-1996) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 17th of October 1995.
+
+---
+
+# NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+# CONTENTS
+
+| | | Page |
+|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 1 | General ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | Scope of IN global functional plane for capability set 1 ..... | 1 |
+| 3 | References ..... | 1 |
+| 4 | IN CS-1 global functional plane modelling ..... | 2 |
+| 4.1 | Role of SIBs in the global functional plane ..... | 2 |
+| 4.2 | Additional characteristics of a IN CS-1 SIB ..... | 2 |
+| 4.3 | IN CS-1 global functional plane model ..... | 2 |
+| 4.4 | Terminology ..... | 2 |
+| 5 | IN CS-1 Service Independent Building Blocks (SIBs) ..... | 3 |
+| 5.1 | Data parameters for SIBs ..... | 3 |
+| 5.2 | Method to describe IN CS-1 SIBs ..... | 4 |
+| 5.3 | ALGORITHM ..... | 6 |
+| 5.4 | AUTHENTICATE ..... | 7 |
+| 5.5 | CHARGE ..... | 9 |
+| 5.6 | COMPARE ..... | 12 |
+| 5.7 | DISTRIBUTION ..... | 13 |
+| 5.8 | LIMIT ..... | 15 |
+| 5.9 | LOG CALL INFORMATION ..... | 17 |
+| 5.10 | QUEUE ..... | 19 |
+| 5.11 | SCREEN ..... | 21 |
+| 5.12 | SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT ..... | 23 |
+| 5.13 | STATUS NOTIFICATION ..... | 26 |
+| 5.14 | TRANSLATE ..... | 29 |
+| 5.15 | USER INTERACTION ..... | 31 |
+| 5.16 | VERIFY ..... | 33 |
+| 6 | Basic call process ..... | 35 |
+| 6.1 | General ..... | 35 |
+| 6.2 | Points of initiation and points of return ..... | 36 |
+| 6.3 | BCP stage 1 description ..... | 37 |
+| 7 | Global service logic ..... | 38 |
+| 7.1 | Relationship between GSL and BCP ..... | 39 |
+| 7.2 | Relationship between global service logic and SIBs ..... | 39 |
+| 8 | Mapping of the service plane to the global functional plane ..... | 40 |
+
+# **SUMMARY**
+
+IN capability set 1 (IN CS-1) is the first standardized stage of the intelligent network as an architectural concept for the creation and provision of telecommunication services. This Recommendation provides the Intelligent Network (IN) Global Functional Plane (GFP) architecture for IN capability set 1 (IN CS-1). This Recommendation defines the IN GFP for IN CS-1 based on the general framework for IN GFP provided in Recommendation Q.1203, consistent with the scope of IN CS-1 defined in Recommendation Q.1211.
+
+This Recommendation defines:
+
+- the IN GFP model for IN CS-1;
+- identifications and definition of the 15 IN CS-1 service independent building-blocks (SIBs), including the Basic Call Process (BCP) specialized SIB;
+- the use of global service logic in IN CS-1.
+
+Companion Recommendations include the Q.1200 and Q.1210 Series Recommendations.
+
+# GLOBAL FUNCTIONAL PLANE FOR INTELLIGENT NETWORK CS-1
+
+(Helsinki, 1993; modified in 1995)
+
+# 1 General
+
+The concepts for the Intelligent Network (IN) are embodied in the Intelligent Network Conceptual Model (INCM) as described in associated Recommendations I.312/Q.1201 [1]. The Global Functional Plane (GFP) of the INCM is described in associated Recommendations I.329/Q.1203 [2].
+
+# 2 Scope of IN global functional plane for capability set 1
+
+IN Capability Set 1 (IN CS-1) is the first standardized stage of the intelligent network as an architectural concept for the creation and provision of telecommunication services. This Recommendation provides the functional characteristics of the GFP associated specifically with IN CS-1. General GFP aspects are addressed in associated Recommendations I.312/Q.1201 [1] and I.329/Q.1203 [2].
+
+The following functional characteristics are specific to IN CS-1 and are addressed in this Recommendation:
+
+- IN CS-1 GFP Modelling (see clause 4).
+- IN CS-1 SIBs (see clause 5).
+
+For IN CS-1, 14 Service Independent Building Blocks (SIBs) are specified (not including the BCP SIB discussed below). These represent the minimum set of SIBs required to define the IN CS-1 targeted services, identified in Recommendation Q.1211 [3].
+
+- BCP SIB (see clause 6).
+
+For IN CS-1 the basic call process has been defined as a specialized SIB which provides the basic call capabilities. Nine Points of Initiation (POIs) for Global Service Logic (GSL) interfaces have been specified. In addition, six Points of Return (PORs) for GSL interfaces have been specified.
+
+- Plane-to-plane mapping (see clause 8).
+
+The relationships between the service plane and the GFP are specified for IN CS-1.
+
+- For IN CS-1, network time is assumed to be available to all SIBs in the GFP and it does not have to be passed through call instance data.
+- Stage 1 SDL diagrams are provided for IN CS-1 SIBs only where the SDLs clarify the understanding of the SIB operation.
+
+# 3 References
+
+The following Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision: all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] CCITT Recommendation I.312/Q.1201 (1992), *Principles of intelligent network architecture*.
+- [2] CCITT Recommendation I.329/Q.1203 (1992), *Intelligent network global functional plane architecture*.
+
+- [3] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1211 (1993), *Introduction to intelligent network capability set 1*.
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1290 (1993), *Glossary of terms used in the definition of intelligent networks*.
+- [5] CCITT Recommendation I.130 (1988), *Method for the characterization of telecommunication services supported by an ISDN and network capabilities of an ISDN*.
+- [6] ITU-T Recommendation Z.100 (1993), *CCITT specification and description language (SDL)*.
+- [7] ITU-T Recommendation Q.931 (1993), *Digital subscriber Signalling System No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call control*.
+
+# 4 IN CS-1 global functional plane modelling
+
+## 4.1 Role of SIBs in the global functional plane
+
+SIBs are abstract representations of network capabilities that exist in an IN structured network. Their definition enforces the concept of service and technology independence by decoupling the services from the technology on which services are provided. The 14 SIBs defined in this Recommendation identify the network capabilities which will be available to service designers in a CS-1 IN structured network. Their use will provide valuable insight on how service creation will be facilitated in CS-n Recommendations.
+
+## 4.2 Additional characteristics of a IN CS-1 SIB
+
+Data required by each SIB is defined by SIB support data parameters and call instance data parameters.
+
+SIBs are global in nature and their location need not be considered as the whole network is regarded as a single entity in the GFP.
+
+## 4.3 IN CS-1 global functional plane model
+
+The INCM described in Recommendation I.312/Q.1201 [1] models the GFP as shown in Figure 1. Normal or non-IN supported services are processed within the BCP. When an IN supported service is to be invoked, its GSL is launched at the POI by triggering mechanism from the BCP. The global functional plane models the network from a global, or a network wide, point of view. Contained in this view is the BCP SIB, including IN CS-1 POIs and PORs, the IN CS-1 SIBs, and the GSL, which describes how SIBs are chained together to describe service features.
+
+This Recommendation specifies how the model can be used to fully define IN CS-1 service features in the GFP.
+
+## 4.4 Terminology
+
+The following terminology used in this Recommendation, is more fully defined in Recommendation Q.1290 [4]:
+
+| | |
+|-------|----------------------------------|
+| CID | Call Instance Data |
+| CIDFP | Call Instance Data Field Pointer |
+| CLI | Calling Line Identification |
+| SSD | Service Support Data |
+
+
+
+Diagram of the Global functional plane model. A large parallelogram labeled 'GSL' contains a rectangle labeled 'BCP' on the left and three ovals labeled 'SIB 1', 'SIB 2', and 'SIB n' on the right. An arrow labeled 'POI' points from the BCP to the SIBs, and an arrow labeled 'POR' points from the SIBs back to the BCP. The text 'T1135970-91/d01' is in the bottom right corner.
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.1213
+**Global functional plane model**
+
+# 5 IN CS-1 Service Independent Building Blocks (SIBs)
+
+The following list of SIBs have been identified as required to support the list of targeted IN CS-1 services and service features identified in Recommendation Q.1211 [3]:
+
+- ALGORITHM
+- AUTHENTICATE
+- CHARGE
+- COMPARE
+- DISTRIBUTION
+- LIMIT
+- LOG CALL INFORMATION
+- QUEUE
+- SCREEN
+- SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT
+- STATUS NOTIFICATION
+- TRANSLATE
+- USER INTERACTION
+- VERIFY
+
+The stage 1 SIB descriptions that follow reflect the understanding of the logical function of each SIB in its role of supporting IN CS-1 services and service features. The BCP, which is viewed as a specialized SIB, is described in clause 6.
+
+An explanation of the format of the stage 1 SIB descriptions is outlined below.
+
+## 5.1 Data parameters for SIBs
+
+By definition, SIBs are independent of the service/SF they are used to represent. They have no knowledge about previous or subsequent SIBs which are used to describe the service feature.
+
+In order to describe service features with these generic SIBs, some elements of service dependence is needed. Service dependence can be described using data parameters which enable a SIB to be tailored to perform the desired functionality. Data parameters are specified independently for each SIB and are made available to the SIB through global service logic.
+
+Two types of data parameters are required for each SIB, dynamic parameters called Call Instance Data (CID) and static parameters called Service Support Data (SSD).
+
+### 5.1.1 Call Instance Data (CID)
+
+Call instance data defines dynamic parameters whose value will change with each call instance. They are used to specify subscriber specific details like calling or called line information. This data can be:
+
+- made available from the BCP SIB (e.g. Calling Line Identification);
+- generated by a SIB (e.g. a translated number); or
+- entered by the subscriber (e.g. a dialled number or a PIN code).
+
+Associated with each CID value is a logical name which is referred to as the CID Field Pointer (CIDFP). If a SIB requires CID to perform its function, there will be an associated CIDFP assigned through SSD (refer to 5.1.2). For instance, the TRANSLATE SIB's CID which defines what is to be translated is called Information. The TRANSLATE SIB's SSD parameter which defines where this data can be found is CIDFP-Filter Value(s).
+
+Since the CID value can vary with each call instance, service features can be written with data flexibility. In the above TRANSLATE SIB example, one service feature may require translation of a calling number, while another service feature will require translation of the called number. In both cases, the data required by the SIB is specified by the information Calling Line Identity (CLI), but the CIDFP-Filter Value(s) changes. In the first service feature, the value of CIDFP-Filter Value(s) is set to CLI, while the second service feature sets the value of CIDFP-Filter Value(s) to Called Number.
+
+Once a CIDFP has been specified for a service feature, it can be referenced by subsequent SIBs, and the CID value can be made available to all subsequent SIBs in the SIB chain. This CIDFP is said to be fixed for that service and is constant for all instances of that service. The actual value of the CID changes for each call instance of that service feature.
+
+### 5.1.2 Service Support Data (SSD)
+
+Service support data defines data parameters required by a SIB which are specific to the service feature description. When a SIB is included in the GSL of a service description, the GSL will specify the SSD values for the SIB. SSD consists of:
+
+#### i) Fixed parameters
+
+These are data parameters whose values are fixed for all call instances. For instance, the “File Indicator” SSD for the TRANSLATE SIB needs to be specified uniquely for each occurrence of that SIB in a given service feature. The “File Indicator” SSD value is then said to be fixed, as its value is determined by the service/SF description, not by the call instance.
+
+If a service/SF is described using multiple occurrences of the same SIB, then fixed SSD parameters are defined uniquely for each occurrence.
+
+#### ii) Field pointers
+
+Field pointers identify which CID is required by the SIB, and in doing so provide a logical location for that data. They are signified by “CIDFP-xxxx”, where “xxxx” names the data required. For instance, “CIDFP-Filter Value(s)” for the TRANSLATE SIB will specify which CID element is to be translated.
+
+If more than one CID is required by a SIB to perform its function, then the SSD data parameters will contain multiple field pointers.
+
+## 5.2 Method to describe IN CS-1 SIBs
+
+The following template applies to characterize and describe the SIBs.
+
+### 5.2.1 Definition
+
+Prose description of the SIB from the service creation point of view.
+
+### 5.2.2 Operation
+
+Description of actions performed by the SIB. The operations section expands on the definition, to allow the reader to clearly understand the operation that this SIB is intended to perform.
+
+### 5.2.3 Potential service applications
+
+Service examples of where this SIB can be used.
+
+### 5.2.4 Input
+
+Input to each SIB is specified as three distinct elements:
+
+- one logical start;
+- Service Support Data which defines parameters which are specified by the service description;
+- Call Instance Data which are specific to that call instance.
+
+### 5.2.5 Output
+
+Output from each SIB is specified as two distinct elements:
+
+- one or more logical end;
+- call instance data which defines data parameters specific to that call instance which results from the execution of that SIB and are required by other SIBs or the BCP to complete the call service instance.
+
+### 5.2.6 Graphic representation
+
+A graphic representation is used to describe input, operations and output of the SIB and is illustrated in Figure 2. Each SIB is characterized by having one logical start and one or more logical ends. These logic flows are shown by the solid arrows on the left and right of the diagram. Each logic flow is specified above each arrow. SSD parameters are identified by the dashed arrow at the top of the diagram and are specified beside the dashed arrow. Similarly, CID parameters are specified below the diagram. Input CID parameters are separated from the output parameters.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a central rectangular box labeled 'SIB'. To its left, a solid arrow labeled 'Logic start' points into the box. To its right, three solid arrows labeled 'Logic end' point out of the box. Above the box, a dashed arrow labeled 'SSD' points down into the box, with the text 'SSD parameters' to its right. Below the box, a dashed arrow labeled 'CID' points down away from the box, with 'CID input parameters' to its left and 'CID output parameters' to its right. The text 'T1814200-91/d02' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram of an IN CS-1 SIB showing inputs and outputs.
+
+FIGURE 2/Q.1213
+Graphical representation of IN CS-1 SIB
+
+### 5.2.7 SDL diagram
+
+This diagram gives a graphic representation of the stage 1 description of the SIB using SDL macro diagrams (see Recommendation Z.100 [6]).
+
+## **5.3 ALGORITHM**
+
+### **5.3.1 Definition**
+
+Applies a mathematical algorithm to data to produce a data result.
+
+### **5.3.2 Operation**
+
+This SIB takes a specified call instance data and applies the specified mathematical algorithm to it to produce the corresponding data result.
+
+It can be used to implement a simple arithmetic operation as incrementing a counter.
+
+### **5.3.3 Potential service applications**
+
+- Mass calling;
+- Televoting.
+
+### **5.3.4 Input**
+
+#### **5.3.4.1 Logical start**
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### **5.3.4.2 Service support data**
+
+- Type
+Specifies the type of algorithm for this SIB. Two algorithms have been identified for IN CS-1:
+ - a) increment;
+ - b) decrement.
+- Value
+Specifies the amount to be used when applying the SIB (e.g. 1, 2, etc.).
+- CIDFP-Data
+This CID field pointer specifies the call instance data to which the algorithm is to be applied.
+- CIDFP-Error
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### **5.3.4.3 Call instance data**
+
+- Data
+The identifier is the data associated with the CIDFP-Data upon which algorithm is to be applied.
+
+### **5.3.5 Output**
+
+#### **5.3.5.1 Logical end**
+
+- Success;
+- Error.
+
+#### **5.3.5.2 Call instance data**
+
+- Data
+Contains the resultant value after the SIB has completed.
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for ALGORITHM:
+
+- a) invalid type;
+- b) invalid value.
+
+### 5.3.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 3.
+
+
+
+Diagram of the ALGORITHM SIB graphical representation. A central box labeled 'ALGORITHM' has an input arrow from the left labeled 'Data'. Above the box, a dashed arrow labeled 'SSD' points down, with a list of fields: 'Type', 'Value', 'CIDFP - Data', and 'CIDFP - Error'. Below the box, a dashed arrow labeled 'CID' points down, with a list of fields: 'Data' and 'Error cause'. To the right of the box, two arrows point out: 'Success' and 'Error'. The diagram is labeled 'T1175130-95/d03' at the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 3/Q.1213
+ALGORITHM SIB
+
+## 5.4 AUTHENTICATE
+
+### 5.4.1 Definition
+
+Provides authentication functionality for a service.
+
+### 5.4.2 Operation
+
+This SIB provides an authentication function to establish an authorized relationship between the service logic and a database on behalf of a user.
+
+The authentication function can be either simple authentication or externally defined.
+
+### 5.4.3 Potential service applications
+
+- All services.
+
+### 5.4.4 Input
+
+#### 5.4.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.4.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Authenticate Name (optional)
+
+This SSD field is only used if SSD Authenticate Mechanism ID has value “Simple”. The Authenticate Name is used to identify the location of the object containing the Authenticate Password attribute in order to set up an Authorized Relationship. A “null” in this SSD field indicates that the Authenticate Name can vary and its value must be provided through call instance data.
+
+- Authenticate Password (optional)
+
+This SSD field is only used if SSD Authenticate Mechanism ID has value “Simple”. The Authenticate Password provides the data to be matched in the Authenticate Name object in order to set up an Authorized Relationship. A “null” in this SSD field indicates that the Authenticate Name can vary and its value must be provided through call instance data.
+
+- Authenticate Mechanism Id
+
+The Authenticate Mechanism Id identifies the authentication mechanism which is to be used to establish the Authorized Relationship. It may take one of the following values:
+
+- None, which implies that no authentication is performed.
+- Simple, which implies that simple authentication is performed.
+- External, which implies that an externally defined authentication is performed.
+
+- CIDFP – Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+- CIDFP – Authorized Relationship Id
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the Authorized Relationship Id will be written.
+
+- CIDFP – Authenticate Name
+
+This CID Field Pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the Authenticate Name.
+
+- CIDFP – Authenticate Password
+
+This CID Field Pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the Authenticate Password.
+
+#### 5.4.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Authenticate Name (optional)
+
+This CID field is only used if SSD Authenticate Mechanism Id has value “Simple” and SSD Authenticate Name has value “null”. The Authenticate Name is used to identify the location of the object containing the Authenticate Password attribute in order to set up an Authorized Relationship.
+
+- Authenticate Password (optional)
+
+This CID field is only used if SSD Authenticate Mechanism ID has value “Simple” and SSD Authenticate Name has value “null”. The Authenticate Password provides the data to be matched in the Authenticate Name object in order to set up an Authorized Relationship.
+
+NOTE – When Authenticate Name and Authenticate Password are supplied as input CID, the SSD parameters Authenticate Name and Authenticate Password are not used.
+
+### 5.4.5 Output
+
+#### 5.4.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Success (Authentication successful);
+- Error.
+
+#### 5.4.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB.
+
+- Authorized Relationship Id
+
+The Authorized Relationship Id provides the identity of the established Authorized Relationship through which operations can be applied.
+
+### 5.4.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 4.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the AUTHENTICATE SIB. A central rectangular box is labeled "AUTHENTICATE". Above the box, a dashed vertical line labeled "SSD" points down to the top edge, with associated parameters: "Authenticate Name", "Authenticate Password", "Authenticate mechanism Id", "CIDFP - Error", and "CIDFP - Relationship Id". To the left of the box, a solid horizontal arrow points into the box. Below the box, a dashed vertical line labeled "CID" points up to the bottom edge, with associated parameters: "Authenticate Name" and "Authenticate Password". To the right of the box, two solid horizontal arrows point outwards, labeled "Success" and "Error". Below the "Error" arrow, a dashed vertical line points down from the bottom edge, with associated parameters: "Error cause" and "Relationship Id". At the bottom right of the diagram, the text "T1175140-95/d04" is present.
+
+Diagram of the AUTHENTICATE SIB (Service Information Block) showing its inputs and outputs.
+
+FIGURE 4/Q.1213
+**AUTHENTICATE SIB**
+
+## 5.5 CHARGE
+
+### 5.5.1 Definition
+
+Determine special charging treatment for the call, where special refers to any charging in addition to that normally performed by the basic call process.
+
+In general, this involves identifying:
+
+- the resources for which charging is to occur;
+- to where the charges are to be directed.
+
+It should be noted that this SIB is not responsible for the subscriber billing process.
+
+### 5.5.2 Operation
+
+The charging information output by this SIB must be compatible with the charging and billing system of the network operator or service provider. However, this SIB does not define the format of the output nor does it identify all the types of information that an Administration will require for charging. Generation of bills will often be done off-line by the Administration's existing billing system.
+
+The CHARGE SIB is used for specific resource charging and may be invoked several times in one service/service feature instance.
+
+Different simultaneous or consecutive call instances may charge the same account.
+
+Typical resources for which charging can occur are:
+
+- circuit-mode bearers;
+- packet or messages;
+- SRF resources, e.g. announcements, voice message storage, etc.;
+- SCF usage (in units).
+
+Typically, charging may be directed towards:
+
+- a) the account identified by the CLI;
+- b) the account identified by the called number (either the dialled number or the destination number);
+- c) an account or credit card identified by the collected user information;
+- d) the calling user's exchange accumulator;
+- e) a payphone.
+
+### 5.5.3 Potential service application
+
+- Any service which requires specific IN charging.
+
+### 5.5.4 Input
+
+#### 5.5.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.5.4.2 Service support data
+
+- number of accounts to charge;
+- Account.
+
+Each account is specified by two parameters, as follows:
+
+- a) Number
+
+Specifies one of the following:
+
+- 1) CIDFP-Line
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the line number to charge.
+
+- 2) CIDFP-Account
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the account number to charge.
+
+- 3) Fixed account
+
+Specifies an account number which is fixed for all call instances.
+
+- b) Per cent (%)
+
+Specifies the allocation of the total charge for this account. The sum of all allocations must equal 100%.
+
+- Resource type
+
+Specifies the resource to be charged for (e.g. bearer type, announcement, SCF usage, etc.).
+
+- Units
+
+Specifies a premium value for the specified resource type.
+
+- Service/service feature identifier
+
+Specifies the service/service feature for which charging is to be applied.
+
+- CIDFP-Pulse
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is used to identify pulse metering on the calling line.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.5.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Line(s)
+Specifies a line number for charging. This can be the calling line, the dialled number or a destination number.
+- Account(s)
+Specifies an account number for charging. This is an account number which was entered during the call such as a credit card or a calling card number.
+- Pulse metering
+When specified, indicates that pulse metering is associated with the calling line.
+
+### 5.5.5 Output
+
+#### 5.5.5.1 Logical end
+
+- 1) Success;
+- 2) Error.
+
+#### 5.5.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Error cause
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for CHARGE:
+ - a) invalid account to charge;
+ - b) invalid percentage allocation (> 100, < 0);
+ - c) invalid sum of percentage allocations (not equal to 100);
+ - d) invalid service/service feature;
+ - e) invalid resource;
+ - f) invalid units;
+ - g) system fault - unable to write record.
+
+### 5.5.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 5.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the CHARGE SIB. A central rectangular box is labeled "CHARGE".
+
+- An unlabeled arrow points into the box from the left.
+- A dashed arrow points from the top of the box to a list of data fields: "# of Accounts", "Account", "Resource type", "Units", "Service/Service feature ID", "CIDFP – Pulse", and "CIDFP – Error". This list is preceded by the label "SSD".
+- An arrow points from the right side of the box to the label "Success".
+- An arrow points from the right side of the box to the label "Error".
+- A dashed arrow points from the bottom of the box to the label "Error cause".
+- A dashed arrow points from the label "CID" to the bottom of the box.
+- A dashed arrow points from a group of labels ("Line(s)", "Account(s)", "Pulse metering") to the bottom of the box.
+- The text "T1175150-95/d05" is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram of the CHARGE SIB (Service Information Block) showing inputs, outputs, and associated data fields.
+
+FIGURE 5/Q.1213
+**CHARGE SIB**
+
+## 5.6 COMPARE
+
+### 5.6.1 Definition
+
+Performs a comparison of an identifier against a specified reference value. Three results are possible:
+
+- identifier is GREATER THAN the value;
+- identifier is LESS THAN the value;
+- identifier is EQUAL TO the value.
+
+### 5.6.2 Operation
+
+This SIB compares an identifier to a specified reference value. One of three logical ends will result from this operation (e.g. <, >, or =). Other logical ends can be formulated by combining two of the logical ends together (e.g. <, >, <=, or =>).
+
+It can be used for:
+
+- a) Comparing an identifier to a specified reference value. For instance, for checking that the current number of calls is less than the maximum number authorized.
+- b) For checking the relationship of current network time to a customer specified time to perform time dependent decision. The comparison may be done on Time of Day (TOD), Day of Week (DOW), or Day of Year (DOY). The reference value is then the customer specified TOD, DOW or DOY.
+
+### 5.6.3 Potential service applications
+
+- Time dependent routing;
+- CCBS.
+
+### 5.6.4 Input
+
+#### 5.6.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.6.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Comparison type
+
+Specifies the type of comparison to be performed. The following types have been identified:
+
+- a) Identifier value – Compare the identifier against the reference value.
+- b) Time – Compare network time to the reference value. Network time is specified as:
+ - 1) time of day;
+ - 2) day of week; or
+ - 3) day of year.
+
+- CIDFP-Data
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the identifier.
+
+- Reference value
+
+Specifies the value against which the comparison will be made.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.6.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Data
+Specifies the data associated with the CIDFP-Data (see SSD) which is to be compared to the reference value.
+
+### 5.6.5 Output
+
+#### 5.6.5.1 Logical end
+
+- GREATER THAN the value;
+- LESS THAN the value;
+- EQUAL TO the value;
+- Error.
+
+#### 5.6.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Error cause
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for COMPARE:
+ - a) invalid identifier;
+ - b) invalid reference value.
+
+### 5.6.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 6
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the COMPARE SIB as a central rectangular block. It has three input arrows on the left: a solid arrow from the left pointing to the block, a dashed arrow from the bottom labeled 'Data', and a dashed arrow from the bottom labeled 'CID'. Above the block, a dashed arrow labeled 'SSD' points down to a list of parameters: 'Comparison type', 'Reference value', 'CIDFP - Data', and 'CIDFP - Error'. To the right of the block, four solid arrows point outwards, labeled 'Greater than', 'Less than', 'Equal to', and 'Error'. Below the block, a dashed arrow labeled 'Error cause' points down to the text 'T1175160-95/d06'.
+
+Diagram of the COMPARE SIB showing inputs (SSD, Data, CID) and outputs (Greater than, Less than, Equal to, Error, Error cause).
+
+FIGURE 6/Q.1213
+**COMPARE SIB**
+
+## 5.7 DISTRIBUTION
+
+### 5.7.1 Definition
+
+Distribute calls to different logical ends of the SIB based on user specified parameters.
+
+### 5.7.2 Operation
+
+This SIB distributes calls to its different logical ends based on a user identified algorithm. For example, calls could be distributed based on a percentage allocated to each logical end.
+
+### 5.7.3 Potential service applications
+
+- mass calling;
+- televoting;
+- freephone.
+
+### 5.7.4 Input
+
+#### 5.7.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.7.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Algorithm type
+ - a) percentage;
+ - b) sequential;
+ - c) time of day;
+ - d) day of week.
+
+NOTE 1– Hierarchical call distribution may be realized through the use of multiple instances of the DISTRIBUTION SIB in conjunction with the STATUS NOTIFICATION SIB.
+
+- Number of logical ends
+
+NOTE 2 – Unlike most SSD, change of this value will effect the structure of the GSL this SIB is contained in.
+
+- Algorithm parameters
+
+If Type = percentage
+
+- For each logical end
+ - percentage (sum over all paths must equal 100).
+
+If Type = sequential
+
+- None
+
+If Type = time of day
+
+- For each logical end
+ - begin time associated with this logical end;
+ - end time associated with this logical end.
+
+All 24 hours of the day must be accounted for, with no overlap of time across logical ends.
+
+If Type = day of week
+
+- For each logical end
+ - all days of the week to be associated with this logical end.
+
+All days of the week must be accounted for. No day may be associated with more than one logical end.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.7.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- None
+
+### 5.7.5 Output
+
+#### 5.7.5.1 Logical end
+
+- 1
+- 2
+- ...
+- N [where N = number of logical ends (item 1 of input SSD)]
+- Error
+
+#### 5.7.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for DISTRIBUTION:
+
+- a) invalid type;
+- b) invalid percentage allocation (> 100, < 0);
+- c) invalid sum of percentage allocations (not equal to 100);
+- d) invalid number of logical ends;
+- e) missing time period;
+- f) overlap of the time across logical ends;
+- g) missing days;
+- h) overlap of days across logical ends.
+
+### 5.7.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 7.
+
+
+
+Diagram of the DISTRIBUTION SIB. A central box labeled 'DISTRIBUTION' has an input arrow from the left. Above it, a dashed arrow labeled 'SSD' points down, with associated text: 'Algorithm type', 'Number of logical ends', 'Algorithm parameters', and 'CIDFP - Error'. Below it, a dashed arrow points down to 'T1136010-91/d07', with 'Error cause' and 'CID' labels nearby. To the right, three output arrows are labeled '1', '2', and 'n'.
+
+FIGURE 7/Q.1213
+**DISTRIBUTION SIB**
+
+## 5.8 LIMIT
+
+### 5.8.1 Definition
+
+Limit the number of calls related to IN provided service features. Such limiting will be based on user specified parameters.
+
+NOTE – This SIB is not used for network congestion management functions.
+
+### 5.8.2 Operation
+
+This SIB may be used to pass all or a fraction of all calls related to IN provided service features.
+
+For example, calls may be passed:
+
+- for a specific duration (which may be infinite) at specific intervals;
+- according to a counting algorithm (e.g. pass N calls out of P).
+
+The LIMIT SIB in conjunction with other SIBs (e.g. COMPARE) can provide the required functionality for time dependent call limiting (e.g. TOD).
+
+### 5.8.3 Potential service applications
+
+- mass calling;
+- televoting;
+- freephone.
+
+### 5.8.4 Input
+
+#### 5.8.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.8.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Type
+
+Specifies the type of limiting to be performed. The following types have been identified:
+
+- a) pass calls for (S) seconds out of every (Q) seconds;
+- b) pass (N) calls out of (P) calls.
+
+- Parameters
+
+Specifies the parameters associated with the SSD type selected above:
+
+- 1) S duration;
+- 2) Q interval;
+- 3) P counter interval;
+- 4) N number of calls.
+
+- CIDFP-File
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where the current limit count is located.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.8.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- File
+
+Identifies the data associated with CIDFP-File which specifies the current count of calls.
+
+### 5.8.5 Output
+
+#### 5.8.5.1 Logical end
+
+- pass;
+- no pass;
+- error.
+
+#### 5.8.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for LIMIT:
+
+- a) invalid type;
+- b) invalid parameter.
+
+### 5.8.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 8.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a central rectangular box labeled "LIMIT". An arrow points into the box from the left. Above the box, a dashed arrow points down to it, labeled "SSD" at the top and "Type Parameters CIDFP – File CIDFP – Error" next to it. Below the box, a dashed arrow points down from it, labeled "Error cause" at the top and "CID" next to it. To the right of the box, three arrows point outwards, labeled "Pass", "No pass", and "Error" from top to bottom. At the bottom left, a dashed arrow points up to the box, labeled "File" at the top. At the bottom right, the text "T1175170-95/d08" is present.
+
+Diagram of LIMIT SIB graphical representation
+
+FIGURE 8/Q.1213
+
+#### LIMIT SIB
+
+## 5.9 LOG CALL INFORMATION
+
+### 5.9.1 Definition
+
+Log detailed information for each call into a file. The collected information may be used by management services (e.g. statistics, etc.) and not by call-related services.
+
+### 5.9.2 Operation
+
+This SIB logs (or writes) call related information to a specified file. The type of call-related information to be logged will be identified by service support data. Each instance of this SIB will cause the recording of the specified CID information.
+
+### 5.9.3 Potential service applications
+
+- All services.
+
+### 5.9.4 Input
+
+#### 5.9.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.9.4.2 Service support data
+
+##### – CIDFP-Data
+
+These CID field pointers specify which call instance data are to be used as identifiers. CIDFP-Data can include:
+
+- a) call attempt time;
+- b) call stop time;
+- c) call connect time;
+- d) dialled number;
+- e) destination number;
+- f) additional dialled number (e.g. credit card number, etc.);
+- g) calling line identification;
+- h) time in queue;
+- i) bearer capability;
+- j) error causes;
+- k) any other CID.
+
+##### – Log file name
+
+Specifies the log file object where the value of the identifier is to be logged.
+
+##### – CIDFP - Authorized Relationship Id
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the Authorized Relationship Id.
+
+##### – CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.9.4.3 Call instance data
+
+##### – Data
+
+Specifies the data associated with the CIDFP-Data (see SSD) which is to be logged.
+
+##### – Authorized Relationship Id
+
+The Authorized Relationship Id provides the identity of the established Authorized Relationship through which the operations can be applied.
+
+### 5.9.5 Output
+
+#### 5.9.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Success (information written);
+- Error.
+
+#### 5.9.5.2 Call instance data
+
+##### – Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for LOG CALL INFORMATION:
+
+- invalid identifier;
+- invalid log file indicator.
+
+### 5.9.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 9.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ SSD[SSD] -- "Log file name
+CIDFP - Data
+CIDFP - Error
+CIDFP - Authorized Relationship Id" --> LCI[LOG CALL INFO.]
+ Input(( )) --> LCI
+ LCI --> Success[Success]
+ LCI --> Error[Error]
+ Data[Data] --> LCI
+ ARID[Authorized Relationship Id] --> LCI
+ CID[CID] --> LCI
+ LCI --> EC[Error cause]
+ LCI --> T117518095d09[T1175180-95/d09]
+
+```
+
+Diagram of LOG CALL INFO SIB. A central box labeled 'LOG CALL INFO.' has an input arrow from the left. Above it, 'SSD' points to it with a list: 'Log file name', 'CIDFP - Data', 'CIDFP - Error', 'CIDFP - Authorized Relationship Id'. Below it, 'Data' and 'Authorized Relationship Id' point to it. To the right, 'Success' and 'Error' point away from it. Below the box, 'CID' points to it, and 'Error cause' and 'T1175180-95/d09' point away from it.
+
+FIGURE 9/Q.1213
+**LOG CALL INFO SIB**
+
+## 5.10 QUEUE
+
+### 5.10.1 Definition
+
+Provide sequencing of IN calls to be completed to a called party.
+
+### 5.10.2 Operation
+
+This SIB provides all the processing needed to provide queueing for a call, and will specifically:
+
+- pass the call if resources are available;
+- queue the call;
+- optionally play announcements to caller on queue;
+- when resources become available, dequeue the call.
+
+### 5.10.3 Potential service application
+
+- All IN services which use call queueing service feature.
+
+### 5.10.4 Input
+
+#### 5.10.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.10.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Max active
+ Specifies the maximum number of active calls allowed for the resource.
+- Max number
+ Specifies the maximum number of calls allowed on queue at a given time.
+- Max time
+ Specifies the maximum time the call may remain on the queue.
+
+##### – Announcement parameters
+
+Specify the control values for announcements. The control values which can be specified are:
+
+- Announcement ID: specifies which announcement is to be sent; the Announcement ID could be “null” to signify that no announcement is to be sent.
+- Repetition requested: specifies if the announcement is to be repeated;
+- Repetition interval: specifies the delay period in seconds between repetitions;
+- Maximum repetitions: specifies the maximum number of times the announcement will be repeated.
+
+##### – CIDFP-Call
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data identifies the specific call.
+
+##### – CIDFP-Resource
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data identifies the resource.
+
+##### – CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.10.4.3 Call instance data
+
+##### – Call reference
+
+Identifies the specific call which is a candidate for queueing.
+
+##### – Resource
+
+Specifies the data associated with the CIDFP-Resource which identifies the resource for which the call will be queued.
+
+### 5.10.5 Output
+
+#### 5.10.5.1 Logical end
+
+- 1) Resource available;
+- 2) Call party abandon;
+- 3) Queue timer expiry;
+- 4) Queue full;
+- 5) Error.
+
+#### 5.10.5.2 Call instance data
+
+##### – Time spent in queue
+
+Identifies the total time that a particular call was queued.
+
+##### – Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for QUEUE:
+
+- a) invalid Max active;
+- b) invalid Max number;
+- c) invalid Max time;
+- d) invalid announcement parameters;
+- e) invalid call reference.
+
+### 5.10.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figures 10 and 11.
+
+
+
+Diagram of the Queue SIB (Service Information Block) structure. A central box labeled 'Queue' has several input and output arrows. Inputs include: SSD (top, dashed arrow), Call reference Resource (left, dashed arrow), and CID (bottom, dashed arrow). Outputs include: Max active, Max number, Max time, Announcement parameter, CIDFP - Resource, CIDFP - Error (all from SSD, dashed arrow); Resource available, Call party abandon, Q timer expiry, Q full, Error (all from the right side, solid arrows); and Time spent on queue, Error cause (from the bottom, dashed arrow). A reference code T1175190-95/d10 is shown at the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 10/Q.1213
+
+#### **QUEUE SIB**
+
+## **5.11 SCREEN**
+
+### **5.11.1 Definition**
+
+Perform a comparison of an identifier against a list to determine whether the identifier has been found in the list.
+
+### **5.11.2 Operation**
+
+This SIB takes the appropriate identifier and determines whether or not it is contained within the list identified by the SIB support data. A “Match” condition results if the identifier has been found on the list.
+
+Examples using the SCREEN SIB are:
+
+- for verifying a user ID or PIN;
+- for terminating or originating call screening based on a network address.
+
+Multiple instances of the SCREEN SIB, in conjunction with other SIBs, like TRANSLATE and COMPARE, may result in more complex screening capabilities.
+
+### **5.11.3 Potential service applications**
+
+- Selective call forward on busy/don’t answer;
+- Originating call screening;
+- Terminating call screening;
+- Security screening;
+- Account card calling;
+- Credit card calling.
+
+### **5.11.4 Input**
+
+#### **5.11.4.1 Logical start**
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Logical start]) --> Valid{Input parameters valid?}
+ Valid -- No --> NoError[No error]
+ Valid -- Yes --> MaxAllowed{Maximum allowed}
+ MaxAllowed -- Yes --> MatQSize{Mat Q size}
+ MatQSize -- Yes --> QFull[Q full]
+ MatQSize -- No --> QCall[Q call]
+ QCall --> StartQTimer[Start Q timer]
+ StartQTimer --> IncrementQCount[Increment Q count]
+ IncrementQCount --> Optimal[Optimal]
+ Optimal --> PlayAnnouncement[Play announcement]
+ PlayAnnouncement --> RequestNotificationsAbandon[Request notifications abandon]
+ RequestNotificationsAbandon --> Wait([Wait])
+ MaxAllowed -- No --> IncUsageCounter[Inc. usage counter]
+ IncUsageCounter --> RequestDiscount[Request discount notification or perform status notification]
+ RequestDiscount --> MaxAllowed
+ RequestDiscount --> ResourceAvailable[Resource available]
+ Wait --> TimeExpired{Time expired}
+ Wait --> Abandon{Abandon}
+ Wait --> ResourceFree{Resource free}
+ TimeExpired --> DequeueCall1[Dequeue call]
+ DequeueCall1 --> DecrementQCount1[Decrement Q count]
+ DecrementQCount1 --> CancelAnnouncement1[Cancel announcement]
+ CancelAnnouncement1 --> QTimerExpired[Q timer expired]
+ Abandon --> DequeueCall2[Dequeue call]
+ DequeueCall2 --> DecrementQCount2[Decrement Q count]
+ DecrementQCount2 --> CancelAnnouncement2[Cancel announcement]
+ CancelAnnouncement2 --> CallPartyAbandon[Call party abandon]
+ ResourceFree --> DequeueCall3[Dequeue call]
+ DequeueCall3 --> DecrementQCount3[Decrement Q count]
+ DecrementQCount3 --> CancelAnnouncement3[Cancel announcement]
+ CancelAnnouncement3 --> MaxAllowed
+ Note1[Determined by discount notification or status notification] -.-> ResourceFree
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for QUEUE SIB stage 1. The process starts with 'Logical start' leading to 'Input parameters valid?'. If 'No', it goes to 'No error'. If 'Yes', it checks 'Maximum allowed' (Usage count exceeded?). If 'Yes', it checks 'Mat Q size' (Q count exceeded?). If 'Yes', it goes to 'Q full'. If 'No', it proceeds through 'Q call', 'Start Q timer', 'Increment Q count', 'Optimal' (Play announcement), and 'Request notifications abandon' to a 'Wait' state. From 'Wait', three paths emerge: 'Time expired' (leading to 'Dequeue call', 'Decrement Q count', 'Cancel announcement', and 'Q timer expired'), 'Abandon' (leading to 'Dequeue call', 'Decrement Q count', 'Cancel announcement', and 'Call party abandon'), and 'Resource free' (leading to 'Dequeue call', 'Decrement Q count', 'Cancel announcement', and then looping back to 'Usage count exceeded?'). A side path from 'Usage count exceeded?' (No) leads to 'Inc. usage counter' and 'Request discount notification or perform status notification', which then loops back to 'Usage count exceeded?'. A 'Resource available' label is near the notification block. A dashed line from 'Wait' to 'Resource free' is labeled 'Determined by discount notification or status notification'. The code 'T1176190-95/d11' is at the bottom right.
+
+FIGURE 11/Q.1213
+QUEUE SIB stage 1
+
+#### 5.11.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Screen list name
+
+The screen list name identifies the screen data object to be used.
+
+- Screen list Filter
+
+The Screen list Filter identifies the attributes and filter tests to be applied to the attributes in the screen data object. The attribute values are stored in the CIDFP – Screen pointers.
+
+- CIDFP-Data
+
+This CID field pointer(s) specifies which call instance data is to be used as the identifier(s).
+
+- CIDFP - Authorized Relationship Id
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the Authorized Relationship Id.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.11.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Data
+
+The Data CID is the attributes values associated with the CIDFP-Data (see SSD) which is to be filtered against the screen data object.
+
+- Authorized Relationship Id
+
+The Authorized Relationship Id provides the identity of the established Authorized Relationship through which the operations can be applied.
+
+### 5.11.5 Output
+
+#### 5.11.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Match [= on the list].
+
+- CIDFP – Authorized Relationship Id
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the Authorized Relationship Id.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.11.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for SCREEN:
+
+- a) invalid identifier;
+- b) invalid screen list.
+
+### 5.11.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 12.
+
+## 5.12 SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT
+
+### 5.12.1 Definition
+
+Enables end user specific data to be replaced, retrieved, incremented, or decremented.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the SCREEN SIB. At the top, a list of parameters is shown under the heading 'SSD':
+
+
+- Screen list name
+- Screen list filter
+- CIDFP – Authorized Relationship Id
+- CIDFP – Data
+- CIDFP – Error
+
+ An arrow points from this list down to a central rectangular box labeled 'SCREEN'. To the left of this box, an arrow points into it, and below it, another arrow points into it from the text 'Data Authorized Relationship Id'. To the right of the 'SCREEN' box, three arrows point outwards to the labels 'Match', 'No match', and 'Error'. Below the 'SCREEN' box, an arrow points down to the text 'Error cause'. At the very bottom, the text 'T1181620-96/d12' is shown. To the left of the bottom arrow, the text 'Data Authorized Relationship Id' is present. Below the 'SCREEN' box, there is also a label 'CID' with an arrow pointing up to the box from below.
+
+Diagram of the SCREEN SIB (Service Information Block) showing its inputs, outputs, and internal structure.
+
+FIGURE 12/Q.1213
+
+#### **SCREEN SIB**
+
+### 5.12.2 Operation
+
+This SIB performs the appropriate actions, i.e. replace, retrieve, increment, or decrement information stored within the network. For example, this SIB could be used to retrieve or replace a customer's call forwarding number.
+
+### 5.12.3 Potential service application
+
+- Call forwarding;
+- Customer profile management.
+
+### 5.12.4 Input
+
+#### 5.12.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.12.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Object name
+
+Specifies the subscriber data object to be used.
+
+- Action
+
+Specifies the operation to be performed on the subscriber data. The following actions are allowed:
+
+- a) Replace – Replace the existing data element in the subscriber file specified by the element indicator with new data specified by the information value.
+- b) Retrieve – Copy the data element specified by the element indicator and place it in the output CID called data retrieved.
+- c) Increment – Increase the value of the data element in the subscriber file specified by the element indicator by the amount indicated by the Inc/Dec value.
+- d) Decrement – Decrease the value of the data element in the subscriber file specified by the element indicator by the amount indicated by the Inc/Dec value.
+
+- e) SetToDefault – Reset the value of the data attribute in the subscriber data object to its default value.
+ - f) addObject – Add a new data object into the database. In this case the Attribute indicator must contain all of the object attributes which are required to correctly initialize the data object.
+ - g) removeObject – Remove a data object from the database.
+- Attribute indicator
+
+Specifies the data attribute in the subscriber data object upon which the action is to be performed. This optional data parameter is only required when the field to be acted upon is constant for all call instances (e.g. changing a call forwarding number). A “null” in this SSD field indicates that the attribute indicator can vary and its value must be provided through call instance data.
+ - Inc/Dec value
+
+Specifies the amount by which the attribute indicator is to be incremented or decremented.
+ - CIDFP-Info
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the information value.
+ - CIDFP-Attribute
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the attribute indicator. If the attribute indicator is to be specified by the SSD, then this CID field pointer will not be used by the SIB.
+ - CIDFP-Retrieve
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in call instance data the retrieved data element is to be written.
+ - CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.12.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Information value
+
+Specifies the new value for the subscriber attribute data. This data is passed to this SIB from the user interaction SIB using the output CID parameter called collected data.
+- Attribute indicator
+
+Specifies the data attribute in the subscriber data object upon which the action is to be performed.
+- Authorized Relationship Id
+
+The Authorized Relationship Id provides the identity of the established Authorized Relationship through which the operations can be applied.
+
+### 5.12.5 Output
+
+#### 5.12.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Success (record written or retrieved);
+- Error.
+
+#### 5.12.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Retrieved Value(s)
+
+Specifies the data attribute(s) values retrieved.
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT:
+
+- invalid object indicator;
+- invalid action;
+- invalid attribute indicator;
+- invalid information value;
+- invalid Inc/Dec value.
+
+### 5.12.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 13.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT SIB. A central rectangular box is labeled "SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT".
+
+- A solid horizontal arrow points into the box from the left.
+- A dashed vertical arrow points into the box from the top, labeled "SSD". To the right of this arrow is a list of parameters: OBJECT NAME, Action, ATTRIBUTE, CIDFP – Info, CIDFP – ATTRIBUTE, CIDFP – Retrieve, CIDFP – AUTHORIZED RELATIONSHIP ID, and CIDFP – Error.
+- A dashed vertical arrow points out of the box from the bottom, labeled "CID". To the right of this arrow is a list of parameters: RETRIEVED VALUE and ERROR CAUSE. Below this list is the text "T1181630-96/d13".
+- A dashed vertical arrow points into the box from the bottom left, labeled "Information value", "ATTRIBUTE INDICATOR", and "AUTHORIZED RELATIONSHIP ID".
+- Two solid horizontal arrows point out of the box to the right, labeled "Success" and "Error".
+
+Diagram of SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT SIB showing inputs and outputs.
+
+FIGURE 13/Q.1213
+SERVICE DATA MANAGEMENT SIB
+
+## 5.13 STATUS NOTIFICATION
+
+### 5.13.1 Definition
+
+Provide the capability of inquiring about the status and/or status changes of network resources.
+
+### 5.13.2 Operation
+
+There are four types of status notification requests:
+
+- Poll resource status – Return the current status of the resource.
+- Wait for status – Wait until the resource assumes the desired status unless the resource is already in the desired status.
+- Initiate continuous monitor – Monitor and record the changes in busy/idle status; subsequent monitor – Return all the changes in status for the resource or other events as required.
+- Cancel continuous monitor.
+
+“Poll resource status” status notification could be used to determine if the destination address is busy or idle. In the busy case, “Wait for status” status notification could be used to notify service logic when the destination address becomes idle. “Initiate continuous monitor” status notification could be needed to create a resource history file.
+
+### 5.13.3 Potential service applications
+
+- CCBS;
+- call distribution;
+- freephone;
+- call transfer.
+
+### 5.13.4 Input
+
+#### 5.13.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.13.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Type
+
+Specifies the type of operation for this SIB. Four types have been identified:
+
+- a) poll resource status;
+- b) wait for status;
+- c) initiate continuous monitor;
+- d) cancel continuous monitor.
+
+- Resource
+
+Specifies the particular entity to be monitored. The following resources can be monitored:
+
+- 1) lines;
+- 2) trunks.
+
+- Timer
+
+Specifies the maximum amount of time to monitor the resource. If the value of timer is “null” no time limit is specified. This SSD is not used if the type is set to “poll resource status” or “cancel continuous monitor”.
+
+- Status notification file name
+
+Specifies the file object where the current resource status is to be logged. If a “null” value is specified, the resource status will not be logged. This SSD is not used if type is set to “cancel continuous monitor”.
+
+- Resource status
+
+Specifies the desired status of the resource being monitored. This SSD is only used when the type is set to “wait for status”. Valid resource status’s are:
+
+- a) busy;
+- b) idle.
+
+- CIDFP-Status
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in call instance data the resultant status of the resource is to be written.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.13.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- None.
+
+### 5.13.5 Output
+
+#### 5.13.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Success
+ - Poll resource status – Present status returned.
+ - Wait for status – Line or resource has assumed the given status.
+ - Initiate continuous monitor – Continuous monitor initiated.
+ - Cancel continuous monitor – Continuous monitor terminated.
+- Timer expiry (only used with “wait for status”).
+- Error.
+
+#### 5.13.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Status
+
+Specifies the current status of the resource.
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for STATUS NOTIFICATION:
+
+- a) invalid type;
+- b) invalid resource;
+- c) invalid timer;
+- d) invalid file indicator;
+- e) invalid resource status.
+
+### 5.13.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 14.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the STATUS NOTIFICATION SIB. A central rectangular box is labeled "STATUS NOTIFICATION". To its left, an arrow points into the box. Above the box, a dashed vertical line labeled "SSD" at the top points down to the box. To the right of this line, a list of parameters is shown: Type, Resource, Resource status, Timer duration, Status notification file indicator, CIDFP – Status, and CIDFP – Error. Below the box, a dashed vertical line points down to the text "T1136080-91/d14". To the left of this line is the label "CID". To the right of the line, the labels "Status" and "Error cause" are present. From the right side of the box, three arrows point outwards to the labels "Success", "Timer expiry", and "Error".
+
+Diagram of STATUS NOTIFICATION SIB showing inputs (SSD, CID) and outputs (Success, Timer expiry, Error, Status, Error cause).
+
+FIGURE 14/Q.1213
+STATUS NOTIFICATION SIB
+
+## **5.14 TRANSLATE**
+
+### **5.14.1 Definition**
+
+Determines output information from input information.
+
+### **5.14.2 Operation**
+
+This SIB translates input information and provides output information, based on the various other input parameters. Parameters provided identify which file should be scanned for the translation. Translation can be based on either input information only, or on input information and the CLI.
+
+For example, this SIB could be used for modifying input information (for instance, dialled digits) into a standard numbering plan upon which network routing is based.
+
+In conjunction with other SIBs, like COMPARE, the TRANSLATE SIB can provide the required functionality for time dependant routing.
+
+### **5.14.3 Potential service applications**
+
+- Freephone;
+- User-defined routing;
+- VPN;
+- UPT;
+- Abbreviated dialling;
+- Selective call forwarding on busy/don't answer;
+- Call forwarding;
+- Call transfer.
+
+### **5.14.4 Input**
+
+#### **5.14.4.1 Logical start**
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### **5.14.4.2 Service support data**
+
+- Object Name
+
+Specifies where the translation data object is located.
+
+- Translate Filter
+
+The Translate Filter identifies the attributes and filter tests to be applied to the attributes in the translate data object. The attribute values are stored in the CIDFP – Filter Value(s) pointers.
+
+- Translated Attribute
+
+Specifies which object attribute(s) is to be returned to Translated data value(s).
+
+- CIDFP-Filter Value(s)
+
+This CID field pointer(s) specifies which call instance data is to be used as the information.
+
+- CIDFP-Translated Data
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in call instance data that the translated data attribute value is to be written.
+
+- CIDFP - Authorized Relationship Id
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the Authorized Relationship Id.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.14.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Filter Value(s)
+
+Specifies the translate filter data value(s) to be used. Stored in CIDFP - Filter Value(s).
+
+- Authorized Relationship Id
+
+The Authorized Relationship Id provides the identity of the established Authorized Relationship through which the operations can be applied.
+
+### 5.14.5 Output
+
+#### 5.14.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Success;
+- Error.
+
+#### 5.14.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Translated data
+
+Specifies the data element(s) resulting from the translation.
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for TRANSLATE:
+
+- invalid type;
+- invalid file indicator;
+- invalid information;
+- translation not available.
+
+### 5.14.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 15.
+
+
+
+Figure 15: TRANSLATE SIB graphical representation. The diagram shows a central 'TRANSLATE' block. Above it, an 'SSD' (Service Selection Data) block lists parameters: object name, Translate filter, Translated Attribute, CIDFP - Filter Value(s), CIDFP - Translated Data, CIDFP - Authorized Relationship Id, and CIDFP - Error. A dashed arrow points from the SSD to the TRANSLATE block. To the left of the block, an arrow points into it, and below it, a dashed arrow points into it labeled 'Filter value(s)' and 'Authorized Relationship Id'. To the right of the block, two arrows point out: 'Success' and 'Error'. Below the block, a dashed arrow points out labeled 'Translated data' and 'Error cause'. At the bottom center, 'CID' is written. At the bottom right, 'T1175200-95/d15' is written.
+
+FIGURE 15/Q.1213
+**TRANSLATE SIB**
+
+## 5.15 USER INTERACTION
+
+### 5.15.1 Definition
+
+Allows information to be exchanged between the network and a call party, where a call party can be either a calling or a called party.
+
+### 5.15.2 Operation
+
+This SIB provides a call party with information (e.g. announcements) and/or collects information from a call party.
+
+The announcements can be, for example:
+
+- DTMF tones;
+- a customized or generic audio message;
+- network progression tones (e.g. dial tone, busy tone, etc.).
+
+The collected information can be, for example:
+
+- DTMF tones;
+- audio;
+- IA5 string text.
+
+This SIB provides the specified announcement (which may be null) to the user. Depending on the repetition type (i.e. count, time), the message is repeated until the repetition number or time is reached.
+
+Expected user input may be null. Assuming it is not null and user interruptibility is allowed, the message is stopped upon initial input by the user. If user interruptibility is not allowed or the message (or message sequence) is completed with no input from the user, the first input should be received within the initial response time after the message (or message sequence) is terminated, otherwise an error condition results.
+
+User input is considered complete when the maximum number of characters has been reached, or an end delineator character is received, or the inter-digit timer has been exceeded.
+
+The stage 2 SDL representation of this SIB may be helpful in understanding its operation. Refer to 5.2.12/Q.1214.
+
+### 5.15.3 Potential service applications
+
+- Most IN CS-1 services will require user interaction.
+
+### 5.15.4 Input
+
+#### 5.15.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.15.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Announcement parameters
+
+Specify the following control values for announcements:
+
+##### a) Announcement ID
+
+Specifies which announcement is to be sent. The Announcement ID could be “null” to signify that no announcement is to be sent.
+
+##### b) Repetition requested
+
+Specifies if the announcement is to be repeated.
+
+##### c) Repetition interval
+
+Specifies the delay period in seconds between repetitions.
+
+##### d) Maximum repetitions
+
+Specifies the maximum number of times the announcement will be repeated.
+
+- e) Duration
+
+Specifies the maximum length of time the announcement will be played.
+- Collect information parameters
+
+Specify the control values for user entered information.
+
+ - 1) User interruptibility
+
+Specifies if an announcement can be interrupted by the call party entering information (yes or no).
+ - 2) Voice feedback
+
+Specifies if the user is given a vocalization of the users input.
+ - 3) Type
+
+Specifies the expected form of the user entered information. The following forms can be identified:
+
+ - i) DTMF;
+ - ii) audio;
+ - iii) IA5 string;
+ - iv) null (where null signifies that no data is to be collected).
+ - 4) Maximum number of characters
+
+Specifies the maximum number of characters to collect, ( $> = 0$ , where 0 identifies non-character input).
+ - 5) Minimum number of characters
+
+Specifies the minimum number of characters to collect, ( $< =$ the maximum, $> = 0$ , where 0 identifies non-character input).
+ - 6) Initial input waiting timer
+
+Specifies the maximum time to wait for beginning of call party's response.
+ - 7) Inter-character waiting timer
+
+Specifies the maximum time to wait after a pause by the call party.
+ - 8) End delineator
+
+Specifies special character(s) signifying the end of an input. If this parameter is “null”, no delineator is specified.
+- CIDFP-Call\_Party
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used to identify the call party.
+- CIDFP-Collected
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data that the call party entered data is to be written.
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.15.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Call party identifier
+
+Specifies the data associated with the CIDFP-Call\_Party which identifies the call party exchanging information with the network.
+
+### 5.15.5 Output
+
+#### 5.15.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Success;
+- error.
+
+#### 5.15.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Collected data
+
+Specifies the data collected by the network from the call party.
+
+- Error cause
+
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for USER INTERACTION:
+
+- call abandon;
+- collection time out (no input received);
+- incorrect number of digits received;
+- announcement resource unavailable;
+- data collection resource unavailable;
+- invalid announcement ID;
+- invalid call party;
+- inconsistent timer setting;
+- call status incompatible with playing of announcements;
+- call status incompatible with collecting information.
+
+### 5.15.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 16.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the interaction between the SSD (Switching System Data) and the UI (User Interface). The SSD provides 'Announcement parameters', 'Collect info parameters', and 'CIDFP' (Call party, Collected, Error) to the UI. The UI outputs 'Success' and 'Error'. The UI also receives 'Call party id.' from the SSD and provides 'Collected data' and 'Error cause' back to the SSD. The diagram is labeled 'T1136100-91/d16' and 'CID'.
+
+Diagram of User Interaction SIB (SIB 16) showing the flow of information between the SSD (Switching System Data) and the UI (User Interface).
+
+FIGURE 16/Q.1213
+USER INTERACTION SIB
+
+## 5.16 VERIFY
+
+### 5.16.1 Definition
+
+Provide confirmation that information received is syntactically consistent with the expected form of such information.
+
+### 5.16.2 Operation
+
+Information is compared with the format expected for the data. The VERIFY SIB normally follows the USER INTERACTION SIB when information has been collected from a call party.
+
+The service support data identifies the type of data format. This SIB compares the input data to that expected format.
+
+This SIB may, for example, be used when there is a need to verify the syntax of information. This could be:
+
+- a user identification;
+- a network address;
+- any extra dialogue such as PIN code dialling or answer to a call prompt.
+
+### 5.16.3 Potential service applications
+
+- Freephone;
+- selective call forwarding;
+- UPT;
+- televoting.
+
+### 5.16.4 Input
+
+#### 5.16.4.1 Logical start
+
+Indicates the logical start of execution for the SIB.
+
+#### 5.16.4.2 Service support data
+
+- Maximum number of characters
+
+Specifies the maximum number of characters allowed.
+
+- Minimum number of characters
+
+Specifies the minimum number of characters allowed.
+
+- Format
+
+Format specifies the expected syntax of the data being verified. The format is specified using “code” characters. The following “codes” have been identified:
+
+- 1) x Any character;
+- 2) L Any letter;
+- 3) A Upper case letters only;
+- 4) a Lower case letters only;
+- 5) D Any digit (0-9) or delineator (#, \*);
+- 6) N Any digit (0-9);
+- 7) n Any digit except 0 (1-9);
+- 8) [x] Optional character, where x represents any of the specified “codes”;
+- 9) \x\ Specific character(s) required (e.g. \01\ indicated that either a 0 or a 1 must be present at that designated position in the data being verified).
+
+For example, the format “NNNN\c” would indicate that a PIN code of 2387c would pass syntax verification, while 2387d would fail.
+
+- CIDFP-Data
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the identifier to be verified.
+
+- CIDFP-Error
+
+This CID field pointer specifies where in output call instance data the error cause will be written.
+
+#### 5.16.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Data
+Specifies the data associated with the CIDFP-Data which is to be verified.
+
+### 5.16.5 Output
+
+#### 5.16.5.1 Logical end
+
+- Pass;
+- Fail;
+- Error.
+
+#### 5.16.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Error cause
+Identifies the specific condition which caused an error during the operation of the SIB. The following errors have been identified for VERIFY:
+ - a) invalid format;
+ - b) invalid identifier;
+ - c) inconsistent Max/Min number of characters specified.
+
+### 5.16.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 17.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the VERIFY SIB process. A central rectangular box is labeled 'VERIFY'. Above the box, a list of parameters under the heading 'SSD' is shown: 'Maximum number', 'Minimum number', 'Format', 'CIDFP – Data', and 'CIDFP – Error'. An arrow points from this list down into the top of the 'VERIFY' box. To the left of the box, an arrow points into it, labeled 'Data' below it. Below the box, a dashed line labeled 'CID' points up into the bottom of the box. To the right of the box, three arrows point out to the labels 'Pass', 'Fail', and 'Error'. Below the box, a dashed line labeled 'Error cause' points down from the bottom of the box. At the bottom right of the diagram, the text 'T1175210-95/d17' is present.
+
+Diagram of VERIFY SIB process showing inputs (SSD, Data, CID) and outputs (Pass, Fail, Error, Error cause).
+
+FIGURE 17/Q.1213
+**VERIFY SIB**
+
+# 6 Basic call process
+
+## 6.1 General
+
+The Basic Call Process (BCP) has been defined in 4.0/I.329/Q.1203 [2] as a specialized SIB which provides the basic call capabilities.
+
+These capabilities enable the use of GSL as well as other SIBs to completely describe IN CS-1 services and service features.
+
+It is not necessary or intended to fully model the BCP on the GFP in IN CS-1, but rather to insure that the functionality of the BCP that is required on the GFP in conjunction with SIBs be available to fully support IN CS-1 services/service features.
+
+## **6.2 Points of initiation and points of return**
+
+The BCP functional interfaces to the global service logic in the GFP are described as Points of Initiation (POI) and Points of Return (POR). These are defined in 4.2/I.329/Q.1203.
+
+IN CS-1 service flexibility is provided by defining specific POI and POR interfaces between the BCP and GSL. This flexibility allows a chain of SIBs to represent different services based on the launching POI and the returning POR.
+
+For example, a SIB chain which screens a network address against a list could represent an originating call screening service if the address analysed POI launches the chain. However, if the prepared to complete call POI was used to launch the same chain, a terminating call screening service could result.
+
+Furthermore, using the screening example from above, different services can result based upon which POR is used to complete the chain. If a “Match” logic end of the SCREEN SIB, is followed by a proceed with new data POR, a call is allowed to complete and this is an example of positive screening. However, negative screening, or call blocking, can be done with the same SIB chain by having the “Match” followed by a clear call POR.
+
+### **6.2.1 List of POIs**
+
+The following set of POIs has been identified for IN CS-1.
+
+#### **Call originated**
+
+This POI identifies that the user has made a service request without yet specifying a destination address (e.g. off-hook but before dialling).
+
+#### **Address collected**
+
+This POI identifies that the address input has been received from the user.
+
+#### **Address analysed**
+
+This POI identifies that the address input has been analysed to determine characteristics of the address (e.g. freephone number).
+
+#### **Prepared to complete call**
+
+This POI identifies that the network is prepared to attempt completion of the call to the terminating party.
+
+#### **Busy**
+
+This POI identifies that the call is destined for a user who is currently busy.
+
+#### **No answer**
+
+This POI identifies that the call has been offered to a user who has not answered.
+
+#### **Call acceptance**
+
+This POI identifies that the call is active but the connection between the calling and called parties is not established (e.g. called party off-hook but no switch-through).
+
+#### **Active state**
+
+This POI identifies that the call is active and the connection between the calling and called parties is established.
+
+#### **End of call**
+
+This POI identifies that a call party has disconnected.
+
+### **6.2.2 List of PORs**
+
+The following set of PORs has been identified for IN CS-1.
+
+#### **Continue with existing data**
+
+This POR identifies that the BCP should continue call processing with no modification.
+
+#### **Proceed with new data**
+
+This POR identifies that the BCP should proceed with call processing with only a data modification.
+
+#### **Handle as transit**
+
+This POR identifies that the BCP should treat the call as if it had just arrived.
+
+#### **Clear call**
+
+This POR identifies that the BCP should clear the call.
+
+#### **Enable call party handling**
+
+This POR identifies that the BCP should perform functions to enable call control for individual call parties.
+
+The use of this POR and the definition of any additional SIBs needed to support call party handling, are for further study.
+
+#### **Initiate call**
+
+This POR identifies that the call should be initiated. This may be independent of an existing call, or may be in the context of an existing call.
+
+## **6.3 BCP stage 1 description**
+
+### **6.3.1 Definition**
+
+This specialized SIB allows access to IN services/service features represented through the use of chains of SIBs and global service logic. The interface points between this SIB and GSL are described as POIs and PORs.
+
+### **6.3.2 Operation**
+
+The BCP contains a set of armed POIs, and if during the processing of a call, one of these POIs is encountered, a chain of SIB is executed through global service logic.
+
+When the chain of SIB terminates, call processing may be influenced according to the specified POR.
+
+NOTE – Non-IN supported services are processed in the BCP and no GSL processing is required.
+
+### **6.3.3 Potential service applications**
+
+- All IN CS-1 services.
+
+### **6.3.4 Output**
+
+Specifies the POI and data parameters which are passed to GSL.
+
+#### **6.3.4.1 Logical output**
+
+Initiate global service logic from a specified POI.
+
+#### **6.3.4.2 Service support data**
+
+- Set of POIs
+
+Specifies the points in the BCP where IN service logic processing can occur for a given service.
+
+- CIDFP-CLI
+
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the CLI.
+
+- CIDFP-Category
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the CLI category data.
+- CIDFP-Dialled
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the dialled number.
+- CIDFP-Destination
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the destination number.
+- CIDFP-Call reference
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data identifies the call reference.
+- CIDFP-Bearer
+This CID field pointer specifies which call instance data is to be used as the CLI bearer capability.
+
+#### 6.3.4.3 Call instance data
+
+- Calling line identity
+Specifies the network address from which the call in progress originated.
+- Calling line category
+Specifies the characteristics of CLI (e.g. payphone, operator, etc.).
+- Dialled number
+Specifies the number(s) dialled by the caller.
+- Destination number
+Specifies the number(s) dialled by the caller (the destination number although originally the same as the dialled number, may be modified through IN service processing).
+- Call reference
+Identifies a specific call.
+- Bearer capabilities
+Specifies the ISDN bearer capabilities (see Recommendation Q.931 [7]) requested by the caller.
+
+### 6.3.5 Input
+
+#### 6.3.5.1 Logical input
+
+Resume BCP at the point specified by the GSL specified POR.
+
+#### 6.3.5.2 Call instance data
+
+- Destination number
+Specifies a network address to which the call in progress is to be connected. For instance, a chain of SIBs may be used to create a destination number which differs from the dialled number.
+
+### 6.3.6 Graphical representation
+
+See Figure 18.
+
+# 7 Global service logic
+
+Global Service Logic (GSL) is the “glue” that describes the order in which SIBs can be chained together to accomplish services.
+
+
+
+Diagram of the Basic call process SIB (BCP). A central box labeled 'BCP' contains 'POI' on the left and 'POR' on the right. Above the box, 'SSD' and 'Set of POIs' are listed, with 'CIDFP' parameters (CLI, Category, Dialled, Destination, Bearer, Error) also shown. An arrow points from this list to the 'POI' inside the box. To the right, 'CID' and 'Destination Number' are listed, with an arrow pointing to the 'POR' inside the box. Below the box, 'CID' parameters (Call reference, Calling line identity, Calling line category, Dialled number, Destination number, Bearer capability, Error cause) are listed. The diagram is labeled 'T1136140-91/d18'.
+
+FIGURE 18/Q.1213
+**Basic call process SIB**
+
+For a given IN CS-1 services/service feature, global service logic is used to describe:
+
+- i) A specific POI which will define the functional launching point from the BCP to the SIB chain. Refer to 6.2.1 for a list of IN CS-1 POIs.
+- ii) A specific set of PORs where the SIB chain can logically return to the BCP. Refer to 6.2.2 for a list of IN CS-1 PORs.
+- iii) The pattern and order of SIBs which are to be chained together. This pattern begins at the POI defined in i) and ends at the set of PORs defined by ii). Refer to clause 5 for a list of IN CS-1 SIBs.
+- iv) Data parameters (SSD and CID) for each SIB in the SIB chain.
+
+## 7.1 Relationship between GSL and BCP
+
+Global service logic on the global functional plane views basic call process as a single resource. Based upon such a view of IN services, the following are identified as necessary interactions between global service logic and BCP, for example:
+
+*Communications from BCP to GSL:*
+
+- i) *Logical start for SIB chains* – Which is represented by POIs.
+- ii) *Data* – Which is represented by call instance data, which is required by SIB chains for processing IN service features. Examples of specific call instance data which the BCP may be responsible for, could include calling line identity and dialled number.
+
+*Communications from GSL to BCP:*
+
+- i) *Logical termination for SIB chains* – Which is represented by PORs.
+- ii) *Data* – Which is represented by call instance data that have been defined by one or more SIBs on a SIB chain. An example of such a call instance data could be a destination number. GSL ensures that all relevant CID is maintained throughout multiple SIB chains until termination of each call instance.
+
+## 7.2 Relationship between global service logic and SIBs
+
+The remaining components of GSL needed to define a service/SF, are the collection of SIBs (including their service support and call instance data), and the topology of their interconnection (to each other and to the POIs and PORs of the BCP). This specifies the functionality required to support the service/SF and the sequence of occurrence of this functionality.
+
+# 8 Mapping of the service plane to the global functional plane
+
+Referring to Figure 19 in the GFP, non-IN services are processed through the basic call process. When an IN Service Feature (SF) is to be evoked, it is initiated by a triggering mechanism from the basic call process. The chain “link” pattern which describes the SF, must then be obtained by the global service logic in order to process the SF. As new SFs are designed their SIB descriptions must be made available to the global service logic.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the mapping of service features to the global functional plane. At the top, two chains of Service Information Blocks (SIBs) are shown. Chain No. 1 consists of SIB 1, SIB 2, SIB 3, and SIB 6, with POI entering SIB 1 and POR exiting SIB 6. Chain No. 2 consists of SIB 4 and SIB 5, with POI entering SIB 4 and POR exiting SIB 5. A branching arrow points from SIB 2 in Chain No. 1 to SIB 4 in Chain No. 2. Below this, a box labeled 'Basic call process' is connected to a box labeled 'SF representation in GSL'. Arrows labeled POI and POR connect these two boxes. A callout box titled '(SF No. xyz)' contains a table defining the links between SIBs.
+
+| SIB | From | To |
+|-------------|------|-----|
+| | BCP | 1 |
+| | 1 | 2 |
+| Chain No. 1 | 2 | 3 |
+| | 3 | 6 |
+| | 6 | BCP |
+| Chain No. 2 | 2 | 4 |
+| | 4 | 5 |
+| | 5 | BCP |
+
+T18 12470-91/d19
+
+Diagram showing the mapping of service features to the global functional plane. It includes two chains of SIBs (SIB 1-6) and a table defining the links between them.
+
+FIGURE 19/Q.1213
+Global functional plane blueprint of a service feature
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1222-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1222-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36a32fb27730598abaef54b051cf1fffedc17599
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1222-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c315972c25456ec61dce423cf7bdb17e9326e1a8465e66d166c5dfadaf26aa35
+size 8270
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1222-199709-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1222-199709-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4953e2123e431470211e41b34ad8833ec2b04b5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1222-199709-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f0ca7badd3b87e479f9ce8247dc8ba0b3343b1271032fff10014938e31d746fc
+size 42141
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/00504fc688ebcf131ccbeff94dfc9939_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/00504fc688ebcf131ccbeff94dfc9939_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e80f81a7ef30fa4b403137c16cfe906e6fde3d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/00504fc688ebcf131ccbeff94dfc9939_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a884e9cb4733ab8f76ff98e9e0242350daa96b47987838f54e8de51e33592ee4
+size 24173
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/014daefdecf9d847ca82cb5b9f50731f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/014daefdecf9d847ca82cb5b9f50731f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb3e41c6c48f974af2c457744dc5cff2535c68b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/014daefdecf9d847ca82cb5b9f50731f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cc7ab29ecc27279c3ba41c941a07c85c2d291f4347372f46bb970503b2ad4c93
+size 20899
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1fafba4c85a7a3a964bb9b5475e9343dcf0bf2a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/042733dc5e8e7f5f30b60adba3266cde_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9138c536c1860fb01ababdb6f8476397c8d400e97886ca5ac6fc49affffb171c
+size 26622
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/08a978a124d3ed6cf1a3d0cfd89418d0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/08a978a124d3ed6cf1a3d0cfd89418d0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a1f914de725f1b6b69e361359cf46376ef304ecd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/08a978a124d3ed6cf1a3d0cfd89418d0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:12bd811d9759074e178bcbea3f0b2a261c42f9e3bd3beba56ce3614d16511918
+size 49350
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0997dbaa9dfecedd60029d70b53327b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0997dbaa9dfecedd60029d70b53327b8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15f23490d16a731d18e011126b55f790ac27c286
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0997dbaa9dfecedd60029d70b53327b8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9a1f28fc37fc1032ebcd104c02bdf4f7a9c9b5eb3cc135b2cf35fef0c6cc1dde
+size 40446
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/09e20a17ecd8042b3d9b7fd462f2d9b4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/09e20a17ecd8042b3d9b7fd462f2d9b4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec593e2cc4ee8e70a79ec16029a273038813efd5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/09e20a17ecd8042b3d9b7fd462f2d9b4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8a36a4b7bd8bff27bc3d8701b59c307cf750c17501ce59f5240abdfd62ac1cfa
+size 9961
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0af1ba85ab6e4e50befbef3d63e017dc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0af1ba85ab6e4e50befbef3d63e017dc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3f3bbf61ae84db638105ba5550fe049c20f751b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0af1ba85ab6e4e50befbef3d63e017dc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3eb3de11dbab9975832afed48f2d29ced80079b0c8247aedfabb92fa663f7d88
+size 11230
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0c80c383f76034e117adf5e5eaadaaf3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0c80c383f76034e117adf5e5eaadaaf3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7004ef6e343d2f95028c7b3a6d7385ac9741929d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/0c80c383f76034e117adf5e5eaadaaf3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7edae0f3434e0523e187ca30ade7025dc218b48220dd5f736feb2a2cb5fce0d1
+size 30342
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/13fde41de77bf026013a0b81684d1fc9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/13fde41de77bf026013a0b81684d1fc9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53b271c2397870a45923c8745409a867d76c29fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/13fde41de77bf026013a0b81684d1fc9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8659f171a9491d242dfd89a1c90c6ef0719b5a0e44e7590ad95b25aa343dba69
+size 8450
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/144e1d61e8738b22dcf4a683f869ac6f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/144e1d61e8738b22dcf4a683f869ac6f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80250b5413a111e01d2994171c8a71fd051f7013
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/144e1d61e8738b22dcf4a683f869ac6f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:780f0992ff8dabff8d06ae76c2311681a2c012f0ff15c62ecc4c3cbead0071df
+size 7408
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/18bb06865e2dada3656ea3d57f290f7f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/18bb06865e2dada3656ea3d57f290f7f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c43abfbdff14454e4084086b10cbfb37bc8c0ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/18bb06865e2dada3656ea3d57f290f7f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9cdc83481006a8340f9d8af812b4c4a9bd107af48f8e4fc3e40faf96894f2e19
+size 39967
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/19d7a7ce68d3e9036613910b761c4b24_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/19d7a7ce68d3e9036613910b761c4b24_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c371c85f51dbef435dd268a1dceaf178908b5eaa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/19d7a7ce68d3e9036613910b761c4b24_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:287c31c26be37efc347c8067459ef318d7b853fcd5804f70b90b98fe969c17ce
+size 15844
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/1cac1845cf99a3f64ae00cd2bb4f9ed7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/1cac1845cf99a3f64ae00cd2bb4f9ed7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc80aac471ecbac2f7b8838cd2a041a4d840ae74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/1cac1845cf99a3f64ae00cd2bb4f9ed7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9dc2f3e436ffa28ebb083cf769e072e43d5e9c56b855f69a64f3d06dd7aa177d
+size 9406
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/257c8341b41f1f4a287f27d33227974c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/257c8341b41f1f4a287f27d33227974c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc75bb97c44b34863cbf32fdcf33acf417228e85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/257c8341b41f1f4a287f27d33227974c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:af75a08baa76078b6d0affd333a23b5baf5fb7f85be772b8f5fa24fc9af34361
+size 28106
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/29a9cd1cb2a960eb91dbf79aab5d8668_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/29a9cd1cb2a960eb91dbf79aab5d8668_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa432c668c646fe0e938daf7a2bec3c8f824358a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/29a9cd1cb2a960eb91dbf79aab5d8668_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2ef0b02272cf96c2acbe8b67e8ea9f798da45efee45bb0fade8743793fcd874e
+size 16926
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/2a476a0b3dbc3429436246db4784ff9f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/2a476a0b3dbc3429436246db4784ff9f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd505d23e3b2ee43658297797d372701655802ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/2a476a0b3dbc3429436246db4784ff9f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:afae721a32877e66363373aebede9a082e3b4803c947b67f9ed164e36aebbb5b
+size 26534
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7da83ecb82b51a4cef7694858eef2c35f1986ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d77a478c5b78d330a2a6abbd32e7d0ac053d8b9c1ffe8a96476214afa6ddf7ae
+size 8196
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3337af75dfee8af7687b4f49914d6c93_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3337af75dfee8af7687b4f49914d6c93_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1861996959db7de032b417f0a49fb0644a02878d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3337af75dfee8af7687b4f49914d6c93_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:46d3d23e6ca730903d361a2cc413aaa53048312e7cfc75908d567527e21dfb22
+size 39495
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/339be989b91d5b1e73e5ecdc8401ca75_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/339be989b91d5b1e73e5ecdc8401ca75_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55c47c07859fcf4ebe49196f13a80c274498eefb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/339be989b91d5b1e73e5ecdc8401ca75_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:13aaf4665af44af468f9db334008328aa2b2f18767b55f7bcd14a528cf68be71
+size 25411
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af4907f573b8e3995122d6ed2ac85c157b35da29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:04b29ca620041c645025310b345f29ab5831faada884b3e73636d66e9dbb3576
+size 101720
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3481cde1adf61b0452dd6489dada6d6a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3481cde1adf61b0452dd6489dada6d6a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e0dfaa5e40642984c1b6b142779096b4a11bd75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3481cde1adf61b0452dd6489dada6d6a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4dcc2b87de894a2b9fd0a13f3d480cc32df77405d59369089b71f7f60e17f40f
+size 133668
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/356eb99ab9489bbd647223390a913903_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/356eb99ab9489bbd647223390a913903_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..032996997976cfc76768347cad3c82f26b7b13fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/356eb99ab9489bbd647223390a913903_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:538209eeb181b36b6d1848a4ad7267c6799f803a8a42c00e023a8455b63746f3
+size 8046
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3766b291e69420b0437ae278b057b5ee_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3766b291e69420b0437ae278b057b5ee_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..303304f273d47d71a2643e750cdae34fd30f8119
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/3766b291e69420b0437ae278b057b5ee_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6453843b3c6fd39e5e25f8611d51d57eabd222e2c2ff0ea4abf6597fa8192381
+size 8522
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/376f80eb8a41369e87da63a0210d173e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/376f80eb8a41369e87da63a0210d173e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ede9ffe068b18eb41847e329ad33bfc26d76b68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/376f80eb8a41369e87da63a0210d173e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9e68751982e882873d3ba0ca4f7db8fc453b1d74a4dfa9cff81d01090912e660
+size 7602
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4346261cc730a1eb683f35e4ce9deacf_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4346261cc730a1eb683f35e4ce9deacf_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0e53da2cb16a30f01e23643e588360c27d9694d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4346261cc730a1eb683f35e4ce9deacf_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:11401ef4b53efb0af93bde498105e54e4e8995e1662ef480dc26a9b183f0fa15
+size 9438
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/44ffa7f0e6419d046ab4fed0faaf7738_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/44ffa7f0e6419d046ab4fed0faaf7738_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be0ee8c3caeca3babb6c019a35c9c9f7b60bc44f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/44ffa7f0e6419d046ab4fed0faaf7738_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2be6e4534445ad5baca7b714f5d79a64d608550f521da1312744f7491f89edc3
+size 26522
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4540c7355b250cb891be0b54b0ba25c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4540c7355b250cb891be0b54b0ba25c7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb3a177b95e94ec279b6a744bd65eb8a0a77c825
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4540c7355b250cb891be0b54b0ba25c7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8972aac3711a9234caaf137a78a2d5efe3041db815e9ed30d4f9bd5455c651f4
+size 30435
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4801e73fa692059f2ca78196e6e907be_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4801e73fa692059f2ca78196e6e907be_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a2b8865b8c1e70226d06e8fb2e3bd3e0c1999b67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4801e73fa692059f2ca78196e6e907be_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e1f0a5cb02765c8b2bdaf73e1033448f353a4f5ea12d3ade07859d3b39969915
+size 26696
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4cde160bcc69b7b6c81b648dd0e4252e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4cde160bcc69b7b6c81b648dd0e4252e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ef21e09c8544ee4a852ddd190cf01ae02851774
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/4cde160bcc69b7b6c81b648dd0e4252e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:473616ef7c10eed1d0f7196cfdd7a7c7025627fc64a77d30b93d818667926548
+size 25101
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/523ab7b925beb555f88b2e1e1336974f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/523ab7b925beb555f88b2e1e1336974f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6525df23e805c6edce243a1b2a2a085bba5f24e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/523ab7b925beb555f88b2e1e1336974f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a50492fac3626b2ff0940a644d71b14b7b489e56e67a293fdfad8c616e763c41
+size 7337
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/5414f65867392f05ba0063b208eeb5e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/5414f65867392f05ba0063b208eeb5e1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b38f53becca5e7f8fa4744500b75e66dd9b0cf3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/5414f65867392f05ba0063b208eeb5e1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8d11c63313eda1bf9c1307cab0fe43d0a1965d617ab45f5ca4111afa9029dd04
+size 35806
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/6116b1a533010c170fc526ec513ba0b8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/6116b1a533010c170fc526ec513ba0b8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f30701758699bf36ba4a4741199223f66adc5bab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/6116b1a533010c170fc526ec513ba0b8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2082a9d98b3a9f317a7a975aa026f67683497d8a4a7dee83cadf1b7b5c9938c7
+size 7115
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/64544fbada794f3cdf4f78f5d83613e4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/64544fbada794f3cdf4f78f5d83613e4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4609a9a632815d5c850a4e3962beb35dc450fba3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/64544fbada794f3cdf4f78f5d83613e4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6cf0c71bbc742700ca273811c0af7313649fbe2ec84eb3aabdaa3aea2e9d9716
+size 11968
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/677bcb564410628b8b966ad87b394888_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/677bcb564410628b8b966ad87b394888_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20158ce5053cb1222076e3e326884580e36e6d32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/677bcb564410628b8b966ad87b394888_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:10bfae9f523f5f93515776be114a42c9b98c00f15b540745187a66782a424764
+size 11915
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/6cc85a2b62fd8a2a3faab29730f20e81_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/6cc85a2b62fd8a2a3faab29730f20e81_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80ed7bd6fc4c8b6c3e9c1db9bb890695d7bf9c1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/6cc85a2b62fd8a2a3faab29730f20e81_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:763aac83aae8dca384491361574f5a30227a78f8409e1d8f5103c00baebd47a4
+size 23367
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/70a863dc6cd47bac82c12162a9479aac_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/70a863dc6cd47bac82c12162a9479aac_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f5188f22ec45816170b99db9d4cefc35012de11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/70a863dc6cd47bac82c12162a9479aac_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8641f5711ca9193f2cb7c7689cb4598938c9e6932244093f12a9645b308fe6f5
+size 29182
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/7136ef99edf9289cc069898bd584d3aa_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/7136ef99edf9289cc069898bd584d3aa_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e3813d317797cee7d7c84cd0844c389b978cb55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/7136ef99edf9289cc069898bd584d3aa_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:550f279b1da5077ea364a71c024128b704086eea23fd96c7fe6b97a794c72c29
+size 6434
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/836b0790cef5469a167fa8931df4e408_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/836b0790cef5469a167fa8931df4e408_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27f4c61d8be85033819fa6b9a8ea7b7011ac5949
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/836b0790cef5469a167fa8931df4e408_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6c7752b3452ed38f58c516608d24f40d2b0c92040405478209d44aba0f001f14
+size 30321
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8db4732bcce5a584c4bdf2a2cd43a9f45ceba11f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:29392df9be5c582fbc9805935cd73c08ab595b56448be1f5b507dd0eee555f81
+size 101124
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/8d66c9c295023a1380f9986d3663bb1e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/8d66c9c295023a1380f9986d3663bb1e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33fbd1be478747c326a299d9bc957c9389ce0605
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/8d66c9c295023a1380f9986d3663bb1e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f0b0739bf668f9e767081fae8ba7042f003f6a8395b53b8ad0c16b1d082b16d1
+size 25215
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/91c33f8e1713989e8192322ec2d1212b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/91c33f8e1713989e8192322ec2d1212b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e67f17fa4a91082ab62164536862f9217a2782b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/91c33f8e1713989e8192322ec2d1212b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bb3006740fc0a47a60fb8c152a91863b6af9469447a300f3a9b8693bf6526114
+size 7254
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/98e54d5540b2efe3e24af3cf936bc4ea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/98e54d5540b2efe3e24af3cf936bc4ea_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb645b65393c273f8712bc290a9bbbfffab5a5f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/98e54d5540b2efe3e24af3cf936bc4ea_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b498e50a1f2d2e1a2faf310f14c1f9e8b10f8498763ed5015df5b5e405c9896b
+size 11641
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/9b9d2abd741ed4bafe7f78f89961c663_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/9b9d2abd741ed4bafe7f78f89961c663_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d39cb566688c49fce1e3eb435b2b13755b30b8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/9b9d2abd741ed4bafe7f78f89961c663_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0bed8a60d5557d289cc66db2ca75301598bd8227fec05a194f29a7272fd55787
+size 72012
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/9e8ebf03cae78f4f81b697548c2d7250_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/9e8ebf03cae78f4f81b697548c2d7250_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad8bab077298369f047af03971419e4e80d24fa7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/9e8ebf03cae78f4f81b697548c2d7250_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5aa7716639a58c264db1b8a3b132e337e32cda05b8db18e20c96bcdf3b7b829a
+size 10293
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/a161a2bbb4d830e847ccb4f44b7e41a9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/a161a2bbb4d830e847ccb4f44b7e41a9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d178f4a1d1825673d9e21555c1ca5066ebdd4b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/a161a2bbb4d830e847ccb4f44b7e41a9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d2c37bedfdc914472dd09568d0cdbf1084976362f5c993abda3c5ef2a79115ff
+size 6759
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9f36c6b324a774daa4b7534c22acd4b85d11046
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/aeb2a26a07219661191294dba528067a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4a0b8e2b1f8a69892cb020772d13a6ce4bced896947739c7191e0c51e756fd9d
+size 32538
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b60f017acac2f85adcfd13cde1a4192c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b60f017acac2f85adcfd13cde1a4192c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf9f2520fc9bae57db341c872eacf355967e0144
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b60f017acac2f85adcfd13cde1a4192c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:747f90757404c4e2cf6b2e348cd6cba4e0094e5b1e23e0d42cbff8c9ee25b200
+size 30791
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8167d000d3ee2cbfc08811f574067ee4d05b62c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6060b13fffc94810e0d026c99bacbe1d76d7ab88ad0b0ba544d8f1697251d2d2
+size 41412
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b7fd98a4fcc4990a613abfc31c5bdb5e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b7fd98a4fcc4990a613abfc31c5bdb5e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef1e3b4282f315cc975e525388e08bc4c1d6b9d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b7fd98a4fcc4990a613abfc31c5bdb5e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9a090cec7fdb9de6bbad62b1574b2cd9753fc262f232e7d94ab14ff8491b4007
+size 29104
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b9c0d46c1148cf65cb79f27fac420981_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b9c0d46c1148cf65cb79f27fac420981_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b81579496ec150959b9993b6968dc24a0c9e9c9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/b9c0d46c1148cf65cb79f27fac420981_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cb750d22f9c63f15428cabea8ac305e78ffb0ec779da63655dcbe5ce3d6450f2
+size 21103
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/c07e21a8d65991db04263322f859c94f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/c07e21a8d65991db04263322f859c94f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..faf5bbefdd1e8b2e31332ad0819f5843caec92dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/c07e21a8d65991db04263322f859c94f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:621445767f86d7d3ff190f0d44dd4476f0705c694b56b6c7518edba454b1adb0
+size 29280
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/cfaeb2934fffcb1f4690ab7de835c2e0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/cfaeb2934fffcb1f4690ab7de835c2e0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e6eb176c85cd67c8290464b4c941bca761db29e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/cfaeb2934fffcb1f4690ab7de835c2e0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d3747729de67b718c064bd8e750e8d24ce8b750b0c83f8276552f26d8956c09a
+size 5757
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1bf44be18eae0974bc9a4931ed4cbfeb92800c4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/cfef993dcc8fb513de79eb1f93cf26ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e179b246ea11ce3724042e32f652b7a19abb7da294dedfa54d3fdb1b89f28b8f
+size 87524
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/d04c50badc78d5ba47bf4e352af4a754_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/d04c50badc78d5ba47bf4e352af4a754_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbad87979014d2b50709bb039aa8e67b057a0b97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/d04c50badc78d5ba47bf4e352af4a754_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:848f2f2e43c1302d58e35d894c2815b66e44211ef6463a8688d7f37baf44c804
+size 52304
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/d9cfc30025244dcd75766061f27ee09f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/d9cfc30025244dcd75766061f27ee09f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d7fc0b86f736c75ad16b3cfb56b4e581edb7061
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/d9cfc30025244dcd75766061f27ee09f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1fd9ae688e7bdb10294adae5587ee7fe95003b26ae0132b090727abc64d9ed3f
+size 33503
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/dae88eec6d1005984029b794ff8b7a9e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/dae88eec6d1005984029b794ff8b7a9e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..514a26ae55c505d445fb9f3b7f1a4b5d73c1beb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/dae88eec6d1005984029b794ff8b7a9e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6b6b70c04dc9c25fd3b3cc1c26571c89ee6492dfccd33add8a359fa2da0e5a0d
+size 24044
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/dde1a42ca58cd189901556a0cbfe7d57_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/dde1a42ca58cd189901556a0cbfe7d57_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09052bcf6a87430fe799e5bbcf7d856c225256d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/dde1a42ca58cd189901556a0cbfe7d57_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2ad23b2e86142e70d7caec95cf1c991b0a47bed7c4429579ae0a3656f45de667
+size 23914
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/e38f0349f1b6094626cbfeab7105f029_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/e38f0349f1b6094626cbfeab7105f029_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcd927f225bc219ade61b279381bc5f45d0c0b81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/e38f0349f1b6094626cbfeab7105f029_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c0b35a86a96ee7baf67467690257493006affc3216edf1411b4d557205477fd0
+size 25501
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/e776395ba1d4a6d568f08b406d784abd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/e776395ba1d4a6d568f08b406d784abd_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7dc4a639279c26b14640572595aa0868640f7be2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/e776395ba1d4a6d568f08b406d784abd_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5ce5de1ecee89910eb2aec92027bca29a7b28194622931c7f1c4093ed99dd05a
+size 38810
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2000af489e27590c1319aac56189eaa2f2d227ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/eefe19c5e14dc4d6c316b7f7fbb7d7d7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b78b9d4df7a6ef82b8d6d4747c5f4d19b833cdff72cc8cf36e2d90f8f3ba60aa
+size 48270
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/efbdfb3d9d5a7a7782ef29e131f9f280_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/efbdfb3d9d5a7a7782ef29e131f9f280_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1bec592ad01a46ab9dffff27b19d2c6b732918a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/efbdfb3d9d5a7a7782ef29e131f9f280_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d5ab647903a992929f281907b08d84be6c2959eab9b6c40a1b43e14176c614d8
+size 49908
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/f61d0925551545b5938b3a4d1bbf63c3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/f61d0925551545b5938b3a4d1bbf63c3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5230c65079d60b9422b0d338de82b0eb23b8e78e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/f61d0925551545b5938b3a4d1bbf63c3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec2d2467fa4d7893366699470ab991560c701749d8fc25c1ffa6036ad76f49e6
+size 22014
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/f796c4b6ef101faa39b887a86820c3d1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/f796c4b6ef101faa39b887a86820c3d1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79d695d11956236e97e8a279caf80fe8c7690342
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/f796c4b6ef101faa39b887a86820c3d1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d77dc06ae4e985984a4da281eb76ffea844902266672290ebdbf4f22187976dc
+size 28342
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/fcc757566216206ceddbd6c775e8db02_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/fcc757566216206ceddbd6c775e8db02_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1a043ede993a03f143b9a54c802d437d3c59dc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/fcc757566216206ceddbd6c775e8db02_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:296d5648a13aca589a4b7c22d5ef878bfc5f5ac8fc82367350b4837641fe4a27
+size 53406
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/feae5a5b6e128162dbced0860fd97b9b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/feae5a5b6e128162dbced0860fd97b9b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f65418d8fb0f84f6664b38cb7f361518f94a8e75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/feae5a5b6e128162dbced0860fd97b9b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bdb8624020fd8ecc2a4ec48d2c0601dd2e2137556f183bed7993e3c839e9ae76
+size 30319
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/ff7977984f2552f326b2089d7595fff3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/ff7977984f2552f326b2089d7595fff3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45c07df523ebf69566500250018198d9ff88de98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1223-199709-I_PDF-E/ff7977984f2552f326b2089d7595fff3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:672843ddb6faa241dc57ff13bdc91797e2329a596593f2fbe15e9e0f801074e9
+size 25817
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1225-199709-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1225-199709-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a53b67001f0da2b5613c0891d5e21077a5dc12a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1225-199709-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,495 @@
+
+
+
+
+The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with intersecting lines.
+
+ITU logo
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.1225**
+
+(09/97)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+Intelligent Network
+
+---
+
+**Physical plane for Intelligent Network Capability
+Set 2**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.1225
+
+(Previously CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+## **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+| | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 |
+| Interworking with Standard-A INMARSAT system | Q.1100–Q.1109 |
+| Interworking with Standard-B INMARSAT system | Q.1110–Q.1149 |
+| Interworking with the INMARSAT aeronautical mobile-satellite system | Q.1150–Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1999 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.*
+
+# **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION Q.1225**
+
+# **PHYSICAL PLANE FOR INTELLIGENT NETWORK CAPABILITY SET 2**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+This Recommendation describes the physical plane of the Intelligent Network (IN) architecture for CS-2. The physical plane identifies different Physical Entities (PEs), the allocation of functional entities to PEs, and the interfaces between the PEs.
+
+Companion Recommendations include the Q.120x- and Q.122x-Series Recommendations.
+
+## **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.1225 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 12th of September 1997.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 1998
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 1 | General ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | Requirements and assumptions ..... | 2 |
+| 2.1 | Requirements..... | 2 |
+| 2.2 | Assumptions ..... | 3 |
+| 3 | Physical Entities (PEs) ..... | 3 |
+| 4 | Mapping requirements..... | 5 |
+| 5 | Mapping the distributed functional plane to the physical plane..... | 5 |
+| 5.1 | Mapping of functional entities to physical entities..... | 5 |
+| 5.2 | Mapping of FE-FE relationships to PE-PE relationships..... | 6 |
+| 5.3 | Selection of underlying protocol platforms..... | 7 |
+| 5.3.1 | SCP-SSP interface..... | 7 |
+| 5.3.2 | AD-SSP interface ..... | 8 |
+| 5.3.3 | IP-SSP interface ..... | 8 |
+| 5.3.4 | SN-SSP interface..... | 8 |
+| 5.3.5 | SCP-IP interface..... | 8 |
+| 5.3.6 | AD-IP interface ..... | 8 |
+| 5.3.7 | SCP-SDP interface..... | 8 |
+| 5.3.8 | User interfaces..... | 8 |
+| 5.3.9 | Enhanced ISDN CPE-CUSP interface ..... | 9 |
+| 5.3.10 | AD-CUSP interface..... | 10 |
+
+
+
+# Recommendation Q.1225
+
+# PHYSICAL PLANE FOR INTELLIGENT NETWORK CAPABILITY SET 2
+
+*(Geneva, 1997)*
+
+# 1 General
+
+This Recommendation describes the physical plane of the Intelligent Network (IN) architecture for CS-2. General IN physical plane information is contained in Recommendation Q.1205.
+
+The physical plane of the IN conceptual model identifies the different physical entities and the interfaces between these entities.
+
+The physical plane architecture should be consistent with the IN conceptual model. The IN conceptual model is a tool that can be used to design the IN architecture to meet the following main objectives:
+
+- service implementation independence;
+- network implementation independence;
+- vendor and technology independence.
+
+The I.130 stage 3 service description methodology may be used (which includes the functional specification of the node and detailed description of the protocol between the nodes) in developing the physical plane architecture.
+
+The following is the list of abbreviations used in this Recommendation:
+
+| | |
+|----------|--------------------------------------------------|
+| AD | Adjunct |
+| BRI | Basic Rate Interface |
+| CCAF | Call Control Agent Function |
+| CCF | Call Control Function |
+| CS | Capability Set |
+| CUSF | Call-Unrelated Service Function |
+| DSS | Digital Signalling System |
+| INAP | Intelligent Network Application Protocol |
+| IP | Intelligent Peripheral |
+| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network |
+| ISDN-CPE | ISDN Customer Premises Equipment |
+| ISUP | ISDN User Part (Protocol) |
+| NAP | Network Access Point |
+| NCP | Network Control Point |
+| N-ISDN | Narrow-band Integrated Services Digital Networks |
+| PBX | Private Branch Exchange |
+| PRI | (ISDN) Primary Rate Interface |
+
+| | |
+|----------|---------------------------------------|
+| SCCP | Signalling Connection Control Part |
+| SCEF | Service Creation Environment Function |
+| SCF | Service Control Function |
+| SCP | Service Control Point |
+| SCUAF | Service Control User Agent Function |
+| SDF | Service Data Function |
+| SDP | Service Data Point |
+| SMF | Service Management Function |
+| SMP | Service Management Point |
+| SN | Service Node |
+| SRF | Specialized Resource Function |
+| SS No. 7 | Signalling System No. 7 |
+| SSCP | Service Switching and Control Point |
+| SSF | Service Switching Function |
+| SSP | Service Switching Point |
+| TMN | Telecommunications Management Network |
+
+## 2 Requirements and assumptions
+
+### 2.1 Requirements
+
+The key requirements of the physical plane architecture are as follows:
+
+- the functional entities in the CS-2 distributed functional plane can be mapped onto the CS-2 physical entities; however, there is no present need to describe (or map to Physical Plane) the IN Management aspects;
+- one or more functional entities may be mapped onto the same physical entity;
+- one functional entity cannot be split between two physical entities (i.e. the functional entity is mapped entirely within a single physical entity);
+- duplicate instances of a functional entity can be mapped to different physical entities, though not to the same physical entity;
+- physical entities can be grouped to form a physical architecture;
+- the physical entities may offer standard interfaces;
+- vendors must be able to develop physical entities based on the mapping of functional entities and the standard interfaces;
+- vendors must be able to support mature technologies and new technologies as they become available; and
+- the Telecommunications Management Network (TMN) represents the system or systems associated with management of IN. As such, it is not restrained to any single physical implementation but may be implemented by distributing its functionality to one or more physical entities. This requirement is reflected in Figure 1/Q.1215 by means of the "TMN Cloud".
+
+### 2.2 Assumptions
+
+The following assumptions are made for the development of the physical plane architecture:
+
+- The IN conceptual model is used as a tool to develop the IN physical architecture.
+- Existing and new technologies can be used to develop the physical entities.
+- The specification of functional entities in the distributed functional plane and standard interfaces in the physical plane support network vendor independence and service independence.
+- For CS-2, a sufficient number of interfaces are identified for support of services. Service creation and OAM functions are not addressed.
+
+## 3 Physical Entities (PEs)
+
+This clause describes a selection of PEs to support IN CS-2. That selection is not intended to preclude or disallow the application of any other IN PE to support CS-2.
+
+### a) Service Switching Point (SSP)
+
+In addition to providing users with access to the network (if the SSP is a local exchange) and performing any necessary switching functionality, the SSP allows access to the set of IN capabilities. The SSP contains detection capability to detect requests for IN-based services. It also contains capabilities to communicate with other PE(s) containing a Service Control Function (SCF), such as a Service Control Point (SCP), and to respond to instructions from the other PE. Functionally, an SSP contains a Call Control Function (CCF), a Service Switching Function (SSF), and, if the SSP is a local exchange, a Call Control Agent Function (CCAF). It also may optionally contain a Service Control Function (SCF), and/or a Specialized Resource Function (SRF), and/or a Service Data Function (SDF). The SSP may provide IN-based services to users connected to subtending Network Access Points.
+
+### b) Network Access Point (NAP)
+
+A NAP is a PE that includes only the CCAF and CCF functional entities. It may also be present in the network. The NAP supports early and ubiquitous deployment of IN-based services. This NAP cannot communicate with an SCF, but it has the ability to determine when IN processing is required. It must send calls requiring IN processing to an SSP.
+
+### c) Service Control Point (SCP)
+
+The SCP contains the Service Logic Programs (SLPs) and data that are used to provide IN-based services. The SCP is connected to SSPs by a signalling network. Multiple SCPs may contain the same SLPs and data to improve service reliability and to facilitate load sharing between SCPs. Functionally, an SCP contains an SCF and it may contain an SDF. The SCP can access data in an SDP either directly or through a signalling network. The SDP may be in the same network as the SCP, or in another network. The SCP can be connected to SSPs, and optionally to IPs, through the signalling network. The SCP can also be connected to an IP via an SSP relay function.
+
+### d) Adjunct (AD)
+
+The AD is functionally equivalent to an SCP (i.e. it contains the same functional entities) but it is directly connected to an SSP. Communication between an AD and an SSP is supported by a high-speed interface. This arrangement may result in differing performance characteristics for an AD and an SCP. The application layer messages are identical in content to those carried by the signalling network to an SCP.
+
+An AD may be connected to more than one SSP and an SSP may be connected to more than one Adjunct.
+
+### **e) Intelligent Peripheral (IP)**
+
+The IP provides resources such as customized and concatenated voice announcements, voice recognition, and Dual Tone Multi-Frequencies (DTMF) digit collection, and contains switching matrix to connect users to these resources. The IP supports flexible information interactions between a user and the network, and may contain service-specific user interaction scripts, which allow user interactions to be grouped. Functionally, the IP contains the SRF. The IP may directly connect to one or more SSPs, and/or may connect to the signalling network.
+
+In the ISDN stimulus protocol environment, the IP will also provide resources such as customized and concatenated Information Display and Digit collection, out of channel, and it contains the necessary coordination and multiplexing to connect users to these resources.
+
+An SCP or AD can request an SSP to connect a user to a resource located in an IP that is connected to the SSP from which the service request is detected. An SCP or AD can also request the SSP to connect a user to a resource located in an IP that is connected to another SSP.
+
+### **f) Service Node (SN)**
+
+The SN can control IN-based services and engage in flexible information interactions with users. The SN communicates directly with one or more SSPs, each with a point-to-point signalling and transport connection. Functionally, the SN contains an SCF, SDF, SRF, and an SSF/CCF. This SSF/CCF is closely coupled to the SCF within the SN, and is not accessible by external SCFs.
+
+In a manner similar to an AD, the SCF in an SN receives messages from the SSP, executes SLPs, and sends messages to the SSP. SLPs in an SN may be developed by the same service creation environment used to develop SLPs for SCPs and ADs. The SRF in an SN enables the SN to interact with users in a manner similar to an IP. An SCF can request the SSF to connect a user to a resource located in an SN that is connected to the SSP from which the service request is detected. An SCF can also request the SSP to connect a user to a resource located in an SN that is connected to another SSP.
+
+### **g) Service Switching and Control Point (SSCP)**
+
+The SSCP is a combined SCP and SSP in a single node. Functionally, it contains an SCF, SDF, CCAF, CCF, and SSF. The connection between the SCF/SDF functions and the CCAF/CCF/SSF functions is proprietary and closely coupled, but it provides the same service capability as an SSP and SCP separately.
+
+This node may also contain SRF functional capabilities (i.e. SRF as an optional capability).
+
+The interfaces between the SSCP and other PEs are the same as the interfaces between the SSP and other PEs, and therefore will not be explicitly stated.
+
+### **h) Service Data Point (SDP)**
+
+The SDP contains the customer and network data which is accessed during the execution of a service. Functionally, the SDP contains an SDF.
+
+### **i) Enhanced ISDN Customer Premises Equipment (Enhanced ISDN CPE)**
+
+Recommendation I.112 defines the ISDN CPE as "a node that provides the functions necessary for the operation of the access protocols by the user". Functionally, the ISDN CPE can contain the SCUAF (for the bearer-unrelated interactions), the CCAF, and the IAF.
+
+### **j) Call-Unrelated Service Point (CUSP)**
+
+The CUSP provides a point of protocol interworking for Call Unrelated User Interaction. It establishes and releases call-unrelated associations between the user and the SCP or AD, carries out protocol adaptation between ROSE APDUs and TCAP transactions, and monitors the integrity of the association.
+
+## **4 Mapping requirements**
+
+- Physical plane architecture requirements listed in 2.1 should be met.
+- Functional entities should be mapped to physical entities in a manner which will support the identified benchmark CS-2 services.
+- Functional entity to physical entity mapping must allow efficient implementation in existing physical entities.
+- Functional entity to physical entity mapping must allow for standard communications between network functions via service independent interfaces.
+
+## **5 Mapping the distributed functional plane to the physical plane**
+
+### **5.1 Mapping of functional entities to physical entities**
+
+This subclause gives a mapping of functional entities into physical entities for CS-2, and describes the reference points between the PEs. In so doing, an appropriate distribution of functionality for CS-2 is identified, and functional interfaces suitable for standardization are highlighted. The PEs described in this subclause are for illustrative purposes only, and do not imply the only possible mapping of functionality for CS-2.
+
+This subclause describes a flexible physical architecture made up of several PEs. Each PE contains one or more functional entities, which define its IN functionality. PEs included in the physical architecture shown in Figure 1 are Service Switching Point (SSP), Network Access Point (NAP), Service Control Point (SCP), Intelligent Peripheral (IP), Adjunct (AD), Service Switching and Control Point (SSCP), Service Data Point (SDP), ISDN Customer Premises Equipment (ISDN CPE), and Services Node (SN).
+
+Typical scenarios of functional entity mapping to physical entity are shown in Table 1.
+
+**Table 1/Q.1225 – Typical scenarios of FE to PE mapping**
+
+| PEs | FEs | | | | | | | |
+|-------------|-------------|-----------------|------|-------|-----|------|-----|-----|
+| | SCF | SSF-CCF | CCAF | SCUAF | SDF | CUSF | SRF | IAF |
+| SCP | C | – | – | – | O | – | – | – |
+| SN | C | C | O | – | C | C | C | – |
+| AD | C | – | – | – | C | – | – | – |
+| SSP | O | C | O | – | O | C | O | – |
+| IP | – | – | – | – | – | – | C | – |
+| SDP | – | – | – | – | C | – | – | – |
+| SSCP | C | C | – | – | C | – | O | – |
+| NAP | – | C
(CCF only) | – | – | – | – | – | – |
+| ISDN
CPE | – | – | O | C | – | – | – | O |
+| CUSP | – | C
(CCF only) | – | – | – | C | – | – |
+| C | Core | | | | | | | |
+| O | Optional | | | | | | | |
+| – | Not allowed | | | | | | | |
+
+There is no intention that the table should disallow any other combination of functional entities that would result in a PE not shown in the table.
+
+The above mappings are shown in Figure 1. Each PE has certain functional entities mapped into it. The solid lines on the figure show transport paths that may exist between the PEs, and the dotted lines show signalling paths that can carry application layer messages for IN-based services.
+
+### 5.2 Mapping of FE-FE relationships to PE-PE relationships
+
+The FE-FE interfaces that fall within the scope of CS-2 are:
+
+- 1) SSF-SCF;
+- 2) SCF-SDF;
+- 3) SCF-SSF;
+- 4) SDF-SDF;
+- 5) CUSF-SCF
+- 6) SCUAF-CUSF; and
+- 7) SCF-SRF.
+
+A mapping to the PE-PE interfaces is provided in Table 2.
+
+Table 2 is not meant to be an exhaustive list of all possible PE-PE relationships that may be covered by the CS-2 Recommendations.
+
+**Table 2/Q.1225 – FE-FE relationships to PE-PE relationships**
+
+| FE-FE | PE-PE |
+|--------------|-------------------------------|
+| SSF-SCF | SSP-SCP
SSP-AD
SSP-SN |
+| SCF-SDF | SSP-SCP
SCP-SDP |
+| SCF-SRF | SCP-IP
SCP-SSP-IP
AD-IP |
+| IAF-SCF | ISDN CPE-SCP
(via Switch) |
+| SCUAF-CUSF | ISDN CPE-SSP |
+| SDF-SDF | SDP-SDP |
+| SCF-SCF | SCP-SCP |
+
+### **5.3 Selection of underlying protocol platforms**
+
+This subclause describes the candidate interfaces for CS-2 between the elements of the physical architecture. The interfaces are identified below.
+
+- SCP-SSP;
+- AD-SSP;
+- IP-SSP;
+- SN-SSP;
+- SCP-IP;
+- ISDN CPE-SSP;
+- SCP-SCP;
+- SDP-SDP;
+- AD-IP; and
+- SCP-SDP.
+
+Existing lower-layer protocols are proposed for these candidate interfaces to carry the application layer messages required by IN-based services. As such, the focus of the standardization effort for CS-2 is on the application layer protocols. At the application layer, the message sent that the different interfaces carry should reflect the same semantic content, even though the application layer messages may be encoded or formatted differently. For example, the messages between the SSF in an SSP and the SCF in an SCP, AD or SN should contain the same information. The following subclauses give some proposed protocols for use on these interfaces.
+
+#### **5.3.1 SCP-SSP interface**
+
+The proposed underlying protocol platform for the interface between an SCP and an SSP is Transaction Capabilities Application Part (TCAP) on Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP)/Message Transfer Part (MTP) of SS No. 7.
+
+#### **5.3.2 AD-SSP interface**
+
+The proposed underlying protocol platform for the AD-SSP interface is TCAP. The physical interface has not been specified, but a number of alternative standard protocols could be used.
+
+#### **5.3.3 IP-SSP interface**
+
+This interface is used for communications between an IP and an SSP as well as for communication between an IP and an SCP which is being relayed through an SSP.
+
+The proposed underlying protocol platform for the interface between an IP and an SSP is ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI), Primary Rate Interface (PRI) (or both), or SS No. 7.
+
+If a BRI or PRI is used, the ISDN D-channel connecting an IP to an SSP carries application layer information between an SCF and an SRF, and supports the setup of B-channel connections to the IP. Information passed from an SCF to an SRF (e.g. announcement number and number of digits to collect) and vice versa (e.g. collected information and billing measurements) is embedded in the facility information element. The facility information element can be carried by some Q.931 messages, such as SETUP and DISCONNECT. The facility information element can also be carried by the FACILITY message of Recommendation Q.931. This possibility provides for the flexibility to convey application layer information without affecting the call connection establishment.
+
+#### **5.3.4 SN-SSP interface**
+
+The proposed underlying protocol platform for the interface between an SN and an SSP is ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI), Primary Rate Interface (PRI) (or both). An SN and an SSP exchange application layer messages over an ISDN D-channel using the common element procedures of Recommendation Q.932. This communication may occur on a separate D-channel from the channel that carries the common element procedure messages. Figure 1 shows the case where these channels are separate.
+
+#### **5.3.5 SCP-IP interface**
+
+The proposed underlying protocol platform for an interface between an SCP and an IP is Transaction Capabilities Application Part (TCAP) on signalling connection control part (SCCP)/MTP of SS No. 7.
+
+#### **5.3.6 AD-IP interface**
+
+The proposed underlying protocol platform between an AD and an IP is TCAP. The physical interface has not been specified, but a number of alternative standard protocols could be used.
+
+#### **5.3.7 SCP-SDP interface**
+
+The proposed underlying protocol platform for the interface between an SCP and an SDP is Transaction Capabilities Application Part (TCAP) in Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP)/MTP of SS No. 7. For SDPs outside the network (e.g. credit card validation database at credit card company) an interworking unit can be used which is inside the network and performs translation of SS No. 7 TCAP to a public or private data transfer protocol (e.g. X.25).
+
+#### **5.3.8 User interfaces**
+
+A user is an entity external to the IN that uses IN capabilities. IN users may employ the access interfaces described below to invoke various IN service capabilities. For example, users can affect the routing of a call, send and receive information from the network, screen calls, and update service parameters. Users are served by existing network interfaces.
+
+It is important to ensure that IN should continue to support existing services and capabilities. In addition, the current restrictions imposed by each of the interface technologies described below must be considered when deploying IN-based services. For example, calling party information may or may not be available at a given interface and, therefore, may or may not be provided to the SCF.
+
+End users use analogue interface signalling, or ISDN access signalling arrangements. IN user-network interactions include providing stimuli, such as off-hook or DTMF digit signalling, which determine further IN action.
+
+Out-of-band (i.e. D-channel) signalling provides ISDN users with additional capabilities for accessing potential IN-based services. When originating a call, an ISDN user identifies the bearer capability to be associated with the call. IN service logic can use this information to determine how the call should be handled (e.g. how to route the call).
+
+The interface between the ISDN CPE and SSP is supported by DSS 1 protocols.
+
+NOTE – The interface between the ISDN CPE and NAP is left for further study.
+
+#### **5.3.9 Enhanced ISDN CPE-CUSP interface**
+
+The CPE protocol based on Generic or Flexible Functional Protocols can make use of extensions to use ROSE APDUs to interact with the Call-Unrelated Service Point in the Out Channel Call-Unrelated User Interaction mode.
+
+In the case where the Functional Protocol is provided from a Smart Card or PBX, user interaction may exist, which utilizes the CUSP to use an association between the CPE and the SCP. In principle, the CUSP is required to map the ROSE APDU into the TCAP/SCCP protocol elements. The SCUAF and IAF are examples of CPE intelligence, which, for the purpose of Physical Plane mapping may be seen as equivalent options.
+
+#### 5.3.10 AD-CUSP interface
+
+
+
+Interfaces:
+ SCP-SSP SCP-SDP
+ AD-SSP Enhanced ISDN
+ CPE-CUSP
+ IP-SSP AD-IP
+ SN-SSP CUSP-AD
+
+The diagram illustrates the physical plane architecture for CS-2. At the top, an SCP (Service Control Point) containing SCF (Service Control Function) and SDF (Service Data Function) and an SDP (Service Data Point) containing SDF are connected to a central 'SS No. 7 network' oval. The SDP has a dashed line pointing to 'To other SCPs and/or SDPs in this or another network'. Below the SS No. 7 network, several entities are connected via dashed lines (signalling) and solid lines (transport):
+
+- An IP (Intelligent Peripheral) containing SRF (Specialized Resource Function).
+- A SN (Service Node) containing CUSF (Call-Unrelated Service Function), SCF, CCF (Call Control Function), SSF (Service Switching Function), SDF, and SRF.
+- An AD (Adjunct) containing SCF and SDF.
+- An SSP (Service Switching Point) containing SCFa), SRF, CUSF, CCF, SSF, SDFa), and CCAF (Call Control Agent Function). It is connected to a laptop icon.
+- A NAP (Network Access Point) containing CCF and CCAF, connected to a laptop icon.
+- An ISDN CPE (ISDN Customer Premises Equipment) containing IAF (ISDN Access Function), SCUAF (Service Control User Agent Function), and CCAF.
+- A CUSP (Call-Unrelated Service Point) containing CUSF and CCF.
+
+All these entities are interconnected by dashed lines representing signalling paths. A large dashed box at the bottom right, labeled 'Telecommunications Management Network (TMN)', has arrows pointing 'To all PEs' (Physical Entities). A legend at the bottom left defines the line types: solid for Transport, dashed for Signalling, and oval for Optional FE. A footnote 'a) An SSCP PE includes the SCF and SDF FEs as core elements.' is provided. A reference code 'T1185420-97' is in the bottom right corner.
+
+a) An SSCP PE includes the SCF and SDF FEs as core elements.
+
+— Transport
+ - - - Signalling
+ ( ) Optional FE
+
+**Physical Entities (PEs)**
+ AD Adjunct
+ IP Intelligent Peripheral
+ SSP Service Switching Point
+ SCP Service Control Point
+ SN Service Node
+ NAP Network Access Point
+ SDP Service Data Point
+ SSCP Service Switching and Control Point
+ ISDN CPE ISDN Customer Premises Equipment
+ CUSP Call-Unrelated Service Point
+
+**Functional Entities (FEs)**
+ CCF Call Control Function
+ CCAF Call Control Agent Function
+ SCF Service Control Function
+ SDF Service Data Function
+ SRF Specialized Resource Function
+ SSF Service Switching Function
+ CUSF Call-Unrelated Service Function
+ SCUAF Service Control User Agent Function
+
+To all PEs
+ Telecommunications Management Network (TMN)
+ T1185420-97
+
+Diagram of Physical plane architecture for CS-2 showing various network entities and their interconnections.
+
+**Figure 1/Q.1225 – Physical plane architecture for CS-2**
+
+# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communication |
+| Series Z | Programming languages |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1601-199912-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1601-199912-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d91127678c1d2a02944ce8a3b6689fc8594d1629
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.1601-199912-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2048 @@
+
+
+
+
+The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features a globe with a lightning bolt superimposed on it, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font.
+
+ITU logo
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.1601**
+
+(12/1999)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+Intelligent Network
+
+---
+
+**Signalling System No. 7 – Interaction between
+N-ISDN and INAP CS-2**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.1601
+
+(Formerly CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+# **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120-Q.249 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250-Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310-Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400-Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700-Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 |
+| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.*
+
+# **Signalling System No. 7 – Interaction between N-ISDN and INAP CS-2**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+This ITU-T Recommendation specifies procedures in order to provide interaction between N-ISDN and INAP CS-2/CS-3, i.e. to support IN services in an ISDN environment. This ITU-T Recommendation only considers the case where the SSP is located at a transit level. As a consequence, this could lead to limitations for ISDN supplementary services.
+
+The interaction between other signalling systems and INAP can be found by consulting the relevant interworking Recommendation to the N-ISDN in combination with the N-ISDN/INAP interaction Recommendation.
+
+## **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.1601 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1997-2000) and approved under the WTSC Resolution 1 procedure on 3 December 1999.
+
+## **Keywords**
+
+INAP, ISUP, SS7, SSP.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 2001
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 1 | Scope..... | 1 |
+| 2 | References..... | 1 |
+| 3 | ITU-T terms and definitions ..... | 2 |
+| 4 | Abbreviations..... | 2 |
+| 5 | Conventions ..... | 3 |
+| 6 | Description..... | 4 |
+| 6.1 | Establishment of Bearer related connections..... | 4 |
+| 6.2 | Establishment of bearer unrelated connections..... | 10 |
+| 7 | Operational requirements..... | 10 |
+| 8 | Coding requirements..... | 10 |
+| 8.1 | Messages..... | 10 |
+| 8.2 | Parameters..... | 10 |
+| 8.2.1 | Call diversion treatment indicators parameter..... | 10 |
+| 8.2.2 | Called IN number parameter..... | 10 |
+| 8.2.3 | Call offering treatment indicators parameter..... | 10 |
+| 8.2.4 | Charged party identification parameter ..... | 10 |
+| 8.2.5 | Conference treatment indicators parameter ..... | 10 |
+| 8.2.6 | Correlation id parameter ..... | 11 |
+| 8.2.7 | Display information parameter ..... | 11 |
+| 8.2.8 | SCF id parameter ..... | 11 |
+| 8.2.9 | UID action indicators parameter..... | 11 |
+| 8.2.10 | UID capability indicators parameter..... | 11 |
+| 8.2.11 | Original called IN number parameter ..... | 11 |
+| 9 | State definitions ..... | 11 |
+| 10 | Signalling procedures..... | 11 |
+| 10.1 | Bearer related connections ..... | 11 |
+| 10.1.1 | IN basic call ..... | 11 |
+| 10.1.2 | IN call with SCP request to collect further digits ..... | 17 |
+| 10.1.3 | Detection Point processing ..... | 18 |
+| 10.1.4 | Setup of an IN call to destination B..... | 20 |
+| 10.1.5 | User interactive dialogue (in-band) ..... | 23 |
+| 10.1.6 | Call gapping..... | 28 |
+| 10.1.7 | Service filtering ..... | 29 |
+| 10.1.8 | SCP initiated call ..... | 29 |
+| 10.1.9 | GVNS ..... | 31 |
+
+| | Page |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 10.1.10 Actions to be performed in local exchanges..... | 32 |
+| 10.1.11 Actions in an intermediate exchange..... | 33 |
+| 10.1.12 Actions in international gateway exchanges..... | 34 |
+| 10.2 Bearer unrelated connections..... | 34 |
+| 11 Interaction with other networks ..... | 34 |
+| 12 Interaction between IN basic call and ISDN supplementary services..... | 34 |
+| 12.1 Call diversion..... | 36 |
+| 12.1.1 Actions in the service switching point..... | 36 |
+| 12.1.2 Actions in the destination local exchange ..... | 36 |
+| 12.2 Calling line identification presentation/restriction..... | 37 |
+| 12.2.1 Actions in the service switching point..... | 37 |
+| 12.3 Completion of calls service..... | 37 |
+| 12.3.1 Completion of calls to busy subscriber..... | 37 |
+| 12.3.2 Completion of calls on no reply..... | 37 |
+| 12.4 Conference ..... | 37 |
+| 12.4.1 Actions in the originating or destination local exchange..... | 37 |
+| 12.5 Connected line identification presentation/restriction ..... | 37 |
+| 12.5.1 Actions in the service switching point..... | 37 |
+| 12.6 Explicit call transfer..... | 38 |
+| 12.6.1 Actions in the service switching point..... | 38 |
+| 12.7 Malicious call identification ..... | 38 |
+| 12.7.1 Actions in the service switching point..... | 38 |
+| 12.7.2 Actions in the destination local exchange ..... | 38 |
+| 12.8 Three party ..... | 39 |
+| 12.8.1 Actions in the originating or destination local exchange..... | 39 |
+| 13 Interactions between IN services ..... | 39 |
+| 14 Parameter values (timers) ..... | 39 |
+| Annex A – Signalling flows..... | 40 |
+| Appendix I – Coding of the compatibility information for the parameters ..... | 46 |
+| Appendix II – Contents of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo..... | 47 |
+| Appendix III – Limitations for ISUP basic call procedures and supplementary services for different types of IN calls..... | 49 |
+
+# **Signalling System No. 7 – Interaction between N-ISDN and INAP CS-2**
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+This ITU-T Recommendation specifies the interaction between the N-ISDN and INAP CS-2/CS-3.
+
+For the purpose of this ITU-T Recommendation the interface INAP CS-2 between SSP and SCP is regarded as being an intranetwork interface.
+
+The following topics being part of INAP CS-3 are considered in addition.
+
+- "Carrier" parameter on INAP in the InitialDP and InitiateCallAttempt operation.
+- Connected line identification restriction for the called IN number.
+- Setting of the "charge indicator".
+- Mapping of the calling geodetic location parameter.
+
+The interaction between other signalling systems and INAP can be found by consulting the relevant interworking Recommendation to the N-ISDN in combination with the N-ISDN/INAP interaction Recommendation.
+
+This ITU-T Recommendation specifies procedures in order to provide interaction between N-ISDN and INAP, i.e. to support IN services in an ISDN environment. In addition new protocol elements for the ISUP are defined in this ITU-T Recommendation in order to satisfy IN specific requirements. Based on the protocol inherent compatibility mechanism a stepwise upgrade of the ISUP functionality is possible. However, the new function is only available for an IN call, if supported in any of the affected exchanges.
+
+This ITU-T Recommendation only considers the case where the SSP is located at a transit level. As a consequence this could lead to limitations for ISDN supplementary services.
+
+This ITU-T Recommendation does not specify enhancements to the DSS1 protocol, which may be needed due to additional ISUP functions or IN requirements, respectively.
+
+The main subjects of this interaction specification are the following:
+
+- description of specific call control functions for IN calls;
+- impacts on the ISUP basic call and the ISDN supplementary services for IN calls;
+- enhancement of the ISUP protocol due to IN specific requirements.
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] CCITT Recommendation I.130 (1988), *Method for the characterization of telecommunication services supported by an ISDN and network capabilities of an ISDN.*
+- [2] ITU-T Recommendation I.112 (1993), *Vocabulary of terms for ISDNs.*
+- [3] ITU-T Recommendation I.210 (1993), *Principles of telecommunication services supported by an ISDN and the means to describe them.*
+
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1224 (1997), *Distributed functional plane for intelligent network Capability Set 2.*
+- [5] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1228 (1997), *Interface Recommendation for intelligent network Capability Set 2.*
+- [6] ITU-T Recommendation Q.1290 (1993), *Glossary of terms used in the definition of intelligent networks.*
+- [7] ITU-T Recommendation Q.731 (1993), *Stage 3 description for number identification supplementary services using Signalling System No. 7.*
+- [8] ITU-T Recommendation Q.732.2-5 (1999), *Stage 3 description for call offering supplementary services using Signalling System No. 7: Call diversion services.*
+- [9] ITU-T Recommendation Q.763 (1999), *Signalling System No. 7 – ISDN User Part formats and codes.*
+- [10] ITU-T Recommendation Q.764 (1999), *Signalling System No. 7 – ISDN User Part signalling procedures.*
+- [11] ITU-T Recommendation Q.931 (1998), *ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call control.*
+
+# 3 ITU-T terms and definitions
+
+This Recommendation defines the following terms:
+
+- **Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN)**: see ITU-T Recommendation I.112 [2].
+- **Service; telecommunication service**: see ITU-T Recommendation I.112 [2].
+- **Supplementary service**: see ITU-T Recommendation I.210 [3].
+- **Call Control Function (CCF)**: see 3.3/Q.1224 [4].
+- **Service Control Function (SCF)**: see 3.3/Q.1224 [4].
+- **Service Switching Function (SSF)**: see 3.3/Q.1224 [4].
+- **Specialized Resource Function (SRF)**: see 3.3/Q.1224 [4].
+
+# 4 Abbreviations
+
+This ITU-T Recommendation uses the following abbreviations:
+
+| | |
+|-------|--------------------------------------------|
+| ACM | Address Complete Message (ISUP) |
+| ANM | Answer Message (ISUP) |
+| ATP | Access Transport parameter (ISUP) |
+| CCSS | Call completion Service Setup |
+| CON | Connect Message (ISUP) |
+| CPG | Call Progress Message (ISUP) |
+| DLE | Destination Local Exchange |
+| DP | Detection Point |
+| DSS1 | Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 1 |
+| EDP-N | Event Detection Point – Notification |
+| EDP-R | Event Detection Point – Request |
+
+| | |
+|------|------------------------------------------|
+| FAR | Facility Request Message (ISUP) |
+| FOT | Forward Transfer Message (ISUP) |
+| FRJ | Facility Reject (ISUP) |
+| GVNS | Global virtual network service |
+| IAM | Initial Address Message (ISUP) |
+| IDR | Identification Request Message (ISUP) |
+| IE | Information element |
+| IN | Intelligent Network |
+| INAP | Intelligent Network Application Protocol |
+| IP | Intelligent Peripheral |
+| IRS | Identification Response Message (ISUP) |
+| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network |
+| ISUP | ISDN User Part |
+| OLE | Originating Local Exchange |
+| PRI | Pre-release Information message (ISUP) |
+| REL | Release Message (ISUP) |
+| RES | Resume Message (ISUP) |
+| RLC | Release Complete Message (ISUP) |
+| SCP | Service Control Point |
+| SGM | Segmentation Message (ISUP) |
+| SS | Signalling System |
+| SSP | Service Switching Point |
+| SUS | Suspend Message (ISUP) |
+| TMR | Transmission Medium Requirement |
+| TNS | Transit Network Selection (ISUP) |
+
+# 5 Conventions
+
+The name of each element of the following class of terms is capitalized and capital letter within that term can possibly occur:
+
+- operations.
+
+Example: ContinueWithArgument operation.
+
+The name of each element of the following class of terms is not capitalized and capital letter within that term can possibly occur:
+
+- parameters within operations.
+
+Example: calledPartyNumber.
+
+# 6 Description
+
+## 6.1 Establishment of Bearer related connections
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.1224 [4] provides a distributed functional plane architecture for IN Capability Set 2 (CS-2). Interactions between the following functional entities (FEs) are relevant for this ITU-T Recommendation:
+
+- Call Control Function (CCF).
+- Service Switching Function (SSF).
+- Service Control Function (SCF).
+- Specialized Resource Function (SRF).
+
+The functional entities can be implemented in one or more network elements, called physical entities. The service control point (SCP) is the physical entity in the intelligent network, that implements the SCF. The CCF and SSF are realized in the service switching point (SSP) and the SRF is realized in the intelligent peripheral (IP).
+
+The SSF contains the capabilities beyond those that are needed for basic call control. Consequently, this ITU-T Recommendation concentrates on the actions that are performed in the CCF.
+
+Figure 1 illustrates in a simplified manner a signalling configuration which is to be considered in this ITU-T Recommendation. In the configuration it is assumed that SRF support is not needed. The network signalling system used for call setup is the ITU-T ISUP [10]. The interface between SSF and SCF is the ITU-T INAP [5].
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a signalling configuration for an IN call without SRF support. At the top, a box labeled 'SCP' contains a smaller box labeled 'SCF'. A vertical line labeled 'INAP' connects the 'SCF' box to a box below it labeled 'SSP'. The 'SSP' box contains two stacked boxes: 'SSF' on top and 'CCF' on the bottom. From the 'CCF' box, a horizontal line labeled 'ISUP' extends to the left to a box labeled 'OLE'. From the 'OLE' box, a dashed line labeled 'Access Signalling' connects to a telephone icon. Another horizontal line labeled 'ISUP' extends from the 'CCF' box to the right to a box labeled 'DLE'. From the 'DLE' box, a dashed line labeled 'Access Signalling' connects to another telephone icon. The text 'T11103720-99' is located in the bottom right corner of the diagram area.
+
+Diagram of signalling configuration for an IN call without SRF support. It shows a Service Control Point (SCP) containing a Service Control Function (SCF) connected via an INAP interface to a Service Switching Point (SSP). The SSP contains a Service Switching Function (SSF) and a Call Control Function (CCF). The CCF is connected via an ISUP interface to an Access Signalling OLE (Office Line Equipment) on the left, which is connected to a telephone. The CCF is also connected via an ISUP interface to an Access Signalling DLE (Data Link Equipment) on the right, which is connected to another telephone. The diagram is labeled T11103720-99.
+
+Figure 1/Q.1601 – Signalling configuration for an IN call without SRF support
+
+The interaction between ISUP and INAP takes place in the CCF and SSF. The following main subjects have to be considered in this area:
+
+- detection point processing in the CCF;
+- receipt of INAP operations in the SSF.
+
+### Detection point processing
+
+The provision of detection points (DPs) is required in the ISUP basic call handling in order to access IN functionality and to allow IN service logic influence the processing of IN calls. The detection points (DPs) indicate points in call (PICs) at which transfer of control can occur. If a DP is recognized an operation from the SSF to the SCF will be sent. Thus the communication towards the SCP is performed. The DPs defined in [4] are listed in Table 1.
+
+The column "Support" indicates whether the DP is supported with the ITU-T ISUP [10].
+
+**Table 1/Q.1601 – List of Detection Points**
+
+| Detection Points for the originating side | Support | Detection Points for the terminating side | Support |
+|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
+| OA
Origination_Attempt | No impact on ISUP | TA
Terminating_Attempt | No impact on ISUP |
+| OAA
Origination_Attempt_Authorized | No impact on ISUP | TAA
Terminating_Attempt_Authorized | No impact on ISUP |
+| CI
Collected_Information | Yes | | |
+| AI
Analysed_Information | Yes | | |
+| RSF
Route_Select_Failure | Yes | | |
+| OCPB
O_Called_Party_Busy | Yes | TB
T_Busy | Yes |
+| | | FSA
Facility_Selected_and_Available | For further study |
+| OTS
O_Term_Seized | Yes | CA
Call_Accepted | Yes |
+| ONA
O_No_Answer | Yes | TNA
T_No_Answer | Yes |
+| OAns
O_Answer | Yes | TAns
T_Answer | Yes |
+| OMC
O_Mid_Call | For further study | TMC
T_Mid_Call | For further study |
+| OS
O_Suspend | Yes | TS
T_Suspend | Yes |
+| ORA
O_Re_Answer | Yes | TRA
T_Re_Answer | Yes |
+| OD
O_Disconnect | Yes | TD
T_Disconnect | Yes |
+| OAb
O_Abandon | Yes | Tab
T_Abandon | Yes |
+
+### Receipt of INAP operations
+
+Table 2 below lists the INAP operations with direction SCF-SSF and indicates which operation will influence the ISUP call handling.
+
+**Table 2/Q.1601 – INAP operations (direction: SCF-SSF)**
+
+| Operation | Influence on ISUP call handling | Reference |
+|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| ActivateServiceFiltering | Yes | Subclause 10.1.7 (Service filtering) |
+| ActivityTest | No | |
+| AnalyseInformation | For further study (Note) | |
+| ApplyCharging | No | |
+| AuthorizeTermination | For further study (Note) | |
+| CallGap | Yes | Subclause 10.1.6 (Call gapping) |
+| CallInformationRequest | No | |
+| Cancel | No | |
+| CancelStatusReportRequest | For further study (Note) | |
+| CollectInformation | Yes | Subclause 10.1.2 (IN call with SCP request to collect further digits) |
+| Connect | Yes | Subclause 10.1.1.1.1.1 (Connect operation) |
+| Continue | Yes | Subclause 10.1.1.1.1.2 (Continue operation) |
+| ContinueWithArgument | Yes | Subclause 10.1.1.1.1.3 (ContinueWithArgument operation) |
+| ConnectToResource | Yes | Subclause 10.1.5.1 (SSP supports requested IP capabilities) |
+| CreateCallSegmentAssociation | No | |
+| DisconnectForwardConnection | Yes | Subclause 10.1.5.2 (Assist method – procedure in the initiating SSP) |
+| DisconnectForwardConnection WithArgument | Yes | Subclause 10.1.5.2 (Assist method – procedure in the initiating SSP) |
+| DisconnectLeg | For further study (Note) | |
+| EstablishTemporaryConnection | Yes | Subclause 10.1.5.2 (Assist method – procedure in the initiating SSP) |
+| FurnishChargingInformation | No | |
+| HoldCallInNetwork | For further study (Note) | |
+| InitiateCallAttempt | Yes | Subclause 10.1.8 (SCP initiated call) |
+| ManageTriggerData | No | |
+| MergeCallSegments | For further study (Note) | |
+| MoveCallSegments | For further study (Note) | |
+| MoveLeg | For further study (Note) | |
+
+**Table 2/Q.1601 – INAP operations (direction: SCF-SSF) (concluded)**
+
+| Operation | Influence on ISUP call handling | Reference |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Reconnect | For further study (Note) | |
+| ReleaseCall | Yes | Subclause 10.1.1.4 (ReleaseCall operation) |
+| RequestCurrentStatusReport | For further study (Note) | |
+| RequestEveryStatusChangeReport | For further study (Note) | |
+| RequestFirstStatusMatchReport | For further study (Note) | |
+| RequestNotificationChargingEvent | Yes | The treatment is national network specific and not described further within this ITU-T Recommendation |
+| RequestReportBCSMEVENT | Yes | Subclause 10.1.3 (Detection Point processing) |
+| RequestReportFacilityEvent | No | |
+| RequestReportUTSI | No | |
+| ResetTimer | No | |
+| SelectFacility | For further study (Note) | |
+| SendFacilityInformation | No | |
+| SelectRoute | For further study (Note) | |
+| SendSTUI | For further study (Note) | |
+| SplitLeg | For further study (Note) | |
+| SendChargingInformation | Yes | Subclause 10.1.1.1.2 (SendChargingInformation operation) |
+| NOTE – More information can be found in references [4] and [5]. | | |
+
+### **Support of the SCF-SRF relationship**
+
+In the ITU-T INAP standard a number of scenarios for support of the SCF, SSF, and SRF functional entities as physical entities have been identified. The scenarios differ in the method to support the SCF-SRF relationship and are explained in Table 1 and Figures 2 to 6 of the ITU-T INAP [5]. Table 3 below summarizes these configurations and indicates whether the scenario can be supported with the current ISDN User Part Version [10] and the extensions made in this ITU-T Recommendation.
+
+**Table 3/Q.1601 – Scenarios for support of the SCF-SRF relationship**
+
+| Type of signalling system between SSF/CCF and SRF | Method to support SCF-SRF relationship | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | Direct TCAP link | Relay via SSP |
+| ISUP | Supported
(see Figure 3) | Not supported (Note)
NOTE – Transport of additional information in ISUP would be needed. |
+| DSS1 (Note) or implementation dependent
NOTE – Extensions to the DSS1 protocol may be required, but this is outside the scope of this ITU-T Recommendation. | Supported (Note)
NOTE – The scenarios can be supported from the viewpoint of this ITU-T Recommendation. No additional information and no additional procedures are required than for the ISUP as signalling system between SSF/CCF and SRF. | |
+
+The following figures provide in a simplified manner some signalling configurations for IN calls needing an IP for user interaction. The figures are only included to ease the understanding and should not be seen as an exhaustive representation of the various physical scenarios.
+
+In Figure 2 the IP is either integrated into the SSP, or directly attached to the SSP, that is interacting with the SCP. Whether the SRF-SCF INAP operations are relayed via the SSP or are directly exchanged between IP and SCP is not relevant for this ITU-T Recommendation. However, in the figure only the scenario is shown, where a relay via SSP is applied. The procedure for this scenario is described in 10.1.5.1 (SSP supports requested IP capabilities) and a typical arrow diagram is given in Figure A.3.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a signalling configuration. On the left, an icon of a telephone handset is labeled 'Access Signalling', connected to a box labeled 'OLE'. A solid line labeled 'ISUP' connects the 'OLE' box to a large box labeled 'SSP'. Inside the 'SSP' box, there are two stacked boxes: 'SSF' on top and 'CCF' on the bottom. A solid line labeled 'INAP' connects the 'SSF' box to a box labeled 'SCP' above it. Inside the 'SCP' box, there is a box labeled 'SCF'. A dashed line labeled 'DSS1 or implementation dependent interface' connects the 'CCF' box in the 'SSP' to a box labeled 'IP' on the right. Inside the 'IP' box, there is a box labeled 'SRF'. A small text 'T11103730-99' is in the bottom right corner.
+
+Diagram showing the connection to integrated or external IP with SSP relay of IP operations. It illustrates the flow of signalling from an OLE (Access Signalling) through an SSP (containing SSF and CCF) to an SCP (containing SCF) and an IP (containing SRF).
+
+**Figure 2/Q.1601 – Connection to integrated or external IP with SSP relay of IP operations**
+
+In Figure 3 the IP is connected to the SSP via ISUP. The SRF-SCF INAP operations are directly exchanged between IP and SCP.
+
+On completion of the user interaction, control is returned to the initiating SSP. This procedure is called the "Assist" method. The procedure for this scenario is described in 10.1.5.2 (Assist method – procedure in the initiating SSP). The procedure between the SCP and the IP has no impact on the ISUP protocol and is outside the scope of this ITU-T Recommendation. More information can be found in [5]. A typical arrow diagram is given in Figure A.5.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a network architecture for the "Assist" method. On the left, a telephone icon is connected to an "OLE" (Office Line Equipment) block via a dashed line labeled "Access Signalling". The "OLE" block is connected to an "SSP" (Service Switching Point) block via a solid line labeled "ISUP". The "SSP" block contains two internal components: "SSF" (Service Switching Function) and "CCF" (Control Center Function). The "SSF" is connected to an "SCP" (Service Control Point) block above it via a solid line labeled "INAP". The "CCF" is connected to an "IP" (Intelligent Peripheral) block to the right via a solid line labeled "ISUP". The "IP" block contains an "SRF" (Service Resource Function) component. A solid line labeled "INAP" connects the "SRF" to the "SCF" (Service Control Function) component inside the "SCP" block. The reference code "T11103740-99" is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram of External IP connected via ISUP; direct TCAP link between SRF and SCF ('Assist' method).
+
+**Figure 3/Q.1601 – External IP connected via ISUP; direct TCAP link between SRF and SCF ("Assist" method)**
+
+NOTE – This method may be used in some networks. However, problems are identified regarding network integrity aspects and standardized solutions of the ISUP signalling for this type of interface.
+
+In Figure 4 the IP is integrated into another SSP (assisting SSP), than the one that is interacting with the SCP (initiating SSP). Whether the SRF-SCF INAP operations are relayed via the SSP or are directly exchanged between IP and SCP is not relevant for this ITU-T Recommendation. However, in the figure only the scenario is shown, where a relay via SSP is applied.
+
+On completion of the user interaction, control is returned to the initiating SSP. This procedure is called the "Assist" method. The procedure for this scenario is described in 10.1.5.2 (Assist method – procedure in the initiating SSP) and 10.1.5.4 (Assist/Hand-off method – procedure in the assisting SSP). Typical arrow diagrams are given in Figures A.5 and A.6.
+
+If the control of the call is retained in the assisting SSP, the "Hand-off" method is applied. This scenario is not explicitly shown in a figure. The procedure for this scenario is described in 10.1.5.3 (Hand-off method – procedure in the initiating SSP) and a typical arrow diagram is given in Figure A.7.
+
+
+
+Diagram of Figure 4/Q.1601 showing the 'Assist' method for IP attachment to an assisting SSP. The diagram shows an OLE (Office Line Equipment) connected via Access Signalling to an SSP. The SSP contains SSF and CCF components. The CCF is connected to another SSP via ISUP. This second SSP also contains SSF and CCF components. The CCF of the second SSP is connected to an IP (IP) via a DSS1 or implement. dependent interface. The IP is connected to an SRF (Service Resource Function). The first SSP's CCF is connected to an SCP (Service Control Point) via INAP. The SCP contains an SCF (Service Control Function) component. The SCF is connected to the second SSP's CCF via INAP. The diagram is labeled T11103750-99.
+
+Figure 4/Q.1601 – IP attached to an assisting SSP ("Assist" method)
+
+## 6.2 Establishment of bearer unrelated connections
+
+For further study.
+
+# 7 Operational requirements
+
+Not applicable.
+
+# 8 Coding requirements
+
+## 8.1 Messages
+
+None.
+
+## 8.2 Parameters
+
+### 8.2.1 Call diversion treatment indicators parameter
+
+The format of the call diversion treatment indicators parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### 8.2.2 Called IN number parameter
+
+The format of the called IN number parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### 8.2.3 Call offering treatment indicators parameter
+
+The format of the call offering treatment indicators parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### 8.2.4 Charged party identification parameter
+
+The format of the charged party identification parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### 8.2.5 Conference treatment indicators parameter
+
+The format of the conference treatment indicators parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### **8.2.6 Correlation id parameter**
+
+The format of the correlation id parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### **8.2.7 Display information parameter**
+
+The format of the display information parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### **8.2.8 SCF id parameter**
+
+The format of the SCF id parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### **8.2.9 UID action indicators parameter**
+
+The format of the UID action indicators parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### **8.2.10 UID capability indicators parameter**
+
+The format of the UID capability indicators parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+### **8.2.11 Original called IN number parameter**
+
+The format of the called IN number parameter is defined in Q.763 [9].
+
+# **9 State definitions**
+
+No specific state definitions are required.
+
+# **10 Signalling procedures**
+
+## **10.1 Bearer related connections**
+
+### **10.1.1 IN basic call**
+
+For this ITU-T Recommendation, an "IN basic call" is considered as:
+
+- a normal ISUP basic call invoking IN functionality in the SSP;
+- that no DPs are armed dynamically in the request mode;
+- that no user interaction is needed.
+
+For an IN basic call, the normal ISUP basic call procedures are applicable as described in [10] for national intermediate exchanges unless indicated otherwise in the subclauses below.
+
+#### **10.1.1.1 Successful call setup**
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.1 Forward address signalling**
+
+If an IAM is received in a SSP and the call is recognized as IN call, i.e. by detecting a DP as TDP-R [see 10.1.3 (Detection Point processing)], an InitialDP operation or a DP specific operation for a TDP-R is sent from the SSF to the SCF. If the IAM had been segmented the remainder of the call setup information is awaited [see 10.1.1.1.7 (Simple segmentation)]. The mapping of parameters is shown in Table 4.
+
+**Table 4/Q.1601 – Mapping of parameters from IAM to InitialDP**
+
+| ISUP message
IAM (Note 1) | INAP operation
InitialDP |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
+| Called party number | calledPartyNumber |
+| Calling party number | callingPartyNumber |
+| Calling party subaddress IE contained in access transport | callingPartySubaddress |
+| Calling party's category | callingPartysCategory |
+| Location number | locationNumber |
+| Original called number | originalCalledPartyID |
+| User teleservice information (1st priority)
High layer compatibility IE contained in access transport (2nd priority) (Note 2) | highLayerCompatibility |
+| Generic number "additional calling party number" | additionalCallingPartyNumber |
+| Forward call indicators | forwardCallIndicators |
+| User service information prime (1st priority)
User service information (2nd priority)
or
TMR (Note 3) | bearerCapability |
+| Redirecting number | redirectingPartyID |
+| Redirection information | redirectionInformation |
+| CCSS with "CCSS call indicator" | cCSS |
+| Access Transport | iSDNAccessRelatedInformation |
+| Generic Number | genericNumbers |
+| TNS | carrier (Note 4) |
+| Calling geodetic location | callingGeodeticLocation |
+| NOTE 1 – Optional parameters may be absent, i.e. they are only mapped, if these parameters are available at the DP. | |
+| NOTE 2 – If two high layer compatibility information elements are contained in the access transport parameter, then the second information element, carrying the preferred HLC, is mapped to the INAP highLayerCompatibility parameter. | |
+| NOTE 3 – The choice whether to use the user service information or the TMR is network option. | |
+| NOTE 4 – The first octet, the carrier selection field, is coded to "no indication". The following octets are populated with the contents of the TNS parameter received. | |
+
+###### **10.1.1.1.1.1 Connect operation**
+
+On receipt of a Connect operation from the SCP the actions described in 2.1.1.2/Q.764 [10] will be performed. For routing of the call the called party number is derived from the destinationRoutingAddress [see Table 5 (Mapping of parameters from Connect to IAM)].
+
+If no cutAndPaste parameter is received in the Connect operation, an ACM message is sent to the preceding exchange. The ACM shall contain the corresponding ISUP parameters, if a serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter was received in the Connect operation (see below). Other optional parameter will not be sent. The backward call indicators parameter in the ACM is encoded as follows:
+
+| | |
+|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
+| Charge indicator: | see 10.1.1.1.2 (SendChargingInformation operation) |
+| Called party's status indicator: | 00 (no indication) |
+| Called party's category: | 00 (no indication) |
+| End-to-end method indicator: | 00 (no end-to-end method available) |
+| Interworking indicator: | 0 (no interworking encountered) |
+| End-to-end information indicator: | 0 (no end-to-end information available) |
+| ISDN User Part indicator: | 1 (ISDN User Part used all the way) |
+| Holding indicator: | national matter |
+| ISDN access indicator: | 1 (terminating access ISDN) |
+| Echo Control device indicator: | see 2.7.2.1.2/Q.764 [10] |
+| SCCP method indicator: | 00 (no indication) |
+
+NOTE – As a network operator option, the sending of the ACM message may be postponed to a later stage during call setup.
+
+Table 5 illustrates the mapping of parameters received in the Connect operation to parameters sent in the IAM message to the succeeding exchange. Parameters which were received in the IAM and are not replaced by parameters of the Connect operation are treated according to the normal procedures.
+
+On sending of the IAM the awaiting address complete timer T7 is started. If timer T7 expires, the call is released in both directions and an appropriate indication is returned to the calling subscriber.
+
+**Table 5/Q.1601 – Mapping of parameters from Connect to IAM**
+
+| INAP operation | ISUP message |
+|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Connect (Note 1) | IAM |
+| destinationRoutingAddress (Note 2) | Called party number (Note 3) |
+| callingPartyNumber | (Note 4) |
+| serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo | See 10.1.1.1.1.4 (Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo) |
+| originalCalledPartyID | Original called number |
+| callingPartysCategory | Calling party's category |
+| redirectingPartyID | Redirecting number |
+| redirectionInformation | Redirection information |
+| isdnAccessRelated Information | ATP (Note 5) |
+| forwardCallIndicators | Forward call indicators |
+| genericNumbers | Generic Number (Note 4) |
+| Carrier | TNS (Note 6) |
+
+**Table 5/Q.1601 – Mapping of parameters from Connect to IAM (concluded)**
+
+| |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| NOTE 1 – Optional parameters may be absent, i.e. they are only mapped, if received. |
+| NOTE 2 – The Connect operation sent by the SCF to the SSF may contain a list of up to three destination routing addresses, following processing by the SSF only one of these addresses will be passed to ISUP. |
+| NOTE 3 – The treatment of the called party number in the case the cutAndPaste parameter is present in the Connect operation is described in 3.3.16/Q.1228 [5]. |
+| NOTE 4 – The mapping of this parameter must not compromise the existing services supported by ISUP (MCID, CLIP, etc.). |
+| NOTE 5 – Due to the end to end significance of the ATP DSS1 information elements only the "called party subaddress" and "calling party subaddress" contained in the "isdnAccessRelatedInformation" are mapped to the "called party subaddress" and "calling party subaddress" of the ATP. Other information elements are copied from the ATP received on the incoming ISUP. The mapping of these information elements must not compromise the existing services supported by ISUP (CLIP, etc.). |
+| NOTE 6 – The carrier selection field received in the Carrier parameter is not mapped. The octets following to the carrier selection field are as a national option mapped to the TNS parameter or not mapped. |
+
+###### **10.1.1.1.1.2 Continue operation**
+
+On receipt of a Continue operation from the SCP, call processing is resumed and the call setup will be performed as described in 2.1.2.2/Q.764 [10].
+
+###### **10.1.1.1.1.3 ContinueWithArgument operation**
+
+On receipt of a ContinueWithArgument operation from the SCP, call processing is resumed and the call setup will be performed as described in 2.1.2.2/Q.764 [10].
+
+In addition, the following parameter received from the SCP in the ContinueWithArgument operation will be sent in the IAM by the SSP as shown in Table 6.
+
+Parameters which were received in the IAM and are not replaced by parameters of the ContinueWithArgument operation are treated according to the normal procedures.
+
+**Table 6/Q.1601 – Mapping of parameters from ContinueWithArgument to IAM**
+
+| INAP operation | ISUP message |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| ContinueWithArgument (Note) | IAM |
+| ServiceInteractionIndicatorsTwo | See 10.1.1.1.1.4 (Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo) |
+| NOTE – Optional parameters may be absent, i.e. they are only mapped, if received. | |
+
+###### **10.1.1.1.1.4 Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo**
+
+The INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter contains information that is:
+
+- only of local significance, i.e. to be treated in the SSP;
+- relevant for the originating local exchange; or
+- relevant for the destination local exchange.
+
+NOTE – In the context of IN CS-2 the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo is used. However the serviceInteractionIndicators may also be received, but the mapping of the serviceInteractionIndicators is network-operator specific.
+
+Table 7 describes the mapping from the INAP to the ISUP with regard to the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo.
+
+Furthermore for the IN basic, call the following rules shall apply:
+
+- a) If in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter a value has been received indicated as default in Table 7, then this value is mapped to the value "no indication" in the appropriate ISUP parameter.
+- b) An ISUP parameter is only included in a message, if the parameter contents is unequal zero.
+
+**Table 7/Q.1601 – Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo**
+
+| INAP
serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo | ISUP parameter in | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| | ACM/CPG/CON/ANM | IAM |
+| Call to be diverted indicator:
– call diversion allowed (default);
– call diversion not allowed. | – | Call diversion treatment indicators parameter
Call to be diverted indicator:
– no indication;
– call diversion allowed;
– call diversion not allowed. |
+| Call to be offered indicator:
– call offering not allowed (default);
– call offering allowed. | – | Call offering treatment indicators parameter
Call to be offered indicator:
– no indication;
– call offering not allowed;
– call offering allowed. |
+| Conference at DLE accept. ind.:
– accept conference request (default);
– reject conference request. | – | Conference treatment indicators parameter
Conference acceptance ind.:
– no indication;
– accept conference request;
– reject conference request. |
+| Conference at OLE accept. ind.:
– accept conference request (default);
– reject conference request. | Conference treatment indicators parameter
Conference acceptance ind.:
– no indication;
– accept conference request;
– reject conference request. | – |
+
+If multiple IN services are invoked for a call, then the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo received via the INAP may conflict with the received ISUP parameters transferring service interaction information. In this case the ISUP parameters to be sent in forward and backward direction shall transfer the most stringent condition, i.e. the non-default value (refer to Appendix II).
+
+###### **10.1.1.1.1.4.1 Interworking with an ISUP not supporting the parameters**
+
+No specific action is required. If the parameters cannot be transferred to the local exchanges, the behaviour in these exchanges for IN calls is the same as for normal ISDN calls, i.e. no IN controlled treatment of features is possible.
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.2 SendChargingInformation operation**
+
+The following mapping is not intended for freephone services but for supporting reverse charging on a per call basis.
+
+The presence of the noCharge parameter in the SendChargingInformation operation indicates that no charge should be applied to the A-party.
+
+If the partyToCharge parameter (also of the sendChargingInformation [SCI] operation) indicates the B-party then the noCharge parameter, if present, should be ignored.
+
+If the SCI operation is received by ISUP after call setup, then the noCharge parameter, if present, should be ignored.
+
+If the noCharge parameter is determined not be ignored, then this parameter should be mapped to the "Charge indicator" within the next backward signalling message which includes the backward call indicators parameter.
+
+This mapping does not exclude a different mapping in a specific national network.
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.3 Address complete or connect message**
+
+The procedures as described in 2.1.4.2/Q.764 [10] are applicable with the following exceptions:
+
+Upon receipt of an ACM or CON message the awaiting address complete timer T7 is stopped. If an ACM message is received the awaiting answer timer T9 is started.
+
+If an ACM message has not been sent, the received message is passed on. The message shall contain the corresponding ISUP parameters, if a serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter was received in the Connect operation [see 10.1.1.1.1.4 (Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo)].
+
+If an ACM message has already been sent, a received ACM message is mapped to a CPG message and a received CON message to an ANM message, respectively. The mapping of parameters will be performed as described in the Call Diversion stage 3n description (see [8]).
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.4 Information message (national option)**
+
+The procedure as described in 2.1.6/Q.764 [10] is applicable. If call setup information is missing an INR message should be sent by the SSP before the InitialDP operation is sent to the SCP.
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.5 Answer message**
+
+Upon receipt of an ANM message the awaiting answer timer T9 is stopped and the actions described in 2.1.7/Q.764 [10] are performed.
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.6 Continuity check**
+
+If an IAM is received indicating that either a continuity check is requested or is performed on a previous circuit, the normal procedures as described in 2.1.8/Q.764 [10] are applicable. The sending of the InitialDP operation is delayed until a COT message indicating "successful" is received.
+
+If the continuity check fails, no relationship between SSF and SCF will be established.
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.7 Simple segmentation**
+
+With regard to the simple segmentation procedure the SSP behaves like a local exchange. Consequently, items d), e), f) of 2.1.12/Q.764 [10] are applicable.
+
+##### **10.1.1.1.8 Pre-release Information message**
+
+Upon receipt of a PRI message by a SSP, the received information is stored and processed upon receipt of the associated release message as specified in ITU-T Q.764.
+
+When the SSP detects that additional information is to be sent at release time, this information is sent in a PRI message immediately prior to the REL message.
+
+#### **10.1.1.2 Normal call release**
+
+The CCF part of the SSP releases the call as described in item b) of 2.3.1/Q.764 [10]. For the SSF part of the SSP the general rules described in 3.1.1.5/Q.1228 [5] are applicable.
+
+#### **10.1.1.3 Suspend, resume**
+
+Upon receipt of a SUS message with the indication "network initiated" the timer $T_{SUS}$ is started to ensure that a RES message with the indication "network initiated" or a REL message is received. The received SUS message is not passed on. If the timer $T_{SUS}$ expires, the procedures described in 2.4.3/Q.764 [10] apply. The value of timer $T_{SUS}$ depends on the time limits received in serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter.
+
+#### **10.1.1.4 ReleaseCall operation**
+
+Upon receipt of the ReleaseCall operation, the SSP sends REL messages in both directions. The cause indicators parameter contains the releaseCallArg parameter of the ReleaseCall operation. If no releaseCallArg was present, cause value #31 is sent. Furthermore the normal procedures as described 2.3.3/Q.764 [10] are applicable.
+
+#### **10.1.1.5 Transfer of the called IN number and original called IN number**
+
+In all cases the calledPartyNumber parameter sent in the InitialDP operation is transferred in the called IN number parameter to the succeeding exchange.
+
+The address presentation restricted indicator of the Called IN number parameter is set according to the called IN number presentation restricted indicator received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter.
+
+If the Called IN Number parameter had been received from the preceding exchange, but no Original Called IN Number was received, the contents of the received Called IN Number is transferred unchanged in the Original Called IN number parameter.
+
+If an Original Called IN Number is received, it is passed on unchanged.
+
+##### **10.1.1.5.1 Interworking with an ISUP not supporting the called IN number or the original called IN number parameter**
+
+No specific action is required.
+
+#### **10.1.1.6 Abnormal conditions**
+
+##### **10.1.1.6.1 General requirements on receipt of unrecognized signalling information messages and parameters**
+
+With regard to the handling of unrecognized signalling information, a SSP behaves like a type A exchange.
+
+NOTE – In the future this limit may be relaxed.
+
+### **10.1.2 IN call with SCP request to collect further digits**
+
+After sending the InitialDP operation to the SCP, a RequestReportBCSMEVENT operation to arm DP CI accompanied by a CollectInformation operation may be received from the SCP (see 3.3.15/Q.1228 [5]). In this case the specified number of digits will be collected in the SSP. Encountering DP CI, i.e. the specified number of digits has been received, will result in sending an EventReportBCSM operation or a CollectedInformation operation, respectively, to the SCP.
+
+In addition to 10.1.1.5, the digits sent to the SCP in the EventReportBCSM operation or the CollectedInformation operation shall be taken into account when constructing the called IN number parameter.
+
+There is no further impact on the ISUP protocol and the call handling will continue as described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call), unless a further RequestReportBCSMEVENT operation to arm DP CI accompanied by a CollectInformation operation is received from the SCP. In this case the procedure described above is repeated.
+
+### 10.1.3 Detection Point processing
+
+#### 10.1.3.1 General
+
+The SCF uses the RequestReportBCSMEVENT operation to request the SSF to monitor for call-related events. The monitor mode is indicated in the operation as either "interrupted" or "notifyAndContinue".
+
+In the "notifyAndContinue" mode the event is reported as EDP-N (notification mode) in the EventReportBCSM operation or a DP specific operation, respectively, to the SCF and normal call processing continues as described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call).
+
+In the "interrupted" mode the event is reported as EDP-R (request mode) in the EventReportBCSM operation or a DP specific operation, respectively, and the SSF will wait for instructions from the SCF. See Table 8.
+
+**Table 8/Q.1601 – Event Detection Points**
+
+| DP | DP encountered on ... |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| CI | See 10.1.2 (IN call with SCP request to collect further digits). |
+| OTS, CA | Receipt of an ACM or CPG message with an alerting indication. |
+| RSF | National network specific. |
+| OCPB, TB | Receipt of a REL message with cause value #17 (user busy) (Note). |
+| ONA, TNA | Expiry of timer $T_{NoReply}$ . |
+| OAns, TAns | Receipt of an ANM or CON message. |
+| OS, TS | Receipt of a SUS message with the indication "network initiated". |
+| ORA, TRA | Receipt of a RES message with the indication "network initiated". |
+| OD, TD | a) Receipt of a REL message with cause value #16 (normal call clearing) in the active phase of a call (Note).
b) Expiry of timer $T_{SUS}$ . |
+| OAb, Tab | Receipt of a REL message with cause value #16 (normal call clearing) from a preceding exchange before the call is answered (Note). |
+| NOTE – These are examples of correspondence between cause values and DPs. The network operator shall have the possibility to define the complete mapping between cause values and DPs. It should be noted that any operator defined mapping may contradict those defined in future IN Capability Sets. | |
+
+In the following, the differences in call processing for IN calls with dynamically armed detection points compared to the procedures described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call) and 10.1.4 (Setup of an IN call to destination B) are listed.
+
+##### 10.1.3.1.1 Address complete message
+
+On receipt of a ACM message without a cause parameter, the timer $T_{NoReply}$ is started if either DP ONA or TNA has been armed by the SCF.
+
+##### **10.1.3.1.2 Answer or connect message**
+
+The timer $T_{\text{NoReply}}$ is stopped, if applicable.
+
+##### **10.1.3.1.3 Release message**
+
+If a REL is received from either the preceding or succeeding exchange and corresponds to a DP armed as EDP-N (notification mode), the CCF part of the SSP releases the call like an ordinary transit exchange. For the SSF part of the SSP the general rules described in 3.1.1.5/Q.1228 [5] are applicable.
+
+If a REL is received from the preceding exchange and corresponds to a DP armed as EDP-R (request mode), the CCF part of the SSP releases the call like an ordinary transit exchange. For the SSF part of the SSP the general rules described in 3.1.1.5/Q.1228 [5] are applicable.
+
+If a REL is received from the succeeding exchange and corresponds to a DP armed as EDP-R (request mode), the CCF part of the SSP releases the outgoing leg of the connection and holds the incoming leg. For the SSF part of the SSP the general rules described in 3.1.1.5/Q.1228 [5] are applicable. The call processing is suspended and the SSP waits for SCP instructions.
+
+#### **10.1.3.2 Actions to be performed in case of DPs armed in the request mode (except for DP Collect information)**
+
+##### **10.1.3.2.1 Storage and release of initial address information**
+
+Initial address information is not released from memory on receipt of an ACM message.
+
+NOTE – Memory capacity in the exchange may limit the use of services requiring the storage of initial address information.
+
+##### **10.1.3.2.2 Signalling procedures for connection type allowing fallback**
+
+If:
+
+- a) an IAM was received with the TMR value set to "64 kbit/s unrestricted preferred";
+- b) no fallback has already been performed,
+
+then on receipt of the Connect operation a fallback is performed as described in 2.5.1.2.2 and 2.5.2.2.2/Q.764 [10].
+
+##### **10.1.3.2.3 Impact on supplementary services**
+
+###### **10.1.3.2.3.1 User-to-user signalling**
+
+###### **10.1.3.2.3.1.1 User-to-user signalling, service 1**
+
+If user-to-user service 1 is implicitly requested, the user-to-user information parameter will be discarded from the IAM message and the user-to-user indicators parameter indicating "user-to-user information discarded by the network" is sent in the ACM message,
+
+If the user-to-user service 1 was explicitly requested as "not essential", the user-to-user indicators parameter will be discarded from the IAM and service 1 will be indicated as "not provided" in the ACM.
+
+If the user-to-user service 1 was explicitly requested as "essential", the call is cleared with cause value #29 and diagnostics in the REL message.
+
+###### **10.1.3.2.3.1.2 User-to-user signalling, service 2**
+
+If the user-to-user service 2 was explicitly requested as "not essential", the user-to-user indicators parameter will be discarded from the IAM and service 2 will be indicated as "not provided" in the ACM.
+
+If the user-to-user service 2 was explicitly requested as "essential", the call is cleared with cause value #29 and diagnostics in the REL message.
+
+###### **10.1.3.2.3.1.3 User-to-user signalling, service 3**
+
+###### a) *Service request during call setup*
+
+If the user-to-user service 3 was explicitly requested as "not essential", the user-to-user indicators parameter will be discarded from the IAM and service 3 will be indicated as "not provided" in the ACM.
+
+If the user-to-user service 3 was explicitly requested as "essential", the call is cleared with cause value #29 and diagnostics in the REL message.
+
+###### b) *Service request after call setup*
+
+A FRQ with facility indicators set to "user-to-user service" and the user-to-user indicators parameter (containing the relevant service 3 information) will be responded by a FRJ message indicating "not provided" for service 3 in the user-to-user indicators.
+
+### **10.1.4 Setup of an IN call to destination B**
+
+This subclause describes the setup of an IN call to destination B after a user interactive dialogue has been performed or after the SSF has reported an EDP-R in the EventReportBCSM operation or a DP specific operation, respectively, to the SCF. In these situations, the call setup differs from the normal call setup for the "IN basic call".
+
+#### **10.1.4.1 Successful call setup**
+
+##### **10.1.4.1.1 Forward address signalling**
+
+###### **10.1.4.1.1.1 Connect operation**
+
+On receipt of the Connect operation the actions described in 10.1.1.1.1.1 (Connect operation) are performed with the following exceptions:
+
+- a) An ACM message is sent towards the originating local exchange, if not already sent before.
+- b) Throughconnection is performed as described in item d) of 2.1.1.1/Q.764 [10].
+
+##### **10.1.4.1.2 Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo**
+
+The SCF logic may generate new service interaction information for the call.
+
+In this case the indicators of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter relevant for the forward direction, i.e. to be mapped into the IAM, are treated as described in 10.1.1.1.1.4 (Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo).
+
+The handling of the indicators relevant for the backward direction is however different:
+
+- The indicators contained in the received INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter are compared one by one against the indicators that are stored in the SSP, i.e. that have been received in an earlier INAP operation.
+- If the received value of an indicator differs from the one that is stored in the SSP, then this indicator is mapped to the corresponding value in the appropriate ISUP parameter.
+- If the received value of an indicator is equal to the one that is stored in the SSP, then this indicator is mapped to the value "no indication" in the appropriate ISUP parameter.
+
+If for the call no new service interaction information was received, then the exchange will apply the information that is stored, i.e. the forward indicators sent in the IAM are the same as for the previous connection, backward indicators need not be sent.
+
+##### 10.1.4.1.3 Sending of backward messages
+
+If backward messages have already been sent to preceding exchanges, it may be required:
+
+- a) to map a received message into another message; or
+- b) to generate another message instead of the message, that would normally be generated.
+
+Table 9 describes which message is to be sent in the different cases.
+
+**Table 9/Q.1601 – Sending of backward messages**
+
+| Message received or message to be sent, respectively →
↓ Messages already sent | ACM | CPG
"alerting" or "in-band information or an ..." | CPG
"progress" | CON | ANM |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------|
+| ACM/CON not sent | ACM (Note 1) | Not relevant | Not relevant | CON (Note 1) | Not relevant |
+| ACM sent, ANM not sent | CPG (Note 1) | CPG | CPG | ANM (Note 1) | ANM |
+| ANM/CON sent for previous connection, but ANM/CON not received for actual connection | CPG "progress" (Notes 1 and 2) | CPG "progress" (Note 2) | CPG "progress" | CPG "progress" (Notes 1 and 2) | CPG "progress" (Note 2) |
+| ANM/CON sent for previous connection and ANM/CON received for actual connection | Not relevant | Not relevant | CPG "progress" | Not relevant | Not relevant |
+
+NOTE 1 – If a serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter was provided in the INAP operation, this message carries the corresponding ISUP parameters, if applicable.
+
+NOTE 2 – An originating local exchange conforming to [10] will discard this CPG message since no generic notification parameter is contained in the message.
+
+##### 10.1.4.1.4 Address complete message
+
+Upon receipt of an ACM message the following actions shall be performed:
+
+- a) The awaiting address complete timer T7 is stopped.
+- b) If an UID action indicators parameter indicating "stop or do not start T9", then the SSP shall not start/shall stop timer T9 and shall start timer TUID, else timer T9 is started or restarted, respectively.
+- c) If an UID action indicators parameter indicating "through-connect in both directions", the SSP shall through-connect the transmission path in both directions (if not already connected).
+
+Which message is sent to preceding exchanges is described in 10.1.4.1.3 (Sending of backward messages). If the ACM contains an UID action indicators parameter, then the parameter shall be passed on transparently to preceding exchanges, unless an ANM has already been sent.
+
+##### **10.1.4.1.5 Call Progress message (Basic call)**
+
+Upon receipt of a CPG message the following actions shall be performed:
+
+- a) If an UID action indicators parameter indicating "stop or do not start T9", then SSP shall not start/shall stop timer T9 and shall start timer $T_{UID}$ .
+- b) If an UID action indicators parameter indicating "through-connect in both directions", the SSP shall through-connect the transmission path in both directions (if not already connected).
+
+Which message is sent to preceding exchanges is described in 10.1.4.1.3 (Sending of backward messages). If the CPG contains an UID action indicators parameter, then the parameter shall be passed on transparently to preceding exchanges, unless an ANM message has already been sent.
+
+##### **10.1.4.1.6 Connect message**
+
+Upon receipt of a CON message the awaiting address complete timer T7 is stopped and the transmission path is throughconnected in forward direction, if not already connected.
+
+Which message is sent to preceding exchanges is described in 10.1.4.1.3 (Sending of backward messages).
+
+##### **10.1.4.1.7 Answer message**
+
+Upon receipt of an ANM message the awaiting answer timer T9 or the timer $T_{UID}$ , respectively, is stopped and the transmission path is throughconnected in forward direction, if not already connected.
+
+Which message is sent to preceding exchanges is described in 10.1.4.1.3 (Sending of backward messages).
+
+#### **10.1.4.2 Timer $T_{UID}$ expiry**
+
+If $T_{UID}$ expires, the call is released using cause value #31 (normal, unspecified).
+
+#### **10.1.4.3 Abnormal conditions**
+
+##### **10.1.4.3.1 Handling of unexpected messages**
+
+The procedures described in 2.9.5.1/Q.764 [10] are applicable with the following exceptions:
+
+- a) If an ACM message has already been sent for the incoming leg of the call, but an ACM has not been received for the outgoing leg of the call, then
+ - i) a CPG received in forward direction shall be discarded, i.e. the message is not treated as an unexpected message;
+ - ii) an unrecognized message received in forward direction shall not be passed on and the procedure described in item xi) of 2.9.5.2/Q.764 [10] shall be applied.
+- b) If an ANM message has already been sent for the incoming leg of the call, but an ANM has not been received for the outgoing leg of the call, then the following messages received in forward direction shall be discarded, i.e. the messages are not treated as unexpected messages: SUS, RES, FAR and FOT.
+
+#### **10.1.4.4 Impact on supplementary services**
+
+##### **10.1.4.4.1 Call hold**
+
+On receipt of a CPG message with the generic notification indicator set to "remote hold", a note in memory shall be set. The note shall be reset on receipt of a CPG message with the generic notification indicator set to "remote retrieval".
+
+If the note is set on receipt of a connect operation, then an artificial CPG message with the generic notification indicator set to "remote retrieval" shall be generated.
+
+##### **10.1.4.4.2 Malicious call identification**
+
+On receipt of an IDR message two cases exist:
+
+- a) If an IDR or an ANM was already sent to the preceding exchange, then the IDR message is not passed on and is immediately responded by an IRS message.
+- b) If an IDR was not sent to the preceding exchange, then the IDR message is passed on transparently towards the originating local exchange.
+
+If bit A of the MCID request indicators was set to 1, then in addition to the normal procedure the service switching point includes the charged party identification parameter, if available, into the IRS message.
+
+### **10.1.5 User interactive dialogue (in-band)**
+
+If in response to the InitialDP operation, the EventReportBCSM operation or a DP specific operation, a ConnectToResource or EstablishTemporaryConnection operation is received from the SCF, then the incoming call shall be connected to a physical entity containing the SRF, i.e. intelligent peripheral (IP). In case of ConnectToResource the SSP, that interacts with the SCP, supports the requested IP capabilities and the IP is therefore either integrated or co-located in the SSP. In case of EstablishTemporaryConnection the IP is available in another network element. Consequently, the Assist method is applied.
+
+#### **10.1.5.1 SSP supports requested IP capabilities**
+
+##### **10.1.5.1.1 Successful call setup**
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.1.1 Forward address signalling**
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.1.1.1 ConnectToResource operation**
+
+On receipt of the ConnectToResource operation the IP is connected to the incoming call, if the TMR value received in the IAM message is set to either "speech" or "3.1 kHz audio" or "64 kbit/s unrestricted preferred". For the latter case see also 10.1.3.2.2 (Signalling procedures for connection type allowing fallback). If other TMR values are received, the call is released using cause value #65.
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.1.1.2 Address complete message or call progress message**
+
+An ACM message containing an optional backward call indicators parameter indicating "in-band information or an appropriate pattern is now available" is sent. The backward call indicators parameter in the ACM is encoded as described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call).
+
+Depending on the contents of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo and capabilities of the preceding exchanges, the UID action indicators parameter may be included in the ACM:
+
+###### **a) *Through-connection instruction***
+
+If the bothway through-connect indicator in the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter of the ConnectToResource operation was set to "required" and if an UID capability indicators parameter was received with bit A coded 1 (through-connection modification possible) in the IAM, then the UID action indicators parameter shall be included into the ACM message with bit A coded (through-connect in both directions).
+
+###### **b) *T9 timer instruction***
+
+If the dialogue duration indicator in the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter of the ConnectToResource operation was set to "long duration" and if an UID capability indicators parameter was received with bit B coded 1 (stopping of timer possible) in the IAM, then an
+
+UID action indicators parameter shall be included into the ACM with bit B coded 1 (stop or do not start T9).
+
+If backward messages have already been sent to preceding exchange, then instead of ACM a CPG message is sent. This is described in 10.1.4.1.3 (Sending of backward messages). The CPG message shall contain the UID action indicators parameter as described above for the ACM message.
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.1.3 Answer message**
+
+When the IP answers, the sending of an ANM message depends on the following conditions:
+
+- a) If the bothway through-connect indicator in the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter of the ConnectToResource operation was set to "required" and if a through-connection capability indicator set to "through-connection modification possible" was not received in the IAM, then an ANM message is sent.
+- b) If the dialogue duration indicator in the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter of the ConnectToResource operation was set to "long duration" and if a T9 timer indicator set to "stopping of timer possible" was not received in the IAM, then an ANM message is sent.
+
+If backward messages have already been sent to the preceding exchange, then instead of ANM a different message may be sent. This is described in 10.1.4.1.3 (Sending of backward messages).
+
+NOTE – The sending of an ANM message may also be required, if a chargeable announcement is to be connected. However, charging aspects are outside the scope of this ITU-T Recommendation.
+
+##### **10.1.5.1.2 Storage and release of initial address information**
+
+Initial address information is retained in memory to allow a call setup to a new destination after disconnecting the IP.
+
+NOTE – Memory capacity in the exchange may limit the use of services requiring the storage of initial address information.
+
+##### **10.1.5.1.3 Signalling procedures for connection type allowing fallback**
+
+If:
+
+- a) the TMR value received in the IAM is set to "64 kbit/s unrestricted preferred";
+- b) no fallback has already been performed;
+- c) an ANM message is to be sent, i.e. the bothway throughconnect indicator in the serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter of the ConnectToResource operation was set to "required",
+
+then on receipt of the ConnectToResource operation a fallback is performed as described in 2.5.1.2.2 and 2.5.2.2.2 of Q.764 [10].
+
+##### **10.1.5.1.4 DisconnectForwardConnection operation**
+
+When the DisconnectForwardConnection operation is received, the IP will be disconnected.
+
+##### **10.1.5.1.5 Impact on supplementary services**
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.5.1 Connected line identification presentation**
+
+The following text is only applicable, if an ANM message is to be sent for the IP connection and if an ANM message was not sent before.
+
+If the connected line identity was requested by the calling user, the SSP behaves as follows:
+
+If "no impact" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo (connected number treatment indicator), then two cases exist:
+
+- a) If a connected number is available for the IP, then the procedure as described in 5.5.2.5/Q.731 [7] will be performed.
+- b) If a connected number is not available for the IP, then the SSP sends a connected number parameter in the ANM message encoded as follows:
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
+| nature of address indicator: | 0000000 |
+| numbering plan indicator: | 000 |
+| address presentation restricted indicator: | 10 (address not available) |
+| screening indicator: | 11 (network provided), no address signals |
+
+If "presentation restricted" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo (connected number treatment indicator), then two cases exist:
+
+- a) If a connected number is available for the IP, then the procedure as described in 6.5.2.5/Q.731 [7] will be performed.
+- b) If a connected number is not available for the IP, then the SSP sends a connected number parameter in the ANM message encoded as shown in item b) above.
+
+If "present called IN number" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo, then:
+
+- a) A connected number parameter is generated as follows:
+
+| | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| nature of address indicator and numbering plan indicator are encoded as received in the called party number of the IAM message, | |
+| address presentation restricted indicator: | 00 (presentation allowed); |
+| address signals: | as received in called party number or subsequent number parameters, respectively, until ACM message was sent. |
+- b) A generic number parameter "additional connected number" is not sent.
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.5.2 User-to-user signalling**
+
+The text in the following three subclauses is only applicable, if an ANM message is to be sent for the IP connection and if an ANM message was not sent before.
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.5.2.1 User-to-user signalling, service 1**
+
+If user-to-user service 1 is implicitly requested, the user-to-user information parameter will be discarded from the IAM message and the user-to-user indicators parameter indicating "user-to-user information discarded by the network" is sent in the ACM message.
+
+If the user-to-user service 1 was explicitly requested as "not essential", the user-to-user indicators parameter will be discarded from the IAM and service 1 will be indicated as "not provided" in the ACM.
+
+If the user-to-user service 1 was explicitly requested as "essential", the call is cleared with cause value #29 and diagnostics in the REL message.
+
+###### **10.1.5.1.5.2.2 User-to-user signalling, service 2**
+
+If the user-to-user service 2 was explicitly requested as "not essential", the user-to-user indicators parameter will be discarded from the IAM and service 2 will be indicated as "not provided" in the ACM.
+
+If the user-to-user service 2 was explicitly requested as "essential", the call is cleared with cause value #29 and diagnostics in the REL message.
+
+###### 10.1.5.1.5.2.3 User-to-user signalling, service 3
+
+###### a) *Service request during call setup*
+
+If the user-to-user service 3 was explicitly requested as "not essential", the user-to-user indicators parameter will be discarded from the IAM and service 3 will be indicated as "not provided" in the ACM.
+
+If the user-to-user service 3 was explicitly requested as "essential", the call is cleared with cause value #29 and diagnostics in the REL message.
+
+###### b) *Service request after call setup*
+
+A FRQ with facility indicators set to "user-to-user service" and the user-to-user indicators parameter (containing the relevant service 3 information) will be responded by a FRJ message indicating "not provided" for service 3 in the user-to-user indicators.
+
+#### 10.1.5.2 Assist method – procedure in the initiating SSP
+
+##### 10.1.5.2.1 Successful call setup
+
+###### 10.1.5.2.1.1 Forward address signalling
+
+###### 10.1.5.2.1.1.1 EstablishTemporaryConnection operation
+
+On receipt of the EstablishTemporaryConnection operation from the SCP a connection to an external IP will be established, if the TMR value received in the IAM message is set to either "speech" or "3.1 kHz audio" or "64 kbit/s unrestricted preferred". For the latter case see also 10.1.3.2.2 (Signalling procedures for connection type allowing fallback). If other TMR values are received, the call is released using cause value #65.
+
+The IAM message for setup of the temporary connection is newly generated as in an originating local exchange.
+
+For routing of the call the called party number is derived from the assistingSSPIPRoutingAddress.
+
+Table 10 illustrates the mapping of parameters received in the EstablishTemporaryConnection operation to parameters sent in the IAM message.
+
+**Table 10/Q.1601 – Mapping of parameters from EstablishTemporaryConnection to IAM**
+
+| INAP operation | ISUP message |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| EstablishTemporaryConnection (Note) | IAM |
+| assistingSSPIPRoutingAddress | Called party number |
+| serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo | See 10.1.1.1.1.4 (Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo) |
+| correlationID | Correlation id |
+| scfID | SCF id |
+| NOTE – Optional parameters may be absent, i.e. they are only mapped, if received. | |
+
+Except the called party number parameter the remaining mandatory parameters of the IAM message are set as follows:
+
+###### a) *Nature of connection indicators:*
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------|------------------|
+| Satellite indicator: | set as in an OLE |
+| Continuity check indicator: | set as in an OLE |
+| Echo control device indicator: | set as in an OLE |
+
+###### b) *Forward call indicators:*
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
+| National/international call indicator: | set as in an OLE |
+| End-to-end method indicator: | 00 (no end-to-end method available) |
+| Interworking indicator: | 0 (no interworking encountered) |
+| End-to-end information indicator: | 0 (no end-to-end information available) |
+| ISDN user part indicator: | 1 (ISDN user part used all the way) |
+| ISDN user part preference indicator: | 10 (ISDN user part required all the way) |
+| ISDN access indicator: | 0 (originating access non-ISDN) |
+| SCCP method indicator: | 00 (no indication) |
+
+###### c) *Calling party's category:*
+
+00001010 (ordinary subscriber).
+
+###### d) *Transmission medium requirement:*
+
+00000011 (3.1 kHz audio).
+
+Besides the parameters listed in Table 10 (Mapping of parameters from EstablishTemporaryConnection to IAM), the IAM contains the following optional parameters:
+
+- propagation delay counter (set as in an OLE);
+- hop counter (set as in an OLE).
+
+On sending of the IAM an ACM message is sent to the preceding exchange encoded as described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call), and the awaiting address complete timer T7 is started. If timer T7 expires, the call is released in both directions and an appropriate indication is returned to the calling subscriber.
+
+###### **10.1.5.2.1.1.2 Interworking with an ISUP not supporting the Correlation Id and SCF Id parameters**
+
+If the parameters cannot be transferred to the assisting SSP, the setup of the connection will fail.
+
+###### **10.1.5.2.1.2 Address complete message**
+
+Refer to 10.1.4.1.4 (Address complete message).
+
+###### **10.1.5.2.1.3 Call Progress message (Basic call)**
+
+Refer to 10.1.4.1.5 (Call Progress message (Basic call)).
+
+###### **10.1.5.2.1.4 Connect message**
+
+Refer to 10.1.4.1.6 (Connect message).
+
+###### **10.1.5.2.1.5 Answer message**
+
+Refer to 10.1.4.1.7 (Answer message).
+
+##### **10.1.5.2.2 Storage and release of initial address information**
+
+In the initiating SSP initial address information is retained to allow a call setup to a new destination after disconnecting the IP.
+
+NOTE – Memory capacity in the exchange may limit the use of services requiring the storage of initial address information.
+
+##### **10.1.5.2.3 DisconnectForwardConnection operation**
+
+When the DisconnectForwardConnection operation is received from the SCP, the normal release procedures are applied for the outgoing circuit. The REL message sent in forward direction contains cause value #31.
+
+##### **10.1.5.2.4 DisconnectForwardConnectionWithArgument operation**
+
+When the DisconnectForwardConnectionWithArgument operation is received from the SCP, the normal release procedures are applied for the outgoing circuit. The REL message sent in forward direction contains cause value #31.
+
+##### **10.1.5.2.5 Abnormal conditions**
+
+###### **10.1.5.2.5.1 Handling of unexpected messages**
+
+Refer to 10.1.4.3.1 (Handling of unexpected messages).
+
+##### **10.1.5.2.6 Impact on supplementary services**
+
+The actions as described in 10.1.4.4 (Impact on supplementary services) are applicable.
+
+#### **10.1.5.3 Hand-off method – procedure in the initiating SSP**
+
+On receipt of a Connect operation from the SCP, the actions described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call) or in subclause 10.1.4 (Setup of an IN call to destination B) will be performed. The INAP correlationID and scfID parameters are mapped to the corresponding ISUP parameters in the IAM message.
+
+#### **10.1.5.4 Assist/Hand-off method – procedure in the assisting SSP**
+
+##### **10.1.5.4.1 Successful call setup**
+
+###### **10.1.5.4.1.1 Forward address signalling**
+
+If an IAM is received in a SSP and the call is recognized as a call which is to be routed to an IP, an AssistReqInstructions operation is sent from the SSF to the SCF. The mapping of parameters is shown in Table 11.
+
+**Table 11/Q.1601 – Mapping of parameters from IAM to AssistRequestInstruction**
+
+| ISUP message | INAP operation |
+|---------------------|---------------------------------|
+| IAM | AssistRequestInstruction |
+| Correlation id | correlationID |
+
+###### **10.1.5.4.1.1.1 ConnectToResource operation**
+
+The procedure to be performed after receipt of the ConnectToResource operation is identical to the procedure described in 10.1.5.1 (SSP supports requested IP capabilities).
+
+### **10.1.6 Call gapping**
+
+When receiving the CallGap operation, the SSF reduces the rate at which specific service requests are sent to the SCF. The detailed procedure is described in 7.3.6/Q.1228 [5].
+
+If the call is to be gapped and the gapTreatment parameter was present in the CallGap operation, then:
+
+- a) If the "informationToSend" indicates announcement or tone, then the ACM message contains an optional backward call indicators parameter indicating "in-band information or an appropriate pattern is now available".
+
+After the calling user has received the "informationToSend" the call is released and the cause indicators parameter contains the releaseCause parameter of the CallGap operation. If no releaseCause was present, cause value #31 is sent.
+
+- b) If the "informationToSend" indicates display information, then the call is released and a display information parameter is included in the REL message. The cause indicators parameter contains the releaseCause parameter of the CallGap operation. If no releaseCause was present, cause value #31 is sent.
+
+If the gapTreatment is not present in the CallGap operation, the SSF will use a default treatment depending on network-operator implementation.
+
+### **10.1.7 Service filtering**
+
+When receiving the ActivateServiceFiltering operation, the SSF handles calls which are to be filtered in a specified manner without request for instructions to the SCF. The detailed procedure is described in 7.3.1/Q.1228 [5].
+
+- a) If a call is to be filtered and the "informationToSend" indicates announcement or tone, then an ACM message is sent to the preceding exchange with an optional backward call indicators parameter indicating "in-band information or an appropriate pattern is now available". In the case of a chargeable in-band information an ANM is sent in addition.
+
+After the calling user has received the "informationToSend" the call is released and the cause indicators parameter contains the releaseCause parameter of the ServiceFiltering operation. If no releaseCause was present, cause value #31 is sent.
+
+- b) If a call is to be filtered and the "informationToSend" indicates display information, then:
+ - if the "informationToSend" is free of charge, the call is released and a display information parameter is included in the REL message. The cause indicators parameter contains the releaseCause parameter of the ServiceFiltering operation. If no releaseCause was present, cause value #31 is sent;
+ - if the "informationToSend" is not free of charge, an ANM message containing the display information parameter is sent. Then the call is released and the cause indicators parameter contains the releaseCause parameter of the ServiceFiltering operation. If no releaseCause was present, cause value #31 is sent.
+
+#### **10.1.7.1 Impact on supplementary services**
+
+##### **10.1.7.1.1 Closed user group**
+
+If the call is a CUG call with outgoing access not allowed, then the "informationToSend" is not provided and the call is released using cause value #29 with diagnostics. The diagnostics field contains the CUG interlock code parameter name.
+
+### **10.1.8 SCP initiated call**
+
+For a SCP initiated call the SSP behaves like an originating local exchange with the exception that no information is received/sent from/to the access protocol. The call setup information needed for the generation of the IAM message is partly provided with the InitiateCallAttempt operation. The remaining mandatory fields of the IAM message are supplied with default values. This is described in the subclauses below.
+
+#### **10.1.8.1 Successful call setup**
+
+##### **10.1.8.1.1 Forward address signalling**
+
+On receipt of an InitiateCallAttempt operation from the SCP the contents are stored and call processing is suspended.
+
+###### 10.1.8.1.1.1 Continue operation
+
+The actions described in 2.1.1.1/Q.764 [10] will be performed. For routing of the call the called party number is derived from the destinationRoutingAddress [see Table 12 (Mapping of parameters from InitiateCallAttempt to IAM)].
+
+Table 12 illustrates the mapping of parameters received in the InitiateCallAttempt operation to parameters sent in the IAM message.
+
+**Table 12/Q.1601 – Mapping of parameters from InitiateCallAttempt to IAM**
+
+| INAP operation | ISUP message |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| InitiateCallAttempt (Note 1) | IAM |
+| destinationRoutingAddress | Called party number |
+| callingPartyNumber | Calling party number |
+| serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo | See 10.1.1.1.1.4 (Mapping of the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo) |
+| carrier | TNS (Note 2) |
+| NOTE 1 – Optional parameters may be absent, i.e. they are only mapped, if received. | |
+| NOTE 2 – The carrier selection field received in the Carrier parameter is not mapped. The octets following to the carrier selection field are as a national option mapped to the TNS parameter or not mapped. | |
+
+Except the called party number parameter the remaining mandatory parameters of the IAM message are set as follows:
+
+- a) *Nature of connection indicators:*
+ - Satellite indicator: set as in an OLE
+ - Continuity check indicator: set as in an OLE
+ - Echo control device indicator: set as in an OLE
+- b) *Forward call indicators:*
+ - National/international call indicator: set as in an OLE
+ - End-to-end method indicator: 00 (no end-to-end method available)
+ - Interworking indicator: 0 (no interworking encountered)
+ - End-to-end information indicator: 0 (no end-to-end information available)
+ - ISDN user part indicator: 1 (ISDN user part used all the way)
+ - ISDN user part preference indicator: 00 (ISDN user part preferred all the way)
+ - ISDN access indicator: 0 (originating access non-ISDN)
+ - SCCP method indicator: 00 (no indication)
+- c) *Calling party's category:*
+00001010 (ordinary subscriber).
+- d) *Transmission medium requirement:*
+00000011 (3.1 kHz audio).
+
+Besides the parameters listed in Table 12, the IAM contains the following optional parameters:
+
+- propagation delay counter (set as in an OLE);
+- hop counter (set as in an OLE).
+
+### 10.1.9 GVNS
+
+This subclause describes the setup of an GVNS call. In this situation, the call setup differs from the normal call setup for the "IN basic call".
+
+#### 10.1.9.1 Procedure in the SSP providing the GVNS access function
+
+In addition to the description given in 10.1.1 (IN basic call), the following actions are to be performed.
+
+When receiving the Connect or the ContinueWithArgument Operation with the forwardGVNS parameter, the SSP maps it to the ISUP parameter "Forward GVNS" in IAM in addition to the mapping given in 10.1.1 (IN basic call) according to Table 13.
+
+**Table 13/Q.1601 – GVNS Mapping of parameters from Connect/ContinueWithArgument to IAM**
+
+| INAP operation | ISUP message |
+|-------------------------------------|---------------------|
+| Connect/ContinueWithArgument | IAM |
+| ForwardGVNS | Forward GVNS |
+
+On receipt of ANM/CON the received ISUP parameter "Backward GVNS" parameter is mapped to ERB "backwardGVNS" parameter on INAP (if armed) according to Table 14.
+
+**Table 14/Q.1601 – GVNS Mapping of parameters from ANM/CON to ERB**
+
+| ISUP message | INAP operation |
+|---------------------|------------------------|
+| ANM/CON | EventReportBCSM |
+| Backward GVNS | backwardGVNS |
+
+In addition the SSP discards the "backward GVNS" parameter received in ANM/CON.
+
+On receipt of ANM/CON the Backward GVNS parameter is mapped to the backwardGVNS parameter of the EventReportBCSM operation, if applicable.
+
+#### 10.1.9.2 Procedure in the SSP providing the originating GVNS routing function
+
+In addition to the description given in 10.1.1 (IN basic call), the following actions are to be performed.
+
+When receiving the IAM, the actions described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call) are performed. In addition to the mapping given there, the following mapping is applied (see Table 15):
+
+**Table 15/Q.1601 – GVNS mapping of parameters from IAM to InitialDP**
+
+| ISUP message | INAP operation |
+|---------------------|-----------------------|
+| IAM | InitialDP |
+| Forward GVNS | forwardGVNS |
+
+When receiving the Connect or the ContinueWithArgument Operation with the forwardGVNS parameter, the SSP maps it to the ISUP parameter "Forward GVNS" in IAM in addition to the mapping given in 10.1.1 (IN basic call) according to Table 16.
+
+**Table 16/Q.1601 – GVNS Mapping of parameters from
+Connect/ContinueWithArgument to IAM**
+
+| INAP operation | ISUP message |
+|-------------------------------------|---------------------|
+| Connect/ContinueWithArgument | IAM |
+| forwardGVNS | Forward GVNS |
+
+#### **10.1.9.3 Procedure in the SSP providing the terminating GVNS routing function**
+
+In addition to the description given in 10.1.1 (IN basic call), the following actions are to be performed.
+
+When receiving the IAM, the actions described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call) are performed. In addition to the mapping given there, the following mapping is applied (see Table 17):
+
+**Table 17/Q.1601 – GVNS Mapping of parameters from IAM to InitialDP**
+
+| ISUP message | INAP operation |
+|---------------------|-----------------------|
+| IAM | InitialDP |
+| Forward GVNS | forwardGVNS |
+
+When receiving the Connect or the ContinueWithArgument Operation with the backwardGVNS parameter, the SSP maps it to the ISUP parameter "Backward GVNS" in ANM/CON according to Table 18 in addition to the actions described in 10.1.1 (IN basic call).
+
+**Table 18/Q.1601 – GVNS mapping of parameters from Connect/
+ContinueWithArgument to ANM/CON**
+
+| INAP operation | ISUP message |
+|-------------------------------------|---------------------|
+| Connect/ContinueWithArgument | ANM/CON |
+| BackwardGVNS | Backward GVNS |
+
+The Forward GVNS parameter received in IAM is discarded.
+
+### **10.1.10 Actions to be performed in local exchanges**
+
+#### **10.1.10.1 Actions in the originating local exchange**
+
+For an IN basic call the normal ISUP basic call procedures are applicable as described in [10] for originating local exchanges unless indicated otherwise in the subclauses below.
+
+##### **10.1.10.1.1 Successful call setup**
+
+###### **10.1.10.1.1.1 Forward address signalling**
+
+If the exchange has the capability to through-connect the transmission path in both directions upon receipt of the UID action indicators parameter with bit A coded 1, then the exchange shall send the UID capability indicators parameter in the IAM message with bit A coded 1.
+
+If the exchange has the capability to stop or not to start timer T9 upon receipt of the UID action indicators parameter with bit B coded 1, then the exchange shall send the UID capability indicators parameter in the IAM message bit B coded 1.
+
+###### **10.1.10.1.1.2 Address complete, call progress, connect or answer message**
+
+Upon receipt of an ACM or CPG message with the UID action indicators parameter indicating "through-connect in both directions" (bit A coded 1), the local exchange shall through-connect the transmission path in both directions, if not already connected.
+
+Upon receipt of an ACM or CPG message with the UID action indicators parameter indicating "stop or do not start T9 timer" (bit B coded 1), the local exchange shall not start/shall stop timer T9 and shall start timer $T_{UID}$ to guard the connection. If $T_{UID}$ was already running upon receipt of the UID action indicators parameter with bit B coded 1, then $T_{UID}$ shall be restarted.
+
+Upon receipt of an ANM or CON message, the local exchange shall stop T9 or $T_{UID}$ , if running.
+
+If $T_{UID}$ expires, see 10.1.4.2 (Timer $T_{UID}$ expiry).
+
+If received in these messages, the conference treatment indicators parameter shall be stored in the exchange. If the parameter has already been stored, then the stored information will be overwritten. The application of this parameter is described in clause 12 (Interaction between IN basic call and ISDN supplementary services).
+
+#### **10.1.10.2 Actions in the destination local exchange**
+
+##### **10.1.10.2.1 Successful call setup**
+
+###### **10.1.10.2.1.1 Forward address signalling**
+
+If received in the IAM message, the following parameters shall be stored: conference treatment indicators, call diversion treatment indicators, called IN number.
+
+The application of these parameters is described in clause 12 (Interaction between IN basic call and ISDN supplementary services).
+
+###### **10.1.10.2.1.1.1 Preventing of call offering for calls not routed via IN at a destination access**
+
+Upon receipt of an IAM for an access which is marked as "prevent call offering for non-authorized calls" the following actions are performed:
+
+- If the IAM contains the call to be offered indicator set to "call offering allowed" in the call offering treatment indicators parameter field, the call will be setup as described in 2.1.1.6/Q.764 [10].
+- If the IAM contains either the call to be offered indicator set to "call offering not allowed" in the call offering treatment indicators parameter field or no call offering treatment parameter field at all, the call will be released using cause value #21 (call rejected) without diagnostics in the REL message.
+
+NOTE – If the functionality required for this procedure is not implemented in the DLE the call to be offered indicator will be regarded as an unknown parameter value and treated as described in 2.9.5.3.3/Q.764 [10]. The compatibility information for the call offering treatment indicators parameter field is given in Appendix I.
+
+### **10.1.11 Actions in an intermediate exchange**
+
+#### **10.1.11.1 In an intermediate exchange not starting timer T9**
+
+An intermediate exchange not starting timer T9 shall not modify the UID capability and UID action indicators parameters, these two parameters shall be passed on transparently.
+
+#### **10.1.11.2 In an intermediate exchange starting timer T9**
+
+On receipt of the UID capability parameter, the intermediate exchange shall pass it on transparently to the succeeding exchange, if it has the capability to stop or not to start T9 timer upon receipt of the
+
+UID action indicators parameter with bit B coded 1. Otherwise, the bit B of the UID capability parameter shall be set to 0.
+
+On receipt of the UID action indicators parameter indicating "stop or do not start T9 timer" (bit B coded 1), the intermediate exchange shall not start/shall stop timer T9 and shall start timer $T_{UID}$ to guard the connection. If $T_{UID}$ was already running upon receipt of the UID action indicators parameter with bit B coded 1, then $T_{UID}$ shall be restarted.
+
+The UID action indicators parameter shall be passed on transparently to the preceding exchange.
+
+Upon receipt of an ANM or CON message, the intermediate exchange shall stop T9 or $T_{UID}$ , if running.
+
+If $T_{UID}$ expires, see 10.1.4.2 (Timer $T_{UID}$ expiry).
+
+### **10.1.12 Actions in international gateway exchanges**
+
+The UID action indicators and UID capability indicators parameters are only sent across the international interface if a bilateral agreement between both network operators exists.
+
+## **10.2 Bearer unrelated connections**
+
+For further study.
+
+# **11 Interaction with other networks**
+
+For further study.
+
+# **12 Interaction between IN basic call and ISDN supplementary services**
+
+The description in this clause assumes that the SCF controls IN service(s) dependent on whether ISDN supplementary services are influenced for a call.
+
+An overview on the interactions between IN services and ISDN supplementary services is given in Table 19.
+
+The second column of the table marked "possibly impacted by IN services" identifies the ISDN supplementary services for which SCF control is needed. As a consequence, indications "impact/no impact" are required for these supplementary services which are to be sent via the INAP in an appropriate operation (see Appendix II). The third column contains the reference to the subclause describing the action to be taken in case of "impact". The fourth column identifies the exchange where the action is to be performed. In the case the affected exchange is not the SSP itself, a new instruction indicator is needed which is to be transferred in an ISUP message to the originating or destination local exchange, or both respectively.
+
+**Table 19/Q.1601 – Interactions between IN basic call and ISDN supplementary services**
+
+| ISDN Supplementary service | ISUP protocol possibly impacted by IN services | if impacted by IN service(s) the following action will be performed | Affected exchange |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
+| Advice of charge at call setup | No | | |
+| Advice of charge during the call | No | | |
+| Advice of charge at the end of the call | No | | |
+| Call deflection | Yes | See 12.1 (Call diversion) | SSP/DLE |
+| Call forwarding busy | Yes | See 12.1 (Call diversion) | SSP/DLE |
+| Call forwarding reply | Yes | See 12.1 (Call diversion) | SSP/DLE |
+| Call forwarding unconditional | Yes | See 12.1 (Call diversion) | SSP/DLE |
+| Calling line identification presentation
Calling line identification restriction | Yes | See 12.2 (Calling line identification presentation/restriction) | SSP |
+| Call hold | No | | |
+| Call waiting | No | | |
+| Closed user group | No | | |
+| Completion of calls to busy subscriber | Yes | See 12.3 (Completion of calls service) | SSP |
+| Completion of calls on no reply | Yes | See 12.3 (Completion of calls service) | SSP |
+| Add-on conference call | Yes | See 12.4 (Conference) | OLE/DLE |
+| Connected line identification presentation
Connected line identification restriction | Yes | See 12.5 (Connected line identification presentation/restriction) | SSP |
+| Direct-dialling-in | No | | |
+| Explicit call transfer | Yes | See 12.6 (Explicit call transfer) | SSP |
+| GVNS | No | | |
+| International telecommunication charge card | No | | |
+| Malicious call identification | Yes | See 12.7 (Malicious call identification) | SSP/DLE |
+| Meet-me conference | No | | |
+| Multilevel precedence and pre-emption | No | | |
+| Multiple subscriber number | No | | |
+| Reverse charging | Yes | National network specific | |
+| Subaddressing | No | | |
+| Terminal portability | No | | |
+
+**Table 19/Q.1601 – Interactions between IN basic call and ISDN supplementary services
+(concluded)**
+
+| ISDN Supplementary service | ISUP protocol possibly impacted by IN services | if impacted by IN service(s) the following action will be performed | Affected exchange |
+|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
+| Three party | Yes | See 12.8 (Three party) | OLE/DLE |
+| User-to-user service 1 implicit | No | | |
+| User-to-user service 1 explicit | No | | |
+| User-to-user service 2 explicit | No | | |
+| User-to-user service 3 explicit | No | | |
+
+## 12.1 Call diversion
+
+### 12.1.1 Actions in the service switching point
+
+If "suppress information" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo (call diversion notification treatment indicator), then the following parameters shall be discarded, if received:
+
+- a) generic notification indicator parameter with "call is diverting";
+- b) call diversion information parameter;
+- c) redirection number parameter;
+- d) redirection number restriction parameter.
+
+### 12.1.2 Actions in the destination local exchange
+
+#### 12.1.2.1 Call forwarding unconditional
+
+Call forwarding unconditional activated by the ISDN subscriber is suppressed, if "call diversion not allowed" was received in the call diversion treatment indicators (call to be diverted indicator). The call is offered to the subscriber.
+
+#### 12.1.2.2 Call forwarding busy
+
+Call forwarding busy activated by the ISDN subscriber is not performed, if "call diversion not allowed" was received in the call diversion treatment indicators (call to be diverted indicator). The call is released using the appropriate cause in the REL message.
+
+#### 12.1.2.3 Call forwarding no reply
+
+Call forwarding on reply activated by the ISDN subscriber is not performed, if "call diversion not allowed" was received in the call diversion treatment indicators (call to be diverted indicator). Call offering to the subscriber continues.
+
+#### 12.1.2.4 Call deflection
+
+Call deflection requested by the ISDN subscriber is rejected, if "call diversion not allowed" was received in the call diversion treatment indicators (call to be diverted indicator). Call offering to the subscriber continues.
+
+## **12.2 Calling line identification presentation/restriction**
+
+### **12.2.1 Actions in the service switching point**
+
+If a callingPartyNumber parameter or GenericNumbers parameter has been received in the Connect operation, then the mapping of these parameters must not compromise existing services supported by ISUP [refer to Table 5 (Mapping of parameters from Connect to IAM)].
+
+## **12.3 Completion of calls service**
+
+### **12.3.1 Completion of calls to busy subscriber**
+
+#### **12.3.1.1 Actions in the service switching point**
+
+If "reject call completion request" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicator parameter (call completion treatment indicator), then in a received REL message a "CCBS possible" in the diagnostics field of the cause indicators is replaced with "CCBS not possible".
+
+### **12.3.2 Completion of calls on no reply**
+
+#### **12.3.2.1 Actions in the service switching point**
+
+If "reject call completion request" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicator parameter (call completion treatment indicator), then in a received ACM (subscriber free) or CPG (alerting) message a "CCNR possible" in the CCNR Possible indicator parameter is replaced with "CCNR not possible".
+
+## **12.4 Conference**
+
+### **12.4.1 Actions in the originating or destination local exchange**
+
+A request from an ISDN subscriber to add a call to a conference is rejected, if "reject conference request" was received in the conference treatment indicators (conference acceptance indicator).
+
+If "reject conference request" is received in the conference treatment indicators (conference acceptance indicator) for a call which is part of a conference call, then this IN call is cleared.
+
+## **12.5 Connected line identification presentation/restriction**
+
+### **12.5.1 Actions in the service switching point**
+
+If "no impact" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo (connected number treatment indicator), then a connected number parameter and a generic number parameter "additional connected number" are passed on unchanged.
+
+If "presentation restricted" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo, then:
+
+- a) If a connected number parameter has been received in the ANM or CON message, the address presentation restricted indicator is set to "presentation restricted".
+- b) If a generic number parameter "additional connected number" has been received in the ANM or CON message, the address presentation restricted indicator is set to "presentation restricted".
+- c) If a redirection number parameter has been received, a redirection number restriction parameter is sent in the ANM message with bits AB set to "presentation restricted".
+
+If "present called IN number" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo, then:
+
+- a) If a connected number parameter has been received in the ANM or CON message, the connected number parameter is modified as follows:
+
+nature of address indicator and numbering plan indicator are encoded as received in the called party number of the IAM message;
+
+address presentation restricted indicator: 00 (presentation allowed);
+
+address signals: as received in the called party number and possible subsequent number parameters, until the ACM message was sent.
+
+- b) A generic number parameter "additional connected number" is deleted from the message, if applicable.
+- c) A redirection number parameter is deleted from the relevant messages, if applicable.
+
+If "present called IN number restricted" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo, then:
+
+- a) If a connected number parameter has been received in the ANM or CON message, the connected number parameter is modified as follows:
+
+nature of address indicator and numbering plan indicator are encoded as received in the called party number of the IAM message;
+
+address presentation restricted indicator: 01 (presentation restricted);
+
+address signals: as received in the called party number and possible subsequent number parameters, until the ACM message was sent.
+
+- b) A generic number parameter "additional connected number" is deleted from the message, if applicable.
+- c) A redirection number parameter is deleted from the relevant messages, if applicable.
+
+## 12.6 Explicit call transfer
+
+### 12.6.1 Actions in the service switching point
+
+If "suppress information" was received in the INAP serviceInteractionIndicatorsTwo (call transfer notification treatment indicator), then the following parameter shall be discarded, if received:
+
+- a) generic notification indicator parameter with either "call transfer, alerting" or "call transfer, active";
+- b) call transfer number parameter.
+
+## 12.7 Malicious call identification
+
+### 12.7.1 Actions in the service switching point
+
+The service switching point shall pass a received IDR message transparently to the preceding exchange. The subsequent IRS message is passed transparently to the succeeding exchange. If bit A of the MCID request indicators was set to 1, then in addition to the normal procedure the service switching point shall include the charged party identification parameter, if available, into the IRS message.
+
+### 12.7.2 Actions in the destination local exchange
+
+If the MCID supplementary service is invoked by the called user, the registration of call information is extended by the registration of the called IN number and the charged party identification, if these parameters were received in the IAM or IRS message, respectively.
+
+## 12.8 Three party
+
+### 12.8.1 Actions in the originating or destination local exchange
+
+A request from an ISDN subscriber to establish a three-way conference is rejected, if for one call or both, respectively, "reject conference request" was received in the conference treatment indicators (conference acceptance indicator).
+
+If "reject conference request" is received in the conference treatment indicators (conference acceptance indicator) for a call which is part of a three-party call, then this IN call is cleared.
+
+# 13 Interactions between IN services
+
+Although the INAP [5] only supports a single point of control, i.e. one CCF/SSF combination interacts with only one SCF, it may happen, that multiple IN services are invoked for a call, if IN triggering occurs in different SSPs (see Figure 5).
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a network configuration for a three-party call involving two Subscriber Station Packages (SSPs). On the left, a telephone is connected to an Originating Local Exchange (OLE) through 'Access Signalling'. The OLE is connected to the first SSP via an ISUP link. Inside this SSP, the CCF (Control Center Function) is connected to the SSF (Service Switching Function). The SSF is connected to an SCP (Service Control Point) via an INAP link. The CCF of the first SSP is also connected to the CCF of the second SSP via another ISUP link. The second SSP has a similar internal structure with its own SSF and CCF, and its CCF is connected to its own SCP via an INAP link. The CCF of the second SSP is connected to another OLE, which is in turn connected to a second telephone through 'Access Signalling'. The diagram is labeled 'T11103760-99'.
+
+Diagram showing a configuration with two SSPs involved in a call. Two Subscriber Station Packages (SSP) are shown, each containing a Service Switching Function (SSF) and a Control Center Function (CCF). Each SSP is connected to a Service Control Point (SCP) via an INAP link. The CCFs are connected via ISUP links. The left CCF is connected to an Originating Local Exchange (OLE) which is connected to a telephone via Access Signalling. The right CCF is connected to an OLE which is connected to a telephone via Access Signalling. The two CCFs are also connected to each other via an ISUP link. The diagram is labeled T11103760-99.
+
+Figure 5/Q.1601 – Configuration with two SSPs involved in the call
+
+No signalling is provided in the ITU-T INAP (CS-2) and ISUP to support interactions between IN services. This topic will be discussed in future capability sets.
+
+# 14 Parameter values (timers)
+
+See Table 20.
+
+**Table 20/Q.1601 – ISUP timers for the SSP**
+
+| Symbol | Time-out value | Cause for initiation | Normal termination | At expiry | Reference |
+|----------------------|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| T SUS | SCF controlled | When SUS "network initiated" message is received | At receipt of RES "network initiated" or REL message | Initiate release procedure or inform SCF | Subclause 10.1.1.3 (Suspend, resume)
Subclause 10.1.3 (Detection Point processing) |
+| T NoReply | SCF controlled | At receipt of ACM when DP ONA or TNA has been armed. (Note) | At receipt of ANM or REL message | Inform SCF | |
+| T UID | 30 minutes | At receipt of UID action indicators parameter with bit B set to 1 | At receipt of ANM message | Initiate release procedure | Subclause 10.1.4.2 (Timer T UID expiry) |
+
+NOTE – Except for receipt of ACM with cause parameter.
+
+# ANNEX A
+
+## Signalling flows
+
+This annex contains arrow diagrams showing different types of IN calls. In case of discrepancies between the flows contained in this annex and the text in the main part of this ITU-T Recommendation, the text takes precedence. The signal flows on the access protocol are also indicated, but in a simplified manner for illustrative purposes only.
+
+The following abbreviations and notations are used in Figures A.1 to A.7:
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|
+| A-SSP | Assisting SSP |
+| AssReqInstr | AssistRequestInstruction operation |
+| (DPx) | arm DP x |
+| DPx ! | DP x encountered |
+| DFC | DisconnectForwardConnection |
+| CTR | ConnectToResource operation |
+| EstTempConn | EstablishTemporaryConnection operation |
+| I-SSP | Initiating SSP |
+| P&C | PromptAndCollectUserInfo operation |
+| ReqReportBCSMEv | RequestReportBCSMEEvent operation |
+| ⊗ | Switchpath completed in backward direction |
+| ⊕ | Switchpath completed in forward direction |
+| ⊕ | Switchpath completed in both directions |
+| ⊗ | Release switchpath |
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant User A
+ participant OLE
+ participant SSP
+ participant SCP
+ participant DLE
+ participant User B
+
+ Note left of OLE: (X)
+ User A->>OLE:
+ OLE-->>User A:
+ OLE->>SSP: IAM
+ SSP->>SCP: InitialDP
+ SCP-->>SSP: Connect
+ Note left of SSP: (X)
+ SSP->>OLE: ACM (no indication)
+ OLE->>SSP: CPG (alerting)
+ SSP->>SCP: IAM
+ Note left of DLE: (X)
+ SSP->>DLE: ACM (subscriber free)
+ DLE->>User B:
+ User B-->>DLE:
+ DLE->>User B:
+ User B-->>DLE:
+ Note left of DLE: (X)
+ DLE->>SSP: ANM
+ SSP->>OLE: ANM
+ OLE-->>User A:
+ OLE-->>User A:
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram of IN basic call between User A, OLE, SSP, SCP, DLE, and User B. The diagram shows the flow of signaling messages like SETUP, IAM, ACM, CPG, ANM, and CONNECT between the entities.
+
+T11103770-99
+
+Figure A.1/Q.1601 – IN basic call
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant User A
+ participant OLE
+ participant SSP
+ participant SCP
+ participant DLE
+ participant User B
+
+ Note left of User A:
+ User A->>OLE:
+ OLE-->>User A:
+ Note left of OLE: (X)
+ OLE->>SSP: IAM
+ SSP->>SCP: InitialDP
+ Note left of SSP: (DP 2)
+ SCP->>SSP: ReqRepBCSMEv
+ Note left of SSP: (DP 2)
+ SSP->>SCP: CollectInfo
+ Note left of OLE:
+ OLE->>SSP: SAM
+ Note left of OLE:
+ OLE->>SSP: SAM
+ Note left of SSP: (DP 2)
+ SSP->>SCP: EventRepBCSM
+ Note left of SSP: (DP 2)
+ SSP->>SCP: Connect
+ Note left of OLE: (X)
+ OLE->>SSP: ACM
+ Note left of OLE: (no indication)
+ Note left of SSP: (X)
+ SSP->>DLE: IAM
+ Note left of DLE:
+ DLE->>User B:
+ User B-->>DLE:
+ DLE-->>User B:
+ Note left of DLE: (subscriber free)
+ DLE->>SSP: ACM
+ Note left of SSP: (subscriber free)
+ DLE-->>User B:
+ Note left of DLE: (X)
+ DLE->>SSP: ANM
+ Note left of SSP: (alerting)
+ SSP->>OLE: CPG
+ Note left of OLE: (alerting)
+ OLE-->>User A:
+ Note left of OLE: (X)
+ OLE-->>User A:
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for IN call with SCP request to collect further digits. Lifelines: User A, OLE, SSP, SCP, DLE, User B. The diagram shows the interaction between a user and a network element (OLE) which then interacts with a switching system (SSP) and a service control point (SCP) to collect digits before connecting to another user (User B) via a data link element (DLE).
+
+T11103780-99
+
+Figure A.2/Q.1601 – IN call with SCP request to collect further digits
+
+
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant User A
+ participant OLE
+ participant SSP
+ participant SCP
+
+ Note right of OLE: T7
+ Note right of OLE: T9
+
+ User A->>OLE:
+ OLE-->>User A:
+ OLE->>SSP: IAM
+ SSP->>SCP: InitialDP
+ SCP-->>SSP: CTR/P&C
+ SSP-->>OLE: ACM
+ Note right of OLE: (no indication, in-band info)
+ OLE-->>User A:
| SP A | | SP B |
| Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic |
| 1-1 | TRAFFIC (DPC = B, SI = X) | —————→ |
| 1-1 | TRAFFIC (DPC = C, SI = X) | —————→ |
| ←————— | 1-1 TRAFFIC (OPC = C, SI = X) |
| ←————— | 1-1 UPU (OPC = B, SI = X) |
| 1-1 | TRAFFIC (DPC = C, SI = X) | —————→ |
| ←————— | 1-1 TRAFFIC (OPC = C, SI = X) |
| :Wait |
| :Stop traffic |
NOTE – The impact of the reception of a UPU on the traffic from A to B requires further study. The SPs having user part(s) are concerned.
| | | SP A | | SP B | Link | | Link | :Start traffic | | | 1-1 | TRAFFIC
(DPC = B, SI = X) | —————→ | 1-1 | TRAFFIC
(DPC = C, SI = X) | —————→ | | ←————— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(OPC = C, SI = X) | | ←————— | 1-1 UPU
(OPC = B, SI = X) | 1-1 | TRAFFIC
(DPC = C, SI = X) | —————→ | | ←————— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(OPC = C, SI = X) | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC
(DPC = B, SI = X) | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC
(DPC = C, SI = X) | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(OPC = C, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————— | 1-1 UPU
(OPC = B, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC
(DPC = C, SI = X) | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(OPC = C, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C with SI = X. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Send a UPU from B to C with SI = X with the cause "unknown". | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that the UPU message is received correctly without impact on the traffic from A to C. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Wait and stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | Repeat the test with a UPU with the cause "unequipped", and with the cause "unavailable". | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|------|--|------|------|--|------|----------------|--|--|-------------------------------------|--------|--|--|-------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--|--|--|-------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|--|--|-------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|--|--|-------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|-------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|--|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 8.4 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 11.2.7/Q.704 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling traffic flow control | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Sending of a UPU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the detection of an unavailability of a user part | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: One link available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: See Note | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | | SP B |
| Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic | | |
1-1 TRAFFIC (to B and C, SI = X) | —————> | |
| <———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC (from B and C, SI = X) |
| :Deactivate user part X (Note) | | |
| <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE (from B to A, SI = X) |
1-1 UPU (DPC = B, SI = X) | —————> | |
| <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE (from C to A, SI = X) |
1-1 UPU (DPC = C, SI = X) | —————> | |
| <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE (from B to A, SI = X) |
1-1 UPU (DPC = B, SI = X) | —————> | |
| :Reactivate user part X | | |
| <———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC (from B and C to A, SI = X) |
1-1 TRAFFIC (to B and C, SI = X) | —————> | |
| :Wait | | |
| :Stop traffic | | |
NOTE – The notion of unavailability of a user part is specific to the implementation; consequently, the ability to deactivate a user part is implementation dependent. The SPs having user part(s) are concerned.
| | | SP A | | SP B | Link | | Link | :Start traffic | | | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(to B and C, SI = X) | —————> | | | <———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from B and C, SI = X) | :Deactivate user part X (Note) | | | | <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE
(from B to A, SI = X) | 1-1 UPU
(DPC = B, SI = X) | —————> | | | <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE
(from C to A, SI = X) | 1-1 UPU
(DPC = C, SI = X) | —————> | | | <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE
(from B to A, SI = X) | 1-1 UPU
(DPC = B, SI = X) | —————> | | :Reactivate user part X | | | | <———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from B and C to A, SI = X) | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(to B and C, SI = X) | —————> | | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(to B and C, SI = X) | —————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from B and C, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Deactivate user part X (Note) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE
(from B to A, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 UPU
(DPC = B, SI = X) | —————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE
(from C to A, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 UPU
(DPC = C, SI = X) | —————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <———— | 1-1 MESSAGE
(from B to A, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 UPU
(DPC = B, SI = X) | —————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Reactivate user part X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from B and C to A, SI = X) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(to B and C, SI = X) | —————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C with SI = X. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Deactivate the user part X. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Send a message from B to the user part X in A and check that this message is discarded and that a UPU is sent back with the cause "unavailable". | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Send a message from C to the user part X in A and check that this message is discarded and that a UPU is sent back with the cause "unavailable". | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | Repeat point 3 and reactivate the user part. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | Check that the messages sent from B and C are received correctly and that no UPU is sent back. Wait and stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | Repeat the test for an unequipped user part, and verify that a UPU is sent back with the cause "unequipped". | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.1.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 44 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Sending of a TFP on an alternative route – Failure of normal linkset | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the sending of a TFP on the alternative route when the normal linkset becomes unavailable | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: All linksets available | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC →
(from A and F) | 5-1 →
6-1 → | → SP D
→ SP E | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | → | 7-1 → | SP E | | |
+| 1-1 :Deactivate | (MML command or failure) | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFP, PC = B | → | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFP, PC = D | → | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from 1-1) | → | 7-1 →
8-1 → | SP E
SP D | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – A changeover procedure is performed after deactivation of link 1-1 but it is not described in this transfer prohibited test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E on linkset 1 and 2. | | | | |
+| 2. | Deactivate link 1-1 and check that TFPs concerning B and D are sent from A to C (alternative route to reach B and D). Check that no TFP concerning E is sent from A to C (load sharing between linksets 1 and 2 in A to reach E). | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that time out T8 is started for each TFP sent. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that the traffic to D and E is diverted to C. | | | | |
+| 5. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.1.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 44 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Sending of a TFP on an alternative route – On reception of a TFP | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the sending of a TFP on the alternative route when the normal route becomes unavailable on reception of a TFP | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset 4 unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP E • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | → 5-1
→ 6-1 | | SP D
SP E | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | → | 7-1 → | SP E | | |
+| | 5-1 :Deactivate | | | | |
+| (Note) | ← 1-1 TFP, PC = D | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFP, PC=D | → | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | → 6-1 | | SP E | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F, and from 1-1 to D) | → | 8-1 →
7-1 → | SP D
SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – A forced rerouting is performed after the reception of TFP for D in A but it is not described in this transfer prohibited test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Deactivate link 5-1 and check that a TFP concerning D is sent to A. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that a TFP concerning D is received from A and that traffic to D is diverted via C. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that a time out T8 is started. | | | | |
+| 5. | Stop traffic and check that traffic to E has not been disturbed. Some messages to D may have been lost. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|----------------|--|--|--|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--|--|-----------------|--------------------------|--|--|-----------------|-------|--|--|-----------------|---------------------|--|--|-------|--|--|--|---------------|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.2.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 44 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Broadcast of TFPs – On one linkset failure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the broadcast of TFPs when one point is inaccessible | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: All linksets available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP F |
| Link | Link | Link | Link |
| :Start traffic |
3–1 TRAFFIC (from A, D and E) | ————————————————————————————————————→ |
| 3–1 :Deactivate | (MML command or failure) |
| 1–1 TFP, PC = F | ————→ |
| 2–1 TFP, PC = F | ——————————————————→ |
| :Wait |
| :Stop traffic |
| | | SP A | SP B | SP C | SP F | Link | Link | Link | Link | :Start traffic | | | | 3–1 TRAFFIC
(from A, D and E) | ————————————————————————————————————→ | | | 3–1 :Deactivate | (MML command or failure) | | | 1–1 TFP, PC = F | ————→ | | | 2–1 TFP, PC = F | ——————————————————→ | | | :Wait | | | | :Stop traffic | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 TRAFFIC
(from A, D and E) | ————————————————————————————————————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 :Deactivate | (MML command or failure) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TFP, PC = F | ————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2–1 TFP, PC = F | ——————————————————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE – The propagation of TFPs is not presented to simplify the test description. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to F. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Deactivate link 1–1 and check that TFPs concerning F are broadcasted. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that a timer T8 is started. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------------------|------|------|--|------|------|------|------|--|------|----------------|--|--|--|--|-------------|------------------|--|----------------------|------|----------------|--|--|----------------------|------|------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|--|--|------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|-------|--|--|--|--|---------------|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.2.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 44 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Broadcast of TFPs – On multiple failures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the broadcast of TFPs when several points are inaccessible (various reasons) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset 1 unavailable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | SP B | SP C | | SP • |
| Link | Link | Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic |
| 2–1 TRAFFIC | ───────────────> | 7–1 ───────────────> | SP E |
| (from A and F) | | 8–1 ───────────────> | SP D |
| 2–1 :Deactivate (MML command or failure) |
| 3–1 TFP, PC = B | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | SP F |
| 3–1 TFP, PC = C | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | |
| 3–1 TFP, PC = D | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | |
| 3–1 TFP, PC = E | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | |
| :Wait |
| :Stop traffic |
| | | SP A | SP B | SP C | | SP • | Link | Link | Link | | Link | :Start traffic | | | | | 2–1 TRAFFIC | ───────────────> | | 7–1 ───────────────> | SP E | (from A and F) | | | 8–1 ───────────────> | SP D | 2–1 :Deactivate (MML command or failure) | | | | | 3–1 TFP, PC = B | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | SP F | 3–1 TFP, PC = C | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | | 3–1 TFP, PC = D | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | | 3–1 TFP, PC = E | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | | :Wait | | | | | :Stop traffic | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | | SP • | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2–1 TRAFFIC | ───────────────> | | 7–1 ───────────────> | SP E | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (from A and F) | | | 8–1 ───────────────> | SP D | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2–1 :Deactivate (MML command or failure) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 TFP, PC = B | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | SP F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 TFP, PC = C | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 TFP, PC = D | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 TFP, PC = E | ──────────────────────────────────────────────> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Deactivate linkset 2 and check that TFPs concerning B, C, D and E are broadcasted (to F). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that for each TFP sent a timer T8 is started. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Repeat test but with linkset 2 unavailable as pre-test condition and then deactivate linkset 1. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.2.2 (concluded) | | PAGE: 2 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 44 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Broadcast of TFPs – On multiple failures | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: See page 1 | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1 and 4 unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP C | SP D | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ 8-1
—————→ 7-1 | | SP E | | |
+| | 8-1 :Deactivate | | | | |
+| | ←———— 2-1 TFP, PC = D | | | | |
+| 3-1 TFP, PC = D | —————→ | | SP F | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ 7-1 | | SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Deactivate linkset 8 and check that a TFP (PC = D) is sent. Check that TFPs are broadcasted (here to F). | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that a time out T8 started. | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that traffic to E has not been disturbed. | | | | |
+| 5. | Repeat the test with linksets 2 and 4 unavailable as pre-test conditions and then deactivate linkset 5. Repeat the test with linksets 4 and 8 unavailable as pre-test conditions and then deactivate linkset 1. | | | | |
+| 6. | Repeat the test with linksets 4 and 5 unavailable as pre-test conditions and then deactivate linkset 2. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.3 | | PAGE: 1 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 44 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Reception of a message for an inaccessible destination | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check that a TFP is sent in response to a message received for an inaccessible destination | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 4 and 8 unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP F | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| | | :Sent a message to D | | | |
+| | ←————— | 3-1 | MESSAGE TO D | | |
+| 3-1 | —————→ | | | | |
+| TFP, PC = D | | | | | |
+| | | | | | |
+| T8 | | | | | |
+| | | | | | |
+| | ←————— | 3-1 | MESSAGE TO D | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send from F a message with DPC = D to A. | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that a TFP PC = D is sent in response. Check that a time out T8 is started. | | | | |
+| 3. | During T8, send a new message with DPC = D to A and check that no TFP is sent. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------|---------------------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|------|----------------|--|--|--|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--|------|------------------------------------------|--|--|--|-----------------|-----------------------|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--------------------|--|--|--|--------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.3 ( concluded ) | | PAGE: 2 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 44 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Reception of a message for an inaccessible destination | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: See page 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1 and 8 unavailable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • |
| Link | Link | Link | Link |
| :Start traffic |
3-1 TRAFFIC (from A, D and E) | ————————————————————————————————————→ | SP F |
| 3-1 :Deactivate (MML command or failure) |
| 2-1 TFP, PC = F | ————————————————————→ | |
| T8 | ←———————————————————————————————————— ←———————————————————————————————————— | 4-1
2-1 |
| MESSAGE TO F |
| | | SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | Link | Link | Link | Link | :Start traffic | | | | 3-1 TRAFFIC
(from A, D and E) | ————————————————————————————————————→ | | SP F | 3-1 :Deactivate (MML command or failure) | | | | 2-1 TFP, PC = F | ————————————————————→ | | | T8
| ←————————————————————————————————————
←————————————————————————————————————
| |
4-1
2-1 | | | | MESSAGE TO F |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3-1 TRAFFIC
(from A, D and E) | ————————————————————————————————————→ | | SP F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3-1 :Deactivate (MML command or failure) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFP, PC = F | ————————————————————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| T8
| ←————————————————————————————————————
←————————————————————————————————————
| |
4-1
2-1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | MESSAGE TO F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | 1. | Start traffic to F. |
| 2. | Deactivate linkset 3 and check that TFPs are broadcasted. |
| 3. | Within T8, send one message with DPC = F from C to A and check that no TFP is sent in response. |
| | | 1. | Start traffic to F. | 2. | Deactivate linkset 3 and check that TFPs are broadcasted. | 3. | Within T8, send one message with DPC = F from C to A and check that no TFP is sent in response. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to F. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Deactivate linkset 3 and check that TFPs are broadcasted. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Within T8, send one message with DPC = F from C to A and check that no TFP is sent in response. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.4.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 45 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Sending of a TFA on an alternative route – Recovery of normal linkset | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the sending of a TFA on an alternative route when the normal linkset becomes available | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset 1 unavailable (end of test 9.1.1) | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ | 8-1 —————→
7-1 —————→ | SP D
SP E | | |
+| 1-1 : Activate (depending on the activation mean previously used) | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFA, PC = B | —————→ | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFA, PC = D | —————→ | | | | |
+| 1-1 TFP, PC = D | —————→ | | | | |
+| 1-1 TFP, PC = E | —————→ | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F
and from 2-1) | —————→ | 5-1 —————→
6-1 —————→ | SP D
SP E | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – A changeback procedure is performed after activation of link 1-1 but it is not described in this transfer allowed test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate linkset 1 and check that traffic to D and E is diverted on linkset 1 and that a TFA concerning D is sent from A to C. Check that no TFA is sent concerning E (load sharing in A between linksets 1 and 2). | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that it was rerouted correctly without loss of messages, duplication and missequencing. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.4.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 45 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Sending of a TFA on an alternative route – On reception of a TFA | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check that a TFA is sent on the alternative route when the normal route becomes available on reception of a TFA | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 4 and 5 unavailable (end of test 9.1.2) | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ 6-1 | —————→ | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ 7-1 | | SP E | | |
+| | —————→ 8-1 | | SP D | | |
+| | 5-1 :Activate | | | | |
+| (Note) | ←———— 1-1 TFA, PC = D | | | | |
+| 1-1 TFP, PC = D | —————→ | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFA, PC = D | —————→ | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ 5-1 | —————→ | | | |
+| (from A and F,
from 2-1 to D) | —————→ 6-1 | —————→ | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ 7-1 | | SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – A controlled rerouting is performed after the activation of linkset 5 and it is not described in this transfer allowed test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 5-1 and check that a TFA concerning D is sent to A. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that the traffic to D via B and check that a TFA concerning D is sent from A to C. | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that traffic was not disturbed. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------|------------------------|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------|--|--|-------------|--|-------------------|--|----------------|--|--|--|-------------------------------|--------------------------|--|------|-------|--|--|--|---------------|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.5.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 45 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Broadcast of TFAs – On one linkset recovery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the broadcast of TFA when a destination becomes accessible | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 3 unavailable (end of test 9.2.1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP F |
| Link | Link | Link | Link |
| 3–1 :Activate (Note 1) | | | |
| 1–1 TFA, PC = F | ———————> (Note 2) | | |
| TFA, PC = F | | ———————> (Note 2) | |
| :Start traffic | | | |
3–1 TRAFFIC (from A and F) | ———————————————————————> | SP F |
| :Wait | | | |
| :Stop traffic | | | |
| | | | SP A | SP B | SP C | SP F | Link | Link | Link | Link | 3–1 :Activate (Note 1) | | | | 1–1 TFA, PC = F | ———————> (Note 2) | | | TFA, PC = F | | ———————> (Note 2) | | :Start traffic | | | | 3–1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | ———————————————————————> | | SP F | :Wait | | | | :Stop traffic | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 :Activate (Note 1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TFA, PC = F | ———————> (Note 2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TFA, PC = F | | ———————> (Note 2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3–1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | ———————————————————————> | | SP F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE 1 – After activation of the linkset 3, SPs A and F perform a point restart procedure which is not explicitly described in this test.
NOTE 2 – The propagation of TFAs is not presented to simplify the test description.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Activate linkset 3. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that TFAs concerning F are broadcasted. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Start traffic to F and check that it is routed correctly; stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.5.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 45 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Broadcast of TFAs – Various reasons | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the broadcast of TFA when several destinations become accessible in various network situations | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1 and 2 unavailable (end of test 9.2.2 page 1 of 2) | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| 2-1 :Activate | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFA, PC = B | —————→ | | SP F | | |
+| 3-1 TFA, PC = C | —————→ | | SP F | | |
+| 3-1 TFA, PC = D | —————→ | | SP F | | |
+| 3-1 TFA, PC = E | —————→ | | SP F | | |
+| 2-1 TFP, PC = B | —————→ | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFP, PC = D | —————→ | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFP, PC = E | —————→ | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ | 7-1 ———→ | SP E | | |
+| (from A, and F) | | 8-1 ———→ | SP D | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – After activation of the linkset 2, SPs A and C perform the point restart procedure which is not described in this test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Activate linkset 2. | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that TFAs concerning B, C, D and E are broadcasted. | | | | |
+| 3. | Start traffic and check that it is routed correctly; stop traffic. | | | | |
+| 4. | Repeat test but activate linkset 1 instead of linkset 2. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.5.2 (concluded) | | PAGE: 2 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 45 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Broadcast of TFAs – Various reasons | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: See page 1 of 2 | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 4 and 8 unavailable (end of test 9.2.2 page 2 of 2) | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | ←————— | 8-1 :Activate | | | |
+| | | 2-1 TFA, PC = D | | | |
+| 2-1 TFA, PC = D | —————→ | | | | |
+| 3-1 TFA, PC = D | —————→ | | SP F | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | | 8-1 —————→ | SP D | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate linkset 8 and check that a TFA concerning D is sent from C to A. Check that A broadcasts TFAs concerning D. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that the traffic to D is restarted. | | | | |
+| 4. | Repeat test with linksets 2, 4 and 5 unavailable as pre-test conditions and activate linkset 5. Repeat test with linksets 1, 4 and 8 unavailable as pre-test conditions and activate linkset 1. Repeat test with linksets 2, 4 and 5 as pre-test conditions and activate linkset 2. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.6 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 46 | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Periodic sending of Signalling-Route-Set-Test (SRST) messages | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the periodic test of an unavailable signalling route is performed correctly | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset 2 unavailable | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP F
Link Link
:Start traffic
1-1 TRAFFIC →
1-1 RST, PC = C →
T10
1-1 RST, PC = C →
T10
1-1 TRAFFIC →
← TRAFFIC 1-1
←
2-1 :Activate
← TFA, PC = C 1-1
→ TRAFFIC 1-1
:Wait
:Stop traffic
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B. | |
+| 2. | Check that at each expiration of T10, a signalling-Route-Set-Test message concerning C is received from A without response. | |
+| 3. | Activate linkset 2 and check that a TFA is received and that T10 is stopped. | |
+| 4. | Check that traffic to C is restarted and stop traffic. | |
+| 5. | Repeat the test but without sending of TFA after activation of linkset 2 and check that when a RST is received a TFA is sent in response. Check that T10 and signalling-route-set-test procedure are stopped. | |
+| 6. | Check that the duration of T10 is inside the specified range. | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 9.7 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 13/Q.704 Fig. 29, Fig. 46 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling route management | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Reception of a signalling-route-set-test-message | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of an SRST | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 2 and 3 unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP F | | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | | | |
+| | ←———— 1-1 RST, PC = F | | | | |
+| 3-1 :Activate | | T10 | | | |
+| 1-1 TFA, PC = F | ————→ (Ignored) | | | | |
+| | ←———— 1-1 RST, PC = F | , , , , , T10 | | | |
+| | | | | | |
+| | | — | | | |
+| 1-1 TFA, PC = F | ————→ | | | | |
+| 3-1 TRAFFIC
(from A, D and E) | ————→ | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send to A RST message concerning F and check that no response is received. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate linkset 3 and check that a TFA is received but ignored in B. | | | | |
+| 3. | Send a RST message concerning F after activation of linkset 3 and check that a TFA is received in response. | | | | |
+| 4. | Repeat the test but with linksets 1 and 3 unavailable as pre-test conditions and RST message sent from C. | | | | |
+
+###### MTP Level 3
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.1.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Recovery of a linkset (SP A does not have an STP function) – With use of point restart procedure | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check that point restart procedure is performed correctly when the recovery of a linkset restores connexity between two adjacent SPs | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 2, 4 and 6 unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: B | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A
Link
3-1, 2 TRAFFIC
2-1 :Activate
2-1 Activation (link in service at level 2)
2-1 T21
2-1 TRA
2-1 TRAFFIC (from 3-1, 2)
3-1, 2 TRAFFIC
:Wait
:Stop traffic
| SP B
Link
2-1 TFP (PC = C)
2-1 TFP (PC = E)
2-1 TRA
5-1 TFA (PC = A)
TIME CONTROLLED DIVERSION IS APPLIED
5-1
2-1
| SP C
Link
7-1
8-1
3-1, 2
| SP ?
Link
SP E
SP D
7-1 SP E
8-1 SP D
SP D
5-1 SP D
SP E
SP D
7-1 SP E
| | |
+| NOTE – The time controlled diversion procedure is applied in A and a controlled rerouting is performed in D. These procedures are not described in this point restart test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| - 1. Start traffic to E (and D in VAT).
- 2. Activate link 2-1.
- 3. Check that the time controlled diversion procedure is performed after reception of the TRA. Check that the traffic to D is diverted to the link 2-1 in accordance with the load sharing rules in A. Check that the traffic to E is not diverted.
- 4. Stop traffic and check that there were no lost messages, no duplication and no missequencing.
- 5. Repeat the test (in VAT) without sending of TRA and check that the duration of timer T21 is inside the specified range.
| | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.1.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Recovery of a linkset (SP A does not have an STP function) – Not resulting in the signalling point restart procedure | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system in case of restart of a linkset | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 2 and 6 are unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: B | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 3-1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | | 8-1 —————→ | SP D | | |
+| | 4-1 ←————— | | 5-1 SP D | | |
+| | └————→ 3-1, 2 | | | | |
+| | ←—————┘ | | | | |
+| | ←————— 3-1, 2 | ←————— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| 2-1 :Activate | | | | | |
+| CHANGEBACKS ARE PERFORMED IN A AND B (Note) | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ 4-1 | —————→ 7-1 | SP E | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ 5-1 | —————→ | SP D | | |
+| 3-1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | | 8-1 —————→ | SP D | | |
+| | ←————— 2-1 | | 5-1 SP D | | |
+| | ←————— 3-1, 2 | ←————— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – After activation of link 2-1, changebacks are performed in A and B but they are not explicitly described in this point restart test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to E and D. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 2-1. Check that the point restart procedure is not applied and that changebacks are performed. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that the traffic from A is diverted to the link 2-1 in accordance with the load sharing rules in A. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that the signalling route set test procedure is not applied after the activation of the link 2-1. | | | | |
+| 5. | Stop traffic and check that there were no lost messages, no duplication and no missequencing. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.2.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Recovery of a linkset (SP A has STP function) – With use of point restart procedure | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check that restart procedure is performed correctly when the recovery of a linkset restores connectivity between two adjacent SPs | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 3, 4 and 6 are unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP ? | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | | 8-1 —————→ | SP D | | |
+| | ←————— | 2-1 ←————— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| | | | 8-1 SP D | | |
+| 1-1 :Activate | | | | | |
+| 1-1 Activation (link in service at level 2) | | | | | |
+| | T21 | | | | |
+| 1-1 TFP (PC = F) —————→ | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRA —————→ | | | | | |
+| | ←————— 1-1 TFP (PC = C) | | | | |
+| | ←————— 1-1 TFP (PC = E) | | SP D | | |
+| | ←————— 1-1 TRA | | | | |
+| | 5-1 TFA (PC = A) —————→ | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFA (PC = B) —————→ | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TFA (PC = D) —————→ | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TFP (PC = D) —————→ | | | | | |
+| TIME CONTROLLED DIVERSION IS APPLIED | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC —————→ | 5-1 —————→ | | SP D | | |
+| | ←————— 1-1 | | 5-1 SP D | | |
+| | | 2-1 ←————— | 8-1 SP D | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC —————→ | | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | ←————— | 2-1 ←————— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1-1. Check that TFPs are sent from B to A for E and C, and that a TFP is sent from A to B for F. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that timer T21 in SP A and timer T21 in SP B stop at about the same time. Check that a TFA is sent from A to C for B. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that the controlled time diversion is applied in A. Check that the traffic to D is diverted on link 1-1. | | | | |
+| 5. | Stop traffic and check that there were no lost messages, no duplication and no missequencing. | | | | |
+| 6. | Repeat the test (in VAT) without sending TRA from B to A and check that the duration of timer T21 is inside the specified range. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.2.1 (concluded) | | PAGE: 2 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Recovery of a linkset (SP A has STP function) – With use of point restart procedure | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: See page 1 of 2 | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 3, 4 and 6 are unavailable (end of page 1) | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP ? | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC | → 5-1 | → | SP D | | |
+| | ← 1-1 | ← | SP D | | |
+| | | ← 2-1 | ← 8-1 SP D | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC | → | → 7-1 | SP E | | |
+| | | ← 2-1 | ← 7-1 SP E | | |
+| 3-1 :Activate | | | | | |
+| Activation (link service at level 2) | | | | | |
+| 3-1 | | | T21 SP F | | |
+| | ← | → 3-1 | | | |
+| TRA | | | TRA SP F | | |
+| 2-1 TFA (PC = F) | → | | | | |
+| 1-1 TFA (PC = F) | → | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | → 5-1 | → | SP D | | |
+| | ← 1-1 | ← | SP D | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | → | → 7-1 | SP E | | |
+| | | ← 2-1 | ← 7-1 SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 3-1. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that timer T21 in SP A and timer T21 in SP F stop at about the same time. Check that a TFA is sent from A to C for F and from A to B for F. | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that there were no lost messages, duplication and no missequencing. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.2.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Recovery of a linkset (SP A has STP function) – Not resulting in the signalling point restart procedure | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system in case of restart of a linkset | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset 1 unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ | 8-1 —————→
7-1 —————→
2-1 ←————
←———— | SP D
SP E
7-1 SP E
8-1 SP D | | |
+| 1-1 :Activate | | (Note 1) | | | |
+| CHANGEBACKS ARE PERFORMED IN A AND B (Note 2) | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F,
from 2-1) | —————→ 5-1 —————→
6-1 ←———— | | SP D
SP E | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ | 7-1 —————→
2-1 ←————
←———— | SP E
7-1 SP E
8-1 SP D | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE 1 – Depending on the routing rules in D and E, the traffic to A and F may be carried either on linksets 5 or 8, or on linksets 6 or 7. | | | | | |
+| NOTE 2 – Changebacks are performed but they are not explicitly described in this point restart test. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to D and E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1-1. Check that point restart procedure is not applied in this case and that changebacks are performed. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that the traffic to D and E is diverted on link 1-1 in accordance with the load sharing rules in A. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that the signalling route set test procedure is not used. | | | | |
+| 5. | Stop traffic and check there were no lost messages, no duplication and no missequencing. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|----------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.3 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: An adjacent SP becomes accessible via another SP (SP A does not have an STP function) | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system when an adjacent SP becomes accessible via another SP | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: B | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP • | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| | 4-1 :Activate | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 4-1 TFP (A) | | | |
+| TFPs
(D and E) | 4-1 —————→ | | | | |
+| | T21 | T21 | | | |
+| | ←———— | 4-1 TRA | | | |
+| TRA | 4-1 —————→ | | | | |
+| ←———— | 2-X TFAx | 7-1 TFAx (A, B) —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | (PCs = C, D and E) | 8-1 TFAx (A, B) —————→ | SP D | | |
+| | (Broadcasting mode) | | | | |
+| 2-1, 2 TRAFFIC —————→ | 4-1 —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| ←———— | 2-1, 2 ←———— | 4-1 ←———— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| 2-1, 2 TRAFFIC —————→ | 4-1 —————→ | 8-1 —————→ | SP D | | |
+| ←———— | 2-1, 2 ←———— | 4-1 ←———— | 8-1 SP D | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Activate link 4-1. | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that on the reception of TFAx the traffic is immediately restarted in A to E and to D. | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that there were no lost messages, no duplication and no missequencing. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.4 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: An adjacent SP becomes accessible via another SP (SP A has STP function) | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system when an adjacent SP becomes accessible via another SP on reception of a TFA | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 3 and 4 are unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP D | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | | 8-1 —————→ | SP D | | |
+| | ←————— | 2-1 ←————— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| | | ←————— | 8-1 SP D | | |
+| | | 4-1 Activate | | | |
+| | | 4-1 Activation (link in service at level 2) | | | |
+| | T21 | T21 | | | |
+| | ←————— | 4-1 TFP (PC = F) | | | |
+| | ←————— | 4-1 TRA | | | |
+| TFP (PC = A) | 4-1 —————→ | | | | |
+| TFP (PC = F) | 4-1 —————→ | | | | |
+| TRA | 4-1 —————→ | | | | |
+| TFA (PC = F) | 4-1 —————→ | | | | |
+| ←————— | | 2-1 | | | |
+| TFA (PC = C) | 4-1 —————→ | | | | |
+| ←————— | | 2-1 | | | |
+| TFA (PC = C) | 5-1 —————→ | | SP D | | |
+| TFA (PC = C) | 6-1 —————→ | | SP E | | |
+| TFA (PC = A) | 5-1 —————→ | | SP D | | |
+| TFA (PC = A) | 6-1 —————→ | | SP E | | |
+| | | 7-1 TFA (PC = B) —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | | 8-1 TFA (PC = B) —————→ | SP D | | |
+| | ←————— | 2-1 TFA (PC = B) | | | |
+| 2-1 TFP (PC = F) | —————→ | | | | |
+| | ←————— | 4-1 | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – Messages between B and C are only present for understanding the global sequence of message.
Only messages received and sent by/from A are subject to this test | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 4-1. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that, when the TFA is received for B, SP A is aware of that B is an adjacent point which restarts, and consequently, A sends a TFP concerning F on link 2-1 to B. | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that there were no lost messages, no duplication and no missequencing. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.5 | | PAGE: 1 of 2 | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Restart of an SP having no STP function | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the restart procedure in an SP having no STP function | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A unavailable | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: B | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP ? | | | | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | | | | |
+| :Activate | | | | | | | | |
+| X-X | Activation (first link in service at level 2) | | | | | | | |
+| | T20 | T21 | T21 SP D | | | | | |
+| | ←————— TRA 2-1 | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————— TRA 3-1 | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————— TRA 1-1 | | | | | | | |
+| when all (or sufficient) links are available | | | | | | | | |
+| | TRA | | | | | | | |
+| | ————→ TFA (PC = A) are broadcast | | | | | | | |
+| 3-1 | TRA | | | | | | | |
+| | ————→ TFA (PC = A) are broadcast | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRA | | | | | | | |
+| | ————→ | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | ————→ SP D | | | | | | |
+| | ←————— 1-1, 2 SP D | | | | | | | |
+| 2-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | ————→ 5-1 SP D | | | | | | |
+| | ————→ 6-1 SP E | | | | | | | |
+| 3-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | ————→ 8-1 SP E | | | | | | |
+| | ————→ 7-1 SP E | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————— 3-1, 2 SP E | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Activate SP A | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that when the first link is in service at level 2, the timer T20 is started. | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that when all (or sufficient) links are activated, and all TRAs are received from B, C and D timer T20 is stopped. | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that SP A broadcasts TRAs to B, C and D. | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | Check that the traffic is carried as described above. | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | Stop traffic. | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | In VAT, repeat the test without sending TRA from B to A, and check that the duration of T20 is inside the specified range. | | | | | | | |
+| 8. | In VAT, repeat the test without activating the link 1-1, and check that the duration of T20 is inside the specified range. | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.5 (concluded) | | PAGE: 2 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Restart of an SP having no STP function | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the restart procedure in an SP having no STP function | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A, linksets 6 and 7 unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: B | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP ? | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| :Activate | | | | | |
+| X-X Activation (first link in service at level 2) | | | | | |
+| T20 | T21 | T21 | T21 SP D | | |
+| ← TFP (PC = E) 2-1 | | | | | |
+| ← TRA 2-1 | | | | | |
+| ← TFP (PC = E) 3-1 | | | | | |
+| ← TRA 3-1 | | | | | |
+| ← TRA | | | 1-1 | | |
+| when all (or sufficient) links are available | | | | | |
+| 2-1 TRA → | | | | | |
+| TFAs (PC = A) are broadcast | | | | | |
+| 3-1 TRA → | | | | | |
+| TFAs (PC = A) are broadcast | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRA → | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC → | | | SP D | | |
+| | | | 1-1, 2 SP D | | |
+| 2-1, 2 TRAFFIC → | 5-1 → | | SP D | | |
+| | 6-1 → | | SP E | | |
+| 3-1, 2 TRAFFIC → | | 8-1 → | SP D | | |
+| | | 7-1 → | SP E | | |
+| | | 3-1, 2 ← | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Activate SP A. | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that when the first link is in service at level 2, the timer T20 is started. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that when all (or sufficient) links are activated, and all TRAs are received from B, C and D timer T20 is stopped. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that SP A broadcasts TRAs to B, C and D. | | | | |
+| 5. | Check that the traffic is carried as described above. | | | | |
+| 6. | Stop traffic. | | | | |
+| 7. | Repeat the test without sending TRA from B to A, and check that the duration of T20 is inside the specified range. | | | | |
+| 8. | Repeat the test without activating the link 1-1, and check that the duration of T20 is inside the specified range. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.6 | | PAGE: 1 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Restart of an SP having the STP function | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the restart procedure in an SP having STP function | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A
Link | SP B
Link | SP C
Link | SP ?
Link | | |
+| :Activate | | | | | |
+| X-X | Activation (first link in service at level 2) | | | | |
+| T18 | T20 | T21 | T21 SP F | | |
+| | ← TFP (PC = F) 1-1 | | | | |
+| | ← TRA 1-1 | | | | |
+| | ← TFP (PC = F) 2-1 | | | | |
+| | ← TRA 2-1 | | | | |
+| | ← TRA 3-1 | | | | |
+| when all (or sufficient) links are available and when all (or sufficient) TRAs have been received | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TFP (PC = D) → | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TFP (PC = E) → | | | | |
+| 2-1 | TFP (PC = E) → | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRA → | | | | |
+| | ← TFP (PC = F) 1-1 | | | | |
+| | TFAs (A&F) are broadcast | | | | |
+| 2-1 | TRA → | | | | |
+| | ← TFP (PC = F) 2-1 | | | | |
+| | TFAs (A) are broadcast | | | | |
+| 3-1 | TRA → | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC → 5-1 → | | SP D | | |
+| (from A and F) | Via B or C to A and F ← | | 5-1 or 8-1 SP D | | |
+| | 6-1 → | | SP D | | |
+| 2-1 | TRAFFIC → 7-1 → | | SP E | | |
+| (from A and F) | Via B or C to A and F ← | | 6-1 or 7-1 SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – Preventive TFPs are possibly sent after the expiry of T20. Preventive TFPs for the highest priority routes might not be sent. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Activate SP A. | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that when the first link is in service at level 2, the timer T20 is started. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that when all (or sufficient) links are activated, and all TRAs are received from B, C and D timer T18 is stopped. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that SP A broadcasts TRAs to B, C and F. | | | | |
+| 5. | Check that the traffic is carried as described above. | | | | |
+| 6. | Stop traffic. | | | | |
+| 7. | Repeat the test (in VAT) but send the traffic from F to D and E via A immediately after alignment of link 3-1 and check that this traffic is discarded until the end of T20. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.6 (concluded) | | PAGE: 2 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Restart of an SP having the STP function | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the restart procedure in an SP having STP function | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A unavailable and linkset 2 and 4 definitively unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP F | SP ? | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| | :Activate | | | | |
+| X-X | Activation (first link in service at level 2) | | | | |
+| T18 | T20 | | T21 | | |
+| | ← TFP (PC = F) 1-1 | | | | |
+| | ← TFP (PC = C) 1-1 | | | | |
+| | ← TRA 1-1 | | | | |
+| | ← TRA | TRA | 3-1 | | |
+| at the end of timer T18 | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TFP (PC = C) → | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TFP (PC = D) → | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TFP (PC = E) → | | | | |
+| 3-1 | TFP (PC = C) → | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRA → | | | | |
+| | ← TFP (PC = F) 1-1 | | | | |
+| | TFAs (A & F) are broadcast | | | | |
+| 3-1 | TRA → | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC → | 5-1 → | SP D | | |
+| (from A and F) | | 6-1 → | SP E | | |
+| | | to A and F → | 5-1 SP D | | |
+| | | to A and F → | 6-1 SP D | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| NOTE – Preventive TFPs may be sent after the expiry of T20. Preventive TFPs for the highest priority routes might not be sent. | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Activate SP A beginning by the activation of 3-1, activate link 1-1. | | | | |
+| 2. | Stop traffic. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|---------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.7.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Reception of an unexpected TRA – In an SP having no STP function | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the system in case of reception of an unexpected TRA | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with one available link | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| | | 1-1 | TRA | | |
+| 1-1 | T19 | TRA → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1 | TRA | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C on link 1-1. | | | | |
+| 2. | Send a TRA from B to A and check that the timer T19 is started. | | | | |
+| 3. | During T19 send a TRA from B to A and check that this message is ignored. | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that it has not been disturbed. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 10.7.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 9/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling point restart | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Reception of an unexpected TRA – In an SP having the STP function | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: See test 10.7.1 | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linksets 1, 4 and 8 are unavailable | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: D | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | SP B | SP C | SP ? | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | Link | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | ←———— | 2-1 ←———— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| | ←———— | 2-1 TRA | | | |
+| 2-1 T19 | TFP (PC = B) —————→ | | | | |
+| | TFP (PC = D) —————→ | | | | |
+| | TRA —————→ | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 2-1 TRA | | | |
+| 2-1 TRAFFIC
(from A and F) | —————→ | 7-1 —————→ | SP E | | |
+| | ←———— | 2-1 ←———— | 7-1 SP E | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to E. | | | | |
+| 2. | Send a TRA from C to A and check that the timer T19 is started, and that TFPs concerning B and D are received, then, check that a TRA is received from A. | | | | |
+| 3. | During T19 send a TRA from C to A and check that this message is ignored. | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that it has not been disturbed. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|----------------|--|--|---------------|-------|--|---------------|-------|--|--|-------|---------------|--|-------|--|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 11 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.706 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Traffic test | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the behaviour of an STP in various traffic situations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: All links available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: C | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP B | SP A | SP C |
| Link | Link | Link |
| :Start traffic |
| 1-1 TRAFFIC → | 2-1 → | |
| 1-2 TRAFFIC → | 2-1 → | |
| ← 1-1 | ← 2-1 TRAFFIC |
| ← 1-2 | |
| :Wait |
| :Stop traffic |
| | | SP B | SP A | SP C | Link | Link | Link | :Start traffic | | | 1-1 TRAFFIC → | 2-1 → | | 1-2 TRAFFIC → | 2-1 → | | | ← 1-1 | ← 2-1 TRAFFIC | | ← 1-2 | | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP B | SP A | SP C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | Link | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC → | 2-1 → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1-2 TRAFFIC → | 2-1 → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← 1-1 | ← 2-1 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← 1-2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic between B and C in both directions via A using the traffic models presented in ITU-T Rec. Q.706. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that the time to cross the STP is better than 20 milliseconds. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Repeat test but with a traffic model including 5% of messages with an SIF = 272 octets. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|--|------|----------|--|----------|----------------|--|--|-------------|---|--|--|---|-------------|---------------|--|--|----------|---|--|--|---|----------|--|---|----------|----------|---|--|------------|--|--|----------------|---|--|---------|---|----------------|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 12.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling link test | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: After activation of a link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the signalling link test procedure after activation of a signalling link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling link 1–2 available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | | SP B |
Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic |
| 1–2 TRAFFIC | → | |
| ← | 1–2 TRAFFIC |
| 1–1 :Activate |
| 1–1 SLTM | → | |
| ← | 1–1 SLTA |
| ← | 1–1 SLTm |
| 1–1 SLTA | → | |
| CHANGEBACK |
| 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | → | |
| TRAFFIC | ← | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC |
| :Wait |
| :Stop traffic |
| | | SP A | | SP B |
Link | |
Link | :Start traffic | | | 1–2 TRAFFIC | → | | | ← | 1–2 TRAFFIC | 1–1 :Activate | | | 1–1 SLTM | → | | | ← | 1–1 SLTA | | ← | 1–1 SLTm | 1–1 SLTA | → | | CHANGEBACK | | | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | → | | TRAFFIC | ← | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
Link | |
Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–2 TRAFFIC | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | 1–2 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 :Activate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 SLTM | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | 1–1 SLTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | 1–1 SLTm | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 SLTA | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHANGEBACK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TRAFFIC | ← | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B (and C in VAT). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1–1 and check that an SLTM is received from A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Send an SLTM to A and check that an SLTA is received. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that the link 1–1 becomes available and that changeback is performed correctly. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | Stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | In VAT, repeat the test with link 1–1 unavailable and inhibited (in this case changeback is not performed). Check that the link 1–1 becomes available and stays inhibited. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 12.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling link test | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: No acknowledgement to first SLTM | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check that a second SLTM is sent if the first is not acknowledged | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling link 1-2 available | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-2 | TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-2 TRAFFIC | | |
+| 1-1 | :Activate | | | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | —————→ | | | |
+| | , , , , T1 | | | | |
+| | — | | | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-1 SLTA | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-1 SLTM | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTA | —————→ | | | |
+| CHANGEBACK | | | | | |
+| 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-1, 2 TRAFFIC | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1-1 and check that an SLTM is received and not acknowledged. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that when the time T1 expires a new SLTM is sent. Check that the duration of this time is inside of the specified range. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that the link 1-1 becomes available and that the changeback is performed correctly. | | | | |
+| 5. | Stop traffic. | | | | |
+| 6. | Repeat the test with link 1-1 unavailable and inhibited (in this case changeback is not performed). Check that the link becomes available and stays inhibited. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 12.3 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling link test | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: No acknowledgement to second SLTM | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check that the link stays unavailable when the second SLTM is not acknowledged | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling link 1-2 available | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-2 | TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-2 TRAFFIC | | |
+| 1-1 | :Activate | | | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | —————→ | | | |
+| | , , , , , T1 | | | | |
+| | — | | | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | —————→ | | | |
+| | , , , , , T1 | | | | |
+| | — | | | | |
+| 1-2 | TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-2 TRAFFIC | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1-1 and check that two SLTMs are received from A. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that after the second expiration of T1, link 1-1 stays unavailable and that the management system is informed. | | | | |
+| 4. | Repeat the test with link 1-1 unavailable and inhibited. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 12.4 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling link test | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unreasonable field in an SLTA | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of an SLTA with an unreasonable field | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling link 1-2 available | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-2 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| 1-1 | :Activate | | | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1 | SLTA (erroneous test pattern) | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1 | SLTA | | |
+| CHANGEBACK | | | | | |
+| 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1-1 and check that an SLTM is received and acknowledged with an SLTA containing an erroneous test pattern. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that a second SLTM is sent from A and correctly acknowledged. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that link 1-1 becomes available and that changeback is performed correctly. | | | | |
+| 5. | Wait and stop traffic. | | | | |
+| 6. | Repeat the test with a first SLTA containing an erroneous SLC then OPC. | | | | |
+| 7. | Repeat the test with the first and second erroneous SLTA and check that link 1-1 stays unavailable and that management system is informed. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 12.5 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling link test | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Reception of an SLTM in an attempt state | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system when an SLTM is received in an attempt state | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling link 1-2 available | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-2 | TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-2 TRAFFIC | | |
+| 1-1 | :Activate | | | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | —————→ | | | |
+| | T1 | ←————— | 1-1 SLTM | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTA | —————→ | | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTM | —————→ | | | |
+| | T1 | ←————— | 1-1 SLTM | | |
+| 1-1 | SLTA | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-1 SLTA | | |
+| CHANGEBACK | | | | | |
+| 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | |
+| | | ←————— | 1-1, 2 TRAFFIC | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1-1 and check that SLTM is received. Send an SLTM and check that an SLTA is received. | | | | |
+| 3. | On reception of the second SLTM, send an SLTM and check that an SLTA is received. Send an SLTA to A. | | | | |
+| 4. | Check that changeback is performed correctly, and stop traffic. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------|--|------|----------|--|----------|----------------|--|--|-------------|--------|--|--|-------|-------------|--|-------|----------|--|-------|----------|----------|--------|--|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 12.6 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Signalling link test | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Additional SLTA and SLTM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of additional SLTA and SLTM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling link 1–2 available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT, CPT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | | SP B |
Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic |
| 1–2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | |
| ←———— | 1–2 TRAFFIC |
| ←———— | 1–2 SLTA |
| ←———— | 1–2 SLTM |
| 1–2 SLTA | —————→ | |
| :Wait |
| :Stop traffic |
| | | SP A | | SP B |
Link | |
Link | :Start traffic | | | 1–2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | ←———— | 1–2 TRAFFIC | | ←———— | 1–2 SLTA | | ←———— | 1–2 SLTM | 1–2 SLTA | —————→ | | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
Link | |
Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1–2 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1–2 SLTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1–2 SLTM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–2 SLTA | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B (and C in VAT). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Check that the reception of an SLTA is ignored. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Send an SLTM to A and check that an SLTA is received. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.1 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: Table 1/Q.704 | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid H0-H1 in a signalling network management message | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system when a signalling network management message is received with a non-existing H0-H1 | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: All links available | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A participant B as SP B Note over A,B: Link Note over A,B: :Start traffic A->>B: ALL TRAFFIC B->>A: ALL TRAFFIC B->>A: 1-X SIGNALLING NETWORK MANAGEMENT MESSAGE (Invalid H0-H1) A->>B: ALL TRAFFIC B->>A: ALL TRAFFIC Note over A,B: :Wait Note over A,B: :Stop traffic
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C on all links. | |
+| 2. | Send a signalling network management message with a non-existing H0-H1. | |
+| 3. | Check that this message is discarded without impact on the traffic. | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic. | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.2 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid changeover messages | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of changeover messages with an invalid SLC or OPC | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with two available links | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| 1-2 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| | | 1-2 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| | | 1-2 | COO, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | COO, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | ECO, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | ECO, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | COA, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | COA, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | ECA, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | ECA, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) | | |
+| 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C on all links. | | | | |
+| 2. | Send the invalid messages as described above and check that they are ignored. | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.3 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid changeback messages | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of changeback messages with an invalid SLC or OPC | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with two available links | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| 1-2 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| | | 1-2 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| | | 1-2 | CBD, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | CBD, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | CBA, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) | | |
+| | | 1-2 | CBA, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) | | |
+| 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | → | | | |
+| | | ← | | | |
+| | | 1-1, 2 | TRAFFIC | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C on all links. | | | | |
+| 2. | Send the invalid messages described above and check that they are ignored. | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.4 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid changeback code | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of an invalid changeback code in a changeback message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with one link available | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | |
+| SP A | | SP B |
+| Link | | Link |
+| :Start traffic | | |
+| 1-2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | |
+| | ←———— | 1-2 TRAFFIC |
+| 1-1 :Activate (depending on the deactivation mean previously used) | | |
+| 1-2 CBD, SLC 1-1 | —————→ | |
+| | ←———— | 1-2 CBA, SLC 1-1
(invalid changeback
code ≠ CBD) |
+| 1-2 CBD, SLC 1-1 | —————→ | |
+| | ←———— | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from 1-2) | —————→ | |
+| | ←———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC
(from 1-2, Note) |
+| 1-2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | |
+| | ←———— | 1-2 TRAFFIC |
+| :Wait | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | |
+| NOTE – B may perform a changeback or not. | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C on link 1-2. | |
+| 2. | Activate link 1-1, check that a CBD is received and acknowledged by a CBA with an invalid changeback code. | |
+| 3. | Check that a new CBD is received after T4 expires and acknowledged by a correct CBA. Check that changeback is performed. | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic and check that the invalid message has been discarded without impact on the traffic. | |
+
+**MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.5 | | PAGE: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid inhibition messages | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of an invalid inhibition message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with two available links | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+
+MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
+
+SP A
+SP B
+
+Link
+Link
+
+:Start traffic
+
+```
+
+ 1–1 TRAFFIC ——————————————————————————>
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–1 TRAFFIC
+
+ 1–2 TRAFFIC ——————————————————————————>
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–2 TRAFFIC
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–2 LIN, SLC 1–X
+ (non-existing SLC)
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–2 LIN, SLC 1–2
+ (non-existing OPC)
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–2 LIA, SLC 1–X
+ (non-existing SLC)
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–2 LIA, SLC 1–1
+ (non-existing OPC)
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–2 LID, SLC 1–X
+ (non-existing SLC)
+ <—————————————————————————— 1–2 LID, SLC 1–1
+ (non-existing OPC)
+
+```
+
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | |
+|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. |
+| 2. | Send the invalid messages described above and check that these are ignored. |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. |
+
+134 **ITU-T Rec. Q.782 (04/2002)**
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.5 (continued) | | PAGE: 2 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid inhibition messages | | |
+| PURPOSE: As page 1 | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with two available links | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | |
+| SP A | | SP B |
+| Link | | Link |
+| | ←————— | 1-2 LUN, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) |
+| | ←————— | 1-2 LUN, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) |
+| | ←————— | 1-2 LUA, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) |
+| | ←————— | 1-2 LUA, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) |
+| | ←————— | 1-2 LFU, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) |
+| | ←————— | 1-2 LFU, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | See page 1. | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.5 (concluded) | | PAGE: 3 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid inhibition messages | | |
+| PURPOSE: As page 1 | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with two available links | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | |
+| SP A | | SP B |
+| Link | | Link |
+| | ←———— | 1-2 LLT, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) |
+| | ←———— | 1-2 LLT, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) |
+| | ←———— | 1-2 LRT, SLC 1-X
(non-existing SLC) |
+| | ←———— | 1-2 LRT, SLC 1-1
(non-existing OPC) |
+| ALL TRAFFIC | ————→ | |
+| | ←———— | ALL TRAFFIC |
+| :Wait | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | See page 1. | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.6 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid transfer control messages | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check that there is no problem on reception of a TFC with spare field or SLC not coded 00 | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Link 1-1 available | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1-1 TFC, PC = C
(spare field ≠ 0) | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1-1 TFC, PC = C
(SLC ≠ 0000) | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1-1 TFC, PC = X
(non-existing PC) | | | |
+| 1-1 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1-1 TRAFFIC | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | |
+| 2. | Send a TFC with invalid spare field to A, then a TFC with an invalid SLC then a TFC with a non-existing PC. | | | | |
+| 3. | Check that these messages are correctly received without disturbances due to these incorrect values. | | | | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic. | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------|--|------|------|--|------|----------------|--|--|-------------|--------|--|--|--------|-------------|--|--------|--------------------------------------|--|--------|--------------------------------------|--|--------|---------------------------------------|--|--------|--------------------------------------|--|--|-----------------|--|--------|-----------------|--|--------|---------------------------------------|--|--------|--------------------------------------|-------------|--------|--|--|--------|-------------|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.7 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid signalling route management messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of invalid TFA or TFP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Links 1–1 and 2–1 available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGES SEQUENCE:
| SP A | | SP B |
| Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic | | |
| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————> | |
| <————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC |
| <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = X (non-existing PC) |
| <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = X (non-existing PC) |
| <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C (non-existing OPC) |
| <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C (spare bits # 00) |
| | 2–1 :Deactivate |
| <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C |
| <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = C (non-existing OPC) |
| <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = C (spare bits # 00) |
| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————> | |
| <————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC |
| :Wait | | |
| :Stop traffic | | |
| | | SP A | | SP B | Link | | Link | :Start traffic | | | 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————> | | | <————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = X
(non-existing PC) | | <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = X
(non-existing PC) | | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C
(non-existing OPC) | | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C
(spare bits # 00) | | | 2–1 :Deactivate | | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C | | <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = C
(non-existing OPC) | | <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = C
(spare bits # 00) | 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————> | | | <————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = X
(non-existing PC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = X
(non-existing PC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C
(non-existing OPC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C
(spare bits # 00) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | 2–1 :Deactivate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TFP, PC = C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = C
(non-existing OPC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TFA, PC = C
(spare bits # 00) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Send TFPs and TFAs with invalid values to A (as described above). Check that these messages are discarded without impact on the traffic, (except for spare bit # 0). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Deactivate linkset 2 and check that C becomes inaccessible. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Send TFAs concerning C with invalid values to A (as described above) and check that these messages are discarded without impact on the traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | Check the indications are given by the system (except for spare bits # 0). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | Stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|------|--|------|--|--|--|------|--|------|----------------|--|--|-----------------|------------|--|--|------------|-----------------|--|------------|------------------------------------------|--|------------|-------------------------------------------|--|------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|--|------------|-----------------|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.8 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid signalling-route-set-test messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of invalid RST messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Link 1–1 available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: STP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGES SEQUENCE:
| SP A | | SP B |
| | |
| Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic | | |
| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————————→ | |
| ←————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC |
| ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = X (non-existing PC) |
| ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = C (non-existing OPC) |
| ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = C (spare bits # 00) |
| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————————→ | |
| ←————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC |
| :Wait | | |
| :Stop traffic | | |
| | | SP A | | SP B | | | | Link | | Link | :Start traffic | | | 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————————→ | | | ←————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = X
(non-existing PC) | | ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = C
(non-existing OPC) | | ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = C
(spare bits # 00) | 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————————→ | | | ←————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = X
(non-existing PC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = C
(non-existing OPC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————————— | 1–1 RST, PC = C
(spare bits # 00) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TRAFFIC | —————————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Send to A the invalid messages described above and check that these messages are discarded without impact on the traffic, (except for spare bits # 0). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------|--|------|----------|--|----------|----------------|--|--|----------------|--------|--|--|-------|----------------|--|-------|-----------------------|----------------|--------|--|--|-------|----------------|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.9 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid traffic restart allowed message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of an invalid traffic restart allowed message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Linkset with two available links | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | | SP B |
Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic | | |
| 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | |
| ←———— | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC |
| ←———— | 1–1 TRA (unknown OPC) |
| 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | |
| ←———— | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC |
| :Wait | | |
| :Stop traffic | | |
| | | SP A | | SP B |
Link | |
Link | :Start traffic | | | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | ←———— | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | | ←———— | 1–1 TRA (unknown OPC) | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | ←———— | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
Link | |
Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1–1 TRA (unknown OPC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ←———— | 1–1, 2 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Send the invalid message described above and check that this message is ignored. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.10 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid H0-H1 in a signalling network testing and maintenance message | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of this invalid message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Link 1–1 available | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP A
Link Link
:Start traffic
1–1 TRAFFIC ————————————————————> <———————————————————— 1–1 TRAFFIC <———————————————————— 1–1 SIGNALLING NETWORK TESTING AND MAINTENANCE MESSAGE (Invalid H0-H1)
1–1 TRAFFIC ————————————————————> <———————————————————— 1–1 TRAFFIC
:Wait
:Stop traffic | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | |
+| 2. | Send a signalling network testing and maintenance message with a non-existing H0-H1. | |
+| 3. | Check that this message is discarded without impact on the traffic. | |
+| 4. | Stop traffic. | |
+
+###### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|--|------|--|------|--|--|--|------|--|------|----------------|--|--|-----------------|--------------|--|--|--------------|-----------------|--|--------------|----------------------------|--|--------------|----------------------------|-----------------|--------------|--|--|--------------|-----------------|--|--|--|-------|--|--|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.11 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: Q.707 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid signalling link test messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of an invalid signalling link test message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Link 1–1 available | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A | | SP B |
| | |
| Link | | Link |
| :Start traffic | | |
| 1–1 TRAFFIC | ———————————> | |
| <——————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC |
| <——————————— | 1–1 SLTM (invalid SLC) |
| <——————————— | 1–1 SLTA (invalid SLC) |
| 1–1 TRAFFIC | ———————————> | |
| <——————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC |
| | |
| :Wait | | |
| :Stop traffic | | |
| | | | SP A | | SP B | | | | Link | | Link | :Start traffic | | | 1–1 TRAFFIC | ———————————> | | | <——————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | <——————————— | 1–1 SLTM (invalid SLC) | | <——————————— | 1–1 SLTA (invalid SLC) | 1–1 TRAFFIC | ———————————> | | | <——————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | | | :Wait | | | :Stop traffic | | |
+| SP A | | SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Link | | Link | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Start traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TRAFFIC | ———————————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <——————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <——————————— | 1–1 SLTM (invalid SLC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <——————————— | 1–1 SLTA (invalid SLC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1–1 TRAFFIC | ———————————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <——————————— | 1–1 TRAFFIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Wait | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| :Stop traffic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Send the invalid SLTM and SLTA described above and check that they are discarded without impact on the traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+### **MTP Level 3**
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 13.12 | | PAGE: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: clause 15/Q.704 | | |
+| TITLE: Invalid messages | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid user part unavailable messages | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the actions of the system on reception of an invalid user part unavailable message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Link 1-1 available? | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: A | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: ALL |
+| MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A SP B
Link Link
:Start traffic
1-1 TRAFFIC —————→
←————— 1-1 TRAFFIC
←————— 1-1 UPU (non-existing OPC)
←————— 1-1 UPU (non-existing SI)
1-1 TRAFFIC —————→
←————— 1-1 TRAFFIC
:Wait
:Stop traffic
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Start traffic to B and C. | |
+| 2. | Send the invalid UPUs described above and check that these messages are ignored. | |
+| 3. | Stop traffic and check that it was not disturbed. | |
+
+
+
+
+
+## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communications |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/06a315363e7801bba8c7489a6694af19_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/06a315363e7801bba8c7489a6694af19_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da726bb950ce2e3c231af3e903ecfa1dd748fbc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/06a315363e7801bba8c7489a6694af19_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4bfc85c8944d18f6ef487eaf8a5405a0b0bbcb8ffe6b0cf850d5b895408fa66f
+size 1327
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/1c94fd3cebf58af136144f14160d128e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/1c94fd3cebf58af136144f14160d128e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92f01c3f31a68c0d533d60bc8101591b3883719e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/1c94fd3cebf58af136144f14160d128e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cf73ea595d1c5e327247c54e1dafd3196ac840b293abe58a37555557a706d4cd
+size 10136
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc6438bcedc9e72173b2d8e74cd31c264ae32aeb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:40203e46b9f9a68e88bdb204bdd4b7e5899358c088ed2f2902abbc4eb57db8cb
+size 8190
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/33dd23d4cb06e31f8690602510a6d717_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/33dd23d4cb06e31f8690602510a6d717_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e149e5c33232c75c1b3be365d5731ee43e97ce32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/33dd23d4cb06e31f8690602510a6d717_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bb05efbab6899164e4077b475cf74ddb11a182841a4efefc449c9d570dc6caef
+size 1193
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/3a054417cf8a47517e5b4b04f5b8023f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/3a054417cf8a47517e5b4b04f5b8023f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44e879560703696e54a4f4503b2e9d481cc59bdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/3a054417cf8a47517e5b4b04f5b8023f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5aeb85715cec2b231f452054361f16d47360f930b7502fc9336282ebf55f7947
+size 2131
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/683dba75afe26e28cd4de5730b776760_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/683dba75afe26e28cd4de5730b776760_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2bea244808a34d4d8fee22089fb907b789b99d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/683dba75afe26e28cd4de5730b776760_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:15ad2599441f04e8ea946645592be625add8cbf6dc5ea292381bf8692c2a160a
+size 1203
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/b38a6bcbb9dbcdf5bb3c1f507e9a552c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/b38a6bcbb9dbcdf5bb3c1f507e9a552c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2040d72934b0cd561e66033671ea8c07b526f998
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/b38a6bcbb9dbcdf5bb3c1f507e9a552c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d5583c8435dbf0d5f236c9e55e8b72eefb8b186c6c9ccace3c8ca84f3a46b9ac
+size 1681
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/d623125183022a80db828904aabbca16_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/d623125183022a80db828904aabbca16_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..453634e98b870e5977e99af04940f3d93cfd678b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/d623125183022a80db828904aabbca16_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a06fdc366aee40d599742147b525179396e0809d1ca72b3a7a69a7727c2ed3b0
+size 2013
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/e6f65e539f48240963eb1d2334f13fbb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/e6f65e539f48240963eb1d2334f13fbb_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f79dc4e773d03ab2d776bc89f6e40652297d144
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/e6f65e539f48240963eb1d2334f13fbb_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b58bbc082da434459e7f98ab1713ff20134c339556d01dd26b720b32bb462184
+size 1629
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/f2982b253666d4d1350d748428db4031_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/f2982b253666d4d1350d748428db4031_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d23d4488cc4d311a2d9bcebbd7299eb0a0cc2b7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/f2982b253666d4d1350d748428db4031_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:36f2d9325ff26d178ed5dd61f76410978462b6849f0eb8b1babce1878f19e38f
+size 1252
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3af8f088486e970048b776d3c75ddb6b5c812b52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.787-199709-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,10076 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.787**
+
+(09/97)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+Specifications of Signalling System No. 7 – Test
+specification
+
+---
+
+**Transaction Capabilities (TC) test specification**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.787
+
+(Previously CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+## **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.849 |
+| General | Q.700 |
+| Message transfer part (MTP) | Q.701–Q.709 |
+| Signalling connection control part (SCCP) | Q.711–Q.719 |
+| Telephone user part (TUP) | Q.720–Q.729 |
+| ISDN supplementary services | Q.730–Q.739 |
+| Data user part | Q.740–Q.749 |
+| Signalling System No. 7 management | Q.750–Q.759 |
+| ISDN user part | Q.760–Q.769 |
+| Transaction capabilities application part | Q.770–Q.779 |
+| Test specification | Q.780–Q.799 |
+| Q3 interface | Q.800–Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1999 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 |
+
+For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.
+
+## ITU-T RECOMMENDATION Q.787
+
+# TRANSACTION CAPABILITIES (TC) TEST SPECIFICATION
+
+## Summary
+
+This revised Recommendation Q.787 contains the test scripts for the SS No. 7 Transaction Capabilities. This revised Recommendation now covers the test descriptions for the Dialogue Portion of the *White Book* (1993) Recommendations Q.771 to Q.774 (Transaction capabilities application part).
+
+## Source
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.787 was revised by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 12th of September 1997.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+### NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 1998
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|-------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----|
+| 1 | Introduction ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | Objectives of the test specification..... | 1 |
+| 3 | Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 4 | General principles of test..... | 2 |
+| 5 | Test environment..... | 2 |
+| 5.1 | Signalling relation ..... | 2 |
+| 5.2 | Configuration..... | 2 |
+| 6 | Background traffic..... | 2 |
+| 7 | Test list ..... | 2 |
+| 7.1 | TC Transaction sublayer (TSL) test specification..... | 2 |
+| 7.1.1 | Guidance on performing transaction sublayer tests ..... | 2 |
+| 7.1.2 | Transaction sublayer tests ..... | 3 |
+| 7.2 | TC Component Sublayer (CSL) test specification ..... | 114 |
+| 7.2.1 | Guidance on performing component sublayer tests..... | 114 |
+| 7.2.2 | Component sublayer test list ..... | 114 |
+
+
+
+# **TRANSACTION CAPABILITIES (TC) TEST SPECIFICATION**
+
+*(revised in 1997)*
+
+# **1 Introduction**
+
+This Recommendation contains a detailed set of tests for the SS No. 7 Transaction Capabilities (TC). These tests are intended to validate the protocol specified in Recommendations Q.771 to Q.774. This Recommendation conforms to *White Book* (1993) which describes the basic rules for a test specification, as specified in Recommendation Q.780.
+
+## **2 Objectives of the test specification**
+
+The objective of the test specification is to provide:
+
+*Validation* – A level of confidence that a given implementation conforms to the *White Book* (1993) Recommendations Q.771 to Q.774 for SS No. 7 TC.
+
+*Compatibility* – A level of confidence that two implementations of SS No. 7 TC are able to interwork.
+
+The following criteria have been used in the generation of this test specification:
+
+- 1) the test specification does not provide exhaustive testing of all aspects of the SS No. 7 TC;
+- 2) all tests are of a practical nature and implementable using the available technology;
+- 3) the test list concentrates on the testing of normal signalling procedures. Testing of abnormal signalling procedures are only identified where this is regarded as particularly useful;
+- 4) the test list does not include any tests which are application specific. These tests should be contained in application specific testing documentation and are outside the scope of this test specification.
+
+## **3 Scope**
+
+The test scripts are divided into two subclauses: 7.1, TC Transaction Sublayer (TSL) test specification and 7.2, TC Component Sublayer (CSL) test specification. Most TSL and CSL functions are dependent on each other and will need to be performed together. The division between TSL and CSL is for clarification and understanding only and does not imply an implementation.
+
+This test specification is designed to verify the TCAP functionality by testing TCAP messages and their contents. Performance aspects such as the limits of numbers of transactions IDs are not taken into account in this test specification.
+
+Some tests in this Recommendation require the generation of primitives; therefore, when performing these tests, appropriate normal system actions of the TCAP user will have to be chosen which result in the indicated primitive being generated.
+
+The testing of primitives is outside the scope of this Recommendation. Both messages and primitives are shown in the expected message sequence diagrams as indicated below, but primitives are shown for ease of understanding only.
+
+PRIMITIVE: 
+
+MESSAGE: 
+
+The test description provides a guide for the correct interpretation and implementation of the test, but it does not constrain its realisation. In particular, any reference to the internal structure of the
+
+Implementation Under Test (IUT), such as confirmation of internal states of the TC state machines, is given for clarification only and its practical realisation can be application dependent or vary from one test to another. All questions and checks in the test description should be answered "YES" for correct operation.
+
+Throughout the test specification, mention is made of "state machines". This specification conceptual model is used in Recommendation Q.774 to aid understanding. It does not imply an implementation, even when the test script asks for the state to be confirmed at the end of some tests.
+
+Possible methods of ensuring that the software has returned to the required state are enumerated in the 7.1.1 and 7.2.1, Guidance on performing component sublayer tests.
+
+The test specification is independent of any specific application, or implementation.
+
+## 4 General principles of test
+
+The tests are described as "Validation" or "Validation and Compatibility" tests. Each test script indicates in the "Type of Test" field, whether the test is "VAT" (Validation) or "VAT and CPT" (Validation and Compatibility).
+
+## 5 Test environment
+
+## 5.1 Signalling relation
+
+A stable signalling relation is required between "SP A" and "SP B" in order to test TCAP effectively. A tested network service layer, e.g. MTP and SCCP signalling relation, should be used for compatibility tests.
+
+## 5.2 Configuration
+
+Only one configuration is required to perform the tests given in the proposed test list, as shown in Figure 1:
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a signalling relation between two entities, SP A and SP B. SP A is labeled as the Implementation Under Test (IUT). Two horizontal arrows point between the boxes: a top arrow pointing from SP A to SP B, and a bottom arrow pointing from SP B to SP A. The word "(Note)" is centered below these arrows. The text "T1185310-97" is located below the SP B box.
+
+Diagram showing two boxes labeled SP A and SP B. SP A is labeled IUT. Two arrows point between them, one in each direction. The word (Note) is written below the arrows. The text T1185310-97 is written below SP B.
+
+NOTE – The arrows indicate a signalling relation.
+
+**Figure 1/Q.787 – Configuration: 1**
+
+## 6 Background traffic
+
+These tests do not take into account any level of background traffic.
+
+# 7 Test list
+
+The test list categories are given in the following subclauses.
+
+## 7.1 TC Transaction sublayer (TSL) test specification
+
+### 7.1.1 Guidance on performing transaction sublayer tests
+
+For each test, the expected message sequence, a test description and a check table for Information Elements (IE) within messages are given.
+
+In the expected message sequence, primitives are shown at SP A [Implementation Under Test (IUT) side] only.
+
+The function of the check table is to provide the contents of both the initiating message and the expected results in order to perform the checks in the test descriptions. The check table for IE within messages does not include information on the Component Portion or the User Abort Information IE contents, which are dependent on a specific application. In the check tables, messages from the IUT are described using the short form for any IE length, except for 1.1.3.1.1 which tests the length variations. However different forms complying with 3.3/Q.773 may be used in any test.
+
+In order to test for pre and post test results such as the state machines being in the idle state, the following procedure is suggested:
+
+- Send a Continue to the IUT with the identical destination transaction ID (of a transaction that should be idle) and expect an Abort with unrecognized transaction ID cause value. If another message is received as a response, then this means that the transaction is not in the idle state.
+
+NOTE – The details of these confirmation tests are implementation dependant.
+
+### 7.1.2 Transaction sublayer tests
+
+NDA No Details Available
+
+FFS For Further Study
+
+\* Validation and Compatibility
+
+All other tests are Validation Only.
+
+1 *Transaction sublayer*
+
+1.1 Valid function
+
+1.1.1 Unstructured dialogue
+
+\* 1.1.1.1 Tested side sending
+
+\* 1.1.1.2 Tested side receiving
+
+1.1.2 Structured dialogue
+
+1.1.2.1 Clearing before subsequent Message
+
+1.1.2.1.1 Valid clearing from initiating side
+
+\* 1) Prearranged ending
+
+\* 2) Abort by the TR-User
+
+1.1.2.1.2 Valid clearing from responding side
+
+1.1.2.1.2.1 IUT sending
+
+\* 1) Basic ending
+
+\* 2) Prearranged ending
+
+\* 3) Abort by the TR-User
+
+1.1.2.1.2.2 IUT receiving
+
+\* 1) Abort by the TR-User
+
+\* 2) Abort by transaction sublayer
+
+\* 3) Basic ending
+
+1.1.2.2 Clearing after Continue Message
+
+1.1.2.2.1 Valid clearing from initiating side
+
+1.1.2.2.1.1 IUT sending
+
+\* 1) Basic ending
+
+\* 2) Prearranged ending
+
+\* 3) Abort by the TR-User
+
+1.1.2.2.1.2 IUT receiving
+
+\* 1) Basic ending
+
+2) Abort by the transaction sublayer
+
+- \*
+ - 3) Abort by the TR-User
+- 1.1.2.2.2 Valid clearing from responding side
+ - 1.1.2.2.2.1 IUT sending
+ - \* 1) Basic ending
+ - \* 2) Prearranged ending
+ - \* 3) Abort by the TR-User
+ - 1.1.2.2.2.2 IUT receiving
+ - \* 1) Basic ending
+ - \* 2) Abort by the transaction sublayer
+ - \* 3) Abort by the TR-User
+- 1.1.2.3 Clearing after Continue Message (component portion not present)
+ - 1.1.2.3.1 Basic ending IUT sending
+ - 1.1.2.3.2 Basic ending IUT receiving
+- 1.1.2.4 Message exchange after transaction established
+ - 1.1.2.4.1 IUT initiating
+ - 1.1.2.4.2 IUT receiving
+- 1.1.2.5 TC Addressing
+ - 1.1.2.5.1 Register address change
+- 1.1.3 Encoding and value variations
+ - 1.1.3.1 Encoding variations
+ - 1.1.3.1.1 Length variations
+ - 1.1.3.1.1.1 Definite short
+ - 1) Component portion length in definite short form embedded in short form
+ - 2) Component portion length in definite short form embedded in long form
+ - 1.1.3.1.1.2 Definite long
+ - 1) Component portion length in definite long form embedded in long form
+ - 1.1.3.1.1.3 Indefinite form
+ - 1) Component portion length in indefinite form embedded in indefinite form
+ - 1.1.3.2 Value variations
+ - 1.1.3.2.1 Transaction ID
+ - \* 1) Length is one octet
+ - \* 2) Length is four octets
+- 1.2 Syntactically Invalid Behaviour
+ - 1.2.1 Invalid values for information elements
+ - 1.2.1.1 Begin Message type
+ - 1) OTID length = 0
+ - 2) OTID length > four octets
+ - 1.2.1.2 First Continue Message
+ - 1) DTID length = 0
+ - 1.2.1.3 Subsequent Continue Message
+ - 1) Component portion length incorrect
+ - 1.2.1.4 End Message
+ - 1) DTID length > four octets
+
+- 1.2.1.5 Abort Message
+ - 1) Invalid P-Abort cause value
+ - 2) P-Abort cause length incorrect
+- 1.2.2 Invalid structure
+ - 1.2.2.1 Unidirectional Message type
+ - 1) Unknown information element present
+ - 1.2.2.2 Begin Message type
+ - 1) OTID absent
+ - 2) Unknown information element present
+ - 1.2.2.3 First Continue Message
+ - 1) OTID absent
+ - 2) DTID absent
+ - 3) OTID duplicated
+ - 4) DTID duplicated
+ - 5) Unknown information element present
+ - 1.2.2.4 Subsequent Continue Message
+ - 1) OTID absent
+ - 2) Unknown information element present
+ - 1.2.2.5 End Message
+ - 1) DTID absent
+ - 1.2.2.6 Abort Message
+ - 1) DTID absent
+ - 1.2.2.7 Unknown Message
+ - 1) OTID not included
+ - 2) OTID included and DTID not included
+ - 3) OTID included and DTID included
+- 1.2.3 Invalid encoding (i.e. Rec. X.209 BER violation)
+ - 1.2.3.1 Begin Message type
+ - 1) Invalid tag
+ - 1.2.3.2 Continue Message type
+ - 1) Invalid tag
+- 1.3 Inopportune Messages
+ - 1.3.1 Continue Message type
+ - 1) Receipt of Continue Message in Idle state with unassigned DTID
+ - 1.3.2 End Message type
+ - 1) Receipt of End message in Idle state
+ - 1.3.3 Abort Message type
+ - 1) Receipt of Abort message in Idle state
+- 1.4 Multiple Transaction Encoding
+ - 1.4.1 Valid Transaction Encoding
+ - 1) New transaction request during transaction establishment
+ - 2) New transaction request after transaction establishment
+ - 1.4.2 Inopportune Messages
+ - 1) Message with unassigned DTID during transaction establishment
+ - 2) Message with unassigned DTID after transaction establishment
+
+
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.1.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Unstructured dialogue | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Tested side receiving | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to correctly receive a Unidirectional message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL)
← UNIDIRECTIONAL
TR-UNI ind.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Send a Unidirectional message from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE UNIDIRECTIONAL MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE TSL STATE MACHINE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| UNIDIRECTIONAL
Message type tag: 01100001
Message type length: correct number of octets
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; Prearranged ending | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to correctly send a Begin message and then terminate the transaction locally by the "prearranged end" method | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
=====>
BEGIN —————→
TR-END req.
=====>
(Prearranged)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | Before a reply is received from SP B, arrange for a TR-END request primitive (prearranged) to be passed to the TSL at SP A. | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT AN END MESSAGE WAS NOT SENT BY SP A. | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
| | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; Abort by the TR-User | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to correctly generate a Begin message and then terminate the transaction locally by the "abort" method | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
BEGIN →
TR-U-ABORT req.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | Before a reply is received from SP B, arrange for a TR-U-ABORT request primitive to be passed to the TSL at SP A. | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE TR-U-ABORT REQUEST PURELY LOCAL AT SP A? | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT NO ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT FROM SP A. | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | | |
+
+| | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.2.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT Sending; Basic ending | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to receive a Begin message and then terminate the transaction by the "basic end" method | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind. TR-END req. (Basic) END |
←
→ | SP B (TSL) BEGIN |
| | | SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind.
TR-END req.
(Basic)
END |
←
→ | SP B (TSL)
BEGIN |
+| SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind.
TR-END req.
(Basic)
END |
←
→ | SP B (TSL)
BEGIN | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP B to SP A. | | | | |
+| 2. | On receipt of BEGIN indication arrange for a TR-END request primitive (basic) to be passed to the TSL at SP A. | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A AND PASSED TO THE TR-USER? | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|----------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.2.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT sending; Prearranged ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to receive a Begin message and then terminate the transaction by the "prearranged end" method | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| | | |
| (Prearranged) | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-END req. | | | | | | (Prearranged) | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Prearranged) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| - 1. Send a Begin message from SP B to SP A.
- 2. On receipt of the BEGIN indication arrange for a TR-END request primitive (prearranged) to be passed to the TSL at SP A.
- 3. CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A?
- 4. CHECK B: VERIFY THAT AN END MESSAGE WAS NOT SENT BY SP A.
- 5. CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.2.1 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.4/Q.774 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT sending; Abort by the TR-User | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to receive a Begin message and then terminate the transaction by the "abort" method | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) TR-BEGIN ind. <===== TR-U-ABORT req. ===== ABORT (U) | ←────────────────────────────────── ──────────────────────────────────→ | SP B (TSL) BEGIN |
| | | SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind.
<=====
TR-U-ABORT req.
=====
ABORT (U)
| ←──────────────────────────────────
──────────────────────────────────→
| SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
|
+| SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind.
<=====
TR-U-ABORT req.
=====
ABORT (U)
| ←──────────────────────────────────
──────────────────────────────────→
| SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
| | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP B to SP A. | | | | |
+| 2. | On receipt of the BEGIN indication arrange for a TR-U-ABORT request primitive to be passed to the TSL at SP A. | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE ABORT MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
ABORT (U)
Message type tag: 01100111
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
User abort information tag: 01101011
User abort information length: correct number of octets
| | | | | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.2.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.4/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT receiving; Abort by the TR-User | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate a transaction on reception of an Abort (U) message | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL) TR-BEGIN req. =====> BEGIN -> <----- TR-U-ABORT ind. <=====
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send an U-Abort message to SP A. | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
ABORT (U)
Message type tag: 01100111
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
User abort information tag: 01101011
User abort information length: correct number of octets
| | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|----|--|--|----|------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.2.2 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT receiving; Abort by transaction sublayer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate a transaction on reception of an Abort (P) message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | —> | |
| <— | ABORT (P) |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | —> | | | <— | ABORT (P) | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | —> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <— | ABORT (P) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send an P-Abort message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
ABORT (P)
Message type tag: 01100111
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
P-Abort cause length: one octet
P-Abort cause value: INTEGER (between 0 and 4)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.1.2.2 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing before subsequent Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT receiving; Basic ending | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate a transaction on reception of an END message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
>
BEGIN
END
TR-END ind.
<
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send an End message to SP A. | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
END
Message type tag: 01100100
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
| | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------|---|--|--|---|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------|--|--|------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774, 3.3.3.2.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; IUT sending; Basic ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate the transaction by the "basic end" method | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. SP B to respond with a Continue message on receipt of the Begin message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| > | | |
| BEGIN | → | |
| ← | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| > | | |
| (Basic) | | |
| END | → | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | > | | | BEGIN | → | | | ← | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | < | | | TR-END req. | | | > | | | (Basic) | | | END | → | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Basic) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | On receipt of the CONTINUE indication arrange for a TR-END request primitive (basic) to be passed to the TSL at SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY THE TSL AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK E: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|----------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774, 3.3.3.2.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; IUT sending; Prearranged ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to terminate the transaction by the "prearranged end" method | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. SP B to respond with a Continue message on receipt of the Begin message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| | | |
| (Prearranged) | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | TR-END req. | | | | | | (Prearranged) | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Prearranged) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | On receipt of the CONTINUE indication arrange for a TR-END request primitive (prearranged) to be passed to the TSL at SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT THE TR-END REQUEST PRIMITIVE WAS PURELY LOCAL AND THAT AN END MESSAGE WAS NOT GENERATED AND SENT BY SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.1 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774, 3.3.3.2.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; IUT sending; Abort by the TR-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate the transaction by the "abort" method | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. SP B to respond with a Continue message on receipt of the Begin message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-U-ABORT req. | | |
| | | |
| ABORT (U) | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | ABORT (U) | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (U) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | On receipt of the CONTINUE indication arrange for a TR-U-ABORT request primitive to be passed to TSL at SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE DTID IN THE ABORT MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK E: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+User abort information tag: 01101011
+User abort information length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-----------------|---|--|--|---|------------|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1.2/Q.774, 3.3.3.2.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; IUT receiving; Basic ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a Continue message and then terminate the transaction on reception of an End message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE | → | |
| ← | END |
| TR-END ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE | → | | | ← | END | TR-END ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with a Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to respond with an End message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--|------------|--|--|--------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-----------------|--|--|--|--|------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.2 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1.2/Q.774 and 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; IUT receiving; Abort by the transaction sublayer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a Continue message and then terminate the transaction on reception of an Abort message by the peer TSL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE | | |
| | ABORT (P) |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE | | | | | ABORT (P) | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | ABORT (P) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with a Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to respond with an Abort (P) message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: one octet
+P-Abort cause value: INTEGER (0 .. 4)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-----------------|--|--|--|---|------------------|------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.1.2 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; IUT receiving; Abort by the TR-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a Continue message and then terminate the transaction on reception of an Abort message by the peer TR-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE | | |
| ← | ABORT (U) |
| TR-U-ABORT ind. | | |
| < | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE | | | | ← | ABORT (U) | TR-U-ABORT ind. | | | < | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | ABORT (U) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with a Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to respond with an Abort (U) message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (U)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+User abort information tag: 01101011
+User abort information length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-----------------|---|--|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|---------|--|--|------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.2.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774, 3.3.3.2.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT sending; Basic ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a Continue message and then terminate the transaction by the "basic end" method | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE | → | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| | | |
| (Basic) | | |
| END | → | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE | → | | TR-END req. | | | | | | (Basic) | | | END | → | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Basic) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with a Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Terminate the transaction with an End (Basic) message from SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY THE TSL AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WAS THE DTID IN THE CONTINUE AND END MESSAGES THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 8. | CHECK E: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.2.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774, 3.3.3.2.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT sending; Prearranged ending | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a Continue message and then terminate the transaction by the "prearranged end" method | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) ← TR-BEGIN ind. ≡ TR-CONTINUE req. ⇒ CONTINUE → TR-END req. ⇒ (Prearranged) | SP B (TSL) BEGIN |
| | | SP A (TSL)
←
TR-BEGIN ind.
≡
TR-CONTINUE req.
⇒
CONTINUE
→
TR-END req.
⇒
(Prearranged)
| SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
|
+| SP A (TSL)
←
TR-BEGIN ind.
≡
TR-CONTINUE req.
⇒
CONTINUE
→
TR-END req.
⇒
(Prearranged)
| SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
| | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A. | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with a Continue message. | | | |
+| 3. | Terminate the transaction with a TR-END request primitive (prearranged) from SP A. | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY THE TSL AT SP A? | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT THE TR-END REQUEST PRIMITIVE WAS PURELY LOCAL AND THAT AN END MESSAGE WAS NOT GENERATED AND SENT BY SP A. | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WAS THE DTID IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN? | | | |
+| 8. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.2.1 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774, 3.3.3.2.2/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.4/Q.774 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from initiating side; IUT sending; Abort by the TR-User | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a Continue message and then terminate the transaction by the "abort" method | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind. TR-CONTINUE req. CONTINUE TR-U-ABORT req. ABORT (U) |
←
→
→ | SP B (TSL) BEGIN |
| | | SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind.
TR-CONTINUE req.
CONTINUE
TR-U-ABORT req.
ABORT (U) |
←
→
→ | SP B (TSL)
BEGIN |
+| SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN ind.
TR-CONTINUE req.
CONTINUE
TR-U-ABORT req.
ABORT (U) |
←
→
→ | SP B (TSL)
BEGIN | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for a Begin message to be sent from SP B to SP A. | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with a Continue message, then abort the transaction by passing a TR-U-ABORT request primitive to the TSL at SP B. | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE DTID IN THE CONTINUE AND ABORT MESSAGES THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK E: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+User abort information tag: 01101011
+User abort information length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|---|--|--|---|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|---|------------|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.2.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT receiving; Basic ending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate the transaction on reception of an End message following a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | → | |
| ← | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| ← | END |
| TR-END ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | → | | | ← | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | ← | END | TR-END ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Terminate the transaction with an End (basic) message from SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.2.2 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT receiving; Abort by the transaction sublayer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate the transaction on reception of an Abort (P) message following a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| | ABORT (P) |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | ABORT (P) | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | ABORT (P) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Terminate the transaction with an Abort (P) message from SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: one octet
+P-Abort cause value: INTEGER (0 .. 4)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.2.2.2 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2.1/Q.774 and 3.3.3.2.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message; Valid clearing from responding side; IUT receiving; Abort by the TR-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to terminate the transaction on reception of an Abort (U) message following a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| | ABORT (U) |
| TR-U-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | ABORT (U) | TR-U-ABORT ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | ABORT (U) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Terminate the transaction with an Abort (U) message from SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (U)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+User abort information tag: 01101011
+User abort information length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------|---|--|--|---|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------------|--|--|---|--|--|------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.3.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message (component portion not present); Basic ending IUT sending | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to accept a Continue message without CP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| > | | |
| BEGIN | → | |
| ← | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| > | | |
| END | → | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | > | | | BEGIN | → | | | ← | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | < | | | TR-END req. | | | > | | | END | → | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message to SP A without CP. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP A to send an End message to SP B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WAS THE TSL STATE MACHINE LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|----|--|--|-----------------|----|--|--|---|------------|--------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.3.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Clearing after continue Message (component portion not present); Basic ending IUT receiving | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to accept a Begin message without CP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| ═> | | |
| CONTINUE | ─> | |
| ← | END |
| TR-END ind. | | |
| < | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | ═> | | | CONTINUE | ─> | | | ← | END | TR-END ind. | | | < | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ═> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a BEGIN message to SP A without CP. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to send a CONTINUE message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send an END message to SP A without CP. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WAS THE TSL STATE MACHINE LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-----------------|--|--|--|--|------------|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.4.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Message exchange after transaction established; IUT initiating | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify the correct message flow between SP A and SP B, after transaction established (IUT initiating) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE | | |
| | END |
| TR-END ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE | | | | | END | TR-END ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP A to send a Continue message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Arrange for SP B to send an END message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK C: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 8. | CHECK D: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 9. | CHECK E: WAS THE TSL STATE MACHINE LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: 0 (invalid length)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: 0 (invalid length)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: 0 (invalid length)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|----|--|--|-----------------|----|--|--|---|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------------|--|--|----|--|--|------------|----|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.4.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Structured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Message exchange after transaction established; IUT receiving | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify the correct message flow between SP A and SP B, after transaction established (IUT receiving) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| ─> | | |
| CONTINUE | ─> | |
| ← | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| ─> | | |
| END | ─> | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | ─> | | | CONTINUE | ─> | | | ← | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | < | | | TR-END req. | | | ─> | | | END | ─> | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to send a Continue message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | Arrange for SP A to send an END message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK C: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 8. | CHECK D: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 9. | CHECK E: WAS THE TSL STATE MACHINE LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: 0 (invalid length)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets (range 1-4)
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.2.5.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.1.2.2.2.2/Q.771 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function, Structured dialogue | | |
+| SUBTITLE: TC addressing; Register address change | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a correctly reported address change of the peer implementation is registered and used in subsequent messages. | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL)
UDT ( CLG A, CLD B)
BEGIN
—————→
TR-CONTINUE ind.
<═══════
TR-END req
═══════>
TR-BEGIN ind.
═══════>
TR-CONTINUE req.
<═══════
UDT ( CLG B*, CLD A)
UDT ( CLG A, CLD B*)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1.
2.
3.
4. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B.
Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message in which the calling address has been optimized.
Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message.
CHECK A: WAS THE CALLED ADDRESS IN THE SCCP MESSAGE HEADER FOR THE END THE SAME AS THE CALLING ADDRESS IN THE SCCP MESSAGE HEADER FOR THE CONTINUE MESSAGE?
| |
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.3.1.1.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Encoding and value variations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Encoding variations; Length variations; Definite short; Component portion length in definite short form embedded in short form | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to accept a Begin message whose length is encoded using the definite short form and with a component portion whose length is encoded using the definite short form | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
END
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
| Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A with lengths encoded as described in the purpose of the test.
Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message.
CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A AND PASSED TO THE TR-USER?
CHECK B: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A?
CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE?
CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A?
| |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+
+Message type length: correct number of octets coded in definite short form
+
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+
+Originating transaction ID length: one octet
+
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets coded in definite short form
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+
+Destination transaction ID length: one octet
+
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|----------------|--|--|------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.3.1.1.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Encoding and value variations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Encoding variations; Length variations; Definite short; Component portion length in definite short form embedded in long form | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to accept a Begin message whose length is encoded using the definite long form and with a component portion whose length is encoded using the definite short form | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| | | |
| (Basic) | | |
| END | → | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-END req. | | | | | | (Basic) | | | END | → | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Basic) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A with lengths encoded as described in the purpose of the test. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A AND PASSED TO THE TR-USER? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+
+Message type length: correct number of octets coded in definite long form
+
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+
+Originating transaction ID length: one octet
+
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets coded in definite short form
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+
+Destination transaction ID length: one octet
+
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|----------------|--|--|------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.3.1.1.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Encoding and value variations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Encoding variations; Length variations; Definite long; Component portion length in definite long form embedded in long form | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to accept a Begin message whose length is encoded using the definite long form and with a component portion whose length is encoded using the definite long form | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| | | |
| (Basic) | | |
| END | ➔ | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-END req. | | | | | | (Basic) | | | END | ➔ | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Basic) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | ➔ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A with lengths encoded as described in the purpose of the test. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A AND PASSED TO THE TR-USER? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+
+Message type length: correct number of octets coded in definite long form
+
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+
+Originating transaction ID length: one octet
+
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets coded in definite long form
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+
+Destination transaction ID length: one octet
+
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------------|--|--|-------------|--|--|----------------|--|--|------------|-------------|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.3.1.1.3 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Encoding and value variations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Encoding variations; Length variations; Indefinite form; Component portion length in indefinite form embedded in indefinite form | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to accept a Begin message whose length is encoded using the indefinite form and with a component portion whose length is encoded using the indefinite form | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| > | | |
| (Basic) | | |
| END | > | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-END req. | | | > | | | (Basic) | | | END | > | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Basic) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A with lengths encoded as described in the purpose of the test. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A AND PASSED TO THE TR-USER? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets coded in indefinite form
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: one octet
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets coded in indefinite form
+Component contents provided by TC user
+EOC Tag: 00000000, Length: 00000000
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: one octet
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|----------------|--|--|------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.3.2.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 5.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Encoding and value variations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Value variations; Transaction ID; Length is one octet | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to deal with correct encoding of OTID information element (1 octet long) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| | | |
| (Basic) | | |
| END | → | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-END req. | | | | | | (Basic) | | | END | → | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Basic) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A with an OTID 1 octet long. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A AND PASSED TO THE TR-USER? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: one octet
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: one octet
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1 octet)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.1.3.2.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 5.3/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid function; Encoding and value variations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Value variations; Transaction ID; Length is four octets | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to deal with correct encoding of OTID information element (4 octets long) | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) ← TR-BEGIN ind. ===== TR-END req. ===== (Basic) END | SP B (TSL) BEGIN → |
| | | SP A (TSL)
←
TR-BEGIN ind.
=====
TR-END req.
=====
(Basic)
END
| SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
→
|
+| SP A (TSL)
←
TR-BEGIN ind.
=====
TR-END req.
=====
(Basic)
END
| SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
→
| | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A with an OTID four octets long. | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message. | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A AND PASSED TO THE TR-USER? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN END MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: four octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (4 octets)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: four octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (4 octets)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------------|---|--------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Begin message type; OTID length = 0 | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Begin message, signalling point A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the Begin message contains an OTID length of 0 | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| Detect syntax error | ← | BEGIN |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | Detect syntax error | ← | BEGIN |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Begin message to SP A, with an OTID length of 0. | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: THAT THE USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE BEGIN MESSAGE. | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WERE NO MESSAGES SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: 0
Originating transaction ID value: not present
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Begin message type; OTID length > four octets | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to deal with invalid encoding of OTID information element | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the Begin message contains an OTID length of > four octets | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL)
Detect syntax error
←
SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Begin message to SP A, with an OTID five octets long. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER AT SP A WAS NOT INFORMED OF THIS EVENT. | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE BEGIN MESSAGE. | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WERE ALL TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: five octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (5 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
| | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|----------------------------|--|-----------------|-----------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: First continue Message; DTID length = 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message, with DTID length = 0, SP A is able to discard the message or abort the transaction correctly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the first Continue message contains a DTID of length = 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE |
| ABORT (P) (see Note) | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE | ABORT (P) (see Note) | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) (see Note) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE – If the Abort is not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Continue message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER AT SP A WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE CONTINUE MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION PRIOR TO THE CONTINUE MESSAGE LEFT IN INITIATION SENT STATE ? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID AND P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|---------------------|--|-----------------|-----------------------------|--|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.3 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Subsequent continue Message; Component portion length incorrect | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message with OTID derivable and DTID derivable and assigned, after transaction establishment, SP A is able to abort the transaction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| Detect error | | CONTINUE |
| ABORT (P) (see Note) | | |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | Detect error | | CONTINUE | ABORT (P) (see Note) | | | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect error | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) (see Note) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE – If the Abort is not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a correct Continue message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send a corrupted Continue message to SP A (incorrect CP length). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID AND P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: IF THE ABORT WAS SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE (1st)
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: badly formatted transaction portion 00000010
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------|--|--|---------------------|--|------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.4 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: End message; DTID length > four octets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted End message, SP A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the End message DTID length > four octets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| > | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| Detect error | | END |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | > | | | BEGIN | | | Detect error | | END |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect error | | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to Send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a corrupted End message to SP A (invalid DTID length). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE END MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION PRIOR TO THE END MESSAGE, LEFT IN THE INITIATION SENT STATE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
END
Message type tag: 01100100
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: 00000101 (Invalid length)
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (5 octets long)
(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--------------|--|----------------------------|--|------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.5 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Abort message; Invalid P-Abort cause value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to deal with incorrect encoding of P-Abort cause information element (illegal value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that an Abort message with a DTID that is derivable and assigned, contains a syntax error and is sent to SP A in response to the Begin message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | |
| | |
| BEGIN | |
| Detect syntax error | | ABORT (P) |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | |
| | |
NOTE – The sending of the TR-Abort ind. is implementation dependent.
| | | SP A (TSL) | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | BEGIN | | Detect syntax error | | ABORT (P) | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | | ABORT (P) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B and for SP B to respond with the corrupted Abort message. (Illegal P-Abort cause value). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES ARE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE CORRUPTED ABORT MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: IF THE TR-ABORT IND. WAS SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: INTEGER (5 – Illegal value for this field)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|----------------------------|--|------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1.5 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Abort message; P-Abort cause length incorrect | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Abort message with incorrect cause length, signalling point A is able to discard the message and advise the local user | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that an Abort message with a DTID that is derivable and assigned, contains a syntax error and is sent to SP A in response to the Begin message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (TSL) participant B as SP B (TSL) Note over A: TR-BEGIN req. A->>B: BEGIN Note over B: Detect syntax error B->>A: ABORT (P) Note over A: TR-P-ABORT ind.
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| Detect syntax error | | ABORT (P) |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | Detect syntax error | | ABORT (P) | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | | ABORT (P) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE – The sending of the TR-Abort ind. is implementation dependent. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B and for SP B to respond with the corrupted Abort message. (Corrupted P-Abort cause length). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES ARE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE CORRUPTED ABORT MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: IF THE TR-ABORT IND. WAS SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets (i.e. not one)
+P-Abort cause value: INTEGER (0 .. 4)
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unidirectional Message type; Unknown information element present | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Unidirectional message, signalling point A is able to discard the message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that an Unidirectional message contains a syntax error and is sent to SP A | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL)
Detect syntax error ← UNIDIRECTIONAL
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Unidirectional message to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE UNIDIRECTIONAL MESSAGE AT SP A. | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED IN RESPONSE TO THE UNIDIRECTIONAL MESSAGE. | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| UNIDIRECTIONAL
Message type tag: 01100001
Message type length: correct number of octets
Component portion missing | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------------|--------|--------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Begin Message type; OTID absent | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Begin message; signalling point A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the Begin message contains a syntax error and the OTID is not derivable | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| Detect syntax error | ←----- | BEGIN |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | Detect syntax error | ←----- | BEGIN |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | ←----- | BEGIN | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Begin message to SP A, with OTID not present. | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THIS EVENT AT SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED IN RESPONSE TO THE THE CORRUPTED BEGIN MESSAGE. | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
OTID absent | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.2 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Begin Message type; Unknown information element present | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Begin message, with an invalid information element, signalling point A is able to discard the message and generate an Abort message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the Begin message contains a syntax error | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL)
Detect syntax error
ABORT (P)
←
→
SP B (TSL)
BEGIN
| | |
+| NOTE – If the Abort is not sent, this may be valid behavior depending on the implementation. | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Begin message to SP A, with an invalid information element after the OTID. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Information element tag: unknown (eg. 01101101)
+Information element length: correct number of octets
+Information element value: OCTET STRING
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion 00000011
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------|-----------------|--|----------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.3 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: First Continue Message; OTID absent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message, signalling point A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. SP B to respond with a Continue message on receipt of the Begin message. Arrange the data at SP B such that the Continue message contains a syntax error and the OTID is not derivable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| → | | |
| BEGIN | ——————————————→ | |
| Detect syntax error | ←—————————————— | CONTINUE |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | → | | | BEGIN | ——————————————→ | | Detect syntax error | ←—————————————— | CONTINUE |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | ——————————————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | ←—————————————— | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Continue message (OTID not derivable) to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE CONTINUE MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE CORRUPTED CONTINUE MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSACTION, PRIOR TO THE CONTINUE MESSAGE, LEFT IN THE INITIATION SENT STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+
+###### OTID absent
+
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|----------------------------|--|-----------------|--|---------------|--|------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.3 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: First Continue Message; DTID absent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message containing no DTID, signalling point A is able to discard the message or abort the transaction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. SP B to respond with a Continue message on receipt of the Begin message. Arrange the data at SP B such that the Continue message contains no DTID | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE |
| (DTID absent) | |
| ABORT (P) | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE | | (DTID absent) | | ABORT (P) | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | (DTID absent) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE – If the Abort is not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Continue message (DTID absent). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE CONTINUE MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WERE THE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSACTION, PRIOR TO THE CONTINUE MESSAGE, LEFT IN THE INITIATION SENT STATE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+
+###### DTID absent
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion 00000011
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.3 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: First Continue Message; OTID duplicated | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the correct behaviour of the implementation under test on receipt of a first Continue message with a duplicated OTID | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
⇒⇒⇒⇒⇒
BEGIN
→ (with duplicated OTID)
← CONTINUE
→
ABORT (P)
TR-P-ABORT ind.
⇒⇒⇒⇒⇒
NOTE – If the ABORT message and primitive are not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
| Arrange SP A to send a Begin message.
Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message to SP A with a duplicated OTID.
CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A?
CHECK B: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID VALUE AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE?
CHECK C: IF THE ABORT MESSAGE AND PRIMITIVE WERE SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A?
| |
+
+
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.3 4) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: First Continue Message; DTID duplicated | | |
+| PURPOSE: To check the correct behaviour of the implementation under test on receipt of a first Continue message with a duplicated DTID | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL) TR-BEGIN req. =====> BEGIN -> (with duplicated DTID) <-> CONTINUE ABORT (P) -> TR-P-ABORT ind. <=====
NOTE – If the ABORT message and primitive are not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange SP A to send a Begin message. | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message to SP A with a duplicated DTID. | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS AN ABORT MESSAGE WITH CORRECT DTID VALUE AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: IF THE ABORT MESSAGE AND PRIMITIVE WERE SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+ Message type length: correct number of octets
+ Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+ Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+ Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+ Component portion tag: 01101100
+ Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+ Message type length: correct number of octets
+ Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+ Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+ Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+ Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001 }
+ Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets }
+ Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) }
+ (OTID value received in BEGIN message) }
+ } Duplicated
+ Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001 }
+ Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets }
+ Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) }
+ (OTID value received in BEGIN message) }
+ Component portion tag: 01101100
+ Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+ Message type length: correct number of octets
+ Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+ Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+ Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+ (OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+ P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+ P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+ P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion 00000011
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--------|--|--|--------------|--------|--|----------------------------|--------|-----------------|------------------|--------|--|------------------------|--|--|--------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.3 5) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: First Continue Message; Unknown information element present | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message, signalling point A behaves correctly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that a Continue message with an OTID that is derivable and a DTID that is derivable and assigned, contains a syntax error and is sent to SP A in response to the Begin message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| =====> | | |
| BEGIN | =====> | |
| Detect syntax error | <===== | CONTINUE |
| ABORT (P) | =====> | |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| <===== | | |
NOTE – If the ABORT message and primitive are not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation.
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | =====> | | | BEGIN | =====> | | Detect syntax error | <===== | CONTINUE | ABORT (P) | =====> | | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | <===== | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| =====> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | =====> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | <===== | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) | =====> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| <===== | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Continue message with an extra information element after the DTID information element (eg P-Abort Cause). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE CONTINUE MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: IF THE ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A, WITH CORRECT DTID AND THE CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? (INCORRECT TRANSACTION PORTION) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: IF THE MESSAGE AND PRIMITIVE ABORT WERE SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Information element tag: unknown (eg. 01101101)
+Information element length: correct number of octets
+Information element value: OCTET STRING
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion 00000011
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------|--|-----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.4 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Subsequent Continue Message; OTID absent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message after transaction establishment, SP A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| > | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| Detect error | | CONTINUE |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | > | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | < | | | Detect error | | CONTINUE |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect error | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a correct Continue message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send a corrupted Continue message to SP A (OTID not derivable). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE FIRST CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER AT SP A WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE CORRUPTED CONTINUE MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE CORRUPTED CONTINUE MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 8. | CHECK E: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION, PRIOR TO THE CORRUPTED CONTINUE MESSAGE, LEFT IN THE ACTIVE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE (1st)
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|--------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|---|--|-----------------|--|--|--|---|-----------------|---------------------|--|--|------------------|---|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.4 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Subsequent Continue Message; Unknown information element present | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message with OTID derivable and DTID derivable and assigned, after transaction establishment, SP A behaves correctly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | BEGIN |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | → | |
| CONTINUE | | |
| ← | CONTINUE |
| Detect error | | |
| ABORT (P) | → | |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
NOTE – If the ABORT message and primitive are not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation.
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | BEGIN | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | → | | CONTINUE | | | | ← | CONTINUE | Detect error | | | ABORT (P) | → | | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect error | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Send a Begin message from SP B to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to send a correct Continue message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send a corrupted Continue message to SP A (extra Information Element after the DTID Information Element). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE FIRST CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: IF THE ABORT WAS SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE (1st)
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUED (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value used in BEGIN message)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Information element tag: unknown (eg. 01101101)
+Information element length: correct number of octets
+Information element value: OCTET STRING
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion 00000011
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--------|--|--|--------------|--|--|----------------------------|---|------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.5 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: End Message; DTID absent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted End message, SP A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the End message contains a syntax error ( DTID absent) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| =====> | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| Detect syntax error | < | END |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | =====> | | | BEGIN | | | Detect syntax error | < | END |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| =====> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | < | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a corrupted End message to SP A.(DTID absent.) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE CORRUPTED END MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION, PRIOR TO THE END MESSAGE, LEFT IN THE INITIATION SENT STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
END
Message type tag: 01100100
Message type length: correct number of octets
DTID absent
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------|----------------------|--|--------------------------------------|--|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.6 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Abort Message; DTID absent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Abort message, SP A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that the Abort message contains a syntax error ( DTID absent) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | |
| |
| BEGIN | | |
| Detect syntax error | | ABORT |
| | | SP A (TSL) | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | $\xRightarrow{\quad\quad\quad\quad}$ | | BEGIN | $\xrightarrow{\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad}$ | | Detect syntax error | $\xleftarrow{\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad}$ | ABORT |
+| SP A (TSL) | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| $\xRightarrow{\quad\quad\quad\quad}$ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | $\xrightarrow{\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad}$ | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | $\xleftarrow{\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad}$ | ABORT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a corrupted Abort message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE CORRUPTED ABORT MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION, PRIOR TO THE ABORT MESSAGE, LEFT IN THE INITIATION SENT STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
ABORT (P)
Message type tag: 01100111
Message type length: correct number of octets
DTID absent
P-Abort cause tag: 01101100
P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
P-Abort cause value: e.g. incorrect transaction portion 00000011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|------------------------------------|---|------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.7 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unknown Message; OTID not included | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an Unknown message, signalling point A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such that an Unknown message with an OTID that is not derivable is sent to SP A | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| Detect Unknown message type | ← | UNKNOWN MESSAGE |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | Detect Unknown message type | ← | UNKNOWN MESSAGE |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | |
+| Detect Unknown message type | ← | UNKNOWN MESSAGE | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the Unknown message to SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THIS EVENT AT SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE UNKNOWN MESSAGE. | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | |
+| UNKNOWN MESSAGE
Message type tag: unknown (e.g. 01100110)
Message type length: correct number of octets
OTID absent | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|------------------|--------|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.7 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unknown Message; OTID included and DTID not included | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an Unknown message, signalling point A behaves correctly | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B that an Unknown message with an OTID that is derivable and a DTID that is not derivable or derivable but unassigned is sent to SP A | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| Detect Unknown message type | ←————— | UNKNOWN MESSAGE |
| ABORT (P) | —————→ | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | Detect Unknown message type | ←————— | UNKNOWN MESSAGE | ABORT (P) | —————→ | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect Unknown message type | ←————— | UNKNOWN MESSAGE | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | |
+| NOTE – If the Abort message is not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation. | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the Unknown message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: IF A P-ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH THE CORRECT DTID AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: IF THE ABORT WAS SENT, WERE TSL THE STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| UNKNOWN MESSAGE
Message type tag: unknown (e.g. 01100110)
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
ABORT (P)
Message type tag: 01100111
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
(OTID value received in UNKNOWN message)
P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
P-Abort cause length: one octet
P-Abort cause value: unrecognized message type 00000000
| | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------|----|--|------------------------------------|----|------------------------|------------------|----|--|------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2.7 3) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unknown Message; OTID included and DTID included | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an Unknown message with assigned DTID, SP A is able to behave correctly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B such than an Unknown message with an OTID that is derivable and a DTID that is derivable and assigned is sent to SP A in response to the Begin message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| > | | |
| BEGIN | —> | |
| Detect Unknown message type | <— | UNKNOWN MESSAGE |
| ABORT (P) | —> | |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| < | | |
NOTE – If the ABORT message and primitive are not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation.
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | > | | | BEGIN | —> | | Detect Unknown message type | <— | UNKNOWN MESSAGE | ABORT (P) | —> | | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | < | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | —> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect Unknown message type | <— | UNKNOWN MESSAGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) | —> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B and for SP B to respond with the Unknown message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: IF THE P-ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH THE CORRECT DTID AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: IF THE ABORT WAS SENT, WAS THE TR-USER AT SP A ADVISED BY A TR-P-ABORT INDICATION PRIMITIVE THAT THIS TRANSACTION HAD BEEN ABORTED? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: IF THE ABORT WAS SENT, WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### UNKNOWN MESSAGE
+
+Message type tag: unknown (e.g. 01100110)
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in UNKNOWN message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: one octet
+P-Abort cause value: unrecognized message type 00000000
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------------|--------|--------------|------------------|--------|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid encoding | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Begin Message type; Invalid tag | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Begin message with Invalid tag, signalling point A behaves correctly | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. Arrange the data at SP B that the Begin message contains an Invalid tag | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| Detect syntax error | ←————— | BEGIN |
| ABORT (P) | —————→ | |
NOTE – If the Abort message is not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation.
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | Detect syntax error | ←————— | BEGIN | ABORT (P) | —————→ | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | ←————— | BEGIN | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Begin message to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: CHECK THAT THE USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE BEGIN MESSAGE. | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WERE THE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN
Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Invalid tag: e.g. 00100010
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
ABORT (P)
Message type tag: 01100111
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion 00000011
| | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid encoding | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Continue Message type; Invalid tag | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a corrupted Continue message with Invalid tag, signalling point A behaves correctly | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state. SP B to respond with a Continue message on receipt of the Begin message. Arrange the data at SP B such that Continue message contains a syntax error (invalid tag) | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
BEGIN
Detect syntax error
ABORT (P)
TR-P-ABORT ind.
—>
<—
—>
SP B (TSL)
CONTINUE
NOTE – If the ABORT message and the primitive are not sent, this may be valid behaviour depending on the implementation.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send the corrupted Continue message to SP A. | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE CONTINUE MESSAGE AT SP A. | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: IF AN ABORT MESSAGE WAS SENT, WAS IT SENT CORRECTLY FROM SP A WITH CORRECT DTID AND CORRECT P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Invalid tag: e.g. 00011111
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+
+##### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: correct number of octets
+P-Abort cause value: incorrect transaction portion 00000011
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Messages; Continue message type | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Receipt of Continue Message in idle state with unassigned DTID | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a Continue message with unassigned DTID, signalling point A is able to discard the message and generate an Abort message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) to be in the idle state and SP B (TSL) to be in the IR/Active state. Arrange the data at SP B such that a Continue message with an OTID that is derivable and a DTID that is derivable but unassigned is sent to SP A | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) SP B (TSL)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the Continue message with unassigned DTID to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE CONTINUE MESSAGE AT SP A. | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE DTID IN THE ABORT MESSAGE EQUAL TO THE OTID IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS AN ABORT MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT FROM SP A WITH A P-ABORT CAUSE VALUE OF UNRECOGNIZED TRANSACTION ID? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: one octet
+P-Abort cause value: unrecognized transaction ID 00000001
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|--|--------|-----|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Messages; End Message type | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Receipt of End Message in Idle state | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an End message with unassigned DTID, signalling point A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) to be in the idle state and SP B (TSL) to be in the IR/Active state. Arrange the data at SP B such that an End message with a DTID that is derivable but unassigned is sent to SP A | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ←----- | END |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ←----- | END |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | |
+| | ←----- | END | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the End message with unassigned DTID to SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE END MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE END MESSAGE. | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | |
+| END
Message type tag: 01100100
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
| | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.3.3 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.4/Q.774 | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Messages; Abort Message type | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Receipt of Abort message in Idle state | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an Abort message with unassigned DTID, signalling point A is able to discard the message | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) to be in the idle state and SP B (TSL) to be in the IR/Active state. Arrange the data at SP B such that an Abort message with a DTID that is derivable but unassigned is sent to SP A | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| ← | ABORT (P) |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | ← | ABORT (P) |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | |
+| | ← | ABORT (P) | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send the Abort message with unassigned DTID to SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE TR-USER WAS NOT INFORMED OF THE ABORT MESSAGE AT SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGES WERE GENERATED BY SP A IN RESPONSE TO THE ABORT MESSAGE. | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WERE ALL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P)
Message type tag: 01100111
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long)
P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
P-Abort cause length: one octet
P-Abort cause value: INTEGER {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.4.1 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Multiple Transaction Encoding; Valid Transaction Encoding | | |
+| SUBTITLE: New transaction request during transaction establishment | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to correctly react to a Begin message during the establishment of another transaction | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
⇒⇒⇒⇒
BEGIN
TR-BEGIN ind.
⇒⇒⇒⇒
TR-END req.
⇒⇒⇒⇒
(Basic)
(end new transaction)
END
TR-END ind.
⇒⇒⇒⇒
SP B (TSL)
←──────────────────────────────────
BEGIN (new transaction)
←──────────────────────────────────
END
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A (new transaction). | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message to the 2nd Begin message. | |
+| 4. | Arrange for SP B to respond with an End message to the 1st Begin message. | |
+| 5. | CHECK A: WAS THE FIRST BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 6. | CHECK B: WAS THE SECOND BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? | |
+| 7. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE FIRST END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE SECOND BEGIN MESSAGE? | |
+| 8. | CHECK D: WAS THE SECOND END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? | |
+| 9. | CHECK E: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TRANSACTIONS LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN (1st)
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### BEGIN (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Y
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END (1st)
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Y
+(OTID value received in 2nd BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
+(OTID value received in 1st BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--|--|--------------------------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------------|--|--|---|--|--|----------------------------------|--|--|------------|--|--|--|--|------------|--------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.4.1 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Multiple Transaction Encoding; Valid Transaction Encoding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: New transaction request after transaction establishment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to correctly react to a Begin message after the establishment of another transaction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| > | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| | BEGIN (new transaction) |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| > | | |
(Basic) (end new transaction) | | |
| END | | |
| | END |
| TR-END ind. | | |
| < | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | > | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | < | | | | | BEGIN (new transaction) | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-END req. | | | > | | | (Basic)
(end new transaction) | | | END | | | | | END | TR-END ind. | | | < | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | BEGIN (new transaction) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| (Basic)
(end new transaction) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.4.1 2) | | Sheet: 2 of 3 | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to respond with a Continue message to Begin message. | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message to SP A (new transaction). | | | |
+| 4. | Arrange for SP A to respond with an End message to the 2nd Begin message. | | | |
+| 5. | Arrange for SP B to respond with an End message to the 1st Begin message. | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK A: WAS THE FIRST BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? | | | |
+| 8. | CHECK C: WAS THE SECOND BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? | | | |
+| 9. | CHECK D: WAS THE DTID IN THE FIRST END MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE SECOND BEGIN MESSAGE? | | | |
+| 10. | CHECK E: WAS THE SECOND END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? | | | |
+| 11. | CHECK F: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TRANSACTIONS LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| BEGIN (1st) | | | | |
+| Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001000
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Y
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
+(OTID value received in 1st BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### BEGIN (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Z
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END (1st)
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Z
+(OTID value received in 2nd BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### END (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
+(OTID value received in 1st BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--|------------|--------------|-------------------------|--|--|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|-------------------------|------------|------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.4.2 1) | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Multiple Transaction Encoding; Inopportune Messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Message with unassigned DTID during transaction establishment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to correctly react to a Continue message with DTID unassigned during the establishment of another transaction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (TSL) TR-BEGIN req. | | SP B (TSL) |
| BEGIN | ——————————————————————> | |
| <—————————————————————— | CONTINUE (new transaction) |
ABORT (P) TR-P-ABORT ind. | ——————————————————————> | |
| <—————————————————————— | END |
TR-END ind. | | |
| | | SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
| | SP B (TSL) | BEGIN | ——————————————————————> | | | <—————————————————————— | CONTINUE (new transaction) | ABORT (P)
TR-P-ABORT ind.
| ——————————————————————> | | | <—————————————————————— | END | TR-END ind.
| | |
+| SP A (TSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
| | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | ——————————————————————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <—————————————————————— | CONTINUE (new transaction) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P)
TR-P-ABORT ind.
| ——————————————————————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <—————————————————————— | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END ind.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message with unassigned DTID to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to respond with an End message to the Begin message. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK B: WAS THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE ABORT MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 7. | CHECK D: WAS THE P-ABORT CAUSE IN THE ABORT MESSAGE THE CORRECT VALUE, (UNRECOGNIZED TRANSACTION ID)? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 8. | CHECK E: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 9. | CHECK F: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TRANSACTIONS LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### BEGIN
+
+Message type tag: 01100010
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### CONTINUE
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Y
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Z
+(Not equal to X)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Y
+(OTID value received in CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: one octet
+P-Abort cause value: 00000001 Unrecognized Transaction ID
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-----------------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|-----------------------------------|------------------|--|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|------------|--------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.4.2 2) | | Sheet: 1 of 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3.3.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Multiple Transaction Encoding; Inopportune Messages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Message with unassigned DTID after transaction establishment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the signalling point A is able to correctly react to a Continue message with DTID unassigned after the establishment of another transaction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN | | |
| | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| | CONTINUE (new transaction) |
| ABORT (P) | | |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| | END |
| TR-END ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN | | | | | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | CONTINUE (new transaction) | ABORT (P) | | | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | END | TR-END ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (TSL) | | SP B (TSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE (new transaction) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (P) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | END | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 1.4.2 2) | Sheet: 2 of 3 |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message to SP B. |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message in response to Begin message from SP A. |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message with unassigned DTID to SP A. |
+| 4. | Arrange for SP B to respond with an End message to the Begin message. |
+| 5. | CHECK A: WAS THE BEGIN MESSAGE CORRECTLY SENT BY SP A? |
+| 6. | CHECK B: WERE THE CONTINUE MESSAGES CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? |
+| 7. | CHECK C: WAS THE DTID IN THE ABORT MESSAGE THE SAME AS THE OTID IN THE SECOND CONTINUE MESSAGE? |
+| 8. | CHECK D: WAS THE P-ABORT CAUSE IN THE ABORT MESSAGE THE CORRECT VALUE, (UNRECOGNIZED TRANSACTION ID)? |
+| 9 | CHECK E: WAS THE END MESSAGE CORRECTLY RECEIVED BY SP A? |
+| 10. | CHECK F: WERE TSL STATE MACHINES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TRANSACTIONS LEFT IN THE IDLE STATE AT SP A? |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | |
+| BEGIN | |
+| Message type tag: 01100010
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) W
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | |
+| CONTINUE (1st) | |
+| Message type tag: 01100101
Message type length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) X
Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) W
(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+###### CONTINUE (2nd)
+
+Message type tag: 01100101
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID tag: 01001000
+Originating transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Originating transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Y
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Z
+(Not equal to W)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+###### ABORT (P)
+
+Message type tag: 01100111
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) Y
+(OTID value received in 2nd CONTINUE message)
+P-Abort cause tag: 01001010
+P-Abort cause length: one octet
+P-Abort cause value: 00000001 Unrecognized Transaction ID
+
+###### END
+
+Message type tag: 01100100
+Message type length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID tag: 01001001
+Destination transaction ID length: correct number of octets
+Destination transaction ID value: OCTET STRING (1-4 octets long) W
+(OTID value received in BEGIN message)
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+## 7.2 TC Component Sublayer (CSL) test specification
+
+### 7.2.1 Guidance on performing component sublayer tests
+
+- a) For all the tests, the phrase "... component with correct information" in the test description means that the detail values in the indicated component will be syntactically verified against the information listed in the check table for components within messages.
+- b) In some tests, a check is required to verify that the Invocation State Machine has returned to idle. One possible procedure to perform this check is to send a Return Result-Last component with the presumed idled Invoke ID. If the IUT (Implementation Under Test) returns a Reject with problem code = "unrecognized Invoke ID," the IUT has passed this check.
+- c) For all tests of the CSL, the component has to be carried in a TSL message, e.g. the Invoke component in Test No. 2.1.1.1 is carried from SP A to SP B in a Begin message and the Return Result-Last component is carried in an End message. In fact, if a transaction is first established between SP A and SP B, it is possible to carry the Invoke and the Return Result components in Continue messages.
+- d) The assumption used in these CSL tests is that the transaction is kept alive until the last component in the message flow has been delivered to the peer. In case this assumption does not hold for a real application (e.g. because of the use of an Abort or End message), one cannot reach any conclusive verdict on the test.
+- e) CSL tests assume that the TSL and SCCP operate correctly. Thus, CSL tests assume that, in particular, components are carried in valid TSL messages within valid transaction states so that abnormal occurrences in the underlying (sub) layer(s) do not occur.
+- f) TC-User related information, such as specific operation code and parameters, are not specified. It is up to the test implementers to include application dependent information, where applicable, in order to provoke the expected component flow.
+- g) For the dialogue portion tests, the check table sometimes has a "protocol version" shown and sometimes it is not shown. In the main recommendations this information is optional and if not present the default value is "version 1".
+
+### 7.2.2 Component sublayer test list
+
+All tests are validation tests
+
+Tests marked "\*" are compatibility tests
+
+# 2 Component Sublayer
+
+## 2.1 Valid Functions
+
+### 2.1.1 Invoke component, unlinked operations
+
+#### 2.1.1.1 Class 1 single operation invocation
+
+- \* 2.1.1.1.1 IUT as sender: receive result
+ - \* 2.1.1.1.2 IUT as receiver: report result
+ - \* 2.1.1.1.3 IUT as sender: receive error
+ - \* 2.1.1.1.4 IUT as receiver: report error
+ - \* 2.1.1.1.5 IUT as sender: timer expiry
+- ###### 2.1.1.2 Class 2 single operation invocation
+- \* 2.1.1.2.1 IUT as sender: receive error
+ - \* 2.1.1.2.2 IUT as sender: timer expiry
+
+- 2.1.1.3 Class 3 single operation invocation
+ - \* 2.1.1.3.1 IUT as sender: receive result
+ - \* 2.1.1.3.2 IUT as sender: timer expiry
+- 2.1.1.4 Class 4 single operation invocation
+ - \* 2.1.1.4.1 IUT as sender
+- 2.1.2 Invoke component, linked operations
+ - 2.1.2.1 Class 1 original operation invocation
+ - \* 2.1.2.1.1 IUT as sender: receive a linked Class 1 operation invocation, report result
+ - \* 2.1.2.1.2 IUT as receiver: send a linked Class 1 operation invocation, receive result
+ - \* 2.1.2.1.3 IUT as sender: receive a linked Class 1 operation invocation, report error
+ - \* 2.1.2.1.4 IUT as receiver: send a linked Class 1 operation invocation, receive error
+ - 2.1.2.2 Class 4 original operation invocation
+ - \* 2.1.2.2.1 IUT as sender: receive a linked Class 2 operation invocation, no outcome
+ - \* 2.1.2.2.2 IUT as receiver: send a linked Class 2 operation invocation, timer expiry
+- 2.1.3 Remote Reject
+ - 2.1.3.1 Remote Reject by CSL
+ - 2.1.3.1.1 General problem code
+ - 2.1.3.1.2 Invoke problem code
+ - 2.1.3.1.3 Return Result problem code
+ - 2.1.3.1.4 Return Error problem code
+ - 2.1.3.2 Remote Reject by TC-User
+ - 2.1.3.2.1 Invoke problem code
+ - 2.1.3.2.2 Return Result problem code
+ - 2.1.3.2.3 Return Error problem code
+ - 2.1.3.3 Remote Reject with an Invoke problem code
+ - 2.1.3.3.1 Class 1 operation invocation
+ - 2.1.3.3.2 Class 2 operation invocation
+ - 2.1.3.3.3 Class 3 operation invocation
+ - 2.1.3.3.4 Class 4 operation invocation
+- 2.1.4 Reception of component leading to TC-User reject
+ - 2.1.4.1 Invoke problem
+ - 2.1.4.1.1 Unrecognized operation code
+ - 2.1.4.1.2 Unexpected linked operation
+ - 2.1.4.1.3 Linked response unexpected
+ - 2.1.4.1.4 Wrong type parameter
+ - 2.1.4.2 Return Result problem
+ - 2.1.4.2.1 Wrong type parameter
+ - 2.1.4.3 Return Error problem
+ - 2.1.4.3.1 Unrecognized error
+ - 2.1.4.3.2 Unexpected error
+ - 2.1.4.3.3 Wrong type parameter
+- 2.1.5 Segmentation for Return Result
+ - 2.1.5.1 Class 1 single operation invocation
+ - \* 2.1.5.1.1 IUT as sender: receive segmented components
+
+- \*
+ - 2.1.5.1.2 IUT as receiver: send segmented components
+- 2.1.5.2 Class 3 single operation invocation
+- \*
+ - 2.1.5.2.1 IUT as sender: receive segmented components
+- 2.1.6 User Cancel
+- 2.1.7 Encoding variations
+ - 2.1.7.1 Component length definite short
+ - 2.1.7.2 Component length definite long
+ - 2.1.7.3 Component length indefinite
+ - 2.1.7.4 Value variations
+ - 2.1.7.4.1 Invoke ID
+ - 2.1.7.4.1.1 Invoke ID = -127 (FFh)
+ - 2.1.7.4.1.2 Invoke ID = 0 (00h)
+ - 2.1.7.4.2 Global operation code
+- 2.1.8 Multiple components grouping
+ - 2.1.8.1 Multiple operations invocation; receiving success
+ - 2.1.8.2 Multiple operations invocation; reporting success
+ - 2.1.8.3 A malformed component received
+- 2.1.9 Dialogue Portion
+ - 2.1.9.1 Accept application context proposal
+ - 2.1.9.1.1 Send AARQ in begin message
+ - 2.1.9.1.2 Accept AARQ and continue dialogue
+ - 2.1.9.1.3 Accept AARQ and end dialogue
+ - 2.1.9.2 Propose alternative Application context
+ - 2.1.9.2.1 Send AARE with alternative
+ - 2.1.9.2.2 Receive AARE with alternative
+ - 2.1.9.3 Dialogue refused
+ - 2.1.9.4 Dialogue abort
+ - 2.1.9.5 Transport of User Information
+ - 2.1.9.5.1 Accept User Information in Begin message
+ - 2.1.9.5.2 Accept User Information in first Continue message
+ - 2.1.9.5.3 Accept User Information in subsequent Continue message
+ - 2.1.9.5.4 Accept several User Information elements in Continue message
+ - 2.1.9.6 Unstructured dialogue
+ - 2.1.9.7 Dialogue control APDU Version
+ - 2.1.9.7.1 Structured dialogue, NOT Version 1
+ - 2.1.9.7.2 Structured dialogue, Version 1
+ - 2.1.9.7.3 Unstructured dialogue, NOT Version 1
+ - 2.1.9.7.4 Unstructured dialogue, Version 1
+- 2.2 Syntactically invalid behaviour
+ - 2.2.1 Invalid values for information elements
+ - 2.2.1.1 Length of Invoke ID > 1 in Invoke component
+ - 2.2.1.2 Length of Invoke ID = 0 in Invoke component
+ - 2.2.2 Invalid structure
+ - 2.2.2.1 Invoke component
+ - 2.2.2.1.1 Invoke ID missing
+ - 2.2.2.1.2 Operation code missing
+ - 2.2.2.2 Return Result component
+ - 2.2.2.2.1 Invoke ID missing
+ - 2.2.2.2.2 Operation code missing while parameters included
+ - 2.2.2.2.3 Sequence tag missing while parameters included
+
+- 2.2.2.3 Return Error
+ - 2.2.2.3.1 Invoke ID missing
+ - 2.2.2.3.2 Error code missing
+- 2.2.2.4 Unknown component type
+ - 2.2.2.4.1 Invoke ID unrecognizable
+ - 2.2.2.4.2 invoke ID derivable
+- 2.2.2.5 Dialogue Portion
+ - 2.2.2.5.1 Missing application context in APDU AARQ
+ - 2.2.2.5.2 Incorrect length
+ - 2.2.2.5.3 Missing result-source-diagnostic
+ - 2.2.2.5.4 Missing application context in APDU AUDT
+ - 2.2.2.5.5 External type without direct reference
+ - 2.2.2.5.6 Indirect reference in external type
+ - 2.2.2.5.7 User information without direct reference
+ - 2.2.2.5.8 Indirect reference in User information
+- 2.2.3 Invalid encoding for Invoke component
+ - 2.2.3.1 Invalid tag
+ - 2.2.3.2 Wrong component length
+ - 2.2.3.3 Missing EOC in indefinite form
+- 2.3 Inopportune behaviour
+ - 2.3.1 Inopportune Invoke component
+ - 2.3.1.1 Invalid linked ID
+ - 2.3.2 Unrecognized Invoke ID
+ - 2.3.2.1 Inopportune Return Result-Last component
+ - 2.3.2.2 Inopportune Return Result Not-Last component
+ - 2.3.2.3 Inopportune Return Error component
+ - 2.3.2.4 Inopportune Reject component
+ - 2.3.3 Unexpected Components
+ - 2.3.3.1 Return Result-Last for Class 2
+ - 2.3.3.2 Return Result-Last for Class 4
+ - 2.3.3.3 Return Result Not-Last for Class 2
+ - 2.3.3.4 Return Result Not-Last for Class 4
+ - 2.3.3.5 Return Error for Class 3
+ - 2.3.3.6 Return Error for Class 4
+ - 2.3.4 Dialogue Portion, unexpected APDUs
+ - 2.3.4.1 Begin message with APDU AARE
+ - 2.3.4.2 Dialogue confirmation with any APDU other than AARE
+ - 2.3.4.3 Dialogue confirmation with APDU ABRT
+ - 2.3.4.4 Dialogue continuation with the presence of a Dialogue PDU in the active state
+ - 2.3.4.5 Unidirectional message with unexpected abstract syntax
+ - 2.3.4.6 Unexpected dialogue portion in Continue message
+ - 2.3.4.7 Missing dialogue portion in Continue message
+ - 2.3.4.8 Begin message with unexpected abstract syntax
+
+| | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive result | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the successful completion of the operation can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
⇒
INVOKE (i)
→
←
SP B (CSL)
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-user)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL messages from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 single operation invocation; IUT as receiver: report result | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the successful completion of the operation can be sent | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE ind.
<=====
TC-RESULT-L req.
===== >
RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i)
←───────────────────────────────────────────────────
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE OPERATION CODE IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
| | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL messages from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.1.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive error | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the unsuccessful completion of the operation can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKED req. Image: double line arrow pointing right
INVOKE (i) Image: single line arrow pointing right
Image: single line arrow pointing left
SP B (CSL)
RETURN ERROR (i)
TC-U-ERROR ind. Image: double line arrow pointing left
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL messages from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y (y is a valid error code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.1.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 single operation invocation; IUT as receiver: report error | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the unsuccessful completion of the operation can be sent | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the TC-User at SP A such that a Return-Error component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
← INVOKE (i) TC-U-ERROR ind. < TC-RESULT-L req. > RETURN-ERROR (i) →
Image: Sequence diagram showing INVOKE(i) from SP B to SP A, followed by internal TC-User error indication and result request at SP A, then RETURN-ERROR(i) from SP A to SP B.
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) B->>A: INVOKE (i) Note over A: TC-U-ERROR ind. Note over A: TC-RESULT-L req. A->>B: RETURN-ERROR (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE ERROR CODE IN THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT VALID? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR COMPONENT in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.1.5 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: timer expiry | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the timer expiry indication can be delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that no component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing right
INVOKE (i) —————→ timer expiry for invocation (i)
TC-L-CANCEL ind. (i) Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 000000110 (global)
Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
parameters (provided by the TC-User) | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 2 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive error | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 2 operation can be successfully invoked and the failure report can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
=====>
INVOKE (i)
TC-U-ERROR ind.
<=====
SP B (CSL)
RETURN ERROR (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 2 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR COMPONENT in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|---------------------------------|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.2.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 2 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: timer expiry | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 2 operation can be successfully invoked and the timer expiry indication can be delivered to the TC-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that no component will be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| | | |
| INVOKE (i) | | |
| timer expiry for invocation (i) | | |
| TC-L-CANCEL ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | INVOKE (i) | | | timer expiry for invocation (i) | | | TC-L-CANCEL ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| timer expiry for invocation (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-L-CANCEL ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 2 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE TC-USER AT SP A INFORMED OF TIMER EXPIRY? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
parameters (provided by the TC-User) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.3.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 3 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive result | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 3 operation can be successfully invoked and the successful report of the operation can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
=====>
INVOKE (i)
—————→
←—————
SP B (CSL)
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 3 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### **CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES**
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.3.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 3 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: timer expiry | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 3 operation can be successfully invoked and the timer expiry indication can be delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that no component will be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
⇒
INVOKE (i) —————→
timer expiry for invocation (i)
TC-L-CANCEL ind.
⇐
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 3 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE TC-USER AT SP A INFORMED OF TIMER EXPIRY? | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
parameters (provided by the TC-User) | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--|----------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1.4.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, unlinked operations | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 4 single operation invocation; IUT as sender | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a Class 4 operation can be successfully initiated and no response is received. | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) TC-INVOKE req. ⇒ INVOKE (i) timer expiry for invocation (i) TC-L-CANCEL ind. ⇐ | SP B (CSL) |
| → |
| | | SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
⇒
INVOKE (i)
timer expiry for invocation (i)
TC-L-CANCEL ind.
⇐
| SP B (CSL)
| | →
|
+| SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
⇒
INVOKE (i)
timer expiry for invocation (i)
TC-L-CANCEL ind.
⇐
| SP B (CSL)
| | | | | |
+| | →
| | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 4 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE TC-USER AT SP A INFORMED OF TIMER EXPIRY? | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
parameters (provided by the TC-User)
| | | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.2.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, Linked operations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 original operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive a linked Class 1 operation invocation, report result | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a linked Class 1 operation can be successfully received and the successful completion of the original operation can be performed | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a linked Invoke component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
⇒⇒⇒
INVOKE (i)
⇒
TC-INVOKE ind.
⇒⇒⇒
TC-RESULT-L req.
⇒⇒⇒
RETURN-RESULT-LAST (j)
⇒
TC-RESULT-L ind.
⇒⇒⇒
SP B (CSL)
⇒
INVOKE (j, i)
⇒
RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a linked operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS A LINKED INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT SENT BY SP B ? | |
+| 6. | CHECK E: WAS THE OPERATION CODE IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT SENT BY SP A THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT SENT BY SP B ? | |
+| 7. | CHECK F: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 8. | CHECK G: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in 2nd TSL message sent by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: y (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.2.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, Linked operations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 original operation invocation; IUT as receiver: send a linked Class 1 operation invocation, receive result | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a linked Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the successful completion of the original operation can be performed | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component which will invoke a linked operation | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
TC-INVOKE ind.
<=====
←-----
INVOKE (i)
TC-INVOKE req.
=====>
→-----
INVOKE (j, i)
RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i)
←-----
RETURN RESULT-LAST (j)
TC-RESULT-L ind.
<=====
←-----
RETURN-RESULT-LAST (j)
TC-RESULT-L req.
=====>
→-----
RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. | Initiate a linked operation invocation from SP B to SP A.
CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A?
CHECK B: WAS A LINKED INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A?
CHECK C: WAS THE LINKED ID THE SAME AS THE ORIGINAL INVOKE ID SENT BY SP B?
CHECK D: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A?
CHECK E: WAS THE SECOND RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A?
CHECK F: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE SECOND RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE ORIGINAL INVOKE COMPONENT SENT BY SP B?
CHECK G: WAS THE OPERATION CODE IN THE SECOND RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE ORIGINAL INVOKE COMPONENT ?
CHECK H: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+#### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in initial TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message sent from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: y (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message sent by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.2.1.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, Linked operations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 original operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive a linked Class 1 operation invocation, report error | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a linked Class 1 operation can be successfully received and the reporting error will not impact the completion of the original operation | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a linked invocation can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW: | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
+| ⇒⇒⇒ | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | → | |
+| | ← | INVOKE (j, i) |
+| TC-INVOKE ind. | | |
+| ⇒⇒⇒ | | |
+| TC-U-ERROR req. | | |
+| ⇒⇒⇒ | | |
+| RETURN-ERROR (j) | → | |
+| | ← | RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i) |
+| TC-RESULT-L ind. | | |
+| ⇒⇒⇒ | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a linked operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS A LINKED INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT SENT BY SP B ? | |
+| 6. | CHECK E: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 7. | CHECK F: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in the TSL messages sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in the TSL message sent by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+#### **CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES**
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if z is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Error code: z (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in the TSL message sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.2.1.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, Linked operations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 original operation invocation; IUT as receiver: send a linked Class 1 operation invocation, receive error | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a linked Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the receiving error will not impact the completion of the original operation | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
Image: Sequence diagram showing message flow between SP A and SP B. SP B sends INVOKE (i) to SP A. SP A processes TC-INVOKE ind. and TC-INVOKE req., then sends a linked INVOKE (j, i) back to SP B. SP B responds with RETURN ERROR (j). SP A processes TC-U-ERROR ind. and TC-RESULT-L req., then sends RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i) to SP B.
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note right of B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: Note left of A: TC-INVOKE ind. Note left of A: TC-INVOKE req. Note left of A: INVOKE (j, i) A->>B: Note right of B: RETURN ERROR (j) B->>A: Note left of A: TC-U-ERROR ind. Note left of A: TC-RESULT-L req. Note left of A: RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i) A->>B:
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a linked operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS A LINKED INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE LINKED ID THE SAME AS THE ORIGINAL INVOKE ID SENT BY SP B? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 6. | CHECK E: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 7. | CHECK F: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE ORIGINAL INVOKE COMPONENT SENT BY SP B ? | |
+| 8. | CHECK G: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+#### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL messages by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if z is one octet long)
+
+Error code: z
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message sent by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.2.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Invoke component, Linked operations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 4 original operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive a linked Class 2 operation invocation, no outcome | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a linked Class 2 operation can be successfully received and the successful completion of the original Class 4 operation can be performed | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains a Class 4 Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a linked Class 2 Invoke component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
==========>
INVOKE (i)
TC-INVOKE ind.
<==========
timer expiry for invocation (i)
TC-L-CANCEL ind.
<==========
SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (j, i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a linked operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS A LINKED INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+INVOKE component in TSL message sent from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+| | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCES: 3.2.1/Q.774; 3.7.1/Q.772 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject by CSL; General problem code | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a remote rejection by CSL with general problem code can be delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component with general problem code can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKED req.
=====>
INVOKE (i)
----->
<-----
TC-R-REJECT ind.
<=====
SP B (CSL)
REJECT (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message sent from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: i
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General Problem)
+Problem code length: 00000001
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized component)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|-------------------|-----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-----------------------|--|--|----|--|--|---------------------|----|--|--|---|-------------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCES: 3.2.1/Q.774; 3.7.2/Q.772 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject by CSL; Invoke problem code | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the remote rejection by CSL with Invoke problem code can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component with Invoke problem code can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | INVOKE (i) |
| TC-INVOKE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| ─> | | |
| INVOKE (j,i) | ─> | |
| ← | REJECT (j) |
| TC-R-REJECT ind. | | |
| < | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | INVOKE (i) | TC-INVOKE ind. | | | < | | | TC-INVOKE req. | | | ─> | | | INVOKE (j,i) | ─> | | | ← | REJECT (j) | TC-R-REJECT ind. | | | < | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (j,i) | ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | REJECT (j) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-R-REJECT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a linked Class 1 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents an operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL messages from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000101 (unrecognized linked ID)
+
+| | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.1.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774; 3.7.3/Q.772 | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject by CSL; Return Result problem code | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the remote rejection can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component can be generated | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE ind. <
TC-RESULT-L req. >
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
TC-R-REJECT ind. < |
←
→ ← | SP B (CSL) INVOKE (i)
REJECT (i) |
| | | SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE ind.
<
TC-RESULT-L req.
>
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
TC-R-REJECT ind.
< |
←
→
← | SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (i)
REJECT (i) |
+| SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE ind.
<
TC-RESULT-L req.
>
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
TC-R-REJECT ind.
< |
←
→
← | SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (i)
REJECT (i) | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+Parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized Invoke ID)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|-------------------|-----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|---|--|--|---|-------------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.1.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774; 3.7.4/Q.772 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject by CSL; Return Error problem code | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the remote rejection can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | INVOKE (i) |
| TC-INVOKE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TC-U-ERROR req. | | |
| | | |
| RETURN ERROR (i) | → | |
| ← | REJECT (i) |
| TC-R-REJECT ind. | | |
| < | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | INVOKE (i) | TC-INVOKE ind. | | | < | | | TC-U-ERROR req. | | | | | | RETURN ERROR (i) | → | | | ← | REJECT (i) | TC-R-REJECT ind. | | | < | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-ERROR req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| RETURN ERROR (i) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | REJECT (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-R-REJECT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
- Component portion tag: 01101100
- Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
- Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
- Component length: correct number of octets
- Invoke ID tag: 00000010
- Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
- Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: i
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+Error code: y
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: i
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+Problem code length: 00000001
+Problem code: 00000001 (unrecognized Invoke ID)
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774; 3.7.2/Q.772 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject by TC-User; Invoke problem code | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the remote rejection by TC-User with Invoked problem code can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
=====>
INVOKE (i)
TC-U-REJECT ind.
<=====
→
←
SP B (CSL)
REJECT (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents an operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized Invoke ID)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|-------------------|----------------------------|--|--|-----------------------------|--|--|-------------------------------|--|--|--|---|-------------------|------------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.2.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774; 3.7.3/Q.772 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject by TC-User; Return Result problem code | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the remote rejection by TC-User with Return Result problem code can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component with Return Result problem code can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | INVOKE (i) |
TC-INVOKE ind. < | | |
TC-RESULT-L req. | | |
| RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | | |
| ← | REJECT (i) |
TC-U-REJECT ind. < | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | INVOKE (i) | TC-INVOKE ind.
< | | | TC-RESULT-L req.
| | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | | | | ← | REJECT (i) | TC-U-REJECT ind.
< | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE ind.
< | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-RESULT-L req.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | REJECT (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-REJECT ind.
< | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents an operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (wrong type parameter)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.2.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774; 3.7.4/Q.772 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject by TC-User; Return Error problem code | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the remote rejection by TC-User with Return Error problem code can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component with Return Error problem code can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKED ind.
<=====
←-----
SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (i)
TC-U-ERROR req.
=====
→-----
RETURN ERROR (i)
RETURN ERROR (i)
←-----
REJECT (i)
TC-U-REJECT ind.
<=====
→-----
REJECT (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents an operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (unrecognized error)
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.3.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject with an Invoke problem code; Class 1 operation invocation | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 1 operation can be successfully invoked and the remote rejection can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL) TC-INVOKE req. ===========> INVOKE (i) ---------------------------------> <--------------------------------- REJECT (i) TC-U-REJECT ind. <===========
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (wrong type parameter)
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.3.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject with an Invoke problem code; Class 2 operation invocation | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 2 operation can be successfully invoked and the remote rejection can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKED req.
=====>
INVOKE (i)
—————→
←—————
SP B (CSL)
REJECT (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 2 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (wrong type parameter)
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.3.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject with an Invoke problem code; Class 3 operation invocation | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 3 operation can be successfully invoked and the remote rejection can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKES req.
=====>
INVOKE (i)
TC-U-REJECT ind.
<=====
—————→
←—————
SP B (CSL)
REJECT (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 3 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents an operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (wrong type parameter)
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.3.3.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Remote Reject | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Remote Reject with an Invoke problem code; Class 4 operation invocation | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 4 operation can be successfully invoked and the remote rejection can be received and delivered to the TC-User | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
=====>
INVOKE (i)
—————→
←—————
SP B (CSL)
REJECT (i)
TC-U-REJECT ind.
<=====
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 4 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (wrong type parameter)
+
+| | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invoke problem; Unrecognized operation code | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be performed | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with an error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
TC-INVOKE ind.
<=====
TC-U-REJECT req.
>=====
REJECT (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with an unrecognized operation code. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE REJECT COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
| | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents an invalid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message sent from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (unrecognized operation)
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invoke problem; Unexpected linked operation | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to an unexpected linked operation and without affecting the original invocation. | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that an Invoke with a linked ID is contained in an appropriate TSL message | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
INVOKE (i)
INVOKE (j, i)
TC-U-REJECT req.
REJECT (j)
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an unlinked operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS A LINKED INVOKE COMPONENT PASSED TO THE TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE REJECT COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE INVOKE ID IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT SENT BY SP B? | |
+| 6. | CHECK E: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in the TSL message sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i (i is an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents an operation code not linked to x)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message sent by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000111 (unexpected linked operation)
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|----------------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.1.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invoke problem; Linked response unexpected | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an unexpected linked response can be rejected | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component which will invoke a linked operation
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a linked response contains at least one parameter which is not associated with the outcome of the operation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| | | |
| INVOKE (i) | | |
| | INVOKE (j, i) |
| TC-INVOKE ind. | | |
| | | |
| TC-U-REJECT req. | | |
| | | |
| REJECT (j) | | |
| | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) |
| TC-RESULT-L ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | INVOKE (i) | | | | | INVOKE (j, i) | TC-INVOKE ind. | | | | | | TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | REJECT (j) | | | | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | TC-RESULT-L ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | INVOKE (j, i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (j) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-RESULT-L ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS A LINKED INVOKE COMPONENT PASSED TO THE TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 6. | CHECK E: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+#### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code that does not allow any linked operation)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in the TSL message sent from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Linked ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message sent by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000111 (linked response unexpected)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.1.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invoke problem; Wrong type parameter | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be performed | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with an error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
TC-INVOKE ind.
<=====
TC-U-REJECT req.
>=====
REJECT (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with a wrong type parameter included. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE REJECT COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
| | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User, including at least one parameter which is not one of those associated with the operation)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (Invoke problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (wrong type parameter)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result problem; Wrong type parameter | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to an invalid operation code included in the Return Result-Last component | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component for Class 1 or 3
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last with an invalid operation code is generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| | | |
| INVOKE (i) | | |
| | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) |
| TC-RESULT-L ind. | | |
| | | |
| TC-U-REJECT req. | | |
| | | |
| REJECT (i) | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | INVOKE (i) | | | | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | TC-RESULT-L ind. | | | | | | TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | REJECT (i) | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-RESULT-L ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate a response from SP B to SP A with a valid Invoke ID but a different operation code. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: y (y is different from x) (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (wrong type parameter)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.3.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Error problem; Unrecognized error | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to an unrecognized error code included in the Return Error component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component of Class 1
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error with an invalid error code is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TC-INVOKE req. A->>B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: RETURN ERROR (i) Note over A: TC-U-ERROR ind. Note over A: TC-U-REJECT req. A->>B: REJECT (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate A Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate an unsuccessful response from SP B to SP A with a valid Invoke ID but an invalid error code for this operation. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y (y is an invalid error code for this operation)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (unrecognized error)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|---|--|--|---|-------------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.3.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Error problem; Unexpected error | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to an unexpected error code included in the Return Error component | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component of Class 1
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error with an unexpected error code is generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TC-INVOKE req. A->>B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: RETURN ERROR (i) Note over A: TC-U-ERROR ind. Note over A: TC-U-REJECT req. A->>B: REJECT (i)
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| | | |
| INVOKE (i) | → | |
| ← | RETURN ERROR (i) |
| TC-U-ERROR ind. | | |
| | | |
| TC-U-REJECT req. | | |
| | | |
| REJECT (i) | → | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | INVOKE (i) | → | | | ← | RETURN ERROR (i) | TC-U-ERROR ind. | | | | | | TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | REJECT (i) | → | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | RETURN ERROR (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-ERROR ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (i) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate an unsuccessful response from SP B to SP A with a valid Invoke ID but an unexpected error code for this operation. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y (y is an error code that is not one of those which the invoked operation may report)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000011 (unexpected error)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.4.3.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Reception of component leading to TC-User reject | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Error problem; Wrong type parameter | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to a wrong type parameter included in the Return Error component | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component of Class 1
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error with a wrong type parameter is generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| | | |
| INVOKE (i) | | |
| | RETURN ERROR (i) |
| TC-U-ERROR ind. | | |
| | | |
| TC-U-REJECT req. | | |
| | | |
| REJECT (i) | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | INVOKE (i) | | | | | RETURN ERROR (i) | TC-U-ERROR ind. | | | | | | TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | REJECT (i) | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | RETURN ERROR (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-ERROR ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-U-REJECT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate an unsuccessful response from SP B to SP A with a valid Invoke ID but a wrong type parameter for this operation. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN ERROR COMPONENT PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y (y is a valid error code for this operation)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User, including at least one parameter tag which is not one of those associated with the outcome of the operation)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000100 (wrong type parameter)
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.5.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Segmentation for Return Result | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: receive segmented components | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 1 operation can be completed by receiving segmented Return Result components | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result Not-Last component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req. =====> INVOKE (i) ----------------------------> <---------------------------- RETURN RESULT NOT- LAST (i) TC-RESULT-NL ind. <========= <---------------------------- RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) TC-RESULT-L ind. <=========
Image: Sequence diagram showing INVOKE from SP A to SP B, followed by RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST and RETURN RESULT-LAST from SP B to SP A.
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TC-INVOKE req. A->>B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) Note over A: TC-RESULT-NL ind. B->>A: RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) Note over A: TC-RESULT-L ind.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100111 (RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|------------|--|------------|---------------------------|-------|-----------------------|---|--|--|--------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------------------------|---|--|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.5.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Segmentation for Return Result | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 1 single operation invocation; IUT as receiver: send segmented components | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 1 operation can be completed by sending segmented Return Result components | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the TC-User stimulus at SP A such that a Return Result Not-Last component can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
TC-INVOKE ind. | ← | INVOKE (i) |
| < | | |
| TC-RESULT-NL req. | | |
| > | | |
RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) | → | |
| TC-RESULT-L req. | | |
| > | | |
| RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | → | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
TC-INVOKE ind. |
← |
INVOKE (i) | < | | | TC-RESULT-NL req. | | | > | | | RETURN RESULT
NOT-LAST (i) | → | | TC-RESULT-L req. | | | > | | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | → | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TC-INVOKE ind. |
← |
INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-RESULT-NL req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| RETURN RESULT
NOT-LAST (i) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-RESULT-L req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100111 (RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.5.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Segmentation for Return Result | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Class 3 single operation invocation; IUT as sender: Receive segmented components | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a single Class 3 operation can be completed by receiving segmented Return Result components | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result Not-Last component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
INVOKE (i)
>
<
RETURN RESULT
NOT-LAST (i)
TC-RESULT-NL ind.
<
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
TC-RESULT-L ind.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 3 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A ? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100111 (RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.6 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions | | |
+| SUBTITLE: User Cancel | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an operation invocation can be canceled by TC-User | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TC-INVOKE req. A->>B: INVOKE (i) Note over A: TC-U-CANCEL req. B-->>A: RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i) Note over A: TC-L-REJECT ind. A->>B: REJECT (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Arrange TC-User to cancel the operation immediately after the Invoke component is sent. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS SHOWN ABOVE? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized invoke ID)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.7.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.773 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Encoding variations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Component length definite short | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a component portion with a definite short form can be accepted | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP A such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note right of B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: Note left of A: TC-INVOKE ind. Note left of A: <========== Note left of A: TC-RESULT-L req. Note left of A: ==========> Note left of A: RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) A->>B:
Image: Diagram showing message flow between SP A and SP B. An arrow points from SP B to SP A for INVOKE (i). Below, arrows indicate TC-INVOKE indication and TC-RESULT-L request at SP A. Finally, an arrow points from SP A to SP B for RETURN RESULT-LAST (i).
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 or 3 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets (definite short form)
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.7.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.773 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Encoding variations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Component length definite long | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a component portion with a definite long form can be accepted | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP A such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: Note over A: TC-INVOKE ind. Note over A: TC-RESULT-L req. A->>B: RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE ind.
<
SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (i)
←
TC-RESULT-L req.
>
→
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 or 3 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets (definite long)
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00000010 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.7.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.773 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Encoding variations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Component length indefinite | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a component portion with a indefinite form can be accepted | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP A such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
sequenceDiagram Note right of SP B (CSL): INVOKE (i) SP B (CSL) ->> SP A (CSL): Note left of SP A (CSL): TC-INVOKE ind. Note left of SP A (CSL): Note left of SP A (CSL): TC-RESULT-L req. Note left of SP A (CSL): SP A (CSL) ->> SP B (CSL): RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
Image: Diagram showing message flow between SP A and SP B. SP B sends INVOKE (i) to SP A. SP A processes TC-INVOKE ind. and TC-RESULT-L req., then sends RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) back to SP B.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 or 3 operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets (indefinite form)
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+EOC Tag: 00000000
+
+EOC Length: 00000000
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.7.4.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 6.2/Q.773 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Encoding variations | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Value variations; Invoke ID; Invoke ID = -127 (FFh) | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT (SP A) is able to deal with correct encoding of component ID (upper value) | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE ind.
<
TC-RESULT-L req.
>
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP B to SP A with Invoke ID set to 11111111. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE OPERATION CODE IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
- Component portion tag: 01101100
- Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
- Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
- Component length: correct number of octets
- Invoke ID tag: 00000010
- Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
- Invoke ID: 11111111 (FFh)
| | |
+
+#### **CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES**
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: 11111111 (FFh)
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.7.4.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 6.2/Q.773 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Encoding variations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Value variations; Invoke ID; Invoke ID = 0 (00h) | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT (SP A) is able to deal with correct encoding of component ID (lower value) | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKE ind.
<=====
TC-RESULT-L req.
>=====
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
←───────────────────────────────────────────────────
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP B to SP A with Invoke ID set to 0. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION PASSED TO TC-USER BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE OPERATION CODE IN THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: 0
| | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: 0
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.7.4.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 6.3/Q.773 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Encoding variations | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Value variations; Global operation code | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a global operation code is correctly decoded by TCAP | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with a global operation code. The global value does not correspond to a supported operation | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) Image: Sequence diagram showing message flow from SP B to SP A. SP B sends an INVOKE (i) to SP A. SP A responds with TC-INVOKED ind. (double line), then TC-U-REJECT req. (double line), and finally REJECT (i) (single line).
SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (i)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with a non-supported global operation code. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE REJECT COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
Operation code tag: 00000110 (global)
Operation code length: 00000011 (3)
Operation code: 0000 0000
0001 0001
1000 0101 | | | | |
+
+TEST NUMBER: 2.1.7.4.2
+
+Sheet: 2 of 2
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (unrecognized operation)
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.8.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Multiple components grouping | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Multiple operations invocation; receiving success | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that multiple operations can be successfully invoked and the successful completions of the operations can be received | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains multiple components
2) Arrange the TC-User at SP B to send successful completions with an appropriate TSL message | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req. (#1) Image: Double-lined arrow pointing right from SP A towards SP B
TC-INVOKE req. (#n) Image: Double-lined arrow pointing right from SP A towards SP B
INVOKE #1, ..., #na) Image: Single-lined arrow pointing right from SP A to SP B
RETURN RESULT-LAST #1, ..., #na) Image: Single-lined arrow pointing left from SP B to SP A
TC-RESULT-L ind. (#1) Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left from SP B towards SP A
TC-RESULT-L ind. (#n) Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left from SP B towards SP A
a) The sequence of the components is provided by the TC-User.
NOTE – Number of components is subject to the TC-User.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate multiple operations within a TSL message from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WERE ALL THE INVOKE COMPONENTS WITHIN A TSL MESSAGE SENT BY SP A WITH CORRECT INFORMATION? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WERE ALL THE RETURN-LAST COMPONENTS INSIDE A TSL MESSAGE PASSED TO TC-USER IN THE SAME ORDER AS PROVIDED BY SP B WITH CORRECT INFORMATION? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WERE ALL THE INVOKE STATE MACHINES (1, ..., n) IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: 1, or, ..., n corresponding to the INVOKE #1, ..., #n
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x1, ..., xn representing valid operation codes
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: 1, or, ..., n
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x1, or, ..., xn (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.8.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Multiple components grouping | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Multiple operations invocation; reporting success | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that multiple operations can be successfully invoked and the successful completions of the operations can be sent | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains multiple components
2) Arrange the TC-User at SP A to send successful completions with an appropriate TSL message | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
INVOKE #1, ..., #na) Image: Arrow pointing from SP B to SP A
TC-INVOKE ind. (#1) Image: Double arrow pointing from SP A to SP B
TC-INVOKE ind. (#n) Image: Double arrow pointing from SP A to SP B
TC-RESULT-L req. (#1) Image: Double arrow pointing from SP A to SP B
TC-RESULT-L req. (#n) Image: Double arrow pointing from SP A to SP B
RETURN RESULT-LAST #n, ..., #1a) Image: Arrow pointing from SP A to SP B
| | |
+| a) The sequence of the components is provided by the TC-User.
NOTE – Number of components is subject to the TC-User. | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate multiple operations within a TSL message from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WERE ALL THE INVOKE COMPONENTS WITHIN A TSL MESSAGE PASSED TO TC-USER IN THE SAME ORDER AS PROVIDED BY SP B WITH CORRECT INFORMATION? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WERE ALL THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENTS WITHIN A TSL MESSAGE SENT BY SP A WITH CORRECT INFORMATION? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN EACH OF THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENTS ONE-TO-ONE CORRESPONDENT WITH THE ONE IN EACH OF THE INVOKE COMPONENTS? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: 1, or, ..., n corresponding to the INVOKE #1, ..., #n
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x1, ..., xn representing valid operation codes
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: 1, or, ..., n
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x1, or, ..., xn (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.8.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Multiple components grouping | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: A malformed component received | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that subsequent components in the message can be discarded when a badly structured component is detected by the component sublayer | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains multiple components, the second of which is badly structured | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
INVOKE #1, #2, #3 (Note 1)
←
(#2 badly structured, e.g.
operation code missing)
TC-INVOKE ind. (#1)
=====
TC-L-REJECT ind. (#2)
=====
TC-RESULT-L req. (#1)
=====
REJECT #2, RETURN RESULT-LAST #1
(Note 2)
→
NOTE 1 – The sequence of the Invoke components is important.
NOTE 2 – The sequence of these components is not important.
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate multiple operations within a TSL message from SP B to SP A with the order shown in the diagram. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE FIRST INVOKE COMPONENT PASSED TO TC-USER? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WERE ONLY THE RETURN RESULT-LAST COMPONENT FOR THE FIRST OPERATION AND THE REJECT COMPONENT FOR THE SECOND OPERATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### INVOKE #1 component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: 1
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x is a valid operation code
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE #2 component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: 2
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE #3 component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: 3
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x is a valid operation code
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+RETURN RESULT-LAST #1 component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: 1
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT #2 component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: 2
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General Problem)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (badly structured component)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Accept application context proposal; Send AARQ in Begin message | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can generate and send the dialogue control APDU AARQ within the dialogue portion in a Begin message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A ( TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TR-BEGIN req. Image: Double arrow pointing right
BEGIN (AARQ) →
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE BEGIN MESSAGE CONTAIN THE APDU AARQ?
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT or by the Tester. When the last message has been sent by Tester, the END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received.
| |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Begin message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax)
single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
Application context tag: 10100001
Application context length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
direct reference: any object identifier
| | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|---------------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|------------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Accept application context proposal; accept AARQ and continue dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can receive a Begin message with APDU 'AARQ' and then can generate and send the dialogue control APDU 'AARE' within the dialogue portion of a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | BEGIN (AARQ) |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE (AARE) | ➔ | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE (AARE) | ➔ | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE (AARE) | ➔ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CONTAIN THE APDU AARE AND IS THE APPLICATION CONTEXT THE SAME AS IN THE RECEIVED AARQ?
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT or by the Tester. When the last message has been sent by Tester, the END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Begin message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000 (see Note)
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
+
+Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
+
+Protocol Version tag: 10000000
+
+Protocol Version length: 00000010
+
+Protocol Version value: 00000111 10000000
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+NOTE – Instead of the encoding option Single ASN.1 type, this test can also be done with the 2 other options – octet aligned and arbitrary.
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: same octets as in AARQ
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|---------------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|--------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------|----|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.1.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Accept application context proposal; accept AARQ and end dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can receive a Begin message with APDU AARQ and then can generate and send the dialogue control APDU 'AARE' within the dialogue portion of an End message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A ( TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | BEGIN (AARQ) |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR-END req. | | |
| > | | |
| END (AARE) | ─> | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR-END req. | | | > | | | END (AARE) | ─> | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-END req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| END (AARE) | ─> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE END MESSAGE CONTAIN THE APDU AARE AND IS THE APPLICATION CONTEXT THE SAME AS IN THE RECEIVED AARQ? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in End message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax)
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: same octets as in AARQ
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|---------------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|------------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Propose alternative application context; Send AARE with alternative | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can generate and send dialogue control APDU 'AARE' with an alternative application context within the dialogue portion of a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A ( TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | BEGIN (AARQ) |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE (AARE) | → | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE (AARE) | → | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE (AARE) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to propose an alternative application context. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CONTAIN THE APDU AARE AND IS THE APPLICATION CONTEXT DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE IN THE RECEIVED AARQ?
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT or by the Tester. When the last message has been sent by Tester, the END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax)
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: correct number of octets different than those in AARQ
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. Length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------|---|--|--|---|------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.2.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Propose alternative application context; receive AARE with alternative | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can accept the dialogue control APDU 'AARE' with an alternative application context within the dialogue portion of a Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| → | | |
| BEGIN (AARQ) | → | |
| ← | CONTINUE (AARE) |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| ← | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | → | | | BEGIN (AARQ) | → | | | ← | CONTINUE (AARE) | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | ← | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN (AARQ) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | CONTINUE (AARE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ← | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue proposing an alternative application context | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE IUT ACCEPT THE APDU 'AARE' WITH THE ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION CONTEXT?
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT or by the Tester. When the last message has been sent by Tester, the END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax)
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: correct number of octets different than those in AARQ
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. Length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|---------------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue refused | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can generate and send dialogue control APDU 'AARE' within the dialogue portion in an Abort message to indicate that the application context is not supported | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| < | BEGIN (AARQ) |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
| < | | |
| TR- U - ABORT req. | | |
| > | | |
| ABORT (AARE) | > | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | < | BEGIN (AARQ) | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | < | | | TR- U - ABORT req. | | | > | | | ABORT (AARE) | > | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | < | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR- U - ABORT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (AARE) | > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to refuse the dialogue because of application context not supported. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES SP A TRANSMIT THE EXPECTED ABORT MESSAGE WITH APDU 'AARE'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Abort message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax )
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: same octets as in dialogue request
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000001 (Reject -Permanent)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000010 (Application Context Not Supported)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|---------------------|--|--|--|--|------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue abort | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can generate and send the dialogue control APDU 'ABRT' within the dialogue portion in an Abort message after the dialogue has been established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN (AARQ) | | |
| | CONTINUE (AARE) |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-U-ABORT req. | | |
| | | |
| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | CONTINUE (AARE) | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | ABORT (U) (ABRT) | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE (AARE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP A to Abort the dialogue for some reason. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE ABORT MESSAGE CONTAIN APDU 'ABRT'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Abort message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax )
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Abort tag: 01100100
+
+Dialogue Abort length: 00000011
+
+Abort Source tag: 10000000
+
+Abort source length: 00000001
+
+Abort source: 00000000 (dialogue service user)
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.5.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Transport of User information; accept user information in Begin message | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can receive a Begin message with APDU AARQ including an user information element | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1.
2.
| Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request containing user information.
CHECK A: DOES THE IUT ACCEPT USER INFORMATION IN THE RECEIVED DIALOGUE REQUEST?
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT. The END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received.
| |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Begin message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax )
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
+
+Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+##### User information in dialogue PDU
+
+User Information tag: 10111110
+
+User information length: correct number of octets
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000 (see Note)
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+Some bytes of user data in the user defined abstract syntax
+
+NOTE – This test can also be done with the 2 other encoding options – octet aligned and arbitrary.
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.5.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Transport of User information; accept user information in first Continue message | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can accept a Continue message with APDU 'AARE' including a user information element | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion. | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue including user information in the dialogue portion. | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE IUT ACCEPT USER INFORMATION IN THE RECEIVED DIALOGUE RESPONSE?
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT or by the tester. When the last message has been sent by the tester, the END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received.
| |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax )
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. Length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+##### User information in dialogue PDU
+
+User Information tag: 10111110
+
+User information length: correct number of octets
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+Some bytes of user data in the user defined abstract syntax
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|---------------------|----------------------|--|--|-----------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|------------------------|---|--|--|---|-----------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.5.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Transport of User information; accept user information in subsequent Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that SP A can accept a user information element in a subsequent Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state and test cases 2.1.9.5.2 has to be executed successfully | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | BEGIN (AARQ) |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
TR-CONTINUE req. | | |
| | | |
| CONTINUE (AARE) | → | |
| ← | CONTINUE |
| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | TR-BEGIN ind. | | |
TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | CONTINUE (AARE) | → | | | ← | CONTINUE | TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE (AARE) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | CONTINUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message with dialogue request to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP A to confirm the dialogue. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | Arrange for SP B to send a Continue message including an user information element as dialogue portion. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE IUT AT SP A ACCEPTED THE USER INFORMATION ELEMENT
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT or by the Tester. When the last message has been sent by Tester, the END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Continue message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion (user information element)
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
Direct reference: any abstract syntax
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Some bytes of user data in the user defined abstract syntax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|--------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------|--|--|--|--|------------------------|-----------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.5.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Transport of User information, accept several user information elements in Continue message | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can accept a Continue message with APDU 'AARE' including several user information elements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A ( TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state and test cases 2.1.9.5.2 has to be executed successfully | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| > | | |
| BEGIN (AARQ) | | |
| | CONTINUE (AARE) |
TR-CONTINUE ind. | | |
| < | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
TR-BEGIN req. | | | > | | | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | CONTINUE (AARE) |
TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | < | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | CONTINUE (AARE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TR-CONTINUE ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue including user information elements in the dialogue portion. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE IUT ACCEPT USER INFORMATION IN THE RECEIVED DIALOGUE RESPONSE?
Also arrange an END message to be sent by IUT or by the Tester. When the last message has been sent by Tester, the END message sent by IUT can be used to check that the last message has been correctly received. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. Length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+##### User information in dialogue PDU
+
+User Information tag: 10111110
+
+User information length: correct number of octets
+
+External type tag: 00101000 (external number 1)
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any user defined abstract syntax
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Some bytes representing element 1
+
+External type tag: 00101000 (external number 2)
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any user defined abstract syntax
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+###### Some bytes of user data in user information element number 2
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------|--|------------------------------|---|--|--------------------|--|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.6 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unstructured dialogue | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT can accept the dialogue control APDU 'AUDT' in an Unidirectional message | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | SP B (CSL) |
| UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) |
| ← |
| TR-UNI ind. | |
| | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | SP B (CSL) | | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) | ← | | TR-UNI ind. | | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ← | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-UNI ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange SP B to send an Unidirectional message containing a dialogue portion to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE UNIDIRECTIONAL MESSAGE WITH APDU 'AUDT' CORRECTLY RECEIVED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Unidirectional message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010201
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
Application context tag: 10100001
Application context length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
Direct reference: any object identifier | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.7.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.3/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue control APDU Version Structured dialogue; Version not 1 | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can abort the dialogue if the first bit of the protocol version field in the dialogue request, is not set to 1. The dialogue has to be aborted with APDU 'AARE' (reject permanent, no common dialogue) | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
Image: Diagram showing the message sequence. SP B (CSL) sends a BEGIN (AARQ) message to SP A (CSL). SP A (CSL) responds with a TR-U-ABORT req. message. SP A (CSL) then sends an ABORT (AARE) message to SP B (CSL).
sequenceDiagram participant SP B as SP B (CSL) participant SP A as SP A (CSL) Note right of SP B: BEGIN (AARQ) SP B->>SP A: BEGIN (AARQ) Note left of SP A: TR-U-ABORT req. SP A->>SP A: TR-U-ABORT req. Note left of SP A: ABORT (AARE) SP A->>SP B: ABORT (AARE)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request indicating that Version 1 is not supported | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES SP A TRANSMIT THE EXPECTED ABORT MESSAGE WITH APDU 'AARE' INDICATING NO COMMON DIALOGUE PORTION? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Abort message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: same octets as in dialogue request
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000001 (Reject-Permanent)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service Provider tag: 10100010
+
+Dialogue Service Provider length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service provider value: 00000010 (No common dialogue portion)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|------------|------------|--|------------------------|--|--|----------------------|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|--|---------------------------|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.7.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.3/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue control APDU Version Structured dialogue; Version 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can accept a dialogue request offering several versions including version 1.
The IUT response must be of version 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | SP B (CSL) |
| BEGIN (AARQ-Vx) |
| |
| TR-BEGIN ind. | |
| |
| TR-CONTINUE req. | |
| |
| CONTINUE (AARE-V1) | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | SP B (CSL) | | BEGIN (AARQ-Vx) | | | TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | CONTINUE (AARE-V1) | |
+| SP A (CSL) | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | BEGIN (AARQ-Vx) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-CONTINUE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONTINUE (AARE-V1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request offering several versions including Version 1. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE CONTINUE MESSAGE CONTAIN THE APDU AARE AND IS IT OF VERSION 1? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Begin message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010101
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
Protocol Version tag: 10000000
Protocol Version length: 00000010
Protocol Version: 00000110 11000000 (versions 1 and 2 supported)
Application context tag: 10100001
Application context length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
Direct reference: any object identifier | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.7.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue control APDU Version Unstructured dialogue; Version not 1 | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can discard a UNIDIRECTIONAL msg if the first bit of the protocol version field in the dialogue request AUDT, is not set to 1 | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state and test case 2.1.9.6 has to be executed successfully | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: | | | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | |
+| msg discarded | ← | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange SP B to send an Unidirectional msg containing APDU AUDT indicating that Version 1 is not supported to SP A. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE UNIDIRECTIONAL MESSAGE WITH APDU 'AUDT' DISCARDED AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Unidirectional message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010201
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
Protocol Version tag: 10000000
Protocol Version length: 00000010
Protocol Version: 00000110 01000000 (only version 2 supported)
Application context tag: 10100001
Application context length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
Direct reference: any object identifier | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------|--|------------|--|---|------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.1.9.7.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Valid functions; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue control APDU Version Unstructured dialogue; Version 1 | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT can accept a UNIDIRECTIONAL msg if the first bit of the protocol version is set to 1 and also other bits are set to 1 | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state and test case 2.1.9.6 has to be executed successfully | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| ← | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) |
TR-UNI ind. < | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | ← | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) | TR-UNI ind.
< | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | |
+| | ← | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-UNI ind.
< | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange SP B to send an Unidirectional msg containing APDU AUDT offering several versions including Version 1, to SP A. | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE UNIDIRECTIONAL MESSAGE WITH APDU 'AUDT' ACCEPTED AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Unidirectional message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010201
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
+
+Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
+
+Protocol Version tag: 10000000
+
+Protocol Version length: 00000010
+
+Protocol Version: 00000110 11000000 (version 1 and version 2 supported)
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 6.2/Q.773 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Length of Invoke ID >1 in Invoke component | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be performed due to incorrect encoding of component ID (value out of range) | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with an error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
<=====
REJECT (NULL)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with Invoke ID equal to 2 octets (illegal value). | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000010 (two octets)
Invoke ID: 129
| | | | |
+
+| | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.1.1 | Sheet: 2 of 2 |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | |
+| Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
parameters (provided by the TC-User)
REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
Component length: correct number of octets
NULL tag: 00000101
NULL length: 00000000
Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
Problem code length: 00000001
Problem code: 00000001 (mistyped component)
| |
+
+| | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 6.2/Q.773 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid values for information elements | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Length of Invoke ID = 0 in Invoke component | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be performed due to incorrect encoding of component ID (length equals 0) | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with an error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
<=====
REJECT (NULL)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with Invoke ID equal to 0 octets (illegal value). | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000000 (zero octet)
Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 000000110 (global)
Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
parameters (provided by the TC-User)
REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
Component length: correct number of octets
NULL tag: 00000101
NULL length: 00000000
Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
Problem code length: 00000001
Problem code: 00000001 (wrong type component)
| | | | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 6.2/Q.773 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invoke component; Invoke ID missing | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be performed due to Invoke ID missing | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with an error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
REJECT (NULL)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP B to SP A with Invoke ID missing. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Operation code tag: 00000110 (global)
Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
parameters (provided by the TC-User)
REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
Component length: correct number of octets
NULL tag: 00000101
NULL length: 00000000
Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
Problem code length: 00000001
Problem code: 00000001 (wrong type component)
| | | | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.1.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invoke component; Operation code missing | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be performed due to operation code missing | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with a syntax error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
REJECT (i)
←──────────────────────────────────────────────────
══════════════════════════════════════════════════
──────────────────────────────────────────────────→
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with operation code missing. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE REJECT COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
parameters (provided by the TC-User)
REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001
Invoke ID: i
Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
Problem code length: 00000001
Problem code: 00000001 (wrong type component)
| | | | |
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result component; Invoke ID missing | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to the absence of the Invoke ID in the Return Result-Last component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last without an Invoke ID is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req. sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TC-INVOKE req. A->>B: INVOKE (i) B-->>A: RETURN RESULT-LAST Note over A: TC-L-REJECT ind. A->>B: REJECT (NULL) Note over A: time expiry for invocation (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 or 3 operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate a response from SP B to SP A without an Invoke ID. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### **CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES**
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### **RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A**
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: y (y is different from x) (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### **REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B**
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+NULL tag: 00000101
+
+NULL length: 00000000
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (wrong type component)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.2.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result component; Operation code missing while parameters included | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to the operation code being missing in the Return Result-Last component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component for Class 1 or 3
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last without an operation code is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TC-INVOKE req. A->>B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) Note over A: TC-L-REJECT ind. A->>B: REJECT (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate a response from SP B to SP A with a valid Invoke ID but a different operation code. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (wrong type component)
+
+| | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.2.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 6.4/Q.773; 3.2.2.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result component; Sequence tag missing while parameters included | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to Sequence tag missing while parameters included | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that an appropriate TSL message contains a Return Result-Last component with an invalid Sequence tag | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) TC-INVOKE req. Image: Right arrow
INVOKE (i) SP B (CSL) Image: Left arrow
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Left arrow
REJECT (i) | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+#### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (wrong type component)
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.3.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Error; Invoke ID missing | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to the absence of the Invoke ID in the Return Error component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component of the Class 1
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error without an Invoke ID is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
⇒
INVOKE (i) —————————————————→
←————————————————— RETURN ERROR
TC-L-REJECT ind.
⇐
REJECT (NULL) —————————————————→
time expiry for invocation (i) | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate an unsuccessful response from SP B to SP A without an Invoke ID. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### **CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES**
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### **RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A**
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y (y is an error code which the invoked operation may report)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### **REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B**
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+NULL tag: 00000101
+
+NULL length: 00000000
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (mistyped component)
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.3.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Error; Error code missing | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to the absence of the error code in the Return Error component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component of Class 1
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error without an error code is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL) TC-INVOKE req. ===========> INVOKE (i) ----------------------------> <---------------------------- RETURN ERROR (i) TC-L-REJECT ind. <=========== REJECT (i) ---------------------------->
Image: Sequence diagram showing message flow between SP A and SP B. SP A sends an INVOKE (i) to SP B. SP B responds with a RETURN ERROR (i). SP A then generates a REJECT (i) message.
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 1 operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate an unsuccessful response from SP B to SP A with a valid Invoke ID but without error code for this operation. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A ? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000101
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (mistyped component)
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.4.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unknown component type; Invoke ID unrecognizable | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be initiated due to Unknown component type with unrecognized Invoke ID | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Unknown component as described below | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
<
REJECT (NULL)
←
→
SP B (CSL)
Unknown component
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with an Unknown component type with any content. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
- Component portion tag: 01101100
- Component portion length: correct number of octets
Unknown component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
- Component type tag: any values except 10100001, 10100010, 10100011, 10100100 and 10100111
- Component length: correct number of octets
- Component content: any
REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
- Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
- Component length: correct number of octets
- NULL tag: 00000101
- NULL length: 00000000
- Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
- Problem code length: 00000001
- Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized component)
| | |
+
+
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue Portion; Missing Application Context in APDU AARQ | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT aborts the transaction upon reception of a Begin message containing an APDU 'AARQ' without application context parameter. | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+
+EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
+
+SP A (CSL)
+SP B (CSL)
+
+
+
+*Detect syntax error*
+←
+**BEGIN (AARQ)**
+
+
+
+*TR-U-ABORT req.*
+
+**ABORT (ABRT)**
+ →
+
+| |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| TEST DESCRIPTION |
+| 1. Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue request without application context.
2. CHECK A: DOES SP A TRANSMIT THE EXPECTED ABORT MESSAGE WITH APDU 'ABRT'? |
+
+| |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION |
+| Dialogue portion in Abort message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: 00010010
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: 00010000
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax)
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: 00000101
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Abort tag: 01100100
Dialogue Abort length: 00000011
Abort Source tag: 10000000
Abort source length: 00000001
Abort source: 00000001 (dialogue service provider) |
+
+262 **Recommendation Q.787 (09/97)**
+
+| | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.1 | Sheet: 2 of 2 |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION | |
+| Dialogue portion in Begin message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010101
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
Application context tag: Missing | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|---------------------------|--|--|---------------------|--|--|----------------------------|--|------------------------|---------------------------------|--|--|-----------------------------|--|--|---------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue Portion; Incorrect length | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT aborts the transaction upon reception of a Continue message containing an APDU 'AARE' with an incorrect AARE length indicator | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
TR-BEGIN req. > | | |
| BEGIN (AARQ) | | |
| Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE (AARE) |
TR-P-ABORT ind. < | | |
TR-U-ABORT req. > | | |
| ABORT (ABRT) | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TR-BEGIN req.
> | | | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE (AARE) |
TR-P-ABORT ind.
< | | | TR-U-ABORT req.
> | | | ABORT (ABRT) | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req.
> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | | CONTINUE (AARE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TR-P-ABORT ind.
< | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT req.
> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (ABRT) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue with an incorrect AARE length indicator in the APDU AARE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE ABORT MESSAGE CONTAIN APDU 'ABRT'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE DIALOGUE AT SP A HAS BEEN TERMINATED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+#### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: 01111111 ( incorrect)
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: same octets as in dialogue request
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 ( Null)
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue Portion; Missing result-source-diagnostic | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT aborts the transaction upon reception of a Continue message containing an APDU 'AARE' with a missing result-source-diagnostic parameter | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TR-BEGIN req.

BEGIN (AARQ) 
Detect syntax error
CONTINUE (AARE)
TR-P-ABORT ind.

TR-U-ABORT req.

ABORT (ABRT) 
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion. | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue with an incorrect AARE, parameter missing. | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE DIALOGUE AT SP A HAS BEEN TERMINATED. | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE ABORT MESSAGE CONTAIN APDU 'ABRT'? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: same octets as in dialogue request
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: Missing
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------------|---|------------------------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue Portion; Missing application context in APDU AUDT | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT discards an Unidirectional message containing a dialogue request without AC parameter | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| Detect syntax error | ← | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | Detect syntax error | ← | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | |
+| Detect syntax error | ← | UNIDIRECTIONAL (AUDT) | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send an Unidirectional message with corrupted dialogue request to SP A. | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: VERIFY THAT NO MESSAGE IS GENERATED IN RESPONSE TO THE RECEIVED MESSAGE. | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION | | | | | | | | |
+| Dialogue Portion in Unidirectional message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010201
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
Protocol Version tag: 10000000
Protocol Version length: 00000010
Protocol Version: 00000110
11000000
Application context tag: missing | | | | | | | | |
+
+
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------------------|---|-------------------------|--------------------------------|--|--|---------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.6 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue Portion; Indirect reference in External type | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT aborts the transaction on reception of a Begin message containing an external type which contains both a direct reference and indirect reference | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
Detect semantic error | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) |
TR-U-ABORT req. | | |
| ABORT (ABRT) | → | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
Detect semantic error | ← |
BEGIN (AARQ) |
TR-U-ABORT req.
| | | ABORT (ABRT) | → | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
Detect semantic error | ← |
BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TR-U-ABORT req.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (ABRT) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion with an external type also containing an indirect reference. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES SP A TRANSMIT THE EXPECTED ABORT MESSAGE WITH APDU 'ABRT'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Begin message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010101
INTEGER type tag: 00000010
INTEGER length: 00000001
Indirect reference: 00000001
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
Application context tag: 10100001
Application context length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
Direct reference: any object identifier
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------------------|---|-------------------------|----------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.7 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue Portion; User information without direct reference | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT aborts a dialogue on reception of an User information element without direct reference | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
Detect semantic error | ← | BEGIN (AARQ) |
TR-U-ABORT req. | | |
| > | | |
| ABORT (ABRT) | → | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
Detect semantic error | ← |
BEGIN (AARQ) |
TR-U-ABORT req. | | | > | | | ABORT (ABRT) | → | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
Detect semantic error | ← |
BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (ABRT) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion including a user information element whose external type does not contain a direct reference. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES SP A TRANSMIT THE EXPECTED ABORT MESSAGE WITH APDU 'ABRT'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Begin message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
+
+Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+##### User information in dialogue PDU
+
+User Information tag: 10111110
+
+User information length: correct number of octets
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: missing
+
+Object Identifier length: missing
+
+Direct reference: missing
+
+Octet-aligned tag: 10000001
+
+Octet aligned length: correct number of octets
+
+Octet string value: any number of octets
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|--|------------|--|--|---------------------|------------------------------|---|--|----------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2.5.8 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue Portion; Indirect reference in User information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that the IUT aborts a dialogue on reception of an User information element which contains both a direct reference and an indirect reference | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| | BEGIN (AARQ) |
| Detect semantic error | ← | |
TR-U-ABORT req. | | |
| > | | |
ABORT (ABRT) | → | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | BEGIN (AARQ) | Detect semantic error | ← | |
TR-U-ABORT req. | | | > | | |
ABORT (ABRT) | → | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect semantic error | ← | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
ABORT (ABRT) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion with an external type also containing an indirect reference. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2 | CHECK A: DOES SP A TRANSMIT THE EXPECTED ABORT MESSAGE WITH APDU 'ABRT'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Begin message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
+
+Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+##### User information in dialogue PDU
+
+User Information tag: 10111110
+
+User information length: correct number of octets
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Indirect reference: 00000001
+
+Octet-aligned tag: 10000001
+
+Octet aligned length: correct number of octets
+
+Octet string value: any number of octets
+
+| | | | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.3.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.2/Q.774; 3.2.3/Q.773 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid encoding for Invoke component | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid tag | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection is generated because of an invalid tag | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with an error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
<=====
REJECT (i or NULL)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with an invalid tag. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
| | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Invalid tag: 00100010
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+or
+
+NULL tag: 00000101
+
+NULL length: 00000000
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (badly structured component)
+
+| | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.3.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid encoding for Invoke component | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Wrong component length | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be initiated due to wrong component length | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component with a syntax error as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
REJECT (i or NULL)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP B to SP A with an invalid component length value. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE REJECT COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT ? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: wrong number of octets (e.g. 00000000)
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
| | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+or
+
+NULL tag: 00000101
+
+NULL length: 00000000
+
+Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000010 (badly structured component)
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.2.3.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.3/Q.773 | | |
+| TITLE: Syntactically invalid behaviour; Invalid encoding for Invoke component | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Missing EOC in indefinite form | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a component portion with an indefinite form but EOC missing is rejected | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP B contains an Invoke component | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
sequenceDiagram participant SPA as SP A (CSL) participant SPB as SP B (CSL) Note over SPB: INVOKE (i) SPB->>SPA: Note over SPA: TC-L-REJECT ind. SPA->>SPB: REJECT (i or NULL)
SP A (CSL)
TC-L-REJECT ind.
<
SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (i)
←
REJECT (i or NULL) →
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a single operation invocation from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
- Component portion tag: 01101100
- Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
- Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
- Component length: correct number of octets (indefinite form)
- Invoke ID tag: 00000010
- Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
- Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
- Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
- Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
- Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
- parameters (provided by the TC-User)
REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
- Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
- Component length: correct number of octets
- Invoke ID tag: 00000010
- Invoke ID length: 00000001
- Invoke ID: i
- or
- NULL tag: 00000101
- NULL length: 00000000
- Problem code tag: 10000000 (General problem type)
- Problem code length: 00000001
- Problem code: 00000010 (badly structured component)
| | |
+
+| | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.1.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Inopportune Invoke component | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Invalid linked ID | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection of a requested operation can be initiated due to invalid linked ID | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a linked Invoke component can be generated as described below | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL)
TC-INVOKEReq.
→
INVOKE (i)
→
←
TC-L-REJECTind.
←
REJECT (j)
time expiry for invocation (i)
→
TC-L-CANCELind.
←
SP B (CSL)
INVOKE (j, k)
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOKE ID IN THE REJECT COMPONENT THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE INVOKE COMPONENT SENT BY SP B? | | | |
+| 5. | CHECK D: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A ? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message sent by SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+Invoke ID: j (j represents an integer)
+Linked ID tag: 10000000
+Linked ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+Linked ID: k (k is an integer which is different from i)
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+Operation code: y (y represents a valid operation code)
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in the TSL message sent by SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: j
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+Problem code length: 00000001
+Problem code: 00000101 (unrecognized linked ID)
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.2.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unrecognized Invoke ID | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Inopportune Return Result-Last component | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to an unrecognized Invoke ID (never used and just released) in the received Return Result-Last component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component for operation Class 1 or 3
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last with an invalid Invoke ID is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req. Image: Right arrow
INVOKE (i) Image: Right arrow
Image: Left arrow
RETURN RESULT-LAST (j) TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Left arrow
REJECT (j) time expiry for invocation (i)
Image: Right arrow
Image: Left arrow
RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Left arrow
REJECT (i) Image: Right arrow
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate a response from SP B to SP A with an unrecognized Invoke ID. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A ? | |
+| 4. | Generate a Return Result-Last component from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS SHOWN IN ABOVE ? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j (j is different from i)
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized invoke ID)
+
+The contents of the last two components, RETURN-RESULT-LAST (i) and REJECT (i), are the same as above except the Invoke ID is (i).
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.2.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unrecognized Invoke ID | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Inopportune Return Result Not-Last component | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to an unrecognized Invoke ID (never used and just released) in the received Return Result Not-Last component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component for operation Class 1 or 3
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result Not-Last with an invalid Invoke ID is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKED req. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing right
INVOKE (i)
Image: Arrow pointing right
Image: Arrow pointing left
RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (j)
TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left
REJECT (j)
time expiry for invocation (i)
Image: Arrow pointing right
Image: Arrow pointing left
RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i)
TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left
REJECT (i)
Image: Arrow pointing right
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate a response from SP B to SP A with an unrecognized Invoke ID.
CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A?
CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A ?
Generate a Return Result Not-Last component from SP B to SP A.
CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A?
CHECK D: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS SHOWN IN ABOVE ? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100111 (RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j (j is different from i)
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized invoke ID)
+
+RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100111 (RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized invoke ID)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.2.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 3 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unrecognized Invoke ID | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Inopportune Return Error component | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be successfully initiated due to an unrecognized Invoke ID (never used and just released) in the received Return Error component | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component for unrecognized operation Class 1 or 2
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error with an invalid Invoke ID is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing right from SP A to SP B
INVOKE (i) Image: Single-lined arrow pointing right from SP A to SP B
Image: Single-lined arrow pointing left from SP B to SP A
RETURN ERROR (j) TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left from SP B to SP A
REJECT (j) time expiry for invocation (i)
Image: Single-lined arrow pointing right from SP A to SP B
TC-L-CANCEL ind. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left from SP B to SP A
Image: Single-lined arrow pointing left from SP B to SP A
RETURN ERROR (i) TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left from SP B to SP A
REJECT (i) Image: Single-lined arrow pointing right from SP A to SP B
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate an unsuccessful response from SP B to SP A with an invalid Invoke ID. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A ? | |
+| 4. | Generate a Return Error component from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 6. | CHECK D: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS ABOVE ? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j (j is different from i)
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j
+
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized invoke ID)
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+
+Error code: y
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000000 (unrecognized invoke ID)
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.2.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unrecognized Invoke ID | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Inopportune Reject component | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that receipt of a Reject component with an Invoke ID not corresponding to any active invocation has no effect on an active invocation | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component for Class 1 or 2
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Reject with an unrecognized Invoke ID is generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req.
⇒
INVOKE (i) →
← REJECT (j)
TC-R-REJECT ind.a)
⇐
← RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
TC-L-RESULT ind.
⇐
| | |
+| a) The issuing of the TC-R-REJECT ind. is implementation dependent. | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate an operation invocation from SP A to SP B.
Generate a reject from SP B to SP A with an invalid Invoke ID. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | Generate a Reject component from SP B to SP A. | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: WAS THE COMPONENT FLOW AS ABOVE? | |
+| 5. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+##### Component portion in TSL messages
+
+Component portion tag: 01101100
+
+Component portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
+
+Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: j (j is different from i)
+
+Problem code tag: 10000001 (INVOKE)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: any value
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000101 (Global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unexpected Components | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result-Last for Class 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be sent if a Return Result-Last component is received for a Class 2 operation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| | | |
| INVOKE (i) | | |
| | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) |
| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | |
| | | |
| REJECT (i) | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | INVOKE (i) | | | | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | | | | REJECT (i) | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | RETURN RESULT-LAST (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 2 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (return result unexpected)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unexpected Components | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result-Last for Class 4 | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be sent if a Return Result-Last component is received for a Class 4 operation | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result-Last component can be generated | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKES req. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing right
INVOKE (i) —————→
←————— RETURN RESULT-LAST (i)
TC-L-REJECT ind. Image: Double-lined arrow pointing left
REJECT (i) —————→
| | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 4 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100010 (RETURN RESULT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (return result unexpected)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------|---|--|--|---|-----------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unexpected Components | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result Not-Last for Class 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be sent if a Return Result Not-Last component is received for a Class 2 operation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result Not-Last component can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| = | | |
| INVOKE (i) | - | |
| < | RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) |
| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | |
| < | | |
| REJECT (i) | - | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | = | | | INVOKE (i) | - | | | < | RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) | TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | < | | | REJECT (i) | - | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| = | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | < | RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (i) | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 2 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100111 (RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (return result unexpected)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|-----------------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unexpected Components | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Result Not-Last for Class 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be sent if a Return Result Not-Last component is received for a Class 4 operation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Result Not-Last component can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| | | |
| INVOKE (i) | | |
| | RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) |
| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | |
| | | |
| REJECT (i) | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | INVOKE (i) | | | | | RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) | TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | | | | REJECT (i) | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 4 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100111 (RETURN RESULT NOT-LAST)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Sequence tag: 00110000 (see Note)
+
+Sequence length: correct number of octets (see Note)
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global) (see Note)
+
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long) (see Note)
+
+Operation code: x (see Note)
+
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+
+Component length: correct number of octets
+
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+
+Invoke ID: i
+
+Problem code tag: 10000010 (RETURN RESULT)
+
+Problem code length: 00000001
+
+Problem code: 00000001 (return result unexpected)
+
+NOTE – Omitted when no parameter is present.
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|--|------------|-----------------------|--|--|--------|--|--|-------------------|------------------------|--|--|------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--|--|--------|--|--|-------------------|------------------------|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3.5 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unexpected Components | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Error for Class 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be sent if a Return Error component is received for a Class 3 operation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error component can be generated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TC-INVOKE req. | | |
| =====> | | |
| INVOKE (i) | —————————————————————> | |
| <————————————————————— | RETURN ERROR (i) |
| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | |
| <===== | | |
| REJECT (i) | —————————————————————> | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TC-INVOKE req. | | | =====> | | | INVOKE (i) | —————————————————————> | | | <————————————————————— | RETURN ERROR (i) | TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | <===== | | | REJECT (i) | —————————————————————> | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-INVOKE req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| =====> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| INVOKE (i) | —————————————————————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | <————————————————————— | RETURN ERROR (i) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TC-L-REJECT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| <===== | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REJECT (i) | —————————————————————> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 3 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: i
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+Error code: y
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: i
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+Problem code length: 00000001
+Problem code: 00000001 (unexpected return error)
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3.6 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Unexpected Components | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Return Error for Class 4 | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that a rejection can be sent if a Return Error component is received for a Class 4 operation | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS:
1) Arrange the TC-User stimulus such that an appropriate TSL message generated at SP A contains an Invoke component
2) Arrange the data at SP B such that a Return Error component can be generated | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE AND COMPONENT FLOW:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TC-INVOKE req. INVOKE (i) ------------------------------------> <------------------------------------ RETURN ERROR (i) TC-L-REJECT ind. REJECT (i) ------------------------------------>
Image: Message flow diagram showing INVOKE from SP A to SP B, followed by RETURN ERROR from SP B to SP A, and finally REJECT from SP A to SP B.
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TC-INVOKE req. A->>B: INVOKE (i) B->>A: RETURN ERROR (i) Note over A: TC-L-REJECT ind. A->>B: REJECT (i)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Initiate a Class 4 operation invocation from SP A to SP B. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: WAS THE INVOKE COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 3. | CHECK B: WAS THE REJECT COMPONENT WITH CORRECT INFORMATION SENT BY SP A? | |
+| 4. | CHECK C: WAS THE INVOCATION STATE MACHINE IDLE AT SP A? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Component portion in TSL messages
Component portion tag: 01101100
Component portion length: correct number of octets
INVOKE component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
Component type tag: 10100001 (INVOKE)
Component length: correct number of octets
Invoke ID tag: 00000010
Invoke ID length: 00000001 (one octet)
Invoke ID: i (i represents an integer) | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR COMPONENTS WITHIN MESSAGES
+
+Operation code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Operation code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if x is one octet long)
+Operation code: x (x represents a valid operation code)
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### RETURN ERROR component in TSL message from SP B to SP A
+
+Component type tag: 10100011 (RETURN ERROR)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: i
+Error code tag: 00000010 (local) or 00000110 (global)
+Error code length: correct number of octets (e.g. 00000001 if y is one octet long)
+Error code: y
+parameters (provided by the TC-User)
+
+##### REJECT component in TSL message from SP A to SP B
+
+Component type tag: 10100100 (REJECT)
+Component length: correct number of octets
+Invoke ID tag: 00000010
+Invoke ID length: 00000001
+Invoke ID: i
+Problem code tag: 10000011 (RETURN ERROR)
+Problem code length: 00000001
+Problem code: 00000001 (unexpected return error)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|--|------------|--|--|---------------------|------------------------------|--------|--|-----------------------|--|--|------|--|--|-------------------------|--------|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4.1 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.1.2/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Begin message with APDU AARE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT aborts the transaction on reception of a Begin message containing a dialogue portion that carries an APDU 'AARE' | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| | BEGIN (AARE) |
| Detect semantic error | ←————— | |
| TR-U-ABORT req | | |
| ⇒⇒⇒⇒ | | |
| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | —————→ | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | BEGIN (AARE) | Detect semantic error | ←————— | | TR-U-ABORT req | | | ⇒⇒⇒⇒ | | | ABORT (U) (ABRT) | —————→ | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | BEGIN (AARE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect semantic error | ←————— | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT req | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ⇒⇒⇒⇒ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | —————→ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message containing a dialogue response. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES SP A TRANSMIT THE EXPECTED ABORT MESSAGE WITH APDU 'ABRT'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Abort message
Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
External type tag: 00101000
External length: correct number of octets
Object Identifier tag: 00000110
Object Identifier length: 00000111
Direct reference: H'00118605010101
Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
Dialogue Abort tag: 01100100
Dialogue Abort length: 00000011
Abort Source tag: 10000000
Abort source length: 00000001
Abort source: 00000001 (dialogue service provider)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Begin
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: 00011001
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|---|--|--|---------------------|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|---|--|------------------------------|---|------------------------|------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|------------------------|--|--|---|--|--|-------------------------|---|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4.2 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue confirmation with any APDU other than AARE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT aborts the transaction on reception of a Continue message containing a dialogue portion that carries an APDU 'AARQ' | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| ⇒ | | |
| BEGIN (AARQ) | | |
| |
| → | |
| Detect semantic error | ← | CONTINUE (AARQ) |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| ⇐ | | |
| TR-U-ABORT req. | | |
| ⇒ | | |
| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | → | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | ⇒ | | | BEGIN (AARQ) | | |
| | | | → | | Detect semantic error | ← | CONTINUE (AARQ) | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | ⇐ | | | TR-U-ABORT req. | | | ⇒ | | | ABORT (U) (ABRT) | → | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ⇒ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect semantic error | ← | CONTINUE (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ⇐ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ⇒ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | → | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue with a dialogue portion containing an AARQ APDU. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE ABORT MESSAGE CONTAIN APDU 'ABRT'? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE DIALOGUE AT SP A HAS BEEN TERMINATED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
+
+Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: any object identifier
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Abort message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: 00010010
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: 00010000
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: 00000101
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Abort tag: 01100100
+
+Dialogue Abort length: 00000011
+
+Abort Source tag: 10000000
+
+Abort source length: 00000001
+
+Abort source: 00000001 (dialogue service provider)
+
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------|--|------------|----------------------|--|--|--|--|--|---------------------|--|--|------------------------------|--|------------------------|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|-------------------------|--|--|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4.3 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Dialogue Portion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Dialogue confirmation with APDU ABRT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT aborts the transaction on reception of a Continue message containing a dialogue portion that carries an 'ABRT' APDU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) |
| TR-BEGIN req. | | |
| | | |
| BEGIN (AARQ) | | |
| Detect semantic error | | CONTINUE (ABRT) |
| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | |
| | | |
| TR-U-ABORT req. | | |
| | | |
| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | | |
| | | SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | BEGIN (AARQ) | | | Detect semantic error | | CONTINUE (ABRT) | TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | ABORT (U) (ABRT) | | |
+| SP A (CSL) | | SP B (CSL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-BEGIN req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| BEGIN (AARQ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| Detect semantic error | | CONTINUE (ABRT) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-P-ABORT ind. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TR-U-ABORT req. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| ABORT (U) (ABRT) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue with a dialogue portion containing a ABRT APDU. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE ABORT MESSAGE CONTAIN APDU 'ABRT'?
(refer to test number 2.3.4.2 check table for ABRT). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE DIALOGUE AT SP A HAS BEEN TERMINATED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: 00010010
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: 00010000
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: 00000101
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Abort tag: 01100100
+
+Dialogue Abort length: 00000011
+
+Abort Source tag: 10000000
+
+Abort source length: 00000001
+
+Abort source: 00000001 (dialogue service provider)
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4.4 | | Sheet: 1 of 2 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Presence of a Dialogue Portion APDU in the active state. | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT aborts the transaction on reception of a Continue message containing a dialogue portion that carries an ’AARE’ APDU | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state and test case 2.1.9.1.2 has to be executed successfully | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
← BEGIN (AARQ)
TR-BEGIN ind.
TR-CONTINUE req.
CONTINUE (AARE) →
← CONTINUE (AARE)
TR-P-ABORT ind.
TR-U-ABORT req.
ABORT (U) (ABRT) →
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| - Arrange for SP B to send a Begin message with dialogue request to SP A.
- Arrange for SP A to confirm the dialogue.
- Arrange for SP B to send a Continue msg containing a dialogue portion carrying an AARE APDU.
- CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE IUT AT SP A TERMINATES THE TRANSACTION.
| | |
+
+310 Recommendation Q.787 (09/97)
+
+#### CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN DIALOGUE PORTION
+
+##### Dialogue portion in Continue message
+
+Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
+
+Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
+
+##### External data type in dialogue portion
+
+External type tag: 00101000
+
+External length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: 00000111
+
+Direct reference: H'00118605010101
+
+Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
+
+Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
+
+##### Dialogue PDU
+
+Dialogue Response tag: 01100001
+
+Dialogue Response length: correct number of octets
+
+Application context tag: 10100001
+
+Application context length: correct number of octets
+
+Object Identifier tag: 00000110
+
+Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
+
+Direct reference: same octets as in AARQ
+
+Result tag: 10100010
+
+Result length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Result value: 00000000 (Accepted)
+
+Result source diagnostic tag: 10100011
+
+Result source diag. length: 00000101
+
+Dialogue Service User tag: 10100001
+
+Dialogue Service User length: 00000011
+
+INTEGER type tag: 00000010
+
+INTEGER length: 00000001
+
+Dialogue service user value: 00000000 (NULL)
+
+| | | |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4.5 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unidirectional message with unexpected abstract syntax | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT discards an UNIDIRECTIONAL message containing a dialogue portion that is referring to an unexpected abstract syntax | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
Detect error ← UNIDIRECTIONAL (AARQ)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP B to send a Unidirectional message containing a dialogue portion but referring to the structured dialogue abstract syntax. | |
+| 2. | CHECK A: DOES SP A DISCARD THE MESSAGE? | |
+| CHECK TABLE FOR INFORMATION ELEMENTS WITHIN MESSAGES | | |
+| Dialogue portion in Unidirectional message
- Dialogue portion tag: 01101011
- Dialogue portion length: correct number of octets
External data type in dialogue portion
- External type tag: 00101000
- External length: correct number of octets
- Object Identifier tag: 00000110
- Object Identifier length: 00000111
- Direct reference: H'00118605010101 (structured dialogue abstract syntax)
- Single ASN.1 type tag: 10100000
- Single ASN.1 type length: correct number of octets
Dialogue PDU
- Dialogue Request tag: 01100000
- Dialogue Request length: correct number of octets
- Application context tag: 10100001
- Application context length: correct number of octets
- Object Identifier tag: 00000110
- Object Identifier length: correct number of octets
- Direct reference: any object identifier
| | |
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4.6 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Unexpected dialogue portion in Continue message | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT aborts the transaction on reception of a Continue message which includes a dialogue portion while no dialogue portion was sent in the Begin message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
TR-BEGIN req.
→
BEGIN ————————————————→
Detect error ←———————————————— CONTINUE (AARE)
TR-P-ABORT ind.
←
TR-U-ABORT req
→
ABORT (U) (ABRT) ————————————————→
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION | | |
+| 1. | Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message (without dialogue portion) | |
+| 2. | Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue with a dialogue portion containing an AARE APDU. (Refer to check table of test number 2.3.4.4.) | |
+| 3. | CHECK A: DOES THE DIALOGUE PORTION IN THE ABORT MESSAGE CONTAIN APDU 'ABRT'?
(Refer to check table of test number 2.3.4.2.) | |
+| 4. | CHECK B: VERIFY THAT THE DIALOGUE AT SP A HAS BEEN TERMINATED. | |
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------|
+| TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4.7 | | Sheet: 1 of 1 |
+| REFERENCE: 3.2.2.1/Q.774 | | |
+| TITLE: Inopportune Behaviour; Dialogue Portion | | |
+| SUBTITLE: Missing dialogue portion in Continue message | | |
+| PURPOSE: To verify that an IUT aborts the transaction on reception of a Continue message without dialogue portion while a dialogue portion was sent in the Begin message | | |
+| PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A (TSL) and SP B (TSL) are to be in the idle state | | |
+| CONFIGURATION: 1 | TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT | TYPE OF SP: SP |
+| EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE:
SP A (CSL) SP B (CSL)
sequenceDiagram participant A as SP A (CSL) participant B as SP B (CSL) Note over A: TR-BEGIN req. A->>B: BEGIN (AARQ) B->>A: CONTINUE Note over A: Detect error Note over A: TR-P-ABORT ind. Note over A: TR-U-ABORT req. A->>B: ABORT (U) (ABRT)
| | |
+| TEST DESCRIPTION - 1. Arrange for SP A to send a Begin message containing a dialogue portion.
- 2. Arrange for SP B to confirm the dialogue with a Continue without a dialogue portion.
- 3. CHECK A: VERIFY THAT THE DIALOGUE AT SP A HAS BEEN TERMINATED.
| | |
+
+314 Recommendation Q.787 (09/97)
+
+
+
+
+
+# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communications |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure |
+| Series Z | Programming languages |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.8-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.8-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42d5bba82dc9e97e75276f1a354f96be62586059
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.8-198811-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,716 @@
+
+
+
+
+The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with latitude and longitude lines. A lightning bolt symbol is positioned to the right of the globe.
+
+ITU logo
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+**Q.8**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON TELEPHONE
+SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+**INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND
+SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING**
+
+---
+
+**SIGNALLING SYSTEMS TO BE USED FOR
+INTERNATIONAL MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC
+WORKING ON ANALOGUE LEASED
+CIRCUITS**
+
+**ITU-T Recommendation Q.8**
+
+(Extract from the *Blue Book*)
+
+---
+
+# NOTES
+
+1 ITU-T Recommendation Q.8 was published in Fascicle VI.1 of the *Blue Book*. This file is an extract from the *Blue Book*. While the presentation and layout of the text might be slightly different from the *Blue Book* version, the contents of the file are identical to the *Blue Book* version and copyright conditions remain unchanged (see below).
+
+2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## Recommendation Q.8
+
+# SIGNALLING SYSTEMS TO BE USED FOR INTERNATIONAL MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC WORKING ON ANALOGUE LEASED CIRCUITS
+
+The CCITT,
+
+*considering*
+
+(a) that standardization of signalling systems to be used for international manual and automatic working on analogue leased circuits brings advantages to Administrations, manufacturers and users;
+
+(b) that manual and automatic operation of international leased circuits require different technical arrangements;
+
+(c) that the standard signalling systems set out in Recommendation Q.7 are primarily intended for the public service;
+
+(d) that the national circuit sections of international leased circuits may need to conform to local regulations of the Administration(s) concerned;
+
+(e) that the method of signalling will be affected by the type of transmission and vice versa;
+
+(f) that the method of signalling will be affected by the characteristics of the service(s) carried on the circuit;
+
+*recommends*
+
+that Administrations should use for manual international analogue leased circuits the standard signalling system specified in § 1 below;
+
+and *draws the attention* of Administrations
+
+to the guidance clauses and related annexes concerning automatic signalling on international analogue leased circuits, as set out in § 2 below.
+
+## **1 Signalling on manual international analogue leased circuits**
+
+1.1 Signalling shall take place by the transmission of a single frequency signalling current, analogous to the signalling method used in the international manual service and specified in Recommendations Q.1 and Q.2.
+
+1.2 The signalling current shall have a nominal frequency of either 2280 Hz or 2600 Hz. One of these frequencies shall be chosen for both directions of transmission by bilateral agreement between the Administrations concerned. Failing such an agreement, each Administration shall determine which of the two frequencies it wishes to receive.
+
+1.3 The duration of the transmitted tone shall be between 300 ms and 2 seconds. The upper limit of 2 seconds allows the partial use of signalling equipment designed for 500/20 Hz working according to Recommendation Q.1.
+
+1.4 The signal recognition time shall be between 100 ms and 200 ms:
+
+- The minimum duration of 100 ms has been chosen so as to avoid the recognition of false signals due to imitation by speech currents;
+- The maximum duration of 200 ms has been chosen so as to allow a safe margin between this time and the minimum transmission time.
+
+Exceptionally, a maximum signal recognition time of 1200 ms may be used where it is known that the transmitted signal has a 2 second duration. Such arrangements allow the partial use of signalling equipment designed for 500/20 Hz working according to Recommendation Q.1.
+
+1.5 Other technical clauses for 2280 Hz signalling are set out in Annex A to this Recommendation.
+
+1.6 Other technical clauses for 2600 Hz signalling are set out in Annex B to this Recommendation.
+
+## 2 **Signalling on automatic international analogue leased circuits**
+
+2.1 This section refers to international analogue leased circuits employing automatic signalling. Such circuits are considered to form part of a private network extending across international frontiers and linking exchanges carrying out the switching function in a private network. The exchanges may be Private Automatic Branch Exchanges (PABXs). Private tandem exchanges, or switching equipments provided by the Administration to carry out switching functions in a private network. Where the exchanges are privately owned, part of the signalling function may be provided by the Administration.
+
+This Recommendation does not cover the case of international leased circuits directly connecting subscriber lines to remote switching equipment. However, most of the following text is equally applicable to this case. Annex D, § D.3 and Annex E give further information on such signalling.
+
+2.2 Many Administrations have regulations concerning the use of signalling frequencies on leased circuits and these may apply to international leased circuits also. These regulations are intended to ensure non-interference between parts of the voice spectrum used for signalling and those available for use by subscriber apparatus. This does not create exceptional difficulties for manual working since the frequencies used (2280 Hz, 2600 Hz) can be converted to other acceptable frequencies at the Terminal International Centre. However, for automatic circuits it should be the aim to provide an uninterrupted path between the ends of the leased circuit.
+
+Some World regions have existing or proposed signalling systems which meet the regulatory arrangements in those regions and a summary of two such systems are given in Annexes C and D to this Recommendation. Administrations are invited to note these existing systems that may meet their needs for automatic signalling on analogue leased circuits.
+
+2.3 In order to reduce the cost of providing leased circuits some inter-regional leased circuits may be provided with various forms of bandwidth economizing systems, such as speech interpolation systems and digital voice compression. These systems usually have their own internal digital signalling capability and these are not covered by this Recommendation, except that the effect that speech interpolation equipment has on analogue signalling is discussed.
+
+2.4 In the most general case, the choice of signalling and transmission in a private network will be determined by the availability of suitable equipment, and by the decisions of the network user and the Administrations concerned. The following sections give guidance on transmission factors which affect signalling, the important characteristics of signalling systems which could affect the choice of transmission medium, and the interaction between signalling and non-voice services.
+
+## 2.5 *Transmission factors*
+
+2.5.1 Recommendations for the transmission characteristics of leased circuits forming part of a private telephone network are given in Recommendation G.171.
+
+2.5.2 Where large groups of circuits are concerned and the transmission multiplex equipment is on the renter's premises, it is advisable to protect against the effects of faulty transmission on groups of circuits. Recommendation Q.33 gives details of such measures.
+
+### 2.5.3 *Satellite systems*
+
+- i) Some signalling systems will not function correctly over satellite links since the long propagation delay ( $270 \pm 20$ ms one way) exceeds that assumed by the line signalling specification. Amongst the standard systems for public telephony, Signalling System R2 incorporates special precautions because of this delay. In addition the speed of multi-frequency compelled interregister signalling is affected, which may cause undesirable post-dialling delay. If signalling systems based on R2 are used in private networks then reference should be made to information contained in Recommendations Q.7 and Q.400 to Q.490.
+
+- ii) Consideration should be given to the possibility that two satellite links may, in some cases, need to be connected in tandem. Means to prevent this may also need to be considered. (Further information is contained in Recommendations E.171, G.131, Q.14 and Q.115.)
+- iii) If satellite links via Time Division Multiple Access Systems with Digital Speech Interpolation (TDMA/DSI) are used, then guidance on circuit supervision signalling arrangements can be found in Recommendation Q.33. However, Digital Non-Interpolated (DNI) channels are usually assigned for leased circuits and these exhibit fewer problems for signalling.
+- iv) If satellite links via Single Channel Per Carrier (SCPC) systems are used, then it should be noted that these systems employ voice activated carriers for telephony type circuits. On transmission systems of this type, the use of tone-on-idle signalling systems should be avoided, since such signalling systems would override the voice activation feature of SCPC systems.
+
+### 2.5.4 *Echo control*
+
+Paragraph 9 of Recommendation G.171 should be observed concerning the location of echo control devices where these are required. All analogue channel associated signalling systems operate more effectively if the line signal receiver, and often the line signal sender also, are located on the line side of any echo control device. In addition, some signalling systems require echo control devices to be locally disabled during interregister signalling. For these reasons, the echo control device should be located at the private renter's premises and not the terminal international centre.
+
+### 2.5.5 *Speech interpolation*
+
+Some signalling systems may not be compatible with speech interpolation systems for the following
+
+reasons:
+
+- i) Signalling systems employing continuous state tone signalling will cause permanent operation of the speech detectors and thus permanent trunk to channel association. This prevents the correct operation of the interpolation process.
+- ii) The speech interpolation equipment may not be transparent to out-band signalling.
+- iii) The speech interpolation equipment may cause excessive clipping of pulse signals resulting in their non-recognition by the distant signalling equipment.
+- iv) The speech interpolation equipment may not provide sufficient speech detector hangover to allow the successful transmission of some signals, e.g. en bloc multi-frequency signals.
+
+Information on the characteristics of some speech interpolation systems is given in Supplement No. 2 of Fascicle VI.1, though different systems may also be used on leased circuits.
+
+In the case of continuous state tone signalling, compatibility with speech interpolation systems can be achieved by converting the tone signalling to interface with any in-built signalling capability the system may provide. If the transmission difficulty only exists in the interregister signalling phase, then this can be obviated by the simultaneous transmission of a speech interpolation locking tone, e.g. 2800 Hz.
+
+Note that fully compelled signalling techniques are compatible with speech interpolation systems.
+
+## 2.6 *Characteristics of signalling systems*
+
+### 2.6.1 *Line signalling systems*
+
+Analogue line signalling systems can be divided into in-band and out-band systems. In addition, two signalling techniques may be employed: pulse signalling or continuous signalling.
+
+Information on the comparative advantages of in-band and out-band systems can be found in Recommendation Q.20. General requirements for signalling equipment are contained in Recommendations Q.112 to Q.114.
+
+- i) *In-band systems*
+
+According to Recommendation Q.22, signalling frequencies above 2000 Hz should be used (but see also §§ 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 below).
+
+The preferred power level for in-band signalling is -9 dBm0 for pulsed signals and -20 dBm0 for continuous signals (also see Recommendation Q.16).
+
+In-band systems require the use of a guarding characteristic to prevent false operation of the signalling equipment by speech currents. Even so, occasional receiver misoperation by speech can occur, and thus in the speech phase a suitable minimum signal recognition time should be chosen.
+
+In-band systems require the use of splitting techniques in order to confine the signalling frequencies to the link concerned, and this has an impact on minimum signal recognition times. Further information can be found in Recommendation Q.25.
+
+If the leased circuit contains a digital transmission system in the terminal national section and this connects directly to a renter's digital PABX using a first order PCM system, then the detection of in-band signalling requires digital filtering techniques.
+
+#### ii) *Out-band systems*
+
+Recommendation G.171 does not provide for the use of out-band signalling on leased circuits. Because of the frequencies used, out-band signalling requires the use of a transparent 4 kHz bandwidth between the two signalling equipments. Part of the signalling equipment is usually provided within the transmission equipment.
+
+Nevertheless, where the required transmission facilities can be assured, out-band signalling may provide a useful alternative to in-band signalling. Preferred signalling frequencies and power levels for out-band signalling are set out in Recommendation Q.21.
+
+##### iii) *Pulsed signalling*
+
+Pulsed signalling allows a greater signal repertoire than continuous signalling, but requires more complex signal recognition arrangements. In general, the signalling tone is recognized by the signal receiver but requires persistence checking and correlation with the circuit state before the signal is validated.
+
+##### iv) *Continuous signalling*
+
+Usually continuous signalling is arranged to operate with "*tone-on-idle*". Such systems have the inherent advantage of allowing immediate identification of circuit availability.
+
+Since only two signal states are available in each direction, the possible signal repertoire is lower than pulsed systems, but recognition arrangements are simpler. A single persistence timing is usually provided to validate changes of signalling state.
+
+Where continuous in-band signalling uses the "*tone-on*" condition after the interregister signalling phase, means must be provided to prevent the calling or called parties from hearing the signalling tone without undue interference to the transmission of speech currents and tones. A band stop filter as used in Signalling System R1 (see Recommendation Q.313, § 2.3.4) may be suitable. Alternatively, to obviate these difficulties, pulsed signalling could be used in the speech phase.
+
+### 2.6.2 *Interregister signalling*
+
+The following types of interregister signalling may be suitable for use on leased circuits:
+
+#### i) *Decadic signalling*
+
+Signalling takes place using the same frequency and sender/receiver equipment as the line signalling. Forward signals are composed of a sequence of tone pulses analogous to subscriber line signalling employing rotary dials. Backward signals may not always be provided, but *proceed-to-send* and *address complete* signals can be used to advantage.
+
+#### ii) *Multi-frequency signalling*
+
+Multi-frequency (MF) signalling has the advantage of greater speed and signal repertoire than decadic systems. To provide both an adequate repertoire and signalling reliability, signals are composed of two frequencies from a set of 4, 5, 6 or 8 frequencies. Different frequencies may be used for signalling in the backward direction. The frequencies used for MF signalling should lie below 2000 Hz in order that they do not interfere with in-band line signalling.
+
+MF systems may transmit signals in pulse form, or in a compelled sequence with signals in the opposite direction. The preferred signal power level is -9 dBm0 for each constituent tone.
+
+Three existing MF systems may be suitable as the basis for signalling on leased circuits. These are:
+
+- 1) The dual tone multi-frequency system as specified in Recommendation Q.23 and modified to act as an interregister signalling system. (See also Recommendation Q.24.)
+- 2) Signalling System R1. See Recommendations Q.7 and Q.310 to Q.331.
+- 3) Signalling System R2. See Recommendations Q.7 and Q.400 to Q.490.
+
+### 2.6.3 *Overall signalling repertoire*
+
+Consideration should be given to providing a set of signals capable of being adapted for different situations to provide a signal capability for extending the scope of PABX supplementary services to encompass the private network as a whole, and to provide other network facilities. This is best achieved by the inclusion in the signalling repertoire of a set of auxiliary signals that are separate from the basic call set-up and supervisory signals and can therefore be allocated in a flexible manner to the required function.
+
+### 2.6.4 *Position of signalling equipment*
+
+Normally all signalling equipment for automatic leased circuits will be located at the renter's premises. Some Administrations may wish or may be able to provide part of the signalling equipment at the Terminal National Centre or the Terminal International Centre. In these cases, suitable signalling arrangements need to be made to interconnect the exchange at the renter's premises with the remote elements of the signalling equipment. This will be determined by the Administration concerned. Any echo control device could in this case also be remote, but see Recommendation G.171, § 9.2.
+
+## 2.7 *Interaction between signalling and non-voice services*
+
+As well as normal speech transmission, leased circuits can be used to provide for other types of service (see Recommendation M.1015).
+
+The most common types are:
+
+- Voice-frequency telegraphy,
+- Data transmission,
+- Facsimile,
+- Phototelegraphy.
+
+Since these services use in-band frequencies, there is a possibility of interaction with signalling, and the following general guidance is given below.
+
+### 2.7.1 *Voice-frequency telegraphy*
+
+Where voice-frequency telegraphy is carried on a telephone-type leased circuit it will be by one of two methods:
+
+- *Alternate use* (see Recommendation M.1015). The circuit is switched at both ends between the telephone equipment and the photo-telegraph equipment.
+- Subdivision of the frequency band between telephone and telegraph services. (See Recommendation H.34.)
+
+In the former case, the signalling equipment is disconnected during telegraph use and no interaction can take place. (Outgoing telephone circuits should be removed from service and blocked prior to service switching).
+
+In the latter case, the in-band telephone signalling must be confined to frequencies below 2500 Hz since the attenuation at higher frequencies due to the separation filter cannot provide a reliable signalling path.
+
+### 2.7.2 Data transmission
+
+Data transmission systems for use over leased circuits are specified in Recommendations V.16, V.19 to V.23, V.26 and V.27. These systems do not interact with the Standard Systems for the following reasons:
+
+- i) In most cases, the data carriers lie below 2000 Hz and thus below the range for voice frequency line signalling. However, when the carrier is modulated, energy may be present in the signalling band but false receiver operation is prevented by there being at all times a greater energy in the pass-band of the guard circuit.
+- ii) In some cases, the carriers do lie in the signalling band above 2000 Hz, but with constant phase modulation the guard circuit will operate as outlined in i) above. In the case of 1200 bits/sec duplex transmission according to Recommendation V.22, a guard tone of 1800 Hz is required in order to ensure guard circuit operation.
+
+For signalling systems on automatic leased circuits therefore, providing the signalling frequency is above 2000 Hz and that a guard circuit with a pass-band covering the common data carrier frequencies is used, no problems are foreseen with interaction.
+
+In order that duplex data transmission can take place on circuits equipped with echo control devices, the data set will transmit a tone disabling signal with the following characteristics (see also Recommendation G.164).
+
+$2100 \pm 15$ Hz at a level of $-12 \pm 6$ dBm0
+
+Duration greater than 400 ms
+
+In order that false operation of signalling equipment does not take place, it is essential that the lowest possible operating frequency of the signalling receiver be above the highest possible tone disabling frequency. This requires that the lowest usable signalling frequency be higher than the 2000 Hz referred to above in § 2.6.1.
+
+For example:
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------|---|---------|
+| Highest tone disabling frequency | = | 2115 Hz |
+| Allowance for frequency deviation in channel | = | 5 Hz |
+| Margin of safety | = | 30 Hz |
+| Typical maximum receiver deviation for operation | = | 75 Hz |
+| | |
|
+| Giving | | 2225 Hz |
+
+Thus on the basis of this example, frequencies above 2225 Hz should be suitable for signalling.
+
+Since the tone disabling circuit of echo control devices may respond in the range 1900-2350 Hz, the unintentional disabling of echo control devices may occur during signalling if this frequency range is used. However, this is not considered detrimental since the echo control device serves no essential function during the time when signalling tones are present on the circuit.
+
+### 2.7.3 Facsimile
+
+Facsimile apparatus for use on telephone circuits are specified in Recommendations T.2, T.3, T.4 and T.10.
+
+- i) *Group 1 apparatus* (Recommendation T.2)
+
+Since leased circuits in an automatic private network form part of a switched connection, the centre frequency $f_0$ should be 1700 Hz as used on the public switched network. This implies, for frequency modulation, a transmitted frequency between 1300 Hz (white) and 2100 Hz (black). With a maximum frequency deviation of 32 Hz, and by analogy with the calculations in § 2.7.2 above, frequencies above 2242 Hz should be suitable for signalling. This must be carefully observed since facsimile transmission may result in a single tone for a significant period, and without energy in the pass-band of the guard circuit.
+
+#### ii) *Group 2 apparatus* (Recommendation T.3)
+
+The transmission method for Group 2 machines uses vestigial sideband amplitude modulation. The 2100 Hz carrier frequency is permanently modulated and the effect of this and the vestigial sideband filter is such that the energy spectrum of the transmitted signal is biased towards frequencies in the pass-band of the guard circuit and receiver misoperation should not occur.
+
+#### iii) *Group 3 apparatus* (Recommendation T.4)
+
+The transmission method for Group 3 machines uses the data transmission method of Recommendation V.27 *ter* or V.29. False operation should not occur for the reasons described in § 2.7.2 above.
+
+### 2.7.4 *Phototelegraphy*
+
+For Phototelegraphy on leased circuits, Recommendations T.1 and T.11 apply.
+
+The transmitted centre frequency is 1900 Hz with deviation (in the case of frequency modulation) from 1500 Hz (white) to 2300 Hz (black). For amplitude modulated systems the carrier may be between 1300 and 1900 Hz.
+
+In many cases a phototelegraph circuit is derived by *alternate use* where the telephone signalling equipment is disconnected. However, where automatic switching of phototelegraph circuits is required, the guidance of Recommendation T.11, § 3.2 applies; that is, a guard tone (*blocking signal*) should be transmitted in order to prevent false receiver operation on single-frequency signalling systems.
+
+#### 2.7.5 *Interference of service signals*
+
+With the systems referred to in §§ 2.7.1-2.7.4 above, the precautions included to prevent false recognition of service signals will usually be reliable. However, where the precautions are dependent on the statistical probability of the transmitted power spectrum operating the guard circuit, there is always a small risk of receiver operation for very short periods (in a similar fashion to the occasional false operation by speech). It should be noted that if such operation persists long enough, then the receiver splitting function will operate and thus cause a discontinuity in the service signal. This should be borne in mind when deciding the minimum receiver splitting time. In the call connected phase it is advisable that the minimum tone recognition time for a valid signal should be chosen such that occasional short receiver operation does not cause a change of signalling state.
+
+# ANNEX A
+
+(to Recommendation Q.8)
+
+## **Technical clauses for 2280 Hz signalling on manual circuits**
+
+### A.1 *Signal sender*
+
+#### A.1.1 *Signalling frequency*
+
+$2280 \pm 5$ Hz.
+
+#### A.1.2 *Transmitted signal level*
+
+$-13 \pm 1$ dBm0.
+
+The permissible noise level measured at the output of the signal sender shall be as low as practicable, but in any event at least 35 dB below signal level.
+
+The level of leak current transmitted to line should be at least 50 dB below signal level.
+
+### A.2 *Signal receiver*
+
+#### A.2.1 *Operating limits*
+
+The signal receiver must operate satisfactorily if a signal is received satisfying the following conditions:
+
+- the frequency received is within $2280 \pm 15$ Hz;
+- the absolute power level $N$ of each unmodulated signal shall be within the limits $(-19 + n \leq N \leq -7 + n)$ dBm where $n$ is the relative power level at the receiver input.
+
+The limits give a margin of $\pm 6$ dB on the nominal absolute power level of the 2280 Hz signal received at the receiver input, to allow for variations in transmission conditions on the international circuits.
+
+#### A.2.2 *Non-operate conditions*
+
+- Selectivity*
+
+The signal receiver shall not operate on a signal having an absolute power level at the receiving end within the limits specified in § 2.1 b) when the frequency is outside: $2280 \pm 75$ Hz.
+
+- Maximum sensitivity of the signal receiver*
+
+The signal receiver shall not operate on a signal in the range $2280 \pm 15$ Hz whose absolute power level at the point of connection of the receiver is $(-29 - 13 + n)$ dBm, $n$ being the relative power level at this point.
+
+#### A.2.3 *Guard circuit*
+
+##### A.2.3.1 *Efficiency of the guard circuit*
+
+The signal receiver must be protected by a guard circuit against false operation due to speech currents, circuit noise, or other currents of miscellaneous origin circulating in the line.
+
+The purpose of the guard circuit is to prevent signal imitation, and operation of the splitting device by interfering speech.
+
+To minimize signal imitation by speech current it is advisable that the guard circuit be tuned as follows:
+
+To minimize signal interference by low-frequency noise it is advisable that the response of the guard circuit fails off towards the lower frequencies and that the sensitivity of the guard circuit at 200 Hz is at least 10 dB less than at 1000 Hz.
+
+An indication of the efficiency of the guard circuit is given by the following:
+
+- during 10 hours of speech, normal speech currents should not, on average, cause more than one false operation of the receiver lasting more than the minimum recognition time of the signal;
+- the number of false splits of the speech path caused by speech currents should not cause an appreciable reduction in the transmission quality of the circuit.
+
+##### A.2.3.2 *Guard circuit limits*
+
+Considering:
+
+- that unweighted noise of a level $-40$ dBm0 and uniform spectrum energy may arise on the longest international circuit;
+- that an oversensitive guard circuit might give rise to signalling difficulties.
+
+It is recommended that, the guard circuit shall not operate in the presence of noise at a level of less than $-35$ dBm0 and uniform spectral energy over the frequency range 300-3400 Hz.
+
+### A.3 *Splitting arrangements*
+
+Sending and receiving line splitting shall be provided.
+
+#### A.3.1 *Sending line split*
+
+- a) the sending line transmission path of the signalling termination shall be disconnected 30-50 ms before a voice-frequency signal is sent over the circuit;
+- b) the sending line transmission path of the signalling termination will not be reconnected for 30-50 ms following the end of the sending of a voice-frequency signal over the circuit.
+
+#### A.3.2 *Receiving line split*
+
+- a) the receiving line transmission path of the signalling termination shall be split when the 2280 Hz signal is received. The splitting time should be less than 20 ms;
+- b) the split must be maintained for the duration of the signal but must cease within 25 ms of the cessation of the 2280 Hz signal;
+- c) the splitting device may be any suitable arrangement for example, physical line disconnection, insertion of a bandstop filter, etc. The level of leak current transmitted to the subsequent circuit should be at least 40 dB below the received signal level.
+
+# ANNEX B
+
+(to Recommendation Q.8)
+
+## **Technical clauses for 2600 Hz signalling on manual circuits**
+
+### B.1 *Signalling sender*
+
+#### B.1.1 *Signalling frequency*
+
+$2600 \pm 5$ Hz.
+
+#### B.1.2 *Transmitted signal level*
+
+The transmitted signal level shall be $-8 \pm 1$ dBm0 for the duration of the signal or for a minimum of 300 ms (whichever is shorter) and for a maximum of 550 ms after which the level of the signal shall be reduced to $-20 \pm 1$ dBm0.
+
+#### B.1.3 *Signal frequency leak*
+
+The level of signal frequency leak power transmitted to the line should not exceed -70 dBm0, during the tone-off condition.
+
+#### B.1.4 *Extraneous frequency components*
+
+The total extraneous frequency components accompanying a tone signal should be at least 35 dB below the fundamental signal power.
+
+#### B.1.5 *Sending line split*
+
+The following splitting arrangements are required when transmitting line signals to prevent incorrect operation of the receiving equipment:
+
+- a) when a tone-on signal is to be transmitted, the sending line transmission path shall be split, within an interval from 20 ms before, to 5 ms after tone is applied to the line, and remain split for a minimum of 350 ms and a maximum of 750 ms;
+- b) when a tone-off signal is to be transmitted, the sending line transmission path shall be split, within an interval from 20 ms before, to 5 ms after tone is removed from the line, and remain split for a minimum of 75 ms and a maximum of 160 ms after the tone is removed.
+
+Further details are given in § 2.2.6 of Recommendation Q.312.
+
+### B.2 *Signal receiver*
+
+#### B.2.1 *Operating limits*
+
+The receiving equipment shall operate on a received tone signal that meets the conditions listed below:
+
+- 2600 $\pm$ 15 Hz;
+- to ensure proper operation in the presence of noise, the signal level of the initial portion of each tone-on signal is augmented by 12 dB. The absolute power level of the signal shall be within the limits $(-27 + n \leq N \leq -1 + n)$ dBm where $n$ is the relative power level at the input to the receiving equipment.
+
+#### B.2.2 *Non-operate limits*EF
+
+- The receiving equipment shall neither operate on signals originating from subscriber stations (or other sources) if the total power in the band from 800 Hz to 2450 Hz equals or exceeds the total power present at the same time in the band from 2450 Hz to 2750 Hz as measured at the station, nor degrade these signals.
+- The receiving equipment shall not operate on any tone or signal whose absolute power level at the point of connection of the receiving equipment is $(-17 - 20 + n)$ dBm or less, $n$ being the relative power level at this point.
+
+On average during 10 hours of speech, normal speech currents should not cause more than one operation lasting more than 50 ms.
+
+#### B.2.3 *Receiving line split*
+
+To prevent line signals of the signalling system from causing disturbances to signalling systems on subsequent circuit sections, the receiving line transmission path should be split when the signal frequency is received to ensure that no portion of any signal exceeding 20 ms duration may pass out of the circuit section.
+
+This should be achieved by use of a bandstop filter in which case the level of signal leak current transmitted to the subsequent circuit section with the bandstop filter inserted should be at least 35 dB below the received signal level. In addition, the bandstop filter must not introduce more than 5 dB loss at frequencies 200 Hz or more above or below the midband frequency nor more than 0.5 dB loss at frequencies 400 Hz or more above or below the midband frequency.
+
+The receiving line split must be maintained for the duration of the incoming tone signal, but must cease within 300 ms of tone removal.
+
+*Note* - In some existing designs, the initial cut may be a physical line disconnection but the filter must be inserted within 100 ms of tone reception.
+
+# ANNEX C
+
+(to Recommendation Q.8)
+
+## **The standard European inter-PABX signalling system**
+
+### C.1 *Introduction*
+
+Recognizing the increasing use of leased lines between private automatic branch exchanges (PABXs) in the European telecommunication networks, a specification has been developed covering the need for signalling on such lines. The system emerged is called Signalling System L1. Distinction is made between line signalling (call supervisory signals) and interregister signalling (set-up including routing and additional service control). Taking into account different applications, existing interregister signalling techniques have been adopted for use with the basic line signalling as follows:
+
+- decadic pulsing (DP);
+- multi-frequency push-button (MFPB) type signalling;
+- System R2 multi-frequency code (MFC) type signalling.
+
+### C.2 *Principles and field of application*
+
+C.2.1 The line signalling system is to provide automatic and semi-automatic working between PABXs in different countries.
+
+C.2.2 The signalling system is a single voice frequency (1 vf) tone-on-idle line signalling system using a signalling frequency of 2280 Hz. The use of voice frequency signals renders the system suitable for all voice transmission media, except those using speech interpolation.
+
+C.2.3 The system is intended for use on bothway inter-PABX circuits, with first party clearing.
+
+C.2.4 Either decadic pulsing or multi-frequency interregister signalling may be used with the line signalling system. The provision of particular line signals will depend upon the requirements of the associated interregister signalling system.
+
+C.2.5 The system operates on a four-wire basis, forward and backward signals being segregated by utilizing the four-wire circuits as two separate signalling paths.
+
+C.2.6 In addition to the application or removal of signalling frequency (tone-on and tone-off) in continuous form, the transmission of pulses of signalling frequency is applied.
+
+C.2.7 When in the idle condition, the signalling frequency applied to the line is reduced in power level to conform to the transmission loading requirements of Recommendation Q.15.
+
+C.2.8 The line signalling operates on a link-by-link basis and may be used to establish a multi-link tandem connection using one or more private automatic exchange(s) as a transit switch. In accordance with Recommendation Q.25 sending fine and receiving line splitting arrangements are provided so that signals are contained within the appropriate link and are not allowed to spill over into subsequent or preceding links.
+
+### C.3 *Line signal conditions and signalling codes*
+
+C.3.1 The line signal conditions and the signalling codes shall be as shown in Table C-1/Q.8. Signal sending and detection requirements are given in §§ C.3.2 and C.3.3.
+
+C.3.2 A continuous tone-on condition shall be the application of the signalling frequency to the send signalling path for a period exceeding 300 ms.
+
+A tone-on pulse signal shall be the application of the signalling frequency to the send signalling path for a period of 45-135 ms. A continuous tone-off condition shall exist when any signalling frequency is absent from the send signalling path for a period exceeding 80 ms.
+
+TABLE C-1/Q.8
+
+#### Line signal conditions and signalling codes
+
+| Signal | From outgoing PABX | From incoming PABX |
+|--------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------|
+| Idle | Continuous tone-on | Continuous tone-on |
+| Seizing | Continuous tone-off | Continuous tone-on |
+| Seizing-acknowledgement or proceed-to-send | Continuous tone-off | Continuous tone-off |
+| Answer | Continuous tone-off | Single tone-on pulse |
+| Clear-forward | Continuous tone-on | Continuous tone-on or tone-off |
+| Clear-back | Continuous tone-off | Continuous tone-on |
+
+C.3.3 A tone-on condition applied to the receive signalling path PABX termination may be recognized as a continuous tone-on condition for signalling when it has persisted for 150 ms, while for a tone-off condition a value of 40 ms has to be taken into account.
+
+A tone-on condition applied to the receive signalling path PABX termination and persisting for 35-150 ms, followed by a tone-off condition longer than 200 ms, may be recognized as a pulse tone-on signal.
+
+### C.4 *Line signalling transmission requirements*
+
+#### C.4.1 *Signal sender*
+
+C.4.1.1 The signalling tone shall be at a frequency of $2280 \pm 5$ Hz.
+
+C.4.1.2 The tone-on condition shall have two power levels: a high level and a low level.
+
+A high level tone shall be sent for the duration of the signal or for a minimum of 300 ms (whichever is shorter) and for a maximum of 550 ms after which it must be reduced to low level.
+
+- A high level tone-on condition shall be a signalling tone transmitted at a level of $-10 \text{ dBm}0 \pm 1 \text{ dB}$ .
+- A low level tone-on condition shall be a signalling tone transmitted at a level of $-20 \text{ dBm}0 + 1 \text{ dB}$ .
+
+#### C.4.2 *Signal receiver*
+
+C.4.2.1 A frequency within the range $2280 \pm 15$ Hz at an absolute level $N$ , within the range $(-30 + n \leq N \leq -4 + n)$ dBm, shall be recognized as a tone-on condition; where $n$ is the relative power level at the receive signalling path PABX termination (see Recommendation G.171).
+
+C.4.2.2 Any frequency or combination of frequencies having a total absolute power level or less than $(-40 + n)$ dBm shall be recognized as a tone-off condition; where $n$ is the relative power level at the receive signalling path PABX termination as in § C.4.2.1.
+
+### C.5 *General line signal transfer procedures*
+
+C.5.1 Depending upon the capabilities of the incoming PABX, recognition of the seizing signal will initiate either proceed-to-send or seizing acknowledgement. The sending of the latter signal does not imply that the incoming PABX is ready to receive address information.
+
+C.5.2 Some PABXs do not use the answer signal, others require it for correct operation. Therefore the answer signal is optional and subject to mutual agreement,
+
+C.5.3 A continuous tone-on signal shall be applied when, after recognition of a seizing signal, no address or incomplete address information is received and the incoming PABX times-out.
+
+A continuous tone-on signal may be applied when an incoming PABX encounters congestion or an engaged extension.
+
+### C.6 *Decadic pulsing*
+
+For decadic pulsing interregister signalling the 2280 Hz line signalling is used. Some characteristics are given below.
+
+C.6.1 The break periods of dial pulses shall be applied to the send signalling path as pulses of tone-on condition within the following limits.
+
+| SPEED (pulses per sec.) | 7 | | 9 | | 11 | | 12 | |
+|-------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
+| BREAK PULSE | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX |
+| DURATION (ms) | 45 | 112 | 45 | 81 | 45 | 61 | 45 | 52 |
+
+C.6.2 Pulses of tone-on condition applied to the receive signalling path PABX termination and consistent with the following speed and duration limits, are break periods of dial pulses (address signal).
+
+SPEED (pulses per sec.)
+
+| BREAK PULSE | 7 | | 9 | | 11 | | 12 | |
+|---------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
+| | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX |
+| DURATION (ms) | 35 | 112 | 35 | 91 | 35 | 71 | 35 | 62 |
+
+# ANNEX D
+
+(to Recommendation Q.8)
+
+## A typical North American private analogue network signalling system
+
+### D.1 *Introduction*
+
+D.1.1 A Private Switched Network is a common control switching arrangement which provides interconnections of subscriber locations via dedicated access lines and inter-exchange circuits and shared common control switching with the Public Switched Telephone Network. The Private Switched Networks are terminated at the subscriber location by directly-homed telephone sets, multi-line telephone systems or by main PBX or PABXs. This annex describes the signalling on a typical North American switched private network.
+
+### D.2 *General signalling applications*
+
+D.2.1 The line signalling system provides for semi-automatic and automatic working between subscribers on the private network and the ability to go off network to the Public Switched Network.
+
+D.2.2 In general, four-wire transmission links employing an in-band single frequency of 2600 Hz, tone-on-idle, are used on the inter-exchange circuits, directly-homed stations and PBX access lines.
+
+D.2.3 Signalling on an inter-exchange circuit is in accordance with Recommendations Q.310 to Q.331 - System R1 signalling.
+
+D.2.4 Either decadic pulsing (DP) or multi-frequency pushbutton is used for address signalling on access lines.
+
+D.2.5 Multi-frequency pushbutton signalling is in accordance with Recommendation Q.23. (See also Recommendation Q.24.)
+
+D.2.6 Address signalling on inter-exchange circuits is multi-frequency (MF) using a combination of two out of six frequencies in accordance with Recommendations Q.320 to Q.326.
+
+D.2.7 Interregister signalling techniques are used for controlling outpulsing to accommodate different equipment designs and to improve register usage.
+
+### D.3 *Signalling on access lines*
+
+D.3.1 Either decadic pulsing (DP) or multi-frequency push-button (MFPB) is used on access lines for address signalling.
+
+D.3.2 Supervisory signalling may use either the single frequency 2600 Hz or direct current loop.
+
+D.3.3 Called party ringing is controlled by the terminating exchange or PABX in a conventional manner.
+
+### D.4 *Signalling on inter-exchange trunks*
+
+D.4.1 Supervisory signalling is single frequency 2600 Hz in accordance with Recommendations Q.310 to Q.313, Q.317 and Q.318.
+
+D.4.2 Register signalling uses multi-frequency (MF) signals consisting of two out of six frequencies in accordance with Recommendation Q.320.
+
+### D.5 *Decadic pulsing*
+
+The decadic pulsing represents the numeric value of each digit by the number of on-hook intervals in a train of pulses.
+
+D.5.1 The general characteristics of decadic pulsing are shown below:
+
+| Equipment | Pulsing Speed (PPS) | Percent Break (BK) |
+|------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------|
+| Customer Dial | 8-11 PPS | 58-64 BK |
+| 10-PPS PBX | $10 \pm 0.3$ PPS | 62-66 BK |
+| Sender Pulsing | $10 \pm 1$ PPS | 57-64 BK |
+
+### D.6 *Multi-frequency pushbutton*
+
+See Recommendations Q.11, Q.23 and Q.24. Signal combinations A-D are not usually used in North American private switched networks.
+
+# ANNEX E
+
+(to Recommendation Q.8)
+
+## **The standard European signalling system for leased circuits connecting subscribers to remote PABXs and public exchanges**
+
+### E.1 *Introduction*
+
+Recognizing the increasing use of leased lines for interconnection of telephone instruments and public exchanges or private automatic branch exchanges (PABXs) in the European telecommunication networks, a specification has been developed covering the need for signalling on such lines. The system emerged is called Signalling System L2. Distinction is made between line signalling (call supervisory signals) and interregister signalling (set-up including routing and additional service control). Taking into account different applications, existing interregister signalling techniques have been adopted for use with the basic line signalling as follows:
+
+- decadic pulsing (DP);
+- multi-frequency pushbutton (MFPB) type signalling.
+
+### E.2 *Principles and fields of application*
+
+E.2.1 The line signalling system is to provide supervisory signals (e.g. loop signalling in one direction and ringing in the other) between a telephone instrument or its equivalent and a public exchange or PABX in different countries, via an extra long line.
+
+E.2.2 For the purpose of description, this specification refers to an instrument signalling unit (ISU) and an exchange signalling unit (ESU).
+
+E.2.3 The system is intended for use over four-wire circuits but, as an option for national use, it may be used over two-wire circuits. In the four-wire case, forward and backward signals are segregated by utilizing the four-wire circuit as two separate signalling paths.
+
+E.2.4 The system is a single voice frequency (1 vf) line signalling system using a signalling frequency of:
+
+- 2280 Hz in both directions on four-wire circuits;
+- 2280 Hz in the direction ISU to ESU and 2400 Hz in the direction ESU to ISU on two-wire circuits (national).
+
+The use of voice frequency signals renders the system suitable for all voice transmission media, except those using speech interpolation.
+
+E.2.5 In addition to the application or removal of signalling frequency (tone-on and tone-off) in continuous form, the transmission of pulses of signalling frequency is applied.
+
+E.2.6 When in the idle condition, the signalling frequency applied to the line by the ISU is reduced in power level to conform to the transmission loading requirements of Recommendation Q.15.
+
+E.2.7 In accordance with Recommendation Q.25, sending and receiving line splitting arrangements are provided so that signals are contained within the ISU-ESU link and not allowed to spill over into the next link.
+
+E.2.8 When making an outgoing call, a through speech path shall be provided in the direction ESU-ISU prior to the answered state.
+
+E.2.9 Signals may be passed in the direction ISU to ESU while speech or audible indications are being received in the direction ESU to ISU.
+
+### E.3 *Line signal conditions and signalling codes*
+
+E.3.1 The line signal conditions and the signalling codes shall be as shown in Tables E-1/Q.8 and E-2/Q.8. Signal sending and detection requirements are given in §§ E.3.2 and E.3.3.
+
+TABLE E-1/Q.8
+
+#### **Calls originated by the telephone instrument**
+
+| Signal | Conditions from ISU | Conditions from ESU |
+|---------|----------------------|---------------------|
+| Idle | Continuous tone-on | Continuous tone-off |
+| Seizing | Continuous tone-off | Continuous tone-off |
+| Answer | Continuous tone-off | Tone-on pulse |
+| Recall | Recall tone-on pulse | Continuous tone-off |
+| Clear | Continuous tone-on | Continuous tone-off |
+
+TABLE E-2/Q.8
+
+#### **Calls from the exchange**
+
+| Signal | Conditions from ESU | Conditions from ISU |
+|---------|-----------------------|----------------------|
+| Idle | Continuous tone-off | Continuous tone-on |
+| Calling | Calling tone-on-pulse | Continuous tone-on |
+| Answer | Continuous tone-off | Continuous tone-off |
+| Recall | Continuous tone-off | Recall tone-on pulse |
+| Clear | Continuous tone-off | Continuous tone-on |
+
+E.3.2 A continuous tone-on condition shall be the application of the signalling frequency to the send signalling path for a period exceeding 350 ms. A tone-on pulse signal shall be the application of the signalling frequency to the send signalling path for a period of 45-135 ms or 210-240 ms (see § E.5.2).
+
+A continuous tone-off condition shall exist when any signalling frequency is absent from the send signalling path for a period exceeding 80 ms.
+
+E.3.3 A tone-on condition applied to the receive signalling path line termination may be recognized as a continuous tone-on condition for signalling, when it has persisted for 250 ms, while for a tone-off condition a value of 40 ms has to be taken into account.
+
+A tone-on condition applied to the receive signalling path line termination, and persisting for a period of 35-150 ms or 200-250 ms (see § E.5.2) may be recognized as a tone-on pulse signal.
+
+### E.4 *Line signalling transmission requirements*
+
+#### E.4.1 *Signal sender*
+
+E.4.1.1 The signalling tone shall be at a frequency of 2280 (2400 Hz in the ESU for two-wire working) $\pm 5$ Hz.
+
+E.4.1.2 The tone-on condition shall have two power levels: a high level and a low level.
+
+A high level tone shall be sent for the duration of the signal or for a minimum of 300 ms (whichever is shorter), and for a maximum of 550 ms after which it must be reduced to low level.
+
+- A high level tone-on condition shall be a signalling tone transmitted at a level of $-10 \text{ dBm}0 \pm 1 \text{ dB}$ .
+- A low level tone-on condition shall be a signalling tone transmitted at a level of $-20 \text{ dBm}0 \pm 1 \text{ dB}$ .
+
+#### E.4.2 *Signal receiver*
+
+E.4.2.1 A frequency within the range 2280 (2400 Hz in the ISU for two-wire working) $\pm 15$ Hz at an absolute level $N$ , within the range $(-30 + n \leq N \leq -4 + n)$ dBm shall be recognized as a tone-on condition; where $n$ is the relative power level at the receive signalling path line termination (see Recommendation G.171).
+
+E.4.2.2 Any frequency or combination of frequencies having a total absolute power level of less than $(-40 + n)$ dBm shall be recognized as a tone-off condition; where $n$ is the relative power level at the receive signalling path line termination as in § E.4.2.1.
+
+### E.5 *General line signal transfer procedures*
+
+E.5.1 The calling signal is a series of tone-on pulses with a duration of each pulse according to the length of the original ringing pulse and in step with the period of the ringing signal.
+
+E.5.2 As an option and subject to mutual agreement by the parties involved, the ISU applies a recall signal in the form of a tone-on pulse to the signalling path.
+
+The length of tone-on pulse applied by the ISU depends upon the type of recall employed by the associated telephone, e.g. timed break or earthed loop.
+
+E.5.3 As an option and subject to mutual agreement by the parties involved, the answer signal is sent by the ESU.
+
+### E.6 *Decadic pulsing*
+
+For decadic pulsing interregister signalling, the 2280 Hz line signalling is used. Some characteristics are given below.
+
+E.6.1 The break periods of decadic pulses shall be applied to the send signalling path of the ISU, as pulses of tone-on condition within the following limits.
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
+| SPEED (pulses per sec.) | | | | | | | | |
+| BREAK PULSE | 7 | | 9 | | 11 | | 12 | |
+| | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX |
+| DURATION (ms) | 45 | 112 | 45 | 81 | 45 | 61 | 45 | 52 |
+
+E.6.2 Pulses of tone-on condition applied to the receive signalling path line termination of the ESU, consistent with the following speed and duration limits, are break periods of dial pulses (address signal).
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
+| SPEED (pulses per sec.) | | | | | | | | |
+| BREAK PULSE | 7 | | 9 | | 11 | | 12 | |
+| | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX | MIN | MAX |
+| DURATION (ms) | 35 | 122 | 35 | 91 | 35 | 71 | 35 | 62 |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44d3876f79c67d6423285d69ff7f544b86482ae2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/2763901b7a1fd1b5d704cdc450d12ed0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7e6e91fdf97d1da4fe551f979219cddb40dfafc0d75df83ddf3cd089a4c1d69b
+size 37678
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64672153e39c851d9e16fdbc702e526c7ba7e8a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:454a9958ffe168868cb7d38a0eb24418dafe31a7a4245c992089b2316ac37d3e
+size 7392
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..933fb9bb34fffef4be1b64970eec802edfbb7b9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/3121ebddccf183ca63bb9781be440a7e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7711e8da7905f78090af292a8c8c73848a5833f7a59b854f7195cae0499a8cb3
+size 142718
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/aa81b9b80bd1e3d723922b3a033564a2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/aa81b9b80bd1e3d723922b3a033564a2_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..74874537f530c34646be76923d3ca5b016d15cd9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/aa81b9b80bd1e3d723922b3a033564a2_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:462b47290d18373ed7711968266d8f0149a6328a3aa8dad33931db31d606ae26
+size 81529
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/d980a3f9608055996a07f31788baf827_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/d980a3f9608055996a07f31788baf827_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1cdd7c2388278f99403222d9be8906970e842c93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/d980a3f9608055996a07f31788baf827_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:21ee4e0e8daccffa7b19f4728a383e1f233d7b60dba83cb527f320f943021fe7
+size 101646
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65280bfbcd414ab416fe090de15853982d1197d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/ebff22fb5dd6f50a90e44dca0f82f285_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:56f2fddaa92f5549015868d2bbc53abb89ea16b1948130a421f10af95206b6e9
+size 67109
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0af2180de27472a643e8b4c44d4c0bf954de4389
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.81.1-198811-I_PDF-E/fc46871d72c65d3381d9201646d23439_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3f11959d87f055c36d3a2b0ba05051e1db8e42e9833f091b54433cc3f577abbd
+size 32544
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/0c08e48c08f96934cd6bc6911f3069dc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/0c08e48c08f96934cd6bc6911f3069dc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b49a7e4f8629c230ea26f639358f4f810746e356
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/0c08e48c08f96934cd6bc6911f3069dc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8ac92bc52e5f4c519370b4ad9becbff0076880ab649592c921345df5fbccf1be
+size 72986
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b8938b59041c640ba55041c064dba115e5a7043c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:308adb92564464180cdd632c7ac79d7957bd78266da19f6b78cdc6dc62ff1159
+size 103864
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a4a3fb6e6ecea1245b1281fd015af36985a7181
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e71a7250efee11dbff458f099ce68098bbafd19b478471841b0011f0769083a7
+size 8410
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/4cde160bcc69b7b6c81b648dd0e4252e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/4cde160bcc69b7b6c81b648dd0e4252e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..273633521351e0e7f0719b51b7979dfbbef1bb80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/4cde160bcc69b7b6c81b648dd0e4252e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c0722cb6d12e0d5a87c8a8a373a0baac5bc8198572dda8fb5f43d4d838f60dd0
+size 38117
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/4d5d6207a6d444ae745057ebc3ddcd86_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/4d5d6207a6d444ae745057ebc3ddcd86_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a574b25b278aaa2d78c3cd181bc96d42d17fd5de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/4d5d6207a6d444ae745057ebc3ddcd86_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5e2c92f53fa23ed4044dd86dc9f07f962397c43ff4a73928b7992c7687d30378
+size 35258
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/5d782eeb9d1e5871d7f09e0ccdd4cdf1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/5d782eeb9d1e5871d7f09e0ccdd4cdf1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9d205c8adb5986397702165e8ecfc44f4467adf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/5d782eeb9d1e5871d7f09e0ccdd4cdf1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0274cf10103fa017cc662c1e2034e81de162346aaf6279a5cd2949169e53b2fe
+size 61951
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..836dda5a4f56de2e2bb00eb567a68be158d1c810
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1475cfb02b7b71e0aa06be262156248d211266330629c56dc0d391cf29a775a7
+size 68541
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/a4de02b04a1a8f6cb8121ac2e11bf95a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/a4de02b04a1a8f6cb8121ac2e11bf95a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19cc63b6588ec9c4b4006da971080e739bd0c371
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/a4de02b04a1a8f6cb8121ac2e11bf95a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:32b58d8052c3be1c1e7a179ba6b122b53c3a0009bb81ac37f59cec7e59b284c3
+size 75775
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8990fbd6b7f97a358056ec754eea705401338e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/b6671cfafda3820aafe9a24fa7a4d8c7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b4be7c2606eb5e8868a54448e5badc64ec0c920999aedb517e7280a59c6ac05a
+size 125467
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/c649cad02e45d7d9a16f3f5bdb332219_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/c649cad02e45d7d9a16f3f5bdb332219_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e100810cf0df8ad4615c4556268be08f93cf906
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/c649cad02e45d7d9a16f3f5bdb332219_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a15b4f59763b3f8e60583a752b0e55683294931e130e9bd0ab16c20580c9c95c
+size 39909
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/c76da2d73c064464051d1583fd80bb6b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/c76da2d73c064464051d1583fd80bb6b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d2b7898035ef87456e9f5bb37f235653d544606
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/c76da2d73c064464051d1583fd80bb6b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4f525e5f0be03dca1437a146a0ad9bac573ea711882df934beeb7b971c647e38
+size 26203
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/d734a6ea1b381280f043fcf70391b6db_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/d734a6ea1b381280f043fcf70391b6db_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26e3479a90a0fae7338bfb29b27c21ec56045eea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/d734a6ea1b381280f043fcf70391b6db_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fd4b999f548e85cbe7c1deb93fbda640d5f797a57c0f8a3afbe5e93bec3b9d90
+size 82306
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/f468e577645d646f5157ce3eefb4ed96_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/f468e577645d646f5157ce3eefb4ed96_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b5b11f22bf3a633eed5c62a11410b48226ea430b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/f468e577645d646f5157ce3eefb4ed96_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:56828210cb132863ae3c8b224784e72936db7e33d8154586799c2e0949792590
+size 44995
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/fc0735d325f0ebd9214171975c68a888_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/fc0735d325f0ebd9214171975c68a888_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b8e3f271a303d900ec94c26d59c110d6774cb37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/fc0735d325f0ebd9214171975c68a888_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ea7464847f8170c7eb0f3c5cdc1fca24b1916e9c84579f1a4fe37134bbc70b31
+size 50845
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9434258bf2f821bd2ef51fe09f6bdf8c57d097fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.816-200101-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2822 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.816**
+
+(01/2001)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+Q3 interface
+
+---
+
+**CORBA-based TMN services**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.816
+
+(Formerly CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+## SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 |
+| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 |
+| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.*
+
+# **CORBA-based TMN services**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+This Recommendation defines a set of services that along with ITU-T X.780 composes a framework for CORBA-based TMN interfaces. It specifies protocol requirements, CORBA Common Object Service usage requirements, and TMN-specific support services. A CORBA IDL module defining the interfaces to the TMN-specific support services is provided.
+
+## **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.816 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 4 (2001-2004) and approved under the WTSA Resolution 1 procedure on 19 January 2001.
+
+## **Keywords**
+
+Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Interface Definition Language (IDL), CORBA services, Distributed Processing, TMN Interfaces, Managed Objects
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 2001
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|-------|-------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 1 | Scope ..... | 7 |
+| 1.1 | Purpose ..... | 7 |
+| 1.2 | Application..... | 8 |
+| 1.3 | Recommendation Roadmap ..... | 9 |
+| 1.4 | Recommendation Conventions ..... | 9 |
+| 1.5 | Compiling the IDL ..... | 10 |
+| 2 | References..... | 10 |
+| 3 | Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 11 |
+| 3.1 | Definitions from ITU-T X.701..... | 11 |
+| 3.2 | Definitions from ITU-T X.703..... | 11 |
+| 3.3 | Additional definitions ..... | 11 |
+| 3.4 | Abbreviations ..... | 11 |
+| 4 | CORBA-based TMN services goals and requirements ..... | 13 |
+| 4.1 | Goals..... | 13 |
+| 4.1.1 | Application interoperability ..... | 13 |
+| 4.1.2 | Common usage of CORBA Common Object Services ..... | 14 |
+| 4.1.3 | Information model transparency..... | 14 |
+| 4.2 | Information modeling dependencies ..... | 14 |
+| 4.2.1 | Access granularity ..... | 14 |
+| 4.2.2 | Representation of containment and naming..... | 14 |
+| 4.2.3 | Object creation and deletion..... | 15 |
+| 4.3 | Scoping and filtering ..... | 15 |
+| 4.3.1 | Scoping ..... | 15 |
+| 4.3.2 | Filtering..... | 16 |
+| 4.4 | Notifications..... | 17 |
+| 5 | Framework overview and protocol requirements..... | 17 |
+| 5.1 | Framework overview ..... | 17 |
+| 5.2 | Framework protocol requirements ..... | 18 |
+| 6 | Framework common object services requirements ..... | 19 |
+| 6.1 | The Naming Service ..... | 20 |
+| 6.1.1 | Translating managed object names to strings ..... | 24 |
+| 6.2 | Notification Service..... | 25 |
+| 6.3 | Telecom Log Service..... | 29 |
+| 6.4 | Messaging Service..... | 30 |
+| 6.5 | Security Service..... | 32 |
+
+| | Page |
+|----------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 6.6 Transaction Service ..... | 32 |
+| 7 Framework support services ..... | 33 |
+| 7.1 The Factory Finder Service..... | 33 |
+| 7.2 The Channel Finder Service..... | 34 |
+| 7.2.1 Channel Finder interface..... | 34 |
+| 7.2.2 Channel Finder requirements ..... | 37 |
+| 7.3 The Terminator Service ..... | 38 |
+| 7.4 The Multiple-Object Operation Service ..... | 39 |
+| 7.4.1 The MOO Service interface ..... | 39 |
+| 7.4.2 The default filter language ..... | 45 |
+| 7.4.3 MOO Service requirements..... | 48 |
+| 7.5 The Heartbeat Service ..... | 49 |
+| 7.6 Other support services ..... | 50 |
+| 8 Compliance and conformance..... | 50 |
+| 8.1 System conformance ..... | 51 |
+| 8.1.1 Conformance points..... | 51 |
+| 8.1.2 Basic conformance profile ..... | 52 |
+| 8.2 Conformance statement guidelines ..... | 52 |
+| ANNEX A – Framework Support Services IDL ..... | 52 |
+| // Data Types and Structures..... | 53 |
+| // Constants ..... | 56 |
+| // Exceptions ..... | 56 |
+| // Interfaces ..... | 57 |
+| // Factory Finder Interface ..... | 57 |
+| // Channel Finder Interface ..... | 58 |
+| // Heartbeat Service Interface ..... | 59 |
+| // Terminator Service Interface ..... | 60 |
+| // DeleteResultsIterator Interface ..... | 60 |
+| // GetResultsIterator Interface..... | 61 |
+| // UpdateResultsIterator Interface ..... | 61 |
+| // BasicMooService Interface ..... | 62 |
+| // AdvancedMooService Interface ..... | 63 |
+| // Notifications Interface..... | 64 |
+
+| | Page |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| ANNEX B – The Constraint Language BNF ..... | 65 |
+| B.1 The constraint language proper in terms of lexical tokens ..... | 65 |
+| B.2 "BNF" for lexical tokens up to character set issues ..... | 66 |
+| B.3 Character set issues..... | 67 |
+| APPENDIX I – Interworking scenarios between models using ITU framework and
ADSL- /ATMF-compliant models ..... | 67 |
+| I.1 Introduction..... | 67 |
+| I.2 Terminology..... | 68 |
+| I.3 Interworking scenarios..... | 68 |
+| I.3.1 Grain-Neutral Server migrating to ITU Framework Server..... | 68 |
+| I.3.2 Grain-neutral Client migrating to ITU Framework client..... | 69 |
+| APPENDIX II – Filtering native and translated structured events ..... | 69 |
+| APPENDIX III – Bibliography..... | 72 |
+
+
+
+## CORBA-based TMN services
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+The TMN architecture defined in ITU-T M.3010 (2000) introduces concepts from distributed processing and includes the use of multiple management protocols. The initial TMN interface specifications for intra- and inter-TMN interfaces were developed using the Guidelines for the Definition of Managed Objects (GDMO) notation from OSI Systems Management with Common Management Information Protocol (CMIP) as the protocol. The inter-TMN interface (X) included both CMIP and CORBA GIOP/IIOP as possible choices at the application layer.
+
+CORBA, a distributed processing technology, is being considered for use in the TMN communication architecture primarily due to its acceptance by the Information Technology industry. This acceptance is expected to enhance the availability of CORBA-based interfaces due to better development tools and widespread expertise in developing CORBA-based interfaces. This technology, developed by the Object Management Group (OMG), is also being considered by multiple industries. Specifications using this technology provide support for standard application programming interfaces (APIs) and language bindings to programming languages, and they also facilitate software portability. The interoperability solutions offered by the object request broker combined with the inter-ORB protocols address interoperability between client and server. While CMIP and information models provide solutions for interoperability between manager and agent systems, CORBA defines inter-object interactions where the objects may be distributed.
+
+## 1.1 Purpose
+
+Several groups are developing network management specifications that use CORBA modeling techniques with IDL as the notation along with CORBA services. The scope of this Recommendation is to define protocol requirements and common services suitable for use in the specification of interoperable CORBA-based network management interfaces. The demands placed on "X" interfaces are different from those used "inside" a TMN, "Q" interfaces. The scope of this Recommendation covers all interfaces in the TMN where CORBA may be used. It is expected that not all capabilities and services defined here are required in all TMN interfaces. This implies that the framework can be used for interfaces between management systems at all levels of abstractions (inter- and intra-administration) as well as between management systems and network elements.
+
+This Recommendation is intended for use by various groups specifying network management interfaces. A number of factors are considered: the version of CORBA to use, the set of CORBA Common Object Services employed, and additional services. This Recommendation, along with the object modeling guidelines defined in ITU-T X.780 form a *framework* for CORBA-based TMN interfaces. Use of a common framework on telecommunications management interfaces has several advantages. Some examples are:
+
+- facilitating reuse of models that are developed to meet the generic requirements of telecommunications;
+- profiling CORBA services for use by the telecommunications industry;
+- easing the definition of new services for TMN, reusing the semantics of the existing rich set of models; and
+- harmonizing the modeling approach across groups using a single source similar to ITU-T X.720, ITU-T X.721 and ITU-T X.722 for CMIP.
+
+Re-using a common framework and generic information model for a variety of network technologies and network management applications will speed the introduction of new network services while keeping network management system development costs down.
+
+The telecommunications industry has invested a great deal of time and energy in the development of information models for the CMIP network management protocol. A primary goal of this framework is the reuse of these information models by enabling their translation to CORBA Interface Definition Language (IDL) with little change in semantics (see ITU-T X.780). As a result, initial IDL information models are expected to be derived from CMIP models.
+
+In addition to taking advantage of CMIP information models, another purpose of the framework is to take advantage of CORBA. The framework leverages the functions defined in the CORBA specifications, including a set of Common Object Services. Also, the framework tries to reuse CORBA approaches and design patterns wherever they fit. Finally, while re-using existing models is important, it is equally important that the framework support the development of new models. This framework does not require a GDMO model to be developed prior to the development of an IDL model. In fact, developing a new IDL information model for use within this framework is straightforward and guidelines for doing so are provided.
+
+## 1.2 Application
+
+As CORBA is introduced in TMN, different scenarios are possible that range from the use of gateways performing translations between systems using different network management protocols to cases where CORBA is natively supported by the communicating systems. The application of this framework is intended for scenarios where both the managed system and the managing system provide CORBA interfaces.
+
+The framework does not address other interworking scenarios requiring "gateway" systems where protocol and information model conversions are necessary for achieving interoperability. In particular, this framework is not specifically designed to support the construction of gateways between CORBA and CMIP network management applications even though the semantics of the existing models are retained by this framework. A management system, however, might have to support multiple protocols, to interwork in different environments.
+
+A gateway approach has already been developed and standardized by the Joint Inter-Domain Management (JIDM) group. This gateway approach provides a one-to-one mapping of all constructs and capabilities available with CMIP and GDMO. However, many of the CORBA services and capabilities are not reused by this approach because the problem solved is to facilitate interworking with systems that have been deployed using CMIP. In contrast, the problem domain for applying this framework is to support standards-based native CORBA network management interfaces. Such an approach takes advantage of the benefits offered by CORBA as a technology used by multiple industries.
+
+ITU-T X.780 [1] accompanies this Recommendation and defines object modeling guidelines, superclasses for all managed objects and managed object factories for use with this framework, and a standard set of notifications. Together, ITU-T X.780 and this Recommendation define a *framework* for CORBA-based TMN interfaces. Also, ITU-T M.3120 provides a CORBA IDL version of the generic network information model originally defined in ITU-T M.3100. The IDL version follows the object modeling guidelines in ITU-T X.780 and is designed to fit with the services defined here.
+
+## 1.3 Recommendation Roadmap
+
+This Recommendation has the following structure:
+
+- Clause 1 Introduction, Recommendation roadmap, updates, and list of issues
+- Clause 2 References
+- Clause 3 Definitions of terms and abbreviations used throughout the rest of the Recommendation
+- Clause 4 Requirements for the TMN CORBA-based services. These are the design goals the services must meet
+- Clause 5 CORBA ORB and Service version requirements. Also provided is an overview of the services
+- Clause 6 Requirements on the use of CORBA Common Object Services for network management interfaces
+- Clause 7 Definition of TMN-specific support services. IDL interfaces for the support services are defined in Annex A
+- Clause 8 Compliance and conformance guidelines
+- Annex A TMN-specific support service IDL
+- Appendix I Interworking Scenarios Between Models Using ITU Framework and ADSL/ATMF Compliant Models
+- Appendix II Filtering native and translated structured events
+- Appendix III Bibliography
+
+## 1.4 Recommendation Conventions
+
+A few conventions are followed in this Recommendation to make the reader aware of the purpose of the text. While most of the Recommendation is normative, paragraphs succinctly stating mandatory requirements to be met by a management system (managing and/or managed) are preceded by a boldface "R" enclosed in parentheses, followed by a short name indicating the subject of the requirement, and a number. For example:
+
+**(R) EXAMPLE-1** An example mandatory requirement.
+
+Requirements that may be optionally implemented by a management system are preceded by an "O" instead of an "R." For example:
+
+**(O) OPTION-1** An example optional requirement.
+
+The requirement statements are used to create compliance and conformance profiles.
+
+Many examples of CORBA IDL are included in this Recommendation, and IDL specifying the TMN specific services, and supporting data types, included in a normative annex. The IDL is written in a 9-point courier typeface:
+
+```
+// Example IDL
+interface foo {
+ void operation1 ();
+};
+```
+
+Instructions for extracting the IDL from an electronic version of this Recommendation and compiling it are presented in the next clause.
+
+## 1.5 Compiling the IDL
+
+An advantage of using IDL to specify network management interfaces is that IDL can be "compiled" into programming code by tools that accompany an ORB. This actually automates the development of some of the code necessary to enable network management applications to interoperate. This Recommendation has one annex that contains code that implementers will want to extract and compile. Annex A is normative and should be used by developers implementing systems that conform with this standard. The IDL in this Recommendation has been checked with two compilers to ensure its correctness. A compiler supporting the CORBA version specified in 5.2 must be used.
+
+Annex A has been formatted to make it simple to cut and paste it into a plain text file that may then be compiled. Below are tips on how to do this.
+
+- 1) Cutting and pasting seems to work better from the Microsoft® Word® version of this Recommendation. Cutting and pasting from the Adobe® Acrobat® file format seems to include page headers and footers, which cannot be compiled.
+- 2) All of Annex A, beginning with the line "/\* This IDL code..." through the end should be stored in a file named "itut\_q816.idl" in a directory where it will be found by the IDL compiler.
+- 3) The headings embedded in Annex A need not be removed. They have been encapsulated in IDL comments and will be ignored by the compiler.
+- 4) Comments that begin with the special sequence "/\*\*" are recognized by compilers that convert IDL to HTML. These comments often have special formatting instructions for these compilers. Those that will be working with the IDL may want to generate HTML as the resulting HTML files have links that make for quick navigation through the files.
+- 5) Annex A has been formatted with tab spaces at 8-space intervals and hard line feeds that should enable almost any text editor to work with the text.
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] ITU-T X.780 (2001), *Guidelines for defining CORBA managed objects*.
+- [2] OMG Document formal/1999-10-07, *The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification*, Revision 2.3.1.
+- [3] OMG Document formal/2000-11-1, *Interoperable Naming Service Specification*.
+- [4] OMG Document formal/2000-06-20, *Notification Service Specification*, Version 1.0.
+- [5] OMG Document formal/00-01-04, *Telecom Log Service Specification*, Version 1.0.
+- [6] OMG Document formal/2000-06-25, *Security Services Specification*, Version 1.5.
+- [7] OMG Document formal/2000-06-28, *Transaction Service Specification*, Version 1.1.
+
+- [8] OMG Document formal/2000-10-58, *CORBA Messaging*.
+- [9] OMG Document formal/2000-08-01, *Interworking between CORBA and TMN Systems Specification*.
+- [10] IETF RFC 2246 (1999), *The TLS Protocol Version 1.0*.
+- [11] IEEE/ANSI Std 1003.2-1992, *Information Technology – Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) Part 2: Shell and Utilities*.
+- [12] IETF RFC 2253 (1997), *Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of Distinguished Names*.
+- [13] ETSI TS 132 106-3 (2000), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Telecommunication Management; Configuration Management; Part 3: Notification Integration Reference Point: CORBA solution set version 1.1* (3G TS 32 106-3 Release 1999).
+- [14] ITU-T X.701 (1997), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management overview*.
+- [15] ITU-T X.703 (1997), *Information technology – Open Distributed Management Architecture*.
+
+# 3 Definitions and abbreviations
+
+## 3.1 Definitions from ITU-T X.701
+
+The following terms used in this Recommendation are defined in ITU-T X.701:
+
+- managed object class;
+- manager;
+- agent.
+
+## 3.2 Definitions from ITU-T X.703
+
+The following term used in this Recommendation is defined in ITU-T X.703:
+
+- notification.
+
+## 3.3 Additional definitions
+
+**3.3.1 event channel:** a support object in a managed system with one or more interfaces allowing a managing system to receive notifications from that managed system.
+
+NOTE – There are two models for event channel delivery of notifications (see ITU-T X.703):
+
+- In the push model of event delivery, the managing system uses one or more event channel interface instances to register one or more managing system interface references that may be used by the channel to invoke event push operations.
+- In the pull model of event delivery, the managing system uses one or more event channel interface references to invoke operations which return notification information.
+
+## 3.4 Abbreviations
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations:
+
+AMI Asynchronous Messaging Invocation
+
+| | |
+|-------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| API | Application Programming Interface |
+| ASN.1 | Abstract Syntax Notation One |
+| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer Mode |
+| AVA | Attribute Value Assertion |
+| CMIP | Common Management Information Protocol |
+| CORBA | Common Object Request Broker Architecture |
+| COS | Common Object Services |
+| DN | Distinguished Name |
+| EMS | Element Management System |
+| FIFO | First In, First Out |
+| GDMO | Guidelines for the Definition of Managed Objects |
+| GIOP | General Interoperability Protocol |
+| HTML | HyperText Markup Language |
+| ID | Identifier |
+| IDL | Interface Definition Language |
+| IEEE | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
+| IETF | Internet Engineering Task Force |
+| IIOP | Internet Interoperability Protocol |
+| IOR | Interoperable Object Reference |
+| ITU-T | International Telecommunication Union – Telecommunication Standardization Sector |
+| JIDM | Joint Inter-Domain Management |
+| MO | Managed Object |
+| MOO | Multiple Object Operation |
+| NE | Network Element |
+| NMS | Network Management System |
+| OAM&P | Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning |
+| OID | Object Identifier |
+| OMG | Object Management Group |
+| ORB | Object Request Broker |
+| OSI | Open Systems Interconnection |
+| PDU | Protocol Data Unit |
+| PM | Performance Management |
+| POA | Portable Object Adapter |
+| POP | Point of Presence |
+| POSIX | Portable Operating System Interface |
+
+| | |
+|-------|---------------------------------------|
+| QoS | Quality of Service |
+| RDN | Relative Distinguished Name |
+| SDH | Synchronous Digital Hierarchy |
+| SONET | Synchronous Optical Network |
+| SSL | Secure Socket Layer |
+| TII | Time-Independent Invocation |
+| TLS | Transport Layer Security |
+| TMN | Telecommunications Management Network |
+| TTP | Trail Termination Point |
+| UID | Universal Identifier |
+| UML | Unified Modeling Language |
+| UTC | Universal Time Code |
+
+# 4 CORBA-based TMN services goals and requirements
+
+This clause describes the key goals of the services framework and the requirements that help the CORBA-based TMN services support these goals. Subclause 4.1 introduces the goals of the CORBA framework. Subclause 4.2 then provides terminology and requirements. The requirements in this clause are requirements that the framework must satisfy. They are based on the telecommunications management needs. Clauses 5, 6, 7, and 8 then describe a framework that meets these needs and define how to achieve the requirements of this clause by using CORBA in a certain way. The rules in Clauses 5, 6, 7, and 8 on how to use CORBA also are referred to as requirements.
+
+## 4.1 Goals
+
+This Recommendation sets out to define a framework for defining how interfaces supported by management systems and network elements should be modeled. Some key goals of the framework are identified here:
+
+- Application interoperability;
+- Common usage of CORBA common object services;
+- Information model transparency.
+
+This clause elaborates on these three goals.
+
+### 4.1.1 Application interoperability
+
+A key goal of the TMN architecture, and in particular the information architecture, is to promote a standard framework for providing interoperability and information exchange between systems from a diverse set of network management system suppliers. Interoperability between systems involves many aspects of development. At its lowest layer, a common communication mechanism must be in place to support a common syntax, the establishment of connectivity and the exchange of operation requests/replies between systems. This aspect of interoperability is inherently supported by the CORBA specification.
+
+For TMN, there is the need to provide application interoperability. That is, management systems from diverse suppliers will be utilized within a single administration's TMN to support different functions necessary to support management of its networks. To simplify integration of these various
+
+suppliers' systems, they must agree on the semantics of the information being exchanged. This is accomplished with the specification of an information model. Guidelines for the definition of CORBA-based information models are specified in ITU-T X.780, but the services defined here must support those guidelines.
+
+### 4.1.2 Common usage of CORBA Common Object Services
+
+A second aspect of this framework is the definition of common usage and profiling of the distributed processing environment of choice. This aspect of the framework should indicate the reasonable expectations network management system suppliers may have for one another. Rather than redefining the interface capabilities needed to support common network management functions such as object naming and notification filtering with each information model, the modeling guidelines in ITU-T X.780 rely upon a set of support services. These support services enable the information models to be simpler, and also enhance interoperability.
+
+In defining these services, special effort will be taken to make use of the CORBA common object services. Specifically, this Recommendation will address the use of the CORBA ORB and CORBA Common Object Services (COS) that will impact system interoperability (i.e., issues involving the use of CORBA within a single system are outside the scope of this Recommendation). Where network management needs cannot be met by CORBA COS, additional services will be defined.
+
+### 4.1.3 Information model transparency
+
+If CORBA is used in places within the TMN architecture where existing information models (e.g., GDMO) are well established, then the framework must support the reuse of those models without any major changes.
+
+The focus of this Recommendation is on the set of services required to allow the existing models to be used as they were originally intended with a reasonable amount of efficiency.
+
+## 4.2 Information modeling dependencies
+
+As described in the previous clause, the explicit modeling of resources that are manageable across an interface is central to application interoperability. The guidelines for defining CORBA-managed objects detailed in ITU-T X.780 describe the rules for modeling manageable resources. They also embody several decisions that must be supported by the TMN CORBA-based services framework. This clause summarizes those points.
+
+### 4.2.1 Access granularity
+
+CORBA interface *granularity* refers to the relationship between the resources that are modeled on an interface and the means by which they are accessed using CORBA. ITU-T X.780 uses an *instance-grain* modeling approach, which means each modeled resource is accessible using a unique CORBA object reference, known as an *interoperable object reference* (IOR). The objects that represent manageable resources are called *managed objects*.
+
+### 4.2.2 Representation of containment and naming
+
+Containment is a logical representation of how modeled resources contain other modeled resources. Containment has traditionally been a very important relationship in network management applications because it is a convenient means of identifying the large number of resources that typically must be managed. ITU-T X.780 guidelines require that a unique name be assigned to each managed object, based in part on the name of the object that contains it. The TMN CORBA-based services must provide a means to store these names (and hence the containment relationships they represent) as well as a means to find the IOR of an object based on its name.
+
+### 4.2.3 Object creation and deletion
+
+The CORBA ORB does not provide clients with a means to create objects on remote systems. Instead, typically *factory* objects are instantiated by remote systems, and these factory objects provide operations that may be invoked by clients to create objects on the remote system. For a number of information modeling purposes, ITU-T X.780 specifies that a factory IDL interface shall be defined for each managed object IDL interface in an information model. So, object creation will be model-dependent and is not a good candidate for a TMN CORBA service. However, a service for managing system seeking a factory in order to request creation of an object in a managed system is defined in this Recommendation.
+
+Object deletion is also an area in need of support. Often, CORBA objects are deleted by simply invoking some delete operation on the object, but this is not a good approach for network management applications because of their reliance on containment relationships. Deleting an object that contains other objects has impacts beyond the object being deleted. Also, as described in the previous clause, support is required for storing the names of managed object instances, and this data must be updated when objects are deleted. The TMN CORBA services therefore need to provide support for deleting managed objects in an orderly fashion.
+
+## 4.3 Scoping and filtering
+
+The ability to perform complex queries (i.e., GET operations), updates (i.e., SET operations), and delete operations on a group of Entities with a single operation request is a valuable component of TMN. Management systems may have to manage up to $10^{7}$ instances of managed objects. Due to the size of the management information base, a managing system can not efficiently perform ad hoc queries on individual instances of Managed Objects (i.e., Entities). Rather, the managing system expects a level of intelligence to be supported by the managed system.
+
+The intelligence in the managed system allows the managing system to select a group of managed entities on which some operation will be performed. Managed entity selection involves two phases: scoping and filtering. This managed entity selection process is supported by a service defined later in this Recommendation. This service allows a managing system to select a scope of objects to act on (scope is defined through containment relationships; see 4.2.2). Once the scope of Entities is determined, the operation (specified by the scope and filtered request) is performed only on those Entities which meet criteria defined by a filter.
+
+The use of scoping and filtering in this framework supports:
+
+- Scoped and Filtered get: Returns the values (for a list of attributes) from each of the Entities that meet the scope and filter criteria.
+- Scoped and Filtered update: Replaces an attribute value or adds/removes values to/from set-valued attributes, in the group of Entities meeting the scope and filter criteria, to the values specified in the scoped and filtered request. May be used to update one or multiple attributes in a single object or multiple objects.
+- Scoped and Filtered deletion: Deletes all Entities that meet the scope and filter criteria.
+
+### 4.3.1 Scoping
+
+Scoping entails the identification of the Entities to which a filter is to be applied. Scoping is applied based on the containment hierarchy as defined in 4.2.2. The scope is applied from some base managed entity down to some depth in the containment tree.
+
+The base entity for the scope is defined as the root of the containment tree from which the search is to commence. A scoped request must specify the base managed entity of the scope. The depth of the scoping level can then be specified in one of four manners within the scoped request:
+
+- 1) the base entity;
+- 2) the nth level subordinates of the base entity;
+- 3) the base entity and all of its subordinates down to and including the nth level;
+- 4) the base entity and all of its subordinates (i.e., the whole subtree).
+
+### 4.3.2 Filtering
+
+Filters allow for the specification of criteria that Entities must meet in order to have a management operation performed. Together with scoping, filtering allows a single operation to be performed across multiple managed objects with a single operation request.
+
+A filter parameter is used to determine whether or not an operation should be performed on a managed object. A filter parameter applies a test that is either satisfied or not by a particular managed object. The filter is expressed in terms of assertions about the presence or value of certain attributes of the managed object, and it is satisfied if and only if it evaluates to TRUE.
+
+#### 4.3.2.1 Attribute matching rules
+
+The following matching rules are defined that may be used in attribute value assertions (AVAs). These rules are:
+
+- **Equality:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if the value supplied in the AVA is equal to the value of the attribute.
+For SET valued attributes, the AVA evaluates to TRUE if and only if the set of members supplied in the AVA is equal to the set of members in the attribute.
+- **Greater or equal:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if the value supplied in the AVA is greater than or equal to the value of the attribute.
+For SET valued attributes, the value in the AVA shall contain exactly one member. The AVA evaluates to TRUE if and only if that member is greater than or equal to at least one of the members in the attribute value.
+- **Less or Equal:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if the value supplied in the AVA is less than or equal to the value of the attribute.
+For SET valued attributes, the value in the AVA shall contain exactly one member. The AVA evaluates to TRUE if and only if that member is less than or equal to at least one of the members in the attribute value.
+- **Present:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if such an attribute is present in the managed object.
+- **Substrings:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if all of the substrings specified in the AVA appear in the attribute in the given order without overlapping and separated from the ends of the attribute value and from one another by zero or more string elements. In addition, for the AVA to evaluate to TRUE,
+ - the first element in the initial substring, if present, shall match the first element in the attribute value;
+ - the other substrings, if present, shall appear in the attribute value in the order that the substrings appear in the AVA; and
+ - the last element in the final substring, if present, shall match the last element in the attribute value.
+
+For SET valued attributes, each value in the AVA shall contain exactly one member. The AVA evaluates to TRUE if and only if there is at least one of the members of the attribute value in which all of the substrings supplied in the AVA appear as described above.
+
+(The remaining three matching tests apply to SET valued attributes only)
+
+- **subset of:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if all asserted members are present in the attribute.
+- **superset of:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if all members of attribute are present in the attribute value assertion.
+- **non-null set intersection:** Evaluates to TRUE if and only if at least one of the asserted members is present in the attribute.
+
+## 4.4 Notifications
+
+The framework needs to support the ability to:
+
+- deliver notifications;
+- subscribe for notification types;
+- forward notifications to multiple destinations;
+- filter notifications;
+- uniquely identify the resource that emits the notification.
+
+The framework must also support the requirements on notification content, clearing, and correlation algorithms found in ITU-T X.733 and ITU-T Q.821.
+
+# 5 Framework overview and protocol requirements
+
+The previous clause outlined the network management functions the framework must support. This clause and the rest of the Recommendation provide the details on how the CORBA-based TMN services will provide these functions. The aspects of the framework related to modeling objects are included in ITU-T X.780. First, a brief overview of the framework is presented; then, some basic protocol requirements are defined.
+
+## 5.1 Framework overview
+
+This framework for CORBA-based TMN interfaces is a collection of capabilities. A central piece of the framework is a set of CORBA Common Object Services. This framework defines their role in network management interfaces, and defines conventions for their use. The framework also defines support services that have not been standardized as CORBA Common Object Services, but are expected to be standard on network management interfaces conforming to this framework. IDL interfaces for these services are defined later in Annex A.
+
+To support the software objects representing manageable resources, the framework requires that they implement some common basic capabilities. Therefore, two base classes are defined in ITU-T X.780 for use in modeling network management resources. Managed object classes (or object classes) in information models must inherit and implement a basic set of capabilities from these base classes in order to operate within this framework. Finally, some rules and conventions are defined for information modelers developing models for use with this framework. These consist of modeling guidelines, rules for converting GDMO models for CMIP to CORBA IDL definitions, and IDL style idioms. All of these are depicted graphically in Figure 1.
+
+
+
+Figure 1/Q.816 – Overview of framework. This diagram illustrates the architecture of the framework, organized into three horizontal layers. The top layer, labeled 'Superclasses:', contains 'Managed Object' and 'Managed Object Factory' as primary inheritance bases. 'Managed Object' is inherited by 'Network', 'Connection', and 'Managed Element'. 'Managed Object Factory' is inherited by 'Network Factory', 'Managed Element Factory', and 'Connection Factory'. 'Connection Factory' further branches into 'Link Factory'. 'Link' is shown as a component of 'Connection'. The middle layer, labeled 'Application-specific Objects', includes 'Heartbeat Service', 'Channel Finder' (with a database icon), 'Factory Finder' (with a database icon), 'Notification Service', 'Telecom Log Service' (with a database icon), 'Terminator Service', 'Naming Service' (with a 'Names' database icon), and 'Multiple Object Operation Service'. The bottom layer is a box labeled 'CORBA 2.3 ORB'. To the right of the top layer are icons for 'Std. Data Types', 'GDMO to IDL', 'Conventions', and 'Notification Specifications'. A small text 'T0414890-00' is in the bottom right corner.
+
+T0414890-00
+
+**Figure 1/Q.816 – Overview of framework**
+
+Figure 1 shows the framework in gray. In the middle are the application-specific objects that are supported by the framework. Along the bottom is a box representing the CORBA ORB. Above that are a number of boxes with names in them representing the services that compose the framework. (Some also have icons depicting the databases they would have to maintain to perform their functions.) Along the top of the figure are icons representing two superclasses, one for managed objects and one for managed object factories. Each of the managed objects and managed object factories supported by this framework must ultimately inherit from these superclasses, respectively. Also shown on Figure 1 are icons of pages with up-turned corners representing standard object modeling conventions.
+
+The framework services, represented as boxes with square corners, are defined in this Recommendation. The superclasses, notifications, and object modeling conventions are defined in ITU-T X.780.
+
+## 5.2 Framework protocol requirements
+
+This clause defines the versions of the services that are required to support this framework. CORBA services and protocol specifications are defined by the Object Management Group (OMG). Table 1 shows which version of the applicable OMG specification must be supported to comply with this framework and indicates the clause in this Recommendation where detailed requirements are defined
+
+for the service. A later version of a service that includes all the required capabilities of the stated version complies with this framework.
+
+**Table 1/Q.816 – CORBA service versions**
+
+| Service | Version | Clause |
+|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
+| ORB | 2.3.1 [2] | 5.2 |
+| Naming Service | 1.0 [3] | 6.1 |
+| Notification Service | 1.0 [4] | 6.2 |
+| Telecommunications Logging Service | 1.0 [5] | 6.3 |
+| Asynchronous Messaging | (determined by client system) | 6.4 |
+| Security (if required) | Either the "Secure IOP protocol", or "CORBA Security SSL Interoperability", as defined in [6] | 6.5 |
+| Transaction Service | 1.1 [7] | 6.6 |
+
+The choice of version 2.3.1 for the basic ORB capabilities is important. CORBA 2.3 includes support for the Portable Object Adapter (POA) as well as for passing objects by value. POA is important to the framework because it enables implementations based on this framework to scale up to millions of instantiated objects, a magnitude required for network management applications. The framework also makes use of value-type inheritance (which supports polymorphism) to retain flexibility but reduce the usage of CORBA "any" types, which can be inefficient and tedious for programmers.
+
+The Naming, Notification, and Logging services are all the initial versions available from the OMG.
+
+Asynchronous Messaging is really only a client-side consideration. An ORB with Asynchronous Messaging capabilities enables a client to use synchronous CORBA interfaces (those that would normally cause the client to block) in an asynchronous fashion. This capability is essential for clients that are single-threaded and cannot afford to block during network management operations. The availability of Asynchronous Messaging capabilities is important to this framework because it frees it from having to define both synchronous and asynchronous interfaces. Clients need not use an ORB with Asynchronous Messaging if they are multi-threaded and therefore can afford to block during synchronous CORBA calls.
+
+If security is required, this framework condones the use of ORBs that use SSL 3.0 for security until products supporting TLS become available, and the OMG migrates the CORBA Security. Until the OMG CORBA Security Service specification references TLS, the choice of which is supported in a product (if any) will have to be negotiated between individual suppliers and users. So, for now, the use of either one (or none) is compliant with this framework.
+
+# 6 Framework common object services requirements
+
+The CORBA ORB provides basic object-to-object interaction capabilities [2]. Additional capabilities are defined as separate "Common Object Services." The CORBA Common Object Services are general purpose, domain-independent services that are fundamental for developing CORBA applications composed of distributed objects. They also provide the basic building blocks for application interoperability. The services are defined with object interfaces and can be combined in many different ways and put to many uses in different applications. In a specific domain, CORBA
+
+Common Object Services can be used to construct higher-level facilities and object frameworks that can inter-operate across multiple platform environments.
+
+Many of these CORBA Common Object Services have already been implemented and are available as commercial, off-the-shelf software products. Also, programmers working in many industries will likely have experience with them in the near future. Reusing these Common Object Services instead of defining new ones strictly for the telecommunications industry or re-implementing the functionality in application-specific code will result in a quicker, more cost-efficient adoption of CORBA for network management.
+
+The following subclauses specify requirements on the use of CORBA Common Object Services to ensure interoperability between different network management systems and to preserve the telecommunications context.
+
+## 6.1 The Naming Service
+
+The OMG Naming Service is CORBA's directory service, or "white pages"[3]. It allows a client to build a name-to-object association called a *name binding* that other clients can then use to find the object. (CORBA object references are binary and difficult for use by humans.) A name binding is always defined relative to a *naming context*. A naming context is an object that contains a set of name bindings in which each name is locally unique. A name binding is a data structure containing two strings and an object reference (address). The *ID* string is the identifier for the binding. A second string, called "kind," is also part of the data structure. Together, the ID and kind uniquely identify an object relative to a context. Different names can be bound to an object in the same or different contexts at the same time. The naming context can also be bound to a name in another naming context. Binding contexts in other contexts creates a *naming graph* – a directed graph with nodes and labeled edges where nodes are contexts. Given a context in a naming graph, a sequence of name components (*ID-kind* pairs) can reference an object. This sequence of structures, called a *compound name*, defines a path in the naming graph that may be navigated to resolve the name and find the object.
+
+There is no requirement that CORBA name bindings represent a containment relationship between objects, but the concept of containment is important in network management and needs to be communicated across network management interfaces. The CORBA Naming Service is the best way to accomplish this. The following paragraphs define a series of requirements on using the CORBA Naming Service to represent the containment relationships among managed object instances.
+
+**(R) NAME-1** Every managed object shall have one and only one name (DN). The components of the name may be obtained from multiple federated servers. Although the OMG Naming Service supports multiple names per object, this framework restricts a managed object to using a single name. Support for multiple names is outside the scope of the framework.
+
+**(R) NAME-2** Since a simple name binding cannot identify an object and also contained objects, each managed object must actually have a corresponding Naming Context. A specially-named binding in each such context will bind the *ID* value "Object" with a reference to the actual managed object. (The *kind* field of this binding will be null.) Other naming contexts, representing contained managed objects, may also be bound to names in this context.
+
+**(R) NAME-3** The *ID* field of a name binding for a naming context representing a managed object will be application-dependent, and it may actually have semantic value beyond uniquely identifying a managed object, for a particular class of objects. For example, an *ID* value of "7" for an equipment holder object representing a slot in a shelf may indicate that this object represents the 7th slot in the shelf. Special semantic value attached to IDs will be documented for each class of managed objects as part of the managed object interface specification. Note that the *ID* field is a string.
+
+**(R) NAME-4** The *kind* field of a name binding for a naming context representing a managed object shall be determined by *managed object name binding information*. This is information defined as constants in IDL modules specifically for the purpose of representing possible containment relationships. See ITU-T X.780 for details on the representation of managed object name binding information. In short, however, a name binding module will contain a constant string named "kind" that will be used as the value for the *kind* field in CORBA name bindings. The value of this string will usually be the unscoped class name of the managed object. This adds value by making it easier to identify the type of an object and by reducing the likelihood of name collisions. One factor complicating this is the release of new versions of an object, for example, an *equipmentR1* that extends an *equipment* object. When the new class merely extends the capabilities of an existing class without changing its purpose (that is, it still represents the same managed resource), the *kind* field will usually be the original base class name. This, however, is ultimately up to the object modeler who defines the name binding IDL module. Using the original value will enable existing applications to continue to use the new class as if it was the old version.
+
+Figure 2 gives an example of name bindings according to the above requirements. In the figure, CORBA Naming Contexts are represented as folders. The contents of the folders are name bindings. The convention for representing a name component as a string with the format . is used. (Some example name bindings do not have a pointer shown in the diagram to reduce the complexity of the diagram.) The graph represents a Network object, named "CentralNet," that contains a Managed Element object named "Element9" and a Connection named "R5698."
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a naming graph of managed objects using folder-like containers for naming contexts and boxes for objects.
+
+- CentralNet (The local root Naming Context)**: Contains bindings for `CentralNet.Network`, `NorthernNet.Network`, and `SouthernNet.Network`. An arrow points from this context to a box labeled **MO (The CentralNet Network Managed Object)**.
+- CentralNet Managed Object Context**: Contains bindings for `Object`, `Element9.ManagedElement`, `R5698.Connection`, and `A549.Trail`. Arrows point from `Element9.ManagedElement` to the **Bay1.Equipment** context and from `R5698.Connection` to the **Object** context.
+- Bay1.Equipment (The Naming Context for Element9)**: Contains bindings for `Bay1.Equipment`, `Version7.Software`, and `Object`. An arrow points from `Object` to an **MO (The Element9 ME Managed Object)** box.
+- Object (The Naming Context for Connection R5698)**: Contains a binding for `Object`. An arrow points from `Object` to an **MO (The R5698 Connection Managed Object)** box.
+
+Figure 2/Q.816 – Naming graph of Managed Objects. A hierarchical diagram showing naming contexts as folders and managed objects as boxes. The root context 'CentralNet' contains 'CentralNet.Network', 'NorthernNet.Network', and 'SouthernNet.Network'. It points to a context containing 'Object', 'Element9.ManagedElement', 'R5698.Connection', and 'A549.Trail'. This context points to 'Bay1.Equipment' (containing 'Version7.Software' and 'Object') and another 'Object' context. 'Bay1.Equipment' points to an 'MO' box labeled '(The Element9 ME Managed Object)'. The 'Object' context points to an 'MO' box labeled '(The R5698 Connection Managed Object)'. A separate 'MO' box labeled '(The CentralNet Network Managed Object)' is also shown.
+
+T0414900-00
+
+**Figure 2/Q.816 – Naming graph of Managed Objects**
+
+**(R) NAME-5** Each managed system shall provide at least one local root naming context. Note on Figure 2 that the topmost naming context is referred to as a "local root" naming context. This is the naming context in which names for the topmost managed objects on the system will be bound, as well as names for certain support service objects.
+
+A managed system may have multiple local root naming contexts. Since managed objects cannot have multiple names, they may be bound under only one local root. Support service objects, however, may have names bound under multiple root naming contexts on the same system. One factor to consider when determining how many local root naming contexts a managed system will have is if the possibility exists that some of the managed objects might sometime have to be moved to another system. Moving an entire tree of managed objects, including the local root naming context, will be simpler than moving a subtree of objects.
+
+**(R) NAME-6** A managed system shall provide a local administrative procedure for assigning a CORBA name to each local root naming context on the system. All names exchanged across the managed interface will include the local root context name unless otherwise noted. This includes operation parameters and notifications.
+
+This feature is to enable an administration to make names globally unique. Since the managed system must ensure that all names are unique relative to the local root naming context, by assigning a globally unique name to the local root naming context an administration can ensure that all names on a managed system are unique. The mechanism used to choose a globally unique name for the local root context is up to the administration. The format of the name will be the same as used by the CORBA Naming Service, *CosNaming::Name*. Multiple components are allowed, but administrations will likely want to keep local root context names short to reduce overhead.
+
+In addition to making names unique, assigning a name to the local root naming context will make it easier for a managing system to resolve names. This is because the managing system can bind the local root naming contexts for all the systems it manages into its own local naming service. The name it uses for this binding will be the same name assigned to the root naming context on the managed system. See Figure 3 for an example.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating the assignment of names to root naming contexts. A Managing System at the top contains three points labeled A, B, and C. Below it are two Managed Systems, X and Y. Managed System X contains two 'Local Root' contexts, 'Local Root = A' and 'Local Root = B'. Each local root contains an 'Element1: ManagedElement' object and an 'Object' object. Managed System Y contains one 'Local Root = C' context, which also contains an 'Element1: ManagedElement' object and an 'Object' object. Arrows from points A, B, and C in the Managing System point to the corresponding local root contexts in the managed systems. A small code snippet 'T0414910-00' is visible in the bottom right corner of the diagram area.
+
+**Figure 3/Q.816 – Assigning names to root naming contexts**
+
+Figure 3 shows two element management systems on the bottom. System "X" has two objects of type *ManagedElement*, and System "Y" has 1. Each *ManagedElement* object belongs to its own local root naming context, which means System X has two local roots and System Y has one. There is also a network management system, and the local root contexts of both EMSs have been bound into the naming service on this system. This administration has chosen to assign the unique names "A" and "B" to the local root contexts on System X, and "C" to the local root context on System Y. References to the local root naming contexts have been bound with these names in the network management System.
+
+Say System Y emits a notification concerning its *ManagedElement* object. The full name of that object (contained in the notification) will be "C/Element1.ManagedElement". Now let's say the NMS wants to retrieve more data from the object. In order to do so, it will have to resolve the name into a CORBA object reference. The NMS can accomplish this by simply performing a resolve operation using the full name on the local context where it bound the EMS local root contexts. Because the NMS' naming service is federated with the EMS naming services, the NMS' naming service can automatically forward the resolve operation to the naming service on the proper EMS, and return the object reference to the NMS application.
+
+It is anticipated that the local root naming context name will be assigned during the initialization of a new system. Once in operation, it will be extremely difficult if not impossible to change.
+
+Once assigned a name, the local root context's CORBA Interoperable Object Reference (IOR) will have to be bound to a naming context on the managing system, since up to now it has no idea the new system exists. This means the managed system will also have to provide a means for accessing
+
+the "stringified" IOR of the local root naming context. This value will then be transferred to the managing system by some means other than the management interface (e-mail, ftp, etc.). The managing system will require a way to accept this stringified IOR and bind it to a name on the managing system. As soon as the local root context's IOR is bound to a name on the managing system, the managing system can begin discovering the objects on the new system (using the Multiple Object Operation Service described later) and begin to manage it.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows three main components: a Managing System at the top, Managed System X at the bottom left, and Managed System Y at the bottom right. The Managing System contains a list of entries labeled A, B, and C. Managed System X contains two local root naming contexts, 'Local Root = A' and 'Local Root = B'. Each local root contains an 'Element1: ManagedElement' and an 'Object'. Arrows indicate that 'Element1: ManagedElement' points to 'Object', and 'Object' points to its containing local root. Managed System Y contains one local root context, 'Local Root = C', which also contains an 'Element1: ManagedElement' and an 'Object' with similar internal arrows. Long arrows connect the local roots in the managed systems to the entries in the managing system: 'Local Root = A' to entry A, 'Local Root = B' to entry B, and entry C to 'Local Root = C' in Managed System Y. A small code 'T0414920-00' is visible in the bottom right corner of the diagram area.
+
+Diagram illustrating the movement of a local root naming context and its objects between systems. A Managing System at the top contains entries A, B, and C. Managed System X contains two local roots, A and B. Managed System Y contains one local root, C. Each local root contains an Element1: ManagedElement and an Object. Arrows show the mapping: A in X to A in the Managing System, B in X to B in the Managing System, and C in the Managing System to C in Y. Within each system, arrows show Element1 pointing to Object, and Object pointing to its own container.
+
+**Figure 4/Q.816 – Moving a local root naming context and contained objects**
+
+Figure 4 shows how a local root naming context and all of the objects contained below it can be moved to another system without changing the names of the objects. The only change that might be required would be to change the object reference bound to the name in the network management system(s). Also, any outstanding references to moved objects would have to be refreshed. Moving only part of a tree contained below a local root naming context would require re-naming those objects.
+
+### 6.1.1 Translating managed object names to strings
+
+In this framework, managed object names are represented with data structures. There may at times, however, be a need to represent managed object names as strings. The CORBA Interoperable Naming Service[Ref] specification defines rules for translating CORBA Naming Service names (which are used by this framework) to strings. Network management systems may, however, find the need to store managed object names in Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) servers. This clause defines the rules for translating managed object names to strings suitable for use with LDAP.
+
+A managed object name is a data structure containing sequences of data structures with two strings named *kind* and *ID*. Managed object names are converted to Distinguished Name strings by concatenating the strings from each of the data structures in the sequence, along with equal signs ('=') and commas (,) in the order defined below.
+
+DN string = "0=0,1=1,2=2..."
+
+"0 refers to the value of the *kind* string in the first component of the sequence,1 refers to the value of the *kind* string in the second component of the sequence, etc. When placed into the LDAP DN string form, the *kind* and *ID* strings may have to contain escape sequences. See [12] for details.
+
+## 6.2 Notification Service
+
+The CORBA Notification Service supports the asynchronous exchange of event messages between clients using a subscribe-and-publish paradigm [4]. The Notification Service introduces event channels that broker event messages, notification suppliers that supply event messages, and notification consumers that consume event messages. The CORBA Notification Service preserves all of the semantics specified for the CORBA Event Service, allowing for backward compatibility with Event Service clients. The extended functionality that is important to the network management domain is the structured event, event filtering, and QoS (Quality of Service). Figure 5 depicts the general architecture of the Notification Service.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a central vertical rectangle labeled "Notification Service Event Channel". To its left, three "Supplier" boxes are arranged vertically. Each Supplier box has a double-headed arrow labeled "QoS" pointing to a small box labeled "F". Each "F" box is connected to the central channel. To the right of the channel, three "Consumer" boxes are arranged vertically. Each Consumer box has a double-headed arrow labeled "QoS" pointing to a small box labeled "F". Each "F" box is connected to the central channel. Vertical dotted lines between the second and third boxes on both sides indicate additional suppliers and consumers. At the bottom left, a small box labeled "F" is shown next to the text "Filter". At the bottom right, the text "T0414930-00" is present.
+
+Diagram illustrating the Architecture of the Notification Service. A central 'Notification Service Event Channel' is shown. On the left, multiple 'Supplier' boxes are connected to the channel via 'Filter' (F) boxes. On the right, multiple 'Consumer' boxes are connected to the channel via 'Filter' (F) boxes. Each connection is labeled 'QoS'. A legend at the bottom left shows a box labeled 'F' next to the text 'Filter'. A code 'T0414930-00' is in the bottom right.
+
+Figure 5/Q.816 – Architecture of the Notification Service
+
+**(R) NOTIF-1** The Notification Service shall support the push interface model. The managed object interface to the event channel shall be a push supplier.
+
+**(R) NOTIF-2** The managed system shall instantiate the event channel object(s) that it will use. A managed system must instantiate at least one channel and may instantiate more than one. (These channels may either be OMG Notification event channels [4] or OMG Telecom Log event channels [5], or an object supporting the 3GPP NotificationIRPOperation interface [13].) The framework does not support the creation or deletion of event channels across the management interface. Local administrative procedures may be provided for this purpose. (Event channels do, however, support the creation and deletion of filters across the management interface.)
+
+**(R) NOTIF-3** Each event channel shall be registered with the Channel Finder service. The Channel Finder service is a support service defined by this framework in 7.2. During registration, the channel shall be associated with one or more managed objects that each forms the base of a scope of managed objects that send their events to the channel. Multiple channels may be associated with the same base managed object. A likely use of this is to have different channels for different types of events. For example, one channel might handle performance management events while another handles alarms. When the channel is registered with the Channel Finder service, it is also tied with a set of event types it handles and a set of managed object types that send their events to it. Every notification from every managed object must go to at least one channel.
+
+While this approach is quite flexible and enables complex arrangements of channels, because channels cannot be created across the management interface, the complexity is under the control of the implementation of the managed system. It might be as simple as a single channel monitoring all managed objects on the system. (Please note again that while channels cannot be created across the interface, individual channels do support the creation and deletion of filters across the management interface. Thus, any number of clients may register for the events they wish to receive.)
+
+**(R) NOTIF-4** The Notification Service shall support structured events.
+
+**(O) NOTIF-5** The use of sequences of structured events is optional. Sequences of structured events are defined in [4] and are used to send multiple events in one message.
+
+**(O) NOTIF-6** The use of typed events is optional.
+
+**NOTE** – If the managed system supports typed events it still must enable managing systems to receive structured events if the manager chooses. This may be accomplished by using a Notification Event Channel that supports the translation of typed event to structured events as defined in the OMG's Notification Service specification [4].
+
+The message interface between suppliers and consumers shall be defined in IDL as if they were using typed events. This is done to enable capturing the notification in IDL (which cannot be done for structured events except with comments) as well as to support typed notifications for applications that wish to use them.
+
+Rules for creating structured notifications based on these typed operations are provided below.
+
+The OMG Notification Service definition does define rules for channels to automatically convert typed notifications to structured notifications. If the managed objects natively create typed notifications, but the client wishes to receive structured notifications, the OMG translation rules shall be followed by the channel. Note, however, that this arrangement is likely less efficient than both systems using typed events. If the managed objects natively create structured notifications, they shall do so according to the rules below.
+
+The structured notifications natively created by a managed system will differ slightly from the structured notifications created by automatic conversion from typed notifications. One reason for this is to make it possible for a managing system to tell the difference, and accept typed notifications if they are supported by the managed system. Another is to more efficiently use structured notifications. Managed systems that natively create structured notifications may exclude optional parameters from those notifications. Because a typed notification is created from a strongly-typed method invocation, a commercial notification channel that translates this to a structured notification will include any null values as name-value pairs in the body of the structured event rather than exclude them. Note that allowing managed systems that natively create structured notifications to exclude optional parameters makes it unlikely that commercial notification channels will be able to support the automatic conversion of structured events to typed events.
+
+In summary, if the managed objects natively create structured events, they shall do so according to the rules below. Because, for efficiency, these rules allow managed systems to exclude optional parameters from structured notifications, support for automatic conversion of these structured notifications to typed notifications by commercial notification channels is not expected. Thus, the managing system must accept structured events. If the managed system natively creates typed events, the managing system may rely on the notification channel to automatically convert them to structured events based on the OMG Notification Service's rules. Structured notifications rely upon the heavy use of CORBA "any" data types, however, which can be inefficient. Thus, in this case, the managing system will likely prefer to accept typed notifications.
+
+**(R) NOTIF-7** The suppliers and consumers of structured events shall follow these rules for constructing and receiving the structured events. (See Figure 6 which depicts the Notification Structure and how elements from the IDL notification definition are to be mapped into it.)
+
+- The `domain_type` string in the fixed header of the structured event shall be set to "telecommunications".
+- The `type_name` string in the fixed header of the structured event shall be set to the scoped name of the operation defining the notification in IDL, for example, "itut\_x780::Notifications::attributeValueChange".
+- The `event_name` string in the fixed header of the structured event is not used by this framework.
+- Optional header fields may be included to support features like Quality of Service as appropriate.
+- Each parameter in the operation shall be placed in a name-value pair in the filterable body portion of the structured event. The `fd_name` string of this pair shall be set to the name of the parameter and the type placed in the associated `fd_value` will be the type specified for the parameter. Using as an example the `equipmentAlarm` notification from the IDL presented later in this document, the first `fd_name` string would be set to "eventTime" and the first `fd_value` would contain an `ExternalTimeType` data type. Although all notification parameters go in the filterable body of the notification structure, depending on the data type of the parameter it may be difficult or even impossible to create a useful filter utilizing that parameter. Filter "matching rules" are based on the capabilities of the channel.
+- Parameters that are denoted "optional" may optionally be excluded from the notification structure. If typed notifications are used, these parameters are included, but will usually have a special null value if not supported. For types for which there is no special null value (such as integers) a special type consisting of a union between the base type (such as integer) and the null type is usually defined. These union types may be excluded from structured notifications when they have a null value, but if they are included, the union type must be used. This is to enable the same filters to be used for both structured and typed notifications.
+- The remainder of the body of the structured event (the non-filterable part) shall be null.
+- Parameters named "operation" shall be avoided in notification operations to potentially support the use of typed notifications. (When converting typed notifications to structured notifications, the parameters of an operation are automatically placed into a notification structure by the event channel. Unfortunately, the rules developed for doing this state that the name of the operation used to issue the notification goes not in the header of the event, but in the body of the of the structure as the first name-value pair. The `fd_name` string is set to "operation" and the `fd_value` is set to a string containing the name of the operation. Using a parameter named "operation" would then result in a second name-value pair with the name "operation", and the two could be confused.)
+
+
+
+```
+
+void equipmentAlarm (
+ in ExternalTimeType
+ in NameType
+ in ObjectClassType
+...);
+
+```
+
+eventTime,
+source,
+sourceClass,
+
+
+
+| | | |
+|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
+| domain_type | | Fixed Header |
+| type_name | | |
+| event_name | | |
+| ohf_name 1 | ohf_value 1 | Variable Header |
+| ohf_name 2 | ohf_value 2 | |
+| ... | | |
+| ohf_name n | ohf_value n | |
+| fd_name 1 =
"eventTime" | fd_value 1 =
value of
eventTime | Filterable Body
Fields |
+| fd_name 2 =
"source" | fd_value 2 =
value of source | |
+| ... | | |
+| fd_name n | fd_value n | |
+| remainder_of_body | | Remaining Body |
+
+T0414940-00
+
+Diagram showing the mapping of a notification function call to a structured event format. Arrows show 'Telecommunications' mapping to domain\_type, '' mapping to type\_name, and function parameters mapping to filterable body fields. The event structure is divided into Fixed Header, Variable Header, and Event Body (Filterable Body Fields and Remaining Body).
+
+**Figure 6/Q.816 – Mapping notifications to structured events**
+
+**(R) NOTIF-8** The Notification Service specification supports filter expressions that are used to determine if the event is to be forwarded. It also supports filter expressions that "map" values in the notification to parameters used to impact the operation of the event channel, such as the QoS used in delivering the event. For example, a mapping filter might be used to map a "severity=major" field from an event (which means nothing to an event channel) to a QoS parameter "priority=1" (which does mean something to the channel). The Notification Service shall support event filtering with filter objects that support constraints expressed in the default constraint grammar specified by the OMG. The Notification Service shall also support mapping filters.
+
+**(R) NOTIF-9** The Notification Service reliability QoS shall support EventReliability = Persistent & ConnectionReliability = Persistent.
+
+*Each event is guaranteed to be delivered to all consumers registered to receive it at the time the event was delivered to the channel, within expiry limits. If the connection between the channel and a consumer is lost for any reason, the channel will persistently store any events destined for that consumer until each event time out due to expiry limits, or the consumer once again becomes*
+
+*available and the channel is subsequently able to deliver the events to all registered consumers. In addition, upon start from a failure the notification channel will automatically re-establish connections to all clients that were connected to it at the time the failure occurred [4].*
+
+**(R) NOTIF-10** The Notification Service order policy QoS shall allow the events to be delivered in the order of their arrival, i.e. FIFO. The Notification Service may also optionally support a priority-order QoS in which events could be buffered in priority order, such that higher priority events will be delivered before lower priority events.
+
+**(R) NOTIF-11** The Notification Service implementation deployed shall be compliant to the conformance statements of the OMG Notification Service specification with the exception of the pull interface model.
+
+## 6.3 Telecom Log Service
+
+The CORBA Telecom Log Service [5] is a CORBA-based Log Service that fully supports ITU-T X.735. The log is implemented as an Event Service or Notification Service event channel. The Log Service supports the following functionality:
+
+- Writing to the log: Events supplied to the log are persistently stored as log records.
+- Forwarding from the log: Events supplied to the log are also forwarded to other logs or to any application that wishes to receive them.
+- Log-generated events: The log itself will generate events.
+
+Also the Log Service provides functions of log control and management, log record manipulation, log lifecycle management. Figure 7 gives a graphic representation of the Log Service.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the Telecom Log Service architecture. At the center is a large rectangle labeled "Notification Service Event Channel". On the left, three boxes labeled "Supplier" are connected to the channel via arrows labeled "QoS". Each arrow points to a small box labeled "F" (Filter) which is inside the channel. On the right, three boxes labeled "Consumer" are connected to the channel via arrows labeled "QoS". Each arrow points from a small box labeled "F" (Filter) which is inside the channel. Vertical dotted lines between the suppliers and consumers indicate additional instances. Below the channel, a box labeled "Log Filter" is connected to the channel. Below the "Log Filter", a box labeled "Non-Event Writer" points to a cylinder labeled "Log Persistent Store". A double-headed arrow connects the "Log Filter" to the "Log Persistent Store". At the bottom left, a small box labeled "F" is next to the text "Filter". The code "T0414950-00" is in the bottom right corner.
+
+Figure 7/Q.816 – Telecom Log Service diagram
+
+**Figure 7/Q.816 – Telecom Log Service**
+
+By manipulating the Log Filter, a managing system is able to control which events are logged and which aren't, in exactly the same way it is able to control which events are forwarded and which aren't. The only exception is the "Non-event Writer," which is an application that writes data directly to the log.
+
+Note that the definition of the OMG's Telecom Log pre-dates this framework. The notifications from the Telecom Log are structurally different from the other notifications in this framework even though some of the names of the notifications and parameters are semantically the same.
+
+**(R) LOG-1** The Log Service shall support all the Notification Service requirements. Log Event Channels must be registered with the Channel Finder service.
+
+**(R) LOG-2** The Log Record supported by the Log Service shall be the normal `struct LogRecord`. The support of `struct TypedLogRecord` is optional.
+
+**(R) LOG-3** The Log Service implementation shall be compliant with the conformance statement in the OMG Telecom Log Service specification with the exception of the pull interface model.
+
+## 6.4 Messaging Service
+
+The CORBA Messaging Service covers three areas: Asynchronous Method Invocation (AMI), Time-Independent Invocation (TII), and Messaging Quality of Service (QoS) [8]. Of the three areas, the AMI has a significant role in the network management domain because it allows clients to make non-blocking requests on a CORBA object.
+
+Note that CORBA is designed to enable an application to invoke a method on an object as if the object was local to the application, regardless of the object's actual location. Typically, when a method is invoked on an object in a non-distributed application, control passes to that object and the calling routine blocks until the method completes and control is passed back. These semantics are maintained in CORBA. In a distributed application, however, network latency can lead to poor performance. There are five possible solutions to consider:
+
+- 1) Applications simply live with the delays.
+- 2) TMN IDL interfaces are defined to be asynchronous. That is, management operations are always defined to return no results. Thus, invocations can be made without blocking. (This is supported by CORBA.) Results are returned later when the managed system performs a "callback" on the managing system.
+- 3) TMN IDL interfaces always have two sets of operations, one that is asynchronous, and the other synchronous.
+- 4) TMN IDL interfaces are defined to be synchronous, and manager applications improve performance by being multi-threaded and capable of blocking on multiple outstanding requests while continuing to process other work.
+- 5) TMN IDL interfaces are defined to be synchronous, and manager applications improve performance by using the Asynchronous Method Invocation service, and an ORB that supports it.
+
+This framework chooses a combination of solutions 4 and 5. TMN IDL interfaces are defined to be synchronous. Manager applications that are multi-threaded can use these interfaces directly and experience good performance. Manager applications that cannot be multi-threaded shall use the AMI service to improve performance. Since multi-threaded managers do not need the AMI service, its use is optional.
+
+The AMI is treated as a client side language mapping issue only. In most cases, server side implementations are not required to change. In certain situations, such as with a transactional server,
+
+the asynchrony of a client does matter and requires server side changes if it is expected to handle transactional asynchronous requests. Transactional asynchronous requests, however, will not be addressed in this Recommendation. Figure 8 depicts the basic concept of the OMG AMI model.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ SC[Sync Client] -- "IDL – Stub (sync)" --> AO[Async-aware ORB]
+ AC[Async Client] -- "Implied-IDL – Stub (async)" --> AO
+ AO -- "IDL – Skeleton (sync)" --> S[Servant]
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the OMG AMI model architecture. At the top, there are two client boxes: 'Sync Client' on the left and 'Async Client' on the right. The 'Sync Client' is connected to a central 'Async-aware ORB' box via a line labeled 'IDL – Stub (sync)'. The 'Async Client' is also connected to the 'Async-aware ORB' box via a line labeled 'Implied-IDL – Stub (async)'. The 'Async-aware ORB' box is connected to a 'Servant' box at the bottom via a line labeled 'IDL – Skeleton (sync)'. Below the 'Servant' box, there is a small text label 'T0414960-00'.
+
+Diagram of the OMG AMI model showing a Sync Client and an Async Client connected to an Async-aware ORB, which is connected to a Servant.
+
+**Figure 8/Q.816 – Asynchronous-aware ORB**
+
+The AMI specification provides two models of asynchronous requests: *callback* and *polling*. In the *callback* model, the client passes an object reference for a `ReplyHandler` object as a parameter when it invokes a two-way asynchronous operation on a server. When the server responds, the client ORB receives the response and dispatches it to the appropriate method on the `ReplyHandler` servant so the client can handle the reply. In other words, the ORB turns the response into a request on the client's `ReplyHandler`. The `ReplyHandler` is a normal CORBA object that is implemented by the programmer as with any object implementation. In the *polling* model, the client makes the request passing in all the parameters needed for the invocation, and is returned a `Poller` object which can be queried to obtain the results of the invocation. This `Poller` is an instance of a `valueType`, which is a new IDL type introduced by the new *Objects-by-Value* specification. A `valueType` has both data members and methods, which when invoked are just local function calls and not distributed CORBA operation invocations.
+
+The value of the Asynchronous Method Invocation capability in network management applications is that it enables managing systems that wish to use asynchronous method calls to inter-operate with managed systems using the same interface definitions as those used by synchronous clients. No changes are required in the interface definition or the implementation of the managed system. The following requirements are proposed for implementations that optionally wish to support asynchronous method invocations (but not transactions with "ACID" capabilities).
+
+**(O) AMI-1** The AMI-aware CORBA implementation shall at least support the callback programming model.
+
+**(O) AMI-2** For each operation in an IDL interface, the AMI-aware CORBA implementation shall generate corresponding asynchronous callback method signatures. These signatures are described in implied-IDL which is used to generate language-specific operation signatures.
+
+**(O) AMI-3** The AMI-aware CORBA ORB shall pass a type-specific `ExceptionHolder` value instance that contains the marshaled exceptions as its state to the `ReplyHandler` when exception
+
+replies are returned from the CORBA object. The AMI-aware IDL compiler would generate a type-specific `ExceptionHolder` for each IDL interface.
+
+**(O) AMI-4** The AMI-aware IDL compiler shall generate a type-specific reply handler for each IDL interface. The client will implement and register a reply handler with each asynchronous request and receive a callback when the reply is returned for that request. This reply handler is derived from the generic `Messaging::ReplyHandler`.
+
+## 6.5 Security Service
+
+The CORBA Security Service comprises the security functionality of authentication of principals (human users and objects), authorization of access to objects by principals, security auditing, communication security, non-repudiation, and administration [6]. All of this may be overkill for many applications, though. Instead, applications might require only the communication security and system-level authentication functionality based on Transport Layer Security (TLS) technology (and its precursor, SSL) for availability and simplicity reasons. Finally, some applications might require no security. The optional requirements below, therefore, reflect three possible choices:
+
+- 1) No security.
+- 2) ORBs use SSL to provide communications security and system-level authentication, which is essentially "session" security.
+- 3) ORBs use the CORBA Security Service to provide communications security, authentication, non-repudiation, access control lists for groups or individuals accessing individual objects and operations, etc.
+
+The actual level of service to be provided on an interface is left as a matter to be negotiated between the parties supplying the managed and managing systems.
+
+**(O) SEC-1** The CORBA interface may optionally support either the "Secure IOP protocol," or "CORBA Security SSL Interoperability," as defined in the CORBA Security Service Specification [6].
+
+**(O) SEC-2** The CORBA Security Service may be used to support its wide range of capabilities.
+
+**(O) SEC-3** Support for the exchange of authentication certificates shall be an option left up to the administration.
+
+## 6.6 Transaction Service
+
+In a distributed computing environment such as CORBA, it is possible that updates from some clients could be overwritten by concurrent (or near concurrent) updates from other clients unless suitable safeguards are provided. Even though the Notification Service and Telecom Log Service provide a basis for making a client aware that its update has been overwritten, they do not provide a locking mechanism to prevent the occurrence of such overwrites. The OMG Transaction Service [7] provides a comprehensive locking mechanism for preventing the overwriting of one client's update by a concurrent update from a different client. This solution is designed for high reliability. However, the OMG Transaction Service may not be required in all applications and the additional overhead incurred may not be justified. If consistency of data after concurrent updates must be supported, the transaction service from the OMG should be considered.
+
+**(O) TRANS-1** The CORBA interface may optionally support the OMG Transaction Service to guarantee data consistency.
+
+# 7 Framework support services
+
+This clause defines common support services included in the framework that are not standard OMG CORBA Common Object Services. Many network management applications perform functions that are not commonly required by general-purpose business applications, so it is not reasonable to expect the standard CORBA framework to supply all the necessary services for network management. This clause defines services that will be broadly used by network management applications but are not as likely to be used by many other types of applications and are therefore unlikely to become CORBA Common Object Services. These services also provide functionality required to enable the reuse of existing information models without significant changes in semantics.
+
+The advantages of placing this functionality in common support services is that it unburdens the managed object implementations from providing these services and allows the services to evolve to provide greater functionality without changing the managed object interfaces or implementations. The IDL describing the interfaces to these services can be found in Annex A.
+
+## 7.1 The Factory Finder Service
+
+The Factory Finder Service enables clients to find factories. A client finds a factory by querying this service with the class name of a factory. The service responds with a reference to a factory of that type. Note that the class name supplied by the client is the factory's class, not the class of the object to be created.
+
+The Factory Finder Service is found by looking it up in the Naming Service.
+
+Before factories can be found in the service, the service must know about them. Therefore, the Factory Finder Service also provides a means for factories to register and unregister themselves with the service. While it is not necessary to expose this capability across the management interface, these operations are defined to enable the implementation of the Factory Finder Service as a component, separate from the objects comprising a specific information model. Thus, once implemented, the Factory Finder Service implementation will not have to be changed when new information models with new factories are defined. The Factory Finder Service could even be acquired from a third party.
+
+The operations used to register and unregister channels are in a separate interface that is subclassed from the Factory Finder interface. Only the Factory Finder interface needs to be implemented to conform with this framework. The subclassed interface is provided for implementations that wish to use it to construct the Factory Finder service as a separate component.
+
+This is the IDL that defines the interface to the Factory Finder Service (without comments):
+
+```
+interface FactoryFinder {
+
+ itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory find (
+ in ObjectType factoryClass)
+ raises (FactoryNotFound, itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ FactoryInfoSetType list()
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of FactoryFinder interface
+
+interface FactoryFinderComponent : FactoryFinder {
+
+ void register (in ObjectType factoryClass,
+ in itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory factoryRef)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+```
+
+```
+
+ void unregister (in ObjectClassType factoryClass,
+ in itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory factoryRef)
+ raises (FactoryNotFound, itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ }; // end of FactoryFinderComponent interface
+
+```
+
+The *find* operation on the *FactoryFinder* interface is used by a client to find a factory of a particular type. The *list* operation returns a list of all the factories registered with the Factory Finder. The *register* operation on the *FactoryFinderComponent* interface is used by a factory to register itself with the service, and the *unregister* operation is used by a factory to delete its registration. These last two operations should not be used by managing systems.
+
+**(R) FACTORY\_FINDER-1** A managed system shall instantiate at least one Factory Finder Service object. Also, each local root naming context on a system shall have at least one name binding for a Factory Finder Server Object. The value of the *ID* string in this binding shall simply identify the server, perhaps with a value similar to "FactoryFinder1". The *kind* string in the binding shall identify the class of the object ("itut\_q816::FactoryFinder").
+
+**(R) FACTORY\_FINDER-2** The Factory Finder server object(s) shall support the Factory Finder interface described above and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A. The Factory Finder server object(s) may support the Factory Finder Component interfaces defined above. The functionality described above shall be supported.
+
+## 7.2 The Channel Finder Service
+
+It is anticipated that a large network management system might have multiple event channels. These channels might handle different types of events, or they might handle events from different sets of objects. To ensure that a client does not miss any of the events in which it is interested, a means of identifying the channels present on a managed system, and the events they are handling, is needed. The Channel Finder Service performs this function. A client can invoke an operation on this service to list all of the event channels present on a managed system, along with the events they are handling. Once the client knows about the channels, it can interact with them to arrange to receive notifications.
+
+A client finds a Channel Finder object by looking it up in the Naming Service.
+
+Before channels can be listed by the service, the service must know about them. Therefore, the Channel Finder Service also provides a means for channels to be registered and unregistered with the service. While it is not necessary to expose this capability across the management interface, these operations are defined to enable the implementation of the Channel Finder Service as a component, separate from the objects comprising a specific information model. Thus, once implemented, the Channel Finder Service implementation will not have to be changed when new information models are defined. The Channel Finder Service could even be acquired from a third party.
+
+The operations used to register and unregister channels are in a separate interface that is subclassed from the Channel Finder interface. Only the Channel Finder interface needs to be implemented to conform with this framework. The subclassed interface is provided for implementations that wish to use it to construct the channel finder service as a separate component.
+
+### 7.2.1 Channel Finder interface
+
+This is the IDL that defines the interface to the Channel Finder Service (without comments):
+
+```
+
+interface ChannelFinder {
+
+ ChannelInfoSetType list()
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+};
+
+```
+
+```
+
+}; // end of ChannelFinder interface
+
+interface ChannelFinderComponent : ChannelFinder {
+ void register (in ChannelIDType channelID,
+ in ObjectClassType channelClass,
+ in BaseAndScopeSetType baseAndScopes,
+ in EventSetType eventTypes,
+ in EventSetType excludedEventTypes,
+ in ScopedNameSetType sourceClasses,
+ in ScopedNameSetType excludedSourceClasses,
+ in EventChannel channel)
+ raises (ChannelAlreadyRegistered,
+ itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ void unregister (in ChannelIDType channelID)
+ raises (ChannelNotFound, itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+}; // end of ChannelFinderComponent interface
+
+```
+
+The *list* operation on the *ChannelFinder* interface can be used by a managing system to discover all the channels present on a managed system. The information returned is the same information included when a channel is registered, which is discussed below. The two operations on the *ChannelFinderComponent* interface are used by the managed system to register and unregister its channels with the service. These operations are not intended for use by a managing system.
+
+#### 7.2.1.1 Channel Finder data
+
+When a channel is registered, seven pieces of data are associated with the reference to the channel. First, a string identifier for the channel is specified. Second, the type of channel is identified (this framework has two types of channels: Notification channels and Log channels).
+
+After that, the set of objects covered by the channel is specified by a set of managed object names and "scopes" of objects contained below them. See 7.4.1.1 for more on scopes. There is a scope for each base managed object in the set. These base objects and the objects within their associated scopes are the sets of objects that send events to this channel. If multiple channels have scopes that overlap, the channel with the base object that is the closest ancestor to the source object handles the events from that object, pursuant to some restrictions discussed below. If multiple channels have the same base object and it is the closest ancestor to a source object, all of those channels process the events from that source object. An empty set has the special meaning that all managed objects directly bound to the local root naming context that also contains this channel finder are base objects and the scope of objects sending events to the channel are the whole subtrees contained by those objects.
+
+Next, the types of events sent to this channel are identified. This is done with two sets of strings. The *eventTypes* set explicitly includes the name of each type of event sent to this channel. An example event type is "itut\_x780::Notifications::equipmentAlarm". An empty set has the special meaning that all types of events are sent to this channel. The *excludedEventTypes* set lists the types of events that are not sent to this channel. If the *eventTypes* string set is null, then all events except those listed in the *excludedEventTypes* set are sent to the channel. If the *eventTypes* string set is not null, the *excludedEventTypes* parameter should be empty and is ignored.
+
+Finally, the types of objects sending events to this channel are identified. This is also done with two sets of strings. The *sourceClasses* set explicitly includes the name of each managed object class that sends events to this channel. An example object class name is "itut\_m3120::Equipment". An empty set has the special meaning that all types of managed objects send events to this channel. The *excludedSourceClasses* set lists the names of managed object classes that do not send events to this
+
+channel. If the *sourceClasses* string set is null, then all managed object classes except those listed in the *excludedSourceClasses* set send events to the channel. If the *sourceClasses* string set is not null, the *excludedSourceClasses* parameter should be empty and is ignored.
+
+#### 7.2.1.2 Channel coverage
+
+The combination of the base objects, list of event types, and source classes identifies the events handled by a channel. This can lead to some confusing combinations. While not all of these are expected to be implemented in systems, they are explained below just in case.
+
+- 1) A channel may be registered with multiple base objects and scopes.
+- 2) Multiple channels may be registered with the same base object. If the event lists and source object types associated with these channels also overlap, the events from objects in the overlapping scopes must be made available at all channels listing the matching event and source object types.
+- 3) An attempt to re-register a channel will result in an update to that channel registration. The new information will be associated with the channel and the old information will be discarded. A notification reporting the change will be sent.
+- 4) A managed object always sends an event to the channel with the associated base object that:
+ - has a base object and scope that includes the object;
+ - has the base object that is the managed object's closest superior (if other channels also have base objects and scopes that include the object);
+ - handles that type of event; and
+ - handles that class of object.
+
+If multiple channels tie, the managed object sends the event to all channels that tie.
+
+Figure 9 also graphically depicts some examples for further clarification.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a hierarchy of managed objects represented by circles. At the top is a single circle. Below it are three circles, each connected to the top circle by a line labeled "Containment Relationship". The leftmost of these three circles is labeled "Managed Object". Below each of these three circles are three more circles, forming a tree structure. On the right side, a large oval encloses the bottom two sub-trees (the middle and rightmost circles and their descendants). An arrow labeled "Channel Finder Association" points from a box for "Channel 2" to the top circle of this oval. Another arrow points from a box for "Channel 1" to the top-most circle of the entire hierarchy.
+
+Channel 1
+Event types = all
+Source classes = all
+
+Channel 2
+Event types = equipmentAlarm
+Source classes = circuitPack
+
+Managed Object
+
+Containment Relationship
+
+Equipment alarms from circuit packs in this subtree go to Channel 2. All other notifications go to Channel 1.
+
+T0414970-00
+
+Diagram illustrating channel coverage with two channels and a hierarchy of managed objects.
+
+Figure 9/Q.816 – Channel Example Event
+
+#### 7.2.1.3 Channel Finder notification
+
+A special notification has been defined that must be sent whenever a channel registration is added, removed, or modified. This notification must be sent on all channels registered immediately before the change occurred. Since this notification is emitted by the channel finder instead of a managed object, and since it is sent to all channels, the channel finder shall not list the channel change notification along with the other notifications handled by a channel. The IDL describing this notification is:
+
+```
+void channelChange (
+ in ChannelModificationType channelModification,
+ in ChannelInfoType channelInfo
+);
+```
+
+The channel modification parameter indicates if a channel has been added, deleted, or modified (in terms of the event types it handles). The channel information parameter provides a string describing the type of channel, a reference to the channel, the base object(s) with which it is associated, and the source object classes and event types it handles.
+
+It should be noted that while this approach to supporting multiple event channels is quite flexible and therefore complicated, the degree of complication is under the control of the managed system implementation. The creation and registration of event channels across the management interface is not supported. A complex managed system might support a local administrative procedure for adding, modifying, or removing channels to tune performance, or it might just update channels through software releases. A simple system will likely have one or perhaps two channels (one for high-priority events like equipment alarms and the other for everything else) associated with the root managed object. Also, please note that precluding a managing system from creating event channels does not preclude it from creating filters and "proxy suppliers" on existing channels. This gives the client capabilities equal to creating event forwarding discriminators in OSI network management systems.
+
+### 7.2.2 Channel Finder requirements
+
+**(R) CHANNEL\_FINDER-1** A managed system shall instantiate at least one Channel Finder Service object. Also, each local root naming context on a system shall have at least one name binding for a Channel Finder Service object. The value of the *ID* string in this binding shall simply identify the server, perhaps with a value similar to "ChannelFinder1". The *kind* string in the binding shall identify the class of the object ("itut\_q816::ChannelFinder").
+
+**(R) CHANNEL\_FINDER-2** The Channel Finder server object(s) shall support the Channel Finder interface described above and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A. The Channel Finder server object(s) may support the Channel Finder Component interfaces defined above. The functionality described above shall be supported.
+
+**(R) CHANNEL\_FINDER-3** Whenever a change to the channel registrations is made, the Channel Finder shall send a channel change notification on all channels registered immediately before the change.
+
+**(R) CHANNEL\_FINDER-4** The network of event channels reported by a managed system shall handle all alarms from all managed objects on the system. A system that lists a set of channels that does not cover all events from all managed objects on the system does not comply with this framework.
+
+## 7.3 The Terminator Service
+
+The purpose of the Terminator Service is to provide a place in the framework to implement common functionality that would otherwise have to be implemented in the managed objects. The Terminator Service is used by managing systems to delete managed objects. It does so according to the delete policy of the managed object. (ITU-T X.780 requires that every managed object have a *deletePolicy* attribute with one of three values: *notDeletable*, *deleteOnlyIfNoContainedObjects*, and *deleteContainedObjects*.) If the delete policy of the managed object is *notDeletable*, the Terminator Service does not delete the object, and instead raises an exception. If the delete policy is *deleteOnlyIfNoContainedObjects*, and the object does not contain any objects, then the Terminator Service deletes the object. Otherwise, it raises an exception. Finally, if the delete policy of the object is *deleteContainedObjects*, then the Terminator Service will delete the object as well as all of its contained objects, pursuant to some rules defined below.
+
+ITU-T X.780 also defines a destroy operation to be supported by all managed objects that is intended for use by the Terminator Service for actually deleting the managed object and releasing its resources. In addition to following the delete policies and actually deleting the managed objects, though, the Terminator Service is also a good place to implement code to maintain the integrity of the naming tree by removing name bindings for managed objects that are being deleted. Implementations may choose to implement this function elsewhere, but a goal of the framework is to enable implementations of managed objects that focus on representing network resources. It is believed that a service like this will help to make the implementation of managed objects simpler.
+
+The IDL describing the Terminator Service provides two methods for deleting a managed object. One identifies the managed object by name, the other by reference. This is the IDL that defines the delete service interface:
+
+```
+interface TerminatorService {
+
+ void deleteByName (in NameType name)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError,
+ itut_x780::DeleteError);
+
+ void deleteByRef (in itut_x780::ManagedObject mo)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError,
+ itut_x780::DeleteError);
+
+}; // end of TerminatorService interface
+```
+
+**(R) TERM-1** A managed system shall instantiate at least one Terminator Service object. Also, each local root naming context on a system shall have at least one name binding for a Terminator Service object. The value of the *ID* string in this binding shall simply identify the server, perhaps with a value similar to "Terminator1". The *kind* string in the binding shall identify the class of the object ("itut\_q816::TerminatorService").
+
+**(R) TERM-2** The interface supported by the Terminator Server object(s) shall be the Terminator interface described above and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A. The functionality described above must be supported.
+
+**(R) TERM-3** The Terminator Service shall delete objects according to the objects' delete policy attribute, which is set at creation and cannot be changed. Note that the Terminator Service is not a scoped service. The Terminator Service may actually delete multiple objects in response to a single request, but its focus is on the single object requested to be deleted. The Terminator Service shall implement the following rules when deleting an object:
+
+- 1) No object shall ever be "orphaned." That is, no object may be deleted without deleting its subordinates.
+- 2) If the object has a delete policy of *notDeletable*, the object shall not be deleted, nor are any of its subordinates if it has any. The *DeleteError* exception shall be raised with the error identifier set to the value *notDeletable*.
+- 3) If the object has a delete policy of *deleteOnlyIfNoContainedObjects*, and it does not have any subordinates, the object shall be deleted. If the object has subordinates, regardless of their delete policies, it shall not be deleted nor shall any of its subordinates. The *DeleteError* exception shall be raised with the error identifier set to the value *containsObjects*.
+- 4) If the object has a delete policy of *deleteContainedObjects*, and it does not have any subordinates, the object shall be deleted. If the object has subordinates, the Terminator Service shall check the delete policies of all the subordinates. If any are *notDeletable*, no objects are deleted. If any are *deleteOnlyIfNoContained* and they contain subordinates, no objects are deleted. Otherwise, the object and its subordinates are deleted.
+- 5) The Terminator Service shall delete contained objects from the bottom up. If any contained object raises an exception during deletion, the Terminator Service shall not remove that object's name and shall not delete any of its superiors. The Terminator Service shall, however, continue trying to delete other contained objects. When all objects that can be deleted are deleted, the Terminator Service shall raise a *DeleteError* exception with the error identifier set to the value *undeletableContainedObject*. This best-effort approach to deleting contained objects is required to make the results deterministic. The client can identify the undeletable objects because they will be at the leaves of the tree remaining beneath the target object.
+- 6) If the base object raises a *DeleteError* exception, the Terminator Service shall return the same exception (and included data). The object is not deleted and the object's name is not removed from the naming tree.
+
+## 7.4 The Multiple-Object Operation Service
+
+With potentially millions of entities to manage, there is a need for the framework to support operations on multiple objects with a single method invocation or perhaps a small number of invocations. The Multiple-Object Operation (MOO) Service provides this capability.
+
+It is expected that each network management platform supporting a CORBA interface will provide at least one instance of the MOO Service. (For performance reasons, it is recommended that the MOO Service, Naming Service, and the managed objects be located on the same computing platform.) Managers will interact with the service using a limited number of interactions requiring relatively low bandwidth. The service will in turn interact with managed objects using either their published CORBA interfaces or some proprietary means. This high number of interactions is expected to require higher bandwidth, thus the need to co-locate the service with the managed objects.
+
+Note that the MOO service is an example of application-specific access granularity discussed in clause 4.
+
+### 7.4.1 The MOO Service interface
+
+The MOO Service's interface, defined in Annex A, is weakly-typed. It provides a set of generic capabilities that may be invoked on sets of any kinds of managed objects, even objects of different types. The operations supported are:
+
+- Scoped get: Returns the values from each of the objects for a list of attributes.
+
+- Scoped update: Used to replace an attribute value or to add or remove values to/from set-valued attributes. May be used to update one or multiple attributes in a single object or multiple objects.
+- Scoped delete: Deletes multiple objects.
+
+The scoped get operation is defined on the *BasicMooService* interface. The scoped update and delete operations are defined on the *AdvancedMooService* interface, which inherits the scoped get operation from the basic service interface. This was done to allow for some flexibility in the implementation of multiple-object operation services. A basic service need only implement the scoped get operation.
+
+#### 7.4.1.1 Common parameters in MOO Service operations
+
+Each of the scoped operations requires four parameters to define the set of objects on which the operation will be performed:
+
+- Base object name: The name of the object at the root of a tree of objects on which the operation will potentially be performed.
+- Scope: A discriminated union identifying the objects contained under the base object on which the operation potentially will be performed. The union has four cases. Two of the cases include an integer specifying a level of objects contained below the base object. The four choices are:
+ - Base Object Only. If the scope is *baseObjectOnly*, then only the named target (base) object is included in the scope.
+ - Whole Subtree. If the scope is *wholeSubtree*, the scope is all of the objects contained below the base object, along with the base object.
+ - Individual Level. If the scope is *individualLevel*, the scope will also include an integer-valued *level*. All of the objects contained at a level below the base object equal to this value are in the scope. The objects directly contained by the base object are level one. If *level* equals zero, the scope is the base object.
+ - Base to Level. If the scope is *baseToLevel*, the scope will also include an integer-valued *level*. The scope will be all of the objects down to the given level, including the base object and the object at the given level. If *level* equals zero, the scope is the base object only.
+
+Note that because this framework uses some unique naming conventions, the service has to do a little work to determine the actual depth for containment-based scopes. The goal is to make it as simple as possible for the client. First, the base object name will be the entire compound name including the final component with an ID value of "Object". The service will have to "back up" to the naming context that contains this binding and start counting from there. Also, the service shall automatically follow the "Object" bindings in the managed object naming contexts within the scope. This last hop will not count towards the depth.
+
+- Filter: An expression written in a constraint language that is used to evaluate the attributes of an object. The operation is applied to those objects within the scope for which the filter expression evaluates to *true*.
+- Language: A string indicating the language in which the filter expression is written.
+
+The object names are the same as the *Name* type defined by the CORBA Naming Service. The scope is a union with values as described above. Finally, the filter and language parameters are strings.
+
+Each of the operations may raise one of these exceptions:
+
+- an *InvalidParameter* exception if one of the parameters has an invalid value. The name of the invalid parameter is returned. Here are some conditions under which this exception would be raised:
+ - The base object name is not valid.
+ - An unrecognized filter language value is supplied.
+- an *InvalidFilter* exception if the syntax of the filter is incorrect. This exception returns the text near the syntax error for trouble-shooting purposes.
+- a *FilterComplexityLimit* exception if the syntax of the filter is correct, but the filter is too complex to be processed by the managed system.
+- an *ApplicationError* exception to relate other problems on the server (such as a lack of resources) that make it impossible to carry out the requested operation.
+
+Note that if an expression cannot be evaluated for a particular object because the types of its attributes do not match the expression, the filter is not invalid. That object may simply fail to pass the filter.
+
+The other parameters for the operations as well as the return types are specific to the operation. For example, the scoped get operation takes a list of attribute names and returns a sequence of results, one from each object, with the name of the object associated with the results from that object.
+
+#### 7.4.1.2 MOO Service Iterators
+
+Because each of the operations could potentially return large amounts of data, the iterator design pattern is used for returning the results. An iterator is an object that is created to contain the results of an operation so that they may be returned to the client at a rate determined by the client. The client receives a reference to the iterator as part of the information returned by the method. The client may then invoke operations on the iterator to receive batches of results in sizes determined by the client. The iterator keeps track of how far through the results the client has progressed.
+
+Each time a client invokes a *get* operation on an iterator, it supplies the maximum number of responses it wishes to receive. The iterator shall return no more than the batch size requested, in a *sequence* data structure. The iterator also returns a Boolean indication if there are more results to be retrieved. The iterator may return less than the requested batch size, balancing the efficiency of returning results in a large batch with the possible need to block until more results are available. The iterator shall not return an empty sequence unless there are no more results to return, as doing so would force the client to poll the iterator.
+
+The managed system controls the life-cycle of the iterator. A *destroy* operation, however, is provided if the manager wants to stop retrieving results before reaching the last iteration. Upon returning the last result, the iterator shall destroy itself. The iterator may also be destroyed by the managed system if it is unused for an unreasonably long period of time.
+
+Note that the iterators are used to pace the return of information from the operations only, and should not control when the operations are actually invoked on individual objects. A scoped operation should be invoked on the objects and the results queued as soon as possible. Delaying the invocation of the operation on the individual managed objects until the results are requested through the iterator may be more efficient, but could lead to incorrect results or race conditions.
+
+The following clauses give additional details on each of the scoped operations.
+
+#### 7.4.1.3 Scoped Get
+
+The IDL signature for the scoped get operation on the basic MOO Service is:
+
+```
+GetResultsSetType scopedGet (
+ in NameType baseName,
+ in ScopeType scope,
+ in FilterType filter,
+ in LanguageType language,
+ in StringSetType attributes,
+ in unsigned short howMany,
+ out GetResultsIterator resultsIterator)
+raises (InvalidParameter,
+ InvalidFilter,
+ FilterComplexityLimit,
+ Itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+```
+
+As described above, the first four parameters are used to select a set of object on which to perform the get operation. For each of these the service will try to return a value for each of the attributes named in the "attributes" parameter, which is just a list of strings. A submitted null attribute list, however, has the special meaning that *all* attribute values for the objects that pass the filter should be returned. The types involved in the return value are:
+
+```
+struct AttributeValueType { // from itut_x780 framework
+ string attributeName;
+ any value; // type will depend on the attribute
+};
+
+typedef sequence AttributeSetType; // framework
+
+struct GetResultsType {
+ NameType name;
+ boolean notFilterable;
+ AttributeSetType attributes;
+ StringSetType failedAttributes;
+};
+
+typedef sequence GetResultsSetType;
+```
+
+The first two types form a *name-value pair* list. The return type is a sequence of structures, one for each object that passed the filter. In that structure is an object's name, a flag that will be true if the object could not be evaluated to see if it passed the filter, the list of attribute values from that object, and the names of any attributes that could not be retrieved from that object. Objects that could not be filtered are flagged as a special case because they may be objects in which the client was not even interested. If the object could not be filtered, the client will know the MOO server could not retrieve any attributes for that object, so the other two data members shall be empty. If an object passes the filter but an attribute value could not be retrieved either because the object did not have a matching attribute or some exception was raised on access, that attribute's name should be put on the failed attribute list for that object.
+
+The *howMany* parameter indicates to the service how many objects' results should be included in the first batch of responses. (Zero is allowed, forcing all results to be returned through the iterator.) The *resultsIterator* output parameter is a reference to an iterator object that may be used to retrieve additional results in batches. If all the results were returned by the *scopedGet* operation, this reference will be null. The client must destroy this object when it is finished with it, and may do so before all the results are retrieved. The functionality of the CMIP Cancel Get operation is provided in this framework by destroying the results iterator.
+
+#### 7.4.1.4 Scoped Update
+
+The IDL signature for the scoped update operation on the advanced MOO Service is:
+
+```
+UpdateResultsSetType scopedUpdate (
+ in NameType baseName,
+ in ScopeType scope,
+ in FilterType filter,
+ in LanguageType language,
+ in ModificationSeqType modifications,
+ in boolean failuresOnly,
+ in unsigned short howMany,
+ out UpdateResultsIterator resultsIterator)
+raises (InvalidParameter,
+ InvalidFilter,
+ filterComplexityLimit,
+ itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+```
+
+Again, the first four parameters are used to select the set of objects on which the update is performed. The modifications list is a list of structures, each with the name of an attribute, a value for that attribute, and an enumerated value indicating if the value should replace the attribute's current value, be added to the attribute's current value, or removed from it. The add and remove options are valid only if the attribute's type is a CORBA sequence and if the interface has add and remove operations for the attribute. The values in the modification list structures are passed across as CORBA *any* types. If the attribute's type is a CORBA sequence, a sequence of the proper type should be put in the *any* field, even if it contains only a single value. The IDL describing the modification list is:
+
+```
+enum ModificationOpType {set, add, remove};
+
+struct ModificationType {
+ string attribute;
+ ModificationOpType op;
+ any value;
+};
+
+typedef sequence ModificationSeqType;
+```
+
+The *failuresOnly* flag is used to indicate if the client wants the service to return results for all objects meeting the scope and filter, or just those objects for which at least one of the modifications could not be performed even though the scope and filter are satisfied.
+
+The return value is a list of structures, each containing an object's name along with a Boolean value indicating if the object could not be evaluated to see if it passed the filter and a list of any attributes that could not be modified. If the service cannot interact with the object to determine if it passes the filter, the results for that object will have the *notFilterable* set to true and the *failedAttributes* data member will be empty. (This is flagged as a special case because the object may be one in which the client was not even interested.) The service will try to perform all the modifications in the list, in order, continuing to try the rest even if one modification fails. If any operation fails on an attribute, that attribute's name is added to the list of failures. If the *notFilterable* flag is false, and the *failedAttributes* data member is empty, the client will know all updates were performed on that object. The new types involved in the return value are:
+
+```
+struct UpdateResultsType {
+ NameType name;
+ boolean notFilterable;
+ StringSetType failedAttributes;
+};
+
+typedef sequence UpdateResultsSetType;
+```
+
+The *howMany* parameter indicates to the service how many objects' results should be included in the first batch of responses. (Zero is allowed, forcing all results to be returned through the iterator.) The *resultsIterator* output parameter is a reference to an iterator object that may be used to retrieve additional results in batches. If all the results were returned by the *scopedUpdate* operation, this reference will be null. The client must destroy this object when it is finished with it, and may do so before all the results are retrieved.
+
+#### 7.4.1.5 Scoped Delete
+
+The IDL signature for the scoped delete operation on the advanced MOO Service is:
+
+```
+DeleteResultsSetType scopedDelete (
+ in NameType baseName,
+ in ScopeType scope,
+ in FilterType filter,
+ in LanguageType language,
+ in boolean failuresOnly,
+ in unsigned short howMany,
+ out DeleteResultsIterator resultsIterator)
+ raises (InvalidParameter,
+ InvalidFilter,
+ FilterComplexityLimit,
+ Itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+```
+
+Rather than accessing attribute values, this operation simply attempts to delete each object in the scope that passes the filter.
+
+The *failuresOnly* flag is used to indicate if the client wants the service to return results for all objects meeting the scope and filter, or just those objects that could not be deleted. Because object deletion notification are typically sent, clients may often want to choose to receive results for only those objects that could not be deleted.
+
+The return value lists the name of each object along with two flags that might indicate that the object could not be deleted. The *notFilterable* flag shall be true if the MOO service could not interact with the object to even determine if it passed the filter. The *notDeletable* flag shall be true if the object passed the filter, but could not be deleted, either due to its delete policy, or because it raised an exception. An object that cannot be evaluated against the filter is flagged as a special case to let the client know it may be an object that it did not even intend for deletion.
+
+```
+struct DeleteResultsType {
+ NameType name;
+ boolean notFilterable;
+ boolean notDeletable;
+};
+
+typedef sequence DeleteResultsSetType;
+```
+
+The *howMany* parameter indicates to the service how many objects' results should be included in the first batch of responses. (Zero is allowed, forcing all results to be returned through the iterator.) The *resultsIterator* output parameter is a reference to an iterator object that may be used to retrieve additional results in batches. If all the results were returned by the *scopedDelete* operation, this reference will be null. The client must destroy this object when it is finished with it, and may do so before all the results are retrieved.
+
+Because many objects cannot be deleted if they contain other objects, for scopes based on containment relationships the service must begin deleting the "leaf" objects that are within scope and work toward the "root" object. When deleting objects, the MOO service must follow the rules for deleting an object based on the object's delete policy as described in 7.3. Because the rules are being applied to each of the objects in the scope, starting from the bottom up, however, the effect will be different than simply trying to delete the object at the root of a subtree. Also, the MOO service is best-effort. Therefore, it is possible for some of the objects in a scoped subtree to be deleted while others aren't. These are the rules that must be applied to scoped delete operations:
+
+- 1) No objects may be "orphaned." That is, an object may not be deleted without deleting all of its contained (child) objects.
+- 2) Performing a scoped delete on an entire subtree results in all of the objects in that subtree being deleted unless an object has a delete policy of *notDeletable*, the object raised an exception on the destroy operation, or an object has a subordinate that is not deletable.
+- 3) Performing a scoped delete on part of a subtree requires evaluating each of the objects at the lowest scoped layer using the delete rules in 7.3. If an object at the lowest layer of the scope may be deleted according to these rules, it and any subordinates are deleted. If a lowest layer object cannot be deleted, it is not deleted nor are any of its superior objects. Other objects in the scope may be deleted, however, if the delete rules allow it. The service then moves up to the next layer, and so on.
+
+### 7.4.2 The default filter language
+
+This clause describes the default filtering constraint language that must be supported by all conformant implementations of the MOO Service. Conforming implementations may support other constraint grammars in addition to the grammar described here. An operation is provided on the Basic MOO Service interface to enable a client to retrieve the languages supported by a service. The grammar used in a request is indicated by a string-valued parameter named "language" on each scoped operation. A value of "MOO 1.0" (one space between "MOO" and "1.0") shall indicate the grammar described here. (A constant named *defaultLanguage* with this value is provided in the IDL module.)
+
+The default grammar supported by each conformant implementation shall be the default constraint grammar defined for version 1.0 of the Notification Service [4] with changes as described in the following subclauses. Note that by taking this approach, the framework fixes the support for comparison rules (or "matching rules") with the filter grammar. New rules (e.g., a case-insensitive string match) cannot be added with the addition of a new data type or attribute type. Instead, the grammar will have to be updated if new capabilities are required.
+
+#### 7.4.2.1 Applying the constraint language to object attributes
+
+The default Notification Service constraint grammar introduced the special token '\$' to denote the current event and run-time variables. For multiple-object operations, the '\$' token shall denote the "current" object as well as run-time variables. That is, one can think of the MOO Service as selecting a set of objects based on the supplied base name and scope parameter, then applying the filter expression individually to each of the objects in that set. The "current" object is the object against which the expression is being evaluated. The following examples illustrate the use of the '\$' token:
+
+\$administrativeState The administrative state attribute of the current object.
+
+\$curtime A "built-in" variable named "curtime".
+
+The identifiers that come after the "\$." (dollar-sign period) are names of the attributes of the current object as found in the value object defined to return the attributes of an object. (See ITU-T X.780 for
+
+details on managed object attributes.) That is, "\$.administrativeState" refers to the member named "administrativeState" in the value type returned by a call to the *getAttributes()* operation on the current object. (It is assumed that many implementations of the MOO Service will use the *getAttributes()* operation to retrieve the attributes from an object before evaluating the filter.)
+
+The Notification Service constraint language, on which the MOO Service constraint language is built, has a "dot" operator (".") that can be used to access the individual members within a data structure, and data structures can be nested. Thus, an identifier like this one may be used to access a value within an attribute that has a data structure value:
+
+`$.systemTimingSource.primaryTimingSource`
+
+A comparison with an attribute name that is not present in an object always evaluates to false. To illustrate, in the expression "(A == 0) || (A != 0)" if there is no attribute named "A" present in the object both comparisons will evaluate to false and the expression will actually evaluate to false. The default Notification Service language does support an "exists" operation that can be used to test the existence of an attribute before including it in a comparison. Also, a comparison always evaluates to false if the types of the operands do not match. In the example above, if "A" is a string, the expression will be false.
+
+Notice that the default Notification Service constraint grammar defines a set of run-time variables (which may be better thought of as "built-in" or "pre-defined" variables) but does not allow user-defined variables in filter expressions. In fact, there is no assignment operator that would support the use of user-defined variables. There are currently no built-in variables defined for the Scoping and Filtering Service and user-defined variables are not supported.
+
+NOTE – Since the Notification Service evaluates objects based on the names of their attributes, care must be taken when defining attribute names (the names of the members of the attribute value object defined for an interface). An attribute of type *AdministrativeStateType* named "adminState" with a value of "unlocked" will fail a filter of "administrativeState == unlocked" because the name does not match.
+
+#### 7.4.2.2 Support for regular expressions
+
+The default Notification Service constraint language defines a substring operator to work like this: "A ~ B" is true if A is a substring of B. The default MOO Service constraint language extends the language by defining a regular expression matching operator. The '#' character is designated for this operator. Using this, "A # B" evaluates to true if the regular expression pattern defined in A is matched in B. For this framework, regular expressions are "modern" regular expressions as defined in 2.8 of POSIX 1003.2 [11].
+
+A regular expression is a pattern that describes a set of strings. The inclusion of special characters known as "meta-characters" enables one string to describe a set of strings. The manual page for the "grep" command on most POSIX-compliant systems gives a complete description of regular expressions and their use.
+
+Regular expression matching is added to the constraint language to satisfy the requirement to match sub-strings at the beginning, middle, or end of a string. POSIX regular expressions support this capability by using meta-characters that represent the beginning or end of a string("^" and "\$"). Matching in the middle of a string is done by excluding these characters from the regular expression. Certainly, this requirement could have been met by only adding a couple of meta-characters to the string matching function. It was felt, however, that since regular expression matching is supported as a utility on POSIX-compliant systems, it made sense to go ahead and use this capability, which adds rich pattern matching to the language, rather than to require developers to implement a special capability offering far less functionality.
+
+Since both the notification filter language for strings and the regular expression language use "\" for the escape character, "\\\" must be used in a filter string (which will be changed by the filter string parser to "\") whenever the "\" character is to be included in the regular expression. Consider this example. The "." in a regular expression can match any single character. To make sure that the character matched is actually a "." character, the following operation might be used in a filter: 'itu\\.int' # \$.domain\_name
+
+#### 7.4.2.3 Support for testing set-valued and sequence-valued attributes
+
+Network management applications tend to rely heavily on the attributes of the managed objects, and often these attributes are actually sets or sequences of values. (Sets and sequences differ. Sets should not contain duplicates and the order of the elements is unimportant. In sequences, duplicate elements are allowed and order is important.) To support the use of set-valued and sequence-valued attributes in filter expressions, the default Notification Service constraint language needs to be extended. Two groups of extensions are required to support the use of sets and sequences. The first enables sets and sequences of literal values to be included in filter expression. The second defines operators for sets and sequences.
+
+##### 7.4.2.3.1 Sets and sequences of literal values
+
+Sets and sequences of literal values are included in filter expressions by enclosing a comma-separated list of literal values in curly braces. For example:
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
+| {1, 16, 21} | A set or sequence of integers |
+| {5.2, 6.8, 7.01} | A set or sequence of floating-point numbers |
+| {'apple', 'orange'} | A set or sequence of strings |
+| {Critical, Major, Minor} | A set or sequence of enumerated values |
+| {} | A null set or sequence. |
+
+The literal values must be of the "simple" types defined for the Notifications Service constraint language (Boolean, short, unsigned short, long, unsigned long, float, double, char, wchar, string, wstring), or enumerated values. All values in a set or sequence must be of the same type.
+
+Obviously, in this constraint language, literal sets and sequences are defined in the same way. Actually, this matches the case with CORBA interface attribute types. Unlike some other interface syntax languages, OMG IDL has only a sequence structure, and no set type. To account for this, different operations for sets and sequences are defined. When a sequence operator is applied to a pair of sequences (either literal or attribute values), the sequences are treated as true sequences. That is, order is taken into account. When two sequences are involved in a set operation, however, the sequences are actually treated as sets. That is, the order of the values in the set does not matter. Also, while managed objects should never return duplicates in the value of a set-valued attribute, any duplicates should be ignored.
+
+##### 7.4.2.3.2 Set operators
+
+In order to include set-valued attributes in filter expressions, operators that work on sets are needed. This clause extends the Notification Service constraint language by defining how the operators already defined for that service are to be applied to sets. One new operator, using the caret symbol ("^"), is defined for testing the interclause of two sets. Also, two built-in functions that take sets as arguments are defined.
+
+Note that the default Notification Service constraint language already defines one operator that works on sets: the "in" operator. The expression "A in B" can only be applied if A is a simple type as
+
+defined above and B is a sequence of the same simple type. The expression evaluates to true if the value represented by A is equal to a value in B. Also, the default Notification Service constraint language supports the use of the "exist" operation on set-valued parameters. This behavior will also be supported for multiple object operations.
+
+In general, to use any of the set operators in an expression such as "A B" one or both operands must be a sequence of one of the types listed above in the clause on sets of literal values. If one operand is a sequence of type X, the other must either be a sequence of type X or a value of type X. Because one or both of the operands are actually sequences, not sets, the operations must ignore any duplicate values within a sequence and must not depend on any order of the values in a sequence. The operators extended to work on set-valued attributes are defined below:
+
+- A == B True if all the values in each operand are present in the other.
+- A != B False if all the values in each operand are present in the other.
+- A < B True if all the values in A are in B and B contains at least one other value not in A.
+- A <= B True if all the values in A are in B. (If A is a singly-valued attribute, this is the same as "A in B".)
+- A > B True if all the values in B are in A and A contains at least one other value not in B.
+- A >= B True if all the values in B are in A.
+- A ^ B True if any value in A is present in B (the intersection is not null).
+
+In addition to these operations, two built-in functions that take a set or sequence as an argument and return a single value from that set or sequence are defined:
+
+- MAX() Returns the highest value in the set or sequence.
+- MIN() Returns the lowest value in the set or sequence.
+
+If no maximum or minimum can be derived from the set (because the values are not numeric), the returned value should be indeterminate and any comparison to this indeterminate value should evaluate to false.
+
+##### 7.4.2.3.3 Sequence operators
+
+To support the inclusion of sequence-valued attributes in filter expressions, operators that work on sequences are needed. This clause extends the Notification Service constraint language by defining operators that work on sequences.
+
+Only a single operator is defined for sequences, since the only requirement was to do equality matching on sequences. The operator defined to work on sequence-valued operands is:
+
+- A % B True if A and B have the same number of values and all the values in A match those in B, in order.
+
+The MAX and MIN built-in function, defined in the previous clause, can also be applied to sequences.
+
+### 7.4.3 MOO Service requirements
+
+This clause summarizes the Multiple Object Operation Service requirements.
+
+**(R) MOO-1** A managed system shall instantiate at least one MOO Server object. Also, each local root naming context on a system shall have at least one name binding for a MOO Service object. The value of the *ID* string in this binding shall simply identify the server, perhaps with a value similar to
+
+"MOO1". The *kind* string in the binding shall identify the class of the object ("itut\_q816::BasicMooService" or a sub-class).
+
+**(R) MOO-2** The interface supported by the MOO Server object(s) shall be the "Basic" MOO Service interface described above and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A.
+
+**(O) MOO-3** Optionally, the interface supported by the MOO Server object(s) may be the "Advanced" MOO Service interface described above and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A.
+
+**(R) MOO-4** The MOO Server object(s) shall at least support the default constraint language defined above for the specification of filters, and may support other grammars. The default constraint language, identified as "MOO 1.0", is the default constraint language defined by the CORBA Notification Service but extended as described above to support:
+
+- filtering on object attribute values rather than notification structure member values;
+- regular expression matching;
+- filtering on attributes containing sets or sequences of values.
+
+## 7.5 The Heartbeat Service
+
+The Heartbeat Service is used to verify the operation of the notification channels on a managed system, as well as the communications network between the managed system and managing system. It periodically sends a small notification to a managing system interested in receiving it that identifies the system that emitted the heartbeat, as well as the notification channel through which it was emitted. After configuring this service, a managing system can then set a filter for heartbeat notifications on any of the channels it is interested in to ensure that they are functioning. Since these notifications flow through the same channels, software, and networks as notifications from other resources, they periodically verify the operation of these resources.
+
+The Heartbeat Service is found by looking it up in the Naming Service.
+
+The following IDL (without comments) describes the Heartbeat Service interface:
+
+```
+interface Heartbeat {
+
+ attribute SystemLabelType systemLabel;
+
+ HeartbeatPeriodType periodGet()
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ void periodSet(in HeartbeatPeriodType period)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);;
+
+}; // end of Heartbeat interface
+
+interface Notifications {
+ ...
+ void heartbeat (
+ in SystemLabelType systemLabel,
+ in ChannelIDType channelID,
+ in HeartbeatPeriodType period,
+ in GeneralizedTimeType timeStamp
+ );
+ ...
+}; // end of Notifications interface
+```
+
+As can be seen, the Heartbeat service has an attribute named *systemLabel*, and operations to set and get the period between heartbeats. *SystemLabel* is a user-supplied identifier. The intended use is to allow a managing system to insert a label to identify the system providing the heartbeat.
+
+The Heartbeat Service periodically emits a notification on each event channel that it can find in the Channel Finder Service. The Channel Finder Service provides a listing of each channel on the system, with a channel ID for each, as well as additional information on the use of the channel. (The Channel Finder shall not list the heartbeat notification as one of the notifications it handles. Heartbeat notifications are not sent by managed objects, and are sent to all channels.) At the end of each period, the Heartbeat Service sends a notification on each of the channels listed. The notification sent to each channel includes the channel ID of that channel.
+
+The period between heartbeats is controlled using the *periodSet* operation. The value submitted to this operation is the period, in seconds, that the Heartbeat Service waits between emitting notifications. Updating the period causes the service to immediately emit a notification with the new period value, and begin a new period. Setting the period to zero causes the service to emit one final notification with a period value of zero, then no more (until the period is reset).
+
+Each notification includes the value of the *systemLabel* attribute, the ID of the channel through which the notification was sent, the current value for the period, and a timestamp.
+
+**(R) HEARTBEAT-1** A managed system may instantiate at least one Heartbeat Service object. If the Heartbeat Service is supported, each local root naming context on a system shall have at least one name binding for a Heartbeat Service Object. The value of the *ID* string in this binding shall simply identify the server, with a value similar to "Heartbeat1". The *kind* string in the binding shall identify the class of the object ("itut\_q816::Heartbeat").
+
+**(R) HEARTBEAT-2** The Heartbeat server object(s) shall support the Heartbeat interface described above and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A. The functionality described above shall be supported.
+
+**(R) HEARTBEAT-3** Updating of the period shall cause the service to deliver a notification to all channels with the new period value and then begin a new period. Setting the period to zero shall cause the service to emit one final notification with a period value of zero, then no more (until the period is reset).
+
+**(R) HEARTBEAT-4** Until the period is changed, the heartbeat notifications shall be sent to all the channels once within each period. The time between heartbeat notifications being sent to a channel shall never be greater than twice the period.
+
+## 7.6 Other support services
+
+This framework anticipates the need for other network management support services but recognizes it is impractical to make them all part of one framework document. Exactly where the line gets drawn is a bit arbitrary, though. Because of its focus on TMN and the need to support existing information models, this framework includes services that equate to those provided by the CMIP protocol and the most basic TMN management information capabilities. Just as with CMIP, it is expected that additional support services will be defined, most likely in separate Recommendations.
+
+# 8 Compliance and conformance
+
+This clause defines the criteria that must be met by other standards documents claiming compliance to this framework and the functions that must be implemented by systems claiming conformance to this Recommendation.
+
+## 8.1 System conformance
+
+### 8.1.1 Conformance points
+
+This clause summarizes the individual functions described earlier in this Recommendation. These conformance points are then combined in profiles that must be supported by systems claiming conformance to this specification.
+
+- 1) An implementation claiming conformance to the Naming Service requirements must:
+ - support the CORBA Naming Service version specified in 5.2.
+ - support all of the Naming Service requirements specified in 6.1.
+- 2) An implementation claiming conformance to the Notification Service requirements must:
+ - support either:
+ - the CORBA Notification Service version specified in 5.2; or
+ - the 3GPP NotificationIRPOperations interface specified in [13].
+ - support all of the Notification Service requirements specified in 6.2.
+
+NOTE – Further study is required to identify a minimum subset of Notification Service capabilities that must be supported for compliance to the framework.
+
+- 3) An implementation claiming conformance to the Telecom Logging Service requirements must:
+ - support the CORBA Telecom Logging Service version specified in 5.2.
+ - support all of the Logging Service requirements specified in 6.3.
+- 4) An implementation claiming conformance to the Security Service requirements must:
+ - support the Security Service version specified in 5.2.
+ - support all of the Security Service requirements specified in 6.5.
+- 5) An implementation claiming conformance to the Transaction Service requirements must:
+ - support the CORBA Transaction Service version specified in 5.2.
+ - support the Transaction Service requirements specified in 6.6.
+- 6) An implementation claiming conformance to the Factory Finder Service must:
+ - support the Factory Finder service interface described in 7.1 and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A.
+- 7) An implementation claiming conformance to the Channel Finder Service must:
+ - support the Channel Finder service interface described in 7.2 and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A.
+- 8) An implementation claiming conformance to the Terminator Service must:
+ - support the Terminator Service interface described in 7.3 and defined by the CORBA IDL in Annex A.
+- 9) An implementation claiming conformance to the Basic MOO Service must:
+ - support the mandatory MOO Service requirements described in 7.4.3.
+- 10) An implementation claiming conformance to the Advanced MOO Service must:
+ - support the mandatory and optional MOO Service requirements described in 7.4.3.
+
+- 11) An implementation claiming conformance to the Heartbeat Service must:
+- support the Heartbeat Service interface described in 7.5 and defined in the CORBA IDL in Annex A.
+
+### 8.1.2 Basic conformance profile
+
+A system claiming conformance to the ITU-T.Q.816 Basic Profile shall support:
+
+- 1) the version of CORBA specified in 5.2.
+- 2) the Naming Service requirements (See conformance point 1).
+- 3) the Notification Service requirements (See conformance point 2).
+- 4) the Factory Finder Service (See conformance point 6).
+- 5) the Channel Finder Service (See conformance point 7).
+- 6) the Terminator Service (See conformance point 8).
+- 7) the Basic MOO Service (See conformance point 9).
+
+## 8.2 Conformance statement guidelines
+
+The users of this framework must be careful when writing conformance statements. Because IDL modules are being used as name spaces, they may, as allowed by OMG IDL rules, be split across files. Thus, when a module is extended its name won't change. Instead, a new IDL file will simply be added. Simply stating the name of a module in a conformance statement, therefore, will not suffice to identify a set of IDL interfaces. The conformance statement must identify a document and year of publication to make sure the right version of IDL is identified.
+
+# ANNEX A
+
+## Framework Support Services IDL
+
+```
+/* This IDL code is intended to be stored in a file named "itut_q816.idl"
+located in the search path used by IDL compilers on your system. */
+
+#ifndef ITUT_Q816_IDL
+#define ITUT_Q816_IDL
+
+#include
+#include
+
+#pragma prefix "itu.int"
+
+module itut_q816 {
+
+ // Types imported from CosTime
+ typedef TimeBase::UtcT UtcT;
+
+ // Types imported from itut_x780
+ typedef itut_x780::AttributeSetType AttributeSetType;
+ typedef itut_x780::GeneralizedTimeType GeneralizedTimeType;
+ typedef itut_x780::NameType NameType;
+ typedef itut_x780::NameSetType NameSetType;
+ typedef itut_x780::ObjectClassType ObjectClassType;
+ typedef itut_x780::ObjectClassSetType ObjectClassSetType;
+ typedef itut_x780::ScopedNameType ScopedNameType;
+ typedef itut_x780::ScopedNameSetType ScopedNameSetType;
+ typedef itut_x780::StringSetType StringSetType;
+ typedef itut_x780::SystemLabelType SystemLabelType;
+```
+
+```
+
+// Interfaces imported from itut_x780 (interfaces are not typedefed)
+// for efficiency and clarity reasons)
+// itut_x780::ManagedObject
+// itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory
+
+// Exceptions imported from itut_x780 (exceptions can't be typedefed)
+// itut_x780::ApplicationError
+// itut_x780::DeleteError
+
+```
+
+### **// Data Types and Structures**
+
+```
+
+/** ScopeChoice enumerates four possible choices for a scope. A
+scope may include just the named base object, the entire subtree
+of object below and including the base object, the objects at a certain
+level below the base object (level 1 objects are directly contained by
+the base object), or all of the objects down to a level, including the
+base object and the level.
+*/
+enum ScopeChoiceType {baseObjectOnly, wholeSubtree, individualLevel,
+ baseToLevel};
+
+/** Scope is used to convey which objects contained under the base
+object, if any, are to be included in the scope of a scoped and
+filtered operation. A level does not make sense for the baseObjectOnly
+and wholeSubtree choices, but does for the other two. To illustrate
+the difference between the two options that include a level, a
+scope choice of individualLevel with level = 1 would include all
+of the objects directly contained by the base object. A scope choice
+of baseToLevel with level = 1 would include all of the objects
+directly contained by the base object, and the base object.
+*/
+
+union ScopeType switch (ScopeChoiceType)
+{
+ /* The baseObjectOnly and wholeSubtree cases carry no value. */
+ case individualLevel: /* fall through */
+ case baseToLevel: short level;
+};
+
+/** BaseAndScopeType combines the name of a base managed object with
+a "scope" of objects contained below it. */
+
+struct BaseAndScopeType {
+ NameType base;
+ ScopeType scope;
+};
+
+/** BaseAndScopeSetType is a set of BaseAndScopeTypes. */
+
+typedef sequence BaseAndScopeSetType;
+
+/** ChannelIDType is a string used to contain a channel ID. */
+
+typedef string ChannelIDType;
+
+/** EventSetType is a list of event types. It is actually just a list
+of strings. The values of the strings are the names of the event types
+(the strings that go in the "type_name" field of the structured event),
+which are the same as the scoped names of the operation defined on the
+Notifications interfaces to send the events. For example:
+itut_x780::Notifications::objectCreation */
+
+typedef sequence EventSetType;
+
+/** A channelInfo structure contains information about an event
+channel.
+@member channelID A string identifier for the channel.
+@member channelClass the channel's scoped class name.
+
+```
+
+```
+
+@member baseAndScopes The objects and the scopes of managed objects
+ below them sending events to this channel.
+ A null list indicates that all base managed
+ objects on the system are covered by this
+ channel.
+@member eventTypes The list of event types handled by this
+ channel. A null list indicates all event types
+ are handled by this channel.
+@member excludedEventTypes If the eventTypes parameter is null, this
+ can be used to exclude event types. If
+ eventTypes is not null, this should be null
+ and is ignored.
+@member sourceClasses The list of types of objects that send events
+ to this channel. A null list indicates all
+ types of managed objects send events to this
+ channel.
+@member excludedSourceClasses If the sourceClasses parameter is null,
+ this can be used to exclude source classes.
+ If sourceClasses is not null, this should be
+ null and is ignored.
+@member channel a reference to the channel.
+*/
+
+struct ChannelInfoType {
+ ChannelIDType channelID;
+ ObjectClassType channelClass;
+ BaseAndScopeSetType baseAndScopes;
+ EventSetType eventTypes;
+ EventSetType excludedEventTypes;
+ ObjectClassSetType sourceClasses;
+ ObjectClassSetType excludedSourceClasses;
+ Object channel;
+};
+
+/** A channel info set contains a list of channel references and the
+ data associated with them. */
+
+typedef sequence ChannelInfoSetType;
+
+/** ChannelModification indicates the type of event channel
+ modification. */
+
+enum ChannelModificationType {ChannelCreate, ChannelDelete,
+ ChannelUpdate};
+
+/** The DeleteResultsType holds, for a single object, the results
+ of a scoped delete operation. If both boolean flags in the result
+ are false, the object was deleted.
+ @member name The name of the object to which these results
+ apply.
+ @member notFilterable This flag will be true if the service could not
+ interact with the object to see if it even
+ passed the filter.
+ @member notDeletable This flag will be true if the object could not
+ be deleted due to its delete policy or because
+ it raised an exception.
+ */
+
+ struct DeleteResultsType {
+ NameType name;
+ boolean notFilterable;
+ boolean notDeletable;
+ };
+
+ /** The DeleteResultsSetType is a set of results returned by the
+ scoped delete operation. */
+
+ typedef sequence DeleteResultsSetType;
+
+```
+
+```
+
+/** A factory info structure contains information about a managed
+object factory.
+@member factoryClass the factory's scoped class name
+@member factoryRef a reference to the factory
+*/
+struct FactoryInfoType {
+ ObjectClassType factoryClass;
+ itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory factoryRef;
+};
+
+/** A factory info set contains a list of factory references and
+their class names. */
+typedef sequence FactoryInfoSetType;
+
+/** A FilterType parameter conveys the filter expression used in a
+scoped and filtered operation.
+*/
+typedef string FilterType;
+
+/** GetResults structures hold a list of attribute values per object.
+@member name The CORBA name of the object
+@member notFilterable This flag will be true if the service could not
+ interact with the object to see if it even
+ passed the filter. If true, the attributes and
+ failedAttributes members will be empty.
+@member attributes The list of attributes retrieved from the
+ object.
+@member failedAttributes The list of attributes whose values could
+ not be retrieved from the object.
+*/
+struct GetResultsType {
+ NameType name;
+ boolean notFilterable;
+ AttributeSetType attributes;
+ StringSetType failedAttributes;
+};
+
+/** The GetResultsSet is a set of results returned by a scoped get
+operation. */
+typedef sequence GetResultsSetType;
+
+/** HeartbeatPeriodType contains the length of the interval between
+heartbeats emitted by the Heartbeat Service. Using an unsigned short
+to contain this interval limits the longest possible interval to
+a little over 18 hours. */
+typedef unsigned short HeartbeatPeriodType;
+
+/** A LanguageType parameter conveys the filter expression language
+used in a scoped and filtered operation.
+*/
+typedef string LanguageType;
+
+/** A LanguageSetType parameter contains a sequence of Languages. */
+typedef sequence LanguageSetType;
+
+/** ModificationOp is used to indicate the type of update to be made to
+an attribute. */
+enum ModificationOpType {set, add, remove};
+
+```
+
+```
+
+/** Modification structures identify an attribute and a modification to
+ be made to it. Multiple updates may be made to a single attribute by
+ including multiple structures with the same attribute name in the
+ modification Set.
+ @member attrib The name of the attribute to update.
+ @member op The operation to be performed on the attribute.
+ @member val The value to be used for the update operation.
+ It's type will depend on the attribute.
+*/
+
+struct ModificationType {
+ string attrib; // the name of the attribute
+ ModificationOpType op; // operation to be performed
+ any value; // value used to update attrib.
+};
+
+/** The Modification Sequence contains a sequence of modifications to
+ be made (in order) to each object in a scoped update operation. */
+
+typedef sequence ModificationSeqType;
+
+/** Update Results structures hold the name of an object, a boolean
+ flag indicating if all modifications to that object were successful,
+ and a list of the attributes that could not be updated on that object.
+ The list will be null if the success flag is true.
+ @member name the CORBA name of the object
+ @member notFilterable This flag will be true if the service could not
+ interact with the object to see if it even
+ passed the filter. If true, the client will
+ know no attributes could be set, so
+ the failedAttributes member will be empty.
+ @member failedAttributes the list of attributes that were not
+ correctly updated.
+*/
+
+struct UpdateResultsType {
+ NameType name;
+ boolean notFilterable;
+ StringSetType failedAttributes;
+};
+
+/** An Update Results Set is returned in response to a scoped update
+ operation (one that sets, adds to, or removes from the value of an
+ attribute). */
+
+typedef sequence UpdateResultsSetType;
+
+```
+
+### // Constants
+
+```
+
+/** Default filter is to allow everything through the filter*/
+
+const FilterType defaultFilter = "TRUE";
+
+/** Default language is the grammar described in this document */
+
+const LanguageType defaultLanguage = "MOO 1.0";
+
+```
+
+### // Exceptions
+
+```
+
+/** A channel already registered exception is returned when an attempt
+ is made to register a channel with multiple channel IDs. */
+
+exception ChannelAlreadyRegistered {};
+
+/** A channel not found exception is returned when an event channel
+ cannot be found. */
+
+```
+
+```
+
+exception ChannelNotFound {};
+
+/** A FactoryNotFound exception is raised when a requested factory
+can't be found. */
+
+exception FactoryNotFound {};
+
+/** A Filter Complexity Limit is raised when a filter expression in a
+scoped operation is valid, but too complex to be processed. */
+
+exception FilterComplexityLimit {};
+
+/** An invalid filter exception is raised when a client includes a
+filter expression that cannot be parsed. The text surrounding the
+syntax error should be returned for trouble-shooting purposes. */
+
+exception InvalidFilter {string badText;};
+
+/** An Invalid Parameter exception is raised when the value of a
+parameter is not valid for the operation.
+@param parameter the name of the bad parameter
+*/
+
+exception InvalidParameter {string parameter;};
+
+```
+
+### **// Interfaces**
+
+### **// Factory Finder Interface**
+
+```
+
+/**
+This interface defines a simple service for locating a managed object
+factory.
+*/
+
+interface FactoryFinder {
+
+ /** This method is used to find a managed object factory.
+ @param factoryClass The scoped class name of the factory,
+ NOT the managed object to be created.
+ */
+
+ itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory find (
+ in ObjectClassType factoryClass)
+ raises (FactoryNotFound, itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ /** This method returns the list of factories registered
+ with the factory finder. */
+
+ FactoryInfoSetType list()
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of FactoryFinder interface
+
+/**
+This interface extends the FactoryFinder interface to add methods
+to support the registration and unregistration of factories.
+*/
+
+interface FactoryFinderComponent : FactoryFinder {
+
+ /** This method is used by factories to register themselves.
+ It should not be used by managing systems.
+ @param factoryClass The scoped class name of the factory,
+ NOT the managed object to be created.
+ */
+
+```
+
+```
+
+ @param factoryRef A reference to the factory.
+ */
+
+ void register (in ObjectClassType factoryClass,
+ in itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory factoryRef)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ /** This method is used by factories to unregister themselves,
+ if necessary. It should not be used by managing systems.
+ @param factoryClass The scoped class name of the factory,
+ NOT the managed object to be created.
+ @param factoryRef A reference to the factory.
+ */
+
+ void unregister (in ObjectClassType factoryClass,
+ in itut_x780::ManagedObjectFactory factoryRef)
+ raises (FactoryNotFound, itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of FactoryFinderComponent interface
+
+```
+
+### **// Channel Finder Interface**
+
+```
+
+/**
+This interface defines a simple service for locating event channels.
+*/
+
+interface ChannelFinder {
+
+ /** This method returns the list of channels registered
+ with the channel finder. */
+
+ ChannelInfoSetType list()
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of ChannelFinder interface
+
+/**
+This interface extends the ChannelFinder interface to add methods
+to support the registration and unregistration of channels.
+*/
+
+interface ChannelFinderComponent : ChannelFinder {
+
+ /** This method is used by channels to register themselves.
+ It should not be used by managing systems. Re-registering
+ a channel (re-using an existing channelID) results in
+ updating that entry. The other information previously
+ associated with that entry is overwritten. A
+ ChannelAlreadyRegistered exception may be raised when an
+ attempt is made to register a channel with multiple channelIDs.
+ This should not be done. (The service cannot guarantee that
+ because two object references differ, they do not reference
+ the same object. It is therefore required that the managed
+ system ensure that the same channel is not registered twice.)
+ A channel change notification is sent whenever calling this
+ method results in a change.
+ @param channelID A string identifier for the channel.
+ @param channelClass The scoped class name of the event
+ channel.
+ @param baseAndScopes The objects and the scopes of managed
+ objects below them sending events to
+ this channel. A null list indicates
+ that all base managed objects on the
+ system are covered by this channel.
+ */
+
+```
+
+```
+
+ @param eventTypes The list of event types handled by
+ this channel. A null list indicates one
+ of the following:
+- for event channel interfaces that do not provide an explicit query for the events types
+handled by the channel (e.g. the OMG Notification channel), it implies all event types are
+handled by this channel
+- for event channel interfaces that do provide an explicit query for the event types
+handled by the channel (e.g. 3GPP NotificationIRPOperations interface), it implies that
+the explicit query must be used to determine the types of events handled.
+
+ @param excludedEventTypes If the eventTypes parameter is null,
+ this can be used to exclude event
+ types. If eventTypes is not null, this
+ should be null and is ignored.
+ @param sourceClasses The list of types of objects that send
+ events to this channel. A null list
+ indicates all types of managed objects
+ send events to this channel.
+ @param excludedSourceClasses If the sourceClasses parameter is
+ null, this can be used to exclude
+ source classes. If sourceClasses is
+ not null, this should be null and is
+ ignored.
+ @param channel A reference to the channel.
+ */
+
+ void register (in ChannelIDType channelID,
+ in ObjectClassType channelClass,
+ in BaseAndScopeSetType baseAndScopes,
+ in EventSetType eventTypes,
+ in EventSetType excludedEventTypes,
+ in ScopedNameSetType sourceClasses,
+ in ScopedNameSetType excludedSourceClasses,
+ in Object channel)
+ raises (ChannelAlreadyRegistered,
+ itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ /** This method is used by managed systems to unregister
+ channels, if necessary. It should not be used by managing
+ systems.
+ @param channelID A string identifier for the channel.
+ */
+
+ void unregister (in ChannelIDType channelID)
+ raises (ChannelNotFound, itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of ChannelFinderComponent interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// Heartbeat Service Interface***
+
+```
+
+/**
+This interface defines a service used to periodically test the
+operation of the notification channels on a system. The service
+supporting this interface periodically emits a short "heartbeat"
+notification on each channel on the system.
+*/
+
+interface Heartbeat {
+
+ /** The systemLabel attribute is sent in heartbeat
+ notifications. It is used to identify the heartbeat service
+ instance from which the notification came. Resetting this does
+ not cause the service to immediately emit a notification, but
+ the new value will be sent with the next notification. */
+
+ attribute SystemLabelType systemLabel;
+
+```
+
+```
+
+ /** The period is the interval, in seconds, at which the
+ heartbeat service emits the heartbeat notification. If it is
+ zero, the service does not emit notifications. */
+
+ HeartbeatPeriodType periodGet()
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ /** Updating of the period shall cause the service to deliver a
+ notification to all channels with the new period value and then
+ begin a new period. Setting the period to zero shall cause the
+ service to emit one final notification with a period value of
+ zero, then no more (until the period is reset).
+ Implementations may limit the range of values supported by this
+ operation, particularly on the low end as excessive heartbeats
+ would present a drain on the managed system. An attempt to
+ set the period to a value outside the range supported will
+ result in an ApplicationError with the error code set to
+ invalidParameter. */
+
+ void periodSet(in HeartbeatPeriodType period)
+ raises(itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of Heartbeat interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// Terminator Service Interface***
+
+```
+
+/**
+This interface defines a service that supports the deletion of managed
+objects by clients. A goal of the framework is to enable
+implementations in which the managed objects do not have to maintain
+the naming tree information. The factories are one place to implement
+the functions needed to create name bindings, and this service can be
+used to clean up the naming tree after object deletion.
+
+```
+
+Also, this service can implement the rules for deleting objects based
+on the delete policy of the managed objects.
+\*/
+
+```
+
+interface TerminatorService {
+
+ /** This method is used to delete a managed object by
+ specifying its name. */
+
+ void deleteByName (in NameType name)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError,
+ itut_x780::DeleteError);
+
+ /** This method is used to delete a managed object by
+ reference. */
+
+ void deleteByRef (in itut_x780::ManagedObject mo)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError,
+ itut_x780::DeleteError);
+
+}; // end of TerminatorService interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// DeleteResultsIterator Interface***
+
+```
+
+/** The Delete Results Iterator interface is used to retrieve the
+results from a scoped delete operation using the iterator design
+pattern. */
+
+```
+
+```
+
+interface DeleteResultsIterator {
+
+ /** This method is used to retrieve the next "howMany" results
+ in the result set.
+
+```
+
+```
+
+ @param howMany The maximum number of items to be returned in
+ the results.
+ @param results The next batch of results.
+ @return True if there are more results after those
+ being returned. The return value should not
+ be true if the results set is empty, as this
+ forces the client to poll for results.
+ Instead the call should block.
+
+ */
+
+ boolean getNext(in unsigned short howMany,
+ out DeleteResultsSetType results)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ /** This method is used to destroy the iterator and release its
+ resources. */
+
+ void destroy();
+
+}; // end of Delete Results Iterator interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// GetResultsIterator Interface***
+
+```
+
+/** The Get Results Iterator interface is used to retrieve the results
+from a scoped get operation using the iterator design pattern. */
+
+interface GetResultsIterator {
+
+ /** This method is used to retrieve the next "howMany" results
+ in the result set.
+ @param howMany The maximum number of items to be returned in
+ the results.
+ @param results The next batch of results.
+ @return True if there are more results after those
+ being returned. The return value should not
+ be true if the results set is empty, as this
+ forces the client to poll for results.
+ Instead the call should block.
+
+ */
+
+ boolean getNext(in unsigned short howMany,
+ out GetResultsSetType results)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ /** This method is used to destroy the iterator and release its
+ resources. */
+
+ void destroy();
+
+}; // end of Get Results Iterator interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// UpdateResultsIterator Interface***
+
+```
+
+/** The Update Results Iterator interface is used to retrieve the
+results from a scoped update (set, add, remove) operation using the
+iterator design pattern.
+*/
+
+interface UpdateResultsIterator {
+
+ /** This method is used to retrieve the next "howMany" results
+ in the result set.
+ @param howMany The maximum number of items to be returned in
+ the results.
+ @param results The next batch of results.
+
+```
+
+```
+
+@return True if there are more results after those
+ being returned. The return value should not
+ be true if the results set is empty, as this
+ forces the client to poll for results.
+ Instead the call should block.
+
+*/
+
+boolean getNext(in unsigned short howMany,
+ out UpdateResultsSetType results)
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+/** This method is used to destroy the iterator and release its
+ resources. */
+
+void destroy();
+
+}; // end of Update Results Iterator interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// BasicMooService Interface***
+
+```
+
+/** The basic scoping and filtering interface provides a common service
+ for performing attribute retrieval operations on multiple objects.
+*/
+
+interface BasicMooService {
+
+ /** This operation is used to retrieve the list of filter
+ languages supported by the service. At the least, the
+ list must include the value of the defaultLanguage constant
+ defined above. */
+
+ LanguageSetType getFilterLanguages()
+ raises (itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+ /** This operation is used to retrieve attributes from multiple
+ objects using a small number of method invocations. The method
+ returns the first batch of results, one per object. Each
+ result has the name of the object and a list of name-value
+ pairs indicating the attributes that could be retrieved with
+ their values.
+
+ @param baseName The name of the object at the base of the scope
+ tree.
+ @param scope A value indicating the contained objects to
+ include in the scope of the operations. See
+ ScopeType for details.
+ @param filter A string containing an expression to be
+ evaluated with attribute values from each
+ object in the scope. Attribute values are
+ returned only for those objects for which the
+ expression evaluates to true.
+ @param language A string identifying the language in which the
+ filter expression is written.
+ @param attributes The names of the attributes for which values
+ should be returned. If this list is null, all
+ attributes are to be returned.
+ @param howMany The maximum number of objects for which results
+ should be returned in the first batch.
+ @param resultsIterator A reference to an iterator that can be
+ used to retrieve the rest of the results. This
+ reference will be null if all results were
+ returned in the first batch.
+
+ */
+
+ GetResultsSetType scopedGet (
+ in NameType baseName,
+ in ScopeType scope,
+
+```
+
+```
+
+ in FilterType filter,
+ in LanguageType language,
+ in StringSetType attributes,
+ in unsigned short howMany,
+ out GetResultsIterator resultsIterator)
+ raises (InvalidParameter,
+ InvalidFilter,
+ FilterComplexityLimit,
+ itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of BasicMooService interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// AdvancedMooService Interface***
+
+```
+
+/** The advanced scoping and filtering interface provides a common
+service for performing multiple-attribute updates on multiple objects,
+and for deleting multiple objects.
+*/
+
+interface AdvancedMooService : BasicMooService {
+
+ /** This operation is used to modify multiple attributes in
+multiple objects using a small number of method invocations.
+The method returns the first batch of results, a list of
+objects for which one or more modifications failed. Each
+result indicates the attribute(s) on that object that could not
+be updated.
+
+ @param baseName The name of the object at the base of the scope
+tree.
+ @param scope A value indicating the contained objects to
+include in the scope of the operations. See
+ScopeType for details.
+ @param filter A string containing an expression to be
+evaluated with attribute values from each
+object in the scope. Updates are performed
+only on those objects for which the expression
+evaluates to true.
+ @param language A string identifying the language in which the
+filter expression is written.
+ @param modifications The list of modifications to be made to
+each object.
+ @param failuresOnly If true only results for failed objects
+will be returned.
+ @param howMany The maximum number of objects for which results
+should be returned in the first batch.
+ @param resultsIterator A reference to an iterator that can be
+used to retrieve the rest of the results. This
+reference will be null if all results were
+returned in the first batch.
+
+ */
+
+ UpdateResultsSetType scopedUpdate (
+ in NameType baseName,
+ in ScopeType scope,
+ in FilterType filter,
+ in LanguageType language,
+ in ModificationSeqType modifications,
+ in boolean failuresOnly,
+ in unsigned short howMany,
+ out UpdateResultsIterator resultsIterator)
+ raises (InvalidParameter,
+ InvalidFilter,
+ FilterComplexityLimit,
+ itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+```
+
+```
+
+/** This operation is used to delete multiple objects using a
+small number of method invocations. The method returns the
+first batch of results, a list of the objects that could not be
+deleted.
+
+@param baseName The name of the object at the base of the scope
+ tree.
+@param scope A value indicating the contained objects to
+ include in the scope of the operations. See
+ ScopeType for details.
+@param filter A string containing an expression to be
+ evaluated with attribute values from each
+ object in the scope. Only those objects for
+ which the expression evaluates to true are
+ deleted.
+@param language A string identifying the language in which the
+ filter expression is written.
+@param failuresOnly If true only results for failed objects
+ will be returned.
+@param howMany The maximum number of objects for which results
+ should be returned in the first batch.
+@param resultsIterator A reference to an iterator that can be
+ used to retrieve the rest of the results. This
+ reference will be null if all results were
+ returned in the first batch.
+
+*/
+
+DeleteResultsSetType scopedDelete (
+ in NameType baseName,
+ in ScopeType scope,
+ in FilterType filter,
+ in LanguageType language,
+ in boolean failuresOnly,
+ in unsigned short howMany,
+ out DeleteResultsIterator resultsIterator)
+ raises (InvalidParameter,
+ InvalidFilter,
+ FilterComplexityLimit,
+ itut_x780::ApplicationError);
+
+}; // end of AdvancedMooService interface
+
+```
+
+### ***// Notifications Interface***
+
+```
+
+/** The notifications interface defines the notifications emitted by
+the framework services, not the managed objects themselves.
+*/
+
+interface Notifications {
+
+ /** The Channel Change notification is a special notification
+because it is emitted by the framework (the Channel Finder) and
+not a managed object. It reports the addition, deletion, or
+change of a registered event channel.
+@param channelModification indicates if a channel has been
+ added, removed, or updated.
+@param channelInfo provides the information about
+ the affected channel.
+
+*/
+
+ void channelChange (
+ in ChannelModificationType channelModification,
+ in ChannelInfoType channelInfo
+ );
+
+ /** This operation signature defines the notification emitted
+by the heartbeat service.
+
+```
+
+```
+
+ @param systemLabel the current value of the Heartbeat
+ service systemLabel attribute.
+ @param channelID the ID of the channel through which the
+ notification was sent.
+ @param period the current value of the Heartbeat
+ service period attribute.
+ @param timeStamp the current time when the notification
+ is emitted.
+ */
+
+ void heartbeat (
+ in SystemLabelType systemLabel,
+ in ChannelIDType channelID,
+ in HeartbeatPeriodType period,
+ in GeneralizedTimeType timeStamp
+ );
+
+ /** These constants defines the names of the notification
+ declared above and are provided to help reduce errors. */
+
+ const string channelChangeTypeName =
+ "itut_q816::Notifications::channelChange";
+
+ const string heartbeatTypeName =
+ "itut_q816::Notifications::heartbeat";
+
+ /** These constants define the names of the parameters used in
+ the notifications declared above and are provided to help
+ reduce errors. */
+
+ const string channelIDName = "channelID";
+ const string channelModificationName = "channelModification";
+ const string channelInfoName = "channelInfo";
+ const string periodName = "period";
+ const string systemLabelName = "systemLabel";
+ const string timeStampName = "timeStamp";
+
+}; // end of Notifications interface
+
+}; // end of module itut_q816
+
+#endif // end of #ifndef ITUT_Q816_IDL
+
+```
+
+# ANNEX B
+
+## The Constraint Language BNF
+
+The BNF in this annex is an extension of the BNF used by the OMG's Notification Service filter language. The extensions are shown in a larger, bold font.
+
+## B.1 The constraint language proper in terms of lexical tokens
+
+```
+
+:=/* empty */
+ |
+:=/* */
+ | min
+ | max
+ | with
+ | random
+ | first
+:=
+:= or
+ |
+:= and
+
+```
+
+```
+
+ |
+:= ==
+ | !=
+ | <
+ | <=
+ | >
+ | >=
+ |
+ | ^ /* non-null set intersection test*/
+ | % /* true if sequence
+ operands have identical values */
+:= in
+ |
+ | in $ < Component>
+:= ~
+ |
+ | #
+:= +
+ | -
+ |
+:= *
+ | /
+ |
+:=not
+ |
+:= ( )
+ | exist
+ |
+ |
+ | -
+ |
+ | TRUE
+ | FALSE
+ | + < Number>
+ | exist $ < Component>
+ | $ < Component>
+ | default $ < Component>
+ | MAX ( )
+ | MIN ( )
+ |
+ :=
+ |
+ := { }
+ := /*empty*/
+ | ,
+ |
+
+```
+
+## B.2 "BNF" for lexical tokens up to character set issues
+
+```
+
+:=
+ | \ < Leader> < FollowSeq>< Component> := /* empty */
+ | . < CompDot>
+ |
+ |
+ | < CompExt> /* run-time variable */
+< CompExt> := /* empty */
+ | . < CompDot>
+ |
+ |
+< CompDot>:= < CompExt>
+ |
+ |
+ | length
+ | d
+ | _type_id
+ | _repos_id
+< CompArray>:= [ < Digits> ] < CompExt>
+< CompAssoc>:= ( < Ident> ) < CompExt>
+< CompPos>:= < CompExt>
+< UnionPos>:= ( < UnionVal> ) < CompExt>
+
+```
+
+```
+
+< UnionVal> := /* empty */
+|
+| - < Digits>
+| + < Digits>
+|
+
+:=/* */
+|
+:=
+|
+:=
+| .
+| .
+| .
+:=
+:= +
+| -<
+Exp>:= E
+| e
+:=
+|
+:= ' '
+:=/* */
+|
+:=
+|
+|
+|
+:=\\
+|\\'
+
+```
+
+## B.3 Character set issues
+
+The previous BNF has been complete up to the non-terminals , , , , and . For a particular character set, one must define the characters which make up these character classes.
+
+Each character set which the trading service is to support must define these character classes. This annex defines these character classes for the ASCII character set.
+
+```
+
+:=
+:=
+|
+| _
+ is the set of alphabetic characters [A-Za-z]
+ is the set of digits [0-9]
+ is the set of ASCII characters that are not , , or
+
+```
+
+# APPENDIX I
+
+## Interworking scenarios between models using ITU framework and ADSL-/ATMF-compliant models
+
+(Informative)
+
+## I.1 Introduction
+
+This appendix describes how systems designed using the approach in this framework may interwork with systems designed using the approach specified in the ATM Forum and the ASDM Forum.
+
+The following approaches have been used to define interfaces for CORBA-based managed objects:
+
+- A fine-grained model has a one-to-one relationship between CORBA interface instances (i.e., having their own Interoperable Object Reference, (IOR)) and managed object instances.
+
+- A class-grained model has one CORBA interface for each managed object class. Some other mechanism (such as managed object name placed as an input parameter for every operation in that interface) has to be supported by the CORBA class-grained interface to allow management of each managed object instance.
+
+A so-called grain-neutral approach uses a structure holding both the managed object name and the IOR used to provide access to each managed objects. Note that the grain-neutral approach, while requiring the client to pass the managed object instance as a parameter to each operation (i.e., looks like class-grained to the client), allows the implementation in the server to be either class-grained or fine-grained.
+
+The framework in this Recommendation uses a fine-grained approach, along with a value-type based *attributesGet* operation, for defining CORBA-based managed objects. The value type associated with a CORBA managed object subclass uses value-type inheritance to extend the elements of the value type associated with its superclass.
+
+The ATM Forum and ASDM Forum specifications includes the IOR for the class and the name of the managed object as a paired list of parameters for the operations (i.e., they are grain-neutral). The client uses the name to reference the specific entity and does not require a separate IOR for each entity. These specifications also use structures (i.e., they do not employ inheritance) for their *attributesGet* operations.
+
+## I.2 Terminology
+
+The following terms are introduced for the purpose of discussion:
+
+- Grain-Neutral Server – A managed system which implements objects defined using a grain-neutral model with CORBA 2.1.
+- ITU Framework Server – A managed system which implements objects defined using the framework in this Recommendation, thus supporting CORBA 2.3 features.
+- Grain-Neutral Managing System – A client capable of managing CORBA objects defined using grain-neutral model with CORBA 2.1.
+- ITU Framework Managing System – A client capable of managing CORBA objects defined according to the framework in this Recommendation, thus supporting CORBA 2.3 features.
+
+## I.3 Interworking scenarios
+
+### I.3.1 Grain-Neutral Server migrating to ITU Framework Server
+
+Upon migration from a grain-neutral server, an ITU Framework server may add new capabilities; however, it must preserve the old capabilities as found in the grain-neutral version.
+
+The new server should implement an adapter function. This function should present the grain-neutral interfaces to existing grain-neutral managing systems. An implementation approach can employ delegation of operations invoked on grain-neutral objects to the objects built according to the framework. Such a delegation approach will issue the same operations on the individual objects as would be invoked by an ITU Framework-based managing system.
+
+The class-specific grain-neutral *get all attribute* operation parameters should be converted to the value type structured as per the framework in this Recommendation.
+
+There are functions to be performed by the interworking software beyond the differences resulting from the use of POA and value object. The delegation software needs to be customized to address the differences in the naming structure, including this framework's use of the *kind* field. For example,
+
+explain how the context object reference used in constructing the name needs to be replaced with *kind* field of COS naming structure.
+
+### I.3.2 Grain-neutral Client migrating to ITU Framework client
+
+Such an ITU Framework client needs to manage both grain-neutral servers as well as ITU Framework servers.
+
+ITU Framework client with CORBA 2.3 needs, in addition to using the naming tree for ITU Framework servers, to use the naming tree for grain-neutral servers. CORBA 2.3 implementation may require an adaptation function where the application issuing the request to an object has to be converted to be appropriate for the grain-neutral server. If the application uses the value type it has to be decomposed into the object-specific get operation for the old server.
+
+For an ITU Framework-based client to manage both ITU Framework-based servers and pre-ITU Framework servers, the ITU client will need to support stubs for both the ITU and pre-ITU servers. In addition, some interworking function may be needed, as discussed above and as shown in Figure I.1.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows two client types and two server types. On the left, a 'Grain-neutral client' box is at the top, and an 'ITU Framework client' box is at the bottom. The 'ITU Framework client' box contains three ovals: 'IWF', 'Grain-Neutral stubs, etc.', and 'ITU stubs, etc.'. On the right, a 'Grain-neutral server' box is at the top, and an 'ITU Framework server' box is at the bottom. An 'Adaptation function' box is positioned between the 'ITU Framework client' and the 'ITU Framework server'. Arrows indicate the following connections: from 'Grain-neutral client' to 'Grain-neutral server'; from 'Grain-neutral client' to 'Adaptation function'; from 'ITU Framework client' to 'Grain-neutral server'; from 'ITU Framework client' to 'Adaptation function'; and from 'Adaptation function' to 'ITU Framework server'. A small text 'T0414980-00' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram illustrating interworking scenarios between a Grain-neutral client and an ITU Framework client.
+
+Figure I.1/Q.816 – Interworking scenarios
+
+# APPENDIX II
+
+## Filtering native and translated structured events
+
+This Recommendation defines notifications using IDL operation signatures, with the event type as the operation name, and with a separate *in* parameter of the operation for each data element of the notification. These operation signatures may be used for directly posting notifications to a channel via Typed proxy consumers, as defined in the OMG Notification Service. This is shown as the arrow labeled as (1) in Figure II.1.
+
+
+
+Figure II.1/Q.816 – Example of Typed and Structured Notification Posting, with Structured Delivery. The diagram shows two notification channels. The top channel is for 'Typed Notification Posting' and involves a 'Typed Notification Provider' (1) sending to a 'Typed Notification Proxy Consumer' inside a 'Notification Channel with Typed Proxy Consumer and Structured Proxy Provider', which then sends to a 'Structure Notification Consumer' (3). The bottom channel is for 'Structured Notification Posting' and involves a 'Structured Notification Provider' (2) sending to a 'Structured Notification Proxy Consumer' inside a 'Notification Channel with Structured Notification Proxies', which then sends to a 'Structured Notification Consumer' (4).
+
+T0415600-01
+
+**Figure II.1/Q.816 – Example of Typed and Structured Notification Posting, with Structured Delivery**
+
+Since structured events are widely supported, this Recommendation also provides an algorithm for defining a structured event report for each of the notifications defined. This defined format is used for native structured notifications posted by providers to structured proxy consumers on channels, as shown in the arrow labeled (2) in Figure II.1, and for non-translated delivery, as shown in the arrow labeled (4) in Figure II.1.
+
+
+
+Figure X-2- Native Structured Notification. This diagram shows the structure of a native structured notification. It is divided into four sections: Fixed Header (domain\_type, type\_name, event\_name), Variable Header (ohf\_name\_1 to ohf\_name\_n), Filterable Body Fields (fd\_name\_1 to fd\_name\_n), and Remaining Body (remainder\_of\_body). The Fixed Header is shown as a table with three columns: field name, field value, and a bracket indicating it's part of the Fixed Header. The Variable Header and Filterable Body Fields are shown as tables with two columns: field name and field value. The Remaining Body is shown as a single column: remainder\_of\_body.
+
+**Figure X-2- Native Structured Notification**
+
+
+
+Figure X-3 - Translated Typed to Structured Notification. This diagram shows the structure of a translated typed notification. It includes a C code snippet for 'equipmentAlarm' and a table representing the notification structure. The table is divided into sections: Fixed Header (domain\_type, type\_name, event\_name), Variable Header (fd\_name\_1 to fd\_name\_n), Filterable Body Fields (fd\_name\_1 to fd\_name\_n), and Variable Header and Remaining Body are not used. The Fixed Header is shown as a table with three columns: field name, field value, and a bracket indicating it's part of the Fixed Header. The Variable Header and Filterable Body Fields are shown as tables with two columns: field name and field value.
+
+**Figure X-3 - Translated Typed to Structured Notification**
+
+These native structured events are defined from typed notification definitions, as follows (summarized in Figure 6):
+
+- 1) The domain\_type data member is set to "Telecommunications".
+- 2) The type\_name data member is set to the full name of the operation defining the event type, e.g., "itut\_X780::Notifications::communicationsAlarm".
+- 3) The event\_name data member is set to the empty string.
+
+- 4) The name elements of the filterable body field name-value pairs are set to indicate the name of each parameter (as an example, "eventTime", "source", "sourceClass", etc.). The nth name element contains the name of the nth parameter.
+- 5) The value elements of the filterable body field name-value pairs are set to indicate the value that is passed to the corresponding parameter.
+
+An example of a native structured event, corresponding to the standard mapping, using the normal X.780 rules, would look like the following:
+
+```
+domain_type = "Telecommunications"
+type_name = ""
+event_name = ""
+fd_name1 = "" fd_value1 =
+fd_name2 = "" fd_value2 =
+fd_name3 = "" fd_value3 =
+```
+
+The OMG Notification Service defines procedures for notification channels to automatically convert Typed Events received from providers (see arrow labeled (1) in Figure II.1) into Structured notifications for delivery to consumers (see arrow labeled (2) in Figure II.1), summarized as follows:
+
+- 1) The domain\_type data member is set to the empty string.
+- 2) The type\_name data member is set to the "%TYPED" string.
+- 3) The event\_name data member is set to the empty string.
+- 4) The name element of the first filterable body field name-value pair is set to the "operation" string.
+- 5) The value element of the first filterable body field name-value pair is set to a string containing the fully scoped operation name. In this case, e.g., "itu\_X780::Notifications::communicationsAlarm".
+- 6) The remaining name elements of the filterable body field name-value pairs are set to indicate the name of each parameter (as an example, "eventTime", "source", "sourceClass", etc.). The nth name element contains the name of the nth-1 parameter.
+
+The remaining value elements of the filterable body field name-value pairs are set to indicate the value that was passed for each parameter (as an example, value of eventTime, value of source, value of sourceClass, etc.). The nth value element contains the value of the nth-1 parameter.
+
+*Using the same example as above for native structured notification, for a translated typed event, the channel would distribute something like the following, (where fd\_namei: and fd\_valuei denote the name and value of the ith element of the filterable data name value pair list):*
+
+```
+domain_type = ""
+type_name = "%TYPED"
+event_name = ""
+fd_name1 = "operation" fd_value1 = ""
+fd_name2 = "" fd_value2 =
+fd_name3 = "" fd_value3 =
+fd_name4 = "" fd_value4 =
+```
+
+Note that the fully scoped operation name is inserted as the first element of the filterable data name value pair list, and each *in* parameter of the typed event operation is a subsequent element.
+
+An example sketch of a filter construct, using run time variables, which would test for the event type `itut_x780::Notifications::attributeValueChange` and which would work for both forms of the structured event (native and channel translated typed) above is as follows:
+
+```
+$typename == "%TYPED" and
+$operation == "itut_x780::Notifications::attributeValueChange"
+
+or
+$typename == "itut_x780::Notifications::attributeValueChange"
+```
+
+# APPENDIX III
+
+## Bibliography
+
+The following Recommendations contain information that was used in the development of this framework. As stated in the introduction, a primary design goal of this framework is to enable the reuse of existing network management information models, at least without significant semantic changes. These Recommendations provide many of the details on the ITU-T's CMIP framework, and therefore define some of the functionality the CORBA framework must support.
+
+- ITU-T M.3010 (2000), *Principles for a Telecommunications management network.*
+- ITU-T M.3120 (2001), *CORBA generic network and NE level information model.*
+- ITU-T Q.821 (2000), *Stage 2 and Stage 3 description for the Q3 interface – Alarm Surveillance.*
+- ITU-T X.703 (1997), *Information technology – Open Distributed Management Architecture.*
+- ITU-T X.710 (1997) | ISO/IEC 9595:1998, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Common Management Information Service.*
+- ITU-T X.711 (1997) | ISO/IEC 9596-1:1998, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Common Management Information Protocol: Specification.*
+- ITU-T X.711/Cor.2 (2000) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Common management information protocol: Specification – Technical Corrigendum 2: Revision to include ASN.1: 1997.*
+- ITU-T X.720 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10165-1:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Management information model.*
+- ITU-T X.720/Cor.1 (1994), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Management information model – Technical Corrigendum 1.*
+- ITU-T X.721 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10165-2:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Definition of management information.*
+- ITU-T X.721/Cor.1 (1994) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Definition of management information – Technical Corrigendum 1.*
+- ITU-T X.721/Cor.2 (1996) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Definition of management information – Technical Corrigendum 2.*
+- ITU-T X.722 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10165-4:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects.*
+
+- ITU-T X.722/Amd.1 (1995) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects – Amendment 1: Set by create and component registration.*
+- ITU-T X.722/Amd.2 (1997) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects – Amendment 2: Addition of the NO-MODIFY syntax element and guidelines extension.*
+- ITU-T X.722/Amd.3 (1997) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects – Amendment 3: Guidelines for the use of Z in formalizing the behaviour of managed objects.*
+- ITU-T X.722/Cor.1 (1996) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects – Technical Corrigendum 1.*
+- ITU-T X.722/Cor.2 (2000) *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects – Technical Corrigendum 2: Revision of GDMO to include ASN.1:1997.*
+- ITU-T X.733 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-4:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Alarm reporting function.*
+
+## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communications |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.82.7-199607-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.82.7-199607-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5cdde830a4ea1ed044525a8ff94328b624a8b965
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.82.7-199607-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,1175 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.82.7**
+
+(07/96)
+
+# **SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+Functions and information flows for services in the ISDN –
+Supplementary services
+
+---
+
+Stage 2 description for call offering supplementary
+services:
+
+## **Explicit call transfer**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.82.7
+
+(Previously CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+# **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 |
+| Basic Recommendations | Q.4–Q.9 |
+| Numbering plan and dialling procedures in the international service | Q.10–Q.11 |
+| Routing plan for international service | Q.12–Q.19 |
+| General Recommendations relative to signalling and switching systems (national or international) | Q.20–Q.34 |
+| Tones for use in national signalling systems | Q.35–Q.39 |
+| General characteristics for international telephone connections and circuits | Q.40–Q.47 |
+| Signalling for satellite systems | Q.48–Q.49 |
+| Signalling for circuit multiplication equipment | Q.50–Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 |
+| Methodology | Q.60–Q.67 |
+| Basic services | Q.68–Q.79 |
+| Supplementary services | Q.80–Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATION OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1999 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.*
+
+## **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION Q.82.7**
+
+# **STAGE 2 DESCRIPTION FOR CALL OFFERING SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES: EXPLICIT CALL TRANSFER**
+
+### **Summary**
+
+This Recommendation defines the Stage 2 of the Explicit Call Transfer (ECT) supplementary service.
+
+The ECT supplementary service enables a user who has two calls, each of which can be an incoming or an outgoing call, to connect the other users in the two calls.
+
+### **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.82.7 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1993-1996) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 9th of July 1996 .
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993).
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+© ITU 1996
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+# CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 1 | Scope..... | 1 |
+| 2 | Normative references..... | 1 |
+| 3 | Definitions ..... | 2 |
+| 4 | Symbols and abbreviations ..... | 2 |
+| 5 | Description..... | 2 |
+| 6 | Derivation of the functional model..... | 3 |
+| 6.1 | Functional model description..... | 3 |
+| 6.2 | Description of functional entities..... | 4 |
+| 6.3 | Relationship with a basic service..... | 4 |
+| 7 | Information flows..... | 4 |
+| 7.1 | Information flow diagrams..... | 4 |
+| 7.2 | Definition of the individual information flows..... | 7 |
+| 7.2.1 | Relationship rq..... | 7 |
+| 7.2.2 | Relationship rr ..... | 7 |
+| 7.2.3 | Relationship rs1 ..... | 8 |
+| 7.2.4 | Relationship rs2 ..... | 9 |
+| 7.2.5 | Relationship rt..... | 10 |
+| 7.2.6 | Relationship ru..... | 10 |
+| 8 | SDL diagrams for functional entities..... | 11 |
+| 8.1 | FE1 ..... | 12 |
+| 8.2 | FE2..... | 14 |
+| 8.3 | FE3..... | 15 |
+| 8.4 | FE4..... | 19 |
+| 8.5 | FE5..... | 22 |
+| 8.6 | FE6..... | 25 |
+| 9 | Functional Entity Actions (FEAs)..... | 26 |
+| 9.1 | FEAs of FE1 ..... | 26 |
+| 9.2 | FEAs of FE2 ..... | 26 |
+| 9.3 | FEAs of FE3 ..... | 26 |
+| 9.4 | FEAs of FE4 ..... | 27 |
+| 9.5 | FEAs of FE5 ..... | 27 |
+| 9.6 | FEAs of FE6 ..... | 28 |
+| 10 | Allocation of functional entities to physical locations..... | 28 |
+
+
+
+# **STAGE 2 DESCRIPTION FOR CALL OFFERING SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES: EXPLICIT CALL TRANSFER**
+
+*(Geneva, 1996)*
+
+## **1 Scope**
+
+This Recommendation defines the Stage 2 of the Explicit Call Transfer (ECT) supplementary service. Stage 2 identifies the functional capabilities and the information flows needed to support the service as described in Stage 1. The Stage 2 description also identifies user operations not directly associated with a call (see Recommendation I.130 [2]).
+
+This Recommendation is specified according to the methodology specified in Recommendation Q.65 [3].
+
+In addition, this Recommendation does not specify the requirements where the service is provided to the user via a private ISDN. This Recommendation does not specify the requirements for the allocation of defined functional entities within a private ISDN, it does however define which functional entities may be allocated to a private ISDN.
+
+This Recommendation does not specify the additional requirements where the service is provided to the user via a telecommunications network that is not an ISDN.
+
+The ECT supplementary service enables a user who has two calls, each of which can be an incoming or an outgoing call, to connect the other users in the two calls.
+
+The ECT supplementary service is applicable to all circuit-switched telecommunication services.
+
+This Recommendation is applicable to the Stage 3 Recommendations for the integrated services digital network.
+
+## **2 Normative references**
+
+The following Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision: all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] ITU-T Recommendation I.112 (1993), *Vocabulary of terms for ISDNs*.
+- [2] CCITT Recommendation I.130 (1988), *Method for the characterization of telecommunication services supported by an ISDN and network capabilities of an ISDN*.
+- [3] CCITT Recommendation Q.65 (1988), *Stage 2 of the method for the characterization of services supported by an ISDN*.
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation Q.71 (1993), *ISDN circuit mode switched bearer services*.
+- [5] ITU-T Recommendation Z.100 (1993), *CCITT Specification and Description Language (SDL)*.
+
+## 3 Definitions
+
+For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following definitions apply:
+
+- 3.1 **integrated services digital network (ISDN)**: See 2.3/I.112 [1], definition 308.
+- 3.2 **primary call**: One of the user A's (answered) calls.
+- 3.3 **secondary call**: The other user A call (answered or alerting).
+- 3.4 **service; telecommunications service**: See 2.2/I.112 [1], definition 201.
+- 3.5 **transfer by join**: The effecting of transfer by joining together the primary and secondary calls at user A's local exchange.
+- 3.6 **transfer by re-routing**: The effecting of transfer by establishing a new connection to replace the primary and secondary calls.
+- 3.7 **user A**: The served user, i.e. the user requesting the ECT supplementary service.
+- 3.8 **user B**: The other user in user A's primary call.
+- 3.9 **user C**: The other user in user A's secondary call.
+
+## 4 Symbols and abbreviations
+
+For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following abbreviations are used.
+
+- CC Call Control
+- CCA Call Control Agent
+- ECT Explicit Call Transfer
+- FE Functional Entity
+- FEA Functional Entity Action
+- ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network
+- LE Local Exchange
+- PTNX Private Telecommunications Network Exchange
+- SDL Specification and Description Language
+- TE Terminal Equipment
+
+## 5 Description
+
+This Stage 2 supports only one variant of the ECT supplementary service, that of transfer by join. The functional model supports interworking with transfer by re-routing, which may occur within a private network but involving users of a public network.
+
+Table 1 shows the states for the invocation of the ECT supplementary service.
+
+TABLE 1/Q.82.7
+
+### **States for invocation of the ECT supplementary service**
+
+| Primary call | Secondary call |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
+| Active, idle | Active, idle |
+| Active, held | Active, idle (Note 2) |
+| Active, idle | Active, held (Note 2) |
+| Active, idle | Alerting, idle (Note 1) |
+| Active, held | Alerting, idle (Note 1) |
+| Active, idle | Alerting, held (Note 1) |
+| NOTES
1 Only applicable for an outgoing call.
2 These two entries are identical and there is no distinction between the information flows for the two calls, the only distinction being the held state of one of the calls. | |
+
+The procedures are currently restricted to basic telecommunication services involving a single 64 kbit/s connection. This Recommendation is not applicable to a videotelephony call involving two 64 kbit/s connections.
+
+## **6 Derivation of the functional model**
+
+### **6.1 Functional model description**
+
+The functional model for the ECT supplementary service is shown in Figure 1.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the functional model for the ECT supplementary service. It consists of several functional entities (FEs) and their interconnections:
+
+
+- FE1** is connected to **FE2** via a link labeled **rq**.
+- FE2** is connected to **FE3** via a link labeled **rr**.
+- FE3** has two outgoing links labeled **rs1**, each leading to a **FE4** entity.
+- From the top **FE4**, a link labeled **rs2** leads to **FE5**, which in turn connects to **FE6** (labeled **user B**) via a link labeled **rt**.
+- From the bottom **FE4**, a link labeled **rs2** leads to another **FE5**, which connects to **FE6** (labeled **user C**) via a link labeled **rt**.
+- Both **FE6** entities (user B and user C) have a return link labeled **ru** that connects back to **FE3**.
+
+Functional model diagram for the ECT supplementary service showing functional entities FE1 through FE6 and their interconnections labeled rq, rr, rs1, rs2, rt, and ru. It shows a primary call path and two secondary call paths to user B and user C.
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.82.7
+
+#### **Functional model for the ECT supplementary service**
+
+### 6.2 Description of functional entities
+
+The Functional Entities (FEs) required by the ECT supplementary service in addition to those of basic call are as follows:
+
+- FE1: Transfer invoke entity;
+- FE2: Transfer validate entity;
+- FE3: Transfer execute entity;
+- FE4: Transfer screen entity;
+- FE5: Transfer complete receive entity;
+- FE6: Transfer inform receive entity.
+
+### 6.3 Relationship with a basic service
+
+The relationship with a basic service is as shown in Figure 2.
+
+
+
+Figure 2/Q.82.7: Relationship with a basic service. This is a complex state transition diagram showing the interaction between functional entities (FE1-FE6) and call control (CC) states. The diagram is organized into two main horizontal tracks. The top track shows a sequence of CC boxes connected by arrows labeled r2, rs1, r2, rs2, r1 or r3, and rt. FE4, FE5, and FE6 are positioned below these CC boxes. FE6 connects to a CCA box. The bottom track shows a similar sequence of CC boxes connected by arrows labeled r2, rs1, r2, rs2, r1 or r3, and rt. FE4, FE5, and FE6 are positioned above these CC boxes. FE6 connects to a CCA box. On the left, FE1, FE2, and FE3 are shown. FE1 connects to a CCA box. FE2 connects to a CC box. FE3 connects to a CC box. Arrows labeled r1 or r3, rq, rr, r2, and r1 or r3 connect these entities. Vertical arrows labeled ru connect FE6 boxes to FE3 boxes. A small code T1175230-95 is in the bottom right corner.
+
+FIGURE 2/Q.82.7
+
+#### Relationship with a basic service
+
+## 7 Information flows
+
+### 7.1 Information flow diagrams
+
+The information flow diagrams assume the existence of a primary call and a secondary call and that both calls are maintained until the completion of the transfer. Clearing of the primary and secondary calls with respect to the served user is not shown as this uses basic call information flows only. Similarly any information flows concerned with holding and retrieving the primary and secondary calls are outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+The TERMINAL DETAILS information flow may occur between both FE6s. Where there is no information to be sent at all, the information flow is not present in either direction. The information flow is only shown in one direction in Figure 3 for reasons of clarity.
+
+The TRANSFER ACTIVE information flow will only occur in the case of an alerting transfer where the alerting user subsequently answers. In such a case, a TERMINAL DETAILS information flow from user B's FE6 may also occur as a result of receiving the second TRANSFER INFORM indication.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a sequence of messages between several entities: FE6, FE5, FE4, FE1, FE2, FE3, FE4, FE5, and FE6. The sequence is as follows:
+
+- FE1 to FE2:** TRANSFER INVOKE (911, 912, 914) with *req.ind* (921, 922, 923).
+- FE2 to FE3:** TRANSFER INVOKE (931, 932, 933) with *req.ind* (934).
+- FE3 to FE2:** TRANSFER (Note) (934) with *resp.conf* (924, 925).
+- FE2 to FE1:** TRANSFER INVOKE (915, 916, 917) with *resp.conf* (915, 916, 917).
+- FE1 to FE4:** TRANSFER COMPLETE (941, 942) with *req.ind* (943, 944).
+- FE4 to FE5:** TRANSFER COMPLETE (951, 952) with *req.ind* (953, 954).
+- FE5 to FE6:** TRANSFER INFORM (961, 962, 963) with *req.ind* (961, 962, 963).
+
+Timing constraints are indicated by dashed lines and labels: *rt* (FE6 to FE5), *rs2* (FE5 to FE4), *ru* (FE4 to FE1), *rq* (FE1 to FE2), *rr* (FE2 to FE3), *rs1* (FE3 to FE4), *rs2* (FE4 to FE5), and *rt* (FE5 to FE6). A dashed box labeled *ru* encloses FE1, FE2, and FE3. A dashed box labeled *rs1* encloses FE1, FE2, FE3, and FE4. A dashed box labeled *ru* encloses FE1, FE2, FE3, FE4, and FE5.
+
+Sequence diagram for a successful call transfer (Figure 3/Q.82.7 sheet 1 of 2).
+
+T1175240-95
+
+NOTE – If the optional procedures for preventing loops are provided, the information flow shown in Figure 4 occurs at this point, before proceeding with the rest of the information flow shown in this figure.
+
+FIGURE 3/Q.82.7 (sheet 1 of 2)
+
+#### **Successful call transfer**
+
+
+
+Sequence diagram for a successful call transfer in Q.82.7. Lifelines: FE6 (rt), FE5 (rs2), FE4 (rq), FE1 (r), FE2 (rr), FE3 (rs1), FE4 (rs2), FE5 (rt), FE6. The process involves: 1. FE6 sends req.ind to FE5. 2. FE5 sends TERMINAL DETAILS to FE4. 3. FE4 sends req.ind to FE3. 4. FE3 sends TERMINAL DETAILS to FE6. 5. FE6 sends req.ind to FE3. 6. FE3 sends SETUP <<<<|<-- resp. conf to FE4. 7. FE4 sends TRANSFER ACTIVE to FE5. 8. FE5 sends req.ind to FE6. 9. FE6 sends TRANSFER INFORM to FE5. 10. FE5 sends req.ind to FE6. Dashed boxes labeled 'ru' and 'rs1' indicate specific protocol regions.
+
+T1175250-95
+
+FIGURE 3/Q.82.7 (sheet 2 of 2)
+**Successful call transfer**
+
+Figure 4 shows the optional procedure for preventing loops.
+
+
+
+Sequence diagram illustrating the optional loop test procedure. Lifelines are FE5, FE4, FE3, FE4, FE5. The sequence starts with FE3 sending a 'LOOP TEST' message to the second FE4. The second FE4 sends 'req.ind' to FE5. FE5 performs a 'LOOP TEST' and returns 'req.ind' to the second FE4. The second FE4 sends 'LOOP TEST' to FE3. FE3 performs a 'LOOP TEST' and returns 'resp.conf' to the second FE4. The second FE4 sends 'resp.conf' to FE4. FE4 performs a 'LOOP TEST' and returns 'resp.conf' to FE5. FE5 performs a 'LOOP TEST' and returns 'req.ind' to the first FE5. The first FE5 performs a 'LOOP TEST' and returns 'resp.conf' to the first FE4. The first FE4 performs a 'LOOP TEST' and returns 'resp.conf' to FE3. The diagram is labeled T1175260-95.
+
+FIGURE 4/Q.82.7
+**Optional loop test procedure**
+
+### 7.2 Definition of the individual information flows
+
+#### 7.2.1 Relationship rq
+
+##### 7.2.1.1 Contents of TRANSFER INVOKE
+
+This confirmed information flow initiates a transfer. It contains the identities of the calls involving user B and user C.
+
+The contents of the TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind and TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf information flows are shown in Table 2.
+
+TABLE 2/Q.82.7
+**TRANSFER INVOKE**
+
+| Name | req.ind | resp.conf |
+|------------------------|---------|-----------|
+| Call identities (Note) | M | - |
+| Transfer result | - | M |
+
+NOTE – Means of providing such an identifier are outside the scope of this Recommendation. Such identification is local to relationship rq and may involve a local information flow across rq.
+
+#### 7.2.2 Relationship rr
+
+##### 7.2.2.1 Contents of TRANSFER INVOKE
+
+This confirmed information flow requests execution of a transfer. It contains the identities of the calls involving user B and user C.
+
+The contents of the TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind and TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf information flows are shown in Table 3.
+
+TABLE 3/Q.82.7
+**TRANSFER INVOKE**
+
+| Name | req.ind | resp.conf |
+|------------------------|---------|-----------|
+| Call identities (Note) | M | - |
+| Transfer result | - | M |
+
+NOTE – Means of providing such an identifier are outside the scope of this Recommendation. Such identification is local to relationship rr and may involve a local information flow across rr.
+
+#### 7.2.3 Relationship rs1
+
+##### 7.2.3.1 Contents of TRANSFER COMPLETE
+
+This unconfirmed information flow indicates that a transfer has been effected.
+
+The contents of the TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind information flow are shown in Table 4.
+
+TABLE 4/Q.82.7
+**TRANSFER COMPLETE**
+
+| Name | req.ind |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Transferred number | O (Note 1) |
+| Alerting indication | O (Note 2) |
+| NOTES
1 Mandatory if known.
2 Mandatory if other user is being alerted. | |
+
+##### 7.2.3.2 Contents of TRANSFER ACTIVE
+
+This unconfirmed information flow indicates that answer has taken place subsequent to an alerting transfer. The contents are the same as those of a basic call SETUP resp.conf.
+
+##### 7.2.3.3 Contents of LOOP TEST
+
+This confirmed information flow indicates that a loop test has been invoked.
+
+There are no contents of the LOOP TEST req.ind or LOOP TEST resp.conf information flows.
+
+##### 7.2.3.4 Contents of LOOP TEST REJECT
+
+This unconfirmed information flow indicates that a loop test has failed.
+
+The contents of the LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind information flow is shown in Table 5.
+
+TABLE 5/Q.82.7
+**Contents of LOOP TEST REJECT**
+
+| Name | req.ind |
+|--------|---------|
+| Reason | M |
+
+#### 7.2.4 Relationship rs2
+
+##### 7.2.4.1 Contents of TRANSFER COMPLETE
+
+This unconfirmed information flow indicates that a transfer has been effected.
+
+The contents of the TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind information flow are shown in Table 6.
+
+TABLE 6/Q.82.7
+
+###### TRANSFER COMPLETE
+
+| Name | req.ind |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Transferred number | O (Note 1) |
+| Transferred subaddress | O (Note 2) |
+| Alerting indication | O (Note 3) |
+| NOTES
1 Mandatory if known and not restricted.
2 Mandatory if transfer occurs with the other user alerting, and if the TRANSFER INFORM req.ind is being sent as a result of the answer to the alerting call, and if the subaddress is known and not restricted. Otherwise, the information shall not be sent.
3 Mandatory if the other user is being alerted. | |
+
+##### 7.2.4.2 Contents of TRANSFER ACTIVE
+
+This unconfirmed information flow indicates that answer has taken place subsequent to an alerting transfer. The contents are the same as those of a basic call SETUP resp.conf.
+
+##### 7.2.4.3 Contents of TERMINAL DETAILS
+
+This unconfirmed information flow informs users of any subaddress associated with the other user involved in the transfer.
+
+The contents of the TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind information flow are shown in Table 7.
+
+TABLE 7/Q.82.7
+
+###### TERMINAL DETAILS
+
+| Name | req.ind |
+|------------------------|---------|
+| Transferred subaddress | M |
+
+##### 7.2.4.4 Contents of LOOP TEST
+
+This confirmed information flow indicates that a loop test has been invoked.
+
+There are no contents of the LOOP TEST req.ind or LOOP TEST resp.conf information flows.
+
+##### 7.2.4.5 Contents of LOOP TEST REJECT
+
+This unconfirmed information flow indicates that a loop test has failed.
+
+The contents of the LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind information flow are shown in Table 8.
+
+TABLE 8/Q.82.7
+
+###### **Contents of LOOP TEST REJECT**
+
+| | |
+|--------|---------|
+| Name | req.ind |
+| Reason | M |
+
+#### **7.2.5 Relationship rt**
+
+##### **7.2.5.1 Contents of TRANSFER INFORM**
+
+This unconfirmed information flow informs users of the successful completion of a call transfer, and the identity of the other user.
+
+The contents of the TRANSFER INFORM req.ind information flow are shown in Table 9.
+
+TABLE 9/Q.82.7
+
+###### **TRANSFER INFORM**
+
+| | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
+| Name | req.ind |
+| Transferred number | O (Note 1) |
+| Alerting indication | O (Note 2) |
+| NOTES
1 Mandatory if known and not restricted.
2 Mandatory if the other user is being alerted. | |
+
+##### **7.2.5.2 Contents of TERMINAL DETAILS**
+
+This unconfirmed information flow informs users of any subaddress associated with the other user involved in the transfer.
+
+The contents of the TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind information flow are shown in Table 10.
+
+TABLE 10/Q.82.7
+
+###### **TERMINAL DETAILS**
+
+| | |
+|------------------------|---------|
+| Name | req.ind |
+| Transferred subaddress | M |
+
+#### **7.2.6 Relationship ru**
+
+##### **7.2.6.1 Contents of TERMINAL DETAILS**
+
+This unconfirmed information flow informs users of any subaddress associated with the other user involved in the transfer.
+
+The contents of the TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind information flow are shown in Table 11.
+
+TABLE 11/Q.82.7
+
+###### **TERMINAL DETAILS**
+
+| | |
+|------------------------|---------|
+| Name | req.ind |
+| Transferred subaddress | M |
+
+## **8 SDL diagrams for functional entities**
+
+The Specification and Description Language (SDL) diagrams are provided according to Recommendation Z.100 [5].
+
+### 8.1 FE1
+
+The SDL diagram for FE1 is shown in Figure 5.
+
+
+
+The diagram is an SDL (State Definition Language) diagram for FE1. It consists of the following elements:
+
+- States:**
+ - Idle**: Initial state, represented by a double circle.
+ - Awaiting confirmation**: State reached after a successful transfer, represented by a double circle.
+ - Unnamed state**: State reached after an invalid request, represented by a double circle with a dashed line inside.
+- Transitions:**
+ - User request transfer B and C together**: A transition from the Idle state to the Request valid? decision. It is associated with FEA 911, user.
+ - Request valid?**: A decision diamond. It is associated with FEA 912. It has two outgoing transitions:
+ - Yes**: Leads to the TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind transition.
+ - No**: Leads to the Request invalid transition.
+ - TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind**: A transition from the Request valid? (Yes) decision to the Awaiting confirmation state. It is associated with FEA 914, to FE2.
+ - Request invalid**: A transition from the Request valid? (No) decision to the unnamed state. It is associated with FEA 913, user.
+- Functional Areas (FEA):**
+ - FEA 911, user**: Associated with the initial request transition.
+ - FEA 912**: Associated with the Request valid? decision.
+ - FEA 913, user**: Associated with the Request invalid transition.
+ - FEA 914, to FE2**: Associated with the TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind transition.
+
+SDL diagram for FE1 showing states Idle, Awaiting confirmation, and an unnamed state, with transitions for user requests and system responses.
+
+T1175270-95
+
+FIGURE 5/Q.82.7 (sheet 1 of 2)
+
+#### SDL diagrams for FE1
+
+
+
+```
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Awaiting_confirmation : Awaiting confirmation
+ Awaiting_confirmation --> TRANSFER_INVOKE_resp_conf : TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf
+ TRANSFER_INVOKE_resp_conf --> Transfer_successful? : Transfer successful?
+ Transfer_successful? -- Yes --> Transfer_complete : Transfer complete
+ Transfer_successful? -- No --> Transfer_failed : Transfer failed
+ Transfer_complete --> Idle1 : Idle
+ Transfer_failed --> Idle2 : Idle
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the state transitions for Process FE1\_ECT. It begins in the 'Awaiting confirmation' state. A transition labeled 'TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf' (associated with FEA 915 from FE2) leads to a decision state 'Transfer successful?'. This decision is influenced by FEA 916. If the transfer is successful ('Yes'), it proceeds to 'Transfer complete' (associated with FEA 917 user) and then to an 'Idle' state. If the transfer fails ('No'), it proceeds to 'Transfer failed' (associated with FEA 918, user) and then to another 'Idle' state.
+
+State transition diagram for Process FE1\_ECT. It starts at 'Awaiting confirmation', goes to 'TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf' (linked to FEA 915 from FE2), then to a decision 'Transfer successful?'. 'Yes' leads to 'Transfer complete' (linked to FEA 917 user) and then to 'Idle'. 'No' leads to 'Transfer failed' (linked to FEA 918, user) and then to 'Idle'. FEA 916 is also associated with the decision.
+
+T1175280-95
+
+FIGURE 5/Q.82.7 (sheet 2 of 2)
+**SDL diagrams for FE1**
+
+### 8.2 FE2
+
+The SDL diagram for FE2 is shown in Figure 6.
+
+
+
+Process FE2\_ECT
+
+SE0368\_F6(1)
+
+```
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Idle
+ Idle --> T1: TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind
+ T1 --> Decision: Is transfer barred by virtue of call states or supplementary service interactions?
+ Decision -- Yes --> T2: TRANSFER INVOKE (barred) resp.conf
+ Decision -- No --> T3: TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind
+ T3 --> Awaiting: Awaiting confirmation
+ Awaiting --> T4: TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf
+ T4 --> T5: TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf
+ T2 --> [*]
+ T5 --> [*]
+```
+
+FEA 921, from FE1
+
+FEA 922
+
+FEA 923, to FE3
+
+FEA 924, to FE1
+
+FEA 925, from FE3
+
+FEA 926, to FE1
+
+T1175290-95
+
+SDL diagram for FE2 process. It starts at an 'Idle' state, followed by a 'TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind' message. A decision diamond asks 'Is transfer barred by virtue of call states or supplementary service interactions?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'TRANSFER INVOKE (barred) resp.conf' (FEA 924, to FE1). If 'No', it goes to 'TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind' (FEA 923, to FE3), then to 'Awaiting confirmation' state, then to 'TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf' (FEA 925, from FE3), and finally to 'TRANSFER INVOKE resp.conf' (FEA 926, to FE1). Both final messages lead to end states.
+
+FIGURE 6/Q.82.7
+SDL diagrams for FE2
+
+### 8.3 FE3
+
+The SDL diagram for FE3 is shown in Figure 7.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Idle([Idle]) --> TI_req[TRANSFER INVOKE
+req.ind]
+ TI_req --- FEA931[FEA 931,
+from FE2]
+ TI_req --> Identify[Identify primary
+and secondary
+calls]
+ Identify --- FEA932[FEA 932]
+ Identify --> Unacceptable{Transfer request
+unacceptable?
+(Note)}
+ Unacceptable --- FEA933[FEA 933]
+
+ Unacceptable -- Yes --> TI_reject[TRANSFER
+INVOKE
+(reject)
+resp.conf]
+ TI_reject --- FEA935[FEA 935,
+to FE2]
+ TI_reject --> Term1([ ])
+
+ Unacceptable -- No --> LoopPrev[Loop
+prevention
+procedure]
+ LoopPrev --> LoopTest[Loop
+Test]
+ LoopTest -- Yes --> LoopPrev
+
+ LoopPrev -- success --> TI_accept[TRANSFER
+INVOKE
+(accept)
+resp.conf]
+ TI_accept --- FEA934[FEA 934,
+to FE2]
+
+ TI_accept --> Connect[Connect call paths
+between user B and
+user C together]
+ Connect --- FEA936[FEA 936]
+
+ Connect --> Clear[Clear call paths
+to user A]
+ Clear --- FEA937[FEA 937]
+
+ Clear --> TC_req1[TRANSFER
+COMPLETE
+req.ind]
+ TC_req1 --- FEA938[FEA 938,
+to B's FE4]
+
+ TC_req1 --> TC_req2[TRANSFER
+COMPLETE
+req.ind]
+ TC_req2 --- FEA939[FEA 939,
+to C's FE4]
+
+ TC_req2 --> Alerted{Is user C
+being alerted?}
+
+ Alerted -- Yes --> WaitActive([Wait transfer
+active])
+ Alerted -- No --> Term2([ ])
+
+ LoopTest -- failure --> Term3([ ])
+
+ subgraph NoteBox [ ]
+ direction TB
+ Note[NOTE - For example, may be for operational reasons,
+or because CUG restrictions have been infringed.]
+ end
+
+```
+
+The diagram is an SDL for Process FE3\_ECT, labeled SE0368\_F7.1(2). It begins at the 'Idle' state. The first transition is 'TRANSFER INVOKE req.ind', which leads to a process block 'Identify primary and secondary calls'. A note indicates this may be for operational reasons or due to CUG restrictions. This process is associated with FEA 931 (from FE2), FEA 932, and FEA 933. A decision diamond 'Transfer request unacceptable? (Note)' follows. If 'Yes', it leads to 'TRANSFER INVOKE (reject) resp.conf', which is associated with FEA 935 (to FE2), and then to a terminal state. If 'No', it leads to a 'Loop prevention procedure' block. This block is associated with FEA 934 (to FE2), FEA 936, FEA 937, FEA 938 (to B's FE4), and FEA 939 (to C's FE4). A 'Loop Test' block is also shown. From the 'Loop prevention procedure', a 'success' path leads to 'TRANSFER INVOKE (accept) resp.conf', which then leads to 'Connect call paths between user B and user C together', then 'Clear call paths to user A', then 'TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind', then another 'TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind', and finally to a decision 'Is user C being alerted?'. If 'Yes', it leads to 'Wait transfer active' state. If 'No', it leads to a terminal state. A 'failure' path from the 'Loop prevention procedure' leads to a terminal state.
+
+SDL diagram for Process FE3\_ECT. The diagram shows a state transition from 'Idle' through various transfer and loop prevention steps, leading to 'Wait transfer active' or other terminal states. It includes labels for FEA 931 through FEA 939 and a note about operational reasons or CUG restrictions.
+
+FIGURE 7/Q.82.7 (sheet 1 of 4)
+**SDL diagrams for FE3**
+
+
+
+```
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Wait_transfer_active : Wait transfer active
+ state "Wait transfer active" as Wait_transfer_active
+ state "TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind" as TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind
+ state "Idle" as Idle
+ Wait_transfer_active --> Transfer_active_indication : Transfer active indication
+ state "Transfer active indication" as Transfer_active_indication
+ Transfer_active_indication --> TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind
+ TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind --> Idle
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the state transitions for Process FE3\_ECT. It begins with an initial state leading to 'Wait transfer active'. A transition labeled 'Transfer active indication' occurs, with a message 'FEA 93A from co-located CC' being received. This is followed by a transition labeled 'TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind', with a message 'FEA 93A, to B's FE4' being sent. The process then transitions to the 'Idle' state.
+
+State transition diagram for Process FE3\_ECT showing states 'Wait transfer active' and 'Idle', and transitions 'Transfer active indication' and 'TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind' with associated message details.
+
+T1175310-95
+
+FIGURE 7/Q.82.7 (sheet 2 of 4)
+**SDL diagrams for FE3**
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a state transition process for 'Macro Loop\_Test'. It begins with an initial state 'Loop Test' (oval). A transition arrow points to a state 'LOOP TEST req.ind' (chevron). From this state, a dashed line branches to the right, leading to a dashed box containing the text 'FEA 93B, to B's FE4'. Another transition arrow points down from 'LOOP TEST req.ind' to a second 'LOOP TEST req.ind' state (chevron). From this second state, another dashed line branches to the right, leading to a dashed box containing the text 'FEA 93B, to C's FE4'. A transition arrow points down from the second 'LOOP TEST req.ind' state to a rectangular state 'SET NOW + Loop, TLoop'. Finally, a transition arrow points down to the terminal state 'Test in progress' (oval).
+
+```
+graph TD; A([Loop Test]) --> B{{LOOP TEST req.ind}}; B -.-> B1[FEA 93B, to B's FE4]; B --> C{{LOOP TEST req.ind}}; C -.-> C1[FEA 93B, to C's FE4]; C --> D[SET NOW + Loop, TLoop]; D --> E([Test in progress])
+```
+
+State transition diagram for Macro Loop\_Test
+
+T1175320-95
+
+FIGURE 7/Q.82.7 (sheet 3 of 4)
+**SDL diagrams for FE3**
+
+
+
+The diagram is a State Transition Diagram (STD) for a state machine named "Macro Loop\_Test" (SE0368\_F7.4(2)). It begins with an initial state "Test in progress" (oval). The main state is a composite state "Loop Test" (rectangle), which contains two sub-states: "FEA 93C, from B's or C's FE4" (dashed box) and "FEA 93C" (dashed box). Transitions include "LOOP TEST req.ind" (input), "TRANSFER INVOKE (reject) resp.conf" (input), "LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind" (input), "FEA 935 to FE2" (input), "TLoop" (output), "RESET (TLoop)" (output), and "Reason?" (output). The "Reason?" output leads to a decision diamond with options "simultaneous transfer" (leading to "TRANSFER INVOKE (reject) resp.conf"), "insufficient information" (leading to "Implementation option?" which then leads to "reject transfer" or "proceed with transfer"), and "FEA 935, to FE2" (leading to "Failure"). The diagram ends with four terminal states: "Failure" (circle), "Failure" (circle), "Success" (circle), and "Success" (circle).
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> TestInProgress : Test in progress
+ TestInProgress --> LoopTest
+ state "Loop Test" as LoopTest {
+ state "FEA 93C, from B's or C's FE4" as FEA93C1 {
+ [*] --> FEA93C1
+ }
+ state "FEA 93C" as FEA93C2 {
+ [*] --> FEA93C2
+ }
+ }
+ LoopTest --> FEA93C1 : LOOP TEST req.ind
+ FEA93C1 --> FEA93C2 : FEA 93C
+ FEA93C2 --> FEA93C1 : FEA 93C
+ FEA93C1 --> LoopTest : LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind
+ FEA93C2 --> LoopTest : FEA 93C
+ FEA93C1 --> FEA935 : FEA 935 to FE2
+ FEA935 --> Failure1 : Failure
+ FEA93C1 --> TransferInvoke : TRANSFER INVOKE (reject) resp.conf
+ TransferInvoke --> Failure2 : Failure
+ FEA93C1 --> Reset1 : RESET (TLoop)
+ Reset1 --> Success1 : Success
+ FEA93C2 --> TLoop : TLoop
+ TLoop --> Reset2 : RESET (TLoop)
+ Reset2 --> Success2 : Success
+ FEA93C1 --> Reason : Reason?
+ Reason --> SimultaneousTransfer : simultaneous transfer
+ SimultaneousTransfer --> TransferInvoke
+ Reason --> InsufficientInformation : insufficient information
+ InsufficientInformation --> ImplementationOption : Implementation option?
+ ImplementationOption --> RejectTransfer : reject transfer
+ RejectTransfer --> Failure3 : Failure
+ ImplementationOption --> ProceedWithTransfer : proceed with transfer
+ ProceedWithTransfer --> Success3 : Success
+ FEA93C2 --> FEA935 : FEA 935, to FE2
+ FEA935 --> Failure4 : Failure
+
+```
+
+State transition diagram for Macro Loop\_Test (SE0368\_F7.4(2)).
+
+T1175330-95
+
+FIGURE 7/Q.82.7 (sheet 4 of 4)
+**SDL diagrams for FE3**
+
+### 8.4 FE4
+
+The SDL diagram for FE4 is shown in Figure 8.
+
+
+
+Process FE4\_ECT SE0368\_F8.1(3)
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Idle
+ Idle --> T1: TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind
+ Idle --> T2: FEA 941, from FE3
+ Idle --> T3: FEA 945 from local FE5
+ Idle --> T4: TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind
+ T1 --> T1_1: TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind
+ T1_1 --> T1_2: FEA 942, to local FE5
+ T1_2 --> T1_3: Cancel any active user-to-user signalling supplementary service
+ T1_3 --> T1_4: FEA 943
+ T1_4 --> T1_5: Store call details
+ T1_5 --> T1_6: FEA 944
+ T1_6 --> D1: Other party being alerted?
+ D1 -- Yes --> S1: Wait transfer active
+ D1 -- No --> S2: -----
+ T3 --> D2: Transmission of terminals details permitted?
+ D2 -- No --> S3: -----
+ D2 -- Yes --> T4_1: TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind
+ T4_1 --> T4_2: FEA 947, to remote FE6
+ T4_2 --> S4: -----
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the state transitions for Process FE4\_ECT. It begins at the 'Idle' state. From 'Idle', four main transitions are possible:
+
+
+- TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind**: This transition leads to a sequence of actions: 'TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind', 'FEA 942, to local FE5', 'Cancel any active user-to-user signalling supplementary service', 'FEA 943', 'Store call details', and 'FEA 944'. This is followed by a decision 'Other party being alerted?'. If 'Yes', the state becomes 'Wait transfer active'. If 'No', the state becomes a terminal state '-----'.
+- FEA 941, from FE3**: This transition leads directly to a terminal state '-----'.
+- FEA 945 from local FE5**: This transition leads directly to a terminal state '-----'.
+- TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind**: This transition leads to a decision 'Transmission of terminals details permitted?'. If 'No', the state becomes a terminal state '-----'. If 'Yes', it leads to 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind', then 'FEA 947, to remote FE6', and finally to a terminal state '-----'.
+
+SDL diagram for FE4 showing state transitions from Idle to various terminal states based on specific events and conditions.
+
+T1175340-95
+
+FIGURE 8/Q.82.7 (sheet 1 of 3)
+
+#### SDL diagrams for FE4
+
+
+
+```
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Wait_transfer_active
+ state "Wait transfer active" as Wait_transfer_active
+ state "TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind" as TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind_L
+ state "Store call details" as Store_call_details
+ state "TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind" as TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind_R
+ state "Idle" as Idle
+ state "TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind" as TERMINAL_DETAILS_req_ind
+ state "Transmission of terminal details permitted?" as Transmission_permitted
+ state "TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind" as TERMINAL_DETAILS_req_ind_2
+ state "-----" as Terminal_1
+ state "-----" as Terminal_2
+
+ Wait_transfer_active --> TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind_L
+ Wait_transfer_active --> TERMINAL_DETAILS_req_ind
+
+ TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind_L --> Store_call_details
+ Store_call_details --> TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind_R
+ TRANSFER_ACTIVE_req_ind_R --> Idle
+
+ TERMINAL_DETAILS_req_ind --> Transmission_permitted
+ Transmission_permitted -- No --> Terminal_2
+ Transmission_permitted -- Yes --> TERMINAL_DETAILS_req_ind_2
+ TERMINAL_DETAILS_req_ind_2 --> Terminal_1
+```
+
+SDL diagram for Process FE4\_ECT. The process starts at 'Wait transfer active'. It branches into two paths. The left path involves 'TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind' (FEA 948 from FE3), 'Store call details' (FEA 949), and 'TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind' (FEA 94A, to local FE5), leading to 'Idle'. The right path involves 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind' (FEA 945, from local FE5), a decision 'Transmission of terminal details permitted?' (FEA 946), 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind' (FEA 947, to remote FE6), and an unlabeled terminal state.
+
+T1175350-95
+
+FIGURE 8/Q.82.7 (sheet 2 of 3)
+SDL diagrams for FE4
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the state transitions for Process FE4\_ECT. It begins with an initial state labeled 'Idle' (represented by a double oval). From 'Idle', three transitions are possible: 'LOOP TEST req.ind' (left), 'LOOP TEST resp.conf' (center), and 'LOOP TEST reject req.ind' (right). Each transition is associated with specific data flows indicated by dashed boxes: 'FEA 94B, from FE3' and 'FEA 94C, from FE5' for the left path; 'FEA 94D, from FE5' for the center path; and 'FEA 94D, from FE3' for the right path. Each transition leads to a 'Loop prevention procedure' (represented by a triangle). From each procedure, a 'Yes' or 'No' decision is made. The 'Yes' path leads to a state transition ('LOOP TEST req.ind' or 'LOOP TEST reject req.ind') which then leads to a final state (double oval with dashes). The 'No' path leads to another state transition ('FEA 94B, to FE5', 'FEA 94C, to FE3', or 'FEA 94D, to FE3') which then leads to a 'LOOP TEST resp.conf' state transition, which finally leads to a final state. The 'Yes' and 'No' labels are placed near the decision points.
+
+SDL diagram for Process FE4\_ECT showing states and transitions for loop testing.
+
+T1175360-95
+
+FIGURE 8/Q.82.7 (sheet 3 of 3)
+**SDL diagrams for FE4**
+
+### 8.5 FE5
+
+The SDL diagram for FE5 is shown in Figure 9.
+
+
+
+Process FE5\_ECT SE0368\_F9.1(3)
+
+```
+
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Idle
+ Idle --> TRANSFER_COMPLETE_req.ind
+ Idle --> TERMINAL_DETAILS_req.ind
+ TRANSFER_COMPLETE_req.ind --> FEA_951_from_FE4
+ TRANSFER_COMPLETE_req.ind --> TRANSFER_INFORM_req.ind
+ TRANSFER_INFORM_req.ind --> FEA_952_to_local_FE6
+ TRANSFER_INFORM_req.ind --> FEA_956
+ TRANSFER_INFORM_req.ind --> Cancel_active_user_to_user_signalling_supplementary_service
+ Cancel_active_user_to_user_signalling_supplementary_service --> Outstanding_notifications
+ Outstanding_notifications --> FEA_953_to_local_FE6
+ Outstanding_notifications --> FEA_957_to_local_FE4
+ Outstanding_notifications --> Store_call_details
+ Store_call_details --> Other_user_being_alerted
+ Other_user_being_alerted -- Yes --> Wait_transfer_active
+ Other_user_being_alerted -- No --> End1
+ TERMINAL_DETAILS_req.ind --> FEA_955_from_local_FE6
+ TERMINAL_DETAILS_req.ind --> Transmission_permitted
+ Transmission_permitted -- Yes --> TERMINAL_DETAILS_req.ind
+ Transmission_permitted -- No --> End2
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the state transitions for Process FE5\_ECT. It begins at the 'Idle' state. From 'Idle', two primary transitions are available: 'TRANSFER COMPLETE req.ind' and 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind'. The 'TRANSFER COMPLETE' path leads to a sequence of operations: 'FEA 951, from FE4', 'TRANSFER INFORM req.ind', 'FEA 952, to local FE6', 'FEA 956', 'Cancel any active user-to-user signalling supplementary service', 'Outstanding notifications', 'FEA 953, to local FE6', 'FEA 957, to local FE4', and 'Store call details'. This is followed by a decision 'Other user being alerted?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Wait transfer active'; if 'No', it ends. The 'TERMINAL DETAILS' path from 'Idle' leads to 'FEA 955, from local FE6' and a decision 'Transmission of terminal details permitted?'. If 'Yes', it loops back to 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind'; if 'No', it ends. There are also dashed boxes for FEA 95E and FEA 954 connected to the 'Store call details' state.
+
+SDL diagram for FE5 showing state transitions from Idle to various service handling paths based on input signals like TRANSFER COMPLETE, TRANSFER INFORM, and TERMINAL DETAILS.
+
+T1175370-95
+
+FIGURE 9/Q.82.7 (sheet 1 of 3)
+
+#### SDL diagrams for FE5
+
+
+
+The diagram is an SDL (State Transition Diagram) for Process FE5\_ECT. It starts with an initial state 'Wait transfer active' (oval). From this state, two transitions are possible: 'TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind' (trapezoid) and 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind' (trapezoid). The 'TRANSFER ACTIVE' path leads to state 'FEA 958, from FE4' (dashed box), then to action 'Store call details' (rectangle), then to state 'FEA 959' (dashed box), then to action 'TRANSFER INFORM req.ind' (trapezoid), then to state 'FEA 95A, to local FE6' (dashed box), and finally to the 'Idle' state (oval). The 'TERMINAL DETAILS' path leads to state 'FEA 955, from local FE6' (dashed box), then to a decision diamond 'Transmission of terminal details permitted?'. If 'Yes', it leads to action 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind' (trapezoid), then to state 'FEA 956' (dashed box), then to state 'FEA 957 to local FE4' (dashed box), and finally to a terminal state (oval with dashes). If 'No', it leads directly to another terminal state (oval with dashes).
+
+```
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Wait_transfer_active
+ state "Wait transfer active" as Wait_transfer_active
+ state "FEA 958, from FE4" as FEA_958
+ state "FEA 959" as FEA_959
+ state "FEA 95A, to local FE6" as FEA_95A
+ state "FEA 955, from local FE6" as FEA_955
+ state "FEA 956" as FEA_956
+ state "FEA 957 to local FE4" as FEA_957
+ state "Idle" as Idle
+ state "-----" as T1
+ state "-----" as T2
+
+ Wait_transfer_active --> FEA_958 : TRANSFER ACTIVE req.ind
+ Wait_transfer_active --> FEA_955 : TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind
+ FEA_958 --> FEA_959 : Store call details
+ FEA_959 --> FEA_95A : TRANSFER INFORM req.ind
+ FEA_95A --> Idle
+ FEA_955 --> Decision{Transmission of terminal details permitted?}
+ Decision -- Yes --> FEA_956 : TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind
+ FEA_956 --> FEA_957
+ FEA_957 --> T1
+ Decision -- No --> T2
+```
+
+SDL diagram for Process FE5\_ECT showing states and transitions between FEA 958, 959, 95A, 955, 956, and 957.
+
+T1175380-95
+
+FIGURE 9/Q.82.7 (sheet 2 of 3)
+SDL diagrams for FE5
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD; Idle([Idle]) --> L1{LOOP TEST req.ind}; FEA95B[FEA 95B, from FE4] -.-> L1; L1 --> LPP{Loop prevention procedure?}; LPP -- Yes --> C{Collected FE3 in state "Test in progress"?}; LPP -- No --> End1([-----]); C -- No --> L2{LOOP TEST REJECT resp.conf}; FEA95C[FEA 95C, to FE4] -.-> L2; L2 --> End2([-----]); C -- Yes --> L3{LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind}; FEA95D[FEA 95D, to FE4] -.-> L3; L3 --> End3([-----]);
+```
+
+State transition diagram for Process FE5\_ECT. It starts at 'Idle', receives 'LOOP TEST req.ind' (from FEA 95B, FE4), checks 'Loop prevention procedure?'. If 'Yes', it checks 'Collected FE3 in state "Test in progress"?'. If 'No', it sends 'LOOP TEST REJECT resp.conf' (to FEA 95C, FE4) and ends. If 'Yes', it sends 'LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind' (to FEA 95D, FE4) and ends. If 'No' to the loop prevention check, it ends.
+
+T1175390-95
+
+FIGURE 9/Q.82.7 (sheet 3 of 3)
+**SDL diagrams for FE5**
+
+### 8.6 FE6
+
+The SDL diagram for FE6 is shown in Figure 10.
+
+
+
+Process FE6\_ECT SE0368\_F10(1)
+
+```
+stateDiagram-v2
+ [*] --> Idle
+ Idle --> TRANSFER_INFORM: FEA 961, from FE5
+ Idle --> TERMINAL_DETAILS: FEA 965, from remote FE4
+ TRANSFER_INFORM --> User_indication_1: FEA 962, user
+ User_indication_1 --> Any_terminal_specific_details: FEA 963
+ Any_terminal_specific_details -- Yes --> TERMINAL_DETAILS_1: FEA 964, to FE5
+ Any_terminal_specific_details -- No --> State_2
+ TERMINAL_DETAILS --> User_indication_2: FEA 966, user
+ User_indication_2 --> State_3
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the state transitions for Process FE6\_ECT. It begins at the 'Idle' state. Two possible transitions are available: 'TRANSFER INFORM req.ind' triggered by FEA 961 from FE5, and 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind' triggered by FEA 965 from remote FE4. The 'TRANSFER INFORM' path leads to 'User indication "transferred" call state and identity' (FEA 962, user), which then leads to a decision 'Any terminal specific details to send?' (FEA 963). If 'Yes', it leads to 'TERMINAL DETAILS req.ind' (FEA 964, to FE5) and then to a terminal state. If 'No', it leads directly to another terminal state. The 'TERMINAL DETAILS' path leads to 'User indication further details of other user' (FEA 966, user), which then leads to a third terminal state.
+
+SDL diagram for FE6 showing state transitions between Idle, TRANSFER INFORM, User indication, Any terminal specific details to send?, TERMINAL DETAILS, and terminal states.
+
+T1175400-95
+
+FIGURE 10/Q.82.7
+SDL diagrams for FE6
+
+## **9 Functional Entity Actions (FEAs)**
+
+### **9.1 FEAs of FE1**
+
+- 911: FE1 receives the request for transfer.
+- 912: FE1 optionally performs local checks with respect to the compatibility of the two calls against information held with the CCAs.
+- 913: If the request is found locally to be invalid, the requesting user is informed that the transfer has failed.
+- 914: If the request is found locally to be valid, FE2 is requested to execute the transfer.
+- 915: FE1 receives the result of the transfer from FE2.
+- 916: FE1 examines the result of the transfer.
+- 917: If the transfer is successful, the requesting user is informed of the successful completion. Optionally the calls involved may be released (if they have not already been cleared by FE2).
+- 918: If the transfer is unsuccessful, the requesting user is informed.
+
+### **9.2 FEAs of FE2**
+
+- 921: FE2 receives the request for invocation of transfer from FE1.
+- 922: FE2 determines whether the transfer is valid in terms of the two calls to be transferred. Such checks are network specific; when FE2 resides in the public network it shall check that one call is answered and held and that the other call is not held and is answered or alerting (see Table 1), that the requesting user is not a conference controller, that the three-party supplementary service has not been invoked by the requesting user, and that closed user group restrictions would not be violated if the transfer were allowed to proceed. Checks performed when FE2 is in another network are outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+- 923: If the transfer is permitted, a request for transfer is sent to FE3.
+- 924: If the transfer is barred, a response indicating rejection is returned to FE1.
+- 925: The result of the transfer is received from FE3.
+- 926: The result of the transfer is relayed to FE1.
+
+### **9.3 FEAs of FE3**
+
+- 931: FE3 receives the request for invocation of transfer from FE2.
+- 932: FE3 identifies the primary and secondary calls.
+- 933: FE3 shall verify whether the requested transfer is allowed or, for example, should be rejected for operational reasons, or would violate closed user group restrictions if allowed to proceed.
+- 934: If the transfer is permitted, a response indicating success is returned to FE2.
+- 935: If the transfer is barred, a response indicating rejection is returned to FE2.
+- 936: The call paths from user A's exchange toward user B and user C are joined together.
+- 937: The call paths from user A's exchange toward user A are cleared.
+- 938: Completion of the transfer is indicated to user B's exchange. This includes the identity of user C where known and an indication of whether user C is being alerted.
+- 939: Completion of the transfer is indicated to user C's exchange. This includes the identity of user B where known.
+- 93A: Following an alerting transfer, answer by user C is indicated to user B's FE4 on receipt of the basic call setup confirmation by the Call Control (CC) collocated with FE3.
+
+93B: As a network option, a LOOP TEST req.ind is sent to both FE4s to determine if a loop exists.
+
+93C: As a network option, the results of the loop test are processed.
+
+### **9.4 FEAs of FE4**
+
+941: FE4 receives the indication of transfer completion from FE3.
+
+942: The indication of transfer completion is passed to the local FE5.
+
+943: If FE4 is not allocated to a gateway, any active user-to-user supplementary service is cancelled.
+
+944: Details received in the transfer complete indication relevant to the network are stored.
+
+945: FE4 receives terminal specific details intended for the remote user from the local FE5.
+
+946: FE4 determines whether or not such information transfer is allowed. The mechanism for deciding upon this (for example a timer or counter) is implementation dependent.
+
+947: If the information can be transferred, it is sent to the remote FE6.
+
+948: FE4 receives the indication that answer has taken place subsequent to an alerting transfer.
+
+949: Details received in the transfer active indication relevant to the network are stored.
+
+94A: The indication that answer has taken place is passed to the local FE5.
+
+94B: As a network option, a LOOP TEST req.ind received from FE3 is relayed to FE5.
+
+94C: As a network option, a LOOP TEST resp.conf received from FE5 is relayed to FE3.
+
+94D: As a network option, a LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind received from FE5 is relayed to FE3.
+
+### **9.5 FEAs of FE5**
+
+951: FE5 receives the indication of transfer completion from FE4.
+
+952: The indication of transfer completion is passed to the local FE6.
+
+953: Any outstanding notifications (for example that the local user is holding) are sent to the remote user.
+
+954: Details received in the transfer complete indication relevant to the network are stored.
+
+955: FE5 receives terminal specific details intended for the remote user from the local FE6.
+
+956: FE5 determines whether or not such information transfer is allowed. The mechanism for deciding upon this (for example a timer or counter) is implementation dependent.
+
+957: If the information can be transferred, it is relayed to the local FE4.
+
+958: FE5 receives the indication that answer has taken place subsequent to an alerting transfer.
+
+959: Details received in the transfer active indication relevant to the network are stored.
+
+95A: The indication that answer has taken place is passed to the local FE6.
+
+95B: As a network option, a LOOP TEST req.ind received from FE4 is processed.
+
+95C: As a network option, if there is no colocated FE3 in state "TEST IN PROGRESS" for the same call, a LOOP TEST resp.conf is sent to FE4.
+
+95D: As a network option, if there is no colocated FE3 in state "TEST IN PROGRESS" for the same call, a LOOP TEST REJECT req.ind is sent to FE4.
+
+95E: Any active user-to-user signalling supplementary service is cancelled.
+
+### 9.6 FEAs of FE6
+
+- 961: FE6 receives the indication that a transfer or answer following an alerting transfer has taken place.
+- 962: The local user is informed of the transfer or the answer and the other details associated with it, such as other party number (if received).
+- 963: FE6 determines whether there is any subaddress to be sent to the other user.
+- 964: If there is a subaddress to be sent, this is indicated to the local FE5.
+- 965: FE6 receives the subaddress associated with the remote terminal.
+- 966: The local user is informed of the other terminal's subaddress.
+
+## 10 Allocation of functional entities to physical locations
+
+The possible physical locations of functional entities are shown in Table 12.
+
+TABLE 12/Q.82.7
+
+### Allocation of functional entities
+
+| | FE1 | FE2 | FE3 | FE4 | FE5 | FE6 |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------|--------|------------------|----------------------|------------------|
+| Scenario 1 (Note 1) | A's TE | A's LE | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 2 (Note 1) | A's TE | A's LE | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's PTNX
C's LE | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 3 (Note 1) | A's TE | A's LE | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's LE
C's PTNX | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 4 (Note 1) | A's TE | A's LE | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's PTNX
C's PTNX | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 5 | A's TE | A's PTNX | PTNX | B's LE
C's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 6 | A's TE | A's PTNX | PTNX | B's LE
C's LE | B's PTNX
C's LE | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 7 | A's TE | A's PTNX | PTNX | B's LE
C's LE | B's LE
C's PTNX | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 8 | A's TE | A's PTNX | PTNX | B's LE
C's LE | B's PTNX
C's PTNX | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 9 (Note 2) | A's TE | A's PTNX | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 10 (Note 2) | A's TE | A's PTNX | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's PTNX
C's LE | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 11 (Note 2) | A's TE | A's PTNX | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's LE
C's PTNX | B's TE
C's TE |
+| Scenario 12 (Note 2) | A's TE | A's PTNX | A's LE | B's LE
C's LE | B's PTNX
C's PTNX | B's TE
C's TE |
+| NOTES
1 FE4 can also be allocated in the gateway of user A's network.
2 FE2 and FE3 shall exist in adjacent basic call CC's in this scenario. The primary and secondary calls may exist in separate access links between the same PBX and same LE. | | | | | | |
+
+Scenario 1 represents transfer by join either entirely within one public network, or between different public networks.
+
+Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 represent transfer by join where user B, user C, and both user B and user C are in a private network respectively.
+
+Scenarios 5, 6, 7 and 8 represent transfer (by join or re-routing) where the transfer is invoked from and controlled within a private network for the cases where both user B and user C, only user C, only user B, and neither user B nor user C, are in the public network respectively. In these scenarios, the PTNX where the functionality of FE3 is realized may or may not be user A's PTNX and in the case of transfer by re-routing the functionality may be split across a number of PTNXs.
+
+# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES
+
+- Series A Organization of the work of the ITU-T
+- Series B Means of expression
+- Series C General telecommunication statistics
+- Series D General tariff principles
+- Series E Telephone network and ISDN
+- Series F Non-telephone telecommunication services
+- Series G Transmission systems and media
+- Series H Transmission of non-telephone signals
+- Series I Integrated services digital network
+- Series J Transmission of sound-programme and television signals
+- Series K Protection against interference
+- Series L Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant
+- Series M Maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits
+- Series N Maintenance: international sound-programme and television transmission circuits
+- Series O Specifications of measuring equipment
+- Series P Telephone transmission quality
+- Series Q Switching and signalling**
+- Series R Telegraph transmission
+- Series S Telegraph services terminal equipment
+- Series T Terminal equipment and protocols for telematic services
+- Series U Telegraph switching
+- Series V Data communication over the telephone network
+- Series X Data networks and open system communication
+- Series Z Programming languages
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/0adfaa8c2562a9fe3a8a96165d7d59a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/0adfaa8c2562a9fe3a8a96165d7d59a3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f7e12a2a85ad4fe7a1acaa81a4209a2d23e5ba6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/0adfaa8c2562a9fe3a8a96165d7d59a3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fa441490d26df5c065741584bdb14c88537f79f48a9607317da7334e379df8dc
+size 51749
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5023cb5190259d0e36c78a3995c78525bfbbddb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/11edb7fcedf09ac6a817f8d7b8c61eec_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d126c71de386c9b812ed28c5d5401ae7c23da9fb92fb2de8b5317fdc402aaa9e
+size 119059
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c1dfa8ee22ad063471e82648f8515dd37ce784d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1699fae88e3fee843d3e7c6630ffd354a895d007811a17ddd3575320a6443bfe
+size 8191
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e86d31240f943599983c5177b2da4b184b859ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/318886a86a1dcc59e1fc83db6f157c60_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0fefe271cb3034f9f56579247ed414ce92046c77486a0076ac8e317f1819e12c
+size 46137
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/350dece6293a0ac3d4c9e4bf41eefa5d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/350dece6293a0ac3d4c9e4bf41eefa5d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0808f1d29a42984ae0391d83d7e79be91f109601
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/350dece6293a0ac3d4c9e4bf41eefa5d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1ed7d650df82e6628fbc775e43dfd942d7a3ed811a0c81183e74da905c4102f4
+size 73173
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b59081fd931ba1787bb73bdf234d68684c1c2af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/365b54f616aff249b4e6c0edafdcb9b3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:28dc6dc431d183d3e502713d12014496cd1aae4fe4984269ded0d554529aeb5c
+size 18442
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/384ca4ed072674dbb16642cd334b1c15_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/384ca4ed072674dbb16642cd334b1c15_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df0c965d4c599a8dd1c4304c167b562642c08f66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/384ca4ed072674dbb16642cd334b1c15_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ad9b7a59fd3e109632b0e9b7809895db85cbd0801c20e24c144f41236d03e02b
+size 79212
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab6a82a311a1834b7ac8d0fe5509ed758dd2bb51
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ddbfca55988cbb10fdcbc95eefcf5a28a16406a956cb5d53203c28f72bc3fe9d
+size 91702
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/4a2b39fa33747a6553031cfe1e0947fa_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/4a2b39fa33747a6553031cfe1e0947fa_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12b0a558adf2dc76a2e5195e652280402c2f9f32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/4a2b39fa33747a6553031cfe1e0947fa_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f92a5ec57e5d552cdf12f2f70b773d138c8e04938064d27ead7054537f5b97dd
+size 63555
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ec6efda972d1365657c4415a56c0c155c9e4200
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f8940c79f13123b6d8fed8f113e511f647111f30f1d5f65e3de5f054dd0e94a2
+size 73161
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af4b9449c58393ba3cc80f77bf5ee90f7aec1519
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/69b7bd65e85cdef6fdd7fb0a8194257c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9c39a26d52606b6cf81c3b3fac79f6c44bdef2b45e04de147b0be6ed7dc417fb
+size 54622
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/7e1c9b51e067a48cd0fcc9748d8bd8d8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/7e1c9b51e067a48cd0fcc9748d8bd8d8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b1457c6cc9c66e21017f1696067abeb1564725d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/7e1c9b51e067a48cd0fcc9748d8bd8d8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b23bdd3fdabc25396178eddceab8a4681f3be04427b4213e660900beb341fb28
+size 88094
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/811d62d08ce934a2a7e5bd877abff7ad_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/811d62d08ce934a2a7e5bd877abff7ad_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..489e5066b55f7297cd951366554434421aa5d42f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/811d62d08ce934a2a7e5bd877abff7ad_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c825c7454df35a2c0536de4a619a672928eff13e726bd546f4114c8dd99f4f80
+size 96199
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/8adc21ec44b6c7debe36fed5b1bb044f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/8adc21ec44b6c7debe36fed5b1bb044f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ee657e2ae5bcc6a17d34c09cbec83e0f7b31887
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/8adc21ec44b6c7debe36fed5b1bb044f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:df79393d486f79e36d9e19d22dbce2d2f07caf523cf9247d6f5388b06ab0eb5a
+size 41343
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a60ef3dfb7637503b5b3b8e7bc69cfb4ee012883
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/8c348bf9c2c81b018017ae1d19506a9a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:dd95adfd324da1a1f0200039a20d6af73ff763c9267d2b2e08f63266766ab27f
+size 85985
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/a05e675f8651ae7ccea1d0d68691d1a9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/a05e675f8651ae7ccea1d0d68691d1a9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd49aee93913465f02bf32c6a9d03a5d798de1a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/a05e675f8651ae7ccea1d0d68691d1a9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5a742162fbdde7cb003e2167e2a0b35011f35196bd634a451e97effc2d51aeb0
+size 62172
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..865b546fae6a904e2c9f965de24db5427f1fcc85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/aaf3e6e44cdeabd6d1df869c5f392ea1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2b81df0c5cb7b61f53d614f6fdc4440560018621192e73b48e1b64ba16f39a84
+size 45379
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ea15d2a9ee910a6a1824a849ad8d024ed6c7bba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/c494cd874a082a97b50b3c4d3938f467_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d8f39f70a70862a6b502813832705e132d3f9ccd0bef87cbd53e7eaafa04ebe6
+size 160745
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e17ace188c96747cb20620dfe22b2f9722f112b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/cbdfdade780e677eb1c1aef3081ce9ef_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3489d48c3651595851c17836d0ca9272e833d40468eca78b23ca810fdea0e638
+size 83451
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/d1ad05f1189b0d80188fee24ae33c112_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/d1ad05f1189b0d80188fee24ae33c112_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..744c39816179c0b121650729ed8a5971d9bdb0b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/d1ad05f1189b0d80188fee24ae33c112_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5481490c4d44a44a266bd23c2ce3bf484259d549d95da282fd843c44fd9985a3
+size 64421
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/e6d2a5fe2df965cbe598f8ea80fbb7d6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/e6d2a5fe2df965cbe598f8ea80fbb7d6_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3940a2cd993ca5e82c1d08e09ee2be2272d3e2ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/e6d2a5fe2df965cbe598f8ea80fbb7d6_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f3ca23a6b379cf0fa44934dbc2115d2bddec9e5a46bf86c044ed06d5c00b3091
+size 51102
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..991affd701851750aa3e823b066084c58c9c5781
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.5-199710-I_PDF-E/fa01531ea2c45beeb4036005da3037a4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:26cfbbd695a3f5eefa8ecc34f021b00e5ac8ec06bbe2e512840048adf2932155
+size 24585
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.7-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.7-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad11e58d860de57cb9abb8a91b8a75b4ec1365d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.824.7-200002-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,1349 @@
+
+
+
+
+The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) features the letters 'ITU' in a bold, sans-serif font, superimposed on a stylized globe with intersecting lines.
+
+ITU logo
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.824.7**
+
+(02/2000)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+Q3 interface
+
+---
+
+**Stage 2 and stage 3 description for the Q3
+interface – Customer administration: Enhanced
+broadband switch management**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.824.7
+
+(Formerly CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+# **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1-Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4-Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60-Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100-Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120-Q.249 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250-Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310-Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400-Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500-Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600-Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700-Q.799 |
+| General | Q.700 |
+| Message transfer part (MTP) | Q.701-Q.709 |
+| Signalling connection control part (SCCP) | Q.711-Q.719 |
+| Telephone user part (TUP) | Q.720-Q.729 |
+| ISDN supplementary services | Q.730-Q.739 |
+| Data user part | Q.740-Q.749 |
+| Signalling System No. 7 management | Q.750-Q.759 |
+| ISDN user part | Q.760-Q.769 |
+| Transaction capabilities application part | Q.770-Q.779 |
+| Test specification | Q.780-Q.799 |
+| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800-Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850-Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000-Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100-Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200-Q.1699 |
+| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700-Q.1799 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000-Q.2999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.*
+
+# **Stage 2 and stage 3 description for the Q3 interface – Customer administration: Enhanced broadband switch management**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+This Recommendation specifies the Q3 interface between an ATM switch with enhanced functionality and the Telecommunications Management Network (TMN). The interface specified is that between TMN Network Elements or Q-Adapters which interface to TMN Operations Systems (OSs) without mediation and between OSs and Mediation Devices, as defined in ITU-T Recommendation M.3010.
+
+The scope of this Recommendation includes the management of switched VPs as defined in ITU-T Recommendations Q.2766.1 and Q.2934 and of soft PVCs as defined in ITU-T Recommendation Q.2767.1.
+
+## **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.824.7 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 4 (1997-2000) and approved under the WTSC Resolution 1 procedure on 4 February 2000.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 2001
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from ITU.
+
+# CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 1 | Purpose and Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | References ..... | 1 |
+| 3 | Definitions, abbreviations and conventions ..... | 2 |
+| 3.1 | Definitions ..... | 2 |
+| 3.2 | Abbreviations ..... | 3 |
+| 3.3 | Conventions ..... | 4 |
+| 4 | General overview ..... | 4 |
+| 4.1 | Entity relationship models ..... | 5 |
+| 4.1.1 | Entity relationship diagram for the switched virtual paths ..... | 5 |
+| 4.1.2 | Entity relationship diagram for the soft PVCs ..... | 6 |
+| 4.2 | Inheritance hierarchy ..... | 7 |
+| 5 | Formal definitions ..... | 7 |
+| 5.1 | Object classes ..... | 7 |
+| 5.1.1 | Profiling notes for imported classes ..... | 8 |
+| 5.1.2 | Definition of classes ..... | 8 |
+| 5.2 | Name bindings ..... | 11 |
+| 5.2.1 | softPvc-managedElementR1 ..... | 11 |
+| 5.2.2 | vpPool-tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional ..... | 11 |
+| 5.3 | Definition of packages ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.1 | atmTrafficDescriptorPtrPkg (ATM traffic descriptor pointer package) ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.2 | calledPartyVciPkg (called party VCI package) ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.3 | calledPartyVpciPkg (called party VPCI package) ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.4 | callingPartyNumberPtrPkg (calling party number pointer package) ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.5 | callingPartyVciPkg (calling party VCI package) ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.6 | callingPartyVpciPkg (calling party VPCI package) ..... | 12 |
+| 5.3.7 | retryPkg (retry package) ..... | 13 |
+| 5.3.8 | uniAccessPtrPkg (uni access pointer package) ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4 | Definition of attributes ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.1 | atmTrafficDescriptorPtr (ATM traffic descriptor pointer) ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.2 | calledPartyNumber (called party number) ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.3 | calledPartySelectionType (called party selection type) ..... | 13 |
+| 5.4.4 | calledPartyVci (called party VCI) ..... | 14 |
+| 5.4.5 | calledPartyVpci (called party VPCI) ..... | 14 |
+| 5.4.6 | callingPartyDirectoryNumberPtr (calling party directory number pointer) ..... | 14 |
+| 5.4.7 | callingPartyVci (calling party VCI) ..... | 14 |
+| 5.4.8 | callingPartyVpci (calling party VPCI) ..... | 14 |
+
+| | Page |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 5.4.9 egressBandwidth (egress bandwidth) ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.10 ingressBandwidth (ingress bandwidth)..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.11 retryInterval (retry interval) ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.12 retryLimit (retry limit) ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.13 softPvcCause (soft PVC cause) ..... | 15 |
+| 5.4.14 softPvcId (soft PVC identifier)..... | 16 |
+| 5.4.15 switchingModes (switching modes) ..... | 16 |
+| 5.4.16 uniAccessPtr (uni access pointer)..... | 16 |
+| 5.4.17 vpiRange (VPI range)..... | 16 |
+| 5.4.18 vpPoolAndVpciPtrList (VP pool and VPCI pointer list) ..... | 16 |
+| 5.4.19 vpPoolId (VP pool identifier)..... | 17 |
+| 6 Type definitions ..... | 17 |
+| 7 Protocol stacks ..... | 18 |
+| Annex A – Management requirements ..... | 19 |
+| A.1 Management requirements for switched virtual paths ..... | 19 |
+| A.2 Management requirements for user-to-user soft PVCs..... | 19 |
+| Appendix I – Bibliography..... | 20 |
+| Appendix II – Instantiation examples for switched VPs..... | 22 |
+
+# **Stage 2 and stage 3 description for the Q3 interface – Customer administration: Enhanced broadband switch management**
+
+# **1 Purpose and Scope**
+
+This Recommendation specifies the Q3 interface between an ATM switch with enhanced functionality and the Telecommunications Management Network (TMN). The interface specified is that between TMN Network Elements or Q-Adapters which interface to TMN Operations Systems (OSs) without mediation and between OSs and Mediation Devices, as defined in ITU-T Recommendation M.3010 [5].
+
+The scope of this Recommendation includes the management of switched VPs as defined in ITU-T Recommendations Q.2766.1 [8] and Q.2934 [11] and of soft PVCs as defined in ITU-T Recommendation Q.2767.1 [9]. The associated management for customer administration and for call routing is also within the scope of this Recommendation. The object model in this Recommendation is based on and extends the model in ITU-T Recommendation Q.824.6 [12].
+
+The definition of the functionality of TMN Operations Systems is outside the scope of this Recommendation. Security management is also outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+Existing protocols are used where possible, and the focus of the work is on defining the object model.
+
+# **2 References**
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] ITU-T Recommendation I.311 (1996), *B-ISDN general network aspects*.
+- [2] ITU-T Recommendation I.363.5 (1996), *B-ISDN ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) specification: Type 5 AAL*.
+- [3] ITU-T Recommendation I.610 (1999), *B-ISDN operation and maintenance principles and functions*.
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation I.751 (1996), *Asynchronous transfer mode management of the network element view*.
+- [5] ITU-T Recommendation M.3010 (2000), *Principles for a telecommunications management network*.
+- [6] ITU-T Recommendation M.3100 (1995), *Generic network information model*.
+- [7] ITU-T Recommendations Q.2761 (1999), Q.2762 (1999), Q.2763 (1999), Q.2764 (1999), *B-ISDN User Part (B-ISUP) of Signalling System No. 7*.
+- [8] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2766.1 (1998), *Switched virtual path capability*.
+- [9] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2767.1 (2000), *Soft PVC capability*.
+
+- [10] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2931 (1995), *Digital Subscriber Signalling System No. 2 – User-Network Interface (UNI) layer 3 specification for basic call/connection control.*
+- [11] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2934 (1998), *Digital subscriber signalling system No. 2 – Switched virtual path capability.*
+- [12] ITU-T Recommendation Q.824.6 (1998), *Broadband Switch Management.*
+- [13] CCITT Recommendation X.720 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10165-1:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Management information model.*
+- [14] CCITT Recommendation X.721 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10165-2:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Definition of management information.*
+- [15] CCITT Recommendation X.731 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-2:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management: State management function.*
+- [16] CCITT Recommendation X.732 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-3:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management: Attributes for representing relationships.*
+
+# 3 Definitions, abbreviations and conventions
+
+### 3.1 Definitions
+
+This Recommendation defines the following terms:
+
+**3.1.1 permanent VCC:** A permanent VCC is a virtual circuit connection which is established by configuration management, not by on-demand call control.
+
+**3.1.2 soft PVC:** A connection which is provisioned via management at the soft PVC Calling Endpoint (at the source interface) and established by signalling procedures across a network to the soft PVC Called Endpoint (at the destination interface).
+
+**3.1.3 virtual channel trail:** This corresponds to a VCC in standard ATM terminology.
+
+**3.1.4 virtual channel trail termination point:** This corresponds to the end point of a VCC and marks the extremity of an end-to-end F5 OAM flow.
+
+**3.1.5 virtual channel connection termination point:** This corresponds to an intermediate point of a VCC and may mark the extremity of a segment F5 OAM flow.
+
+**3.1.6 virtual path trail:** This corresponds to a VPC in standard ATM terminology.
+
+**3.1.7 virtual path trail termination point:** This corresponds to the end point of a VPC and marks the extremity of an end-to-end F4 OAM flow.
+
+**3.1.8 virtual path connection termination point:** This corresponds to an intermediate point of a VPC and may mark the extremity of a segment F4 OAM flow.
+
+In addition, this Recommendation uses terms defined in ITU-T Recommendations:
+
+**3.1.9 F4 OAM flow:** See ITU-T I.610 [3].
+
+**3.1.10 F5 OAM flow:** See ITU-T I.610 [3].
+
+**3.1.11 soft PVC called endpoint:** See ITU-T Q.2767.1 [9].
+
+**3.1.12 soft PVC calling endpoint:** See ITU-T Q.2767.1 [9].
+
+**3.1.13 trail termination point:** See ITU-T M.3100 [6].
+
+- 3.1.14 virtual channel:** See ITU-T I.311 [1].
+- 3.1.15 virtual channel connection:** See ITU-T I.311 [1].
+- 3.1.16 virtual path:** See ITU-T I.311 [1].
+- 3.1.17 virtual path connection:** See ITU-T I.311 [1].
+
+### **3.2 Abbreviations**
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations:
+
+| | |
+|-------|--------------------------------------------------|
+| AAL | ATM Adaptation Layer |
+| AIS | Alarm Indication Signal |
+| ASN.1 | Abstract Syntax Notation One |
+| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer Mode |
+| ERD | Entity Relationship Diagram |
+| GDMO | Guidelines for the Definition of Managed Objects |
+| MIB | Management Information Base |
+| MOC | Managed Object Class |
+| NNI | Network-Network Interface |
+| OAM | Operations, Administration and Maintenance |
+| OS | Operations System |
+| PVC | Permanent Virtual Connection |
+| PVCC | Permanent Virtual Channel Connection |
+| PVPC | Permanent Virtual Path Connection |
+| RDI | Remote Defect Indication |
+| RDN | Relative Distinguished Name |
+| SDH | Synchronous Digital Hierarchy |
+| SVP | Switched Virtual Path |
+| TMN | Telecommunications Management Network |
+| TTP | Trail Termination Point |
+| UNI | User-Network Interface |
+| VC | Virtual Channel |
+| VCC | Virtual Channel Connection |
+| VCI | Virtual Channel Identifier |
+| VP | Virtual Path |
+| VPC | Virtual Path Connection |
+| VPCI | Virtual Path Connection Identifier |
+| VPI | Virtual Path Identifier |
+
+### 3.3 Conventions
+
+Objects and their characteristics and associated ASN.1 defined here are given names with capitals used to indicate the start of the next word and acronyms are treated as if they were words.
+
+Throughout this Recommendation, all new attributes are named according to the following guidelines:
+
+- The name of an attribute ends in the string "Ptr" if and only if the attribute value is intended to identify a single object.
+- The name of an attribute ends in the string "PtrList" if and only if the attribute value is intended to identify one or more objects.
+- The name of an attribute is composed of the name of an object class followed by the string "Ptr" if and only if the attribute value is intended to identify a specific object class.
+- If an attribute is intended to identify different object classes, a descriptive name is given to that attribute and a description is provided in the attribute behaviour.
+- The name of an attribute ends in the string "Id" if and only if the attribute value is intended to identify the name of an object, in which case this attribute should be the first one listed, should use ASN.1 NameType and should not be used to convey other information.
+- The name of an attribute is composed of the name of an object class followed by the string "Id" if and only if the attribute value is intended to identify the name of the object class holding that attribute.
+
+# 4 General overview
+
+The following information model diagrams have been drawn for the purpose of clarifying the relations between the different object classes of the model.
+
+- 1) Entity Relationship Models showing the relations of the different managed objects.
+- 2) Inheritance Hierarchy showing how managed objects are derived from each other (i.e. the different paths of inherited characteristics of the different managed objects).
+
+These diagrams are only for clarification. The formal specification in terms of GDMO templates and ASN.1 type definitions are the relevant information for implementations.
+
+## 4.1 Entity relationship models
+
+The following conventions are used in the diagrams (see Figure 1):
+
+
+
+The legend defines the following conventions:
+
+- c**: is contained in
+- 1:1 containment**: represented by a double-headed arrow with a single arrowhead at each end.
+- 1:N containment**: represented by a double-headed arrow with a single arrowhead at one end.
+- a**: is associated with
+- 1:1 association**: represented by a dashed double-headed arrow with a single arrowhead at each end.
+- 1:N association**: represented by a dashed double-headed arrow with a single arrowhead at one end.
+- bidirectional**: represented by a double-headed arrow with two arrowheads.
+- unidirectional**: represented by a single-headed arrow.
+- i**: "is-a" relationship (represented by a dashed box with a solid border).
+- moc**: managed object class (represented by a solid box).
+- moc**: uninstantiable object class (superclass) (represented by a dashed box).
+- moc**: managed object class outside the actual fragment (represented by a shaded box).
+
+T0412880-99
+
+Legend for Entity Relationship Models showing various relationship and class types.
+
+Figure 1/Q.824.7 – Conventions used in diagrams for Entity Relationship Models
+
+Where the directionality of containment is not clear, it can be identified by implications since the root class is unique.
+
+#### 4.1.1 Entity relationship diagram for the switched virtual paths
+
+See Figure 2.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the following entities and relationships:
+
+- tcAdaptorTTP Bidirectional (I.751)**: A shaded box at the top, connected via a **c** relationship to **vpPool**.
+- customerProfileBb (Q.824.6)**: A shaded box on the left, connected via a **c** relationship to **vpSwitchingInd** and via an **a** relationship to **uniAccessR1**.
+- uniAccessR1**: A white box in the center-left, connected via an **a** relationship to **vpPool**.
+- vpPool**: A white box in the center, connected via an **a** relationship to **virtualPathGroupR1**.
+- nniAccess (Q.824.6)**: A shaded box on the right, connected via a **c** relationship to **virtualPathGroupR1**.
+- vpSwitchingInd**: A white box at the bottom left.
+- virtualPathGroupR1**: A white box at the bottom center.
+
+T0412890-99
+
+Entity relationship diagram for switched virtual paths showing relationships between various network elements.
+
+Figure 2/Q.824.7 – Entity relationship diagram – switched virtual paths
+
+#### 4.1.2 Entity relationship diagram for the soft PVCs
+
+See Figure 3.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the following entities and relationships:
+
+- managedElementR1 (M.3100)**: A solid rectangle at the top. It has a solid line labeled 'c' pointing down to **softPvc**.
+- Q.824.0 directoryNumber**: A solid rectangle on the left. It has a dashed line labeled 'a' pointing left from **softPvc**. There is also a self-looping dashed line labeled 'a' on this entity.
+- Q.824.6 uniAccess**: A solid rectangle on the left, below **Q.824.0 directoryNumber**. It has a dashed line labeled 'a' pointing left from **softPvc**. There is also a self-looping dashed line labeled 'a' on this entity.
+- softPvc**: A dashed rectangle in the center. It receives a solid line labeled 'c' from **managedElementR1** and dashed lines labeled 'a' from **Q.824.0 directoryNumber** and **Q.824.6 uniAccess**. It has a solid line labeled 'i' pointing down to a junction.
+- softPvpc** and **softPvcc**: Solid rectangles at the bottom. They both receive solid lines from the junction point labeled 'i'.
+
+T0412900-99
+
+Entity relationship diagram for soft PVCs showing relationships between managedElementR1, Q.824.0 directoryNumber, Q.824.6 uniAccess, softPvc, softPvpc, and softPvcc.
+
+Figure 3/Q.824.7 – Entity relationship diagram – soft PVCs
+
+## 4.2 Inheritance hierarchy
+
+See Figure 4.
+
+
+
+```
+graph LR; top["\"X.721\": top"] --- Q824_6_1["\"Q.824.6\": postAnalysis Evaluation"]; top --- softPvc["softPvc"]; top --- Q824_6_2["\"Q.824.6\": uniAccess"]; top --- Q824_6_3["\"Q.824.6\": virtualPathGroup"]; top --- vpPool["vpPool"]; top --- Q824_6_4["\"Q.824.6\": supplementary ServiceIndBb"]; Q824_6_1 --- postAnalysisEvaluationR1["postAnalysis EvaluationR1"]; softPvc --- softPvcc["softPvcc"]; softPvc --- softPvpc["softPvpc"]; Q824_6_2 --- uniAccessR1["uniAccessR1"]; Q824_6_3 --- virtualPathGroupR1["virtualPathGroup R1"]; Q824_6_4 --- vpSwitchingInd["vpSwitchingInd"];
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the inheritance hierarchy for the Q.824.7 standard. At the top level is the base class "X.721": top. This class inherits from several intermediate classes: "Q.824.6": postAnalysis Evaluation, softPvc, "Q.824.6": uniAccess, "Q.824.6": virtualPathGroup, vpPool, and "Q.824.6": supplementary ServiceIndBb. These intermediate classes further inherit from specific classes: postAnalysis EvaluationR1, softPvcc, softPvpc, uniAccessR1, virtualPathGroup R1, and vpSwitchingInd. A small code T0412910-99 is visible at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Inheritance hierarchy diagram for Q.824.7
+
+Figure 4/Q.824.7 – Inheritance hierarchy
+
+# 5 Formal definitions
+
+This clause gives the formal definitions of the managed object classes, name bindings, general packages, behaviours, attributes, actions and notifications.
+
+## 5.1 Object classes
+
+This subclause specifies the object classes for all of the managed objects used in the management information model. These object classes are either defined here or by reference to other specifications. Classes of managed objects which are defined elsewhere and which are only used for containment are not included, but are identified by the name bindings for the classes specified here.
+
+Unidirectional trails are modelled by bidirectional objects with the traffic descriptor in the unused direction set to a null value.
+
+All of the instantiable classes that are defined in ITU-T I.751 [4] may be instantiated.
+
+The following class which is defined in ITU-T M.3100 [6] may be instantiated:
+
+- managedElementR1.
+
+All of the instantiable classes that are defined in ITU-T Q.824.6 [12] may be instantiated.
+
+The following class which is defined in ITU-T X.721 [14] may be instantiated:
+
+- log.
+
+#### 5.1.1 Profiling notes for imported classes
+
+No profiling notes are required.
+
+#### 5.1.2 Definition of classes
+
+##### 5.1.2.1 postAnalysisEvaluationR1 (post analysis evaluation revision 1)
+
+postAnalysisEvaluationR1 MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
+DERIVED FROM "ITU-T Q.824.6":postAnalysisEvaluation;
+CHARACTERIZED BY
+postAnalysisEvaluationR1Pkg PACKAGE
+BEHAVIOUR postAnalysisEvaluationR1Beh;
+ATTRIBUTES
+switchingModes
+DEFAULT VALUE Q824-7Asn1Module.switchingModesDefault
+GET-REPLACE;;;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 1};
+
+postAnalysisEvaluationR1Beh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This subclass of postAnalysisEvaluation is enhanced to support VP switching.";
+
+##### 5.1.2.2 softPvc (soft PVC)
+
+softPvc MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
+DERIVED FROM "Rec. X.721| ISO/IEC 10165-2": top;
+CHARACTERIZED BY
+"ITU-T M.3100": attributeValueChangeNotificationPackage,
+"ITU-T M.3100": stateChangeNotificationPackage,
+"ITU-T M.3100": createDeleteNotificationsPackage,
+softPvcPkg PACKAGE
+BEHAVIOUR softPvcBeh;
+ATTRIBUTES
+softPvcId
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE,
+"Rec. X.721|ISO/IEC-10165-2": administrativeState
+GET-REPLACE,
+"Rec. X.721|ISO/IEC-10165-2": operationalState
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE,
+calledPartyNumber
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE,
+calledPartySelectionType
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE,
+softPvcCause
+GET;;;
+CONDITIONAL PACKAGES
+atmTrafficDescriptorPtrPkg
+PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+
+```
+
+uniAccessPtrPkg
+ PRESENT IF "instance is associated with a 'uniAccess' object instance",
+callingPartyVpciPkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+callingPartyNumberPtrPkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+calledPartyVpciPkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+retryPkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system";
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 2};
+
+```
+
+###### **softPvcBeh BEHAVIOUR**
+
+###### **DEFINED AS**
+
+"The 'softPvc' object class (SPVC = Soft Permanent Virtual Connection) is a class of managed objects that delimit virtual channel (VC) or virtual path (VP) connections.
+
+The softPvc class is not instantiated, but serves as a superclass from which specialized subclasses are derived and instantiated. These represent either VC or VP connections.
+
+Management operations are limited to the network element where the originating side of the SPVC is located.
+
+For the 'administrativeState' attribute only the values locked and unlocked shall be used.
+
+If the attribute 'calledPartySelectionType' has the value requiredValue, then the package 'calledPartyVpciPkg' must be present.
+
+The calling party number at the originating UNI shall be one of the directory numbers assigned to this access, that is the object referenced by the callingPartyDirectoryNumberPtr must be associated with the object referenced by the uniAccessPtr.
+
+The administrative state attribute may be used to establish ('unlocked') and release ('locked') the soft PVC."
+
+##### **5.1.2.3 softPvcc (soft PVCC)**
+
+###### **softPvcc MANAGED OBJECT CLASS**
+
+###### **DERIVED FROM softPvc;**
+
+###### **CHARACTERIZED BY**
+
+###### **softPvccPkg PACKAGE**
+
+###### **BEHAVIOUR softPvccBeh;;;**
+
+###### **CONDITIONAL PACKAGES**
+
+###### **callingPartyVciPkg**
+
+PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+
+###### **calledPartyVciPkg**
+
+PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system";
+
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 3};
+
+###### **softPvccBeh BEHAVIOUR**
+
+###### **DEFINED AS**
+
+"The 'softPvcc' object class is an instantiable subclass of the 'softPvc' managed object class that delimits virtual channel (VC) connections.
+
+If the attribute 'calledPartySelectionType' has the value requiredValue, then the package 'calledPartyVciPkg' must be present.
+
+The VPCI used by the soft PVCC at the originating UNI shall be one of the VPCIs assigned to this access, that is the callingPartyVpci has to be one of the VPCIs assigned to the associated uniAccess (referenced by the uniAccessPtr) in its tpAndVpciSigPtrList attribute."
+
+##### **5.1.2.4 softPvpc (soft PVPC)**
+
+###### **softPvpc MANAGED OBJECT CLASS**
+
+###### **DERIVED FROM softPvc;**
+
+###### **CHARACTERIZED BY**
+
+###### **softPvpcPkg PACKAGE**
+
+###### **BEHAVIOUR softPvpcBeh;;;**
+
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 4};
+
+softPvpcBeh BEHAVIOUR
+
+DEFINED AS
+
+"The 'softPvpc' object class is an instantiable subclass of the 'softPvc' managed object class that delimits virtual path (VP) connections.
+
+The VPCI used by the soft PVPC at the originating UNI shall be one of the VPCIs assigned to this access, that is the callingPartyVpci has to be one of the VPCIs assigned to the associated uniAccessR1 (referenced by the uniAccessPtr) in its vpPoolAndVpciPtrList attribute.";
+
+##### 5.1.2.5 uniAccessR1 (UNI access revision 1)
+
+uniAccessR1 MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
+
+DERIVED FROM "ITU-T Q.824.6":uniAccess;
+
+CHARACTERIZED BY
+
+uniAccessR1Pkg PACKAGE
+
+BEHAVIOUR uniAccessR1Beh;
+
+ATTRIBUTES
+
+vpPoolAndVpciPtrList
+
+GET-REPLACE ADD-REMOVE;;;
+
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 5};
+
+uniAccessR1Beh BEHAVIOUR
+
+DEFINED AS
+
+"This subclass of uniAccess represents a UNI access which supports VP switching.
+
+The vpPoolAndVpciPtrList attribute identifies the VPCI ranges that may be used at this uniAccessR1. A VPCI range is associated with each VPI range. Within a uniAccessR1, VPCIs and VPCI ranges assigned through the tpAndVpciSigPtrList and vpPoolAndVpciPtrList attributes must not overlap.
+
+Associated signalling does not apply when supporting switched virtual paths. Thus for instances of this class that support VP switching the signallingChannelPtrPkg (inherited from uniAccess) must be present and the sigChannel components of the tpAndVpciSigPtrList attribute (inherited from uniAccess) must be empty.";
+
+##### 5.1.2.6 virtualPathGroupR1 (virtual path group revision 1)
+
+virtualPathGroupR1 MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
+
+DERIVED FROM "ITU-T Q.824.6":virtualPathGroup;
+
+CHARACTERIZED BY
+
+virtualPathGroupR1Pkg PACKAGE
+
+BEHAVIOUR virtualPathGroupR1Beh;
+
+ATTRIBUTES
+
+vpPoolAndVpciPtrList
+
+GET-REPLACE ADD-REMOVE;;;
+
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 6};
+
+virtualPathGroupR1Beh BEHAVIOUR
+
+DEFINED AS
+
+"This subclass of virtualPathGroup represents a virtual path group which supports VP switching.";
+
+##### 5.1.2.7 vpPool (VP pool)
+
+vpPool MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
+
+DERIVED FROM "Rec. X.721 | ISO/IEC 10165-2":top;
+
+CHARACTERIZED BY
+
+"ITU-T M.3100": attributeValueChangeNotificationPackage,
+
+"ITU-T M.3100": stateChangeNotificationPackage,
+
+"ITU-T M.3100": createDeleteNotificationsPackage,
+
+"Rec. X.721|ISO/IEC 10165-2":administrativeStatePackage,
+
+vpPoolPkg PACKAGE
+
+BEHAVIOUR vpPoolBeh;
+
+ATTRIBUTES
+
+vpPoolId
+
+GET
+
+SET-BY-CREATE,
+
+vpiRange
+
+GET-REPLACE,
+
+```
+
+egressBandwidth
+ GET-REPLACE,
+ingressBandwidth
+ GET-REPLACE;;
+CONDITIONAL PACKAGES
+ "ITU-T Q.824.6": blockedForMaintenancePkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+ "ITU-T Q.824.6": maintenanceSignallingRunningPkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+ "ITU-T Q.824.6": propagationDelayPkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system",
+ "ITU-T Q.824.6": remoteBlockingPkg
+ PRESENT IF "supplied by the managing system";
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 7};
+
+```
+
+###### vpPoolBeh BEHAVIOUR
+
+###### DEFINED AS
+
+"This managed object represents a pool of bandwidth and VPI values available for VP switching.
+
+The vpiRange attribute reserves a range of VPIs for switched VPs at an interface. This range of VPIs must not overlap with ranges reserved for switched VPs by other vpPool instances within the same tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional, and it must not contain a VPI used by a vpCTPBidirectional for a VP established by management within the same tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional.
+
+The egress and ingress bandwidth attributes are used to reserve bandwidth that may be used exclusively for switched VPs within the pool (i.e. using the VPIs within this pool).
+
+The attributeValueChangeNotification need not be sent for the maintenanceSignallingRunning attribute.";
+
+##### 5.1.2.8 vpSwitchingInd (VP switching independent)
+
+###### vpSwitchingInd MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
+
+DERIVED FROM "ITU-T Q.824.6":supplementaryServiceIndBb;
+
+###### CHARACTERIZED BY
+
+vpSwitchingIndPkg PACKAGE
+
+BEHAVIOUR vpSwitchingIndBeh;;
+
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7ManagedObjectClass 8};
+
+###### vpSwitchingIndBeh BEHAVIOUR
+
+###### DEFINED AS
+
+"This subscription option enables VP switching for a user.
+
+Only one object of this class shall be contained within the superior managed object. ";
+
+### 5.2 Name bindings
+
+#### 5.2.1 softPvc-managedElementR1
+
+##### softPvc-managedElementR1 NAME BINDING
+
+SUBORDINATE OBJECT CLASS
+
+softPvc AND SUBCLASSES;
+
+NAMED BY SUPERIOR OBJECT CLASS
+
+"ITU-T M.3100": managedElementR1 AND SUBCLASSES;
+
+WITH ATTRIBUTE softPvcId;
+
+##### CREATE
+
+WITH-AUTOMATIC-INSTANCE-NAMING;
+
+##### DELETE
+
+ONLY-IF-NO-CONTAINED-OBJECTS;
+
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7NameBinding 1};
+
+#### 5.2.2 vpPool-tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional
+
+##### vpPool-tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional NAME BINDING
+
+SUBORDINATE OBJECT CLASS vpPool
+
+AND SUBCLASSES;
+
+NAMED BY SUPERIOR OBJECT CLASS "ITU-T Rec. I.751":tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional
+AND SUBCLASSES;
+WITH ATTRIBUTE vpPoolId;
+CREATE
+WITH-AUTOMATIC-INSTANCE-NAMING;
+DELETE
+ONLY-IF-NO-CONTAINED-OBJECTS;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7NameBinding 2};
+
+### **5.3 Definition of packages**
+
+#### **5.3.1 atmTrafficDescriptorPtrPkg (ATM traffic descriptor pointer package)**
+
+atmTrafficDescriptorPtrPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+atmTrafficDescriptorPtr
+GET-REPLACE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 1};
+
+#### **5.3.2 calledPartyVciPkg (called party VCI package)**
+
+calledPartyVciPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+calledPartyVci
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 2};
+
+#### **5.3.3 calledPartyVpciPkg (called party VPCI package)**
+
+calledPartyVpciPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+calledPartyVpci
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 3};
+
+#### **5.3.4 callingPartyNumberPtrPkg (calling party number pointer package)**
+
+callingPartyNumberPtrPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+callingPartyDirectoryNumberPtr
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 4};
+
+#### **5.3.5 callingPartyVciPkg (calling party VCI package)**
+
+callingPartyVciPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+callingPartyVci
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 5};
+
+#### **5.3.6 callingPartyVpciPkg (calling party VPCI package)**
+
+callingPartyVpciPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+callingPartyVpci
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 6};
+
+#### **5.3.7 retryPkg (retry package)**
+
+retryPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+retryLimit
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE,
+retryInterval
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 7};
+
+#### **5.3.8 uniAccessPtrPkg (uni access pointer package)**
+
+uniAccessPtrPkg PACKAGE
+ATTRIBUTES
+uniAccessPtr
+GET
+SET-BY-CREATE;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Package 8};
+
+### **5.4 Definition of attributes**
+
+#### **5.4.1 atmTrafficDescriptorPtr (ATM traffic descriptor pointer)**
+
+atmTrafficDescriptorPtr ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.PointerOrNull;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR atmTrafficDescriptorPtrBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 1};
+
+atmTrafficDescriptorPtrBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+
+"This attribute is used as a pointer to an instance of the traffic descriptor managed object class.";
+
+#### **5.4.2 calledPartyNumber (called party number)**
+
+calledPartyNumber ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.DirectoryNumber;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR calledPartyNumberBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 2};
+
+calledPartyNumberBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+
+"This attribute specifies the directory number of the called party.";
+
+#### **5.4.3 calledPartySelectionType (called party selection type)**
+
+calledPartySelectionType ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.CalledPartySelectionType;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR calledPartySelectionTypeBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 3};
+
+calledPartySelectionTypeBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+
+"This attribute indicates whether the VPCI (if applicable also the VCI) for the called party have to be used at the destination. In case of 'anyValue' the destination switch will choose VPCI (if applicable also VCI) values. In case of 'requiredValue', the VPCI (if applicable also VCI) values supplied by the managing system will be used."
+";
+
+#### **5.4.4 calledPartyVci (called party VCI)**
+
+calledPartyVci ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.VciValue;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR calledPartyVciBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 4};
+
+calledPartyVciBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute specifies the VCI for the called party.";
+
+#### **5.4.5 calledPartyVpci (called party VPCI)**
+
+calledPartyVpci ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.VpciValue;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR calledPartyVpciBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 5};
+
+calledPartyVpciBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute specifies the VPCI for the called party.";
+
+#### **5.4.6 callingPartyDirectoryNumberPtr (calling party directory number pointer)**
+
+callingPartyDirectoryNumberPtr ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.ObjectInstance;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR callingPartyDirectoryNumberPtrBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 6};
+
+callingPartyDirectoryNumberPtrBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute is used as a pointer to an instance of a subclass of the 'directoryNumber' managed object class which pertains to the calling party.";
+
+#### **5.4.7 callingPartyVci (calling party VCI)**
+
+callingPartyVci ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.VciValue;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR callingPartyVciBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 7};
+
+callingPartyVciBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute specifies the VCI for the calling party.";
+
+#### **5.4.8 callingPartyVpci (calling party VPCI)**
+
+callingPartyVpci ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.VpciValue;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR callingPartyVpciBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 8};
+
+callingPartyVpciBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute specifies the VPCI for the calling party.";
+
+#### **5.4.9 egressBandwidth (egress bandwidth)**
+
+egressBandwidth ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.EgressBandwidth ;
+BEHAVIOUR egressBandwidthBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 9};
+
+egressBandwidthBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute describes the egress bandwidth reserved for the VP pool.";
+
+#### **5.4.10 ingressBandwidth (ingress bandwidth)**
+
+ingressBandwidth ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.IngressBandwidth ;
+BEHAVIOUR ingressBandwidthBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 10};
+
+ingressBandwidthBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute describes the ingress bandwidth reserved for the VP pool.";
+
+#### **5.4.11 retryInterval (retry interval)**
+
+retryInterval ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.RetryInterval;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR retryIntervalBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 11};
+
+retryIntervalBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute specifies the time (in sec) between two attempts to re-establish an SPVC automatically.";
+
+#### **5.4.12 retryLimit (retry limit)**
+
+retryLimit ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.RetryLimit;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR retryLimitBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 12};
+
+retryLimitBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute specifies the maximal number of attempts to re-establish an SPVC automatically. After this number is reached no more re-establishment efforts will be made. However a value of zero indicates that an infinite number of call attempts will be made.";
+
+#### **5.4.13 softPvcCause (soft PVC cause)**
+
+softPvcCause ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.SoftPvcCause;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR softPvcCauseBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 13};
+
+softPvcCauseBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute is used to inform the operator of problems with SPVC establishment after receiving an 'attributeValueChange' notification that contains this attribute in the component 'attributeIdentifierList' of its information syntax. Possible cause values contained in this attribute are identical to those specified in ITU-T Recommendations Q.850, Q.2610 and Q.2767.1.";
+
+#### **5.4.14 softPvcId (soft PVC identifier)**
+
+softPvcId ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.NameType ;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR softPvcIdBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 14};
+
+softPvcIdBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This is the naming attribute of the object class 'softPvc' and subclasses." ;
+
+#### **5.4.15 switchingModes (switching modes)**
+
+switchingModes ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.SwitchingModes;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR switchingModesBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 15};
+
+switchingModesBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute specifies if the managed object may be used for channel switching and/or path switching. At least one of the two modes (channelSwitching, pathSwitching) must have value TRUE.";
+
+#### **5.4.16 uniAccessPtr (uni access pointer)**
+
+uniAccessPtr ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.ObjectInstance;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR uniAccessPtrBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 16};
+
+uniAccessPtrBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute is used as a pointer to an instance of the 'uniAccess' managed object class or a subclass.";
+
+#### **5.4.17 vpiRange (VPI range)**
+
+vpiRange ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.VpiRange ;
+BEHAVIOUR vpiRangeBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 17};
+
+vpiRangeBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This attribute describes the range of VPI values belonging to the VP pool.";
+
+#### **5.4.18 vpPoolAndVpciPtrList (VP pool and VPCI pointer list)**
+
+vpPoolAndVpciPtrList ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.VpPoolAndVpciPtrList ;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY, SET-COMPARISON, SET-INTERSECTION;
+BEHAVIOUR vpPoolAndVpciPtrListBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 18};
+
+vpPoolAndVpciPtrListBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This is a set-valued attribute whose value(s) point to instances of the vpPool managed object class or its subclasses. The bandwidth and VPIs represented by the vpPool instances are available for VP switching at the concerned access. A VPCI value is related to every pointer. This VPCI value determines the lower limit of the VPCI range for the VP pool. The upper limit is calculated from the lower limit and the VPI range of the pool.";
+
+#### 5.4.19 vpPoolId (VP pool identifier)
+
+vpPoolId ATTRIBUTE
+WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX Q824-7Asn1Module.NameType ;
+MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
+BEHAVIOUR vpPoolIdBeh;
+REGISTERED AS {q824-7Attribute 19};
+
+vpPoolIdBeh BEHAVIOUR
+DEFINED AS
+"This entity describes the object identifier attribute of the object class 'vpPool'." ;
+
+## 6 Type definitions
+
+```
+Q824-7Asn1Module {
+ itu-t(0) recommendation (0) q(17) ca(824) dot(127) ebs(7)
+ q824-7informationModel(0) asn1Modules(2)
+asn1DefinedTypesModule(0)}
+
+DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
+
+BEGIN
+-- EXPORTS everything
+
+IMPORTS
+ ObjectInstance
+ FROM CMIP-1 {joint-iso-ccitt ms(9) cmip(1) modules(0) protocol(3)}
+
+ VciValue
+ FROM AtmMIBMod {itu-t(0) recommendation(0) i(9) atmm(751)
+ informationModel(0) asn1Module(2) atm(0)}
+
+ NameType,
+ PointerOrNull
+ FROM ASN1DefinedTypesModule {ccitt recommendation m 3100
+ informationModel(0) asn1Modules(2) asn1DefinedTypesModule(0)}
+
+ DirectoryNumber,
+ VpciValue
+ FROM ASN1DefinedTypesModule {itu-t(0) recommendation(0)
+ q(17) 824(824) dot(127) bsm(6)
+ informationModel(0) asn1Module(2) asn1TypeModule(0)}--Q.824.6
+
+; -- end of imports
+
+-- start of object identifier definitions
+
+q824-7InformationModel
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {itu-t(0) recommendation (0) q(17) ca(824) dot(127)
+ ebs(7) q824-7InformationModel(0)}
+q824-7StandardSpecificExtension
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {q824-7informationModel
+ q824-7StandardSpecificExtension(0)}
+q824-7ManagedObjectClass
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {q824-7informationModel q824-7ManagedObjectClass(3)}
+q824-7Package
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {q824-7informationModel q824-7Package(4)}
+q824-7NameBinding
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {q824-7informationModel q824-7NameBinding(6)}
+q824-7Attribute
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {q824-7informationModel q824-7Attribute(7)}
+q824-7Action
+ OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {q824-7informationModel q824-7Action(9)}
+```
+
+```
+
+q824-7Notification
+OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {q824-7informationModel q824-7Notification(10)}
+
+-- end of object identifier definitions
+
+-- other ASN1 definitions in alphabetical order
+
+CalledPartySelectionType ::= ENUMERATED {
+ anyValue (0),
+ requiredValue (1) }
+
+EgressBandwidth ::= INTEGER
+
+IngressBandwidth ::= INTEGER
+
+RetryInterval ::= INTEGER(0..3600)
+
+RetryLimit ::= INTEGER
+
+SoftPvcCause ::= SEQUENCE {
+ softPvcCauseIndication [0] SoftPvcCauseIndication,
+ softPvcCauseValue [1] SoftPvcCauseValue }
+
+SoftPvcCauseIndication ::= ENUMERATED {
+ noCause (0), -- no failure detected
+ firstCause (1), -- failure detected, trying to re-establish
+ lastCause (2), -- not or no longer attempting to re-establish
+}
+
+SoftPvcCauseValue ::= INTEGER (0..127)
+
+SwitchingModes ::= SEQUENCE {
+ channelSwitching BOOLEAN,
+ pathSwitching BOOLEAN }
+
+switchingModesDefault SwitchingModes ::= {
+ channelSwitching TRUE,
+ pathSwitching FALSE }
+
+VpiRange ::= SEQUENCE {
+ lowerLimit INTEGER,
+ upperLimit INTEGER }
+
+VpPoolAndVpciPtrList ::= SET OF SEQUENCE {
+ vpPool ObjectInstance,
+ lowerVpciLimit VpciValue }
+
+END -- of Q824-7Asn1Module
+
+```
+
+# 7 Protocol stacks
+
+The protocol stacks specified in ITU-T Q.811, Q.812, G.773 and the SDH digital cross-connect part of ITU-T G.784 can be used as part of the protocol stack for this Recommendation. The following ITU-T Recommendations should be used to extend these stacks to include TM:
+
+- Q.2811 Broadband Q3 and X interfaces – Lower Layer Protocols.
+- Q.2812 Broadband Q3 and X interfaces – Upper Layer Protocols.
+
+# Management requirements
+
+## A.1 Management requirements for switched virtual paths
+
+#### *VP pools*
+
+To support VP switching at a physical interface, a part of the bandwidth of the interface and one or more VPI ranges need to be reserved for switched VPs. A range of VPIs together with a bandwidth reserved for switched VPs using these VPIs is called a VP pool.
+
+#### *VPC pools*
+
+Before VP switching can take place, VP pools need to be associated with signalling interfaces and VPCIs need to be assigned to the VPI values. From a management perspective, a VPC Pool is a VP Pool which is associated with a signalling access and which has a VPCI range assigned to the VPI range. See ITU-T Q.2766.1 [8] for VPC Pools.
+
+#### *Propagation delay*
+
+The accumulation of propagation delay needs to be supported. The expected propagation delay should be provided for each VP Pool.
+
+#### *Blocking procedures*
+
+The blocking procedures described in 4.3/Q.2766.1 [8] need to be supported at the management interface. It shall be possible to block and unblock VPC pools, to identify remotely blocked VPs and to identify whether maintenance signalling is running.
+
+#### *Subscription option*
+
+According to ITU-T Q.2934 [11] VP switching is a subscription option.
+
+#### *Routing criterium*
+
+The support of switched VPs may be one of the criteria used to configure the selection of a route.
+
+## A.2 Management requirements for user-to-user soft PVCs
+
+
+
+Diagram of Soft PVC Configuration (Figure A.1/Q.824.7). The diagram shows a User connected to a 'soft PVC calling endpoint' (Q3). This endpoint is connected via a 'VP or VC' link to a central node. Above this link is a dashed arc labeled 'NNI Signalling'. The central node is connected via another 'VP or VC' link to a second central node, also with an 'NNI Signalling' arc above it. The second central node is connected via a third 'VP or VC' link to a 'soft PVC called endpoint', which is then connected to another User. The diagram is labeled T0412920-99.
+
+**Figure A.1/Q.824.7 – Soft PVC Configuration**
+
+Two types of soft PVC are supported:
+
+- soft permanent virtual path connection (PVPC); and
+- soft permanent virtual channel connection (PVCC).
+
+A user-to-user soft PVC is configured and established by management at the calling endpoint. There is no need for management action at the called endpoint.
+
+For each soft PVC the following types of information need to be provided via the Q3 interface of the "calling endpoint" network element: information related to the calling party, information related to the called party, traffic descriptors, and information to support the re-establishment of soft PVCs.
+
+#### *Calling Party*
+
+The calling party is identified by the calling party number. In addition calling party VPCI and calling party VCI (for soft PVCCs only) need to be provided. As VPCIs are defined per signalling access, the signalling access needs to be identified.
+
+#### *Called party*
+
+The called party is identified by the called party number. Optionally called party VPCI and called party VCI (for soft PVCCs only) may be provided. The called party selection type determines the selection of VPCI (and VCI) at the soft PVC called endpoint, see ITU-T Q.2767.1 [9].
+
+#### *Traffic descriptors*
+
+The traffic descriptors for the connection need to be provided via the Q3 interface.
+
+#### *Re-establishment of soft PVCs*
+
+To support the re-establishment of soft PVCs as described in 6.5.1 and Annex 1/Q.2767.1 [9], configuration of retry limit and retry interval needs to be supported at the Q3 interface.
+
+The decision whether or not the network element attempts to re-establish the soft PVCs depends on the cause value, i.e. on the reason of the failure. It is a fault management requirement that this information is available at the Q3 interface.
+
+# APPENDIX I
+
+## **Bibliography**
+
+- ITU-T Recommendation G.773 (1993), *Protocol suites for Q-interfaces for management of transmission systems*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation G.774 (1992), *Synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) management information model for the network element view*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation G.803 (2000), *Architecture of transport networks based on the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation I.211 (1993), *B-ISDN service aspects*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation I.327 (1993), *B-ISDN functional architecture*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation I.356 (2000), *B-ISDN ATM layer cell transfer performance*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation I.371 (2000), *Traffic control and congestion control in B-ISDN*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation I.371.1 (1997), *Traffic control and congestion control in B-ISDN: Conformance definitions for ABT and ABR*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation I.413 (1993), *B-ISDN user-network interface*.
+- ITU-T Recommendations I.432.x, *B-ISDN user-network interface – Physical layer specification*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation I.580 (1995), *General arrangements for interworking between B-ISDN and 64 kbit/s based ISDN*.
+
+- ITU-T Recommendation M.3010 (2000), *Principles for a Telecommunications management network*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation M.3100 (1995), *Generic network information model*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation M.3200 (1997), *TMN management services and telecommunications managed areas: overview*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation M.3400 (2000), *TMN management functions*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation Q.822 (1994), *Stage 1, stage 2 and stage 3 description for the Q3 interface – Performance management*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.208 (1988), *Specification of Abstract Syntax Notification One (ASN.1)*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.701 (1997) | ISO/IEC 10040:1998, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – System management overview*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.722 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10165-4:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of Management Information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.733 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-4:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Alarm reporting function*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.734 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-5:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Event report management function*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.735 (1992) | ISO/IEC 10164-6:1992, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Log control function*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.737 (1995) | ISO/IEC 10164-14:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management: Confidence and diagnostic test categories*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.738 (1993) | ISO/IEC 10164-13:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management: Summarization function*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.739 (1993) | ISO/IEC 10164-11:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Metric objects and attributes*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.745 (1993) | ISO/IEC 10164-12:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Test management function*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation X.746 (2000) | ISO/IEC 10164-15:1993, *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems management: Scheduling function*.
+- ATM Forum Specification af-nm-0020.001 (1998), *M4 Interface Requirements and Logical MIB: ATM Network Element View, Version 2*.
+- ATM Forum Specification af-nm-0027.001 (1999), *CMIP Specification for the M4 Interface: ATM Network Element View, Version 2*.
+- ATM Forum Specification af-pnni-0066.000 (1996), *Private Network-Network Interface Specification Version 1.0 Addendum (Soft PVC MIB)*.
+- ATM Forum Specification af-sig-0061.000 (1996), *ATM User-Network Interface (UNI) Signalling Specification, Version 4.0*.
+- ATM Forum Specification af-uni-0010.002 (1994), *ATM User-Network Interface Specification, Version 3.1*.
+
+# APPENDIX II
+
+## Instantiation examples for switched VPs
+
+### Conventions
+
+The following conventions are used in the example (see Figure II.1):
+
+
+
+A
+
+Object A contains object B
+
+Object A points to object B
+
+B
+
+A
+
+B
+
+T0412930-99
+
+Figure II.1/Q.824.7 – Conventions. The diagram illustrates two conventions for object relationships. The top part shows a large rectangle labeled 'A' containing a smaller rectangle labeled 'B', with text to the right stating 'Object A contains object B' and 'Object A points to object B'. The bottom part shows a rectangle labeled 'A' with an arrow pointing to a rectangle labeled 'B', with the text 'T0412930-99' below the arrow.
+
+**Figure II.1/Q.824.7 – Conventions**
+
+Object instances are labelled by their class name, followed by #, followed by their RDN. Pointers are labelled by their attribute names.
+
+### Instantiation Example of Managed Objects (Switched VPs at UNI)
+
+In this example a user at a UNI has two permanent VPs (VPI = 0, VPI = 1) provided by management, while the vpPool object reserves bandwidth and a range of VPIs (not including 0 and 1) for VP switching. The vpPool is associated with the signalling access (uniAccess). See Figure II.2.
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ uniAccessR1_1["uniAccessR1 #1"] --> vpPool_1["vpPool #1"] : vpPoolAndVpciPtrList
+ uniAccessR1_1 --> vpCTPBidirectional_1["vpCTPBidirectional #1"] : tpAndVpciSigPtrList
+ uniAccessR1_1 --> vcTTPBidirectional_1["vcTTPBidirectional #1"] : signallingChannelPtr
+ tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional_1["tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional #1"] --> uni_1["uni #1"] : underlyingTTPPointer
+ vpCTPBidirectional_1 --> vpTTPBidirectional_1["vpTTPBidirectional #1"] : 1
+ vpCTPBidirectional_0["vpCTPBidirectional #0"] --> vpTTPBidirectional_2["vpTTPBidirectional #2"] : 1
+ vpTTPBidirectional_2 --> vcCTPBidirectional_5["vcCTPBidirectional #5"]
+ vcCTPBidirectional_5 --> vcTTPBidirectional_1 : 1
+
+```
+
+Diagram illustrating the instantiation example for ITU-T Q.824.7. It shows a hierarchy of network objects. At the top, 'uniAccessR1 #1' is connected to 'vpPool #1' via 'vpPoolAndVpciPtrList' and to 'vpCTPBidirectional #1' via 'tpAndVpciSigPtrList'. 'uniAccessR1 #1' also has a 'signallingChannelPtr' pointing to 'vcTTPBidirectional #1'. 'tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional #1' contains 'vpPool #1', 'vpCTPBidirectional #1', and 'vpCTPBidirectional #0'. 'vpCTPBidirectional #1' is connected to 'vpTTPBidirectional #1' with a '1' multiplicity. 'vpCTPBidirectional #0' is connected to 'vpTTPBidirectional #2' with a '1' multiplicity. 'vpTTPBidirectional #2' contains 'vcCTPBidirectional #5'. 'vcCTPBidirectional #5' is connected to 'vcTTPBidirectional #1' with a '1' multiplicity. 'uni #1' is connected to 'tcAdaptorTTPBidirectional #1' via 'underlyingTTPPointer'. A label 'T0412940-99' is present near the bottom right. A note at the bottom left states '1 upstream/downstream Connectivity Pointers'.
+
+NOTE 1 – The use of #0 for the signalling VP and #5 for the signalling VC is deliberate so that the RDNs match the signalling VPI and VCI.
+
+NOTE 2 – Not all (possible) managed objects are shown, e.g. the atmAccessProfile and the object classes for customer administration are not shown.
+
+**Figure II.2/Q.824.7 – Instantiation example**
+
+# SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communications |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/007b053fe94a8348f75128a584503fd0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/007b053fe94a8348f75128a584503fd0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eed8fb54a12ce6a0c2c7d288e355ade1f2c6d7de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/007b053fe94a8348f75128a584503fd0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cfa16608cb5058033403399466b3ef4cc1b0dfad68daa829373036df63aa75b0
+size 10805
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/031de8ea6c5568a02faffd59b5c337f7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/031de8ea6c5568a02faffd59b5c337f7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..447025be1a2bf1718bfbb91a7807a9ac553b1372
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/031de8ea6c5568a02faffd59b5c337f7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d8b14a2929fa507ab2ad89541ccb0b107d1c14261dc73e8321ed50e486094fe9
+size 115094
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0adfaa8c2562a9fe3a8a96165d7d59a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0adfaa8c2562a9fe3a8a96165d7d59a3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20ee670e117bfa1797eefabeb1dc4a875110df87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0adfaa8c2562a9fe3a8a96165d7d59a3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6a5199a4a80372105233528188831927e03ba88fcbdbdcec8bd42168eaa62c17
+size 109086
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0ccaa59b5bc46884777e728ee3dadaa7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0ccaa59b5bc46884777e728ee3dadaa7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce0a015cca7a45d2072c8ef684257303556d1921
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0ccaa59b5bc46884777e728ee3dadaa7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3b928019563530a27fe3172a1ae50690c865ec93059875b4c92858bee40d52d7
+size 160062
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0f007a07756791edf7be50672cb010a4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0f007a07756791edf7be50672cb010a4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b752ef8641669fb5a57e196360ef8da0a56ada1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/0f007a07756791edf7be50672cb010a4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7d5f077064bdbc99dc3fced7d54a51b520e7de1355d84c7d7c492b5546d5f820
+size 114744
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/15de63f0b5df62e6ab9164f2a72e2e33_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/15de63f0b5df62e6ab9164f2a72e2e33_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8313c01f50469a7f36e1e8f6b55f6f07983988b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/15de63f0b5df62e6ab9164f2a72e2e33_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2c1448b7911867d394504632f40a7b76b37abc71eb9b6341ee1d22b8be2ff1e4
+size 108947
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/1b23b78336d8bd286c653cbdb38428dd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/1b23b78336d8bd286c653cbdb38428dd_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f6a58a2086ddaae0141c959013b98071682d9a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/1b23b78336d8bd286c653cbdb38428dd_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:253c0f458857c2d4a4a3a84af1455d0adb62d65f4e686fd29e4e8fb11c52c9dd
+size 94534
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/1c20b988e3792ded6d601aca944792a9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/1c20b988e3792ded6d601aca944792a9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2995af38e6a935acb330c5cd683492216d586fcc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/1c20b988e3792ded6d601aca944792a9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:13c690d0437484a3c1172a3a0bd1f4a5c6d97b7fa55a89ad4e125f0048daf492
+size 213734
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/207817524fe964425718e1723d5b7d9e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/207817524fe964425718e1723d5b7d9e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9713a73667cb5d4afc2abf14e666f92ec03667ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/207817524fe964425718e1723d5b7d9e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e71a40b720e07e45c5621e0adc6d76473b58cf22645c5114052528bdbdae15d7
+size 268767
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/24a5d31d8d81bf0e4fe402416b8b2f49_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/24a5d31d8d81bf0e4fe402416b8b2f49_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8ff00a23beb6fd6bd1e3297563abe4d64bb2e8a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/24a5d31d8d81bf0e4fe402416b8b2f49_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f23bb5cf2e3ec28c0942c7f764c254924c5a129f91fd26bb807ccd0f62a3c594
+size 132361
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/26d6d8d333f84acff82b7a9f9b303da6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/26d6d8d333f84acff82b7a9f9b303da6_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1404fc82e532a9199c1c1a64bf6529f1c049d10c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/26d6d8d333f84acff82b7a9f9b303da6_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ab8d8f4eec0892247b17df567faca85670f78ce39021aa421809cba4fe291891
+size 100819
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/2c4c90917583576b27072e2083d75906_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/2c4c90917583576b27072e2083d75906_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e6e31ddbf8a74147bc01cd04fb5b660e57b7e31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/2c4c90917583576b27072e2083d75906_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:540a0effc4fa76e93319dd71993304b2564d1a450089bed8ee399e90ee9293b0
+size 159783
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/2dd10dd89365981b6b6154de6390a602_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/2dd10dd89365981b6b6154de6390a602_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f11c277cf18a2a3bca2b104bbdcfd75a167eefb5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/2dd10dd89365981b6b6154de6390a602_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7ee9f1a7716c7f20186a73dbbeabbbd1cfff558402bad718b9a1907caf9ca930
+size 110987
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/301f4a188198a15b1415d54545b07e0d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/301f4a188198a15b1415d54545b07e0d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..faf8e30a2b61af5eb81ff7b31b9b29ec1ce18146
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/301f4a188198a15b1415d54545b07e0d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:edc8a99b4e9fa7cbe0a95b60baea8cbb519db7a2f133e1eb2adc3ed7ba165c92
+size 123438
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/32d36dfe7dc75b7c63f8edf0f28e4009_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/32d36dfe7dc75b7c63f8edf0f28e4009_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba10bd52829fe24f30acdd977ec83e2640787ef3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/32d36dfe7dc75b7c63f8edf0f28e4009_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d17bd6a8bbb57c58b4f068eb5b35243bd155c9a4b95af263c5772ab98eac51cb
+size 92964
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/33cbd34b2ff74e39d12fae4db73f5b41_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/33cbd34b2ff74e39d12fae4db73f5b41_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9bd74d6639bed8f85ae754c292ddf900c31f94d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/33cbd34b2ff74e39d12fae4db73f5b41_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6034609b61344a3496c8738b808d7efc764ff27772406fe8f9c5094bcf38b04f
+size 100194
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3429a2cee05dee88538d8b6816a5a877_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3429a2cee05dee88538d8b6816a5a877_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6caffcda9eea78ec1e94878f01f0baa09b9a2838
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3429a2cee05dee88538d8b6816a5a877_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7e222133471396d0c822d381460962b8c405cc52576e2e089ba8f89923db5e39
+size 129506
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3a006a7c9c9934695f0fc731344eff8a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3a006a7c9c9934695f0fc731344eff8a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce33b32ff740e9d55d4967d6f0d7fcf0e9f2efca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3a006a7c9c9934695f0fc731344eff8a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:564b4c7e434178c6406f7a259106ce3f2c8bb67f41884c6bbee2f13afe77445e
+size 97703
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3b11cc18f8ee769d0076c139dbf81ba3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3b11cc18f8ee769d0076c139dbf81ba3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c32ed5b5043e983ab6363718113737c35c0300d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3b11cc18f8ee769d0076c139dbf81ba3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1ae9a140c2210cb740bf54133ab49cdf89955aef769660712bdb057c64a0e6b6
+size 137318
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3bf1696c3034743b5ab07a0b5e398347_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3bf1696c3034743b5ab07a0b5e398347_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..feda0482a6a396a3ce642e61326bcbd4c1ef307c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3bf1696c3034743b5ab07a0b5e398347_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e2287e9badcf5b6cb3c2e78e04264f8c85c1003ac427bc76f3c866675f536305
+size 83876
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3c6151f296d5800335472b7dc00ce423_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3c6151f296d5800335472b7dc00ce423_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3cc3e151a522f889d549619837350731680afbc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3c6151f296d5800335472b7dc00ce423_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b444e81b7aee13b7787a714b0cea47676481971afa0a3e9fb74adcea1e170096
+size 126084
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3ce04f1c7128814978c6b34d654a25cc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3ce04f1c7128814978c6b34d654a25cc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc51a5835d79f2e57fd52af5ae60c03385f093fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3ce04f1c7128814978c6b34d654a25cc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a3254de30b9dcbedb0566f000787463e90fccf5890009d5128f632925bc326f5
+size 155769
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3ce6b213ec556257e32ff7451182369d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3ce6b213ec556257e32ff7451182369d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9dfb47b763867fe21a955eb32c725a209a07541
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3ce6b213ec556257e32ff7451182369d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:da1969dbe86484c9e7a72aa325fc84bd9827720d93746981d96ca62e9f0d94ba
+size 88191
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3d46409f8d0190e611a910ff27f8ec07_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3d46409f8d0190e611a910ff27f8ec07_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70ba6b9f9b22b9972086693f52314eb032ac901f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/3d46409f8d0190e611a910ff27f8ec07_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4d2455db4807972ab29b81060b5cdb2d7d7823703096b3a9ac023227a4e4731c
+size 143913
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ea2d323b6d5aafe55c1b3f2de76e73d126148de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/401f020d9ab5904f584424eabb596d2c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4b42d763852876ab3be6fd5c89f0b6f81285450ec64c4cca76e789d64a0ade13
+size 106931
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8a9d9f053703d13d0f7f0a7b3bd3ff85127cd484
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0950a67b4d86d205b4e21f200ae82fde285fd99dce359aaa775c6bf4ebc57e08
+size 85953
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/43f7b6b61db9a2f3e3920740a9527d97_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/43f7b6b61db9a2f3e3920740a9527d97_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ae6f637b48449f3a19c06e2d432d96edd360b18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/43f7b6b61db9a2f3e3920740a9527d97_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:585eeedeb3167f51fde77609388463a63064c33dc025d787dea6ffef21a1e015
+size 80682
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/487c58c79e44e6cf98b6368b6667b9c6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/487c58c79e44e6cf98b6368b6667b9c6_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e31c88f216b84c4d03872f8e66c6d5d432b0397
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/487c58c79e44e6cf98b6368b6667b9c6_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:de1f29194cf21a0e4d530c43d8cdbbc9682626ec73fcced62724be90f182a209
+size 84964
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/48adb97a6a4a14b039450192f25cc1e0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/48adb97a6a4a14b039450192f25cc1e0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7969088361cdcd917f228e9835e690c30d4a72f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/48adb97a6a4a14b039450192f25cc1e0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9324ab08e1dd365d2d6e2a960618b3fcf342caf5a680da0aca255cd75fc69f68
+size 162730
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/49d7bfbc65a92a7e1bd61777326a212d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/49d7bfbc65a92a7e1bd61777326a212d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c140e0edc0119c7459b2d51224708630e836582
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/49d7bfbc65a92a7e1bd61777326a212d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:13d6f8bb42737ab7d44f7f2c1a099b75fa6dfbd3c432ceddb61ce44cc5188b2b
+size 126319
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49c935e9e59d0aedb0d30151b58906f043e1c1ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5a4e62bead259c258d069fd3663ea670_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f7d820cbddaf104b5d5951c8b28ccd5b779fb7555a0e6d1b050417798a022831
+size 9785
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5cab96b2d23174c25919840ecd50aa48_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5cab96b2d23174c25919840ecd50aa48_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..826fb0ced5480dfb2f98d6062a9fc6acee0322ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5cab96b2d23174c25919840ecd50aa48_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3ba999546944dddb2a8dae7de8a72443ed663430a49ab99c5299cbf61eb311cd
+size 64925
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5cc4a2ef554f31ea0577731931007fff_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5cc4a2ef554f31ea0577731931007fff_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4af0b353c75b7e2e9f65ddcc6866a56299337147
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5cc4a2ef554f31ea0577731931007fff_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0c5ca74d3c9cec41607738c6a4bea39e54bca74550ec1cf81596a447dea1994d
+size 91907
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5ee80a63ec53c60d7306b5a44984afcf_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5ee80a63ec53c60d7306b5a44984afcf_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47e646946409704ce19ad82038cd6d339df3f2e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/5ee80a63ec53c60d7306b5a44984afcf_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:07673bad3fce42f063070b3505ffd877d74fecfce842f602a56dc455dd5862e2
+size 85597
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/69d00e8adf9811292427fb2ce6712e39_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/69d00e8adf9811292427fb2ce6712e39_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10a166a2ad829381bb8f816ac50d76dd0a4e50a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/69d00e8adf9811292427fb2ce6712e39_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b6353ec92da7326672d8df52669d4029ebb44afcfb31a1cda627a37dc8368fad
+size 137355
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/6a7ea9d5162b0a0cfbd8d77c6cac90d1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/6a7ea9d5162b0a0cfbd8d77c6cac90d1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..668514b74fb6bacceb176786700d4d95cabb77f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/6a7ea9d5162b0a0cfbd8d77c6cac90d1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5f4006c3d33ebf1681fb78f4bb7ee363018e2b0a4d5a3afc46476c3659648d09
+size 105478
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36420dc78eadfc29edf1cd88a7c6c33c8f4eff6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:577d3338e4e1d2ef8567d5ae9a07ec2b4d9b5e4cac3db0f5c70534806cb7e0aa
+size 89745
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19c2d4ace9e33020af2860bbc41fe94fb190a04c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:35b54033e56aad311f6b42a7a8d8f9b0a99ff794b9a9e80f89f5c68dce2e2d6c
+size 64878
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f39336ad9baeec776579fcf1c6b60edde1a6b8bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/75f0cb39f1cd165dfe4a6aa6c4d9388d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b4d747498df8cbfdfd13cde307b20e222abc85cbb844e12aae1fe113247ebd65
+size 46565
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/792a3e6edb8dc2fc545f0782d6b4d3f7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/792a3e6edb8dc2fc545f0782d6b4d3f7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2781031d9da6cf777c2c6dc8da1eb7e285712eef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/792a3e6edb8dc2fc545f0782d6b4d3f7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2a84ad4396106ce95f37077296666e23095757d3ba1303ac29e1e18c2c8b9184
+size 114842
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b408e4d0a306fd99d3e979f6ee36577d8bd4f48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4571b7677a113dd7f3618c8ffe873c669169320d2475c4a1c6b420fc5707a830
+size 100833
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7ed5d5770331f31ade15439a21c31425_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7ed5d5770331f31ade15439a21c31425_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9819eba3403fa21a23ca640e480136362f4e17d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7ed5d5770331f31ade15439a21c31425_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:551195d927778e59f6a8139285ff44fdc02b7bba866eab0401e00a8ff6441cce
+size 90217
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7f25db95ce3916c0e09803b861a2f7bc_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7f25db95ce3916c0e09803b861a2f7bc_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75cff665b586439e5c7cd7087356fca0770635ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/7f25db95ce3916c0e09803b861a2f7bc_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3f9d9ee61b8f6aefe888ec93d914b0610e48eb9ef0b117159a00553f2f743cbb
+size 92195
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/811d62d08ce934a2a7e5bd877abff7ad_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/811d62d08ce934a2a7e5bd877abff7ad_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..82d73705a506af961f4e0067a439bf970c44f5db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/811d62d08ce934a2a7e5bd877abff7ad_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bcd0c55e5145dea356ee93a2a3b3c00420b94c2299c9cbda8b3638b9f3643b25
+size 94700
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/83852ec55d4802521a727926336bedab_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/83852ec55d4802521a727926336bedab_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8327f2fc29207dd0c03bc5f570b8f463728ebec1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/83852ec55d4802521a727926336bedab_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d45562a49d5066f422a71980c9151ffa66de4b48ddc54ee501d22357d997846d
+size 78428
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1aa22d5cd453d015584aafe321835269f33668a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:14438bea405184cac35dbb116d2fed3db9f1175c36e0d7104a2b2b3e845e2eaf
+size 69716
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/92e26d86c5a582766cb9afdbd2c1aee7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/92e26d86c5a582766cb9afdbd2c1aee7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c1178c7677972c9c243500fdf83e208cab121fc7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/92e26d86c5a582766cb9afdbd2c1aee7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4ebfc70a816152efac3978babf35be973d45683ff126b065de206e8b6aa861ee
+size 114486
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/95be50ec094942200786128aa936cfae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/95be50ec094942200786128aa936cfae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d147c65d4ed8fc8b1422da5a9455073e0aa581bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/95be50ec094942200786128aa936cfae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0d6c2d0b7c270fe4ed931ca6d955b5b1657fb00227d74e121c0191b5a7601827
+size 103007
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9687bd5e8b62cadba093b0d1b70536cd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9687bd5e8b62cadba093b0d1b70536cd_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b4cc0b977d92233b351ae62c197e1d496e8a1f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9687bd5e8b62cadba093b0d1b70536cd_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8e05efbd81a71b1763a60518399be5a2d7051171aa23fab4e3bb314db2f9fa75
+size 138658
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/99698c448635861b7dc8d352f87a1b2b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/99698c448635861b7dc8d352f87a1b2b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d641e8df7140aeca05af695ae7c72035283fe5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/99698c448635861b7dc8d352f87a1b2b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4878abc24bd49df4d5afb5ccf45e33effd7b8b8a209ccef6f3c654838c22bfa9
+size 76991
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9b6977f95ef47e2c87cd4979c09a7edb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9b6977f95ef47e2c87cd4979c09a7edb_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f00870493775100cc9ae32133685f61fd5d4f09f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9b6977f95ef47e2c87cd4979c09a7edb_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2cc9f632cf6bb580347abbc917c878d8543776ab34e039bd4db3fc407396e4fc
+size 85808
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9d47fe89bc71acebde670ea760ee6ffb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9d47fe89bc71acebde670ea760ee6ffb_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad83db07d1b07efaabbb65ea78d8bc637d3299be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9d47fe89bc71acebde670ea760ee6ffb_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:857e7304563c55ceb0147e6c5230afd9fd18133374094b9c3a5fd593d89ab154
+size 129159
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9dc88fb2c48bc64047fc3e79814f1d47_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9dc88fb2c48bc64047fc3e79814f1d47_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e0999b10481f41a81649c27be7a4bb10a523e67b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/9dc88fb2c48bc64047fc3e79814f1d47_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c95f996a075b59e8faeeb66aeb74391cec8713e178d4e8d48ad2d58d61cbc9d0
+size 108062
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..048d67ceb5bf0e98e4c9c1f20f74614ff882a807
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a33da0f14e456f92539ce3e9b7d81f9a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cdc873bd73ba79403f7b4062e219397b64653f7efe38b9649dd58a6a0fd4e8f6
+size 49610
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a37adbbe12ec735a20ead2466363d07a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a37adbbe12ec735a20ead2466363d07a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f5987b8d82206705722e14dc24f9bcea1bc12eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a37adbbe12ec735a20ead2466363d07a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:dea1c475783304a96c03769ba7af9476203e1a838978f84b005895686eac1a4e
+size 117287
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36cf51f8ba07e44aa7a4b009f3ba08eb2b570b1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a3dc41dc3df86ea68d266af2bf95cf5b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:11780faeee75ba39ab4ed9de67a9e67abec0d9ba3068ebec661dea70c16e29d3
+size 4338
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a4de02b04a1a8f6cb8121ac2e11bf95a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a4de02b04a1a8f6cb8121ac2e11bf95a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..442edadb7900fca2cfa3935d1b993fc3dbf0b928
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a4de02b04a1a8f6cb8121ac2e11bf95a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d11de83c388595641fa9bbb5c59c33eaa65ed8a36f1ae7c57d8256e34a249b8a
+size 50064
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a7450c80e88ad3f6ca1427ad84020998_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a7450c80e88ad3f6ca1427ad84020998_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4470449970fc7c655f0d3522300f20d749d0adc5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a7450c80e88ad3f6ca1427ad84020998_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d82840edceb58903e509909be91261781f6928cc785da5d2466eb1c3576f4ba5
+size 99946
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a76fa39f5daf6a026e032495262ed0f6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a76fa39f5daf6a026e032495262ed0f6_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0facc4208b2ce1c4fcfa1403244e24d2d51f694
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a76fa39f5daf6a026e032495262ed0f6_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5a16a26fd6acdc541fc56214c6865c3190455a176a8c8f1429fff44529d4ec78
+size 115202
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a98f3ef00da8508d2468334c6867f90f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a98f3ef00da8508d2468334c6867f90f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32f866e240fbbf733d8d59888c6b8aae38c94ad1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/a98f3ef00da8508d2468334c6867f90f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:68255b5870519a0d1ae54e2d1b011b22c835372357352f7d671dd54c587cb1a5
+size 173795
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af4f213abb5ad1891a43425e0d758021_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af4f213abb5ad1891a43425e0d758021_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6c0db2dfb3e938c68acafafac85e130f647d0a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af4f213abb5ad1891a43425e0d758021_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:aed79d181db67b606deeabe8c78a7141663c1d6b3d988931f7ea04709e12d0c5
+size 85966
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af6c3f383ddc0c142cdd7e186cc78199_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af6c3f383ddc0c142cdd7e186cc78199_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1a1f23a883dc6e639ffa72a93a58e0c09f6460ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af6c3f383ddc0c142cdd7e186cc78199_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:356ccc3f3391346a12805152c0d74fd22bc7df27c31a4b8557907099400690b6
+size 95173
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18dd2a5084d2daf8e18c4f900e2707899f80321b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/af7916c89a458fdab6c3f443217388ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b004786d5cf0f3ec0dc085f126c0f7cb7222e0c314cda2820cad72f76c52c860
+size 27187
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/afd9ce64c136f2090b978ea5f3ef9d8d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/afd9ce64c136f2090b978ea5f3ef9d8d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c0725bd91b769b9c4ebc3fbd8d59042789f6f37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/afd9ce64c136f2090b978ea5f3ef9d8d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:20d403571d497523aac6ea288b2b679daaa989eb9acd7b4b6ba4443a62fa50db
+size 115911
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b3335932702b8668e62791e9fd12c9ff_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b3335932702b8668e62791e9fd12c9ff_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9868d515e0b269509fa71c15c373baf404d1d92
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b3335932702b8668e62791e9fd12c9ff_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:600f169a5c0656bbf4b8b0421aa5deec75be6762172488a20ab911c737aa65f6
+size 87632
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b68ed2f7c90787b2fcfeb6be5640ecd4_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b68ed2f7c90787b2fcfeb6be5640ecd4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31b8a757ca620b95a001acfec581063af4416642
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b68ed2f7c90787b2fcfeb6be5640ecd4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fc212aac514de4835fcd981160a33f4ef8be06cfccb4e3a85da46e63e1f8a68c
+size 108251
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b8d855a06aad434aeafa2739bf62e7de_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b8d855a06aad434aeafa2739bf62e7de_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8283e84bea96b16be1e9935e23190f9bd1336959
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b8d855a06aad434aeafa2739bf62e7de_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:87f0b86ea417169f850d0bd46daf51f5293aa9e524fc2e9024994eca847e872d
+size 119049
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b99ddca16383b6f00fc70050d695a235_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b99ddca16383b6f00fc70050d695a235_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35dd5088edbd09e42a60074474bd80ae710ce37a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/b99ddca16383b6f00fc70050d695a235_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6b8953c9b3cd07f03820104c22f3306bfc5b89cdac1f555edc129a437317dfaa
+size 154468
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d40b8d6038c913ac97498192d0790ae28a524a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/bd0b93e7a46ede276d0a3b79ac487bd9_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ba5c5525472b66e2b94a263cb406ac7d8b944d3c72ef1149df01462199af8212
+size 13099
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/be9225da20b1fa284d0ed4b44fd633a3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/be9225da20b1fa284d0ed4b44fd633a3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fbdfee9a800fa3c72f4ca4dd40def8e31fdf8b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/be9225da20b1fa284d0ed4b44fd633a3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3b9a01ee92210ff27db917239bd8b12956ba2a4c04bcb8bd730e826ebf719301
+size 143218
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d78e4bcba8aa13819d0f611169abf22cea6b27a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d7e6d8c60bf30f4bdf6d6dace5fd158f175af5521fb44897904baa9f19171ba8
+size 85675
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c355b8056bdd4728357d7d5ed18792ca_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c355b8056bdd4728357d7d5ed18792ca_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37d521eac4b8d7af9f84cbe5bf2eca46aca3bd08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c355b8056bdd4728357d7d5ed18792ca_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:75554541b6943e482096c39b5710003cbc878538477040a6f6adafa25d3d75ad
+size 179411
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c6212a3b14736d6a8c81ace75ae94ccf_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c6212a3b14736d6a8c81ace75ae94ccf_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e36733099d970404eb775ed2a73140a2de0d318e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c6212a3b14736d6a8c81ace75ae94ccf_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6834466bb5c055b0bf266a1eb26e3a65afdd23d81f2f7b9043fb601283608b93
+size 93172
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c30d14dccddeb2f58ec0c8e6915868626c7f793f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:54ba7fc6695c53e0a4a4795b8a5300e5040184d558a033cc3cfbc677cd030e87
+size 33321
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c93353297f7ed04bc9173ac1f224d406_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c93353297f7ed04bc9173ac1f224d406_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6dab41d3450fcbc7c816f006c4836e18560c4a6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/c93353297f7ed04bc9173ac1f224d406_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d1d975b760271363a2d557752152fc78feee40665c30451c846d7d3e6348334b
+size 96828
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/caeb1637753f79f4cd005eda3768d1d5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/caeb1637753f79f4cd005eda3768d1d5_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14f4f2d4c0df9745713fd2a56520d248f81aeaf5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/caeb1637753f79f4cd005eda3768d1d5_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5f7792fc7b4bb02a15ef85e1e5c5a40c36a9765cd74ea8c0e414bfd13d331b39
+size 64044
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/cc91bf9aed46f8b219ebceaee276d195_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/cc91bf9aed46f8b219ebceaee276d195_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e46103c329edcd13a2c5187759e9fbc9d359b5e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/cc91bf9aed46f8b219ebceaee276d195_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ad6576e477fd9257d8756bc33d0eb53a130602d600974c09a12f66ec9994362f
+size 103392
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ce06eec6bb6d76bf7688932b2f6eb6fa_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ce06eec6bb6d76bf7688932b2f6eb6fa_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4dadda3babcd77864f09121a0ba72704ec5b757b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ce06eec6bb6d76bf7688932b2f6eb6fa_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c5c78280ea3371c7d3e88e7e518d11efcffc5b76f7f7dfd3fa15a41233c3b6f8
+size 102377
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d1ad05f1189b0d80188fee24ae33c112_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d1ad05f1189b0d80188fee24ae33c112_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f44ec700355c07aae038b49c3d84de03e18624dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d1ad05f1189b0d80188fee24ae33c112_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5bcd936bb2840a9b21cf863a6f349cc4d787d0cc2ecbfc049d8f4169fb76f1e0
+size 83004
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d6b0963170ed3d0ed9c5bfaccec452e3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d6b0963170ed3d0ed9c5bfaccec452e3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd201a8cf7212ae4262f33ab7d0a57a8b920d1bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d6b0963170ed3d0ed9c5bfaccec452e3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5ec3aef552461b0bf69d1a026826d429076f18eb695a5d6350cc0dafc2cb63e6
+size 84167
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d7896dd2d38adf224c3b76cd22d29c10_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d7896dd2d38adf224c3b76cd22d29c10_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df4c50c31e74cdd1c87e3fc45945792073648f9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/d7896dd2d38adf224c3b76cd22d29c10_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e831774635b1ca8031fc7d7c3eddde62ab86d723a4bef5bfe7bb778d6acef2e3
+size 47300
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/defe20e5056d0c3552de2d50ce88c5cb_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/defe20e5056d0c3552de2d50ce88c5cb_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d2bc1cba85f328264c2ce310139606b70835ba6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/defe20e5056d0c3552de2d50ce88c5cb_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:38e7963ea2a4534eaecf21bf3440428a8c97bbe48d006421575d5601b4245e3c
+size 103236
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/df803281854ce2cbde7019b5aeefd8cd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/df803281854ce2cbde7019b5aeefd8cd_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..493bb190770fedfbcf0c7715f238406ee8f786e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/df803281854ce2cbde7019b5aeefd8cd_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8bbf73b45c798540f92d2a483f35fbe434a8a7884767ed7cfc4b6c39aee52530
+size 100156
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e47d450f315d0b633906c03cc91f90ef_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e47d450f315d0b633906c03cc91f90ef_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67360803c59bec0eee8600c9f119bb42f8a25763
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e47d450f315d0b633906c03cc91f90ef_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:edb7e68f32b5d38271d50c10e4ddef3c82aa9446ffb41058e3e8869692033421
+size 67566
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e492fe1061d82aa76cbf7114f57eb90c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e492fe1061d82aa76cbf7114f57eb90c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05fbf860e18f910e2535ed6f06a324c0396f227b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e492fe1061d82aa76cbf7114f57eb90c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:10f58ddc792eb02f68dcb42707ca3026611a0316fc770e5007039a6ec72f7796
+size 102074
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e5ded42f8e352da02ee86cb55550c45d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e5ded42f8e352da02ee86cb55550c45d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5743fddf0dd40beea02454e224e199cf0057784d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/e5ded42f8e352da02ee86cb55550c45d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:87e0e238639f4d4ce4a693635bd9eb82887c3acd62ef28a2046c4da756d42cbd
+size 54762
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ec96d99a16edb981eb7defe41a79b57f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ec96d99a16edb981eb7defe41a79b57f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e6dd03518dd0d86b0745aafcd4c6f348a48219c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ec96d99a16edb981eb7defe41a79b57f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:04bb931f05efc9a8b8c6aede4545c96f677cda4e51c1fcec1e1ea2833ec947da
+size 91121
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/eca6a6c6546af8ac124c207445901964_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/eca6a6c6546af8ac124c207445901964_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..818e68a8089abda8e7faa0ddf5aadb3b19dbdf6e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/eca6a6c6546af8ac124c207445901964_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a1981ca6816aa55dc17286a4f95a802540095fe7f43c335404df887a0fb4ebb7
+size 152649
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f431b5db0c635c95318cff1adbe10c05_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f431b5db0c635c95318cff1adbe10c05_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab5e354224cdd5b73fb621f45e8ee9f6f0bcd606
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f431b5db0c635c95318cff1adbe10c05_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f1abddf6431a633c3f9e317297329b9038a32ecf79a08512b488cc0df0dc3503
+size 113177
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f512ae9c630f2fb53197fa77a1bda0e8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f512ae9c630f2fb53197fa77a1bda0e8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6962b43ef7710e121d8d06e3eb050ab2130e26af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f512ae9c630f2fb53197fa77a1bda0e8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0502f435125092a3f231558c071f71ce59d62716d5e70a4d4b614b2828c2a25f
+size 86038
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f78d2e126f00fcc5d8d9797ca410cc09_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f78d2e126f00fcc5d8d9797ca410cc09_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c40214086a419693869a451670c0770629c352c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/f78d2e126f00fcc5d8d9797ca410cc09_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6855b1604e8b777792ea7332711dec6b7fbc44a37fd8021872c45991204b6ebb
+size 109896
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/fc7c83167c4e9e614f40e52b39ef735d_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/fc7c83167c4e9e614f40e52b39ef735d_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..118250cef5cfc54bd4a989b5da01918789b268de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/fc7c83167c4e9e614f40e52b39ef735d_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c4e314f1d7085c6b3d8c27f8703469798e8d8153019192ad7a3d71e9c0553114
+size 61015
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/fd8f5da2b60cdca94896f3cde8ee81f0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/fd8f5da2b60cdca94896f3cde8ee81f0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51df37c761bbfbe79057f7225587ba231a8e2711
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/fd8f5da2b60cdca94896f3cde8ee81f0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a34cb5a6a37a32c6284c3ca7c8c43d451f14bd5f8adb28d498a068b0d26dc28d
+size 91736
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ff7ce44f3fdd51bae7b231f34df07c6a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ff7ce44f3fdd51bae7b231f34df07c6a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..231a81767860488c0a16d3174952738a2594db30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/ff7ce44f3fdd51bae7b231f34df07c6a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5f3270568998ef8433534330863678f315a06e3c1e0f24a646e1cddec0fd5b5d
+size 87161
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42fbf2d5ee5d1e689b3d7ebc3e9d8cdf5f582857
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.834.3-200406-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8149 @@
+
+
+I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n
+
+# ITU-T
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+## Q.834.3
+
+(06/2004)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+Q3 interface
+
+# --- **A UML description for management interface requirements for Broadband Passive Optical Networks**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.834.3
+
+## ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4, 5, 6, R1 AND R2 | Q.120–Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.799 |
+| Q3 INTERFACE | Q.800–Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1699 |
+| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR IMT-2000 | Q.1700–Q.1799 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING RELATED TO BEARER INDEPENDENT CALL CONTROL (BICC) | Q.1900–Q.1999 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 |
+| SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTOCOLS FOR THE NGN | Q.3000–Q.3999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.*
+
+# **ITU-T Recommendation Q.834.3**
+
+# **A UML description for management interface requirements for Broadband Passive Optical Networks**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+This Recommendation provides a UML description for the management interface between a supplier management system and an operator management system. This work defines part of the management aspects for network resources defined by the G.983-series of Recommendations for Broadband Passive Optical Network (BPON) equipment.
+
+Generally speaking, the supplier management system is an element management system (EMS) and the operator management system is a network management system (NMS). However, the supplier management system is required to present a "network view" of connection management to the operator management system. Therefore, it was deemed necessary for the sake of clarity to use the terminology adopted in naming the systems involved.
+
+## **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.834.3 was approved on 13 June 2004 by ITU-T Study Group 4 (2001-2004) under the ITU-T Recommendation A.8 procedure.
+
+## **Keywords**
+
+APON, BPON, UML.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database at .
+
+© ITU 2008
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+| | Page |
+|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 1 Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 2 References..... | 1 |
+| 3 Definitions ..... | 2 |
+| 3.1 Terms defined in [ITU-T M.3010] ..... | 2 |
+| 3.2 Terms defined in [b-OMG 99-06-01]..... | 2 |
+| 3.3 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 3 |
+| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 4 |
+| 5 Conventions ..... | 5 |
+| 6 GDMI template..... | 6 |
+| 6.1 Scope ..... | 6 |
+| 6.2 Requirements..... | 7 |
+| 6.3 Analysis ..... | 45 |
+| Appendix I – Additional UML diagrams ..... | 144 |
+| I.1 Process incoming NE events and log event records ..... | 144 |
+| I.2 Root cause alarm analysis ..... | 146 |
+| I.3 Autodiscover NEs and plug-in units..... | 148 |
+| I.4 Collect history data..... | 152 |
+| Appendix II – High level summary class diagrams ..... | 154 |
+| II.1 Event handling..... | 154 |
+| II.2 Software and configuration data management ..... | 156 |
+| II.3 Installation ..... | 157 |
+| II.4 Provisioning..... | 158 |
+| II.5 Archiving and bulk transfer ..... | 159 |
+| Bibliography..... | 160 |
+
+
+
+# ITU-T Recommendation Q.834.3
+
+# A UML description for management interface requirements for Broadband Passive Optical Networks
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+This Recommendation provides a UML description of a management interface between a supplier management system, provided to manage network resources conforming to specifications found in the G.983-series of Recommendations, and a network owner operation management system. It follows the process proposed in ITU-T Rec. M.3020 with alternations in order of presentation of material. Behaviour for real time and non-real time interfacing is addressed. All aspects of TMN management functional areas are addressed except for accounting management since usage data collection is outside the scope of the BPON equipment reference architecture.
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation.
+
+- [ITU-T G.983.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.983.1 (1998), *Broadband optical access systems based on Passive Optical Networks (PON)*.
+- [ITU-T G.983.2] ITU-T Recommendation G.983.2 (2002), *ONT management and control interface specification for B-PON*.
+- [ITU-T G.983.3] ITU-T Recommendation G.983.3 (2001), *A broadband optical access system with increased service capability by wavelength allocation*.
+- [ITU-T G.983.4] ITU-T Recommendation G.983.4 (2001), *A broadband optical access system with increased service capability using dynamic bandwidth assignment*.
+- [ITU-T G.983.5] ITU-T Recommendation G.983.5 (2002), *A broadband optical access system with enhanced survivability*.
+- [ITU-T G.983.6] ITU-T Recommendation G.983.6 (2002), *ONT management and control interface specifications for B-PON system with protection features*.
+- [ITU-T G.983.7] ITU-T Recommendation G.983.7 (2001), *ONT management and control interface specification for Dynamic Bandwidth Assignment (DBA) B-PON system*.
+- [ITU-T M.2140] ITU-T Recommendation M.2140 (2000), *Transport network event correlation*.
+- [ITU-T M.3010] ITU-T Recommendation M.3010 (2000), *Principles for a telecommunications management network*.
+- [ITU-T M.3200] ITU-T Recommendation M.3200 (1997), *TMN management services and telecommunications managed areas: overview*.
+- [ITU-T M.3400] ITU-T Recommendation M.3400 (2000), *TMN management functions*.
+- [ITU-T Q.816.1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.816.1 (2001), *CORBA-based TMN services: Extensions to support coarse-grained interfaces*.
+
+- [ITU-T Q.834.1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.834.1 (2004), *ATM-PON requirements and managed entities for the network and network element view.*
+- [ITU-T Q.834.2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.834.2 (2001), *ATM-PON requirements and managed entities for the network view.*
+- [ITU-T X.720] ITU-T Recommendation X.720 (1992), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Management information model.*
+- [ITU-T X.722] ITU-T Recommendation X.722 (1992), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Structure of management information: Guidelines for the definition of managed objects.*
+- [ITU-T X.734] ITU-T Recommendation X.734 (1992), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Event report management function.*
+- [ITU-T X.735] ITU-T Recommendation X.735 (1992), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Log control function.*
+- [ITU-T X.741] ITU-T Recommendation X.741 (1995), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Objects and attributes for access control.*
+- [ITU-T X.744] ITU-T Recommendation X.744 (1996), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Software management function.*
+- [ITU-T X.745] ITU-T Recommendation X.745 (1993), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Test management function.*
+- [ITU-T X.746] ITU-T Recommendation X.746 (2000), *Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Systems Management: Scheduling function.*
+- [ITU-T X.780.1] ITU-T Recommendation X.780.1 (2001), *TMN guidelines for defining coarse-grained CORBA managed object interfaces.*
+
+# 3 Definitions
+
+This Recommendation uses the following terms:
+
+## 3.1 Terms defined in [ITU-T M.3010]
+
+- user
+- TMN management service
+- TMN management function set
+
+## 3.2 Terms defined in [b-OMG 99-06-01]
+
+- activity diagram
+- actor
+- class
+- class diagram
+- collaboration diagram
+- sequence diagram
+- state diagram
+
+- stereotype
+- use case
+
+## 3.3 Terms defined in this Recommendation
+
+This Recommendation defines the following terms:
+
+**3.3.1 activate:** Execute installed software. Normally implies the switch of installed software from being secondary to primary.
+
+**3.3.2 assign:** The outcome of service provisioning.
+
+**3.3.3 autodiscovery:** The autonomous messaging to an OMS of creation or deletion notifications for equipment inventory data.
+
+**3.3.4 BPON resource:** BPON network resources that need to be managed. These resources can be physical and logical.
+
+**3.3.5 build:** The construction of a fragment of a management model based on containment rules and defined relationships, i.e., the provisioning of the parameters of a BPON managed resource, resulting from a discovery or autodiscovery process of installed equipment or through a pre-provisioning process prior to physical installation.
+
+**3.3.6 data warehouse:** Long-term archival system, normally implemented as a database management system.
+
+**3.3.7 dispatch:** To send personnel to a particular location where telecommunications equipment or facilities are or will be installed.
+
+**3.3.8 factory:** Functionality that manufactures and deletes managed entities.
+
+**3.3.9 filtering:** Criteria used for selection purposes.
+
+**3.3.10 includes:** An include relationship from use case A to use case B indicates that an instance of the use case A will also contain the behaviour as specified by use case B (see [ITU-T M.3400]).
+
+**3.3.11 install:** Physical placement of equipment. This means that shelves have been installed and powered. All common equipment is inserted. Management communication has been established. Interface cards may be inserted.
+
+**3.3.12 management model:** Formal description of managed entities and relationships between them.
+
+**3.3.13 range:** Ranging is a function used to measure the round-trip delay between the OLT and each ONU or ONT in order to determine the transmission timing for the subtending ONT or ONU. The process also involves establishing of security mechanisms (churning key algorithm) and the embedded operations channel. Ranging may be initiated manually by supplying the OLT with the serial number of the ONT or ONU. If supported by the implementation, ranging can also be initiated automatically by the OLT.
+
+**3.3.14 register:** The process used to bring a network resource into the management jurisdiction of the supplier management system. The management communication link is established to a physically installed NE, and the NE is included in the management domain for the supplier management system.
+
+**3.3.15 reserve:** The setting aside of network resources before provisioning of service.
+
+**3.3.16 service instance:** A service instance is a connection between a UNI endpoint on an ONT or NT and an NNI endpoint at an OLT, or between UNI endpoints on two ONTs or NTs.
+
+**3.3.17 transfer function:** This function implies the use of a non-real time protocol.
+
+**3.3.18 user label:** Indicates an identifier that is created and provided by the operator or operator management system to associate with a managed resource by the supplier management system.
+
+# **4 Abbreviations and acronyms**
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms:
+
+| | |
+|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
+| AAL | ATM Adaptation Layer |
+| APON | ATM Passive Optical Network |
+| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer Mode |
+| BICI | Broadband Inter-Carrier Interface |
+| BISSI | Broadband Inter-Switching System Interface |
+| BPON | Broadband Passive Optical Network |
+| CAC | Call Admission Control |
+| CES | Circuit Emulation Service |
+| CORBA | Common Object Request Broker Architecture |
+| CTP | Connection Termination Point |
+| DCN | Data Communications Network |
+| DSx | Digital Signal x |
+| EM-OSF | Element Management Layer Operations System Function |
+| EMS | Element Management System |
+| EOC | Embedded Operations Channel |
+| Ex | European digital signal x |
+| FSAN | Full Service Access Network |
+| GDMI | Guidelines for the Definition of Management Information |
+| GUI | Graphical User Interface |
+| IP | Internet Protocol |
+| ME | Managed Entity |
+| MIB | Management Information Base |
+| NE | Network Element |
+| NM-OSF | Network Management layer Operations System Function |
+| NMS | Network Management System |
+| NT | Network Terminal |
+| ODN | Optical Distribution Network |
+| OLT | Optical Line Terminal |
+| OMG | Object Management Group |
+| OMS | Operator Management System |
+| ONT | Optical Network Terminal |
+| ONU | Optical Network Unit |
+
+| | |
+|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
+| OS | Operations System |
+| OSF | Operations System Function |
+| PON | Passive Optical Network |
+| PVC | Permanent Virtual Circuit |
+| QoS | Quality of Service |
+| RCAA | Root Cause Alarm Analysis |
+| RCIA | Root Cause Impairment Analysis |
+| SM-OSF | Service Management layer Operations System Function |
+| TCA | Threshold Crossing Alert |
+| TMN | Telecommunication Management Network |
+| TP | Termination Point |
+| TTP | Trail Termination Point |
+| UML | Unified Modelling Language |
+| UNI | User Network Interface |
+| VC | Virtual Channel |
+| VCC | Virtual Channel Connection |
+| VCI | Virtual Channel Identifier |
+| VCL | Virtual channel link |
+| VDSL | Very high speed Digital Subscriber Line |
+| VP | Virtual Path |
+| VPC | Virtual Path Connection |
+| VPI | Virtual Path Identifier |
+| VPL | Virtual Path Link |
+
+# 5 Conventions
+
+Any "communicates" association between an actor and use case in the requirements clause (see clause 6.2), refers to the Q interface addressed in this Recommendation when the actor is any one of the following: OMS, privileged user, external event channel, profile object repository, data warehouse or secure file server. Figure 5-1 illustrates this diagrammatic reference.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph LR
+ Actor[Actor] --- communicates[communicates] --- UseCase((Use Case Name))
+
+```
+
+Figure 5-1: A UML diagram showing an actor (stick figure) connected to a use case (yellow oval) with the label 'communicates' above the association line. The actor is labeled 'Actor' and the use case is labeled 'Use Case Name'.
+
+**Figure 5-1 – Q interface reference in use case diagram**
+
+Any association between an actor and an object class in the analysis clause (see clause 6.3) refers to the Q interface addressed in this Recommendation when the actor is any one of the following: OMS, privileged user, external event channel, profile object repository, data warehouse or secure file server. Figure 5-2 illustrates this diagrammatic reference.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a stick figure labeled 'Actor' with the text '(from Use Case View)' below it. A horizontal line connects the actor to a rectangular box labeled 'Class'. The line is labeled 'association name' above it. The 'Class' box has a header section with the word 'Class' and a body section below it.
+
+UML class diagram showing an association between an Actor and a Class.
+
+**Figure 5-2 – Q interface reference in class diagram**
+
+All other associations, as well as other object classes not possessing such an association to these actors in the analysis clause are provided in this clause in order to complete the description of expected behaviour of the supplier management system and the BPON NEs within its management jurisdiction when fulfilling the TMN management needs of the operator and operator management systems. In general, it is not required that the supplier management system explicitly implement these associations, or object classes, provided that the implementation possesses the same behaviour. However, when an object class appears in the Analysis clause, and this class is one of the managed entities of [ITU-T Q.834.1] or [ITU-T Q.834.2], the class shall be implemented within the supplier management system as part of its logical schema. In general, the managed entities of [ITU-T Q.834.1] and [ITU-T Q.834.2] provide management data that is present on the mechanized interface.
+
+# **6 GDMI template**
+
+## **6.1 Scope**
+
+The scope of this Recommendation includes management aspects for a BPON system as described by the G.983-series of Recommendations. The BPON system can be classified as an access and terminal equipment network [ITU-T G.983.1]. The management services covered by this Recommendation include aspects of network and service provisioning management, network performance management, traffic management, maintenance management and security administration. Figure 6-1 below shows the Q interface addressed in this Recommendation.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ A[Operator Management System(s)] ---|Q| B[BPON Supplier Management System
+(E-OSF, N-OSF, S-OSF)]
+ B --- C[BPON Network Element(s)]
+
+```
+
+Figure 6-1 – Reference interface diagram showing a vertical hierarchy of three boxes. The top box is 'Operator Management System(s)'. A vertical line connects it to the middle box, 'BPON Supplier Management System (E-OSF, N-OSF, S-OSF)', with a horizontal tick mark and the letter 'Q' on the line. The middle box is connected to the bottom box, 'BPON Network Element(s)', by another vertical line.
+
+**Figure 6-1 – Reference interface**
+
+## **6.2 Requirements**
+
+### **6.2.1 Business level requirements**
+
+Major business requirements concerning the functionality of the supplier management system are documented in [ITU-T Q.834.1]. Services performed by the supplier management system on behalf of the operator management system(s) and operator users are controlled by the interfaces supported by the supplier management and described by the requirements provided in [ITU-T Q.834.1].
+
+#### **6.2.1.1 Actor roles**
+
+There are several actors mentioned in the high-level use case diagrams provided in clause 6.2.1.3. These actors include the following: operator, privileged user, operator management system (OMS), external event channel, white pages, data warehouse, BPON NE, profile object repository and secure file server. Figure 6-2 provides a brief definition of the roles that these actors play.
+
+| Actor | Roles |
+|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Operator | User interacting with the supplier management system via a graphical user interface. |
+| Privileged user | User with administrative access to the supplier management system. Can be a system or operator. |
+| Operator management system (OMS) | Separate management systems supporting operator TMN management requirements. |
+| External event channel | Consumer of BPON events supplied by the supplier management system. This channel acts as a conduit of event information to interested client applications. |
+| White pages | Directory service for resolving names of objects referenced by interface method invocations. |
+| Data warehouse | Long-term archive of records maintained by the operator. |
+| BPON NE | Equipment that is a network element. |
+| Profile object repository | External OMS where profile objects reside. |
+| Secure file server | Secure and centralized repository of network element configuration data and software generics. |
+
+**Figure 6-2 – Actors and roles**
+
+#### 6.2.1.2 Telecommunications resources
+
+Figure 6-3 illustrates the BPON system architecture. The operation system linked to the OLT in this figure is the supplier management system. This system is provided, along with the equipment, to a network owner operator. There is no specification concerning the management communications interface between the OLT and the supplier management system. Consequently, both the supplier management system and the managed BPON equipment are viewed as relevant telecommunications resources in this Recommendation.
+
+The optical line terminal (OLT) is a head-end digital terminal commonly located in the central office or some controlled environment structure. The optical distribution network (ODN) is a point-to-multipoint fibre infrastructure employing a passive splitter or coupler device for the fan out. The ONU provides the access network line termination function and the ATM multiplexing and de-multiplexing function. The NT provides the user network interface line termination function. The reference point, indicated by the term UNI, denotes the user network interface. It is used in the most abstract sense and is meant to indicate any type of service interface. The ONT combines the functions of the ONU and NT in one piece of equipment. In some cases, the UNIs from one ONT may belong to different users.
+
+
+
+| | |
+|------|--------------------------------------------|
+| EICI | Broadband Inter-Carrier Interface |
+| EISI | Broadband Inter-Switching System Interface |
+| EPON | Broadband Passive Optical Network |
+| NNI | Network-to-Network Interface |
+| NT | Network Terminal |
+| OLT | Optical Line Terminal |
+| ODN | Optical Distribution Network |
+| ONT | Optical Network Terminal |
+| ONU | Optical Network Unit |
+| UNI | User/Network Interface |
+
+Figure 6-3 – BPON system architecture diagram. The diagram shows a Supplier Management System (oval) connected to an OLT (rectangle) within a dashed box labeled 'EPON Network Elements'. The OLT is connected to an ODN (oval), which then branches to multiple ONUs (rectangles) and ONTs (rectangles). Each ONU is connected to an NT (rectangle), which is then connected to a UNI (rectangle). The OLT has external interfaces labeled EICI, EISI, and NNI. The ONT has a UNI interface. A legend below the diagram defines the abbreviations: EICI (Broadband Inter-Carrier Interface), EISI (Broadband Inter-Switching System Interface), EPON (Broadband Passive Optical Network), NNI (Network-to-Network Interface), NT (Network Terminal), OLT (Optical Line Terminal), ODN (Optical Distribution Network), ONT (Optical Network Terminal), ONU (Optical Network Unit), and UNI (User/Network Interface).
+
+Figure 6-3 – BPON system architecture
+
+#### 6.2.1.3 High-level use case diagrams
+
+This clause contains high-level use case diagrams that summarize the functionality and interfaces of the supplier management system. Use cases are shown in these diagrams even when they do not have a "communicates" association to an external actor. The internal functionality described by these use cases serves an important purpose in that the behaviour of the supplier management system would be incompletely characterized without it. In some cases there are specific use cases mentioned on more than one high-level diagram. Again, the reason for this duplication is to aid in completing the characterization of behaviour and functionality. Use case descriptions are provided for every use case pictured in these high-level diagrams.
+
+The interfacing to BPON technology domain objects through a façade object or through a fine-grain mechanism is defined and described in ITU-T Rec. X.780 and [ITU-T X.780.1] with key services defined in ITU-T Rec. Q.816 and [ITU-T Q.816.1].
+
+The first overview use case diagram shows the interactions involved administering user access to the supplier management system.
+
+
+
+```
+graph LR; A[Privileged User] ---|communicates| B([Administer User Privileges])
+```
+
+A use case diagram illustrating access control. It features a stick figure actor labeled "Privileged User" on the left and a yellow oval use case labeled "Administer User Privileges" on the right. A line connects them, with the label "communicates" written above the line.
+
+Use case diagram for access control showing a Privileged User communicating with Administer User Privileges.
+
+**Figure 6-4 – Access control**
+
+The second overview use case diagram shows the external interactions involved in event handling activities of the supplier management system. It includes both real time and non-real time activities.
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD; A[BPON NE] ---|communicates| B([Process Incoming NE Events]); C[External Event Channel] ---|communicates| D([Publish Events]); E[Log Events]; F([Root Cause Alarm Analysis]); G([Root Cause Impairment Analysis]); H[OMS/Operator] ---|communicates| G
+```
+
+A use case diagram illustrating event handling activities. It includes several actors and use cases. On the left, a stick figure actor "BPON NE" is connected by a line labeled "communicates" to a yellow oval use case "Process Incoming NE Events". On the right, a stick figure actor "External Event Channel" is connected by a line labeled "communicates" to a yellow oval use case "Publish Events". Below these are two more yellow oval use cases: "Log Events" and "Root Cause Alarm Analysis". At the bottom left, a stick figure actor "OMS/Operator" is connected by a line labeled "communicates" to a yellow oval use case "Root Cause Impairment Analysis".
+
+Use case diagram for event handling showing interactions between BPON NE, External Event Channel, and OMS/Operator with various event processing use cases.
+
+**Figure 6-5 – Event handling**
+
+The third overview use case diagram covers the external interactions involving software and configuration data management by the supplier management system.
+
+
+
+```
+
+ graph TD
+ SCS[Secure Config Server]
+ BPN[BPON NE]
+ S[Scheduler]
+ NSVC[NE Software Version Control]
+ BRNE[Backup and Restore NE]
+ OMS[OMS/Operator]
+ DASNE[Download and Activate NE Software]
+
+ SCS ---|communicates| BPN
+ SCS ---|communicates| BRNE
+ BPN ---|communicates| S
+ BPN ---|communicates| BRNE
+ S ---|includes| BRNE
+ BRNE ---|communicates| OMS
+ OMS ---|communicates| NSVC
+ OMS ---|communicates| DASNE
+ NSVC ---|communicates| BRNE
+ DASNE ---|communicates| OMS
+ SCS ---|communicates| DASNE
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the interactions for software and configuration data management. It features several actors (stick figures) and use cases (ovals). The actors are Secure Config Server, BPON NE, Scheduler, Backup and Restore NE, OMS/Operator, and Download and Activate NE Software. The use cases are NE Software Version Control and Scheduler. The relationships are as follows: Secure Config Server communicates with BPON NE, Backup and Restore NE, and Download and Activate NE Software. BPON NE communicates with Scheduler and Backup and Restore NE. Scheduler includes Backup and Restore NE. Backup and Restore NE communicates with OMS/Operator. OMS/Operator communicates with NE Software Version Control, Download and Activate NE Software, and Backup and Restore NE. NE Software Version Control communicates with Backup and Restore NE. Download and Activate NE Software communicates with OMS/Operator.
+
+UML Use Case Diagram for Software and configuration data management
+
+**Figure 6-6 – Software and configuration data management1**
+
+1 Backup and restore NE use case only communicates with the actor Secure Config Server when the MIB data is stewarded by the EMS.
+
+The fourth overview use case diagram shows the interactions for testing functionality through the support of the supplier management system.
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD
+ BPON_NE[BPON NE] ---|communicates| UC1(( ))
+ UC1 -->|includes| UC2(( ))
+ UC2 ---|communicates| UC3(( ))
+ UC3 ---|communicates| OMS_Operator[OMS/Operator]
+```
+
+The diagram is a UML Use Case Diagram illustrating the testing process. It features three use cases, each represented by a yellow oval, and two actors represented by stick figures. The actors are labeled 'BPON NE' and 'OMS/Operator'. The use cases are labeled 'Conduct Test, Report Results' and 'Scheduler'. The relationships are as follows: 'BPON NE' communicates with the first use case. The first use case includes the 'Scheduler' use case. The 'Scheduler' use case communicates with 'OMS/Operator'. Finally, the first use case also communicates directly with 'OMS/Operator'.
+
+UML Use Case Diagram for Testing
+
+**Figure 6-7 – Testing**
+
+The fifth overview use case diagram presents the internal functionality and external interactions of the supplier management system associated with the installation of BPON equipment.
+
+
+
+```
+
+ usecaseDiagram
+ actor BPON_NE as BPON NE
+ actor Privileged_User as Privileged User
+ actor OMS_Operator as OMS/Operator
+ actor External_Event_Channel as External Event Channel
+
+ usecase UC1[Process Incoming NE Events]
+ usecase UC2[Provide Current Event Listings]
+ usecase UC3[Synchronise NE]
+ usecase UC4[Register OLT]
+ usecase UC5[Range ONT or ONU]
+ usecase UC6[Autodiscover NEs and Plug-in Units]
+ usecase UC7[Publish Events]
+ usecase UC8[Scheduler]
+
+ BPON_NE --> UC1 : communicates
+ BPON_NE --> UC2 : communicates
+ BPON_NE --> UC3 : communicates
+ BPON_NE --> UC4 : communicates
+ BPON_NE --> UC5 : communicates
+ BPON_NE --> UC6 : communicates
+
+ Privileged_User --> UC2 : communicates
+ Privileged_User --> UC3 : includes
+ Privileged_User --> UC8 : communicates
+
+ OMS_Operator --> UC4 : communicates
+ OMS_Operator --> UC5 : communicates
+
+ External_Event_Channel --> UC7 : communicates
+
+ UC3 --> UC2 : includes
+ UC3 --> UC8 : includes
+ UC6 --> UC7 : includes
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the internal functionality and external interactions of the supplier management system for BPON equipment installation. It features several actors and use cases connected by relationships.
+
+- Actors:**
+ - BPON NE:** The primary actor, represented by a stick figure, which communicates with multiple use cases.
+ - Privileged User:** Represented by a stick figure, interacting with 'Provide Current Event Listings', 'Synchronise NE', and 'Scheduler'.
+ - OMS/Operator:** Represented by a stick figure, interacting with 'Register OLT' and 'Range ONT or ONU'.
+ - External Event Channel:** Represented by a stick figure, interacting with 'Publish Events'.
+- Use Cases (Yellow Ovals):**
+ - Process Incoming NE Events**
+ - Provide Current Event Listings**
+ - Synchronise NE**
+ - Register OLT**
+ - Range ONT or ONU**
+ - Autodiscover NEs and Plug-in Units**
+ - Publish Events**
+ - Scheduler**
+- Relationships:**
+ - Communicates:** Indicated by solid lines with open arrowheads. BPON NE communicates with 'Process Incoming NE Events', 'Provide Current Event Listings', 'Synchronise NE', 'Register OLT', 'Range ONT or ONU', and 'Autodiscover NEs and Plug-in Units'. Privileged User communicates with 'Provide Current Event Listings', 'Scheduler', and 'Synchronise NE'. OMS/Operator communicates with 'Register OLT' and 'Range ONT or ONU'. External Event Channel communicates with 'Publish Events'.
+ - Includes:** Indicated by solid lines with hollow block arrowheads. 'Synchronise NE' includes 'Provide Current Event Listings' and 'Scheduler'. 'Autodiscover NEs and Plug-in Units' includes 'Publish Events'.
+
+UML Use Case Diagram for BPON Installation
+
+**Figure 6-8 – Installation**
+
+The sixth overview use case diagram presents the internal functionality and external interactions of the supplier management system associated with provisioning of BPON network elements and BPON services.
+
+
+
+```
+
+ usecaseDiagram
+ actor BPON_NE as BPON NE
+ actor OMS_Operator as OMS/Operator
+ actor Profile_Repository as Profile Object Repository
+ actor External_Channel as External Event Channel
+
+ usecase Provision_Installed_NEs as Provision Installed NEs
+ usecase Synchronise_NE as Synchronise NE
+ usecase Build_Logical_Managed_Entities as Build Logical Managed Entities
+ usecase Provision_Service as Provision Service
+ usecase Reserve_Resources as Reserve Resources
+ usecase Manage_Profile_Objects as Manage Profile Objects
+
+ BPON_NE -- communicates --> Provision_Installed_NEs
+ BPON_NE -- communicates --> Synchronise_NE
+ BPON_NE -- communicates --> Build_Logical_Managed_Entities
+ BPON_NE -- communicates --> Provision_Service
+ BPON_NE -- communicates --> Reserve_Resources
+ BPON_NE -- communicates --> Manage_Profile_Objects
+
+ Provision_Installed_NEs -- includes --> Build_Logical_Managed_Entities
+ Synchronise_NE -- includes --> Build_Logical_Managed_Entities
+
+ OMS_Operator -- communicates --> Provision_Installed_NEs
+ OMS_Operator -- communicates --> Build_Logical_Managed_Entities
+ OMS_Operator -- communicates --> Provision_Service
+ OMS_Operator -- communicates --> Reserve_Resources
+ OMS_Operator -- communicates --> Manage_Profile_Objects
+
+ Profile_Repository -- communicates --> Provision_Service
+ Profile_Repository -- communicates --> Reserve_Resources
+ Profile_Repository -- communicates --> Manage_Profile_Objects
+
+ External_Channel -- communicates --> Reserve_Resources
+ External_Channel -- communicates --> Manage_Profile_Objects
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the provisioning process for BPON network elements and services. It features several actors and use cases. The 'BPON NE' actor communicates with 'Provision Installed NEs', 'Synchronise NE', 'Build Logical Managed Entities', 'Provision Service', 'Reserve Resources', and 'Manage Profile Objects'. 'Provision Installed NEs' and 'Synchronise NE' both include 'Build Logical Managed Entities'. The 'OMS/Operator' actor communicates with 'Provision Installed NEs', 'Build Logical Managed Entities', 'Provision Service', 'Reserve Resources', and 'Manage Profile Objects'. The 'Profile Object Repository' actor communicates with 'Provision Service', 'Reserve Resources', and 'Manage Profile Objects'. Finally, the 'External Event Channel' actor communicates with 'Reserve Resources' and 'Manage Profile Objects'.
+
+UML Use Case Diagram for Provisioning
+
+**Figure 6-9 – Provisioning**
+
+The seventh and final overview use case diagram presents the external interactions of the supplier management system associated with collection of statistics and bulk transfer of large amounts of data stored in short-term archives within the supplier management system.
+
+
+
+```
+
+ graph TD
+ BPON_NE[BPON NE] -- communicates --> Collect_NE[Collect NE Statistics]
+ Privileged_User[Privileged User] -- communicates --> Control_Archives[Control Archives]
+ Log_Events[Log Events] -- includes --> Collect_NE
+ Control_Archives -- includes --> View_Records[View Records]
+ View_Records -- includes --> Report_Outages[Report Service Outages]
+ Collect_NE -- includes --> Scheduler[Scheduler]
+ Performance_Traffic[Performance and Traffic Monitoring Reporting Control] -- communicates --> Scheduler
+ Scheduler -- communicates --> OMS_Operator[OMS/Operator]
+ OMS_Operator -- communicates --> Bulk_Transfer[Bulk Transfer]
+ Bulk_Transfer -- communicates --> Data_Warehouse[Data Warehouse]
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the external interactions of the supplier management system. It features several actors (stick figures) and use cases (ovals). The actors are BPON NE, Privileged User, OMS/Operator, and Data Warehouse. The use cases are Collect NE Statistics, Control Archives, Log Events, Performance and Traffic Monitoring Reporting Control, Scheduler, View Records, Report Service Outages, and Bulk Transfer. The relationships are as follows: BPON NE communicates with Collect NE Statistics; Privileged User communicates with Control Archives; Log Events includes Collect NE Statistics; Control Archives includes View Records; View Records includes Report Service Outages; Collect NE Statistics includes Scheduler; Performance and Traffic Monitoring Reporting Control communicates with Scheduler; Scheduler communicates with OMS/Operator; OMS/Operator communicates with Bulk Transfer; and Bulk Transfer communicates with Data Warehouse.
+
+UML Use Case Diagram for Archiving and Bulk Transfer
+
+**Figure 6-10 – Archiving and bulk transfer**
+
+### 6.2.2 Specification level requirements
+
+This clause contains textual details for each of the use cases shown in the high-level use case diagrams of the previous clause. The details are provided to clarify the roles of external actors and telecommunications resources, to establish the basis for interactive diagrams in the analysis clause, and to refine the previous high level use case diagrams to a specification level. Use case details include the following components:
+
+- Summary: Short summary of use case functionality referencing TMN functionality as needed.
+- Assumptions: Listing of requirements surrounding the use case that would affect the design of the application code of the supplier management system.
+- Actors: Actors are listed as shown in Figure 6-2 followed by parenthetical role characteristic as needed.
+- Preconditions: Identifies the trigger for the use case commencement.
+
+- Description: Detailed textual rendition of the functionality of the use case including stops where exceptions can occur.
+- Exceptions: Identifies unsuccessful completion circumstances for the use case.
+- Post-conditions: Identifies the conditions that will hold if the use case ends successfully.
+
+The use case details are listed alphabetically by the use case title shown in the diagrams of the previous clause.
+
+#### 6.2.2.1 Administer user privileges
+
+**Summary:** This use case describes functionality for creating, deleting, assigning and using access control information for users of the supplier management system.2
+
+**Assumptions:** Authentication is accomplished through use of an external authentication service for operator or OMS access and this function is outside the scope of the use case. The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. Control of human user access to the supplier management system via the OMS is controlled by the OMS and is outside the scope of this use case. Access to the supplier management system via an OMS by any human user of the OMS is viewed to have the same privileges as the OMS. The supplier management system supports an administrative privileged user. Default logins and passwords have been provided to this user for initial login. Target activities are defined previously and known to the supplier management system.
+
+**Actors:** Privileged user.
+
+**Preconditions:** The supplier management system has been installed. Connectivity between the supplier management application, OMSs, and all required GUI client applications has been provided.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the supplier management system is first installed and the privileged user is required to establish access permission for any users of the supplier management system. The privileged user retrieves the default password policy of the supplier management system and determines whether or not to change the settings. If changes are needed, the privileged user makes them. Next, the privileged user checks the target activities and permission levels for any system-provided user group and determines whether or not these user groups will meet operational needs [unknown user group]. The privileged user will create new user groups if necessary based on this analysis [duplicate user group, unknown targets].
+
+With a list of current operators in hand, the privileged user then creates new users and assigns them to user groups or establishes special target activities on an individual case basis [unknown user group, duplicate user Id, unknown targets, user login policy violation]. Settings for activity level for each activity for each user Id or group of users have values including "monitor only", "allowed to execute" or "no-access", to designate allowable operations on an individual activity basis.
+
+As operator assignments change, the privileged user maintains access control for these changes by any of the following means:
+
+- adding new operators to existing user groups [unknown user group];
+- retrieving the permission listing for any existing user [unknown user Id], and making modifications to the listing according to operational needs either through membership to different user groups or by individual assignment [unknown targets, unknown user Id, unknown user group];
+- deleting users who have left the company or whose assignments have changed so as to no longer require access to the supplier management system [unknown user Id].
+
+---
+
+2 This use case description makes use of management functionality described in [ITU-T X.741].
+
+Additionally, as high-level network administrative changes occur, the privileged user can re-define the management scope of groups of users. The privileged user can examine existing operator assignments to specific user groups or can examine the access limitations established for the user group [unknown user group]. The privileged user can perform broad reassignments as well as make modifications to the access limitations defined. This includes adding, deleting or modifying the level of accessibility to any activity [unknown user group, duplicate user group, unknown targets]. It may also include the elimination of existing user groups [unknown user group, user group not empty].
+
+Subsequently, operators attempting to log onto the supplier management system experience the following verification process. The access control manager of the supplier management system verifies the user Id and password of the operator and grants the operator GUI access to the functionality allowed in the permission list. At any time after establishing access permission levels, the user may forget their password. The user Id – password relationship can be re-established by the privileged user [user login policy violation, unknown user Id].
+
+This use case ends when the privileged user has updated permissions as needed.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown user Id, unknown targets, duplicate user Id, unknown user group, duplicate user group, user group not empty.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Operator access to the supplier management system is restricted to the activities and items that are allowed by permission and privilege listings. As the supplier management system software is upgraded, operator access control settings are preserved.
+
+#### 6.2.2.2 Autodiscover NEs and plug-in units
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system publishes changes in inventory management information to the operator or OMS. Changes in inventory management information are discovered by the supplier management system as a result of establishing management communications to an installed NE, or through the insertion or removal of a plug-in unit.
+
+**Assumptions:** Communications between the supplier management system and the OLT are in place. Inventory data modelled in the supplier management system for an NE (including contained equipment holders) and plug-in units may be overwritten based on discovered data. The "to be discovered" equipment is in a stable condition. Embedded NE software is able to detect actual plug-in units present and act accordingly (in the case of the ONT or ONU, this implies that the default setting for any slot must be "plug and play"). Inventory management data refers to the type of information normally tracked by a capital asset system concerning physically installed equipment.
+
+**Actors:** No external actors.
+
+**Preconditions:** An OLT is installed.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when any one of the following events takes place:
+
+- an OLT is registered;
+- an ONT or ONU is ranged;
+- an NT is installed and connected to a port of the ONU;
+- a plug-in unit is installed in or removed from a slot of an installed NE having an available management communications channel to the supplier management system.
+
+Registration of an OLT is an event triggering the synchronization of provisioned or modelled inventory management data for the OLT with the same inventory properties discovered through direct communications with the OLT. The supplier management system uses a set of managed entity creation records to format information about discovered properties of the OLT, the shelves contained within the OLT (equipmentHolderF), the slots within the shelves (equipmentHolderF),
+
+and the plug-in units inserted in the slots (plugInUnitF), including information concerning embedded software for the OLT or plug-in unit.
+
+The ranging of an ONU or ONT, whether on demand by the supplier management system or through the automatic ranging function described by [ITU-T G.983.1] for a newly installed ONT or ONU, is an event that also triggers the synchronization of provisioned or modelled inventory management data for the ONU or ONT with the same inventory properties discovered through direct communications with the ONU or ONT. The supplier management system uses a set of managed entity creation records to format information about discovered properties of the ONU or ONT, the shelves contained within the ONU or ONT (equipmentHolderF), the slots within the shelves (equipmentHolderF), the plug-in units inserted in the slots (plugInUnitF), and the embedded software for the ONU or ONT or of any plug-in unit present.
+
+If any port of the ONT is integrated to the ONT (meaning not the port of a plug-in unit), then this port relationship is known through recognition of the hardware version of the ONT.
+
+The installation of an NT with connection to a port on the ONU is an event that triggers the synchronization of provisioned or modelled inventory management data for the NT with the same inventory properties discovered through supplier management system discovery of this network element. The supplier management system uses a set of managed entity creation records to format information about the discovered properties of the NT, the slots of the NT if any (equipmentHolderF), and any plug-in units that may be inserted in the slots (plugInUnitF) including information concerning embedded software loads for the NT or plug-in units.
+
+The manipulation of a plug-in unit in a slot is an event that triggers either the formatting of a managed entity creation record for the plug-in unit in the case of insertion, or the formatting of a managed entity deletion record for the plug-in unit in the case of removal. Embedded software of the plug-in unit is also discovered.
+
+If any of these synchronization activities indicates a difference between what had been planned and what is actually present, then the supplier management system will form an alarm event record indicating the mismatch.
+
+This use case ends when the supplier management system formats the inventory change and/or provisioned versus installed alarm information into a form appropriate for publication to the external event channel.
+
+**Exceptions:** None specified since this use case does not describe an IF1 communications mechanism.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The newly discovered data is made available to the OMS and operators responsible for inventory management.
+
+#### 6.2.2.3 Backup and restore NE
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system provides the operator with capabilities for backing up and subsequent restoring of BPON system configuration data in the case of catastrophic failure of the OLT.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. Stewardship of the OLT system MIB3 may be in the OLT, may be in the supplier management system or may be spread between the two. OLT system refers to the OLT and all its subtending BPON NEs. The OLT has the current copy of MIB data for its subtending BPON NEs. When required, the restoring of system configuration data to the OLT and its return to normal functioning
+
+---
+
+3 Here system MIB (or Management Information Base) is used generally to mean all configuration data held within the system.
+
+must be accomplished as soon as possible. Backup versions of the OLT system MIB information are available on a secure file server.
+
+Before the restore or backup processes can start, DCN communications between the OLT and supplier management system and between the OLT and the secure file server must be available. Before the restore process begins, the OLT equipment must be repaired.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, OMS, BPON NE (OLT), secure file server.
+
+**Preconditions:** The BPON OLT is installed, registered and not experiencing a catastrophic failure.
+
+**Description:** This user case begins when an operator or OMS wishes to establish the routine backup of system configuration data found in a newly installed BPON system. The operator or OMS formulates a request that identifies the OLT system, provides the DCN address for the destination server and user Id and password to access the destination server, gives the full directory location for the backup file and a flag indicates whether the backup should overwrite the existing file or not, and specifies a schedule to be followed when backing up the configuration data [unknown destination server, unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler, unknown NE].
+
+The supplier management system returns a tracking object Id to the request that can be used to cancel, abort, monitor the progress of, or change the schedule for, the back up activities [unknown backup process, unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler, comm failure, equipment failure]. Subsequently, the scheduling utility launches the actual backup activity according to a time trigger.
+
+The master of the OLT system MIB data may be the supplier management system, may be the OLT, or the responsibility may be shared between the two. As a result, OLT system MIB data may have to be uploaded from several locations at the same time. If the information comes from two locations (OLT and supplier management system) the backup data must be held in the same destination server directory.
+
+The server retains multiple versions of backup data. If need be, this server uses tape device backup itself to archive sufficient versions for operator requirements of security and reliability. The supplier management system maintains a log of successful and unsuccessful backups.
+
+Occasionally, due to DCN communications failures, NE software upgrade safeguards or other factors, it may be necessary to request a backup on-demand. In this case, the OMS or operator formulates a backup request specifying the OLT, the DCN address for the destination server, the user Id and password to access the destination server, the full directory location for the backup file and a flag indicates whether the backup should overwrite the existing file [unknown destination server, comm failure, equipment failure, unknown NE].
+
+If an OLT needs to be restored, maintenance activities may be required (including replacement of plug-in units) before the operator can request a restore of the OLT system. The operator accesses the log of successful uploads and chooses a version to use to restore the OLT. The operator forms a restore request. This request includes the identity of the OLT and the version of archived MIB data to be used, as well as the location of the archived file and user Id and password for supplier management system access to the archived file. The operator may also let the supplier management system make the "best possible" version choice.
+
+The supplier management system checks the requested version against current equipment and software versions and determines if the version can be downloaded for the purposes of restoring the NE [software load hardware mismatch, unknown NE, denied access, unknown source file, unknown source server, comm failure, equipment failure]. In the case that the OLT is the master of the data, the supplier management system causes the OLT to pull the correct MIB version from the server. In the case that the supplier management system is the master of the data, the supplier management system pulls the version of MIB data from the server. In both cases, the configuration data eventually is downloaded and installed in the OLT.
+
+The operator may monitor the progress of the restore activity [unknown restore process]. The operator may also view the final disposition of the activity by examining a log reporting on the success or failure of the restore process.
+
+The use case ends when the restored OLT establishes management communication with the supplier management system.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown NE, software load hardware mismatch, unknown destination server, unknown scheduler, comm failure, equipment failure, unknown backup process, unknown restore process, unknown source server, unknown source file.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The successful download of MIB data triggers an NE synchronization process between the NE and the supplier management system.
+
+#### **6.2.2.4 Build logical managed entities**
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system builds and/or modifies management model groupings for planned or installed BPON equipment on request of an OMS or operator, or builds management model groupings as a result of discovery. The constructed resources (consisting potentially of many managed entities) include but are not limited to NEs, plug-in units and logical resources such as TCONTs and MACBridges.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The OLT must be registered with the supplier management system if discovery triggers this use case. If the OLT is already registered, the DCN connection between the supplier management system and the OLT must be available to build subtending managed entities. The DCN connection between the supplier management system and the operator or provisioning OMS is available. The supplier management system is responsible for providing unique identifiers for managed entities that are contained within the context of an OLT system that are created by execution of this use case. As result of some external process outside the scope of this use case, the OMS or operator will have knowledge of the equipment hierarchy and naming conventions of the supplier management system.
+
+**Actors:** OMS, operator.
+
+**Preconditions:** The supplier management system is installed.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the operator plans for the installation of all or part of the BPON equipment, needs to modify parameters that have been automatically applied to newly installed BPON equipment, or needs to provision infrastructure aspects of BPON equipment that are not automatically established by installation of the equipment.
+
+When the operator plans for the installation of an NE, the operator or OMS formulates a request identifying the type of node, indicating versions of hardware and software, providing various configuration profiles to be associated with the node, and supplying several operator labels. A similar request is formulated for construction of plug-in units that also includes slot assignment [unrecognized version, invalid serial num syntax, duplicate serial number, unknown profiles, parameter violation, unknown managed entity, duplicate user label, invalid external time, unknown system timing source, profile suspended, unknown NE, invalid equipment code, slot already assigned, unknown slot, invalid slot assignment list].
+
+The build process within the supplier management system follows containment relationships and other obvious restrictions (e.g., a plug-in unit is not built until the containing node has been constructed, or a protection grouping of ports is not built until the ports exist, or the construction of a subtending ONT or ONU is not possible unless the serving PON interface card port on the OLT exists). The construction of all managed entities within the supplier management system that is the consequence of a single request follows the schema for configuration managed entities described in [ITU-T Q.834.1]. The supplier management system follows the equipment hierarchy rules for the
+
+supplier's equipment, assigning identifiers to the managed entities it builds. The supplier management system returns with a unique identifier for the constructed item.
+
+The operator proceeds with provisioning activities such as modifications to port attributes, construction of protection groupings of ports, construction of MACBridges (if required), and construction of TCONTs. In each case, a request is formulated that identifies previously built managed entities, supplying configuration profiles and parameters, providing operator labels and, in some cases providing some control logic [unknown NE, insufficient PON BW, unsupported TCONT type, duplicate user label, unknown managed entity, unknown profiles, parameter violation, profile suspended, invalid protection scheme, interface speed not changeable]. As before, the logical schema for configuration managed entities described in [ITU-T Q.834.1] is followed. These activities can occur before or after the equipment is installed. The provisioning request results in configuration changes in any installed NE. The supplier management system returns with a unique identifier for any constructed item.
+
+If NEs and plug-in units are installed prior to operator or OMS provisioning activities, then the supplier management system shall support the augmentation of discovered equipment configuration information with profile assignments and user label assignments. In this case, the operator or OMS will formulate configuration requests identifying managed entities whose existence and identity have been provided to the OMS through installation notification reports, supplying configuration profiles and parameters, providing operator labels and, in some cases, providing some control logic [unknown NE, insufficient PON BW, unsupported TCONT type, duplicate user label, unknown managed entity, unknown profiles, parameter violation, profile suspended, invalid protection scheme, interface speed not changeable, invalid slot assignment list, invalid external time]. As before, the logical schema for configuration managed entities described in [ITU-T Q.834.1] is followed. The provisioning request results in configuration changes in the installed NE.
+
+Eventually it may become necessary to remove a BPON network resource. In this case, the operator or OMS requests that the administrative state of the resource be locked and then that it be deleted [unknown NE, remaining contained managed entities, remaining reservations, remaining subnetwork connections, unknown managed entity].
+
+This use case ends when infrastructure provisioning information has been successfully conveyed to the supplier management system and transfer to any pertinent installed BPON NE.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown managed entity, unknown NE, unknown system timing source, unknown profiles, unknown slot, unrecognized version, remaining contained managed entities, remaining reservations, remaining subnetwork connections, duplicate user label, duplicate serial number, invalid parameter value, invalid slot assignment list, invalid external time, invalid equipment code, invalid user label syntax, invalid protection scheme, profile suspended, invalid serial number syntax, interface speed not changeable, slot already assigned, insufficient PONBW, profile suspended.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The resource is built within the supplier management system management model and is available for activities such as service provisioning.
+
+#### **6.2.2.5 Bulk transfer**
+
+**Summary:** Based on a timer (scheduler) or explicit request, the supplier management system transfers archived data through non-real time transfer mechanisms to a separate server known as a data warehouse. Archived data includes the contents of logs or record sets of statistics. This functionality includes monitoring and tracking of the transfer procedure.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. A communication link exists and is available between the operator or OMS and the supplier management system when making an explicit request. A communication link exists between the data warehouse and the supplier management system exists and is available. The supplier
+
+management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. Archived data is accessible to the supplier management system. The data warehouse is able to store the new files (no obvious memory limitations). The supplier management system supports a scheduling function. Every record transferred in a single execution of bulk transfer function shall have the same data structure. After export, all exported data may or may not be deleted from the source location. If deletion of log records is expected, operator requested export should be possible only for special operator groups (authenticated) and this is handled by the OMS. If a scheduled transfer is desired, a schedule to be used in conjunction with the transfer has been established. Details of the file format are outside the scope of this use case.
+
+**Actors:** Data warehouse, operator, BPON NE, OMS.
+
+**Preconditions:** Archives have been established within the supplier management system and data has been stored in the archives.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the operator or OMS schedules the routine retrieval of archived data within the supplier management system on the BPON NE. The request includes reference to a previously determined schedule, identifies the archive and provides security credentials to the data warehouse and a file name to be used when the supplier management system transfers the data within the archive [unknown record set, unknown scheduler, unknown destination server, invalid scheduler]. At the trigger of the clock, the file transfer process is initiated.
+
+The operator or OMS may also make a request for the immediate file transfer of records within an archive of the supplier management system supplying the same reference material as before but without mention of the schedule [unknown record set, unknown destination server].
+
+The supplier management system performs the following sequence of activities as part of the file transfer process:
+
+- The data records are grouped together into a file following a data transfer format pre-defined by operator and supplier agreement. The format conventions cover the use of delimiters, file header structure, file trailer structure. If the transfer data is found within a BPON NE, this step is accomplished within the BPON NE by request of the supplier management system. This file is created at the time trigger, whether or not this time trigger is derived from a schedule or on-demand by the OMS.
+- The supplier management system uses file transfer protocol mechanisms to establish a connection with the data warehouse using the supplied security credentials.
+- The supplier management system then writes the file to the file name provided [comm failure].
+- The supplier management system determines when the transfer is complete. It relies on file transfer protocol mechanisms to confirm that the transfer was successful.
+- Throughout, the supplier management system records the status of the transfer process by providing updates to the transfer tracking object that was created within the supplier management system with the original transfer request.
+- The supplier management system forms an activity completion record and logs the success or failure of the transfer in an activity completion log.
+
+At any time before completion of this process, the operator or OMS may check on the status of the transfer [unknown transfer process]. It is also possible for the operator or OMS to investigate the history of all file transfer requested or scheduled.
+
+Later, the OMS or operator may modify the schedule for the transfer of data from a particular archive. The OMS or operator formulates a request including reference to the existing scheduled activity and the new schedule to be applied [unknown transfer process, unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler]. The OMS or operator may also cancel the routine transfer of data from an archive
+
+[unknown transfer process]. If the activity is in progress, it shall be allowed to complete prior to cancelling of subsequent file transfer from that archive. The transfer tracking object is deleted from the supplier management system automatically upon cancellation of the scheduled process or with completion of an on-demand file transfer.
+
+This use case ends when all immediate file transfers have been completed and the OMS or operator has cancelled all scheduled file transfers.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown record set, unknown scheduler, unknown destination server, unknown transfer process, invalid scheduler.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The supplier management system no longer routinely transfers archived data to the data warehouse and no transfer tracking objects exist within the supplier management system.
+
+#### **6.2.2.6 Collect NE statistics**
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system shall provide for the collection of history data records from the BPON NEs, including both performance and traffic monitoring statistics. This collection shall be timely and occur before requested records can be over-written by the BPON NE. This function supports OMS or operator data collection from the supplier management system.
+
+**Assumptions:** Performance or traffic monitoring and reporting has been activated by the operator or OMS for at least one monitoring point on a BPON NE within the management jurisdiction of the supplier management system. Monitoring on the BPON NE is accomplished through a register for every monitoring point. All registers for the same interval are initialized at the same time throughout the BPON NE (intervals may be 5 minutes, 15 minutes or 24 hours in length).
+
+Each type of collectable history data record is defined by the operator and associated with a specific monitoring interval length and monitoring point. Interval start times are determined by the supplier management system. A statistics archive has been created and initialized by the operator (or via supplier management system default setting) to hold each type of collectable history data record. Archives are constructed to only accept records of the same type (e.g., DS1PMHistoryData or DS3PMHistoryData) involving the same monitoring window length.
+
+If performance reporting has been requested by the operator for a particular monitoring point (via the use case called "performance and traffic monitoring reporting control"), a record showing the values for the counters or gauges is created at the end of the monitoring interval in the BPON NE and is available for collection.
+
+If the collection of history data records is triggered by a customer complaint, then the supplier management system executes the retrieval of pertinent history data records as a separate process in order to tag each record with the service instance Id.
+
+**Actors:** BPON NE.
+
+**Preconditions:** All required history data records have been formed on the BPON NE.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the clock indicates that another collection interval has been begun. The supplier management system systematically communicates with each BPON NE and retrieves all available history data records for the monitoring points and time interval specified by the operator or OMS. In the case of collection triggered by a customer complaint, the service instance Id is added to the history data records collected because of the customer complaint.
+
+If the communication channel between the supplier management system and the BPON NE is interrupted, the supplier management system attempts several times to re-establish communications and complete the retrieval of all history data records [comm failure]. The supplier management system classifies and stores the records in the short-term archive that holds the same record type. The supplier management system forms an activity completion record and logs the success or failure of the transfer in an activity completion log.
+
+This use case ends when the scheduled collection interval is ended.
+
+**Exceptions:** Comm failure.
+
+**Post-conditions:** BPON NE historical performance information is available for subsequent viewing by the operator and for bulk transfer to other file servers. The supplier management system archives the resulting information with other records of the same type awaiting the bulk transfer to the operator data warehouse.
+
+#### 6.2.2.7 Conduct test and report results
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system shall participate as required in any operator or OMS directed testing procedure including, but not limited to, ATM OAM cell loopback testing, interface loopback set-up on subscriber cards or OLT network interface cards, self test, metallic drop test, MAC layer test, draw dialtone break dialtone, and ATM continuity checks.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The supplier management system communications channel to the NE is working. The supplier management system is ready to receive commands from an operator or OMS. Supplier management system communications channel to operator or OMS is working. The test performer or test device of the NE is working. Tests are sequential. The NE has capabilities to conduct the test. This use case can conduct tests to assess hardware functioning. This use case can also conduct test scenarios in order to address customer complaints of service failures. The OMS or operator constructs various test sequences to address diagnostics for specific detected or reported failure conditions.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, BPON NE, OMS.
+
+**Preconditions:** BPON network resources tested by this functionality have been installed and provisioned. In the case of service level testing, service has been provisioned and activated as well.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when an operator or OMS receives a customer complaint or detects the failure of a BPON network resource. The operator or OMS constructs a test request. Types of tests requested include physical level tests, logical level tests and service level tests.
+
+Physical level tests include the following: voice frequency, quality of data transmission, multimeter test, signalling test, loop test, wideband test, power on self-test and on demand self-test. Logical level tests include the following: ATM cell continuity check and ATM cell loop back. Service level tests include protocol tests, MAC layer test, metallic drop test, draw dialtone break dialtone test and service level loopback.
+
+The supplier management system executes the following steps:
+
+- identifies the tests requested [unknown test, invalid test operations, invalid timeout period];
+- identifies the BPON resource to be tested and ancillary BPON resources that must participate in the test [unknown NE, unknown managed entity, not available for test, unknown service instance];
+- prepares the resources for the test (engages the test performer or device of the NE);
+- executes the test sequence in collaboration with the NEs [comm failure, invalid test operations, invalid start time, invalid stop time, invalid direction, invalid location Id, invalid timeout period];
+- collects the results of the test; and
+- reports the results of the testing promptly to the requester.
+
+If the test is of sufficient duration (e.g., interface port loopback tests) and the test is viewed to be controlled, the supplier management system supports test interruption from the requesting party and reporting of interim test results [unknown test].
+
+Tests may be triggered by the clock as a scheduled activity [unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler, invalid timeout period, invalid test operations]. In this case, the test reporting process retains test results, grouping it with other test results and logged for viewing by the operator at a later date. The OMS may modify the schedule for a test or even cancel a regularly scheduled test on a managed resource [unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler, unknown test, uncontrolled test in progress].
+
+If the supplier management system receives test requests to occur on the same managed resource at about the same time, the first scheduled or requested test is executed and the others generate a conflict report that is logged [not available for test].
+
+This use case ends when the test completes execution and results are reported to the requesting OMS and logged in an activity completion log. Operators can retrieve historical test result by managed entity or service instance [unknown managed entity, access denied, unknown test, unknown service instance].
+
+**Exceptions:** Access denied, comm failure, invalid test operations, invalid start time, invalid stop time, invalid direction, invalid location Id, invalid scheduler, not available for test, unknown managed entity, unknown NE, unknown test, invalid timeout period, uncontrolled test in progress, unknown scheduler, unknown service instance, unknown test, invalid timeout period.
+
+**Post-conditions:** An operator or OMS has more information with which to resolve the complaint of a customer or to support a maintenance activity.
+
+#### 6.2.2.8 Control archives
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system provides the functionality to manage logs for specific groups of events. The privileged user can create, initialize, suspend, resume, purge and remove event logs. The supplier management system also provides the functionality to query the status of a log.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The supplier management system supports logs and short-term statistics archives. Only a privileged user has permission to create, initialize, suspend or resume archiving. Access control for the user has been verified prior to this use case. There are memory resources available on the server hardware supporting the supplier management system. The supplier management system tracks the status of logs and archives and provides a notification if a threshold related to the fill status of the log or archive is crossed. A communication link exists between the privileged user and the supplier management system.
+
+**Actors:** Privileged user.
+
+**Preconditions:** The privileged user is authenticated and a working session is established with the supplier management system.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the privileged user initiates a request to create a log or short-term archive that is not one of the standard archives installed with the supplier management system application.
+
+In case of log creation, the creation request identifies a filter defining the entrance criterion for an event in the log, log maximum size, full action (wrap or stop recording), a threshold to determine log full condition and action to be performed in case of log full [record set exists, duplicate user label, access denied].
+
+In the case of performance or traffic statistics recording, the creation request identifies the type of history data record, the maximum size (in terms of record count), and a user label for identification [archive exists, duplicate user label].
+
+After the creation of the log or statistics archive record set, the operator can change the user label of the record set or query its status [unknown record set]. The user can also suspend recording of new
+
+records into a particular record set or resume recording that had been previously suspended [unknown record set]. At any time the privileged user can purge an archive [unknown record set]. The privileged user can also delete any record set that was not automatically installed with the supplier management system application [unknown record set].
+
+This use case ends when an archive is created, modified or deleted.
+
+**Exceptions:** Record set exists, unknown record set, duplicate user label.
+
+**Post-conditions:** A record set is created, re-named or deleted. Recording to the record set may be active or suspended.
+
+#### **6.2.2.9 Download and activate NE software**
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system provides for the download, distribution, installation (commit) and activation of software generic programs, software upgrades and software maintenance changes (patches) to BPON NEs based on request of the operator or OMS. The supplier management system can accept requests for one or multiple BPON NEs at once.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The destination within the BPON NE for software download is free to accept downloaded software (e.g., no backup in progress). There are no outstanding alarms on BPON NE components involved in software download (e.g., control card operational or other NE components involved in software propagation). Supplier management system supports software version control. The communication between supplier management system and OLT is functional at the beginning of the use case. The communication channel between the OLT and the secure software file server is functional at the beginning of the use case. Before establishing an NE software download activity, it is assumed that the software set is available and tested.
+
+Until software is successfully loaded, propagated and activated, the formerly "active" version stays active. Software version control functionality is available. The supplier management system shall be able to support requests for software download, commitment and activation for a single instance and/or all instances of ONTs, ONUs or NTs subtending from one or all PON interfaces on one or more OLTs. The supplier management system shall be able to support requests for software download, commitment, and activation for a single instance and/or all instances of a particular card type for one or more OLTs. The activation of software on the OLT and ONU shall not be service affecting. If the activation of software on the ONT or NT is service affecting, the activation period is expected to last less than a few seconds.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, OMS, BPON NEs, secure file server.
+
+**Preconditions:** The software set is loaded onto the secure file server.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the operator or OMS makes a request to the supplier management system to load (and eventually activate) new software for the BPON NEs. The request includes a reference to the location of the software set to be downloaded and the target destination(s) of the download. The target destination can be specified at the BPON NE group level, the BPON NE level or at the circuit pack level depending on supplier implementation and operator agreement. The request can include a reference to a start time for download and/or activation if the intent of the OMS or operator is to plan the NE software activity. The supplier management system verifies the use of the software through software version control [unrecognized target, insufficient memory, software load HW mismatch, unknown software load, timeout, invalid start time]. Any request for downloading software generics is accompanied by security credentials whereby the supplier management system is allowed to communicate with the source server.
+
+The supplier management system then coordinates OLT access to the new software to be loaded, consulting the schedule or via on-demand request. The OLT downloads the software from the secure file server, applies the software to the target destination(s) and verifies that the delivery
+
+process has not introduced any errors to the software load [source unreachable, comm failure, insufficient memory, timeout, denied access, equipment failure].
+
+The supplier management system returns a tracking object Id to the request that can be used to commit, activate, revert, get status, cancel and retrieve a list of software administration activities. The lifecycle of tracking object must extend until all associated activities are completed successfully or unsuccessfully. The object is only deleted after a pre-defined retention period and the length of time of the retention period is agreed outside the scope of this interface. The retention period for the tracking object should be generous enough to include any revert activity desired. If the tracking object has been automatically deleted by the supplier management system, then revert activity is viewed as download activity of a previous software load. The OMS can also delete this tracking object before its automatic termination if desired [unknown software download tracking object, software tracking object in use].
+
+The software is not initially loaded to an active segment of the target destination. The software is then committed, i.e., made executable [installation failure, unknown software download tracking object, unrecognized target]. Then the software is activated by the operator or OMS [unknown software download tracking object, software not yet installed, activation failure, unrecognized target]. The supplier management system shall support both manual and automatic commitment and activation of successfully downloaded software.
+
+At each step of the NE software download process, the supplier management system shall update the status information associated with the tracking object. The supplier management system shall also provide a real-time notification as well as log the success or failure of these procedures in an activity completion log. Whether the download is successful or not, the supplier management system supports operator and OMS queries concerning the status of the download, distribution, commitment and activation process.
+
+The operator (or OMS) shall be able to cancel NE software download activities prior to their initiation [unknown software download tracking object, activity completed, activity in progress].
+
+**Exceptions:** Software load/hardware mismatch, installation failure, activation failure, unknown software load, source unreachable, unrecognized target, comm failure, equipment failure, software not yet installed, insufficient memory, activity completed, timeout, activity in progress, denied access, unknown software download tracking object, invalid start time, software tracking object in use.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The BPON NE shall function using its new software load.
+
+#### 6.2.2.10 Log events
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system stores event information in a log based on the filter defining the log. It makes the contents of a log available to a transfer function for scheduled bulk transfer.
+
+**Assumptions:** It is possible to construct filters to describe the contents of logs within the supplier management system. Operator can create these filters, modify the filters when needed and delete them when they are no longer needed. A set of default filters is attached to the individual log file and, when not defined, the default is no filtering. Log maintenance is handled by other use cases (control archiving and bulk transfer). In other words, logs are created, initialized, and cleared via other supplier management functionality. Only privileged users are allowed to create filters that define logs archived within the supplier management system.
+
+**Actors:** There are no external actors.
+
+**Preconditions:** An event has been processed by the supplier management system and a record formatted as result of that processing.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the supplier management system has processed an incoming event and formatted the resulting event record. Important events include but are not limited to the following: alarms, alarm clearings, threshold-crossing alerts, protection switching events, circuit pack removals and insertions, creation or deletion of managed entities, changes to key state and status variables, and scheduled or time-consuming activity completions.
+
+The processed event record is examined to see whether or not the record data matches any of the filter constructs defining the contents of any of the logs created and initialized for the supplier management system [event flood] (the filters determine which events are to be added to specific event logs). If the event record does not match any filter, the event information is discarded. If the event record does match a specific construct, the event record is stored in the relevant event log. If the log is not full, the event record is written at the end of the log. If the log has been configured as a "wrap around" log, and the log is full, the event record overwrites the oldest record in the log. If the writing of the event record causes a logFull condition, then a notification is prepared for forwarding to an external event channel [out of memory].
+
+**Exceptions:** Out of memory, event flood.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The log is available for viewing by the OMS or operator. The contents of the log are available for bulk transfer to another file server called a data warehouse.
+
+#### 6.2.2.11 Manage profile objects
+
+**Summary:** Once a profile object has been created in the profile object repository, the supplier management system can process event information stating this fact and make the profile object settings available for use by any use case of the supplier management system. This functionality includes the ageing out and deletion of these profile settings.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The supplier management system maintains information on the syntax and permitted range of values for parameters for each profile type that it recognizes. Supplier management systems participating in this use case are instances of the same supplier application. The operator has determined which supplier management systems are interested consumers for event information. This assumes that the profile object type can be referenced and employed by the supplier management system. As required, management communications network links exist to support the publishing of profile object creation/deletion messages to the external event channel. Through an external specification process beyond the scope of this use case, the profile object repository is knowledgeable about valid values for profile object attributes. One or more profile object repositories may exist.
+
+**Actors:** OMS, operator, external event channel, BPON NEs.
+
+**Preconditions:** A supplier management system is installed and has registered as a consumer of profile object creation and deletion notifications.4
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when a profile object is created in the profile object repository and published to the notification channel on external event channel. The message from the notification channel is consumed by the supplier management system. The message includes the name and type of the profile. It also includes the attribute value listing for the specific values of the profile object instance. The supplier management system stores the profile name and attribute values. In some circumstances, this may mean that the supplier management system writes this
+
+---
+
+4 If creation of the profile object occurs prior to the instantiation of the supplier management system, then the supplier management system obtains its attribute values by query to the profile object repository [unknown profiles]. The supplier management system writes this profile name and attribute values to the NEs within its management jurisdiction. The profile object settings are now available for use by an operator or OMS when interfacing with supplier management system.
+
+profile name and attribute values to the NEs within its management jurisdiction. The profile object settings are now available for use by an operator or OMS when interfacing with supplier management system.
+
+The supplier management system supports the inquiry by an operator or OMS if a particular profile is in use in the management model under the jurisdiction of the supplier management system. The query includes the name of the profile object [unknown profiles]. The supplier management system supports the re-naming of any known profile [unknown profiles]. The supplier management system also supports the ageing out of use of a particular profile object by request of an operator or OMS [unknown profiles]. In this case, the supplier management system prevents subsequent use of the named profile object by any external or internal interaction. The operator or OMS can also request the resumption of use of a profile object [unknown profiles].
+
+The supplier management system also supports deletion of all references to a particular profile object instance. A deletion request includes the name of the profile object [unknown profiles]. The supplier management system verifies that no use of the profile object is being made by any managed entity within its domain of management [profile in use]. This verification is accomplished by checking the management model. The supplier management system deletes all reference to the profile object within its application and on the network resources it is managing.
+
+This use case ends when the profile object parameters have been created, aged out or deleted in the supplier management system.
+
+**Exceptions:** Duplicate profile name, unknown profiles, profile in use.
+
+**Post-conditions:** At the end of its lifecycle, the profile object is unavailable for use by any supplier management system. Prior to that point, the profile object is available for use by an operator or OMS when interfacing with the supplier management system provided it has not been discontinued from use by an ageing out request of the operator or OMS.
+
+#### 6.2.2.12 NE software version control
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system tracks the version and update status of BPON NE software and records this information in a repository accessible by the operator or NML system. The software version control validates the to-be-downloaded software version against the saved version number, and raises exception for invalid to-be-downloaded software version. The operator can view the software version information in the repository.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The supplier management system has a repository set up to store BPON NE software version information. The supplier management system has built-in algorithms, or rules for version control. The repository is large enough to hold hardware and software version information for all BPON NEs within its engineered management domain.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, OMS and BPON NE.
+
+**Preconditions:** A new version of NE software is due to be downloaded or a new BPON NE has been installed and registered with the supplier management system or a new plug-in unit has been inserted.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when an NE software download is requested or when a new BPON NE has been installed in the network and autodiscovery has taken place. In each case, the supplier management system retrieves the current software and hardware version information from the BPON NE and updates (if necessary) the information within the software control repository for the NE memory area(s) [comm failure]. It determines if the version of software in the download request matches the rules or algorithmic checks implemented within the supplier management system for the corresponding hardware version. It provides notification of mismatch or match to the
+
+requesting internal process. As the NE software download process continues, the supplier management system continues to update the software hardware version information in its inventory.
+
+In the case of newly installed BPON hardware, the supplier management system determines if the current software load of newly installed hardware can be upgraded to the release being used throughout the administrative domain and automatically upgrades the new hardware with the current release and, again, updates its version release inventory.
+
+In all cases the supplier management system can respond to OMS or operator queries concerning the current release of software installed on a BPON network resource as well as whether or not a specific BPON network resource can support a particular software release [unknown managed entity, unknown NE].
+
+This use case ends when hardware and software release information has been updated in the supplier management system inventory.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown managed entity, unknown NE, comm failure.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The version information of BPON NE software is updated and accessible to the operator and OMS.
+
+#### **6.2.2.13 Performance and traffic monitoring reporting control**
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system shall provide for the activation and deactivation of performance data or traffic measurements collection on individual termination points contained in the BPON NEs as required by the operator or OMS. This use case also includes the setting of threshold values and describes automatic reporting of performance measurements when thresholds have been crossed.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. Hardware and software support for monitoring of all performance and traffic parameters defined in the current data and history data managed entities of [ITU-T Q.834.1] is available. Current data is not directly controlled by OMS. Hardware and firmware support for performance and/or traffic monitoring at all BPON NE monitoring points have been initialized and activated and counters and gauges are operational. The communications channels between the BPON NE and supplier management system and between the supplier management system and the operator or OMS are working. The supplier management system has verified that the operator or OMS has permission to establish threshold values and/or to request the collection of statistics from the BPON NEs.
+
+The supplier management system can hold up to one week of history data records collected from the BPON NEs within its management domain. The BPON NE can retain historical parameter values for at least one collection period beyond the recording of the data. The ultimate short-term archiving capability for performance and traffic records in the BPON NE is a matter for determination through explicit operator requirements and is not in the scope of this use case. Performance monitoring points of BPON NEs support the raising of threshold crossings alerts based on the setting of threshold values.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, OMS and BPON NE.
+
+**Preconditions:** Based on customer complaints or other trouble-shooting or maintenance needs, the operator decides to change the setting of threshold data values or wishes to collect performance and traffic measurements from BPON NEs.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the operator or OMS establishes or modifies values for thresholds for monitored performance or traffic measurements for certain termination points within a BPON NE. The operator or OMS sends a request to the supplier management system indicating the monitoring point(s) of the BPON NE, identification of the monitored parameters, and associated threshold values to be used in the detection of threshold crossing event [unknown NE, unknown managed entity, unknown profiles, invalid association, comm failure, profile suspended]. The
+
+supplier management system transfers each of the threshold values to the identified BPON NE for use at the associated monitoring point. The request process includes the opportunity for the operator to make a default setting assignment for a system-wide threshold value for each monitored parameter type within an entire BPON subnetwork [unknown NE, unknown managed entity, unknown profiles, invalid association, comm failure, profile suspended, unknown monitoring point types].
+
+The BPON NE continues its constant monitoring of performance at each monitoring point for each counter, resetting each measurement to zero at the end of the monitoring interval associated with the counter. There can be 5-minute, 15-minute and 24-hour counters in the BPON NE. Monitoring intervals are automatically established and applied on a uniform basis across all monitoring points of the BPON NEs within the management domain of the supplier management system as each BPON NE is added to the management domain of the supplier management system.
+
+The BPON NE uses the threshold value to autonomously alert the supplier management system whenever the counter associated with the performance parameter falls out of the acceptable performance range indicated by the threshold value. TCA event processing by the supplier management system triggers (in part) the automatic retrieval of the history data record associated with the TCA event by the supplier management system. The history data record is archived with other records of the same type associated with TCA events and awaits the bulk transfer to the operator data warehouse.
+
+Based on a customer complaint, the operator or OMS can request the collection of history data records for a selection of monitoring points for limited periods of time. The request includes the identification of the BPON NE and monitoring points, the history data records to be collected, the start time for collection, the collection window length and the service instance Id associated with the complaint [unknown managed entity, collection period past, unknown service instance Id, unknown NE]. The supplier management system notes the monitoring points and monitoring collection intervals and collaborates with the containing BPON NE to enable the subsequent reporting of performance parameter values for each of the collection intervals for each monitoring point [collection limitation].
+
+The operator or OMS may also request the routine collection of certain history data records from BPON NEs or may request the termination of routine collection. The request made to the supplier management system identifies the monitoring point type and history data type [unknown history data type, invalid association, unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler, unknown NE]. The supplier management system notes the monitoring points and collaborates with the containing BPON NE to enable the subsequent reporting of performance parameter values for every collection interval for each monitoring point, or to disable the subsequent reporting [collection limitation].
+
+Based on trend analysis or traffic monitoring needs, the operator or OMS can also request the routine auditing (i.e., collection) of history data records. The request made to the supplier management system includes the BPON NE, monitoring point instance, history data record type and schedule to apply to the collection of the history data record identified [unknown managed entity, collection period past, unknown NE]. The supplier management system notes the monitoring points and monitoring collection intervals and collaborates with the containing BPON NE to enable the subsequent reporting of performance parameter values for each of the collection intervals for each monitoring point. In this case, reporting of zeroes is not suppressed [collection limitation].
+
+The operator or OMS may query the supplier management system at any time to obtain a listing of reporting monitoring points and reporting intervals for each BPON NE.
+
+This use case ends when threshold values have been established, modified or removed for all or selected monitoring points or when performance data collection schedules are established, modified or cancelled according to maintenance needs and service level agreement policies.
+
+**Exceptions:** Collection limitation, unknown monitoring point, collection period past, unknown type, comm failure, unknown threshold data, invalid threshold data, unknown service instance Id, unknown BPON NE, reporting exists, unknown scheduler.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The operator has set threshold data values for monitored parameters on the BPON NE and the NE will respond with a TCA if an impairment is detected. If the operator request involves the collection of history data records in the supplier management system, then these record sets are available for retrieval by the OMS or operator, or for bulk transfer to the data warehouses.
+
+#### **6.2.2.14 Process incoming NE events**
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system processes event notifications from the BPON NEs within its management jurisdiction. The supplier management system identifies the event type and source, transforms and augments the data into an event record structure of potential benefit to upstream systems and users, and transfers the record into an internal repository accessible to other supplier management system functions.
+
+**Assumptions:** The communications channels between the supplier management system and the NEs are working. The supplier management system is able to accept notification of all events from the BPON NEs within its domain of management. Events are time-stamped by the NEs with a consistent timing source. The supplier management system coordinates the time stamp mechanism between NEs.
+
+**Actors:** BPON NE.
+
+**Preconditions:** An event is detected by an installed BPON NE.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when an event notification arrives from a BPON NE at the supplier management system event channel. Upon receiving an NE event the supplier management system uses a soak period to screen event transients (e.g., toggling alarms). This is distinct from the soak period used by the NE to determine that the situation should be reported as an alarm. The supplier management system perceives the event (i.e., it screens the source of the event and verifies that it is interested in the event) [corrupted event data, incomplete event data, unauthorized source]. The supplier management system shall discard any event according to a set of business rules including, but not limited to, the elimination of "toggling" events and congestion conditions on the input event buffer (persistence analysis on the event may also have occurred on the NE). The supplier management system further identifies the event. The list of event types consists of alarms (including threshold crossing alerts), attribute value changes (including protection switching events and state changes), and network resource creation and deletion notifications.
+
+The supplier management system may add data to the NE event information according to business requirements provided by the network operator [unable to add required enhancements]. For example, in the case of alarm events, the supplier management system may correlate alarm information to service instances supported by the managed entity in failure condition and add the identification of affected services to the event notification. The addition of the data could involve consultation with the management model in the supplier management system in order to determine if a service outage has occurred and the assignment of alarm severity, if this characteristic has not already been provided by the NE.
+
+This use case ends when the supplier management system makes the enhanced information accessible to other internal functions by putting it in an event queue.
+
+**Exceptions:** Corrupted event data, incomplete event data, unauthorized source, unable to add required enhancements.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The functions "autodiscover NE and plug in units", "root cause alarm analysis", "root cause impairment analysis", "provide current event summary listings", "maintain management model" and "log events" are able to consume properly formatted event records.
+
+#### 6.2.2.15 Provide current event listings
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system will provide access to information showing the current value of key status and state parameters and group this information in a listing for perusal by the operator. The listings are continuously and autonomously updated by the supplier management system based upon ongoing events within the BPON NEs.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. Lists are limited to information concerning failure conditions and trouble-shooting within the BPON NEs. This functionality includes, but is not limited to the following: current alarm summaries, listing of successful and unsuccessful protection switching events where the protected unit is no longer the active one, service instances currently experiencing a service outage, termination points in loopback mode, or managed entities whose administrative state is "locked".
+
+The supplier management system can process incoming BPON NE and GUI interaction events. The supplier management system can correlate events and service information, can conclude that a service outage exists for a particular failure condition (considering all affecting conditions like protection switching events and that a service has indeed been provisioned), and can correlate protection group provisioning information with protection switching events. Events can come from BPON NEs or operator interaction. It is a matter for supplier implementation and operator requirements which current event listings are supported.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, BPON NE, privileged user.
+
+**Preconditions:** Current listings and event queues have been initialized as part of the installation of the supplier management system.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when events of interest are detected at the BPON NE and event information is set to the supplier management system. The supplier management system examines events indicating changes in state and status. If the variable is one tracked for a current summary event listing, the listing is consulted. If the event indicates the start of a tracked condition, information concerning the managed entity associated with the event and attribute is added to the listing along with a timestamp of the event, provided the condition is not outstanding already. If the event indicates the end of a tracked condition, the listing is consulted and the most recent listing entry concerning the start of the condition is removed. Listings summarize conditions on a BPON system basis.
+
+The listing is always accessible to view by the operator through a graphical user interface. Changes to the listing happen autonomously without the need for operator refreshing of the screen. Desired modes of presentation of the listing are determined via operator system requirements.
+
+Operators with privileged status are allowed to resynchronize current summary event listings. Based on operator request, the supplier management system retrieves the current value of the state, status or management attribute tracked by the current summary event listing for the BPON system for any managed entity contained in the system that possesses the characteristic attribute [comm failure, DCN timeout, unknown NE, equipment failure, timeout]. If the BPON system retrieval process shows that the listing is not up-to-date with the current conditions of the system, then the listing is modified (through deletion of an entry or insertion of a new entry) in order to correct the listing.
+
+Listing entries are correlated with information retrieved from the system via the identifier of the managed entity. Deletion of an entry can occur if a listed managed entity no longer exists contained within the BPON system, or if a failure condition or test has ended and the system has reverted to normal functioning. If either of these situations occur, all entries concerning the same managed entity are removed from the listing. Insertion can occur when no listing entry exists for a managed entity now indicating a change in functioning.
+
+This use case ends when the listing has been properly updated.
+
+**Exceptions:** Comm failure, DCN timeout, unknown NE, equipment failure, timeout.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Accurate current event list information is accessible to the operator and OMS.
+
+#### 6.2.2.16 Provision installed NEs
+
+**Summary:** Installed BPON resources are provisioned with configuration settings in anticipation of service provisioning.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. Management communications between the supplier management system and the installed BPON resource is operational. In the case of the OLT, this means that the OLT has been registered. In the case of an ONT or ONU, this means that the ONT or ONU has been ranged. In the case of an NT, this means that the upstream ONU has been ranged and that management communications exists between the NT and ONU. Configuration settings may (or may not) have been previously supplied to the supplier management system.
+
+**Actors:** BPON NE, operator or OMS.
+
+**Preconditions:** A BPON NE has been installed and is under the management jurisdiction of the supplier management system.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the operator or OMS undertakes to provision the installed BPON network resource. BPON resources include BPON NEs (OLT, ONT, ONU, NT) and/or plug-in units. The autodiscovery function provides the supplier management system with inventory data describing the type of equipment installed. The supplier management system automatically "builds" the BPON resource in the management model.
+
+If the information constructed in the management model matches inventory data supplied previously to the supplier management system (through a set of "pre-provisioning" build transactions from the operator or OMS), the supplier management system automatically applies to the installed resource any additional configuration settings supplied via the previous transactions. If the information constructed in the management model does not match inventory data supplied previously to the supplier management system, the supplier management system prepares one or more event records to notify interested consumers of the mismatch.
+
+If no previous "pre-provisioning" build transactions have taken place, the operator or provisioning OMS formulates a set of provisioning build requests identifying the discovered BPON resource and providing configuration settings necessary to prepare the BPON resource for use in service provisioning.5 The supplier management system applies these settings to the identified BPON resource and updates the management model appropriately.
+
+This use case ends when provisioning information has been transferred (as needed) to the pertinent network resources by the supplier management system.
+
+**Exceptions:** See clause 6.2.2.4 exceptions.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The installed BPON resource is available for service provisioning and activation management operations.
+
+#### 6.2.2.17 Provision service
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system selects ports, facilities and bandwidth from BPON resources determined to be available in order to complete the design, selection and assignment process associated with a set of services for a particular customer. Activation of network resources occurs simultaneously provided immediate activation is required. A service is
+
+---
+
+5 Details covered in clause 6.2.2.4.
+
+defined as a connection between an UNI endpoint on an ONT and an NNI endpoint at an OLT, or between UNI endpoints on two ONTs subtending from the same OLT.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The OLT is registered with the supplier management system. The PON interface plug-in unit on the OLT may or may not be installed. In any case, the PON port has been provisioned. The ONT may or may not be installed. ONT resources have been provisioned if not installed. An operator or provisioning OMS selects the endpoints. The provisioning OMS or operator have access to the valid/permissible range of VPI/VCI values for the NNI and UNI interfaces. The communications channel between the supplier management system and OLT is up at the start of the use case. Resources may or may not have been reserved prior to this use case for the service connection.
+
+**Actors:** OMS, operator, BPON NEs.
+
+**Preconditions:** A service request has triggered the need for a connection between an UNI endpoint on an ONT or NT and an NNI endpoint on an OLT or between two UNI endpoints of ONTs subtending from the same OLT.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the OMS or operator sends a service connection set up request to the supplier management system. The request includes a service instance identifier, identifiers and characteristics for the endpoints (i.e., VPI and VCI values for ATM endpoints), a reservation Id (if relevant), administrative state value, and profile pointers that characterize the service connection desired. The supplier management system validates existence of the end points, identifiers and profiles [unknown NE, unknown profiles, unknown port, profile suspended, connection already exists]. It checks to see if the VPI/VCI values are in use and are valid [parameter violation]. It checks to see if resources have already been reserved [unknown reservation Id]. The supplier management system also validates that required network resources exist to provision this service if resources have not been reserved and applies appropriate configuration requests to the BPON NEs if they are already installed [insufficient BW, connection count exceeded, comm failure, equipment failure, insufficient PON BW]. Whether or not the BPON NEs are installed, the supplier management system updates its own management information model following rules derived from [ITU-T Q.834.1]. The supplier management system generates a subnetwork connection Id to describe the service connection and returns this value to the OMS or operator.
+
+At some later point, it might be necessary to modify the traffic or service characteristics describing the connection. In this case, a modification request is made from the operator or OMS to the supplier management system that includes the subnetwork connection Id [unknown connection], port A Id [unknown port] and a listing of service profile names and new network profile names [unknown profiles, profile suspended]. The supplier management system validates that required network resources exist to provision this service change (e.g., bandwidth over the PON and on the designated network interface) [insufficient BW] and applies the new traffic profile characteristics to the service connection [unknown profiles, profile suspended].
+
+Based on customer request (extended absence) or failure to pay service charges, the OMS or operator may request the suspension of an existing service connection. In this case, the OMS or operator formulates a request including the service instance Id and the suspension time interval that is sent to the supplier management system for execution [unknown service instance, invalid start time, invalid stop time]. The supplier management system also supports the resumption of service based on the request of the OMS or operator if this is desired prior to the stop time of suspension or if the original connection request had administrative state set to the "locked" value [unknown service instance].
+
+The operator or OMS may request the removal of a service connection. In this case, the deletion request includes the subnetwork connection Id. The supplier management system changes the configuration data on the BPON NEs [unknown connection, comm failure, equipment failure] as well as within its own management information model. The supplier management system also
+
+makes resources formerly assigned to the service available for use by any subsequent connection request, modifying managed entities tracking these resource values.
+
+This use case ends when the service creation, modification, suspend, resume or disconnect request completes and relevant service provisioning information has been transferred to the pertinent NE(s) as they are installed.
+
+**Exceptions:** Insufficient bandwidth, insufficient PON bandwidth, unknown port, unknown profiles, profile suspended, comm failure, equipment failure, unknown NE, connection already exists, connection count exceeded, parameter violation, invalid start time, invalid stop time, unknown service instance, unknown reservation Id.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Connection information is available to be applied to installed BPON network resources, thus creating service availability for the requesting customer.
+
+#### **6.2.2.18 Publish event**
+
+**Summary:** On receipt of processed configuration, performance, or fault event information provided by other use cases within the supplier management system and based on rules concerning publication, the supplier management system queues and channels event information to all interested consumers.
+
+**Assumptions:** Management communications channels are available between the supplier management system and interested consumers (users and systems) allowing the transfer of event information. The actual notification mechanisms are dependent on the communications protocol and can range from publishing, to specific event channels, to directing of event messages to individual consumers based on a discriminator construct filter. Details of the autonomous mechanisms are outside the scope of the use case. Operator business rules have been implemented in the supplier management system describing the event data that should be immediately transferred to upstream OMS(s) or operators. Relationships between event type and suitable notification channels have also been implemented.
+
+**Actors:** External event channel.
+
+**Preconditions:** The supplier management system is installed and is managing at least one BPON NE.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when, as part of its installation, the supplier management system establishes management communications mechanisms for the purpose of forwarding event information using agreed upon protocols [already connected]. Then the supplier management system becomes aware of the creation of an event record from an internal process. Event records can be created because of managed entity creation, managed entity deletion, alarms, threshold crossing alerts in performance monitoring, and attribute value changes, including, but not limited to, changes in state and status variables, circuit pack removal from slots, and protection switching occurrences.
+
+The supplier management system applies business rules provided by operator requirements to determine whether or not the event record is of interest to any consumers. If the event record is not of interest to any consumers, it is discarded. If the event record is qualified for immediate transfer, the supplier management system provides the event record information to the notification forwarding mechanism implemented on the supplier management system that is specific to the communications protocol in use between the supplier management system and any interested event consumer [disconnected]. In some cases there may be multiple notification channels, in which case the supplier management system will also determine the channels to be used [invalid event type].
+
+This use case ends when the event record has been successfully transferred to an external event channel.
+
+**Exceptions:** Disconnected, already connected, invalid event type.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The event information is available for use by the operator or OMS.
+
+#### 6.2.2.19 Range ONT or ONU
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system directs the OLT to range a subtending ONT or ONU.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The OLT has been installed and is equipped with a provisioned PON interface card. The DCN is working between the supplier management system and OLT. The OLT supports ranging as described in [ITU-T G.983.1]. The ONT or ONU has been installed and is equipped with power. There is an ODN connection between the OLT PON interface port and the ONT (or ONU). Ranging can be accomplished without required use of service demand information. The supplier's manufacturing process control prevents the possibility of duplicate serial numbers. The supplier management system may support rules concerning serial number syntax and the maximum number of subtending ONT or ONUs on any OLT PON interface card port.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, OMS, BPON NE (OLT).
+
+**Preconditions:** An ONT or ONU has been installed.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the supplier management system obtains the serial number for a newly installed ONT or ONU. The serial number may be provided by a field installation technician or through an automatic protocol detection mechanism. If the serial number is provided by a technician, a ranging request for the ONT or ONU is formulated including identification of the OLT, the OLT PON port, the user label of the ONT or ONU, and the serial number itself. The supplier management system directs the OLT to range the new subtending ONT or ONU based on its serial number [comm failure, equipment failure, unknown NE, unknown port, max subtending nodes exceeded, insufficient PON BW, invalid serial num syntax, APON layer failure, duplicate user label, invalid user label syntax, backup in progress, synch in progress].
+
+This ranging activity calculates the optical distance between the OLT and ONT/ONU, establishes security mechanisms, sets up the upstream time slot for the ONT/ONU, assigns an index number for the ONT/ONU, and establishes the VCC for the embedded operations channel between the OLT and ONT/ONU. The latter action establishes management communication between the supplier management system and the ONT/ONU. The supplier management system associates the ONT (or ONU) with an index number and returns the managed entity Id for the ONT. It also associates the user label supplied on the request with the index number and the ONT (or ONU) managed entity Id.
+
+If the serial number is supplied through automatic ranging protocol mechanisms through the autodiscovery function of the supplier management system, then the OMS or operator either requests the association of pre-provisioned data to the freshly discovered ONT/ONU [unknown managed entity] or builds the ONT/ONU and then requests the association of provisioned data to the freshly discovered ONT/ONU [unknown managed entity]. In either case, the supplier management system associates the ONT (or ONU) with an index number, the user label, and the managed entity Id as before.
+
+In case the ONT or ONU becomes defective, the supplier management system supports requests for replacement of ONTs/ONUs. In this case, the OMS or operator forms a request including the managed entity Id of the original NE, the new serial number for the replacement NE, and the new user label. The supplier management system processes the request, ranges the new ONT or ONU from the same PON port of the OLT, and applies existing service configuration data to the new ONT/ONU [comm failure, unknown NE, invalid serial num syntax, APON layer failure, equipment failure, invalid user label syntax, HW services mismatch, duplicate user label, backup in progress, synch in progress].
+
+In case the service demand at the ONT or ONU location exceeds the capabilities of the existing NE, the supplier management system supports requests for the upgrading of the ONT or ONU. In this case, the OMS or operator forms a request including the managed entity Id of the original NE, a
+
+reference to pre-provisioning information for the new services, the new serial number for the replacement NE, and the new user label. The supplier management system processes the request, ranges the new ONT or ONU from the same PON port of the OLT, and applies existing and new service configuration data to the upgraded ONT/ONU [comm failure, unknown NE, invalid serial num syntax, APON layer failure, equipment failure, invalid user label syntax, HW services mismatch, duplicate user label, backup in progress, synch in progress, insufficient PON BW].
+
+In case the service demand on a PON port reaches a threshold, then the supplier management system also supports requests for moving of the ONT/ONU from one PON port to another one. In this case, the OMS or operator forms a request including the managed entity Id of the original NE and the new PON port Id. The supplier management system processes the request, ranges the existing ONT or ONU from the new PON port of the OLT, and retains existing service configuration data associated with the ONT/ONU [comm failure, unknown NE, unknown port, APON layer failure, equipment failure, insufficient PON BW, backup in progress, synch in progress].
+
+This use case ends when the ONT or ONU has been ranged successfully and all pertinent managed entities have been built in the supplier management system.
+
+**Exceptions:** Comm failure, unknown NE, invalid serial num syntax, APON layer failure, equipment failure, invalid user label syntax, HW services mismatch, duplicate user label, backup in progress, synch in progress, insufficient PON BW, unknown port.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The ONT or ONU is ready for further provisioning activities.
+
+#### 6.2.2.20 Register OLT
+
+**Summary:** The management communications channel between the supplier management system and OLT is verified and the OLT is registered for management by the supplier management system.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The OLT is installed. The power supply is working. An operator-defined name (OLT user label) and DCN address (e.g., IP address) have been configured on the installed OLT via local craft interface or some factory provisioning mechanisms. Registration takes less than one minute. The DCN connection has been installed and configured. A check of DCN connectivity times-out from the supplier management system if no response from the remote end is received within 10 seconds. If privileged user status is required for the provisioner, access control mechanisms have been verified in advance of this use case.
+
+**Actors:** Operator, OMS, BPON NE (OLT).
+
+**Preconditions:** An OLT is installed, but not yet managed by the supplier management system.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the OMS or operator requests that a supplier management system build a new OLT within its management domain. The request includes the DCN address associated with the OLT and an OLT user label. The request may also include references to operator administration domains. The supplier management system processes the request [duplicate user label, too many NEs, invalid user label syntax]. Invalid DCN address stores the address and label information and checks the DCN connection between itself and the OLT [DCN timeout, invalid DCN address]. The supplier management system establishes application layer to application layer communications between itself and the OLT and verifies this communication by retrieving the OLT user label [denied access, address label mismatch]. The supplier management system then assigns a globally unique OLTid (managed entity Id) to the OLT, thus exercising its role as manager of the OLT, and returns this assignment to the requesting OMS or operator.
+
+Upon request of the OMS or operator, the supplier management system can change the DCN address of an OLT belonging to its management domain. In this situation, the request includes the managed entity Id for the OLT and the new DCN address. The supplier management system verifies
+
+the old DCN address, checks the DCN connection between itself and the OLT using the new DCN address, and verifies management capabilities by retrieving the OLT user label [denied access, address label mismatch, DCN timeout, comm failure, unknown NE, invalid DCN address, backup in progress].
+
+It is also possible to remove an OLT from management jurisdiction of the supplier management system by making such a request [unknown NE].
+
+This use case ends when the supplier management system has added the OLT to its domain of management and has established a management application association with the OLT.
+
+**Exceptions:** Denied access, address label mismatch, DCN timeout, comm failure, unknown NE, invalid DCN address, backup in progress, duplicate user label, too many NEs, invalid user label syntax.
+
+**Post-conditions:** As long as the OLT is registered with the supplier management system it is available for management by the OMS or operator through the supplier management system.
+
+#### 6.2.2.21 Report service outages
+
+**Summary:** When a network outage occurs, the supplier management system should be able to detect it based on incoming alarms and events, identify affected services and BPON resources, generate service outage records and report the outage to the OMS or operator.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system establishes a proper channel to receive incoming alarms/events. It also establishes the proper channel to the OMS to report possible outages. The supplier management system has the necessary information about the services and BPON resources that it manages. It also contains proper logic to detect outage and affected service/resources based on incoming alarms/events.
+
+**Actors:** BPON NE.
+
+**Preconditions:** The supplier management system is installed and maintains relationship information between network resources and service assignments.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the supplier management system receives NE event information reflecting a possible network outage. The supplier management system proceeds with root cause analysis in an attempt to determine the fundamental cause of the failure. It also accesses events from the alarm event queue and protection switching event queue for the affected BPON NE in order to determine whether or not the failure condition is service affecting. If so, the supplier management system consults with the management model in order to identify the service instances that have been affected by the network outage and creates a service outage event record for each instance affected. Each service outage record shall include identification of the affected service, values of relevant state attributes, cause of outage, outage start time. The supplier management system posts the outage event record to a current event listing for such service outages. The OMS and operator can retrieve this information via an explicit request.
+
+Later, when event information indicating the clearing of the network outage is received and processed by the supplier management system, the supplier management system removes the outage event information from the current listing, appends the outage stop time to the record, and records the enhanced record in a log on the supplier management system.
+
+This use case ends when expanded outage record has been posted to the log.
+
+**Exceptions:** None specified.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Service outage records are available for retrieval by the OMS from the log.
+
+#### 6.2.2.22 Reserve resources
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system supports reservation of bandwidth pending installation of an ONT, ONU, NT or subscriber port in the ONT or NT for a particular OLT prior to the dispatch of personnel to the ONT, ONU or NT installation location. This function includes cancel and modification of resource reservation.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The supplier management system may support rules concerning the maximum number of subtending ONT on any OLT PON interface card port for the OLT. The supplier management system has an accurate view of current network resources for a specific OLT, including installed, assigned and reserved resources. CAC calculation capability is supported either by an installed OLT or by the supplier management system. Slot assignments do not change within this use case.
+
+Appropriate DCN communications between the supplier management system, upstream OMS(s), and OLT are available as needed at the start of the use case. Reservation of bandwidth is supported on a per service instance basis (implying the eventual creation of a subnetwork connection).
+
+**Actors:** Operator, OMS, BPON NE (OLT).
+
+**Preconditions:** The OLT has been provisioned as well as the relevant PON interface slot and NNI slot and the OLT is under the management jurisdiction of the supplier management system.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when an operator or OMS receives a work order to install a new service where there is new ONT, a new ONU, a new NT or a new subscriber line card in an existing NT or ONT. The operator or OMS formulates a reservation of bandwidth request. The request includes a service instance identifier, identifiers and characteristics for the endpoints (i.e., VPI and VCI values for ATM endpoints), and profile pointers that characterize the service connection desired. The supplier management system validates existence of the end points, identifiers and profiles [unknown NE, unknown profiles, unknown port, profile suspended, connection already exists]. It checks to see if the VPI/VCI values are in use and are valid [parameter violation]. The supplier management system processes the information provided on the request and performs the following:
+
+- accesses a CAC calculation mechanism to determine whether there is sufficient bandwidth in the OLT to admit the service [insufficient bandwidth];
+- uses connection counts, grant bandwidth metrics and port line bit rate information to determine whether there is sufficient capacity on the OLT (includes ODN limitations) and on the prospective interfaces of the OLT to satisfy the service demand [max subtending nodes exceeded, connection count exceeded];
+- reserves bandwidth, capacity and connections [comm failure] on the provisioned NEs;
+- makes association of reserved resources to service instance Id;
+- provides the reservation Id to the requesting operator (or provisioning system) as identification for the reserved resources.
+
+The operator or OMS makes requests until reservation of all resources in the OLT required for the installation of services for the specific customer served by the ONT, NT or port/circuit pack is finished.
+
+The supplier management system shall also support requests by the operator provisioning OMS to cancel reserved resources. The operator or OS references the reservation Id with the cancel request [unknown reservation Id]. The supplier management system releases all network resources whose reservation is tagged by the reservation Id.
+
+The supplier management system shall also support retrieval of a reservation Id given a service instance Id value or the retrieval of a service instance Id given a reservation Id originally provided
+
+with a successfully completed reservation request [unknown service instance, unknown reservation Id].
+
+The supplier management system can report on reserved, assigned and available bandwidth per port on request of the OMS or operator [unknown NE, comm failure]. The supplier management system can also report on the amount of bandwidth reserved for a particular reservation [unknown reservation Id].
+
+This use case ends when reservation of bandwidth, connections and other capacity metrics is completed and reservation information has been transferred as needed to the pertinent NE(s).
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown NE, insufficient bandwidth, max subtending nodes exceeded, connection count exceeded, duplicate service instance Id, unknown service instance, unknown reservation Id, comm failure, unknown profiles, profile suspended.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Bandwidth, connections and capacity are marked as "reserved" in any subsequent capacity inventory reporting and dedicated for future provisioning activities for the identified service instance.
+
+#### 6.2.2.23 Root cause alarm analysis
+
+**Summary:** When there is an occurrence of a set of alarms associated with a single failure condition, the supplier management system shall analyse and correlate the alarm events within its domain to the best of its ability and determine the underlying root cause of the problem. It prepares an alarm record for the root cause failure condition for forwarding to OMS(s) and operators. If root cause is not determined, the supplier management system prepares a set of alarm records for publication to OMSs and operators.6
+
+**Assumptions:** One failure condition in a BPON network resource may result in many alarm events from multiple managed entities. Multiple alarm events occurred at approximately the same time. These events were already evaluated and validated by the supplier management system ("process incoming NE events") and shown to possess enough information for alarm analysis purposes. The supplier management system maintains a management model containing (in part) dependency relationships between managed resources including unmonitored resources. Redundant alarm events are eliminated.
+
+**Actors:** No external actors.
+
+**Preconditions:** Multiple failure conditions have been detected by a BPON NE within a short period of time.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when multiple incoming alarm events have been processed by the supplier management system within a small period of time. The supplier management system groups together related alarm events into an event set for direct comparison or patterning. Event sets are created via rules determined by managed entity dependency relationships. The supplier management system engages in an event comparison process with the goal of finding one active, underlying, independent event for the event set. The process starts with the first alarm event in the event set and compares the next event to see if one of them may be eliminated through rules of event correlation. The process continues until all events in the event set have been processed. If the comparison process detects an event that cannot supersede or be superseded by a previous event, it will be combined with remaining previous events. The result of this comparison process is either determination of a single root cause failure condition or a filtered set of alarm events.
+
+Dependencies are relationships between equipment components and/or transmission media determined by the topology of the network, client-server associations and cross connections.
+
+---
+
+6 This use case description makes significant use of management functionality described in [ITU-T M.2140].
+
+Patterning may be done recursively to infer trouble with a resource such as a conduit or power supply from indications in many indirectly supported resources. State change information also plays a role in alarm event correlation. There are several types of failure conditions: equipment failures, communications failures, processing errors, environmental concerns and security violations. There can be dependencies and causality relationships between different types of failure conditions.
+
+Communication alarms may be triggered by an equipment fault. Therefore, if an equipment alarm is received, all communication alarms for termination points contained by the equipment component should be superseded. That is, communication alarms are only considered when they occur without related equipment alarms. If no equipment alarms related to the trail are received, but communication alarms are received, then the cause of the fault might be outside of the supplier management system management domain, might be due to some unmonitored equipment component within its domain, or might arise from the transmission medium that carries the characteristic signal between the BPON NEs. In this case, the upstream communication alarm might be considered the best root cause information within the supplier management system domain.
+
+Environmental alarms should be given high priority in searching for root cause since they point to problems for entire BPON nodes or all NEs at a given location (i.e., they relate to many equipment components and many trails). State changes can also serve as a backup method of detecting faults. Administrative and operational state changes should be treated as equipment alarms, since they always indicate a change in the ability of a resource to fulfil its function. The details of alarm event correlation are left up to the individual supplier management system.
+
+This use case ends when a root cause has been determined, or when an event set has been filtered to the greatest extent possible. The alarm information is formatted in records and made available to interested consumers.
+
+**Exceptions:** None specified.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Root cause alarm information has been formatted and these alarms can be raised to external event channels.
+
+#### **6.2.2.24 Root cause impairment analysis**
+
+**Summary:** When there is an occurrence of a set of threshold crossing alerts associated with a single performance degradation condition, the supplier management system shall analyse and correlate the alert events within its domain to the best of its ability, determine the underlying root cause of the problem, and store this information in a log. If several occurrences of the same root cause impairment are detected within a period of time, the supplier management system shall prepare a QoS alarm record for publication by any interested consumer (operator or OMS).
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. One impairment condition in a BPON network resource may result in the notification of multiple TCA events associated with multiple managed entities. Multiple TCA events occurred at approximately the same time. These events were already evaluated and validated by the supplier management system ("process incoming NE events") and shown to possess enough information for impairment analysis purposes. The supplier management system maintains a management model containing (in part) dependency relationships between managed resources including unmonitored resources. Redundant TCA events are eliminated. The supplier management system shall support the collection of performance monitored parameters including, but not limited to, those listed as history data managed entities.
+
+**Actors:** Operator or OMS.
+
+**Preconditions:** Multiple impairments have been detected on a BPON NE within a short time window.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when multiple incoming TCA events have been processed by the supplier management system within a small period of time. The supplier management system groups together related TCA events into an event set for direct comparison or patterning. Event sets are created via rules determined by managed entity dependency relationships. The supplier management system engages in an event comparison process with the goal of determining one active, underlying and independent priority impairment for the event set.
+
+The process starts with the first TCA event in the event set and compares the next event to see if one of them may be eliminated through rules of event correlation (see below for some filtering rules). The process continues until all events in the event set have been processed. If the comparison process detects an event that cannot supersede, or be superseded by, a previous event, it will be combined with remaining previous events. The result of this comparison process is either determination of a single root cause impairment condition or a filtered set of TCAs.
+
+Dependencies are relationships between equipment components and/or transmission media determined by the topology of the network, client-server associations, and cross connections. With the exception of physical interface termination points on the subscriber plug-ins, the supplier management system shall collect only near-end performance monitored parameters. The supplier management system shall suppress the processing and reporting of TCA on trails when the trails have an active failure condition. For each TCA, the supplier management system shall filter out any downstream near-end and far-end TCAs relating to the same direction of transmission for lower level trails served by the trail generating the TCA. For a set of TCAs involving the same parameter for the same trail, the supplier management system shall filter out all but the first TCA received during the interval of collection. TCAs may be further filtered according to precedence within each history data parameter category.
+
+At the end of the precedence and comparison filtering process, the supplier management system shall support tagging of the remaining TCAs. If a particular TCA persists for X intervals within a window of Y collection intervals (where X and Y are settable), the TCA will be called a persistent root cause impairment. The supplier management system shall notify all interested clients of any such persistent filtered root cause impairments using a quality of service alarm and providing the necessary information including managed entity Id, performance parameter, threshold value and observed value.
+
+The supplier management system also allows the setting of sliding window parameters (i.e., X TCAs within Y consecutive collection intervals) per monitored parameter type. [unknown NE, unknown parameters, interval count too large, comm failure, unknown managed entity, equipment failure]. The supplier management system also supports administrative functions of retrieval concerning settings of sliding window parameters [unknown managed entity, unknown NE, unknown parameters].
+
+This use case ends when root cause impairment information has been logged and any suitable quality of service alarm notification has been prepared.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown NE, unknown parameters, interval count too large, comm failure, unknown managed entity, equipment failure.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Root cause impairment data is available for retrieval from the supplier management system and quality of service alarms can be raised to an external event channel.
+
+#### **6.2.2.25 Scheduler**
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system provides a scheduler function for activities to be carried out at a later date. The operator or OMS can create a new schedule, suspend/resume a schedule, view a schedule and delete or modify an existing schedule if it is not in use.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. A communication link exists between the operator or OMS and the supplier management system.
+
+The supplier management system has authenticated the operator or OMS to access the scheduling function.
+
+**Actors:** Operator or OMS.
+
+**Preconditions:** The supplier management system is installed.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the OMS or operator initiates a request to create a new schedule. To create a new schedule, the following parameters are included: schedule name, start and stop times for when the schedule can be applied, schedule trigger point times matrix, and the periodicity of the schedule [duplicate user label, matrix scheduler type mismatch, invalid start time, invalid stop time, invalid trigger].
+
+Once the schedule is created, the OMS or operator can schedule an activity such as NE MIB uploading, bulk transfer, testing or synchronization activity simply by referencing the schedule name. The scheduled activity is in pending mode prior to the trigger time, and in progress mode until it is successfully (or unsuccessfully) completed.
+
+The operator or OMS can retrieve information on the schedule. The returned information includes scheduler name, start time, stop time, trigger point times, matrix, operational state and administrative state [unknown scheduler]. The supplier management system also supports the operator's need to suspend or resume activities via reference to the schedule. The supplier management system is able to suspend/resume a scheduled activity by locking/unlocking the administrative state of the associated schedule [unknown scheduler]. The operator can also delete or modify an existing schedule that is not in use [unknown scheduler, schedule in use, invalid start time, invalid stop time, matrix scheduler type mismatch, invalid trigger, duplicate user label].
+
+This use case ends when a schedule has been created, modified or deleted.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown scheduler, schedule in use, duplicate user label, matrix scheduler type mismatch, invalid start time, invalid stop time, invalid trigger.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Invocation of routine management activities can be supported by the supplier management system based on any established active schedulers.
+
+#### 6.2.2.26 Synchronize NE
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system is responsible for providing synchronization and consistency between all physical and logical BPON network resource data.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. The management communications channel between the BPON resource is available. The supplier management system maintains an information model that captures the configuration data in a BPON system. This information model should reflect the current provisioned state of the BPON system. As provisioning changes are made in the network the information model is updated to reflect the latest changes. These changes may occur by the operator provisioning something through the supplier management system, or through a craftsperson provisioning changes in the field.
+
+**Actors:** BPON NEs, privileged user.
+
+**Preconditions:** The supplier management system is installed and is designed to normally remain in synch with the configuration of the BPON NEs within its management jurisdiction.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the privileged user suspects that the supplier management system and BPON NE are out of synch with each other. The privileged user formulates a request for synchronization naming the BPON NE. The supplier management system responds to the request by updating its management information with the latest information obtained by retrieving all configuration data from the BPON NE [comm failure, unknown NE, equipment failure, backup in progress, synch in progress]. While this process is active it is assumed that other management activities involving the BPON NE are blocked.
+
+If the synchronization proves to be disruptive to management operations (taking too long), then it is possible for the privileged user to abort the synchronization process. Any inconsistencies between the supplier management system and the NE that have been resolved before the abort are retained.
+
+Similar functionality is invoked automatically whenever there is an event denoting a DCN connection establishment or recovery, a remote reset of a BPON NE, an ONT or ONU ranging, or a resynchronization of a current event listing. When an ONT is ranged, it is assumed that the OLT will automatically update its local ONT configuration to reflect the state of the ONT. This means that the supplier management system will use the range event to trigger an upload of the ONT data from the OLT.
+
+Each time the process is initiated, an NE will be selected for synchronization. The process will initiate an upload of data from the NE. This will be a vendor-specific implementation.
+
+The next step in the sequence is to reconcile the data retrieved from the NE with the current state of the information model. If there is any difference in any data stewarded by the NE, then the model will be updated and (if business rules apply) attribute value change information will be formatted and made available as published notifications to any interested operator or OMS. As updates are made to the information model, events will also be generated in the system. If there is any difference in any data stewarded by the supplier management system, then the supplier management system issues configuration change requests to the NE.
+
+The process will conclude by returning a value to the initiator (internal procedure) that indicates that the synchronization process was successfully completed, and the information model was updated.
+
+A privileged user can also request routine resynchronization of NE and supplier management system management information. The request includes the identification of the BPON NE and reference to the schedule [unknown NE, unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler]. The privileged user can modify the scheduled activity as well as cancel it [unknown NE, unknown scheduler, invalid scheduler].
+
+This user case ends when supplier management system and the BPON NE are in synch.
+
+**Exceptions:** Comm failure, unknown scheduler, unknown NE, equipment failure, backup in progress, synch in progress.
+
+**Post-conditions:** Management information resident in installed BPON NEs is consistent with the same information resident in the supplier management system.
+
+#### **6.2.2.27 View records**
+
+**Summary:** The supplier management system will provide means to view all logged events or other records archived temporarily at the supplier management system. It will also provide a way to retrieve a subset of records on behalf of an OMS.
+
+**Assumptions:** The supplier management system has authenticated the requesting operator or OMS. Selection filters have been specified and implemented.
+
+**Actors:** Operator and OMS.
+
+**Preconditions:** The supplier management system has been archiving performance and traffic measurements and recording event notifications in logs.
+
+**Description:** This use case begins when the operator or OMS initiates a request to select records from a particular record set for further evaluation. The request identifies the record set and provides selection criteria. The selection criteria may include such parameters as:
+
+- Managed entity Id.
+- Time interval.
+- Record type.
+
+The supplier management system will process the retrieval request and find the records contained in the record set that meet the selection criterion. The listing of records will be returned to the requestor [unknown record set, timeout, no such records, too many records].
+
+The OMS may query for the size of any existing record set [unknown record set].
+
+This use case ends when the records or status of a record set information has been provided to the requesting operator or OMS.
+
+**Exceptions:** Unknown record set, timeout, no such records, too many records.
+
+**Post-conditions:** The records are available for reviewing by the operator, or for processing by the OMS.
+
+## 6.3 Analysis
+
+Detailed class, sequence and state change diagrams will be offered only for those situations where an interface to an external actor exists, or for those cases that these details are necessary to explain behaviour. Each section of the analysis begins with a high-level view of the classes involved in the high-level use case diagrams of clause 6.2.1.3 with details of specific use cases following this summary. This is followed by references to any managed entities (the management information data structures from [ITU-T Q.834.1] and [ITU-T Q.834.2]) that may be involved in the use case. In some cases, the references to managed entities is followed by a listing to "management support entities" referring to familiar entities from existing ITU-T Recommendations. Next follows signatures for any real time operations between an external actor and the supplier management system. This information is accompanied by a brief description of each exception raised by the operations listed. Finally, users of this Recommendation may assume that every operation is atomic except where indicated as "best effort".
+
+### 6.3.1 Access control
+
+The following class diagram show interactions between actors and classes internal to the supplier management system when administering user access to the supplier management system.
+
+#### 6.3.1.1 Administer user privileges
+
+
+
+```
+classDiagram
+ class PrivilegedUser {
+ <>
+ }
+ class AccessControlMgr {
+ +UserList
+ +UserGroupList
+ +PasswordPolicy
+ +setPasswordPolicy()
+ +passwordPolicyGet()
+ +userListGet()
+ +userGroupListGet()
+ +userGet()
+ +userGroupGet()
+ +createUserGroup()
+ +modifyUserGroup()
+ +deleteUserGroup()
+ +addUsersToGroup()
+ +deleteUsersFromGroup()
+ +getPermissionList()
+ +modifyPermissionList()
+ +createUser()
+ +deleteUser()
+ +resetPassword()
+ }
+ class UserGroup {
+ +MemberUserIds
+ +addMember()
+ +deleteMember()
+ +retrieveMembers()
+ +create()
+ +modifyTargetActivities()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class User {
+ +UserId
+ +TargetActivities
+ +GroupMembership
+ +Password
+ +create()
+ +modifyUserTargets()
+ +retrieveGroupIds()
+ +retrieveUserTargetActivities()
+ +delete()
+ +resetPassword()
+ +modifyUserGroupMembership()
+ }
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ PrivilegedUser --> AccessControlMgr : controls GUI user access
+ AccessControlMgr --> UserGroup : administers
+ AccessControlMgr --> Factory : commissions
+ UserGroup --> User : belongs to
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the classes and relationships for administering user privileges. It includes a stick figure actor, three class boxes, and one factory box.
+
+- Privileged User** (Actor): Interacts with **AccessControlMgr** via the relationship "controls GUI user access".
+- AccessControlMgr** (Class):
+ - Attributes: `UserList`, `UserGroupList`, `PasswordPolicy`.
+ - Methods: `setPasswordPolicy()`, `passwordPolicyGet()`, `userListGet()`, `userGroupListGet()`, `userGet()`, `userGroupGet()`, `createUserGroup()`, `modifyUserGroup()`, `deleteUserGroup()`, `addUsersToGroup()`, `deleteUsersFromGroup()`, `getPermissionList()`, `modifyPermissionList()`, `createUser()`, `deleteUser()`, `resetPassword()`.
+- UserGroup** (Class):
+ - Attribute: `MemberUserIds`.
+ - Methods: `addMember()`, `deleteMember()`, `retrieveMembers()`, `create()`, `modifyTargetActivities()`, `delete()`.
+- User** (Class):
+ - Attributes: `UserId`, `TargetActivities`, `GroupMembership`, `Password`.
+ - Methods: `create()`, `modifyUserTargets()`, `retrieveGroupIds()`, `retrieveUserTargetActivities()`, `delete()`, `resetPassword()`, `modifyUserGroupMembership()`.
+- Factory** (Class):
+ - Methods: `create()`, `delete()`.
+
+Relationships:
+
+- AccessControlMgr** *administers* **UserGroup**.
+- AccessControlMgr** *commissions* **Factory**.
+- UserGroup** *belongs to* **User**.
+
+UML class diagram for Administer user privileges showing AccessControlMgr, UserGroup, User, and Factory classes with their attributes, methods, and relationships.
+
+Figure 6-11 – Administer user privileges class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor PU as : Privileged User
+ participant ACM as : AccessControlMgr
+ participant U as : User
+ participant UG as : UserGroup
+ participant UF as User : Factory
+ participant UGF as User Group : Factory
+
+ PU->>ACM: passwordPolicyGet()
+ activate ACM
+ deactivate ACM
+ PU->>ACM: setPasswordPolicy()
+ activate ACM
+ deactivate ACM
+ PU->>ACM: createUser()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>UF: create()
+ activate UF
+ deactivate UF
+ ACM->>U: resetPassword()
+ activate U
+ deactivate U
+ deactivate ACM
+ PU->>ACM: createUserGroup()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>UGF: create()
+ activate UGF
+ deactivate UGF
+ ACM->>UG: modifyTargetActivities()
+ activate UG
+ deactivate UG
+ deactivate ACM
+ PU->>ACM: addUsersToGroup()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>UG: addMember()
+ activate UG
+ UG->>UGF: modifyUserGroupMembership()
+ activate UGF
+ UGF->>U: modifyUserTargets()
+ activate U
+ deactivate U
+ deactivate UGF
+ deactivate UG
+ deactivate ACM
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for creating a user and user group. The diagram shows interactions between a Privileged User, AccessControlMgr, User, UserGroup, User:Factory, and UserGroup:Factory. The process includes password policy management, user creation, password reset, user group creation, target activity modification, and group membership management.
+
+Figure 6-12 – Create user and user group sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor PU as : Privileged User
+ participant ACM as : AccessControlMgr
+ participant U as : User
+ participant UG as : UserGroup
+
+ PU->>ACM: userGet()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>U: reIssueGroupIds()
+ activate U
+ U->>ACM: reIssueUserTargetActivities()
+ deactivate U
+ ACM->>U: reIssueGroupIds()
+ deactivate ACM
+ deactivate U
+
+ PU->>ACM: userGroupGet()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>U: reIssueGroupIds()
+ activate U
+ U->>ACM: reIssueGroupIds()
+ deactivate U
+ ACM->>U: reIssueGroupIds()
+ deactivate ACM
+ deactivate U
+
+ Note left of PU: Modify by Group permissions modification.
+ PU->>ACM: modifyUserGroup()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>U: modifyTargetPermissions()
+ activate U
+ U->>UG: modifyUserTargets()
+ activate UG
+ UG->>U: modifyUserTargets()
+ deactivate UG
+ U->>ACM: modifyUserTargets()
+ deactivate U
+ ACM->>U: modifyUserTargets()
+ deactivate ACM
+ deactivate U
+
+ Note left of PU: Modify Individually.
+ PU->>ACM: getPermissions()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>U: reIssueUserTargetActivities()
+ activate U
+ U->>ACM: reIssueUserTargetActivities()
+ deactivate U
+ ACM->>U: reIssueUserTargetActivities()
+ deactivate ACM
+ deactivate U
+
+ PU->>ACM: modifyPermissions()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>U: modifyUserTargets()
+ activate U
+ U->>ACM: modifyUserTargets()
+ deactivate U
+ ACM->>U: modifyUserTargets()
+ deactivate ACM
+ deactivate U
+
+ Note left of PU: Modify by group membership.
+ PU->>ACM: addUsersToGroup()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>U: addMember()
+ activate U
+ U->>UG: modifyUserGroupMembership()
+ activate UG
+ UG->>U: modifyUserTargets()
+ activate U
+ U->>ACM: modifyUserTargets()
+ deactivate U
+ ACM->>U: modifyUserTargets()
+ deactivate ACM
+ deactivate U
+ deactivate UG
+ deactivate U
+ deactivate ACM
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Modify user permissions' involving actors and objects: Privileged User, AccessControlMgr, User, and UserGroup. The diagram shows two main paths: one for modifying permissions by group and another for modifying permissions individually. The 'Modify by group' path includes calls to userGet(), userGroupGet(), modifyUserGroup(), modifyTargetPermissions(), and modifyUserTargets(). The 'Modify individually' path includes calls to getPermissions(), reIssueUserTargetActivities(), modifyPermissions(), and modifyUserTargets(). The 'Modify by group membership' path includes calls to addUsersToGroup(), addMember(), modifyUserGroupMembership(), and modifyUserTargets().
+
+Figure 6-13 – Modify user permissions sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor PU as Privileged User
+ participant ACM as : AccessControlMgr
+ participant U as : User
+ participant UG as : UserGroup
+ participant UF as User : Factory
+ participant UGF as User Group : Factory
+
+ PU->>ACM: deleteUser()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>U: modifyUserGroupMembership()
+ activate U
+ U->>UG: deleteMember()
+ activate UG
+ UG->>UF: delete()
+ deactivate UG
+ ACM->>UGF: delete()
+ deactivate U
+ deactivate UG
+ deactivate UF
+ deactivate ACM
+
+ PU->>ACM: userGroupGet()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>UGF: userGroupGet()
+ activate UGF
+ deactivate ACM
+
+ PU->>ACM: deleteUserGroup()
+ activate ACM
+ ACM->>UGF: delete()
+ activate UGF
+ deactivate ACM
+ deactivate UGF
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for deleting users and user groups. The diagram shows interactions between a Privileged User, AccessControlMgr, User, UserGroup, User Factory, and User Group Factory. The Privileged User initiates deleteUser() and deleteUserGroup(). AccessControlMgr handles these by calling modifyUserGroupMembership() and deleteMember() on User, and delete() on UserGroup and User Factory. It also calls userGroupGet() on User Group Factory.
+
+**Figure 6-14 – Delete users and user groups sequence diagram**
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) setPasswordPolicy | This operation allows the privileged users to manage the password policy. |
+| 2) passwordPolicyGet | This operation allows the privileged users to retrieve the policy concerning the syntax of data exchanged and timers used when logging into the supplier management system. |
+| 3) userListGet | This operation allows the privileged users to retrieve the list of user Ids having some form of access to the supplier management system as well as their target activities and group memberships. |
+| 4) userGroupListGet | This operation allows the privileged users to retrieve the user groups having access to the supplier management system with the members of the group and target activities identified. |
+| 5) userGet | This operation allows the privileged users to retrieve the user's group membership and target activities. |
+| 6) userGroupGet | This operation allows the privileged users to retrieve the member users of the group and their allowed target activities. |
+| 7) createUserGroup | This operation allows the privileged users to create a new user group. |
+| 8) modifyUserGroup | This operation allows the privileged users to add/delete the target activities of a user group. |
+| 9) deleteUserGroup | This operation allows the privileged users to delete an existing user group. |
+| 10) addUsersToGroup | This operation allows the privileged user to add new users to an existing user group. |
+| 11) deleteUsersFromGroup | This operation allows the privileged users to delete users from a user group. |
+| 12) getPermissionList | This operation allows the privileged users to obtain the list of the activities allowed to a specified user. |
+| 13) modifyPermissionList | This operation allows the privileged users to modify the list of the activities allowed to a user. |
+| 14) createUser | This operation allows the privileged users to create a new user. |
+| 15) deleteUser | This operation allows the privileged users to delete an existing user. |
+| 16) resetPassword | This operation allows the privileged users to reset the password for a user. |
+
+**Figure 6-15 – Access control manager operations**
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) setPasswordPolicy | PasswordPolicyType | void | AccessDenied |
+| 2) passwordPolicyGet | | PasswordPolicyType | AccessDenied |
+| 3) userListGet | | UserSeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 4) userGroupListGet | | UserGroupSeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 5) userGet | UserIdType | UserType | AccessDenied,
UnknownUserIds |
+| 6) userGroupGet | UserLabelType | UserGroupType | AccessDenied,
UnknownUserGroupId |
+| 7) createUserGroup | UserLabelType,
TargetActivitySeqType | void | DuplicateUserGroupId,
UnknownTargets,
AccessDenied |
+| 8) modifyUserGroup | UserLabelType,
TargetActivitySeqType,
TargetActivitySeqType | TargetActivitySeqType | UnknownUserGroupId,
UnknownTargets,
AccessDenied |
+| 9) deleteUserGroup | UserLabelType | void | AccessDenied,
UserGroupNotEmpty,
UnknownUserGroupId |
+| 10) addUsersToGroup | UserLabelType | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownUserGroupId |
+| 11) deleteUsersFromGroup | UserLabelType,
UserIdSeqType | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownUserGroupId,
UnknownUserIds |
+| 12) getPermissionList | UserIdType | TargetActivitySeqType | UnknownUserIds,
AccessDenied |
+| 13) modifyPermissionList | UserIdType,
TargetActivitySeqType,
TargetActivitySeqType | TargetActivitySeqType | UnknownUserIds,
UnknownTargets,
AccessDenied |
+| 14) createUser | UserIdType,
PasswordType,
TargetActivitySeqType | void | DuplicateUserId,
UnknownTargets,
AccessDenied,
UserLoginPolicyViolation |
+| 15) deleteUser | UserIdType | void | UnknownUserIds,
AccessDenied |
+| 16) resetPassword | UserIdType,
PasswordType | void | UnknownUserIds,
UserLoginPolicyViolation,
AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-16 – Access control manager signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| DuplicateUserGroupId | The Id is already used for another user group. |
+| DuplicateUserId | Access control profile has already been established for this user Id. |
+| UnknownTargets | List of unknown target activities. |
+| UnknownUserGroupId | User group is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownUserIds | This exception is raised when any user Id is unrecognized. |
+| UserLoginPolicyViolation | The specified assignment of a new password to a user violates the user login policy currently enforced by the supplier management system. |
+| UserGroupNotEmpty | Non-empty user group cannot be deleted. |
+
+**Figure 6-17 – Access control manager exceptions**
+
+### 6.3.2 Event handling
+
+The following two clauses provide the analysis for the two use cases in Figure 6-5, having interactions with external actors provided by the operator or network owner.
+
+#### 6.3.2.1 Publish event
+
+
+
+```
+classDiagram
+ class NotificationAdmin {
+ +updateChannels()
+ +updateFilters()
+ +updateConnections()
+ }
+ class EventForwarder {
+ +SupplierFilterMatrix
+ +notifyEventSupplier()
+ +processAnnouncement()
+ +updateSupplierFilterMatrix()
+ }
+ class EventSupplier {
+ +subscriptionChange()
+ +disconnectSupplier()
+ +pushEvent()
+ }
+ class ExternalEventChannel {
+ +push()
+ +getSupplierAdmin()
+ +connectSupplier()
+ +obtainSubscription()
+ }
+ class WhitePages {
+ +resolve()
+ }
+
+ NotificationAdmin --> EventForwarder : updates event supplier info
+ EventForwarder --> EventSupplier : pushes events
+ EventSupplier --> NotificationAdmin : updates external forwarding
+ EventSupplier --> ExternalEventChannel : pushes events
+ EventSupplier --> WhitePages : looks up name
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the 'Publish event' process with the following components and interactions:
+
+- NotificationAdmin**: Contains methods `updateChannels()`, `updateFilters()`, and `updateConnections()`. It sends the message *updates event supplier info* to **EventForwarder**.
+- EventForwarder**: Contains a `SupplierFilterMatrix` object and methods `notifyEventSupplier()`, `processAnnouncement()`, and `updateSupplierFilterMatrix()`. It sends the message *pushes events* to **EventSupplier**.
+- EventSupplier**: Contains methods `subscriptionChange()`, `disconnectSupplier()`, and `pushEvent()`. It sends the message *updates external forwarding* to **NotificationAdmin** and *pushes events* to **External Event Channel**. It also sends the message *looks up name* to **White Pages**.
+- External Event Channel**: Contains methods `push()`, `getSupplierAdmin()`, `connectSupplier()`, and `obtainSubscription()`.
+- White Pages**: Contains the method `resolve()`.
+
+UML Class Diagram for Publish Event
+
+Figure 6-18 – Publish event class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant WP as : White Pages
+ participant EEC as : External Event Channel
+ participant ES as : Event Supplier
+ participant EF as : Event Forwarder
+ participant NA as : Notification Admin
+
+ WP->>EEC: resolve()
+ activate EEC
+ EEC->>ES: updateChannels()
+ activate ES
+ ES->>EEC: obtainSubscription()
+ deactivate ES
+ activate EEC
+ EEC->>ES: getSupplierAdmin()
+ activate ES
+ ES->>NA: updateFilters()
+ deactivate ES
+ activate NA
+ NA->>EEC: connectSupplier()
+ deactivate NA
+ activate EEC
+ EEC->>ES: updateConnections()
+ activate ES
+ ES->>EF: updateSupplierFilterMatrix()
+ deactivate ES
+ activate EF
+ EF->>NA: processAnnouncement()
+ deactivate EF
+ activate NA
+ NA->>EF:
+ deactivate NA
+ EF->>ES: pushEvent()
+ activate EF
+ EF->>EEC: push()
+ deactivate EF
+ deactivate ES
+ deactivate EEC
+ EEC->>ES: disconnectSupplier()
+ activate EEC
+ activate ES
+ ES->>EF: updateConnections()
+ deactivate ES
+ activate EF
+ EF->>NA: updateSupplierFilterMatrix()
+ deactivate EF
+ activate NA
+ NA->>EF: processAnnouncement()
+ deactivate NA
+ EF->>EF:
+ deactivate EF
+ deactivate ES
+ deactivate EEC
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the sequence of operations for publishing an event. It involves five participants: **: White Pages**, **: External Event Channel**, **: Event Supplier**, **: Event Forwarder**, and **: Notification Admin**. The process begins with **: White Pages** calling **resolve()** on **: External Event Channel**. This triggers a series of updates and connections: **: External Event Channel** calls **updateChannels()** on **: Event Supplier**, which then calls **obtainSubscription()** back on **: External Event Channel**. Next, **: External Event Channel** calls **getSupplierAdmin()** on **: Event Supplier**, which calls **updateFilters()** on **: Notification Admin**. **: Notification Admin** then calls **connectSupplier()** on **: External Event Channel**, which calls **updateConnections()** on **: Event Supplier**. **: Event Supplier** calls **updateSupplierFilterMatrix()** on **: Event Forwarder**, which calls **processAnnouncement()** on **: Notification Admin**. **: Notification Admin** returns to **: Event Forwarder**, which then calls **pushEvent()** on **: Event Supplier**. **: Event Supplier** calls **push()** on **: External Event Channel**. **: External Event Channel** then calls **disconnectSupplier()** on **: Event Supplier**, which calls **updateConnections()** on **: Event Forwarder**. **: Event Forwarder** calls **updateSupplierFilterMatrix()** on **: Notification Admin**, which calls **processAnnouncement()** on **: Event Forwarder**. Two notes are present: one stating "As announcements arrive, events are pushed." pointing to the **pushEvent()** call, and another stating "If communications are to be suppressed." pointing to the **disconnectSupplier()** call.
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Publish event' showing interactions between White Pages, External Event Channel, Event Supplier, Event Forwarder, and Notification Admin.
+
+Figure 6-19 – Publish event sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) obtainConsumers | This operation allows the supplier management system to determine the names of the OMSs that consume event notifications. |
+| 2) connectSupplier | This operation allows the supplier management system to connect to the external event channel. |
+| 3) push | This operation allows the supplier management system to push an event notification to the external event channel. |
+| 4) obtainSubscription | This operation allows the supplier management system to determine the type of events to be pushed on the external event channel. |
+| 5) disconnectSupplier | This operation allows the supplier management system to be disconnected from the external event channel. |
+| 6) getSupplierAdmin | This operation allows the supplier management system to administer its event supplier function. |
+
+**Figure 6-20 – Event publisher operations**
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|-----------------------|---------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------|
+| 1) obtainConsumers | | NameType | AccessDenied |
+| 2) connectSupplier | NameType | | AccessDenied, AlreadyConnected |
+| 3) push | StructuredEventType | void | Disconnected, AccessDenied |
+| 4) obtainSubscription | | StructuredEventSeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 5) disconnectSupplier | NameType | void | AccessDenied |
+| 6) getSupplierAdmin | | sequence of long | AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-21 – Event publisher signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| AlreadyConnected | The communicating object is already connected to the event channel. |
+| Disconnected | The object was disconnected from the event channel. |
+| InvalidEventType | The subscription change identified an invalid event type. |
+
+**Figure 6-22 – Event publisher exceptions**
+
+#### 6.3.2.2 Root cause impairment analysis
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class ProfileObjectRepository {
+ retrieve()
+ }
+ class BPONNE {
+ setValues()
+ getValues()
+ }
+ class ImpairmentPersistence {
+ setSlidingWindowParameters()
+ setSpecificSlidingWindowParameters()
+ getSpecificSlidingWindowParameters()
+ setThreshold()
+ setThresholds()
+ getThresholdValues()
+ getSystemThresholdsSetting()
+ getSystemSWSettings()
+ }
+ class EventSetManager {
+ Scheduler
+ notify()
+ deleteEventSet()
+ }
+ class EventCorrelator {
+ supersedeFilterings()
+ addDependencyRelationshipInfo()
+ groupWithSameDependentResource()
+ removeGroupRedundancy()
+ patternToSupportingResource()
+ }
+ class EventQueue {
+ addEvents()
+ selectEvents()
+ }
+ class EventSet {
+ EventSetId
+ RetrievalCriteria
+ TimeWindow
+ setAttributes()
+ fillWithNewEvents()
+ create()
+ delete()
+ purge()
+ completeEventRecord()
+ }
+ class QoSLog {
+ Scheduler
+ XYMatrix
+ storeRecord()
+ calcPersistence()
+ addRemoveMatrixRow()
+ clockTrigger()
+ getXYMatrixRows()
+ }
+ class EventForwarder {
+ processAnnouncement()
+ }
+ class Clock
+ class ManagementModelMaintainer
+
+ ProfileObjectRepository --> ImpairmentPersistence : retrieves Threshold Data
+ ImpairmentPersistence --> ProfileObjectRepository : provisions thresholds
+ ImpairmentPersistence --> OMSOperator : sets threshold parameters
+ ImpairmentPersistence --> ManagementModelMaintainer : modify properties of monitoring points
+ ImpairmentPersistence --> QoSLog : set counter parameters
+ BPONNE --> EventScreening : sends TCA event
+ class EventScreening {
+ readEvents()
+ validates()
+ }
+ EventScreening --> EventSetManager : notifies
+ EventSetManager --> EventSet : creates
+ EventScreening --> EventQueue : queues to
+ EventSet --> EventQueue : extracts from
+ EventSet --> EventCorrelator : obtains correlation
+ EventSet --> QoSLog : logs root cause TCAs
+ Clock --> QoSLog : periodically triggers
+ QoSLog --> EventForwarder : announce QoS alarm
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the root cause impairment analysis process. Key components and their interactions are as follows:
+
+- Profile Object Repository** and **BPON NE** interact with **Impairment Persistence** for threshold data retrieval and provisioning.
+- Impairment Persistence** manages threshold parameters and interacts with **OMS/Operator** and **Management Model Maintainer**.
+- BPON NE** sends TCA events to the **Event Screening** component.
+- Event Screening** notifies the **Event Set Manager** and queues events to the **Event Queue**.
+- The **Event Set Manager** creates **Event Set** objects.
+- The **Event Set** extracts events from the **Event Queue** and obtains correlation from the **Event Correlator**.
+- The **Event Set** logs root cause TCAs into the **QoS Log**.
+- The **QoS Log** is periodically triggered by the **Clock** and announces QoS alarms to the **Event Forwarder**.
+
+UML Class Diagram for Root cause impairment analysis. The diagram shows the interactions between various components including Profile Object Repository, BPON NE, Impairment Persistence, Event Set Manager, Event Correlator, Event Queue, Event Set, QoS Log, and Event Forwarder. It details methods like retrieve(), setThreshold(), and processAnnouncement() and their relationships.
+
+Figure 6-23 – Root cause impairment analysis class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant IP as : ImpairmentPersistence
+ participant BPN as : BPON NE
+ participant QSL as : QoSLog
+
+ OMS->>IP: setThresholds()
+ activate IP
+ IP->>BPN: setValues()
+ deactivate IP
+ BPN-->>QSL:
+ Note right of QSL: As many times...
+ OMS->>IP: setSlidingWindowParameters()
+ activate IP
+ IP->>QSL: addRemoveMatrixRow()
+ deactivate IP
+ OMS->>IP: getSystemThresholdsSetting()
+ activate IP
+ deactivate IP
+ OMS->>IP: getSystemSWSettings()
+ activate IP
+ deactivate IP
+ OMS->>IP: setThreshold()
+ activate IP
+ IP->>BPN: setValues()
+ deactivate IP
+ BPN-->>QSL:
+ Note right of QSL: For all monitoring points of specific type.
+ OMS->>IP: getThresholdValues()
+ activate IP
+ IP->>BPN: getValues()
+ deactivate IP
+ BPN-->>QSL:
+ Note right of QSL: For all monitoring points monitoring the specific parameter.
+ OMS->>IP: getSpecificSlidingWindowParameters()
+ activate IP
+ IP->>QSL: getXYMatrixRows()
+ deactivate IP
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the sequence of operations for setting parameters. It involves four participants: : OMS/Operator (Actor), : ImpairmentPersistence (Boundary), : BPON NE (Entity), and : QoSLog (Control). The sequence begins with the OMS/Operator sending a `setThresholds()` message to ImpairmentPersistence. ImpairmentPersistence then sends a `setValues()` message to BPON NE. A dashed arrow from BPON NE to QoSLog is annotated with a note: "As many times...". Next, the OMS/Operator sends `setSlidingWindowParameters()` to ImpairmentPersistence, which sends `addRemoveMatrixRow()` to QoSLog. This is followed by two self-call messages from the OMS/Operator to ImpairmentPersistence: `getSystemThresholdsSetting()` and `getSystemSWSettings()`. Then, the OMS/Operator sends `setThreshold()` to ImpairmentPersistence, which sends `setValues()` to BPON NE. A dashed arrow from BPON NE to QoSLog is annotated with a note: "For all monitoring points of specific type.". The OMS/Operator then sends `getThresholdValues()` to ImpairmentPersistence, which sends `getValues()` to BPON NE. Another dashed arrow from BPON NE to QoSLog is annotated with a note: "For all monitoring points monitoring the specific parameter.". Finally, the OMS/Operator sends `getSpecificSlidingWindowParameters()` to ImpairmentPersistence, which sends `getXYMatrixRows()` to QoSLog.
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Setting of parameters' involving OMS/Operator, ImpairmentPersistence, BPON NE, and QoSLog.
+
+Figure 6-24 – Setting of parameters sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant ImpairmentPers... as :ImpairmentPers...
+ participant BPON NE as :BPON NE
+ participant Event Screener as :Event Screener
+ participant EventDelete as :EventDelete
+ participant EventSet Manager as :EventSet Manager
+ participant EventSet as :EventSet
+ participant Event Correlator as :Event Correlator
+ participant QoSLog as :QoSLog
+ participant EventForwarder as :EventForwarder
+ participant Clock as :Clock
+
+ ImpairmentPers...->>BPON NE: setValues()
+ activate BPON NE
+ BPON NE->>Event Screener: readEvents(TCA)
+ activate Event Screener
+ Event Screener->>EventDelete: addEvents()
+ activate EventDelete
+ EventDelete->>EventSet Manager: notify()
+ activate EventSet Manager
+ EventSet Manager->>EventSet: create()
+ activate EventSet
+ EventSet->>Event Correlator: selectEvents()
+ activate Event Correlator
+ Event Correlator->>Event Correlator: addDependencyRelationship()
+ Event Correlator->>Event Correlator: groupWithSameDependencyResource()
+ Event Correlator->>Event Correlator: removeGroupDependency()
+ Event Correlator->>Event Correlator: supersedeFilterings()
+ Event Correlator->>Event Correlator: patternToSupportingResource()
+ Event Correlator->>Event Correlator: completeEventRecord()
+ Event Correlator->>QoSLog: storeRecord()
+ deactivate Event Correlator
+ Event Correlator->>EventSet Manager: deleteEventSet()
+ activate EventSet Manager
+ EventSet Manager->>EventSet: purge()
+ deactivate EventSet Manager
+ EventSet->>EventSet: delete()
+ deactivate EventSet
+ Event Correlator->>Clock: clockTrigger()
+ activate Clock
+ Clock->>EventForwarder: calcPersistence()
+ activate EventForwarder
+ EventForwarder->>EventForwarder: processAnnouncement()
+ deactivate EventForwarder
+ deactivate Clock
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for RCIA showing interactions between ImpairmentPers..., BPON NE, Event Screener, EventDelete, EventSet Manager, EventSet, Event Correlator, QoSLog, EventForwarder, and Clock. The diagram illustrates the flow of events and data processing, including operations like readEvents(TCA), addEvents(), notify(), create(), selectEvents(), addDependencyRelationship(), groupWithSameDependencyResource(), removeGroupDependency(), supersedeFilterings(), patternToSupportingResource(), completeEventRecord(), storeRecord(), deleteEventSet(), purge(), delete(), clockTrigger(), calcPersistence(), and processAnnouncement().
+
+Figure 6-25 – RCIA sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters |
+|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) setSlidingWindowParameters | This operation sets the sliding window parameters for one, some or all monitored parameters in an NE. |
+| 2) setSpecificSlidingWindowParameters | This operation is similar to the operation setSlidingWindowParameters except the scope of assignment of settings is limited to a specific monitoring point identified in the operation. |
+| 3) getSpecificSlidingWindowParameters | This operation provides a listing of monitoring points and their sliding window settings for a specified parameter. |
+| 4) setThreshold | This operation sets the threshold value identified by a profile to a monitoring point in a network element. |
+| 5) setThresholds | This operation allows the setting of a collection of threshold value, monitoringPointType pairs on a particular NE. |
+| 6) getThresholdValues | This operation provides a listing of monitoring points and their threshold data setting names for a specified monitoring point type. |
+| 7) getSystemThresholdsSetting | This operation retrieves the system default values for threshold data. |
+| 8) getSystemSWSettings | This operation retrieves the system default sliding window settings. |
+
+Figure 6-26(a) – Impairment persistence operations
+
+##### Operation signatures7
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) setSlidingWindowParameters | ManagedEntityType (NE),
MonitoredParameterSeqType,
short (total consecutive intervals),
short (minimum persistence) | void | UnknownNE,
UnknownParameters,
IntervalCountTooLarge,
AccessDenied,
CommFailure |
+| 2) setSpecificSlidingWindowParameters | ManagedEntityType (NE),
ManagedEntityType (Monitoring Point),
MonitoredParameterSeqType,
short (total consecutive intervals),
short (minimum persistence) | void | UnknownNE,
UnknownParameters,
IntervalCountTooLarge,
AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
CommFailure,
EquipmentFailure |
+| 3) getSpecificSlidingWindowParameters | ManagedEntityType (NE),
MonitoredParameterType | SWPValueSeqType | UnknownNE,
UnknownParameters,
CommFailure |
+| 4) setThreshold | ManagedEntityType (NE),
ManagedEntityType (monitoring point),
NameType (threshold data profile) | void | UnknownNE,
AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownProfiles,
InvalidAssociation,
CommFailure,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 5) setThresholds | ManagedEntityType (NE),
boolean (system scope),
ThresholdsSeqType | void | UnknownNE,
UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
UnknownMonitoringPoint Types,
InvalidAssociation,
CommFailure,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 6) getThresholdValues | ManagedEntityType (NE),
MonitoringKindType | MonitoringPoint ThresholdsSeqType | UnknownNE,
UnknownMonitoringPoint Types,
CommFailure |
+| 7) getSystemThresholdsSetting | ManagedEntityType (NE) | ThresholdsSeqType | AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity |
+| 8) getSystemSWSettings | ManagedEntityType (NE) | ParameterSetting SeqType | AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity |
+
+**Figure 6-26(b) – Impairment persistence signatures**
+
+7 The "set" operations listed above modify (overwrite) an existing X,Y sliding window specification. If no such specification exists for the monitored parameter, then the "set" operations are viewed to be additional specifications.
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| EquipmentFailure | The NE currently has a failure condition preventing the requested transaction from being completed. |
+| IntervalCountTooLarge | The exception is raised when the requested intervals exceeds the maximum supported by the supplier management system. The exception indicates the maximum allowed monitoring intervals supported by the supplier management system. |
+| InvalidAssociation | The given profile cannot be applied to a monitoring point. |
+| ProfileSuspended | This exception is raised if the profile name provided is unknown to the supplier management system and cannot be retrieved from the profile object repository. |
+| UnknownManagedEntity | The specified managed entity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownMonitoringPointTypes | The monitoring point instance provided on the request is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownParameters | The given monitored parameter is unknown in the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownProfiles | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+
+**Figure 6-27 – Impairment persistence exceptions**
+
+### 6.3.3 Software and configuration data
+
+#### 6.3.3.1 Download and activate NE software
+
+
+
+```
+classDiagram
+ class RecordSetMgr {
+ +selectRecords()
+ }
+ class Log {
+ +storeRecord()
+ +findRecords()
+ +displayByKey()
+ +displayRecords()
+ }
+ class DownloadLogRecord
+ class DownloadMgr {
+ +Scheduled Software Download Tracking Object List
+ +On Demand Software Download Tracking Object List
+ +Software Load Target Mapping
+ +deliverDistSWGlobal()
+ +deliverDistSWSpecific()
+ +deleteSoftwareDownloadTrackingObject()
+ +commit()
+ +activate()
+ +revert()
+ +getStatus()
+ +scheduleDeliverDist()
+ +scheduleCommit()
+ +scheduleActivate()
+ +cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity()
+ +scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet()
+ +onDemandSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet()
+ }
+ class EventSupplier {
+ +pushEvent()
+ }
+ class EventForwarder {
+ +processAnnouncement()
+ }
+ class Clock
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class VersionRepository {
+ +updateSWVersion()
+ +retrieveVersions()
+ +validateNEVersion()
+ +validatePlugInVersion()
+ }
+ class OMSOperator[OMS/Operator]
+ class BPONNE[BPON NE]
+ class SecureFileServer[Secure File Server]
+
+ RecordSetMgr --> Log : obtains records
+ RecordSetMgr --> RecordSetMgr : selectRecords()
+ Log --> DownloadLogRecord : updates
+ Log --> DownloadMgr : views
+ DownloadMgr --> Log : plans NE software loading
+ DownloadMgr --> BPONNE : +coordinator
+ BPONNE --> DownloadMgr : delivers to
+ DownloadMgr --> EventForwarder : announces
+ DownloadMgr --> Clock : triggers
+ DownloadMgr --> Factory : commissions
+ DownloadMgr --> SecureFileServer : designates software set source
+ EventForwarder --> EventSupplier : pushes event notification
+ EventSupplier --> ExternalEventChannel[External Event Channel] : push()
+ VersionRepository --> DownloadMgr : validates version
+ VersionRepository --> VersionRepository : updateSWVersion()
+ VersionRepository --> VersionRepository : retrieveVersions()
+ VersionRepository --> VersionRepository : validateNEVersion()
+ VersionRepository --> VersionRepository : validatePlugInVersion()
+```
+
+UML class diagram for Distribute NE software. The diagram shows classes: RecordSetMgr, Log, DownloadLogRecord, DownloadMgr, Event Supplier, Event Forwarder, Clock, Factory, Version Repository, and actors: OMS/Operator, BPON NE, and Secure File Server. Relationships include: RecordSetMgr obtains records from Log and selects records; Log stores, finds, displays by key, and displays records; DownloadMgr updates Log, views Log, plans NE software loading, and acts as a coordinator for BPON NE; BPON NE delivers to DownloadMgr; DownloadMgr announces to Event Forwarder, triggers Clock, commissions Factory, and designates software set source to Secure File Server; Event Forwarder pushes event notification to Event Supplier, which then pushes to External Event Channel; Version Repository validates version from DownloadMgr and has methods for update, retrieve, validate NE, and validate PlugIn.
+
+Figure 6-28 – Distribute NE software class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator
+ participant DownloadMgr as :DownloadMgr
+ participant VersionRepository as :VersionRepository
+ participant OLT as OLT:BPON NE
+ participant SFS as :Secure File Server
+ participant Target as Target:BPON NE
+ participant Log as ActivityCompletion:Log
+ participant Factory as TrackingObject:Factory
+ participant Channel as :ExternalBeetChannel
+ participant Forwarder as :BeetForwarder
+ participant Supplier as :BeetSupplier
+
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: deliverDISTINGGlobal()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: validateNEVersions()
+ activate VersionRepository
+ VersionRepository->>DownloadMgr: validatePluginVersion()
+ deactivate VersionRepository
+ Note over DownloadMgr: For every system.
+ DownloadMgr->>Factory: create()
+ activate Factory
+ Factory->>DownloadMgr: downloadSoftware()
+ deactivate Factory
+ DownloadMgr->>OLT: login()
+ activate OLT
+ OLT->>SFS: establishFileTransfer()
+ activate SFS
+ SFS->>OLT: checkDownload()
+ deactivate SFS
+ OLT->>Target: endConnection()
+ activate Target
+ Target->>OLT: removeLoad()
+ deactivate Target
+ Note over OLT: For every target within system.
+ OLT->>Target: distributeSoftware()
+ activate Target
+ Target->>Target: checkDownload()
+ deactivate Target
+ OLT->>Log: storeRecord()
+ deactivate OLT
+ DownloadMgr->>Log: processAnnouncement()
+ activate Log
+ Log->>Channel: postBeet()
+ activate Channel
+ Channel->>Forwarder: postBeet()
+ activate Forwarder
+ Forwarder->>Supplier: postBeet()
+ activate Supplier
+ Supplier->>Forwarder: post()
+ deactivate Supplier
+ Forwarder->>Channel: post()
+ deactivate Forwarder
+ Channel->>Log: post()
+ deactivate Channel
+ Log->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate Log
+ deactivate DownloadMgr
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Immediate NE software delivery. The diagram shows interactions between OMSOperator, DownloadMgr, VersionRepository, OLT:BPON NE, Secure File Server, Target:BPON NE, ActivityCompletion:Log, TrackingObject:Factory, ExternalBeetChannel, BeetForwarder, and BeetSupplier. Key steps include validation, software download, distribution to targets, and final status updates.
+
+Figure 6-29 – Immediate NE software delivery sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant DownloadMgr as :DownloadMgr
+ participant VersionRepository as :VersionRepository
+ participant OLT as OLT: BRON NE
+ participant SecureFileServer as :Secure File Server
+ participant Target as Target: BPON NE
+ participant ActivityCompletionLog as :ActivityCompletion Log
+ participant TrackingObjectFactory as :Tracking Object Factory
+ participant ExternalBeutChannel as :External Beut Channel
+ participant BeutForwarder as :BeutForwarder
+ participant BeutSupplier as :BeutSupplier
+
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: getStatus()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: getNEDetails()
+ activate VersionRepository
+ VersionRepository->>DownloadMgr: validateNEVersion()
+ deactivate VersionRepository
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: validatePlugInVersion()
+ activate VersionRepository
+ VersionRepository->>DownloadMgr: validatePlugInVersion()
+ deactivate VersionRepository
+ Note left of DownloadMgr: For each missed system / target type.
+ DownloadMgr->>TrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TrackingObjectFactory
+ TrackingObjectFactory->>DownloadMgr: downloadSoftware()
+ deactivate TrackingObjectFactory
+ DownloadMgr->>OLT: login()
+ activate OLT
+ OLT->>SecureFileServer: establishFileTransfer()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>OLT: checkDownload()
+ deactivate SecureFileServer
+ OLT->>Target: endConnection()
+ activate Target
+ Target->>OLT: removeLoad()
+ deactivate Target
+ OLT->>Target: distributeSoftware()
+ activate Target
+ Target->>Target: checkDownload()
+ deactivate Target
+ OLT->>ActivityCompletionLog: storeRecord()
+ deactivate OLT
+ ActivityCompletionLog->>BeutForwarder: processAnnouncement()
+ activate BeutForwarder
+ BeutForwarder->>BeutSupplier: pushEvent()
+ activate BeutSupplier
+ BeutSupplier->>BeutForwarder: push()
+ deactivate BeutSupplier
+ BeutForwarder->>ExternalBeutChannel: push()
+ deactivate BeutForwarder
+ deactivate ActivityCompletionLog
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Immediate specific NE software delivery. The diagram shows interactions between an OMS Operator, Download Manager, Version Repository, OLT: BRON NE, Secure File Server, Target: BPON NE, Activity Completion Log, Tracking Object Factory, External Beut Channel, BeutForwarder, and BeutSupplier. The process starts with the OMS Operator requesting software status and details, followed by validation of NE version and plug-in version. A loop 'For each missed system / target type' leads to creating a tracking object and downloading software. The software is then distributed through the OLT and Target, with various status checks and connection management. Finally, records are stored and announcements are processed, leading to a push event and a push response.
+
+Figure 6-30 – Immediate specific NE software delivery sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant DownloadMgt as :DownloadMgt
+ participant Target as Target: EPON NE
+ participant Log as ActivityCompletion: Log
+ participant Repository as :Version Repository
+ participant Channel as :External Event Channel
+
+ Note over Target: For each successful delivery target.
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgt: getStatus()
+ DownloadMgt->>Target: commit()
+ Target->>Target: sem&SyncCheck()
+ Target->>Target: removeLoad()
+ DownloadMgt->>Repository: updateSWVersion()
+ DownloadMgt->>Log: storeRecord()
+ DownloadMgt->>Channel: pushNotification()
+
+ Note over Target: For each successful commit target.
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgt: activate()
+ DownloadMgt->>Target: switchPrimarySecondary()
+ Target->>Target: reset()
+ DownloadMgt->>Repository: updateSWVersion()
+ DownloadMgt->>Log: storeRecord()
+ DownloadMgt->>Channel: pushNotification()
+
+ Note over Target: For undesirable software loads.
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgt: revert()
+ DownloadMgt->>Target: switchPrimarySecondary()
+ Target->>Target: reset()
+ DownloadMgt->>Repository: updateSWVersion()
+ DownloadMgt->>Log: storeRecord()
+ DownloadMgt->>Channel: pushNotification()
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for Immediate NE software commit, activate or revert sequence. The diagram shows interactions between OMS Operator, DownloadMgt, Target: EPON NE, ActivityCompletion: Log, Version Repository, and External Event Channel. The process is divided into three main sections: commit, activate, and revert. Each section involves sending messages to the Target, updating the Version Repository, and pushing notifications to the External Event Channel. Notes indicate that these actions are performed for each successful delivery or commit target.
+
+**Figure 6-31 – Immediate NE software commit, activate or revert sequence diagram (for successful software delivery targets)8**
+
+8 In this figure and subsequent software activity sequences diagrams, "pushes notification" to the external event channel refers to the same notification process that is detailed out in Figures 6-29 and 6-30 for on demand software delivery and distribution.
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as :OMS Operator
+ participant DM as :DownloadMgr
+ participant VR as :VersionRepository
+ participant OLT as OLT: BPON NE
+ participant SFS as :Secure File Server
+ participant Target as Target: BPON NE
+ participant EF as :EventForwarder
+ participant ACL as Activity Completion Log
+ participant TOF as Tracking Object Factory
+ participant EEC as :External Event Channel
+
+ OMS->>DM: scheduleDelivery()
+ activate DM
+ DM->>VR: validateNEVersions()
+ activate VR
+ VR->>DM: validateNEVersions()
+ deactivate VR
+ DM->>TOF: create()
+ activate TOF
+ TOF->>DM:
+ deactivate TOF
+ DM->>OLT: downloadSoftware()
+ activate OLT
+ OLT->>SFS: login()
+ activate SFS
+ SFS->>OLT: establishFileTransfer()
+ activate SFS
+ SFS->>OLT: checkDownload()
+ activate SFS
+ SFS->>OLT: endConnection()
+ deactivate SFS
+ OLT->>DM: removeLoad()
+ deactivate OLT
+ Note over OLT: To all appropriate targets.
+ OLT->>Target: distributeSoftware()
+ activate Target
+ Target->>Target: checkDownload()
+ deactivate Target
+ Note over Target: For each specific target.
+ DM->>DM: storeRecord()
+ activate DM
+ DM->>ACL: persistNotification()
+ activate ACL
+ ACL->>DM:
+ deactivate ACL
+ DM->>EEC:
+ activate EEC
+ EEC->>DM:
+ deactivate EEC
+ DM->>DM: getStatus()
+ deactivate DM
+ OMS->>DM: getStatus()
+ activate DM
+ DM->>DM: getStatus()
+ deactivate DM
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Scheduled NE software download. The diagram shows interactions between :OMS Operator, :DownloadMgr, :VersionRepository, OLT: BPON NE, :Secure File Server, Target: BPON NE, :EventForwarder, Activity Completion Log, Tracking Object Factory, and :External Event Channel. The process starts with a scheduled delivery, followed by validation, software download to OLTs, distribution to targets, and final status reporting.
+
+Figure 6-32 – Scheduled NE software download sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMS Operator
+ participant DownloadMgr as :DownloadMgr
+ actor BPGNNE as :BPGN NE
+ participant VersionRepository as :Version Repository
+ participant Log as :Log
+ participant EventForwarder as :EventForwarder
+ participant TrackingObjectFactory as :Tracking Object Factory
+ actor ExternalEventChannel as :External Event Channel
+
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: scheduleCommit()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ DownloadMgr->>BPGNNE: getStatus()
+ activate BPGNNE
+ BPGNNE->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate BPGNNE
+ DownloadMgr->>BPGNNE: writeToSecondary()
+ activate BPGNNE
+ BPGNNE->>DownloadMgr: sendSyncCheck()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ DownloadMgr->>BPGNNE: removeLoad()
+ activate BPGNNE
+ BPGNNE->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate BPGNNE
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: updateSVNVersion()
+ activate VersionRepository
+ VersionRepository->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate VersionRepository
+ DownloadMgr->>EventForwarder: postEventNotification()
+ activate EventForwarder
+ EventForwarder->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate EventForwarder
+ DownloadMgr->>TrackingObjectFactory: storeRecord()
+ activate TrackingObjectFactory
+ TrackingObjectFactory->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate TrackingObjectFactory
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: updateSVNVersion()
+ activate VersionRepository
+ VersionRepository->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate VersionRepository
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: scheduleActivate()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ DownloadMgr->>BPGNNE: switchPrimarySecondary()
+ activate BPGNNE
+ BPGNNE->>DownloadMgr: reset()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ DownloadMgr->>BPGNNE:
+ deactivate BPGNNE
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: updateSVNVersion()
+ activate VersionRepository
+ VersionRepository->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate VersionRepository
+ DownloadMgr->>EventForwarder: postEventNotification()
+ activate EventForwarder
+ EventForwarder->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate EventForwarder
+ DownloadMgr->>TrackingObjectFactory: storeRecord()
+ activate TrackingObjectFactory
+ TrackingObjectFactory->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate TrackingObjectFactory
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: updateSVNVersion()
+ activate VersionRepository
+ VersionRepository->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate VersionRepository
+ DownloadMgr->>ExternalEventChannel: delete()
+ activate ExternalEventChannel
+ ExternalEventChannel->>DownloadMgr:
+ deactivate ExternalEventChannel
+ deactivate DownloadMgr
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the sequence of operations for scheduling a software commit or activation. It involves the following components and their interactions:
+
+- Participants:** :OMS Operator (Actor), :DownloadMgr (Boundary), :BPGN NE (Actor), :Version Repository (Boundary), :Log (Boundary), :EventForwarder (Boundary), :Tracking Object Factory (Boundary), and :External Event Channel (Actor).
+- Sequence of Operations:**
+ - scheduleCommit():** Initiated by :OMS Operator to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `getStatus()` on :BPGN NE.
+ - :BPGN NE returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `writeToSecondary()` on :BPGN NE.
+ - :BPGN NE calls `sendSyncCheck()` on :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `removeLoad()` on :BPGN NE.
+ - :BPGN NE returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `updateSVNVersion()` on :Version Repository.
+ - :Version Repository returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `postEventNotification()` on :EventForwarder.
+ - :EventForwarder returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `storeRecord()` on :Tracking Object Factory.
+ - :Tracking Object Factory returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `updateSVNVersion()` on :Version Repository.
+ - :Version Repository returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - scheduleActivate():** Initiated by :OMS Operator to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `switchPrimarySecondary()` on :BPGN NE.
+ - :BPGN NE calls `reset()` on :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr returns to :BPGN NE.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `updateSVNVersion()` on :Version Repository.
+ - :Version Repository returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `postEventNotification()` on :EventForwarder.
+ - :EventForwarder returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `storeRecord()` on :Tracking Object Factory.
+ - :Tracking Object Factory returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `updateSVNVersion()` on :Version Repository.
+ - :Version Repository returns to :DownloadMgr.
+ - :DownloadMgr calls `delete()` on :External Event Channel.
+ - :External Event Channel returns to :DownloadMgr.
+
+A note indicates: "For all specific targets at start time." This applies to the `postEventNotification()` and `storeRecord()` calls to the EventForwarder and Tracking Object Factory respectively.
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Scheduled NE software commit or activate' showing interactions between OMS Operator, DownloadMgr, BPGN NE, Version Repository, Log, EventForwarder, Tracking Object Factory, and External Event Channel.
+
+Figure 6-33 – Scheduled NE software commit or activate sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant DownloadMgr as :DownloadMgr
+ participant VersionRepository as :VersionRepository
+
+ Note over OMSOperator, DownloadMgr: Assume software has been distributed via
+schedule successfully. Software download
+tracking object is automatically deleted.
+
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet()
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: getStats()
+ VersionRepository-->>DownloadMgr:
+ Note over VersionRepository: Shows more.
+
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: scheduleCommit()
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: scheduleActivate()
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet()
+ Note over VersionRepository: For same target.
+
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity()
+ Note over VersionRepository: Shows two activities.
+
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: validateNEVersion()
+ DownloadMgr->>VersionRepository: validatePluginVersion()
+ VersionRepository-->>DownloadMgr:
+ Note over VersionRepository: For each scheduled activity.
+
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity()
+ OMSOperator->>DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet()
+ Note over VersionRepository: Shows more.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Cancel scheduled NE software delivery'. The diagram involves three lifelines: :OMSOperator (actor), :DownloadMgr, and :VersionRepository. The process starts with a note: 'Assume software has been distributed via schedule successfully. Software download tracking object is automatically deleted.' The sequence of messages is: 1. :OMSOperator->>:DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet(). 2. :DownloadMgr->>:VersionRepository: getStats(). 3. :VersionRepository-->>:DownloadMgr: (return). 4. :OMSOperator->>:DownloadMgr: scheduleCommit(). 5. :OMSOperator->>:DownloadMgr: scheduleActivate(). 6. :OMSOperator->>:DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet(). 7. :OMSOperator->>:DownloadMgr: cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity(). 8. :DownloadMgr->>:VersionRepository: validateNEVersion(). 9. :DownloadMgr->>:VersionRepository: validatePluginVersion(). 10. :VersionRepository-->>:DownloadMgr: (return). 11. :OMSOperator->>:DownloadMgr: cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity(). 12. :OMSOperator->>:DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet(). Annotations include: 'Shows more.' pointing to the first call to getStats(); 'For same target.' pointing to the return of getStats(); 'Shows two activities.' pointing to the first call to scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet(); 'For each scheduled activity.' pointing to the first call to cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity(); and another 'Shows more.' pointing to the second call to scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectLinkGet().
+
+Figure 6-34 – Cancel scheduled NE software delivery sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor Operator as : OMS/Operator
+ participant DownloadMgr as : DownloadMgr
+ participant Factory as Tracking Object : Factory
+
+ Operator->>DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ deactivate DownloadMgr
+
+ Operator->>DownloadMgr: onDemandSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ deactivate DownloadMgr
+
+ Operator->>DownloadMgr: getStatus()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ deactivate DownloadMgr
+
+ Operator->>DownloadMgr: deleteSoftwareDownloadTrackingObject()
+ activate DownloadMgr
+ DownloadMgr->>Factory: delete()
+ activate Factory
+ deactivate Factory
+ deactivate DownloadMgr
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Tracking object maintenance. Lifelines: : OMS/Operator (Actor), : DownloadMgr (Object), Tracking Object : Factory (Object). Messages: 1. : OMS/Operator to : DownloadMgr: scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet(). 2. : OMS/Operator to : DownloadMgr: onDemandSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet(). 3. : OMS/Operator to : DownloadMgr: getStatus(). 4. : OMS/Operator to : DownloadMgr: deleteSoftwareDownloadTrackingObject(). 5. : DownloadMgr to Tracking Object : Factory: delete().
+
+**Figure 6-35 – Tracking object maintenance sequence diagram**
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) deliverDistSWGloabal | This operation requests the supplier management system to download software generics from software source machine for the purpose of software upgrades and software maintenance changes (patches) to NEs. |
+| 2) deliverDistSWSpecific | This operation is same as deliverDistSWGloabal except the scope is within a single NE/PlugInUnit/slot as described in the input parameter distributionTarget. |
+| 3) deleteSoftwareDownloadTrackingObject | This operation allows the OMS to notify the supplier management system that the software tracking object specified is no longer needed. |
+| 4) commit | This operation requests the supplier management system to install (commit) the downloaded software to target locations. |
+| 5) activate | This operation activates installed software at target locations. |
+| 6) revert | This operation activates older installed software at target locations. |
+| 7) getStatus | This operation requests the status of software activities. |
+| 8) scheduleDeliverDist | This operation schedules the delivery and distribution of software to specified targets. |
+| 9) scheduleCommit | This operation schedules the installation (commit) of software to predetermined targets. |
+| 10) scheduleActivate | This operation schedules the activation of software to predetermined targets. |
+| 11) cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity | This operation cancels all subsequently scheduled software download activities associated with this tracking object. |
+| 12) scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet | This operation retrieves the list of outstanding scheduled activities for software download. |
+| 13) onDemandSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet | This operation retrieves the list of outstanding non-scheduled activities for software download. |
+
+**Figure 6-36 – Download manager operations**
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) deliverDistSWGloab | FilenameSeqType,
DCNAddressType,
UserIdType,
PasswordType,
ManagedEntityIdSeqType | SoftwareDownload
TrackingObjectId
Type | CommFailure,
UnrecognisedTarget,
InsufficientMemory,
SoftwareLoadHWMismatch,
SourceUnreachable,
UnknownSoftwareLoad,
Timeout,
AccessDenied,
DeniedAccess |
+| 2) deliverDistSWSpecific | FilenameSeqType,
DCNAddressType,
UserIdType,
PasswordType,
TargetType | SoftwareDownload
TrackingObjectId
Type | CommFailure,
UnrecognisedTarget,
InsufficientMemory,
SoftwareLoadHWMismatch,
SourceUnreachable,
UnknownSoftwareLoad,
Timeout,
AccessDenied,
DeniedAccess |
+| 3) deleteSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject | SoftwareDownloadTracking
ObjectIdType | void | UnknownSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject,
AccessDenied,
SoftwareTrackingObjectInUse |
+| 4) commit | SoftwareDownloadTracking
ObjectIdType,
TargetType | void | InstallationFailure,
UnknownSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject,
AccessDenied,
UnrecognisedTarget |
+| 5) activate | SoftwareDownloadTracking
ObjectIdType,
TargetType | void | UnknownSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject,
SoftwareNotYetInstalled,
ActivationFailure,
AccessDenied,
UnrecognisedTarget |
+| 6) revert | SoftwareDownloadTracking
ObjectIdType,
TargetType | void | UnknownSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject,
SoftwareNotYetInstalled,
ActivationFailure,
AccessDenied,
UnrecognisedTarget,
InvalidSoftwareTrackingObject |
+| 7) getStatus | SoftwareDownloadTracking
ObjectIdType | DownloadStatusSeq
Type | UnknownSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject,
AccessDenied |
+| 8) scheduleDeliverDist | FilenameSeqType
DCNAddressType
UserIdType
PasswordType
ManagedEntityIdSeqType
GeneralizedTimeType | SoftwareDownload
TrackingObjectId
Type | SoftwareLoadHWMismatch,
AccessDenied,
InvalidStartTime |
+| 9) scheduleCommit | SoftwareDownloadTracking
ObjectIdType,
GeneralizedTimeType | void | UnknownSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject,
SoftwareNotYetInstalled,
AccessDenied,
InvalidStartTime |
+| 10) scheduleActivate | SoftwareDownloadTracking
ObjectIdType,
GeneralizedTimeType | void | UnknownSoftwareDownload
TrackingObject,
SoftwareNotYetInstalled,
AccessDenied,
InvalidStartTime |
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 11) cancelScheduledSoftwareActivity | SoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectIdType | void | UnknownSoftwareDownloadTrackingObject, ActivityCompleted, ActivityInProgress, AccessDenied |
+| 12) scheduledSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet | | SoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectIdSeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 13) onDemandSoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectListGet | | SoftwareDownloadTrackingObjectIdSeqType | AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-37 – Download manager signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| ActivationFailure | This exception is raised if the software activation process failed. |
+| ActivityCompleted | The software activity has been executed and cannot be cancelled. |
+| ActivityInProgress | This exception is raised when the software activity has been initiated and cannot be cancelled. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| DeniedAccess | System is not granted access to the NE. |
+| InstallationFailure | Software installation process failed. |
+| InsufficientMemory | There is insufficient memory on the NE to load the software unit. |
+| InvalidSoftwareTrackingObject | The referenced software tracking object is not the most recent associated with the installation of a software load on the NE. |
+| InvalidStartTime | The start time is inconsistent with the current time, the current trigger time matrix or the new stop time. |
+| SoftwareLoadHWMismatch | The designated software may not be loaded onto the equipment hardware since the version of the hardware cannot accept the software load. |
+| SoftwareNotYetInstalled | The software may not be activated since it has not been installed yet. |
+| SoftwareTrackingObjectInUse | Indicates that software download has been completed so that the process cannot be cancelled. |
+| SourceUnreachable | The server holding the software load to be downloaded could not be reached by the OLT. |
+| Timeout | The process duration reached a system-defined timeout before the process could complete. |
+| UnknownSoftwareLoad | The specified software unit cannot be found. |
+| UnknownSoftwareDownloadTrackingObject | The named software activity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnrecognisedTarget | The designated software in the secure file server is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-38 – Download manager exceptions**
+
+#### 6.3.3.2 Backup and restore NE
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class Log {
+ +storeRecord()
+ +findRecords()
+ +displayByKey()
+ +displayRecords()
+ }
+ class BackupRestoreLogRecord {
+ }
+ class MIBMover {
+ +TransferTrackingObjectList
+ +startBackup()
+ +cancelScheduledBackup()
+ +getBackupStatus()
+ +startRestore()
+ +getRestoreStatus()
+ +scheduleBackup()
+ +modifyBackupSchedule()
+ +abortBackup()
+ +transferTrackingObjectListGet()
+ }
+ class Scheduler {
+ }
+ class TransferMgr[Transfer Mgr] {
+ }
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class ManagementModelMaintainer[Management Model Maintainer] {
+ }
+ class BPON_NE[BPON NE]
+ class OMS_Operator[OMS/Operator]
+ class Secure_File_Server[Secure File Server]
+ class OLTSysMIB[OLTSysMIB]
+
+ Log ..> BackupRestoreLogRecord
+ MIBMover --> Log : updates
+ MIBMover --> Scheduler : triggers
+ Scheduler --> MIBMover : loading
+ MIBMover --> TransferMgr : commissions
+ TransferMgr --> Factory : commissions
+ MIBMover --> ManagementModelMaintainer : consults
+ BPON_NE --> MIBMover : extracts and applies MIB data
+ OMS_Operator --> MIBMover : schedules backup and initiates restore
+ OMS_Operator --> Scheduler
+ OLTSysMIB --> TransferMgr : loading
+ TransferMgr --> Secure_File_Server : delivers to
+ Factory --> TransferMgr
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the class structure and interactions for Network Element (NE) data backup and restore.
+
+- MIBMover** is the central class, managing operations like `startBackup()`, `startRestore()`, and `scheduleBackup()`. It maintains a `TransferTrackingObjectList`.
+- OMS/Operator** (actor) interacts with **MIBMover** to schedule backups and initiate restores, and also interacts with the **Scheduler**.
+- BPON NE** (actor) interacts with **MIBMover** to extract and apply MIB data.
+- MIBMover** updates the **Log** (which contains **BackupRestoreLogRecord**), triggers the **Scheduler**, commissions the **Transfer Mgr**, and consults the **Management Model Maintainer**.
+- Scheduler** is responsible for loading **MIBMover**. A note indicates: "Details found in 'Scheduler' Analysis."
+- Transfer Mgr** is commissioned by **MIBMover** and also commissions the **Factory** (which has `create()` and `delete()` methods). It loads data from **OLTSysMIB** and delivers it to the **Secure File Server** (actor). A note indicates: "Details found in 'File Transfer' Analysis."
+
+UML class diagram for NE data backup and restore. The diagram shows the interactions between various components including Log, BackupRestoreLogRecord, MIBMover, Scheduler, Transfer Mgr, Factory, Management Model Maintainer, BPON NE, OMS/Operator, and Secure File Server. It includes method lists for each class and detailed annotations for the relationships.
+
+Figure 6-39 – NE data backup and restore class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant MIBMover as :MIBMover
+ participant SecureFileServer as :Secure File Server
+ participant OLT as OLT: BRON NE
+ participant TrackingObjectFactory as Tracking_Object: Factory
+ participant TransferMgr as :Transfer Mgr
+ participant TransferTrackingObjectFactory as Transfer Tracking Object: Factory
+ participant ActivityCompletionLog as Activity Completion: Log
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: startBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>SecureFileServer: checkPermissions()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>OLT: snapshotMIB()
+ activate OLT
+ OLT->>TrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TrackingObjectFactory
+ TrackingObjectFactory->>MIBMover: prepareFile()
+ deactivate TrackingObjectFactory
+ MIBMover->>OLT: prepareFile()
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ OLT->>MIBMover: getBackupStatus()
+ deactivate OLT
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>TransferMgr: fileTransfer()
+ activate TransferMgr
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ TransferTrackingObjectFactory->>TransferMgr: delete()
+ deactivate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ TransferMgr->>SecureFileServer: transferFile()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>OLT: login
+ activate OLT
+ OLT->>SecureFileServer: establishFileTransfer
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>OLT: readConnection
+ deactivate SecureFileServer
+ OLT->>TransferMgr: storeRecord()
+ deactivate OLT
+ TransferMgr->>ActivityCompletionLog: delete()
+ deactivate TransferMgr
+ MIBMover->>TrackingObjectFactory: delete()
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover: getBackupStatus()
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ MIBMover-->>MIBMover: Raises exception.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Immediate NE backup sequence. Lifelines: :OMSOperator, :MIBMover, :Secure File Server, OLT: BRON NE, Tracking\_Object: Factory, :Transfer Mgr, Transfer Tracking Object: Factory, Activity Completion: Log. Messages: startBackup(), checkPermissions(), snapshotMIB(), create(), prepareFile(), getBackupStatus(), fileTransfer(), transferFile(), create(), delete(), storeRecord(), delete(). Includes a 'Raises exception.' note.
+
+Figure 6-40 – Immediate NE backup sequence diagram9
+
+9 If the MIB is stewarded within the supplier management system, then the MIB snapshot, file creation and file transfer is accomplished within the supplier management system and not the OLT.
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant MIBMgr as :MIB Mgr
+ participant SecureFileServer as :Secure File Server
+ participant TrackingObjectFactory as Tracking Object : Factory
+ participant OLT as OLT : BRON NE
+ participant Scheduler as :Scheduler
+ participant TransferMgr as :Transfer Mgr
+ participant TransferTrackingObjectFactory as Transfer Tracking Object : Factory
+ participant ActivityCompletionLog as Activity Completion : Log
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMgr: schedule Backup()
+ activate MIBMgr
+ MIBMgr->>SecureFileServer: checkPermission()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ deactivate SecureFileServer
+ MIBMgr->>TrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TrackingObjectFactory
+ deactivate TrackingObjectFactory
+ MIBMgr->>Scheduler: addAssociatedActivity()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMgr: startBackup()
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ activate MIBMgr
+ MIBMgr->>SecureFileServer: checkPermission()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ deactivate SecureFileServer
+ MIBMgr->>OLT: snapshotMIB()
+ activate OLT
+ deactivate OLT
+ MIBMgr->>OLT: prepareFile()
+ activate OLT
+ deactivate OLT
+ MIBMgr->>TransferMgr: fileTransfer()
+ activate TransferMgr
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ deactivate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ TransferMgr->>OLT: transferFile()
+ activate OLT
+ deactivate OLT
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: delete()
+ activate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ deactivate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ TransferMgr->>ActivityCompletionLog: storeRecord()
+ activate ActivityCompletionLog
+ deactivate ActivityCompletionLog
+ TransferMgr->>SecureFileServer: log()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ deactivate SecureFileServer
+ TransferMgr->>SecureFileServer: establishFileTransfer()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ deactivate SecureFileServer
+ TransferMgr->>SecureFileServer: endConnection()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ deactivate SecureFileServer
+ deactivate TransferMgr
+ MIBMgr->>MIBMgr: getBackupStatus()
+ deactivate MIBMgr
+ activate MIBMgr
+ MIBMgr->>MIBMgr: getBackupStatus()
+ deactivate MIBMgr
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Scheduled NE backup process. Lifelines: :OMSOperator, :MIB Mgr, :Secure File Server, Tracking Object : Factory, OLT : BRON NE, :Scheduler, :Transfer Mgr, Transfer Tracking Object : Factory, Activity Completion : Log. Messages: 1. :OMSOperator->>:MIB Mgr: schedule Backup(). 2. :MIB Mgr->>:Secure File Server: checkPermission(). 3. :MIB Mgr->>Tracking Object : Factory: create(). 4. :MIB Mgr->>:Scheduler: addAssociatedActivity(). 5. :Scheduler->>:MIB Mgr: startBackup(). 6. :MIB Mgr->>:Secure File Server: checkPermission(). 7. :MIB Mgr->>OLT : BRON NE: snapshotMIB(). 8. :MIB Mgr->>OLT : BRON NE: prepareFile(). 9. :MIB Mgr->>:Transfer Mgr: fileTransfer(). 10. :Transfer Mgr->>Transfer Tracking Object : Factory: create(). 11. :Transfer Mgr->>OLT : BRON NE: transferFile(). 12. :Transfer Mgr->>Transfer Tracking Object : Factory: delete(). 13. :Transfer Mgr->>Activity Completion : Log: storeRecord(). 14. :MIB Mgr->>:Transfer Mgr: log(). 15. :Transfer Mgr->>:Secure File Server: establishFileTransfer(). 16. :Transfer Mgr->>:Secure File Server: endConnection(). 17. :MIB Mgr->>:MIB Mgr: getBackupStatus(). 18. :MIB Mgr->>:MIB Mgr: getBackupStatus().
+
+Figure 6-41 – Scheduled NE backup sequence diagram10
+
+10 If the MIB is stewarded within the supplier management system, then the MIB snapshot, file creation and file transfer is accomplished within the supplier management system and not the OLT.
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant MIBMover as :MIB Mover
+ participant SecureFileServer as :Secure File Server
+ participant TOF as Tracking Object Factory
+ participant Scheduler as :Scheduler
+ participant OLT as OLT: BRON NE
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: scheduleBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>SecureFileServer: checkPermissions()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>TOF: create()
+ activate TOF
+ TOF->>Scheduler: addAssociatedActivity()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: cancelScheduledBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>SecureFileServer: delete()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>Scheduler: removeAssociatedActivity()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: cancelScheduledBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover: Raises exception.
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: scheduleBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>SecureFileServer: checkPermissions()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>TOF: create()
+ activate TOF
+ TOF->>Scheduler: addAssociatedActivity()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover: Raises exception.
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: startBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>SecureFileServer: checkPermissions()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>Scheduler: startBackup()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: cancelScheduledBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>OLT: stopMIB
+ activate OLT
+ OLT->>MIBMover: prepareFile
+ deactivate OLT
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: abortBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: getBackupStatus()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover: Shows abort termination.
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: cancelScheduledBackup()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>SecureFileServer: delete()
+ activate SecureFileServer
+ SecureFileServer->>Scheduler: removeAssociatedActivity()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover:
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Cancel scheduled NE backup. Lifelines: :OMSOperator, :MIB Mover, :Secure File Server, Tracking Object Factory, :Scheduler, OLT: BRON NE. The diagram shows a sequence of operations including scheduling, canceling, starting, aborting, and deleting backups, with error handling for exceptions.
+
+Figure 6-42 – Cancel scheduled NE backup sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant MIBMover as :MIB Mover
+ participant SectFileServer as :Sect's File Server
+ participant TransferMgr as :Transfer Mgr
+ participant BPCNNE as :BPC N NE
+ participant TransferTrackingObjectFactory as Transfer Tracking Object: Factory
+ participant ManagementModelMaintainer as :Management Model Maintainer
+ participant Factory as :Factory
+
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: selectRecords()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover: getBackupStatus()
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: startRestore()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>SectFileServer: checkPermissions()
+ activate SectFileServer
+ deactivate SectFileServer
+ MIBMover->>ManagementModelMaintainer: checkSW/HWMatch()
+ activate ManagementModelMaintainer
+ deactivate ManagementModelMaintainer
+ MIBMover->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ deactivate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ MIBMover->>TransferMgr: fileTransfer()
+ activate TransferMgr
+ TransferMgr->>SectFileServer: checkPermissions()
+ activate SectFileServer
+ deactivate SectFileServer
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ deactivate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ TransferMgr->>BPCNNE: login
+ activate BPCNNE
+ deactivate BPCNNE
+ TransferMgr->>BPCNNE: establishFileTransfer
+ activate BPCNNE
+ deactivate BPCNNE
+ TransferMgr->>SectFileServer: endConnection
+ activate SectFileServer
+ deactivate SectFileServer
+ BPCNNE->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: applyMIB
+ activate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ deactivate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ BPCNNE->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: reset
+ activate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ deactivate TransferTrackingObjectFactory
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover: getRestoreStatus()
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: getRestoreStatus()
+ activate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>Factory: notify delete()
+ activate Factory
+ deactivate Factory
+ MIBMover->>MIBMover: storeRecord()
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ MIBMover->>Factory: delete()
+ activate Factory
+ deactivate Factory
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: getRestoreStatus()
+ activate MIBMover
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ OMSOperator->>MIBMover: selectRecords()
+ activate MIBMover
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for the Restore NE process. The diagram shows interactions between several lifelines: :OMSOperator, :MIB Mover, :Sect's File Server, :Transfer Mgr, :BPC N NE, Transfer Tracking Object: Factory, :Management Model Maintainer, and :Factory. The process starts with :OMSOperator selecting records and getting backup status. Then, :MIB Mover starts a restore, checks permissions, and checks SW/HW match. It then creates a Transfer Tracking Object and calls fileTransfer() on :Transfer Mgr. :Transfer Mgr checks permissions, creates a Transfer Tracking Object, logs in, establishes a file transfer, and ends the connection. :BPC N NE then applies MIB and resets. :MIB Mover gets restore status, notifies :Factory to delete, and stores records. Finally, :MIB Mover gets restore status again and selects records.
+
+Figure 6-43 – Restore NE sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) startBackup | This operation initiates an immediate backup of system configuration data from a system and/or supplier management system to a backup server destination. |
+| 2) getBackupStatus | This operation provides the capability to retrieve the status of a backup process. |
+| 3) scheduleBackup | This operation cancels all subsequent backup processes for a system based on a scheduler. This operation will not interrupt a backup process in progress. |
+| 4) modifyBackupSchedule | This operation cancels all subsequent backup processes for a system based on a scheduler. |
+| 5) cancelScheduledBackup | This operation aborts a backup process in progress whether scheduled or not. Subsequent scheduled backup process are not affected by this operation. |
+| 6) abortBackup | This operation aborts a backup process in progress whether scheduled or not. Subsequent scheduled backup process are not affected by this operation. |
+| 7) startRestore | This operation provides functionality to restore a system based on a backed up copy of configuration data. |
+| 8) getRestoreStatus | This operation provides the status of a restoral process. |
+| 9) transferTrackingObjectIdListGet | This operation retrieves the list of outstanding system MIB transfers, both backup and restore. |
+
+Figure 6-44 – MIB mover operations
+
+##### Operation signatures11
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) startBackup | ManagedEntityIdType (NE),
DCNAddressType,
UserIdType,
PasswordType,
FilenameType,
boolean (overwrite file?) | TransferTrackingObjectIdType | UnknownNE,
UnknownDestinationServer,
CommFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
DeniedAccess,
AccessDenied |
+| 2) getBackupStatus | TransferTrackingObjectIdType | StatusAttributeSeqType | UnknownBackupProcess,
AccessDenied |
+| 3) scheduleBackup | ManagedEntityIdType (NE),
UserIdType,
PasswordType,
UserLabelType,
DCNAddressType,
FilenameType,
boolean (overwrite file?) | TransferTrackingObjectIdType | UnknownNE,
UnknownDestinationServer,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler,
AccessDenied |
+| 4) modifyBackupSchedule | TransferTrackingObjectIdType,
UserLabelType | void | UnknownBackupProcess,
AccessDenied,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 5) cancelScheduledBackup | TransferTrackingObjectIdType, | void | UnknownBackupProcess,
AccessDenied |
+| 6) abortBackup | TransferTrackingObjectIdType, | void | UnknownBackupProcess,
CommFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
AccessDenied |
+| 7) startRestore | ManagedEntityIdType (NE),
DCNAddressType,
UserIdType,
PasswordType,
FilenameType | TransferTrackingObjectIdType | UnknownNE,
CommFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
UnknownSourceServer,
DeniedAccess,
SoftwareLoadHardwareMismatch,
AccessDenied |
+| 8) getRestoreStatus | TransferTrackingObjectIdType | StatusAttributeSeqType | UnknownRestoreProcess,
AccessDenied |
+| 9) transferTrackingObjectIdListGet | | TransferTrackingObjectIdSeqType | AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-45 – MIB mover signatures**
+
+11 The operation "overWriteBackup" has the same behaviour as "startBackup" except that the named destination file (the target) may be non-empty.
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| DeniedAccess | System is not granted access to the NE. |
+| EquipmentFailure | The NE currently has a failure condition preventing the requested transaction from being completed. |
+| InvalidScheduler | The scheduler parameters values are outside defined scope. |
+| SoftwareLoadHardwareMismatch | The former NE configuration data could not be downloaded to the NE because there were changes made to the NE hardware that caused an incapability. |
+| UnknownBackupProcess | The named transfer-tracking object identifying the file transfer process is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownDestinationServer | The identified destination server cannot be accessed by the transfer agent. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownRestoreProcess | The name restore activity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownScheduler | The named scheduler is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownSourceServer | The supplier management system and/or OLT cannot communicate with the source server. The DCN address is unknown or access is blocked. |
+
+Figure 6-46 – MIB mover exceptions
+
+#### 6.3.3.3 NE software version control
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class DownloadMgr {
+ }
+ class VersionRepository {
+ retrieveVersions()
+ validateNEVersion()
+ validatePluginVersion()
+ }
+ class Discoverer {
+ }
+ class BPONNE["BPON NE"]
+ class OMSOperator["OMS/Operator"]
+
+ DownloadMgr ..> Note1["Details in "Download Manager" Analysis"]
+ DownloadMgr --> VersionRepository : confirms and updates
+ VersionRepository --> Discoverer : updates through
+ Discoverer ..> Note2["More details in "NE Synchroniser" Analysis"]
+ Discoverer --> BPONNE : queries
+ OMSOperator --> VersionRepository : verifies version information
+
+```
+
+UML class diagram for NE software version control. The diagram shows three main classes: Download Mgr, Version Repository, and Discoverer. Download Mgr has a dashed association to a note 'Details in "Download Manager" Analysis'. Version Repository has two methods: retrieveVersions() and validateNEVersion(). Discoverer has a dashed association to a note 'More details in "NE Synchroniser" Analysis'. The relationships are: Download Mgr confirms and updates Version Repository; Version Repository updates through Discoverer; Discoverer queries BPON NE; and OMS/Operator verifies version information from Version Repository.
+
+Figure 6-47 – NE software version control class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant DM as : Download Mgr
+ participant VR as : Version Repository
+ participant NS as NE Synchroniser
+ participant D as : Discoverer
+ actor BPGN as : BPGN NE
+
+ OMS->>DM: retrieveVersions()
+ activate DM
+ DM->>VR: getEquipmentVersion()
+ activate VR
+ VR->>NS: getSoftwareVersions()
+ activate NS
+ NS->>BPGN: get
+ activate BPGN
+ BPGN-->>NS:
+ deactivate BPGN
+ NS-->>VR:
+ deactivate NS
+ VR->>DM: updateSWVersion()
+ activate DM
+ Note left of DM: Show updating triggered by NE synchronisation activities.
+ VR->>DM: updateHWVersion()
+ deactivate DM
+ activate DM
+ DM->>DM: deliverDistSWGGlobal (or deliverDistSWGGlobal or scheduleDeliverDist)
+ activate DM
+ DM->>VR: validateNEVersion()
+ activate VR
+ Note right of VR: Details found in "Distribute Software" Analysis.
+ DM->>VR: validatePlugInVersion()
+ activate VR
+ Note left of VR: Followed by many steps.
+ VR-->>DM:
+ deactivate VR
+ activate DM
+ DM->>DM: commit (or activate or scheduleCommit or scheduleActivate)
+ Note left of DM: Preceded by many steps.
+ activate DM
+ DM->>VR: updateSWVersion
+ activate VR
+ VR-->>DM:
+ deactivate VR
+ deactivate DM
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for NE software version control. Lifelines: : OMS/Operator, : Download Mgr, : Version Repository, NE Synchroniser, : Discoverer, : BPGN NE. Messages: retrieveVersions(), getEquipmentVersion(), getSoftwareVersions(), get, updateSWVersion(), updateHWVersion(), deliverDistSWGGlobal (or deliverDistSWGGlobal or scheduleDeliverDist), validateNEVersion(), validatePlugInVersion(), commit (or activate or scheduleCommit or scheduleActivate), updateSWVersion. Notes: 'Show updating triggered by NE synchronisation activities.', 'Details found in "Distribute Software" Analysis.', 'Followed by many steps.', 'Preceded by many steps.'
+
+Figure 6-48 – NE software version control sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) retrieveVersions | This operation retrieves all version information (both software and hardware) for a network resource. |
+| 2) validateNEVersion | This operation requests the supplier management system to validate if the proposed software is compatible with the the NE. |
+| 3) validatePlugInVersion | This operation requests the supplier management system to validate if the proposed software is compatible with the plugInUnit. |
+
+Figure 6-49 – Version repository operations
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|--------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) retrieveVersions | ManagedEntityIdType | VersionsSeqType | CommFailure, UnknownManagedEntity, AccessDenied |
+| 2) validateNEVersion | ManagedEntityIdType, VersionType | boolean (valid?) | UnknownNE, AccessDenied |
+| 3) validatePlugInVersion | ManagedEntityIdType, VersionType | boolean (valid?) | UnknownManagedEntity, AccessDenied |
+
+Figure 6-50 – Version repository signatures
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownManagedEntity | The specified managed entity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+Figure 6-51 – Version repository exceptions
+
+#### 6.3.3.4 Scheduler
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class SchedulerMgr {
+ SchedulerList
+ SchedulerIdUserLabelListing
+ makeScheduler()
+ suspendScheduler()
+ resumeScheduler()
+ modifyTime()
+ changeSchedulerName()
+ modifyTriggerTimes()
+ removeScheduler()
+ retrieveScheduler()
+ schedulerListGet()
+ }
+ class Factory {
+ create()
+ delete()
+ }
+ class Scheduler {
+ SchedulerId
+ AdministrativeState
+ StartTime
+ StopTime
+ UserLabel
+ AssociatedActivityPointerList
+ lockAdministrativeState()
+ unlockAdministrativeState()
+ setTime()
+ getTime()
+ setUserLabel()
+ getUserLabel()
+ setByCreate()
+ terminate()
+ getAll()
+ modifyTriggerTimes()
+ }
+ class DailyScheduler {
+ TriggerTimeListing
+ }
+ class HourlyScheduler {
+ minuteTriggerTimeMatrix
+ }
+ class WeeklyScheduler {
+ weekdayTriggerTimeMatrix
+ }
+ class MonthlyScheduler {
+ monthdayTriggerTimeMatrix
+ }
+ SchedulerMgr --> Factory : commissions
+ SchedulerMgr --> Scheduler : controls
+ Factory --> Scheduler : creates
+ SchedulerMgr --> Scheduler : manipulates scheduling
+ Scheduler <|-- DailyScheduler
+ Scheduler <|-- HourlyScheduler
+ Scheduler <|-- WeeklyScheduler
+ Scheduler <|-- MonthlyScheduler
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the Scheduler management class structure. The **Scheduler Mgr** class is the central interface, containing methods for managing schedulers and a list of scheduler objects. It interacts with a **Factory** to create and delete schedulers, and it controls the **Scheduler** interface. The **Scheduler** interface defines the common methods and attributes for all scheduler types, including administrative state management, time setting, and retrieval. Four concrete scheduler classes are shown: **DailyScheduler**, **HourlyScheduler**, **WeeklyScheduler**, and **MonthlyScheduler**, each with its own specific trigger time matrix or listing. An **OMS/Operator** actor is shown manipulating the scheduling process through the **Scheduler Mgr**.
+
+UML Class Diagram for Scheduler Management
+
+Figure 6-52 – Scheduler management class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant Mgr as : Scheduler Mgr
+ participant Factory as Scheduler: Factory
+ participant Scheduler as : Scheduler
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: makeScheduler()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Factory: create()
+ activate Factory
+ Factory->>Scheduler: setByCreate()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler-->>Factory:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ Factory-->>Mgr:
+ deactivate Factory
+ Mgr-->>Oms:
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: suspendScheduler()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Scheduler: lockAdministrativeState()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler-->>Mgr:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ Mgr-->>Oms:
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: resumeScheduler()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Scheduler: unlockAdministrativeState()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler-->>Mgr:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ Mgr-->>Oms:
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: changeSchedulerName()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Scheduler: setUserLabel()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler-->>Mgr:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ Mgr-->>Oms:
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: retrieveScheduler()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr-->>Oms:
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: schedulerListGet()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr-->>Oms:
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: retrieveScheduler()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Scheduler: getAll()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler-->>Mgr:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ Mgr-->>Oms:
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Scheduler control. Lifelines: : OMS/Operator (Actor), : Scheduler Mgr, Scheduler: Factory, and : Scheduler. Messages: 1. makeScheduler() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr, then create() to Scheduler: Factory, then setByCreate() to Scheduler. 2. suspendScheduler() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr, then lockAdministrativeState() to Scheduler. 3. resumeScheduler() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr, then unlockAdministrativeState() to Scheduler. 4. changeSchedulerName() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr, then setUserLabel() to Scheduler. 5. retrieveScheduler() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr. 6. schedulerListGet() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr. 7. retrieveScheduler() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr, then getAll() to Scheduler.
+
+Figure 6-53 – Scheduler control sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant Mgr as : Scheduler Mgr
+ participant Factory as Scheduler: Factory
+ participant Scheduler as : Scheduler
+ participant MIBMover as : MIBMover
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: modifyTime()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Scheduler: setTime()
+ deactivate Mgr
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover: startBackup()
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ activate MIBMover
+ Note right of MIBMover: Modifies the start or stop time for the periodic activity (e.g., daily activity starts on Tuesday, rather than Monday).
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: modifyTriggerTimes()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Scheduler: modifyTriggerTimes()
+ deactivate Mgr
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover: startBackup()
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ activate MIBMover
+ Note right of MIBMover: Scheduled activity begins one hour earlier.
+ deactivate MIBMover
+
+ OMS->>Mgr: removeScheduler()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Factory: delete()
+ deactivate Mgr
+ activate Factory
+ Factory->>Scheduler: terminate()
+ deactivate Factory
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler->>MIBMover: cancelScheduledBackup()
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ activate MIBMover
+ Note right of MIBMover: When a scheduler is removed, all associated activities are cancelled.
+ deactivate MIBMover
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ deactivate Factory
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for Scheduler modifications. Lifelines: : OMS/Operator, : Scheduler Mgr, Scheduler: Factory, : Scheduler, : MIBMover. Messages: 1. modifyTime() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr. 2. setTime() from Scheduler Mgr to Scheduler. 3. startBackup() from Scheduler to MIBMover. 4. modifyTriggerTimes() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr. 5. modifyTriggerTimes() from Scheduler Mgr to Scheduler. 6. startBackup() from Scheduler to MIBMover. 7. removeScheduler() from OMS/Operator to Scheduler Mgr. 8. delete() from Scheduler Mgr to Scheduler: Factory. 9. terminate() from Scheduler: Factory to Scheduler. 10. cancelScheduledBackup() from Scheduler to MIBMover. Notes: - Note 1: 'Modifies the start or stop time for the periodic activity (e.g., daily activity starts on Tuesday, rather than Monday).' - Note 2: 'Scheduled activity begins one hour earlier.' - Note 3: 'When a scheduler is removed, all associated activities are cancelled.'
+
+Figure 6-54 – Scheduler modifications sequence diagram12
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) makeScheduler | This operation creates a new scheduler object. |
+| 2) suspendScheduler | This operation is used to suspend a schedule. |
+| 3) resumeScheduler | This operation is used to resume a suspended schedule. |
+| 4) modifyTime | This operation is used in order to change the startTime and stopTime of a schedule. |
+| 5) changeSchedulerName | This operation is used to change the name of the scheduler object. |
+| 6) modifyTriggerTimes | This operation is used by the OMS to specify new trigger times and iteration for a scheduler. |
+| 7) removeScheduler | This operation is used to delete a scheduler. |
+| 8) retrieveScheduler | This operation is used to retrieve information on the schedule. |
+| 9) schedulerListGet | This operation is used to retrieve the names of all existing schedulers defined for the supplier management system. |
+
+Figure 6-55 – Scheduler operations
+
+12 This sequence diagram uses an associated scheduled activity of MIB backup as an example. There can be others, and more than one associated with a given scheduler.
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) makeScheduler | UserLabelType,
GeneralizedTimeType (start time),
GeneralizedTimeType (stop time),
HourlyDailyWeeklyMonthlyIndType,
TriggerTimeMatrixSeqType | void | InvalidStartTime,
InvalidStopTime,
DuplicateUserLabel,
MatrixSchedulerType
Mismatch, AccessDenied,
InvalidTrigger |
+| 2) suspendScheduler | UserLabelType | void | UnknownScheduler,
AccessDenied |
+| 3) resumeScheduler | UserLabelType | void | UnknownScheduler,
AccessDenied |
+| 4) modifyTime | UserLabelType,
GeneralizedTimeType (start time),
GeneralizedTimeType (stop time) | void | InvalidStartTime,
InvalidStopTime,
UnknownScheduler,
AccessDenied |
+| 5) changeSchedulerName | UserLabelType (old name),
UserLabelType (new name) | void | UnknownScheduler,
DuplicateUserLabel,
AccessDenied |
+| 6) modifyTriggerTimes | UserLabelType,
HourlyDailyWeeklyMonthlyIndType,
TriggerTimeMatrixSeqType | void | UnknownScheduler,
MatrixSchedulerType
Mismatch, InvalidTrigger,
AccessDenied |
+| 7) removeScheduler | UserLabelType | void | UnknownScheduler,
AccessDenied,
ScheduleInUse |
+| 8) retrieveScheduler | UserLabelType | SchedulerType | UnknownScheduler,
AccessDenied |
+| 9) schedulerListGet | | SchedulerSeqType | AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-56 – Scheduler signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| DuplicateUserLabel | The user label provided in the request has been used to label another scheduler. |
+| InvalidStartTime | The new start time is inconsistent with the current time, the current trigger time matrix or the new stop time. |
+| InvalidStopTime | The new stop time is inconsistent with the current time, the current trigger time matrix or the new start time. |
+| InvalidTrigger | The specified trigger has values that cannot be interpreted by the scheduler. |
+| MatrixSchedulerTypeMismatch | The syntax for the trigger time matrix is mismatched with the type of scheduler named. |
+| ScheduleInUse | There are still activities scheduled by the named scheduler. |
+| UnknownScheduler | The named scheduler is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-57 – Scheduler exceptions**
+
+### 6.3.4 Testing
+
+#### 6.3.4.1 Conduct tests
+
+
+
+This UML Class Diagram illustrates the architecture for conducting tests and reporting results. The diagram includes the following classes and their interactions:
+
+- Log**: Contains methods `storeRecord()`, `findRecords()`, `displayByKey()`, and `displayRecords()`. It is updated by **TestHistoryRecord** and viewed by **RecordSetMgr**.
+- RecordSetMgr**: Contains `selectRecords()`. It retrieves data from **OMSOperator** and obtains records from **Log**.
+- OMSOperator**: Interacts with **RecordSetMgr** and **TestActionPerformer**. It requests tests and processes results from **TestActionPerformer**.
+- TestIDInbome**: A data structure that triggers **TestActionPerformer**.
+- TestRequestInb**: A data structure that triggers **TestActionPerformer**.
+- Scheduler**: Triggers **TestActionPerformer**.
+- TestActionPerformer**: The central class for test execution. It contains:
+ - Attributes: `ScheduledTestNEList`, `SupportedTestList`.
+ - Methods: `getTTLLoopback()`, `initiateLoopback()`, `terminateLoopback()`, `initiateContinuityCheck()`, `terminateContinuityCheck()`, `scheduledResourceSetTest()`, `modifyTestSchedule()`, `cancelScheduledTest()`, `conductResourceSetTest()`, `terminateResourceSetTest()`, `getLoopbackInb()`, `getLoopbackInbByNE()`, `getTestStatus()`, `scheduledTestNEListGet()`, `TestHistoryByManagedEntity()`, `TestHistoryBySequenceInstance()`, `metallicDropTest()`, `scheduledMetallicDropTest()`, `MACLayerTest()`, `scheduledMACLayerTest()`, `drawDialtoneDropBreakTest()`, and `scheduledDrawDialtoneBreakTest()`.
+- TestHistoryRecord**: Updates the **Log**.
+- BPONE**: Performs tests. It has methods `doTest()`, `loopUp()`, `loopDown()`, `getTestResults()`, `stopTest()`, and `testSetup()`. It receives test requests from **TestActionPerformer**.
+- TestObject**: Contains:
+ - Attributes: `TestObjectID`, `InitializationSchedule`, `OperationalState`, `ProceduralStatus`, `TestInvocationID`, `AvailabilityStatus`, `ActualStart`, `ActualStop`, `TerminationCriteria`, `AssociatedObjectsList`, `ResourceObjectsUnderTest`, `TimeonPeriod`, and `TestOperations`.
+ - Methods: `terminate()`, `setCrateDetails()`, `setActualTime()`, `monitorTesting()`, `getProceduralStatus()`, `getOperationalState()`, `getTestResults()`, and `setTestResults()`.
+- Factory**: Contains `create()` and `delete()`. It creates **TestTrackInbObject** and **TestObject**.
+- TestTrackInbObject**: Created by the **Factory**.
+
+Key interactions include: **TestActionPerformer** performing tests on **BPONE**, setting actual times for controlled tests on **TestObject**, and creating **TestObject** instances via the **Factory**. The **OMSOperator** manages the flow of test requests and result processing between the **RecordSetMgr** and **TestActionPerformer**.
+
+UML Class Diagram for Conduct tests and report results
+
+Figure 6-58 – Conduct tests and report results class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as OMS/Operator
+ participant TAP as : Test Action Performer
+ actor BPON as : BPON NE
+ participant THL as Test History : Log
+
+ OMS->>TAP: aTMLoopback()
+ TAP->>BPON: doTest()
+ BPON->>THL: storeRecord()
+ BPON-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+ TAP-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+
+ OMS->>TAP: metallicDropTest()
+ TAP->>BPON: doTest()
+ BPON->>THL: storeRecord()
+ BPON-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+ TAP-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+
+ OMS->>TAP: mACLayerTest()
+ TAP->>BPON: doTest()
+ BPON->>THL: storeRecord()
+ BPON-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+ TAP-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+
+ OMS->>TAP: drawDialtoneDropBreakTest()
+ TAP->>BPON: doTest()
+ BPON->>THL: storeRecord()
+ BPON-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+ TAP-->>TAP: prepareTestOutcome()
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for conducting uncontrolled tests. The diagram shows four test scenarios: aTMLoopback(), metallicDropTest(), mACLayerTest(), and drawDialtoneDropBreakTest(). Each scenario involves an OMS/Operator initiating a test, the Test Action Performer executing the test and preparing the outcome, the BPON NE performing the test, and the Test History Log storing the record.
+
+**Figure 6-59 – Conduct uncontrolled tests sequence diagram**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant TestActionPerformer as :TestAction Performer
+ participant TestTrackingObjectFactory as TestTracking Object: Factory
+ actor BPONNE as :BPON NE
+ participant TestHistoryLog as TestHistory: Log
+
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer: Initiate Loopback()
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>BPONNE: loopUp()
+ activate BPONNE
+ BPONNE->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate BPONNE
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestTrackingObjectFactory->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestHistoryLog: store Record()
+ activate TestHistoryLog
+ TestHistoryLog->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestHistoryLog
+ TestActionPerformer->>OMSOperator: getLoopbackInfo()
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer:
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTrackingObjectFactory: getLoopbackInfoByNE()
+ activate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestTrackingObjectFactory->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestActionPerformer->>OMSOperator: terminate Loopback()
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer:
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>BPONNE: loopDown()
+ activate BPONNE
+ BPONNE->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate BPONNE
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTrackingObjectFactory: delete()
+ activate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestTrackingObjectFactory->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestHistoryLog: store Record()
+ activate TestHistoryLog
+ TestHistoryLog->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestHistoryLog
+ TestActionPerformer->>OMSOperator: InitializeContinue Check()
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer:
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>BPONNE: testSetup()
+ activate BPONNE
+ BPONNE->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate BPONNE
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ activate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestTrackingObjectFactory->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestHistoryLog: store Record()
+ activate TestHistoryLog
+ TestHistoryLog->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestHistoryLog
+ TestActionPerformer->>OMSOperator: terminateContinue Check()
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer:
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>BPONNE: testSetup()
+ activate BPONNE
+ BPONNE->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate BPONNE
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTrackingObjectFactory: delete()
+ activate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestTrackingObjectFactory->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestTrackingObjectFactory
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestHistoryLog: store Record()
+ activate TestHistoryLog
+ TestHistoryLog->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestHistoryLog
+ TestActionPerformer->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the sequence of operations for test setup and teardown. It involves five main components: the OMS Operator (actor), the Test Action Performer (participant), the Test Tracking Object Factory (participant), the BPON NE (actor), and the Test History Log (participant). The process begins with the OMS Operator initiating a loopback, followed by the Test Action Performer performing loopup, creating a record, and storing it. Subsequent steps include retrieving loopback information and terminating the loopback. The process then repeats for a continue check, involving test setup, record creation, and storage, followed by another termination and record storage. Two yellow notes provide additional context: 'Shows loopback initiated about.' and 'Shows at least loopback initiated about.'
+
+UML sequence diagram for Test set up showing interactions between OMS Operator, Test Action Performer, Test Tracking Object Factory, BPON NE, and Test History Log.
+
+Figure 6-60 – Test set up sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant TAP as : Test Action Performer
+ participant BPON as : BPON NE
+ participant TTOF as Test Tracking Object : Factory
+ participant TOF as Test Object : Factory
+ participant TO as : TestObject
+ participant Log as : Log
+
+ OMS->>TAP: conductResourceSelfTest()
+ activate TAP
+ TAP->>TTOF: create()
+ activate TTOF
+ TAP->>TOF: setCreateDefault()
+ activate TOF
+ TAP->>TO: setActualTime()
+ activate TO
+ TAP->>BPON: doTest()
+ activate BPON
+ TAP->>TTOF: create()
+ activate TTOF
+ TAP->>TO: getTestStatus()
+ activate TO
+ deactivate TO
+ TAP->>TAP: terminateResourceSelfTest()
+ activate TAP
+ TAP->>BPON: getInterimResults()
+ activate BPON
+ deactivate BPON
+ TAP->>TO: setTestResults()
+ activate TO
+ deactivate TO
+ TAP->>TTOF: delete()
+ activate TTOF
+ deactivate TTOF
+ TAP->>Log: storeRecord()
+ activate Log
+ deactivate Log
+ TAP->>TO: getTestStatus()
+ activate TO
+ TO-->>TAP: Raises exception.
+ deactivate TO
+ deactivate TAP
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for a controlled test sequence. Lifelines include : OMS/Operator, : Test Action Performer, : BPON NE, Test Tracking Object : Factory, Test Object : Factory, : TestObject, and : Log. The sequence involves conducting a resource self-test, creating objects, setting defaults, performing tests, and storing results, with an exception handling path.
+
+Figure 6-61 – Controlled test sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant TestActionPerformer as :TestAction Performer
+ participant TestTracking as TestTracking Object: Factory
+ participant Scheduler as :Scheduler
+ actor BPQNE as :BPQNE
+ participant TestHistory as TestHistory: Log
+ participant RecordSetter as :RecordSetter
+
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer: scheduleMetallicDropTest()
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTracking: create()
+ activate TestTracking
+ TestTracking->>Scheduler: addAssociatedActivity()
+ deactivate TestTracking
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTracking: scheduledTestNEListGet()
+ activate TestTracking
+ Note over TestTracking: Includes new scheduled test.
+ TestTracking->>TestActionPerformer: metallicDropTest()
+ deactivate TestTracking
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>BPQNE: doTest()
+ activate BPQNE
+ BPQNE->>RecordSetter: storeRecord()
+ activate RecordSetter
+ RecordSetter-->>TestHistory: findRecords()
+ activate TestHistory
+ TestHistory-->>RecordSetter:
+ deactivate TestHistory
+ RecordSetter-->>BPQNE:
+ deactivate RecordSetter
+ BPQNE-->>TestActionPerformer: metallicDropTest()
+ deactivate BPQNE
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTracking: metallicDropTest()
+ activate TestTracking
+ TestTracking->>TestActionPerformer: doTest()
+ deactivate TestTracking
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>BPQNE: storeRecord()
+ activate BPQNE
+ BPQNE->>RecordSetter: storeRecord()
+ activate RecordSetter
+ RecordSetter-->>TestHistory:
+ deactivate RecordSetter
+ BPQNE-->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate BPQNE
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ Note over TestTracking: Shows previous test completion.
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTracking: getTestStatus()
+ activate TestTracking
+ TestTracking-->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestTracking
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer: selectRecords()
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>RecordSetter: selectRecords()
+ activate RecordSetter
+ RecordSetter->>TestHistory: findRecords()
+ activate TestHistory
+ TestHistory-->>RecordSetter:
+ deactivate TestHistory
+ RecordSetter-->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate RecordSetter
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ Note over TestTracking: Shows all previous test completions.
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTracking: cancelScheduledTest()
+ activate TestTracking
+ TestTracking->>TestActionPerformer: delete()
+ deactivate TestTracking
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>Scheduler: removeAssociatedActivity()
+ activate Scheduler
+ Scheduler-->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate Scheduler
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTracking: getTestStatus()
+ activate TestTracking
+ Note over TestTracking: Raises exception.
+ TestTracking-->>TestActionPerformer:
+ deactivate TestTracking
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ OMSOperator->>TestActionPerformer: scheduledTestNEListGet()
+ activate TestActionPerformer
+ Note over TestTracking: Does n't include previously scheduled metallic drop test.
+ TestActionPerformer->>TestTracking:
+ deactivate TestActionPerformer
+ deactivate TestTracking
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Schedule test and view status' showing interactions between OMS Operator, TestAction Performer, TestTracking Object: Factory, Scheduler, BPQNE, TestHistory: Log, and RecordSetter.
+
+Figure 6-62 – Schedule test and view status sequence diagram13
+
+13 Using MetallicDropTest as one example. All other scheduled tests would have similar behavioural characteristics.
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) aTMLoopback | This operation is used to invoke an ATM OAM loopback test. |
+| 2) initializeContinuityCheck | This operation is used to prepare for an ATM continuity check. |
+| 3) terminateContinuityCheck | This operation is used to take down the ATM continuity test environment. |
+| 4) scheduleResourceSelfTest | This operation is used to schedule a resource self test. |
+| 5) modifyTestSchedule | This operation is used to modify the schedule for a regularly conducted test. |
+| 6) cancelScheduledTest | This operation is used to cancel a regularly scheduled test. |
+| 7) conductResourceSelfTest | This operation is used to initiate a resource self test following the identification of a system fault or a subscriber service complaint. |
+| 8) terminateResourceSelfTest | This operation terminates a resource self test in progress. |
+| 9) initiateLoopback | This operation is used to initiate a loopback for a service. |
+| 10) terminateLoopback | This operation is used to cancel a running loopback. |
+| 11) getLoopbackInfo | This operation is used to retrieve the loopback information of a particular connection termination point. |
+| 12) getLoopbackInfoByNE | This operation is used to retrieve the location and details of every connection point in an NE that are in loopback mode. |
+| 13) getTestStatus | This operation is used to retrieve the status of a loopback in progress. |
+| 14) scheduledTestNEListGet | This operation is used to retrieve the list of all scheduled NE testing. |
+| 15) testHistoryByManagedEntity | This operation is used to retrieve the test history associated with a managed entity. |
+| 16) testHistoryByServiceInstance | This operation is used to retrieve the test history associated with a service instance. |
+| 17) metallicDropTest | This operation is used to conduct a metallic drop test following the identification of a system fault or a subscriber service complaint. |
+| 18) scheduleMetallicDropTest | This operation is used to schedule a metallic drop test. |
+| 19) mACLAYERTest | This operation is used to conduct a MAC layer test following the identification of a system fault or a subscriber service complaint. |
+| 20) scheduleMACTest | This operation is used to schedule a MAC layer test. |
+| 21) drawDialToneBreakTest | This operation is used to conduct a telephony service related test following the identification of a system fault or a subscriber service complaint. |
+| 22) scheduleDrawDialToneBreakTest | This operation is used by the OMS to set up draw dialtone/break dialtone testing for telephony service ports to be executed at a regular basis. |
+
+**Figure 6-63 – Test action performer operations**
+
+##### Operation signatures14
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) aTMLoopback | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityType (TP),
ATMLoopbackInfoType,
TestIterationNumType,
ServiceInstanceIdType | AggregateATM
LoopbackResult
SeqType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownManagedEntity,
NotAvailableForTest,
InvalidLocationId,
InvalidDirection |
+| 2) initializeContinuityCheck | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityType (TP),
ATMContinuityCheckInfoType,
GeneralizedTimeType,
ServiceInstanceIdType | CCSetUpIdType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownManagedEntity,
NotAvailableForTest,
InvalidStartTime,
InvalidStopTime,
InvalidDirection |
+| 3) terminateContinuityCheck | CCSetUpIdType | void | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownTest |
+| 4) scheduleResourceSelfTest | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityType (NE),
unsigned long (timeout),
ResourceSelfTestInfoSeqType,
UserLabelType (scheduler) | TestTrackingObject
IdType | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler,
InvalidTimeoutPeriod,
InvalidTestOperations |
+| 5) modifyTestSchedule | TestTrackingObjectIdType,
UserLabelType (new scheduler) | TestTrackingObject
IdType | UnknownTest,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler,
AccessDenied |
+| 6) cancelScheduledTest | TestTrackingObjectIdType | void | UnknownTest,
UncontrolledTestInProgress,
AccessDenied |
+| 7) conductResourceSelfTest | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityType (NE),
unsigned long (timeout),
ResourceSelfTestInfoType | TestTracking
ObjectId | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownNE,
InvalidTimeoutPeriod,
InvalidTestOperations |
+| 8) terminateResourceSelfTest | TestTrackingObjectIdType | ResourceSelfTest
ResultSeqType | UnknownTest,
UncontrolledTestInProgress,
AccessDenied |
+| 9) initiateLoopback | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityType (TP),
long (duration),
DirectionalityType,
LoopbackTestType,
ServiceInstanceIdType | LoopbackTracking
ObjectIdType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownManagedEntity,
NotAvailableForTest |
+| 10) terminateLoopback | LoopbackTrackingObjectId | void | UnknownTest,
AccessDenied |
+| 11) getLoopbackInfo | ManagedEntityType (TP) | LoopbackInfoType | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied |
+| 12) getLoopbackInfoByNE | ManagedEntityType (NE) | LoopbackInfo
SeqType | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied |
+| 13) getTestStatus | LoopbackTrackingObjectIdType | StatusValueType | UnknownTest,
AccessDenied |
+| 14) scheduledTestNEListGet | | ScheduledTestNE
SeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 15) testHistoryByManagedEntity | ManagedEntityType | TestHistorySeqType | AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity |
+
+14 At the moment, controlled testing is not required for BPON network resources. However, for the sake of completeness, two operations called "requestControlledTest" and "requestScheduledControlledTest" have been included and shown in the sequence diagrams. Scheduled tests can be periodic.
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 16) testHistoryByServiceInstance | ServiceInstanceIdType | TestHistorySeqType | AccessDenied,
UnknownServiceInstance |
+| 17) metallicDropTest | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port),
ServiceInstanceIdType | DropTestResultsType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownManagedEntity |
+| 18) scheduleMetallicDropTest | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port),
ServiceInstanceIdType,
UserLabelType (scheduler) | TestTrackingObject
IdType | AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 19) mACLAYERTest | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port),
ServiceInstanceIdType | short | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownManagedEntity |
+| 20) scheduleMACTest | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port),
ServiceInstanceIdType,
UserLabelType (scheduler) | TestTrackingObject
IdType | AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 21) drawDialToneBreakTest | UserIdType, ManagedEntityId
Type (port),
ServiceInstanceIdType | boolean | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownManagedEntity |
+| 22) scheduleDrawDialToneBreak
Test | UserIdType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port),
ServiceInstanceIdType,
UserLabelType (scheduler) | TestTrackingObject
IdType | AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler |
+
+**Figure 6-64 – Test action performer signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| InvalidDirection | Identified test operations unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| InvalidLocationId | The LLID specified is not valid. |
+| InvalidScheduler | The scheduler parameters values are outside defined scope. |
+| InvalidStartTime | The new start time is inconsistent with the current trigger time matrix or the new stop time. |
+| InvalidStopTime | The new stop time is inconsistent with the current trigger time matrix or the new start time. |
+| InvalidTestOperations | The requested self test operation is not valid. |
+| InvalidTimeoutPeriod | Designated timeout period violates definition of valid values. |
+| NotAvailableForTest | The specified CTP is not available for this test. |
+| UncontrolledTestInProgress | The scheduled test cannot be cancelled because of an uncontrolled test in progress. |
+| UnknownManagedEntity | The specified managed entity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownScheduler | The named scheduler is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownServiceInstance | The service instance is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownTest | The test specified by the TestTrackingObjectId is not known in the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-65 – Test action performer exceptions**
+
+### 6.3.5 Installation
+
+#### 6.3.5.1 Synchronize NE and current event listing
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class ManagementInformationMaintainer["Management Information Maintainer"]
+ class Scheduler
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class NESynchroniser["NESynchroniser\nScheduledSynchNEList"] {
+ +synchNE()
+ +scheduleSynchNE()
+ +abortSynchNE()
+ +modifyNESynchSchedule()
+ +cancelScheduledSynchNE()
+ +synchCurrentEventListings()
+ +scheduledSynchNEListGet()
+ }
+ class Discoverer {
+ +getConfigurationData()
+ +getStatusData()
+ +getStateData()
+ }
+ class EventScreener["Event Screener"]
+ class EventQueue["Event Queue"]
+ class EventSetManager["Event Set Manager"]
+ class EventSet["Event Set"]
+ class Log {
+ +storeRecord()
+ +findRecords()
+ +displayByKey()
+ +displayRecords()
+ }
+ class CurrentEventListing["Current Event Listing"] {
+ +writeRecord()
+ +deleteRecord()
+ }
+
+ class PrivilegedUser["Privileged User"]
+ class OMSOperator["OMS/Operator"]
+ class BPONNE["BPON NE"] {
+ +get()
+ }
+
+ Scheduler --> NESynchroniser : triggers
+ ManagementInformationMaintainer --> NESynchroniser : consults
+ PrivilegedUser --> NESynchroniser : requests synchronization
+ Factory --> NESynchroniser : commissions
+ NESynchroniser --> Discoverer : gets details
+ Discoverer --> BPONNE : queries
+ BPONNE --> EventScreener : sends events
+ NESynchroniser --> EventScreener : sends discovery event
+ EventScreener --> EventQueue : queues to
+ EventQueue --> EventSetManager : extracts from
+ EventSetManager --> EventSet : creates
+ EventSet --> Log : logs event
+ EventScreener --> Log : updates
+ NESynchroniser --> Log : synchs
+ Log --> CurrentEventListing : writes to
+ OMSOperator --> CurrentEventListing : views
+ EventScreener --> EventSetManager : notifies
+
+```
+
+Figure 6-66 – NE synchronization class diagram
+
+**Figure 6-66 – NE synchronization class diagram**
+
+90
+
+ITU-T Rec. Q.834.3 (06/2004)
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor User as : Privileged User
+ participant NESynchroniser as : NESynchroniser
+ participant Discoverer as : Discoverer
+ participant MIIM as : Management Information Maintainer
+ actor BPQN as : BPQN NE
+ participant MEF as : Managed Entity Factory
+ participant ES as : Event Screener
+
+ User->>NESynchroniser: synchNE()
+ activate NESynchroniser
+ NESynchroniser->>Discoverer: getConfigurationData()
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>BPQN: get()
+ activate BPQN
+ BPQN-->>NESynchroniser:
+ deactivate BPQN
+ NESynchroniser->>Discoverer: compare and update
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer-->>MIIM: create()
+ activate MIIM
+ MIIM-->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate MIIM
+ Discoverer-->>MEF: delete()
+ activate MEF
+ MEF-->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate MEF
+ Discoverer->>NESynchroniser: prepareDiscoveryEvent
+ activate NESynchroniser
+ NESynchroniser-->>ES: readEvent()
+ activate ES
+ ES-->>NESynchroniser:
+ deactivate ES
+ NESynchroniser-->>User:
+ deactivate NESynchroniser
+ Note left of NESynchroniser: For all inventory data changes.
+ NESynchroniser->>Discoverer: getStatusData()
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>BPQN: get()
+ activate BPQN
+ BPQN-->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate BPQN
+ Discoverer->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ NESynchroniser->>Discoverer: getStateData()
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>BPQN: get()
+ activate BPQN
+ BPQN-->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate BPQN
+ Discoverer->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ NESynchroniser->>Discoverer: compare and update
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer-->>MIIM:
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ NESynchroniser->>NESynchroniser: prepareEvent
+ activate NESynchroniser
+ NESynchroniser-->>ES: readEvent()
+ activate ES
+ ES-->>NESynchroniser:
+ deactivate ES
+ NESynchroniser-->>User:
+ deactivate NESynchroniser
+ Note left of NESynchroniser: For all current event listings.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for NE synchronization requested by a privileged user. The diagram shows interactions between a Privileged User, NESynchroniser, Discoverer, Management Information Maintainer, BPQN NE, Managed Entity Factory, and Event Screener. Key steps include configuration data retrieval, entity creation/deletion, discovery event preparation, status/state data retrieval, and event listing preparation.
+
+Figure 6-67 – NE synchronization requested by privileged user sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor User as Privileged User
+ participant NESynchroniser as :NESynchroniser
+ participant Discoverer as :Discoverer
+ participant BPON_NE as :BPON NE
+ participant MI_M as :Management Information Maintainer
+ participant CEL as Current Event Log
+ participant ES as :Event Screener
+ participant CEL_obj as :CurrentEventListing
+
+ User->>NESynchroniser: synchCurrentEventListings()
+ activate NESynchroniser
+ NESynchroniser->>Discoverer: getStatusData()
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>BPON_NE: get()
+ activate BPON_NE
+ BPON_NE-->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate BPON_NE
+ NESynchroniser->>Discoverer: getStateData()
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>BPON_NE: get()
+ activate BPON_NE
+ BPON_NE-->>Discoverer:
+ deactivate BPON_NE
+ NESynchroniser->>MI_M: compare and update
+ activate MI_M
+ MI_M-->>NESynchroniser:
+ deactivate MI_M
+ NESynchroniser->>MI_M: prepareEvent
+ activate MI_M
+ MI_M-->>NESynchroniser:
+ deactivate MI_M
+ NESynchroniser->>ES: readEvent()
+ activate ES
+ ES->>CEL_obj: writeRecord()
+ activate CEL_obj
+ CEL_obj-->>ES:
+ deactivate CEL_obj
+ ES->>CEL_obj: deleteRecord()
+ activate CEL_obj
+ CEL_obj-->>ES:
+ deactivate CEL_obj
+ ES-->>NESynchroniser:
+ deactivate ES
+ NESynchroniser-->>User:
+ deactivate NESynchroniser
+
+ Note left of NESynchroniser: For all changed conditions.
+ Note right of ES: Proceed with event processing as described in Appendix A.
+ Note right of CEL_obj: For new outstanding conditions.
+ Note left of CEL_obj: For return to normal conditions.
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for Synchronize current event listing. The diagram shows interactions between a Privileged User, NESynchroniser, Discoverer, BPON NE, Management Information Maintainer, Current Event Log, Event Screener, and CurrentEventListing. The process involves getting status and state data, comparing and updating, preparing an event, reading the event, and then writing or deleting records based on conditions.
+
+Figure 6-68 – Synchronize current event listing sequence diagram
+
+
+
+UML sequence diagram for Scheduled synchronization. Lifelines: :Privileged User, :NESynchronizer, :Scheduler, :Discoverer, :BPCON NE, :Management Information Maintainer, :Managed Entity Factory, :Event Screener, :Scheduler. Operations: scheduleSynchNEListGet(), scheduleSynchNE(), addAssociatedActivity(), scheduleSynchNEListGet() (with note: Shows additional scheduled synchronizations.), abortSynchNE() (with note: Raises exception.), synchNE(), getConfigurationData(), get(), compare and update, create(), delete(), prepareDiscoverEvent(), readEvent(), abortSynchNE(), scheduleSynchNEListGet() (with note: Shows same scheduled synchronizations.), modifyNESynchSchedule(), removeAssociatedActivity(), addAssociatedActivity(), cancelScheduledSynchNE(), deleteAssociatedActivity(), scheduleSynchNEListGet() (with note: Shows same as at the top.).
+
+Figure 6-69 – Scheduled synchronization sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) synchNE 15 | This operation initiates a synchronization process between the supplier management system and a specific NE. |
+| 2) abortSynchNE | This operation aborts a synchronization process in progress between the supplier management system and a specific NE. |
+| 3) scheduleSynchNE | This operation schedules a synchronization process between the supplier management system and a specific NE. |
+| 4) modifyNESynchSchedule | This operation modifies the schedule for NE synchronization. |
+| 5) cancelScheduledSynchNE | This operation cancels all subsequent scheduled synchronization processes for this NE. |
+| 6) synchCurrentEventListings | The operation initiates synchronization between the supplier management system and specified NE for items in particular current event listings. |
+| 7) scheduledSynchNEListGet | This operation is used to retrieve the names of all NEs with synchronization schedules. |
+
+Figure 6-70 – NE synchronizer operations
+
+15 The "synch" operation is a best effort attempt. If the results are suspect as detected by the supplier management system, then the suspect flag is set to TRUE.
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) synchNE | ManagedEntityIdType (NE) | void | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownNE,
EquipmentFailure,
BackupInProgress,
SynchInProgress |
+| 2) abortSynchNE | ManagedEntityIdType (NE) | void | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownNE,
EquipmentFailure,
NoSynchInProgress |
+| 3) scheduleSynchNE | ManagedEntityIdType (NE),
UserLabelType (scheduler) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 4) modifyNESynchSchedule | ManagedEntityIdType (NE),
UserLabelType (new scheduler) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler,
SynchNotScheduled |
+| 5) cancelScheduledSynchNE | ManagedEntityIdType (NE) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE |
+| 6) synchCurrentEventListings | ManagedEntityIdType,
CurrentListingSeqType | void | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
DCNTimeout,
UnknownNE,
EquipmentFailure,
Timeout |
+| 7) scheduledSynchNEListGet | | ScheduledSynchNE
SeqType | AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-71 – NE synchronizer signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| BackupInProgress | This exception is raised when the request is issued while the backup is in progress. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| DCNTimeout | The DCN communications link between at least one of the NEs and the supplier management system is so congested that current state or status information cannot be transferred within a system-defined synch time. |
+| EquipmentFailure | The NE currently has a failure condition preventing the requested transaction from being completed. |
+| InvalidScheduler | The scheduler parameter's values are outside defined scope. |
+| NoSynchInProgress | The exception is raised if there is no synchronization process is in progress. |
+| SynchInProgress | An operation is requested while the supplier management system is in the process of synchronizing with the NE, which prohibits the execution of the operation requested. |
+| Timeout | The process duration reached a system-defined timeout before the process could complete. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownScheduler | The named scheduler is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| SynchNotScheduled | This exception is raised when the schedule modification references an NE for which no synchronization schedule has previously been established. |
+
+**Figure 6-72 – NE synchronizer exceptions**
+
+#### 6.3.5.2 Range ONT or ONU and register OLT
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class EventScreener
+ class NERegistrar {
+ +SerialNumberList
+ +OLTDCNAddressList
+ +rangeReplacementNE()
+ +rangeONTorONU()
+ +registerNE()
+ +modifyNEDCNAddress()
+ +rangeUpgradeNE()
+ +moveONTorONU()
+ +getSubstendingNEList()
+ +nEListGet()
+ +deRegisterNE()
+ +associateNE()
+ }
+ class RecordSetMgr
+ class Log
+ class Discoverer {
+ +getConfigurationData()
+ +getStatusData()
+ +getStateData()
+ }
+ class OLTCommunicator {
+ +sendKeepAliveMessage()
+ +raiseCommAlarm()
+ +terminateKeepAliveMessage()
+ }
+ class BPONNE {
+ +get()
+ +range()
+ +set()
+ }
+ class ManagementModelMaintainer
+ class Builder
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class APONLink
+ class OLT
+ class APONLinkConnection
+ class APONLogicalLinkEnd
+ class APONCTP
+ class APONTTP
+ class APONTrail
+ class vpLinkConnectionF
+ class vpTopologicalLinkF
+ class pluginUnitF
+ class equipmentHolderF
+ class FSANNE
+ class toAdaptorF
+ class TPF
+ class CTPF
+ class TTPF
+
+ EventScreener --> NERegistrar : notifies
+ NERegistrar --> RecordSetMgr : selects discovery record
+ RecordSetMgr --> Log : finds
+ NERegistrar --> Discoverer : gets details
+ Discoverer --> NERegistrar : enrolls
+ NERegistrar --> OLTCommunicator : DCN Validation
+ OLTCommunicator --> NERegistrar : +Comm Agent
+ NERegistrar --> BPONNE : constructs
+ BPONNE --> NERegistrar : checks DCN
+ NERegistrar --> ManagementModelMaintainer : consults and updates
+ ManagementModelMaintainer --> APONLink : updates
+ ManagementModelMaintainer --> OLT : updates substending list
+ ManagementModelMaintainer --> Builder : modifies
+ Builder --> Factory : commissions
+ Factory --> pluginUnitF : creates
+ Factory --> equipmentHolderF : creates
+ Factory --> FSANNE : creates all types
+ Factory --> toAdaptorF : creates at ONT PON port
+ Factory --> TPF : creates TPs at ports
+ Factory --> Port : creates
+ Factory --> APONLinkConnection : creates EOC
+ Factory --> APONLogicalLinkEnd : creates by ranging
+ Factory --> APONCTP : creates to describe capacity on ONT PON port
+ Factory --> APONTTP : creates
+ Factory --> vpLinkConnectionF : creates
+ Factory --> vpTopologicalLinkF : creates
+ APONLinkConnection --> APONLogicalLinkEnd
+ APONCTP --> APONTTP
+ TPF --> CTPF
+ TPF --> TTPF
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the registration process for an ONT or ONU and the registration of an OLT. Key components and their interactions include:
+
+- Event Screener** notifies the **NERegistrar**.
+- NERegistrar** (containing `SerialNumberList` and `OLTDCNAddressList`) interacts with **RecordSetMgr** (selects discovery record) and **Log** (finds).
+- NERegistrar** gets details from **Discoverer** and enrolls it.
+- NERegistrar** performs DCN Validation with **OLT Communicator**, which acts as a `+Comm Agent`.
+- NERegistrar** constructs **BPON NE**, which checks DCN.
+- NERegistrar** consults and updates the **Management Model Maintainer**.
+- Management Model Maintainer** updates **APONLink** and updates the substending list for **OLT**.
+- Management Model Maintainer** modifies the **Builder**.
+- Builder** commissions the **Factory**.
+- Factory** (with `create()` and `delete()`) creates various components:
+ - `pluginUnitF`, `equipmentHolderF`, `FSANNE` (creates all types), `toAdaptorF` (creates at ONT PON port), `TPF` (creates TPs at ports), `Port`.
+ - `APONLinkConnection` (creates EOC), `APONLogicalLinkEnd` (creates by ranging), `APONCTP` (creates to describe capacity on ONT PON port), `APONTTP`.
+ - `vpLinkConnectionF` and `vpTopologicalLinkF`.
+- Factory** also creates **APONTrail**.
+- APONLinkConnection** is associated with **APONLogicalLinkEnd**.
+- APONCTP** is associated with **APONTTP**.
+- TPF** is associated with **CTPF** and **TTPF**.
+
+Registration class diagram showing the interactions between various components for registering an ONT or ONU and registering an OLT.
+
+Figure 6-73 – Registration class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as :OMS/Operator
+ participant NERegistrar as :NERegistrar
+ participant OLTComm as :OLT Communicator
+ participant OLT as OLT: BPON NE
+ participant Discoverer as :Discoverer
+ participant Builder as :Builder
+ participant Factory as Managed Entity : Factory
+ participant Maintainer as : Management Model Maintainer
+
+ OMS->>NERegistrar: registerNE()
+ NERegistrar->>OLTComm: sendKeepAliveMessage()
+ OLTComm->>OLT: get()
+ Note over OLTComm: Periodically performed.
+ OLTComm->>Discoverer: getConfigurationData()
+ Discoverer->>OLTComm: get()
+ OLTComm->>NERegistrar: checkUserLabel
+ NERegistrar->>Discoverer: getStatusData()
+ Discoverer->>OLTComm: get()
+ NERegistrar->>Discoverer: getStateData()
+ Discoverer->>OLTComm: get()
+ NERegistrar->>Builder: buildNode()
+ Builder->>Factory: create()
+ Note over NERegistrar: As required based on discovery.
+ NERegistrar->>Builder: buildPlugInUnit()
+ Builder->>Factory: create()
+ NERegistrar->>Builder: modifyPort()
+ Builder->>Maintainer: update()
+ OMS->>NERegistrar: nEListGet()
+ Note over NERegistrar: Includes new OLT.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Register NE. Lifelines: :OMS/Operator, :NERegistrar, :OLT Communicator, OLT: BPON NE, :Discoverer, :Builder, Managed Entity : Factory, : Management Model Maintainer. Messages: registerNE(), sendKeepAliveMessage(), get(), getConfigurationData(), checkUserLabel, getStatusData(), getStateData(), buildNode(), buildPlugInUnit(), modifyPort(), create(), update(), nEListGet(). Notes: 'Periodically performed.', 'As required based on discovery.', 'Includes new OLT.'
+
+Figure 6-74 – Register NE sequence diagram16
+
+16 Applies only to OLT.
+
+
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as :OMS/Operator
+ participant NER as :NERRegistrar
+ participant BPON as :BPON NE
+ participant MM as :Management Model Maintainer
+ participant OLT as :OLT Communicator
+ participant MEF as Managed Entity Factory
+ participant Builder as :Builder
+
+ OMS->>NER: deRegisterNE()
+ activate NER
+ NER->>BPON: narrowByContainment()
+ activate BPON
+ BPON->>MM: modifyPort()
+ activate MM
+ MM->>Builder: update()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>MM:
+ deactivate Builder
+ MM->>BPON:
+ deactivate MM
+ NER->>MM: modifyNode()
+ activate MM
+ MM->>Builder: update()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>MM:
+ deactivate Builder
+ MM->>BPON:
+ deactivate MM
+ NER->>MM: deletePlugInUnit()
+ activate MM
+ MM->>Builder: delete()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>MM:
+ deactivate Builder
+ MM->>BPON:
+ deactivate MM
+ NER->>MM: deleteNode()
+ activate MM
+ MM->>Builder: delete()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>MM:
+ deactivate Builder
+ MM->>BPON:
+ deactivate MM
+ NER->>OLT: terminateKeepAliveMessage()
+ activate OLT
+ OLT->>OLT:
+ deactivate OLT
+ deactivate NER
+
+```
+
+As required based on existing management information fragment.
+
+Sequence diagram for Deregister NE. The diagram shows the interaction between :OMS/Operator, :NERRegistrar, :BPON NE, :Management Model Maintainer, :OLT Communicator, Managed Entity Factory, and :Builder. The process starts with :OMS/Operator calling deRegisterNE() on :NERRegistrar. :NERRegistrar then calls narrowByContainment() on :BPON NE. :NERRegistrar calls modifyPort() on :Management Model Maintainer, which then calls update() on :Builder. :NERRegistrar calls modifyNode() on :Management Model Maintainer, which then calls update() on :Builder. :NERRegistrar calls deletePlugInUnit() on :Management Model Maintainer, which then calls delete() on :Builder. :NERRegistrar calls deleteNode() on :Management Model Maintainer, which then calls delete() on :Builder. Finally, :NERRegistrar calls terminateKeepAliveMessage() on :OLT Communicator. A note indicates that the update and delete calls are 'As required based on existing management information fragment.'
+
+Figure 6-76 – Deregister NE sequence diagram
+
+
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant NERegistrar as :NERegistrar
+ participant OLTAB as OLT A : BPON NEOLT B
+ participant BPONNE as BPON NEONT or ONU : BPON NE
+ participant Builder as :Builder
+ participant ManagementModel as :Management Model Maintainer
+ participant ManagedEntityFactory as Managed Entity : Factory
+ participant Discoverer as :Discoverer
+
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: getSubtreeIncludingNELink()
+ NERegistrar->>OLTAB: get()
+ Note over OLTAB: Shows ONT or ONU to be moved.
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: moveONTorONU()
+ Note over OMSOperator: Includes all the subsequent behaviour and classes found in rangeONTorONU.
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: modifyNode()
+ Note over Builder: To avoid unnecessary alarms.
+ Builder->>ManagementModel: update()
+ OMSOperator->>OLTAB: range()
+ OLTAB->>BPONNE: range()
+ OMSOperator->>Discoverer: getConfigData()
+ Discoverer->>OLTAB: get()
+ OMSOperator->>Discoverer: getStateData()
+ Discoverer->>OLTAB: get()
+ OMSOperator->>Discoverer: getStateData()
+ Discoverer->>OLTAB: get()
+ OMSOperator->>Discoverer: getStateData()
+ Discoverer->>OLTAB: get()
+ Note over OMSOperator: Associate ONT with OLT B.
+ OMSOperator->>ManagementModel: update()
+ OMSOperator->>ManagementModel: narrowByConstraint()
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: deletePlugInUnit()
+ Note over Builder: As needed.
+ Builder->>ManagementModel: deleteNode()
+ ManagementModel->>ManagedEntityFactory: delete()
+ Note over ManagedEntityFactory: As needed based on management information fragment.
+ ManagedEntityFactory->>Discoverer: update()
+ Discoverer->>ManagementModel: delete()
+ ManagementModel->>ManagedEntityFactory: delete()
+ ManagedEntityFactory->>Discoverer: update()
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: getSubtreeIncludingNELink()
+ NERegistrar->>OLTAB: get()
+ Note over OLTAB: Includes new ONT or ONU.
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: getSubtreeIncludingNELink()
+ NERegistrar->>OLTAB: get()
+ Note over OLTAB: Doesn't show ONT or ONU.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Move ONT or ONU' showing interactions between OMS Operator, NE Registrar, OLT A, BPON NEOLT B, BPON NEONT or ONU, Builder, Management Model Maintainer, Managed Entity Factory, and Discoverer. The diagram includes various messages like getSubtreeIncludingNELink(), get(), modifyNode(), range(), getConfigData(), getStateData(), deletePlugInUnit(), deleteNode(), and delete(). It also contains several notes explaining specific actions and conditions.
+
+Figure 6-78 – Move ONT or ONU sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant Builder as :Builder
+ participant ServiceProvider as :Service Provider
+ participant NERegistrar as :NERegistrar
+ participant OLT as OLT : BPON NE
+ participant ONTA as ONT A : BPON NE
+ participant ONTB as ONT B : BPON NE
+ participant Builder2 as :Builder
+ participant ManagementModel as :Management Model Maintainer
+ participant ManagedEntity as Managed Entity : Factory
+
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: buildNode()
+ Note over Builder: As required by new hardware type and including all install classes and behaviour for strict construction.
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: buildPlugInUnit()
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: modifyPort()
+ Note over Builder: As required for new desired services and including all install classes and behaviour for strict construction.
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: provisionConnection()
+ Note over Builder: Proceeds as in rangeONTorONU with associated classes and behaviour.
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: rangeUpgradeNE()
+ NERegistrar->>Builder2: modifyNode(ONT A)
+ Builder2->>ManagementModel: update()
+ NERegistrar->>OLT: range()
+ OLT->>ONTA: range()
+ NERegistrar->>ONTA: associateNE()
+ Note over NERegistrar: Associates new desired services.
+ NERegistrar->>ONTA: set()
+ Note over NERegistrar: Associates existing desired services.
+ NERegistrar->>ONTA: deleteNode(ONT A)
+ Note over NERegistrar: Doesn't show any change unless MEd changes.
+ NERegistrar->>Builder2: deleteNode(ONT A)
+ Builder2->>ManagementModel: delete()
+ ManagementModel->>ManagedEntity: update()
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: NEListGet()
+ Note over NERegistrar: Does not show any change unless MEd changes.
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: getSubordinateNEList()
+ NERegistrar->>OLT: get()
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for upgrading an ONT or ONU. The diagram shows interactions between an OMS Operator, a Builder, a Service Provider, a NE Registrar, and three ONT/ONU entities (OLT, ONT A, ONT B). The process involves building nodes, modifying ports, provisioning connections, upgrading NEs, associating services, and deleting old nodes.
+
+Figure 6-79 – Upgrade ONT or ONU sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as OMS/Operator
+ participant Builder
+ participant ServiceProvisioner
+ participant EventScreener
+ participant NERegistrar
+ participant EventForwarder
+ participant EventSupplier
+ participant ExternalEventChannel as External Event Channel
+ participant NESynchroniser
+ participant BPONNE as BPON NE
+
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: buildNede()
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: buildPlugInUnit()
+ Note over Builder: As required by new hardware and including all usual classes and behaviour for such construction.
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: modifyPort()
+ Note over Builder: As required for new desired services and including all usual classes and behaviour for such construction.
+ OMSOperator->>ServiceProvisioner: provisionConnection()
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: nEListGet()
+ Note over NERegistrar: Shows no change.
+ NERegistrar->>EventForwarder: notify
+ Note over EventForwarder: Autodiscovery based on automatic ranging.
+ EventForwarder->>EventSupplier: pushEvent()
+ EventSupplier->>ExternalEventChannel: push()
+ ExternalEventChannel->>NESynchroniser: synchNE()
+ Note over NESynchroniser: Synch of Supplier Management System db and NE db shown only at a high-level.
+ NESynchroniser->>BPONNE: get()
+ BPONNE->>NERegistrar: consumeEvent()
+ NERegistrar->>Builder: associateNE()
+ OMSOperator->>NERegistrar: nEListGet()
+ Note over NERegistrar: Shows new ONT or ONU.
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for Automatic ranging showing interactions between OMS/Operator, Builder, Service Provisioner, Event Screener, NERegistrar, Event Forwarder, Event Supplier, External Event Channel, NESynchroniser, and BPON NE. The diagram includes messages like buildNede(), buildPlugInUnit(), modifyPort(), provisionConnection(), nEListGet(), notify, processAnnouncement, pushEvent(), push(), synchNE(), get(), consumeEvent(), and associateNE(), along with several explanatory notes.
+
+**Figure 6-80 – Automatic ranging sequence diagram**
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operations name | Operation purpose |
+|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) registerNE | This operation registers an NE with a particular instance of supplier management system. |
+| 2) modifyNEDCNAddress | This operation changes the DCN address of a registered NE. |
+| 3) rangeONTorONU | This operation ranges an ONT or ONU using the serial number of the PON interface of the NE. |
+| 4) rangeReplacementNE | This operation ranges a replacement ONT or ONU using the serial number of the replacement equipment. |
+| 5) rangeUpgradeNE | This operation ranges a replacement NE for the purposes of upgrading the hardware. |
+| 6) moveONTorONU | This operation is used to move an ONT or ONU from one PON to another and also move all of the associated services. |
+| 7) getSubtendingNEList | This operation returns all subtending NEs of a particular NE. |
+| 8) nEListGet | This operation retrieves the network elements under the management jurisdiction of the supplier management system. |
+| 9) deRegisterNE | This operation removes the network element from the management jurisdiction of the supplier management system. |
+| 10) associateNE | This operation associates pre-provisioning information with a network element that has been installed and autodiscovered. |
+
+**Figure 6-81 – NE registrar operations**
+
+##### Operation signatures17
+
+| Operations name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) registerNE | DCNAddressType,
UserLabelType,
AdministrationDomainType | ManagedEntityIdType | AccessDenied,
DCNTimeout,
AddressLabelMismatch,
DuplicateUserLabel,
TooManyNEs,
InvalidDCNAddress,
DeniedAccess,
InvalidUserLabelSyntax |
+| 2) modifyNEDCNAddress | ManagedEntityIdType,
DCNAddressType | void | AccessDenied,
DeniedAccess,
AddressLabelMismatch,
DCNTimeout,
CommFailure,
UnknownNE,
InvalidDCNAddress,
BackupInProgress |
+| 3) rangeONTorONU | ManagedEntityIdType (OLT),
UserLabelType,
SerialNumType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port) | void | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
UnknownNE,
UnknownPort,
MaxSubtendingNodesExceeded,
InsufficientPONBW,
InvalidSerialNumSyntax,
APONLayerFailure,
DuplicateUserLabel,
InvalidUserLabelSyntax,
BackupInProgress,
SynchInProgress |
+| 4) rangeReplacementNE | ManagedEntityIdType (old NE),
UserLabelType,
SerialNumType | ManagedEntityIdType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownNE,
InvalidSerialNumSyntax,
APONLayerFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
InvalidUserLabelSyntax,
HWServicesMismatch,
DuplicateUserLabel,
BackupInProgress,
SynchInProgress |
+| 5) rangeUpgradeNE | ManagedEntityIdType (old NE),
ManagedEntityIdType
(pre-provisioned NE),
UserLabelType,
SerialNumType | ManagedEntityIdType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
APONLayerFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
InvalidUserLabelSyntax,
DuplicateUserLabel,
UnknownNE,
HWServicesMismatch,
InsufficientPONBW,
BackupInProgress,
SynchInProgress |
+
+17 The operation "rangeNewONU" has the same behaviour as "rangeNewONT" so there was no apparent need to show another sequence diagram.
+
+| Operations name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 6) moveONTorONU | ManagedEntityType (old NE),
ManagedEntityType (new port) | ManagedEntityType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownNE,
UnknownPort,
APONLayerFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
InsufficientPONBW,
BackupInProgress,
SynchInProgress |
+| 7) getSubtendingNEList | ManagedEntityType (subtended NE) | ManagedEntityIdSeqType | UnknownNE,
AccessDenied |
+| 8) nEListGet | | ManagedEntityIdSeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 9) deRegisterNE | ManagedEntityType | void | AccessDenied |
+| 10) associateNE | ManagedEntityType (pre-provisioned NE),
ManagedEntityType (discovered NE) | ManagedEntityType | AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity |
+
+**Figure 6-82 – NE registrar signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| AddressLabelMismatch | The identified NE does not have the current DCN address provided in the request. |
+| APONLayerFailure | There was an APON protocol ranging failure between the OLT and the designed subtending node. |
+| BackupInProgress | This exception is raised when the request is issued while the backup is in progress. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| DCNTimeout | The DCN communications link between at least one of the NEs and the supplier management system is so congested that current state or status information cannot be transferred within a system-defined synch time. |
+| DeniedAccess | System is not granted access to the NE. |
+| DuplicateUserLabel | The user label provided in the request has been used to label another archive, i.e., one that is defined by a different set of creation request parameters. |
+| EquipmentFailure | The NE currently has a failure condition preventing the requested transaction from being completed. |
+| HWServicesMismatch | The replacement NE cannot perform the provisioned services. |
+| InsufficientPONBW | The ONT or ONU cannot be ranged due to insufficient bandwidth on the APONLink. |
+| InvalidDCNAddress | The specified DCN address is not valid. |
+| InvalidSerialNumSyntax | Syntax of the serial number provided does not match definition rules. |
+| InvalidUserLabelSyntax | The specified user label does not follow established rules for user label. |
+| MaxSubtendingNodesExceeded | The maximum engineered number of subtending nodes for the identified PON interface has been exceeded with this request for service provisioning. |
+| SynchInProgress | An operation is requested while the supplier management system is in the process of synchronizing with the NE that prohibits the execution of the operation requested. |
+| TooManyNEs | The supplier management system cannot manage one more OLT. |
+| UnknownManagedEntity | The specified managed entity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownPort | The identified port is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-83 – NE registrar exceptions**
+
+### 6.3.6 Provisioning
+
+#### 6.3.6.1 Build BPON resources
+
+This clause shows the construction of management infrastructure to support the management of an OLT, an ONT or ONU, and of a port. In each case, a class diagram is followed by the associated sequence diagram.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the Build BPON resources class diagram. It features the following components and relationships:
+
+- internal use case**: A rectangular box with a double-line border.
+- Builder**: A central class containing:
+ - Attributes: `CreatedNodesList`, `ManagedEntityFragments`.
+ - Operations: `buildNode()`, `modifyNode()`, `deleteNode()`, `modifyPort()`, `buildPlugInUnit()`, `modifyPlugInUnit()`, `deletePlugInUnit()`, `assignUserLabelsToNE()`, `buildProtectionGrouping()`, `modifyProtectionParameters()`, `modifyProtectionUnitList()`, `deleteProtectionGrouping()`, `buildBridge()`, `deleteBridge()`, `modifyBridgePortList()`, `modifyBridgeProfile()`, `buildVPNetworkCTP()`, `deleteVPNetworkCTP()`, `buildTCONT()`, `deleteTCONT()`, `modifyTCONTParameters()`, and `createdNodesGet()`.
+- Management Model Maintainer**: A class containing operations `update()` and `scopeFilter()`.
+- Profile Object Repository**: A class containing the operation `retrieve()`.
+- Factory**: A class containing operations `create()` and `delete()`.
+- Actors**: `OMS/Operator` (represented by a stick figure) and `Profile Object Repository` (represented by a stick figure).
+
+Relationships and Messages:
+
+- internal use case** to **Builder**: `constructs entity` (solid arrow).
+- OMS/Operator** to **Builder**: `constructs entity` (solid arrow).
+- Builder** to **Management Model Maintainer**: `consults and updates` (solid arrow).
+- Builder** to **Profile Object Repository**: `retrieves Profile values` (solid arrow). A note "Only if Profile is unknown." is attached to this message.
+- Builder** to **Factory**: `commissions` (solid arrow).
+- Profile Object Repository** to **Builder**: `retrieve()` (solid arrow).
+
+UML Class Diagram for Build BPON resources
+
+Figure 6-84 – Build class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant Builder as : Builder
+ participant Factory as Managed Entity : Factory
+ participant Maintainer as : Management Model Maintainer
+
+ OMS->>Builder: buildNode()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>Factory: create()
+ activate Factory
+ Factory-->>Maintainer:
+ deactivate Factory
+ Note right of Maintainer: Create all managed entities in management information fragment for node entity.
+ Builder->>Builder: deactivate
+ OMS->>Builder: modifyNode()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>Maintainer: updates()
+ activate Maintainer
+ Note right of Maintainer: Assigns new values to relevant management information fragment managed entities.
+ Maintainer-->>Builder:
+ deactivate Maintainer
+ Builder->>Builder: deactivate
+ OMS->>Builder: assignUserLabelsToNE()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>Maintainer: updates()
+ activate Maintainer
+ Note right of Maintainer: Raises exception if there are remaining subnetwork connections or reservations.
+ Maintainer-->>Builder:
+ deactivate Maintainer
+ Builder->>Builder: deactivate
+ OMS->>Builder: deleteNode()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>Maintainer: scopeFilter()
+ activate Maintainer
+ Note right of Maintainer:
+ Maintainer->>Factory: delete()
+ activate Factory
+ Factory-->>Maintainer:
+ deactivate Factory
+ Maintainer-->>Builder:
+ deactivate Maintainer
+ Note right of Maintainer: Delete all managed entities in management information fragment for node entity.
+ Builder->>Builder: deactivate
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the sequence of operations for building, modifying, and deleting a node entity. The participants involved are the OMS/Operator (Actor), the Builder (Boundary), the Managed Entity Factory (Control), and the Management Model Maintainer (Control). The process begins with the OMS/Operator sending a `buildNode()` message to the Builder. The Builder then sends a `create()` message to the Managed Entity Factory, which in turn interacts with the Management Model Maintainer. A note specifies: "Create all managed entities in management information fragment for node entity." Next, the OMS/Operator sends a `modifyNode()` message to the Builder, which sends an `updates()` message to the Management Model Maintainer. A note states: "Assigns new values to relevant management information fragment managed entities." This is followed by the OMS/Operator sending an `assignUserLabelsToNE()` message to the Builder, which again sends an `updates()` message to the Management Model Maintainer. A note indicates: "Raises exception if there are remaining subnetwork connections or reservations." Finally, the OMS/Operator sends a `deleteNode()` message to the Builder, which sends a `scopeFilter()` message to the Management Model Maintainer. The Maintainer then sends a `delete()` message to the Managed Entity Factory. A final note states: "Delete all managed entities in management information fragment for node entity."
+
+UML sequence diagram showing interactions between OMS/Operator, Builder, Managed Entity Factory, and Management Model Maintainer for build, modify, and delete operations.
+
+**Figure 6-85 – Build, modify and delete sequence diagram18**
+
+18 This example concerns the "node" entity (for BPON technology this would be an OLT, ONT, ONU or NT), but the behaviour described applies to all the other entities in this interface including the following: Port, ProtectionGrouping, TCONT, PlugInUnit, MACBridge or VPNetworkCTP.
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) buildNode | This operation builds an NE in the supplier management system. |
+| 2) assignUserLabelsToNE | This operation assigns operator administrative designations to NEs. |
+| 3) modifyNode | The operation initiates reconfiguration and update of specific parameters associated with an NE. |
+| 4) deleteNode | This operation deletes the NE from the supplier management system and cancels a previous pre-provisioning request. |
+| 5) modifyPort | The operation modifies parameters of the designated port identified by physicalPathTPId. |
+| 6) buildPlugInUnit | This operation builds a plug-in unit in the supplier management system as part of the pre-provisioning activities. |
+| 7) modifyPlugInUnit | This operation modifies attributes of the plug-in unit in the supplier management system. |
+| 8) deletePlugInUnit | This operation deletes a plug-in unit from the supplier management system. |
+| 9) buildProtectionGrouping | This operation builds a protectionGrouping in the supplier management system. |
+| 10) modifyProtectionParameters | This operation modifies the protection schema for the identified protection grouping. |
+| 11) modifyProtectionUnitList | This operation either adds to or removes from the list of protected and protecting ports for the identified protection grouping. |
+| 12) deleteProtectionGrouping | This operation deletes a protection grouping of ports from the supplier management system. |
+| 13) buildBridge | This operation builds a MAC bridge in the supplier management system. |
+| 14) modifyBridgeProfile | This operation modifies the characteristics of the bridging function by changing the MAC bridge service profile associated with the bridge. |
+| 15) modifyBridgePortList | This operation either adds to or removes from the list of UNI ports belonging to the bridge grouping. |
+| 16) deleteBridge | This operation deletes a bridge provisioning from the supplier management system. |
+| 17) buildVPNNetworkCTP | This operation builds a VP network CTP in the supplier management system. |
+| 18) deleteVPNNetworkCTP | This operation deletes a VP network CTP provisioning from the supplier management system. |
+| 19) createdNodesGet | This operation retrieves the list of network elements that have been constructed through invocation of this interface. |
+| 20) buildTCONT | This operation builds a TCONT in the supplier management system. |
+| 21) modifyTCONTParameters | This operation modifies the parameters associated with an existing TCONT in the supplier management system. |
+| 22) deleteTCONT | This operation deletes a TCONT provisioning from the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-86 – Builder operations**
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) buildNode | NEKindType,
string (supplier name),
string (location),
VersionType (hardware version),
SerialNumType,
string (registration Id)
NameSeqType (alarm severity profile),
NameSeqType (threshold data profile),
SlotAssignmentSeqType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port),
string (equipment code)
UserLabelType,
ExternalTimeType,
SystemTimingType,
RegistrationIdType,
boolean (status reporting indicator)
AdministrationDomainType | ManagedEntity
IdType | UnrecognisedVersion,
InvalidSerialNumSyntax,
DuplicateSerialNumber,
UnknownProfiles,
UnknownManagedEntity,
DuplicateUserLabel,
AccessDenied,
InvalidExternalTime,
UnknownSystemTimingSource,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 2) assignUserLabelsToNE | SerialNumType,
string (registration Id),
UserLabelType,
RegistrationIdType
AdministrationDomainType | void | InvalidSerialNumSyntax,
DuplicateSerialNumber,
DuplicateUserLabel,
AccessDenied |
+| 3) modifyNode | ManagedEntityIdType,
SlotAssignmentSeqType,
NameSeqType (alarm severity profile),
NameSeqType (threshold data profile),
string (registration Id),
UserLabelType,
ExternalTimeType,
RegistrationIdType,
boolean (status reporting indicator)
AdministrationDomainType | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownNE,
InvalidSlotAssignmentList,
UnknownProfiles,
DuplicateUserLabel,
AccessDenied,
InvalidExternalTime,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 4) deleteNode | ManagedEntityIdType | void | UnknownNE,
RemainingContainedManaged
Entities,
AccessDenied,
RemainingReservations,
RemainingSubnetworkConnections |
+| 5) modifyPort | ManagedEntityIdType,
NameSeqType (alarm severity profile),
NameSeqType (threshold data profile),
NameSeqType (port profiles),
string,
AdministrativeStateType,
OpticalWaveLengthArraySeqType,
LoopbackLocationIdSeqType,
unsigned long (interface speed),
unsigned long (ARC timer) | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
InterfaceSpeedNotChangeable,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 6) buildPlugInUnit | ManagedEntityIdType,
NameSeqType (alarm severity profile),
UserLabelType,
string (equipment code),
AdministrativeStateType,
ManagedEntityIdType (slot) | ManagedEntity
IdType | UnknownNE,
DuplicateUserLabel,
AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
InvalidEquipmentCode,
SlotAlreadyAssigned,
UnknownSlot,
InvalidSlotAssignmentList,
UnknownProfiles,
ProfileSuspended |
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 7) modifyPlugInUnit | ManagedEntityType,
NameType (alarm severity profile),
string (equipment code),
ManagedEntityType,
UserLabelType,
AdministrativeStateType | ManagedEntity
IdType | UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
InvalidEquipmentCode,
SlotAlreadyAssigned,
UnknownSlot,
InvalidSlotAssignmentList,
InvalidUserLabelSyntax,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 8) deletePlugInUnit | ManagedEntityType | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
RemainingSubnetworkConnections,
AccessDenied,
RemainingReservations |
+| 9) buildProtection
Grouping | ProtectionParameterType,
ProtectionUnitSeqType | ManagedEntity
IdType | InvalidProtectionScheme,
AccessDenied |
+| 10) modifyProtection
Parameters | ManagedEntityType,
ProtectionParameterType | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
InvalidProtectionScheme,
AccessDenied |
+| 11) modifyProtection
UnitList | ManagedEntityType,
ProtectionUnitSeqType,
boolean (add delete indication) | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
InvalidProtectionScheme,
AccessDenied |
+| 12) deleteProtection
Grouping | ManagedEntityType | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied |
+| 13) buildBridge | NameType (MAC bridge profile),
ManagedEntityType (port),
ManagedEntityIdSeqType (UNI ports) | ManagedEntity
IdType | UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 14) modifyBridgeProfile | ManagedEntityType,
NameType (MAC bridge profile) | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 15) modifyBridgePortList | ManagedEntityType,
ManagedEntityIdSeqType (delta UNI
ports),
boolean (add delete indication) | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
RemainingSubnetworkConnections,
AccessDenied |
+| 16) deleteBridge | ManagedEntityType | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied,
RemainingSubnetworkConnections |
+| 17) buildVPNNetworkCTP | ManagedEntityType (port),
short (VPI),
NameType(traffic descriptor profile)
ATMOverbookingFactorType,
UserLabelType,
SegmentEndpointIdType | ManagedEntity
IdType | UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
UnknownManagedEntity,
ParameterViolation,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 18) deleteVPNNetwork
CTP | ManagedEntityType | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied |
+| 19) createdNodesGet | | ManagedEntity
IdSeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 20) buildTCONT | ManagedEntityType (ONT or ONU),
TCONTType,
BWType (maxBW),
BWType (fixedBW),
BWType (guaranteedBW),
UserLabelType | ManagedEntity
IdType | UnknownNE,
AccessDenied,
InsufficientPONBW,
UnsupportedTCONTType,
DuplicateUserLabel |
+| 21) modifyTCONT
Parameters | ManagedEntityType (TCONT),
BWType (maxBW),
BWType (fixedBW),
BWType (guaranteedBW),
UserLabelType | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied,
InsufficientPONBW,
DuplicateUserLabel |
+| 22) deleteTCONT | ManagedEntityType (TCONT) | void | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied,
RemainingSubnetworkConnections |
+
+**Figure 6-87 – Builder signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| DuplicateSerialNumber | There exists other equipment of the same type with this serial number. |
+| DuplicateUserLabel | The user label provided in the request has been used to label another archive, i.e., one that is defined by a different set of creation request parameters. |
+| InterfaceSpeedNotChangeable | The physical port cannot support the new interface speed or the speed is not configurable. |
+| InvalidEquipmentCode | The equipment code does not conform to syntax. |
+| InvalidExternalTime | External time specified is not valid. |
+| InvalidProtectionScheme | The network resource does not support the protection parameters specified in context with the port listing or if the protection units are ports of dissimilar physical path characteristic. |
+| InvalidSerialNumSyntax | Syntax of the serial number provided does not match definition rules. |
+| InvalidSlotAssignmentList | Expected slot provisioning rules are violated by slot assignment provided. |
+| InvalidUserLabelSyntax | The specified UserLabel does not follow established rules for UserLabel. |
+| ParameterViolation | This exception is raised when the endpoint parameters do not match the protocol characteristics of the port, or when the values are out of range or invalid duplicates. |
+| ProfileSuspended | The named profile(s) in the invocation have been suspended for use within the supplier management system by the OMS or operator. |
+| RemainingContainedManagedEntities | Contained circuit packs or equipment holders have not been deleted yet. |
+| RemainingReservations | The node cannot be deleted as resource reservations still exist. |
+| RemainingSubnetworkConnections | The node or plug-in unit cannot be deleted as there are remaining subnetwork connections. |
+| SlotAlreadyAssigned | The requested slot is already provisioned. |
+| UnknownManagedEntity | The specified managed entity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownProfiles | This exception is raised if the profile name provided is unknown to the supplier management system and cannot be retrieved from the profile object repository. |
+| UnknownSlot | The requested slot is unknown in the NE. |
+| UnknownSystemTimingSource | External time source unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnrecognisedVersion | Equipment version provided does not match known values. |
+
+**Figure 6-88 – Builder exceptions**
+
+#### 6.3.6.2 Profile object management
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class ProfileObjectRepository {
+ +retrieve()
+ +createProfileObject()
+ }
+ class OMSOperator {
+ +obtainsParameterValues()
+ +managesProfileUsage()
+ }
+ class ManagementModelMaintainer {
+ +consultsAndUpdatesUsageCapability()
+ }
+ class ProfileUsageMgr {
+ +KnownProfileList
+ +isUse()
+ +suspendUse()
+ +deleteProfile()
+ +lookup()
+ +setName()
+ +resetUse()
+ +matchKnownProfile()
+ }
+ class ProfileObjectConsumer {
+ +subscribeToChannel()
+ +consumeProfileObjectCreation()
+ }
+ class InternalProcess {
+ }
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class ExternalEventChannel {
+ +push()
+ }
+ class ATMNetworkAccessProfileF {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +LocalMaxNmVPCSupportable
+ +LocalMaxNmVCCSupportable
+ +LocalMaxNmAllocatedVPIBts
+ +LocalMaxNmAllocatedVCIBts
+ +TotalEgressBandwidth
+ +TotalIngressBandwidth
+ +UPC/NPCId
+ +Suspended
+ }
+ class TiresHoldDataF {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +PMTType
+ +PerformParamTiresHoldValueList
+ }
+ class AAL2PVCProfile {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +AppId
+ +MaxNmNmCba
+ +MinNmNmCbaIdVal
+ +MaxNmNmCbaIdVal
+ +MaxPCSPDULEn
+ +TimeRCULEn
+ }
+ class CESServiceProfile {
+ +Name
+ +CESBInterDCDVTolerance
+ +ChannelAssociatedSignalling
+ +CableGaugeLength
+ }
+ class TrafficDescriptorProfileF {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +ServiceCategory
+ +ConformanceDefinition
+ +PeakCellRate - Ingress and Egress
+ +CellDelayVariationTolerancePCR - Ingress and Egress
+ +CellDelayVariationToleranceSCR - Ingress and Egress
+ +SustainableCellRate - Ingress and Egress
+ +MaximumBurstSize - Ingress and Egress
+ +MFS - Ingress and Egress
+ +MinimumCellRate - Ingress and Egress
+ +RateIncreaseFactor - Ingress and Egress
+ +FixedRoundTripTime
+ +InitialCellRate - Ingress and Egress
+ +TransitBufferExposure - Ingress and Egress
+ +RateDecreaseFactor - Ingress and Egress
+ +Nrm - Ingress and Egress
+ +Ttm - Ingress and Egress
+ +CDF - Ingress and Egress
+ +ADTF - Ingress and Egress
+ }
+ class VoiceServiceProfileAAL1 {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +AnnouncementType
+ }
+ class MACBridgeServiceProfile {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +SpanningTreeId
+ +LearnIngId
+ +MaxAge
+ +HelloTime
+ +ForwardDelay
+ }
+ class EthernetProfile {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +DuplexId
+ +AutoDetectionId
+ +DataRate
+ +MaxFrameSize
+ +DTEorDCEId
+ +BridgePortId
+ }
+ class VoiceServiceProfileAAL2 {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +AnnouncementType
+ +JitterTarget
+ +JitterBurstMax
+ +TimingReference
+ }
+ class SSCSPParameterProfile1 {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +SegmentLength
+ +RASTimer
+ +MaxSSARSDUlen
+ +SSTEDId
+ +SSADTId
+ }
+ class SSCSPParameterProfile2 {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +ServiceCategory
+ +EncStrType
+ +EncProfileIndex
+ +AudioSequenced
+ +PCMEncType
+ +CMDataId
+ +CMMultipleNrm
+ +FIMDataId
+ +FIMMaxFrameLen
+ +CASId
+ +DTMFId
+ +MFRFId
+ +RateControlId
+ +SyncCableLength
+ }
+ class LESServiceProfile {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +ELCId
+ +POTS signalling
+ +BRI signalling
+ +MaxNmCIDs
+ +MaxPacketLength
+ +ChannelSSCSPParameterPtrList
+ }
+ class UNINbF {
+ +Name
+ +LocalMaxNmVPCSupportable
+ +LocalMaxNmVCCSupportable
+ +LocalMaxNmAllocatedVPIBts
+ +LocalMaxNmAllocatedVCIBts
+ +LoopbackLocationCode
+ }
+ class AAL1ProfileF {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +SubType
+ +CBRRate
+ +ClockRecoveryType
+ +ForwardErrorCorrectionType
+ +StructuredDataTransfer
+ +PartiallyFilledCells
+ +CellLossIntegrationPeriod
+ }
+ class AAL2P1P1P {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +DetailSSCSPParameterProfile1Ptr
+ +DetailSSCSPParameterProfile2Ptr
+ }
+ class VGCESServiceProfile {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +CESBInterDCDVTolerance
+ +ChannelAssociatedSignalling
+ }
+ class AALSPProfileF {
+ +Name
+ +ManagedEntityId
+ +MaxPCSPDULen
+ +SSCSType
+ }
+
+ ProfileObjectRepository --> ProfileUsageMgr : retrieve()
+ ProfileObjectRepository --> ProfileUsageMgr : createProfileObject()
+ OMSOperator --> ProfileUsageMgr : obtainsParameterValues()
+ OMSOperator --> ProfileUsageMgr : managesProfileUsage()
+ ManagementModelMaintainer --> ProfileUsageMgr : consultsAndUpdatesUsageCapability()
+ ProfileUsageMgr --> ProfileObjectConsumer : matches
+ ProfileUsageMgr --> InternalProcess : matches
+ InternalProcess --> Factory : commissions
+ ProfileObjectConsumer --> Factory : commissions
+ ProfileObjectConsumer --> ExternalEventChannel : consumesEventsFrom
+ Factory --> ProfileUsageMgr : createsAndDeletesProfilesWithinSupplierManagementSystem
+ Factory --> ProfileUsageMgr : delete()
+ Factory --> ProfileUsageMgr : create()
+
+```
+
+UML class diagram for Profile object management showing entities like Profile Object Repository, OMS Operator, Management Model Maintainer, Profile Usage Mgr, Profile Object Consumer, Factory, and various profile classes like ATM Network Access Profile F, Tires hold Data F, AAL2 PVC Profile, CES Service Profile, Traffic Descriptor Profile F, etc.
+
+Figure 6-89 – Profile object management class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant POConsumer as :Profile Object Consumer
+ participant POR as :Profile Object Repository
+ participant Operator as :Operator
+ participant EEC as :External Event Channel
+ participant MMT as :Management Model Maintainer
+ participant MEF as Managed Entity:
+Factory
+ participant PUM as :Profile Usage Mgr
+ participant IP as Internal Process
+ participant OMSOperator as :OMS Operator
+
+ POConsumer->>POR: subscribeToChannel()
+ activate POR
+ Operator->>POR: createProfileObject(ProfileA)
+ activate POR
+ POR->>EEC: post()
+ deactivate POR
+ activate EEC
+ EEC->>POConsumer: post()
+ deactivate EEC
+ POConsumer->>MMT: matchKnownProfile(ProfileA)
+ activate MMT
+ MMT-->>PUM: If not
+known.
+ deactivate MMT
+ POConsumer->>MEF: create(ProfileA)
+ activate MEF
+ Note right of PUM: Response is
+negative.
+ PUM->>OMSOperator: In Use(ProfileA)
+ activate OMSOperator
+ OMSOperator->>PUM: matchKnownProfile(ProfileA)
+ deactivate OMSOperator
+ PUM->>MMT: getProfile(ProfileA)
+ activate MMT
+ MMT->>MEF: updateProfilePtr(ProfileA)
+ Note left of MMT: The profile is being "used" to
+configure another managed entity.
+ Note right of MMT: Response is
+positive.
+ MEF-->>PUM:
+ deactivate MEF
+ PUM->>OMSOperator: In Use(ProfileA)
+ activate OMSOperator
+ OMSOperator->>PUM: suspendUse(ProfileA)
+ deactivate OMSOperator
+ PUM->>MMT: matchKnownProfile(ProfileA)
+ activate MMT
+ Note left of MMT: Raises
+exception.
+ MMT->>MEF: getProfile(ProfileA)
+ activate MEF
+ MEF-->>PUM:
+ deactivate MMT
+ deactivate MEF
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Profile object management. Lifelines include Profile Object Consumer, Profile Object Repository, Operator, External Event Channel, Management Model Maintainer, Managed Entity: Factory, Profile Usage Mgr, Internal Process, and OMS Operator. The diagram shows the flow of creating, matching, updating, and managing profile objects with various annotations like 'Response is negative' and 'Response is positive'.
+
+Figure 6-90 – Profile object management sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant IP as :InternalProcess
+ participant PUM as :Profile Usage Mgr
+ participant POR as :Profile Object Repository
+ participant MEF as :Managed Entity Factory
+ participant MMM as :Management Model Maintainer
+ participant OMS as :OMS Operator
+ participant POC as :Profile Object Consumer
+ participant EEC as :External Event Channel
+
+ IP->>PUM: matchKnownProfile (Profile B)
+ PUM->>POR: lookUp()
+ Note left of PUM: Response is no.
+ PUM->>POR: retrieve()
+ Note right of POR: Profile is in use by another managed entity.
+ PUM->>MEF: create (Profile B)
+ PUM->>MMM: getProfile (Profile B)
+ PUM->>MMM: updateProfilePrf (Profile B)
+ PUM->>POR: resumeUse (Profile A)
+ POC->>POR: matchKnownProfile (Profile C)
+ POC->>MEF: create (Profile C)
+ POC->>POC: consumeProfileObjCreation (Profile C)
+ POC->>POR: deleteProfile (Profile C)
+ POC->>MEF: delete (Profile C)
+ POC->>MMM: reName (Profile C)
+ Note left of POR: Raises exception.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Profile object management. Lifelines: InternalProcess, Profile Usage Mgr, Profile Object Repository, Managed Entity Factory, Management Model Maintainer, OMS Operator, Profile Object Consumer, External Event Channel. The diagram shows interactions for creating, updating, deleting, and managing profiles, with notes indicating error handling like 'Profile is in use by another managed entity' and 'Raises exception'.
+
+**Figure 6-91 – Profile object management – New supplier management system sequence diagram**
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) reName | This operation provides the capability to rename a profile. |
+| 2) inUse | This operation returns a boolean value to tell if the profile is in use. |
+| 3) suspendUse | This operation suspends the use of a profile. |
+| 4) resumeUse | This operation resumes the use of a named profile. |
+| 5) deleteProfile | This operation deleteProfile provides the capability to remove a profile which is not in use. |
+| 6) retrieve 19 | This operation provides the capability to retrieve a profile attribute values. |
+
+**Figure 6-92 – Profile usage manager and profile retriever operations**
+
+19 The operation "retrieve()" is the only one associated with the interface object profile retriever.
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) reName | NameType (old profile name),
NameType (new profile name) | void | UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
DuplicateProfileName |
+| 2) inUse | NameType (profile name) | boolean (indication of in use) | UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied |
+| 3) suspendUse | NameType (profile name) | void | UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied |
+| 4) resumeUse | NameType (profile name) | void | UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied |
+| 5) deleteProfile | NameType (profile name) | void | UnknownProfiles,
AccessDenied,
ProfileInUse |
+| 6) retrieve 20 | NameType (profile name) | ProfileInfoType | UnknownProfiles |
+
+**Figure 6-93 – Profile usage manager and profile retriever signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| DuplicateProfileName | This exception is raised when the new profile name duplicates an existing profile name. |
+| ProfileInUse | This exception is raised when the profile may not be deleted because it is still being used to characterize managed entities within the management jurisdiction of the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownProfiles | This exception is raised if the profile name provided is unknown to the supplier management system and cannot be retrieved from the profile object repository. |
+
+**Figure 6-94 – Profile usage manager and profile retriever exceptions**
+
+---
+
+20 The operation "retrieve()" is the only one associated with the interface object profile retriever. It is instantiated by the profile object repository.
+
+#### 6.3.6.3 Provision installed BPON resources
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class EventScreener {
+ +getConfigurationData()
+ +getStatusData()
+ +getStateData()
+ }
+ class EventQueue
+ class NotificationAdmin
+ class EventForwarder {
+ +processAnnouncement()
+ }
+ class EventSupplier
+ class Discoverer {
+ +getConfigurationData()
+ +getStatusData()
+ +getStateData()
+ }
+ class Synchronizer {
+ +NECommunicationsList
+ +getCompare()
+ +formatDataRecord()
+ +notify()
+ }
+ class NERegister
+ class Builder {
+ +CreatedNodesList
+ +ManagedEntityFragments
+ }
+ class ManagementModelMaintainer
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class InventoryData
+ class ExternalEventChannel
+ class Small_FSANNE
+ class NEFSAN
+ class Large_FSANNE
+ class equipmentHolderF
+ class Port
+ class OLT
+ class ONT
+ class ONU
+ class PlugInUnitF
+ class ProfileObjectRepository
+
+ BPON_NE[BPON NE] --> EventScreener : sends events
+ BPON_NE --> Discoverer : queries
+ BPON_NE --> Synchronizer : triggers
+ BPON_NE --> NERegister : provides NE database
+ OMS_Operator[OMS Operator] --> Builder : registers or reconfigures
+ OMS_Operator --> Builder : provisions
+ OMS_Operator --> ProfileObjectRepository : consults and discovers (event)
+ ProfileObjectRepository --> Builder : retrieves Profile values
+ Note for EventScreener: Details found in "Process Incoming NE Events" Analysis.
+ Note for EventForwarder: Details found in "Publish BPON Event Analysis".
+ EventScreener --> EventQueue : queues to
+ EventScreener --> Synchronizer : notifies
+ Synchronizer --> EventQueue : extracts from
+ Synchronizer --> EventForwarder : announces discovery events
+ EventForwarder --> EventSupplier : pushes event
+ EventSupplier --> ExternalEventChannel : publishes event
+ Synchronizer --> Factory : commissions
+ Factory --> InventoryData : creates
+ InventoryData --> ExternalEventChannel : contains hardware and software inventory
+ ExternalEventChannel --> NEFSAN
+ NEFSAN --> Large_FSANNE
+ Large_FSANNE --> equipmentHolderF
+ equipmentHolderF --> Port
+ Port --> OLT
+ OLT --> ONT
+ ONT --> ONU
+ ONU --> equipmentHolderF
+ equipmentHolderF --> PlugInUnitF
+ PlugInUnitF --> equipmentHolderF
+ Note for PlugInUnitF: Only if Profile is unknown.
+
+```
+
+UML Class Diagram for Provision installed BPON resources. The diagram shows the relationships between various components including EventScreener, EventQueue, NotificationAdmin, EventForwarder, EventSupplier, Discoverer, Synchronizer, NERegister, Builder, ManagementModelMaintainer, Factory, InventoryData, ExternalEventChannel, Small\_FSANNE, NEFSAN, Large\_FSANNE, equipmentHolderF, Port, OLT, ONT, ONU, PlugInUnitF, and ProfileObjectRepository. It also includes actors like BPON NE, OMS Operator, and External Event Channel, and several notes about event analysis and profile retrieval.
+
+Figure 6-95 – Provision installed BPON resources class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant Builder as :Builder
+ participant BPON_NE as :BPON NE
+ participant Event_Screener as :Event Screener
+ participant Event_Queue as :Event Queue
+ participant Synchroniser as :Synchroniser
+ participant Managed_Entity_Factory as :Managed Entity Factory
+ participant Discoverer as :Discoverer
+ participant NE_Registrar as :NERegistrar
+ participant Port as :Port
+
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: buildNode()
+ Builder-->>Managed_Entity_Factory: create()
+ Note right of Managed_Entity_Factory: As required based on management information fragment.
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: buildPort()
+ Builder-->>Managed_Entity_Factory: create()
+ Note right of Managed_Entity_Factory: As required based on management information fragment.
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: modifyPort()
+ Note left of Builder: As desired and as many as desired.
+ Builder->>Port: setAttribute()
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: buildProtectionGroup()
+ Builder-->>Managed_Entity_Factory: create()
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: readEvent()
+ Note left of Builder: The node is installed and registered or raised.
+ Builder->>Event_Screener: readEvent()
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Queue: notify()
+ OMSOperator->>Builder: associateNE()
+ Builder->>NE_Registrar: set()
+ Note right of NE_Registrar: Set all configuration values with pre-provisioned settings.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for provisioning installed BPON resources with pre-provisioning. The diagram shows interactions between :OMSOperator, :Builder, :BPON NE, :Event Screener, :Event Queue, :Synchroniser, :Managed Entity Factory, :Discoverer, :NERegistrar, and :Port. Key actions include building nodes, ports, and protection groups, reading events, and associating NEs. Annotations specify that objects are created as required based on management information fragments and that the node is installed and registered or raised.
+
+Figure 6-96 – Provision installed BPON resources sequence diagram with pre-provisioning
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant Builder as : Builder
+ participant MM as : Management Model Maintainer
+ participant ME as Managed Entity : Factory
+ actor ExtEvent as : External Event Channel
+ participant BPON as : BPON NE
+
+ ExtEvent->>OMS: consumes autodiscovery event()
+ activate OMS
+ OMS->>Builder: modifyNode()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder-->>MM: update
+ deactivate Builder
+ Builder->>ME: set()
+ deactivate Builder
+ OMS->>Builder: modifyPlugInUnit()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder-->>MM: update
+ deactivate Builder
+ Builder->>ME: set()
+ deactivate Builder
+ OMS->>Builder: modifyPort()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder-->>MM: update
+ deactivate Builder
+ Builder->>ME: set()
+ deactivate Builder
+ OMS->>Builder: buildProtectionGrouping()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>ME: create()
+ deactivate Builder
+ ME->>BPON: set()
+ deactivate ME
+ OMS->>Builder: buildBridge()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>ME: create()
+ deactivate Builder
+ ME->>BPON: set()
+ deactivate ME
+ OMS->>Builder: buildTCONT()
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>ME: create()
+ deactivate Builder
+ ME->>BPON: set()
+ deactivate ME
+ deactivate OMS
+
+```
+
+According to Management Information fragment rules. Depending on the autodiscovered network resource, some of the build functions are not required.
+
+Sequence diagram for provisioning installed BPON resources. The diagram shows interactions between OMS/Operator, Builder, Management Model Maintainer, Managed Entity Factory, External Event Channel, and BPON NE. The process starts with an external event being consumed by the OMS/Operator, which then triggers a series of modify and build actions on the Builder. The Builder then updates the Management Model Maintainer, which in turn sets values on the Managed Entity Factory. Finally, the Managed Entity Factory creates and sets values on the BPON NE. A note indicates that some build functions may not be required depending on the autodiscovered network resource.
+
+Figure 6-97 – Provision installed BPON resources sequence diagram – No pre-provisioning
+
+#### 6.3.6.4 Provision service
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class ServiceProvider {
+ +provisionConnection()
+ +provisionReservation()
+ +deleteConnection()
+ +modifyConnection()
+ +suspendService()
+ +resumeService()
+ }
+ class BPONE
+ class OMSOperator
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class ProfileUsageMgr {
+ }
+ class ResourceAllocator {
+ +ServiceInstanceReservationIdListing
+ +ReservationIdReservedResourcesListing
+ +CACAlgorithms
+ +reserveForService()
+ +cancelReservation()
+ +getReservationId()
+ +reportReservedResources()
+ +getReservations()
+ +cancelAllRemainingReservations()
+ +getReservation()
+ +getAvailableSocBandwidth()
+ +assignForService()
+ +makeUnassigned()
+ }
+ class ATMPortResource
+ class EthernetPortResource
+ class TDMPortResource
+ class ManagementModelMaintainer {
+ }
+ class DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis
+ class AAL2PvCPProfile
+ class AAL5ProfileF
+ class AAL2ProfileF
+ class DS1PProfile
+ class E3PProfile
+ class UNItoF
+ class AAL1PProfileF
+ class DS3PProfile
+ class E1PProfile
+ class SSCSPParameterProfile2
+ class BridgedLANServiceProfile
+ class TrafficDescriptorProfileF
+ class IDLCCallProcessingProfile
+ class CESServiceProfile
+ class VoiceServiceProfileAAL1
+ class BridgedLANServiceProfile
+ class VoiceServiceProfileAAL2
+ class MACBridgeServiceProfile
+ class EthernetProfile
+ class ATMNetworkAccessProfileF
+ class LESServiceProfile
+ class VoiceServiceProfileAAL2
+
+ ServiceProvider --> BPONE : updates
+ ServiceProvider --> OMSOperator : provisions service
+ ServiceProvider --> ProfileUsageMgr : employs
+ ServiceProvider --> Factory : commissions
+ ProfileUsageMgr --> ResourceAllocator : employs
+ ProfileUsageMgr --> ManagementModelMaintainer : verifies capacity
+ ResourceAllocator --> ATMPortResource : adjusts
+ ResourceAllocator --> EthernetPortResource : adjusts
+ ResourceAllocator --> TDMPortResource : adjusts
+ ManagementModelMaintainer --> ResourceAllocator : consults
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> AAL2PvCPProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> AAL5ProfileF
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> AAL2ProfileF
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> DS1PProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> E3PProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> UNItoF
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> AAL1PProfileF
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> DS3PProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> E1PProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> SSCSPParameterProfile2
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> BridgedLANServiceProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> TrafficDescriptorProfileF
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> IDLCCallProcessingProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> CESServiceProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> VoiceServiceProfileAAL1
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> BridgedLANServiceProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> VoiceServiceProfileAAL2
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> MACBridgeServiceProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> EthernetProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> ATMNetworkAccessProfileF
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> LESServiceProfile
+ DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis --> VoiceServiceProfileAAL2
+
+ Note for DetailAboutProfileObjectManagementAnalysis "Details about 'Profile Object Management' Analysis."
+ Note for ProfileUsageMgr "Profile Usage Manager"
+ Note for ResourceAllocator "Resource Allocator"
+ Note for ManagementModelMaintainer "Management Model Maintainer"
+ Note for AAL2PvCPProfile "AAL2PvCP Profile"
+ Note for AAL5ProfileF "AAL5 Profile F"
+ Note for AAL2ProfileF "AAL2 Profile F"
+ Note for DS1PProfile "DS1P Profile"
+ Note for E3PProfile "E3P Profile"
+ Note for UNItoF "UNI to F"
+ Note for AAL1PProfileF "AAL1P Profile F"
+ Note for DS3PProfile "DS3P Profile"
+ Note for E1PProfile "E1P Profile"
+ Note for SSCSPParameterProfile2 "SSCSP Parameter Profile 2"
+ Note for BridgedLANServiceProfile "BridgedLAN Service Profile"
+ Note for TrafficDescriptorProfileF "Traffic Descriptor Profile F"
+ Note for IDLCCallProcessingProfile "IDLCCall Processing Profile"
+ Note for CESServiceProfile "CES Service Profile"
+ Note for VoiceServiceProfileAAL1 "Voice Service Profile AAL1"
+ Note for BridgedLANServiceProfile "BridgedLAN Service Profile"
+ Note for VoiceServiceProfileAAL2 "Voice Service Profile AAL2"
+ Note for MACBridgeServiceProfile "MAC Bridge Service Profile"
+ Note for EthernetProfile "Ethernet Profile"
+ Note for ATMNetworkAccessProfileF "ATM Network Access Profile F"
+ Note for LESServiceProfile "LES Service Profile"
+ Note for VoiceServiceProfileAAL2 "Voice Service Profile AAL2"
+
+ Note for ProfileUsageMgr "Only if P profile is unknown."
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the Provision service architecture. Key components include:
+
+- Service Provider**: Manages connections and reservations, interacting with BPONE and OMSOperator.
+- Factory**: Creates and deletes resources, commissioned by the Service Provider.
+- Profile Usage Manager**: Manages profiles, employing the Resource Allocator and verifying capacity with the Management Model Maintainer.
+- Resource Allocator**: Allocates resources (ATM, Ethernet, TDM) and manages reservations.
+- Management Model Maintainer**: Consults the Resource Allocator for capacity management.
+- Profile Objects**: A collection of specific profiles such as AAL2PvCP, AAL5, AAL2, DS1P, E3P, UNItoF, AAL1P, DS3P, E1P, SSCSP, BridgedLAN, TrafficDescriptor, IDLCCallProcessing, CES, VoiceService (AAL1, AAL2), MAC Bridge, Ethernet, ATM Network Access, LES, and VoiceService (AAL2).
+
+UML Class Diagram for Provision Service
+
+Figure 6-98 – Provision service class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as OMS Operator
+ participant ServiceProvisioner as Service Provisioner
+ participant ResourceAllocator as Resource Allocator
+ participant OLT_PON as OLT PON : ATM Port Resource
+ participant ONT_PON as ONT PON : ATM Port Resource
+ participant OLT_NNI as OLT NNI : ATM Port Resource
+ participant ONT_UNI as ONT UNI : TDM Port Resource
+ participant ManagedEntity as Managed Entity : Factory
+
+ OMSOperator->>ServiceProvisioner: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate ServiceProvisioner
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: provisionConnection() reserveForService()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ ResourceAllocator->>OLT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate OLT_PON
+ OLT_PON->>ONT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate ONT_PON
+ ONT_PON->>OLT_NNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate OLT_NNI
+ OLT_NNI->>ONT_UNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate ONT_UNI
+ ResourceAllocator-->>ManagedEntity: create()
+ activate ManagedEntity
+ Note over ManagedEntity: Creates all necessary NetworkCTPs, NetworkTTPs, CTPs, TTPs, and subnetwork and link connections, according to the designation of endpoints.
+ ManagedEntity-->>ResourceAllocator:
+ deactivate ManagedEntity
+ ResourceAllocator->>ServiceProvisioner: assignForService()
+ activate ServiceProvisioner
+ ServiceProvisioner->>OLT_PON: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate OLT_PON
+ OLT_PON->>ONT_PON: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate ONT_PON
+ ONT_PON->>OLT_NNI: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate OLT_NNI
+ OLT_NNI->>ONT_UNI: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate ONT_UNI
+ Note over ONT_UNI: Shows adjustments in gauges and counters.
+ ONT_UNI-->>ServiceProvisioner:
+ deactivate ONT_UNI
+ deactivate OLT_NNI
+ deactivate ONT_PON
+ deactivate OLT_PON
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ ResourceAllocator->>ServiceProvisioner: provisionReservation()
+ activate ServiceProvisioner
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: getReservation()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ ResourceAllocator->>ManagedEntity: create()
+ activate ManagedEntity
+ ManagedEntity->>ServiceProvisioner: assignForService()
+ activate ServiceProvisioner
+ ServiceProvisioner->>OLT_PON: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate OLT_PON
+ OLT_PON->>ONT_PON: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate ONT_PON
+ ONT_PON->>OLT_NNI: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate OLT_NNI
+ OLT_NNI->>ONT_UNI: update "assigned" and "reserved" metrics
+ activate ONT_UNI
+ ONT_UNI-->>ServiceProvisioner:
+ deactivate ONT_UNI
+ deactivate OLT_NNI
+ deactivate ONT_PON
+ deactivate OLT_PON
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ deactivate ResourceAllocator
+ deactivate ServiceProvisioner
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for Provision service and reservation connection. The diagram shows interactions between OMS Operator, Service Provisioner, Resource Allocator, and various network resource objects (OLT PON, ONT PON, OLT NNI, ONT UNI, Managed Entity). Key actions include bandwidth checks, connection and reservation requests, metric updates, and resource creation. Two callouts provide context: one for creating network components and another for adjusting gauges and counters.
+
+Figure 6-99 – Provision service and reservation connection sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator
+ participant ServiceProvisioner
+ participant ManagementModelMaintainer
+ participant ONT as ONT:BPON NE
+ participant ResourceAllocator
+ participant ManagedEntityFactory
+ participant OLT_PON as OLT PON: ATMPortResource
+ participant ONT_PON as ONT PON: ATMPortResource
+ participant OLT_NNI as OLT NNI: ATMPortResource
+ participant ONT_UNI as ONT UNI: TDMPortResource
+
+ OMSOperator->>ServiceProvisioner: suspendService()
+ activate ServiceProvisioner
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ManagementModelMaintainer: set()
+ activate ManagementModelMaintainer
+ ManagementModelMaintainer->>ONT: update
+ deactivate ManagementModelMaintainer
+ Note over ManagementModelMaintainer: Change administrative state of UNI port
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ Note over ResourceAllocator: No change
+ ResourceAllocator->>ServiceProvisioner:
+ deactivate ResourceAllocator
+ OMSOperator->>ServiceProvisioner: resumeService()
+ activate ServiceProvisioner
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ManagementModelMaintainer: set()
+ activate ManagementModelMaintainer
+ ManagementModelMaintainer->>ONT: update
+ deactivate ManagementModelMaintainer
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ Note over ResourceAllocator: Provides bandwidth values
+ ResourceAllocator->>ServiceProvisioner:
+ deactivate ResourceAllocator
+ OMSOperator->>ServiceProvisioner: deleteConnection()
+ activate ServiceProvisioner
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ManagementModelMaintainer: getReservationId()
+ activate ManagementModelMaintainer
+ ManagementModelMaintainer->>ResourceAllocator: getReservation()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ ResourceAllocator->>ManagedEntityFactory: delete()
+ deactivate ResourceAllocator
+ Note over ManagedEntityFactory: All previously created managed entities for the service connection
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: makeUnassigned()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ ResourceAllocator->>OLT_PON: update "available" and "assigned" metrics
+ activate OLT_PON
+ OLT_PON->>ONT_PON: update "available" and "assigned" metrics
+ activate ONT_PON
+ ONT_PON->>OLT_NNI: update "available" and "assigned" metrics
+ activate OLT_NNI
+ OLT_NNI->>ONT_UNI: update "available" and "assigned" metrics
+ deactivate OLT_NNI
+ deactivate ONT_PON
+ deactivate OLT_PON
+ ResourceAllocator->>ServiceProvisioner:
+ deactivate ResourceAllocator
+ ServiceProvisioner->>ResourceAllocator: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate ResourceAllocator
+ Note over ResourceAllocator: Shows adjustments
+ ResourceAllocator->>ServiceProvisioner:
+ deactivate ResourceAllocator
+ deactivate ServiceProvisioner
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for suspend, resume, and delete connection operations. The diagram shows interactions between OMSOperator, ServiceProvisioner, ManagementModelMaintainer, ONT:BPON NE, ResourceAllocator, ManagedEntityFactory, and various resource objects (OLT PON, ONT PON, OLT NNI, ONT UNI). Key actions include suspendService(), resumeService(), deleteConnection(), and bandwidth management updates. Notes indicate 'No change', 'Change administrative state of UNI port', 'Provides bandwidth values', and 'All previously created managed entities for the service connection'.
+
+Figure 6-100 – Suspend, resume and delete connection sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) provisionConnection | This operation provisions a connection between any two endpoints of a BPON fibre access system. |
+| 2) provisionReservation | This operation provisions service between the NNI of an OLT and the UNI of an ONT or between two UNIs based on an outstanding reservation. |
+| 3) deleteConnection | The operation tears down the existing service and connections. |
+| 4) modifyConnection | This operation provides the capability to modify the existing service. |
+| 5) suspendService | This operation disables the flow of user traffic through the service subnetwork connection. |
+| 6) resumeService | This operation enables the flow of user traffic through the service subnetwork connection. |
+
+Figure 6-101 – Service provisioner operations
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) provisionConnection | EndpointType (endpoint A),
EndpointType (endpoint Z),
NameSeqType (network profiles),
ServiceInstanceType,
RegistrationIdType,
AdministrativeStateType | ManagedEntityIdType | UnknownNE,
UnknownProfiles,
UnknownPort,
InsufficientBW,
ConnectionCountExceeded,
CommFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
ParameterViolation,
AccessDenied,
InsufficientPONBW,
ProfileSuspended,
ConnectionAlreadyExists |
+| 2) provisionReservation | ReservationIdType,
AdministrativeStateType | ManagedEntityIdType | UnknownReservationId,
AccessDenied |
+| 3) deleteConnection | ManagedEntityIdType | void | UnknownConnection,
CommFailure,
EquipmentFailure,
AccessDenied |
+| 4) modifyConnection | ManagedEntityIdType,
ManagedEntityIdType (port A),
NameSeqType (new network
profiles),
NameSeqType (new service
profiles) | ManagedEntityIdType | UnknownConnection,
UnknownProfiles,
InsufficientBW,
UnknownPort,
AccessDenied,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 5) suspendService | ServiceInstanceType,
GeneralizedTimeType (start time),
GeneralizedTimeType (stop time) | void | UnknownServiceInstance,
AccessDenied,
InvalidStartTime,
InvalidStopTime |
+| 6) resumeService | ServiceInstanceType | void | UnknownServiceInstance,
AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-102 – Service provisioner signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| ConnectionAlreadyExists | There already exists a subnetwork connection with the same endpoints. |
+| ConnectionCountExceeded | The maximum number of connections for the OLT or PON port has been exceeded with this request for service provisioning. |
+| EquipmentFailure | The NE currently has a failure condition preventing the requested transaction from being completed. |
+| InsufficientPONBW | The ONT or ONU cannot be ranged or the service connection cannot be provisioned due to insufficient bandwidth on the APONLink. |
+| InsufficientBW | The CAC algorithm indicates that requested service requires too much bandwidth for the OLT. |
+| InvalidStartTime | The new start time is inconsistent with the current trigger time matrix or the new stop time. |
+| InvalidStopTime | The new stop time is inconsistent with the current trigger time matrix or the new start time. |
+| ParameterViolation | This exception is raised when the endpoint parameters do not match the protocol characteristics of the port, or when the values are out of range or invalid duplicates. |
+| ProfileSuspended | The named profile(s) in the invocation have been suspended for use within the supplier management system by the OMS or operator. |
+| UnknownConnection | The subnetwork connection is not known by the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownPort | The identified port is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownProfiles | This exception is raised if the profile name provided is unknown to the supplier management system and cannot be retrieved from the profile object repository. |
+| UnknownReservationId | The supplier management system does not recognize this reservation Id. |
+| UnknownServiceInstance | The service instance is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-103 – Service provisioner exceptions**
+
+#### 6.3.6.5 Reserve resources
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class Profile_Object_Repository {
+ <>
+ retrieve()
+ }
+ class Profile_Usage_Mgr {
+ <>
+ obtain_profile_parameters()
+ }
+ class Resource_Allocator {
+ <>
+ Get_Service_Instance_Id_Reservations_Listing()
+ Get_Reservation_Id_Reserved_Resources_Listing()
+ CAC_Algorithms()
+ reserve_For_Service()
+ cancel_Reservation()
+ get_Reservation_Id()
+ report_Reserved_Resources()
+ get_Reservations()
+ cancel_All_Remaining_Reservations()
+ get_Reservation()
+ get_Available_Sys_Bandwidth()
+ assign_For_Service()
+ make_Unassigned()
+ }
+ class Management_Model_Maintainer {
+ <>
+ }
+ class ATM_Port_Resource {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Ethernet_Port_Resource {
+ <>
+ }
+ class TDM_Port_Resource {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Profile_Object_Management_Analysis {
+ <>
+ }
+ class AAL2PVC_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class AAL2P_Profile_F {
+ <>
+ }
+ class AAL2P_Profile_F_2 {
+ <>
+ }
+ class DS1P_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class E3P_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class UNIMbf {
+ <>
+ }
+ class AAL1P_Profile_F {
+ <>
+ }
+ class DS3P_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class E1P_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class SSC_Parameter_Profile_2 {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Bridged_LAN_Service_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Traffic_Descriptor_Profile_F {
+ <>
+ }
+ class IDUC_Call_Processing_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class CES_Service_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Voice_Service_Profile_AAL1 {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Bridged_LAN_Service_Profile_2 {
+ <>
+ }
+ class SSC_Parameter_Profile_1 {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Voice_Service_Profile_AAL2 {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Ethernet_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class ATM_Network_Access_Profile_F {
+ <>
+ }
+ class LES_Service_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Voice_Service_Profile_AAL2_2 {
+ <>
+ }
+ class MAC_Bridge_Service_Profile {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Management_Model_Maintainer {
+ <>
+ }
+
+ Profile_Object_Repository --> Profile_Usage_Mgr : retrieve()
+ Profile_Usage_Mgr --> Profile_Object_Repository : obtain_profile_parameters()
+ Profile_Usage_Mgr --> Resource_Allocator : lookup
+ Resource_Allocator --> Profile_Usage_Mgr :
+ Resource_Allocator --> Management_Model_Maintainer : consists
+ Resource_Allocator --> ATM_Port_Resource : adjusts
+ Resource_Allocator --> Ethernet_Port_Resource : adjusts
+ Resource_Allocator --> TDM_Port_Resource : adjusts
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Profile_Usage_Mgr
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Resource_Allocator
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Management_Model_Maintainer
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> AAL2PVC_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> AAL2P_Profile_F
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> AAL2P_Profile_F_2
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> DS1P_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> E3P_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> UNIMbf
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> AAL1P_Profile_F
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> DS3P_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> E1P_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> SSC_Parameter_Profile_2
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Bridged_LAN_Service_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Traffic_Descriptor_Profile_F
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> IDUC_Call_Processing_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> CES_Service_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Voice_Service_Profile_AAL1
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Bridged_LAN_Service_Profile_2
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> SSC_Parameter_Profile_1
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Voice_Service_Profile_AAL2
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Ethernet_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> ATM_Network_Access_Profile_F
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> LES_Service_Profile
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> Voice_Service_Profile_AAL2_2
+ Profile_Object_Management_Analysis --> MAC_Bridge_Service_Profile
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the Reserve resources class diagram. It features several key components and their interactions:
+
+- Profile\_Object\_Repository** (Boundary) interacts with **Profile\_Usage\_Mgr** (Control) via `retrieve()` and `obtain_profile_parameters()`.
+- Profile\_Usage\_Mgr** (Control) interacts with **Resource\_Allocator** (Control) via `lookup`.
+- Resource\_Allocator** (Control) interacts with **Management\_Model\_Maintainer** (Control) via `consists`.
+- Resource\_Allocator** (Control) interacts with **ATM\_Port\_Resource** (Entity) via `adjusts`.
+- Resource\_Allocator** (Control) interacts with **Ethernet\_Port\_Resource** (Entity) via `adjusts`.
+- Resource\_Allocator** (Control) interacts with **TDM\_Port\_Resource** (Entity) via `adjusts`.
+- Profile\_Object\_Management\_Analysis** (Note) is associated with **Profile\_Usage\_Mgr**, **Resource\_Allocator**, **Management\_Model\_Maintainer**, and various profile classes.
+
+The **Resource\_Allocator** class includes the following methods:
+
+- `Get_Service_Instance_Id_Reservations_Listing()`
+- `Get_Reservation_Id_Reserved_Resources_Listing()`
+- `CAC_Algorithms()`
+- `reserve_For_Service()`
+- `cancel_Reservation()`
+- `get_Reservation_Id()`
+- `report_Reserved_Resources()`
+- `get_Reservations()`
+- `cancel_All_Remaining_Reservations()`
+- `get_Reservation()`
+- `get_Available_Sys_Bandwidth()`
+- `assign_For_Service()`
+- `make_Unassigned()`
+
+The **Profile\_Usage\_Mgr** class includes the following method:
+
+- `obtain_profile_parameters()`
+
+The **Management\_Model\_Maintainer** class is an empty control class.
+
+The **ATM\_Port\_Resource**, **Ethernet\_Port\_Resource**, and **TDM\_Port\_Resource** classes are empty entity classes.
+
+The **Profile\_Object\_Management\_Analysis** is a note box containing a list of profile classes: AAL2PVC\_Profile, AAL2P\_Profile\_F, AAL2P\_Profile\_F\_2, DS1P\_Profile, E3P\_Profile, UNIMbf, AAL1P\_Profile\_F, DS3P\_Profile, E1P\_Profile, SSC\_Parameter\_Profile\_2, Bridged\_LAN\_Service\_Profile, Traffic\_Descriptor\_Profile\_F, IDUC\_Call\_Processing\_Profile, CES\_Service\_Profile, Voice\_Service\_Profile\_AAL1, Bridged\_LAN\_Service\_Profile\_2, SSC\_Parameter\_Profile\_1, Voice\_Service\_Profile\_AAL2, Ethernet\_Profile, ATM\_Network\_Access\_Profile\_F, LES\_Service\_Profile, Voice\_Service\_Profile\_AAL2\_2, and MAC\_Bridge\_Service\_Profile.
+
+UML class diagram for Reserve resources. The diagram shows the interactions between Profile Usage Mgr, Resource Allocator, and various profile and resource classes.
+
+Figure 6-104 – Reserve resources class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant RA as Resource Allocator
+ participant OLT_PON as OLT PON : ATMPortResource
+ participant ONT_PON as ONT PON : ATMPortResource
+ participant OLT_NNI as OLT NNI : ATMPortResource
+ participant ONT_UNI as ONT UNI : TDMPortResource
+
+ OMSOperator->>RA: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate RA
+ RA->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate RA
+
+ OMSOperator->>RA: reserveForService()
+ activate RA
+ RA->>OLT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate OLT_PON
+ OLT_PON->>RA:
+ deactivate OLT_PON
+
+ RA->>ONT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate ONT_PON
+ ONT_PON->>RA:
+ deactivate ONT_PON
+
+ RA->>OLT_NNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate OLT_NNI
+ OLT_NNI->>RA:
+ deactivate OLT_NNI
+
+ RA->>ONT_UNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate ONT_UNI
+ ONT_UNI->>RA:
+ deactivate ONT_UNI
+
+ RA->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate RA
+
+ Note over RA: Shows adjustments in gauges and counters.
+ OMSOperator->>RA: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate RA
+ RA->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate RA
+
+ Note over RA: Shows all input data and bandwidth associated with reservation request.
+ OMSOperator->>RA: getReservation()
+ activate RA
+ RA->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate RA
+
+ OMSOperator->>RA: cancelReservation()
+ activate RA
+ RA->>OLT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate OLT_PON
+ OLT_PON->>RA:
+ deactivate OLT_PON
+
+ RA->>ONT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate ONT_PON
+ ONT_PON->>RA:
+ deactivate ONT_PON
+
+ RA->>OLT_NNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate OLT_NNI
+ OLT_NNI->>RA:
+ deactivate OLT_NNI
+
+ RA->>ONT_UNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ activate ONT_UNI
+ ONT_UNI->>RA:
+ deactivate ONT_UNI
+
+ RA->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate RA
+
+ Note over RA: Makes exception.
+ OMSOperator->>RA: getReservationId()
+ activate RA
+ RA->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate RA
+
+ Note over RA: Shows original data.
+ OMSOperator->>RA: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ activate RA
+ RA->>OMSOperator:
+ deactivate RA
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for Reserve and cancel reservation. The diagram shows interactions between an OMS Operator and five system components: Resource Allocator, OLT PON: ATMPortResource, ONT PON: ATMPortResource, OLT NNI: ATMPortResource, and ONT UNI: TDMPortResource. The process includes getting available system bandwidth, reserving for a service, updating metrics across all components, getting reservation details, canceling the reservation, and getting reservation IDs. Annotations explain the purpose of various steps, such as updating gauges and counters, showing input data, and handling exceptions.
+
+Figure 6-105 – Reserve and cancel reservation sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant RA as ResourceAllocator
+ participant OLT_PON as OLT PON : ATMPortResource
+ participant ONT_PON as ONT PON : ATMPortResource
+ participant OLT_NNI as OLT NNI : ATMPortResource
+ participant ONT_UNI as ONT UNI : TDMPortResource
+
+ OMSOperator->>RA: getAvailableSysBandwidth()
+ RA->>RA: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>OLT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>ONT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>OLT_NNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>ONT_UNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>OMSOperator: reportReservedResources()
+ Note over OLT_PON: Shows reserved resources.
+ Note over ONT_UNI: For same service connection type.
+ OMSOperator->>RA: reserveForService()
+ RA->>RA: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>OLT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>ONT_PON: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>OLT_NNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>ONT_UNI: update "reserved" and "available" metrics
+ RA->>OMSOperator: reportReservedResources()
+ Note over OLT_PON: Shows double reservation.
+ OMSOperator->>RA: cancelReservation()
+ Note over OLT_PON: Reduced by half.
+ RA->>OMSOperator: reportReservedResources()
+ OMSOperator->>RA: cancelAllRemainingReservations()
+ Note over OLT_PON: Shows none.
+ RA->>OMSOperator: reportReservedResources()
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for Reserve resources showing interactions between OMS Operator, Resource Allocator, and various network elements (OLT PON, ONT PON, OLT NNI, ONT UNI). The diagram illustrates the process of reserving resources, reporting reserved resources, and canceling reservations.
+
+**Figure 6-106 – Reserve resources sequence diagram**
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) reserveForService | This operation reserves bandwidth for a network resource such as ONT, ONU or NT whose installation is pending. |
+| 2) cancelReservation | This operation is used to delete the reservation and release the resources from the reserved system capacity. |
+| 3) getReservationId | This operation is used to display the reservation Id associated with the service instance Id that is assigned for the reserved bandwidth. |
+| 4) reportReservedResources | This operation is used by the OMS to display the current reserved bandwidth in the specific headend NE (in this case the OLT). |
+| 5) getReservations | This operation is used by OMS to retrieve all the reservations associated with the given NE. |
+| 6) cancelAllRemainingReservations | This operation is used to delete all the remaining reservations against capacity associated with a given network element. |
+| 7) getReservation | This operation is used to investigate the origins of a reservation of capacity within an NE. |
+| 8) getAvailableSysBandwidth | This operation is used to determine the amount of capacity remaining for service connection reservation or assignment for a network element. |
+
+**Figure 6-107 – Resource allocator operations**
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) reserveForService | EndPointType (endpoint A),
EndPointType (endpoint Z),
NameSeqType (network profiles),
ServiceInstanceIdType | ReservationBandwidthType | UnknownNE,
UnknownPort,
UnknownProfiles,
InsufficientBW,
MaxSubtendingNodes Exceeded,
ConnectionCountExceeded,
CommFailure,
AccessDenied,
ProfileSuspended |
+| 2) cancelReservation | ReservationIdType | AvailableSysBandwidthSeqType | UnknownReservationId,
CommFailure,
AccessDenied |
+| 3) getReservationId | ServiceInstanceIdType | ReservationIdType | UnknownServiceInstance,
AccessDenied |
+| 4) reportReservedResources | ManagedEntityIdType | ReservedBandwidthSeqType | UnknownNE,
AccessDenied |
+| 5) getReservations | ManagedEntityIdType (NE) | ReservationIdSeqType | UnknownNE,
AccessDenied |
+| 6) cancelAllRemaining Reservations | ManagedEntityIdType (NE) | AvailableSysBandwidthSeqType | UnknownNE,
CommFailure,
AccessDenied |
+| 7) getReservation | ReservationIdType | ReservationInfoType | UnknownReservationId,
AccessDenied |
+| 8) getAvailableSys Bandwidth | ManagedEntityIdType (NE) | AvailableSysBandwidthSeqType | UnknownNE,
CommFailure,
AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-108 – Resource allocator signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| ConnectionCountExceeded | The maximum number of connections for the OLT or PON port has been exceeded with this request for service provisioning. |
+| InsufficientBW | The CAC algorithm indicates that requested service requires too much bandwidth for the OLT. |
+| MaxSubtendingNodesExceeded | The maximum engineered number of subtending nodes for the identified PON interface has been exceeded with this request for service provisioning or reservation. |
+| ProfileSuspended | The named profile(s) in the invocation have been suspended for use within the supplier management system by the OMS or operator. |
+| UnknownNE | Identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownPort | The identified port is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownProfiles | This exception is raised if the profile name provided is unknown to the supplier management system and cannot be retrieved from the profile object repository. |
+| UnknownReservationId | The supplier management system does not recognize this reservation Id. |
+| UnknownServiceInstance | The service instance is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-109 – Resource allocator exceptions**
+
+### 6.3.7 Archiving and bulk transfer
+
+#### 6.3.7.1 Bulk transfer
+
+
+
+```
+classDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as OMS/Operator
+ class RecordSetMgr {
+ +RecordSetNameToldListing
+ }
+ class TransferMgr {
+ +RecordSetNameToldListing
+ +fileTransfer()
+ +scheduleFileTransfer()
+ +createFile()
+ +scheduledFileTransferListGet()
+ +fileTransferHistoryListGet()
+ +cancelScheduledFileTransfer()
+ +getStatus()
+ +modifyFileTransferSchedule()
+ }
+ class Log {
+ +Records
+ +storeRecord()
+ +findRecords()
+ +displayRecords()
+ +displayByKey()
+ }
+ class Scheduler {
+ }
+ class ScheduleMgr {
+ }
+ class TransferLogRecord {
+ }
+ class DataWarehouse as Data Warehouse
+ class Factory {
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ }
+ class TransferTrackingObject {
+ +TransferObjectId
+ +InitialisationSchedule
+ +OperationalState
+ +ProceduralStatus
+ +TransferInvocationId
+ +AvailabilityStatus
+ +ActualStart
+ +ActualStop
+ +TerminationCriteria
+ +RecordSetId
+ +terminate()
+ +setCreateDefaults()
+ +setActualTime()
+ +getProceduralStatus()
+ +getOperationalState()
+ }
+ class RecordSet {
+ }
+
+ OMSOperator --> RecordSetMgr : selects records
+ OMSOperator --> TransferMgr : requests file transfer
+ RecordSetMgr --> TransferMgr : obtain records
+ OMSOperator --> Log : views
+ OMSOperator --> ScheduleMgr : schedules activity
+ TransferMgr --> DataWarehouse : delivers to
+ Scheduler --> TransferMgr : triggers
+ TransferMgr --> Factory : commissions
+ Factory --> TransferTrackingObject : creates
+ TransferMgr --> TransferTrackingObject : record's progress
+ TransferLogRecord ..> Log : writes
+ RecordSet ..> TransferMgr : record set full
+ ScheduleMgr ..> RecordSetMgr : Details are found in "Scheduler" Analysis
+ RecordSet ..> RecordSetMgr : Details are found in "Control Archiving" Analysis
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the bulk transfer process. An OMS/Operator interacts with RecordSetMgr (selects records) and TransferMgr (requests file transfer). RecordSetMgr obtains records from TransferMgr. The OMS/Operator also views Log and schedules activity with Schedule Mgr. TransferMgr delivers data to Data Warehouse, is triggered by Scheduler, and commissions Factory. Factory creates TransferTrackingObject, which TransferMgr tracks progress. TransferLogRecord writes to Log. RecordSet is notified of a full record set. Notes indicate that Scheduler and Control Archiving details are found in specific analysis documents.
+
+Bulk transfer class diagram showing interactions between OMS/Operator, RecordSetMgr, Transfer Mgr, Log, Scheduler, Schedule Mgr, TransferLogRecord, Data Warehouse, Factory, and TransferTrackingObject.
+
+Figure 6-110 – Bulk transfer class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor Operator as :Operator or OMS
+ participant TransferMgr as :TransferMgr
+ participant Factory as TransferTrackingObject:Factory
+ participant TransferObj as :TransferTrackingObject
+ participant RecordSet as :RecordSet
+ actor DataWareHouse as :DataWareHouse
+ participant Log as ActivityCompletion:Log
+ participant RecordMgr as :RecordSetMgr
+
+ Operator->>TransferMgr: fileTransfer()
+ activate TransferMgr
+ TransferMgr->>Factory: create(TransferTrackingObject)
+ activate Factory
+ Factory->>TransferObj: sendCreateDetails()
+ deactivate Factory
+ TransferMgr->>RecordSet: gatherAllRecords()
+ activate RecordSet
+ RecordSet->>TransferMgr:
+ deactivate RecordSet
+ TransferMgr->>TransferObj: createFile()
+ activate TransferObj
+ TransferObj->>DataWareHouse: establishFileTransfer()
+ activate DataWareHouse
+ DataWareHouse->>TransferMgr:
+ deactivate DataWareHouse
+ TransferMgr->>TransferObj: getStatus()
+ activate TransferObj
+ TransferObj->>TransferMgr:
+ deactivate TransferObj
+ TransferMgr->>TransferObj: getProceduralStatus()
+ activate TransferObj
+ TransferObj->>TransferMgr:
+ deactivate TransferObj
+ TransferMgr->>TransferObj: setActualTime()
+ activate TransferObj
+ TransferObj->>TransferMgr:
+ deactivate TransferObj
+ TransferMgr->>TransferObj: putFile()
+ activate TransferObj
+ TransferObj->>DataWareHouse:
+ activate DataWareHouse
+ DataWareHouse-->>TransferObj:
+ deactivate DataWareHouse
+ TransferObj->>TransferMgr:
+ deactivate TransferObj
+ TransferMgr->>TransferObj: setActualTime()
+ activate TransferObj
+ TransferObj->>TransferMgr:
+ deactivate TransferObj
+ TransferMgr->>Log: storeRecord()
+ activate Log
+ Log->>RecordMgr:
+ deactivate Log
+ TransferMgr->>TransferObj: delete(TransferTrackingObject)
+ activate TransferObj
+ TransferObj->>TransferMgr: terminate()
+ deactivate TransferObj
+ TransferMgr->>RecordSet: selectRecords()
+ activate RecordSet
+ RecordSet->>RecordMgr: findRecords()
+ activate RecordMgr
+ RecordMgr->>RecordSet:
+ deactivate RecordMgr
+ RecordSet->>RecordMgr:
+ deactivate RecordSet
+ TransferMgr->>RecordMgr: fileTransferHistoryGet()
+ activate RecordMgr
+ RecordMgr->>RecordSet:
+ deactivate RecordMgr
+ deactivate TransferMgr
+
+```
+
+Can occur anytime before termination of the transfer object.
+
+Attempt file transfer as many times as allowed by Data Ware house.
+
+Shows requested file transfer.
+
+Shows disposition of requested transfer.
+
+UML sequence diagram for Immediate bulk transfer. Lifelines: :Operator or OMS, :TransferMgr, TransferTrackingObject:Factory, :TransferTrackingObject, :RecordSet, :DataWareHouse, ActivityCompletion:Log, :RecordSetMgr. Messages: fileTransfer(), create(TransferTrackingObject), sendCreateDetails(), gatherAllRecords(), createFile(), establishFileTransfer(), getStatus(), getProceduralStatus(), setActualTime(), putFile(), setActualTime(), storeRecord(), delete(TransferTrackingObject), terminate(), selectRecords(), findRecords(), fileTransferHistoryGet(). Annotations: 'Can occur anytime before termination of the transfer object.', 'Attempt file transfer as many times as allowed by Data Ware house.', 'Shows requested file transfer.', 'Shows disposition of requested transfer.'
+
+Figure 6-111 – Immediate bulk transfer sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor Operator as : OMS/Operator
+ participant TM as : Transfer Mgr
+ participant Factory as Transfer Tracking Object : Factory
+ participant TTO as : TransferTrackingObject
+ participant RS as : Record Set
+ actor DW as : Data Warehouse
+ participant ACL as Activity Completion : Log
+
+ Operator->>TM: fileTransfer()
+ activate TM
+ TM->>Factory: create()
+ activate Factory
+ Factory->>TTO: setCreateDefaults()
+ activate TTO
+ TTO->>RS: gatherAllRecords()
+ activate RS
+ RS-->>Factory:
+ deactivate RS
+ Factory->>TM: createFile
+ deactivate Factory
+ TM->>DW: establishFileTransfer
+ activate DW
+ DW-->>TM:
+ deactivate DW
+ TM->>TTO: setActualTime()
+ activate TTO
+ TTO-->>TM:
+ deactivate TTO
+ TM->>Factory: pushFile
+ activate Factory
+ Note over Factory: DCN fails.
+ Factory->>Factory: prepareRecord
+ activate Factory
+ Factory->>ACL: storeRecord(Failure)
+ activate ACL
+ ACL-->>Factory:
+ deactivate ACL
+ Factory-->>TM:
+ deactivate Factory
+ deactivate TM
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Bulk transfer failure. Lifelines: : OMS/Operator, : Transfer Mgr, Transfer Tracking Object : Factory, : TransferTrackingObject, : Record Set, : Data Warehouse, Activity Completion : Log. Sequence: 1. : OMS/Operator calls fileTransfer() on : Transfer Mgr. 2. : Transfer Mgr calls create() on Transfer Tracking Object : Factory. 3. Transfer Tracking Object : Factory calls setCreateDefaults() on : TransferTrackingObject. 4. : Transfer Tracking Object : Factory calls gatherAllRecords() on : Record Set. 5. : Transfer Mgr calls createFile on : Transfer Tracking Object : Factory. 6. : Transfer Tracking Object : Factory calls establishFileTransfer on : Data Warehouse. 7. : Transfer Mgr calls setActualTime() on : TransferTrackingObject. 8. : Transfer Mgr calls pushFile on : Transfer Tracking Object : Factory. 9. : Transfer Tracking Object : Factory calls prepareRecord on : Transfer Tracking Object : Factory. 10. : Transfer Tracking Object : Factory calls storeRecord(Failure) on Activity Completion : Log. A note 'DCN fails.' points to the pushFile call.
+
+**Figure 6-112 – Bulk transfer failure sequence diagram**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant TransferMgr as :Transfer Mgr
+ participant TransferTrackingObjectFactory as :Transfer Tracking Object Factory
+ participant TransferTrackingObject as :Transfer Tracking Object
+ participant RecordSet as :Record Set
+ participant Scheduler as :Scheduler
+ participant DataWarehouse as :Data Warehouse
+ participant ActivityCompletionLog as :Activity Completion Log
+ participant Scheduler2 as :Scheduler
+
+ OMSOperator->>TransferMgr: scheduleFileTransfer()
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObjectFactory: create()
+ TransferTrackingObjectFactory->>TransferTrackingObject: setCreateDetails()
+ TransferMgr->>Scheduler: addAssociatedActivity()
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObject: fileTransfer()
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObject: setProcedureStatus()
+ TransferMgr->>RecordSet: gatherAllRecords()
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObject: createFile()
+ TransferMgr->>DataWarehouse: establishFileTransfer()
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObject: setActualTime()
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObject: pushFile()
+ TransferMgr->>DataWarehouse: disconnect
+ TransferMgr->>TransferTrackingObject: setProcedureStatus()
+ TransferMgr->>ActivityCompletionLog: storeRecord()
+ Scheduler->>TransferMgr: scheduledFileTransferListGet()
+ Note over TransferMgr: Shows this periodic scheduled activity.
+ TransferMgr->>TransferMgr: modifyFileTransferSchedule()
+ TransferMgr->>Scheduler: removeAssociatedActivity()
+ TransferMgr->>Scheduler: addAssociatedActivity()
+ TransferMgr->>Scheduler: cancelScheduledFileTransfer()
+ TransferMgr->>Scheduler: removeAssociatedActivity()
+ TransferMgr->>TransferMgr: scheduledFileTransferListGet()
+ Note over TransferMgr: Shows none.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Scheduled bulk transfer. Lifelines: :OMSOperator, :Transfer Mgr, :Transfer Tracking Object Factory, :Transfer Tracking Object, :Record Set, :Scheduler, :Data Warehouse, :Activity Completion Log, :Scheduler. The diagram shows the process of scheduling, executing, and managing file transfers, including creating objects, setting parameters, performing transfers, and logging completion.
+
+Figure 6-113 – Scheduled bulk transfer sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) fileTransfer | The file transfer is initiated immediately by this operation. |
+| 2) scheduleFileTransfer | The file transfer is scheduled for future initiation by this operation. |
+| 3) modifyFileTransferSchedule | The file transfer schedule is modified by this operation. |
+| 4) cancelScheduledFileTransfer | The scheduled file transfer is cancelled. |
+| 5) getStatus | This operation allows the client to check the status of a transfer before its completion. |
+| 6) fileTransferHistoryListGet | This operation is used to retrieve the list of all completed file transfers for the supplier management system. |
+| 7) scheduledFileTransferListGet | This operation is used to retrieve the names of all existing scheduled file transfers defined for the supplier management system. |
+
+Figure 6-114 – Transfer manager operations
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) fileTransfer | ManagedEntityType,
DCNAddressType,
UserIdType,
PasswordType,
FilenameType,
boolean (overwrite?) | TransferTrackingObject
IdType | AccessDenied,
CommFailure,
UnknownRecordSet,
UnknownDestinationServer |
+| 2) scheduleFileTransfer | ManagedEntityType,
DCNAddressType,
UserIdType,
PasswordType,
FilenameType,
boolean (overwrite?),
UserLabelType (scheduler
name) | TransferTrackingObject
IdType | AccessDenied,
UnknownRecordSet,
UnknownDestinationServer,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 3) modifyFileTransferSchedule | TransferTrackingObjectIdType,
UserLabelType (scheduler
name) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownTransferProcess,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 4) cancelScheduledFileTransfer | TransferTrackingObjectIdType | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownTransferProcess |
+| 5) getStatus | TransferTrackingObjectIdType | StatusValueType | AccessDenied,
UnknownTransferProcess |
+| 6) fileTransferHistoryListGet | | FileTransferHistorySeq
Type | AccessDenied |
+| 7) scheduledFileTransferListGet | | ScheduledFileTransfer
SeqType | AccessDenied |
+
+**Figure 6-115 – Transfer manager signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| InvalidScheduler | The scheduler parameters' values are outside defined scope. |
+| UnknownDestinationServer | The identified destination server cannot be accessed by the transfer agent. |
+| UnknownRecordSet | Record set identified in the request is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownScheduler | The named scheduler is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownTransferProcess | The status of the identified transfer process could not be checked because it is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-116 – Transfer manager exceptions**
+
+#### 6.3.7.2 Control archives
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class RecordSet {
+ RecordSetId
+ CurrentSize
+ OperationalState
+ MaximumSize
+ RecentClearTime
+ SizeThreshold
+ EntranceFilter
+ FullAction
+ SuspendStatus
+ Records
+ AdministrativeState
+ RecordType
+ UserLabel
+ storeRecord()
+ gatherAllRecords()
+ displayRecords()
+ findRecords()
+ getStatusAttributes()
+ setMaximumSize()
+ setSizeThreshold()
+ setFullAction()
+ setByCreation()
+ purge()
+ setAdministrativeState()
+ displayByKey()
+ getCurrentSize()
+ setUserLabel()
+ }
+ class RecordSetMgr {
+ RecordSetList
+ createArchive()
+ deleteArchive()
+ createLog()
+ getStatusAttributes()
+ suspendArchive()
+ resumeArchive()
+ purgeArchive()
+ selectRecords()
+ recordSetListGet()
+ changeUserLabel()
+ }
+ class Factory {
+ create()
+ delete()
+ }
+ class StatisticsCollector {
+ }
+ class EventScreen {
+ }
+ class EventQueue {
+ }
+ class EventSet {
+ }
+ class EventCorrelator {
+ }
+ class BPON_NE
+ class PrivilegedUser
+ class OMS_Operator
+
+ RecordSet --> RecordSetMgr : enters record
+ RecordSetMgr --> Factory : commissions
+ RecordSetMgr --> RecordSet : controls recording
+ RecordSetMgr --> EventSet : suspends, resumes archiving or purges
+ RecordSetMgr --> EventSet : selects records
+ RecordSetMgr --> EventSet : logs event record
+ RecordSetMgr --> EventCorrelator : obtains correlation
+ Factory --> RecordSetMgr : commissions
+ StatisticsCollector --> RecordSetMgr : collects from
+ StatisticsCollector --> BPON_NE : collects from
+ BPON_NE --> EventScreen : sends event
+ PrivilegedUser --> RecordSetMgr : manipulates storage
+ PrivilegedUser --> EventScreen : notifies
+ EventScreen --> EventQueue : queues to
+ EventScreen --> EventSet : extracts from
+ EventQueue --> EventSet : extracts from
+ EventSet --> EventCorrelator : obtains correlation
+ EventCorrelator --> EventSet : obtains correlation
+ OMS_Operator --> EventSet : obtains correlation
+ OMS_Operator --> RecordSet : logs event record
+
+```
+
+**Record Set**
+
+- RecordSetId
+- CurrentSize
+- OperationalState
+- MaximumSize
+- RecentClearTime
+- SizeThreshold
+- EntranceFilter
+- FullAction
+- SuspendStatus
+- Records
+- AdministrativeState
+- RecordType
+- UserLabel
+- storeRecord()
+- gatherAllRecords()
+- displayRecords()
+- findRecords()
+- getStatusAttributes()
+- setMaximumSize()
+- setSizeThreshold()
+- setFullAction()
+- setByCreation()
+- purge()
+- setAdministrativeState()
+- displayByKey()
+- getCurrentSize()
+- setUserLabel()
+
+**RecordSetMgr**
+
+- RecordSetList
+- createArchive()
+- deleteArchive()
+- createLog()
+- getStatusAttributes()
+- suspendArchive()
+- resumeArchive()
+- purgeArchive()
+- selectRecords()
+- recordSetListGet()
+- changeUserLabel()
+
+**Factory**
+
+- create()
+- delete()
+
+**Statistics Collector**
+
+**Event Screen**
+
+**Event Queue**
+
+**Event Set**
+
+**Event Correlator**
+
+**Actors:** BPON NE, Privileged User (from Use Case View), OMS/Operator
+
+**Associations and Messages:**
+
+- Record Set** enters record to **RecordSetMgr**.
+- RecordSetMgr** commissions **Factory**.
+- RecordSetMgr** controls recording to **Record Set**.
+- RecordSetMgr** suspends, resumes archiving or purges to **Event Set**.
+- RecordSetMgr** selects records to **Event Set**.
+- RecordSetMgr** logs event record to **Event Set**.
+- RecordSetMgr** obtains correlation to **Event Correlator**.
+- Factory** commissions **RecordSetMgr**.
+- Statistics Collector** collects from **RecordSetMgr**.
+- Statistics Collector** collects from **BPON NE**.
+- BPON NE** sends event to **Event Screen**.
+- Privileged User** manipulates storage to **RecordSetMgr**.
+- Privileged User** notifies **Event Screen**.
+- Event Screen** queues to **Event Queue**.
+- Event Screen** extracts from **Event Set**.
+- Event Queue** extracts from **Event Set**.
+- Event Set** obtains correlation to **Event Correlator**.
+- Event Correlator** obtains correlation to **Event Set**.
+- OMS/Operator** obtains correlation to **Event Set**.
+- OMS/Operator** logs event record to **Record Set**.
+
+**Notes:**
+
+- Details found in "Collect History Data" Analysis.
+- Details explained in Appendix A.
+
+UML Class Diagram for Control Archiving System
+
+Figure 6-117 – Control archiving class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor User as : Privileged User
+ participant RSM as : RecordSetMgr
+ participant ES as : EventSet
+ actor BPON as : BPON NE
+ participant EScreener as : Event Screener
+ participant RS as : Record Set
+ participant LF as Log : Factory
+
+ User->>RSM: createLog()
+ activate RSM
+ RSM->>ES: modifyFilterLogListing()
+ activate ES
+ deactivate ES
+ deactivate RSM
+
+ User->>RSM: resumeArchive()
+ activate RSM
+ RSM->>EScreener: setAdministrativeState()
+ activate EScreener
+ deactivate EScreener
+ deactivate RSM
+
+ BPON->>EScreener: create()
+ activate EScreener
+ EScreener->>LF: setFullAction()
+ activate LF
+ deactivate LF
+ EScreener->>LF: setMaximumSize()
+ activate LF
+ deactivate LF
+ EScreener->>LF: setSizeThreshold()
+ activate LF
+ deactivate LF
+ deactivate EScreener
+
+ EScreener->>ES: processEvent()
+ activate ES
+ ES->>EScreener: consumesRecord()
+ deactivate ES
+ activate EScreener
+ EScreener->>ES: matchToFilters()
+ activate ES
+ deactivate ES
+ EScreener->>RS: storeRecord()
+ activate RS
+ deactivate RS
+ deactivate EScreener
+
+ User->>RS: getStatusAttributes()
+ activate RS
+ deactivate RS
+ deactivate User
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the 'Create log' sequence. It involves a Privileged User, RecordSetMgr, EventSet, BPON NE, Event Screener, Record Set, and Log Factory. The sequence begins with the Privileged User calling createLog() on RecordSetMgr. RecordSetMgr then calls modifyFilterLogListing() on EventSet. The Privileged User calls resumeArchive() on RecordSetMgr, which then calls setAdministrativeState() on Event Screener. BPON NE calls create() on Event Screener, which in turn calls setFullAction(), setMaximumSize(), and setSizeThreshold() on Log Factory. Event Screener then calls processEvent() on EventSet, which returns consumesRecord() to Event Screener. Event Screener then calls matchToFilters() on EventSet, which returns to Event Screener. Event Screener then calls storeRecord() on Record Set. Finally, the Privileged User calls getStatusAttributes() on Record Set.
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Create log' showing interactions between Privileged User, RecordSetMgr, EventSet, BPON NE, Event Screener, Record Set, and Log Factory.
+
+Figure 6-118 – Create log sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor User as : Privileged User
+ participant EventSet as : EventSet
+ participant EventScreen as : EventScreen
+ participant RecordSet as Log : Record Set
+ participant RecordSetMgr as : RecordSetMgr
+ participant LogFactory as Log : Factory
+
+ User->>EventSet: suspendArchive()
+ EventSet->>RecordSetMgr: getAdminIsrativeState()
+ RecordSetMgr->>RecordSet:
+ EventScreen->>EventSet: processEvent()
+ EventSet->>EventScreen: constructRecord()
+ EventScreen->>EventSet: matchToFilters()
+ EventSet->>RecordSetMgr: processEvent()
+ EventSet->>EventScreen: constructRecord()
+ EventScreen->>EventSet: matchToFilters()
+ User->>RecordSet: getStatusAttributes()
+ User->>RecordSetMgr: resumeArchive()
+ RecordSetMgr->>RecordSet: getAdminIsrativeState()
+ EventScreen->>EventSet: processEvent()
+ EventSet->>EventScreen: constructRecord()
+ EventScreen->>EventSet: matchToFilters()
+ EventSet->>RecordSet: storeRecord()
+ User->>RecordSetMgr: purgeArchive()
+ RecordSetMgr->>RecordSet: purge()
+ User->>RecordSetMgr: deleteArchive()
+ RecordSetMgr->>RecordSet: purge()
+ RecordSetMgr->>LogFactory: delete()
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the control log sequence. It involves a Privileged User, an EventSet object, an EventScreen object, a RecordSet object, a RecordSetMgr object, and a LogFactory object. The sequence begins with the Privileged User suspending the archive, followed by a series of interactions between EventSet and RecordSetMgr to manage the archive's state and process events. The Privileged User then resumes the archive, and the RecordSetMgr interacts with the RecordSet to purge and delete the archive. Finally, the RecordSetMgr deletes the archive from the LogFactory.
+
+UML sequence diagram for Control log sequence diagram showing interactions between Privileged User, EventSet, EventScreen, RecordSet, RecordSetMgr, and LogFactory.
+
+Figure 6-119 – Control log sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor User as :Privileged User
+ participant Mgr as :RecordSetMgr
+ participant Set as :Record Set
+ participant BPNONE as :BPNONE
+ participant Collector as :Statistics Collector
+ participant Scheduler as :Scheduler
+ participant OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+
+ User->>Mgr: createArchive()
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Set: setCreation()
+ Mgr->>Set: setSizeThreshold()
+ Mgr->>Set: setMaximumSize()
+ Mgr->>Set: setFullAction()
+ deactivate Mgr
+ activate Set
+
+ Scheduler->>Collector: pmHistoryDataRecords()
+ activate Collector
+ Collector->>BPNONE: getHistoryData()
+ activate BPNONE
+ BPNONE->>Set: storeRecords()
+ deactivate BPNONE
+ deactivate Set
+ deactivate Collector
+
+ Scheduler-->>Collector: Repeats for all records over a period of time.
+ Scheduler-->>Collector: pmHistoryDataRecords()
+ Collector-->>BPNONE: getHistoryData()
+ BPNONE-->>Set: storeRecords()
+ deactivate BPNONE
+ deactivate Set
+ deactivate Collector
+
+ Mgr->>Set: getStatusAttributes()
+ activate Mgr
+ activate Set
+ deactivate Set
+ deactivate Mgr
+
+ OMSOperator->>Mgr: selectRecords()
+ activate OMSOperator
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Set: findRecords()
+ activate Mgr
+ activate Set
+ deactivate Set
+ deactivate Mgr
+ deactivate OMSOperator
+
+ User->>Mgr: recordSetListGet()
+ activate User
+ activate Mgr
+ deactivate Mgr
+ deactivate User
+
+ User->>Mgr: changeUserLabel()
+ activate User
+ activate Mgr
+ Mgr->>Set: setUserLabel()
+ activate Mgr
+ activate Set
+ deactivate Set
+ deactivate Mgr
+ deactivate User
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Control statistics archiving. Lifelines: :Privileged User, :RecordSetMgr, :Record Set, :BPNONE, :Statistics Collector, :Scheduler, :OMSOperator. Interactions include: createArchive() from User to Mgr; setCreation(), setSizeThreshold(), setMaximumSize(), setFullAction() from Mgr to Set; a loop 'Repeats for all records over a period of time' where Scheduler calls getHistoryData() on Collector, Collector calls getHistoryData() on BPNONE, BPNONE calls storeRecords() on Set, and Scheduler calls pmHistoryDataRecords() on Collector; Mgr calls getStatusAttributes() on Set; OMSOperator calls selectRecords() on Mgr; Mgr calls findRecords() on Set; User calls recordSetListGet() on Mgr; User calls changeUserLabel() on Mgr, which then calls setUserLabel() on Set.
+
+Figure 6-120 – Control statistics archiving sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) createLog | This operation is used to create a record set in the supplier management system for the purposes of archiving event information. |
+| 2) createArchive | This operation is used to create a record set for storing data. |
+| 3) getStatusAttributes | At any time the operator or OMS can view the current status of an archive through this operation. |
+| 4) suspendArchive | Once the short-term archive has been created and initialized for use, the OMS can suspend its use by invoking this operation. |
+| 5) resumeArchive | This operation resumes recording in an archive or initializes the recording within a record set that has been constructed in a locked state. |
+| 6) deleteArchive | This operation deletes an archive from the supplier management system. |
+| 7) purgeArchive | This operation removes the information contained within a specified archive. However, the archive continues its recording. |
+| 8) selectRecords | After the creation of an archive, this operation allows the selection of some (or all) of the records found within it. The selection is based on a filter. |
+| 9) recordSetListGet | This operation allows an OMS to get a complete listings of record sets managed by the supplier management system. |
+| 10) changeUserLabel | After the creation of a short-term archive, the OMS can change the user label assigned to the archive. |
+
+Figure 6-121 – Record set manager operations
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) createLog | UserLabelType,
AdministrativeStateType
NameType (selection filter),
FullActionType,
MaxSizeType,
SizeThresholdType | ManagedEntityIdType | RecordSetExists,
DuplicateUserLabel,
AccessDenied |
+| 2) createArchive | UserLabelType,
AdministrativeStateType,
RecordKindType,
MaxSizeType | ManagedEntityIdType | RecordSetExists,
DuplicateUserLabel,
AccessDenied |
+| 3) getStatusAttributes | ManagedEntityIdType | RecordSetStatusType | AccessDenied,
UnknownRecordSet |
+| 4) suspendArchive | ManagedEntityIdType | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownRecordSet |
+| 5) resumeArchive | ManagedEntityIdType | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownRecordSet |
+| 6) deleteArchive | ManagedEntityIdType | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownRecordSet |
+| 7) purgeArchive | ManagedEntityIdType | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownRecordSet |
+| 8) selectRecords | FilterType,
ManagedEntityIdType | RecordSeqType | UnknownRecordSet,
Timeout,
NoSuchRecords,
AccessDenied,
TooManyRecords |
+| 9) recordSetListGet | CreationModeType | ManagedEntityIdSeqType | AccessDenied |
+| 10) changeUserLabel | ManagedEntityIdType,
UserLabelType | void | UnknownRecordSet,
AccessDenied,
DuplicateUserLabel |
+
+**Figure 6-122 – Record set manager signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| DuplicateUserLabel | The user label provided in the request has been used to label another archive, i.e., one that is defined by a different set of creation request parameters. |
+| NoSuchRecords | No records among the designated record sets matches the selection criteria. |
+| RecordSetExists | The record set defined by the parameters of the creation request already exists in the supplier management system. |
+| Timeout | The process duration reached a system-defined timeout before the process could complete. |
+| TooManyRecords | The number of records selected for retrieval produces a response to the request that exceeds a predetermined size. |
+| UnknownRecordSet | Record set identified in the request is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-123 – Record set manager exceptions**
+
+#### 6.3.7.3 Performance and traffic monitoring reporting control
+
+
+
+Details provided in "Process Incoming NE Events" use case.
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class BPON_NE {
+ <>
+ }
+ class Event_Screenshot {
+ }
+ class Event_Queue {
+ }
+ class TCAS_Collector {
+ CollectionInterval
+ NextTimeToMonitorList
+ +addMonitoringPoint()
+ +pullHistoryDataRecords()
+ +removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()
+ }
+ class Statistics_Collector {
+ CollectionInterval
+ NextTimeToMonitorList
+ MonitoringPointsScheduleList
+ +addMonitoringPointsSchedule()
+ +removeMonitoringPoint()
+ +pullHistoryDataRecords()
+ +removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()
+ +lowMonitoringPointsScheduleList()
+ +modifyMonitoringPointsSchedule()
+ }
+ class Report_Controller {
+ +displayActiveReporting()
+ +addNewMonitoringReporting()
+ +addCustomerMonitoringReporting()
+ +removeCustomerMonitoringReporting()
+ +selectByServiceInstance()
+ +selectByMonitoringPoint()
+ +createReportingSchedule()
+ +modifyReportingSchedule()
+ +cancelReportingSchedule()
+ }
+ class Record_Set {
+ RecordSetId
+ CurrentSize
+ OperationalState
+ MaximumSize
+ RecordKeepTime
+ SizeThreshold
+ EntranceFilter
+ ExitAction
+ SuspendedStatus
+ Records
+ RecordType
+ AdminIsWritableState
+ UserLabel
+ +storeRecord()
+ +retrieveAllRecords()
+ +displayRecords()
+ +findRecords()
+ +getStatisticsAttributes()
+ +setMaximumSize()
+ +setSizeThreshold()
+ +setExitAction()
+ +setEntryAction()
+ +storeRecords()
+ +displayByKey()
+ +prune()
+ +setAdminIsWritableState()
+ +getCurrentSize()
+ +setUserLabel()
+ }
+ class DailyScheduler {
+ }
+ class Implementation_Instance {
+ }
+ class CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector {
+ ServiceInstanceTypeMonitoringPointsReference
+ +addServiceInstanceIds()
+ }
+
+ BPON_NE --> Event_Screenshot : sends events
+ Event_Screenshot --> Event_Queue : queues to
+ Event_Queue --> TCAS_Collector : triggers collection
+ TCAS_Collector --> BPON_NE : collects from
+ TCAS_Collector --> Statistics_Collector : triggers
+ Statistics_Collector --> Record_Set : enters record
+ Report_Controller --> Statistics_Collector : schedules collection
+ Report_Controller --> BPON_NE : set threshold values
+ Report_Controller --> BPON_NE : controls reporting
+ Implementation_Instance --> BPON_NE : set
+ Implementation_Instance --> BPON_NE : collects from
+ CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector <|-- Statistics_Collector
+
+```
+
+**BPON NE** (Actor) Methods:
+
+- getTNTTrafficLoad()
+- getUPCNPCKragreement()
+- getVAL1PM()
+- getVAL2PM()
+- getVALSPM()
+- getDS1PM()
+- getDS3PM()
+- getE1PM()
+- getE3PM()
+- getPVCPM()
+- getEthernetPM()
+- getMACBridgePM()
+- getMACBridgePortPM()
+- getVoicePM()
+- setThresholdValues()
+- RecordHistoryData()
+
+**Event Screenshot** Methods:
+
+- None
+
+**Event Queue** Methods:
+
+- None
+
+**TCAS Collector** Methods:
+
+- CollectionInterval
+- NextTimeToMonitorList
+- +addMonitoringPoint()
+- +pullHistoryDataRecords()
+- +removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()
+
+**Statistics Collector** Methods:
+
+- CollectionInterval
+- NextTimeToMonitorList
+- MonitoringPointsScheduleList
+- +addMonitoringPointsSchedule()
+- +removeMonitoringPoint()
+- +pullHistoryDataRecords()
+- +removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()
+- +lowMonitoringPointsScheduleList()
+- +modifyMonitoringPointsSchedule()
+
+**Report Controller** Methods:
+
+- +displayActiveReporting()
+- +addNewMonitoringReporting()
+- +addCustomerMonitoringReporting()
+- +removeCustomerMonitoringReporting()
+- +selectByServiceInstance()
+- +selectByMonitoringPoint()
+- +createReportingSchedule()
+- +modifyReportingSchedule()
+- +cancelReportingSchedule()
+
+**Record Set** Methods:
+
+- RecordSetId
+- CurrentSize
+- OperationalState
+- MaximumSize
+- RecordKeepTime
+- SizeThreshold
+- EntranceFilter
+- ExitAction
+- SuspendedStatus
+- Records
+- RecordType
+- AdminIsWritableState
+- UserLabel
+- +storeRecord()
+- +retrieveAllRecords()
+- +displayRecords()
+- +findRecords()
+- +getStatisticsAttributes()
+- +setMaximumSize()
+- +setSizeThreshold()
+- +setExitAction()
+- +setEntryAction()
+- +storeRecords()
+- +displayByKey()
+- +prune()
+- +setAdminIsWritableState()
+- +getCurrentSize()
+- +setUserLabel()
+
+**Daily Scheduler** Methods:
+
+- None
+
+**Implementation Instance** Methods:
+
+- None
+
+**Customer Complaint Statistics Collector** Methods:
+
+- ServiceInstanceTypeMonitoringPointsReference
+- +addServiceInstanceIds()
+
+UML Class Diagram for Performance and traffic monitoring reporting control. The diagram shows the interactions between various components including BPON NE, Event Screenshot, Event Queue, TCAS Collector, Statistics Collector, Report Controller, and Record Set. It includes a list of methods for each class and a note about details provided in a specific case.
+
+Figure 6-124 – Performance and traffic monitoring reporting control class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant RC as : ReportController
+ actor BPON as : BPON NE
+ participant SC as : Statistics Collector
+ participant DS as : Daily Scheduler
+ participant AAL1PM as : AAL1PM Record Set
+
+ OMS->>RC: createReportingSchedule()
+ activate RC
+ RC->>SC: addMonitoringPoint&Schedule()
+ activate SC
+ SC->>BPON: recordHistoryData()
+ activate BPON
+ BPON-->>SC:
+ deactivate BPON
+ RC->>SC: modifyMonitoringPointSchedule()
+ deactivate SC
+ RC->>RC: modifyReportingSchedule()
+ deactivate RC
+
+ DS->>SC: refreshNextIntervalMonitoringList()
+ activate SC
+ SC->>SC: pullHistoryDataRecords()
+ activate SC
+ SC->>BPON: getAAL1PM()
+ activate BPON
+ BPON-->>SC:
+ deactivate BPON
+ SC->>AAL1PM: storeRecords()
+ activate AAL1PM
+ AAL1PM-->>SC:
+ deactivate AAL1PM
+ deactivate SC
+ deactivate DS
+
+ OMS->>RC: selectByMonitoringPoint()
+ activate RC
+ RC-->>RC:
+ deactivate RC
+ deactivate OMS
+
+```
+
+The sequence diagram illustrates the process of performance and traffic monitoring reporting (scheduled) for AAL1PM. It involves the following participants and interactions:
+
+- : OMS/Operator** (Actor) initiates the process by calling `createReportingSchedule()` on **: ReportController**.
+- : ReportController** (Boundary) calls `addMonitoringPoint&Schedule()` on **: Statistics Collector**.
+- : Statistics Collector** (Control) calls `recordHistoryData()` on **: BPON NE**.
+- : BPON NE** (Actor) returns control to **: Statistics Collector**.
+- : ReportController** calls `modifyMonitoringPointSchedule()` on **: Statistics Collector**.
+- : ReportController** performs a self-call `modifyReportingSchedule()`.
+- : Daily Scheduler** (Control) calls `refreshNextIntervalMonitoringList()` on **: Statistics Collector**.
+- : Statistics Collector** performs a self-call `pullHistoryDataRecords()`.
+- : Statistics Collector** calls `getAAL1PM()` on **: BPON NE**.
+- : BPON NE** returns control to **: Statistics Collector**.
+- : Statistics Collector** calls `storeRecords()` on **: AAL1PM Record Set**.
+- : AAL1PM Record Set** (Entity) returns control to **: Statistics Collector**.
+- : OMS/Operator** calls `selectByMonitoringPoint()` on **: ReportController**.
+- : ReportController** performs a self-call.
+
+UML sequence diagram for performance and traffic monitoring reporting (scheduled) - AAL1PM example. The diagram shows interactions between OMS/Operator, ReportController, BPON NE, Statistics Collector, Daily Scheduler, and AAL1PM Record Set.
+
+**Figure 6-125 – Performance and traffic monitoring reporting (scheduled) sequence diagram – AAL1PM example**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as OMS/Operator
+ participant ImpairmentPersistence as : Impairment Persistence
+ participant DailyScheduler as : Daily Scheduler
+ participant TCAStatsCollector as : TCAStatsCollector
+ actor BPONNE as : BPON NE
+ participant EventScreener as : Event Screener
+ participant TCAEventQueue as TCA : EventQueue
+ participant TCAAAL1PMRecordSet as TCA AAL1PM : Record Set
+
+ OMSOperator->>ImpairmentPersistence: setAllThresholds()
+ ImpairmentPersistence->>BPONNE: setThresholdValues()
+ OMSOperator->>ImpairmentPersistence: setThresholds()
+ ImpairmentPersistence->>BPONNE: setThresholdValues()
+ BPONNE->>EventScreener: readEvent()
+ EventScreener->>EventScreener: identifySource()
+ EventScreener->>EventScreener: identifyEventType()
+ EventScreener->>EventScreener: checkComplete()
+ EventScreener->>EventScreener: checkEventLogic()
+ EventScreener->>EventScreener: doPersistenceAnalysisProcess()
+ EventScreener->>TCAAAL1PMRecordSet: addMonitoringPoint()
+ EventScreener->>TCAAAL1PMRecordSet: addEvent()
+ TCAAAL1PMRecordSet->>TCAEventQueue: Showing TCA for AAL1PM example.
+ TCAAAL1PMRecordSet->>TCAEventQueue: pullHistoryDataRecords()
+ TCAAAL1PMRecordSet->>TCAEventQueue: getAAL1PM()
+ TCAAAL1PMRecordSet->>TCAAAL1PMRecordSet: storeRecord()
+ TCAAAL1PMRecordSet->>TCAAAL1PMRecordSet: refreshNextIntervalMonitoringList()
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for performance monitoring reporting (TCA triggered) sequence diagram – AAL1PM example. The diagram shows interactions between OMS/Operator, Impairment Persistence, Daily Scheduler, TCAStatsCollector, BPON NE, Event Screener, TCA EventQueue, and TCA AAL1PM Record Set.
+
+**Figure 6-126 – Performance monitoring reporting (TCA triggered) sequence diagram – AAL1PM example**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as :OMSOperator
+ participant ReportController as :ReportController
+ actor BPCN_NE as :BPCN_NE
+ participant CSC as :Customer Complaint Statistics Collector
+ participant DS as :Daily Scheduler
+ participant RS as :Record Set
+
+ OMSOperator->>ReportController: displayActiveReporting()
+ ReportController->>CSC: showCustomerMonitoringPointsAndSchedule()
+ BPCN_NE->>CSC: modifyCustomerMonitoringPointsSchedule()
+ ReportController->>CSC: modifySchedule()
+ OMSOperator->>ReportController: addCustomerMonitoringReporting()
+ ReportController->>CSC: addCustomerMonitoringPoints&Schedule()
+ CSC->>BPCN_NE: recordHistoryData()
+ CSC->>DS: refreshNextTimeNextMonitoringList()
+ CSC->>DS: putCustomerHistoryDataRecords()
+ DS->>CSC: addServiceInstanceIds()
+ DS->>RS: storeRecord()
+ DS->>CSC: removeInactiveCustomerMonitoringPoints()
+ CSC->>BPCN_NE: getVALIPM()
+ CSC->>BPCN_NE: getDSIPM()
+ CSC->>BPCN_NE: getPVCPM()
+ OMSOperator->>ReportController: selectServiceInstance()
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the sequence of operations for performance and traffic monitoring reporting in a customer complaint scenario. The participants involved are the OMS Operator, Report Controller, BPCN\_NE, Customer Complaint Statistics Collector, Daily Scheduler, and Record Set. The process begins with the OMS Operator displaying active reporting, followed by the Report Controller showing monitoring points and schedules to the CSC. The BPCN\_NE and Report Controller then modify the schedule. The OMS Operator adds monitoring reporting, which the Report Controller passes to the CSC. The CSC records history data from BPCN\_NE and refreshes the monitoring list with the Daily Scheduler. The scheduler adds service instance IDs, stores records in the Record Set, and removes inactive monitoring points. Finally, the CSC retrieves VALIPM, DSIPM, and PVCPM data from BPCN\_NE, and the OMS Operator selects a service instance.
+
+UML sequence diagram for performance and traffic monitoring reporting (customer complaint).
+
+Figure 6-127 – Performance and traffic monitoring reporting (customer complaint) sequence diagram
+
+##### Operations
+
+| Operation name | Operation purpose |
+|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) addCustomerMonitoringReporting | This operation causes performance monitoring at specific monitoring point(s) in response to a customer complaint. |
+| 2) removeCustomerMonitoringReporting | This operation removes all performance monitoring statistics collection on behalf of a supplied service instance. |
+| 3) selectByServiceInstance | This operation retrieves all the performance monitoring statistics available in the supplier management system associated with a given service instance Id. |
+| 4) displayActiveReporting | This operation retrieves all the monitoring points for which performance monitoring statistics are currently being collected for a given service instance Id. |
+| 5) addNewMonitoringReporting | This operation causes performance monitoring at specific monitoring point(s). |
+| 6) selectByMonitoringPoint | This operation gets all the performance statistic records available in the supplier management system associated with the given monitoring point. |
+| 7) createReportingSchedule | This operation adds a scheduled collection of performance monitoring statistics for a specific monitoring point. |
+| 8) modifyReportingSchedule | This operation modifies the scheduled collection of performance monitoring statistics for a specific monitoring point. |
+| 9) cancelReportingSchedule | This operation cancels subsequent scheduled collection of performance monitoring statistics where the scheduled reporting was requested by the operator previously. |
+
+**Figure 6-128 – Report controller operations**
+
+##### Operation signatures
+
+| Operation name | Input parameters | Return value | Exceptions |
+|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) addCustomerMonitoringReporting | ManagedEntityType (NE),
ServiceInstanceIdType,
ManagedEntityType (monitoring point),
GeneralizedTimeType (stop time),
HistoryDataType,
short (granularity period) | void | UnknownServiceInstance,
AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownManagedEntity,
CollectionPeriodPast,
CollectionLimitation,
InvalidAssociation,
UnknownHistoryDataType,
CommFailure |
+| 2) removeCustomerMonitoringReporting | ServiceInstanceIdType | void | UnknownServiceInstance,
AccessDenied,
CollectionPeriodPast,
CommFailure |
+| 3) selectByServiceInstance | ServiceInstanceIdType,
GeneralizedTimeType (start time),
GeneralizedTimeType (stop time), | RecordsSeqType | UnknownServiceInstance,
AccessDenied |
+| 4) displayActiveReporting | ServiceInstanceIdType | MonitoringPointSeqType | UnknownServiceInstance,
AccessDenied |
+| 5) addNewMonitoringReporting | ManagedEntityType (NE),
ManagedEntityType (monitoring point),
GeneralizedTimeType (stop time),
HistoryDataType,
short (granularity period) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownManagedEntity,
CollectionPeriodPast,
CollectionLimitation,
InvalidAssociation,
UnknownHistoryDataType,
CommFailure |
+| 6) selectByMonitoringPoint | ManagedEntityType (monitoring point),
GeneralizedTimeType (start time),
GeneralizedTimeType (stop time) | RecordsSeqType | UnknownManagedEntity,
AccessDenied |
+| 7) createReportingSchedule | ManagedEntityType (NE),
ManagedEntityType (monitoring point),
HistoryDataType,
ServiceInstanceIdType,
short (granularity period),
UserLabelType (scheduler name) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownManagedEntity,
CollectionLimitation,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidAssociation,
UnknownHistoryDataType,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 8) modifyReportingSchedule | ManagedEntityType (NE),
ManagedEntityType (monitoring point),
HistoryDataType,
ServiceInstanceIdType,
UserLabelType (scheduler name) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownManagedEntity,
CollectionLimitation,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidAssociation,
UnknownHistoryDataType,
InvalidScheduler |
+| 9) cancelReportingSchedule | ManagedEntityType (NE),
ManagedEntityType (monitoring point),
HistoryDataType,
ServiceInstanceIdType,
UserLabelType (scheduler name) | void | AccessDenied,
UnknownNE,
UnknownManagedEntity,
UnknownScheduler,
InvalidAssociation,
UnknownHistoryDataType |
+
+**Figure 6-129 – Report controller signatures**
+
+##### Exceptions
+
+| Exception raised | Description |
+|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| AccessDenied | System is not granted access to this interface object. |
+| CollectionLimitation | The supplier management system cannot collect data for the given time duration and granularity period due to implementation restrictions. |
+| CollectionPeriodPast | When the period end-time is less than or equal to the current time. |
+| CommFailure | There was a DCN link failure between the NE and the supplier management system. |
+| InvalidAssociation | The given profile cannot be applied to a monitoring point. |
+| InvalidScheduler | The Scheduler parameters values are outside defined scope. |
+| UnknownHistoryDataType | The history data type is unknown in the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownManagedEntity | The specified managed entity is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownNE | The identified NE is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownScheduler | The named scheduler is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+| UnknownServiceInstance | The service instance is unknown to the supplier management system. |
+
+**Figure 6-130 – Report controller exceptions**
+
+# Appendix I
+
+## Additional UML diagrams
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation)
+
+The following class and sequence diagrams are provided as non-normative information with the intention of completing a description of the behaviour within the supplier management system associated with use cases of clause 6 not directly involving the interface shown in Figure 6-1.
+
+## I.1 Process incoming NE events and log event records
+
+
+
+```
+classDiagram
+ actor BPON_NE as BPON NE
+ class Event_Screener {
+ +QueueList
+ +identifySource()
+ +doPersistenceAnalysisProcess()
+ +identifyEventType()
+ +checkComplete()
+ +checkEventLogic()
+ +readEvent()
+ }
+ class Event_Set {
+ +EventSetId
+ +RetrievalCriteria
+ +TimeWindow
+ +setAttributes()
+ +fillWithNewEvents()
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ +purge()
+ +completesEventRecord()
+ }
+ class Event_Queue {
+ +EventType
+ +QueueId
+ +EventListing
+ +addEvent()
+ +selectEvents()
+ }
+ class Event_Correlator {
+ +obtainsCorrelation()
+ }
+ class Management_Model_Maintainer {
+ +consults()
+ }
+ class Record_Set {
+ +RecordSetId
+ +CurrentSize
+ +OperationalState
+ +MaximumSize
+ +RecentClearTime
+ +SizeThreshold
+ +EntranceFilter
+ +FullAction
+ +SuspendStatus
+ +Records
+ +RecordType
+ +AdministrativeState
+ +UserLabel
+ +storeRecord()
+ +gatherAllRecords()
+ +displayRecords()
+ +findRecords()
+ +getStatusAttributes()
+ +setMaximumSize()
+ +setSizeThreshold()
+ +setFullAction()
+ +setByCreation()
+ +purge()
+ +setAdministrativeState()
+ +getCurrentSize()
+ +displayByKey()
+ }
+
+ BPON_NE --> Event_Screener : sends events
+ Event_Screener --> Event_Queue : queues to
+ Event_Set --> Event_Queue : extracts from
+ Event_Set --> Record_Set : logs event record
+ Event_Set --> Event_Correlator : obtains correlation
+ Event_Set --> Management_Model_Maintainer : consults
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the process of handling incoming NE events and logging them. It features several classes and their interactions:
+
+- BPON NE** (Actor): Sends events to the **Event Screener**.
+- Event Screener**: Contains a **QueueList** and methods for identifying sources, persistence analysis, event types, completion checks, logic checks, and reading events. It queues events to the **Event Queue**.
+- Event Queue**: Contains attributes for event type, queue ID, and event listing, along with methods for adding and selecting events. It extracts data from the **Event Set**.
+- Event Set**: Contains attributes for event set ID, retrieval criteria, and time window, and methods for setting attributes, filling with new events, creating, deleting, purging, and completing event records. It logs event records to the **Record Set**, obtains correlations from the **Event Correlator**, and consults the **Management Model Maintainer**.
+- Event Correlator**: Provides correlation information to the **Event Set**.
+- Management Model Maintainer**: Consulted by the **Event Set** for model-related operations.
+- Record Set**: A comprehensive class containing numerous attributes (e.g., RecordSetId, CurrentSize, OperationalState, MaximumSize, RecentClearTime, SizeThreshold, EntranceFilter, FullAction, SuspendStatus, Records, RecordType, AdministrativeState, UserLabel) and methods for storing, gathering, displaying, finding, and managing records.
+
+UML class diagram for processing incoming NE events and logging event records.
+
+Figure I.1 – Incoming event class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor BPON_NE as :BPON NE
+ participant Event_Screener as :Event Screener
+ participant Event_Queue as :EventQueue
+
+ BPON_NE->>Event_Screener: readEvent
+ activate Event_Screener
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Screener: identifySource()
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Screener: identifyEventType()
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Screener: checkComplete()
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Screener: checkEventLogic()
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Screener: doPersistenceAnalysisProcess()
+ deactivate Event_Screener
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Queue: addEvent()
+ activate Event_Queue
+ deactivate Event_Queue
+
+```
+
+Equivalent to "validates" in RCIA Sequence diagram.
+
+Sequence diagram for processing an incoming event. Lifelines: :BPON NE (actor), :Event Screener, :EventQueue. Messages: readEvent, identifySource(), identifyEventType(), checkComplete(), checkEventLogic(), doPersistenceAnalysisProcess(), addEvent(). A note indicates the first five messages are equivalent to 'validates' in an RCIA diagram.
+
+**Figure I.2 – Process incoming event sequence diagram**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant Event_Queue as :EventQueue
+ participant Event_Set as :EventSet
+ participant Event_Correlator as :Event Correlator
+ participant Management_Model_Maintainer as :Management Model Maintainer
+ participant Record_Set as :Record Set
+
+ Event_Set->>Event_Queue: selectEvents()
+ activate Event_Queue
+ Event_Queue->>Event_Correlator: obtainsCorrelation()
+ activate Event_Correlator
+ deactivate Event_Correlator
+ Event_Queue->>Management_Model_Maintainer: consults()
+ activate Management_Model_Maintainer
+ deactivate Management_Model_Maintainer
+ Event_Queue->>Event_Set: completesEventRecord()
+ deactivate Event_Queue
+ Event_Set->>Record_Set: storeRecord()
+ activate Record_Set
+ deactivate Record_Set
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram for logging an event. Lifelines: :EventQueue, :EventSet, :Event Correlator, :Management Model Maintainer, :Record Set. Messages: selectEvents(), obtainsCorrelation(), consults(), completesEventRecord(), storeRecord().
+
+**Figure I.3 – Log event sequence diagram**
+
+## I.2 Root cause alarm analysis
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ actor BPON_NE
+ actor OMS_Operator
+ class Builder
+ class Management_Model_Maintainer
+ class Event_Screener {
+ +setValues()
+ +getValues()
+ }
+ class Event_Set_Manager {
+ +Scheduler
+ +notify()
+ +deleteEventSet()
+ }
+ class Event_Correlator {
+ +supersedeFilterings()
+ +addDependencyRelationshipInfo()
+ +groupWithSameDependentResource()
+ +removeGroupRedundancy()
+ +patternToSupportingResource()
+ }
+ class Alarm_Log {
+ +RecordSetId
+ +CurrentSize
+ +OperationalState
+ +MaximumSize
+ +RecentClearTime
+ +SizeThreshold
+ +EntranceFilter
+ +FullAction
+ +SuspendStatus
+ +Records
+ +RecordType
+ +AdministrativeState
+ +UserLabel
+ +storeRecord()
+ +gatherAllRecords()
+ +displayRecords()
+ +findRecords()
+ +getStatusAttributes()
+ +setMaximumSize()
+ +setSizeThreshold()
+ +setFullAction()
+ +setByCreation()
+ +purge()
+ +setAdministrativeState()
+ +getCurrentSize()
+ +displayByKey()
+ }
+ class Event_Set {
+ +EventSetId
+ +RetrievalCriteria
+ +TimeWindow
+ +setAttributes()
+ +fillWithNewEvents()
+ +create()
+ +delete()
+ +purge()
+ +completeEventRecord()
+ }
+ class Event_Queue {
+ +addEvents()
+ +selectEvents()
+ }
+ class Event_Forwarder {
+ +processAnnouncement()
+ }
+
+ BPON_NE --> Builder : assigns severity
+ OMS_Operator --> Builder : provisions alarm severity
+ Builder --> Management_Model_Maintainer : updates
+ BPON_NE --> Event_Screener : sends alarm event
+ Event_Screener --> Event_Set_Manager : notifies
+ Event_Screener --> Event_Queue : queues to
+ Event_Set_Manager --> Event_Set : creates
+ Event_Set --> Event_Correlator : obtains correlation
+ Event_Set --> Event_Queue : extracts from
+ Event_Set --> Alarm_Log : writes root cause alarms
+ Event_Set --> Event_Forwarder : announces root cause alarms
+ Event_Correlator --> Event_Set : consults
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the root cause alarm analysis process. It involves several actors and classes:
+
+- Actors:** BPON NE and OMS/Operator.
+- Classes:** Builder, Management Model Maintainer, Event Screener, Event Set Manager, Event Correlator, Alarm Log, Event Set, Event Queue, and Event Forwarder.
+
+**Interactions:**
+
+- BPON NE** assigns severity to the **Builder**.
+- OMS/Operator** provisions alarm severity to the **Builder**.
+- The **Builder** updates the **Management Model Maintainer**.
+- BPON NE** sends an alarm event to the **Event Screener**.
+- The **Event Screener** notifies the **Event Set Manager** and queues events to the **Event Queue**.
+- The **Event Set Manager** creates an **Event Set**.
+- The **Event Set** obtains correlation from the **Event Correlator** and consults it.
+- The **Event Set** extracts events from the **Event Queue**.
+- The **Event Set** writes root cause alarms to the **Alarm Log**.
+- The **Event Set** announces root cause alarms to the **Event Forwarder**.
+
+**Event Set Manager Class Details:**
+
+- Attributes: Scheduler
+- Operations: notify(), deleteEventSet()
+
+**Event Correlator Class Details:**
+
+- Operations: supersedeFilterings(), addDependencyRelationshipInfo(), groupWithSameDependentResource(), removeGroupRedundancy(), patternToSupportingResource()
+
+**Alarm Log Class Details:**
+
+- Attributes: RecordSetId, CurrentSize, OperationalState, MaximumSize, RecentClearTime, SizeThreshold, EntranceFilter, FullAction, SuspendStatus, Records, RecordType, AdministrativeState, UserLabel
+- Operations: storeRecord(), gatherAllRecords(), displayRecords(), findRecords(), getStatusAttributes(), setMaximumSize(), setSizeThreshold(), setFullAction(), setByCreation(), purge(), setAdministrativeState(), getCurrentSize(), displayByKey()
+
+**Event Set Class Details:**
+
+- Attributes: EventSetId, RetrievalCriteria, TimeWindow
+- Operations: setAttributes(), fillWithNewEvents(), create(), delete(), purge(), completeEventRecord()
+
+**Event Queue Class Details:**
+
+- Operations: addEvents(), selectEvents()
+
+**Event Forwarder Class Details:**
+
+- Operations: processAnnouncement()
+
+UML Class Diagram for Root cause alarm analysis showing actors, classes, and their interactions.
+
+Figure I.4 – Root cause alarm analysis class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor BPON_NE as :BPON NE
+ participant Event_Screener as :Event Screener
+ participant Event_Delete as :EventDelete
+ participant Event_Set_Manager as :EventSet Manager
+ participant Event_Set as :EventSet
+ participant Event_Correlator as :Event Correlator
+ participant Alarm_Log as :Alarm Log
+ participant Event_Forwarder as :EventForwarder
+
+ BPON_NE->>Event_Screener: readEvents()
+ activate Event_Screener
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Screener: validate()
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Delete: addEvent()
+ activate Event_Delete
+ Event_Delete->>Event_Set_Manager: notify()
+ deactivate Event_Delete
+ activate Event_Set_Manager
+ Event_Set_Manager->>Event_Set: create()
+ activate Event_Set
+ Event_Set->>Event_Delete: selectEvents()
+ deactivate Event_Set
+ activate Event_Delete
+ Event_Delete->>Event_Correlator: addDependencyRelationship()
+ activate Event_Correlator
+ Event_Correlator->>Event_Set: groupWithSameDependencyResource()
+ activate Event_Set
+ Event_Set->>Event_Correlator: removeGroupRedundancy()
+ deactivate Event_Set
+ activate Event_Correlator
+ Event_Correlator->>Event_Set: suppressFilterings()
+ activate Event_Set
+ Event_Set->>Event_Correlator: patternToSupportingResource()
+ deactivate Event_Set
+ activate Event_Correlator
+ Event_Correlator->>Event_Set: completeEventRecord()
+ deactivate Event_Correlator
+ activate Event_Set
+ Event_Set->>Event_Set_Manager: storeRecord()
+ deactivate Event_Set
+ activate Event_Set_Manager
+ Event_Set_Manager->>Alarm_Log: processAnnouncement()
+ deactivate Event_Set_Manager
+ activate Alarm_Log
+ Alarm_Log->>Event_Forwarder: purge()
+ deactivate Alarm_Log
+ activate Event_Forwarder
+ Event_Forwarder->>Event_Set_Manager: deleteEventSet()
+ deactivate Event_Forwarder
+ activate Event_Set_Manager
+ Event_Set_Manager->>Event_Set: delete()
+ deactivate Event_Set_Manager
+ deactivate Event_Set
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Root cause alarm analysis. Lifelines: :BPON NE, :Event Screener, :EventDelete, :EventSet Manager, :EventSet, :Event Correlator, :Alarm Log, :EventForwarder. Messages: readEvents(), validate(), addEvent(), notify(), create(), selectEvents(), addDependencyRelationship(), groupWithSameDependencyResource(), removeGroupRedundancy(), suppressFilterings(), patternToSupportingResource(), completeEventRecord(), storeRecord(), processAnnouncement(), purge(), deleteEventSet(), delete().
+
+Figure I.5 – Root cause alarm analysis sequence diagram
+
+
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor BPQN_NE as :BPQN NE
+ participant Event_Screener as :Event Screener
+ participant Event_Queue as :Event Queue
+ participant Synchroniser as :Synchroniser
+ participant Discoverer as :Discoverer
+ participant Event_Forwarder as :Event Forwarder
+ participant Inventory_Data as :Inventory Data
+
+ BPQN_NE->>Event_Screener: readEvents(new node)
+ activate Event_Screener
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Screener: validates
+ Event_Screener->>Event_Queue: addEvents()
+ deactivate Event_Screener
+ activate Event_Queue
+ Event_Queue->>Synchroniser: notify()
+ deactivate Event_Queue
+ activate Synchroniser
+ Synchroniser->>Event_Queue: selectEvents()
+ deactivate Synchroniser
+ activate Event_Queue
+ Event_Queue->>Discoverer: getNodeDetails()
+ deactivate Event_Queue
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>BPQN_NE: getValues()
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ activate BPQN_NE
+ Note right of Discoverer: Polling if event information is insufficient.
+ Discoverer->>Discoverer: getEquipmentHolderList()
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ activate BPQN_NE
+ BPQN_NE->>Discoverer: getValues()
+ deactivate BPQN_NE
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>Discoverer: getPlugInUnits()
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ activate BPQN_NE
+ BPQN_NE->>Discoverer: getValues()
+ deactivate BPQN_NE
+ activate Discoverer
+ Discoverer->>Inventory_Data: getPrevious()
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ activate Inventory_Data
+ deactivate Inventory_Data
+ Discoverer->>Discoverer: formatInvDataRecord()
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ Note left of Discoverer: For all new plug-in units and the node.
+ Discoverer->>Inventory_Data: updates()
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ activate Inventory_Data
+ deactivate Inventory_Data
+ Discoverer->>Event_Forwarder: processAnnouncement()
+ deactivate Discoverer
+ activate Event_Forwarder
+ deactivate Event_Forwarder
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for New NE event sequence. Lifelines: :BPQN NE, :Event Screener, :Event Queue, :Synchroniser, :Discoverer, :Event Forwarder, :Inventory Data. Messages: readEvents(new node), validates, addEvents(), notify(), selectEvents(), getNodeDetails(), getValues(), getEquipmentHolderList(), getPlugInUnits(), getPrevious(), formatInvDataRecord(), updates(), processAnnouncement(). Notes: 'Polling if event information is insufficient.' and 'For all new plug-in units and the node.'
+
+**Figure I.7 – New NE event sequence diagram**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant NE as : NE Registrar
+ participant Syn as : Synchroniser
+ participant Disc as : Discoverer
+ participant BPON as : BPON NE
+ participant MM as : Management Model Maintainer
+ participant EF as : Event Forwarder
+
+ OMS->>NE: registerNE(OLT)
+ activate NE
+ NE->>Syn: get&compare()
+ activate Syn
+ Syn->>Disc: getNodeDetails()
+ activate Disc
+ Disc->>BPON: getValues()
+ activate BPON
+ BPON-->>Disc:
+ deactivate BPON
+ Disc->>Syn: getEquipmentHolderList()
+ activate Syn
+ Syn->>BPON: getValues()
+ activate BPON
+ BPON-->>Syn:
+ deactivate BPON
+ Syn->>Disc: getPlugInUnits()
+ activate Disc
+ Disc->>BPON: getValues()
+ activate BPON
+ BPON-->>Disc:
+ deactivate BPON
+ Disc->>MM: consults()
+ activate MM
+ MM-->>Disc:
+ deactivate MM
+ Disc->>Disc: formatInvDataRecord()
+ activate Disc
+ Note left of Disc: For all new plug-in units and the OLT.
+ Disc->>EF: processAnnouncement()
+ activate EF
+ EF-->>Disc:
+ deactivate EF
+ deactivate Disc
+ deactivate Syn
+ deactivate NE
+ deactivate OMS
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for Register OLT and autodiscovery. Lifelines: : OMS/Operator, : NE Registrar, : Synchroniser, : Discoverer, : BPON NE, : Management Model Maintainer, : Event Forwarder. Messages: registerNE(OLT), get&compare(), getNodeDetails(), getValues(), getEquipmentHolderList(), getValues(), getPlugInUnits(), getValues(), consults(), formatInvDataRecord(), processAnnouncement(). A note indicates: 'For all new plug-in units and the OLT.'
+
+Figure I.8 – Register OLT and autodiscovery sequence diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ actor OMS as : OMS/Operator
+ participant Builder as : Builder
+ participant BPDN as : BPDN NE
+ participant EventS as : Event Screener
+ participant EventQ as : Event Queue
+ participant Synchroniser as : Synchroniser
+ participant MM as : Management Model Maintainer
+ participant EventF as : Event Forwarder
+
+ OMS->>Builder: modifyNode(administrative state)
+ activate Builder
+ Builder->>BPDN: setValues()
+ activate BPDN
+ BPDN->>EventS: readEvents(node removed)
+ activate EventS
+ EventS->>EventS: validates()
+ EventS->>EventQ: addEvents()
+ activate EventQ
+ EventQ->>Synchroniser: notify()
+ activate Synchroniser
+ Synchroniser->>EventQ: selectEvents()
+ deactivate Synchroniser
+ Synchroniser->>MM: consults()
+ activate MM
+ MM->>EventF: processAnnouncement()
+ activate EventF
+ EventF->>MM: formalInvDataRecord()
+ deactivate EventF
+ deactivate MM
+ Synchroniser->>Builder: deleteNode()
+ deactivate Synchroniser
+ deactivate EventQ
+ deactivate EventS
+ deactivate BPDN
+ deactivate Builder
+
+```
+
+The sequence diagram illustrates the equipment removal process. It begins with the **: OMS/Operator** actor sending a **modifyNode(administrative state)** message to the **: Builder** participant. The **: Builder** then sends **setValues()** to the **: BPDN NE** participant. The **: BPDN NE** participant sends **readEvents(node removed)** to the **: Event Screener** participant. The **: Event Screener** performs a self-call **validates()**, then sends **addEvents()** to the **: Event Queue** participant. The **: Event Queue** participant sends **notify()** to the **: Synchroniser** participant. The **: Synchroniser** participant sends **selectEvents()** back to the **: Event Queue** participant. The **: Synchroniser** then sends **consults()** to the **: Management Model Maintainer** participant. The **: Management Model Maintainer** sends **processAnnouncement()** to the **: Event Forwarder** participant. The **: Event Forwarder** sends **formalInvDataRecord()** back to the **: Management Model Maintainer** participant. Finally, the **: Synchroniser** sends **deleteNode()** back to the **: Builder** participant, which then returns the control to the **: OMS/Operator** actor.
+
+UML sequence diagram for Equipment removal process involving OMS/Operator, Builder, BPDN NE, Event Screener, Event Queue, Synchroniser, Management Model Maintainer, and Event Forwarder.
+
+Figure I.9 – Equipment removal sequence diagram
+
+## I.4 Collect history data
+
+Figure I.10 provides the class diagram associated with history data collection triggered by routine needs for performance monitoring as well as by customer complaint or detection of threshold crossing alerts for a monitored performance parameter. Figure I.11 provides a sequence diagram that shows separate processes for history data collection triggered by customer complaint and history data collection triggered by all other mechanisms.
+
+
+
+```
+classDiagram
+ class ReportController
+ class DailyScheduler
+ class EventScreener
+ class StatisticsCollector {
+ +CollectionInterval
+ +MonitoringPointSchedulerList
+ +NextIntervalMonitoringList
+ +addMonitoringPoint&Schedule()
+ +removeMonitoringPoint()
+ +pullHistoryDataRecords()
+ +refreshNextIntervalMonitoringList()
+ +removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()
+ }
+ class CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector {
+ +ServiceInstanceTypeMonitoringPointsReference
+ +addServiceInstanceIds()
+ }
+ class RecordSet
+ class BPON_NE {
+ +getATMTrafficLoad()
+ +getUPCNPCDisagreement()
+ +getAAL1PM()
+ +getAAL2PM()
+ +getAAL5PM()
+ +getDS1PM()
+ +getAPONPM()
+ +getDS3PM()
+ +getE1PM()
+ +getE3PM()
+ +getVPVCPM()
+ +getEthernetPM()
+ +getMACBridgePM()
+ +getMACBridgePortPM()
+ +getVoicePM()
+ }
+
+ ReportController --> StatisticsCollector : modifies scheduled monitoring points
+ DailyScheduler --> StatisticsCollector : triggers
+ EventScreener --> StatisticsCollector : TCA triggers
+ StatisticsCollector <|-- CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector
+ StatisticsCollector --> RecordSet : enters record
+ BPON_NE --> StatisticsCollector : collects from
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the classes and interactions for collecting history data. The **Statistics Collector** class is central, containing attributes *CollectionInterval*, *MonitoringPointSchedulerList*, and *NextIntervalMonitoringList*, and methods *addMonitoringPoint&Schedule()*, *removeMonitoringPoint()*, *pullHistoryDataRecords()*, *refreshNextIntervalMonitoringList()*, and *removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()*. It is triggered by **Daily Scheduler** and **Event Screener** (via TCA triggers), and its monitoring points are modified by **ReportController**. A **Customer Complaint Statistics Collector** inherits from **Statistics Collector**, adding *ServiceInstanceTypeMonitoringPointsReference* and *addServiceInstanceIds()*. The **Statistics Collector** enters records into a **Record Set**, which is detailed in a note about "Control Archiving" Analysis. The **BPON NE** actor (from the Use Case View) collects data from the **Statistics Collector**, with a list of methods including *getATMTrafficLoad()*, *getUPCNPCDisagreement()*, *getAAL1PM()*, *getAAL2PM()*, *getAAL5PM()*, *getDS1PM()*, *getAPONPM()*, *getDS3PM()*, *getE1PM()*, *getE3PM()*, *getVPVCPM()*, *getEthernetPM()*, *getMACBridgePM()*, *getMACBridgePortPM()*, and *getVoicePM()*.
+
+UML Class Diagram for Collect history data
+
+Figure I.10 – Collect history data class diagram
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant DS as :Daily Scheduler
+ participant RC as :Report Controller
+ participant SC as :Statistics Collector
+ participant BPON_NE as :BPON NE
+ participant AAL1PM_RS as 15 Minutes AAL1PM : Record Set
+ participant CCS as :Customer Complaint Statistics Collector
+ participant AAL1PM_CRS as 15 Minutes Cost AAL1PM : Record Set
+ participant TCA_BS as TCA : Best Screener
+
+ DS->>RC: addMonitoringPointSchedule()
+ RC->>SC: addMonitoringPointSchedule()
+ SC->>BPON_NE: pullHistoryDataRecords()
+ BPON_NE->>SC: removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()
+ SC->>SC: refreshNextTimeMailMonitoringList()
+ SC->>AAL1PM_RS: getVAL1PM()
+ SC->>AAL1PM_RS: storeRecords()
+ Note over AAL1PM_RS: Repeating for all identified monitoring points and each type of 15 minute register.
+ SC->>CCS: addMonitoringPointSchedule()
+ RC->>CCS: pullHistoryDataRecords()
+ CCS->>SC: removeInactiveMonitoringPoints()
+ CCS->>SC: refreshNextTimeMailMonitoringList()
+ CCS->>BPON_NE: getVAL1PM()
+ CCS->>AAL1PM_CRS: addServiceInstanceIds()
+ CCS->>AAL1PM_CRS: storeRecords()
+ Note over AAL1PM_CRS: Repeating for all identified monitoring points and each type of 15 minute register with a selected monitoring point.
+
+```
+
+UML sequence diagram for 'Collect history data' involving components like Daily Scheduler, Report Controller, Statistics Collector, BPON NE, and various Record Sets. The diagram shows a loop for processing monitoring points, with notes indicating repetition for all identified points and each type of 15-minute register.
+
+Figure I.11 – Collect history data sequence diagram
+
+# **Appendix II**
+
+## **High level summary class diagrams**
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation)
+
+The following class diagrams are provided as non-normative information with the intention of completing a description of the behaviour within the supplier management system. Object classes, actors and associations are identified for the use case diagrams of clause 6.2.1.3 where more than one use case is present. The purpose of providing this information is to show how use cases within the supplier management system addressing similar management functionality might employ the same internal object classes. Since these diagrams show primarily internal associations, the diagrams are for information only.
+
+## **II.1 Event handling**
+
+The following simplified class diagram, Figure II.1, shows interactions between external actors and classes internal to the supplier management system when events are processed in the supplier management system. This diagram serves to consolidate and provide consistency to diagrams found within clause 6.3.2. The analysis for the interactions called "provisions service", and "selects records" and "views" involving the actor called "OMS/Operator" in Figure II.1 are found in clauses 6.3.5 and 6.3.6, respectively.
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ actor OMSOperator as OMS/Operator
+ actor BPONNE as BPON NE
+ actor ExternalEventChannel as External Event Channel
+ class CurrentEventListing
+ class RecordSetMgr
+ class ImpairmentPersistence
+ class EventCorrelator
+ class ManagementModelMaintainer
+ class ServiceAffectingDeterminer
+ class EventForwarder
+ class NotificationAdmin
+ class EventSupplier
+ class EventQueue
+ class EventSetManager
+ class EventScreener
+ class Log
+ class Clock
+ class ManagedEntityFactory
+ class ServiceProvisioner
+
+ OMSOperator --> CurrentEventListing : views
+ OMSOperator --> ServiceProvisioner : provisions service
+ OMSOperator --> RecordSetMgr : selects records
+ OMSOperator --> ImpairmentPersistence : sets threshold parameters
+ OMSOperator --> ManagedEntityFactory : updates containment relationships
+ OMSOperator --> ManagementModelMaintainer : modify properties of monitoring points
+ BPONNE --> EventScreener : sends events
+ EventScreener --> EventQueue : queues to
+ EventScreener --> EventSetManager : notifies
+ EventQueue --> EventSetManager : extracts from
+ EventSetManager --> EventSet : creates
+ EventSet --> CurrentEventListing : adds to current outage list
+ EventSet --> Log : logs event records
+ EventSet --> ImpairmentPersistence : writes not impairments to
+ EventSet --> EventCorrelator : obtains correlation
+ EventSet --> ManagementModelMaintainer : retrieves service tags
+ EventSet --> ServiceAffectingDeterminer : determines
+ EventSet --> EventForwarder : announces event
+ EventSet --> EventForwarder : announces QoS Alarm
+ EventForwarder --> NotificationAdmin : updates event supplier info
+ NotificationAdmin --> EventSupplier : updates external forwarding
+ EventSupplier --> EventForwarder : pushes event
+ EventSupplier --> ExternalEventChannel : pushes event
+ ExternalEventChannel --> EventSupplier : pushes event
+ CurrentEventListing --> RecordSetMgr : updates
+ RecordSetMgr --> ImpairmentPersistence : manages
+ ImpairmentPersistence --> EventCorrelator : consults
+ EventCorrelator --> ManagementModelMaintainer : consults
+ ManagementModelMaintainer --> ServiceAffectingDeterminer : consults
+ ServiceAffectingDeterminer --> ManagementModelMaintainer : consults
+ ServiceProvisioner --> ManagedEntityFactory : commissions
+ ManagedEntityFactory --> ManagementModelMaintainer : updates
+ Clock --> Log : triggers periodically
+ Log --> CurrentEventListing : provisions thresholds
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the high-level event handling process. It involves several actors and classes. The **OMS/Operator** actor interacts with **Current Event Listing**, **Service Provisioner**, **Record Set Mgr**, **Impairment Persistence**, **Managed Entity Factory**, and **Management Model Maintainer**. The **BPON NE** actor sends events to the **Event Screener**, which queues them to the **Event Queue** and notifies the **Event Set Manager**. The **Event Queue** extracts from the **Event Set**, which is created by the **Event Set Manager**. The **Event Set** then triggers various actions: it adds to the current outage list, logs event records, writes not impairments to **Impairment Persistence**, obtains correlation from **Event Correlator**, retrieves service tags from **Management Model Maintainer**, determines service affecting determiners, and announces events and QoS alarms to the **Event Forwarder**. The **Event Forwarder** updates event supplier info for the **Notification Admin**, which in turn updates external forwarding for the **Event Supplier**. The **Event Supplier** pushes events to the **Event Forwarder** and the **External Event Channel**, which also pushes events to the **Event Supplier**. The **Current Event Listing** updates the **Record Set Mgr**, which manages **Impairment Persistence**. The **Impairment Persistence** consults the **Event Correlator**, which consults the **Management Model Maintainer**, which in turn consults the **Service Affecting Determiner**. The **Service Provisioner** commissions the **Managed Entity Factory**, which updates the **Management Model Maintainer**. The **Clock** triggers periodically the **Log**, which provisions thresholds to the **Current Event Listing**.
+
+High-level event handling class diagram showing interactions between various components like OMS/Operator, Service Provisioner, Event Set Manager, and Event Forwarder.
+
+Figure II.1 – High-level event handling class diagram
+
+### II.2 Software and configuration data management
+
+The following simplified class diagram show interactions between external actors and classes internal to the supplier management system when software and NE configuration data is managed with the supplier management system. This diagram serves to consolidate and provide consistency to the subsequent diagrams found within clause 6.3.3.
+
+
+
+A high-level UML class diagram showing the relationships between various management components and external actors. Key actors include OMS Operator, BPON NE, Secure File Server, OLT: BPON NE, and Operator or OMS. Core classes include Scheduler, Download Mgr, Transfer Mgr, MIB Mover, and Version Repository. Relationships are labeled with actions such as 'manipulates scheduling', 'obtains records', 'updates', 'commissions', 'triggers', 'delivers to', and 'extracts and applies MIB data'.
+
+Figure II.2 – High-level software and configuration data class diagram
+
+**Figure II.2 – High-level software and configuration data class diagram**
+
+156 ITU-T Rec. Q.834.3 (06/2004)
+
+
+
+## II.4 Provisioning
+
+Figure II.4 shows interactions between external actors and classes internal to the supplier management system when BPON equipment and services are being provisioned. This diagram serves to consolidate and provide consistency to the subsequent diagrams found within clause 6.3.6.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the provisioning process within a supplier management system. Key components and interactions include:
+
+- External Actors:** OMS Operator, BPON NE, and an unnamed actor at the top left.
+- Core Classes:**
+ - Inventory Data**: Interacts with **Management Model Interfaces** and **Profiles**.
+ - Management Model Interfaces**: Central hub for data management.
+ - Profiles**: Includes **Profile Object Consumer**, **Profile Object Repository**, and various **Profile** subclasses (e.g., **ATMNetConnProfile**, **MPLSProfile**, **GPRSProfile**).
+ - BPON NE Registration**: Manages **Event Clauses** and **NE Synchronism**.
+ - Event Clauses** and **NE Synchronism**: Handle event-driven logic and synchronization.
+ - Discovery** and **Event Supplies**: Manage discovery processes and event supply details.
+ - External Communications**: Facilitates communication with external systems.
+ - Notification Administration**: Manages system notifications.
+- Internal Logic and Data:**
+ - Build** and **BuildLogical**: Core logic for building and logical representation of profiles.
+ - OLP** (Operation Logical Profile): A central class for logical operations.
+ - ATMConnConnProfile**, **MPLSConnConnProfile**, **GPRSConnConnProfile**: Specific connection profiles.
+ - Equipment** and **Physical** classes: Represent hardware components and their physical attributes.
+ - Service Provisioning**: The core process for provisioning services.
+- Interactions:**
+ - Inventory Data** is *maintained by* **External Event Channel**.
+ - Management Model Interfaces** *publishes to* **Profile Object Consumer** and *provides access* to **Build**.
+ - Build** *builds physical inventory* for **BPON NE Registration**.
+ - BPON NE Registration** *registers* **Event Clauses** and *updates* **NE Synchronism**.
+ - Event Clauses** *publishes to* **Event Supplies**.
+ - Event Supplies** *publishes to* **External Communications**.
+ - External Communications** *publishes to* **Notification Administration**.
+ - Notification Administration** *updates* **Inventory Data**.
+ - Profiles** are *managed* and *provisioned* through various internal classes like **OLP** and **Service Provisioning**.
+
+Figure II.4 – Provisioning class diagram. This is a complex UML class diagram showing the interactions for provisioning BPON equipment and services. It includes numerous classes such as Inventory Data, Management Model Interfaces, Profiles, BPON NE Registration, Event Clauses, NE Synchronism, Discovery, Event Supplies, External Communications, and various protocol-specific classes like ATM, MPLS, and GPRS. External actors like OMS Operator and BPON NE are also shown. Relationships include associations, generalizations, and specific interactions like 'build physical inventory', 'provision service', and 'update'.
+
+Figure II.4 – Provisioning class diagram
+
+## II.5 Archiving and bulk transfer
+
+Figure II.5 shows interactions between external actors and classes internal to the supplier management system when statistics are archived for short periods of time in the supplier management system and eventually transferred, via a file transfer protocol, to long-term archives within an operator data warehouse. This diagram serves to consolidate and provide consistency to the subsequent diagrams found within clause 6.3.7.
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ actor BPON_NE
+ actor OperatorOrOMS as Operator or OMS
+ actor PrivilegedUser
+ class EventScreener
+ class EventQueue
+ class TCASStatsCollector
+ class DailyScheduler
+ class StatisticsCollector
+ class CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector
+ class ReportController
+ class TransferRequestInfo
+ class TransferMgr
+ class Scheduler
+ class Factory
+ class ActivityCompletionLog
+ class TransferLogRecord
+ class RecordSet
+ class TransferTrackingObject
+ class RecordSetMgr
+
+ BPON_NE --> EventScreener : sends events
+ BPON_NE --> TCASStatsCollector : collects from
+ BPON_NE --> StatisticsCollector : collects from
+ BPON_NE --> ReportController : sets thresholds & History Data recording
+ ReportController --> StatisticsCollector : reads scheduled monitoring points
+ OperatorOrOMS --> ReportController : sets thresholds and reporting
+ OperatorOrOMS --> TransferMgr : requests transfer
+ OperatorOrOMS --> ActivityCompletionLog : views
+ OperatorOrOMS --> RecordSetMgr : retrieves records
+ PrivilegedUser --> RecordSetMgr : suspends and resumes recording
+
+ EventScreener --> EventQueue : queues to
+ EventScreener --> EventSet : sends record to
+ EventQueue --> EventSet : obtains correlation
+ EventSet --> EventCorrelator
+ EventScreener --> StatisticsCollector : triggers
+ DailyScheduler --> StatisticsCollector : triggers
+ DailyScheduler --> EventSet : triggers collection
+ StatisticsCollector --|> CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector
+ StatisticsCollector --> TransferMgr : enters record
+ StatisticsCollector --> RecordSet : logs event record
+ TransferRequestInfo ..> TransferMgr : requests transfer
+ TransferMgr --> Scheduler : triggers
+ TransferMgr --> Factory : commissions
+ TransferMgr --> Factory : creates
+ TransferMgr --> RecordSet : reports progress
+ TransferMgr --> RecordSet : record set full
+ TransferMgr --> TransferLogRecord : writes
+ TransferMgr --> RecordSet : inventories
+ TransferMgr --> TransferTrackingObject
+ TransferLogRecord ..> RecordSet : inventories
+ RecordSetMgr --> RecordSet
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the interactions for archiving and bulk transfer. Key components include:
+
+- Actors:** BPON\_NE, Operator or OMS, Privileged User, and Data Warehouse.
+- Classes:** EventScreener, EventQueue, TCASStatsCollector, DailyScheduler, StatisticsCollector, CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector, ReportController, TransferRequestInfo, TransferMgr, Scheduler, Factory, ActivityCompletionLog, TransferLogRecord, RecordSet, TransferTrackingObject, and RecordSetMgr.
+- Interactions:**
+ - BPON\_NE sends events to EventScreener and collects data from TCASStatsCollector and StatisticsCollector.
+ - Operator or OMS sets thresholds and reporting for ReportController and requests transfers from TransferMgr.
+ - ReportController reads scheduled monitoring points from StatisticsCollector.
+ - EventScreener queues events to EventQueue and sends records to EventSet.
+ - DailyScheduler triggers StatisticsCollector and EventSet.
+ - StatisticsCollector inherits from CustomerComplaintStatisticsCollector and logs event records to RecordSet.
+ - TransferMgr commissions and creates objects from a Factory, reports progress to RecordSet, and writes TransferLogRecords.
+ - RecordSetMgr manages RecordSet and is controlled by a Privileged User.
+
+UML Class Diagram for Archiving and Bulk Transfer
+
+Figure II.5 – Archiving and bulk transfer class diagram
+
+# Bibliography
+
+[b-OMG 99-06-01] OMG Document formal/99-06-01, *OMG Modeling Book* (section 1).
+
+
+
+# SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.86.4-199706-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.86.4-199706-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16a4a3f948a741c19cbfd777ba8cd04d23fd9932
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.86.4-199706-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,819 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+# ITU-T
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+## Q.86.4
+
+(06/97)
+
+SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING
+
+Functions and information flows for services in the ISDN –
+Supplementary services
+
+---
+
+**Stage 2 description for charging supplementary
+services: International Freephone Service (IFS)**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.86.4
+
+(Previously CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T Q-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
+| SIGNALLING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MANUAL SERVICE | Q.1–Q.3 |
+| INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC WORKING | Q.4–Q.59 |
+| FUNCTIONS AND INFORMATION FLOWS FOR SERVICES IN THE ISDN | Q.60–Q.99 |
+| Methodology | Q.60–Q.67 |
+| Basic services | Q.68–Q.79 |
+| Supplementary services | Q.80–Q.99 |
+| CLAUSES APPLICABLE TO ITU-T STANDARD SYSTEMS | Q.100–Q.119 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS No. 4 AND No. 5 | Q.120–Q.249 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 6 | Q.250–Q.309 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R1 | Q.310–Q.399 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM R2 | Q.400–Q.499 |
+| DIGITAL EXCHANGES | Q.500–Q.599 |
+| INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS | Q.600–Q.699 |
+| SPECIFICATIONS OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 | Q.700–Q.849 |
+| DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 | Q.850–Q.999 |
+| PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETWORK | Q.1000–Q.1099 |
+| INTERWORKING WITH SATELLITE MOBILE SYSTEMS | Q.1100–Q.1199 |
+| INTELLIGENT NETWORK | Q.1200–Q.1999 |
+| BROADBAND ISDN | Q.2000–Q.2999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.*
+
+## **ITU-T RECOMMENDATION Q.86.4**
+
+### **STAGE 2 DESCRIPTION FOR CHARGING SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES: INTERNATIONAL FREEPHONE SERVICE (IFS)**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+Consistent with Recommendation E.152, International Freephone Service (IFS) Stage 1, this Recommendation constitutes the Stage 2 description for the service, including the functional architecture, Intelligent Network-based descriptions for normal IFS and optional features, and allocation of functional entities to physical locations. This Recommendation also provides Q.1200-Series references for information flows, SDL diagrams, and functional entity actions.
+
+### **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.86.4 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 11 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 5th of June 1997.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+### NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+### INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had/had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 1998
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+| | Page |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 4 International Freephone Service (IFS)..... | 1 |
+| 4.1 Scope..... | 1 |
+| 4.2 References..... | 1 |
+| 4.3 Definitions ..... | 2 |
+| 4.4 Symbols and abbreviations ..... | 2 |
+| 4.5 Description..... | 2 |
+| 4.6 Derivation of the functional model..... | 3 |
+| 4.6.1 Functional model description ..... | 3 |
+| 4.6.2 Description of functional entities ..... | 3 |
+| 4.6.3 Relationship with basic service ..... | 4 |
+| 4.7 IN SIB-based service feature definitions ..... | 4 |
+| 4.7.1 Announcement for caller ..... | 6 |
+| 4.7.2 Geographical zone call routing..... | 7 |
+| 4.7.3 Variable call routing ..... | 8 |
+| 4.7.4 Additional customer service statistics/real-time information..... | 15 |
+| 4.8 Information flows..... | 15 |
+| 4.9 SDL diagrams for functional entities..... | 15 |
+| 4.10 Functional entity actions..... | 15 |
+| 4.11 Allocation of functional entities to physical locations..... | 16 |
+
+
+
+## Recommendation Q.86.4
+
+### STAGE 2 DESCRIPTION FOR CHARGING SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES: INTERNATIONAL FREEPHONE SERVICE (IFS)
+
+(Geneva, 1997)
+
+## 4 International Freephone Service (IFS)
+
+### 4.1 Scope
+
+This Recommendation defines the stage 2 service description for the call handling aspects of the international freephone service on the international Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). It is also applicable to IFS callers located on ISDNs or private networks directing calls towards IFS customers on the PSTN. It may be applicable to some degree to called IFS customers on ISDNs or private networks.
+
+This Recommendation is specified according to the methodology defined in Recommendation Q.65 (1997).
+
+This Recommendation does not formally describe the relationship between this supplementary service and basic call. Where possible, this information is included for guidance.
+
+"The **international freephone service (IFS)** enables a customer in one country to be assigned one or more special telephone numbers in another country(ies) which allow callers in those countries to call the customer free of charge. All service and call-related charges are paid by the customer. " (4.1/E.152.)
+
+This Recommendation is applicable to the stage 3 Recommendation for the IFS service. The term "stage 3" is also defined in Recommendation I.130. Where the text indicates the status of a requirement (i.e. as strict command or prohibition, as authorization leaving freedom, or as a capability or possibility), this shall be reflected in the text of the relevant stage 3 Recommendations.
+
+Conformance to this Recommendation is met by conforming to the stage 3 Recommendations with the field of application appropriate to the equipment being implemented. Therefore no method of testing is provided for this Recommendation.
+
+### 4.2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- ITU-T Recommendation E.152 (1996), *International freephone service*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1213 (1995), *Global functional plane for intelligent network CS-1*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1214 (1995), *Distributed functional plane for intelligent network CS-1*.
+
+- ITU-T Recommendation Q.1215 (1995), *Physical plane for intelligent network CS-1*.
+- ITU-T Recommendation Q.65 (1997), *The unified functional methodology for the characterization of services and network capabilities*.
+
+### 4.3 Definitions
+
+This Recommendation defines the following terms.
+
+**4.3.1 IFS customer:** The individual or entity who (or which) obtains an international freephone service from an IFS service provider, and is responsible for payment of all charges due to that IFS service provider.
+
+**4.3.2 IFS caller:** The person who places a call to an IFS number.
+
+These definitions are extracted from clause 3/E.152.
+
+### 4.4 Symbols and abbreviations
+
+This Recommendation uses the following symbols and abbreviations:
+
+| | |
+|-------|----------------------------------------|
+| CCAF | Call Control Agent Function |
+| CCF | Call Control Function |
+| CID | Call Instance Data |
+| CIDFP | Call Instance Data Field Pointer |
+| CLI | Calling Line Identity |
+| FE | Functional Entity |
+| FIFO | First-In-First-Out |
+| IFS | International Freephone Service |
+| IN | Intelligent Network |
+| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network |
+| LE | Local Exchange |
+| PNX | Private Network Exchange |
+| PSTN | Public Switched Telephone Network |
+| SCF | Service Control Function |
+| SDF | Service Data Function |
+| SDL | Specification and Description Language |
+| SIB | Service Independent Building Block |
+| SRF | Specialized Resource Function |
+| SSF | Service Switching Function |
+| TE | Terminal Equipment |
+| TR | Transit Exchange |
+
+### 4.5 Description
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### 4.6 Derivation of the functional model
+
+International freephone service and its optional customer features are characterized in terms of SIBs in the IN context. The applicable functional model is that of the intelligent network as defined in Recommendation Q.1214, modified to show explicitly that initiating and terminating end treatment are required.
+
+### 4.6.1 Functional model description
+
+The functional model defining the supplementary service aspects of IFS is shown in Figure 4-1.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates two functional models for IFS. Both models consist of a vertical stack of three functional entities (FEs): SDF (Service Data Function) at the top, SCF (Service Control Function) in the middle, and SSF (Service Switching Function) at the bottom. In the left model, SDF is labeled FE4, SCF is FE3, and SSF is FE1. SCF (FE3) is also connected to SRF (Service Resource Function, FE2) on the left. In the right model, SDF is labeled FE8, SCF is FE6, and SSF is FE5. SCF (FE6) is also connected to SRF (FE7) on the right. The label T1180820-96 is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Figure 4-1/Q.86.4 – IFS functional model diagram showing two network architectures. The left architecture shows a vertical stack of SDF (FE4) connected to SCF (FE3), which is connected to SSF (FE1). SCF (FE3) is also connected to SRF (FE2). The right architecture shows a vertical stack of SDF (FE8) connected to SCF (FE6), which is connected to SSF (FE5). SCF (FE6) is also connected to SRF (FE7).
+
+**Figure 4-1/Q.86.4 – IFS functional model**
+
+### 4.6.2 Description of functional entities
+
+The Functional Entities (FEs) required by IFS above those of basic call are as follows:
+
+- FE1: Originating service switching function.
+- FE2: Originating side specialized resource function.
+- FE3: Originating side service control function.
+- FE4: Originating side service data function.
+- FE5: Terminating side service switching function.
+- FE6: Terminating side service control function.
+- FE7: Terminating side specialized resource function.
+- FE8: Terminating side service data function.
+
+The following table shows the functional entities spanned by each SIB used in this Recommendation, and the subclauses of Recommendation Q.1213 corresponding to the SIBs.
+
+| SIB | CCF/SSF | SCF | SDF | SRF | Q.1213 subclause |
+|----------------------|---------|-----|-----|-----|------------------|
+| Translate | | X | X | | 5.14 |
+| Log call information | X | X | X | | 5.9 |
+| User interaction | X | X | | X | 5.15 |
+| Screen | | X | X | | 5.11 |
+| Compare | | X | | | 5.6 |
+| Queue | X | X | | X | 5.10 |
+
+#### 4.6.3 Relationship with basic service
+
+The relationship of the IFS functional model to basic service is shown in Figure 4-2.
+
+NOTE – The basic call model for this Recommendation is defined in Recommendation Q.1214.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ subgraph Left_Model [Left Functional Model]
+ SDF4(SDF FE4) --- SCF3(SCF FE3)
+ SCF3 --- SRF2(SRF FE2)
+ SCF3 --- SSF1(SSF FE1)
+ SSF1 --- CCF1(CCF FE1)
+ CCF1 --- CCAF1(CCAF)
+ end
+ subgraph Right_Model [Right Functional Model]
+ SDF8(SDF FE8) --- SCF6(SCF FE6)
+ SCF6 --- SRF7(SRF FE7)
+ SCF6 --- SSF5(SSF FE5)
+ SSF5 --- CCF5(CCF FE5)
+ CCF5 --- CCAF2(CCAF)
+ end
+ CCF1 --- CCF5
+
+```
+
+CCF Call Control Function
+CCAF Call Control Agent Function
+
+T1180830-96
+
+Figure 4-2/Q.86.4 – Relationship of IFS functional model to basic service. The diagram shows two symmetrical functional models connected by a central CCF entity. Each model consists of a vertical stack of SDF, SCF, and SSF/CCF, with SRF and CCAF branching off. Functional entities are labeled FE1 through FE8.
+
+**Figure 4-2/Q.86.4 – Relationship of IFS functional model to basic service**
+
+### 4.7 IN SIB-based service feature definitions
+
+These global service logic and SIB diagrams conform to the semantics and syntax of Recommendations Q.1203 and Q.1213 (revised), with the exception that SIB error outputs are not shown or terminated. It is expected that error handling will be implementation-specific and is not covered in this Recommendation.
+
+With no additional customer service features, the SIB-based network support for the IFS service is shown in Figure 4-3.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Address analysed]) --> TranslateSIB((Translate SIB))
+ TranslateSIB --> LogCallSIB((Log call SIB))
+ LogCallSIB --> End([Proceed with new data])
+
+```
+
+Translate dialled # to destination network #
+
+Log to billing file for charging to account #
+
+Address analysed
+
+Proceed with new data
+
+T1180840-96
+
+Flowchart of the Normal IFS service process. It starts with 'Address analysed' pointing to a circle labeled 'Translate SIB'. Above this circle is the text 'Translate dialled # to destination network #'. An arrow points from 'Translate SIB' to another circle labeled 'Log call SIB'. Above this circle is the text 'Log to billing file for charging to account #'. An arrow points from 'Log call SIB' to a downward-pointing triangle labeled 'Proceed with new data'. To the right of this triangle is the text 'T1180840-96'.
+
+**Figure 4-3/Q.86.4 – Normal IFS service**
+
+The service support data for this service is shown in the following tables:
+
+| Translate SIB | |
+|----------------------|-------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Object name | IFS number translation list |
+| Translate filter | Originally dialled IFS number |
+| Translated attribute | Network routing number |
+| CIDFP-info | Originally dialled IFS number |
+| CIDFP-translated | Network routing number |
+
+| Log call information SIB | |
+|--------------------------|----------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| CIDFP-log | IFS number and call attempt time |
+
+NOTE – While this Recommendation does not show all possible combinations of IFS and its options, combinations consistent with the requirements of the stage 1 service description can be readily formulated using IN techniques.
+
+### 4.7.1 Announcement for caller
+
+See Figure 4.4.
+
+
+
+```
+graph TD; Start([Prepared to complete call]) --> SIB((User interaction SIB)); SIB --> End1([Confirm no-charge nature of call to caller]); SIB --> End2([Continue with existing data]);
+```
+
+The diagram is a flowchart centered around a circle labeled "User interaction SIB". An arrow points from a triangle labeled "Prepared to complete call" to the circle. From the circle, two arrows point outwards. The top arrow points to the text "Confirm no-charge nature of call to caller". The bottom arrow points to a triangle labeled "Continue with existing data", with the reference "T1180850-96" placed next to it.
+
+Flowchart for 'No-charge announcement to caller' showing a user interaction SIB with two paths: 'Prepared to complete call' and 'Continue with existing data'.
+
+**Figure 4-4/Q.86.4 – No-charge announcement to caller**
+
+The service support data for this service feature is shown in the following table:
+
+| User interaction SIB | |
+|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Announcement ID | Pointer to "confirmation of no-charge" message |
+| Repetition requested | No |
+| Collect information/type | Null (i.e. no collection of user input) |
+| CIDFP-call_party | Caller |
+
+This terminating call treatment is in addition to the translation/logging for billing purposes at the initiating end for normal IFS.
+
+This feature can also be provided by the originating network by incorporating the user interaction SIB into normal IFS service (see 4.7, Figure 4-3), as shown in Figure 4-5.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Address analysed]) --> SIB1((Translate SIB))
+ SIB1 --> SIB2((User interaction SIB))
+ SIB2 --> SIB3((Log call SIB))
+ SIB3 --> End([Proceed with new data])
+
+```
+
+Translate dialled # to destination network #
+
+Confirm no-charge nature of call to caller
+
+Log to billing file for charging to account #
+
+Address analysed
+
+Proceed with new data
+
+T1180860-96
+
+Flowchart for Figure 4-5/Q.86.4: IFS with originating no-charge announcement. The process starts with 'Address analysed' leading to 'Translate SIB' (with function 'Translate dialled # to destination network #'). This leads to 'User interaction SIB' (with function 'Confirm no-charge nature of call to caller'), which then leads to 'Log call SIB' (with function 'Log to billing file for charging to account #'). The process ends with 'Proceed with new data' (with code 'T1180860-96').
+
+**Figure 4-5/Q.86.4 – IFS with originating no-charge announcement**
+
+### 4.7.2 Geographical zone call routing
+
+See Figure 4-6.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Address analysed]) --> SIB1((Screen SIB))
+ SIB1 -- Match --> SIB2((Translate SIB))
+ SIB1 -- No match --> SIB3((User interaction SIB))
+ SIB2 --> SIB4((Log call SIB))
+ SIB3 --> End1([Clear call])
+ SIB4 --> End2([Proceed with new data])
+
+```
+
+Check calling line identity against allowed zone list
+
+Translate dialled # to destination network #
+
+Log to billing file for charging to account #
+
+Address analysed
+
+Clear call
+
+Proceed with new data
+
+T1180870-96
+
+Match
+
+No match
+
+Inform caller: e.g. IFS calling from zone not supported
+
+Flowchart for Figure 4-6/Q.86.4: Geographical zone call routing. The process starts with 'Address analysed' leading to 'Screen SIB' (with function 'Check calling line identity against allowed zone list'). From 'Screen SIB', a 'Match' path leads to 'Translate SIB' (with function 'Translate dialled # to destination network #'), which then leads to 'Log call SIB' (with function 'Log to billing file for charging to account #'). A 'No match' path from 'Screen SIB' leads to 'User interaction SIB' (with function 'Inform caller: e.g. IFS calling from zone not supported'), which then leads to 'Clear call'. The process ends with 'Proceed with new data' (with code 'T1180870-96') from 'Log call SIB'.
+
+**Figure 4-6/Q.86.4 – Geographical zone call routing**
+
+The service support data for this service feature is shown in the following tables:
+
+| Screen SIB | |
+|----------------------|--------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Screen list name | Acceptable zone CLI list |
+| Screen list filter | Calling line identity |
+| CIDFP-screen | Calling line identity |
+
+| User Interaction SIB | |
+|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Announcement ID | Pointer to "call not allowed from your zone" message |
+| Repetition requested | No |
+| Collect information/type | Null (i.e. no collection of user input) |
+| CIDFP-call_party | Caller |
+
+The service support data for the translate and log SIBs is the same as in 4.6.
+
+### 4.7.3 Variable call routing
+
+Variable call routing consists of a number of service features:
+
+#### 4.7.3.1 Point of origin call routing
+
+See Figure 4-7.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ A[Address analysed] --> B((Translate SIB))
+ B --> C((Log call SIB))
+ C --> D[Proceed with new data]
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the process of point of origin call routing. It begins with 'Address analysed' (represented by a triangle symbol), which leads to the 'Translate SIB' (represented by a circle). Above the 'Translate SIB' circle, the text 'Translate dialled # and calling line id to destination network #' is written. An arrow points from 'Translate SIB' to the 'Log call SIB' (represented by a circle). Above the 'Log call SIB' circle, the text 'Log to billing file for charging to account #' is written. Finally, an arrow points from 'Log call SIB' to 'Proceed with new data' (represented by an inverted triangle symbol). The reference 'T1180880-96' is located near the 'Proceed with new data' symbol.
+
+Flowchart of Point of origin call routing showing the sequence from Address analysed to Translate SIB, then to Log call SIB, and finally to Proceed with new data.
+
+**Figure 4-7/Q.86.4 – Point of origin call routing**
+
+The service support data for this service feature is shown in the following table:
+
+| Translate SIB | |
+|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Object name | IFS point of origin number translation list |
+| Translate filter | Originally dialled IFS number and CLI |
+| Translated attribute | Network routing number |
+| CIDFP-info | Originally dialled IFS number, CLI |
+| CIDFP-translated | Network routing number |
+
+The service support data for the log SIB is the same as in 4.6.
+
+This feature can also be provided by the terminating network (in addition to normal originating treatment) as shown in Figure 4-8.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ A[Translate dialled #
+and calling line id
+to destination
+network #] --> B((Translate SIB))
+ B --> C[Prepared to
+complete call]
+ B --> D[Handle as transit
+T1180890-96]
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for Point of origin call routing (destination). The process starts with 'Translate dialled # and calling line id to destination network #', leading to a circle labeled 'Translate SIB'. From this circle, two paths emerge: one leading to a triangle labeled 'Prepared to complete call', and another leading to a triangle labeled 'Handle as transit' with the reference 'T1180890-96'.
+
+**Figure 4-8/Q.86.4 – Point of origin call routing (destination)**
+
+#### 4.7.3.2 Time-dependent call routing
+
+##### 4.7.3.2.1 Time-dependent routing to alternative destinations
+
+This feature is illustrated by an example using a different translation during the lunch period (1200 to 1400 hours). The parameters and the structure may vary from IFS customer-to-IFS customer. See Figure 4-9.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Prepared to complete call]) --> C1((Compare SIB))
+ C1 -- ">" --> T1((Translate SIB))
+ C1 -- "<=" --> C2((Compare SIB))
+ C2 -- ">" --> T2((Translate SIB))
+ C2 -- "<=" --> T3((Translate SIB))
+ T1 --> End([Handle as transit])
+ T2 --> End
+ T3 --> End
+ End --- Code[T1180900-96]
+
+```
+
+Compare time of day against 1400 hours limit
+
+Non-lunch time translation, dialled # to destination network #
+
+Translate SIB
+
+Compare SIB
+
+Compare time of day against 1200 hours limit
+
+Lunch time translation, dialled # to destination network #
+
+Translate SIB
+
+Handle as transit
+
+T1180900-96
+
+Flowchart illustrating time-dependent call routing logic. The process starts with 'Prepared to complete call' leading to a 'Compare SIB' block. This block compares the time of day against a 1400 hours limit. If the time is greater than 1400 hours (indicated by '>'), it proceeds to a 'Translate SIB' block for 'Non-lunch time translation, dialled # to destination network #'. If the time is less than or equal to 1400 hours (indicated by '<='), it proceeds to another 'Compare SIB' block. This second 'Compare SIB' block compares the time of day against a 1200 hours limit. If the time is greater than 1200 hours (indicated by '>'), it proceeds to a 'Translate SIB' block for 'Lunch time translation, dialled # to destination network #'. If the time is less than or equal to 1200 hours (indicated by '<='), it proceeds to a third 'Translate SIB' block. All three 'Translate SIB' blocks lead to a final 'Handle as transit' block, which is associated with the code 'T1180900-96'.
+
+**Figure 4-9/Q.86.4 – Time-dependent call routing**
+
+The service support data for this service feature is shown in the following tables:
+
+| Compare SIB | |
+|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Comparison type | Time, day or date, per customer requirements |
+| CIDFP-compare | Time, day or date, per customer requirements |
+| Reference value | Value of time, day or date, per customer requirements |
+
+| Translate SIB | |
+|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Object name | Customer-specific IFS translation list corresponding to service logic leg |
+| Translate filter | Originally dialled IFS number |
+| Translated attribute | Network routing number |
+| CIDFP-info | Originally dialled IFS number, CLI |
+| CIDFP-translated | Network routing number |
+
+This terminating call treatment is in addition to the translation/logging for billing purposes at the initiating end for normal IFS.
+
+###### 4.7.3.2.2 Time-dependent routing to alternative destinations or announcement
+
+As a second example, the call can be routed to a destination or an announcement. See Figure 4-10.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Prepared to complete call]) --> C1((Compare SIB))
+ C1 -- ">" --> T1((Translate SIB))
+ C1 -- "=" --> C2((Compare SIB))
+ C1 -- "<" --> UI((User interaction SIB))
+ T1 -->|Non-lunch time translation, dialled # to destination network #| H1([Handle as transit])
+ C2 -- ">" --> UI
+ C2 -- "=" --> C2
+ C2 -- "<" --> UI
+ UI -->|Lunch time message, e.g. sorry, no service until 1400 hours| C3([Clear call])
+
+```
+
+Flowchart illustrating time-dependent routing logic. It starts with 'Prepared to complete call' leading to a 'Compare SIB' node. This node compares the time of day against a 1400 hours limit. If the time is greater than 1400 (>), it goes to a 'Translate SIB' node. If the time is equal to 1400 (=), it goes to another 'Compare SIB' node. If the time is less than 1400 (<), it goes to a 'User interaction SIB' node. The 'Translate SIB' node performs 'Non-lunch time translation, dialled # to destination network #' and leads to 'Handle as transit'. The second 'Compare SIB' node compares the time of day against a 1200 hours limit. If the time is greater than 1200 (>), it goes to the 'User interaction SIB' node. If the time is equal to 1200 (=), it loops back to itself. If the time is less than 1200 (<), it goes to the 'User interaction SIB' node. The 'User interaction SIB' node displays a 'Lunch time message, e.g. sorry, no service until 1400 hours' and leads to 'Clear call'.
+
+**Figure 4-10/Q.86.4 – Time-dependent routing to destination or announcement**
+
+The additional service support data for this service feature is shown in the following table:
+
+| User interaction SIB | |
+|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Announcement ID | Pointer to "no lunch-time service" message |
+| Repetition requested | No |
+| Collect information/type | Null (i.e. no collection of user input) |
+| CIDFP-call_party | Caller |
+
+This terminating call treatment is in addition to the translation/logging for billing purposes at the initiating end for normal IFS.
+
+#### 4.7.3.3 Date-dependent call routing
+
+This feature is illustrated by an example using a different translation for Bastille Day, 14 July. The parameters and the structure may vary from IFS customer-to-IFS customer. See Figure 4-11.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Prepared to complete]) --> CompareSIB((Compare SIB))
+ CompareSIB -- "> Compare date against 14 July limit" --> TranslateSIB1((Translate SIB))
+ TranslateSIB1 -- "14 July translation
+dialled # to destination
+network #" --> HandleTransit
+ CompareSIB -- "==" --> TranslateSIB2((Translate SIB))
+ TranslateSIB2 -- "Non-14 July translation
+dialled # to destination
+network #" --> HandleTransit
+ CompareSIB -- "<" --> HandleTransit
+ HandleTransit --> End([Handle as transit])
+ End --- T1180920-96
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for Date-dependent call routing. The process starts with 'Prepared to complete' leading to 'Compare SIB'. From 'Compare SIB', a decision is made: if the date is greater than the 14 July limit (>), it goes to 'Translate SIB' (14 July translation); if equal (==), it goes to 'Translate SIB' (Non-14 July translation); if less than (<), it goes to 'Handle as transit'. Both 'Translate SIB' blocks lead to 'Handle as transit', which is associated with T1180920-96.
+
+**Figure 4-11/Q.86.4 – Date-dependent call routing**
+
+The service support data for the translate SIB is the same as in 4.7.3.2. This terminating call treatment is in addition to the translation/logging for billing purposes at the initiating end for normal IFS.
+
+#### **4.7.3.4 Variable (follow-me) call routing**
+
+This is a service management feature and not part of call control. As such, it is beyond the scope of the stage 2 Recommendation.
+
+#### **4.7.3.5 Call completion on busy (traffic dependent) call routing**
+
+This terminating call treatment consists of the following three sub-options and is in addition to the translation/logging for billing purposes at the initiating end for normal IFS:
+
+- Diversion of calls to alternative destinations.
+- Queueing of calls.
+- Recorded announcements.
+
+##### 4.7.3.5.1 Diversion of calls to alternative destinations
+
+See Figure 4-12.
+
+
+
+Translate current destination # to forwarded-to #
+
+```
+graph TD; A[Translate SIB] --> B[Busy]; A --> C[Handle as transit];
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates a process flow for call diversion. A central circular process box labeled "Translate SIB" receives an input from above with the instruction "Translate current destination # to forwarded-to #". From this box, two output paths emerge: one leads to a state represented by an upward-pointing triangle labeled "Busy", and the other leads to a state represented by a downward-pointing triangle labeled "Handle as transit". The reference "T1180930-96" is positioned next to the "Handle as transit" state.
+
+Flowchart for 'Diversion on busy' showing a 'Translate SIB' process box with two outgoing paths: one to a 'Busy' state and another to 'Handle as transit' with reference T1180930-96.
+
+**Figure 4-12/Q.86.4 – Diversion on busy**
+
+The service support data for this service feature is shown in the following table:
+
+| Translate SIB | |
+|----------------------|------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Object name | Forwarding number translation list |
+| Translate filter | Destination number |
+| Translated attribute | Forwarding number |
+| CIDFP-info | Destination number |
+| CIDFP-translated | Forwarding number |
+
+###### 4.7.3.5.2 Queueing of calls/recorded announcements
+
+See Figure 4-13.
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant Caller
+ participant QUEUE_SIB as QUEUE SIB
+ participant UI_SIB as UI SIB
+
+ Caller->>QUEUE_SIB: Message to caller while in queue
+ QUEUE_SIB->>Caller: Resource available
+ QUEUE_SIB->>UI_SIB: Call abandon
+ QUEUE_SIB->>UI_SIB: Timer expiry
+ QUEUE_SIB->>UI_SIB: Queue full
+ UI_SIB-->>Caller: Message to caller that call cannot be completed because queue is full
+ UI_SIB-->>Caller: Message to caller that allowed time in queue has expired and call will be cleared
+ Caller->>QUEUE_SIB: Prepared to complete call
+ QUEUE_SIB->>Caller: Clear call
+ QUEUE_SIB->>UI_SIB: Continue with existing data
+
+```
+
+T1182410-96
+
+Sequence diagram for Queueing of calls/recorded announcements. The diagram shows the interaction between a caller, a QUEUE SIB, and a UI SIB. The caller sends a 'Message to caller while in queue' to the QUEUE SIB. The QUEUE SIB sends 'Resource available' to the caller, 'Call abandon' to the UI SIB, 'Timer expiry' to the UI SIB, and 'Queue full' to the UI SIB. The UI SIB sends 'Message to caller that call cannot be completed because queue is full' to the caller. The UI SIB also sends 'Message to caller that allowed time in queue has expired and call will be cleared' to the caller. The caller then sends 'Prepared to complete call' to the QUEUE SIB. The QUEUE SIB sends 'Clear call' to the caller and 'Continue with existing data' to the UI SIB. The diagram is labeled T1182410-96.
+
+**Figure 4-13/Q.86.4 – Queueing of calls/recorded announcements**
+
+The service support data for this service feature is shown in the following tables:
+
+| Queue SIB | |
+|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Max active | Maximum number of simultaneous calls supported at the IFS subscriber |
+| Max number | Maximum number of calls allowed in the queue |
+| Max time | Maximum time a call is allowed to remain in a queue |
+| Announcement ID | Pointer to "an attendant will be with you shortly" message |
+| Repetition requested | Customer specified |
+| Repetition interval | Customer specified |
+| Maximum repetitions repeated | Customer specified |
+| CIDFP-call_party | Caller |
+
+| User interaction SIB | |
+|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
+| Service support data | Values |
+| Announcement ID | Pointer to "queue full" or "timer expiry" message |
+| Repetition requested | No |
+| Collect information/type | Null (i.e. no collection of user input) |
+| CIDFP-call_party | Caller |
+
+### 4.7.4 Additional customer service statistics/real-time information
+
+As a national option, the network should provide by suitable means, to the extent possible, the called and calling number, from which the customer can deduce the origin of the call and the charging related to the call.
+
+### 4.8 Information flows
+
+International freephone service and its optional customer features are characterized in terms of SIBs. The information flows for these SIBs are defined in Recommendation Q.1214 as shown in the following table.
+
+| SIB information flows | Q.1214 subclause |
+|-----------------------|------------------|
+| Translate | 5.2.11.2 |
+| Log call information | 5.2.6.2 |
+| User interaction | 5.2.12.2 |
+| Screen | 5.2.8.2 |
+| Compare | 5.2.3.2 |
+| Queue | 5.2.7.2 |
+
+NOTE – No new information flows are required between the CCAF $\leftrightarrow$ CCF ( $r_1$ and $r_3$ ) or CCF $\leftrightarrow$ CCF ( $r_2$ ).
+
+### 4.9 SDL diagrams for functional entities
+
+International freephone service and its optional customer features are characterized in terms of SIBs. The SDL diagrams for these SIBs are defined in Recommendation Q.1214 as shown in the following table.
+
+| SIB SDLs | Q.1214 subclause |
+|----------------------|------------------|
+| Translate | 5.2.11.3 |
+| Log call information | 5.2.6.3 |
+| User interaction | 5.2.12.3 |
+| Screen | 5.2.8.3 |
+| Compare | 5.2.3.3 |
+| Queue | 5.2.7.3 |
+
+### 4.10 Functional entity actions
+
+International freephone service and its optional customer features are characterized in terms of SIBs. The functional entity actions for these SIBs are defined in Recommendation Q.1214 as shown in the following table.
+
+| SIB functional entity actions | Q.1214 subclause |
+|--------------------------------------|-------------------------|
+| Translate | 5.2.11.4 |
+| Log call information | 5.2.6.4 |
+| User interaction | 5.2.12.4 |
+| Screen | 5.2.8.4 |
+| Compare | 5.2.3.4 |
+| Queue | 5.2.7.4 |
+
+### **4.11 Allocation of functional entities to physical locations**
+
+International freephone service and its optional customer features are characterized in terms of SIBs and the IN functional model. The allocation options for IN functional entities to IN generic physical entities are defined in Recommendation Q.1215. Such allocation is shown in Figure 1/Q.1215. These options include the collapsing of various combinations of FEs into single PEs, if desired.
+
+The allocation options of SSF FEs to specific network physical entities is shown in the following table:
+
+| | FE1 | FE5 |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------|
+| Scenario 1 | Originating LE | Destination LE (Note) |
+| Scenario 2 | Originating TR | Destination LE (Note) |
+| Scenario 3 | Originating international gateway | Destination LE (Note) |
+| Scenario 4 | Originating LE | Destination PNx |
+| Scenario 5 | Originating TR | Destination PNx |
+| Scenario 6 | Originating international gateway | Destination PNx |
+| NOTE – The called user's TE shall be directly attached to the destination LE in these scenarios. | | |
+
+## ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communication |
+| Series Z | Programming languages |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.930-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.930-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..39e0a065612701559626ee703a374b0ed4a4c7f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.930-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+# ITU-T
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+## Q.930
+
+(03/93)
+
+# **DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 NETWORK LAYER** ---
+
+# **DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN USER-NETWORK INTERFACE LAYER 3 – GENERAL ASPECTS**
+
+## **ITU-T Recommendation Q.930**
+
+(Previously “CCITT Recommendation”)
+
+---
+
+# FOREWORD
+
+The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.930 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993).
+
+## --- NOTES
+
+1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector.
+
+In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure.
+
+2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+# CONTENTS
+
+*Page*
+
+| | | |
+|---|---------------------------------------------------------|---|
+| 1 | General ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | Structure of layer 3 Recommendations ..... | 2 |
+| 3 | Interface between layer 3 and the adjacent layers ..... | 2 |
+
+
+
+# **DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN USER-NETWORK INTERFACE LAYER 3 – GENERAL ASPECTS**
+
+*(Málaga-Torremolinos, 1984; modified at Helsinki, 1993)*
+
+## **1 General**
+
+### **1.1 Introduction**
+
+This Recommendation describes in general terms the D-channel layer 3 functions and protocol employed across an ISDN user-network interface. Details are provided in Recommendations in the Q.930-Series and in the Q.950-Series.
+
+The term “layer 3” is a general term used in these Recommendations to refer to the procedures described in Recommendation Q.931 [1] and in Recommendation Q.932 [2]. The term “layer 3” does not correspond to layer 3 of the OSI protocol reference model or to layer 3 of the control plane of the ISDN protocol reference model.
+
+The layer 3 protocol provides the means to establish, maintain and terminate network connections across an ISDN between communicating application entities. In addition, it provides generic procedures which may be used for the invocation and operation of supplementary services. The detailed description of the layer 3 protocol in Recommendation Q.931, Recommendation Q.932 and Recommendation Q.933 [3] make use of the definition and terminology concepts of the ISDN protocol reference model given in Recommendation I.320 [4].
+
+Procedures for basic call, to support a range of bearer services and teleservices are described. Recommendation Q.931 contains procedures for circuit-mode and packet-mode bearer capabilities. Recommendation Q.933 contains procedures for frame-mode bearer capabilities. Recommendation Q.939 [5] contains a detailed description of the coding of the compatibility information elements required to identify the various bearer services and teleservices.
+
+Recommendation Q.932 contains a number of generic protocols for the provision of supplementary services.
+
+The application of the functional protocol of Recommendation Q.932 to the detailed operation of each individual supplementary service will be the subject for the Recommendations in the Q.950-Series.
+
+### **1.2 Connection control by the user of an ISDN requires:**
+
+- a) application of layer 3 protocol for control of circuit-switched connections, packet-switched and/or frame-mode connections, in combination with;
+- b) application of an appropriate data link layer service (supported by an appropriate physical layer service).
+
+Layer 3 provides to the user the functions associated with the establishment and operation of a network connection. Layer 3 makes invisible to the user how it utilizes underlying resources such as data link connections to provide a network connection.
+
+### **1.3 Services provided by the data link layer**
+
+Layer 3 utilizes functions and services provided by the data link as defined in Recommendations Q.920 [6] and Q.921 [7]. These services are summarized below:
+
+- a) establishment of data link connections;
+- b) error-protected transmission of data;
+- c) re-establishment of data link connection (indicating loss of information).
+
+### 1.4 Symmetry of the layer 3 protocol
+
+It is intended that the layer 3 protocol is fully symmetrical to enable direct user-to-user communication.
+
+In order to achieve this objective, several options are incorporated in Recommendation Q.931. They are described in Annex D/Q.931.
+
+## 2 Structure of layer 3 Recommendations
+
+The following is the structure of the layer 3 Recommendations:
+
+Q.930 – ISDN user-network interface layer 3 – General aspects
+
+Q.931 – ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call control
+
+Q.932 – Generic procedures for the control of ISDN supplementary services
+
+Q.933 – Specification for frame-mode basic call control
+
+Q.939 – Typical DSS 1 service indicator codings for ISDN telecommunications services
+
+Q.950 – Supplementary service protocols – Structure and general principles
+
+Further supplementary service Recommendations are described in Recommendation Q.950 [8].
+
+## 3 Interface between layer 3 and the adjacent layers
+
+### 3.1 Interface between layer 3 and data link layer
+
+Overview of the interface between ISDN user-network interface layer 3 and the data link layer from the view point of the data link layer is given in 2/Q.920. Primitives and primitive procedures for this interface are specified in 4/Q.921.
+
+### 3.2 Interface to call control
+
+Both basic call and supplementary service protocols interface to call control. A general view of this structure is given in Figure 1.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the modelling of basic and supplementary services in two symmetrical architectures: Terminal Call Processing and Exchange Call Processing. Each architecture is represented by a vertical stack of components. At the top is an oval labeled 'Terminal Call Processing' (left) or 'Exchange Call Processing' (right). Below this oval are two rectangular boxes: 'Basic Service Protocol (Q.931)' and 'Supp. Svc. Protocol (Facility)'. These two boxes are connected to a horizontal bar labeled 'Q.931 Messages'. Below the 'Q.931 Messages' bar is a rectangular box labeled 'LAPD'. At the bottom is a rectangular box labeled 'I.430/I.431'. A horizontal line at the very bottom connects the 'I.430/I.431' boxes of both architectures, indicating a shared interface or connection.
+
+Figure 1/Q.930: Modelling of basic and supplementary services. The diagram shows two symmetrical architectures for Terminal and Exchange Call Processing. Each architecture consists of a top-level oval (Terminal/Exchange Call Processing) connected to two parallel boxes (Basic Service Protocol (Q.931) and Supp. Svc. Protocol (Facility)). These boxes connect to a horizontal bar (Q.931 Messages), which then connects to a vertical stack of two boxes (LAPD and I.430/I.431). A horizontal line at the bottom connects the I.430/I.431 boxes of both architectures.
+
+T1143260-92/d01
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.930
+
+Modelling of basic and supplementary services
+
+### 3.3 Abbreviations used in Recommendations Q.930(I.450) and Q.931(I.451)
+
+See list at the end of Recommendation Q.931.
+
+## References
+
+- [1] CCITT Recommendation *ISDN user-network interface layer 3 specification for basic call control*, Rec. Q.931(I.451).
+- [2] CCITT Recommendation *Generic procedures for the control of ISDN supplementary services*, Rec. Q.932(I.452).
+- [3] CCITT Recommendation *Digital subscriber Signalling System No. 1 (DSS 1) – Signalling specification for frame mode basic call control*, Rec. Q.933.
+- [4] CCITT Recommendation *ISDN protocol reference model*, Rec. I.320.
+- [5] CCITT Recommendation *Typical DSS 1 service indicator codings for ISDN telecommunications services*, Rec. Q.939.
+- [6] CCITT Recommendation *ISDN user-network interface data link layer – General aspects*, Rec. Q.920(I.440).
+- [7] CCITT Recommendation *ISDN user-network interface data link layer specification*, Rec. Q.921(I.441).
+- [8] CCITT Recommendation *Supplementary services protocols – Structure and general principles*, Rec. Q.950.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.941-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.941-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d25d862104396c112202f4084bd9790bf0b4bbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.941-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.941**
+
+(03/93)
+
+**DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING
+SYSTEM No. 1 (DSS 1)**
+
+---
+
+**DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING
+SYSTEM No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN USER-
+NETWORK INTERFACE PROTOCOL
+PROFILE FOR MANAGEMENT**
+
+**ITU-T Recommendation Q.941**
+
+(Previously “CCITT Recommendation”)
+
+---
+
+# FOREWORD
+
+The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.941 was revised by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993).
+
+# --- NOTES
+
+1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector.
+
+In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure.
+
+2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+# CONTENTS
+
+| | Page |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 1 General ..... | 1 |
+| 1.1 Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 1.2 Abbreviations and symbols..... | 2 |
+| 1.3 Terms ..... | 2 |
+| 2 ISDN user-network management profile: overview..... | 2 |
+| 3 Physical layer profile..... | 2 |
+| 3.1 Basic rate physical layer ..... | 2 |
+| 3.2 Primary rate physical layer ..... | 2 |
+| 4 Data link layer profile ..... | 3 |
+| 5 Network layer profile ..... | 3 |
+| 5.1 Use of the extended facility information element..... | 4 |
+| 5.2 Call independent management procedures ..... | 4 |
+| 5.3 Call associated management procedures..... | 4 |
+| 6 Convergence function ..... | 4 |
+| 6.1 Mapping..... | 5 |
+| 7 Application layer ..... | 5 |
+| 7.1 Association control ..... | 6 |
+| 7.2 Remote operations ..... | 6 |
+| 7.3 Common management information service ..... | 7 |
+| 7.4 System management application service element (SMASE)..... | 7 |
+| 7.5 Syntax and encoding..... | 7 |
+| 8 Conformance ..... | 7 |
+| Annex A – Example of APDU mapping to Q.931/Q.932 messages ..... | 8 |
+| References ..... | 8 |
+
+
+
+# **DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 (DSS 1) – ISDN USER-NETWORK INTERFACE PROTOCOL PROFILE FOR MANAGEMENT**
+
+*(Melbourne, 1988; modified at Helsinki, 1993)*
+
+# **1 General**
+
+This Recommendation is one of a series of Recommendations describing the model, protocol profile and the communications capabilities in support of management and maintenance functions to be provided at the ISDN user-network interface.
+
+This Recommendation describes the protocol profile employed in providing management information transfer capabilities at the ISDN user-network interface. The overall management architecture, communications paths and service requirements are specified in Recommendation Q.940 [1]. These protocols can be used on the D-channel of both the basic and primary rate interface structures and across both reference points S and T, and are based on the DSS 1 messages. Because these messages are transferred between a network node and the directly connected users, these protocols only have local significance at the user-network interface. If management information transfer is end-to-end between a user and a remote OS, mapping in the network node has to be provided.
+
+Other Recommendations in this series specify the procedures and protocol associated with specific management functions that are provided at the ISDN user-network interface.
+
+The protocols and procedures described in these Recommendations provide the means to support management functions at the ISDN user-network interface. In particular, these management functions “provided by the ISDN user-network interface” should “enable the network node or network user” to support the activities of the Telecommunications Management Network (TMN) and support specific requirements such as those expressed in the I.600-Series [2] Recommendations (Subscriber access and installation maintenance). These protocols make the local control of these management functions possible, e.g. the control of loopbacks and diagnostic tests, the initiation and termination of event reports, etc.
+
+NOTE – The means by which file transfer capability is to be provided on the ISDN primary rate access is for further study.
+
+## **1.1 Scope**
+
+This Recommendation specifies the application protocol and the use of the layer 1-3 protocols at the ISDN user-network interface in providing management capabilities. The protocols defined in this Recommendation are suitable for management interactions involving transaction type information exchanges.
+
+NOTE – The means of providing file transfer capabilities at the local access is for further study.
+
+Specifically, this Recommendation defines the following:
+
+- a) the layer services for layers 1-3 and the application layer;
+- b) the protocols for layers 1-3 and the application layer;
+- c) the convergence function required to allow the application layer to interface directly with layer 3; and
+- d) the conformance requirements to be met by a system claiming to implement the management protocol profile for the ISDN user-network interface.
+
+This Recommendation does not:
+
+- a) define the structure or meaning of the management information that is transmitted by means of these protocols;
+- b) specify the manner in which management is accomplished as a result of the protocol exchanges;
+
+- c) define the nature of any interactions which result in the use of the application layer protocol; and
+- d) define the nature of any implementation intended to provide the ISDN management function.
+
+## **1.2 Abbreviations and symbols**
+
+### **1.2.1 Abbreviations**
+
+| | |
+|-------|-----------------------------------------------|
+| ACSE | Association Control Service Element |
+| ASN.1 | Abstract Syntax Notation One |
+| CMISE | Common Management Information Service Element |
+| CMIP | Common Management Information Protocol |
+| ROSE | Remote Operation Service Element |
+| SMASE | System Management Application Service Element |
+
+## **1.3 Terms**
+
+To be provided.
+
+# **2 ISDN user-network management profile: overview**
+
+The ISDN user-network management profile is based on CCITT ISDN Recommendations for the D-channel layers 1-3 protocols and on ISO standards and CCITT Recommendations for the management application layer. To allow the management application layer to access the network layer interface a convergence function has been defined. The architecture of the resulting profile is shown in Figure 1. The ISDN user-network interface management protocols make use of the D-channel.
+
+# **3 Physical layer profile**
+
+The ISDN user-network management protocol utilizes the D-channel of either the primary or basic rate interface.
+
+## **3.1 Basic rate physical layer**
+
+Management information is transmitted on the 16 kbit D-channel of the basic rate interface.
+
+The service and protocol definition for the physical layer shall apply as defined in Recommendation I.430 [3].
+
+The default values of all parameters shall be the values specified in Recommendation I.430.
+
+The interface connector shall comply with ISO 8877 [4].
+
+## **3.2 Primary rate physical layer**
+
+Management information is transmitted on the 64 kbit D-channel of the primary rate interface.
+
+The service and protocol definition for the physical layer shall apply as defined in Recommendation I.431.
+
+The default values of all parameters shall be the values specified in Recommendation I.431 [5].
+
+The interface connector and interface wiring shall comply with 6/I.431 and 7/I.431, respectively.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ subgraph Management_Profile [Management Profile]
+ SMASE[SMASE]
+ ACSE[ACSE]
+ CMISE[CMISE]
+ ROSE[ROSE]
+ SMASE --- ACSE
+ SMASE --- CMISE
+ CMISE --- ROSE
+ end
+
+ subgraph Network_Layers [Network Layers]
+ CF[Convergence function]
+ L3[Layer 3
+Q.931 and Q.932]
+ L2[Layer 2
+Q.921]
+ L1[Layer 1
+I.430 or I.431]
+ end
+
+ Management_Profile --- CF
+ CF --- L3
+ L3 --- L2
+ L2 --- L1
+
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the ISDN user-network interface management profile. It is structured into two main sections: a management profile at the top and network layers below. The management profile includes SMASE at the top, which connects to ACSE and CMISE. CMISE further connects to ROSE. Below this, the network layers are stacked: a Convergence function layer, followed by Layer 3 (Q.931 and Q.932), Layer 2 (Q.921), and Layer 1 (I.430 or I.431).
+
+Diagram of the ISDN user-network interface management profile showing protocol layers and functions.
+
+T1155600-93/d01
+
+FIGURE 1/Q.941
+ISDN user-network interface management profile
+
+# 4 Data link layer profile
+
+Local management information shall be transmitted on the D-channel and shall use the same SAPI as for call control procedures, i.e. SAPI 0.
+
+The data link layer service and protocol definition shall apply as defined in Recommendation Q.921.
+
+Default values for all parameters shall be as specified in 5.9/Q.921 [6].
+
+# 5 Network layer profile
+
+The network layer service and protocol definition shall be in accordance with Recommendations Q.931 [7] and Q.932 [8].
+
+Default values for layer 3 parameters shall apply as defined in Table 9/Q.931.
+
+In addition to Q.931 messages, to support the management profile the ISDN access shall also support the following Q.932 messages:
+
+- FACILITY,
+- REGISTER.
+
+In addition the ISDN access shall also support the extended facility information element specified in Recommendation Q.932, in these Q.931 and Q.932 messages as specified in those Recommendations.
+
+The extended facility information element may carry information with a length longer than 255 octets in its PDU field. Management services which utilize layer 3 messages with a length exceeding N201 (defined in Recommendation Q.921) shall support Annex H/Q.931, Message segmentation procedures. The default maximum number of message segments supported by Annex H/Q.931 is eight. Thus the maximum length of the application protocol data unit (APDU) which may be carried by an extended facility information element is approximately 2000 octets1).
+
+## 5.1 Use of the extended facility information element
+
+The extended facility information element is used to convey application protocol data units (APDUs). To indicate that a management service has been invoked the protocol profile is used with the following encoding:
+
+### Protocol profile
+
+| Bits | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
+|------|---|---|---|---|---|-------------------|
+| | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | for CMIP Protocol |
+| | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | for ACSE Protocol |
+
+## 5.2 Call independent management procedures
+
+For management procedures invoked independent of an active call, once a data link connection has been established, the user or the network start the establishment of a signalling connection (and management association) by transferring a REGISTER message across the user-network interface. The signalling connection (and management association) is identified by the call reference allocated with the REGISTER message. The REGISTER message shall contain an extended facility information element which will carry the information for requesting to establish the management association.
+
+Management service requests are conveyed in the extended facility information elements in the FACILITY messages.
+
+The signalling connection (and management association) is released by means of a RELEASE COMPLETE message. The RELEASE COMPLETE message shall contain an extended facility information element which will carry the information for orderly release of the management association.
+
+If the protocol profile in the extended facility information element indicates “CMIP Protocol” or “ACSE Protocol” then the information in the extended facility information element is passed to the management entity for further processing.
+
+NOTE – The term “management entity” as used here refers to the convergence function and protocol entities that process management information.
+
+If an extended facility information element contains more than one PDU, these PDUs are treated as separate PDUs and no assumption can be made about the order in which they will be processed.
+
+## 5.3 Call associated management procedures
+
+When management information is exchanged in association with an existing call the management information may be carried in any Q.931 or Q.932 message that contains an extended facility information element.
+
+NOTE – Further study is required to determine the actions to be taken when either the call control process attempts to release the connection or when the management application process attempts to release the connection (e.g. due to attempted security violations or errors in the extended facility information element).
+
+# 6 Convergence function
+
+The convergence function is required to support the mapping service.
+
+1) The exact length is determined by $N201 \times 8$ – layer 3 headers.
+
+## **6.1 Mapping**
+
+The mapping service is required to map the P-DATA, P-CONNECT, P-RELEASE and P-U-ABORT services onto appropriate network services and Q.931/Q.932 messages.
+
+### **6.1.1 Mapping of the P-DATA service**
+
+P-DATA-requests issued by the management entity shall have their user data mapped into the PDU field of the extended facility information element of a message. The protocol profile shall be set to the value indicating CMIP Protocol.
+
+PDU received by the convergence function shall be mapped into the user data field of a P-DATA-indication.
+
+### **6.1.2 Mapping of the P-CONNECT service**
+
+P-CONNECT-requests issued by the management entity shall be mapped onto the REGISTER message. Only the user data parameter of the P-CONNECT-request is required. If any other parameters are present, they shall be ignored. For information on when the P-CONNECT-request is used see 7.1.3.
+
+The first response received shall be mapped onto the P-CONNECT-confirmation. Only the user data parameter of the P-CONNECT-confirmation is required. If any other parameters are present, they shall be ignored. A RELEASE COMPLETE message shall result in a negative indication and contain a negative AARE APDU in its user data field. A FACILITY message shall result in a positive confirmation containing a positive AARE APDU in its user data field.
+
+The protocol profile in the extended facility information element shall be set to the value indicating ACSE Protocol.
+
+### **6.1.3 Mapping of the P-RELEASE service**
+
+P-RELEASE-requests issued by the management entity shall be mapped onto a FACILITY message. For information on when the P-RELEASE-request is used see 7.1.3.
+
+A RELEASE COMPLETE message received by the convergence function shall be mapped onto a P-RELEASE-confirmation with a RLRE APDU in the user data.
+
+The protocol profile in the extended facility information element shall be set to the value indicating ACSE Protocol.
+
+### **6.1.4 Mapping of the P-U-ABORT service**
+
+P-U-ABORT-requests issued by the management entity shall be mapped onto a RELEASE COMPLETE message. A RELEASE COMPLETE message received by the convergence function shall be mapped onto a P-U-ABORT-indication with an ABRT APDU in the user data.
+
+The protocol profile in the extended facility information element shall be set to the value indicating ACSE Protocol.
+
+# **7 Application layer**
+
+The application layer provides transaction type management across the ISDN user-network interface. To provide this capability the following application service elements are used:
+
+ACSE Association Control Service Element
+
+CMISE Common Management Information Service Element
+
+ROSE Remote Operation Service Element
+
+## **7.1 Association control**
+
+Version 1 of the ACSE protocol shall be used. For ISDN local management, the Q.931 call reference value is used to identify the Q.931 connection and the management association, if any. Since the management association is identified, the following optional parameters in AARQ and AARE shall not be used: calling and called AP-titles, calling and called AP-invocations, calling and called AE-qualifiers, and calling and called AE-invocations: and responding AP-title, responding AP-invocation, responding AE-qualifier, and responding AE-invocation.
+
+### **7.1.1 Association control service**
+
+Association control services used shall comply with Recommendation X.217 [9]. All the A-ASSOCIATE parameters in Table 2/X.217 with a value of P with respect to request, indication, response and confirmation columns are not required in A-ASSOCIATE service primitives. If present, they shall be ignored.
+
+### **7.1.2 Association control service protocol**
+
+The association control protocol shall comply with Recommendation X.227 [10].
+
+### **7.1.3 Use of Associations**
+
+To establish a new non-call associated management association, the A-ASSOCIATE-request is used. The request uses the P-CONNECT-request in the presentation layer. The association is established when the positive A-ASSOCIATE-confirmation is received. The confirmation uses the P-CONNECT-confirmation in the presentation layer.
+
+To exchange call associated management information on an existing connection, the A-ASSOCIATE-request shall not be used. Instead the appropriate CMISE operation shall be invoked. The SMISE services use the P-DATA in the presentation layer.
+
+When management information is exchanged in conjunction with Q.931 call establishment, the A-ASSOCIATE-request shall not be used. Instead the appropriate operation shall be conveyed in an extended facility information element contained in a SETUP message.
+
+To release a management association, the A-RELEASE-request is used if the association was established via an exchange of the A-ASSOCIATE-request and A-ASSOCIATE-confirmation. The A-RELEASE-request makes use of the P-RELEASE-request. The management association is orderly released when a positive A-RELEASE-confirmation is received. For a call associated management association, the management association will be cleared when the call reference is released.
+
+## **7.2 Remote operations**
+
+### **7.2.1 Remote operations service**
+
+The remote operations service element shall comply with Recommendation X.219 [11] with the exception that the BIND and UNBIND operations are not used in this profile. Operation Classes 2 and 5 shall be supported. Alternatively, Operation Class 1 may be supported instead of Operation Class 2.
+
+### **7.2.2 Remote operations protocol**
+
+The remote operations protocol shall comply with Recommendation X.229 [12]. In addition support of the correct origination and reception of the linked-id protocol element is required.
+
+ROSE association class 3 shall be supported.
+
+## **7.3 Common management information service**
+
+### **7.3.1 Common management service**
+
+For this interface a simplified subset of the CMIP protocol is used. The availability of the CMIP functional units cannot be negotiated when this profile is used and shall be statically supported as follows:
+
+- 1) the support of multiple object selection and filter functional units by the network for the requests from the user is mandatory for both the basic and primary rate interfaces;
+- 2) the support of multiple object selection and filter functional units by the user for the requests from the network is mandatory for the primary rate interface and optional for the basic rate interface;
+- 3) the support of a multiple reply functional unit by both the network and the user for both the basic and primary rate interfaces is mandatory; and
+- 4) the cancel-get and extended service functional units shall not be used for this profile.
+
+The common management information service shall comply with Recommendation X.710 [13].
+
+### **7.3.2 Common management protocol**
+
+The common management information protocol shall comply with Recommendation X.711 [14]. Version 2 of CMIP shall be used.
+
+### **7.3.3 Object naming**
+
+The Local Distinguished Name (LDN) shall be used.
+
+## **7.4 System management application service element (SMASE)**
+
+The SMASE provides services in support of specific management functions. The details are for further study.
+
+## **7.5 Syntax and encoding**
+
+The application layer protocol data units is described by using ASN.1 as defined in Recommendation X.208 [15] and is encoded in accordance with the Basic Encoding Rules for ASN.1 as defined in Recommendation X.209 [16].
+
+The procedures for encoding/decoding the EXTERNAL type shall comply with 34.5/X.208. For encoding/decoding the two ASN.1 types: CMIPUserInfo and CMIPAbortInfo, the following object identifier value is assigned. An ASN.1 object identifier value
+
+**{ ccitt(0) recommendation(0) q(17) q941(941) abstractSyntax(0) }**
+
+is assigned in this Recommendation which is the combination of
+
+**{ joint-iso-ccittms(9)cmip(1)abstractSyntax(4) }**
+
+as the abstract syntax and the Basic Encoding Rules as the transfer syntax.
+
+The maximum value of an ASN.1 basic encoding tag shall be limited to 16,383.
+
+# **8 Conformance**
+
+For further study.
+
+# Annex A
+
+## Example of APDU mapping to Q.931/Q.932 messages
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation)
+
+An example is given below to illustrate the mapping of the APDUs to the Q.931/Q.932 messages in a time sequence for a call independent management association.
+
+
+
+(AARQ) REGISTER
+
+FACILITY (AARE)
+
+(CMIP/ROSE) FACILITY
+
+FACILITY (CMIP/ROSE)
+
+(CMIP/ROSE) FACILITY
+
+(RLRQ) FACILITY
+
+RELEASE COMPLETE (RLRE)
+
+T1155610-93/d02
+
+Sequence diagram showing the mapping of APDUs to Q.931/Q.932 messages. On the left, four right-pointing arrows represent outgoing APDUs: (AARQ) REGISTER, (CMIP/ROSE) FACILITY, (CMIP/ROSE) FACILITY, and (RLRQ) FACILITY. On the right, four left-pointing arrows represent incoming Q.931/Q.932 messages: FACILITY (AARE), FACILITY (CMIP/ROSE), and RELEASE COMPLETE (RLRE). The first two outgoing APDUs map to the first two incoming messages. The third outgoing APDU maps to the third incoming message. The fourth outgoing APDU maps to the fourth incoming message. The text 'T1155610-93/d02' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+# References
+
+- [1] CCITT Recommendation Q.940 *ISDN User-Network Interface Protocol for Management – General Aspects*.
+- [2] CCITT Recommendations I.600 Series *ISDN – Inter network Interfaces and Maintenance Principles*.
+- [3] CCITT Recommendation I.430 *Basic User-Network Interface – Layer 1 Specification*.
+- [4] ISO 8877 Interface Connector and Contact Assignments for ISDN Basic Interface Located at Reference Points S and T.
+- [5] CCITT Recommendation I.431 *Primary Rate User-Network Interface – Layer 1 Specification*.
+- [6] CCITT Recommendation Q.921 *ISDN User-Network Interface-Data Link Layer Specification*.
+- [7] CCITT Recommendation Q.931 *ISDN User-Network Interface Layer 3 Specification for Basic Call Control*.
+- [8] CCITT Recommendation Q.932 *Generic Procedures for the Control of ISDN Supplementary Services*.
+- [9] CCITT Recommendation X.217 *Open Systems Interconnection – Service Definition for Association Control Service Elements* (see also ISO 8649).
+- [10] CCITT Recommendation X.227 *Open Systems Interconnection – Protocol Specification for Association Control Service Element* (see also ISO 8650).
+
+- [11] CCITT Recommendation X.219 *Remote Operations: Model, Notation, and Service Definition*.
+- [12] CCITT Recommendation X.229 *Remote Operations: Protocol Specification*.
+- [13] CCITT Recommendation X.710 *Common Management Information Service Definition* (see also ISO 9595).
+- [14] CCITT Recommendation X.711 *Common Management Information Protocol [Part 1:] Specification* (see also ISO 9596-1).
+- [15] CCITT Recommendation X.208 *Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)* (see also ISO 8824).
+- [16] CCITT Recommendation X.209 *Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)* (see also ISO 8825).
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7268078d896f5bfca565184f09b88647a1cd364b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0935f46b2119ed3ea372951a62df08ce7c6b9936db253d24760166e294d70c56
+size 82551
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/171115f072e42b379238ed0dd438e9d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/171115f072e42b379238ed0dd438e9d7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c977f588b33e514b3c6289f1959cdf879b98477
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/171115f072e42b379238ed0dd438e9d7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:443d11dc23c7613a2b3737e10657625f8adfba1bf5b287b638b5cce0513773b0
+size 52160
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a34da7d9efbdd7d852293445e38deb4065074027
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:038f53f616d222c8448aa9214e186460849d0166bfb0d657d5f34a29f23c3ce1
+size 8280
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf171b8f1b4fb7fdcca86ec8100fe3f427355b84
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:22538145812bbf698c657d9c6b4ea924fe82ee3f53ea6979962d1e73e9d7ab20
+size 77653
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..628fe88dd86f07c25e95f238d6daa62d362fef96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ab9a9811006dc47541714584c9b56a4628f86f87b961255a10c8a4cba8c7bd79
+size 76479
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e94691d736789d41d921391d7c51bedcd308855f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e1b8a14c0b7b63ee77c1afcd128ecd604dbc7eb3e28c895391f8b9c21c01f13c
+size 85003
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f672b216d9e0df1a992f076d02b4dd609f103366
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ad7e1c8ab64c25ae856a9f3e9328eff95c650826340256ee2dfc942ea1c63084
+size 41882
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e5553de6deec57863b97ec0654e84ab7b536bca6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:723f07bf1d4551f90decd002eec912eb24a118c70e1b5cf026b135263898126a
+size 72293
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44d4722486815e13b5c15b1bf4410dca8f9ee5b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.4-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f48f1511f565fdc5752458fd2ef635ea664ceae3c3eaac3a0cbfdf3898e8e657
+size 71032
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7268078d896f5bfca565184f09b88647a1cd364b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/08dce7ad4c512fdf0c0cde60415fade6_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0935f46b2119ed3ea372951a62df08ce7c6b9936db253d24760166e294d70c56
+size 82551
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/171115f072e42b379238ed0dd438e9d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/171115f072e42b379238ed0dd438e9d7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c977f588b33e514b3c6289f1959cdf879b98477
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/171115f072e42b379238ed0dd438e9d7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:443d11dc23c7613a2b3737e10657625f8adfba1bf5b287b638b5cce0513773b0
+size 52160
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a34da7d9efbdd7d852293445e38deb4065074027
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:038f53f616d222c8448aa9214e186460849d0166bfb0d657d5f34a29f23c3ce1
+size 8280
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf171b8f1b4fb7fdcca86ec8100fe3f427355b84
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/33ed1f9b27c7c21c797aa928b0f06851_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:22538145812bbf698c657d9c6b4ea924fe82ee3f53ea6979962d1e73e9d7ab20
+size 77653
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..628fe88dd86f07c25e95f238d6daa62d362fef96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/4801720824e4b5e2361a5564f91cfb70_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ab9a9811006dc47541714584c9b56a4628f86f87b961255a10c8a4cba8c7bd79
+size 76479
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e94691d736789d41d921391d7c51bedcd308855f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/692541e65db4dc852988ce77ebb60ce5_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e1b8a14c0b7b63ee77c1afcd128ecd604dbc7eb3e28c895391f8b9c21c01f13c
+size 85003
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2ce526420dd23be25b04660fcf26514ffffd1db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/7133ccf78043568ca62ecbcd43628a4a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:122ed946ac3b47f074d959a4b5de1d4cbcdc77e079c0be788761df3327864ebb
+size 41887
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b9909963daba5f66f751cb921466c1c80ed220cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fa6a037596081df4a16ee92d055fa86f01a1d94978a6f78aad7cf91152c3770b
+size 72315
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44d4722486815e13b5c15b1bf4410dca8f9ee5b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f48f1511f565fdc5752458fd2ef635ea664ceae3c3eaac3a0cbfdf3898e8e657
+size 71032
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..913794842215e1aad7eac0166505dadc5d6249a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.951.5-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,1712 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt symbol.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+# ITU-T
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+## Q.951
+
+(03/93)
+
+# **DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1 STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES USING DSS 1** ---
+
+## **STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR NUMBER IDENTIFICATION SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES USING DSS 1**
+
+**Clause 3 – Calling Line Identification Presentation (CLIP)**
+
+**Clause 4 – Calling Line Identification Restriction (CLIR)**
+
+**Clause 5 – Connected Line Identification Presentation (COLP)**
+
+**Clause 6 – Calling Line Identification Restriction (COLR)**
+
+## **ITU-T Recommendation Q.951**
+
+(Previously “CCITT Recommendation”)
+
+---
+
+# FOREWORD
+
+The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.951, clauses 3, 4, 5 and 6 was prepared by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993).
+
+# --- NOTES
+
+1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector.
+
+In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure.
+
+2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+# CONTENTS
+
+| | Page |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 3 Calling Line Identification Presentation (CLIP) ..... | 1 |
+| 3.1 Definition..... | 1 |
+| 3.2 Description..... | 1 |
+| 3.3 Operational requirements..... | 2 |
+| 3.4 Coding requirements..... | 2 |
+| 3.5 Signalling requirements..... | 2 |
+| 3.6 Interaction with other supplementary services ..... | 6 |
+| 3.7 Interaction with other networks ..... | 8 |
+| 3.8 Signalling flows ..... | 9 |
+| 3.9 Parameter values (timers) ..... | 9 |
+| 3.10 Dynamic description ..... | 9 |
+| Annex A (referred to in clause 3) – Two Calling party number information elements delivery option..... | 12 |
+| A.1 Scope ..... | 12 |
+| A.2 Additional procedures at the destination network side ..... | 12 |
+| A.3 Actions at the originating user ..... | 12 |
+| A.4 Additional actions at the originating local exchange ..... | 12 |
+| 4 Calling Line Identification Restriction (CLIR) ..... | 13 |
+| 4.1 Definition..... | 13 |
+| 4.2 Description..... | 13 |
+| 4.3 Operational requirements..... | 14 |
+| 4.4 Coding requirements..... | 14 |
+| 4.5 Signalling requirements..... | 14 |
+| 4.6 Interaction with other supplementary services ..... | 15 |
+| 4.7 Interaction with other networks ..... | 17 |
+| 4.8 Signalling flows ..... | 17 |
+| 4.9 Parameter values (timers) ..... | 17 |
+| 4.10 Dynamic description ..... | 17 |
+| 5 Connected Line Identification Presentation (COLP) ..... | 17 |
+| 5.1 Definition..... | 17 |
+| 5.2 Description..... | 17 |
+| 5.3 Operational requirements..... | 19 |
+| 5.4 Coding requirements..... | 19 |
+| 5.5 Signalling requirements..... | 21 |
+| 5.6 Interaction with other supplementary services ..... | 25 |
+| 5.7 Interaction with other networks ..... | 27 |
+| 5.8 Signalling flows ..... | 27 |
+| 5.9 Parameter values (timers) ..... | 27 |
+| 5.10 Dynamic description ..... | 27 |
+| 6 Connected Line Identification Restriction (COLR) ..... | 30 |
+| 6.1 Definition..... | 30 |
+| 6.2 Description..... | 30 |
+| 6.3 Operational requirements..... | 30 |
+| 6.4 Coding requirements..... | 31 |
+| 6.5 Signalling requirements..... | 31 |
+| 6.6 Interaction with other supplementary services ..... | 31 |
+| 6.7 Interaction with other networks ..... | 33 |
+| 6.8 Signalling flows ..... | 33 |
+| 6.9 Parameter values (timers) ..... | 33 |
+| 6.10 Dynamic description ..... | 33 |
+
+
+
+## STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR NUMBER IDENTIFICATION SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES USING DSS 1
+
+*(Helsinki, 1993)*
+
+# 3 Calling Line Identification Presentation (CLIP)
+
+## 3.1 Definition
+
+**calling line identification presentation (CLIP)** is a supplementary service offered to the called party which provides the calling party's ISDN number, possibly with sub-address information to the called party.
+
+## 3.2 Description
+
+#### 3.2.1 General description
+
+This supplementary service provides the ability of indicating the ISDN number of the calling line, with possible additional sub-address information (i.e. the Calling party sub-address information element), to the called party.
+
+The information provided to the called user consists of the ISDN number of the calling user in a form sufficient to allow the returning of the call (i.e. a subscriber number, a national number or an international number and optionally a sub-address if provided by the calling user).
+
+#### 3.2.2 Specific terminology
+
+For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following terms apply:
+
+A **served user** is the user of a particular ISDN number who has subscribed to the presentation of the calling line identification information in association with incoming calls. The served user is also known as the called user.
+
+A **calling user** is the user that initiated an incoming call at the served user. The calling user need not have subscribed to the Calling Line Identification Presentation supplementary service.
+
+An **ISDN number** is a number conforming to the numbering plan structure specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+An **address** is the number of the calling user (normally ISDN number), and a sub-address if provided by that user.
+
+An **international number** is an ISDN number structured as specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+A **national number; national significant number** is an ISDN number structured as specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+A **subscriber number** is an ISDN number structured as specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+A **default number** is an agreed number between the user at the calling side and the network provider.
+
+A **special arrangement** is an arrangement between a customer and a public network operator whereby customer supplied calling numbers are not screened by the public ISDN.
+
+CLIP Calling Line Identification Presentation
+
+CLIR Calling Line Identification Restriction
+
+#### **3.2.3 Qualification on the applicability to telecommunication services**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.3.
+
+#### **3.2.4 State definitions**
+
+No specific state definitions are required.
+
+## **3.3 Operational requirements**
+
+#### **3.3.1 Provision/withdrawal**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.3.
+
+NOTE – Annex A contains some additional procedures to support the two Calling party number information elements delivery option. This is a network option.
+
+#### **3.3.2 Requirements on the originating network side**
+
+All information pertaining to CLIP, shall be inserted in the SETUP message sent as part of the basic call procedures according to 5/Q.931.
+
+In the case where no information is provided by the calling user (as part of the basic call procedures) the network shall provide the default number associated with the user access (in which the call was generated) in the originating local exchange.
+
+When the calling party information is provided by the user, the network can only verify that the number is within the range allocated to that user.
+
+Where a special arrangement exists with the calling user, no screening of the calling number they supplied, shall be performed.
+
+#### **3.3.3 Requirements in the network**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **3.3.4 Requirements on the destination network side**
+
+See 3.5.2.3.
+
+### **3.4 Coding requirements**
+
+All information pertaining to CLIP is inserted in the SETUP message. 4.5.10/Q.931 and 4.5.11/Q.931 give the coding for the Calling party number and Calling party sub-address information elements which are required to support this service. The purpose of the Calling party number information element is to identify the origin of a call. The purpose of the Calling party sub-address information element is to identify a sub-address associated with the origin of the call.
+
+## **3.5 Signalling requirements**
+
+#### **3.5.1 Activation/deactivation/registration**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### **3.5.2 Invocation and operation**
+
+##### **3.5.2.1 Actions at the originating local exchange**
+
+###### **3.5.2.1.1 Normal operation**
+
+###### **3.5.2.1.1.1 Actions at the originating user**
+
+These procedures shall be provided as part of the basic service and the calling user need not have subscribed to the CLIP supplementary service.
+
+The numbering plan identification, to be indicated with the Calling party number information element, sent by the calling user, shall be either “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”.
+
+NOTE – Either coding may be used and the treatment of both by the network is identical.
+
+Where the calling number included by the calling user is complete the type of number to be indicated within the Calling party number information element, sent by the calling user, shall be one of the following:
+
+- “*Subscriber number*” – In the case where the complete subscriber number is sent.
+- “*National number*” – In the case where the complete national number is sent.
+- “*International number*” – In the case where the complete international number is sent.
+
+Where a partial calling number is included by the calling user (e.g., to indicate digits specific to the Direct-Dialling-In or the Multiple Subscriber Number supplementary services) the user shall set the type of number to be indicated within the Calling party number information element to “unknown”.
+
+###### **3.5.2.1.1.2 Actions at the originating local exchange if a special arrangement does not apply**
+
+These procedures shall be provided as part of the basic service and the calling user need not have subscribed to the CLIP supplementary service.
+
+When a SETUP message is received from the calling user, the network shall check to see if the Calling party number and Calling party sub-address information elements are included.
+
+If the Calling party number information element is received with a coding of the numbering plan identification field other than “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”, then the network shall discard the Calling party number information element and process the call as if that information was not received.
+
+The network shall set the value of the screening indicator based on the outcome of the screening of the calling number. The network shall disregard any value of the screening indicator, if received from the calling user.
+
+If the Calling party number information element is included, the network shall perform the screening function.
+
+NOTE 1 – Some networks may accept a full ISDN number in a Calling party number information element with the addition of a prefix or escape digits to the number digits field and the type of number field set to “unknown”.
+
+If the calling number received from the calling user is determined to be correct, the network shall set the screening indicator to “user-provided, verified and passed”.
+
+If the screening function fails the network shall note that the screening is failed and shall use a default number associated with the calling user. The network shall set the screening indicator to “network provided”.
+
+If the SETUP message does not contain the Calling party number information element the network shall use a default number associated with the calling user. The network shall set the screening indicator to “network provided”.
+
+In the case where the calling user provides only partial calling number information and the number is a valid digit sequence for the user access arrangement, the network shall complete the number as appropriate. The network shall set the screening indicator to “user-provided, verified and passed”.
+
+NOTE 2 – In some cases the network cannot guarantee that the completed number identifies an end user.
+
+The information determined by the procedures above, shall be forwarded to the destination local exchange, in association with the basic call request.
+
+The presentation indicator, as determined by the procedures of the CLIR supplementary service (see clause 4), shall be forwarded to the destination local exchange, in association with the basic call request.
+
+If the Calling party sub-address information element is available, it shall be passed transparently through the network.
+
+The actions at the originating local exchange when special arrangement does not apply are summarized in Table 3-1.
+
+TABLE 3-1/Q.951
+
+###### **Information provided by the calling user and by the network when special arrangement does not apply**
+
+| Information provided by the calling user | | Information provided by the network to the called user | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
+| Calling number received from the calling user (octet 4) | Type of number (octet 3) | Calling number forwarded (if CLIR is not activated) (octet 4) | Screening indicator forwarded (octet 3a) | Type of number forwarded (octet 3) |
+| No calling party number information element is provided by the calling user | | Default number stored at the network side sufficient for returning the call | Network provided | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| Valid part of the number not sufficient for returning the call (Note 2) | “Unknown” | Completion of the number (Note 3) | User-provided verified and passed (Note 4) | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| Correct complete calling party number (Note 5) | “Subscriber number” or “national number” or “international number” | Complete calling party number | User-provided verified and passed | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| Incorrect number (Note 6) | Any type of number | Default number stored at the network side sufficient for returning the call | Network-provided | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| NOTES
1 A national number shall be converted to an international number at some point in the public network path where the destination is in a different country.
2 This assumes that the user's equipment provides that part of the number pertaining to its own (private) domain. This may be multiple subscriber number digits provided by a terminal equipment or an extension line number provided by a private ISDN. The network shall interpret the number digits and check if it is a valid digit sequence according to the agreements existing between the calling user and the network provider.
3 Completion means that the remaining part of the ISDN number associated with the appropriate access is added to the user provided part of the number.
4 The term “verified” implies matching the user provided number or part of this number with the range(s) of numbers stored at the network side and it implies at least a valid format of user provided number information.
5 The term “correct” implies, from the network point of view, matching the subscriber number provided by the user with one of the numbers in the set of numbers stored at the network side.
6 The number provided by the user is discarded.
7 As a network option the type of number forwarded to the called user may be coded “unknown” when a prefix is added to the number, in which case the number is organized according to the network dialling plan, i.e. prefixes or the absence of a prefix, shall be used to distinguish international numbers and national numbers from each other.
| | | | |
+
+###### 3.5.2.1.1.3 Actions at the originating local exchange if a special arrangement applies
+
+These procedures shall be provided as part of the basic service and the calling user need not have subscribed to the CLIP supplementary service.
+
+When a SETUP message is received from the calling user, the network shall check to see if the Calling party number and Calling party sub-address information elements are included.
+
+If the Calling party number information element is received with a coding of the numbering plan identification field other than “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”, then the network shall discard the Calling party number information element and process the call as if that information element was not received.
+
+If the Calling party number information element is received with the coding of the type of number field other than “national number” or “international number”, then the network shall discard the Calling party number information element and process the call as if that information element was not received.
+
+The network shall disregard any value of the screening indicator, if received from the calling user.
+
+If the SETUP message does not contain the Calling party number information element the network shall use a default number associated with the calling user. The network shall set the screening indicator to “network provided”.
+
+If the Calling party number information element is included the network shall set the screening indicator to “user-provided, not screened”.
+
+NOTE – For the above condition, the procedures of basic call will provide for another calling number to be transported through the network. This other calling number will contain the default number, with an associated screening indicator set to “network provided”.
+
+The information determined by the procedures above, shall be forwarded to the destination local exchange, in association with the basic call request.
+
+The presentation indicator, as determined by the procedures of the CLIR supplementary service (see clause 4) shall be forwarded to the destination local exchange, in association with the basic call request.
+
+If the Calling party sub-address information element is available, it shall be passed transparently through the network.
+
+The actions at the originating local exchange when special arrangement applies are summarized in Table 3-2.
+
+TABLE 3-2/Q.951
+
+###### **Information provided by the calling user and by the network when special arrangement applies**
+
+| Information provided by the calling user | | Information provided by the network to the called user | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
+| Calling party number received from the calling user (octet 4) | Type of number (octet 3) | Calling party number forwarded (if CLIR is not activated) (octet 4) | Screening indicator forwarded (octet 3a) | Type of number forwarded (octet 3) |
+| No calling party number information element is provided by the calling user | | Default number stored at the network side sufficient for returning the call | Network provided | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 2) |
+| Any digit sequence conforming to E.164 | “National number” or “international number” | Number provided by the user (Note 1) | User-provided, not screened | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 2) |
+| NOTES
1 A national number shall be converted to an international number at some point in the public network path where the destination is in a different country.
2 As a network option the type of number forwarded to the called user may be coded “unknown” when a prefix is added to the number, in which case the number is organized according to the network dialling plan, i.e. prefixes or the absence of prefixes, shall be used to distinguish international numbers and national numbers from each other.
| | | | |
+
+###### 3.5.2.1.2 Exceptional procedures
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### **3.5.2.2 Actions at the transit exchange**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **3.5.2.3 Actions at the destination local exchange**
+
+###### **3.5.2.3.1 Normal operation**
+
+When the network sends a SETUP message to the called user and if the called user is provided with the CLIP supplementary service, the network shall check to see if the calling number is available.
+
+If the calling number is available and presentation is allowed according to the presentation indicator supplied together with the calling number, the network shall include the Calling party number information element in the SETUP message sent to the called user. If provided, the network shall also include the Calling party sub-address information element in the SETUP message. The presentation and screening indicators associated with the calling number, and the calling sub-address, received at the destination exchange, shall be passed transparently to the called user.
+
+The numbering plan identification field shall be coded either “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164)” or “unknown”.
+
+If presentation is not allowed according to the presentation indicator supplied together with the calling number, the network shall include the Calling party number information element in the SETUP message sent to the called user. The presentation indicator in the Calling party number information element shall indicate “presentation restricted”. The network shall encode the screening indicator, numbering plan identification and the type of number according to one of the following options:
+
+- i) The screening indicator shall indicate “network provided”. The type of number and numbering plan identification shall be set to “unknown”.
+- ii) The screening indicator, numbering plan identification and the type of number shall be as received at the destination network.
+
+The network shall not include digits field. The network shall not include the Calling party sub-address information element in the SETUP message.
+
+If neither the calling number nor an indication that presentation is restricted is available at the destination local exchange the network shall include the Calling party number information element in the SETUP message sent to the called user. The presentation indicator shall be set to “number not available due to interworking”, and the screening indicator shall be set to “network provided”, the type of number and the numbering plan identification shall be set to “unknown” and the number digits field shall not be included. The network shall not include the Calling party sub-address information element, if provided, in the SETUP message.
+
+If the called user is not provided with the CLIP supplementary service, then neither the Calling party number nor the Calling party sub-address information elements shall be included in the SETUP message sent to the called user.
+
+If presentation is restricted but as a national network option the called user has the “override” category (e.g., police or emergency service) marked in the destination local exchange, the network shall include the Calling party number information element, and Calling party sub-address information element if the sub-address was supplied by the calling party in the SETUP message. In this case, the presentation and screening indicators shall be passed transparently to the called user.
+
+NOTE – If the presentation indicator in the Calling party number information element received by the user is set to “number not available due to interworking” or “presentation restricted”, the remaining information in the Calling party number information element should be ignored by the user.
+
+###### **3.5.2.3.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### **3.6 Interaction with other supplementary services**
+
+#### **3.6.1 Call Waiting**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.2 Call Transfer**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.3 Connected Line Identification Presentation**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.4 Connected Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.5 Calling Line Identification Presentation**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.6 Calling Line Identification Restriction**
+
+The calling line identification will not be presented if the calling user has an arrangement to inhibit the presentation of his number(s) to the called party (calling user subscribes to the supplementary service “Calling Line Identification Restriction”). The only occasion when a user subscribing to CLIP can take precedence over CLIR is when the CLIP served user has an override category. This is a national option.
+
+#### **3.6.7 Closed User Group**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.8 Conference Calling**
+
+As specified in 1/Q.954.
+
+#### **3.6.9 Direct-Dialling-In**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.10 Call diversion (call forwarding) services**
+
+##### **3.6.10.1 Call Forwarding Busy**
+
+As specified in 2/Q.952.
+
+##### **3.6.10.2 Call Forwarding No Reply**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.952.
+
+##### **3.6.10.3 Call Forwarding Unconditional**
+
+As specified in 4/Q.952.
+
+##### **3.6.10.4 Call Deflection**
+
+As specified in 5/952.
+
+#### **3.6.11 Line Hunting**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.12 Three-Party Service**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.13 User-to-User Signalling**
+
+##### **3.6.13.1 Service 1**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **3.6.13.2 Service 2**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **3.6.13.3 Service 3**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.14 Multiple Subscriber Number**
+
+Upon call initiation, if the ISDN number indicated by the MSN user terminal is not subscribed to for the interface, or if no numbering information is indicated, a default number or a number unavailable indication is provided to the CLIP user.
+
+#### **3.6.15 Call Hold**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.16 Advice of charge**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.17 Sub-addressing**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.18 Terminal Portability**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.19 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.953.
+
+#### **3.6.20 Malicious Call Identification**
+
+As specified in clause 7.
+
+#### **3.6.21 Reverse Charging**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **3.6.22 Multilevel Precedence and Preemption**
+
+No interaction.
+
+### **3.7 Interaction with other networks**
+
+#### **3.7.1 Interaction with non-ISDNs**
+
+On calls incoming from some non-ISDNs, the calling number may be delivered to the destination ISDN without an indication of calling line identity restriction. In this case a number of options exist and the selection of the following is according to the network rules and regulations:
+
+- The network shall send the Calling party number information element according to 3.5.2.3.1, sixth paragraph, and shall include no Calling party sub-address information element.
+- The network shall send the Calling party number information element according to 3.5.2.3.1, fourth paragraph, and shall include no Calling party sub-address information element.
+- The network shall send the Calling party number information element according to 3.5.2.3.1, second paragraph, and shall include the Calling party sub-address information element if the calling sub-address is available.
+
+For some other non-ISDNs, no complete calling number may be available to the ISDN and therefore the full number of the calling user cannot be given to the called user who has been provided with the CLIP supplementary service. In this case the network shall send the Calling party number information element according to 3.5.2.3.1, sixth paragraph, and shall include no Calling party sub-address information element.
+
+On calls incoming from some non-ISDNs, the calling number may be delivered to the destination ISDN with an indication of Calling Line Identity Restriction. In this case the network shall send the Calling party number information element according to 3.5.2.3.1, second paragraph, and shall include the Calling party sub-address information element if the calling sub-address is available.
+
+As a network option the originating network may restrict any address information identifying the calling user from being forwarded to another network.
+
+#### **3.7.2 Procedures for interworking with private ISDNs**
+
+The procedures specified in 3.5.2 shall be used.
+
+NOTE – The provision of the special arrangement where an access is used by a private network is especially appropriate.
+
+### **3.8 Signalling flows**
+
+The signalling flows are not included as they are an integral part of the basic call control procedures.
+
+### **3.9 Parameter values (timers)**
+
+No specific timers are required.
+
+### **3.10 Dynamic description**
+
+See Figures 3-1 and 3-2.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Null 0]) --> Setup[SETUP]
+ Setup --> CPN{CPN IE provided by the calling user?}
+ CPN -- No --> SI11_1[Default number set SI = 11]
+ CPN -- Yes --> Special{Special arrangement?}
+ Special -- Yes --> SI00[Set SI = 00]
+ Special -- No --> Verification{Verification of the number?}
+ Verification -- OK --> SI01[Complete the number set SI = 01]
+ Verification -- Not OK --> SI11_2[Default number set SI = 11]
+ SI11_1 --> Merge(( ))
+ SI01 --> Merge
+ SI11_2 --> Merge
+ SI00 --> Merge
+ Merge --> CLIR[CLIR Service]
+ CLIR --> SetType[Set type of number and numbering plan]
+ SetType --> SetupInd[Setup indication]
+ SetupInd --> End([Call initiated 1])
+
+```
+
+T1158670-94/d01
+
+Flowchart for Originating network side dynamic description (FIGURE 3-1/Q.951). The process starts with a 'Null 0' terminal, followed by a 'SETUP' message. A decision diamond asks 'CPN IE provided by the calling user?'. If 'No', it goes to 'Default number set SI = 11'. If 'Yes', it goes to another decision diamond 'Special arrangement?'. If 'Yes' to 'Special arrangement?', it goes to 'Set SI = 00'. If 'No', it goes to a third decision diamond 'Verification of the number?'. If 'OK', it goes to 'Complete the number set SI = 01'. If 'Not OK', it goes to 'Default number set SI = 11'. All three paths (SI = 11, SI = 01, and SI = 00) merge at a junction, followed by 'CLIR Service', 'Set type of number and numbering plan', 'Setup indication', and finally 'Call initiated 1' terminal.
+
+## NOTES
+
+- 1 This procedure operates independently from any CLIP subscription by the calling user and is provided as part of the basic service.
+- 2 The screenings indicator encodings are:
+ SI = 11 Network provided
+ SI = 01 User provided verified and passed
+ SI = 00 User provided not screened.
+
+FIGURE 3-1/Q.951
+**Originating network side dynamic description**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Null
+0]) --> SetupReq[/Setup
+request/]
+ SetupReq --> UserSubscribed{User
+subscribed
+to CLIP?}
+ UserSubscribed -- No --> NoCPNIE[No CPN IE is sent
+to the called user]
+ UserSubscribed -- Yes --> CPNIEAvailable{CPN IE
+available?}
+ CPNIEAvailable -- Yes --> PresentationAllowed{Presentation
+allowed?}
+ CPNIEAvailable -- No --> CPNIEWithoutDigitsNote[CPN IE without
+number digits
+(Note)]
+ PresentationAllowed -- No --> Override{Override?}
+ PresentationAllowed -- Yes --> SendCPNIE[Send CPN IE as
+received]
+ Override -- No --> CPNIEWithoutDigits[CPN IE without
+number digits]
+ Override -- Yes --> SendCPNIE
+ NoCPNIE --> Join(( ))
+ CPNIEWithoutDigits --> Join
+ SendCPNIE --> Join
+ CPNIEWithoutDigitsNote --> Join
+ Join --> SETUP[/SETUP/]
+ SETUP --> End([Call
+present
+6])
+
+```
+
+T1130140-91/d02
+
+Flowchart for Destination network side dynamic description (Recommendation Q.951). The process starts with a 'Null 0' start node, followed by a 'Setup request' input. A decision 'User subscribed to CLIP?' branches into 'No' (leading to 'No CPN IE is sent to the called user') and 'Yes' (leading to 'CPN IE available?'). 'CPN IE available?' branches into 'Yes' (leading to 'Presentation allowed?') and 'No' (leading to 'CPN IE without number digits (Note)'). 'Presentation allowed?' branches into 'No' (leading to 'Override?') and 'Yes' (leading to 'Send CPN IE as received'). 'Override?' branches into 'No' (leading to 'CPN IE without number digits') and 'Yes' (leading to 'Send CPN IE as received'). All four paths converge at a join point before the 'SETUP' output, which leads to a 'Call present 6' end node. The reference 'T1130140-91/d02' is at the bottom.
+
+NOTE – In this case SI = 11 and PI = 10.
+
+FIGURE 3-2/Q.951
+Destination network side dynamic description
+
+## **Annex A** (referred to in clause 3)
+
+### **Two Calling party number information elements delivery option**
+
+### **A.1 Scope**
+
+This annex specifies additional procedures to be supported for the delivery of two Calling party number information elements to the served user. The support of these procedures (or of a part of these) is a network option.
+
+These additional features shall have no impact and shall place no requirement whatsoever on the provision and operation of the CLIP supplementary service defined in this Recommendation by public ISDNs that do not support these additional features, nor on the interchangeability of terminals.
+
+### **A.2 Additional procedures at the destination network side**
+
+The procedures described in this annex pertain to networks capable of delivering two numbers to the called user.
+
+#### **A.2.1 Normal operation**
+
+The procedures described in 3.5.2.3.1 apply in the following situations:
+
+- a) only a single number is available for delivery at the terminating exchange;
+- b) presentation is restricted;
+- c) the called user is not provided with the CLIP supplementary service;
+- d) if the subscription option to two number delivery exists and the called user has not subscribed to two number delivery.
+
+When two numbers are available at the terminating exchange with screening indicators of one set to “network provided” and the other set to “user provided not screened”, the network shall deliver the information in two Calling party number information elements sent in a SETUP message to the called user.
+
+In addition, for some networks, when two numbers are available at the terminating exchange with screening indicators of one set to “network provided” and the other set to “user-provided, verified and failed”, the network shall deliver the information in two Calling party number information elements sent in a SETUP message to the called user.
+
+The order in which the Calling party number information elements appear in the SETUP message is a network option.
+
+If provided, the network shall also include the Calling party sub-address information element in the SETUP message. The presentation and screening indicators associated with the calling number, and the calling sub-address, received at the destination exchange, shall be passed transparently to the called user.
+
+#### **A.2.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### **A.3 Actions at the originating user**
+
+Actions at the originating user are as described in 3.5.2.1.1.1.
+
+### **A.4 Additional actions at the originating local exchange**
+
+The procedures of 3.5.2.1.1.2 shall apply except in the case where the screening function fails.
+
+When the screening function fails, the network shall set the screening indicator to “user-provided, verified and failed”.
+
+NOTE – For the above condition, the procedures of basic call will provide for another calling number to be transported through the network. This other calling number will contain the default number with an associated screening indicator set to “network provided”.
+
+The information determined by the procedures above shall be forwarded to the destination local exchange in association with the basic call request.
+
+The presentation indicator, as determined by the procedures of the CLIR supplementary service (see clause 4) shall be forwarded to the destination local exchange in association with the basic call request.
+
+If the Calling party sub-address information element is available, it shall be passed transparently through the network.
+
+The actions at the originating local exchange when screening fails are summarized in Table A.1.
+
+TABLE A-1/Q.951
+
+#### **Information provided by the calling user and by the network when screening fails**
+
+| Information provided by the calling user | | Information provided by the network to the called user | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Any digit sequence conforming to E.164 | “Unknown number”, “national number” or “international number” | Number provided by the user (Note 1) | User-provided, verified and failed | “Unknown number”, “international number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 2) |
+| NOTES
1 A national number shall be converted to an international number at some point in the public network path where the destination is in a different country.
2 As a network option the type of number forwarded to the called user may be coded “unknown” when a prefix is added to the number, in which case the number is organized according to the network dialling plan, i.e. prefixes or the absence of a prefix, shall be used to distinguish international numbers and national numbers from each other. | | | | |
+
+## 4 Calling Line Identification Restriction (CLIR)
+
+### 4.1 Definition
+
+**calling line identification restriction (CLIR)** is a supplementary service offered to the calling party to restrict presentation of the calling party’s ISDN number and sub-address to the called party.
+
+### 4.2 Description
+
+#### 4.2.1 General description
+
+When CLIR is applicable and activated the originating network shall provide the destination network with an indication that the calling user’s ISDN number and sub-address (if provided by the calling user) are not allowed to be presented to the called user. In this case no calling user number and sub-address shall be included in the call offered to the called user.
+
+The presentation restriction function shall not influence the forwarding of the calling party number within the network as part of the basic service procedures.
+
+#### 4.2.2 Specific terminology
+
+For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following terms apply:
+
+A **served user** is the user of a particular ISDN number who has subscribed to the restriction of the calling line identification information (on a permanent or on a per-call basis) in association with outgoing calls. The served user is also known as the calling user.
+
+A **called user** is the receiver of a call, initiated by the served user, on which CLIR has been activated.
+
+An ISDN number is a number conforming to the numbering plan and structure specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+CLIP Calling Line Identification Presentation
+
+CLIR Calling Line Identification Restriction
+
+#### **4.2.3 Qualification on the applicability to telecommunication services**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.4.
+
+#### **4.2.4 State definition**
+
+No specific states are required.
+
+### **4.3 Operational requirements**
+
+#### **4.3.1 Provision/withdrawal**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.4
+
+#### **4.3.2 Requirements on the originating network side**
+
+All information pertaining to CLIR is inserted in the SETUP message sent as part of the basic call procedures according to Recommendation Q.931.
+
+#### **4.3.3 Requirements in the network**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **4.3.4 Requirements on the destination network side**
+
+See 4.5.2.3.
+
+### **4.4 Coding requirements**
+
+The same as for 3.4.
+
+### **4.5 Signalling requirements**
+
+#### **4.5.1 Activation/deactivation/registration**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### **4.5.2 Invocation and operation**
+
+#### **4.5.2.1 Actions at the originating user**
+
+If the calling user wishes to override the default setting in the network, the SETUP message sent by the user shall contain the Calling party number information element with the presentation indicator set appropriately.
+
+#### **4.5.2.2 Actions at the originating local exchange**
+
+###### **4.5.2.2.1 Normal operation**
+
+If the calling user has subscribed to the Calling Line Identification Restriction supplementary service permanent mode, the presentation indicator received in the SETUP message will be ignored. The network shall set the presentation indicator to "presentation restricted".
+
+If the calling user has subscribed to the CLIR supplementary service on a per-call basis and requests to override the default setting, the originating network shall set the presentation indicator according to that in the received Calling party number information element.
+
+The number digits, if included, shall be treated according to Table 3-1 or Table 3-2, and 3.5.2.1.1.
+
+If the CLIR is requested by the user on a per-call basis, and no Calling party number information element is included in the SETUP message, the originating network shall set the presentation indicator according to the subscribed default value.
+
+The presentation indicator shall be forwarded to the destination in association with the basic call request.
+
+###### **4.5.2.2.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### **4.5.2.3 Actions at the transit exchange**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **4.5.2.4 Actions at the destination local exchange**
+
+###### **4.5.2.4.1 Normal operation**
+
+The actions to be performed at the destination local exchange are provided as part of the CLIP service, described in 3.5.2.3.1.
+
+###### **4.5.2.4.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### **4.6 Interaction with other supplementary services**
+
+#### **4.6.1 Call Waiting**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.2 Call Transfer**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.3 Connected Line Identification Presentation**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.4 Connected Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.5 Calling Line Identification Presentation**
+
+CLIR takes precedence over CLIP. The only occasion when a user subscribing to CLIP can take precedence over CLIR is when the CLIP served user has an override category. This is a national option.
+
+#### **4.6.6 Calling Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.7 Closed User Group**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.8 Conference Calling**
+
+As specified in 1/Q.954.
+
+#### **4.6.9 Direct-Dialling-In**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.10 Call diversion (call forwarding) services**
+
+##### **4.6.10.1 Call Forwarding Busy**
+
+As specified in 2/Q.952.
+
+##### **4.6.10.2 Call Forwarding No Reply**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.952.
+
+##### **4.6.10.3 Call Forwarding Unconditional**
+
+As specified in 4/Q.952.
+
+#### **4.6.10.4 Call Deflection**
+
+As specified in 5/Q.952.
+
+#### **4.6.11 Line Hunting**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.12 Three-Party Service**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.13 User-to-User Signalling**
+
+##### **4.6.13.1 Service 1**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **4.6.13.2 Service 2**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **4.6.13.3 Service 3**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.14 Multiple Subscriber Number**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.15 Call Hold**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.16 Advice of Charge**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.17 Sub-addressing**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.18 Terminal Portability**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.19 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.953.
+
+#### **4.6.20 Malicious Call Identification**
+
+As specified in clause 7.
+
+#### **4.6.21 Reverse Charging**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **4.6.22 Multi-level Precedence and Preemption**
+
+No interaction.
+
+### **4.7 Interaction with other networks**
+
+#### **4.7.1 Interaction with other networks**
+
+On calls to or via non-ISDNs, it cannot be assured that a restriction indication can be carried to the destination network. As a national network option the originating network shall have the possibility to restrict any information identifying the calling party being forwarded to the destination network when CLIR is applicable. If a destination network receives a calling party number without any indication of presentation allowed or restricted, the destination network (the host network) will act according to its rules and regulations. For further information see 3.7.
+
+#### **4.7.2 Procedures for interworking with private ISDNs**
+
+The procedures specified in 4.5 shall be used.
+
+### **4.8 Signalling flows**
+
+The signalling flows are not included as they form an integral part of the basic call control procedures.
+
+### **4.9 Parameter values (timers)**
+
+No specific timers are required.
+
+### **4.10 Dynamic description**
+
+See Figure 4-1.
+
+## **5 Connected Line Identification Presentation (COLP)**
+
+### **5.1 Definition**
+
+**connected line identification presentation (COLP)** is a supplementary service offered to the calling party which provides the connected party's ISDN number, with possible additional sub-address information, to the calling party.
+
+### **5.2 Description**
+
+#### **5.2.1 General description**
+
+This supplementary service is not a dialling check but an indication to the calling subscriber of the connected ISDN number. In a full ISDN environment, the connected line identity must include all the information necessary to unambiguously identify the connected line.
+
+Moreover, the information on the connected line identity may include additional sub-address information (i.e. the Connected sub-address information element) generated by the connected user and transparently transported by the network. The network is not responsible for the content of this additional sub-address information.
+
+Unless COLR has been subscribed by the connected user, the network delivers the connected line identity to the calling user regardless of the terminal capability to handle the information.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([CLIR service]) --> D1{Calling usersubscribed to CLIR?}
+ D1 -- No --> P1[PI = 00 set by the network]
+ D1 -- Yes --> D2{Subscription option}
+ D2 -- Permanent --> P2[PI = 01 set by the network]
+ D2 -- Temporary --> D3{PI included in the CPN IE?}
+ D3 -- No --> P3[PI = default value]
+ D3 -- Yes --> P4[PI as received from the calling user]
+ P1 --> Join((X))
+ P2 --> Join
+ P3 --> Join
+ P4 --> Join
+
+```
+
+T1124580-90/d03
+
+Flowchart for CLIR service logic. It starts with 'CLIR service' leading to a decision 'Calling usersubscribed to CLIR?'. If 'No', it leads to 'PI = 00 set by the network'. If 'Yes', it leads to a decision 'Subscription option'. If 'Permanent', it leads to 'PI = 01 set by the network'. If 'Temporary', it leads to a decision 'PI included in the CPN IE?'. If 'No', it leads to 'PI = default value'. If 'Yes', it leads to 'PI as received from the calling user'. All paths converge at a junction marked with a circle containing an 'X'.
+
+PI = 00 "presentation allowed"
+ PI = 01 "presentation restricted"
+
+FIGURE 4-1/Q.951
+ Originating network side dynamic description
+
+#### 5.2.2 Specific terminology
+
+For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following terms apply:
+
+A **served user** is the user of a particular ISDN number who has subscribed to the presentation of the connected line identification information in association with outgoing calls. The served user is also known as the calling user.
+
+A **connected user** is the user that responded to the served user call request at the destination network and has been awarded the call by the network. The connected user need not have subscribed to the Connected Line Identification Presentation supplementary service.
+
+An ISDN number is a number conforming to the numbering plan structure specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+An international number is an ISDN number structured as specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+A national number or a national significant number is an ISDN number structured as specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+A subscriber number is an ISDN number structured as specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+An address is the number of the connected user (normally ISDN number), and a sub-address if provided by that user.
+
+A default number is an agreed number between the user at the connected side and the network provider.
+
+A special arrangement is an arrangement between a customer and a public network operator whereby customer supplied connected numbers are not screened by the public ISDN.
+
+COLP Connected Line Identification Presentation
+
+COLR Connected Line Identification Restriction
+
+#### **5.2.3 Qualification on the applicability to telecommunication services**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.5.
+
+#### **5.2.4 State definition**
+
+No specific states are required.
+
+### **5.3 Operational requirements**
+
+#### **5.3.1 Provision/withdrawal**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.5.
+
+#### **5.3.2 Requirements on the originating network side**
+
+See 5.5.2.1.
+
+#### **5.3.3 Requirements in the network**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **5.3.4 Requirements on the destination network side**
+
+All information pertaining to COLP shall be inserted in the CONNECT message sent as part of the basic call procedures according to 5/Q.931.
+
+In the case where no information is provided by the connected user (as part of the basic call procedures), the network shall provide the default number associated with this user's access in the destination local exchange. When the connected number is provided by the connected user, the network can only verify that the number is within the set of numbers allocated to that user. Where a special arrangement exists with the connected user, no verification shall be performed.
+
+### **5.4 Coding requirements**
+
+The COLP supplementary service shall make use of the Connected number and Connected sub-address information elements inserted in the CONNECT message.
+
+All codesets used in this Recommendation are defined in codeset 0.
+
+TABLE 5-1/Q.951
+**CONNECT message content**
+
+Message type: CONNECT
+Significance: local
+Direction: both
+
+| Information element | Reference | Direction | Type | Length |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|------|--------|
+| Protocol discriminator | 4.2/Q.931 | Both | M | 1 |
+| Call reference | 4.3/Q.931 | Both | M | 2-* |
+| Message type | 4.4/Q.931 | Both | M | 1 |
+| Connected number | 5.4.1 | Both | O | 2-* |
+| Connected sub-address | 5.4.1 | Both | O | 2-23 |
+| NOTE – Other information elements as described in 3.1/Q.931. | | | | |
+
+#### 5.4.1 Connected number information element
+
+The purpose of the Connected number information element is to indicate which number is connected to a call. The connected number may be different from the called party number because of changes (e.g. call redirection, transfer) during the lifetime of a call.
+
+The Connected number information element is coded as shown in Figure 5-1. The maximum length of this information element is network dependent.
+
+
+
+| | | | | | | | | | |
+|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|---|-------------------------------|------------------------|---|-----|-----------|
+| | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
+| 0 | 1001100
Connected number
Information element identifier
| | | | | | | | Octet 1 |
+| | Length of connected number contents | | | | | | | | |
+| 0/1
ext. | Type of number | | | | Numbering plan identification | | | | 3 |
+| 1
ext. | Presentation
indicator | 000
Spare
| | | | Screening
indicator | | 3a* | |
+| 0
Spare | Number digits
(IA5 characters)
| | | | | | | | 4
etc. |
+
+FIGURE 5-1/Q.951
+**Connected number information element**
+
+#### 5.4.2 Connected sub-address information element
+
+The purpose of the Connected sub-address information element is to identify a sub-address associated with the connected number of a call. For the definition of sub-address, see Recommendation I.330.
+
+The Connected sub-address information element is coded as shown in Figure 5-2. Octets 3 and 4 are coded as in calling and Called party sub-address information elements in Recommendation Q.931. The maximum length of this information element is 23.
+
+
+
+| | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-----------------------|---|------------|---|---|-----------|
+| bits | | | | | | | | |
+| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Octets |
+| 0 | Sub-address
1001101
Information element identifier
| | | | | | 1 | |
+| Length of calling party sub-address contents | | | | | | | | 2 |
+| 1
ext. | Type of sub-address | | Odd/Even
indicator | 0 | 0
Spare | 0 | | 3 |
+| Sub-address information | | | | | | | | 4
etc. |
+
+FIGURE 5-2/Q.951
+
+#### Connected sub-address information element
+
+### 5.5 Signalling requirements
+
+#### 5.5.1 Activation/deactivation/registration
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### 5.5.2 Invocation and operation
+
+#### 5.5.2.1 Actions at the originating local exchange
+
+###### 5.5.2.1.1 Normal operation
+
+When the network sends a CONNECT message to the calling user and the calling user is provided with the COLP supplementary service, the network shall check to see if the connected number is available.
+
+If the connected number is available and presentation is allowed according to the presentation indicator supplied together with the connected number, the network shall include the Connected number information element in the CONNECT message sent to the calling user. If provided, the network shall also include the Connected sub-address information element in the CONNECT message. The presentation and screening indicators associated with the connected number and the connected sub-address received at the originating exchange shall be passed transparently to the calling user.
+
+The numbering plan identification field shall be coded either as “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”.
+
+If presentation is not allowed according to the presentation indicator supplied together with the connected number, the network shall include the Connected number information element in the CONNECT message sent to the calling user. The presentation indicator in the Connected number information element shall indicate “presentation restricted”. The network shall encode the screening indicator, numbering plan identification and the type of number according to one of the following options:
+
+- i) The screening indicator shall indicate “network provided”. The type of number and numbering plan identification shall be set to “unknown”.
+- ii) The screening indicator, numbering plan identification and the type of number shall be passed as received at the destination network.
+
+The network shall not include number digits field. The network shall not include the Connected sub-address information element, in the CONNECT message.
+
+If neither the connected number nor an indication that presentation is restricted is available at the originating local exchange, the network shall include the Connected number information element in the CONNECT message sent to the calling user. The presentation indicator shall be set to “number not available due to interworking” and the screening indicator shall be set to “network provided”, the type of number and numbering plan identification shall be set to “unknown” and the number digits field shall not be included. The network shall not include the Connected sub-address information element, if provided, in the CONNECT message.
+
+If the calling user is not provided with the COLP supplementary service, then neither the Connected number nor the Connected sub-address information elements shall be included in the CONNECT message sent to the calling user.
+
+If presentation is restricted but as a national network option the calling user has the “override” category (e.g. police or emergency service) marked in the originating local exchange, the network shall include the Connected number information element and Connected sub-address information element if the sub-address was supplied by the connected user, in the CONNECT message. In this case, the presentation and screening indicators shall be passed transparently to the calling user.
+
+NOTE – If the presentation indicator in the Connected number information element received by the user is set to “number not available due to interworking” or “presentation restricted”, the remaining information in the Connected number information element should be ignored by the user.
+
+###### **5.5.2.1.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### **5.5.2.2 Actions at the transit exchange**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **5.5.2.3 Actions at the destination local exchange**
+
+###### **5.5.2.3.1 Normal operation**
+
+###### **5.5.2.3.1.1 Action at the destination user**
+
+These procedures shall be provided as part of the basic service and the connected user need not have subscribed to the COLP supplementary service.
+
+The numbering plan identification to be indicated within the Connected number information element, sent by the connected user shall be either “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”.
+
+NOTE – Either coding may be used and the treatment of both by the network is identical.
+
+Where the connected number included by the connected user is complete, the type of number to be indicated within the Connected number information element, sent by the connected user, shall be one of the following:
+
+- “*Subscriber number*” – In the case where the complete subscriber number is sent.
+- “*National number*” – In the case where the complete national number is sent.
+- “*International number*” – In the case where the complete international number is sent.
+
+Where a partial connected number is included by the connected user (e.g. to indicate digits specific to the Multiple Subscriber Number supplementary service) the user shall set the type of number to be indicated within the Connected number information element to “unknown”.
+
+###### **5.5.2.3.1.2 Actions at the destination local exchange if a special arrangement does not apply**
+
+These procedures shall be provided as part of the basic service and the connected user need not have subscribed to the COLP supplementary service.
+
+If multiple CONNECT messages are received from the called user, the network shall only perform the following procedures when it has decided which CONNECT message to acknowledge.
+
+Where a CONNECT message is received from the connected user, the network shall check to see if the Connected number and Connected sub-address information elements are included.
+
+If the Connected number information element is received with a coding of the numbering plan identification field other than “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”, then the network shall discard the Connected number information element and process the call as if that information was not received.
+
+The network shall set the value of the screening indicator based on the outcome of the screening of the connected number. The network shall disregard any value of the screening indicator, if received from the connected user.
+
+If the Connected number information element is included, the network shall perform the screening function.
+
+NOTE 1 – Some networks may accept a full ISDN number with the addition of a prefix or escape digits to the number digits field and the type of number field set to “unknown”.
+
+If the connected number received from the connected user is determined to be correct, the network shall set the screening indicator to “user-provided, verified and passed”.
+
+If the screening function fails, the network shall note that the screening is failed and shall use a default number associated with the connected user. The network shall set the screening indicator to “network provided”.
+
+If the CONNECT message does not contain the Connected number information element, the network shall use a default number associated with the connected user. The network shall set the screening indicator to “network provided”.
+
+In the case where the connected user provides partial connected number information, and the number is a valid digit sequence for the user access arrangement, the network shall complete the number as appropriate. The network shall set the screening indicator to “user-provided, verified and passed”.
+
+NOTE 2 – In some cases the network cannot guarantee that the completed number identifies an end user.
+
+The information, as determined by the procedures above, shall be forwarded to the originating local exchange, in association with the basic call response.
+
+The presentation indicator, as determined by the procedures of the COLR supplementary service (see clause 6), shall be forwarded to the originating local exchange, in association with the basic call response.
+
+If the Connected sub-address information element is available, it shall be passed transparently through the network.
+
+The actions at the destination local exchange if a special arrangement does not apply are shown in Table 5-2.
+
+###### **5.5.2.3.1.3 Actions at the destination local exchange if a special arrangement applies**
+
+These procedures shall be provided as part of the basic service and the connected user need not have subscribed to the COLP supplementary service.
+
+If multiple CONNECT messages are received from the called user, the network shall only perform the following procedures when it has decided which CONNECT message to acknowledge.
+
+When a CONNECT message is received from the connected user, the network shall check to see if the Connected number and Connected sub-address information elements are included.
+
+If the Connected number information element is received with a coding of the numbering plan identification field other than “ISDN/telephony numbering plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”, then the network shall discard the Connected number information element and process the call as if that information element was not received.
+
+If the Connected number information element is received with a coding of the type of number field other than “national number” or “international number”, then the network shall discard the Connected number information element and process the call as if that information element was not received.
+
+If the Connected number information element is received with a coding of the numbering plan identification field other than “ISDN/telephony number plan” (see Recommendation E.164) or “unknown”, then the network shall discard the Connected number information element and process the call as if that information element was not received.
+
+The network shall disregard any value of the screening indicator, if received from the connected user.
+
+TABLE 5-2/Q.951
+
+###### **Information provided by the connected user and by the network when special arrangement does not apply**
+
+| Information provided by the connected user | | Information provided by the network to the calling user | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
+| Connected number received from the connected user (octet 4) | Type of number (octet 3) | Connected number forwarded (if COLR is not activated) (octet 4) | Screening indicator forwarded (octet 3a) | Type of number forwarded (octet 3) |
+| No connected number information element is provided by the connected user | | Default number stored at the network side sufficient for returning the call | Network provided | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| Valid part of the number not sufficient for returning the call (Note 2) | “Unknown” | Completion of the number (Note 3) | User-provided verified and passed (Note 4) | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| Correct complete connected number (Note 5) | “Subscriber number” or “national number” or “international number” | Complete connected number | User-provided verified and passed | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| Incorrect number (Note 6) | Any type of number | Default number stored at the network side sufficient for returning the call | Network-provided | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 7) |
+| NOTES
1 A national number shall be converted to an international number at some point in the public network where the origination is in a different country.
2 This assumes that the user's equipment provides that part of the number pertaining to its own (private) domain. This may be multiple subscriber number digits provided by a terminal equipment or an extension line number provided by a private ISDN. The network shall interpret the number digits and check if it is a valid digit sequence according to the agreements existing between the connected user and the network provider.
3 Completion means that the remaining part of the ISDN number associated with the appropriate access is added to the user provided part of the number.
4 The term “verified” implies matching the user provided number or part of this number(s) with the range(s) of numbers stored at the network side and it implies at least a valid format of user provided number information.
5 The term “correct” implies, from the network point of view, matching the subscriber number provided by the user with one of the range(s) of subscriber numbers stored at the network side.
6 The number provided by the user is discarded.
7 As a network option the type of number may be coded “unknown”, in which case, the number is organized according to the network dialling plan, i.e. prefixes, or the absence of a prefix, shall be used to distinguish international numbers and national numbers from each other.
| | | | |
+
+If the CONNECT message does not contain the Connected number information element, the network shall use a default number associated with the connected user. The network shall set the screening indicator to “network provided”.
+
+The actions at the destination local exchange when special arrangement does not apply, are summarized in Table 5-2.
+
+The information, as determined by the procedures above, shall be forwarded to the origination local exchange, in association with the basic call response.
+
+If the Connected sub-address information element is available, it shall be passed transparently through the network.
+
+The presentation indicator, as determined by the procedures of the COLR supplementary service (see clause 6), shall be forwarded to the originating local exchange, in association with the basic call response.
+
+The actions at the destination local exchange when special arrangement applies are summarized in Table 5-3.
+
+If the Connected number information element is included, the network shall set the screening indicator forwarded to the calling user to “user-provided, not screened”.
+
+TABLE 5-3/Q.951
+
+###### **Information provided by the connected user and by the network when special arrangement applies**
+
+| Information provided by the connected user | | Information provided by the network to the called user | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
+| Connected number received from the connected user (octet 4) | Type of number (octet 3) | Connected number forwarded if COLR is not activated (octet 4) | Screening indicator forwarded (octet 3a) | Type of number forwarded (octet 3) |
+| No connected number information element is provided by the connected user | | Default number stored at the network side sufficient for returning the call | Network provided | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 2) |
+| Any digit sequence conforming to Rec. E.164 | “National number” or “international number” | Number provided by the user (Note 1) | User-provided, not screened | “International number” or “national number” (Notes 1, 2) |
+| NOTES
1 A national number shall be converted to an international number at some point in the public network path where the origination is in a different country.
2 As a network option the type of number may be coded “unknown”, in which case, the number is organized according to the network dialling plan, i.e. prefixes, or the absence of a prefix, shall be used to distinguish international numbers and national numbers from each other.
| | | | |
+
+###### 5.5.2.3.2 Exceptional procedures
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### 5.6 Interaction with other supplementary services
+
+#### 5.6.1 Call Waiting
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 5.6.2 Call Transfer
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 5.6.3 Connected Line Identification Presentation
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 5.6.4 Connected Line Identification Restriction
+
+The connected line identification will not be presented to the calling user if the connected user has subscribed to COLR. The only occasion when a user subscribing to COLP can take precedence over COLR is when the COLP user has an override category. This is a national option.
+
+#### 5.6.5 Calling Line Identification Presentation
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.6 Calling Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.7 Closed User Group**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.8 Conference Calling**
+
+As specified in 1/Q.954.
+
+#### **5.6.9 Direct-Dialling-in**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.10 Call diversion (call forwarding) services**
+
+##### **5.6.10.1 Call Forwarding Busy**
+
+As specified in 2/Q.952.
+
+##### **5.6.10.2 Call Forwarding no Reply**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.952.
+
+##### **5.6.10.3 Call Forwarding Unconditional**
+
+As specified in 4/Q.952.
+
+#### **5.6.10.4 Call Deflection**
+
+As specified in 5/Q.952.
+
+#### **5.6.11 Line Hunting**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.12 Three-Party Service**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.13 User-to-User Signalling**
+
+##### **5.6.13.1 Service 1**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **5.6.13.2 Service 2**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **5.6.13.3 Service 3**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.14 Multiple Subscriber Number**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.15 Call Hold**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.16 Advice of charge**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.17 Sub-addressing**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.18 Terminal Portability**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.19 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.953.
+
+#### **5.6.20 Malicious Call Identification**
+
+As specified in clause 7.
+
+#### **5.6.21 Reverse Charging**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **5.6.22 Multilevel Precedence and Preemption**
+
+No interaction.
+
+### **5.7 Interaction with other networks**
+
+#### **5.7.1 Interaction with non-ISDNs**
+
+On calls destined for some non-ISDNs, the connected number may be delivered to the originating ISDN without an indication of connected line identity restriction. In this case a number of options exist and the selection of the following options is according to the network rules and regulations:
+
+- The network shall send the Connected number information element according to 5.5.2.1.1, sixth paragraph, and shall include no Connected sub-address information element.
+- The network shall send the Connected number information element according to 5.5.2.1.1, fourth paragraph, and shall include no Connected sub-address information element.
+- The network shall send the Connected number information element according to 5.5.2.1.1, second paragraph, and shall include the Connected sub-address information element if the connected sub-address is available.
+
+For some other non-ISDNs, no complete connected number may be available to the ISDN and therefore the full number of the connected user cannot be given to the calling user who has been provided with the COLP supplementary service. In this case the network shall send the Connected number information element according to 5.5.2.1.1, sixth paragraph, and shall include no Connected sub-address information element.
+
+On calls destined for some non-ISDNs, the connected number may be delivered to the originating ISDN with an indication of connected line identity restriction. In this case the network shall send the Connected number information element according to 5.5.2.1.1, second paragraph, and shall include the Connected sub-address information element if the connected sub-address is available.
+
+As a network option, the destination network may restrict any information identifying the connected user from being forwarded to another network.
+
+#### **5.7.2 Procedures for interworking with private ISDNs**
+
+These procedures specified in 5.5.2 shall be used.
+
+NOTE – The provision of the special arrangement where an access is used by a private network is especially appropriate.
+
+### **5.8 Signalling flows**
+
+The signalling flows are not included as they are an integral part of the basic call control procedures.
+
+### **5.9 Parameter values (timers)**
+
+No specific timers are required.
+
+### **5.10 Dynamic description**
+
+See Figures 5-3 and 5-4.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Call present 6
+Incoming call proceeding 9
+Call received 7]) --> Connect[/CONNECT/]
+ Connect --> Decision1{CON IE
+provided by
+the connected
+user?}
+ Decision1 -- No --> SI11_1[Default
+number set
+SI = 11]
+ Decision1 -- Yes --> Decision2{Special
+arrangement?}
+ Decision2 -- Yes --> SI00[Set SI = 00]
+ Decision2 -- No --> Decision3{Verification
+of the number?}
+ Decision3 -- OK --> SI01[Complete the
+number set
+SI = 01]
+ Decision3 -- Not OK --> SI11_2[Default
+number set
+SI = 11]
+ SI11_1 --> Merge(( ))
+ SI01 --> Merge
+ SI11_2 --> Merge
+ SI00 --> Merge
+ Merge --> COLR[COLR
+Service]
+ COLR --> SetType[Set type of
+number and
+numbering plan]
+ SetType --> Setup[/Setup
+confirmation/]
+ Setup --> End([Connect request 8])
+
+```
+
+T1158680-94/d04
+
+Flowchart for Destination network side dynamic description. The process starts with a call present, incoming call proceeding, and call received. It then connects and checks if CON IE is provided by the connected user. If yes, it checks for special arrangements. If yes, it sets SI = 00. If no, it verifies the number. If OK, it completes the number set (SI = 01). If not OK, it sets the default number set (SI = 11). If the user did not provide CON IE, it sets the default number set (SI = 11). All paths lead to COLR Service, setting the type of number and numbering plan, setup confirmation, and finally the connect request.
+
+## NOTES
+
+- 1 This procedure operates independently from any COLP subscription by the connected user and is provided as part of the basic service.
+- 2 The screening indicator encodings are:
+ - SI = 11 Network provided
+ - SI = 01 User provided verified and passed
+ - SI = 00 User provided verified not screened.
+
+FIGURE 5-3/Q.951
+Destination network side dynamic description
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Overlap sending
+2 outgoing call
+proceeding 3
+Call delivered 4]) --> Setup[/Setup
+response/]
+ Setup --> COLP{User
+subscribed
+to COLP?}
+ COLP -- No --> NoCONIE[No CON IE is sent
+to the calling user]
+ COLP -- Yes --> CONIEAvail{CON IE
+available?}
+ CONIEAvail -- Yes --> Presentation{Presentation
+allowed?}
+ CONIEAvail -- No --> CONIENoDigitsNote[CON IE without
+number digits
+(Note)]
+ Presentation -- No --> Override{Override?}
+ Presentation -- Yes --> SendCONIE[Send CON IE as
+received]
+ Override -- No --> CONIENoDigits[CON IE without
+number digits]
+ Override -- Yes --> SendCONIE
+ NoCONIE --> Merge(( ))
+ CONIENoDigits --> Merge
+ SendCONIE --> Merge
+ CONIENoDigitsNote --> Merge
+ Merge --> CONNECT[/CONNECT/]
+ CONNECT --> Active10([Active 10])
+
+```
+
+T1130160-91/d05
+
+Flowchart for Originating network side dynamic description (Q.951). The process starts with 'Overlap sending 2 outgoing call proceeding 3 Call delivered 4', followed by 'Setup response'. A decision 'User subscribed to COLP?' branches into 'No' (leading to 'No CON IE is sent to the calling user') and 'Yes' (leading to 'CON IE available?'). 'CON IE available?' branches into 'Yes' (leading to 'Presentation allowed?') and 'No' (leading to 'CON IE without number digits (Note)'). 'Presentation allowed?' branches into 'No' (leading to 'Override?') and 'Yes' (leading to 'Send CON IE as received'). 'Override?' branches into 'No' (leading to 'CON IE without number digits') and 'Yes' (leading to 'Send CON IE as received'). All paths converge at a merge point before 'CONNECT', which leads to 'Active 10'.
+
+NOTE – In this case SI=11 and PI=10.
+
+FIGURE 5-4/Q.951
+Originating network side dynamic description
+
+# **6 Connected Line Identification Restriction (COLR)**
+
+## **6.1 Definition**
+
+**connected line identification restriction (COLR)**fs is a supplementary service offered to the connected party to restrict presentation of the connected party's ISDN number and sub-address to the calling party.
+
+### **6.2 Description**
+
+#### **6.2.1 General description**
+
+When COLR is applicable and activated, the destination network shall provide the originating network with an indication that the connected user's ISDN number and sub-address information is (if provided by the connected user) are not allowed to be presented to the calling user. In this case no connected number and sub-address shall be included in the call connected information to the calling user.
+
+The presentation restriction function shall not influence the forwarding of the connected number within the network as part of the basic service procedures.
+
+#### **6.2.2 Specific terminology**
+
+For the purposes of this Recommendation, the following terms apply:
+
+A **served user** is the user of a particular ISDN number who has subscribed to the restriction of the connected line identification information (on a permanent or on a per-call basis) in association with incoming calls. The served user may also be known as the connected user.
+
+A **calling user** is the initiator of a call, received by the served user, on which COLR has been activated.
+
+An ISDN number is a number conforming to the numbering plan and structure specified in Recommendation E.164.
+
+COLP Connected Line Identification Presentation
+
+COLR Connected Line Identification Restriction
+
+#### **6.2.3 Qualification on the applicability to telecommunication services**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.6.
+
+#### **6.2.4 State definition**
+
+No specific states are required.
+
+### **6.3 Operational requirements**
+
+#### **6.3.1 Provision/withdrawal**
+
+See Recommendation I.251.6.
+
+#### **6.3.2 Requirements on the originating network side**
+
+See 6.5.2.1.
+
+#### **6.3.3 Requirements in the network**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **6.3.4 Requirements on the destination network side**
+
+All information pertaining to COLR is inserted in the CONNECT message sent as part of the basic call procedures according to 5/Q.931.
+
+### **6.4 Coding requirements**
+
+The same as for 5.4.
+
+### **6.5 Signalling requirements**
+
+#### **6.5.1 Activation/deactivation/registration**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### **6.5.2 Invocation and operation**
+
+##### **6.5.2.1 Actions at the originating local exchange**
+
+###### **6.5.2.1.1 Normal operation**
+
+The actions to be performed at the originating local exchange are provided as part of the COLP supplementary service, described in 5.5.2.1.1.
+
+###### **6.5.2.1.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+#### **6.5.2.2 Actions at the transit exchange**
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### **6.5.2.3 Action at the destination user**
+
+If the connected user wishes to override the default setting in the network, the CONNECT message sent by the user shall contain the Connected number information element with the presentation indicator set appropriately.
+
+#### **6.5.2.4 Actions at the destination local exchange**
+
+###### **6.5.2.4.1 Normal operation**
+
+If the connected user has subscribed to the Connected Line Identification Restriction supplementary service permanent mode, the presentation indicator received in the CONNECT message will be ignored. The network shall set the presentation indicator to “presentation restricted”.
+
+If the connected user has subscribed to the COLR supplementary service on a per-call basis and requests to override the default setting, the destination network shall set the presentation indicator according to that in the received Connected number information element.
+
+The digits, if included, shall be treated according to Table 5-2 or Table 5-3, and 5.5.2.3.1.
+
+If COLR is requested by the user on a per-call basis, and no Connected number information element is included in the CONNECT message, the destination network shall set the presentation indicator according to the subscriber value.
+
+The presentation indicator shall be forwarded to the originating network in association with the basic call response.
+
+###### **6.5.2.4.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### **6.6 Interaction with other supplementary services**
+
+#### **6.6.1 Call Waiting**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.2 Call Transfer**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.3 Connected Line Identification Presentation**
+
+COLR will take precedence over COLP. The only occasion when a user subscribing to COLP can take precedence over COLR is when the user has an override category. This is a national option.
+
+#### **6.6.4 Connected Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.5 Calling Line Identification Presentation**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.6 Calling Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.7 Closed User Group**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.8 Conference Calling**
+
+As specified in 1/Q.954.
+
+#### **6.6.9 Direct-Dialling-In**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.10 Call diversion (call forwarding) services**
+
+##### **6.6.10.1 Call Forwarding Busy**
+
+As specified in 2/Q.952.
+
+##### **6.6.10.2 Call Forwarding no Reply**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.952.
+
+##### **6.6.10.3 Call Forwarding Unconditional**
+
+As specified in 4/Q.952.
+
+##### **6.6.10.4 Call Deflection**
+
+As specified in 5/Q.952.
+
+#### **6.6.11 Line Hunting**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.12 Three-Party Service**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.13 User-to-User Signalling**
+
+##### **6.6.13.1 Service 1**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **6.6.13.2 Service 2**
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### **6.6.13.3 Service 3**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.14 Multiple Subscriber Number**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.15 Call Hold**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.16 Advice of Charge**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.17 Sub-addressing**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.18 Terminal Portability**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.19 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.953.
+
+#### **6.6.20 Malicious Call Identification**
+
+As specified in clause 7.
+
+#### **6.6.21 Reverse Charging**
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### **6.6.22 Multilevel Precedence and Preemption**
+
+No interaction.
+
+### **6.7 Interaction with other networks**
+
+#### **6.7.1 Interaction with non-ISDNs**
+
+On calls to or via non-ISDNs, it cannot be assured that a restriction indication can be carried to the originating network. As a national network option the destination network shall have the possibility to restrict any information identifying the connected party from being returned to the originating network when COLR is applicable. If an originating network receives a connected party ISDN number without any indication of presentation allowed or restricted, the originating network (the host network) will act according to its rules and regulations. For further information see 5.7.
+
+#### **6.7.2 Procedures for interworking with private ISDNs**
+
+The procedures specified in 6.5 shall be used.
+
+### **6.8 Signalling flows**
+
+The signalling flows are not included as they form an integral part of the basic call control procedures.
+
+### **6.9 Parameter values (timers)**
+
+No specific timers are required.
+
+### **6.10 Dynamic description**
+
+See Figure 6-1.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([COLR service]) --> Dec1{Connected user
+subscribed to
+COLR?}
+ Dec1 -- No --> PI00[PI = 00 set by
+the network]
+ Dec1 -- Yes --> Dec2{Subscription
+option}
+ Dec2 -- Permanent --> PI01[PI = 01 set by
+the network]
+ Dec2 -- Temporary --> Dec3{PI included
+in the CON IE?}
+ Dec3 -- No --> PIDefault[PI = default
+value]
+ Dec3 -- Yes --> PIUser[PI as received
+from the
+connected user]
+ PI00 --> Merge((X))
+ PI01 --> Merge
+ PIDefault --> Merge
+ PIUser --> Merge
+
+```
+
+T1124610-90/d06
+
+Flowchart for Destination network side dynamic description. It starts with 'COLR service' leading to a decision 'Connected user subscribed to COLR?'. If 'No', PI = 00 set by the network. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Subscription option' (Permanent/Temporary). Permanent leads to PI = 01 set by the network. Temporary leads to 'PI included in the CON IE?'. If 'No', PI = default value. If 'Yes', PI as received from the connected user. All paths merge at a junction marked with a circle containing an X.
+
+PI = 00 “presentation allowed”
+PI = 01 “presentation restricted”
+
+FIGURE 6-1/Q.951
+**Destination network side dynamic description**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3492ba13104c1b23df1f843562f3a44bfb2f2c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/0a42e05c07941450f34e4f7117725834_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4c3b5263a414e8fc8439fed79252c47c4fa87561b287a62849e3421e8064d9d2
+size 38645
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5fb0ad100987e7a486babf420232c8cff79e7979
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/0b7849dae424b0dd33e6386d2384643a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:90a36647ab412616ae2ebeeb6c57fbdb78d180b3e91d5af55062638bb7386ed7
+size 60761
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..36ad17a3ef915cae178c26dd1bc8a647a4dbbb80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/12c19090355e19922e23044633b9d1ea_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2d58b2d3f801f4759843448c6f3163baa9947e05fd175b7f5314846a96e703eb
+size 48455
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/15de63f0b5df62e6ab9164f2a72e2e33_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/15de63f0b5df62e6ab9164f2a72e2e33_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26442a15942cfbfa94ee13369391ac5855e83d97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/15de63f0b5df62e6ab9164f2a72e2e33_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2cc3a8f1c6c09e069d8810b66ad377083c5440e611db6b90231d3df32c610838
+size 45238
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/1b23b78336d8bd286c653cbdb38428dd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/1b23b78336d8bd286c653cbdb38428dd_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1dfa4d0c052bd5e90d18a3a242dc4c114a4db4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/1b23b78336d8bd286c653cbdb38428dd_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4f34f770fd6d3986a538671d550d7eda63de9a11fdf9fba2c8391ab4f553fbe3
+size 18457
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7996f5b8beee3796ab3170c874a1f42ca0569b0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/2580688a4de0a29692805cc6ba4822d7_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8df113aae113a62a5160ec662f3356b0c85ba767b68fcf7ba99f0a8f07670484
+size 82934
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..660482f67c44ff6f3207939e71e8de295cd106ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f9431be4b979467005c48eab2bef411813d145d8251dbad065f9a1472780d6f7
+size 8278
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/352d21d1e740e4a58cb17ab8656cfad8_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/352d21d1e740e4a58cb17ab8656cfad8_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edcc48e8cad98359a0034531d3b6fe31a43dc8cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/352d21d1e740e4a58cb17ab8656cfad8_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f57e1d3f5bcfa63f9cf04c226400fec4a3a34d07eeb1d9a00903a8f9b0914e6b
+size 55647
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..005bd8ca2639017b1d2df459c9ccc2427449f819
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/38cbce07f83fba6d5a7c46605bd5743f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:57c86f920277a23776cd771bd81c89b972863a8c108a66880944c3c698b98052
+size 65292
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da744f67c459da472520051bd2f39b0c88c47546
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/4162c218fc7881cd90fc9574e07d2327_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2c9a474d01042d4ec8cfb4b61808136a9d271bf8bcbde37ae2d8bf7e8b37f253
+size 54554
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/51d4540605fdfa2c090638305022143b_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/51d4540605fdfa2c090638305022143b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..098a31fe9214ebe786f9fead7d13f03f520a9321
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/51d4540605fdfa2c090638305022143b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:446cb89d922a72c0ac90f0fb58f5eb9406d23e848bd6d61a46848c864091670b
+size 40488
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5a9cdc1fed33ae8fb871a8cd4d591729_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5a9cdc1fed33ae8fb871a8cd4d591729_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2f9a76d816d468c0802a3c779f0a0ac174017bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5a9cdc1fed33ae8fb871a8cd4d591729_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:62c07cfc3c51fa5563d31a3543d978402dcd782f45c70cc5ea3134259920fb02
+size 48677
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..78fde414e464e810e254489a002d12a10edb25ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5eb69662cc4fa7d0d49b4eb22951c204_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2118331203561cb623506c8527a1387b025714b9998ef65d1b9a453a6e5119e4
+size 89682
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3bfec2ee37a2bc5198720ae0b2defd76df8e002c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/5ee1bbbf85b473f78af9ec8368a4159a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:195dc6f5790e25a95191605072b77db2643b243db4e577d45b5f9f5422fd973b
+size 61292
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b45eb79b264dc809733c5234f12429798997a5a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/6f11044c88ea04e43de06c3491defeee_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e596bc2f1fe413072e7cc32b28010cc636936f39d46a93382f1ae96319d0f6bb
+size 68540
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b17fa9ef3b8e28af1a50c83b40a946c2ac82df72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/701bc79e78b382bcfd3ba85597dbb9c3_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:50bc79ef71ee3711a58014f8d115b99f829f0b04912888df75cc293d34841964
+size 52288
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b7f6d593c4f8466e3089035880382ab9034d1ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/77959075c823bb5169480d7b8ff82a63_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:deb1c558962a042276e889fd93ababa7c864e2248f2a34cd51047de0fe3dbb4e
+size 88084
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..63f65864ebea78b62b0146d4d38c48da6874e224
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/798679874d1c29f8343506a156c79d7e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f9c1ab2f802cf8ff0ecec3dd002e8162847f308659913dda78048a685794a77e
+size 85436
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c63d467914000e3c30106fe43aefcdd36a776ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/7ae836e598020d937ed1478c2ef13025_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:827675bf6e8b9879cb5b72fe42226779f622b01da915b7e69d366023234e7af0
+size 88637
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..877a5a0d5b6f2270a95de6267a1130275f084911
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/7e14467740b2570a44379b347a697921_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cc26b5cb28edd3184a9be076ccac97d6d1f152a2dc7f4406e165f06376b62129
+size 84018
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/87c64bd7d33fca8b9b29228c80ddf175_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/87c64bd7d33fca8b9b29228c80ddf175_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26fe2872ac943172e6a077f69eae4443e812ffb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/87c64bd7d33fca8b9b29228c80ddf175_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ca10e83984d59c59a503ef70e9522b44a639620920d8c192f2ab239b60e0d793
+size 112034
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f11cf5d37e22e08d12f790381076419e053f9beb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/89f8aefc01866631793087542316cef2_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9c7635e91b1026f301cdc15c3eaafdb76ddaf31f253f8d3cc6e0505e8a3f9331
+size 41775
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b739af2dd64231fb77300051271da947dd5d7d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/a2251e3bbfcd726b68cc50b091e53b02_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:653c0282235a26008949a05d08fe32e3760bcf63a58f087c2a16dc46725fddc5
+size 101275
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20f93899bc55aca1f33322fc5a9d6a30172553ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c0b9e5fc63e19306394e0d4249da62cd_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:01213870b65f907af4a5f5312a0cb12bb364d0fa56f0c5b44e2a36c6f2f61b47
+size 100287
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c1df61cc3717e878a48e530218403403_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c1df61cc3717e878a48e530218403403_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11ee5155c91a50e7b775f0abefc53f7a8cd042c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c1df61cc3717e878a48e530218403403_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a92ab7b15c8743e3888f263ecbaf2dbfae07ae015f5584d65eed2f3eafb69559
+size 131132
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c2c4e63ebb9afc1ab64e39a159890e0f_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c2c4e63ebb9afc1ab64e39a159890e0f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f441452d24447eaabbf0d723b5ab9935f8ce238d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/c2c4e63ebb9afc1ab64e39a159890e0f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9fa9d56b7429443f2944dc1566138f9ee22e7c32c7cdbed79f6712e5f067898e
+size 128011
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a32d92f58c78c01ef6c499e7ee1a92ec40d105fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/cbab05075b3d7dc0d27c4cbb0c914a94_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9bd6f13d0cd70b8b309bdcc94e0c4e6922295792d607a739daf04d85e104ee28
+size 35339
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a0c42790345f83db5905b13ef2204ca2fca3525
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/cbb2d311b20781a595488445ded48d0a_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:caef803f8e61852a1c128a82918ae96c950ccd416db3ab888a27ff4cc133d0f8
+size 86020
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8024ff8a3dfdd1c945fd4f07485e720ed7aef85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/dbd074feb5cce1300f42f91da8f673d1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3d1c7b92478548e2b54abd3757ca6fd5d6d5316ffe360478e4909269ad1e2fc8
+size 89269
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6fee8a2889d9ce5ffad831473cbc0f11505736e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e451401f8fa77b466f401d5fce15b26c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fc2e0627f91b2572f3990b56da5ed0cb9a1570e6256f19479621139017edc584
+size 98215
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..045148baaad27b5187436d74e631e5789c6457b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e64c7b989e5bdb2708cd7aefd18b06e1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0c3cd3249fcfa379b9f0dbb8dfc01cf43d5881a13c4ffeb4ae1e4ba78d9d389d
+size 87403
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5bb41e4e587dcd9a9085638c52b1db38954bd3ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/e8e818455bb0d1a6153299a388b94868_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b5797cadad6e8b897c51d838b332015e60cd3d1961efb9d954be18a35c6acbb8
+size 99376
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55be73aa53e02db978805e2ec97fd86022564773
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/f57c7b37d7a05a99618104f390089f03_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9ac5f942a7f47be667f866c9a41f57497ca4eeacced7a7eb9de6e9b496487478
+size 92765
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2df445e80ccb3076e31391807fc59e439fc655c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/f9c64800d9bace9b4315646d1057be3c_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8d67cfcd3a158ab7cf22069596c517b7b8528d9378faba07e36ac611d0b6ad9b
+size 88224
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/fd8f5da2b60cdca94896f3cde8ee81f0_img.jpg b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/fd8f5da2b60cdca94896f3cde8ee81f0_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69705561c6cce32be76515a09994593bcff32435
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.952-199303-I_PDF-E/fd8f5da2b60cdca94896f3cde8ee81f0_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:eaaccff2510052f14762e17eb1500bf14df12c3852aee87833a2a8ac993d0c4e
+size 18105
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.955.1-199202-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.955.1-199202-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0bf960006ba370be016ea0b854d48737b0b6ca1e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.955.1-199202-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,987 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, crossed by a lightning bolt.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+# CCITT
+
+## Q.955
+
+THE INTERNATIONAL
+TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE
+CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
+
+# **STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES USING DSS 1** ---
+
+# **STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR COMMUNITY OF INTEREST SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES USING DSS 1**
+
+## **SECTION 1 – CLOSED USER GROUP**
+
+## **Recommendation Q.955** ---
+
+
+
+CCITT logo: a globe with the letters CCITT inside.
+
+Geneva, 1992
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The CCITT (the International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). CCITT is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The Plenary Assembly of CCITT which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study and approves Recommendations prepared by its Study Groups. The approval of Recommendations by the members of CCITT between Plenary Assemblies is covered by the procedure laid down in CCITT Resolution No. 2 (Melbourne, 1988).
+
+Recommendation Q.955, § 1 was prepared by Study Group XI and was approved under the Resolution No. 2 procedure on the 4th of February 1992.
+
+## --- CCITT NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication Administration and a recognized private operating agency.
+
+© ITU 1992
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+# **STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR COMMUNITY OF INTEREST SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES USING DSS 1**
+
+## **1 Closed User Group (CUG)**
+
+### **1.1 *Definition***
+
+The supplementary service Closed User Group (CUG) enables users to form groups, to and from which access is restricted. A specific user may be a member of one or more CUGs. Members of a specific CUG can communicate among themselves but not, in general, with users outside the group. Specific CUG members can have additional capabilities that allow them to originate calls outside the group, and/or to receive calls from outside the group. Specific CUG members can have additional restrictions that prevent them from originating calls to other members of the CUG, or from receiving calls from other members of the CUG.
+
+### **1.2 *Description***
+
+#### **1.2.1 *General description***
+
+Essentially normal call establishment procedures apply, but additionally, to provide CUG service, the network analyses the call request from the calling user in conjunction with the CUG attributes associated with both the calling and called users (as identified by their ISDN numbers). As a result of this analysis the call either fails for CUG reasons or is allowed to proceed.
+
+*Note* – In the case where a user has subscribed to the DDI supplementary service, attributes are associated with that part of the ISDN number which the network can recognize or with the default number valid for that access.
+
+The network provider may define the maximum number of CUGs of which a user can be a member.
+
+Since the fundamental purpose of the CUG service is to prevent certain connections, it is necessary to strictly control interactions with some other supplementary services to protect CUG integrity.
+
+#### **1.2.2 *Specific terminology***
+
+##### **1.2.2.1 CUG manager**
+
+The CUG manager is the authority representing the interests of all the members of a CUG. By planning and controlling the membership and members' options, the manager can provide the overall CUG service expected by the members as a whole.
+
+The CUG manager need not be a CUG member and the concept has no signalling implications.
+
+##### **1.2.2.2 CUG index**
+
+The CUG index is a parameter used by the calling user to select a particular CUG when originating a call. The index is also used by the network to indicate to the called user the CUG from which an incoming call has originated.
+
+This index has only local significance, i.e. the index used by the calling user will, in general, be different from the index used by the called user to identify the same CUG.
+
+##### **1.2.2.3 CUG interlock code**
+
+This is a means of identifying CUG membership within the network. At the calling side, if a CUG match exists, the CUG index identifying a CUG maps to the CUG interlock code for that CUG. If a CUG match exists at the called side, the CUG interlock code identifying a CUG maps to the CUG index representing that CUG.
+
+CUG interlock code is not an access concept, but is used for clarity during the descriptions of signalling procedures and flows.
+
+##### 1.2.2.4 **preferential CUG**
+
+A CUG user subscribing to preferential CUG nominates a CUG index which the network uses to identify the required CUG in the absence of a CUG index being included in the outgoing call request.
+
+A preferential CUG applies to an ISDN number (or to an ISDN number/service – see § 1.3.1) and not to a specific CUG.
+
+##### 1.2.2.5 **CUG only service**
+
+A user with CUG only services is limited to making calls to, and receiving calls from, members of those CUGs of which the user is a member.
+
+##### 1.2.2.6 **outgoing calls barred within the CUG**
+
+This restriction means that a CUG user cannot make CUG calls to members of those CUGs of which the user is a member with the “outgoing calls” barring within the CUG option.
+
+##### 1.2.2.7 **outgoing access**
+
+Outgoing access allows a CUG user, in addition to the CUG only service (with or without outgoing calls barred within the CUG), to make calls to all other non-CUG users and also to those other CUG users that allow incoming access.
+
+An outgoing access arrangement applies to an ISDN number (or to an ISDN number/service – see § 1.3.1) and not to a specific CUG.
+
+##### 1.2.2.8 **incoming calls barred within the CUG**
+
+This restriction means that a CUG user cannot receive CUG calls from members of those CUGs of which the user is a member with the “incoming calls” barring within the CUG option.
+
+##### 1.2.2.9 *Incoming access*
+
+Incoming access allows a CUG user, in addition to the CUG only service (with or without incoming calls barred within the CUG), to receive calls from all other non-CUG users and also from those other CUG users that allow outgoing access.
+
+An incoming access arrangement applies to an ISDN number (or to an ISDN number/service – see § 1.3.1) and not to a specific CUG.
+
+#### 1.2.3 *Qualification on the applicability to telecommunication services*
+
+In general CUG service is defined independently of any basic service, i.e. it applies to an ISDN number. However, the service may be defined in relation to one, or a list of basic services.
+
+#### 1.2.4 *State definitions*
+
+No specifically defined states are required for the CUG service.
+
+### 1.3 *Operational requirements*
+
+#### 1.3.1 *Provision/withdrawal*
+
+The provision of the CUG service to a new member and also assignment of the various CUG service options (except preferential CUG) individually, require a prior arrangement between the (new) member and the network provider with the consent of the CUG manager for the CUG.
+
+The assignment of a CUG index value to be associated with the CUG and also the assignment of any preferential CUG requires prior arrangement between the (new) member and the network provider only.
+
+The CUG service is provided on a subscription basis. As a network provider option, CUG service can be offered with subscription options. The options can be divided into two groups:
+
+- a) The following options apply per ISDN number. The option values can be assigned individually for each basic service, or set of basic services, available at the ISDN number with CUG service:
+
+| Option | Values |
+|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1) Preferential CUG | Default CUG index, or non designated |
+| 2) Outgoing access | Allowed permanently, allowed per call, or not allowed |
+
+*Note* – The “allowed per call” outgoing access option is alternatively known as “outgoing access (explicit)” and the “allowed permanently” outgoing access option is alternatively known as “Outgoing access (implicit)”.
+
+| Option | Values |
+|--------------------|-------------------------|
+| 3) Incoming access | Allowed, or not allowed |
+
+If for a user with CUG service, a basic service, or set of basic services, is not included in at least one CUG, then:
+
+- preferential CUG must have the “none designated” option value;
+- outgoing access will normally have the “allowed permanently” option value if outgoing calls using a basic service or set of basic services are required;
+- incoming access will have the “allowed” option value if incoming calls using a basic service or set of basic services are required.
+
+- b) The following option applies per CUG. If the CUG includes more than one basic service, or set of basic services, the value of this option can be assigned individually for each basic service, or set of basic services, including:
+
+| Option | Values |
+|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
+| 1) Barring within the CUG | None, incoming calls, or outgoing calls |
+
+If for a particular basic service, or set of basic services, available to an ISDN number, a preferential CUG is nominated, then it shall not be possible to assign the “outgoing calls” barring within the CUG option to that basic service, or set of basic services, for the preferential CUG.
+
+The options assigned to a CUG member are stored in the network.
+
+*Note* – Whether or not the storage of these options for CUG are centralized or decentralized is beyond the scope of this Recommendation and is defined in the stage 2 of Recommendation of CUG (see Recommendation Q.85.1).
+
+#### 1.3.2 *Requirements on the originating network side*
+
+For correct interactions with other supplementary services, it is necessary for the originating network side to store, for the duration of the call, details of whether a non-CUG, CUG (without outgoing access) or CUG (with outgoing access) call was requested in the information sent to the destination network side. The CUG identity (if any) requested of the destination network side must also be retained.
+
+#### 1.3.3 *Requirements in the network*
+
+This section is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+#### 1.3.4 Requirements on the terminating network side
+
+For correct interactions with other supplementary services, it is necessary for the destination network side to store, for the duration of the call, details of whether a non-CUG or CUG (with or without outgoing access) call request was passed to the user. The CUG identity (if any) requested must also be retained.
+
+### 1.4 Coding requirements
+
+#### 1.4.1 Messages
+
+The messages that will be used for the invocation and control of the CUG supplementary service follow:
+
+- a) DISCONNECT (see Note 1);
+- b) RELEASE (see Note 1);
+- c) RELEASE COMPLETE (see Note 1);
+- d) SETUP (see Note 2).
+
+*Note 1* – The facility information element may be included in the network-to-user direction in the first call clearing message if the calling user explicitly requests CUG service, if the network cannot allow the call to proceed before returning CUG service acceptance to the calling user. In the user-to-network direction the facility information element may be included in the first call clearing message if the called user cannot allow the call to proceed before returning CUG service acceptance to the network.
+
+*Note 2* – In the user-to-network direction the facility information element will be included if the calling user explicitly requests CUG service. In the network-to-user direction facility information element will be included if a CUG call is required.
+
+#### 1.4.2 Operations (ASN.1)
+
+Closed-User-Group-Service-Operations {ccitt recommendation q 955 cug (1)}
+
+DEFINITIONS ::=
+
+BEGIN
+
+EXPORTS CUGCallOperationType ;
+
+IMPORTS OPERATION, ERROR Remote-Operation-Notation {joint-iso-ccitt remote-operations(4) notations(0)}
+userNotSubscribed, basicServiceNotProvided FROM General-Error-List
+{ccitt recommendation q 950 general-error-list};
+
+CUGCallOperationType ::= -- invoked from calling user to originating
+-- network side and from destination network
+-- side to user.
+
+OPERATION
+
+ARGUMENT SEQUENCE {
+outgoingAccessRequest [1] IMPLICIT BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
+-- if outgoing access is requested then TRUE is set, and
+-- if outgoing access is not requested then FALSE is set.
+cUGIndex [2] IMPLICIT CUGindex OPTIONAL}
+-- in SETUP message
+
+ERRORS {
+userNotSubscribed,
+basicServiceNotProvided,
+invalidOrUnregisteredCUGIndex,
+requestedBasicServiceViolatesCUGConstraints,
+outgoingCallsBarredWithinCUG,
+
+```
+
+ incomingCallsBarredWithinCUG,
+ userNotMemberOfCUG,
+ inconsistencyInDesignatedFacilityAndSubscriberClass}
+ -- in first clearing message to calling user or network
+
+CUGCallOperation CUGCallOperationType ::= 2
+
+CUGIndex ::= INTEGER (0..32767)
+
+-- Some networks may specify a max. value of the CUG index from 0 to 9999.
+
+invalidOrUnregisteredCUGIndex ERROR ::= 16
+requestedBasicServiceViolatesCUGConstraints ERROR ::= 17
+outgoingCallsBarredWithinCUG ERROR ::= 18
+incomingCallsBarredWithinCUG ERROR ::= 19
+userNotMemberOfCUG ERROR ::= 20
+inconsistencyInDesignatedFacilityAndSubscriberClass ERROR ::= 21
+
+END -- of closed user group service operations
+
+```
+
+### 1.5 *Signalling requirements*
+
+#### 1.5.1 *Activation/deactivation/registration*
+
+No signalling procedure is necessary for activation, deactivation and registration.
+
+#### 1.5.2 *Invocation and operation*
+
+The CUG service is invoked by:
+
+- a call originating from a user that has CUG service. The user can explicitly request CUG service, but in the absence of an explicit request the CUG service default procedures are automatically applied;
+- a call terminating at a user that has CUG service.
+
+##### 1.5.2.1 *Normal operation*
+
+###### 1.5.2.1.1 *Actions at the originating local exchange*
+
+###### 1.5.2.1.1.1 *Call originating from a user with CUG service*
+
+###### 1.5.2.1.1.1.1 *Explicit request of CUG service*
+
+The calling user can explicitly request the CUG service by including in the outgoing SETUP message a facility information element containing a CUG call invoke component.
+
+To indicate outgoing access the user shall set the value of the Outgoing Access Request parameter to TRUE.
+
+The network performs internal checks appropriate to the originating network side based on the contents of the invoke component and the CUG attributes of the calling user. The outcome of these checks are defined in Table 1-1/Q.955 (including Notes).
+
+*Note* – The network might respond to the SETUP message with a SETUP ACKNOWLEDGE or CALL PROCEEDING message or the call might be cleared for some non-CUG service related reasons before the checks are completed.
+
+If the result of the checks relevant to the originating network side allow the call to proceed, then the network performs further internal checks based on the CUG attributes (if any) of the called user. The outcome of these checks are defined in Table 1-2/Q.955.
+
+If the call is successfully offered to the called user, an ALERTING or CONNECT message according to basic call control, shall be returned to the calling user.
+
+###### 1.5.2.1.1.1.2 *Implicit request of CUG service*
+
+The calling user with CUG service can request the CUG service without including an invoke component in the outgoing setup message (e.g. to make use of the preferential CUG facility). In this case the procedures of § 1.5.2.1.1.1.1 apply with the following exception:
+
+- the network performs internal checks appropriate to the originating network side only based on the CUG attributes of the calling user.
+
+###### 1.5.2.1.1.2 *Call originating from a user without CUG service*
+
+It is possible for a user without CUG service to make a call to a user with CUG service. If such a calling user does not include a CUG call invoke component in the outgoing SETUP message, Table 1-1/Q.955 shall apply.
+
+The network then performs further internal checks based on the CUG attributes (if any) of the called user. The outcome of these checks are defined in Table 1-2/Q.955.
+
+If the call is successfully offered to the called user, no return result component shall be returned to the calling user.
+
+###### 1.5.2.1.2 *Actions at the transit exchange*
+
+This section is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+###### 1.5.2.1.3 *Actions at the destination local exchange*
+
+If the internal checks defined in Table 1-2/Q.955 result in a requirement for a CUG call (with or without outgoing access request) to the called user, then the incoming SETUP message shall include a facility information element containing a CUG call invoke component.
+
+If the call is successfully offered to the called user, no return result component shall be expected by the network.
+
+##### 1.5.2.2 *Exceptional procedures*
+
+###### 1.5.2.2.1 *Actions at the originating local exchange*
+
+###### 1.5.2.2.1.1 *Call originating from a user with CUG service*
+
+###### 1.5.2.2.1.1.1 *Explicit request of CUG service*
+
+If the network cannot allow the call to proceed for a CUG service related reason as a result of the checks relevant to either the originating or the destination network side, then the network shall fail the call attempt and include in the first clearing message returned to the calling user a facility information element containing a return error component with the appropriate indication as defined by Tables 1-1/Q.955 and 1-2/Q.955 (including Notes).
+
+The Q.931 cause in the clearing message conveying the return error component will be No. 29 “facility rejected”.
+
+If the call attempt fails for a non-CUG service related reason, then a facility information element containing a return error component indicating “basic service not provided” should be included in the first clearing message returned to the calling user. The Q.931 cause used will be determined by the event causing the failure. However, even if a facility information element containing a return error component will not be included in the first clearing message to the calling user, the terminal shall continue normal clearing and abandon the operation.
+
+The possibility of “simultaneous” failure for CUG and non-CUG service related reasons is not precluded. In this case the return error component will contain an indication as defined by Tables 1-1/Q.955 and 1-2/Q.955, but the Q.931 cause will be determined by the non-CUG service event causing call failure.
+
+TABLE 1-1/Q.955
+
+###### **CUG check at the originating network side**
+
+This table is used to determine the type of call request sent to the destination network side and the type of rejection indications returned to the calling user.
+
+*Note* — The type of call request derived from this table determines the linkage to Table 1-2/Q.955
+
+| CUG attributes of calling user for requested basic service | | CUG information received from calling user in SETUP | | | | |
+|------------------------------------------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
+| | | CUG call invoke received | | | | No CUG call invoke received |
+| | | OA not requested CUG index | OA requested CUG index | OA not requested no CUG index | OA requested no CUG index | |
+| O/access not allowed | Not OCB | CUG call
IC = spec CUG
(Note 1) | CUG call
IC = spec CUG
(Note 1) | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 21
(Note 5) | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 21
(Note 5) | Rejected
Rec. Q.931
CAUSE = No. 29
(Note 5) |
+| | OCB | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 18 | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 18 | | | |
+| O/access per call | Not OCB | CUG call
IC = spec CUG
(Note 1) | CUG + OA
IC = spec CUG
(Note 2) | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 21
(Note 5) | Non-CUG call
(Note 5) | Rejected
Rec. Q.931
CAUSE = No. 29
(Note 5) |
+| | OCB | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 18 | Non-CUG call | | | |
+| O/access permanent | Not OCB | CUG + OA
IC = spec CUG
(Note 1) | CUG + OA
IC = spec CUG
(Note 1) | Non-CUG call
(Note 5) | Non-CUG call
(Note 5) | Non-CUG call
(Note 5) |
+| | OCB | Non-CUG call | Non-CUG call | | | |
+| Preferential CUG nominated
O/access not allowed | Not OCB | CUG call
IC = spec CUG
(Note 3) | CUG call
IC = spec CUG
(Note 3) | CUG call
IC = preferential CUG | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 21 | CUG call IC = preferential CUG |
+| | OCB | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 18
(Note 4) | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 18
(Note 4) | Combination barred
(Note 6) | Combination barred
(Note 6) | Combination barred
(Note 6) |
+| Preferential CUG nominated
O/access per call | Not OCB | CUG call
IC = spec CUG
(Note 3) | CUG + OA
IC = spec CUG
(Note 3) | CUG call
IC = preferential CUG | Non-CUG call | CUG call IC = preferential CUG |
+| | OCB | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 18
(Note 4) | Non-CUG call
(Note 4) | Combination barred
(Note 6) | Combination barred
(Note 6) | Combination barred
(Note 6) |
+| Preferential CUG nominated
O/access permanent | Not OCB | CUG + OA
IC = spec CUG
(Note 3) | CUG + OA
IC = spec CUG
(Note 3) | (Note 8) | CUG + OA call IC = preferential CUG | (Note 8) |
+| | OCB | Non-CUG call
(Note 4) | Non-CUG call
(Note 4) | Combination barred
(Note 6) | Combination barred
(Note 6) | Combination barred
(Note 6) |
+| Not a CUG user | | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 0 | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 0 | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 0 | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 0 | Non-CUG call
(Note 7) |
+
+OA Outgoing access
+ OCB Outgoing call barred
+ IC CUG interlock code
+ RE Return error
+ RE-VAL Return error value
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
+| RE-VAL No. 0 | User not subscribed |
+| RE-VAL No. 16 | InvalidOrUnregisteredCUGIndex |
+| RE-VAL No. 17 | Requested basic service violates CUG constraints |
+| RE-VAL No. 18 | Outgoing calls barred within CUG |
+| RE-VAL No. 21 | Inconsistency in designated facility and subscriber class |
+| Rec. Q.931 CAUSE No. 29 | Facility rejected |
+
+*Note 1* — Assumes match between CUG index and IC exists for the requested basic service. If no match exists then:
+
+- if the CUG index exists but is not appropriate to the requested basic service the call is rejected with RE-VAL = No. 17;
+- Note that this includes the case when the requested basic service is not included in any CUG;
+- if the CUG index does not exist the call is rejected with RE-VAL = No. 16.
+
+*Note 2* — Assumes match between CUG index and IC exists for the requested basic service. If no match exists then:
+
+- if the CUG index exists but is not appropriate to the requested basic service the call proceeds as a non-CUG call.
+
+Note that this includes the case when the requested basic service is not included in any CUG;
+
+- if the CUG index does not exist the call is rejected with RE-VAL = No. 16.
+
+*Note 3* — Assumes match between CUG index and IC exists for the requested basic service. If no match exists then:
+
+- if the CUG index exists but is not appropriate to the requested basic service the call is rejected with RE-VAL = No. 17;
+- if the CUG index does not exist the call is rejected with RE-VAL = No. 16.
+
+*Note 4* — If the CUG index identifies the preferential CUG then this combination is barred in the options data, i.e. the preferential CUG cannot be assigned the “outgoing calls” barring within the CUG option.
+
+*Note 5* — This includes the case when the requested basic service is not included in any CUG.
+
+*Note 6* — This combination is barred in the options data, i.e. the preferential CUG cannot be assigned the “outgoing calls” barring within the CUG option.
+
+*Note 7* — This represents the normal case of a user without CUG service making a non-CUG call.
+
+*Note 8* — Both “preferential CUG” and “allowed permanently” outgoing access options imply that either of them can be requested without including an invoke component in the outgoing SETUP message. When a user subscribes to both options, a network does not know which option the user is invoking in the outgoing SETUP message.
+
+Three ways of operating are recommended:
+
+- 1) the user has to indicate if a call is intended to be an outgoing access call. If no information (CUG request or outgoing call request) is given, the preferential CUG is assumed;
+- 2) the combination of the options is not allowed, i.e. a user cannot have both options allocated at the same time;
+- 3) the caller may make a call and the network will route the call with the preferential CUG and an outgoing access request. The call will therefore be connected if the called number is a member of the preferential CUG or is a member of a different CUG and has incoming access, or is a non-CUG user.
+
+In the case of option 1) the type of call request sent to the destination network side is “CUG (IC = pref.)”.
+
+In the case of option 2) the combination of the options is not allowed.
+
+In the case of option 3) the type of call request sent to the destination network side is “CUG + OA (IC = pref.)”.
+
+The choice from the above cases is a national option.
+
+TABLE 1-2/Q.955
+
+###### **CUG checks at the destination network side**
+
+This table can be used to determine the type of call request sent to the destination user and the type of rejection indications returned to the calling user.
+
+| Type of CUG indication from the network | M or NM | CUG attributes of called user for requested basic service | | | | Not a CUG user | |
+|-----------------------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|--|
+| | | I/access not allowed | | Incoming access allowed | | | |
+| | | Not ICB | ICB | Not ICB | ICB | | |
+| CUG call with no O/access indication | M | CUG call | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 19 | CUG call | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 19 | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 20 | |
+| | NM | Rejected RE-VAL = No. 20
(Note 1) | | Rejected RE-VAL = No. 20
(Note 1) | | | |
+| CUG call with O/access indication | M | CUG call with OA request | Rejected
RE-VAL = No. 19 | CUG call with OA request | Non-CUG call | Non-CUG call | |
+| | NM | Rejected RE-VAL = No. 20
(Note 1) | | Non-CUG call (Note 2) | | | |
+| Non-CUG call | — | Rejected RE-VAL = No. 20 (Note 2) | | Non-CUG call (Note 2) | | Non-CUG call
(Note 3) | |
+
+| | |
+|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| ICB | Incoming call barred |
+| M | Match between IC and CUG index exists for the requested basic service |
+| NM | No match between IC and CUG index exists for the requested basic service |
+| IC | CUG interlock code |
+| RE | “Return error” component returned to calling user |
+| RE-VAL | “Return error” value |
+| RE-VAL No. 17 | Requested basic service violates CUG constraints |
+| RE-VAL No. 19 | Incoming calls barred within CUG |
+| RE-VAL No. 20 | User not member of CUG |
+
+###### *Key to cross points in table:*
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| CUG call | Invoke component in SETUP message identifies CUG index but does not request outgoing access |
+| CUG call with OA request | Invoke component in SETUP message identifies CUG index and requests outgoing access |
+| Non-CUG call | No invoke component in SETUP message |
+
+*Note 1* — Assumes that the CUG match fails because the IC does not exist for the called user. If the IC exists but is not appropriate to the requested basic service, then the call is rejected with RE-VAL = No. 17.
+
+Note that this includes the case when the requested basic service is not included in any CUG.
+
+*Note 2* — This includes the case when the requested basic service is not included in any CUG.
+
+*Note 3* — This represents the normal case of a user without CUG service receiving a non-CUG call.
+
+###### 1.5.2.2.1.1.2 *Implicit request of CUG service*
+
+If the calling user with CUG service does not include an invoke component in the outgoing SETUP message (e.g. to make use of the preferential CUG facility) the procedures of § 1.5.2.2.1.1.1 apply with the following exceptions:
+
+- 1) if either the originating or destination network side cannot allow the call to proceed for a CUG service related reason, the network shall initiate call clearing using the following Q.931 causes:
+ - No. 87 “user not a member of CUG” if the corresponding return error value would be No. 20 “user not a member of CUG” using the explicit request procedures;
+ - No. 29 “facility rejected” in the case of all other CUG service related reasons,
+- 2) when a call fails for a purely non-CUG service related reason, then no indication of “basic service not provided” is provided to the calling user.
+
+###### 1.5.2.2.1.2 *Call originating from a user without CUG service*
+
+If the calling user includes in the outgoing SETUP message a facility information element containing a CUG call invoke component, and the network can recognize that the calling user is requesting CUG service, then it shall include in the first CLEARING message returned to the calling user a facility information element containing a return error component with the appropriate indication as defined by Table 1-1/Q.955, i.e. “user not subscribed”.
+
+If the calling user does not include a facility information element, and the network cannot allow the call to proceed as a result of the checks relevant to the destination network side, then the network shall fail the call attempt and initiate clearing with Q.931 cause No. 87 “user not a member of CUG”. No CUG service related indication shall be conveyed to the calling user.
+
+If the call attempt fails for a non-CUG service related reason, then no CUG service related procedures apply.
+
+###### 1.5.2.2.2 *Actions at the transit exchange*
+
+This section is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+###### 1.5.2.2.3 *Actions at the destination local exchange*
+
+If after transmitting the incoming SETUP message and before receiving an ALERTING message, the call attempt fails for a CUG or non-CUG service related reason, then the network expects a return error component with the appropriate indication in the first clearing message received from the called user. If the call attempt fails for a CUG service related reason, the Q.931 cause in the clearing message conveying the return error component will normally be No. 29 “facility rejected”. The indication in the return error component shall be sent back to the calling user. Absence of the return error component shall be regarded by the destination network side as a failure for non-CUG service related reasons.
+
+In the case of a SETUP message sent via the broadcast data link, the network may, as a network option, retain the return error component along with the Q.931 cause retained according to § 5.2.5.3 of Recommendation Q.931. If there are multiple clearing messages containing return error components, the indication in the return error component contained in the first clearing message will be sent back to the calling user. If any of the clearing messages with the highest Q.931 causes do not contain return error components and other clearing messages with Q.931 causes of lower priority do contain return error components, no indication in these return error components shall be sent back to the calling user.
+
+### 1.6 *Interaction with other supplementary services*
+
+#### 1.6.1 *Call Waiting*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.2 *Call Transfer*
+
+No applicable interaction at this time.
+
+#### 1.6.3 *Connected Line Identification Presentation*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.4 *Connected Line Identification Restriction*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.5 *Calling Line Identification Presentation*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.6 *Calling Line Identification Restriction*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.7 *Closed User Group*
+
+Not relevant.
+
+#### 1.6.8 *Conference Calling*
+
+No applicable interaction at this time.
+
+#### 1.6.9 *Direct-Dialling-in*
+
+When the user has also subscribed to the DDI supplementary service, the CUG supplementary service is provided on the basis of that part of the ISDN number which the network can recognize or with the default number valid for that access. However CUG membership shall not be available on a per DDI number basis, but instead shall be on the basis of the entire range of DDI members applicable at an access or group of accesses.
+
+#### 1.6.10 *Call diversion (call forwarding) services*
+
+##### 1.6.10.1 *Call Forwarding Busy*
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### 1.6.10.2 *Call Forwarding No Reply*
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### 1.6.10.3 *Call Forwarding Unconditional*
+
+No interaction.
+
+##### 1.6.10.4 *Call Deflection*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.11 *Line Hunting*
+
+Interaction is specified in Recommendation Q.952, § 6.
+
+#### 1.6.12 *Three-Party-Service*
+
+Interaction is specified in Recommendation Q.954, § 2.
+
+#### 1.6.13 *User-to-User Signalling*
+
+##### 1.6.13.1 *Service 1*
+
+No interaction
+
+##### 1.6.13.2 *Service 2*
+
+No interaction
+
+##### 1.6.13.3 *Service 3*
+
+No interaction
+
+#### 1.6.14 *Multiple Subscriber Number*
+
+It shall be possible to provide separate CUG services for each ISDN number both at the calling and called sides.
+
+If the calling terminal does not identify its MSN, then the CUG attributes assigned to the default number shall be applied by the originating network side.
+
+It is the CUG manager's responsibility to ensure that a passive bus does not compromise CUG integrity.
+
+#### 1.6.15 *Call Hold*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.16 *Advice of Charge*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.17 *Sub-addressing*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.18 *Terminal Portability*
+
+No interaction.
+
+#### 1.6.19 *Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber*
+
+No applicable interaction at this time.
+
+#### 1.6.20 *Malicious Call Identification*
+
+No applicable interaction at this time.
+
+### 1.7 *Interaction with other networks*
+
+#### 1.7.1 *Interaction with public network*
+
+Where a CCITT Signalling System No. 7 link exists between two networks, bilateral agreement is required to allow a CUG interlock code to be unique across both networks.
+
+Note that part of the CUG interlock code already identifies the allocating country.
+
+When a CCITT Signalling System No. 7 network interworks with a network not supporting CUG service (e.g. an analogue network), the gateway allows non-CUG calls and CUG calls requesting outgoing access to proceed as normal calls. In the latter case the CUG interlock code is discarded and there is no CUG specific notification returned to the originating network side.
+
+In the case of CUG calls (without outgoing access request) the gateway rejects the call request. Within the return error component returned to the calling user, the indication shall be "user not member of CUG" and the Q.931 cause will normally be No. 29 "facility rejected".
+
+#### 1.7.2 *Interaction with private ISDN*
+
+When a public network CUG interacts with a private network CUG by way of an access, it is possible, by mapping between the two CUG domains in the gateway (e.g. PBX), to arrange for CUG users to perceive the concatenated CUG domains as a single CUG.
+
+Under these circumstances the access must behave as an internodal link for CUG purposes.
+
+If the private network with a private network CUG domain is the originating network, a public CUG index should be indicated in a SETUP message whenever CUG service is requested so that the private network can receive proper indications of public CUG failures or destination private CUG failures.
+
+Therefore when the private network anticipates interaction with a public CUG domain at the originating side, it shall use only the explicit request of CUG service.
+
+If the private network is the destination network, no special procedures are required.
+
+### 1.8 Signalling flows
+
+The following examples show only the messages which convey CUG information and their CUG related contents. Otherwise, basic call control applies.
+
+### 1.9 Parameter value (timers)
+
+### 1.10 Dynamic description (SDLs)
+
+The SDL description is shown in Figures 1-5/Q.955 and 1-6/Q.955.
+
+Figures 1-5/Q.955 and 1-6/Q.955 provide the SDL description of the CUG process at the originating and destination network sides respectively.
+
+The CUG process is modelled as an extension of the call control process. Information can pass between the call control and CUG processes by means of primitives.
+
+The call control process communicates certain call control events and parameters to the CUG process and then waits for instructions to proceed from the CUG process. The primitives from the CUG process fall into two categories:
+
+- a) *Continue*: The continue primitive prompts the call control process to proceed but does not change the course of call control in establishing or clearing the call attempt. It may provide additional instructions from the CUG process to call control, e.g.:
+ - *normal*: no additional instructions to call control;
+ - apply checks – call control required to perform the appropriate CUG checks and then proceed (note that the stage 2 description functional entities FE3 “outgoing CUG control” and FE5 “incoming CUG control” are not modelled as part of the stage 3 description “CUG process”);
+ - RE value – call control required to include a *CUG call* return error component with the indicated value in the first clearing message to the calling user;
+- b) *Clear call*: The clear call primitive causes call control to move from call establishment to appropriate call clearing procedures using the additional information provided by the CUG process.
+
+
+
+```
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant CU as Calling user
+ participant N as Network
+ participant CUS as Called user
+
+ CU->>N: SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)]
+ N-->CU: CALL PROCEEDING
+ N->>CUS: SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)]
+ CUS-->N: ALERT
+ N-->CU: ALERT
+ CUS->>N: CONNECT
+ N-->CU: CONNECT
+ CUS->>N: CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the signalling flow for a successful call passing through both originating and destination network checks. It involves three entities: Calling user, Network, and Called user. The sequence of messages is as follows: 1. The Calling user sends a SETUP message to the Network, containing FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI). 2. The Network responds to the Calling user with a CALL PROCEEDING message. 3. The Network sends a SETUP message to the Called user, also containing FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI). 4. The Called user sends an ALERT message back to the Network. 5. The Network sends an ALERT message back to the Calling user. 6. The Called user sends a CONNECT message to the Network. 7. The Network sends a CONNECT message back to the Calling user. 8. The Called user sends a CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT message to the Network.
+
+Sequence diagram showing call signalling flow between Calling user, Network, and Called user.
+
+T1124750-90
+
+FIGURE 1-1/Q.955
+
+**Call passes both originating and destination network checks and is successful**
+
+![Sequence diagram for Figure 1-2/Q.955 showing a call failure scenario where the destination network side checks fail. The diagram involves three lifelines: Calling user, Network, and Called user. The sequence of messages is: Calling user sends SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] to Network; Network sends CALL PROCEEDING to Calling user; Network sends DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)] to Calling user. The Called user lifeline is present but has no messages.](fa859e4e468bfb2710a94527f2c504af_img.jpg)
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant CU as Calling user
+ participant N as Network
+ participant C as Called user
+
+ CU->>N: SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)]
+ N-->>CU: CALL PROCEEDING
+ N-->>CU: DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)]
+ C
+
+```
+
+T1124760-90
+
+Sequence diagram for Figure 1-2/Q.955 showing a call failure scenario where the destination network side checks fail. The diagram involves three lifelines: Calling user, Network, and Called user. The sequence of messages is: Calling user sends SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] to Network; Network sends CALL PROCEEDING to Calling user; Network sends DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)] to Calling user. The Called user lifeline is present but has no messages.
+
+FIGURE 1-2/Q.955
+
+**Call fails destination network side checks**
+
+![Sequence diagram for Figure 1-3/Q.955 showing a call failure scenario where the origination network side checks fail. The diagram involves three lifelines: Calling user, Network, and Called user. The sequence of messages is: Calling user sends SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] to Network; Network sends CALL PROCEEDING to Calling user; Network sends DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)] to Calling user. The Called user lifeline is present but has no messages.](1a827b10290f33d4fec04d0e8ef7a897_img.jpg)
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant CU as Calling user
+ participant N as Network
+ participant C as Called user
+
+ CU->>N: SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)]
+ N-->>CU: CALL PROCEEDING
+ N-->>CU: DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)]
+ C
+
+```
+
+T1124770-90
+
+Sequence diagram for Figure 1-3/Q.955 showing a call failure scenario where the origination network side checks fail. The diagram involves three lifelines: Calling user, Network, and Called user. The sequence of messages is: Calling user sends SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] to Network; Network sends CALL PROCEEDING to Calling user; Network sends DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)] to Calling user. The Called user lifeline is present but has no messages.
+
+FIGURE 1-3/Q.955
+
+**Call fails origination network side checks**
+
+![Sequence diagram showing a call setup and release between a Calling user and a Network. The Calling user sends a SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] message to the Network, and the Network returns a RELEASE COMPLETE [FAC(RE)] message to the Calling user. A Called user is shown but has no messages.](8fbdfc3d17fb1dae7b2d8f5a287fa9fc_img.jpg)
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant CU as Calling user
+ participant N as Network
+ participant C as Called user
+ CU->>N: SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)]
+ N-->>CU: RELEASE COMPLETE [FAC(RE)]
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram showing a call setup and release between a Calling user and a Network. The Calling user sends a SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] message to the Network, and the Network returns a RELEASE COMPLETE [FAC(RE)] message to the Calling user. A Called user is shown but has no messages.
+
+![Sequence diagram showing a call setup, proceeding, and release between a Calling user, a Network, and a Called user. The Calling user sends a SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] message to the Network. The Network returns a CALL PROCEEDING message to the Calling user. The Network then sends a SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] message to the Called user. The Called user returns a RELEASE COMPLETE [FAC(RE)] message to the Network. The Network then returns a DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)] message to the Calling user.](c85ded401105f62f2d6ff26b3b5eb4af_img.jpg)
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant CU as Calling user
+ participant N as Network
+ participant C as Called user
+ CU->>N: SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)]
+ N-->>CU: CALL PROCEEDING
+ N->>C: SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)]
+ C-->>N: RELEASE COMPLETE [FAC(RE)]
+ N-->>CU: DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)]
+
+```
+
+Sequence diagram showing a call setup, proceeding, and release between a Calling user, a Network, and a Called user. The Calling user sends a SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] message to the Network. The Network returns a CALL PROCEEDING message to the Calling user. The Network then sends a SETUP [FAC(CUG-CL-INV, OA, CI)] message to the Called user. The Called user returns a RELEASE COMPLETE [FAC(RE)] message to the Network. The Network then returns a DISCONNECT [FAC(RE)] message to the Calling user.
+
+FAC Facility information element
+CUG-CL-INV CUG call invoke
+RE Return error
+CI CUG index
+OA Outgoing access
+
+T1124780-90
+
+*Note* – Point-to-point configuration is assumed for the called user.
+
+FIGURE 1-4/Q.955
+
+**Call passes both originating and destination network checks and fails at the called user side**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([CUG idle]) --> Outgoing_SETUP[/Outgoing SETUP/]
+ Start --> Call_fail_1[/Call fail (reason)/]
+ Start --> Called_party_ALERTING_1[/Called party ALERTING/]
+ Start --> Called_party_CONNECT_1[/Called party CONNECT/]
+
+ Outgoing_SETUP --> CUG_subscription{CUG? subscription?}
+ CUG_subscription -- Yes --> Continue_Apply_checks[/Continue (Apply checks)/]
+ Continue_Apply_checks --> Outgoing_CUG([Outgoing CUG])
+ Outgoing_CUG --> Called_party_ALERTING_2[/Called party ALERTING/]
+ Called_party_ALERTING_2 --> Continue_Normal_1[/Continue (normal)/]
+ Continue_Normal_1 --> CUG_idle_1([CUG idle])
+
+ CUG_subscription -- No --> Explicit_invocation{Explicit invocation?}
+ Explicit_invocation -- Yes --> Set_error[Set error value = No. 0]
+ Set_error --> Clear_call[/Clear call (RE value)/]
+ Clear_call --> Called_party_CONNECT_2[/Called party CONNECT/]
+ Called_party_CONNECT_2 --> Continue_Normal_2[/Continue (normal)/]
+ Continue_Normal_2 --> CUG_idle_2([CUG idle])
+
+ Explicit_invocation -- No --> Continue_Normal_3[/Continue (normal)/]
+ Continue_Normal_3 --> CUG_idle_3([CUG idle])
+
+ Called_party_CONNECT_1 --> Continue_Normal_4[/Continue (normal)/]
+ Continue_Normal_4 --> CUG_idle_4([CUG idle])
+
+ Call_fail_1 --> CUG_idle_5([CUG idle])
+
+ Called_party_ALERTING_1 --> Continue_Normal_5[/Continue (normal)/]
+ Continue_Normal_5 --> CUG_idle_6([CUG idle])
+
+ Called_party_CONNECT_1 --> Call_fail_2[/Call fail (reason)/]
+ Call_fail_2 --> 1((1))
+ 1 --> 2
+
+```
+
+T1124790-90
+
+Flowchart of CUG process – Outgoing call (network side). The process starts with 'CUG idle' and branches into 'Outgoing SETUP', 'Call fail (reason)', 'Called party ALERTING', and 'Called party CONNECT'. It includes decision points for 'CUG? subscription?' and 'Explicit invocation?', leading to various 'Continue (normal)' and 'CUG idle' states, or error handling steps like 'Set error value = No. 0' and 'Clear call (RE value)'. A reference 'T1124790-90' and a circled '1' with a '2' are also present.
+
+FIGURE 1-5/Q.955 (sheet 1 of 2)
+CUG process – Outgoing call (network side)
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start((1)) --> CUGRelated{CUG related reason?}
+ CUGRelated -- Yes --> MapReason[Map reason to error value]
+ CUGRelated -- No --> SetError[Set error value = No. 8]
+ MapReason --> Explicit{Explicit invocation?}
+ SetError --> Explicit
+ Explicit -- Yes --> ContinueRE{{Continue (RE value)}}
+ Explicit -- No --> Error20{Error value = No. 20}
+ Error20 -- Yes --> Continue87{{Continue (Cause = No. 87)}}
+ Error20 -- No --> ContinueNormal{{Continue (Normal)}}
+ ContinueRE --> Merge(( ))
+ Continue87 --> Merge
+ ContinueNormal --> Merge
+ Merge --> CUGIdle{{CUG idle}}
+
+```
+
+T1124800-90
+
+Flowchart for CUG process – Outgoing call (network side). The process starts with a start node (1) leading to a decision 'CUG related reason?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Map reason to error value'. If 'No', it goes to 'Set error value = No. 8'. Both paths merge and lead to a decision 'Explicit invocation?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Continue (RE value)'. If 'No', it goes to a decision 'Error value = No. 20'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Continue (Cause = No. 87)'. If 'No', it goes to 'Continue (Normal)'. All three 'Continue' paths merge and lead to the final state 'CUG idle'.
+
+FIGURE 1-5/Q.955 (sheet 2 of 2)
+
+#### **CUG process – Outgoing call (network side)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ CUG_idle1{{CUG idle}}
+ InSETUP_NonCUG[Incoming SETUP (Non-CUG)]
+ InSETUP_CUG[Incoming SETUP (CUG)]
+ InSETUP_CUG_OA[Incoming SETUP (CUG + OA)]
+ Called_ALERTING1[Called party ALERTING]
+ Called_CONNECT1[Called party CONNECT]
+ Call_fall1[Call fall (Reason)]
+ Continue_NonCUG[Continue (Normal)]
+ Continue_CUG[Continue (Apply checks)]
+ Continue_fall1[Continue (Normal)]
+ CUG_idle2{{CUG idle}}
+ InCUG{{Incoming CUG}}
+ Called_ALERTING2[Called party ALERTING]
+ Called_CONNECT2[Called party CONNECT]
+ Call_fall2[Call fall (Reason)]
+ Junction1((1))
+ Junction2((2))
+
+ CUG_idle1 --- InSETUP_NonCUG
+ CUG_idle1 --- InSETUP_CUG
+ CUG_idle1 --- InSETUP_CUG_OA
+ CUG_idle1 --- Called_ALERTING1
+ CUG_idle1 --- Called_CONNECT1
+ CUG_idle1 --- Call_fall1
+
+ InSETUP_NonCUG --> Continue_NonCUG
+ Continue_NonCUG --> CUG_idle2
+
+ InSETUP_CUG --> Continue_CUG
+ InSETUP_CUG_OA --> Continue_CUG
+ Continue_CUG --> InCUG
+
+ InCUG --> Called_ALERTING2
+ InCUG --> Called_CONNECT2
+ InCUG --> Call_fall2
+
+ Called_ALERTING1 --> Junction1
+ Called_CONNECT1 --> Junction1
+ Junction1 --> Called_ALERTING2
+ Junction1 --> Called_CONNECT2
+
+ Call_fall1 --> Junction2
+ Call_fall2 --> Junction2
+ Junction2 --> Continue_fall1
+ Continue_fall1 --> CUG_idle2
+
+ subgraph BottomRow [ ]
+ Called_ALERTING2
+ Called_CONNECT2
+ Call_fall2
+ end
+
+```
+
+T1124810-90
+
+Flowchart of CUG process – Incoming call (network side). The process starts with 'CUG idle' and branches into 'Incoming SETUP (Non-CUG)', 'Incoming SETUP (CUG)', and 'Incoming SETUP (CUG + OA)'. 'Non-CUG' leads to 'Continue (Normal)' and back to 'CUG idle'. 'CUG' and 'CUG + OA' lead to 'Continue (Apply checks)' and then to 'Incoming CUG'. 'Incoming CUG' branches into 'Called party ALERTING', 'Called party CONNECT', and 'Call fall (Reason)'. 'ALERTING' and 'CONNECT' lead to a junction point labeled '1' with a '2' below it. 'Call fall (Reason)' leads to a junction point labeled '2' with a '2' below it. A second set of boxes for 'Called party ALERTING', 'Called party CONNECT', and 'Call fall (Reason)' is shown below, with arrows from the first set pointing to them. 'Call fall (Reason)' also leads to 'Continue (Normal)' and back to 'CUG idle'. Reference T1124810-90 is noted.
+
+FIGURE 1-6/Q.955 (sheet 1 of 2)
+
+**CUG process – Incoming call (network side)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start((1)) -- 1 --> ContinueNormal1[/Continue (Normal)/]
+ ContinueNormal1 --> Decision{RE component included?}
+ Decision -- Yes --> MapError[Map error to reason value]
+ MapError --> ContinueReason[/Continue (Reason)/]
+ ContinueReason --> End([CUG idle])
+ Decision -- No --> ContinueNormal2[/Continue (Normal)/]
+ ContinueNormal2 --> End
+
+```
+
+T1124820-90
+
+Flowchart of the CUG process – Incoming call (network side). The process starts with a start node (1) leading to a 'Continue (Normal)' block. This block leads to a decision diamond 'RE component included?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Map error to reason value', then to a 'Continue (Reason)' block, and finally to the 'CUG idle' end node. If 'No', it goes to another 'Continue (Normal)' block, which also leads to the 'CUG idle' end node. A reference 'T1124820-90' is noted at the bottom right of the flowchart.
+
+FIGURE 1-6/Q.955 (sheet 2 of 2)
+
+#### **CUG process – Incoming call (network side)**
+
+## ANNEX A
+
+(to § 1 of Recommendation Q.955)
+
+### **Diagrammatic description of coding requirements**
+
+This annex gives examples on the detailed coding of the following components:
+
+- invoke component;
+- Return error component.
+
+*Note* – The formal description of this component is defined in § 1.4 of this Recommendation which takes precedence over this annex in case of discrepancy. The structure and encoding is only one possible version and the full range of legal encodings is given in the formal definition in § 1.4.
+
+#### A.1.1 *Invoke component*
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------|-----------------|----------------------------|
+| Invoke component type | 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 | context-spec, const, 1 |
+| Invoke component length | 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 | (for example) |
+| Invoke component contents: | | |
+| Invoke identifier type | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | univ, prim, 2 (INTEGER) |
+| Invoke identifier length | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | |
+| Invoke identifier contents | XXXXXXXX | invoke id value |
+| | | |
+| OPERATION type | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | univ, prim, 2 (INTEGER) |
+| OPERATION length | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | |
+| OPERATION contents | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | CUG Call |
+| | | |
+| SEQUENCE type | 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 | univ, const, 16 (SEQUENCE) |
+| SEQUENCE length | 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 | (for example) |
+| SEQUENCE contents: | | |
+| Outgoing access request type | 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | context-spec, prim, 1 |
+| Outgoing access request length | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | |
+| Outgoing access request contents | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | Error! |
+| | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | (implied BOOLEAN) |
+| | | |
+| CUG index type | 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | context-spec, prim, 2 |
+| CUG index length | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | (for example) |
+| CUG index contents | XXXXXXXX | (implied INTEGER) |
+| CUG index contents | XXXXXXXX | |
+| | | |
+
+#### A.1.2 Return error component
+
+| | | |
+|-------------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Return error component type | 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 | context-spec, const, 3 |
+| Return error component length | 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 | |
+| Return error component cont: | | |
+| Invoke identifier type | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | univ, prim, 2 (INTEGER) |
+| Invoke identifier length | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | |
+| Invoke identifier contents | XXXXXXXX | invoke id value |
+| Error type | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | univ, prim, 2 (INTEGER) |
+| Error length | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | |
+| Error contents | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | (0) User not subscribed |
+| | 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 | (8) Basic service not provided |
+| | 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 | (16) Invalid or unregistered CUG index |
+| | 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 | (17) Requested basic service violates CUG constraints |
+| | 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 | (18) Outgoing calls barred within CUG |
+| | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 | (19) Incoming calls barred within CUG |
+| | 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 | (20) User not member of CUG |
+| | 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 | (21) Inconsistency in designated facility and subscriber class |
+| | All other values are reserved. | |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.955.3-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.955.3-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..362050fb2ca224e525daa54705014a0b235a86dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/Q/T-REC-Q.955.3-199303-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2327 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: a globe with the letters ITU inside, and a lightning bolt striking the globe.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**Q.955**
+
+(03/93)
+
+**DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 1
+STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR SUPPLEMENTARY
+SERVICES USING DSS 1**
+
+---
+
+**STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR COMMUNITY
+OF INTEREST SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES
+USING DSS 1
+CLAUSE 3 – MULTI-LEVEL PRECEDENCE
+AND PREEMPTION (MLPP)**
+
+**ITU-T Recommendation Q.955**
+
+(Previously “CCITT Recommendation”)
+
+---
+
+# FOREWORD
+
+The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecommunication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+ITU-T Recommendation Q.955, clause 3, was prepared by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993).
+
+# --- NOTES
+
+1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 February 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRB have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector.
+
+In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been made in the text to references containing the acronyms “CCITT, CCIR or IFRB” or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure.
+
+2 In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+# CONTENTS
+
+| | Page |
+|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 3 Multi-level precedence and preemption (MLPP)..... | 1 |
+| 3.1 Definition..... | 1 |
+| 3.2 Description..... | 1 |
+| 3.3 Operational requirements..... | 2 |
+| 3.4 Coding requirements..... | 4 |
+| 3.5 Signalling requirements..... | 8 |
+| 3.6 Interactions with other supplementary services..... | 16 |
+| 3.7 Interactions with other networks..... | 20 |
+| 3.8 Signalling flows..... | 25 |
+| 3.9 Parameter values – timers..... | 29 |
+
+
+
+# STAGE 3 DESCRIPTION FOR “COMMUNITY OF INTEREST” SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES, USING DSS 1
+
+*(Helsinki 1993)*
+
+# 3 Multi-level precedence and preemption (MLPP)
+
+## 3.1 Definition
+
+The Multi-level Precedence and Preemption (MLPP) supplementary service provides prioritized call handling service. This supplementary service has two parts – precedence and preemption. Precedence involves assigning a priority level to a call. Preemption involves the seizing of resources, which are in use by a call of a lower precedence, by a higher level precedence call in the absence of idle resources. Users in networks that do not support this service will not be affected by this service.
+
+The stage 1 description of the MLPP supplementary service is contained in 3/I.255.
+
+The stage 2 description of the MLPP supplementary service is contained in 3/Q.85.
+
+## 3.2 Description
+
+### 3.2.1 General description
+
+The MLPP supplementary service is provided as a network provider's option to a domain of a network. The domain can be the whole network or a subset of the network. The MLPP supplementary service applies to all network resources in the domain that are in common use. The maximum precedence level of a subscriber is set at the subscription time by the service provider based on the subscriber's need. The subscriber may select a precedence level up to and including the maximum subscribed to precedence level on a per call basis.
+
+Precedence calls (calls using the MLPP supplementary service that have a higher precedence than the lowest level of precedence) that are not responded to by the called party (e.g. call unanswered and/or unacknowledged, called party busy with call of equal or higher precedence, or called party busy and non-preemptable) are diverted to a predetermined alternate party. This alternate party may be another subscriber or a network operating position.
+
+Preemption may take one of two forms. First, the called party may be busy with a lower precedence call which must be preempted in favor of completing the higher precedence call from the calling party. Second, the network resources may be busy with calls some of which are of lower precedence than the call requested by the calling party. One or more of these lower precedence calls must be preempted to complete the higher precedence call. There are three characteristics of preemption:
+
+- 1) Any party whose connection was terminated (whether that resource is reused or not) must receive a distinctive preemption notification.
+- 2) Any called party of an active call that is being preempted by a higher precedence call should be required to acknowledge the preemption before being connected to the new calling party.
+- 3) When there are no idle resources, preemption of the lowest lower level of precedence resources shall occur.
+
+A call can be preempted any time after the precedence level of the call has been established and before call clearing has begun.
+
+The MLPP supplementary service is not intended to provide preemption of users that do not subscribe to the MLPP supplementary service. The service provides for preemption of calls within the MLPP domain, which consists of the resources belonging to the users that subscribe to the MLPP supplementary service. In other words, calls that are originated by or made to non-MLPP users will not be preempted. Calls that are originated by MLPP subscribers may be preempted by calls of higher precedence only in networks that support this service.
+
+### 3.2.2 Specific terminology
+
+The following specific terminology is used in this Recommendation:
+
+*Precedence* is the priority associated with a call.
+
+A *precedence call* is a call using the MLPP supplementary service with precedence level higher than the lowest level of precedence.
+
+An *MLPP call* is a call using the MLPP supplementary service that has a precedence level established and is either being setup or is setup. In the DSS 1, an MLPP call is a call from an MLPP subscriber for which a SETUP has been sent but no DISCONNECT has been sent or received (i.e. call states U1 through U10).
+
+A *preempting call* is a call using the MLPP supplementary service with a precedence level higher than the lowest (i.e. ROUTINE) level of precedence, for which a call setup request has been received at the exchange.
+
+*User* is a DSS 1 protocol entity at the user side of the user-network interface. A *user* is identified by a terminal, which is addressed by its ISDN number. A *called user* is considered *busy* if he is on an active call (i.e. in call state U10).
+
+*Network* is a DSS 1 protocol entity at the network side of the user-network interface.
+
+A *preemptable circuit* is a circuit that is active with or reserved for an MLPP call: (1) within the same domain as the preempting call and (2) with a lower precedence than the preempting call. A busy or reserved circuit for which a precedence level has not been specified is not a preemptable circuit.
+
+A *preemption initiating exchange* is the exchange that is congested (i.e. no idle circuits) and has received a preempting call setup.
+
+*Congestion* has been encountered when it is determined that all circuits capable of routing the MLPP call are busy (i.e. no idle circuits.)
+
+*Response Timer $T_K$* is as defined in 3/Q.85. The length of this timer is in the range of 4-30 seconds.
+
+An *alternate party* is as defined in 3/Q.85.
+
+*OE (Originating Exchange)* is an exchange that is directly connected to a calling user.
+
+*DE (Destination Exchange)* is an exchange that is directly connected to a called user.
+
+The “*Invoke*”, “*Return Result*”, and “*Return Error*” components shall be as defined in 8.2.3.1.1/Q.932.
+
+### 3.2.3 Qualifications on the applicability to telecommunication services
+
+This supplementary service is considered meaningful when applied to the Telephony Teleservice, speech, 3.1 kHz audio, 7 kHz audio, and 64 kbit/s unrestricted bearer services. Furthermore, it may be meaningful when applied to other services.
+
+### 3.2.4 State definitions
+
+No additional call states, beyond those specified in Recommendations Q.931 and Q.932, are identified for the MLPP service.
+
+## 3.3 Operational requirements
+
+### 3.3.1 Provision/withdrawal
+
+For a given ISDN number, a maximum authorized precedence level may be subscribed to for each service or collectively for all services.
+
+#### 3.3.1.1 Terminal options
+
+A user, as identified by a terminal, has the following subscription options for the MLPP supplementary service:
+
+- 1) Maximum authorized precedence level (see Note 1):
+ - a) 0 (FLASH OVERRIDE – highest)
+ - b) 1 (FLASH)
+ - c) 2 (IMMEDIATE)
+ - d) 3 (PRIORITY)
+ - e) 4 (ROUTINE – lowest).
+- 2) Alternate party:
+ - a) yes
+ - network operating position
+ - alternate party directory number
+ - b) no.
+- 3) Access resources non-preemptable (see Note 2):
+ - a) yes
+ - b) no.
+
+###### NOTES
+
+1 A call of higher precedence level can preempt calls of lower precedence. For example, a FLASH call can preempt IMMEDIATE, PRIORITY, or ROUTINE calls.
+
+2 A user having this option will not experience preemption of calls by higher precedence calls, if the cause for preemption would be due to called party busy condition. However, the user may still experience preemption of calls due to a lack of network resources other than the user's own access resources.
+
+Terminal equipment invoking MLPP supplementary service should be able to indicate the precedence level of the call in the SETUP message and should support Cause values: #8, "preemption" and #46, "precedence call blocked".
+
+Terminal equipment that receive MLPP calls, including that of the alternate party, should support the Hold and Retrieve functions, as defined in 6.2.1/Q.932, Cause value: #8, "preemption". Terminal equipment receiving MLPP calls do not have to subscribe to the call hold supplementary service.
+
+#### 3.3.1.2 Network options
+
+As described in MLPP supplementary service Recommendations I.255.3 (for stage 1) and 3/Q.85 (for stage 2).
+
+### 3.3.2 Requirements on the originating network side
+
+Notification to the calling, called, and preempted users (as a result of preemption in the network or access) shall be conveyed in call control messages using Cause #8 and #46 in the Cause information element, as described in this Recommendation.
+
+Notification to the calling user of delay in call setup shall be conveyed in the NOTIFY message using notification description "0 0 0 1 0 0" in the Notification indicator information element, as described in this Recommendation.
+
+Notification to all conferees of served user preemption shall be conveyed in the NOTIFY message using notification description "1 0 0 1 1 1" in the Notification indicator information element, as described in this Recommendation.
+
+Notification to the remaining parties of a three way conversation that conference is disconnected as a result of preemption of one of the two calls, shall be conveyed in the NOTIFY or DISCONNECT message using notification description "1 0 0 1 1 0 0" in the Notification indicator information element, as described in this Recommendation.
+
+### 3.3.3 Requirements in the network
+
+This subclause is not applicable to DSS 1.
+
+### **3.3.4 Requirements on the terminating network side**
+
+Notification to the calling, called, and preempted users (as a result of preemption in the network or access) shall be conveyed in call control messages using Cause #s 8 and #46 in the Cause information element, as described in this Recommendation.
+
+## **3.4 Coding requirements**
+
+### **3.4.1 Messages**
+
+The following messages are applicable to the operation of the MLPP supplementary service: SETUP, ALERTING, NOTIFY, REGISTER, FACILITY, HOLD, HOLD ACKNOWLEDGE, HOLD REJECT, DISCONNECT, RELEASE, and RELEASE COMPLETE.
+
+The SETUP, ALERTING, NOTIFY, DISCONNECT, RELEASE, and RELEASE COMPLETE messages shall be as defined in 3.3.1/Q.931. For the SETUP, NOTIFY, and DISCONNECT messages the following changes are required.
+
+The SETUP message will contain the Facility information element. In addition, it shall contain the optional Calling party number, Called party number, and Channel identification information elements as mandatory information elements. The NOTIFY message shall contain the Notification indicator information element to indicate delay in call setup, as described in the MLPP procedure. The DISCONNECT message shall include the Cause information element, coded as described in this Recommendation.
+
+The FACILITY message shall contain the Return Result or Return Error components in its Facility information element when it is sent in response to the REGISTER message that shall be used to invoke an MLPP DSS 1 Look-ahead For Busy (LFB) query. The RELEASE COMPLETE message shall be used to terminate the signalling association created by the REGISTER message.
+
+The REGISTER, FACILITY, HOLD, HOLD ACKNOWLEDGE, and HOLD REJECT messages shall be as defined in 7.1/Q.932. The REGISTER message shall contain the Bearer capability, Calling party number, Called party number, and Channel identification information elements encapsulated within the Invoke component of the Facility information element. The HOLD message shall also contain the Cause information element, coded as appropriate to the MLPP procedure.
+
+### **3.4.2 Codesets**
+
+All information elements are in codeset 0. Cause values #8 and #46, contained in the Cause information element, are proposed codeset 0 values.
+
+### **3.4.3 Information elements**
+
+The following information elements are applicable.
+
+#### **3.4.3.1 Facility information element**
+
+For the functional protocol, the Facility information element, as described in 8.2.2/Q.932, shall be used for three MLPP operations, mLPPCallpreemption with operation value 26 (for management of the circuit occupied by the to be preempted call), mLPPCallrequest (for MLPP call) with operation value 25 and mLPPFBquery [for MLPP Look-ahead for Busy (LFB) query] with operation value 24. The MLPP operations and errors are defined in 3.4.
+
+#### **3.4.3.2 Cause Information Element**
+
+For indicating the preemption of the call in the network and in the access, the Cause information element, as described in 4.5.12/Q.931, shall be used with the two proposed codepoints for cause values described in Table 3-1.
+
+TABLE 3-1/Q.955
+
+##### **Cause information element**
+
+| Number | Label | Meaning |
+|--------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 8 | Preemption | No preemptable circuit or called user is busy with a call of equal or higher precedence level |
+| 46 | Precedence call blocked | |
+
+#### **3.4.3.3 Notification indicator information element**
+
+For indicating call completion delay; conference disconnected, preemption; and for indicating conference floating, served user preempted, the Notification indicator information element, as described in 4.5.21/Q.931, shall be used with the notification descriptions, as described in Table 3-2.
+
+TABLE 3-2/Q.955
+
+##### **Notification indicator information element**
+
+| Notification Description (Octet 3) | |
+|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
+| Bits | |
+| 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 | |
+| 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 | Call completion delay |
+| 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 | Conference floating served user preempted |
+| 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 | Conference disconnected, preemption |
+
+### **3.4.4 Definition of operations and errors**
+
+The definition of operations and errors required for the MLPP supplementary service using the ASN.1, as specified in Recommendation X.208 and using the OPERATION and ERROR macros, as defined in Figure 4/X.219, is in Table 3-3.
+
+TABLE 3-3/Q.955
+
+#### **Definition of operations and errors**
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| -- Begin MLPP-operations definitions | |
+| MLPP-operations{ccitt recommendation q 955 mlpp (3) operations-and-errors(1)} | |
+| DEFINITIONS | ::= |
+| BEGIN | |
+| EXPORTS | mLPPLFBquery, mLPPCallrequest, mLPPCallpreemption, unauthorizedPrecedenceLevel; |
+| IMPORTS | OPERATIONS, ERRORS |
+| | FROM Remote-Operation-Notation |
+| | {joint-iso-ccitt remote-operations(4) notation(0)} |
+| | userNotSubscribed, rejectedByNetwork |
+| | FROM General-Error-List |
+| | {ccitt recommendation q 950 general-error-list(1)} |
+| | Q931InformationElement |
+| | FROM Embedded-Q931-Types |
+| | {ccitt recommendation q 932 embedded-q931-types(5)}; |
+
+TABLE 3-3/Q.955 (continued)
+
+#### Definition of operations and errors
+
+| | | | |
+|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
+| -- Begin mLPPLFBquery operation | | | |
+| MLPP_LFBquery | OPERATION | MLPP_LFB_arg | |
+| | ARGUMENT | MLPP_LFB_resp | |
+| | RESULT | | {userNotSubscribed,rejectedByNetwork} |
+| | ERRORS | | |
+| MLPP_LFB-arg | ::= SEQUENCE | {MLPP_params, IE_arg} | |
+| MLPP_params | ::= SEQUENCE | {Prec_level, LFB_Indictn, MLPP_Svc_Domn} | |
+| Prec_level | ::= ENUMERATED | { | |
+| | | flashOverride(0), flash(1), immediate(2), priority(3), routine(4) | |
+| | | } | |
+| | | -- Prec_level identifies the precedence level of the MLPP call. | |
+| LFB_Indictn | ::= ENUMERATED | { | |
+| | | lfbAllowed(0), lfbNotAllowed(1), pathReserved(2) | |
+| | | } | |
+| | | -- LFB_Indictn is coded for values, as indicated. | |
+| MLPP_Svc_Domn | ::= OCTET STRING (size(5)) | | |
+| | | -- Initial two octets provide the International ID, while the | |
+| | | -- following three octets provide the MLPP Domain | |
+| | | -- identification. | |
+| IE_arg | ::= Q931InformationElement | | |
+| | | -- Bearer capability, Calling party number, Called party | |
+| | | -- number, and Channel identification information elements in | |
+| | | -- the IE_arg shall be as defined in Q.931. | |
+| MLPP_LFB_resp | ::= SEQUENCE {StatusQuery, Location} | | |
+| | | -- The MLPP DSS1 LFB query response contains two | |
+| | | -- parameters, StatusQuery and Location. | |
+| StatusQuery | ::= ENUMERATED | { | |
+| | | success(1), | |
+| | | -- Many cases as described in the optional MLPP LFB | |
+| | | failure(2), | |
+| | | -- Many cases as described in the MLPP procedure with LFB | |
+| | | -- option. | |
+| | | bearerCapabilityNotAuthorized(3), | |
+| | | -- bearer capability check failure, not authorized | |
+| | | bearerCapabilityNotImplemented(4), | |
+| | | -- bearer capability check failure, not implemented | |
+| | | bearerCapabilityNotAvailable(5), | |
+| | | -- bearer capability check failure, not available | |
+| | | pathReservationDenied(6) | |
+| | | -- circuit cannot be reserved at the far end | |
+| | | } | |
+
+TABLE 3-3/Q.955 (concluded)
+
+#### Definition of operations and errors
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Location | ::= Q931InformationElement
-- a bit string which conforms to Octect 3 of the Cause
-- information element as defined in Q.931, except that bit 8 is
-- marked as a spare.
-- End of mLPPLFBquery operation.
-- Begin mLPPCallrequest operation |
+| MLPPCallrequest | OPERATION MLPP_params
ARGUMENT StatusRequest
RESULT {userNotSubscribed, rejectedByNetwork,
ERRORS unauthorizedPrecedenceLevel} |
+| StatusRequest | ::= ENUMERATED
{
successCalledUserMLPPSubscriber(1) ,
-- Called user is an MLPP subscriber.
successCalledUserNotMLPPSubscriber(2) ,
-- Called user is not an MLPP subscriber.
failureCaseA(3) ,
-- MLPP call from the calling user is a precedence call and
-- cannot be completed.
failureCaseB(4) ,
-- MLPP call from the calling user or MLPP call between two
-- MLPP subscribers experiences preemption.
} |
+| | -- End mLPPCallrequest operation.
-- Begin mLPPCallpreemption operation |
+| MLPPCallpreemption | OPERATION
ARGUMENT Preempt_params
RESULT
ERRORS |
+| Preempt_params | ::= ENUMERATED
{
circuitReservedForReuse(1) ,
-- Circuit of the to be preempted call is reserved for reuse
circuitNotReservedForReuse(2) ,
-- Circuit of the to be preempted call is not reserved for
-- reuse
} |
+| | -- End mLPPCallpreemption operation |
+| UnauthorizedPrecedenceLevel | ::= ERROR
-- An indication that the calling user has exceeded the authorized, maximum
-- precedence level. |
+| mLPPLFBquery MLPLFBquery | ::= 24 |
+| mLPPCallrequest MLPPCallrequest | ::= 25 |
+| mLPPCallpreemption MLPPCallpreemption | ::= 26 |
+| unauthorizedPrecedenceLevel UnauthorizedPrecedenceLevel | ::= 44 |
+| END | -- End MLPP-operations. |
+
+## **3.5 Signalling requirements**
+
+### **3.5.1 Activation/deactivation/registration**
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### **3.5.2 Invocation and operation**
+
+Invocation and operation without an optional MLPP DSS 1 LFB query is illustrated in Figures 3-1 through 3-3 and described in 3.5.2.1.
+
+#### **3.5.2.1 MLPP DSS 1 procedure without LFB option**
+
+##### **3.5.2.1.1 Procedure at originating exchange/originating user side**
+
+###### **3.5.2.1.1.1 Normal operation**
+
+The calling user shall implicitly invoke the MLPP supplementary service by sending a SETUP message to the network.
+
+The calling user shall explicitly invoke the MLPP supplementary service by including the Facility information element in the SETUP message sent to the network. The Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation within the Facility information element contains the precedence level (Prec\_level), LFB Indication (LFB\_Indictn), and MLPP Service Domain (MLPP\_Svc\_Domn). The precedence level inserted by the user may be up to and including the maximum subscribed to precedence level on a per call basis. The LFB Indication and MLPP Service Domain values are set according to user subscription options.
+
+Upon receipt of a SETUP message for an MLPP service call, the originating exchange shall do the following:
+
+- 1) If the Facility information element is not present in the SETUP message for a call invoking MLPP supplementary service (i.e. from an MLPP subscriber) and the calling user has subscribed to the MLPP supplementary service for the bearer capability in the SETUP message the originating exchange shall formulate a Facility information element with a precedence level equal to ROUTINE by coding Prec\_level to “routine”.
+- 2) If the Facility information element is present in the SETUP message for a call invoking the MLPP supplementary service, it shall validate the precedence level to insure that it falls within the range that the calling user is authorized.
+
+In both cases in items 1) and 2) above, the originating exchange shall also set appropriate codes for LFB Indication (LFB\_Indictn) and MLPP Service Domain (MLPP\_Svc\_domn) in the Facility information element. If the LFB option is supported by the network and subscribed to for the precedence level in the SETUP message, the LFB\_Indictn is coded “lfbAllowed”. If the LFB option is not supported by the network or if the LFB option is supported by the network but not subscribed to for the precedence level in the SETUP message, LFB\_Indictn is coded “lfbNotAllowed”.
+
+- 3) Upon formulating the Facility information element with a precedence level equal to ROUTINE or receiving the Facility information element with a valid precedence level, the originating exchange shall mark the circuit busy with the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the outgoing MLPP call, send the CALL PROCEEDING message toward the calling user and a Setup Indication toward the network, and wait for the network response. Upon receipt of the CALL PROCEEDING message, the calling user shall mark the outgoing circuit busy with the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the outgoing MLPP call. Upon receiving an Alerting Indication that user alerting is initiated at the called user, the originating exchange shall check to determine if the called user is an MLPP subscriber or not. If the called user is not an MLPP subscriber, the originating exchange shall unmark the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call; if the called user is an MLPP subscriber, the originating exchange shall retain
+
+marking on the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call. Then, in both cases above, the MLPP call setup will continue, as described in 5.1/Q.931, except that upon receipt of the ALERTING message, the calling user shall unmark the previously marked circuit if the StatusRequest in the Return Result component of its Facility information element is coded to “successCalledUserNotMLPPSubscriber”.
+
+###### **3.5.2.1.1.2 Exceptional Procedures**
+
+- 1) Upon receipt of a SETUP message for an MLPP service call, the originating exchange shall check to determine if the network supports the invoked MLPP service. If this check is not satisfied, the Facility information element shall be ignored or not formulated and the MLPP call setup shall continue as if it were a basic call, as described in 5.1/Q.931, except that the first call control message shall contain the Return Error component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, which is coded to “rejectedByNetwork”.
+- 2) If the Facility information element is present in the SETUP message for a call invoking the MLPP supplementary service (i.e. from an MLPP subscriber) and if the calling user exceeds the maximum subscribed precedence level, the originating exchange shall return a RELEASE COMPLETE message toward the calling user, which contains the Return Error component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with Error “unauthorizedPrecedenceLevel”.
+- 3) If the Facility information element is not present in the SETUP message for a call invoking MLPP supplementary service (i.e. from an MLPP subscriber) and if the calling user has not subscribed to the MLPP supplementary service for the bearer capability in the SETUP message, the originating exchange shall reject the call by sending a RELEASE COMPLETE message toward the calling user, which contains the Return Error component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with Error “userNotSubscribed”.
+- 4) The precedence call may not be completed as a result of a network exchange being busy with calls of equal or higher precedence (on the path toward the called user) or no preemptable circuit at the called interface. In this case, upon receipt of the Release Indication with cause value #46, “precedence call blocked” from the network, the originating exchange shall return a DISCONNECT message toward the calling user with the same cause value to clear the call. The DISCONNECT message shall also contain the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with StatusRequest coded to “failureCaseA”, indicating call failure.
+- 5) The precedence call may not be completed as a result of called user, who has not subscribed to alternate party, is busy with either: (a) a call of equal or higher precedence than the calling user and no call completion supplementary services (e.g. call waiting) or call offering supplementary services (e.g. call forwarding busy) are available or (b) non-preemptable access resources and no call completion supplementary services (e.g. call waiting) or call offering supplementary services (e.g. call forwarding busy) are available. In this case, upon receipt of the Release Indication with cause value #46, “precedence call blocked” from the network, the originating exchange shall return a DISCONNECT message toward the calling user with the same cause value to clear the call. The DISCONNECT message shall also contain the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with StatusRequest coded to “failureCaseA”, indicating call failure.
+- 6) An MLPP call may be preempted as a result of preemption in the network or access. In this case, upon receipt of the Release Indication with cause value #8, “preemption” from the network, the originating exchange shall return a DISCONNECT message toward the calling user with the same Cause to clear the call. The DISCONNECT message shall also contain the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with StatusRequest coded to “failureCaseB”, indicating call failure.
+
+##### 3.5.2.1.2 Procedure at destination exchange/destination user side
+
+###### 3.5.2.1.2.1 Normal operation
+
+Upon receipt of the Setup Indication, the destination exchange that serves the called user shall mark the incoming circuit (identified by the Channel identification information element within the SETUP message) busy at the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the MLPP call. Then:
+
+If LFB Indication was set to “pathReserved”, the network shall stop timer $T_{LR}$ which it had started upon marking a circuit to the called user as reserved (see 3.5.2.2.2.1). Then:
+
+- If the reserved (or marked) circuit to the called user (as identified by a match between the Calling Party Number within the Setup Indication and Calling Party Numbers of the “reserved” circuits) is found and it is not idle, and if the called user is busy, the procedure in item 3) b) (1) (a) below shall be followed; otherwise, the procedure in item 2) b) (1) below shall be followed.
+- If the reserved circuit to the called user is found and it is idle, it shall be marked with the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call, and the procedure in item 1) b) below shall be followed.
+- If the reserved circuit to the called user is not found, the LFB Indication is coded to “lfbNotAllowed”, and the procedure in the items below shall be followed.
+
+If LFB Indication was not set to “pathReserved”, the procedure in the items below shall be followed.
+
+- 1) If the called user is idle and an idle circuit to deliver the call to the called user exists, it shall mark the idle circuit busy at the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call. Then:
+ - a) If the incoming call is a ROUTINE call, a SETUP message shall be sent to the called user, which contains the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element. The called user shall respond with: a CALL PROCEEDING message and mark the idle circuit busy at the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call or RELEASE COMPLETE message. Upon receipt of a CALL PROCEEDING message from the called user indicating that compatibility requirements have been satisfied, the procedure in item 4) shall be followed; otherwise, upon receipt of a RELEASE COMPLETE message from the called user with cause value #88, “incompatible destination”, indicating that compatibility requirements have not been satisfied, the network shall unmark the previously marked circuit and clear the incoming call with the same cause value.
+ - b) If the incoming call is a precedence call, a SETUP message shall be sent to the called user, which contains the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element. The called user shall respond with: a CALL PROCEEDING message and mark the idle circuit busy at the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call or a RELEASE COMPLETE message. Upon receipt of a CALL PROCEEDING message from the called user, indicating that compatibility requirements have been satisfied, the following procedure will be followed; otherwise, upon receipt of a RELEASE COMPLETE message from the called user with cause value #88, “incompatible destination”, indicating that compatibility requirements have not been satisfied, the network shall unmark the previously marked circuit and continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in item 3) b) (1) (b), items 1) through 3).
+- (1) If an alternate party is subscribed to, then:
+ - (a) Upon receipt of ALERTING message, sent by the called user, indicating that the called user has been notified of the precedence call, the network shall start timer $T_K$ . The ALERTING message shall contain the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element. Then, the destination exchange shall check the StatusRequest to determine if the called user is an MLPP subscriber. If the called user is *not* an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to “successCalledUserNotMLPPSubscriber”), the destination exchange shall unmark the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call; if the called user is an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to “successCalledUserMLPPSubscriber”), the destination exchange shall retain marking on the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call. If the called user responds with a CONNECT message before the expiry of timer $T_K$ (indicating called user acceptance of preemption), the network shall stop timer $T_K$ and the network shall complete the MLPP call setup, as described in 5.2.7/Q.931. If no CONNECT message
+
+is received from the called user before the expiry of timer $T_K$ , the network shall stop timer $T_K$ and the network shall divert the precedence call to the alternate party, using the procedures as described in 3/Q.952 for the call forwarding no reply supplementary service. The setup sent to the alternate party shall contain: the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the diverted precedence call, LFB Indication set to "IfbNotAllowed", and the reason for redirection = Call Forwarding No Reply.
+
+- (b) If no ALERTING message is received, the network shall divert the precedence call to the alternate party, using the procedures as described in 3/Q.952 for the call forwarding no reply supplementary service. The setup sent to the alternate party shall contain: the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the diverted precedence call, LFB Indication set to "IfbNotAllowed", and the reason for redirection = Call Forwarding No Reply.
+
+- (2) If no alternate party is subscribed to, then the procedure in item 4) shall be followed.
+
+- 2) If the called user is idle, but an idle circuit to deliver the call to the called user does not exist, then:
+
+- a) If the call is a ROUTINE call, clearing of the calling user shall be initiated by sending a Reject Indication to the network with cause value #34, "no circuit/channel available".
+
+- b) If the call is a precedence call and the existing MLPP call is at lower precedence, then:
+
+- (1) If preemptable access resources exist, the network shall mark the circuit (carrying the existing MLPP call) with the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming call and the network shall send a SETUP message, which contains the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, to the called user. The called user may respond with a CALL PROCEEDING message or a RELEASE COMPLETE message. Then:
+
+Upon receipt a CALL PROCEEDING message from the called user, indicating that compatibility requirements have been satisfied, the network shall clear the existing MLPP call to the busy user (i.e. "other user") on the called interface toward: (a) the busy user, using a DISCONNECT message and (b) the network with cause value #8 and the preempting call setup continues employing the procedure in item 5). The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitReservedForReuse".
+
+Upon receipt of a RELEASE COMPLETE message from the called user with cause value #88, "incompatible destination", indicating that compatibility requirements have not been satisfied, the network shall unmark the previously marked circuit and continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in item 3) b) (1) (b), items 1) through 3) except that the "called user" is to be interpreted as the "other user" under consideration on the called interface.
+
+- (2) If preemptable access resources do not exist, the network shall continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in item 3) b) (1) (b), items 1) through 3) except that the "called user" is to be interpreted as the "other user" under consideration on the called interface.
+
+- c) If the call is a precedence call and the existing MLPP call is at equal or higher precedence, then the procedure in item 3) b) (1) (b) shall be followed.
+
+- 3) If the called user is busy, then:
+ - a) If the call is a ROUTINE call, clearing of the calling user shall be initiated by sending an Indication to the network with cause value #17, "user busy".
+ - b) If the call is a precedence call, then:
+ - (1) If the called user is busy with a call of lower precedence, then:
+ - (a) If preemptable access resources exist, the network shall mark the circuit (carrying the MLPP call of the called user) with the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming call and the network shall send a SETUP message, which contains the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, to the called user. The called user may respond with a CALL PROCEEDING message or a RELEASE COMPLETE message. Then:
+ - 1) Upon receipt a CALL PROCEEDING message from the called user, indicating that compatibility requirements have been satisfied, the network shall place the existing MLPP call on hold, using a HOLD message delivered to the called user with cause value #8, "preemption" (in order to notify the called user of intended preemption) and the network shall start the timer $T_K$ . Upon sending the CALL PROCEEDING message, the called user shall mark the circuit with which the called user is busy with the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call.
+
+If the called user responds with a HOLD ACKNOWLEDGE message is received before the expiry of timer $T_K$ (indicating the acceptance of intended preemption), the network shall stop the timer $T_K$ and the network shall clear the existing MLPP call to: (a) the called user, using a DISCONNECT message and (b) the remote (to be preempted) user with a cause value #8 and the network shall continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in item 5). The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitReservedForReuse".
+
+If no HOLD ACKNOWLEDGE message is received from the called user before the expiry of the timer $T_K$ , the network shall stop the timer $T_K$ . Then, if an alternate party is subscribed to, the network shall clear the existing MLPP call to: (a) the called user using a DISCONNECT message and (b) the remote (to be preempted) user with a cause value #8 and the network shall divert the incoming (preempting) call to the alternate party, using the procedures as described in 2/Q.952 for the call forwarding busy supplementary service. The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitNotReservedForReuse". The setup sent to the alternate party shall contain: the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the diverted precedence call, LFB Indication set to "lfbNotAllowed" and the reason for redirection = Call Forwarding Busy. Otherwise (i.e. when no HOLD ACKNOWLEDGE message is received from the called user before the expiry of the timer $T_K$ and no alternate party is subscribed to), the network shall clear the existing MLPP call to: (a) the called user, using a DISCONNECT message and (b) the remote (to be preempted) user with a cause value #8 and the network shall continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in item 5). The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitReservedForReuse".
+
+If the called user corresponds with a STATUS message in response to the HOLD message sent by the network indicating that the called user's terminal does not support the Hold function, the network shall clear the existing MLPP call to: (a) the called user, using a DISCONNECT message and (b) the remote (to be preempted) user with a cause value #8 and the network shall continue the preempting call setup employing the
+
+procedure in item 5). The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to “circuitReservedForReuse”.
+
+- 2) Upon receipt of a RELEASE COMPLETE message from the called user with cause value #88, “incompatible destination”, indicating that compatibility requirements have not been satisfied, the network shall unmark the previously marked circuit and continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in item 3) b) (1) (b), items 1) through 3).
+- (b) If preemptable access resources do not exist, then:
+ - 1) If call completion or call offering supplementary services are available, then procedures as defined in MLPP supplementary service interactions with call completion or call offering supplementary services shall be initiated.
+ - 2) If call completion or call offering supplementary services are not available, but alternate party is subscribed to, the network shall divert the incoming precedence call to the alternate party, using the procedures as described in 2/Q.952 for the call forwarding busy supplementary service. The setup sent to the alternate party shall contain: the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the diverted precedence call, LFB Indication set to “lfbNotAllowed”, and the reason for redirection = Call Forwarding Busy.
+ - 3) If call completion or call offering supplementary services are not available and no alternate party is subscribed to, the network shall clear the calling user with cause value #46, “precedence call blocked”.
+- (2) If the called user is busy with a call of equal or higher precedence, the procedure in item 3) b) (1) (b) shall be followed.
+- 4) Upon receipt of the ALERTING message from the called user, which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, the destination exchange shall check the StatusRequest to determine if the called user is an MLPP subscriber. If the called user is *not* an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to “successCalledUserNotMLPPSubscriber”), the destination exchange shall unmark the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call; if the called user is an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to “successCalledUserMLPPSubscriber”), the destination exchange shall retain marking on the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call. Then, in both cases above, the network shall complete the MLPP call setup as described in 5.2.7/Q.931.
+- 5) Upon sending the DISCONNECT message in case (a), the network shall start the timer TRR to ensure that the circuit reserved for reuse is unreserved at the expiry of timer TRR. Then:
+ - a) If the existing call is cleared within timer TRR, as indicated by the network receiving RELEASE message from the destination user (called user or other user, as appropriate), which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element, the network shall stop the timer TRR as indicated by the network receiving RELEASE message from the destination user (called user or other user, as appropriate), which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element the network shall continue the preempting call by using the same (reserved) circuit and following the procedure in items 1) b) (1) or 1) b) (2), as appropriate.
+ - b) If the timer TRR expires and no response is obtained to the DISCONNECT message, from the destination user (called user or other user, as appropriate), the network shall stop the timer TRR, unreserved the marked circuit, and the procedure in this section (see 3.5.2.1.2.1, starting with item 1)) shall be followed, if this was the first attempt to setup the MLPP call; otherwise, the network shall clear the call toward calling user with cause value #46, “precedence call blocked”.
+
+###### 3.5.2.1.2.2 Exceptional procedures
+
+- 1) If the called user’s terminal does not support the Hold function, the user may return a STATUS message with cause value #98, “message not compatible with call state or message type nonexistent or not implemented” or cause value #97, “message type non-existent or not implemented” in response to the HOLD message sent by the destination network. Alternatively, the user may return a STATUS ENQUIRY message as described in 5.8.4/Q.931. In both cases, the destination network shall clear the existing MLPP call to: (a) the called user, using a DISCONNECT message and (b) the remote (to be
+
+preempted user) user with a cause value #8 and the network shall continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in 3.5.2.1.2.1, item 5). The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to “circuitReservedForReuse”.
+
+- 2) If the incoming call is a precedence call and the called user is busy with a call of lower precedence and has preemptable access resources, then the following procedure is followed if the called user responds with a HOLD REJECT message within response timer $T_K$ to the HOLD message sent by the network. The network shall clear the existing MLPP call to: (a) the called user, using a DISCONNECT message and (b) the remote (to be preempted) user with a cause value #8 and the network shall continue the preempting call setup employing the procedure in 3.5.2.1.2.1, item 5). The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to “circuitReservedForReuse”.
+- 3) An MLPP call may be preempted as a result of preemption in the network or access. In this case, upon receipt of the Release Indication or DISCONNECT message with cause value #8, “preemption” the destination network shall, respectively send the DISCONNECT message toward the called user or Release Indication toward the network with the same Cause to clear the call. The DISCONNECT message shall also contain the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, containing StatusRequest coded to “failureCaseB”, indicating call failure.
+
+#### **3.5.2.2 Optional MLPP DSS 1 LFB procedure**
+
+When the LFB option is provided in the DSS 1, then the MLPP DSS 1 LFB query shall be invoked in the DSS 1 environment to continue the network LFB query. The DSS 1 shall employ the Invoke component of the mLPPLFBquery operation contained in the Facility information element of the REGISTER message to invoke the query and the Return Result or Return Error components of the mLPPLFBquery operation contained in the Facility information element of the FACILITY message to return the responses to the query. The signalling association created by the REGISTER message shall be terminated by employing the RELEASE COMPLETE message, as described in 6.3.2/Q.932.
+
+The optional MLPP DSS 1 LFB procedure is illustrated in Figure 3-4 and described in the following.
+
+##### **3.5.2.2.1 Procedure at originating exchange/Originating user side**
+
+###### **3.5.2.2.1.1 Normal operation**
+
+None identified.
+
+###### **3.5.2.2.1.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+None identified.
+
+##### **3.5.2.2.2 Procedure at destination exchange/destination user side**
+
+###### **3.5.2.2.2.1 Normal operation**
+
+When an LFB option is provided in the DSS 1, upon receipt of the network LFB query Indication, the destination network that serves the called user shall do the following:
+
+- 1) If the incoming reserved circuit indicated in the network LFB query Indication is available, the network shall mark it (with precedence level, MLPP Service Domain, and Calling party number) reserved for use by the preempting call and the procedure below shall be followed.
+
+The destination network shall send a REGISTER message, containing the Invoke component of the mLPPLFBquery operation, toward the called user. The called user shall respond to the REGISTER message with a FACILITY message, containing the query response in the Return Result or Return Error
+
+components of the mLPPLFBquery operation in its Facility information element. The network shall start timer $T_L$ when the REGISTER message is sent. Then:
+
+- a) Upon receipt of the FACILITY message from the called user, containing the query response in the Return Result or Return Error components of the mLPPLFBquery operation in its Facility information element, the network shall do the following:
+
+- (1) If the Return Result component of the mLPPLFBquery operation is received with StatusQuery coded to “bearerCapabilityNotAuthorized”, or “bearerCapabilityNotImplemented”, or “bearerCapabilityNotAvailable” and cause value #88, “incompatible destination”, the network shall stop the timer $T_L$ and the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication with the same coding.
+- (2) If the Return Result component of the mLPPLFBquery operation is received with StatusQuery coded to “success”, the network shall stop the timer $T_L$ and then the following will occur:
+
+- (a) If the called user is idle and idle circuit to deliver the call to the called user exists, then the network shall mark a circuit to the called user (with precedence level, MLPP Service Domain, and Calling party number) as reserved for use by the preempting call and the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication, which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPLFBquery operation with StatusQuery coded to “success” and LFB Indication coded to “pathReserved”.
+
+The network shall start timer $T_{LR}$ after marking the circuit reserved for use to ensure that the reserved circuit is unreserved at the expiry of timer $T_{LR}$ .
+
+- (b) If the called user is idle, but an idle circuit to deliver the call to the called user does not exist, then the procedure in item 1) a) (2) (c) 1). (if preemptable access resources exist) or 1) a) (2) (c) 2). (if preemptable access resources do not exist) shall be followed. When comparing the precedence levels, the precedence level of the active MLPP call on the called interface instead of that of the MLPP call to the called user is employed and the network shall interpret the “called user” as the “other user” under consideration on the called interface.
+
+- (c) If the called user is busy, then:
+
+- 1) If preemptable access resources exist, the network shall compare the precedence levels of the preempting call with the MLPP call with which the called user is busy and do the following:
+
+- a) If the called user is busy with a call of lower precedence than the calling user, the network shall mark the busy circuit to the called user (with precedence level, MLPP Service Domain, and Calling party number) reserved for use by the preempting call and the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication, which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPLFBquery operation with StatusQuery coded to “success” and LFB Indication coded to “pathReserved”.
+
+The network shall start the timer $T_{LR}$ after marking the circuit reserved for use to ensure that the reserved circuit is unreserved at the expiry of timer $T_{LR}$ .
+
+- b) If the called user is busy with a call of equal or higher precedence than the calling user, then the following procedure in item 1) a) (2) (c) 2). shall be followed.
+
+- 2) If preemptable access resources do not exist, then:
+
+- a) If call completion or call offering supplementary services are available, the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication, which is coded to “success”.
+- b) If call completion or call offering supplementary services are not available, but an alternate party is subscribed to, the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication, which is coded to “success”.
+- c) If call completion or call offering supplementary services are not available and no alternate party is subscribed to, the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication, which is coded to “failure”, after unreserving the marked circuit.
+
+In all above cases, the network shall stop timer $T_{LR}$ when subsequent SETUP for the preempting call is sent.
+
+- b) If no FACILITY message is received from the called user before the expiry of timer $T_L$ , then the network shall stop the timer $T_L$ and the network shall unreserve the circuit that was previously marked as reserved and the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication, which shall be coded to “success”.
+
+In all above cases, the destination network shall terminate the signalling association created by the REGISTER message by sending a RELEASE COMPLETE message toward the called user.
+
+- 2) If the incoming reserved circuit indicated in the network LFB query Indication is not available, then the network shall return a network LFB query response Indication with StatusQuery coded to “pathReservationDenied”.
+
+###### **3.5.2.2.2.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+- 1) When an LFB option is not provided in the DSS 1, then upon receipt of the network LFB query Indication, the destination network that serves the called user shall return a network LFB query response Indication, which is coded to “success” so that the preempting call may subsequently be offered when procedure in 3.5.2.1.2.1 is used.
+
+## **3.6 Interactions with other supplementary services**
+
+### **3.6.1 Call Waiting**
+
+If the incoming call to be delivered to the called user (on the basis of the ISDN Number/Bearer Service) is an MLPP call and the called access is busy (i.e. no access channel is available), then:
+
+- 1) If the incoming MLPP call is at a higher precedence level than the MLPP call of the lowest precedence level with which the called access is busy, then: preemption of that MLPP call shall occur as described in 3.5.2.1.2, if the user of that MLPP call has not subscribed to the “non-preemptable access resource” option; otherwise the network shall invoke the Call Waiting supplementary service by sending a SETUP message to the called user.
+- 2) If the incoming MLPP call is at the same precedence level as that of the MLPP call of the lowest precedence level with which the called access is busy, then the network shall invoke the call waiting supplementary service by sending a SETUP message to the called user.
+- 3) If the incoming MLPP call is at a lower precedence level than the MLPP call of the lowest precedence level with which the called access is busy, then the network shall invoke the call waiting supplementary service by sending a SETUP message to the called user.
+
+NOTE – Based on the precedence level comparison, the terminal may prevent the application of call waiting tone to the called user and may use alternate methods (i.e. out-of-band indication) to inform the called user, if busy, that a lower precedence call is waiting.
+
+For each of the three cases, the SETUP message, used for invoking the call waiting supplementary service, shall contain the precedence level of the incoming MLPP call in its Facility information element and the Number of Calls per ISDN Number/Bearer Service counter and the Number of Waiting Calls per ISDN Number/Bearer Service counter shall each be incremented.
+
+### **3.6.2 Call Transfer**
+
+As specified in 1/Q.952.
+
+### **3.6.3 Connected Line Identification Presentation**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.4 Connected Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.5 Calling Line Identification Presentation**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.6 Calling Line Identification Restriction**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.7 Closed User Group**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.8 Conference Calling**
+
+All connections to the conferees on a conference call shall be processed at a precedence equal to the conference precedence selected by the conference controller.
+
+If a conferee is preempted, then after the conferee has been disconnected from the conference bridge, the network shall include cause value #8, "preemption" in the FACILITY message sent to the conference controller (i.e. served user) for notification, as described in 1.6/Q.954.
+
+When the served user is preempted, the NOTIFY message sent to all conferees (i.e. remote users) shall contain a Notification indication information element with Notification Description coded to "Conference floating, served user preempted".
+
+### **3.6.9 Direct-Dialling-In**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.10 Call Diversion services**
+
+#### **3.6.10.1 Call Forwarding Busy**
+
+If the called user has subscribed to the Call Forwarding Busy supplementary service, then:
+
+- 1) If the incoming MLPP call to the called user is a ROUTINE call, the procedure as described in 2/Q.952 shall be followed.
+- 2) If the incoming MLPP call to the called user is a precedence call, then:
+ - a) If the called interface is busy with an MLPP call of lower precedence in the same MLPP service domain and preemptable, the network shall preempt that call to complete the incoming MLPP call to the called user, as described in 3.5.2.1.2.
+ - b) If the called interface is: (1) busy with: MLPP calls of equal or higher precedence in the same MLPP service domain, non-MLPP calls, and/or MLPP calls in other MLPP service domains or (2) busy and non-preemptable, then:
+
+The network shall forward the call, in accordance with the procedures of 2/Q.952, whether or not the called user has subscribed to the alternate party option. The destination network shall retain control of the forwarded call and start a timer $T_{MCF}$ when the SETUP message is sent to the forwarded-to-user only if the called user has subscribed to the alternate party option. The SETUP message sent to the forwarded-to-user shall also contain the precedence level (in Prec\_level of its Facility information element) of the call so that the forwarded-to-user may be preempted, as described in 3.5.2.1.2, to complete the call to the forwarded-to-user.
+
+If no response is received from the forwarded-to-user in the form of a CONNECT message or a Connect Request Indication before the expiry of timer $T_{MCF}$ , or a response is received in the form of a RELEASE COMPLETE message or a Release Request Indication before the expiry of timer $T_{MCF}$ , the network shall stop the timer $T_{MCF}$ and the network shall divert the incoming MLPP call to the alternate party, as described in 3.5.2.1.2. The destination network shall initiate clearing of the MLPP call to the forwarded-to-user, if it has not already occurred.
+
+If a response is received from the forwarded-to-user in the form of a CONNECT message or a Connect Request Indication before the expiry of timer $T_{MCF}$ , the network shall stop the timer $T_{MCF}$ and the network shall continue to forward the call, as described in 3.5.2.1.2.
+
+#### 3.6.10.2 Call Forwarding No Reply
+
+If the called user has subscribed to the Call Forwarding No Reply supplementary service, then:
+
+- 1) If the incoming MLPP call to the called user is a ROUTINE call, the procedure as described in 3/Q.952 shall be followed.
+- 2) If the incoming MLPP call to the called user is a precedence call, then:
+ - a) On expiry of timer $T_K$ , and if the called user has subscribed to the alternate party option of the MLPP supplementary service, the network shall divert the call to the alternate party, as described in 3.5.2.1.2.
+ - b) On expiry of timer T-CFNR (see 3/Q.952), and if the called user has not subscribed to the alternate party option of the MLPP supplementary service, the network shall forward the call, as described in 3/Q.952. The network shall include in the SETUP message sent to the forwarded-to-user after the expiry of timer T-CFNR, the precedence level (in Prec\_level of its Facility information element) of the call so that the forwarded-to-user may be preempted, as described in 3.5.2.1.2, to complete the call to the forwarded-to-user.
+
+#### 3.6.10.3 Call Forwarding Unconditional
+
+If the called user has subscribed to the Call Forwarding Unconditional supplementary service, then:
+
+- 1) If the incoming MLPP call to the called user is a ROUTINE call, the procedure as described in 4/Q.952 shall be followed.
+- 2) If the incoming MLPP call to the called user is a precedence call, then the call shall be forwarded employing the same procedure as in 3.6.10.1, item 2) b).
+
+#### 3.6.10.4 Call Deflection
+
+Not applicable.
+
+### 3.6.11 Line Hunting
+
+If no interface is available and one or more MLPP calls are of lower precedence than that of the incoming call, the network shall preempt an MLPP call of the lowest precedence, as described in 3.5.2.1.
+
+### 3.6.12 Three-Party Service
+
+When a three-way conversation is established, each connection shall maintain its assigned precedence level. Each connection of a call resulting from a split operation shall maintain the precedence level that it was assigned upon being added to the three-way conversation. In the Three Party supplementary service, when one of two original calls is preempted, the network shall release the three-way connection and apply normal call clearing procedure to the call being preempted. The DISCONNECT message sent to one of the parties of the preempted call in normal call clearing shall contain the Notification indicator information element with notification description coded to “conference disconnected, preemption”. The network shall also send to the other remote user a NOTIFY message, containing the Notification indicator information element with notification description coded to “conference disconnected, preemption”.
+
+### 3.6.13 User-to-User Signalling
+
+No impact.
+
+### 3.6.14 Multiple Subscriber Number
+
+No impact.
+
+### 3.6.15 Call Hold
+
+The network may preempt a held MLPP call due to a lack of resources in the network to complete a higher precedence MLPP call in the same MLPP Service Domain. In this situation, the clearing of the held MLPP call at the served user's (Call Hold subscriber's) interface shall be initiated by the network sending a DISCONNECT message to the served user. The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to “circuitNotReservedForReuse” and cause value #8, “preemption” in order to notify the served user that the held call is preempted.
+
+The network may preempt a held MLPP call as a result of a lack of channels at the held party's (or remote user's) interface when a higher precedence MLPP call in the same MLPP Service Domain needs to be setup over that interface. In this situation, the network shall preempt the held MLPP call at the remote user's interface by employing the normal call clearing procedures as described in 5.3/Q.931, with the first clearing message containing the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitReservedForReuse" (to indicate that the B-channel of the held call is reserved for reuse.) The channel thus reserved at the remote user's interface as a result of above MLPP procedure, may then be reused by the incoming or outgoing higher precedence MLPP call by the network or user sending a SETUP message containing channel id = "reserved channel's id". The clearing of the held MLPP call at the served user's (Call Hold subscriber's) interface shall be initiated by the network sending a DISCONNECT message to the served user. The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitNotReservedForReuse" and cause value #8, "preemption" in order to notify the served user that the held call is preempted.
+
+If a multipoint configuration exists at the served user's (user-network) interface, the network or user may use an "idle" or "active" channel that is reserved for a held MLPP call of the served user (Call Hold subscriber) for the incoming or outgoing higher precedence MLPP call to or from the same or another user on the interface. To accomplish this:
+
+- 1) For an "idle" channel, the incoming or outgoing higher precedence MLPP call may be completed or continued by the network or user sending a SETUP message with channel id = "idle channel's id".
+- 2) For an "active" channel, the call on that channel shall be preempted following the normal call clearing procedures as described in Recommendation Q.931, with the first clearing message toward the user containing the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitReservedForReuse" (to indicate that the held channel is reserved for reuse) and the first clearing message toward the remote user of the "active" channel containing the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitNotReservedForReuse" and cause value #8, "preemption" (to indicate that the held channel at the remote user's interface is not reserved for reuse). Then, the incoming or outgoing higher precedence MLPP call may be completed or continued by the network or user sending a SETUP message with channel id = "channel id of the cleared call".
+
+In both of the above cases, the held MLPP call shall not be cleared.
+
+### **3.6.16 Advice of Charge**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.17 Sub-addressing**
+
+No applicable interaction at this time.
+
+### **3.6.18 Terminal Portability**
+
+No applicable interaction at this time.
+
+### **3.6.19 Completion of Calls to Busy Subscriber**
+
+As specified in 3/Q.953.
+
+### **3.6.20 Malicious Call Identification**
+
+No applicable interaction at this time.
+
+### **3.6.21 Reverse Charging**
+
+No impact.
+
+### **3.6.22 Multi-Level Precedence and Preemption**
+
+No impact.
+
+## **3.7 Interactions with other networks**
+
+### **3.7.1 Interactions with public networks**
+
+When a public network employing Signaling System No. 7 (SS No. 7) interacts with the DSS 1, the SS No. 7 shall transport:
+
+- 1) Cause values #8 and #46, respectively to indicate “preemption” and “precedence call blocked” to the calling, called, preempted users, served user of the Conference Calling supplementary service, or remaining parties of a three way conversation when a call is preempted, as appropriate.
+- 2) Information to indicate whether the called user of an MLPP call is an MLPP subscriber or not for the DSS 1 exchanges and the calling user.
+- 3) Call completion delay indication to the calling user when an LFB query is invoked.
+- 4) Conference floating, served user preempted indication to all conferees when the served user of the Conference Calling supplementary service is preempted.
+- 5) Conference disconnected, preemption indication to the remaining parties of a three way conversation when the conference is disconnected as a result of preemption of one of the two calls.
+
+### **3.7.2 Interactions with private ISDNs**
+
+The procedure at the T reference point to support attached private networks is described in this subclause.
+
+Normal operation without an optional MLPP DSS 1 LFB query is illustrated in Figures 3-5 and 3-6 and described in 3.7.2.1.
+
+#### **3.7.2.1 MLPP DSS 1 procedure without LFB option**
+
+##### **3.7.2.1.1 Procedure at originating private ISDN**
+
+###### **3.7.2.1.1.1 Normal operation**
+
+If the originating exchange in the private ISDN is connected to a local exchange in a public network, it shall follow the procedure in 3.5.2.1.1.1, items 1) through 2) It shall then mark the circuit busy with the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the outgoing call and send a CALL PROCEEDING message toward the calling user. Then:
+
+- 1) If there is an idle circuit to propagate the call to the next exchange, then a SETUP message, containing the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, shall be sent after marking the circuit busy at the precedence level and the MLPP Service Domain of the MLPP call. Then the procedure in item 3) shall be followed.
+- 2) If there are no idle circuits (i.e. congestion is encountered), the following shall occur:
+ - a) If the call is a ROUTINE call, it shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) employing the RELEASE COMPLETE message with cause value #34, “no circuit/channel available” and the Return Error component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with Error “resourceUnavailable”.
+ - b) If the call is a precedence call and a preemptable circuit is located, then the MLPP call on that circuit shall be cleared: (a) forward (toward public network) using a DISCONNECT message containing the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to “circuitReservedForReuse” and (b) backward (toward to be preempted user) using a DISCONNECT message containing the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to “circuitNotReservedForReuse”. The circuit reserved for reuse is marked with the precedence level
+
+and MLPP Service Domain of the preempting call. A timer $T_{RR}$ is started upon sending the DISCONNECT message in case (a) to ensure that the circuit reserved for reuse is unreserved at the expiry of timer $T_{RR}$ . Then:
+
+- (1) If the existing MLPP call is cleared within timer $T_{RR}$ , as indicated by the private network receiving RELEASE message, which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element, the timer $T_{RR}$ is stopped and the same (reserved) circuit shall be used to continue the preempting call using a SETUP message, which shall contain the Channel identification of the reserved circuit and the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element. Then, the procedure in item 3) shall be followed.
+ - (2) On expiry of timer $T_{RR}$ , the marked circuit is unreserved and the procedure in this subclause (3.7.2.1.1.1, starting with item 2) shall be followed, if this was the first attempt to setup the MLPP call; otherwise, the call shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) employing the DISCONNECT message. The DISCONNECT message shall contain cause value #46, "precedence call blocked" and the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with StatusRequest coded to "failureCaseA", indicating call failure.
+ - c) If the call is a precedence call and a preemptable circuit is not located, it shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) employing the DISCONNECT message. The DISCONNECT message shall contain cause value #46, "precedence call blocked" and the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element with StatusRequest coded to "failureCaseA", indicating call failure.
+- 3) Upon receipt of the ALERTING message from the network, which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, the originating exchange shall check the StatusRequest to determine if the called user is an MLPP subscriber. If the called user is *not* an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to "successCalledUserNotMLPPSubscriber"), the originating exchange shall unmark the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call; if the called user is an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to "successCalledUserMLPPSubscriber"), the originating exchange shall retain marking on the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call. Then, in both cases above, the MLPP call setup will continue, as described in 5.1.8/Q.931.
+
+###### **3.7.2.1.1.2 Exceptional procedures**
+
+As defined in 3.5.2.1.1.2.
+
+##### **3.7.2.1.2 Procedure at destination private ISDN**
+
+###### **3.7.2.1.2.1 Normal operation**
+
+Upon receipt of the Setup Indication, the local exchange in the public network connected to a private ISDN shall set appropriate codes for LFB Indication (LFB\_Indictn = "lfbAllowed" or "lfbNotAllowed") and MLPP Service Domain (MLPP\_Svc\_Domn) in the Facility information element, mark the circuit busy with precedence level and MLPP Service Domain, return a Call Proceeding Indication toward the network, and do the following:
+
+- 1) If there is an idle circuit to propagate the call to the next exchange, then a SETUP message, containing the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, shall be sent after marking the circuit busy at the precedence level and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call. Then the procedure in item 3) shall be followed.
+- 2) If there are no idle circuits (i.e. congestion is encountered), the following will occur:
+ - a) If the incoming call is a ROUTINE call, it shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) with an Indication with cause value #34, "no circuit/channel available".
+ - b) If the incoming call is a precedence call and a preemptable circuit is located, then the MLPP call on that circuit shall be cleared: (a) forward (toward called user) using a DISCONNECT message and (b) backward (toward to be preempted user) with an Indication containing cause value #8, "preemption". The DISCONNECT message shall contain the Invoke component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element with Preempt\_params coded to "circuitReservedForReuse". The circuit reserved for reuse is marked with the precedence level and
+
+MLPP Service Domain of the preempting call. A timer $T_{RR}$ is started upon sending the DISCONNECT message in case (a) to ensure that the circuit reserved for reuse is unreserved at the expiry of timer $T_{RR}$ . Then:
+
+- (1) If the existing call is cleared within timer $T_{RR}$ , as indicated by the network receiving RELEASE message, which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPCallpreemption operation in its Facility information element, timer $T_{RR}$ is stopped and the same (reserved) circuit shall be used to continue the call using a SETUP message, which shall contain the Channel identification of the reserved circuit and the Invoke component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element. Then, the procedure in item 3) shall be followed.
+- (2) On expiry of timer $T_{RR}$ , the marked circuit is unreserved and the procedure in this subclause (3.7.2.1.2.1, starting with item 1) shall be followed, if this was the first attempt to setup the MLPP call; otherwise, the call shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) with an Indication containing cause value #46, "precedence call blocked".
+- c) If the incoming call is a precedence call and a preemptable circuit is not located, it shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) with an Indication containing cause value #46, "precedence call blocked".
+- 3) Upon receipt of the ALERTING message from the called user side, which contains the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, the local exchange shall check the StatusRequest to determine if the called user is an MLPP subscriber. If the called user is *not* an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to "successCalledUserNotMLPPSubscriber"), the local exchange shall unmark the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call; if the called user is an MLPP subscriber (as indicated by StatusRequest coded to "successCalledUserMLPPSubscriber"), the local exchange shall retain marking on the previously marked circuit for the MLPP call. Then, in both cases above, the MLPP call setup will be completed, as described in 5.2.7/Q.931.
+
+###### 3.7.2.1.2.2 Exceptional procedures
+
+- 1) Upon receipt of the Setup Indication, if the private network does not support the invoked MLPP supplementary service, the local exchange shall continue the MLPP call in the private network as if it were a basic call.
+- 2) An MLPP call may be preempted as a result of preemption in the public network or private network. In this case, upon receipt of the Release Indication or DISCONNECT message with cause value #8, "preemption" the local exchange shall, respectively send the DISCONNECT message toward the private network or an Indication toward the public network with the same Cause to clear the call. The DISCONNECT message shall also contain the Return Result component of the mLPPCallrequest operation in its Facility information element, containing StatusRequest coded to "failureCaseB", indicating call failure.
+
+#### 3.7.2.2 Optional MLPP DSS 1 LFB procedure
+
+When the LFB option is supported by the private ISDN and the LFB Indication in the Invoke component within the Facility information element of mLPPCallrequest operation in the SETUP message or Setup Indication is coded to "lfbAllowed" then the MLPP DSS 1 LFB query shall be invoked in the private ISDN at the preemption initiating exchange when congestion (no idle circuits) is encountered. Note that this query shall also be invoked in the private ISDN to continue the network LFB query. The private ISDN shall employ the Invoke component of the mLPPLFBquery operation contained in the Facility information element of the REGISTER message to invoke the query and the Return Result or Return Error components of the mLPPLFBquery operation contained in the Facility information element of the FACILITY message to return the responses to the query. The signalling association created by the REGISTER message shall be terminated by employing the RELEASE COMPLETE message, as described in 6.3.2/Q.932.
+
+The optional MLPP DSS 1 LFB procedure is illustrated in Figures 3-7 and 3-8 and described in the following.
+
+##### 3.7.2.2.1 Procedure at originating private ISDN
+
+###### 3.7.2.2.1.1 Normal operation
+
+If the originating exchange is in a private ISDN (connected to a Local Exchange in a public network) which encounters congestion (i.e. no idle circuit) upon receipt of a SETUP message and locates a preemptable circuit and if LFB is being invoked on the call for the first time, then the originating exchange shall mark the circuit, as identified by Channel identification (with precedence level, MLPP Service Domain, and Calling party number), for preemption and reserved for use by the preempting call. Otherwise, the procedure in 3.7.2.1.1.1, items 1) through 3), shall be followed. A timer $T_{LR}$ is started to ensure that the marked circuit is unreserved at the expiry of timer $T_{LR}$ . It shall then invoke the MLPP DSS 1 LFB query with a REGISTER message sent towards the called user. The Invoke component of the mLPPLFBquery operation within the Facility information element of the REGISTER message contains the precedence level (Prec\_level), LFB Indication (LFB\_Indictn), and MLPP Service Domain (MLPP\_Svc\_Domn). Timer $T_L$ is started when the REGISTER message is sent. At the same time the REGISTER message is sent, a NOTIFY message is sent toward the calling user to indicate delay in call completion. The Notification Description field in the Notification indicator information element within the NOTIFY message shall be coded to indicate “call completion delay”. The response to the REGISTER message shall be received in an appropriate component within the Facility information element of the FACILITY message. The following actions then occur:
+
+- 1) If no FACILITY message is received and the timer $T_L$ expires, LFB Indication is set to “lfbNotAllowed” timers $T_L$ and $T_{LR}$ are stopped, the circuit previously marked as reserved is unreserved, and procedure described in 3.7.2.1.1.1, items 1) through 3) shall be followed.
+- 2) If the FACILITY message is received before the expiry of timer $T_L$ , indicating success of the network LFB query, timer $T_L$ is stopped, LFB Indication is set to “pathReserved”, and one of the following will occur:
+ - a) If the circuit that was previously reserved for use by the preempting call is found and it is not idle, procedure described in 3.7.2.1.1.1, item 2) b) shall be followed.
+ - b) If the circuit that was previously reserved for use by the preempting call is found and it is idle, procedure described in 3.7.2.1.1.1, item 1) shall be followed.
+ - c) If the circuit that was previously reserved for use by the preempting call is not found, LFB Indication is set to “lfbNotAllowed”, timer $T_{LR}$ is stopped, and the procedure described in 3.7.2.1.1.1, items 1) through 3) shall be followed.
+
+In cases a) and b) above, timer $T_{LR}$ is stopped when subsequent SETUP for the preempting call is sent.
+
+- 3) If the FACILITY message is received before the expiry of timer $T_L$ , containing “pathReservationDenied” indication in StatusQuery, the same action as in item 1) above shall take place.
+- 4) If the FACILITY message is received before the expiry of timer $T_L$ , indicating failure of the network LFB query, timers $T_L$ and $T_{LR}$ are stopped, the circuit previously marked as reserved is unreserved, and the incoming precedence call shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) using a DISCONNECT message, which contains cause value #46, “precedence call blocked” and the result of the mLPPCallrequest operation (i.e. StatusRequest coded to “failureCaseA”) in the Return Result component of its Facility information element.
+
+In all cases above, the originating exchange shall terminate the signalling association created by the REGISTER message by sending a RELEASE COMPLETE message toward the called user.
+
+###### 3.7.2.2.1.2 Exceptional procedures
+
+- 1) Upon receipt of the REGISTER message, if the public network does not support the MLPPLFB query, the public network shall return a FACILITY message towards the private network, which contains the Return Error component of the mLPPLFBquery operation in its Facility information element with Error “rejectedByNetwork” and continue the MLPP call as described in 3.7.2.1.1.1, items 1) through 3).
+
+- 2) Upon receipt of the REGISTER message, if the private network has not subscribed to the MLPPLFBquery, the public network supporting the MLPPLFBquery shall return a FACILITY message toward the private network, which contains the Return Error component of the MLPPLFBquery operation in its Facility information element with Error “userNotSubscribed” and continue the MLPP call as described in 3.7.2.1.1.1, items 1) through 3).
+
+In both cases above, the private network shall terminate the signalling association created by the REGISTER message by sending a RELEASE COMPLETE message.
+
+##### 3.7.2.2.2 Procedure at destination private ISDN
+
+###### 3.7.2.2.2.1 Normal operation
+
+When an LFB option is provided in the private ISDN, upon encountering congestion (i.e. no idle circuit) after the receipt of a Setup Indication and locating a preemptable circuit or upon receipt of the network LFB query Indication, the local exchange in the public network, connected to the private ISDN, will do the following, if LFB is invoked on the call for the first time; otherwise, the procedure in 3.7.2.1.2.1, items 1) through 3) shall be followed:
+
+- 1) *For network LFB query Indication receipt*, if a preemptable or idle circuit is not located, then an Indication, coded to “failure” shall be launched toward the network.
+- 2) *For either network LFB query Indication or Setup Indication receipt*, preemptable or idle (for network LFB query only) circuit, as identified by its Channel identification, shall be marked (with precedence level, MLPP Service Domain, and Calling party number) for preemption and reserved for use by the preempting call. A timer $T_{LR}$ is started to ensure that the marked circuit is unreserved at the expiry of timer $T_{LR}$ . It shall then invoke the MLPP DSS 1 LFB query, employing the Invoke component within the Facility information element of the MLPPLFBquery operation in the REGISTER message, which is sent towards the called user. Timer $T_L$ is started when the REGISTER message is sent. For the Setup Indication receipt, at the same time the REGISTER message is sent, a NOTIFY message is sent toward the calling user to indicate delay in call completion. The Notification Description field in the Notification indicator information element within the NOTIFY message shall be coded to indicate “call completion delay”. The response to the REGISTER message shall be received in an appropriate component within the Facility information element of the FACILITY message. The following actions then occur:
+ - a) If no FACILITY message is received and the timer $T_L$ expires, timers $T_L$ and $T_{LR}$ are stopped and the circuit previously marked as reserved is unreserved. Then:
+ - (1) *For network LFB query Indication receipt*, an Indication, coded to “success” shall be launched toward the network.
+ - (2) *For Setup Indication receipt*, LFB Indication is set to “lfbNotAllowed” and procedure described in 3.7.2.1.2.1, items 1) through 3) shall be followed.
+ - b) If the FACILITY message is received before the expiry of timer $T_L$ , indicating success of the LFB query (i.e. StatusQuery coded to “success”), timer $T_L$ is stopped. Then:
+ - (1) *For network LFB query Indication receipt*, an Indication, coded to “success” shall be launched toward the network. The timer $T_{LR}$ is stopped when subsequent SETUP for the preempting call is sent.
+ - (2) *For Setup Indication receipt*, LFB Indication is set to “pathReserved” and one of the following will occur:
+ - (a) If the circuit that was previously reserved for use by the preempting call is found and it is not idle, procedure described in 3.7.2.1.2.1, item 2) b) shall be followed.
+ - (b) If the circuit that was previously reserved for use by the preempting call is found and it is idle, procedure described in 3.7.2.1.2.1, item 1) shall be followed.
+ - (c) If the circuit that was previously reserved for use by the preempting call is not found, LFB Indication (LFB\_Indictn) is set to “lfbNotAllowed”, timer $T_{LR}$ is stopped, and the procedure described in 3.7.2.1.2.1, items 1) through 3) shall be followed.
+
+In cases (a) and (b) above, timer $T_{LR}$ is stopped when subsequent SETUP for the preempting call is sent.
+
+- c) If the FACILITY message is received before the expiry of timer $T_L$ , containing StatusQuery coded to “pathReservationDenied” the same action as in item a) above shall take place.
+- d) If the FACILITY message is received before the expiry of timer $T_L$ , indicating failure of the LFB query (i.e. StatusQuery coded to “failure”), timers $T_L$ and $T_{LR}$ are stopped, and the circuit previously marked as reserved is unreserved. Then:
+ - (1) *For network LFB query Indication receipt*, an Indication coded to “failure” shall be launched toward the network.
+ - (2) *For Setup Indication receipt*, the incoming precedence call shall be cleared backward (toward calling user) with an Indication containing cause value #46, “precedence call blocked”.
+
+In all cases above, the local exchange shall terminate the signalling association created by the REGISTER message by sending a RELEASE COMPLETE message toward the private network.
+
+###### 3.7.2.2.2 Exceptional procedure
+
+When LFB option is not provided in the private network, then upon receipt of the network LFB query Indication, the local exchange in the public network connected to a private network shall launch an Indication coded to “success” toward the public network so that the preempting call may subsequently be offered when the procedure in 3.7.2.1.2.1 shall be used.
+
+## 3.8 Signalling flows
+
+This subclause contains the signalling flow diagrams for the MLPP supplementary service. They are as shown in Figures 3-1 through 3-8.
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant CU as Calling user
+ participant N as Network
+ CU->>N: SETUP (CR, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+ N-->>CU: CALL PROCEEDING (CR)
+ N-->>CU: ALERTING (CR, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+ N-->>CU: CONNECT (CR)
+
+```
+
+T1 145370-92/d01
+
+Sequence diagram showing the normal operation for MLPP without LFB option (originating interface). The diagram involves two entities: 'Calling user' and 'Network'. The sequence of messages is: 1. 'Calling user' sends 'SETUP (CR, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})' to 'Network'. 2. 'Network' sends 'CALL PROCEEDING (CR)' to 'Calling user'. 3. 'Network' sends 'ALERTING (CR, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})' to 'Calling user'. 4. 'Network' sends 'CONNECT (CR)' to 'Calling user'.
+
+FIGURE 3-1/Q.955
+**Normal operation for MLPP without LFB option
+(originating interface)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant Network
+ participant Called user
+ participant Other user as "Other" user
+
+ Network->>Called user: SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=Ckt of to be preempted call, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+ Called user-->>Network: CALL PROCEEDING (CRp)
+ Network->>Called user: HOLD (CRe, Cause #8)
+ Called user-->>Network: HOLD ACK (CRe)
+ Network->>Called user: DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+ Called user-->>Network: RELEASE (CRe, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+ Network->>Called user: RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)
+ Called user-->>Network: ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+ Called user-->>Network: CONNECT (CRp)
+
+```
+
+Network
+
+Called user
+
+"Other" user
+
+SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=Ckt of to be preempted call, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+CALL PROCEEDING (CRp)
+
+HOLD (CRe, Cause #8)
+
+HOLD ACK (CRe)
+
+DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+RELEASE (CRe, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)
+
+ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+CONNECT (CRp)
+
+$T_K$
+
+$T_{RR}$
+
+$T_K$
+
+T1 145380-92/d02
+
+CRp Call Reference of preempting call
+CRe Call Reference of preempted (existing) call
+
+Sequence diagram for MLPP without LFB option (called user busy).
+
+FIGURE 3-2/Q.955
+**Normal operation for MLPP without LFB option
+(destination interface – called user busy)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant Network
+ participant Called user
+ participant Other user as "Other" user
+
+ Network->>Called user: SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=Ckt of to be preempted call, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+ Called user-->>Network: CALL PROCEEDING (CRp)
+ Network->>Called user: DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+ Called user-->>Network: RELEASE (CRe, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+ Network->>Called user: RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)
+ Called user-->>Network: ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+ Called user-->>Network: CONNECT (CRp)
+
+```
+
+Network
+
+Called user
+
+"Other" user
+
+SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=Ckt of to be preempted call, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+CALL PROCEEDING (CRp)
+
+DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+RELEASE (CRe, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)
+
+ALERTING (CRP, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+CONNECT (CRp)
+
+$T_{RR}$
+
+$T_K$
+
+T1145390-92/d03
+
+Sequence diagram for MLPP without LFB option (other user busy).
+
+FIGURE 3-3/Q.955
+**Normal operation for MLPP without LFB option
+(destination interface – "other" user busy)**
+
+
+
+Sequence diagram showing the normal operation for MLPP with LFB option at the destination interface. The participants are Network and Called user.
+
+- The Network sends REGISTER (CR, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPLFBrequest}) to the Called user.
+- The Called user sends FACILITY (CR, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPLFBrequest}) back to the Network.
+- The Network sends RELEASE COMPLETE (CR) to the Called user.
+
+Timing diagram on the left shows $T_L$ as the time from the start of the REGISTER message to the start of the FACILITY message, and $T_{LR}$ as the time from the start of the REGISTER message to the start of the RELEASE COMPLETE message.
+
+T1145400-92/d04
+
+Sequence diagram for MLPP with LFB option at the destination interface.
+
+FIGURE 3-4/Q.955
+**Normal operation for MLPP with LFB option
+ (destination interface)**
+
+
+
+Sequence diagram showing the normal operation for MLPP without LFB option at the originating private ISDN for successful preemption. The participants are Private Network and Public Network.
+
+- The Private Network sends DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption}) to the Public Network.
+- The Public Network sends RELEASE (CRe, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallpreemption}) back to the Private Network.
+- The Private Network sends RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe) to the Public Network.
+- The Private Network sends SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=reserved ckt, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest}) to the Public Network.
+- The Public Network sends ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest}) back to the Private Network.
+- The Public Network sends CONNECT (CRp) back to the Private Network.
+
+Timing diagram on the left shows $T_{RR}$ as the time from the start of the DISCONNECT message to the start of the RELEASE message.
+
+T1145410-92/d05
+
+Sequence diagram for MLPP without LFB option at the originating private ISDN for successful preemption.
+
+FIGURE 3-5/Q.955
+**Normal operation for MLPP without LFB option
+ (originating private ISDN – successful preemption)**
+
+
+
+Public Network
+
+Private Network
+
+DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+RELEASE (CRe, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+$T_{RR}$
+
+RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)
+
+SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=reserved ckt, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+CONNECT (CRp)
+
+T1145420-92/d06
+
+Detailed description: This sequence diagram illustrates the normal operation for MLPP without the LFB option in a destination private ISDN scenario. The diagram shows two vertical timelines: 'Public Network' on the left and 'Private Network' on the right. The sequence of messages is as follows: 1. A message 'DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})' is sent from the Public Network to the Private Network. 2. A message 'RELEASE (CRe, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. 3. A vertical line with a downward arrow labeled $T_{RR}$ is shown on the Public Network timeline. 4. A message 'RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)' is sent from the Public Network to the Private Network. 5. A message 'SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=reserved ckt, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})' is sent from the Public Network to the Private Network. 6. A message 'ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. 7. A message 'CONNECT (CRp)' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. The identifier 'T1145420-92/d06' is located at the bottom right.
+
+Sequence diagram for MLPP without LFB option (destination private ISDN – successful preemption).
+
+FIGURE 3-6/Q.955
+
+**Normal operation for MLPP without LFB option
+(destination private ISDN – successful preemption)**
+
+
+
+Private Network
+
+Public Network
+
+REGISTER (CR, FIE{INV, OP=mLPP LFBquery})
+
+FACILITY (CR, FIE{RR, OP=mLPP LFBquery})
+
+$T_L$
+
+RELEASE COMPLETE (CR)
+
+DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+$T_{LR}$
+
+RELEASE (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})
+
+$T_{RR}$
+
+RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)
+
+SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=reserved ckt, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})
+
+CONNECT (CRp)
+
+T1145430-92/d07
+
+Detailed description: This sequence diagram illustrates the normal operation for MLPP with the LFB option in an originating private ISDN scenario. The diagram shows two vertical timelines: 'Private Network' on the left and 'Public Network' on the right. The sequence of messages is as follows: 1. A message 'REGISTER (CR, FIE{INV, OP=mLPP LFBquery})' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. 2. A message 'FACILITY (CR, FIE{RR, OP=mLPP LFBquery})' is sent from the Public Network to the Private Network. 3. A vertical line with a downward arrow labeled $T_L$ is shown on the Private Network timeline. 4. A message 'RELEASE COMPLETE (CR)' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. 5. A message 'DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. 6. A vertical line with a downward arrow labeled $T_{LR}$ is shown on the Private Network timeline. 7. A message 'RELEASE (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallpreemption})' is sent from the Public Network to the Private Network. 8. A vertical line with a downward arrow labeled $T_{RR}$ is shown on the Private Network timeline. 9. A message 'RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)' is sent from the Public Network to the Private Network. 10. A message 'SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=reserved ckt, FIE{INV, OP=mLPPCallrequest})' is sent from the Public Network to the Private Network. 11. A message 'ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPPCallrequest})' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. 12. A message 'CONNECT (CRp)' is sent from the Private Network to the Public Network. The identifier 'T1145430-92/d07' is located at the bottom right.
+
+Sequence diagram for MLPP with LFB option (originating private ISDN – successful preemption).
+
+FIGURE 3-7/Q.955
+
+**Normal operation for MLPP with LFB option
+(originating private ISDN – successful preemption)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+sequenceDiagram
+ participant Public as Public Network
+ participant Private as Private Network
+ Note over Public: T_L starts
+ Public->>Private: REGISTER (CR, FIE{INV, OP=mLPP LFB query})
+ Note over Public: T_L ends, T_LR starts
+ Private-->>Public: FACILITY (CR, FIE{RR, OP=LPP LFB query})
+ Public->>Private: RELEASE COMPLETE (CR)
+ Note over Public: T_RR starts
+ Public->>Private: DISCONNECT (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPP Call preemption})
+ Note over Public: T_LR ends, T_RR ends
+ Private-->>Public: RELEASE (CRe, FIE{INV, OP=mLPP Call preemption})
+ Public->>Private: RELEASE COMPLETE (CRe)
+ Public->>Private: SETUP (CRp, Ch ID=reserved ckt, FIE{INV, OP=mLPP Call request})
+ Private-->>Public: ALERTING (CRp, FIE{RR, OP=mLPP Call request})
+ Public->>Private: CONNECT (CRp)
+
+```
+
+T1145440-92/d08
+
+Sequence diagram showing the normal operation for MLPP with LFB option (destination private ISDN – successful preemption) between a Public Network and a Private Network. The diagram includes messages like REGISTER, FACILITY, RELEASE COMPLETE, DISCONNECT, RELEASE, SETUP, ALERTING, and CONNECT, along with timers T\_L, T\_LR, and T\_RR.
+
+FIGURE 3-8/Q.955
+**Normal operation for MLPP with LFB option
+(destination private ISDN – successful preemption)**
+
+## 3.9 Parameter values – timers
+
+Four additional timers $T_K$ , $T_L$ , $T_{LR}$ , and $T_{RR}$ beyond those specified in Recommendations Q.931 and Q.932, shall be employed with the MLPP operation, as described in this Recommendation.
+
+Network timer $T_K$ is started when the serving exchange notifies a user of a precedence call. This timer has a range of values from 4-30 seconds.
+
+Timer $T_L$ is started when the MLPP DSS 1 LFB query is invoked. This timer has an approximate value of 15 seconds.
+
+Timer $T_{LR}$ is started when the MLPP DSS 1 LFB query successfully locates and marks as reserved a preemptable circuit. This timer has an approximate value of 30 seconds.
+
+Timer $T_{RR}$ is started when the call is released with the DISCONNECT message and the circuit is reserved for reuse. This timer has a value of 12 seconds.
+
+## 3.10 Dynamic description
+
+This subclause specifies actions within telecommunication equipment associated with the user-network access interface to support MLPP in diagrammatic form. It is shown in Figures 3-9 and 3-12. Figure 3-9 covers the Originating Exchange (OE), Figure 3-10, the calling user, Figure 3-11, the Destination Exchange (DE), and Figure 3-12, the called user.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([NULL]) --> Setup[/SETUP/]
+ Setup -.-> Note1[For MLPP call]
+ Setup --> FacIE{Facility IE present?}
+ FacIE -- No --> Formulate[Formulate Facility IE with PL = ROUTINE]
+ FacIE -- Yes --> PLValid{PL valid?}
+ PLValid -- No --> Release[/RELEASE COMPLETE with Error = 44, "unauthorizedPrecedenceLevel"/]
+ Release -.-> Note2[MLPP call setup rejected]
+ Release --> End1([NULL])
+ End1 --- T1140660-92/d09
+ PLValid -- Yes --> SetMLPP[Set MLPP Service Domain and LFB indication values]
+ SetMLPP --> MarkCircuit[Mark the circuit with PL and MLPP Service Domain of outgoing MLPP call]
+ MarkCircuit --> SetupInd[Setup indication]
+ SetupInd --> CallInit([CALL INITIATED])
+ CallInit --> ProceedReq[/Proceeding request/]
+ ProceedReq --> CallProceed[/CALL PROCEEDING/]
+ CallProceed -.-> Note3[Additional checks may be made before sending this message]
+ CallProceed --> A((A))
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for originating exchange (OE) procedure without DSS 1 LFB query for outgoing MLPP call. The process starts with a NULL state, followed by a SETUP message. A decision is made on whether Facility IE is present. If not, it proceeds to a 'Formulate Facility IE with PL = ROUTINE' box. If yes, it checks if PL is valid. If not valid, it sends a 'RELEASE COMPLETE' message with Error = 44, 'unauthorizedPrecedenceLevel', and the call setup is rejected. If valid, it sets MLPP Service Domain and LFB indication values, marks the circuit with PL and MLPP Service Domain, and sends a Setup indication. This is followed by CALL INITIATED, a Proceeding request, and a CALL PROCEEDING message. A note indicates that additional checks may be made before sending this message. The process ends at connector A.
+
+FIGURE 3-9/Q.955 (Sheet 1 of 2)
+ Originating exchange (OE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (procedure for outgoing MLPP call)
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ A((A)) -- 1 --> B([OUTGOING CALL PROCEEDING])
+ B --> C[/Alerting request/]
+ C --> D{Called Party
+MLPP User?}
+ D -- Yes --> E[/ALERTING/]
+ D -- No --> F[Unmark the circuit of
+PL and MLPP Service
+Domain marking]
+ F --> E
+ E --> G([CALL DELIVERED])
+ G --> H[/Setup response/]
+ H --> I[/CONNECT/]
+ I --> J([ACTIVE])
+
+```
+
+T1140670-92/d10
+
+Flowchart for Outgoing MLPP call procedure. It starts with a start symbol 'A' leading to 'OUTGOING CALL PROCEEDING', then 'Alerting request', a decision 'Called Party MLPP User?', and states 'ALERTING', 'CALL DELIVERED', 'CONNECT', and 'ACTIVE'. A branch for 'No' leads to 'Unmark the circuit of PL and MLPP Service Domain marking' before joining the 'Yes' path.
+
+FIGURE 3-9/Q.955 (Sheet 2 of 2)
+**Originating exchange (OE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+(Procedure for outgoing MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ NULL1([NULL]) --> SETUP[/SETUP/]
+ SETUP -.->|For MLPP call|
+ SETUP --> CALL_INITIATED([CALL INITIATED])
+ CALL_INITIATED --> CALL_PROCEEDING[/CALL PROCEEDING/]
+ CALL_INITIATED --> RELEASE_COMPLETE[/RELEASE COMPLETE with error = 44 unauthorized PrecedenceLevel/]
+ CALL_PROCEEDING --> MarkCircuit[Mark the circuit with PL and MLPP Service Domain of outgoing MLPP call]
+ MarkCircuit --> ReserveCircuit[..Reserve outgoing circuit after B-channel confirmation from the network]
+ ReserveCircuit --> OUTGOING_CALL_PROCEEDING([OUTGOING CALL PROCEEDING])
+ OUTGOING_CALL_PROCEEDING --> ALERTING[/ALERTING/]
+ ALERTING --> State1((1))
+ State1 --- 2
+ RELEASE_COMPLETE --> NULL2([NULL])
+ NULL2 --- T1145450-92/d11
+
+```
+
+-- Contains Facility information element indicating if the called user is an MLPP subscriber or not
+
+T1145450-92/d11
+
+Flowchart for Calling User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for outgoing MLPP call). The flow starts with a NULL state, followed by a SETUP message (with a dashed line indicating 'For MLPP call'). This leads to CALL INITIATED. From there, the flow branches into two paths: one for successful call proceeding (CALL PROCEEDING) and one for release complete with error (RELEASE COMPLETE with error = 44 unauthorized PrecedenceLevel). The successful path involves marking the circuit with PL and MLPP Service Domain, reserving the outgoing circuit, and then proceeding to OUTGOING CALL PROCEEDING, ALERTING, and finally a state labeled 1 (with a 2 below it). The error path leads to a NULL state with reference T1145450-92/d11. A side box contains facility information about MLPP subscribers.
+
+FIGURE 3-10/Q.955 (Sheet 1 of 2)
+**Calling User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (procedure for outgoing MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start((I)) -- 1 --> Decision{Called uer
+MLPP subscriber?}
+ Decision -- No --> Unmark[Unmark the previously
+marked circuit]
+ Decision -- Yes --> Alerting[/Alerting
+indication/]
+ Unmark --> Alerting
+ Alerting --> CallDelivered{{CALL
+DELIVERED}}
+ CallDelivered --> Connect[/CONNECT/]
+ Connect --> SetupConfirm[/Setup
+confirm/]
+ SetupConfirm --> AckOption[/Ack
+option/]
+ AckOption --> Active{{ACTIVE}}
+ AckOption -- CONNECT
+ACKNOWLEDGE --> Connect
+
+```
+
+T1145460-92/d12
+
+Flowchart for Calling User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for outgoing MLPP call). The process starts with a start symbol 'I' leading to a decision 'Called uer MLPP subscriber?'. If 'No', it goes to 'Unmark the previously marked circuit' and then to 'Alerting indication'. If 'Yes', it goes directly to 'Alerting indication'. 'Alerting indication' leads to 'CALL DELIVERED', which leads to 'CONNECT'. 'CONNECT' leads to 'Setup confirm', which leads to 'Ack option'. 'Ack option' leads to 'ACTIVE'. A 'CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE' message is sent from 'Ack option' back to 'CONNECT'.
+
+FIGURE 3-10/Q.955 (Sheet 2 of 2)
+**Calling User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query**
+**(procedure for outgoing MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([NULL]) --> Setup[/Setup Indication/]
+ Setup -.->|for incoming MLPP call| MLPP[Mark circuit busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call]
+ MLPP --> PathReserved{Path reserved?}
+ PathReserved -.->|"Path reserved" is set in LFB indication| Yes
+ PathReserved -- No --> L6((L 6))
+ Yes --> StopTimer[Stop timer TLR, if running]
+ StopTimer --> MarkedCircuitFound{Is marked circuit found?}
+ MarkedCircuitFound -.->|This decision is on reservation Preemption| No
+ MarkedCircuitFound -- Yes --> ReservedCircuitIdle{Is reserved circuit idle?}
+ ReservedCircuitIdle -- No --> O5((O 5))
+ ReservedCircuitIdle -- Yes --> DD8((DD 8))
+ MarkedCircuitFound -- No --> SetLFB[Set LFB indication to "IfbNotAllowed"]
+ SetLFB --> DD8
+ DD8 --> CalledUserBusy{Called user busy?}
+ CalledUserBusy -- Yes --> PrecedenceCall{Is call a precedence call?}
+ PrecedenceCall -- Yes --> L6
+ PrecedenceCall -- No --> ReleaseCause17[/Release Complete Indication, containing Cause #17, "user busy"/]
+ ReleaseCause17 --> ClearingUser[Clearing of calling user]
+ ClearingUser --> End([NULL])
+ CalledUserBusy -- No --> IdleCircuitAvailable{Is idle circuit available?}
+ IdleCircuitAvailable -- No --> P3((P 3))
+ IdleCircuitAvailable -- Yes --> B2((B 2))
+
+```
+
+T1140680-92/d13
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call). The process starts with a NULL state, followed by a Setup Indication for an incoming MLPP call. The circuit is marked busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain. A decision is made on 'Path reserved?'. If 'Yes', the timer T\_LR is stopped, and a decision is made on 'Is marked circuit found?'. If 'Yes', it checks 'Is reserved circuit idle?'. If 'No', it goes to state O (5). If 'Yes', it goes to state DD (8). If 'No', it sets LFB indication to 'IfbNotAllowed' and goes to state DD (8). From state DD (8), it checks 'Called user busy?'. If 'Yes', it checks 'Is call a precedence call?'. If 'Yes', it goes to state L (6). If 'No', it goes to 'Release Complete Indication, containing Cause #17, "user busy"', then 'Clearing of calling user', and finally NULL. If 'No' to 'Called user busy?', it checks 'Is idle circuit available?'. If 'No', it goes to state P (3). If 'Yes', it goes to state B (2).
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 1 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query**
+**(procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ B((B)) -- 1 --> MarkCircuit[Mark circuit to called user
+busy with PL and MLPP
+Service Domain of
+incoming MLPP call]
+ MarkCircuit -- Yes --> SetupRequest[/Setup
+request/]
+ SetupRequest --> SETUP{{SETUP}}
+ SETUP -.-> Note[Continue setup of
+incoming MLPP call]
+ SETUP --> CALLPRESENT([CALL
+PRESENT])
+
+ CALLPRESENT --> ReleaseComplete[/RELEASE COMPLETE
+with Cause #88,
+"incompatible
+destination"/]
+ ReleaseComplete --> UnmarkCircuit[Unmark the
+previously
+marked circuit]
+ UnmarkCircuit --> IsPrecedenceCall1{Is call
+a precedence
+call?}
+ IsPrecedenceCall1 -- Yes --> T9((T))
+ T9 -- 9 --> EndT
+ IsPrecedenceCall1 -- No --> ClearingUser[Clearing of
+calling user]
+ ClearingUser --> NULL([NULL])
+
+ CALLPRESENT --> CallProceeding[/CALL
+PROCEEDING/]
+ CallProceeding --> IsPrecedenceCall2{Is call
+a precedence
+call?}
+ IsPrecedenceCall2 -- No --> IncomingCallProceeding1([INCOMING CALL
+PROCEEDING])
+ IsPrecedenceCall2 -- Yes --> AlternatePartySubscribed{Alternate
+party
+subscribed to?}
+ AlternatePartySubscribed -- No --> IncomingCallProceeding1
+ AlternatePartySubscribed -- Yes --> IncomingCallProceeding2([INCOMING CALL
+PROCEEDING])
+
+ IncomingCallProceeding1 --> CC10((CC))
+ CC10 -- 10 --> EndCC
+ IncomingCallProceeding2 --> Q4((Q))
+ Q4 -- 4 --> EndQ
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call).
+
+T1145470-92/d14
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 2 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query**
+**(procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ P((P)) -- 1 --> D1{Is call a precedence call?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> P1[Compare PL of incoming MLPP call with that of existing MLPP call]
+ P1 --> D2{Is existing MLPP call at lower PL?}
+ D2 -- Yes --> M((M))
+ M --- 5[5]
+ D2 -- No --> T((T))
+ T --- 9[9]
+ D1 -- No --> P2[["Release Complete Indication, containing Cause #34, "no circuit/channel available""]]
+ P2 --> P3[Clearing of calling user]
+ P3 --> NULL([NULL])
+
+```
+
+T1140700-92/d15
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call). The flow starts at connector P (1), leading to a decision 'Is call a precedence call?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'Compare PL of incoming MLPP call with that of existing MLPP call', then to 'Is existing MLPP call at lower PL?'. If 'Yes', it goes to connector M (5). If 'No', it goes to connector T (9). If 'No' from the first decision, it goes to 'Release Complete Indication, containing Cause #34, "no circuit/channel available"', then to 'Clearing of calling user', and finally to a NULL terminal. The reference T1140700-92/d15 is at the bottom.
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 3 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+(procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Q((Q)) -- 2, 8 --> ALERTING[/ALERTING/]
+ ALERTING -.-> Note[Called party notified of precedence call.
+It also contains an indication of whether
+the called party is an MLPP user or not]
+ ALERTING --> MLPP{Called party
+MLPP user?}
+ MLPP -- No --> Unmark[Unmark the circuit of
+PL and MLPP Service
+Domain marking]
+ MLPP -- Yes --> StartTimer[Start
+timer TK]
+ Unmark --> StartTimer
+ StartTimer --> CALL_RECEIVED{{CALL
+RECEIVED}}
+ CALL_RECEIVED --> TimerExpires[/Timer TK
+expires/]
+ CALL_RECEIVED --> CONNECT[/CONNECT/]
+ TimerExpires --> Divert[Divert call
+to
+alternate party]
+ CONNECT --> StopTimer[Stop
+timer TK]
+ StopTimer --> CONNECT_REQUEST{{CONNECT
+REQUEST}}
+ CONNECT_REQUEST --> Setup[/Setup
+complete
+request/]
+ Setup --> CONNECT_ACK[/CONNECT
+ACK/]
+ CONNECT_ACK --> ACTIVE2{{ACTIVE}}
+ Divert --> ACTIVE1{{ACTIVE}}
+ NoAlerting[/No ALERTING
+is received/] --> Divert
+
+```
+
+T1145480-92/d16
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call). The flowchart starts with a circle 'Q' with '2, 8' below it, leading to an 'ALERTING' event. A callout box points to 'ALERTING' with the text: 'Called party notified of precedence call. It also contains an indication of whether the called party is an MLPP user or not'. From 'ALERTING', a decision diamond asks 'Called party MLPP user?'. If 'No', it goes to 'Unmark the circuit of PL and MLPP Service Domain marking' and then to 'Start timer T\_K'. If 'Yes', it goes directly to 'Start timer T\_K'. 'Start timer T\_K' leads to a 'CALL RECEIVED' event. From 'CALL RECEIVED', the flow splits into two paths. The left path goes through 'Timer T\_K expires' to 'Divert call to alternate party' and then to 'ACTIVE'. The right path goes through 'CONNECT' to 'Stop timer T\_K', then 'CONNECT REQUEST', 'Setup complete request', 'CONNECT ACK', and finally to 'ACTIVE'. There is also a 'No ALERTING is received' event that leads to 'Divert call to alternate party'.
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 4 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ M((M
+3)) --> D1{Non-preemptable
+access resources
+subscribed to?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> T9((T
+9))
+ D1 -- No --> D2{Called
+user busy?}
+ O((O
+1)) --> D2
+ D2 -- Yes --> K6((K
+6))
+ D2 -- No --> D1
+ D1 --> P1[Mark circuit busy with PL
+and MLPP Service Domain
+of the incoming MLPP call]
+ P1 --> S1[/SETUP/]
+ S1 -.-> C1[Continue setup of
+incoming MLPP call]
+ S1 --> P2[/CALL
+PRESENT/]
+ P2 --> D3{RELEASE COMPLETE
+with Cause #88,
+"incompatible
+destination"}
+ P2 --> D4[/CALL
+PROCEEDING/]
+ D3 --> P3[Unmark the
+previously marked
+circuit]
+ P3 --> T9
+ D4 --> P4[/INCOMING CALL
+PROCEEDING/]
+ P4 --> D5[/Disconnect
+request/]
+ D5 --> D6{Is
+circuit to
+be reserved
+for reuse?}
+ D6 -- Yes --> Z7((Z
+7))
+ D6 -- No --> S7((S
+7))
+
+```
+
+The flowchart illustrates the procedure for handling an incoming MLPP call when the destination is busy. It starts with a decision diamond (M 3) asking if non-preemptable access resources are subscribed to. If 'Yes', it goes to terminal T 9. If 'No', it proceeds to a decision diamond (O 1) asking if the called user is busy. If 'Yes', it goes to terminal K 6. If 'No', it loops back to the first decision. Following the 'No' path from the first decision, the circuit is marked busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain, then a SETUP message is sent (with a dashed line indicating 'Continue setup of incoming MLPP call'), and a CALL PRESENT message is received. From CALL PRESENT, the flow splits into two paths: one for 'RELEASE COMPLETE with Cause #88, "incompatible destination"' leading to 'Unmark the previously marked circuit' and then to T 9; the other for 'CALL PROCEEDING' leading to 'INCOMING CALL PROCEEDING', then a 'Disconnect request', and finally a decision diamond asking 'Is circuit to be reserved for reuse?'. If 'Yes', it goes to Z 7; if 'No', it goes to S 7.
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (release and preemption of existing MLPP call).
+
+T1145490-92/d17
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 5 of 14)
+Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+(release and preemption of existing MLPP call)
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ L((L)) -- 1 --> D1{Is called user
+busy with a call of
+equal or
+higher PL?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> T9((T))
+ D1 -- No --> D2{Non-
+preemptable
+access resources
+subscribed
+to?}
+ K((K)) -- 5 --> D2
+ D2 -- Yes --> T9
+ D2 -- No --> P1[Mark circuit busy with PL
+and MLPP Service Domain
+of the incoming MLPP call]
+ P1 --> P2[/SETUP/]
+ P2 -.-> C1[Continue setup of
+incoming MLPP call]
+ P2 --> P3[/CALL
+PRESENT/]
+ P3 --> P4[/RELEASE COMPLETE
+with Cause #88,
+"incompatible
+destination"/]
+ P3 --> P5[/CALL
+PROCEEDING/]
+ P4 --> P6[Unmark the
+previously marked
+circuit]
+ P6 --> T9
+ P5 --> P7[/INCOMING CALL
+PROCEEDING/]
+ P7 --> P8[/Hold request/]
+ P8 --> P9[/HOLD with
+Cause #8,
+"preemption"/]
+ P9 -.-> C2[Notification of intended
+preemption to the called
+user and implicit reservation
+of B-channel]
+ P9 --> N7((N))
+ N7 -- 7 --> T9
+
+```
+
+The flowchart illustrates the procedure for handling an incoming MLPP call when the called user is busy with a call of equal or higher priority level (PL). The process begins at connector L (1) and leads to a decision diamond: "Is called user busy with a call of equal or higher PL?". If the answer is "Yes", the process proceeds directly to connector T (9). If "No", it leads to another decision diamond: "Non-preemptable access resources subscribed to?". Connector K (5) also leads to this second decision diamond. If the answer is "Yes", it proceeds to connector T (9). If "No", it proceeds to a process box: "Mark circuit busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call". This is followed by a "SETUP" process box, which has a dashed line connection to a note: "Continue setup of incoming MLPP call". The process then reaches a "CALL PRESENT" state, which branches into two paths. The left path leads to a "RELEASE COMPLETE with Cause #88, 'incompatible destination'" state, followed by "Unmark the previously marked circuit", and then to connector T (9). The right path leads to a "CALL PROCEEDING" state, followed by "INCOMING CALL PROCEEDING", then a "Hold request" state, and finally a "HOLD with Cause #8, 'preemption'" state. A dashed line from the "HOLD" state connects to a note: "Notification of intended preemption to the called user and implicit reservation of B-channel". The process then reaches connector N (7), which leads to connector T (9).
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (release and preemption of existing MLPP call).
+
+T1145500-92/d18
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 6 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (release and preemption of existing MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ N((N
+6)) --> StartTK[Start timer TK]
+ StartTK --> Decision{Is circuit
+to be reserved
+for reuse?}
+ Decision -- Yes --> WaitResponse(WAITING FOR
+RESPONSE)
+ Decision -- No --> S((S
+5))
+ WaitResponse --> TimerExpires[/Timer TK
+expires/]
+ WaitResponse --> HoldAck[/HOLD ACK/]
+ HoldAck -.-> Note1[Called user acceptance
+of intended preemption]
+ TimerExpires --> Alternate{Alternate party
+subscribed to?}
+ Alternate -- Yes --> Disconnect1[/DISCONNECT/]
+ Disconnect1 --> Divert[Divert call
+to
+alternate party]
+ Divert --> Active{{ACTIVE}}
+ Alternate -- No --> Z((Z
+5))
+ HoldAck --> StopTK[Stop timer TK]
+ StopTK --> Z
+ S --> StopTK2[Stop timer TK]
+ StopTK2 --> Disconnect2[/Disconnect
+Indication,
+with Cause #8/]
+ Disconnect2 --> Clearing["Normal call
+clearing" to the
+preempted user at
+the far end]
+ Clearing --> Null{{NULL
+E}}
+ Z --> Disconnect3[/DISCONNECT/]
+ Disconnect3 -.-> Note2[Preempted circuit is
+marked reserved
+for reuse]
+ Disconnect3 --> StartTKR[Start timer TRR]
+ StartTKR --> DisconnectIndication[/DISCONNECT
+INDICATION
+E/]
+ DisconnectIndication --> R((R
+8))
+
+```
+
+T1140740-92/d19
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) procedure without DSS 1 LFB query. The process starts at connector N (6), leading to 'Start timer T\_K'. A decision 'Is circuit to be reserved for reuse?' follows. If 'Yes', it enters a 'WAITING FOR RESPONSE' state. Two parallel paths emerge: one for 'Timer T\_K expires' leading to 'Alternate party subscribed to?' (Yes leads to 'DISCONNECT' and 'Divert call to alternate party', resulting in 'ACTIVE'); the other for 'HOLD ACK' (noted as 'Called user acceptance of intended preemption'), leading to 'Stop timer T\_K' and connector Z (5). If 'No' to the initial decision, it goes to connector S (5), 'Stop timer T\_K', 'Disconnect Indication, with Cause #8', and 'Normal call clearing' to the preempted user, resulting in 'NULL' (E). Both paths from Z (5) lead to a 'DISCONNECT' state (noted as 'Preempted circuit is marked reserved for reuse'), followed by 'Start timer T\_RR' and 'DISCONNECT INDICATION' (E), leading to connector R (8).
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 7 of 14)
+ Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (release and preemption of existing MLPP call)
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ R((R 7)) --> Branch1(( ))
+ Branch1 --> Timer[Timer TRR expires]
+ Branch1 --> Release[RELEASE]
+
+ Timer --> Unreserve[Unreserve marked circuit]
+ Unreserve --> IsMLPP{Is this a reattempt on MLPP call?}
+
+ IsMLPP -- No --> DD((DD 1))
+ IsMLPP -- Yes --> Disconnect[/Disconnect Indication, containing Cause #46, "precedence call blocked"/]
+ Disconnect --> Normal[Follow normal call clearing procedures]
+ Normal --> Null1[/NULL/]
+
+ Release --> ReleaseComp[/RELEASE COMPLETE/]
+ ReleaseComp --> StopTimer[Stop timer TRR]
+ StopTimer --> Alternate{Alternate party subscribed to?}
+
+ Alternate -- Yes --> Null2[/NULL E/]
+ Null2 --> Q((Q 4))
+
+ Alternate -- No --> Null3[/NULL E/]
+ Null3 --> CC((CC 10))
+
+```
+
+Clearing of incoming MLPP call
+
+T1140750-92/20
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) procedure without DSS 1 LFB query. The process starts at connector R (7), branching into two paths. The left path checks if timer T\_RR expires; if yes, it unreserves the circuit and checks if it's a reattempt on an MLPP call. If yes, it sends a Disconnect Indication (Cause #46) and follows normal clearing procedures. If no, it goes to connector DD (1). The right path releases the circuit and stops timer T\_RR, then checks if the alternate party is subscribed. If yes, it goes to connector Q (4); if no, it goes to connector CC (10).
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 8 of 14)
+ Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (release and preemption of existing MLPP call)
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ T((T)) -- "2, 3, 5, 6" --> A[Continue preempting
+call setup]
+ A --> B{Call completion
+or call offering services
+available?}
+ B -- Yes --> C[Interactions with call completion
+or call offering services]
+ C --> D([ACTIVE])
+ B -- No --> E{Alternate
+party subscribed
+to?}
+ E -- Yes --> F[Divert call
+to alternate party]
+ F --> G([ACTIVE])
+ E -- No --> H[/Disconnect Indication,
+containing Cause #46,
+"precedence call blocked"/]
+ H --> I[Follow normal call
+clearing procedures]
+ I --- J["Clearing of incoming
+MLPP call"]
+ I --> K([NULL])
+
+```
+
+T1145510-92/d21
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (MLPP call completion options).
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 9 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+(MLPP call completion options)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ CC((CC)) -- 2, 8 --> ALERTING[/ALERTING/]
+ ALERTING -.-> Note[Contains indication of whether the called party is an MLPP user or not]
+ ALERTING --> Decision{Called party MLPP user?}
+ Decision -- No --> Unmark[Unmark the circuit of PL and MLPP Service Domain markings]
+ Unmark --> Join(( ))
+ Decision -- Yes --> Join
+ Join --> CALL_RECEIVED([CALL RECEIVED])
+ CALL_RECEIVED --> CONNECT[/CONNECT/]
+ CONNECT --> CONNECT_REQUEST([CONNECT REQUEST])
+ CONNECT_REQUEST --> Setup[/Setup complete request/]
+ Setup --> CONNECT_ACK[/CONNECT ACK/]
+ CONNECT_ACK --> ACTIVE([ACTIVE])
+
+```
+
+T1140770-92/d22
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (call completion for MLPP call). The process starts with a circle labeled 'CC' with '2, 8' next to it, pointing to a parallelogram labeled 'ALERTING'. A dashed line from 'ALERTING' points to a bracketed note: 'Contains indication of whether the called party is an MLPP user or not'. The flow then goes to a decision diamond 'Called party MLPP user?'. If 'No', it goes to a rectangle 'Unmark the circuit of PL and MLPP Service Domain markings' before joining the 'Yes' path. The 'Yes' path goes directly to an oval 'CALL RECEIVED'. From there, it goes to a parallelogram 'CONNECT', then an oval 'CONNECT REQUEST', then a parallelogram 'Setup complete request', then a parallelogram 'CONNECT ACK', and finally an oval 'ACTIVE'. The document number 'T1140770-92/d22' is at the bottom.
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 10 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (call completion for MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([NULL]) --> Request[/Network LFB query request/]
+ Request --> Decision{Is (incoming) reserved circuit available?}
+ Decision -- No --> Denied[/Network LFB query response indicating path reservation denied/]
+ Denied --> Null1([NULL])
+ Decision -- Yes --> Mark[Mark circuit reserved for use]
+ Mark --> Register[/REGISTER/]
+ Register --> Timer[Start timer TL]
+ Timer --> Waiting([WAITING])
+ Waiting -.->|for response to REGISTER| Waiting
+ Waiting --> End((D
+12))
+
+```
+
+T1140780-92/d23
+
+Flowchart for DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call. The process starts with a NULL state, followed by a Network LFB query request. A decision diamond asks 'Is (incoming) reserved circuit available?'. If 'No', it leads to a 'Network LFB query response indicating path reservation denied' message and then back to NULL. If 'Yes', it leads to 'Mark circuit reserved for use', then a 'REGISTER' message, then 'Start timer T\_L', then a 'WAITING' state. A dashed line from the WAITING state is labeled 'for response to REGISTER'. The process ends at a circle labeled 'D' with the number 12 below it.
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 11 of 14)
+Destination exchange (DE) – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ D((D 11)) --> F1[/FACILITY
+(Bearer capability
+check failure)/]
+ D --> F2[/FACILITY
+(Bearer capability
+check success)/]
+ D --> T1[Timer TL expires]
+
+ F1 --> S1[Stop timer TL]
+ S1 --> Q1{{Network LFB query
+response (Bearer
+capability check
+failure cases)}}
+ Q1 --> W1([WAITING])
+ W1 -.->|to terminate
+signalling
+association| W1
+ W1 --> R1[/Release
+request/]
+ R1 --> RC1[/RELEASE
+COMPLETE/]
+ RC1 --> N1([NULL])
+
+ F2 --> S2[Stop timer TL]
+ S2 --> D1{Called user
+busy?}
+ D1 -- No --> U((U 13))
+ D1 -- Yes --> D2{Non-preemptable
+access resources
+subscribed to?}
+ D2 -- Yes --> V((V 13))
+ D2 -- No --> C1[Compare PL of incoming
+preempting call with
+MLPP call to
+the called user]
+ C1 --> D3{Is called user busy
+with a call of equal
+or higher PL?}
+ D3 -- Yes --> V
+ D3 -- No --> W((W 14))
+
+ T1 --> Q2{{Network LFB
+query response
+indicating success}}
+ Q2 --> W2([WAITING])
+ W2 -.->|to terminate
+signalling
+association| W2
+ W2 --> R2[/Release
+request/]
+ R2 --> RC2[/RELEASE
+COMPLETE/]
+ RC2 --> N2([NULL])
+ N2 -.->|Waiting for preempting
+call setup| N2
+ N2 --- T1140790-92/d24
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for Destination exchange (DE) – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call. The flow starts at node D (11) and branches into three paths: 1) Facility (Bearer capability check failure), 2) Facility (Bearer capability check success), and 3) Timer T\_L expires. Path 1 leads to 'Stop timer T\_L', then 'Network LFB query response (Bearer capability check failure cases)', then 'WAITING' (with a note 'to terminate signalling association'), then 'Release request', then 'RELEASE COMPLETE', and finally 'NULL'. Path 2 leads to 'Stop timer T\_L', then a decision 'Called user busy?'. If 'No', it goes to node U (13). If 'Yes', it goes to a decision 'Non-preemptable access resources subscribed to?'. If 'Yes', it goes to node V (13). If 'No', it goes to 'Compare PL of incoming preempting call with MLPP call to the called user', then a decision 'Is called user busy with a call of equal or higher PL?'. If 'Yes', it goes to node V (13). If 'No', it goes to node W (14). Path 3 leads to 'Network LFB query response indicating success', then 'WAITING' (with a note 'to terminate signalling association'), then 'Release request', then 'RELEASE COMPLETE', then 'NULL' (with a note 'Waiting for preempting call setup' and reference T1140790-92/d24).
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 12 of 14)
+Destination exchange (DE) – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ U((U 12)) --> D1{Is idle circuit
+available?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> P_Mark[Mark circuit
+to the called
+user as reserved] --> X((X 14))
+ D1 -- No --> D2{Non-
+preemptable
+access resources
+subscribed
+to?}
+ D2 -- Yes --> V((V 12))
+ D2 -- No --> P1[Compare PL of incoming
+preempting call with
+the existing MLPP call]
+ P1 --> D4{Is
+existing MLPP
+call at equal
+or higher PL?}
+ D4 -- Yes --> V
+ D4 -- No --> Y((Y 14))
+ V --> D3{Call
+completion or call
+offering services
+available?}
+ D3 -- Yes --> P_LFB1[Network LFB
+query response
+indicating success] --> PP1((PP 13))
+ D3 -- No --> D5{Alternate
+party
+subscribed to?}
+ D5 -- Yes --> P_LFB2[Network LFB
+query response
+indicating success] --> PP2((PP 13))
+ D5 -- No --> P2[Unreserve
+(incoming)
+marked circuitN] --> P_LFB3[Network LFB
+query response
+indicating failure]
+ PP1 --> W1([WAITING])
+ PP2 --> W1
+ P_LFB3 --> W2([WAITING])
+ W1 --- Note1[to terminate
+signalling
+association]
+ W2 --- Note2[to terminate
+signalling
+association]
+ W1 --> R1[Release
+request] --> RC1[RELEASE
+COMPLETE] --> N1([NULL])
+ W2 --> R2[Release
+request] --> RC2[RELEASE
+COMPLETE] --> N2([NULL])
+ N1 --- Note3[Waiting for
+preempting call
+setup]
+ N2 --- Note3
+
+```
+
+T1140800-92/d25
+
+Flowchart for DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call at the destination exchange. The process involves checking for idle circuits, non-preemptable access resources, and comparing priority levels (PL) of calls. It leads to various states including WAITING, Release request, RELEASE COMPLETE, and NULL.
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 13 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ W((W)) -- 12 ---> B1[Mark busy circuit reserved for use by the preempting call]
+ Y((Y)) -- 13 ---> B1
+ B1 --> B2[Set LFB indication to "path reserved"]
+ X((X)) -- 13 ---> B2
+ B2 --> B3[Start timer TLR]
+ B3 --> B4[/Network LFB query response indicating success/]
+ B4 --> W1(WAITING)
+ W1 -.- A1[to terminate signalling association]
+ W1 --> B5{{Release request}}
+ B5 --> B6{{RELEASE COMPLETE}}
+ B6 --> W2(NULL)
+ W2 -.- A2[Waiting for preempting call setup]
+
+```
+
+T1140810-92/d26
+
+Flowchart of the DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call. The process starts with entry points W, Y, and X leading to circuit reservation and LFB indication settings. It proceeds through starting a timer, receiving a network query response, entering a WAITING state, handling release messages, and finally reaching a NULL state. Annotations describe the purpose of the states.
+
+FIGURE 3-11/Q.955 (Sheet 14 of 14)
+**Destination exchange (DE) – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([NULL]) --> D1{Path reserved?}
+ D1 -- No --> End1([NULL])
+ D1 -- Yes --> D2{Is marked circuit found?}
+ D2 -- No --> End1
+ D2 -- Yes --> D3{Is reserved circuit idle?}
+ D3 -- No --> O((O 5))
+ D3 -- Yes --> D4{Called user busy?}
+ D4 -- Yes --> D5{Is call a precedence call?}
+ D5 -- Yes --> L((L 6))
+ D5 -- No --> Clear[Clearing of calling user with Cause #17 "user busy"]
+ Clear --> End2([NULL])
+ D4 -- No --> D6{Is idle circuit available?}
+ D6 -- No --> P((P 3))
+ D6 -- Yes --> Setup[/SETUP/]
+ Setup --> SS((SS 2))
+
+```
+
+Annotations in the flowchart:
+
+- Next to 'Path reserved?': "Path reserved" is set in LFB indication
+- Next to 'Is marked circuit found?': This decision is on reservation preemption
+- Next to 'SETUP': Incoming MLPP call
+
+T1145520-92/d27
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call). The flow starts with a NULL terminal, leading to a decision 'Path reserved?'. If 'No', it goes to a NULL terminal. If 'Yes', it leads to 'Is marked circuit found?'. If 'No', it goes to a NULL terminal. If 'Yes', it leads to 'Is reserved circuit idle?'. If 'No', it goes to terminal O (5). If 'Yes', it leads to 'Called user busy?'. If 'Yes', it leads to 'Is call a precedence call?'. If 'Yes', it goes to terminal L (6). If 'No', it goes to 'Clearing of calling user with Cause #17 "user busy"', leading to a NULL terminal. If 'Called user busy?' is 'No', it leads to 'Is idle circuit available?'. If 'No', it goes to terminal P (3). If 'Yes', it goes to a 'SETUP' process, which is annotated as 'Incoming MLPP call', leading to terminal SS (2).
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 1 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query**
+**(procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ SS((SS 1)) --> CALL_PRESENT{{CALL PRESENT}}
+ CALL_PRESENT --> Reject_request[/Reject request/]
+ CALL_PRESENT --> Proceeding_request[/Proceeding request/]
+
+ Reject_request --> RELEASE_COMPLETE{{RELEASE COMPLETE
+with Cause *88
+"incompatible destination"}}
+ RELEASE_COMPLETE --> Is_precedence{Is call a
+precedence call?}
+ Is_precedence -- Yes --> T((T 9))
+ Is_precedence -- No --> Clearing[Clearing of
+calling user]
+ Clearing --> NULL{{NULL}}
+
+ Proceeding_request --> CALL_PROCEEDING{{CALL PROCEEDING}}
+ CALL_PROCEEDING --> Mark_busy[Mark circuit to called user
+busy with PL and MLPP Service
+Domain of incoming MLPP call,
+if MLPP subscriber]
+ Mark_busy --> INCOMING_CALL_PROCEEDING{{INCOMING CALL
+PROCEEDING}}
+ INCOMING_CALL_PROCEEDING --> Alerting_request[/Alerting request/]
+ Alerting_request --> Alternate_party{Alternate party
+subscribed to?}
+ Alternate_party -- Yes --> Q((Q 4))
+ Alternate_party -- No --> CC((CC 10))
+
+```
+
+T1145530-92/d28
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call). The flow starts with a start node 'SS' (1) leading to 'CALL PRESENT'. It branches into 'Reject request' and 'Proceeding request'. The 'Reject request' path leads to 'RELEASE COMPLETE with Cause \*88 "incompatible destination"', then a decision 'Is call a precedence call?'. If 'Yes', it goes to terminal 'T' (9). If 'No', it goes to 'Clearing of calling user' and then 'NULL'. The 'Proceeding request' path leads to 'CALL PROCEEDING', then 'Mark circuit to called user busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain of incoming MLPP call, if MLPP subscriber', then 'INCOMING CALL PROCEEDING', then 'Alerting request', then a decision 'Alternate party subscribed to?'. If 'Yes', it goes to terminal 'Q' (4). If 'No', it goes to terminal 'CC' (10).
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 2 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ P((P)) -- 1 --> D1{Is call
+a precedence
+call?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> D2{Is existing MLPP
+call at lower PL?}
+ D1 -- No --> R1[Clearing of calling user with
+Cause #34, "no circuit/
+channel available"]
+ D2 -- Yes --> M((M))
+ M -- 5 --> M_END[ ]
+ style M_END visibility:hidden
+ D2 -- No --> T((T))
+ T -- 9 --> T_END[ ]
+ style T_END visibility:hidden
+ R1 --> NULL([NULL])
+ subgraph Footer
+ NULL --- ID[T1145540-92/d29]
+ end
+ style Footer fill:none,stroke:none
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call).
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 3 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+(procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Q((Q)) -- 2, 8 --> Branch
+ Branch --> Divert[Call is diverted to alternate party
+when no CONNECT is received
+before the expiry of timer T_K
+or no receipt of ALERTING]
+ Branch --> ALERTING{ALERTING}
+ ALERTING -.-> Note[Contains Facility information
+element indicating if the
+called user is an MLPP
+subscriber or not]
+ ALERTING --> CALL_RECEIVED([CALL
+RECEIVED])
+ CALL_RECEIVED --> Setup_response[/Setup
+response/]
+ Setup_response --> CONNECT{CONNECT}
+ CONNECT --> CONNECT_REQUEST([CONNECT
+REQUEST])
+ CONNECT_REQUEST --> CONNECT_ACKNOWLEDGE[/CONNECT
+ACKNOWLEDGE/]
+ Divert --> J1(( ))
+ CONNECT_ACKNOWLEDGE --> J1
+ J1 --> ACTIVE([ACTIVE])
+
+```
+
+T1145550-92/d30
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (procedure for incoming MLPP call). The flow starts at a circle labeled 'Q' with '2, 8' below it. It branches into two paths. The left path goes to a rectangular box: 'Call is diverted to alternate party when no CONNECT is received before the expiry of timer T\_K or no receipt of ALERTING'. The right path goes to a pentagon labeled 'ALERTING', which has a dashed line to a note: 'Contains Facility information element indicating if the called user is an MLPP subscriber or not'. From 'ALERTING', the flow goes to a rounded rectangle 'CALL RECEIVED', then a parallelogram 'Setup response', then a pentagon 'CONNECT', then a rounded rectangle 'CONNECT REQUEST', then a parallelogram 'CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE', and finally a rounded rectangle 'ACTIVE'. A line from the left box joins the main flow between 'CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE' and 'ACTIVE'. At the bottom is the text 'T1145550-92/d30'.
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 4 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (procedure for incoming MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ M((M 3)) --> D1{Non-preemptable access resources subscribed to?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> T9((T 9))
+ D1 -- No --> D2{Called user busy?}
+ O((O 1)) --> D2
+ D2 -- Yes --> PP6((PP 6))
+ D2 -- No --> SETUP[/SETUP/]
+ SETUP -.->|Incoming MLPP call| SETUP
+ SETUP --> CP([CALL PRESENT])
+ CP --> RR[/Reject request/]
+ RR --> RC[/RELEASE COMPLETE with Cause #88, "incompatible destination"/]
+ RC --> T9
+ CP --> PR[/Proceeding request/]
+ PR --> CPRO[/CALL PROCEEDING/]
+ CPRO --> MCB[Mark circuit busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call, if MLPP subscriber]
+ MCB --> ICPR([INCOMING CALL PROCEEDING])
+ ICPR --> DISCONNECT[/DISCONNECT/]
+ DISCONNECT --> D3{Is circuit to be reserved for reuse?}
+ D3 -- Yes --> Z7((Z 7))
+ D3 -- No --> S7((S 7))
+
+```
+
+T1145560-92/d31
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (release and preemption of existing MLPP call). The flow starts with a decision 'Non-preemptable access resources subscribed to?'. If 'Yes', it goes to terminal T (9). If 'No', it goes to a 'Called user busy?' decision. If 'Yes' to 'Called user busy?', it goes to terminal PP (6). If 'No', it proceeds to a 'SETUP' process (labeled 'Incoming MLPP call'), then 'CALL PRESENT', then a 'Reject request' process, then 'RELEASE COMPLETE with Cause #88, "incompatible destination"', and finally to terminal T (9). Alternatively, from 'CALL PRESENT', it goes to a 'Proceeding request' process, then 'CALL PROCEEDING', then 'Mark circuit busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call, if MLPP subscriber', then 'INCOMING CALL PROCEEDING', then 'DISCONNECT', then a decision 'Is circuit to be reserved for reuse?'. If 'Yes', it goes to terminal Z (7). If 'No', it goes to terminal S (7).
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 5 of 12)
+ Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (release and preemption of existing MLPP call)
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ L((L)) -- 1 --> D1{Is called user busy with call of equal or higher PL?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> T9((T))
+ D1 -- No --> D2{Non-preemptable access resources subscribed to?}
+ PP((PP)) -- 5 --> D2
+ D2 -- Yes --> T9
+ D2 -- No --> SETUP[/SETUP/]
+ SETUP -.->|Incoming MLPP call| MLPP[ ]
+ MLPP --> CP1([CALL PRESENT])
+ CP1 --> R[Reject request]
+ CP1 --> P[Proceeding request]
+ R --> RC[/RELEASE COMPLETE with Cause #88, "incompatible destination"/]
+ RC --> T9
+ P --> CP[/CALL PROCEEDING/]
+ CP --> MCB[Mark circuit busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call, if MLPP subscriber]
+ MCB --> ICP([INCOMING CALL PROCEEDING])
+ ICP --> H[/HOLD with Cause #8, "preemption"/]
+ H -.->|Notification of intended preemption to the called user and implicit reservation of B-channel| N[ ]
+ H --> BB((BB))
+ BB -- 7 --> T9
+
+```
+
+The flowchart describes the procedure for handling an incoming MLPP call when the called user is busy with a call of equal or higher priority (PL). The process starts with a loop (L) leading to a decision: "Is called user busy with call of equal or higher PL?". If "Yes", it proceeds to terminal T (9). If "No", it checks if "Non-preemptable access resources subscribed to?". If "Yes", it proceeds to terminal T (9). If "No", it proceeds to the "SETUP" process, which is associated with an "Incoming MLPP call". This leads to "CALL PRESENT", which branches into "Reject request" and "Proceeding request". The "Reject request" path leads to "RELEASE COMPLETE with Cause #88, 'incompatible destination'", which then leads to terminal T (9). The "Proceeding request" path leads to "CALL PROCEEDING", which then leads to "Mark circuit busy with PL and MLPP Service Domain of the incoming MLPP call, if MLPP subscriber". This is followed by "INCOMING CALL PROCEEDING", which leads to "HOLD with Cause #8, 'preemption'". This step includes a notification of intended preemption to the called user and an implicit reservation of the B-channel. Finally, it leads to terminal BB (7), which then leads to terminal T (9).
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (release and preemption of existing MLPP call).
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 6 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query**
+**(release and preemption of existing MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ BB((BB 6)) --> D1{Is circuit to be reserved for reuse?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> D2{Alternate party subscribed to?}
+ D1 -- No --> S((S 5))
+ D2 -- Yes --> DISCONNECT1[/DISCONNECT/]
+ D2 -- No --> HOLD_ACK[/HOLD ACK/]
+ DISCONNECT1 -.-> Note1[Preempted circuit is not reserved for reuse]
+ DISCONNECT1 --> Divert[Divert call to alternate party]
+ Divert --> ACTIVE{{ACTIVE}}
+ HOLD_ACK -.-> Note2[Called user acceptance of intended preemption]
+ HOLD_ACK --> MarkReserved[Preempted circuit is marked reserved for reuse]
+ MarkReserved --> DISCONNECTE_INDICATION{{DISCONNECTE INDICATION E}}
+ DISCONNECTE_INDICATION --> R((R 8))
+ S --> NormalClearing["Normal call clearing to the preempted user at the far end with Cause #8, "preemption""]
+ NormalClearing --> NULL{{NULL E}}
+ NULL --- T1145580-92/d33
+ Z((Z 5)) --> HOLD_ACK
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (release and preemption of existing MLPP call). The flow starts at connector BB (6) leading to a decision 'Is circuit to be reserved for reuse?'. If 'Yes', it goes to a decision 'Alternate party subscribed to?'. If 'Yes', it goes to 'DISCONNECT', then 'Divert call to alternate party', and finally 'ACTIVE'. If 'No', it goes to 'HOLD ACK' (with a note 'Called user acceptance of intended preemption'), then 'Preempted circuit is marked reserved for reuse', and finally 'DISCONNECTE INDICATION' (E) leading to connector R (8). If 'No' from the first decision, it goes to connector S (5), then 'Normal call clearing to the preempted user at the far end with Cause #8, "preemption"', and finally 'NULL' (E) leading to T1145580-92/d33. A connector Z (5) also feeds into the 'HOLD ACK' path. A note 'Preempted circuit is not reserved for reuse' points to the 'DISCONNECT' step.
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 7 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (release and preemption of existing MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ R((R 7)) --> J1{Is this
+a reattempt
+on MLPP call?}
+ J1 -- No --> DD((DD 1))
+ J1 -- Yes --> P1[Follow normal call clearing
+procedures to clear MLPP
+call with Cause #46,
+"precedence call blocked"]
+ P1 --> N1{{NULL}}
+ R --> R1[/Release
+request/]
+ R1 --> R2[RELEASE]
+ R2 --> R3[/RELEASE
+COMPLETE/]
+ R3 --> J2{Alternate party
+subscribed to?}
+ J2 -- Yes --> N2{{NULL E}}
+ N2 --> Q((Q 4))
+ J2 -- No --> N3{{NULL E}}
+ N3 --> CC((CC 10))
+
+```
+
+The flowchart illustrates the procedure for releasing and preempting an existing MLPP call. It begins with a start node 'R' (7). A decision diamond asks 'Is this a reattempt on MLPP call?'. If 'No', the flow goes to node 'DD' (1). If 'Yes', it proceeds to a process box: 'Follow normal call clearing procedures to clear MLPP call with Cause #46, "precedence call blocked"', which then leads to a 'NULL' terminal. The main path continues to a 'Release request' input, followed by a 'RELEASE' process, and then a 'RELEASE COMPLETE' output. Another decision diamond asks 'Alternate party subscribed to?'. If 'Yes', it leads to a 'NULL' terminal (E), which then connects to node 'Q' (4). If 'No', it leads to another 'NULL' terminal (E), which then connects to node 'CC' (10).
+
+Flowchart for Called User procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (release and preemption of existing MLPP call).
+
+T1145590-92/d34
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 8 of 12)
+**Called User, – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (release and preemption of existing MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ T((T
+2, 3, 5, 6)) --> A[Continue preempting
+call setup]
+ A --> B{Call
+completion or call
+offering services
+available?}
+ B -- Yes --> C[Interactions with call
+completion or call
+offering services]
+ C --> D{{ACTIVE}}
+ B -- No --> E{Alternate
+party
+subscribed to?}
+ E -- Yes --> F[Divert call
+to alternate party]
+ F --> G{{ACTIVE}}
+ E -- No --> H[Follow normal call
+clearing procedures]
+ H --> I{{NULL}}
+ J[Clearing of incoming
+preempting call] -.-> H
+
+```
+
+T1145600-92/d35
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (MLPP call completion options). The process starts with a terminal 'T' (2, 3, 5, 6) leading to 'Continue preempting call setup'. A decision 'Call completion or call offering services available?' branches to 'Interactions with call completion or call offering services' (ACTIVE) if 'Yes', or to 'Alternate party subscribed to?'. The 'Alternate party' decision branches to 'Follow normal call clearing procedures' (NULL) if 'No', or 'Divert call to alternate party' (ACTIVE) if 'Yes'. A bracket on the left indicates 'Clearing of incoming preempting call' for the 'Follow normal call clearing procedures' path.
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 9 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query
+ (MLPP call completion options)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ CC((CC)) -- 2, 8 --> ALERTING{{ALERTING}}
+ ALERTING --- Note[Contains Facility information element indicating if the called user is an MLPP subscriber or not]
+ ALERTING --> CALL_RECEIVED([CALL RECEIVED])
+ CALL_RECEIVED --> Setup_response[/Setup response/]
+ Setup_response --> CONNECT{{CONNECT}}
+ CONNECT --> CONNECT_REQUEST([CONNECT REQUEST])
+ CONNECT_REQUEST --> CONNECT_ACKNOWLEDGE[/CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE/]
+ CONNECT_ACKNOWLEDGE --> ACTIVE([ACTIVE])
+
+```
+
+T1145610-92/d36
+
+Flowchart for Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query (call completion for MLPP call). The flow starts with a circle labeled 'CC' with '2, 8' next to it. An arrow points down to a pentagon labeled 'ALERTING'. A bracket to the right of 'ALERTING' contains the text: 'Contains Facility information element indicating if the called user is an MLPP subscriber or not'. An arrow points down to a rounded rectangle labeled 'CALL RECEIVED'. An arrow points down to a parallelogram labeled 'Setup response'. An arrow points down to a pentagon labeled 'CONNECT'. An arrow points down to a rounded rectangle labeled 'CONNECT REQUEST'. An arrow points down to a parallelogram labeled 'CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE'. An arrow points down to a rounded rectangle labeled 'ACTIVE'. At the bottom, the text 'T1145610-92/d36' is present.
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 10 of 12)
+**Called User – Procedure without DSS 1 LFB query**
+**(call completion for MLPP call)**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ NULL1([NULL]) --> REGISTER[/REGISTER/]
+ REGISTER --- Note1[received when reserved circuit is available]
+
+ REGISTER --> FACILITY_FAIL[/FACILITY
+Bearer capability
+check failure/]
+ REGISTER --> FACILITY_SUCCESS[/FACILITY
+Bearer capability
+check success/]
+ REGISTER --> WAITING_R([WAITING])
+
+ FACILITY_FAIL --> WAITING_F([WAITING])
+ WAITING_F --- Note2[to terminate signalling association]
+ WAITING_F --> RELEASE_F[/RELEASE COMPLETE/]
+ RELEASE_F --> NULL_F([NULL])
+
+ FACILITY_SUCCESS --> BUSY{Called user
+busy?}
+ BUSY -- No --> U((U
+12))
+ BUSY -- Yes --> RESOURCES{Non-preemptable
+access resources
+subscribed to?}
+ RESOURCES -- Yes --> V
+ RESOURCES -- No --> PL{Is
+called user busy
+with a call of
+equal or higher
+PL?}
+ PL -- Yes --> V((V
+12))
+ PL -- No --> W((W
+12))
+
+ WAITING_R --- Note3[to terminate signalling association]
+ WAITING_R --> RELEASE_R[/RELEASE COMPLETE/]
+ RELEASE_R --> NULL_R([NULL])
+ NULL_R --- Note4[Waiting for preempting call setup]
+
+```
+
+T1145620-92/d37
+
+Flowchart for Called User – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call. The process starts with a NULL state, followed by a REGISTER event. It then branches into three paths based on bearer capability check results or a waiting state. The central path involves decisions regarding user busy status, non-preemptable resources, and priority levels (PL), leading to connector states U, V, or W.
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 11 of 12)
+**Called User – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ U((U 11)) --> D1{Is idle circuit available?}
+ D1 -- Yes --> W12((W 12))
+ D1 -- No --> D2{Non-preemptable access resources subscribed to?}
+ D2 -- Yes --> V11((V 11))
+ D2 -- No --> D3{Is existing MLPP call at equal or higher PL?}
+ D3 -- Yes --> V11
+ D3 -- No --> D4{Alternate party subscribed to?}
+ D4 -- Yes --> V11
+ D4 -- No --> W12
+
+ V11 --> D5{Call completion or call offering services available?}
+ D5 -- Yes --> W1112((W 11, 12))
+ D5 -- No --> D6{Alternate party subscribed to?}
+ D6 -- Yes --> W1112
+
+ W1112 --> W12
+
+ W12 -.-> T1[to terminate signalling association]
+ T1 -.-> W12
+
+ W1112 -.-> T2[to terminate signalling association]
+ T2 -.-> W1112
+
+ W12 --> R1[RELEASE COMPLETE]
+ R1 --> N1[NULL]
+
+ W1112 --> R2[RELEASE COMPLETE]
+ R2 --> N2[NULL]
+ N2 -.-> T3[Waiting for preempting call setup]
+ T3 -.-> N2
+
+```
+
+T1145630-92/d38
+
+Flowchart for Called User – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call. The process starts with state U (11) and checks if an idle circuit is available. If not, it checks for non-preemptable access resources and existing MLPP calls. Depending on these checks, it either proceeds to state W (12) or state V (11). From state V (11), it checks for call completion or services availability, and if not available, checks for alternate party subscription. Both paths lead to a WAITING state, followed by RELEASE COMPLETE and NULL states, with specific termination and waiting annotations.
+
+FIGURE 3-12/Q.955 (Sheet 12 of 12)
+Called User – DSS 1 LFB procedure for MLPP call
\ No newline at end of file