+
+## 3 Definitions
+
+The terms and definitions used in this Recommendation are contained in [ITU-T G.810], [ITU-T G.8260] and [IEEE 1588].
+
+## 4 Abbreviations and acronyms
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms:
+
+| | |
+|---------|----------------------------------------------------|
+| 1PPS | One Pulse Per Second |
+| ARP | Antenna Reference Point |
+| BIPM | International Bureau of Weights and Measures |
+| BBU | Base Band Unit |
+| CA | Carrier Aggregation |
+| CDMA | Code Division Multiple Access |
+| CoMP | Co-ordinated Multi-Point |
+| CRC | Cyclic Redundancy Check |
+| CU | Centralized Unit |
+| DCF | Dispersion Compensating Fibre |
+| DU | Distributed Unit |
+| eNB | E-UTRAN Node B |
+| EN-DC | E-UTRAN New radio – Dual Connectivity |
+| ERA | Earth Rotation Angle |
+| E-UTRAN | Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network |
+| FCS | Frame Check Sequence |
+| FDD | Frequency Division Duplexing |
+| FR1 | Frequency Range 1 |
+| FR2 | Frequency Range 2 |
+| GBAS | Ground Based Augmentation System |
+
+| | |
+|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| GLONASS | GLObalnaya NAVigazionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema (Global Navigation Satellite System) |
+| GMT | Greenwich Mean Time |
+| gNB | 5G (NR) Node B |
+| GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System |
+| GPS | Global Positioning System |
+| HRM | Hypothetical Reference Model |
+| HRPD | High Rate Packet Data |
+| IP | Internet Protocol |
+| IRNSS | Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System |
+| IWF | Interworking Function |
+| LTE | Long Term Evolution |
+| LTE-A | Long Term Evolution – Advanced |
+| MAC | Medium Access Control |
+| MBMS | Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service |
+| MBSFN | MBMS based on Single Frequency Network |
+| MIMO | Multiple Input Multiple Output |
+| MRTD | Maximum Received Time Difference |
+| M2M | Machine to Machine |
+| NR | New Radio |
+| NTP | Network Time Protocol |
+| OTDOA | Observed Time Difference of Arrival |
+| OTN | Optical Transport Network |
+| PDV | Packet Delay Variation |
+| PHY | Physical Layer Protocol |
+| PON | Passive Optical Network |
+| PRTC | Primary Reference Time Clock |
+| PSN | Packet Switched Network |
+| PTP | Precision Time Protocol |
+| QZSS | Quasi-Zenith Satellite System |
+| RTT | Radio Transmission Technology |
+| RX | Receive |
+| SBAS | Satellite Based Augmentation System |
+| SI | International System of Units |
+| SMTC | SSB Measurement Timing Configuration |
+| SSB | Synchronization Signal Block |
+| TAE | Time Alignment Error |
+
+| | |
+|----------|-------------------------------------------------|
+| TAI | International Atomic Time |
+| TDD | Time Division Duplexing |
+| TD-SCDMA | Time Domain Synchronized CDMA |
+| T-BC | Telecom Boundary Clock |
+| T-GM | Telecom Grandmaster |
+| T-TC | Telecom Transparent Clock |
+| T-TSC | Telecom Time Slave Clock |
+| TX | Transmit |
+| UDP | User Datagram Protocol |
+| UE | User Equipment |
+| UT | Universal Time |
+| UTC | Universal Time Co-ordinated |
+| UTRA | Universal Terrestrial Radio Access |
+| WCDMA | Wideband CDMA |
+| WDM | Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing |
+| WiMAX | Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access |
+
+## 5 Conventions
+
+Within this Recommendation, the following conventions are used: The term precision time protocol (PTP) is the protocol defined by [IEEE 1588]. As an adjective, it indicates that the modified noun is specified in or interpreted in the context of [IEEE 1588].
+
+# 6 The need for time and phase synchronization
+
+Time synchronization has traditionally been required to support billing and alarm functions (maintenance or fault isolation). In this context, synchronization must in general be accurate to within hundreds of milliseconds.
+
+Another time synchronization application is the monitoring of delays in Internet protocol (IP) networks. In this case, the requirement is accuracy to within some hundreds of microseconds (the actual requirement depends on the application).
+
+Stringent time synchronization requirements (i.e., in the range of a few microseconds) apply to the generation of signals over the air interface of some mobile systems, such as code division multiple access (CDMA)2000 or long term evolution frequency division duplexing (LTE FDD) unicast, when it is required to support synchronous CDMA2000 interworking.
+
+Phase synchronization is often needed to support requirements for the air interface of some mobile systems, as in the case of time division duplexing (TDD) systems (for instance, LTE TDD), or when supporting multimedia broadcast/multicast service (MBMS). Note that ordinary wideband CDMA (WCDMA) MBMS does not require accurate phase synchronization since it has been specified and designed to work properly in networks that satisfy the 50 ppb frequency accuracy requirement. This requirement, which is guaranteed by the WCDMA node synchronization function (see [b-3GPP TS 25.402]), limits phase drift to between 10 and 20 ms. But when MBMS is based on single-frequency network (MBSFN) mode, timing must be accurate to within a few microseconds. This is because identical waveforms are transmitted simultaneously from multiple cells. The signals from these cells are then combined as the multipath components of a single cell. Terminals must thus
+
+perceive the signals of an entire group of transmitting cells as though they came from a single cell. Therefore, all transmissions must be very tightly synchronized and deliver exactly the same content to each base station.
+
+The main requirements applicable at the output of the application (e.g., on the radio interface in the case of a wireless application) are summarized in Appendix II.
+
+Based on Table II.1, it is possible to classify the applications into classes of requirements, as shown in Table 1 below.
+
+NOTE – In the case of mobile applications as described in Table II.1, the requirements are generally expressed in terms of phase error between base stations. In the case of a centralized master, the requirement could be expressed as $\pm$ half of the accuracy requirement applicable to the specific technology. Table 1 presents the requirement in this format in order to allow the analysis of time error budgeting as distributed from a primary reference time clock (PRTC) towards the end application.
+
+**Table 1 – Time and phase requirement classes**
+
+| Class level of accuracy | Time error requirements (Note 1) | Typical applications (for information) |
+|-------------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1 | 500 ms | Billing, alarms. |
+| 2 | 100 – 500 $\mu$ s | IP delay monitoring. Synchronization signal block (SSB)-measurement timing configuration (SMTC) window. |
+| 3 | 5 $\mu$ s | LTE TDD (large cell). Synchronous Dual Connectivity (for up to 7 km propagation difference between eNBs/gNBs in FR1). (Note 2) |
+| 4 | 1.5 $\mu$ s | UTRA-TDD, LTE-TDD (small cell), NR TDD, WiMAX-TDD (some configurations). Synchronous dual connectivity (for up to 9 km propagation difference between eNBs/gNBs in FR1) (Note 2). New radio (NR) intra-band non-contiguous and inter-band carrier aggregation, with or without multiple input multiple output (MIMO) or transmit (TX) diversity. |
+| 5 | 1 $\mu$ s | WiMAX-TDD (some configurations). |
+| 6 | x ns (Note 4) | Various applications, including location based services and some coordination features. (Note 3) |
+
+NOTE 1 – The requirement is expressed in terms of time error with respect to a common reference. Some of the original requirements were expressed in terms of relative time error.
+
+NOTE 2 – FR1: 410 MHz – 7.125 GHz; FR2: 24.25 – 52.6 GHz
+
+NOTE 3 – The performance requirements of some of these features are under study. For information purposes only, values between 500 ns and 1.5 $\mu$ s have been mentioned for some features. Depending on the final specifications developed by 3GPP, these applications may be handled in a different level of accuracy.
+
+NOTE 4 – For the value x, refer to Table 2 and Table II.2 of Appendix II.
+
+Based on Table II.2, it is possible to classify the class 6 level of accuracy into a further three sub-classes, as shown in Table 2.
+
+**Table 2 – Time and phase requirements for cluster based synchronisation**
+
+| Class level of accuracy | Maximum relative time error requirements (Note 1) | Typical applications (for information) |
+|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 3A | 5 µs | LTE MBSFN. |
+| 4A | 3 µs | NR intra-band non-contiguous (FR1 only) and inter-band carrier aggregation; with or without MIMO or TX diversity. |
+| 6A | 260 ns | LTE intra-band non-contiguous carrier aggregation with or without MIMO or TX diversity, and inter-band carrier aggregation with or without MIMO or TX diversity. NR intra-band contiguous (FR1 only) and Intra-band non-contiguous (FR2 only) carrier aggregation, with or without MIMO or TX diversity. |
+| 6B | 130 ns | LTE intra-band contiguous carrier aggregation, with or without MIMO or TX diversity. NR (FR2) intra-band contiguous carrier aggregation, with or without MIMO or TX diversity. |
+| 6C (Note 2) | 65 ns | LTE and NR MIMO or TX diversity transmissions, at each carrier frequency. |
+
+NOTE 1 – The maximum relative time error requirements represent the largest timing difference measured between any two elements of the cluster. See Appendix VII of [b-ITU-T G.8271.1] for illustration of how requirements are specified in a cluster. In 3GPP terminology this is equivalent to time alignment error (TAE).
+
+NOTE 2 – Level 6C is an internal equipment specification, and does not result in a synchronization requirement on the transport network.
+
+This Recommendation deals mainly with the class 4, 5, and 6A levels of accuracy requirement, as indicated in Table 2.
+
+# 7 Time and phase synchronization methods
+
+Packet-based methods (typically using the network time protocol (NTP)) without timing support from the network are traditionally used to support applications with less strict time and phase synchronization requirements (class 1 according to Table 1).
+
+This Recommendation focuses on applications corresponding to classes 4, 5, and 6 according to Table 1.
+
+For these applications, the following options are considered in this Recommendation:
+
+- a distributed primary reference time clock (PRTC) approach, implementing a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver in the end application (a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, for example);
+- packet-based methods with timing support of intermediate nodes.
+
+NOTE 1 – Additional solutions may be considered as a complement to the above solutions. As an example, timing may be carried over the radio interface of mobile systems. Applicability to the general hypothetical reference model (HRMs) is for further study.
+
+NOTE 2 – The use of packet-based methods with limited timing support, or without timing support of intermediate nodes, is considered capable of addressing applications corresponding to class 4.
+
+The following clauses provide details on the synchronization methods based on the distributed PRTC approach, and packet based methods with timing support of intermediate nodes.
+
+### 7.1 Distributed PRTC
+
+One method to achieve time and phase synchronization is to distribute a synchronization signal directly to each clock in the network. This method is referred to as a distributed primary reference time clock and, in general, is feasible with radio distribution because a network-wide wire-based distribution would require a complete extra network, which may be impractical. However, in some cases, a remote distribution of the PRTC signal via cables might also be possible. The radio distribution is normally achieved by means of GNSS, as for instance the GPS. Other radio systems may also be used.
+
+The main objective of a synchronization network is to synchronize the end applications which require a timing reference. If there are several end applications in one site, a single PRTC reference can be deployed in the site and the time/phase reference can be further distributed within the site from a centralized function. The details of the centralized function are for further study.
+
+Figure 1 below gives a generic representation of the distributed PRTC method. In the case of GNSS-based synchronization, the reference timing signal is distributed by the satellite signals and the GNSS receiver acts as the PRTC of the network. The receiver (RX) in Figure 1 processes the GNSS signal and extracts a reference signal for the end applications.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a distributed PRTC synchronization network. At the top, an oval labeled "Radio distributed PRTC, e.g., GNSS or distribution via cables" represents the source of the synchronization signal. Below this, there are three distinct synchronization paths. The first path shows a dashed line (radio) leading to an antenna, then a solid line (cable) to a box labeled "Rx", then a dashed line to a box labeled "End application". The second path shows a dashed line (radio) leading to an antenna, then a solid line (cable) to a box labeled "Rx", which then branches out via three dashed lines (radio) to three separate boxes labeled "End application". The third path shows a dashed line (radio) leading directly to a box labeled "End application". Horizontal dashed lines labeled "PRTC limits" are shown between the "Rx" boxes and the "End application" boxes. A legend at the bottom indicates that a dashed line with an arrow represents "Time or phase synchronization distribution via cable" and a dashed line with a lightning bolt symbol represents "Time or phase synchronization distribution via radio". The text "G.8271-Y.1366(12)\_F01" is in the bottom right corner.
+
+Diagram of a distributed PRTC synchronization network showing radio and cable distribution paths to end applications.
+
+**Figure 1 – Example of a distributed PRTC synchronization network**
+
+#### 7.1.1 Main characteristics
+
+One of the main advantages for a distributed PRTC approach is that the reference timing signals are available world-wide in the case of GNSS. This approach also allows for a flat distribution hierarchy with no risk of timing loops. In general, the overall network planning is also easier.
+
+The main disadvantages of this approach are the dependency on the operator of the navigation system, the requirements for an antenna with a wide-angle view to the sky, the need to address lightning protection and, in general, the issues related to the antenna cabling.
+
+Finally, GNSS-based systems present a risk of interference, e.g., by television (TV) systems, saturation and jamming.
+
+It should be mentioned, however, that evolution of the technology reduces some of the main drawbacks (e.g., installation, reliability, etc.). Moreover, it should be possible to secure the GNSS
+
+receivers, for instance when an accurate frequency reference, such as a synchronous Ethernet signal, is available. The options for securing GNSS receivers are for further study.
+
+In terms of performance, the accuracy that can be achieved by means of a PRTC system is defined in [ITU G.8272].
+
+### 7.2 Packet based methods with timing support of intermediate nodes
+
+Time synchronization can be distributed via timing protocols such as PTP (see [IEEE 1588]). This Recommendation currently focuses on the cases where the timing reference is carried with support from the network.
+
+The timing support in the intermediate nodes (e.g., Ethernet switches) concerns specific hardware as well as software timing functions (see Figure 2).
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a Telecom Grandmaster (T-GM) on the left sending PTP messages (green rectangles) to a network of Telecom Boundary Clocks (T-BC). The T-BCs are interconnected and also receive PTP messages. One T-BC is connected to an End application on the right. The diagram shows the flow of PTP messages from the T-GM through the T-BC network to the End application. A legend at the bottom left indicates that green rectangles represent PTP messages. The diagram is labeled G.8271-Y.1366(16)\_F02.
+
+Diagram illustrating a packet-based method with support from network nodes. A Telecom Grandmaster (T-GM) sends PTP messages (represented by green rectangles) to a network of Telecom Boundary Clocks (T-BC). The T-BCs are interconnected and also receive PTP messages. One T-BC is connected to an End application. The diagram shows the flow of PTP messages from the T-GM through the T-BC network to the End application.
+
+**Figure 2 – Example of packet-based method with support from network nodes**
+
+In the case of PTP, these functions can correspond either to the telecom boundary clock (T-BC) or to the telecom transparent clock (T-TC), with hardware timestamping at the related interfaces.
+
+The T-BC terminates and regenerates timestamp messages.
+
+The T-TC provides a means of measuring the delays that have been added by the network element and by the links connected to the network element. This Recommendation considers only T-BC support in this version. The use of T-TC in telecom applications is for further study.
+
+The Figure 3 shows an example of phase/time synchronization distributed via packet-based methods with timing support from the network. A packet master clock function in a telecom grandmaster (T-GM) having access to a reference timing signal compliant with the PRTC limits originates the packet timing distribution, and every transport node implements a T-BC.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating time synchronization distribution via packet-based methods. At the top, a 'Radio distributed PRTC, e.g., GNSS or distribution via cables' provides a reference signal. This signal is received by an 'Rx' unit, which outputs 'PRTC limits'. Below the 'Rx' unit, the diagram shows two parallel distribution paths. The left path starts with an 'End application' and a 'Packet master clock'. The 'Packet master clock' feeds into a 'Packet timing distribution network' containing two 'Transport node' units, each marked with a 'T-BC' symbol. These nodes feed into 'Packet slave clock' units, which in turn feed into two 'End application' units. The right path starts with a 'Packet master clock' that feeds into a 'Packet timing distribution network' containing one 'Transport node' unit, marked with a 'T-BC' symbol. This node feeds into a 'Packet slave clock' unit, which feeds into two 'End application' units. A legend at the bottom indicates that dashed lines represent 'Time or phase synchronization distribution via cable' and dashed lines with an arrowhead represent 'Time or phase synchronization distribution via radio'. The diagram is labeled 'G.8271-Y.1366(12)\_F03'.
+
+**Figure 3 – Example of time synchronization distributed via packet based methods**
+
+#### 7.2.1 Main characteristics
+
+The main advantage of a time synchronization distribution solution via packet-based methods is the significantly reduced number of GNSS receivers. Note that if the PRTC is based on GNSS, then GNSS receivers would be required at the PRTC locations.
+
+Among the disadvantages, it can be noted that the network planning is in this case more complex (e.g., with risk of timing loops). In addition, noise accumulation has also to be taken into account. Finally, another issue with this methodology is the time error due to asymmetries in the network that needs to be controlled (e.g., implying calibration of fibre lengths).
+
+## 8 Network reference model
+
+Figure 4 describes the network reference model used to define the time and phase synchronization performance objectives when the reference timing signal is carried over the transport network:
+
+
+
+Figure 4 – Network reference model. The diagram shows a sequence of components: Network time reference (e.g., GNSS engine) connected to a PRTC (Primary reference time clock). The PRTC output (A) connects to a Packet master clock. The Packet master clock output (B) connects to a Packet network. The Packet network output (C) connects to a Packet slave clock. The Packet slave clock output (D) connects to an End application time clock. The End application time clock output (E) is the final output. A dashed line indicates a Packet timing signal path from the Packet master clock through the Packet network to the Packet slave clock. A legend indicates that solid lines represent Physical timing signals (for phase and/or time synchronization) and dashed lines represent Packet timing signals. A detailed view of the Packet network shows it is composed of a Transport part and an Access part. The diagram is labeled G.8271-Y.1366(16)-Amd.1(17)\_F04.
+
+**Figure 4 – Network reference model**
+
+The following reference points are defined. All the requirements related to these reference points are defined with respect to a common time reference, i.e., any recognized time reference such as GPS time.
+
+- A: PRTC output;
+- B: Packet master clock output;
+- C: Packet slave clock input;
+- D: Packet slave clock output;
+- E: End application output.
+
+Some specific access technologies may need to be considered in the network reference model in some cases. For instance, the network between points B and C can be composed in some cases of a transport part and an access part. Each part would then have its own phase/time budget derived from the media specific mechanisms that have been developed to transport frequency and time synchronization.
+
+NOTE 1 – In Figure 4 the packet master clock could correspond to a T-GM and the packet slave clock could correspond to a telecom time slave clock (T-TSC).
+
+NOTE 2 – The performance studies documented in [b-ITU-T G.8271.1] are based on a full timing support in the network with hardware timestamping (e.g., T-BC in every node in the case of [IEEE 1588]) and with physical layer frequency synchronization support (e.g., synchronous Ethernet support). The case of partial timing support, where some or all of the nodes are not capable of providing timing support to the PTP layer, is covered in [b-ITU-T G.8271.2].
+
+NOTE 3 – In some cases, specific access technologies may need to be considered in the network reference model. For instance in some cases, the packet network between points B and C can be composed of a transport part and an access part. Each part would then have its own phase/time budget. In some radio access networks (RAN) scenarios, for instance when the RAN is split based on different radio functions, from the point of view of timing, the starting point for the RAN may be present between points B and C shown in Figure 4. Alternatively, the entire network model may be present within the RAN. Details are for further study.
+
+NOTE 4 – Additional detail for the network reference model of Figure 4 for the case of PTP over non-packet technologies (e.g., OTN, gigabit passive optical network (GPON), microwave) is for further study.
+
+The overall budget relates to measurement point 'E' (i.e., the time error at E with respect to the common time reference).
+
+'A', 'B', 'C' and 'D' define the other relevant measurement reference points and related network limits, that also indicate the budget of the noise that can be allocated to the relevant network segments (e.g., 'A to C', 'A to D', etc.).
+
+The measurement points that are of interest for a specific application may depend on where the network administrative domain borders apply.
+
+Also, as described above, the measurement in some cases needs to be performed on a two-way timing signal, which would require a specific test set-up and metrics to be used.
+
+The measurement set-up for two-way timing signals as well as the noise that can be added by the measurement test equipment is an item for further study.
+
+Another possibility is to perform the measurement using an external dedicated output phase/time reference, such as a one pulse per second (1PPS) interface. Annex A provides guidance about this type of interface.
+
+### 8.1 Access section of HRM with PTP/native access IWF
+
+The general network reference model in Figure 4 can be further expanded to illustrate different types of access technology that may be used at the edge of the network such as microwave, digital subscriber line (DSL) or passive optical network (PON).
+
+Generally access technologies can be categorized as either point-to-multipoint shared technologies or point-to-point technologies. An example of a point-to-multipoint shared media technology is a PON with a single multi-port head end and multiple end devices. An example of a point to point technology is a microwave system. Figure 5 expands the access section to show the media conversion that occurs between the Ethernet technology that forms the existing synchronization HRM of the transport section and the technologies in the access section of the HRM. The time error budget of this section may depend on the specific type of technology.
+
+
+
+Figure 5 – Network reference model with access section. The diagram shows a network reference model with several components and interfaces. At the top, a 'Network time reference (e.g., GNSS engine)' is connected to a 'PRTC' (Primary reference time clock). The PRTC is connected to a 'Packet master clock' at interface A. The Packet master clock is connected to a 'Packet network' at interface B.0. The Packet network is connected to a 'Packet slave clock' at interface C. The Packet slave clock is connected to an 'End application time clock' at interface D. Below the Packet network, there is a 'Transport section' and an 'Access section' at interface B.1. The Transport section is connected to the Packet network at B.0 and to the Access section at B.1. The Access section is connected to the Packet slave clock at C. Below the Access section, there is a detailed view of the 'Access section' which includes a 'PTP-Medium IWF', an 'Access medium', and a 'Medium-PTP IWF'. The PTP-Medium IWF is connected to the Transport section at B.1 and to the Access medium. The Access medium is connected to the Medium-PTP IWF. The Medium-PTP IWF is connected to the Packet slave clock at C. A legend indicates that solid lines represent 'Physical timing signal (for phase and/or time synchronization)' and dashed lines represent 'Packet timing signal'. The diagram is labeled 'G.8271-Y.1366(16)-Amd.1(17)\_F05'.
+
+**Figure 5 – Network reference model with access section**
+
+For example, between B.0 and B.1 the transport section consists of a network chain from [b-ITU-T G.8271.1] comprised of full timing aware ITU-T G.8273.2 T-BCs using PTP & SyncE. Between B.1 and C of the access section, there may also be T-BCs, and in this case they are connected to and from native access clocks. These native access clocks provide the direct connection to the medium. Essentially, the T-BC and native access clock provides an interworking function (IWF) that converts between Ethernet carrying PTP and the access medium.
+
+The access section will have a time error that is a combination of the constant and dynamic components of the medium as well as contribution from the clocks in the access section.
+
+## 9 Time and phase synchronization interfaces
+
+Time and phase synchronization interfaces are needed for the following two purposes:
+
+### 1) measurement interface:
+
+in order to allow network operators to measure the quality of the time/phase synchronization distributed along a synchronization chain, each PRTC, T-GM, T-BC and T-TSC must have a dedicated external phase/time output interface implemented;
+
+a one pulse-per-second (1PPS) interface is an adequate measurement interface, and should be implemented according to one of the interfaces specified in Annex A. Additional measurements interfaces are for further study.
+
+### 2) distribution interface:
+
+time and phase synchronization interfaces are sometimes needed to connect systems belonging to a time/phase synchronization distribution chain;
+
+a typical application is the case of a T-TSC connected to an end-application, such as a base station, which is equipped with an existing input 1PPS interface. The details of the distribution interfaces are for further study.
+
+Figure 6 shows examples of both types of time and phase synchronization interfaces: measurement interfaces (reference point 1) and distribution interfaces (reference point 2). Different requirements may apply to these points.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a synchronization chain starting with a PRTC (Primary Reference Time Clock) at the top left. An arrow labeled '1' points out from the PRTC to the right, representing a measurement interface. Below the PRTC, a vertical arrow points down to a T-GM (Timing Generator). From the T-GM, a horizontal line extends to the right, connecting to a series of four T-BC (Timing Boundary Clock) units. Below each T-BC unit, a dashed vertical arrow points down to a '1', representing measurement interfaces. The last T-BC unit connects to a T-TSC (Timing Synchronization Clock). Below the T-TSC, a dashed vertical arrow points down to a '1', representing another measurement interface. Above the T-TSC, a solid vertical arrow points up to a triangle labeled 'End application', with the number '2' next to it, representing a distribution interface. The text 'G.8271-Y.1366(16)\_F06' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram of a synchronization chain showing measurement and distribution interfaces.
+
+**Figure 6 – Possible locations of external time and phase interfaces in a chain of telecom-boundary clocks**
+
+# Annex A
+
+## One pulse-per-second (1PPS) time and phase synchronization interface specification
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+### A.1 1PPS ITU-T V.11 interface
+
+The 1PPS time/phase interface uses a point-to-point ITU-T V.11 interface as specified in [ITU-T V.11] with an additional requirement on the rise/fall times of the 1PPS signal as defined in [ITU-T G.703]. This is needed to provide the accuracy required for the 1PPS signal.
+
+This interface can be used for time synchronization distribution as well as for time measurement.
+
+The interface is a balanced interface that can tolerate significant common mode noise.
+
+The 1PPS interface consists of a balanced 100 ohm 1PPS differential signal that can be used to connect to the next clock or to measurement equipment.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a balanced 1PPS V.11 interface. On the left, a yellow block labeled 'DRIVER' has two output pairs: 'PPS\_OUT' (indicated by an arrow) and 'TX+/TX-' (indicated by '+' and '-' signs). The 'DRIVER' is connected to ground. The 'TX+/TX-' outputs are connected to a blue connector labeled 'CONN'. A red circle highlights a 'Performance measurement point' on the cable just after the first connector. The cable is labeled 'TWISTED CABLE' and has a length 'L' indicated by a dashed line between the two connectors. The second 'CONN' is connected to a yellow block labeled 'RECEIVER'. The 'RECEIVER' has two input pairs: 'PPS\_IN' (indicated by an arrow) and 'RX+/RX-' (indicated by '+' and '-' signs). A '100 ohm load' is connected across the 'PPS\_IN+' and 'PPS\_IN-' inputs. The 'RECEIVER' is also connected to ground. The text 'G.8271-Y.1366(12)-Amd.1(13)\_FA.1' is at the bottom right.
+
+Diagram of a balanced 1PPS V.11 interface showing a DRIVER connected to a RECEIVER via a TWISTED CABLE. The DRIVER has PPS\_OUT and TX+/TX- outputs. The RECEIVER has PPS\_IN and RX+/RX- inputs. A 100 ohm load is connected across the PPS\_IN+ and PPS\_IN- inputs. A performance measurement point is indicated on the cable near the DRIVER. The cable length is labeled L.
+
+Figure A.1 – Balanced 1PPS V.11 interface
+
+#### A.1.1 Interface signals
+
+The signals of this interface are defined in this clause as follows:
+
+- 1PPS\_OUT+/1PPS\_OUT-: This output signal pair indicates the significant event occurring on the leading edge of the signal and is generated by the time master;
+- 1PPS\_IN+/1PPS\_IN-: This input signal pair indicates the significant event occurring on the leading edge of the signal and is used by the time slave;
+- TX+/TX-: This output signal pair is used for a serial communication channel for transfer of time messages and status messages between the time master and the time slave;
+- RX+/RX-: This input signal pair is used for a serial communication channel for transfer of messages between the time master and the time slave.
+
+The connector is defined in [ITU-T G.703], which specifies the physical aspects of this interface.
+
+The connection requires the use of a crossed cable that connects the signal pairs as specified in Table A.1.
+
+Table A.1 – Cable connections
+
+| Connector A | Connector B |
+|---------------------|---------------------|
+| 1PPS_OUT+/1PPS_OUT- | 1PPS_IN+/1PPS_IN- |
+| 1PPS_IN+/1PPS_IN- | 1PPS_OUT+/1PPS_OUT- |
+| TX+/TX- | RX+/RX- |
+| RX+/RX- | TX+/TX- |
+
+**Table A.1 – Cable connections**
+
+NOTE – Not all the signals in Table A.1 will necessarily be needed at the same time (e.g., one direction only might be sufficient in some cases). The backward direction of the messaging channel is for further study.
+
+#### **A.1.2 Automatic cable delay compensation (optional)**
+
+The 1PPS ITU-T V.11 interface can optionally support automatic cable delay compensation. The enhanced 1PPS ITU-T V.11 interface adds support for automatic cable and ITU-T V.11 transceiver compensation using a feedback loop that allows the time master to measure the round-trip delay of the 1PPS signal and compensate for the path delay when generating the 1PPS signal.
+
+The 1PPS signal is initially generated by the timing master at the 1-second boundary, T1. This signal is delayed through the cable before it arrives at the timing slave. The 1PPS signal is looped back at the slave and sent to the time master. The time master captures the time of reception of the 1PPS signal from the time slave, T2, and measures the round-trip delay as the time since the generation of the 1PPS signal.
+
+Assuming that the path is symmetrical, the time master calculates the mean cable delay as: $(T2 - T1)/2$ and either compensates for the cable delays by advancing the 1PPS signal by the mean cable delay or alternatively informs the time slave about the mean cable delay through the ITU-T V.11 serial communication channel so that the slave can perform the compensation.
+
+The protocol used on the serial communication channel is defined in clause A.1.3 below.
+
+The time slave performs a loopback of the 1PPS signal at some point after the ITU-T V.11 transceiver.
+
+#### **A.1.3 Serial communication channel**
+
+##### **A.1.3.1 Transmission characteristics**
+
+The following characteristics apply to the serial communication channel:
+
+- 1) the default baud rate is 9600, without parity check;
+- 2) when every byte data is sent, it shall include one start bit denoted by low voltage level, eight bits data and one end bit denoted by high voltage level. During non-data interval, it should be kept at high voltage level;
+- 3) the message data should be sent no sooner than 1ms after the rising edge of 1PPS and must be finished within 500 ms;
+- 4) the message represents the time at which the current 1PPS starts;
+- 5) the messages should be sent once per second.
+
+##### **A.1.3.2 Message structure**
+
+The message structure is defined in Figure A.2.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the structure of a time of day message. It consists of seven fields: SYNC CHAR 1, SYNC CHAR 2, CLASS, ID, LENGTH, PAYLOAD, and FCS. A bracket labeled 'Length' spans the PAYLOAD field. A bracket labeled 'Check sum' spans the CLASS, ID, LENGTH, and PAYLOAD fields. The text 'G.8271-Y.1366(16)\_FA.2' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram of Time of day message structure showing fields: SYNC CHAR 1, SYNC CHAR 2, CLASS, ID, LENGTH, PAYLOAD, and FCS. Annotations show 'Length' for PAYLOAD and 'Check sum' for CLASS, ID, LENGTH, and PAYLOAD.
+
+**Figure A.2 – Time of day message structure**
+
+Each message is a multiple of 8 bits (octets) with frame check sequence (FCS). The messages are identified by the message CLASS and message ID. The transmission order of octets within multi-octet fields should comply with "big endian" rules, i.e., from the most significant octet first to the least significant octet last. The transmission of bits within one octet should be from bit 0 to bit 7. The transmission of the payload should start from offset 0 (see Tables A.3, A.5 and A.7).
+
+Multiple messages may be sent on the serial communications channel. The messages can be sent with either no delay between messages or with a non-zero delay between messages. However the transmission of all messages must be completed within the time period indicated in clause A.1.3.1.
+
+The interpretation of each message field is as follows:
+
+###### 1) start of message:
+
+The start of a message has two octets: SYNC CHAR 1 and SYNC CHAR 2. These two octets are used for message alignment. A common value of 0x43 and 0x4D has been given to each octet representing the ASCII characters "C" and "M" respectively.
+
+###### 2) header:
+
+The message header includes the sub-fields CLASS (1 octet) and message ID (1 octet). CLASS shows the basic type of the message. ID is encoded as the subtype of each class of message.
+
+###### 3) length:
+
+The length field has two octets which indicates the length of the payload (not including the length of Sync Char 1, Sync Char 2, Header, Length and FCS field).
+
+###### 4) payload:
+
+The payload field contains the contents of the message. This field may vary in length, depending on the message type.
+
+###### 5) FCS:
+
+The FCS has one octet, consisting of a cyclic redundancy check (CRC)-8 calculated over the header, length and payload fields of each message type (excluding Sync Chars 1 and 2). The CRC-8 uses the generator polynomial $G(x) = x^8 + x^5 + x^4 + 1$ , and is calculated as follows:
+
+- the input bits are taken in network transmission order, i.e., the most significant octet first, and within each octet the least significant bit first, to form an $N$ -bit pattern representing the coefficients of a polynomial $M(x)$ of degree $N-1$ (where $N$ is the number of bits in the message);
+- $M(x)$ is pre-pended with the hexadecimal value 0xFC, then multiplied by $x^8$ . The result is then divided (modulo 2) by $G(x)$ , producing a remainder $R(x)$ ;
+- the coefficients of $R(x)$ are considered to be an 8-bit sequence, where $x^7$ is the most significant bit;
+- this 8-bit sequence is the CRC-8 where the first bit of the CRC-8 to be transmitted is the coefficient of $x^7$ and the last bit transmitted is the coefficient of $x^0$ .
+
+The de-mapper process performs the above calculation in the same manner as the mapper process, except that here, the $M(x)$ polynomial of step (a) includes the CRC-8 bits of the FCS field, resulting in $M(x)$ having degree $N+7$ . In the absence of bit errors, the remainder shall be 0000 0000.
+
+Alternatively, the de-mapper may exclude the FCS field in which case, in the absence of bit errors, the remainder shall be equal to the value of the FCS field.
+
+Figure A.3 shows an example of a time-of-day time event message. Using the CRC-8 calculation method defined above, the calculated CRC-8 value in network transmission order is 1010 0100. Represented as an octet field, the FCS value is 0x25.
+
+NOTE – In step (b), the polynomial $M(x)$ is pre-pended with the value 0xFC. In the optimized implementation used by most actual CRC-generators, this is the mathematical equivalent of setting the initial value to 0xFF for the generator polynomial defined, but without pre-pending the value 0xFC.
+
+| Field | Sync Char 1 | Sync Char 2 | Class | ID | Length |
+|----------------------------------------|-------------|-------------|-----------|-----------|---------------------|
+| Hexadecimal Value | 43 | 4D | 01 | 01 | 00 0E |
+| Transmission order (first bit on left) | 1100 0010 | 1011 0010 | 1000 0000 | 1000 0000 | 0000 0000 0111 0000 |
+
+
+
+| Field | Payload | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
+|----------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
+| | Time | | | | | | R | F | cUTCO | | R | | | |
+| Hexadecimal Value | 00 | 00 | 59 | 09 | DF | B8 | 00 | 06 | 16 | 0F | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
+| Transmission order (first bit on left) | 0000 0000 | 0000 0000 | 1001 1010 | 1001 0000 | 1111 1011 | 0001 1101 | 0000 0000 | 0110 0000 | 0110 1000 | 1111 0000 | 0000 0000 | 0000 0000 | 0000 0000 | 0000 0000 |
+
+
+
+| Field | FCS |
+|----------------------------------------|-----------|
+| Hexadecimal Value | 25 |
+| Transmission order (first bit on left) | 1010 0100 |
+
+Figure A.3 – Example time of day message
+
+##### A.1.3.3 Message contents
+
+There are three message types defined for the serial communication channel of the 1PPS V.11 interface:
+
+- **time event message** – timestamp and basic traceability information:
+This message is typically transmitted by all clock types using this interface;
+- **time announce message** – virtual PTP announce message:
+This message is typically transmitted by a PTP clock;
+- **GNSS status message** – provides information about the status of a GNSS timing receiver:
+This message is typically transmitted by a GNSS-based clock.
+
+###### A.1.3.3.1 Time event message
+
+This message is used to output the time of day across the 1PPS V.11 interface.
+
+Table A.2 – Time event message
+
+| | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------|------------------------|-------------|-------|------|--------|---------------|--------------------|
+| Name | Time event message | | | | | | |
+| Description | Time event information | | | | | | |
+| Type | Reported every second | | | | | | |
+| Frame structure | Sync Char 1 | Sync Char 2 | Class | ID | Length | Payload | FCS |
+| | 0x43 | 0x4D | 0x01 | 0x01 | 0x000E | See Table A.3 | See clause A.1.3.2 |
+
+**Table A.3 – Time event message payload**
+
+| Offset | Length (octets) | Name | Notes |
+|--------|-----------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 0 | 6 | Time | PTP seconds (unsigned 48-bit integer) |
+| 6 | 1 | Reserved | Reserved |
+| 7 | 1 | Flags | Bit 0: leap61 – Positive Leap Second pending Bit 1: leap59 – Negative Leap Second pending Bit 2: UTC offset valid Bit 3: Reserved Bit 4: timeTraceable – time traceable to a primary time standard Bit 5: frequencyTraceable – frequency traceable to a primary frequency standard Bits 6, 7: Reserved |
+| 8 | 2 | currentUTCOffset | Current value of the offset between TAI and UTC (i.e., TAI – UTC) |
+| 10 | 4 | Reserved | Reserved |
+
+###### **A.1.3.3.2 Time announce message**
+
+This message is used to output the quality and traceability of the time delivered across the 1PPS V.11 interface of equipment containing a PTP clock.
+
+Use of this message on an output interface of a PRTC is for further study, unless the equipment containing a PRTC also contains a T-GM.
+
+The fields of this message are direct copies of the equivalent named fields of the PTP announce message, as described in [IEEE 1588]. A PTP clock receiving the time of day (ToD) information may treat this information as having been received on a virtual PTP port according to the relevant PTP profile (e.g., [ITU-T G.8275.1]).
+
+**Table A.4 – Time announce message**
+
+| | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-------|------|--------|---------------|--------------------|
+| Name | Time announce message | | | | | | |
+| Description | Provides information on the quality and traceability of the time source, equivalent to that contained in a PTP announce message. | | | | | | |
+| Type | Reported every second | | | | | | |
+| Frame structure | Sync Char 1 | Sync Char 2 | Class | ID | Length | Payload | FCS |
+| | 0x43 | 0x4D | 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x0020 | See Table A.5 | See clause A.1.3.2 |
+
+**Table A.5 – Time announce message payload**
+
+| Offset | Length (octets) | Name | Notes |
+|--------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 0 | 1 | versionPTP | PTP version number |
+| 1 | 1 | domainNumber | PTP domain number |
+| 2 | 2 | flagField | PTP flag field (see Note) |
+| 4 | 8 | sourcePortIdentity.clockIdentity | clockIdentity of the sending clock |
+| 12 | 2 | sourcePortIdentity.portNumber | Port number of the sending virtual PTP port |
+| 14 | 1 | grandmasterPriority1 | Priority1 value of the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 15 | 1 | grandmasterPriority2 | Priority2 value of the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 16 | 1 | grandmasterClockQuality.clockClass | clockClass of the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 17 | 1 | grandmasterClockQuality.clockAccuracy | clockAccuracy of the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 18 | 2 | grandmasterClockQuality.offsetScaledLogVariance | offsetScaledLogVariance of the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 20 | 8 | grandmasterClockIdentity | clockIdentity of the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 28 | 2 | stepsRemoved | StepsRemoved from the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 30 | 1 | timeSource | Type of the source of time provided by the PTP Grandmaster |
+| 31 | 1 | Reserved | Reserved |
+
+NOTE – This is copied directly from the flagfield in the header portion of the PTP announce message, even though some of the flags are not relevant.
+
+###### A.1.3.3.3 GNSS status message
+
+This message is used to output the status or alarms of GNSS receivers across the 1PPS V.11 interface of a PRTC. It is not normally produced by a PTP clock, unless they are contained within the same equipment as a GNSS timing receiver.
+
+**Table A.6 – GNSS status message**
+
+| | | | | | | | |
+|-----------------|----------------------------------------|-------------|-------|------|--------|---------------|--------------------|
+| Name | GNSS status message | | | | | | |
+| Description | Current status of GNSS timing receiver | | | | | | |
+| Type | Reported every second | | | | | | |
+| Frame structure | Sync Char 1 | Sync Char 2 | Class | ID | Length | Payload | FCS |
+| | 0x43 | 0x4D | 0x01 | 0x03 | 0x0008 | See Table A.7 | See clause A.1.3.2 |
+
+**Table A.7 – GNSS status message payload**
+
+| Offset | Length (octets) | Name | Notes |
+|--------|-----------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 0 | 1 | Types of time source | 0x00: Beidou (Compass) 0x01: GPS 0x02: PTP 0x03: Galileo 0x04: Glonass 0x05: QZSS 0x06: IRNSS 0x07: GNSS (Combination of constellations) 0x08: Unknown (in case there is no information about which GNSS timescale is really used and no possible action to compel the module to work with a specific GNSS timescale) 0x09 ~ 0xFF: Reserved |
+| 1 | 1 | Status of time source | GNSS Fix Type: 0x00: Position unknown 0x01: dead reckoning only (see Note 1) 0x02: 2D-fix 0x03: 3D-fix 0x04: GNSS + dead reckoning combined 0x05: Time only fix 0x06: A-GNSS 0x07: GNSS + SBAS 0x08: GNSS + GBAS 0x09 ~ 0xFF: reserved |
+| 2 | 2 | Alarm Status Monitor | Time source alarm status: Bit 0: Reserved Bit 1: Antenna open Bit 2: Antenna shorted Bit 3: Not tracking satellites Bit 4: Reserved Bit 5: Survey-in progress Bit 6: no stored position Bit 7: Leap second pending Bit 8: In test mode Bit 9: GNSS solution (i.e., derived position and time) is uncertain (see Note 2) Bit 10: Reserved Bit 11: Almanac not complete Bit 12: PPS was generated Bit 13 ~ Bit 15: Reserved |
+| 4 | 4 | Reserved | Reserved |
+
+NOTE 1 – Dead Reckoning Only – Position from GNSS is lost. Current position is estimated from the last-known position, plus knowledge of the velocity and acceleration of the antenna since the GNSS-based position was known.
+
+NOTE 2 – GNSS solution is uncertain. When this bit is 1, it indicates that the accuracy of the position derived from GNSS is uncertain, possibly due to not being able to see enough satellites. This alarm may indicate that the antenna has been moved or fallen from place since the unit completed the last self-survey.
+
+### A.2 1PPS 50 $\Omega$ phase synchronization measurement interface
+
+The 1PPS interface consists of an unbalanced 50-ohm 1PPS signal that can be used to connect to measurement equipment (see Figure A.4).
+
+The physical characteristics of this interface are defined in [ITU-T G.703].
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the signal flow for an unbalanced 1PPS 50 $\Omega$ measurement interface. On the left, a signal labeled 'PPS\_OUT' enters a yellow 'DRIVER' block, which is connected to ground. The driver's output goes into a blue 'CONN' (connector) block. A red circle at the output of this connector identifies the 'Performance measurement point'. A green 'CABLE' with a break symbol in the middle connects this first connector to a second blue 'CONN' block. Below the cable, a dashed double-headed arrow indicates 'Cable length L'. The second connector feeds into a yellow 'RECEIVER' block, which contains a '50 ohm load' and is also connected to ground. The final output signal is labeled 'PPS\_IN'. The diagram is identified by the code 'G.8271-Y.1366(20)\_FA.4' in the bottom right corner.
+
+Diagram of the unbalanced 1PPS 50 Ω measurement interface showing a driver, connector, cable, and receiver.
+
+**Figure A.4 – Unbalanced 1PPS 50 $\Omega$ measurement interface**
+
+The system must compensate for the internal delays in the system to ensure that the 1PPS signal timing is met at the edge of the box.
+
+The measurement equipment is expected to compensate for the delays associated with the interconnection of the 1PPS interface.
+
+## Appendix I
+
+## Time and phase noise sources in time distribution chains
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+Quantifying the sources of errors in the time distribution chain is essential in the process to defining noise budget in the network reference model.
+
+The sources of errors listed in this appendix are based on a network with full timing support provided by telecom boundary clocks (T-BCs).
+
+In the case of no timing support in some of the nodes, (or in all the nodes), additional sources of noise should be considered. This is for further study.
+
+The sources of noise due to timing support provided by telecom transparent clocks (T-TCs) are also for further study.
+
+### I.1 Noise introduced by a primary reference time clock (PRTC)
+
+Table I.1 provides the sources of errors in a PRTC.
+
+**Table I.1 – Source of errors in a primary reference time clock**
+
+| | Source of error | Explanation/Assumptions |
+|---|----------------------|-------------------------|
+| 1 | Reference time error | See clause I.7.1 |
+
+### I.2 Noise introduced by a packet master clock function
+
+Table I.2 provides the sources of errors in a packet master clock function. The packet master clock function may be a part of a T-GM or a T-BC.
+
+**Table I.2 – Source of errors in a packet master clock function**
+
+| | Source of error | Explanation/Assumptions |
+|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
+| 1 | Physical layer protocol (PHY) latency asymmetry internal to the nodes | See clause I.7.2 |
+
+### I.3 Noise introduced by a packet slave clock function
+
+Table I.3 provides the sources of errors in a packet slave clock function. The packet slave clock function may be part of a T-TSC or a T-BC.
+
+**Table I.3 – Source of errors in a packet slave clock function**
+
+| | Source of error | Explanation/Assumptions |
+|---|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
+| 1 | Local oscillator phase noise | See clause I.7.4 |
+| 2 | PHY latency asymmetry internal to the nodes | See clause I.7.2 |
+| 3 | Timestamping granularity | See clause I.7.3 |
+| 4 | Frequency reference phase error | See clause I.7.5 |
+| 5 | Time transients | See clause I.7.6 |
+
+### I.4 Noise introduced by a telecom transparent clock
+
+The sources of error in a telecom transparent clock are for further study.
+
+### I.5 Noise introduced by a link
+
+Table I.4 provides the sources of errors in a link.
+
+**Table I.4 – Source of errors in a link**
+
+| | Source of error | Explanation/Assumptions |
+|---|-----------------|-------------------------|
+| 1 | Link asymmetry | See clause I.7.7 |
+
+### I.6 Derivation of delay asymmetry
+
+Figure I.1 illustrates the delays between a packet slave clock function, or requestor (denoted as slave throughout this clause), and a packet master clock function, or responder (denoted as master throughout this clause). The mean propagation delay is measured at the slave after exchange of event messages. If the Delay Request and the Delay Response mechanism is used (see [IEEE 1588]), the slave sends Delay\_Req and the master sends Delay\_Resp and, separately, Sync and Follow\_Up (i.e., the sending of Sync and Follow\_Up are not part of the Delay\_Req/Delay\_Resp exchange; the Follow\_Up message is sent if, and only if, the clock is two-step). If the Peer Delay mechanism is used (see [IEEE 1588]), the slave sends Pdelay\_Req and the master sends Pdelay\_Resp and, if the clock is two-step, Pdelay\_Resp\_Follow\_Up.
+
+The figure shows the effective points in the protocol stack of each clock where timestamps are generated, after any corrections for ingress and egress latencies are made (see clause 7.3.4 and Figure 19 of [IEEE 1588]). These points would ideally be at the reference plane, i.e., the boundary point between the PHY and the network physical medium. However, in practice, the corrections for ingress and egress latencies are not perfect, and the effective points at which the timestamps are generated differ from the reference plane. The delays between the effective points where timestamps are taken and the reference plane are denoted $d_{tx}^{PHY,M}$ and $d_{rx}^{PHY,M}$ for egress and ingress, respectively, at the master, and $d_{tx}^{PHY,S}$ and $d_{rx}^{PHY,S}$ for egress and ingress, respectively, at the slave. In this notation, the subscript $t$ (transmit) is used for egress and the subscript $r$ (receive) is used for ingress. In general, these four quantities can all be different.
+
+The figure also shows the link delays, which are measured from the reference plane of one clock to the reference plane of the other clock. The delay from the master to the slave is denoted $d_{ms}^{link}$ , and the delay from the slave to the master is denoted $d_{sm}^{link}$ .
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating delays between a packet master clock function (responder) and a packet slave clock function (requestor). The diagram shows two protocol stacks, each with MAC and PHY layers. A 'Reference plane' is indicated by a dashed line. Delays are labeled as d\_rx^PHY,M, d\_tx^PHY,M, d\_ms^link, d\_sm^link, d\_rx^PHY,S, and d\_tx^PHY,S. Text labels indicate the 'Effective point in protocol stack for ingress/egress timestamp, after any correction for ingress/egress latency' for both master and slave. The diagram is labeled G.8271-Y.1366(12)-Amd.2(15)\_Fl.1.
+
+**Figure I.1 – Illustration of delays between a packet slave clock function, or requestor, and a packet master clock function, or responder**
+
+The total delay from the master to the slave, $t_{ms}$ , is the sum of the delays in that direction:
+
+$$t_{ms} = d_{tx}^{PHY,M} + d_{ms}^{link} + d_{rx}^{PHY,S} \quad (I-1)$$
+
+Similarly, the total delay from the slave to the master, $t_{sm}$ , is the sum of the delays in that direction:
+
+$$t_{sm} = d_{tx}^{PHY,S} + d_{sm}^{link} + d_{rx}^{PHY,M} \quad (I-2)$$
+
+For the sign convention for the delay asymmetry, the same convention as in clause 7.4.2 of [IEEE 1588] is adopted. Let $D_{mean}$ denote the measured mean path delay (i.e., the measured result of the exchange of Delay\_Req and Delay\_Resp or of Peer Delay messages), and $D_{asym}$ denote the total delay asymmetry. Then, $D_{asym}$ is defined to be positive when the delay from the master to the slave is larger than the delay from the slave to the master. Likewise, $D_{asym}$ is defined to be negative when the delay from the master to the slave is smaller than the delay from the slave to the master. Then:
+
+$$\begin{aligned} t_{ms} &= D_{mean} + D_{asym} \\ t_{sm} &= D_{mean} - D_{asym} \end{aligned} \quad (I-3)$$
+
+Equations (I-3) imply that:
+
+$$D_{mean} = \frac{t_{ms} + t_{sm}}{2} \quad (I-4)$$
+
+as required. Substituting equations (I-1) and (I-2) into equation (I-4) gives:
+
+$$D_{mean} = \frac{(d_{tx}^{PHY,M} + d_{ms}^{link} + d_{rx}^{PHY,S}) + (d_{tx}^{PHY,S} + d_{sm}^{link} + d_{rx}^{PHY,M})}{2} \quad (I-5)$$
+
+Either of the two equations (I-3) may be used with equation (I-4) to obtain the delay asymmetry in terms of the component delays. Using the first of equations (I-3) produces:
+
+$$\begin{aligned}
+D_{asym} &= t_{ms} - D_{mean} \\
+&= (d_{tx}^{PHY,M} + d_{ms}^{link} + d_{rx}^{PHY,S}) - \frac{(d_{tx}^{PHY,M} + d_{ms}^{link} + d_{rx}^{PHY,S}) + (d_{tx}^{PHY,S} + d_{sm}^{link} + d_{rx}^{PHY,M})}{2} \\
+&= \frac{d_{tx}^{PHY,M} - d_{rx}^{PHY,M}}{2} + \frac{d_{ms}^{link} - d_{sm}^{link}}{2} + \frac{d_{rx}^{PHY,S} - d_{tx}^{PHY,S}}{2} \\
+&= e_{phy}^M + e_{link-asym} - e_{phy}^S
+\end{aligned} \tag{I-6}$$
+
+where:
+
+$$e_{phy}^M = \frac{d_{tx}^{PHY,M} - d_{rx}^{PHY,M}}{2} \tag{I-7}$$
+
+$$e_{link-asym} = \frac{d_{ms}^{link} - d_{sm}^{link}}{2} \tag{I-8}$$
+
+$$e_{phy}^S = \frac{d_{tx}^{PHY,S} - d_{rx}^{PHY,S}}{2} \tag{I-9}$$
+
+Equations (I-7) and (I-9) are the errors due to PHY latency asymmetry at the master and slave respectively. Equation (I-8) is the error due to link asymmetry. Equation (I-6) indicates that, in computing the total asymmetry, the errors due to PHY latency at the master and due to the link are added, while the error due to PHY latency at the slave is subtracted.
+
+### I.7 Characteristics of the noise sources
+
+Each of the sources of noise identified in previous clauses has different characteristics in terms of modelling and accumulation. As an example, the noise due to cascaded T-BC could be analysed according to the traditional approach followed in ITU-T for a chain of clocks.
+
+The following clauses analyse the noise sources listed in the table above.
+
+#### I.7.1 Reference time error
+
+The packet master clock function of the T-GM receives a reference time to distribute. The error can be attributed to:
+
+GNSS time error. Distribution schemes that use different GNSS systems (e.g., both GPS and future Galileo) might have an inherent time error due to the difference between the atomic clock ensembles that drive the systems.
+
+GNSS implementation limitations. A GNSS receiver may produce a time signal that has an offset from another GNSS receiver that uses the same satellite system.
+
+This noise source is applicable to PRTC only.
+
+The way the noise source, $e_{ref}$ , is modelled is for further study.
+
+#### I.7.2 PHY latency variation and asymmetry
+
+This noise source is related to the hardware timestamping function, i.e., to the difference between the timestamp measurement point and the interface to the medium (e.g., [IEEE 802.3] defines the minimum and maximum transmit and receive values possible for each PHY supporting
+
+[IEEE 802.3]). For a proper implementation, this will typically be in the range of nanoseconds. The PHY latency asymmetry is defined as $(d_{tx}-d_{rx})/2$ , where $d_{tx}$ is the delay on the transmit path and $d_{rx}$ is the delay on the receive path, as indicated in clause I.6 and Figure I.1.
+
+The delays ( $d_{tx}$ , $d_{rx}$ ) discussed here can be further divided into static delays, which may change based on triggers such as link status reset and power reset, and dynamic delays, which may vary from packet to packet based on triggers such as varying traffic. Depending on the characteristics of any particular delay component, it may or may not be possible to measure and compensate for it. Further detail about the different types of delays involved and their impact on PTP performance of a system is for further study.
+
+This noise source is applicable to the packet master clock function (in a T-GM or a T-BC) and packet slave clock function (in a T-BC or in a T-TSC).
+
+The way the noise source, $e_{phy}$ , is modelled is for further study.
+
+#### I.7.3 Timestamping granularity
+
+The timestamping granularity depends on the rate of the timestamping clock. The timestamping granularity error is limited in extent by $T_{ts,rX}$ , the increment in the timestamp counter at the receiver:
+
+$$0 \leq e_{ts} < T_{ts,rX} \quad (\text{I-10})$$
+
+If the timestamping clock rate at the receiver is an integer multiple/submultiple of the rate at the sender then the beating effect may be observed and the error $e_{ts}$ is almost static and cannot be reduced by the low-pass filtering inherent in phase-locked loops. If the rates are relatively prime then the error $e_{ts}$ is randomized and is well modelled as white noise (flat spectrum).
+
+This noise source is applicable to time-of-arrival measurements at the packet master and packet slave. The same model may apply for the time-of-departure measurements.
+
+#### I.7.4 Local oscillator phase noise
+
+The packet slave clock function uses the master timing data as reference to filter out its local reference phase noise, so as to produce a time error as small as possible. The better the local oscillator, the less noise it produces. Not all of the phase noise can be filtered out.
+
+This noise source is applicable to the packet slave clock function (in a T-BC or in a T-TSC) when the frequency is recovered from the PTP messages (i.e., there is no physical layer frequency synchronization support).
+
+The way the noise source, $e_{\phi}$ , is modelled is for further study.
+
+#### I.7.5 Frequency reference phase error
+
+The packet slave clock function (in a T-BC or in a T-TSC) may use an external frequency reference instead of its local oscillator to help with the recovery of time. The frequency reference will have much better timing characteristics than the local oscillator, but it will not be perfect.
+
+This noise source is applicable to packet slave clock.
+
+This noise source, $e_{syncE}$ , is defined by the network limits in clause 9.2 of [ITU-T G.8261]. The way this noise source is modelled is for further study.
+
+#### I.7.6 Time transients
+
+Reference switches or short interruptions may cause time transients. Failure in the grandmaster or in a link may produce network rearrangement. During such period, time error can accumulate due to some form of holdover functionality.
+
+This noise source is applicable to packet slave clock.
+
+The way the noise source, $e_{transient}$ , is modelled is for further study.
+
+#### I.7.7 Link asymmetry
+
+Packet timing protocols (such as the network time protocol and the precision time protocol (PTP)) measure the round-trip delay through a network, i.e., the delay from a server to a client and back (or vice versa). The one-way delay is then estimated using the assumption that the forward delay through a network is the same as the reverse delay. Any difference between the forward and reverse delay, (known as delay asymmetry), creates an error in the estimate of the client clock's offset from the server.
+
+The use of full timing support (such as T-BC or T-TC in every node) can eliminate delay asymmetry due to packet delay variation (PDV), and different traffic load on the two traffic directions and asymmetry caused by packets taking different routes in each direction (in this case an end-to-end transparent clock however would not solve the issue). However, it is unable to correct delay asymmetry on point-to-point links between network elements. This asymmetry arises because the forward and reverse paths travel down different fibres or copper pairs in the same cable. These fibres or pairs may have different lengths and different electrical or optical characteristics which are sufficient to create delay differences.
+
+Delay asymmetry created by fibre links can have several nanoseconds per metre of difference in each direction. When used over multiple fibre links, the magnitude of this error can become significant relative to the very tight tolerances required by some of the applications being considered.
+
+The link asymmetry is defined as $(d_{ms} - d_{sm})/2$ , where $d_{ms}$ is the delay on the path from the master clock or responder to the slave clock or requestor, and $d_{sm}$ is the delay on the path from the slave clock or requestor to the master clock or responder, as indicated in clause I.6 and Figure I.1.
+
+This noise source is applicable to links.
+
+The way the noise source, $e_{link-asym}$ , is modelled is for further study.
+
+#### I.7.8 Error in distributing time inside a node
+
+This error is due to various internal delays when distributing a time reference from a centralized location in a node (e.g., system card) to other locations in a node (e.g., line card). This error might be attributed, for example, to the length of backplane traces, connectors, and various logic functions.
+
+NOTE – These delays might be non-negligible and proper design and compensation should be performed.
+
+This noise source is defined as $e_{intranode}$ , and is for further study. This noise source is applicable to T-GM, T-BC and T-TSC.
+
+### I.8 Time error accumulation in a chain of clocks
+
+The total time error can be viewed as the sum of a constant time error component and a dynamic time error component.
+
+NOTE – It is assumed that frequency offset and drift components are not present; therefore, only random components are included in the dynamic time error.
+
+These two components have different characteristics in terms of modelling and accumulation. See Appendix IV of [b-ITU-T G.8271.1] for further details.
+
+# Appendix II
+
+## Time and phase end application synchronization requirements
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The following table summarizes the main requirements applicable at the output of the application (e.g., on the radio interface in the case of wireless application).
+
+**Table II.1 – Time and phase end-application requirements**
+
+| Application/ Technology | Accuracy | Specification |
+|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| CDMA2000 | ±3 µs with respect to CDMA System Time, which uses the GPS timescale (which is traceable and synchronous to UTC except for leap second corrections).
±10 µs with respect to CDMA System Time for a period not less than 8 hours (when the external source of CDMA system time is disconnected).
| [b-3GPP2 C.S0002] clause 1.3
[b-3GPP2 C.S0010] clause 4.2.1.1
|
+| TD-SCDMA (NodeB TDD mode) | 3 µs maximum deviation in frame start times between any pair of cells on the same frequency that have overlapping coverage areas. | [b-3GPP TS 25.123] clause 7.2 |
+| WCDMA-TDD (NodeB TDD mode) | In TDD mode, to support Intercell Synchronization and Handoff, a common timing reference among NodeB is required, and the relative phase difference of the synchronization signals at the input port of any NodeB in the synchronized area shall not exceed 2.5 µs. | [b-3GPP TS 25.402] clauses 6.1.2 and 6.1.2.1 |
+| W-CDMA MBSFN | 12.8 µs for MBMS over a single frequency network, where the transmission of NodeB is closely time synchronized to a common reference time. | [b-3GPP TS 25.346] clauses 7.1A and 7.1B.2.1 |
+| LTE MBSFN | The cell phase synchronization accuracy measured at BS antenna connectors shall be better than 5 µs. | [b-3GPP TS 36.133] clause 7.25.2 |
+| W-CDMA (Home NodeB TDD mode) | Microsecond level accuracy (no hard requirement listed). | [b-3GPP TR 25.866] clause 8 |
+| WiMAX | 1) The downlink frames transmitted by the serving base station and the Neighbour base station shall be synchronized to a level of at least 1/8 cyclic prefix length (which is equal to 1.428 µs ). At the base station, the transmitted radio frame shall be time-aligned with the 1PPS timing pulse.
2) The base station transmit reference timing shall be time-aligned with the 1PPS pulse with an accuracy of ± 1 µs.
| [b-IEEE 802.16] Table 6-160, clause 8.4.13.4
[b-WMF T23-001] clause 4.2.2
|
+| LTE-TDD (Wide-Area Base station) | 3 µs for small cell (< 3 km radius).
10 µs for large cell (> 3 km radius).
maximum absolute deviation in frame start timing between any pair of cells on the same frequency that have overlapping coverage areas.
| [b-3GPP TS 36.133] clause 7.4.2 |
+
+**Table II.1 – Time and phase end-application requirements**
+
+| Application/ Technology | Accuracy | Specification |
+|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| LTE-TDD (home-area base station) | 1) 3 µs for small cell (< 500m radius). For large cell (> 500 m radius), $1.33 + T_{propagation}$ µs time difference between base stations, where $T_{propagation}$ is the propagation delay between the Home base station and the cell selected as the network listening synchronization source. In terms of the network listening synchronization source selection, the best accurate synchronization source to GNSS should be selected. If the Home base station obtains synchronization without using network listening, the small cell requirement applies. 2) The requirement is 3.475 µs but in many scenarios a 3 µs sync requirement can be adopted. | [b-3GPP TS 36.133] clause 7.4.2 [b-3GPP TR 36.922] clause 6.4.1.2 |
+| LTE-TDD to CDMA 1xRTT and HRPD handovers | eNB shall be synchronized to GPS time. With external source of CDMA system time disconnected, the eNB shall maintain the timing accuracy within $\pm 10$ µs with respect to CDMA system time for a period of not less than 8 hours. | [b-3GPP TS 36.133] clause 7.5.2.1 |
+| NR TDD | The cell phase synchronization accuracy measured at BS antenna connectors shall be better than 3 µs. | [b-3GPP TS 38.133] clause 7.4.2 |
+| IP network delay monitoring | The requirement depends on the level of quality that shall be monitored. As an example $\pm 100$ µs with respect to a common time reference (e.g., UTC) may be required. $\pm 1$ ms has also been mentioned. | No standard requirement is currently defined. Requirements are operator dependent (depending on the application). |
+| Billing and alarms | $\pm 100$ ms with respect to a common time reference (e.g., UTC). | |
+
+NOTE 1 – In the case of mobile applications, the requirements are generally expressed in terms of phase error between base stations. In the case of a centralized master, the requirement could be expressed as $\pm$ half of the accuracy requirement applicable to the specific technology.
+NOTE 2 – The requirements are generally valid during normal conditions. The applicable requirements during failure conditions are for further study.
+
+**Table II.2 – Other time and phase requirements**
+
+| Typical applications (for information) | Synchronization requirements (MRTD or TAE) (Note 1) | Specification |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
+| LTE asynchronous dual connectivity (Note: applicable only for FDD-FDD inter-band dual connectivity). | No network synchronization requirement (Note 2) | [b-3GPP TS 36.133] clause 7.15.2 |
+| LTE synchronous dual connectivity. | 33 µs MRTD | [b-3GPP TS 36.133] clauses 7.13 and 7.15.2 |
+
+**Table II.2 – Other time and phase requirements**
+
+| Typical applications (for information) | Synchronization requirements (MRTD or TAE) (Note 1) | Specification |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
+| Inter-band asynchronous EN-DC (E-UTRAN NR Dual Connectivity) (Note 3) | No network synchronization requirement (Note 2) | [b-3GPP TS 38.133] clause 7.6.2 |
+| Inter-band synchronous EN-DC (E-UTRAN NR Dual Connectivity) (Note 3). | 33 µs MRTD | [b-3GPP TS 38.133] clause 7.6.2 |
+| NR Inter-band carrier aggregation. | 33µs MRTD (FR1) 8 µs MRTD (FR2) 25µs MRTD (FR1-FR2) (Notes 4) | [b-3GPP TS 38.133] clause 7.6.4 |
+| NR Intra-band synchronous EN dual connectivity (Note: applicable for E-UTRA TDD – NR TDD and E-UTRA FDD – NR FDD). | 3 µs MRTD (Note 6) | [b-3GPP TS 38.133] clause 7.6.3 |
+| NR Inter-band carrier aggregation; with or without MIMO or TX diversity. | 3 µs TAE | [b-3GPP TS 38.104] clauses 9.6.3.2, 9.6.3.3 |
+| NR Intra-band non-contiguous carrier aggregation, with or without MIMO or TX diversity. | 3 µs TAE (FR1) 260ns TAE (FR2) (Note 7) | [b-3GPP TS 38.104] clauses 9.6.3.2, 9.6.3.3 |
+| NR Intra-band contiguous carrier aggregation, with or without MIMO or TX diversity. | 260 ns TAE (FR1) 130 ns TAE (FR2) (Notes 4, 7, 8) | [b-3GPP TS 38.104] clauses 9.6.3.2, 9.6.3.3 |
+| LTE Intra-band non-contiguous carrier aggregation with or without MIMO or TX diversity, and inter-band carrier aggregation with or without MIMO or TX diversity. | 260 ns TAE (Notes 9, 10) | [b-3GPP TS 36.104] clause 6.5.3.1 |
+| LTE Intra-band contiguous carrier aggregation, with or without MIMO or TX diversity. | 130 ns TAE (Notes 8, 9) | [b-3GPP TS 36.104] clause 6.5.3.1 |
+| Location-based services using OTDOA. | x ns (Note 11) | |
+| NR MIMO or TX diversity transmissions, at each carrier frequency. | 65 ns TAE (Notes 5, 8) | [b-3GPP TS 38.104] clauses 9.6.3.2, 9.6.3.3 |
+| LTE MIMO or TX diversity transmissions, at each carrier frequency. | 65 ns TAE (Notes 5, 8) | [b-3GPP TS 36.104] clause 6.5.3.1 |
+
+**Table II.2 – Other time and phase requirements**
+
+| Typical applications (for information) | Synchronization requirements (MRTD or TAE) (Note 1) | Specification |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
+| NOTE 1 – The synchronization requirements in the 3GPP specifications are expressed in terms of either maximum received timing difference (MRTD) or time alignment error (TAE):
– In case of dual connectivity, MRTD concerns the maximum absolute timing mismatch between subframes which are transmitted by Master eNB/gNB (MeNB/MgNB) and Secondary eNB/gNB (SeNB/SgNB) and are scheduled for the same user equipment (UE). For carrier aggregation, MRTD is between the Primary Cell (PCell) and Secondary Cell (SCell). This means that part of this budget should be allocated to propagation time difference between MeNB/MgNB and SeNB/SgNB (in case of dual connectivity) or between PCell and SCell (in case of carrier aggregation). As an example, a 9 km propagation difference accounts for approximately 30 µs, which leaves 3 µs time error between the eNBs. A 7 km propagation difference accounts for approximately 23 µs, which leaves 10 µs time error between the eNBs. The same is applicable for NR. – TAE is defined in [b-3GPP TS 36.104] and [b-3GPP TS 38.104] as the largest timing difference between any two radio signals at the antenna connectors of the base stations. For further details, refer to the relevant 3GPP specifications. In ITU-T terminology, this is equivalent to the maximum relative time error between the two radio signals. NOTE 2 – For asynchronous dual connectivity there is no network synchronization requirement implied for the base stations. The MRTD values indicated in the 3GPP specification are tolerance requirements on the UE to accept MRTD of up to half of the corresponding time slot length (e.g., half of 1 ms). This is the maximum possible delay difference, since if it is larger than this, the next time slot would be referenced.
NOTE 3 – For inter-band dual connectivity, it is mandatory for the UE to support the asynchronous mode. For intra-band FDD-FDD dual connectivity, it is optional for the UE to support asynchronous mode.
NOTE 4 – FR1: 410 MHz – 7.125 GHz; FR2: 24.25 – 52.6 GHz.
NOTE 5 – The 65ns TAE requirement for MIMO and TX Diversity is an internal equipment specification, and does not result in a requirement on the transport network.
NOTE 6 – Intra-band synchronous EN-DC is defined for co-located deployments only (therefore no budget related to the propagation time differences is allocated to the MRTD in this case).
NOTE 7 – For NR intra-band carrier aggregation, only co-located deployment is applicable.
NOTE 8 – The requirement assumes co-located deployments (e.g., antennas installed on the same roof).
NOTE 9 – Although phase/time accuracy requirements for CA and CoMP are generic and are not defined for any particular network topology, this level of phase error budget in general could be achieved by antennas that are co-located with or connected to the same base band unit (BBU) or centralized unit/distributed unit (CU/DU) via direct links. The support of some of these synchronization requirements for scenarios where the antennas are neither co-located (e.g., as related to Inter-site carrier aggregation) nor connected via direct links to the same BBU or CU/DU is for further study.
NOTE 10 – For the cases of LTE Intra-band non-contiguous carrier aggregation and inter-band carrier aggregation, MRTD requirements are also provided (30.26 µs, see [b-3GPP 36.133] clauses 7.9.2 and 7.9.3).
NOTE 11 – The synchronization accuracy requirements depends on the applicable location accuracy requirements. As an example, to achieve a location accuracy of 40-60m, a max TER of 200ns is required when using OTDOA with a minimum of three basestations as per [b-3GPP TR 37.857]
| | |
+
+## Appendix III
+
+## Asymmetry compensation for use of different wavelengths
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The compensation of asymmetry due to the use of different wavelengths is obtained by calculating the group delay applicable to wavelengths used in the forward and in the reverse direction.
+
+Indicating with $A$ the asymmetry, the following applies:
+
+$$A = d_f - d_r = L * (n_r - n_f)/c$$
+
+Where $L$ is the distance, $c$ is the speed of light, $d_f$ and $d_r$ are the forward and reverse transmission delay, and $n_r$ and $n_f$ are the group refractive indexes applicable at the wavelength used in the forward and reverse direction, respectively.
+
+The evaluation of the refractive indexes can be done either using known chromatic dispersion data (e.g., from the optical fibre data-sheet) or, in the case that the dispersion is unknown, making a direct delay measurement at three different wavelengths (the refractive index for an arbitrary wavelength can then be derived by quadratic interpolation).
+
+These data can then be used to derive the group delay of a generic wavelength. In particular, in the case of an ITU-T G.652 compliant fibre, the group delay at the applicable wavelengths can be calculated making use of the Sellmeier equations as described in [b-ITU-T G.652].
+
+## Appendix IV
+
+## Link and network asymmetry compensation
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+In order to compensate for link delay asymmetry, it might be desirable to have in place some automatic link asymmetry calibration procedure. This could be based on calculating the propagation delays by means of two-way measurements made on the fibres used by the traffic.
+
+The procedure can be done separately on both fibres (in the fibre used in the forward direction and in the fibre used for the reverse direction) providing the forward propagation delay $d_f$ and the reverse propagation delay $d_r$ . This is shown in Figure IV.1.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows two nodes, Node 1 and Node 2, connected by two fibres. Node 1 contains a Transmitter (Tx) and a Receiver (Rx). Node 2 contains a Receiver (Rx) and a Transmitter (Tx). A double-headed arrow labeled 'Calibration for $d_f$ ' is positioned above the top fibre, which is labeled 'Fibre 1 – forward direction' and has an arrow pointing from Node 1 Tx to Node 2 Rx. Another double-headed arrow labeled 'Calibration for $d_r$ ' is positioned below the bottom fibre, which is labeled 'Fibre 2 – reverse direction' and has an arrow pointing from Node 2 Tx to Node 1 Rx. The text 'G.8271-Y.1366(12)-Amd.2(15)\_FIV.1' is at the bottom right.
+
+Diagram of link asymmetry calibration process (performed separately on both fibres).
+
+Figure IV.1 – Link asymmetry calibration process (performed separately on both fibres)
+
+Alternatively, the round trip measurement could be done in two steps on both fibres by reversing the direction of transmission. This is shown in Figure IV.2.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a two-step calibration process. In 'Step 1', Node 1 (Tx, Rx) and Node 2 (Rx, Tx) are connected by 'Fibre 1 – forward direction, $d_f$ ' (Tx to Rx) and 'Fibre 2 – reverse direction, $d_r$ ' (Tx to Rx). In 'Step 2', the roles are reversed: Node 1 (Rx, Tx) and Node 2 (Tx, Rx) are connected by 'Fibre 1 – reverse direction' (Rx to Tx) and 'Fibre 2 – forward direction' (Tx to Rx). A large downward arrow on the left points to the text 'Calibration of $d_f, d_r$ '. The text 'G.8271-Y.1366(12)-Amd.2(15)\_FIV.2' is at the bottom right.
+
+Diagram of link asymmetry calibration process (performed on both fibres at the same time).
+
+Figure IV.2 – Link asymmetry calibration process (performed on both fibres at the same time)
+
+NOTE 1 – In the case of the connection between master and slave, as shown in Figure I.1, the following would apply:
+
+$$d_f = d_{ms}$$
+
+$$d_r = d_{sm}$$
+
+The link asymmetry calibration mechanism must meet an accuracy objective for $d_f$ and $d_r$ estimations. This limit is for further study.
+
+NOTE 2 – In the case during the asymmetry calculation procedure where one node enters holdover (e.g., caused by the fibres-swapping if this is required by the procedure), the effect of the frequency holdover needs to be taken into account as it might impact the accuracy of the measurement.
+
+Several implementations are possible, e.g., based on optical switches or fixed or tunable add drop filters. Depending on the implementation, it may not be required to interrupt the traffic during the calibration process and hence in-service operation might be possible. However, the asymmetry compensation is a process that is only required at start-up or during rearrangements in the network.
+
+This measurement is applicable for wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM) systems (including optical transport network (OTN)) and non-WDM systems. In the case of wavelength-division-multiplexing systems, this measurement should also take into account possible delay due to dispersion-compensating fibre (DCF).
+
+NOTE 3 – In the case of WDM systems, the asymmetry due to the use of different wavelengths in the two directions should also be taken into account. Indeed, the use of different wavelengths on the two fibres, (or in a single fibre in the case of a transmission system using a single fibre), would result in different delays even if the fibres have the same length. Note also that a compensation related to the same aspect would be required if the wavelength used during the link asymmetry calibration process is different from the wavelength used by the traffic. Suitable methodologies to address this point are introduced in Appendix III.
+
+The difference ( $d_f - d_r$ ) can be used in the evaluation of the delay asymmetry to be used in the time recovering process. In particular the *delayAsymmetry* parameter as defined in clause 7.4 of [IEEE 1588] would be half of that difference.
+
+NOTE 4 – If a T-BC is implemented in every node, the compensation can be triggered directly by the T-BC, which would know the difference ( $d_f - d_r$ ). If this is not the case, some means have to be provided in order to make the difference ( $d_f - d_r$ ) available at the points in the network where the precision time protocol (PTP) messages are processed. This is for further study.
+
+NOTE 5 – In the case of a time synchronization carried by PTP, the PTP connection may have asymmetry due to a variety of reasons, including network paths, loading levels or cable lengths. The asymmetry of a PTP connection may be evaluated at a PTP network element, if the network element has access to a second time synchronization source that is not significantly impacted by asymmetry (such as a GNSS receiver, or a time synchronization reference carried via timing protocols such as PTP with proper accuracy) as shown in Figure IV.3. If the asymmetry of the PTP connection is evaluated using such a second time synchronization source, then the offset caused by the asymmetry may be compensated by the network element. The same principle could be applied between network elements in a chain.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates two scenarios for a PTP slave to evaluate connection asymmetry. In 'Example #1', a PTP master is connected to a packet network, which in turn connects to a PTP slave through Port 1. The PTP slave also has a GNSS connection without asymmetry at Port 2. The path from the master to the slave is labeled 'PTP connection path with asymmetry'. In 'Example #2', the PTP master connects to a packet network, which connects to a PTP slave through Port 1. The PTP slave connects to a 'Reference PTP master' at Port 2. This reference source provides a 'Time synchronization reference carried via timing protocols such as PTP with proper accuracy (e.g., direct fibre connection without asymmetry)'. The PTP connection path in this example is also labeled 'PTP connection path with asymmetry'.
+
+Figure IV.3 – PTP slave evaluating PTP connection asymmetry. The diagram shows two examples. Example #1 shows a PTP master connected to a packet network, which is connected to a PTP slave via Port 1. The PTP slave is also connected to a GNSS connection without asymmetry via Port 2. The PTP connection path is labeled 'PTP connection path with asymmetry'. Example #2 shows a PTP master connected to a packet network, which is connected to a PTP slave via Port 1. The PTP slave is also connected to a Reference PTP master via Port 2. The PTP connection path is labeled 'PTP connection path with asymmetry'. The Reference PTP master is labeled 'Time synchronization reference carried via timing protocols such as PTP with proper accuracy (e.g., direct fibre connection without asymmetry)'.
+
+G.8271-Y.1366(12)-Amd.2(15)\_FIV.3
+
+Figure IV.3 – PTP slave evaluating PTP connection asymmetry
+
+There are cases when asymmetry is generally static but can change over time due to rare network rearrangements, or the re-start of network nodes. This could happen, for example, in the case of OTN
+
+networks. In these cases, it has been reported that clients carried over OTN may be impacted by changes in the asymmetry whenever a network node is re-started or there are network rearrangements. These can be considered relatively rare events (e.g., in the order of weeks/months), but with an impact that could be on the order of microseconds. Similar events may happen in packet networks (e.g., re-routing).
+
+These cases can be referred to as "*semi-static asymmetry*".
+
+For these cases, assuming the phase change in one of the references is sufficiently large compared with the relevant level of accuracy (see Table 1), and sufficiently fast compared with the relevant clock bandwidth, changes in semi-static asymmetry may be controlled when at least 2 independent timing references are available, with the assumptions that only one at the time is impacted by such changes. This is illustrated in Figure IV.4.
+
+In this example, it is assumed that the asymmetry from all links is first compensated at the start-up by means of a trusted synchronization reference (e.g., via temporary connection to a GNSS reference, or via availability of the GNSS reference as a regular synchronization input).
+
+
+
+Diagram titled 'Example #3' illustrating the monitoring of semi-static asymmetry. It shows two 'PTP master' boxes at the top, each connected to a 'PTP network' oval. Both 'PTP network' ovals point to a 'PTP slave' box at the bottom. The 'PTP slave' box contains two blue rectangles labeled 'PTP port 1' and 'PTP port 2'. An arrow labeled 'Trusted synchronization reference (e.g., GNSS)' points to the right side of the 'PTP slave' box. Below the diagram is the text 'G.8271-Y.1366(17)-Amd.1(18)\_FIV.4'.
+
+**Figure IV.4 – Monitoring of semi-static asymmetry**
+
+The PTP network in this example could be based on full timing support or (assisted) partial timing support.
+
+Assuming only one reference at the time is impacted by changes of network asymmetry (and that, as mentioned earlier, the phase step is sufficiently large and fast), the second reference (not experiencing significant and sudden changes of the relevant parameters, e.g., meanPathDelay, offsetFromMaster) can be used to correct for changes in asymmetry and/or issue an alarm. This may assume that full exchange of PTP messages is present also on the PTP port which is not in the SLAVE state.
+
+The correction for asymmetries during normal operation requires proper operation in the slave as to control phase transients, according to the relevant clock specification.
+
+NOTE 6 – Correction for asymmetry may not be sufficiently accurate after several compensations. Therefore, recalibration with a trusted source would be required.
+
+NOTE 7 – The PTP slave shown in Figures IV.3 and IV.4 could be implemented in a T-BC (i.e., there could be downstream nodes connected to the node correcting for asymmetries in the network).
+
+NOTE 8 – The procedures for scheduled or on-demand measurement of asymmetry are for further study.
+
+# Appendix V
+
+## Delay asymmetry resulting from interface rate change in PTP-unaware network elements
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+In case the master and slave are not connected to a PTP aware network element (e.g., boundary clock (BC) or transparent clock (TC)) and are not using the same Ethernet line speed, a delay asymmetry can be generated due to the "store and forwarding" nature of Ethernet switches, meaning the switch needs to receive the entire frame before starting transmission on port with a faster line speed, to ensure that the packet data is available for transmission. The minimal time necessary to transfer the packet across the switch depends on the length of the packet and the ingress line rate. Sync and Delay\_Req PTP packets have been defined to have the same length in order to reduce delay asymmetry caused by different transition delay, however Ethernet speed mismatch will generate asymmetry.
+
+The expected asymmetry can be estimated based on the PTP event message packet size and interfaces speed.
+
+In case the static asymmetry caused by the speed mismatch is known, it can be compensated by the slave using asymmetric delay compensation mechanism defined in [IEEE 1588], clause 11.6.
+
+The following example is used to illustrate the asymmetry generated by a speed mismatch:
+
+- packet format uses UDP/IPv4/Ethernet header, giving total packet size of 86 bytes (excluding preamble and FCS);
+- preamble is 8 bytes;
+- FCS is 4 bytes;
+- PTP Grand Master timestamp event interface is GE (1000 Mbit/s);
+- PTP slave timestamp event interface is FE (100 Mbit/s);
+- the packet switched network (PSN) delay is assumed to be symmetrical.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a network topology with a Master connected to an IG (Interface Group) switch, which is connected to a Network (PSN) cloud. The Network (PSN) cloud is connected to another switch (100M) which is connected to a Slave (100M). The Master sends a 'Sync' message to the Slave. The Slave sends a 'Delay request' back to the Master. The diagram shows buffering delays at the IG and 100M interfaces. The diagram is labeled G.8271-Y.1366(16)\_FV.1.
+
+Diagram illustrating a speed mismatch example in a network. A Master (IG) sends a 'Sync' message to a Slave (100M) via two Switches (one IG, one 100M). The network is labeled 'Network (PSN)'. The diagram shows buffering delays at the IG and 100M interfaces. The Slave sends a 'Delay request' back to the Master. The diagram is labeled G.8271-Y.1366(16)\_FV.1.
+
+**Figure V.1 – Speed mismatch example**
+
+This yields the following equation for delay between the timestamp event points.
+
+In the forward direction from the master to the slave, the delay between the timestamp event points is:
+
+$$t2 = (L_{PKT} + L_{FCS})_{bytes} \times 8_{bits/byte} \times GE_{ns/bit} + D_{PSN} + (L_{Pre-amble})_{bytes} \times 8_{bits/byte} \times FE_{ns/bit} + t1 \quad (V-1)$$
+
+In the reverse direction from the slave to the master, the delay between the timestamp event points is:
+
+$$t4 = (L_{PKT} + L_{FCS})_{bytes} \times 8_{bits/byte} \times FE_{ns/bit} + D_{PSN} + (L_{Pre-amble})_{bytes} \times 8_{bits/byte} \times GE_{ns/bit} + t3 \quad (V-2)$$
+
+The $\langle meanPathDelay \rangle$ formula from equation (V-2) is:
+
+$$\langle meanPathDelay \rangle = \frac{[(t2 - t1) + (t4 - t3)]}{2} \quad (V-3)$$
+
+Substituting $(t2 - t1)$ for equation (V-1) and $(t4 - t3)$ for equation (V-2) then:
+
+$$\langle meanPathDelay \rangle = \frac{(L_{PKT} + L_{FCS} + L_{Pre-amble}) \times 8 \times (GE + FE)_{ns} + 2 \times D_{PSN}}{2} \quad (V-4)$$
+
+$$\langle meanPathDelay \rangle = (L_{PKT} + L_{FCS} + L_{Pre-amble}) \times 8 \times \frac{GE + FE}{2}_{ns} + D_{PSN} \quad (V-5)$$
+
+By convention the $\langle delayPathAsymmetry \rangle$ is positive when the forward path is longer than the reverse path.
+
+The delay path asymmetry is then the difference between equations (V-1) and (V-5).
+
+$$\langle delayPathAsymmetry \rangle = (L_{PKT} + L_{FCS}) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{GE - FE}{2} \right)_{ns} + (L_{Pre-amble}) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{FE - GE}{2} \right)_{ns} \quad (V-6)$$
+
+or as the difference between equations (V-5) and (V-2)
+
+$$\langle \text{delayPathAsymmetry} \rangle = (L_{\text{PKT}} + L_{\text{FCS}}) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{GE - FE}{2} \right)_{\text{ns}} + (L_{\text{Pre-amble}}) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{FE - GE}{2} \right)_{\text{ns}} \quad (\text{V-7})$$
+
+Substituting for real values into equation (V-6) we obtain:
+
+$$\langle \text{delayPathAsymmetry} \rangle = (86 + 4) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{1 - 10}{2} \right)_{\text{ns}} + (8) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{10 - 1}{2} \right)_{\text{ns}}$$
+
+$$\langle \text{delayPathAsymmetry} \rangle = -2952_{\text{ns}}$$
+
+The general term for the delay asymmetry caused by the speed mismatch:
+
+$$\langle \text{delayPathAsymmetry} \rangle = (L_{\text{PKT}} + L_{\text{FCS}}) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{V_{\text{Master}} - V_{\text{Slave}}}{2} \right) + (L_{\text{Pre-amble}}) \times 8 \times \left( \frac{V_{\text{Master}} - V_{\text{Slave}}}{2} \right) \quad (\text{V-8})$$
+
+Where:
+
+$L_{\text{PKT}}$ is the length of the packet (excluding the preamble and FCS) in bytes
+
+$L_{\text{FCS}}$ is the length of the packet FCS in bytes
+
+$L_{\text{Pre-amble}}$ is the length of the packet preamble in bytes
+
+$V_{\text{Master}}$ is the timestamp interface bit period on the PTP Master Clock in seconds/bit
+
+$V_{\text{Slave}}$ is the timestamp interface bit period on the PTP Slave Clock in seconds/bit
+
+# Appendix VI
+
+## Time synchronization aspects in TDD based mobile communication systems
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+In TDD-based mobile communication systems (hereafter, TDD systems), uplink (UL) signals which are transmitted from user equipment (UE) to base stations (BS), and downlink (DL) signals which are transmitted in the opposite direction, are multiplexed along the time axis alternately on a common frequency channel. Interference in TDD systems occur when signals from adjacent cells overlap a UL time slot at a base station or DL time slot at a UE.
+
+Synchronization errors at a single base station can lead to performance degradation of neighbouring base stations, whether the base stations are of the same operator or different operators. This is due to the interference caused by the neighbouring base station. Hence, in TDD systems, it is essential that base stations receive accurate synchronization.
+
+The frequency allocation for TDD systems operated by multiple mobile operators usually includes guard frequency bands between frequency bands assigned to different operators to avoid interferences resulting from spurious noises as shown in Figure VI.1. If TDD systems are operated without guard frequency bands, not only intra-operator time synchronization but also inter-operator time synchronization to a common timing standard is required. One possibility is to make it explicit that the reference must be traceable to a specific common recognized time standard source. Co-ordinated Universal Time (UTC) might be a good candidate. In fact, as per Recommendation [b-ITU-R TF.460] all standard-frequency and time-signal emissions should conform to UTC. Further information is provided in [b-3GPP TS 38.401].
+
+NOTE – Given the 3GPP requirement for a continuous timescale, the actual implementation in this case could make use of the content of the distributed UTC information that is not impacted by leap seconds, e.g., GPS time in case the reference is carried by a GPS signal.
+
+It should be mentioned that in addition to having synchronization references traceable to a common recognized time standard source, adopting common TDD signal frame patterns is also required.
+
+
+
+With guard frequency bands
+
+Operator A sub-band 1 80 MHz
+
+Operator B sub-band 2 80 MHz
+
+Operator C sub-band 3 80 MHz
+
+3400 MHz GB > 20 MHz GB > 20 MHz 3700 MHz
+
+Without guard frequency bands
+
+Operator A sub-band 1 100 MHz
+
+Operator B sub-band 2 100 MHz
+
+Operator C sub-band 3 100 MHz
+
+3400 MHz GB = 0 MHz GB = 0 MHz 3700 MHz
+
+G.8271-Y.1366(20)\_FVI.1
+
+Figure VI.1: Examples of frequency allocation for TDD systems with and without guard frequency bands. The figure shows two scenarios: 'With guard frequency bands' and 'Without guard frequency bands'. In the 'With guard frequency bands' scenario, three operators (A, B, and C) are shown with sub-bands of 80 MHz each, separated by guard bands (GB) of 20 MHz. The total frequency range is from 3400 MHz to 3700 MHz. In the 'Without guard frequency bands' scenario, the same three operators are shown with sub-bands of 100 MHz each, with no guard bands (GB = 0 MHz) between them. The total frequency range is also from 3400 MHz to 3700 MHz.
+
+Figure VI.1 – Examples of frequency allocation for TDD systems with and without guard frequency bands
+
+### VI.1 An overview of radio-interference in TDD systems
+
+As shown in Figure VI.2, TDD systems have two types of interference conditions: BS-to-BS and UE-to-UE. Interferences occur in TDD systems due to propagation delay of signals in each scenario described below. The propagation delay of a DL signal is higher in large cells than in small cells.
+
+Moreover, the propagation delay of a DL signal is not proportional to the cell radius in inter-operator interference, unlike in intra-operator interferences as shown in Figure VI.3. Thus, in addition to the relative time error between cells, there are other aspects that should be considered regarding the occurrence of interferences in TDD systems.
+
+
+
+Figure VI.2: Overview of interference patterns in TDD systems. The diagram shows two overlapping cells, Cell A and Cell B. Each cell contains a Base Station (BS) and User Equipment (UE). Signal power is plotted against time (t) for Downlink (DL) and Uplink (UL) transmissions, with a Guard Period (GP) between them. Time errors are indicated for both cells. Propagation delays are shown as dashed lines between BS A and BS B, and between UE A and UE B. BS-to-BS interference and UE-to-UE interference are indicated by double-headed arrows between the respective components in the two cells. The diagram is labeled G.8271-Y.1366(20)\_FVI.2.
+
+**Figure VI.2 – Overview of interference patterns in TDD systems**
+
+
+
+Figure VI.3: Relationship between intra- and inter-operator interference. The diagram shows two overlapping cells, Operator A Cell and Operator B Cell. Each cell contains two Base Stations (BS). Intra-operator interference is shown as a dashed double-headed arrow between the two BSs within Operator A Cell. Inter-operator interference is shown as a solid double-headed arrow between a BS in Operator A Cell and a BS in Operator B Cell. The diagram is labeled G.8271-Y.1366(20)\_FVI.3.
+
+**Figure VI.3 – Relationship between intra- and inter-operator interference**
+
+### VI.2 Signal frame format of TDD systems
+
+Guard periods (GPs) in the signal frame format of TDD systems are provided at the switching point around DL-to-UL and UL-to-DL switching as shown in Figure VI.4. Guard periods are not used for signal transmission but contribute to reducing interference during DL to UL switching. $T_{DL\_UL}$ is
+
+defined to allow sufficient time for the BTS and UE transceivers to switch between sending and receiving. The guard period allocated for UL to DL switching is guaranteed by the $TA_{offset}$ , which is added to the RF air delay-dependent timing advance (see [b-3GPP TS 38.211] and [b-3GPP TS 38.133]) for controlling the transmission timing of the UL radio frames.
+
+
+
+Figure VI.4: Signal frame format of TDD systems. The diagram shows a sequence of five blocks: DL, GP, UL, GP, DL. Above the first GP, an arrow labeled T\_DL\_UL points from the DL/GP boundary to the GP/UL boundary. Above the second GP, an arrow labeled TA\_offset points from the UL/GP boundary to the GP/DL boundary. The text G.8271-Y.1366(20)\_FVI.4 is at the bottom right.
+
+Figure VI.4 – Signal frame format of TDD systems
+
+### VI.3 Base station to base station interference
+
+#### VI.3.1 Downlink to uplink switching point
+
+The time synchronization error between base stations ( $T_{Sync}$ ) is defined as the timing error at the Antenna Reference Point (ARP). If the propagation time between interfering and interfered base stations is represented as $T_{prop\_BS2BS}$ , and power ramp-down time at the base station transmitter as $T_{bts\_rampdown}$ , BS-to-BS interference at DL-to-UL switching occurs under the following condition (see Figure VI.5):
+
+$$T_{Sync} > T_{DL\_UL} - T_{prop\_BS2BS} - T_{bts\_rampdown} \quad (VI-1)$$
+
+
+
+Figure VI.5: BS to BS interference at DL to UL switching point. The diagram shows two base stations, 'Interfering BS' (top) and 'Interfered BS' (bottom). The Interfering BS has a DL segment followed by a UL segment. The Interfered BS also has a DL segment followed by a UL segment. A dashed line from the DL/UL switching point of the Interfering BS shows a 'Propagation delay' to the DL/UL switching point of the Interfered BS. The time difference between the DL/UL switching point of the Interfered BS and the start of its UL segment is labeled T\_DL\_UL. The time difference between the DL/UL switching point of the Interfered BS and the start of its DL segment is labeled T\_prop\_BS2BS. The time difference between the start of the UL segment and the start of the interference (shaded grey) is labeled T\_bts\_rampdown. The interference is shown as a shaded grey area in the UL segment of the Interfered BS. Above the diagram, the condition T\_Sync > T\_DL\_UL - T\_prop\_BS2BS - T\_bts\_rampdown is given. The text G.8271-Y.1366(20)\_FVI.5 is at the bottom right.
+
+Figure VI.5 – BS to BS interference at DL to UL switching point
+
+Note that the interference decays as the path loss increases with increased $T_{prop\_BS2BS}$ , so that at after certain distance it will not be significant.
+
+#### VI.3.2 Uplink to downlink switching point
+
+BS-to-BS interference at the UL-to-DL switching point occurs under the following condition where $T_{bts\_rampup}$ is the power ramp-up time at the base station transmitter (see Figure VI.6):
+
+$$T_{sync} > TA_{offset} + T_{prop\_BS2BS} - T_{bts\_rampup} \quad (VI-2)$$
+
+Propagation delay may take a smaller value in inter-operator interference than in intra-operator interference, so this type of interference may have a greater possibility of occurring.
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating BS to BS interference at the UL to DL switching point. It shows three horizontal timelines for 'Interfering BS', an intermediate BS, and 'Interfered BS'. The 'Interfering BS' timeline has UL and DL sections separated by a 'TA\_offset'. A 'Propagation delay' arrow points from the UL section of the 'Interfering BS' to the UL section of the intermediate BS. The intermediate BS timeline also has UL and DL sections separated by a 'TA\_offset'. A 'T\_prop\_BS2BS' arrow points from the start of the UL section of the 'Interfering BS' to the start of the UL section of the intermediate BS. A 'T\_bts\_rampup' arrow points from the start of the DL section of the intermediate BS to the start of the DL section of the 'Interfered BS'. The 'Interfered BS' timeline has UL and DL sections separated by a 'TA\_offset'. A shaded gray rectangle in the UL section of the 'Interfered BS' represents the interference. An arrow labeled 'Interference' points from the DL section of the intermediate BS to this shaded rectangle. A 'T\_Sync' arrow points from the start of the UL section of the 'Interfered BS' to the start of the shaded interference rectangle. The diagram is labeled 'G.8271-Y.1366(20)\_FVI.6'.
+
+**Figure VI.6 – BS to BS interference at UL to DL switching point**
+
+### VI.4 User equipment to user equipment interference
+
+Reachability of the signal from interfering UE to interfered UE is lower in the case of UE-to-UE interference than in the case of BS-to-BS interference. Thus, only the condition under which both UEs are located close to the cell edge can cause intra-operator interferences. On the other hand, UE-to-UE interference may occur anywhere in the cell in the case of inter-operator interference. Similar relationships can be derived for BS-to-BS interference, where time synchronization error between base stations exceeding a certain threshold would cause interference between the UEs.
+
+# Appendix VII
+
+## Time scales
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+This appendix gives some introductions on time scales and the relationship between them.
+
+### VII.1 Time scales
+
+#### Universal Time (UT)
+
+UT is a time standard based on Earth's rotation. It is a modern continuation of Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), i.e., the mean solar time on the Prime Meridian at Greenwich, England. UT1 is the principal form of UT with the Earth Rotation Angle (ERA) adjustment.
+
+A mean solar day is 24 mean solar hours, and is 86400 mean solar seconds, which means a UT second is 1/86400 of a mean solar day.
+
+#### International Atomic Time (TAI)
+
+In October 1967, the General Conference on Weights and Measures redefined the International System of Units (SI) second to be based on the hyperfine resonance of Cesium. The latest definition of SI second is provided in [b-SI System] published by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM).
+
+International Atomic Time (TAI) is a continuous time scale counted with the SI second, with the latest definition also provided in [b-SI System]. The beginning time or epoch of TAI is 0h 1st Jan. 1958 (UT), which means that TAI was synchronized with UT at the time. The two timescales have drifted apart ever since, due to the irregular rotation of Earth.
+
+TAI is maintained by the BIPM using data from some 400 atomic clocks in over 80 national laboratories that maintain the best primary Cesium standards.
+
+#### Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)
+
+TAI is a uniform metering system, which is very important for measuring time intervals. UT, on the other hand, always reflects the position of Earth in space, and corresponds to the four seasons and day and night. It is a time that is familiar in daily life. To balance these two needs, UTC was introduced.
+
+UTC time includes two concepts:
+
+- UTC second is TAI second, i.e., SI second as measured using Cesium atoms;
+- UTC day is UT day, i.e., mean solar day as measured by the rotation of the earth.
+
+UTC is based on TAI with leap seconds added at irregular intervals to compensate for the slowing rotation of Earth. Leap seconds keep UTC within 0.9 second of UT1. The dates of application of the leap second are decided by the International Earth Rotation Service (IERS).
+
+NOTE – This means that the UT second has a longer duration to the SI second used in the TAI and UTC timescales.
+
+UTC is also maintained by the BIPM. Physical realizations of UTC, UTC(k), are maintained in national metrology institutes or observatories contributing with their clock data to the BIPM. These time laboratories then use UTC to steer their clock. Values of UTC-UTC(k) at five-day intervals are published in the monthly BIPM *Circular T* [b-Circular-T], which gives official traceability of UTC to its representations UTC(k).
+
+[b-ITU-R TF.460] recommends that all standard-frequency and time-signal emissions should conform to UTC.
+
+### **VII.2 Relationship between time scales**
+
+The atomic time scales TAI and UTC are disseminated monthly through the BIPM *Circular T* [b-Circular-T]. After the leap second on 1st January 2017, the difference between the time scales was 37s.
+
+## Bibliography
+
+- [b-ITU-T G.652] Recommendation ITU-T G.652 (2016), *Characteristics of a single-mode optical fibre and cable*.
+- [b-ITU-T G.8271.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.8271.1/Y.1366.1 (2020), *Network limits for time synchronization in packet networks*.
+- [b-ITU-T G.8271.2] Recommendation ITU-T G.8271.2/Y.1366.2 (2017), *Network limits for time synchronization in packet networks with partial timing support from the network*.
+- [b-ITU-R TF.460] Recommendation ITU-R TF.460 (2002), *Standard-frequency and time-signal emissions*.
+- [b-IEEE 802.16] IEEE 802.16-2017, *IEEE Standard for Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access Systems*.
+<[https://standards.ieee.org/standard/802\\_16-2017.html](https://standards.ieee.org/standard/802_16-2017.html)>
+- [b-WMF T23-001] WMF-T23-001-R015v03 (2012), *WiMAX Forum® Air Interface Specifications – Mobile System Profile Specification – Common Part*.
+<[http://wimaxforum.org/sites/wimaxforum.org/files/technical\\_document/2012/04/WMF-T23-001-R015v03\\_MSP-Common-Part.pdf](http://wimaxforum.org/sites/wimaxforum.org/files/technical_document/2012/04/WMF-T23-001-R015v03_MSP-Common-Part.pdf)>
+- [b-3GPP TR 25.836] 3GPP TR 25.836 (2001), *Node B synchronization for TDD*.
+< >
+- [b-3GPP TR 25.866] 3GPP TR 25.866 (2010), *1.28 Mcps TDD Home NodeB (HNB) study item technical report*.
+< >
+- [b-3GPP TR 36.814] 3GPP TR 36.814 (2017), *Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access 3GPP TS 25.123 (2019) (E-UTRA); Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects*.
+< >
+- [b-3GPP TR 36.922] 3GPP TR 36.922 (2018), *Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); TDD Home eNode B (HeNB) Radio Frequency (RF) requirements analysis*.
+< >
+- [b-3GPP TR 37.857] 3GPP TR 37.857 (2016), *Study on indoor positioning enhancements for UTRA and LTE*.
+< >
+- [b-3GPP TS 25.123] 3GPP TS 25.123 (2019), *Requirements for support of radio resource management (TDD)*.
+< >
+- [b-3GPP TS 25.346] 3GPP TS 25.346 (2018), *Introduction of the Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS) in the Radio Access Network (RAN); Stage 2*.
+<[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/125300\\_125399/125346/15.00.00\\_60/ts\\_125346v150000p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/125300_125399/125346/15.00.00_60/ts_125346v150000p.pdf)>
+- [b-3GPP TS 25.402] 3GPP TS 25.402 (2018), *Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); Synchronization in UTRAN Stage 2*.
+<[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/125400\\_125499/125402/15.00.00\\_60/ts\\_125402v150000p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/125400_125499/125402/15.00.00_60/ts_125402v150000p.pdf)>
+- [b-3GPP TS 36.104] 3GPP TS 36.104 (2019), *LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception*.
+<[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/136100\\_136199/136104/15.05.00\\_60/ts\\_136104v150500p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/136100_136199/136104/15.05.00_60/ts_136104v150500p.pdf)>
+
+- [b-3GPP TS 36.133] 3GPP TS 36.133 (2019), *LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Requirements for support of radio resource management.*
+[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/125400\\_125499/125402/15.00.00\\_60/ts\\_125402v150000p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/125400_125499/125402/15.00.00_60/ts_125402v150000p.pdf)
+- [b-3GPP TS 38.104] 3GPP TS 38.104 (2019), *5G; NR; Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception.*
+[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/138100\\_138199/138104/15.05.00\\_60/ts\\_138104v150500p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/138100_138199/138104/15.05.00_60/ts_138104v150500p.pdf)
+- [b-3GPP TS 38.133] 3GPP TS 38.133 (2019), *5G; NR; Requirements for support of radio resource management.*
+[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/138100\\_138199/138133/15.06.00\\_60/ts\\_138133v150600p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/138100_138199/138133/15.06.00_60/ts_138133v150600p.pdf)
+- [b-3GPP TS 38.211] 3GPP TS 38.211 (2019), *5G; NR; Physical channels and modulation.*
+[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/138200\\_138299/138211/15.02.00\\_60/ts\\_138211v150200p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/138200_138299/138211/15.02.00_60/ts_138211v150200p.pdf)
+- [b-3GPP TS 38.401] 3GPP TS 38.401(2019), *5G; NG-RAN; Architecture description.*
+[https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi\\_ts/138400\\_138499/138401/15.05.00\\_60/ts\\_138401v150500p.pdf](https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/138400_138499/138401/15.05.00_60/ts_138401v150500p.pdf)
+- [b-3GPP2 C.S0002] 3GPP2 C.S0002-F v2.0 (2014), *Physical layer standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems.*
+[https://www.3gpp2.org/Public\\_html/Specs/C.S0002-D\\_v2.0\\_051006.pdf](https://www.3gpp2.org/Public_html/Specs/C.S0002-D_v2.0_051006.pdf)
+- [b-3GPP2 C.S0010] 3GPP2 C.S0010-E v2.0 (2014), *Recommended Minimum Performance Standards for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Base Stations.*
+[http://www.arib.or.jp/english/html/overview/doc/STD-T64v7\\_00/Specification/ARIB\\_STD-T64-C.S0010-Ev2.0.pdf](http://www.arib.or.jp/english/html/overview/doc/STD-T64v7_00/Specification/ARIB_STD-T64-C.S0010-Ev2.0.pdf)
+- [b-SI System] BIPM, 9th Edition (2019), *The International System of Units.*
+
+- [b-Circular-T] BIPM, *Circular -T* (published monthly).
+
+
+
+
+## ITU-T Y-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+## GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS, NEXT-GENERATION NETWORKS, INTERNET OF THINGS AND SMART CITIES
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
+| GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE | |
+| General | Y.100–Y.199 |
+| Services, applications and middleware | Y.200–Y.299 |
+| Network aspects | Y.300–Y.399 |
+| Interfaces and protocols | Y.400–Y.499 |
+| Numbering, addressing and naming | Y.500–Y.599 |
+| Operation, administration and maintenance | Y.600–Y.699 |
+| Security | Y.700–Y.799 |
+| Performances | Y.800–Y.899 |
+| INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS | |
+| General | Y.1000–Y.1099 |
+| Services and applications | Y.1100–Y.1199 |
+| Architecture, access, network capabilities and resource management | Y.1200–Y.1299 |
+| Transport | Y.1300–Y.1399 |
+| Interworking | Y.1400–Y.1499 |
+| Quality of service and network performance | Y.1500–Y.1599 |
+| Signalling | Y.1600–Y.1699 |
+| Operation, administration and maintenance | Y.1700–Y.1799 |
+| Charging | Y.1800–Y.1899 |
+| IPTV over NGN | Y.1900–Y.1999 |
+| NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS | |
+| Frameworks and functional architecture models | Y.2000–Y.2099 |
+| Quality of Service and performance | Y.2100–Y.2199 |
+| Service aspects: Service capabilities and service architecture | Y.2200–Y.2249 |
+| Service aspects: Interoperability of services and networks in NGN | Y.2250–Y.2299 |
+| Enhancements to NGN | Y.2300–Y.2399 |
+| Network management | Y.2400–Y.2499 |
+| Network control architectures and protocols | Y.2500–Y.2599 |
+| Packet-based Networks | Y.2600–Y.2699 |
+| Security | Y.2700–Y.2799 |
+| Generalized mobility | Y.2800–Y.2899 |
+| Carrier grade open environment | Y.2900–Y.2999 |
+| FUTURE NETWORKS | Y.3000–Y.3499 |
+| CLOUD COMPUTING | Y.3500–Y.3999 |
+| INTERNET OF THINGS AND SMART CITIES AND COMMUNITIES | |
+| General | Y.4000–Y.4049 |
+| Definitions and terminologies | Y.4050–Y.4099 |
+| Requirements and use cases | Y.4100–Y.4249 |
+| Infrastructure, connectivity and networks | Y.4250–Y.4399 |
+| Frameworks, architectures and protocols | Y.4400–Y.4549 |
+| Services, applications, computation and data processing | Y.4550–Y.4699 |
+| Management, control and performance | Y.4700–Y.4799 |
+| Identification and security | Y.4800–Y.4899 |
+| Evaluation and assessment | Y.4900–Y.4999 |
+
+For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.
+
+## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.8275.1-202211-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/G/T-REC-G.8275.1-202211-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fbb700f7c3ba77fdbdad85e33f2aec95c8575196
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.8275.1-202211-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,1859 @@
+
+
+# Recommendation**ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (11/2022)**
+
+SERIES G: Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks
+
+Packet over Transport aspects – Synchronization, quality and availability targets
+
+SERIES Y: Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities
+
+Internet protocol aspects – Transport
+
+---
+
+### **Precision time protocol telecom profile for phase/time synchronization with full timing support from the network**
+
+
+
+The logo of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is located in the bottom right corner. It features a blue globe with white lines representing latitude and longitude, and the letters 'ITU' in a bold, blue, sans-serif font superimposed on the globe.
+
+ITU logo
+
+## ITU-T G-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
+| INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE CONNECTIONS AND CIRCUITS | G.100–G.199 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS COMMON TO ALL ANALOGUE CARRIER-TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS | G.200–G.299 |
+| INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON METALLIC LINES | G.300–G.399 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON RADIO-RELAY OR SATELLITE LINKS AND INTERCONNECTION WITH METALLIC LINES | G.400–G.449 |
+| COORDINATION OF RADIOTELEPHONY AND LINE TELEPHONY | G.450–G.499 |
+| TRANSMISSION MEDIA AND OPTICAL SYSTEMS CHARACTERISTICS | G.600–G.699 |
+| DIGITAL TERMINAL EQUIPMENTS | G.700–G.799 |
+| DIGITAL NETWORKS | G.800–G.899 |
+| DIGITAL SECTIONS AND DIGITAL LINE SYSTEM | G.900–G.999 |
+| MULTIMEDIA QUALITY OF SERVICE AND PERFORMANCE – GENERIC AND USER-RELATED ASPECTS | G.1000–G.1999 |
+| TRANSMISSION MEDIA CHARACTERISTICS | G.6000–G.6999 |
+| DATA OVER TRANSPORT – GENERIC ASPECTS | G.7000–G.7999 |
+| PACKET OVER TRANSPORT ASPECTS | G.8000–G.8999 |
+| Ethernet over Transport aspects | G.8000–G.8099 |
+| MPLS over Transport aspects | G.8100–G.8199 |
+| Synchronization, quality and availability targets | G.8200–G.8299 |
+| Mobile network transport aspects | G.8300–G.8399 |
+| Service Management | G.8600–G.8699 |
+| ACCESS NETWORKS | G.9000–G.9999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.*
+
+# Recommendation ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1
+
+# Precision time protocol telecom profile for phase/time synchronization with full timing support from the network
+
+## Summary
+
+Recommendation ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 contains the ITU-T precision time protocol (PTP) profile for phase and time distribution with full timing support from the network. It provides the necessary details to utilize IEEE 1588 in a manner consistent with the architecture described in Recommendation ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.
+
+## History
+
+| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* |
+|---------|--------------------------------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1.0 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 | 2014-07-22 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/12197 |
+| 1.1 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (2014) Cor. 1 | 2015-01-13 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/12397 |
+| 2.0 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 | 2016-06-22 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/12815 |
+| 2.1 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (2016) Amd. 1 | 2017-08-29 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/13329 |
+| 2.2 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (2016) Amd. 2 | 2018-03-16 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/13553 |
+| 2.3 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (2016) Amd. 3 | 2019-08-29 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/14017 |
+| 3.0 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 | 2020-03-15 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/14215 |
+| 3.1 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (2020) Amd. 1 | 2020-11-13 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/14543 |
+| 3.2 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (2020) Amd. 2 | 2021-06-29 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/14709 |
+| 3.3 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 (2020) Amd. 3 | 2022-02-13 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/14913 |
+| 4.0 | ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1 | 2022-11-13 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/15131 |
+
+## Keywords
+
+IEEE 1588, phase, profile, PTP, time.
+
+---
+
+\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, .
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at .
+
+© ITU 2023
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU.
+
+## Table of Contents
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | References..... | 1 |
+| 3 | Definitions ..... | 2 |
+| 3.1 | Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 2 |
+| 3.2 | Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 |
+| 4 | Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 3 |
+| 5 | Conventions ..... | 4 |
+| 6 | Use of PTP for phase/time distribution ..... | 4 |
+| 6.1 | High-level design requirements..... | 5 |
+| 6.2 | PTP modes and options ..... | 5 |
+| 6.3 | Protection aspects and Alternate BMCA..... | 9 |
+| 6.4 | Phase/time traceability information..... | 16 |
+| 7 | ITU-T PTP profile for phase/time distribution with full timing support from the network ..... | 19 |
+| 8 | Security aspects ..... | 19 |
+| Annex A | – ITU-T PTP profile for phase/time distribution with full timing support from the network ..... | 20 |
+| A.1 | Profile identification ..... | 20 |
+| A.2 | PTP attribute values..... | 20 |
+| A.3 | PTP options ..... | 29 |
+| A.4 | Best master clock algorithm options ..... | 30 |
+| A.5 | Path delay measurement option (delay request/delay response) ..... | 30 |
+| A.6 | Clock identity format..... | 30 |
+| A.7 | Configuration management options ..... | 30 |
+| A.8 | Security aspects ..... | 30 |
+| A.9 | Other optional features of IEEE 1588 ..... | 30 |
+| A.10 | PTP common header flags..... | 30 |
+| A.11 | Profile version compatibility ..... | 32 |
+| Annex B | – Options to establish the PTP topology with the Alternate BMCA..... | 33 |
+| Annex C | – Inclusion of an external phase/time input interface in a T-BC..... | 34 |
+| Annex D | – Path trace (optional) ..... | 35 |
+| Annex E | – Synchronization uncertain indication (optional)..... | 36 |
+| Annex F | – Use of stepsRemoved to limit reference chain (optional)..... | 37 |
+| Annex G | – Monitoring alternate master time information provided by a peer PTP port (optional) ..... | 38 |
+| G.1 | Use Case 1 – PASSIVE port monitoring MASTER port..... | 39 |
+| G.2 | Use Case 2 –MASTER port monitoring PASSIVE port..... | 39 |
+| G.3 | Use Case 3 –MASTER port monitoring MASTER port..... | 40 |
+
+| | Page |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
+| Annex H – Transport of PTP over OTN ..... | 41 |
+| Annex I – Transport PTP over MTN ..... | 42 |
+| Annex J – Transport PTP over FlexE Links ..... | 43 |
+| Annex K – Dynamic Monitoring based on PTSF (Optional) ..... | 44 |
+| Appendix I – Considerations on the use of transparent clock..... | 45 |
+| Appendix II – Considerations on the transmission of Delay_Req messages..... | 46 |
+| Appendix III – Considerations on the choice of the PTP Ethernet multicast destination address ..... | 48 |
+| Appendix IV – Considerations on the use of priority2 ..... | 49 |
+| Appendix V – Description of PTP clock modes and associated contents of Announce messages ..... | 50 |
+| Appendix VI – Operations over link aggregation..... | 51 |
+| Appendix VII – Relationship between clockClass and holdover specification ..... | 52 |
+| Appendix VIII – Considerations on a T-TSC connected to an end application ..... | 54 |
+| Appendix IX – Calculation of offsetScaledLogVariance for T-GM timed by PRTC or ePRTC ..... | 55 |
+| IX.1 Observation interval and TDEV noise generation..... | 55 |
+| IX.2 Computation of PTP variance from TDEV ..... | 55 |
+| IX.3 Computation of offsetScaledLogVariance from PTP variance ..... | 56 |
+| Appendix X – Description of a T-BC extended clockClass application..... | 58 |
+| X.1 Purpose of T-BC extended clockClass application ..... | 58 |
+| X.2 DefaultDS data set member specifications under this extended application.. | 58 |
+| Appendix XI – Considerations on native access equipment..... | 60 |
+| Appendix XII – Monitoring alternate master time information provided by a peer PTP port..... | 61 |
+| Appendix XIII – Considerations on the use of [IEEE 1588-2019]..... | 62 |
+| Appendix XIV – Considerations in an environment of more than two PTP ports on a single PTP communication path when using transparent clocks and multicast addressing ..... | 63 |
+| Appendix XV – Considerations of deploying ePRTC and PRTC in the network ..... | 65 |
+| Bibliography..... | 66 |
+
+# Recommendation ITU-T G.827.1/Y.1369.1
+
+# Precision time protocol telecom profile for phase/time synchronization with full timing support from the network
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+This Recommendation specifies a profile for telecommunication applications based on IEEE 1588 precision time protocol (PTP). The profile specifies the IEEE 1588 functions that are necessary to ensure network element interoperability for the delivery of accurate phase/time synchronization. The profile is based on the full timing support from the network architecture as described in [ITU-T G.827.5] and definitions described in [ITU-T G.826.0].
+
+This version of the profile specifies the high-level design requirements, modes of operation for the exchange of PTP messages, the PTP protocol mapping, the best master clock algorithm (BMCA) options, as well as the PTP protocol configuration parameters.
+
+NOTE 1 – The parameters defined in this version of the profile are chosen based on the case where physical layer frequency support is provided, and the case without physical layer frequency support (i.e., PTP only) is for further study.
+
+This Recommendation also specifies some aspects necessary for use in a telecom environment that are outside the scope of and complement the PTP profile.
+
+An implementation compliant with this profile can claim compliance with either IEEE Std 1588-2008 [IEEE 1588-2008] or IEEE Std 1588-2019 [IEEE 1588-2019]. Considerations on the use of one or the other profile are provided in Appendix XIII. Compliance for a specific implementation with either the [IEEE 1588-2008] or [IEEE 1588-2019] versions of the standard should be stated when referring to this profile.
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation.
+
+- [ITU-T G.709] Recommendation ITU-T G.709/Y.1331 (2020), *Interfaces for the optical transport network*.
+- [ITU-T G.709.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.709.1/1331.1 (2018), *Flexible OTN short-reach interfaces*.
+- [ITU-T G.781] Recommendation ITU-T G.781 (2020), *Synchronization layer functions for frequency synchronization based on the physical layer*.
+- [ITU-T G.810] Recommendation ITU-T G.810 (1996), *Definitions and terminology for synchronization networks*.
+- [ITU-T G.704.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.704.1/Y.1303 (2016), *Generic framing procedure*.
+- [ITU-T G.826.0] Recommendation ITU-T G.826.0 (2022), *Definitions and terminology for synchronization in packet networks*.
+- [ITU-T G.826.5.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.826.5.1/Y.1365.1 (2022), *Precision time protocol telecom profile for frequency synchronization*.
+
+- [ITU-T G.8271] Recommendation ITU-T G.8271/Y.1366 (2020), *Time and phase synchronization aspects of telecommunication networks*.
+- [ITU-T G.8271.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.8271.1/Y.1366.1 (2022), *Network limits for time synchronization in packet networks with full timing support from the network*.
+- [ITU-T G.8272] Recommendation ITU-T G.8272/Y.1367 (2018), *Timing characteristics of primary reference time clocks*.
+- [ITU-T G.8272.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.8272.1/Y.1367.1 (2016), *Timing characteristics of enhanced primary reference time clocks*.
+- [ITU-T G.8273] Recommendation ITU-T G.8273/Y.1368 (2018), *Framework of phase and time clocks*.
+- [ITU-T G.8273.2] Recommendation ITU-T G.8273.2/Y.1368.2 (2020), *Timing characteristics of telecom boundary clocks and telecom time slave clocks for use with full timing support from the network*.
+- [ITU-T G.8273.3] Recommendation ITU-T G.8273.3/Y.1368.3 (2020), *Timing characteristics of telecom transparent clocks for use with full timing support from the network*.
+- [ITU-T G.8275] Recommendation ITU-T G.8275/Y.1369 (2020), *Architecture and requirements for packet-based time and phase distribution*.
+- [ITU-T G.8312] Recommendation ITU-T G.8312 (2020), *Interfaces for metro transport networks*.
+- [IEEE 1588] Either [IEEE 1588-2008] or [IEEE 1588-2019] depending on the specific implementation. See clause 5 Conventions for more details.
+- [IEEE 1588-2008] IEEE 1588-2008, *IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems*.
+- [IEEE 1588-2019] IEEE 1588-2019, *IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems*.
+- [OIF FLEXE IA] Optical Internetworking Forum, IA OIF-FLEXE-02.2 (2021), *FlexE 2.2 Implementation Agreement*.
+
+# 3 Definitions
+
+## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere
+
+This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere:
+
+The terms and definitions used in this Recommendation are contained in [ITU-T G.810] and [ITU-T G.8260].
+
+## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation
+
+This Recommendation defines the following term:
+
+**3.2.1 special port:** A PTP special port is a PTP port that translates between the native timing mechanism of a medium and PTP.
+
+# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms:
+
+| | |
+|-------|---------------------------------------|
+| AVAR | Allan Variance |
+| BC | Boundary Clock |
+| BMCA | Best Master Clock Algorithm |
+| EEC | synchronous Ethernet Equipment Clock |
+| ePRTC | Enhanced Primary Reference Time Clock |
+| EUI | Extended Unique Identifier |
+| FlexE | Flex Ethernet |
+| FPM | Flicker Phase Modulation |
+| GM | Grandmaster |
+| GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System |
+| LAG | Link Aggregation |
+| MA-L | MAC Address – Large |
+| MA-M | MAC Address – Medium |
+| MA-S | MAC Address – Small |
+| MTN | Metro Transport Network |
+| MVAR | Modified Allan Variance |
+| OC | Ordinary Clock |
+| OEC | OTN Equipment Clock |
+| OSMC | OTN synchronization messaging channel |
+| OUI | Organizationally Unique Identifier |
+| PRC | Primary Reference Clock |
+| PRS | Primary Reference Source |
+| PRTC | Primary Reference Time Clock |
+| PSD | Power Spectral Density |
+| PTP | Precision Time Protocol |
+| PTSF | Packet Timing Signal Fail |
+| QL | Quality Level |
+| SDH | Synchronous Digital Hierarchy |
+| SSM | Synchronization Status Message |
+| SSU | Synchronization Supply Unit |
+| SSU-A | primary level SSU |
+| SSU-B | secondary level SSU |
+| ST2 | Stratum 2 |
+| ST3E | Stratum 3 Enhanced |
+| T-BC | Telecom Boundary Clock |
+
+| | |
+|-------|----------------------------|
+| TC | Transparent Clock |
+| T-GM | Telecom Grandmaster |
+| T-TC | Telecom Transparent Clock |
+| T-TSC | Telecom Time Slave Clock |
+| TLV | Type Length Value |
+| TVAR | Time Variance |
+| VLAN | Virtual Local Area Network |
+| WPM | White Phase Modulation |
+
+# 5 Conventions
+
+Within this Recommendation, the following conventions are used: the term PTP refers to the PTP defined in [IEEE 1588]. PTP messages used within this Recommendation are defined in [IEEE 1588] and are identified using italicized text.
+
+The term telecom boundary clock (T-BC) refers to a device consisting of a boundary clock (BC) as defined in [IEEE 1588] and this Recommendation, with additional performance characteristics defined in [ITU-T G.8273.2].
+
+The term telecom transparent clock (T-TC) refers to a device consisting of a transparent clock (TC) as defined in [IEEE 1588] and this Recommendation, with additional performance characteristics defined in [ITU-T G.8273.3].
+
+The term telecom grandmaster (T-GM) refers to a device consisting of a grandmaster (GM) clock as defined in [IEEE 1588] and this Recommendation, with additional performance characteristics for further study.
+
+The term telecom time slave clock (T-TSC) refers to a device consisting of a slave-only ordinary clock (OC) as defined in [IEEE 1588] and this Recommendation, with additional performance characteristics defined in the Annex C of [ITU-T G.8273.2].
+
+The term primary reference time clock (PRTC) refers to the clock defined in [ITU-T G.8272]. The term enhanced primary reference time clock (ePRTC) refers to an enhanced version of the PRTC, which is being studied.
+
+Within this Recommendation, some requirements are stated as requiring compliance to [IEEE 1588]. For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2008], the reference to [IEEE 1588] means compliance to [IEEE 1588-2008]. For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2019], the reference to [IEEE 1588] means compliance to [IEEE 1588-2019]. Some of these references to [IEEE 1588] includes a specific clause number. In these cases, the clause number is the same in both [IEEE 1588-2008] and [IEEE 1588-2019]. If the requirements are in different clauses in the two versions of IEEE 1588, then the text of this Recommendation shall include the specific clause for [IEEE 1588-2008] and the specific cause for [IEEE 1588-2019].
+
+# 6 Use of PTP for phase/time distribution
+
+The [IEEE 1588] standard defines the precision time protocol designed to enable accurate time transfer. It introduces the concept of "profile", whereby aspects of the protocol may be selected and specified for a particular application.
+
+A PTP profile has been defined in [ITU-T G.8265.1] to address applications requiring frequency synchronization only. This Recommendation defines another PTP profile, for telecom applications requiring accurate phase and time synchronization. It supports the specific architecture described in
+
+[ITU-T G.8275] in order to allow the distribution of phase/time with full timing support from the network and is based on [IEEE 1588].
+
+In order to claim compliance with the telecom profile, the requirements of this Recommendation and the relevant requirements of [IEEE 1588], as referenced in Annex A, must be met.
+
+The detailed aspects related to the telecom profile are described in the following clauses, while the profile itself is contained in Annex A. It follows the general rules for profile specification developed in [IEEE 1588].
+
+This PTP telecom profile defines the parameters from [IEEE 1588] to be used in order to guarantee protocol interoperability between implementations and specifies the optional features, default values of configurable attributes and mechanisms that must be supported. However, it does not guarantee that the performance requirements of a given application will be met. These performance aspects are defined in other ITU-T Recommendations and imply additional elements beyond the content of the PTP profile itself.
+
+## 6.1 High-level design requirements
+
+[IEEE 1588] states:
+
+*"The purpose of a PTP profile is to allow organizations to specify specific selections of attribute values and optional features of PTP that, when using the same transport protocol, inter-work and achieve a performance that meets the requirements of a particular application."*
+
+For operation in a telecom network, some additional criteria are also required to be consistent with standard telecom synchronization practices. Therefore, the PTP profile for time and phase distribution must meet the following high-level requirements:
+
+- 1) Mechanisms must be specified to allow interoperability between the various phase/time clocks belonging to the architecture defined in [ITU-T G.8275] and described in [ITU-T G.8273].
+- 2) Mechanisms must permit consistent operation over managed wide area telecom networks.
+- 3) Packet-based mechanisms must allow the synchronization network to be designed and configured in a fixed arrangement.
+- 4) Protection schemes used by packet-based systems must be based on standard telecom operational practice and allow telecom time slave clocks the ability to take phase and time from multiple geographically separate telecom grandmaster clocks.
+- 5) Phase/time reference source selection based on received phase/time traceability and local priority, as well as automatic establishment of the phase/time synchronization network topology, should be permitted.
+
+## 6.2 PTP modes and options
+
+#### 6.2.1 PTP domains
+
+A domain consists of a logical grouping of clocks communicating with each other using the PTP protocol.
+
+PTP domains are used to partition a network within an administrative entity. The PTP messages and data sets are associated with a domain and therefore, the PTP protocol is independent for different domains.
+
+In this PTP telecom profile, the default PTP domain number is 24, and the range of applicable PTP domain numbers is {24 – 43}.
+
+NOTE – This range has been selected from the user-defined PTP domain number range defined in [IEEE 1588]. Although non-overlapping ranges have been considered for the different PTP telecom profiles
+
+so that interactions between the profiles are prevented, nothing precludes another industry from using the same user-defined PTP domain number range when defining a non-telecom PTP profile. It is the responsibility of the network operator to identify if the risk of unintentional interactions between PTP profiles exists, and to take the necessary actions to prevent such behaviour.
+
+### 6.2.2 PTP messages used in the profile
+
+This PTP profile uses the messages: *Sync*, *Follow\_Up*, *Announce*, *Delay\_Req*, and *Delay\_Resp*.
+
+The use of *Signalling* and *Management* messages is for further study.
+
+*Pdelay\_Req*, *Pdelay\_Resp*, and *Pdelay\_Resp\_Follow\_Up* messages are not used.
+
+### 6.2.3 Types of PTP clocks supported in the profile
+
+The ordinary clock (OC), boundary clock (BC) and transparent clock (TC) according to [IEEE 1588] are used in this profile.
+
+There are two types of OCs:
+
+- 1) An OC that can only be a grandmaster (T-GM according to the architecture defined in [ITU-T G.8275], and as included in [ITU-T G.8272]).
+- 2) An OC that can only be a slave, i.e., slave-only OC (T-TSC according to the architecture defined in [ITU-T G.8275], and compliant with [ITU-T G.8273.2]).
+
+There are two types of BCs:
+
+- 1) A BC that can only be a grandmaster (T-GM according to the architecture defined in [ITU-T G.8275], and as included in [ITU-T G.8272]).
+- 2) A BC that can become a grandmaster and can also be slaved to another PTP clock (T-BC according to architecture defined in [ITU-T G.8275] and compliant with [ITU-T G.8273.2]).
+
+NOTE – T-GM and grandmaster (GM) are different concepts; GM is a status defined in [IEEE 1588] that a PTP clock may obtain if it wins the best master clock algorithm (BMCA), while T-GM is a type of clock defined in the [ITU-T G.8275] architecture.
+
+The transparent clock used in this profile (T-TC according to the architecture defined in [ITU-T G.8275] and compliant with [ITU-T G.8273.3]) is the end-to-end transparent clock defined in [IEEE 1588]. It is not permitted to use peer-to-peer transparent clocks in this profile.
+
+The support of OTN ports on a T-TC is for further study.
+
+The support of metro transport network (MTN) ports as defined in [ITU-T G.8312] on a T-TC is for further study.
+
+The support of FlexE as defined in [OIF FlexE IA] on a T-TC is for further study.
+
+The mapping between these PTP clockTypes and the phase/time clocks defined in the [ITU-T G.8275] architecture is described in Table 1.
+
+**Table 1 – Mapping between [ITU-T G.8275.1] deviceTypes and PTP clockTypes**
+
+| deviceType from [ITU-T G.8275.1] | Description | clockType from [IEEE 1588] |
+|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
+| T-GM | Master-only ordinary clock (master with a single PTP port, always a GM, cannot be slaved to another PTP clock) | OC |
+| | Master-only boundary clock (master with multiple PTP ports, always a GM, cannot be slaved to another PTP clock) | BC |
+
+**Table 1 – Mapping between [ITU-T G.8275.1] deviceTypes and PTP clockTypes**
+
+| deviceType from [ITU-T G.8275.1] | Description | clockType from [IEEE 1588] |
+|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
+| T-BC | Boundary clock (may become a GM, or may be slaved to another PTP clock) | BC |
+| T-TSC | Slave-only ordinary clock (always a slave, cannot become a GM) | OC |
+| T-TC | Transparent clock | End-to-end TC |
+
+#### 6.2.3.1 Dataset member for PTP clocks supported in the profile
+
+A management system can configure and/or read the deviceType of a PTP clock; this allows the management node to configure other properties that are specific for that type of clock implemented in the equipment that is being deployed in the network. Equipment may support different types of clocks, and therefore deviceType is a configurable attribute.
+
+The data type for deviceType is Enumeration8, using the enumerated value per Table 2.
+
+**Table 2 – deviceType enumeration value**
+
+| deviceType from [ITU-T G.8275.1] | Enumeration value (hex) |
+|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
+| T-GM | 0x10 |
+| T-BC | 0x11 |
+| T-TSC | 0x12 |
+| T-TC | 0x13 |
+
+### 6.2.4 One-way versus two-way operation
+
+PTP operation must be two-way in this profile in order to transport phase/time synchronization, because propagation delay must be measured. Therefore, only two-way mode is allowed in this profile.
+
+#### 6.2.5 One-step versus two-step clock mode
+
+Both one-step and two-step clocks are supported in the profile. A clock compliant with the profile may use either a one-step clock or a two-step clock.
+
+To be compliant with [IEEE 1588], a slave port must be capable of receiving and processing messages from both one-step clocks and two-step clocks, without any particular configuration.
+
+#### 6.2.6 Ethernet multicast addressing for PTP messages
+
+For the PTP profile specified in this Recommendation, when using the PTP mapping defined in [IEEE 1588-2008] Annex F or [IEEE 1588-2019] Annex E, Ethernet multicast addressing is used for the Ethernet frames that carry the PTP messages. Both the non-forwardable multicast address 01-80-C2-00-00-0E and the forwardable multicast address 01-1B-19-00-00-00 are supported.
+
+A T-GM, T-BC, T-TSC or T-TC clock compliant with this profile must be capable of handling both the non-forwardable multicast address 01-80-C2-00-00-0E and the forwardable multicast address 01-1B-19-00-00-00 on all its PTP-capable Ethernet ports.
+
+For a T-GM, T-BC and T-TSC clock, the choice of the multicast address is made by configuration on a per-port basis; all the PTP messages of an Ethernet port must use the configured address for transmitting PTP messages to the remote PTP port. In case the remote PTP port is configured with the other address, the local PTP port must accept and process the received messages.
+
+The default address depends on the operator policy. See information in Appendix III.
+
+On transmission, the default mode for a T-TC that supports only Ethernet transport does not require any configuration: the PTP messages retransmitted by the T-TC must use the same multicast destination address as the received PTP message. It is mandatory to support this default mode in transmission. The default mode of transmission at an Ethernet port for a T-TC that supports both Ethernet and non-Ethernet ports is for further study.
+
+NOTE – This profile uses [IEEE 1588-2008] Annex F, *Transport of PTP over IEEE802.3/Ethernet*, or [IEEE 1588-2019] Annex E, *Transport of PTP over IEEE 802.3 transports* for the transport layer when the transport layer is Ethernet. In particular, according to the relevant Ethernet bridge models, the appropriate MAC address of the transmit Ethernet port is placed into the source address field of the header of the Ethernet frame encapsulating the PTP packets sent by any of the PTP clocks defined in this profile (i.e., T-GM, T-BC, T-TC or T-TSC).
+
+#### 6.2.7 PTP mapping
+
+This PTP telecom profile is based on the PTP mapping defined in
+
+- a) [IEEE 1588-2008] Annex F, *Transport of PTP over IEEE 802.3/Ethernet*, or [IEEE 1588-2019] Annex E, *Transport of PTP over IEEE 802.3 transports*,
+- b) Annex H of this Recommendation, *Transport of PTP over OTN*,
+- c) Annex I of this Recommendation, *Transport of PTP over MTN*, and
+- d) Annex J of this Recommendation, *Transport of PTP over FlexE*.
+
+Therefore, a PTP clock compliant with the profile described in this Recommendation must be compliant with [IEEE 1588] for ports that use Ethernet transport, with Annex H of this Recommendation for ports that use OTN transport, with Annex I of this Recommendation for ports that use MTN, and with Annex J of this Recommendation for ports that use FlexE. This profile processes PTP messages with:
+
+- a) Ethernet multicast encapsulation when the transport layer is Ethernet;
+- b) Either:
+ - i) GFP-F encapsulation and insertion into the OTUk OSMC or FlexO OSMC, or
+ - ii) Vendor-specific encapsulation into the OSC OSMC,
+
+when the transport layer is OTN;
+
+NOTE – OSC OSMC does not allow interoperability between different vendors. The test of this function is for further study.
+
+- c) Ethernet multicast encapsulation, and insertion into the MTN overhead per clause 9.2.5 of [ITU-T G.8312], when the transport layer is MTN;
+- d) Ethernet multicast encapsulation, and insertion into the Synchronization Messaging Channel per clause 7.3.5 of [OIF FlexE IA], when the transport layer is FlexE.
+
+PTP messages with other encapsulations should be forwarded based on the forwarding rules of the respective transport.
+
+The transportSpecific field is used in this profile and must be set to "0".
+
+In the scenarios currently considered, e.g., based on full timing support with T-BC and T-TC, the insertion of a virtual local area network (VLAN) tag in the frames carrying PTP messages over
+
+Ethernet is not allowed for T-GMs, T-BCs and T-TSC. In this case, when receiving a PTP message within a frame containing a VLAN tag, this frame must be discarded by the T-GM, T-BC, and T-TSC.
+
+Some specific T-TC based configurations are discussed in Appendix I.
+
+Using VLAN tags in other scenarios is for further study.
+
+#### 6.2.8 Message rates
+
+Within the scope of the profile, the following messages can be used, and the corresponding indicated nominal rates shall be respected:
+
+- *Sync* messages (if used, *Follow\_up* messages will have the same rate) – nominal rate: 16 packets-per-second.
+- *Delay\_Req/Delay\_Resp* messages – nominal rate: 16 packets-per-second.
+- *Announce* messages – nominal rate: 8 packets-per-second.
+
+Inter-message interval requirements shall also be respected for the transmission of *Sync* (clause 9.5.9 of [IEEE 1588]) and *Announce* (clause 9.5.8 of [IEEE 1588]) messages. In addition, the time between successive *Sync* messages shall not exceed twice the mean *Sync* interval specified above, and the time between successive *Announce* messages shall not exceed twice the mean *Announce* interval specified above.
+
+The transmission of *Delay\_Req* messages is specified in clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588].
+
+In addition to clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2008] (first and second dashed items) or of [IEEE 1588-2019] (items (a) and (b)), a clock compliant to this profile shall follow one of the following options:
+
+- Transmission time requirements according to clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2008] (third dashed item) or of [IEEE 1588-2019] (item (c), subitem (1)), using an implementation-specific distribution. In this case, the PTP node shall, with 90% confidence, issue *Delay\_Req* messages with inter-message intervals within $\pm 30\%$ of $2^{\log\text{MinDelayReqInterval}}$ seconds.
+- Transmission time requirements specified in clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2008] (forth dashed item) or of [IEEE 1588-2019] (item (c), subitem (2)).
+
+In addition, the time between successive *Delay\_Req* messages shall not exceed $2^{\log\text{MinDelayReqInterval}+1}$ seconds.
+
+As per clause 9.5.12 of [IEEE 1588], the Master sets the *logMessageInterval* in the header of *Delay\_Resp* messages to a value accepted by the Master. In this profile that value is $-4$ (16 pps).
+
+Additional background information concerning the *Delay\_Req* message transmission specified in clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588] is included in Appendix II.
+
+The use of *signalling* and *management* messages is for further study.
+
+## 6.3 Protection aspects and Alternate BMCA
+
+### 6.3.1 Alternate BMCA
+
+The PTP profile specified in this Recommendation uses an Alternate BMCA, as described in clause 9.3.1 of [IEEE 1588]. This Alternate BMCA differs from the default BMCA of [IEEE 1588] as follows:
+
+- a) This profile uses the per port Boolean attribute *masterOnly* as specified in Annex E of [ITU-T G.8275].
+- b) The profile uses the per port Boolean attribute *notMaster* as specified in Annex E of [ITU-T G.8275].
+
+- c) The profile allows for multiple clocks to be active GMs simultaneously (clocks with clockClass less than 128 cannot be a slave). If there are multiple active GMs, every clock that is not a GM is synchronized by a single GM in the PTP domain.
+- d) The per-port attribute localPriority is assigned to each port r of a clock and is used in the determination of Erbest and Ebest. Each parent clock or foreign master clock data set, whose *Announce* information was received on the port r, is appended with the localPriority attribute of the local port r before the data set comparison defined in Figure 2 and Figure 3 below is invoked. The localPriority attribute is not transmitted in *Announce* messages. This attribute is used as a tie-breaker in the data set comparison algorithm, in the event that all other previous attributes of the data sets being compared are equal. The localPriority attribute is set via the configurable, unsigned integer, port data set member portDS.localPriority. The data type for this attribute is UInt8. The range of values for this attribute is {1-255}. The default value for this attribute is 128. A clock compliant with this PTP profile is allowed to support a subset of the values defined in the range.
+- e) The attribute localPriority is assigned to the local clock, to be used if needed when the data associated with the local clock, D0 , is compared with data on another potential GM received via an *Announce* message. The local clock localPriority attribute is set via the configurable, unsigned integer, default data set member defaultDS.localPriority. The data type for this attribute is UInt8. The range of values for this attribute is {1-255}. The default value for this attribute is 128. A clock compliant with this PTP profile is allowed to support a subset of the values defined in the range.
+- f) The data set comparison algorithm is modified according to Figures 2 and 3 in clause 6.3.7.
+ NOTE 1 – For a T-BC, the ports for which the masterOnly attribute is FALSE should be selected according to the network synchronization plan. One typical use case where this parameter should remain TRUE is to prevent timing from propagating from the access portion of the network to the core portion of the network.
+ NOTE 2 – The use of masterOnly is intended primarily to be used in two scenarios:
+ - 1) A PTP port of a T-GM;
+ - 2) A PTP port of a T-BC that is facing the 'downstream' direction towards the access portion of a tree topology.
+
+The use of the masterOnly parameter in other scenarios, such as on PTP ports participating in a ring architecture, may result in unintended operation, especially during re-configuration or topology changes.
+
+#### 6.3.2 Considerations on the use of the localPriority attributes
+
+The localPriority attributes provide a powerful tool in defining the synchronization network architecture.
+
+The use of the default values for these attributes as defined by the Alternate BMCA results in a timing-loop free synchronization network.
+
+Proper planning will be mandatory to avoid timing-loops when configuring values different from the default ones.
+
+#### 6.3.3 Static clock attribute priority1
+
+In this PTP profile, the clock attribute priority1 is static. It is initialized to a default value equal to the midpoint value, 128, of its range, and this value must not be changed.
+
+The priority1 parameter is not used in this version of the PTP telecom profile. Future versions may consider using this attribute, this is for further study.
+
+#### 6.3.4 Clock attribute priority2
+
+In this PTP profile, the clock attribute priority2 is configurable.
+
+It is initialized to a default value, equal for T-GM and T-BC clocks to the midpoint value, 128, of its range {0-255}. The default value for T-TSC clocks is 255, and the range is {255}.
+
+A T-GM or T-BC compliant with this PTP profile must support all the values of priority2 defined in the range. A T-TSC compliant with this profile must support, on reception, all the values of priority2 defined in the full [IEEE 1588] range (i.e., {0-255}).
+
+Appendix IV describes possible use cases for the priority2 attribute; Appendix X describes possible use cases for the priority2 attribute under Note 3 of Table 3; other cases are for further study.
+
+#### 6.3.5 Other clock attributes
+
+A PTP clock compliant with this PTP profile must support all the values of clockClass, clockAccuracy, and offsetScaledLogVariance upon reception [shall not discard] defined in the full [IEEE 1588] range.
+
+The applicable values of the clock attribute clockClass are specified in clause 6.4.
+
+NOTE – It is not expected that equipment compliant to this profile and deployed in an ITU-T G.8275.1 network will receive clockClass values not specified in Table 3 or Table 5. If a clockClass value not specified in Table 3 or Table 5 is received, then the equipment may raise an implementation specific alarm. Future revisions of this profile may include clockClass values not defined in Table 3 or Table 5.
+
+The following values of the clock attribute clockAccuracy apply for the following situations:
+
+- 0x20 for a T-GM connected to an enhanced primary reference time clock (ePRTC) in locked-mode (i.e., ePRTC traceable to global navigation satellite system (GNSS));
+- 0x21 for a T-GM connected to a PRTC in locked-mode (i.e., PRTC traceable to GNSS) or a T-GM connected to an ePRTC where the ePRTC is in phase/time holdover within ITU-T G.8272.1 ePRTC-A specification as specified in Table 3 of [ITU-T G.8272.1];
+- 0xFE for a T-GM not connected to an ePRTC nor a PRTC in locked-mode, or a T-GM connected to an ePRTC in phase/time holdover but outside the holdover specification in Table 3 of [ITU-T G.8272.1];
+- 0xFE for a T-BC, all the time.
+
+The following values of the clock attribute offsetScaledLogVariance apply for the following situations:
+
+- 0x4B32 for a T-GM connected to an ePRTC in locked-mode (i.e., ePRTC traceable to GNSS). This corresponds to TDEV of 10 ns, at observation interval of 1 000 000 s. The corresponding value of PTP Variance (PTPVAR) is $1.271 \times 10^{-16} \text{ s}^2$ (see Appendix IX);
+- 0x4E5D for a T-GM connected to a PRTC in locked-mode (i.e., PRTC traceable to GNSS). This corresponds to TDEV of 30 ns, at observation interval of 10 000 s. The corresponding value of PTP Variance (PTPVAR) is $1.144 \times 10^{-15} \text{ s}^2$ (see Appendix IX);
+- 0xFFFF for a T-GM not connected to an ePRTC in locked-mode nor to a PRTC in locked-mode;
+- 0xFFFF for a T-BC, all the time.
+
+### 6.3.6 State decision algorithm
+
+The state decision algorithm applicable to the Alternate BMCA of the PTP profile specified in this Recommendation is given in Figure 1. After a decision is reached by use of this algorithm, the data sets of the local clock are updated as specified in clause 9.3.5 of [IEEE 1588]. Details on the use of the algorithm are given in clause 9.3.3 of [IEEE 1588].
+
+#### 6.3.7 Data set comparison algorithm
+
+The data set comparison algorithm for the Alternate BMCA of the PTP profile specified in this Recommendation is given in Figures 2 and 3 below. With this algorithm, one clock is compared with another using the data sets representing those clocks, appended with the localPriority attribute. Details on the use of the algorithm are given in clause 9.3.4 of [IEEE 1588].
+
+If either of the data sets, A or B, in Figures 2 and 3 contain the data of the parent clock or a foreign master clock, the corresponding localPriority for its data set is the localPriority of the local port $r$ on which the information from that parent clock or foreign master clock has been received (see item (d) of clause 6.3.1).
+
+If either of the data sets, A or B, in Figures 2 and 3 contain the data of the local clock, $D_0$ , the corresponding localPriority for that data set is the localPriority of the local clock (see item (e) of clause 6.3.1).
+
+NOTE 1 – It is recommended that the entire data set comparison algorithm described in Figures 2 and 3 be implemented even if some parameters are currently static, because they may be used in future versions of this Recommendation.
+
+NOTE 2 – The block in Figure 2 "GM clockClass of A is 127 or less" enables different T-BCs in the network to be synchronized by different T-GMs when multiple T-GMs are deployed.
+
+NOTE 3 – If portDS.SF is TRUE on port $r$ , then the PTP port should set the respective $E_{\text{rbest}}$ to the empty set. As a result, the computation of $E_{\text{best}}$ will not use the information contained in any Announce messages received on the port $r$ . Signal fail (SF) is described in clause 6.3.9.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([State decision algorithm for port 'r' on clock C0]) --> D1{E_best is the empty set AND Port state is LISTENING}
+ D1 -- Yes --> R1([Remain in LISTENING state])
+ D1 -- No --> D2{D0 is Class 1 through 127}
+ D2 -- Yes --> D3{D0 better or better by topology than E_rbest}
+ D2 -- No --> D4{D0 better or better by topology than E_best}
+ D3 -- Yes --> M1([BMC_MASTER D0 M1])
+ D3 -- No --> P1([BMC_PASSIVE E_rbest P1])
+ D4 -- Yes --> M2([BMC_MASTER D0 M2])
+ D4 -- No --> D5{E_best received on port 'r'}
+ D5 -- Yes --> S1([BMC_SLAVE E_best = E_rbest S1])
+ D5 -- No --> D6{E_best better by topology than E_rbest}
+ D6 -- Yes --> P2([BMC_PASSIVE E_rbest P2])
+ D6 -- No --> M3([BMC_MASTER E_best M3])
+
+```
+
+KEY
+
+Recommended state (basis for data set updates)
+
+G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(16)\_F01
+
+Flowchart of the state decision algorithm for Alternate BMCA. The process starts with 'State decision algorithm for port 'r' on clock C0'. It checks if E\_best is empty and the port is in LISTENING state. If yes, it remains in LISTENING. If no, it checks if D0 is Class 1 through 127. If yes, it checks if D0 is better or better by topology than E\_rbest. If yes, it becomes BMC\_MASTER (D0) M1. If no, it becomes BMC\_PASSIVE (E\_rbest) P1. If D0 is not Class 1 through 127, it checks if D0 is better or better by topology than E\_best. If yes, it becomes BMC\_MASTER (D0) M2. If no, it proceeds to check if E\_best received on port 'r'. If yes, it becomes BMC\_SLAVE (E\_best = E\_rbest) S1. If no, it checks if E\_best is better by topology than E\_rbest. If yes, it becomes BMC\_PASSIVE (E\_rbest) P2. If no, it becomes BMC\_MASTER (E\_best) M3. A key indicates that recommended states are in shaded boxes.
+
+Figure 1 – State decision algorithm for Alternate BMCA
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Compare data set A to B]) --> D1{Compare GM clockClass values of A and B}
+ D1 -- A > B --> EndB([Return B better than A])
+ D1 -- A = B --> D2{Compare GM clockAccuracy values of A and B}
+ D1 -- A < B --> EndA([Return A better than B])
+ D2 -- A > B --> EndB
+ D2 -- A = B --> D3{Compare GM offsetScaledLogVariance values of A and B}
+ D2 -- A < B --> EndA
+ D3 -- A > B --> EndB
+ D3 -- A = B --> D4{Compare GM priority2 values of A and B}
+ D3 -- A < B --> EndA
+ D4 -- A > B --> EndB
+ D4 -- A = B --> D5{Compare localPriority values of A and B}
+ D4 -- A < B --> EndA
+ D5 -- A > B --> EndB
+ D5 -- A = B --> D6{GM clockClass of A is 127 or less}
+ D5 -- A < B --> EndA
+ D6 -- Yes --> X1((x))
+ D6 -- No --> D7{Compare GM clockIdentity values of A and B}
+ D7 -- A > B --> EndB
+ D7 -- A = B --> X2((x))
+ D7 -- A < B --> EndA
+
+```
+
+G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(16)\_F02
+
+Flowchart of the data set comparison algorithm for Alternate BMCA. It starts with 'Compare data set A to B' and proceeds through a series of decision diamonds: 'Compare GM clockClass values of A and B', 'Compare GM clockAccuracy values of A and B', 'Compare GM offsetScaledLogVariance values of A and B', 'Compare GM priority2 values of A and B', 'Compare localPriority values of A and B', 'GM clockClass of A is 127 or less', and 'Compare GM clockIdentity values of A and B'. Each diamond has 'A > B', 'A = B', and 'A < B' branches. The 'A > B' branches lead to 'Return B better than A', the 'A = B' branches lead to a connector 'x', and the 'A < B' branches lead to 'Return A better than B'. A connector 'x' is also reached if 'GM clockClass of A is 127 or less' is 'Yes'.
+
+**Figure 2 – Data set comparison algorithm, part 1, for Alternate BMCA**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ x((x)) --> D1{Compare stepsRemoved values of A and B}
+ D1 -- "A > B+1" --> O1([Return B better than A])
+ O1 -- "Receiver < Sender" --> D2{Compare portIdentities of receiver of A and sender of A}
+ D1 -- "A+1 < B" --> O2([Return A better than B])
+ O2 -- "Receiver < Sender" --> D3{Compare portIdentities of receiver of B and sender of B}
+ D1 -- "A within 1 of B" --> D4{Compare portIdentities of receiver of A and sender of A}
+ D4 -- "A > B" --> D5{Compare portIdentities of sender of A and sender of B}
+ D4 -- "A < B" --> D3
+ D4 -- "A = B" --> D6{Compare portNumbers of receiver of A and receiver of B}
+ D5 -- "A > B" --> O3([Return B better by topology than A])
+ O3 -- "Receiver > Sender" --> D2
+ D5 -- "A < B" --> O4([Return A better by topology than B])
+ O4 -- "Receiver > Sender" --> D3
+ D5 -- "A = B" --> D6
+ D6 -- "A > B" --> O3
+ D6 -- "A < B" --> O4
+ D6 -- "A = B" --> E2([error-2])
+ D2 -- "Receiver < Sender" --> O1
+ D2 -- "Receiver > Sender" --> O3
+ D2 -- "Receiver = Sender" --> E1a([error-1])
+ D3 -- "Receiver < Sender" --> O2
+ D3 -- "Receiver > Sender" --> O4
+ D3 -- "Receiver = Sender" --> E1b([error-1])
+
+```
+
+Flowchart of the data set comparison algorithm, part 2, for Alternate BMCA. The process starts at node 'x' and proceeds through a series of decision diamonds and action ovals. The first decision is 'Compare stepsRemoved values of A and B'. If A > B+1, it goes to 'Return B better than A' (Receiver < Sender). If A+1 < B, it goes to 'Return A better than B' (Receiver < Sender). If A is within 1 of B, it proceeds to the next decision: 'Compare portIdentities of receiver of A and sender of A' vs 'Compare portIdentities of receiver of B and sender of B'. If A > B, it goes to 'Compare portIdentities of sender of A and sender of B'. If A < B, it goes to 'Return A better by topology than B' (Receiver > Sender). If A = B, it proceeds to 'Compare portNumbers of receiver of A and receiver of B'. If A > B, it goes to 'Return B better by topology than A' (Receiver > Sender). If A < B, it goes to 'Return A better by topology than B' (Receiver > Sender). If A = B, it goes to 'error-2'. If Receiver = Sender at any point, it goes to 'error-1'.
+
+**Figure 3 – Data set comparison algorithm, part 2, for Alternate BMCA**
+
+#### 6.3.8 Unused PTP fields
+
+Some PTP fields are not used in this PTP profile. This clause defines the actions applicable to these unused PTP fields.
+
+Table A.8 in clause A.10 of this Recommendation defines the PTP common header flag values, and whether or not each flag is used in this profile.
+
+In addition, the following fields are not used in this profile:
+
+- The "controlField" in the common header of PTP messages is not used in this profile. This field must be ignored by the receiver for all types of PTP messages;
+- The "priority1" field in the *Announce* message is not used and must be set to a fixed value specified in clause 6.3.3.
+
+When a PTP clock receives a PTP message with a field, whose use is not specified in this PTP profile, containing a value outside the allowed range, then this field of the PTP message must be ignored, without discarding the PTP message.
+
+As an example, a PTP clock compliant with this PTP profile must ignore on reception the field value for the following fields. A clock compliant with this PTP profile must not update its local data sets with the ingress value for these fields:
+
+- flagField – alternateMasterFlag;
+- flagField – unicastFlag;
+- flagField – PTP profile Specific 1;
+- flagField – PTP profile Specific 2.
+
+When a PTP clock receives a PTP message with a field, whose use is specified in this PTP profile, containing a value outside the allowed range for reception, then this entire PTP message must be discarded. The allowed range for a parameter on reception is the same as the range for the corresponding default dataset parameter, except for the attributes clockClass, clockAccuracy, offsetScaledLogVariance, and priority2 (see clauses 6.3.4 and 6.3.5).
+
+As an example, a compliant clock must discard on reception the ingress packet (General and Event messages) when any of the following fields are outside of the allowed range for the profile:
+
+- domainNumber;
+- versionPTP.
+
+The clock's local data set must not be updated with the ingress value.
+
+NOTE 1 – If a clock receives an *Announce* message with the "priority1" field set to a value other than 128, and if the clock advertising this value is selected as the GM, then 128 must be re-advertised by the receiving clock. The unused attribute priority1 is ignored by the receiving clock for the purpose of the Alternate BMCA.
+
+NOTE 2 – The allowed ranges for reception for the clock attributes priority2, clockClass, clockAccuracy, and offsetScaledLogVariance are the respective full [IEEE 1588] ranges, see clauses 6.3.4 and 6.3.5.
+
+#### 6.3.9 Packet timing signal fail
+
+This clause is optional but, if implemented, it is necessary for the equipment to conform to the requirements contained herein. An implementation may support all, none, or a subset of these types of PTSF.
+
+This clause defines the notion of packet timing signal fail (PTSF), which corresponds to a signal indicating a failure of the PTP packet timing signal received by a port.
+
+Three types of PTSF may be raised in a PTP clock:
+
+- 1) PTSF-lossOfTimingMessages, lack of reception of PTP timing messages from a master (loss of the packet timing signal): if the slave or passive port of a PTP clock no longer receives the timing messages sent by a master (i.e., *Sync* and subsequently *Follow\_Up* and *Delay\_Resp* messages), then a PTSF-lossOfTimingMessages associated with this master must occur. A timeout period for reception of *Sync* messages or *Delay\_Resp* messages (i.e., *syncReceiptTimeout* and *delayRespReceiptTimeout*) for these timing messages must be implemented in the PTP port before triggering the PTSF-lossOfTimingMessages (the range and default value of these timeout parameters are defined in Table A.5).
+
+The value of *syncReceiptTimeout* shall specify the number of *Sync* message intervals that have to pass without receipt of a *Sync* and, if the *twoStep* flag of the *Sync* message is TRUE, a *Follow\_Up* message before the triggering of the PTSF-lossOfTimingMessages event.
+
+The value of *delayRespReceiptTimeout* shall specify the number of *Delay\_Req* message intervals that have to pass without receipt of a *Delay\_Resp* message before the triggering of the PTSF-lossOfTimingMessages event.
+
+When the PTP port enters the UNCALIBRATED or PASSIVE state, a timer should be activated.
+
+- 2) PTSF-unusable, unusable PTP packet timing signal received by the slave or passive port of a PTP clock, exceeding the input tolerance of the PTP clock (noisy packet timing signal): if the PTP packet timing signal is not usable for the PTP clock to achieve the performance target (e.g., excessive noise or abnormal PTP timestamps), then a PTSF-unusable associated with this master must occur. The criteria used to determine that the packet timing signal is not suitable to be used are for further study.
+
+- 3) PTSF-synchronizationUncertain: uncertain timing signal received by the slave or passive port of a PTP clock, if the synchronizationUncertain flag of an Announce message received from an upstream clock is TRUE, a PTSF-synchronizationUncertain associated with this master must occur.
+
+When a PTSF occurs, the clock may set the PTP portDS.SF to TRUE and generate a state decision event, which triggers the running of the alternate BMCA. As described in clause 6.3.7 a value of portDS.SF of TRUE can be used to exclude PTP ports from the alternate BMCA selection process. An implementation may set the PTP portDS.SF to TRUE for only a subset of PTSF listed above; that is, the implementation may set portDS.SF to TRUE for some PTSF and leave portDS.SF as FALSE for others. For example, when PTSF-synchronizationUncertain is raised, if portDS.SF is not set to TRUE, then this would allow the PTP topology to be built as described in Annex D of [ITU-T G.8275].
+
+NOTE 1 – See Appendix XIV for more discussion of deployments with transparent clocks.
+
+NOTE 2 – Annex K includes an option for dynamic monitoring by a PTP port when its portDS.SF has been set to TRUE due to PTSF.
+
+## 6.4 Phase/time traceability information
+
+To deliver phase/time traceability information, the clockClass values described in Table 3 must be used in this PTP telecom profile. Additional information for interworking purposes is provided in Table 5.
+
+The frequencyTraceable flag present in the header of the PTP messages is defined in this profile as follows: if the PTP clock
+
+- is a T-GM that is traceable to a PRTC in locked mode or
+- is a T-GM or a T-BC in holdover or free-run mode that has a timescale traceable to a primary reference clock (PRC),
+
+then this parameter must be set to TRUE, otherwise it must be FALSE. This flag is not used in the Alternate BMCA defined in clause 6.3; the values provided for this flag in Table 3 can be used by a network operator for monitoring purposes or by end applications to take definitive action as described in Appendix VIII.
+
+When a T-GM first enters holdover, it downgrades the clockClass value that it uses to 7. It then calculates if the time error at its output is still within the holdover specification. When the T-GM determines that the time error at its output has exceeded the holdover specification, it downgrades the clockClass value that it uses to 140, 150 or 160 depending on the quality of its frequency reference (internal oscillator or received physical layer frequency signal on an external interface).
+
+When a T-BC first enters holdover, it downgrades the clockClass value that it uses to 135. It then calculates if the time error at its output is still within the holdover specification. When the T-BC determines that the time error at its output has exceeded the holdover specification, it downgrades the clockClass value that it uses to 165 (internal oscillator or received physical layer frequency signal on an external interface).
+
+NOTE 1 – The applicable holdover specification depends on the design and budgeting of the synchronization network. See Appendix V of [ITU-T G.8271.1] for examples of network budgeting. A typical value for the holdover budget, described in the failure scenario (b) depicted in [ITU-T G.8271.1] Table V.1, when using the T-GM or T-BC for holdover while still meeting a total time error of 1.5 µs, is 400 ns.
+
+NOTE 2 – When the term clockClass is used with respect to the property of the individual PTP clock (T-GM, T-BC, T-TSC) it is referring to data set member defaultDS.clockQuality.clockClass.
+
+NOTE 3 – For the T-BC in locked mode, the traceability information of the currently selected best master clock will be passed to the downstream nodes, as per PTP. This means that the attributes and flags in the PTP header will always reflect the phase/time traceability information from the current parent clock, regardless of
+
+the frequency traceability of the T-BC's physical layer clock. Failure scenarios including holdover are for further study.
+
+**Table 3 – Applicable clockClass values**
+
+| Phase/time traceability description | defaultDS. clockQuality. clockClass | frequencyTraceable flag | timeTraceable flag |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------|
+| T-GM connected to a PRTC in locked mode (e.g., PRTC traceable to GNSS) | 6 | TRUE | TRUE |
+| T-GM in holdover, within holdover specification, traceable to Category 1 frequency source (Note 1) | 7 | TRUE | TRUE |
+| T-GM in holdover, within holdover specification, non-traceable to Category 1 frequency source (Note 1) | 7 | FALSE | TRUE |
+| T-BC in holdover, within holdover specification, traceable to Category 1 frequency source (Note 1) | 135 | TRUE | TRUE |
+| T-BC in holdover, within holdover specification, non-traceable to Category 1 frequency source (Note 1) | 135 | FALSE | TRUE |
+| T-GM in holdover, out of holdover specification, traceable to Category 1 frequency source (Note 1) | 140 | TRUE | FALSE |
+| T-GM in holdover, out of holdover specification, traceable to Category 2 frequency source (Note 1) | 150 | FALSE | FALSE |
+| T-GM in holdover, out of holdover specification, traceable to Category 3 frequency source (Note 1) | 160 | FALSE | FALSE |
+| T-BC in holdover, out of holdover specification (Note 1) | 165 | (Note 2) | FALSE |
+| T-GM or T-BC in free-run mode | 248 | (Note 2) | FALSE |
+| Slave only OC (does not send Announce messages) | 255 | (Note 2) | As per PTP |
+
+NOTE 1 – The holdover specification threshold controlling the time spent advertising clockClass values 7 or 135 could be set to zero so that the T-GM or T-BC would advertise a degraded clockClass value directly after losing traceability to a PRTC. In this case, initially after advertising clockClass values 140, 150, 160, or 165, a clock may still be within the holdover specification.
+
+NOTE 2 – The frequencyTraceable flag may be TRUE or FALSE, depending on the availability of a PRC-traceable physical layer frequency input signal.
+
+NOTE 3 – As an option, the clockClass range of a T-BC can be extended from (135, 165, 248) to (135, 140, 150, 160, 165, 248) for some cases, where (a) 140, 150, 160, and 165 are related to the quality of the frequency reference, (b) the applicable circumstances of 140, 150, and 160 are the same as for the T-GM, and (c) 165 corresponds to synchronous Ethernet equipment clock (EEC) or the OTN equipment clock (OEC). Details are in Appendix X. If this option is used, then in a single PTP domain, all PTP clocks should implement this option (and should not be intermixed with clocks that do not implement this option). Details are for further study.
+
+NOTE 4 – The term "holdover" in this table refers to "time holdover".
+
+**Table 3 – Applicable clockClass values**
+
+| |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| NOTE 5 – Refer to Appendix VII for more information about the behaviour of a T-BC that was previously synchronizing to a T-GM or a T-BC that is advertising 'within holdover specification', 'out of holdover specification', or 'free-run mode'. |
+| NOTE 6 – A T-BC that is locked to a PRTC through virtual PTP port (refer to Figure II.1 in ITU-T G.8275, Appendix II) and meets the holdover performance requirements of a T-GM, may follow the clockClass assignments of a T-GM if the T-BC enters holdover (a) due to the loss of the connectivity to that PRTC, and (b) no other PTP source is available. |
+
+Table 4 describes how the clock quality levels (QLs) defined in [ITU-T G.781] are mapped to Category 1, 2 and 3 frequency sources used in Table 3.
+
+**Table 4 – Mapping of [ITU-T G.781] clock QLs to Category 1, 2, 3 frequency sources**
+
+| Category (in Table 3 and 5) | ITU-T G.781 option I QLs | ITU-T G.781 option II QLs |
+|--------------------------------|------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
+| Category 1 frequency source | QL-ePRTC, QL-PRTC, QL-ePRC, QL-PRC | QL-ePRTC, QL-PRTC, QL-ePRC, QL-PRS |
+| Category 2 frequency source | QL-SSU-A | QL-ST2 |
+| Category 3 frequency source | QL-SSU-B | QL-ST3E |
+
+NOTE – Other frequency source categories, while not used in Table 3, are possible. An example is a category containing QL-EEC1 and QL-EEC2.
+
+NOTE 4 – The case of a T-BC acting as a GM, with an external phase/time input coming from a PRTC, is handled by means of a virtual PTP port with associated $E_{rbest}$ attributes as described in Annex C of this Recommendation. The general case of a T-BC with a phase/time external synchronization input different from PRTC is for further study.
+
+Table 5 presents a subset of the clockClass values of Table 3 based on the quality of the frequency reference, and the mapping of the corresponding values used by some equipment deployed prior to this Recommendation.
+
+NOTE 5 – When interoperability with equipment deployed prior to this Recommendation is needed, both sets of clockClass values would need to be supported. Other aspects may be required for full interoperability.
+
+**Table 5 – clockClass values for equipment deployed prior to this Recommendation**
+
+| Phase/time traceability description | Values defined in Table 3 | Values prior to this Rec. |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|------------------------------|
+| T-GM connected to a PRTC in locked mode (e.g., PRTC traceable to GNSS) | 6 | 6 |
+| T-GM in holdover, out of holdover specification, traceable to Category 1 frequency source (Note 1) | 140 | 7 |
+| T-GM in holdover, out of holdover specification, traceable to Category 2 frequency source (Note 1) | 150 | (Note 2) |
+| T-GM in holdover, out of holdover specification, traceable to Category 3 frequency source (Note 1) | 160 | 52 |
+| T-BC in holdover, out of holdover specification, using unspecified frequency source (Note 1) | 165 | 187 |
+
+**Table 5 – clockClass values for equipment deployed prior to this Recommendation**
+
+| | | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----|
+| Slave only OC (does not send Announce messages) | 255 | 255 |
+| NOTE 1 – Initially after advertising clockClass values greater than 6, a clock may still be within the holdover specification. | | |
+| NOTE 2 – Refer to the applicable value specified for the equipment. | | |
+| NOTE 3 – The term "holdover" in this table refers to "time holdover". | | |
+
+# **7 ITU-T PTP profile for phase/time distribution with full timing support from the network**
+
+The PTP profile for phase/time distribution with full timing support from the network is contained in Annex A.
+
+# **8 Security aspects**
+
+For further study.
+
+## Annex A
+
+## ITU-T PTP profile for phase/time distribution with full timing support from the network
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+This annex contains the PTP telecom profile for phase/time distribution with full timing support from the network, as required by [IEEE 1588]. In order to claim compliance with this PTP telecom profile, the requirements in this annex and in the body of this Recommendation must both be met.
+
+### A.1 Profile identification
+
+profileName: ITU-T PTP profile for phase/time distribution with full timing support from the network
+
+profileVersion: 2.4 (for an implementation based on IEEE Std 1588-2008 [IEEE 1588-2008])
+
+profileVersion: 2.5 (for an implementation based on IEEE Std 1588-2019 [IEEE 1588-2019])
+
+profileIdentifier: 00-19-A7-01-02-04 (for an implementation based on IEEE Std 1588-2008 [IEEE 1588-2008])
+
+profileIdentifier: 00-19-A7-01-02-05 (for an implementation based on IEEE Std 1588-2019 [IEEE 1588-2019])
+
+See clause A.11 for details of compatibility between profile versions.
+
+This profile is specified by ITU-T.
+
+A copy may be obtained from [www.itu.int](http://www.itu.int).
+
+### A.2 PTP attribute values
+
+The default values and ranges of the PTP attributes for use in this profile are contained in Tables A.1, A.2, A.3, A.4, A.5, A.6 and A.7. For the attributes clockClass, clockAccuracy, offsetScaledLogVariance, and priority2, the ranges shown are those for the defaultDS.
+
+NOTE 1 – A boundary clock follows the rules of [IEEE 1588] for selection of parent clock, updating of parentDS, and transmission of Announce messages, so it may transmit values different from the defaultDS values.
+
+Attributes not specified by this profile must use the default initialization values and ranges defined in [IEEE 1588].
+
+These tables provide a default initialization value and range for each data set member for:
+
+- Telecom grandmaster: ordinary clock or boundary clock that can only act as a GM (T-GM according to [ITU-T G.8275] – first PTP clock of the chain);
+- Telecom time slave clock: ordinary clock with a clockClass = 255 (T-TSC according to [ITU-T G.8275] – last PTP clock of the chain);
+- Telecom boundary clock: boundary clock that may or may not be a GM; such a clock will be a GM if it is the best clock in the network (T-BC according to [ITU-T G.8275] – intermediate PTP clocks of the chain);
+- Telecom transparent clock: end-to-end transparent clock (T-TC according to [ITU-T G.8275] – intermediate PTP clock of the chain).
+
+The mapping between these PTP clockTypes and the phase/time clocks defined in the [ITU-T G.8275] architecture is described in Table 1, clause 6.2.3.
+
+The attributes defined in Tables A.6 and A.7 are only required for implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2008]; they have been deprecated in [IEEE 1588-2019]. For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2008], these transparent clock datasets are not used for telecom grandmasters, telecom time slave clocks and telecom boundary clocks. For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2008], they are mandatory for telecom transparent clocks. For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2019], these transparent clock datasets are optional.
+
+NOTE 2 – A feature that is deprecated by [IEEE 1588], is no longer recommended or required.
+
+Some attributes in these tables are associated with optional features of this Recommendation. Therefore, these attributes are also optional, unless the associated feature is implemented, in which case these attributes must be supported.
+
+Unless explicitly documented within these tables, the data type of a dataset member is as per PTP.
+
+**Table A.1 – defaultDS data set member specifications**
+
+| [IEEE 1588-2008] | | [IEEE 1588-2019] | | Members of the data set | Telecom grandmaster requirements | | Telecom time slave clock requirements | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------|--------------|------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------|
+| Clause | Data type | Clause | Data type | | Default initialization value (Note 5) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 5) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 5) | Range |
+| 8.2.1.2.1 | As per PTP | (Note 3) | (Note 3) | defaultDS.twoStepFlag (static) | As per PTP | {FALSE, TRUE} | As per PTP | {FALSE, TRUE} | As per PTP | {FALSE, TRUE} |
+| 8.2.1.2.2 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.2.2 | As per PTP | defaultDS.clock Identity (static) (Note 2) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.1.2.3 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.2.3 | As per PTP | defaultDS.numberPorts (dynamic) (Note 2) | 1 for OC As per PTP for BC | {1} for OC As per PTP for BC | 1 | {1} | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.1.3.1.1 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.3.1.2 | As per PTP | defaultDS.clock Quality.clockClass (dynamic) | 248 | {6, 7, 140, 150, 160, 248} | 255 | {255} | 248 | {135, 165, 248} |
+| 8.2.1.3.1.2 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.3.1.3 | As per PTP | defaultDS.clock Quality.clockAccuracy (dynamic) | 0xFE | As per PTP (Note 1) | 0xFE | {0xFE} | 0xFE | {0xFE} |
+| 8.2.1.3.1.3 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.3.1.4 | As per PTP | defaultDS.clock Quality.offsetScaledLogVariance (dynamic) | 0xFFFF | As per PTP (Note 1) | 0xFFFF | {0xFFFF} | 0xFFFF | {0xFFFF} |
+| 8.2.1.4.1 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.4.1 | As per PTP | defaultDS.priority1 (configurable) | 128 | {128} | 128 | {128} | 128 | {128} |
+| 8.2.1.4.2 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.4.2 | As per PTP | defaultDS.priority2 (configurable) | 128 | {0-255} | 255 | {255} | 128 | {0-255} |
+| 8.2.1.4.3 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.4.3 | As per PTP | defaultDS.domain Number (configurable) (Note 2) | 24 | {24-43} | 24 | {24-43} | 24 | {24-43} |
+| 8.2.1.4.4 | As per PTP | 8.2.1.4.4 | As per PTP | defaultDS.slave Only (configurable) | FALSE | {FALSE} | TRUE | {TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE} |
+| (Note 4) | As per PTP | 8.2.1.4.5 | As per PTP | defaultDS.sdoId (configurable) (Note 2) | 0x000 | 0x000 | 0x000 | 0x000 | 0x000 | 0x000 |
+| New member | UInteger8 | New member | UInteger8 | defaultDS.local Priority (configurable) | 128 | {1-255} | 128 | {1-255} | 128 | {1-255} |
+| New member | UInteger8 | 8.2.1.5.4 | As per PTP | defaultDS.maxStepsRemoved (configurable) | 255 | {2-255} | 255 | {2-255} | 255 | {2-255} |
+| New member | Enumeration8 | New member | Enumeration8 | defaultDS.deviceType (configurable) | (Note 6) | (Note 6) | (Note 6) | (Note 6) | (Note 6) | (Note 6) |
+| New member | Octet[6] | New member | Octet[6] | defaultDS.profileIdentifier (configurable) | (Note 7) | (Note 7) | (Note 7) | (Note 7) | (Note 7) | (Note 7) |
+
+**Table A.1 – defaultDS data set member specifications**
+
+| |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| NOTE 1 – Examples of applicable values are shown in clause 6.3.5. Additional values, not specified in clause 6.3.5, may be applicable to future use cases. These additional values are for further study. |
+| NOTE 2 – Applicable also to T-TC in case of an [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementation. |
+| NOTE 3 – In case of [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementations this data set member is deprecated. |
+| NOTE 4 – Applicable to [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementations; this data set member does not exist in [IEEE 1588-2008]. |
+| NOTE 5 – If a default value is not provided by this Recommendation, then it is implementation specific. |
+| NOTE 6 – This attribute can be used to set the deviceType in use in the PTP clock instance. See clause 6.2.3.1 for more information and applicable values. |
+| NOTE 7 – This dataset member is set according to the profileIdentifier specified in clause A.1 |
+
+**Table A.2 – currentDS data set member specifications**
+
+| Clause from [IEEE 1588-2008] | Clause from [IEEE 1588-2019] | Members of the data set | Telecom grandmaster requirements | | Telecom time slave clock requirements | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
+| | | | Default initialization value (Note 3) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 3) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 3) | Range |
+| 8.2.2.2 | 8.2.2.2 | currentDS.stepsRemoved (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.2.3 | 8.2.2.3 | currentDS.offsetFromMaster (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.2.4 | (Note 1) | currentDS.meanPathDelay (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| (Note 2) | 8.2.2.4 | currentDS.meanDelay (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+
+| |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| NOTE 1 – In case of [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementations this data set member is deprecated. |
+| NOTE 2 – Applicable to [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementations; this data set member does not exist in [IEEE 1588-2008]. |
+| NOTE 3 – If a default value is not provided by this Recommendation, then it is implementation specific. |
+
+**Table A.3 – parentDS data set member specifications**
+
+| Clause from [IEEE 1588-2008] | Clause from [IEEE 1588-2019] | Members of the data set | Telecom grandmaster requirements | | Telecom time slave clock requirements | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
+| | | | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range |
+| 8.2.3.2 | 8.2.3.2 | parentDS.parentPortIdentity (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.3.3 | 8.2.3.3 | parentDS.parentStats (dynamic) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+| 8.2.3.4 | 8.2.3.4 | parentDS.observedParentOffsetScaledLogVariance (dynamic) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+
+**Table A.3 – parentDS data set member specifications**
+
+| Clause from [IEEE 1588-2008] | Clause from [IEEE 1588-2019] | Members of the data set | Telecom grandmaster requirements | | Telecom time slave clock requirements | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
+| | | | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range |
+| 8.2.3.5 | 8.2.3.5 | parentDS.observedParentClockPhaseChangeRate (dynamic) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note) | (Note 1) |
+| 8.2.3.6 | 8.2.3.6 | parentDS.grandmasterIdentity (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.3.7 | 8.2.3.7 | parentDS.grandmasterClockQuality (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.3.8 | 8.2.3.8 | parentDS.grandmasterPriority1 (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.3.9 | 8.2.3.9 | parentDS.grandmasterPriority2 (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+
+NOTE 1 – It is not used in this profile, and therefore equipment is not required to support it.
+NOTE 2 – If a default value is not provided by this Recommendation, then it is implementation specific.
+
+**Table A.4 – timePropertiesDS data set member specifications**
+
+| Clause from [IEEE 1588-2008] | Clause from [IEEE 1588-2019] | Members of the data set | Telecom grandmaster requirements | | Telecom time slave clock requirements | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------|---------------------------------------|---------------|---------------------------------------|---------------|
+| | | | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range |
+| 8.2.4.2 | 8.2.4.2 | timePropertiesDS.currentUtcOffset (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.4.3 | 8.2.4.3 | timePropertiesDS.currentUtcOffsetValid (dynamic) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} |
+| 8.2.4.4 | 8.2.4.4 | timePropertiesDS.leap59 (dynamic) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} |
+| 8.2.4.5 | 8.2.4.5 | timePropertiesDS.leap61 (dynamic) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} |
+| 8.2.4.6 | 8.2.4.6 | timePropertiesDS.timeTraceable (dynamic) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} |
+
+**Table A.4 – timePropertiesDS data set member specifications**
+
+| Clause from [IEEE 1588-2008] | Clause from [IEEE 1588-2019] | Members of the data set | Telecom grandmaster requirements | | Telecom time slave clock requirements | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------|
+| | | | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range |
+| 8.2.4.7 | 8.2.4.7 | timePropertiesDS.frequencyTraceable (dynamic) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} (Note 1) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} (Note 1) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} (Note 1) |
+| 8.2.4.8 | 8.2.4.8 | timePropertiesDS.ptpTimescale (dynamic) | TRUE | {TRUE} | TRUE | {TRUE} | TRUE | {TRUE} |
+| 8.2.4.9 | 8.2.4.9 | timePropertiesDS.timeSource (dynamic) | 0xA0 | As per PTP | 0xA0 | As per PTP | 0xA0 | As per PTP |
+
+NOTE 1 – Refer to clause 6.4 for details on when each value applies.
+NOTE 2 – If a default value is not provided by this Recommendation, then it is implementation specific.
+
+**Table A.5 – portDS data set member specifications**
+
+| [IEEE 1588-2008] | | [IEEE 1588-2019] | | Members of the data set | Master port requirements of telecom grandmaster | | Slave port requirements of telecom time slave clock | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------|------------|------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
+| Clause | Data type | Clause | Data type | | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range |
+| 8.2.5.2.1 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.2.1 | As per PTP | portDS.portIdentity.clockIdentity (static) (Note 3) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.5.2.1 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.2.1 | As per PTP | portDS.portIdentity.portNumber (static) (Note 3) | 1 for OC As per PTP for BC | {1} for OC As per PTP for BC | 1 | {1} | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.5.3.1 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.3.1 | As per PTP | portDS.portState (dynamic) | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.2.5.3.2 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.3.2 | As per PTP | portDS.logMinDelayReqInterval (dynamic) (Note 3) | -4 | {-4} | -4 | {-4} | -4 | {-4} |
+
+**Table A.5 – portDS data set member specifications**
+
+| [IEEE 1588-2008] | | [IEEE 1588-2019] | | Members of the data set | Master port requirements of telecom grandmaster | | Slave port requirements of telecom time slave clock | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------|------------|------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|
+| Clause | Data type | Clause | Data type | | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range |
+| 8.2.5.3.3 | As per PTP | (Note 4) | (Note 4) | portDS.peerMeanPathDelay (dynamic) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+| (Note 5) | (Note 5) | 8.2.15.3.3 | As per PTP | portDS.meanLinkDelay | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+| 8.2.5.4.1 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.4.1 | As per PTP | portDS.logAnnounceInterval (configurable) | -3 | {-3} | -3 (Note 2) | {-3} (Note 2) | -3 | {-3} |
+| 8.2.5.4.2 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.4.2 | As per PTP | portDS.announceReceiptTimeout (configurable) | 3 | {3 - z} z is FFS | 3 | {3 - z} z is FFS | 3 | {3 - z} z is FFS |
+| 8.2.5.4.3 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.4.3 | As per PTP | portDS.logSyncInterval (configurable) | -4 | {-4} | -4 (Note 2) | {-4} (Note 2) | -4 | {-4} |
+| 8.2.5.4.4 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.4.4 | As per PTP | portDS.delayMechanism (configurable) | 01 | {01} | 01 | {01} | 01 | {01} |
+| 8.2.5.4.5 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.4.5 | As per PTP | portDS.logMinPdelayReqInterval (configurable) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+| 8.2.5.4.6 | As per PTP | 8.2.15.4.6 | As per PTP | portDS.versionNumber (configurable) | 2 | {2} | 2 | {2} | 2 | {2} |
+| (Note 5) | (Note 5) | 8.2.15.4.7 | As per PTP | portDS.minorVersionNumber (configurable) (Note 3) | 1 | {1} | 1 | {1} | 1 | {1} |
+| (Note 5) | (Note 5) | 8.2.15.4.8 | As per PTP | portDS.delayAsymmetry (configurable) (Note 3) | NA | NA | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| New member | Boolean | 9.2.2.2 | As per PTP | portDS.masterOnly (configurable) (Note 6) | TRUE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {FALSE} | TRUE | {TRUE, FALSE} |
+| New member | UInteger8 | New member | UInteger8 | portDS.localPriority (configurable) | 128 | {1-255} | 128 | {1-255} | 128 | {1-255} |
+| New member | UInteger16 | New member | UInteger16 | portDS.syncReceiptTimeout (configurable) | NA | NA | FFS | FFS | FFS | FFS |
+
+**Table A.5 – portDS data set member specifications**
+
+| [IEEE 1588-2008] | | [IEEE 1588-2019] | | Members of the data set | Master port requirements of telecom grandmaster | | Slave port requirements of telecom time slave clock | | Telecom boundary clock requirements | |
+|------------------|------------|------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------------------------------|---------------|
+| Clause | Data type | Clause | Data type | | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range | Default initialization value (Note 7) | Range |
+| New member | UInteger16 | New member | UInteger16 | portDS.delayRespReceiptTimeout (configurable) | NA | NA | FFS | FFS | FFS | FFS |
+| New member | Boolean | New member | Boolean | portDS.SF (dynamic) | FALSE | {FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} |
+| New member | Boolean | New member | Boolean | portDS.notMaster (configurable) (Note 6) | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} |
+| New member | Boolean | New member | Boolean | portDS.monitorSender (configurable) | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} |
+| New member | Boolean | New member | Boolean | portDS.monitorReceiver (configurable) | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} | FALSE | {TRUE, FALSE} |
+
+NOTE 1 – It is not used in this profile, and therefore equipment is not required to support it.
+NOTE 2 – This type of message is not sent by a slave-only OC.
+NOTE 3 – Applicable also to T-TC in case of an [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementation.
+NOTE 4 – In case of [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementations this data set member is deprecated.
+NOTE 5 – Applicable to [IEEE 1588-2019] based implementations; this data set member does not exist in [IEEE 1588-2008].
+NOTE 6 – Setting both portDS.masterOnly and portDS.notMaster with value TRUE concurrently is not permitted.
+NOTE 7 – If a default value is not provided by this Recommendation, then it is implementation specific.
+
+**Table A.6 – transparentClockDefaultDS data set member specifications**
+
+| Clause from [IEEE 1588-2008] | Members of the data set | Telecom transparent clock requirements | |
+|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------|
+| | | Default initialization value (Note) | Range |
+| 8.3.2.2.1 | transparentClockDefaultDS.clockIdentity (static) | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.3.2.2.2 | transparentClockDefaultDS.numberPorts (dynamic) | As per PTP for TC | As per PTP for TC |
+| 8.3.2.3.1 | transparentClockDefaultDS.delayMechanism (configurable) | 01 | {01} |
+| 8.3.2.3.2 | transparentClockDefaultDS.primaryDomain (configurable) | 24 | {24-43} |
+
+NOTE – If a default value is not provided by this Recommendation, then it is implementation specific.
+
+NOTE – According to [IEEE 1588-2019], the transparent clock data set members used in [IEEE 1588-2008] are deprecated. The relevant dataset members of a PTP instance should apply instead (see Tables A.1 and A.5).
+
+**Table A.7 – transparentClockPortDS data set member specifications**
+
+| Clause from [IEEE 1588-2008] | Members of the data set | Telecom transparent clock requirements | |
+|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------|
+| | | Default initialization value (Note 2) | Range |
+| 8.3.3.2.1 | transparentClockPortDS.portIdentity (static) | As per PTP | As per PTP |
+| 8.3.3.3.1 | transparentClockPortDS.logMinPdelayReqInterval (dynamic) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+| 8.3.3.3.2 | transparentClockPortDS.faultyFlag (dynamic) | FALSE | {FALSE, TRUE} |
+| 8.3.3.3.3 | transparentClockPortDS.peerMeanPathDelay (dynamic) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+
+NOTE 1 – It is not used in this profile, and therefore equipment is not required to support it.
+NOTE 2 – If a default value is not provided by this Recommendation, then it is implementation specific
+
+NOTE – According to [IEEE 1588-2019], the transparent clock data set members used in [IEEE 1588-2008] are deprecated. The relevant dataset members of a PTP instance should apply instead (see Tables A.1 and A.5).
+
+### A.3 PTP options
+
+#### A.3.1 Node types required, permitted, or prohibited
+
+In this profile, the permitted node types are: ordinary clocks, boundary clocks and end-to-end transparent clocks.
+
+In this profile, the prohibited node types are: peer-to-peer transparent clocks.
+
+#### A.3.2 One-step versus two-step clock mode
+
+Both one-step and two-step clocks are permitted. A clock must be capable of receiving and handling messages transmitted from both one-step and two-step clocks. A clock is not required to support both one-step and two-step mode for transmitting messages.
+
+#### A.3.3 Transport mechanisms required, permitted, or prohibited
+
+In this profile, the allowed transport mechanisms are:
+
+- a) IEEE 802.3/Ethernet, as per Annex F of [IEEE 1588-2008] or Annex E of [IEEE 1588-2019];
+- b) OTN via: (i) GFP-F encapsulation as per [ITU-T G.704], and insertion of the GFP-F frames into the OTUk OSMC as per clause 15.7.2.4 of [ITU-T G.709] or into the FlexO OSMC as per clause 9.2.10.1 of [ITU-T G.709.1], or (ii) the OSC OSMC as per clause 14.1 of [ITU-T G.709], where in this case the encapsulation is vendor-specific;
+- c) MTN, with PTP in Ethernet frames transported per clause 9.2.5 of [ITU-T G.832];
+- d) FlexE links, with PTP in Ethernet frames transported per clause 7.3.5 of [OIF FlexE IA].
+
+At least one of the four transport mechanisms must be supported. For transport over IEEE 802.3/Ethernet, both the non-forwardable multicast address, 01-80-C2-00-00-0E, and the forwardable multicast address, 01-1B-19-00-00-00, are required to be supported for compliance with this profile.
+
+All other transport mechanisms are for further study within the scope of this profile.
+
+#### A.3.4 Unicast messages
+
+All messages are sent multicast, using one of the two multicast addresses in clause A.3.3. The unicast mode is not permitted in this version of the profile.
+
+### **A.4 Best master clock algorithm options**
+
+This profile uses the Alternate BMCA described in clause 6.3.
+
+### **A.5 Path delay measurement option (delay request/delay response)**
+
+The delay request/delay response mechanism is used in this profile. The peer delay mechanism must not be used in this profile.
+
+### **A.6 Clock identity format**
+
+For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2008], the procedures to use an EUI-48 to create the EUI-64 clockIdentity as described in clause 7.5.2.2.2 of [IEEE 1588-2008] are no longer recommended. If a clockIdentity is formed by mapping an EUI-48 to an EUI-64, and if the EUI-48 was assigned from an MA-M or MA-S, it is possible that the clockIdentity will be a duplicate of a clockIdentity formed directly from a different MA-M or MA-S (i.e., by appending bits to the end of that different MA-M or MA-S). Only if the EUI-48 was formed from an OUI (MA-L), is the uniqueness ensured. For new implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2019], the clockIdentity shall be constructed as per clause 7.5.2.2.2 of [IEEE 1588-2019]. Non-IEEE clockIdentity formats are not supported.
+
+For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2019], the clockIdentity shall be constructed as per clause 7.5.2.2.2 of [IEEE 1588-2019].
+
+### **A.7 Configuration management options**
+
+Management aspects are for further study and will be specified in a future version of this profile.
+
+### **A.8 Security aspects**
+
+Security aspects are for further study.
+
+### **A.9 Other optional features of IEEE 1588**
+
+Other optional features of [IEEE 1588] are not used in this version of the profile.
+
+For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2008] these include unicast message negotiation (clause 16.1 of [IEEE 1588-2008]), alternate timescales (clause 16.3 of [IEEE 1588-2008]), grandmaster clusters (clause 17.3 of [IEEE 1588-2008]), unicast discovery (clause 17.5 of [IEEE 1588-2008]), acceptable master table (clause 17.6 of [IEEE 1588-2008]), and the experimental cumulative frequency scale factor offset (Annex L of [IEEE 1588-2008]).
+
+For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2019] these include unicast message negotiation (clause 16.1 of [IEEE 1588-2019]), alternate timescale offsets (clause 16.3 of [IEEE 1588-2019]), grandmaster clusters (clause 17.2 of [IEEE 1588-2019]), unicast discovery (clause 17.4 of [IEEE 1588-2019]), acceptable master table (clause 17.5 of [IEEE 1588-2019]), and the Cumulative frequency transfer method for synchronizing clocks (clause 16.10 of [IEEE 1588-2019]).
+
+Some aspects of the optional feature of alternate master are used by optional Annexes G and K of this Recommendation.
+
+### **A.10 PTP common header flags**
+
+The PTP common header flag values, and whether or not each flag is used in this profile, are given in Table A.8.
+
+NOTE – Some of these flags are used only in certain PTP messages, and not in all the PTP messages, see [IEEE 1588-2008] clause 13.3.2.6 or [IEEE 1588-2019] clause 13.3.2.8.
+
+For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2008] the following rule defined in [IEEE 1588-2008] clause 13.3.2.6, must be respected: "For message types where the bit is not defined in Table 20, the values shall be FALSE."
+
+For implementations based on [IEEE 1588-2019] the following rule defined in [IEEE 1588-2019] clause 13.3.2.8, must be respected: "For message types where the bit is not defined in Table 37, the values shall be FALSE."
+
+**Table A.8 – PTP flags**
+
+| Octet | Bit | Flag | Value to be sent | Behaviour for the receiving node |
+|-------|-----|------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------|
+| 0 | 0 | alternateMasterFlag | FALSE | As per PTP |
+| 0 | 1 | twoStepFlag | As per PTP | Used |
+| 0 | 2 | unicastFlag | FALSE | Flag is ignored |
+| 0 | 5 | PTP profile Specific 1 | FALSE | Flag is ignored |
+| 0 | 6 | PTP profile Specific 2 | FALSE | Flag is ignored |
+| 0 | 7 | Reserved | FALSE | Reserved by PTP and flag is ignored |
+| 1 | 0 | leap61 | As per PTP (Note 2) | Used |
+| 1 | 1 | leap59 | As per PTP (Note 2) | Used |
+| 1 | 2 | currentUtcOffsetValid | As per PTP (Note 3) | Used (Notes 3, 4, 5, 6) |
+| 1 | 3 | ptpTimescale | TRUE | Used |
+| 1 | 4 | timeTraceable | See Table 3 | Used |
+| 1 | 5 | frequencyTraceable | See Table 3 | Used |
+| 1 | 6 | (Note 1) | (Note 1) | (Note 1) |
+
+NOTE 1 – An additional flag "synchronizationUncertain" has been defined in Annex E; the use of the "synchronizationUncertain" flag is optional.
+
+NOTE 2 – When a clock is in holdover, within holdover specification, the PTP clock may continue to advertise the last known leap second event. If there was no pending leap second event, then the PTP clock continues to advertise FALSE for the pending leap second fields (leap59 and leap61). If there was a pending leap second event, the PTP clock may choose either to advertise FALSE for the pending leap second fields immediately or to continue to advertise the leap second event. In the latter instance the PTP clock would clear the leap59 and leap61 second event field(s) and adjust the UTC offset field at the appropriate time based on its local PTP time (i.e., the local PTP time's UTC timescale rolling over at UTC midnight) if the PTP clock is still in holdover, within holdover specification. When a clock is in holdover, out of holdover specifications, the PTP clock behaviour with respect to leap second event is implementation specific. It is recommended that the PTP clock continue to advertise any upcoming leap second event as appropriate.
+
+NOTE 3 – When a clock is in holdover, within holdover specification, the PTP clock may continue to advertise the last known UTC offset with UTC offset valid TRUE. If the last known UTC offset valid was FALSE, then the PTP clock continues to advertise FALSE. If the last known UTC offset valid was TRUE then the PTP clock may choose either to advertise UTC offset valid FALSE immediately (freezing the UTC offset value) or to continue to advertise the last known UTC offset with UTC offset valid TRUE. The UTC offset field may be updated as described in Note 2 above. When a clock is in holdover, out of holdover specifications, the PTP clock behaviour with respect to UTC offset is implementation specific.
+
+NOTE 4 – Usage of currentUtcOffset from an Announce message, which indicates currentUtcOffsetValid as FALSE, may lead to wrong UTC time calculation.
+
+NOTE 5 – The alternate ABMCA in this profile does not consider or use currentUtcOffsetValid or currentUtcOffset.
+
+**Table A.8 – PTP flags**
+
+NOTE 6 – The PTP clocks in this profile do not use currentUtcOffsetValid or currentUtcOffset for phase/time synchronization.
+
+### A.11 Profile version compatibility
+
+A specific profile version may have backward compatibility with earlier versions of this profile. Table A.9 lists which earlier versions are compatible with each version. Compatibility means that the nodes can operate in the same network provided optional features in a specific profile that are not present in the earlier version are not enabled.
+
+**Table A.9 – profileVersion compatibility**
+
+| profileVersion | Base IEEE version | Compatible with the earlier profileVersions |
+|----------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------|
+| 2.5 | [IEEE 1588-2019] | 2.4, 2.3, 2.2, 2.1, 2.0, 1.0 (Note) |
+| 2.4 | [IEEE 1588-2008] | 2.2, 2.1, 2.0, 1.0 (Note) |
+| 2.3 | [IEEE 1588-2019] | 2.2, 2.1, 2.0, 1.0 (Note) |
+| 2.2 | [IEEE 1588-2008] | 2.1, 2.0, 1.0 (Note) |
+| 2.1 | [IEEE 1588-2008] | 2.0, 1.0 (Note) |
+| 2.0 | [IEEE 1588-2008] | 1.0 (Note) |
+| 1.0 | [IEEE 1588-2008] | |
+
+NOTE – Version 1 of this profile enforced a limited range on acceptable values for clockClass, clockAccuracy, offsetScaledLogVariance and, for the T-TSC, priority2. Reception of values outside of the acceptable range caused the Announce message to be discarded. Version 2.x of the profile supports the full range of these attributes as defined by PTP. In networks deploying ePRTC, which use new values of clockAccuracy and offsetScaledLogVariance that are outside of the version 1 range, all clocks need to use version 2.x of the profile. If no ePRTC are to be deployed in the network, then the network can operate with a mixture of version 1 and version 2.x clocks.
+
+## **Annex B**
+
+## **Options to establish the PTP topology with the Alternate BMCA**
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+Options to establish the PTP topology with the Alternate BMCA are described in Annex C of [ITU-T G.8275].
+
+## **Annex C**
+
+## **Inclusion of an external phase/time input interface in a T-BC**
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The model for inclusion of a unidirectional, external phase/time interface on a PTP clock is provided in Annex B of [ITU-T G.8275].
+
+## Annex D
+
+## Path trace (optional)
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+In order to track the actual path of the PTP synchronization reference in the network, the Path trace option as per clause 16.2 in [IEEE 1588] can be optionally supported by the PTP clock compliant with this profile.
+
+This feature is optional; however, if it is supported it is necessary that it be supported as described below.
+
+As an example, this option can be used to support troubleshooting analysis in case of failures in the network.
+
+It should be possible to configure a PTP clock so that the Path trace type length value (TLV) is not further forwarded by that clock (e.g., this could be required at the network administration interfaces).
+
+NOTE 1 – There might be cases when not all PTP clocks in the network support the Path trace TLV. The expected behaviour is that in the case of an incoming Announce message carrying the Path trace TLV, this TLV is dropped by these nodes.
+
+NOTE 2 – T-TCs in the path could add their own clockIdentity in the Path trace TLV.
+
+## **Annex E**
+
+## **Synchronization uncertain indication (optional)**
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The synchronization uncertain indication is described in Annex D of [ITU-T G.8275].
+
+## Annex F
+
+## Use of stepsRemoved to limit reference chain (optional)
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The parameter stepsRemoved is defined in [IEEE 1588] is used to indicate the distance between a clock and the grandmaster clock in the network. It was originally intended to be used as a helpful tool to detect cyclic paths that may occur in PTP systems. By default, it is required that a clock not qualify any Announce messages where the stepsRemoved field is equal to, or greater than, 255 in order to ensure that rogue frames are extinguished.
+
+This profile includes a default dataset member, maxStepsRemoved, that allows the operator to configure the value to less than 255. The value configured is typically the same in all clocks in the PTP domain. When configured, a clock would not qualify any Announce messages received where the stepsRemoved field in the ingress header matched or exceeded the maxStepsRemoved field. There would be two primary use cases for this configurability.
+
+First, referring to [ITU-T G.8271.1] and [ITU-T G.8275] analysis has been performed to show that up to 20 clocks may be traversed between the grandmaster and slave while maintaining the proper network performance. If the operator wanted to ensure the network performance limit was not exceeded, or that the chain length was not exceeded, the operator may configure the value smaller (such as 20 or 21).
+
+Second, if the operator does deploy PTP in a ring topology, the operator may configure the maxStepsRemoved parameter to a smaller value so that the clocks may more quickly identify rogue frames and take corrective action to extinguish them and update the topology.
+
+## Annex G
+
+## Monitoring alternate master time information provided by a peer PTP port (optional)
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+This annex is optional but, if implemented, it is necessary for the equipment to conform to the requirements contained herein.
+
+A PTP clock must synchronize only to a PTP port of its parent clock that is in the MASTER state. The synchronization must be received on, and only on, the port of the PTP clock that is in the SLAVE state. However, in some instances it may be desirable for a PTP port to monitor a peer PTP port in a non-traditional situation, where the local PTP port is not in the SLAVE state and/or the peer PTP port is not in the MASTER state.
+
+The monitoring is enabled through the use of the portDS.monitorSender and portDS.monitorReceiver. When portDS.monitorSender is TRUE, and the portDS.portState is not MASTER, the PTP port sends Announce, Sync, Follow\_Up and Delay\_Resp messages with the alternateMasterFlag set to TRUE. When portDS.monitorReceiver is TRUE, and the portDS.portState is not SLAVE, the PTP port sends Delay\_Req messages with alternateMasterFlag set to FALSE. These messages may allow a PTP port to acquire knowledge of the characteristics of the transmission path. Some examples of use cases where a PTP port may want to acquire knowledge of the characteristics of the transmission path are included in the next sub-clauses.
+
+The monitoring feature uses some of the functionality of alternate master (clause 17.4 of [IEEE 1588-2008], clause 17.3 of [IEEE 1588-2019]), limited to the ability to transmit and process PTP messages in the PTP port states as described above, with the alternateMasterFlag set as appropriate.
+
+The following table captures various combinations of Port A and Port B states showing when Port A is able to monitor Port B. Some combinations may occur due to the use of masterOnly, notMaster, slaveOnly or some other means to override the default behaviour.
+
+**Table G.1 – Combination of PTP port states with monitoring**
+
+| Port A State | Port B State | Port A monitoring of Port B is supported when | |
+|--------------|--------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
+| | | Port A configuration of portDS.monitorReceiver | Port B configuration of portDS.monitorSender |
+| SLAVE | MASTER | (NOTE 1) | (NOTE 2) |
+| PASSIVE | MASTER | TRUE | (NOTE 2) |
+| MASTER | SLAVE | TRUE | TRUE |
+| MASTER | PASSIVE | TRUE | TRUE |
+| MASTER | MASTER | TRUE | (NOTE 2) |
+
+NOTE 1 – The configuration of portDS.monitorReceiver does not impact the operation of a PTP port in the SLAVE state (i.e., is not required to be TRUE).
+NOTE 2 – The configuration of portDS.monitorSender does not impact the operation on a PTP port in the MASTER state (i.e., is not required to be TRUE).
+
+NOTE – Table G.1 lists the most typical combinations of PTP port states. The monitoring function described in this annex also applies to other combinations.
+
+### G.1 Use case 1 – PASSIVE port monitoring MASTER port
+
+Figure G.1 shows an example to illustrate where a PTP clock with a PTP port in the PASSIVE state (portDS.monitorReceiver is TRUE) monitors a peer PTP port in the MASTER state. As shown below, T-BC #4 has a PTP port in the PASSIVE state and it is desirable to monitor T-BC #2 that has a PTP port in the MASTER state. When the T-BC #4 PTP PASSIVE port receives the Sync and Delay\_Resp message from the T-BC #2 PTP MASTER port, the T-BC #4 can get the time error based on PTP timestamps. If the difference of the time error of PASSIVE port and the time error of SLAVE port exceeds a threshold, this PTP clock may generate an alarm, which means that a fibre asymmetric, or a clock failure could be present in this PTP network. Note this alarm is just used for PTP monitoring and should not trigger the BMCA. Additionally, the threshold used for this alarm should be properly configured to avoid inappropriate alarms.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a hierarchy of PTP clocks. At the top is a cloud labeled 'PTP network (MASTER)'. Below it is T-BC #1, which has three ports: Port 1 (SLAVE), Port 3 (MASTER), and Port 4 (MASTER). Port 4 (MASTER) is connected to T-BC #2. T-BC #2 has two ports: Port 2 (SLAVE) and Port 3 (MASTER). Port 3 (MASTER) is connected to T-BC #3. T-BC #3 has two ports: Port 1 (SLAVE) and Port 4 (MASTER). Port 4 (MASTER) is connected to T-BC #4. T-BC #4 has two ports: Port 1 (PASSIVE) and Port 2 (SLAVE). A dashed arrow points from T-BC #4 Port 1 (PASSIVE) to T-BC #2 Port 3 (MASTER), indicating the monitoring path. The text 'G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(22)\_FG.1' is at the bottom right.
+
+Diagram illustrating Use case 1: PASSIVE port monitoring MASTER port. A PTP network (MASTER) is connected to T-BC #1. T-BC #1 has Port 1 (SLAVE), Port 3 (MASTER), and Port 4 (MASTER). Port 4 (MASTER) is connected to T-BC #2. T-BC #2 has Port 2 (SLAVE) and Port 3 (MASTER). Port 3 (MASTER) is connected to T-BC #3. T-BC #3 has Port 1 (SLAVE) and Port 4 (MASTER). Port 4 (MASTER) is connected to T-BC #4. T-BC #4 has Port 1 (PASSIVE) and Port 2 (SLAVE). A dashed arrow indicates monitoring from T-BC #4 Port 1 (PASSIVE) to T-BC #2 Port 3 (MASTER).
+
+Figure G.1 – PASSIVE port monitors MASTER port
+
+### G.2 Use case 2 – MASTER port monitoring PASSIVE port
+
+Figure G.2 shows an example to illustrate where a PTP clock with a PTP port in the MASTER state (portDS.monitorReceiver is TRUE) monitors a peer PTP port in the PASSIVE state (portDS.monitorSender is TRUE). In the situation shown, Port 2 could be a PTP port or a virtual PTP port in the SLAVE state preferring to synchronize to the local GNSS receiver. Port 1 in the MASTER state is used for monitoring of the PTP network, and through the monitoring function, the PTP clock is able to measure the time error on the PTP network.
+
+Note that in Figure G.2 it is assumed that the PTP Clock Port 1 is in the MASTER state and the peer port in the PTP network is in the PASSIVE state, but that the opposite may also occur (where Port 1 is PASSIVE and the peer port in the PTP Network is MASTER, which is described in clause G.1) depending on the network planning and the BMCA.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a rectangular box labeled "PTP clock" at the bottom. Inside the box, there are two ports: "Port 1 (MASTER)" on the left and "Port 2 (SLAVE)" on the right. Above Port 1, an arrow points up to a cloud labeled "PTP network (PASSIVE)". Above Port 2, an arrow points down from a rectangle labeled "PRTC". Below the ports, the text "PTP clock" is written. At the bottom right of the diagram, the text "G.827.5.1-Y.1369.1(22)\_FG.2" is present.
+
+Diagram of a PTP clock with Port 1 (MASTER) connected to a passive PTP network and Port 2 (SLAVE) connected to a PRTC.
+
+**Figure G.2 – MASTER port monitors PASSIVE port**
+
+### G.3 Use Case 3 – MASTER port monitoring MASTER port
+
+Figure G.3 shows a use case where a PTP probe may monitor information from a PTP clock. Additionally, the PTP clock may likewise monitor information from the PTP probe. Considering a PTP probe working as a monitor function instead of a PTP reference, it is assumed that the PTP clock Port 2 is configured with portDS.masterOnly TRUE in order to prevent the PTP probe from being selected by the BMCA of the PTP clock. To allow the PTP probe to monitor the PTP clock, the port of the PTP probe is configured with portDS.monitorReceiver TRUE. To allow the PTP clock to monitor the PTP probe, Port 2 of PTP clock is configured with portDS.monitorReceiver TRUE. Once both are configured as described there may be a full exchange of information between the PTP probe and the PTP clock. As a result, the PTP probe may full characterize/probe the PTP clock (receiving Sync & Delay\_Resp), but also the PTP clock may gain the full knowledge of the PTP probe, by reception of Sync & Delay\_Resp from the PTP probe.
+
+Note, for some use cases, it may be only necessary to monitor the timing of one direction but not both, e.g., a PTP probe monitors a PTP clock, or a PTP clock monitors a PTP probe to estimate its accuracy.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a rectangular box labeled "PTP clock" at the bottom. Inside the box, there are two ports: "Port 1 (SLAVE)" on the left and "Port 2 (MASTER)" on the right. Above Port 1, an arrow points down from a cloud labeled "PTP network (MASTER)". Above Port 2, an arrow points down from a rectangle labeled "PTP probe (MASTER)". Below the ports, the text "PTP clock" is written. At the bottom right of the diagram, the text "G.827.5.1-Y.1369.1(22)\_FG.3" is present.
+
+Diagram of a PTP clock with Port 1 (SLAVE) connected to a master PTP network and Port 2 (MASTER) connected to a master PTP probe.
+
+**Figure G.3 – MASTER port monitors MASTER port**
+
+## Annex H
+
+## Transport of PTP over OTN
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The transport of PTP over OTN shall be performed by encapsulating the PTP messages into GFP-F frames as specified in clause 7.10 of [ITU-T G.704], and then inserting the GFP-F frames into the OTUk OSMC as specified in clause 15.7.2.4 of [ITU-T G.709] and the FlexO OSMC as specified in clause 9.2.10 of [ITU-T G.709.1].
+
+The PTP messages shall be timestamped as specified in clause 15.7.2.4.1 of [ITU-T G.709] and in clause 9.2.10.1 of [ITU-T G.709.1].
+
+PTP messages may also be carried over the OSC OSMC as specified in clause 14.1 of [ITU-T G.709]. The PTP encapsulation in this latter case is vendor specific.
+
+All bits of the transportSpecific field (see clause 13.3.2.1 of (IEEE 1588-2008)) shall be transmitted as zero and shall be ignored by the receiver.
+
+The value of the networkProtocol enumeration for the transport of PTP over OTN shall be F000 (hex).
+
+## **Annex I**
+
+## **Transport PTP over MTN**
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The transport of PTP over MTN is performed by encapsulating PTP messages into Ethernet frames that are transported by the MTN overhead per Clause 9.2.5 of [ITU-T G.8312]. The PTP event messages are timestamped. The timestamp generation is for further study.
+
+The value of the networkProtocol enumeration for the transport of PTP over MTN is F001 (hex).
+
+## **Annex J**
+
+## **Transport PTP over FlexE links**
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The transport of PTP over FlexE shall be performed by encapsulating PTP messages into Ethernet frames that are transported by the FlexE overhead per clause 7.3.5 of [OIF FlexE IA]. The PTP event messages shall be timestamped as per clause 7.3.5 of [OIF FlexE IA].
+
+The value of the networkProtocol enumeration for the transport of PTP over FlexE shall be F002 (hex).
+
+## Annex K
+
+## Dynamic Monitoring based on PTSF (Optional)
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+This annex is optional but, if implemented, it is necessary for the equipment to conform to the requirements contained herein.
+
+This annex describes an approach to dynamic monitoring of a neighbour PTP port by a PTP port with local PTSF. When this annex is implemented, a PTP port is additionally permitted to transmit Delay\_Req messages and process received Delay\_Resp messages irrespective of the PTP port state based on the PTSF status, as described below. The PTSF function is specified by clause 6.3.9.
+
+When a PTSF event has occurred at a PTP port of a PTP clock, the PTP clock may set portDS.SF to TRUE according to clause 6.3.9. Upon the change of portDS.SF to TRUE, even if the PTP port state is not in the SLAVE state, the PTP port is allowed to send Delay\_Req message and receive Delay\_Resp messages. This functionality allows the local PTP port to update the PTSF status. If it is verified that the PTSF has cleared, portDS.SF of the PTP port is set to FALSE. As a result, the PTP port is considered as a candidate reference with normal handling of PTP messages.
+
+The monitoring feature uses some of the functionality of alternate master (clause 17.4 of [IEEE 1588-2008], clause 17.3 of [IEEE 1588-2019]), limited to the ability to transmit and processes PTP messages in the PTP port states as described above, with the alternateMasterFlag set as appropriate.
+
+An example for the case of T-BC is shown by Figure K.1.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows three Time Boundary Clocks (T-BCs): T-BC #1, T-BC #2, and T-BC #3. T-BC #1 is at the bottom and contains two ports: Port 1 (MASTER) and Port 2 (SLAVE). T-BC #2 is at the top left and contains Port 1 (MASTER). T-BC #3 is at the top right and contains Port 1 (MASTER). Arrows indicate connections from Port 1 of T-BC #2 and Port 1 of T-BC #3 to Port 1 of T-BC #1. A label 'G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(22)\_FK.1' is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram illustrating an example of PTSF restoration. T-BC #1 (bottom) has Port 1 (MASTER) and Port 2 (SLAVE). Port 1 is connected to Port 1 (MASTER) of T-BC #2 (top left) and Port 1 (MASTER) of T-BC #3 (top right). The diagram shows Port 1 of T-BC #1 in the MASTER state, indicating restoration after a failure.
+
+Figure K.1 – An example of PTSF restoration
+
+In Figure K.1, Port 1 of T-BC #1 was previously in the SLAVE state synchronizing with Port 1 of T-BC #2. After a while, T-BC #1 detects a PTSF event at Port 1 and changes its portDS.SF to TRUE. According to clause 6.3.9, T-BC #1 runs its alternate BMCA, selects Port 1 of T-BC #3 as its new reference, and sets Port 2 to SLAVE, Port 1 to MASTER.
+
+In order to recover the PTSF failure of Port 1 of T-BC #1, that T-BC needs to continue to send messages towards T-BC#2 to detect when the SF condition is resolved. The event of portDS.SF with TRUE triggers Port 1 of T-BC #1 to continue to send Delay\_Req messages. Port 1 of T-BC #2 in MASTER is able to reply with Delay\_Resp messages. As a result, Port 1 of T-BC #1 will continue to receive Announce, Sync and Delay\_Resp messages in order to determine if the signal fail condition has been cleared. If the failure is cleared, T-BC #1 puts portDS.SF of Port 1 to FALSE and then Announce messages received on Port 1 of T-BC #1 can be considered in the alternate BMCA.
+
+## Appendix I
+
+### Considerations on the use of transparent clock
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The integration of the transparent clock in this profile is considered of particular interest for applications such as 2-port type of devices.
+
+For more complex topologies and multiport devices some careful analysis is recommended. In particular, some specific node configuration may be required if the operator wants to prevent multicast packets flooding the network.
+
+Some options could be considered, e.g., by configuration of the T-TCs with insertion of a VLAN tag in the frames carrying PTP. In this case all T-TCs in the PTP communication path where this option is used should support this option. The last T-TC node would need to remove the VLAN tag. By using this option to connect the physical ports of the T-GM, T-BC, and T-TSCs through VLAN virtual connections across the T-TCs, the multicast flooding can be avoided. In this way the PTP port of a T-GM, T-BC or T-TSC would never process a VLAN tagged frame.
+
+The related operational implications would need to be carefully considered.
+
+## Appendix II
+
+### Considerations on the transmission of Delay\_Req messages
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+This appendix discusses the requirements defined in [IEEE 1588] for the transmission of *Delay\_Req* messages when using the default uniform distribution defined in bullet 3 of clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2008] and bullet (1) of clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2019]. This uniform distribution is not used in the PTP telecom profile defined in this Recommendation; a profile-specific distribution has been defined in clause 6.2.8.
+
+The second dashed item of the requirements defined in clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2008] and bullet (b) of clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2019] controls the variability of the times between successive *Delay\_Req* messages. It is analogous to the corresponding requirement for the sending of *Sync* and *Announce* messages, given in clause 7.7.2.1 of [IEEE 1588]. However, a key difference is that, while the requirement for *Sync* messages applies to the population of inter-message intervals, the requirement for *Delay\_Req* messages applies only to the mean of the population.
+
+To be more precise, assume that a population of $N$ inter-message intervals has been measured, and let $T_j$ be the measured values, $j = 1, 2, \dots, N$ . The sample mean, $m$ , is just the numerical average, i.e.,
+
+$$m = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{j=1}^N T_j \quad (\text{II.1})$$
+
+Let $T_{min}$ be the minimum *Delay Request* interval; it is equal to $2^{\text{portDS.logMinDelayReqInterval}}$ s. The second dashed item above states that the mean of the distribution must be greater than or equal to $T_{min}$ with 90% or greater statistical confidence.
+
+The statistical test for this is well-known and is based on the fact that the distribution of $m$ approaches a normal distribution as $N$ becomes large (i.e., it is based on the central limit theorem). Let $\sigma$ be the standard deviation of the distribution of the inter-message times, i.e., the distribution of the $T_j$ . Let $z_{0.90}$ be the 90th percentile of the standard normal distribution; it is given by $z_{0.90} = 1.281$ . Then, the probability that the true mean of the distribution exceeds the quantity
+
+$$q_{0.1} = m - z_{0.90} \sqrt{\frac{\sigma}{N}} \quad (\text{II.2})$$
+
+is 0.9, i.e., 90%. The probability that the mean of the distribution is less than this value is 0.1. In addition, if $\sigma$ is not known, the sample standard deviation, $s$ , may be used in equation (II.2) and the Normal distribution is replaced by the Student- $t$ distribution with $N - 1$ degrees of freedom. The sample standard deviation is given by:
+
+$$s = \left[ \frac{1}{N-1} \sum_{j=1}^N (T_j - m)^2 \right]^{1/2} \quad (\text{II.3})$$
+
+To meet the requirement, the quantity $q_{0.1}$ must exceed $T_{min}$ . It is seen from equation (II.2) that $q_{0.1}$ approaches $m$ as $N$ approaches infinity. Since $m$ converges to the mean of the distribution of inter-message times as $N$ approaches infinity, the requirement can be met for sufficiently large $N$ as long as the mean of the distribution exceeds $T_{min}$ . The mean of the distribution must exceed $T_{min}$ ; the requirement cannot be met if the mean of the distribution is exactly equal to $T_{min}$ or less than $T_{min}$ .
+
+If it is chosen to comply with the requirement of the third dashed item of clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2008] or bullet (1) of clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2019], one way of meeting this
+
+requirement is to increase the upper end of the probability distribution by 10%. If this is done, the transmission times are selected such that the interval between successive *Delay\_Req* messages is taken from a uniform distribution over the interval between 0 and $2.2T_{min}$ . A new random value for the transmission interval is computed for each message transmitted. When computing the mean *Delay\_Req* interval from measured samples to check if it exceeds $T_{min}$ with 90% or greater statistical confidence (if the third dashed item is used), the number of measured samples $N$ must be at least 1000. The granularity of the distribution must be less than or equal to 1/16 *Sync* interval.
+
+If it is chosen to meet the requirement of the fourth dashed item of clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588] or bullet (2) of clause 9.5.11.2 of [IEEE 1588-2019], a *Delay\_Req* message is transmitted as soon as possible after receipt of a *Sync* message, subject to not violating the second dashed item.
+
+## Appendix III
+
+### Considerations on the choice of the PTP Ethernet multicast destination address
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+This PTP profile supports both the non-forwardable multicast address 01-80-C2-00-00-0E and forwardable multicast address 01-1B-19-00-00-00 when the PTP mapping defined in Annex F of [IEEE 1588-2008] or Annex E of [IEEE 1588-2019] is used.
+
+The Ethernet multicast address to be used depends on the operator policy; further considerations are provided hereafter.
+
+Layer 2 bridging function associated with the PTP port of a T-BC or T-TC should not forward any frame with destination MAC address 01-1B-19-00-00-00; this could be done by properly provisioning this multicast address in the filtering database.
+
+#### Option 1 – Use of the non-forwardable multicast address 01-80-C2-00-00-0E
+
+Some network operators consider that the PTP messages must never be forwarded through PTP-unaware network equipment.
+
+The use of the non-forwardable multicast address 01-80-C2-00-00-0E guarantees this property most of the time (exceptions exist for some older Ethernet equipment).
+
+Therefore, in the case of network equipment misconfiguration (e.g., if the PTP functions are not enabled in PTP-aware network equipment), the use of this multicast address prevents incorrect distribution of synchronization, since the PTP messages will be blocked by the PTP-unaware network equipment.
+
+#### Option 2 – Use of the forwardable multicast address 01-1B-19-00-00-00
+
+Some network operators consider that using a forwardable multicast address is more flexible and that it is preferable to forward the PTP messages to keep the synchronization link running in case some equipment is misconfigured as non PTP nodes, although there are potentially risks of performance degradation. The network management system (NMS) will easily find the misconfiguration and will send alarms.
+
+However, it is possible to block the PTP messages by properly provisioning this multicast address in the filtering database of each Ethernet equipment.
+
+## Appendix IV
+
+### Considerations on the use of priority2
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The PTP attribute priority2 is configurable in this profile. In some special circumstances, the use of the priority2 attribute can simplify the network management. This appendix describes two use cases; other possible cases are for further study.
+
+#### Case 1
+
+Operators can configure the PTP attribute priority2 to make all of the T-BCs either traceable to one T-GM, or traceable to two different T-GMs at the same time.
+
+
+
+G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(14)\_FIV.1
+
+Diagram illustrating the use of priority2 with two T-GMs in the network. Two T-GMs (orange circles) are shown at the top. The left T-GM is connected to a T-BC (EEC) (orange circle) via a red square. The right T-GM is connected to another T-BC (EEC) (orange circle) via a red square. The two T-BCs (EECs) are connected to each other via a dashed line, with red squares on the connections. The diagram is labeled G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(14)\_FIV.1.
+
+Figure IV.1 – Use of priority2 with two T-GMs in the network
+
+For example, in Figure IV.1, if all other PTP attributes of the two T-GMs are the same, and the two T-GMs are configured with the same priority2 value, each T-BC will select the T-GM with the shortest path. If the two T-GMs are configured with different priority2 values, all of the T-BCs will synchronize to the T-GM with the smallest priority2 value.
+
+#### Case 2
+
+Operators can configure the PTP attribute priority2 to prevent the T-BCs of an upstream network from synchronizing with the T-BCs of a downstream network when the T-GM is in failure.
+
+
+
+G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(14)\_FIV.2
+
+Diagram illustrating the use of priority2 with T-BCs of different network layers. A T-GM (orange circle) is connected to a T-BC (EEC) (orange circle) via a red square. This T-BC is part of an 'Upstream network' (oval) containing three T-BCs (EECs) (orange circles) connected in a chain. The last T-BC in the upstream network is connected to a T-BC (EEC) (orange circle) via a red square. This T-BC is part of a 'Downstream network' (oval) containing three T-BCs (EECs) (orange circles) connected in a chain. The last T-BC in the downstream network is connected to a T-TSC (EEC) (orange circle) via a red square. The diagram is labeled G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(14)\_FIV.2.
+
+Figure IV.2 – Use of priority2 with T-BCs of different network layers
+
+For example, in Figure IV.2, if all other PTP attributes of all of the T-BCs are the same, and the PTP attribute priority2 of all of T-BCs are configured with the same value, then when the T-GM is in failure, the T-BCs in the upstream network can synchronize with the T-BCs in the downstream network, depending on the clockIdentity values of all of the T-BCs. If the T-BCs in the upstream network are configured with a smaller priority2 value than the T-BCs in the downstream network then, when the T-GM is in failure, the T-BCs in the downstream network will synchronize to the T-BCs in the upstream network.
+
+## Appendix V
+
+### **Description of PTP clock modes and associated contents of Announce messages**
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+Description of PTP clock modes and associated contents of Announce messages are described in Appendix VIII of [ITU-T G.8275].
+
+## Appendix VI
+
+### Operations over link aggregation
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+When two devices embedding PTP clocks compliant with this profile are connected via a link aggregation (LAG) as defined in [b-IEEE 802.1AX], each physical link should be accessed directly to transmit PTP messages, bypassing the LAG. This method prevents potential asymmetries that may be present when the forward and reverse paths are delivered over different links belonging to the LAG.
+
+Alternative solutions taking advantage of some LAG features exist, such as the bidirectional congruity as defined by [b-IEEE 802.1AX]. For the scenarios currently considered, the insertion of a VLAN tag in the frames carrying PTP messages is not allowed. However, the bidirectional congruity alternative solution can be applied to untagged PTP frames by assigning a conversation ID equal to zero to a given physical link. These solutions are for further study.
+
+## Appendix VII
+
+### Relationship between clockClass and holdover specification
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The clockClass values that are used in this profile are described in Table 3. The values may be divided into four different categories:
+
+- 1) T-GM locked to a PRTC or ePRTC;
+- 2) T-GM or T-BC in holdover, within holdover specification;
+- 3) T-GM or T-BC in holdover, outside of holdover specification;
+- 4) Slave clock, or clock that has not been synchronized.
+
+A short footnote (Note 1 of clause 6.4) refers to Appendix V of [ITU-T G.8271.1] for more information on the meaning of "in holdover, within holdover specification" and "in holdover, out of holdover specification". That appendix describes possible budget models for the synchronization performance. The exact model depends on the operator's network and design parameters, but each budget is broken down into several components:
+
+- 1) PRTC/T-GM allocation;
+- 2) Random time error from noise accumulation through the network (dTE);
+- 3) Node asymmetry (cTE, the sum of the asymmetry of all the nodes in the system);
+- 4) Link asymmetry (cTE, the sum of the asymmetry of all the links in the system);
+- 5) Holdover budget;
+- 6) End application budget.
+
+Table V.1 of [ITU-T G.8271.1] shows that for one example budget, 400 ns may be allocated to holdover within the network (this is termed failure scenario (b) in the table). The operator may have different budget allocations, depending on their deployment scenario. The 400 ns holdover budget is allocated to the entire synchronization chain, and not to an individual clock.
+
+The intended operation of the T-GM is, therefore, as follows:
+
+- When the T-GM is synchronised to a PRTC locked to GNSS, it outputs clockClass 6.
+- If the PRTC loses its connection to GNSS, it enters holdover. The T-GM should degrade the advertised clockClass to indicate "in holdover, but within holdover specification" (clockClass 7).
+- The T-GM estimates when the holdover budget will potentially be exceeded. Factors to consider include the known quality of any external frequency support (e.g., SyncE QL), temperature variations, and/or the quality of the internal oscillator.
+- When the T-GM considers that the clock is out of holdover specification (i.e., it is now estimated to have drifted by more than the holdover budget), the T-GM will advertise a clockClass of 140, 150 or 160.
+
+In the event of a network failure, where the T-GM is disconnected from the synchronization chain, a T-BC will take over as the grandmaster of the chain. That T-BC will be operating in holdover. The clockClass that the T-BC is allowed to advertise depends on the clockClass of the T-GM to which it was synchronized prior to losing connectivity.
+
+For example, if the T-BC was synchronized to a T-GM of clockClass 6, none of the holdover budget will have been consumed, and therefore the T-BC may use a clockClass indicating "within holdover specification" (e.g., clockClass 135). This value is chosen to be higher than that of a T-GM that is out of holdover specification, since the T-BC is likely to have more accurate time because it has been locked to a traceable time source more recently. Therefore, if the two clocks (a T-BC in holdover,
+
+within holdover specification and a T-GM in holdover, but out of holdover specification) are compared in the Alternate BMCA operation of a subsequent clock, the subsequent clock will synchronize to the T-BC that is within holdover specification instead of a T-GM that is out of holdover specification.
+
+In another example, if the T-BC was synchronized to a T-GM indicating that the T-GM is in holdover but out of holdover specification (e.g., parentDS clockClass 140, 150 or 160), the T-BC should also use a clockClass indicating "out of holdover specification" (e.g., defaultDS clockClass 165). This is because the T-GM was indicating that, in its estimation, the holdover budget has already been consumed.
+
+In another example, if the T-BC was synchronized to another T-BC, and the other T-BC indicates that it is in holdover but out of holdover specification (e.g., parentDS clockClass 165), the original T-BC should also use a clockClass indicating "out of holdover specification" (e.g., defaultDS clockClass 165). This is because the other T-BC was indicating that, in its estimation, the holdover budget has already been consumed.
+
+In a final example, if the T-BC was synchronized to a T-GM or another T-BC that was already in holdover but still within the holdover specification, the original T-BC could indicate "within holdover specification". However, some of the holdover budget will have already been consumed by the T-GM or T-BC. If it is not known how much of the budget is left, the T-BC should indicate "out of holdover specification".
+
+NOTE 1 – When the term clockClass is used with respect to the property of the individual PTP clock (T-GM, T-BC, T-TSC) it is referring to data set member defaultDS.clockQuality.clockClass.
+
+NOTE 2 – If a T-BC was synchronized to a T-GM or to another T-BC that was in free-run mode (advertising clockClass 248), the T-BC should continue to advertise clockClass 248 even after it loses its reference.
+
+## Appendix VIII
+
+### Considerations on a T-TSC connected to an end application
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The default T-TSC clockclass 255 implies that the T-TSC will always lock to an external PTP reference when available.
+
+The actual synchronization source ultimately used by the end application depends on the applicable synchronization needs. This process is out of the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+As an example, the decision to use the PTP reference that has been selected by the T-TSC (e.g., instead of entering holdover), could depend on the actual clockQuality, frequencyTraceable flag, timeTraceable flag, and synchronizationUncertain flag associated to the external PTP reference. Additional aspects as related to performance monitoring of the external reference might also be considered. This is implementation specific.
+
+As an example, when it is required to meet the network timing requirements as per e.g., [ITU-T G.8271.1], it would be necessary that the external PTP reference has clockClass 6, 7 or 135 and that the timeTraceable flag is TRUE in order to be used by the end application. When this condition is not met, the end application may decide to enter holdover (either using the internal oscillator or driven by SyncE).
+
+NOTE – The specific behaviour for a T-TSC embedded in the end application is outside the scope of this Recommendation. It is assumed that interoperability with the profile is maintained.
+
+## Appendix IX
+
+### Calculation of offsetScaledLogVariance for T-GM timed by PRTC or ePRTC
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+### IX.1 Observation interval and TDEV noise generation
+
+The offsetScaledLogVariance is an offset, scaled representation of the PTP variance (PTPVAR). PTPVAR is described in clause 7.6.3 of [IEEE 1588]; it is equal to Allan variance multiplied by $\tau^2/3$ , where $\tau$ is the observation interval. PTP variance is therefore not a single value; it is a function of observation interval. Clause 7.6.3 of [IEEE 1588] specifies that the observation interval $\tau$ shall be the value defined in the applicable PTP profile. Clause 7.6.3 of [IEEE 1588] refers to $\tau$ as the sampling period. However, comparison of the equations in clause 7.6.3.2 of [IEEE 1588] with the equations for Allan variance in clause II.1 of [ITU-T G.810] indicates that $\tau$ in clause 7.6.3 of [IEEE 1588] is the observation interval of [ITU-T G.810], and not the sampling interval $\tau_0$ .
+
+The offsetScaledLogVariance, i.e., defaultDS.clockQuality.offsetScaledLogVariance, is a clock attribute used in the BMCA. As indicated in clause 7.6.3.5 of [IEEE 1588], it is "an estimate of the variations of the local clock from a linear timescale when it is not synchronized to another clock using the protocol" (quoted text is from [IEEE 1588]; the "protocol" refers to the PTP protocol). Since a clock is not synchronized to another clock via PTP when it is grandmaster, the offsetScaledLogVariance should represent the long-term noise that the clock generates, because it is this noise that is generated if the clock is grandmaster. Therefore, the observation interval should be the longest interval over which noise generation for the clock in question is specified.
+
+For a T-GM timed by a PRTC, i.e., a clock that meets the requirements of [ITU-T G.8272], the longest observation interval for which noise generation TDEV is specified is 10000 s (see Figure 2 of [ITU-T G.8272]). For this interval, TDEV is 30 ns. The specified noise type for intervals ranging from 1000 s to 10000 s is flicker phase modulation (FPM), with TDEV equal to 30 ns in this range. For a T-GM timed by an ePRTC, the longest observation interval for which noise generation TDEV is specified is $10^6$ s. For this interval, TDEV is 10 ns. The specified noise type for intervals ranging from $3 \times 10^5$ s to $10^6$ s is FPM, with TDEV equal to 10 ns in this range.
+
+The value of the observation interval is not used directly in the PTP protocol and is not carried in any PTP messages. It is used only in evaluating PTP variance.
+
+The above values of observation interval and corresponding noise generation TDEV, for the PRTC and ePRTC, are summarized in Table IX.1.
+
+**Table IX.1 – Observation intervals, and corresponding noise generation TDEV values and noise type, for T-GM timed by PRTC and T-GM timed by ePRTC**
+
+| Clock that T-GM is timed by | Observation interval ( $\tau$ ) for offsetScaledLogVariance (s) | $n = \tau / \tau_0$ (see clause IX.2 below) | Noise type | TDEV (ns) |
+|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|-----------|
+| PRTC | 1000 – 10000 | $1.6 \times 10^4$ to $1.6 \times 10^5$ | FPM | 30 |
+| ePRTC | 300 000 – 1 000 000 | $4.8 \times 10^6$ to $1.6 \times 10^7$ | FPM | 10 |
+
+### IX.2 Computation of PTP variance from TDEV
+
+The next step is to compute PTP variance from the TDEV values given in the previous clause. Since PTP variance is equal to $\tau^2/3$ multiplied by Allan variance, and time variance (TVAR) is equal to $\tau^2/3$ multiplied by modified Allan variance, the ratio of TVAR to PTP variance is equal to the ratio of modified Allan variance (MVAR) to Allan variance. This latter ratio is discussed and computed for various noise types in section A.6 of [b-Sullivan]. The results given there are based on [b-Walls] and
+
+[b-Lesage]. In addition, the relations between power spectral density (PSD) and Allan variance are given in Table 5.4 of [b-Bregni], and between PSD and modified Allan variance in Table 5.5 of [b-Bregni] (when using relations between PSD and various time-domain stability parameters, it is important to take note of whether the PSD is of time ( $S_x(f)$ ) or of frequency ( $S_y(f)$ )).
+
+Let $n$ be the ratio of observation interval $\tau$ to sampling interval $\tau_0$ , i.e., $\tau = n\tau_0$ . In general, the ratio of MVAR to AVAR, denoted $R(n)$ , depends on $n$ , though at least for the noise types white phase modulation (WPM), flicker FPM, white frequency modulation (WFM), flicker frequency modulation (FFM), and random-walk frequency modulation (RWFM), it approaches an asymptotic value for large $n$ . In addition, for the case of FPM $R(n)$ depends on the measurement system bandwidth (for WPM, both AVAR and MVAR individually depend on measurement system bandwidth, though their ratio does not). Since time synchronization information from whichever clock is selected as grandmaster is transported via Sync messages, the sampling interval $\tau_0$ can be taken equal to the Sync interval. The actual successive Sync intervals vary with time, as allowed by clause 7.7.2.1 of [IEEE 1588]; for simplicity, we may take $\tau_0$ equal to the mean Sync interval. This is 1/16 s in [ITU-T G.8275.1]. Then, using the observation interval values in Table IX.1 above, the corresponding values of $n$ range from $1.6 \times 10^4$ to $1.6 \times 10^5$ for a T-GM timed by a PRTC, and from $4.8 \times 10^5$ to $1.6 \times 10^5$ for a T-GM timed by an ePRTC. The values of $n$ are also summarized in Table IX.1 above.
+
+From Table IX.1, it is seen that the range of $n$ is different for the PRTC and ePRTC. This means that, even though the noise type in the ranges of interest for these clocks is the same, $R(n)$ will be different, and TVAR for each clock will be adjusted by a different factor to obtain PTPVAR. However, the PRTC and ePRTC stability (as well as the stability of other clocks used in telecommunications) are specified using TDEV (i.e., square root of TVAR), and not using PTPDEV or PTPVAR. It therefore would be desirable to adjust TVAR for the PRTC and ePRTC by the same factor. In previous work, in which TVAR for the PRTC was compared to TVAR for a T-BC timed by SyncE, $R(n)$ was equal to 0.787. This value is used here for convenience, for both the PRTC and ePRTC.
+
+With the above assumption, PTPVAR for the PRTC is given by:
+
+$$\text{PTPVAR (PRTC)} = \frac{\text{TVAR}}{R(n)} = \frac{(30 \times 10^{-9})^2 \text{ s}^2}{0.787} = 1.144 \times 10^{-15} \text{ s}^2 \quad (\text{IX.1})$$
+
+and PTPVAR for the ePRTC is given by:
+
+$$\text{PTPVAR (ePRTC)} = \frac{\text{TVAR}}{R(n)} = \frac{(10 \times 10^{-9})^2 \text{ s}^2}{0.787} = 1.271 \times 10^{-16} \text{ s}^2 \quad (\text{IX.2})$$
+
+### IX.3 Computation of offsetScaledLogVariance from PTP variance
+
+offsetScaledLogVariance is now computed from the PTPVAR results of the previous clause, using the procedure described in clause 7.6.3.3 of [IEEE 1588]. This procedure is:
+
+- a) The logarithm to base 2 of PTPVAR expressed in units of $\text{s}^2$ is computed;
+- b) The result of (a) is multiplied by $2^8$ to produce a scaled value;
+- c) The scaled value is modified per the hysteresis specification of clause 7.6.3.3 of [IEEE 1588]. (This step is not needed here, because offsetScaledLogVariance is being computed from a specification, rather than from real-time measurements.);
+- d) The result of (c) is represented as a 2s complement Integer16 (i.e., it is represented as a signed integer, where negative values are represented in 2s complement form (since PTPVAR is less than $1 \text{ s}^2$ in almost all cases of practical interest, and certainly in the cases described in the previous clause, the result of (c) will almost always be negative));
+- e) The value 0x8000 is added to the result of (d), and any overflow is ignored;
+
+- f) The result of (e) is cast as an Integer16. This result, which may also be expressed in writing in hexadecimal form, is offsetScaledLogVariance.
+
+#### IX.3.1 Computation of offsetScaledLogVariance for a T-GM timed by a PRTC
+
+From Eq. (IX.1), PTPVAR = $1.144 \times 10^{-15}$ s2 . Using steps (a) – (f) above, we obtain
+
+$$\begin{aligned} \log_2(\text{PTPVAR}) &= \frac{\ln(1.144 \times 10^{-15})}{\ln 2} = -49.6348 \\ 2^8 \log_2(\text{PTPVAR}) &= \frac{(256) \ln(1.144 \times 10^{-15})}{\ln 2} = -12706.5176 @ 12707 \end{aligned} \quad (\text{IX.3})$$
+
+Representing the above as a signed integer in 2s complement form produces
+
+$$12707 = 31A3_{16} \mapsto CE5C_{16} \text{ (1s complement form)} \mapsto CE5D_{16} \text{ (2s complement form)} \quad (\text{IX.4})$$
+
+Adding $8000_{16}$ to the above and ignoring any overflow produces
+
+$$CE5D_{16} + 8000_{16} = 14E5D_{16} \mapsto 4E5D_{16} \quad (\text{IX.5})$$
+
+The resulting offsetScaledLogVariance is $4E5D_{16}$ .
+
+#### IX.3.2 Computation of offsetScaledLogVariance for a T-GM timed by an ePRTC
+
+The logarithm to base 2 of PTPVAR expressed in units of s2 is computed and the result is multiplied by $2^8$ to produce a scaled value.
+
+$$\begin{aligned} \log_2(\text{PTPVAR}) &= \frac{\ln(1.271 \times 10^{-16})}{\ln 2} = -52.8049 \\ 2^8 \log_2(\text{PTPVAR}) &= \frac{(256) \ln(1.271 \times 10^{-16})}{\ln 2} = -13518.0507 \cong -13518 \end{aligned} \quad (\text{IX.6})$$
+
+Representing the above as a signed integer in 2s complement form produces
+
+$$13518 = 34CE_{16} \Rightarrow CB31_{16} \text{ (1s complement form)} \Rightarrow CB32_{16} \text{ (2s complement form)} \quad (\text{IX.7})$$
+
+Adding $8000_{16}$ to the above and ignoring any overflow produces
+
+$$CB32_{16} + 8000_{16} = 14B32_{16} \Rightarrow 4B32_{16} \quad (\text{IX.8})$$
+
+The resulting offsetScaledLogVariance is $4B32_{16}$ .
+
+## Appendix X
+
+## Description of a T-BC extended clockClass application
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+Table 3 of [ITU-T G.8275.1] defines a T-BC extended clockClass application. This appendix describes the purpose of this extended application, and its corresponding value amendments, including defaultDS data set member specifications of Annex A of [ITU-T G.8275.1] (corresponding to Table A.1) and T-BC Announce message contents of Appendix V of [ITU-T G.8275.1] (corresponding to Table V.3).
+
+### X.1 Purpose of T-BC extended clockClass application
+
+PTP is the only synchronization source in an [IEEE 1588] network, therefore the clockClass values have been only applied to the PTP clock for indicating its inherent characteristics. The clockClass in Table 5 of the [IEEE 1588-2008] and Table 4 of [IEEE 1588-2019], such as 6,7,52,187, only represents the T-GM. The clockClass may not reflect the change of synchronization states in the T-BCs deployed in the network.
+
+Since it is possible that there are two separate synchronization sources (GNSS time and physical frequency) in a telecom network, an extension mechanism of the clockClass range to cover the case of both T-GM and T-BC changes is provided. The definition of the clockClass values is extended into two parts:
+
+- 1) for a T-GM, the range of clockClass includes 6, 7, 140, 150 and 160. The clockClass values of 140/150/160 represent the time output of T-GM when it is in time holdover instead of tracking to GNSS. The time quality is consistent with the clock quality of the frequency category 1, 2, and 3 respectively;
+- 2) for a T-BC, the clockClass includes 135 and 165. The value of 135 means that when a T-BC is in time holdover, the output time signal is within specification, clockClass 165 means that the output time signal is out of time holdover specification.
+
+The case of two separated sources has been considered in [ITU-T G.8271.1] HRM-2 and HRM-3. In order to extend the advantages of two separated sources, it is better to treat a T-BC differently when it is traceable to frequency of a different quality. The clockClass of 165 could be assigned to a T-BC when the T-BC is traceable to a frequency in QL-SEC, and the T-BC could share the clockClass value of 140/150/160 with the T-GM when it is traceable to a different quality of frequency. In this way, the appropriate T-BC can be selected to be the GM of the network so that better time signals can be sent to the end-users.
+
+For a telecom network, it is crucial to make sure that the best clock selection principle is valid in any PTP network, especially in the case where there exists an isolated time region (which cannot receive any signals from the T-GM) in the network. In this region, if the T-BC has a preferred frequency quality, the T-BC can act as a T-GM and send out precise time/phase signals (where the signal quality is still close to UTC). In telecom networks, from the perspective of synchronization performance, any of the T-BCs could supersede the old T-GM to be the new PTP source of the network.
+
+### X.2 DefaultDS data set member specifications under this extended application
+
+In some cases, the values of clockClass/accuracy/variance will likely be the same as that delivered by the announce packets from the T-GM and T-BC per Table 3/Note 3. As such, the T-BC should synchronize the T-GM. It is suitable for priority 2 to achieve this goal, and the range of priority 2 should be divided into two parts, 0-127 for the T-GM, 128-255 for the T-BC.
+
+In this PTP profile, the clock attribute priority2 is configurable.
+
+If this feature is used, then the *priority2* for the T-GM should be set to a lower value compared to T-BCs, in particular the range for *priority2* could be allocated as follows:
+
+- for T-GM, the range {0-127};
+- for T-BC, the range {128-255}.
+
+As an example of a default value for *priority2*, it is suggested to set the T-GM to 100 and the T-BC to 128.
+
+## Appendix XI
+
+### Considerations on native access equipment
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+In some deployments, native access equipment such as xDSL, xPON, and microwave equipment may have implemented T-BC functionality. This appendix provides information on how such equipment may be modeled as a pair of T-BCs defined in this Recommendation. The following Figure XI.1 shows an example of equipment that is transferring the PTP timing between native PTP and native access media. Examples of such equipment may be an xPON OLT & ONU, an xDSL DSLAM & RT-DSLAM, or microwave equipment. Only one PTP port and one Special port are shown in the diagram, although the equipment may contain multiple ports. Within this simplified diagram there are two PTP ports on the T-BC; one is a normal PTP port and one is a Special PTP port. On both the PTP port and the Special PTP port, the Announce information and Signalling messages are handled according to normal T-BC operation. The difference is that on the PTP port, the timing messages (Sync, Delay\_Req, Delay\_Resp) are handled normally, while on the Special PTP port they are not present as they are replaced by native timing messages. If the timing flow hierarchy is known in advance (such as that of a PON OLT, which will only transfer timing downstream on its Special PTP ports) then the PTP ports, Special PTP ports, or the PTP clock may be configured with masterOnly or slaveOnly parameters (such as a PON OLT configured with Special PTP ports as masterOnly TRUE, or a PON ONU configured with slaveOnly TRUE).
+
+
+
+Diagram illustrating the timing flow between native PTP and native access media. The diagram shows a central box representing the equipment, divided into two main sections: 'Native-access clock' and 'PTP clock', separated by a 'Native-access to PTP IWF' (Interworking Function). The 'Native-access clock' section contains a 'Special port (state: timing slave)'. The 'PTP clock' section contains a 'PTP port (state: timing master)'. Arrows indicate the flow of messages: 'Native timing transfer' (blue) between the top external port and the Special port; 'Announce info' (purple) and 'Signalling' (purple) between the top external port and the PTP port; 'Sync', 'Delay Req', and 'Delay Resp' (blue) between the bottom external port and the PTP port; and 'Announce' (purple) and 'Signalling' (purple) between the bottom external port and the PTP port. Dashed lines indicate that the top and bottom external ports 'May be one physical port'.
+
+G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(16)-Amd.1(17)\_FXI.1
+
+**Figure XI.1 – Timing flow between native PTP and native access media**
+
+This appendix shows one possible way to model native access media (as a pair of T-BCs). Other ways to model native access media may exist.
+
+## **Appendix XII**
+
+### **Monitoring alternate master time information provided by a peer PTP port**
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+The contents of this appendix have been moved into Annex G.
+
+## **Appendix XIII**
+
+### **Considerations on the use of [IEEE 1588-2019]**
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+Considerations on the use of [IEEE 1588-2019] are discussed in Appendix IX of [ITU-T G.8275].
+
+## Appendix XIV
+
+### Considerations in an environment of more than two PTP ports on a single PTP communication path when using transparent clocks and multicast addressing
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+There are some aspects of PTP topology that are unique to a multicast environment that uses transparent clocks. When the network is restricted to ordinary and boundary clocks, each transport layer connection has only two PTP ports. On an ordinary clock or boundary clock each local PTP port will only ever communicate with one external PTP port. When transparent clocks are introduced, this situation changes and one local PTP port may communicate with more than one external PTP port.
+
+In Figure XIV.1, PTP clocks A, B, and C are connected using a transparent clock. This makes the three PTP ports A.1, B.1, and C.1 endpoints of a single PTP communication path. Each of these ports shall have a portDS dataset within their respective clocks.
+
+In this example, it is assumed that PTP ports A.1 and B.1 either have masterOnly set to TRUE or, due to some transport layer distribution of Announce messages (not shown in Figure XIV.1) and/or the rules of the alternate BCMA of [ITU-T G.8275.1], both ports are in MASTER state. Both ports will transmit Announce messages advertising the quality of the grandmaster clocks they are using. Port C.1 will receive the Announce messages from ports A.1 and B.1 due to the transparent clock connection.
+
+According to [IEEE 1588], port C.1 may use a foreign master table and compute an Erbbest based on the data of these two flows of Announce messages. In this example, the grandmaster information from port A.1 is better than the grandmaster information from port B.1. The BMCA in clock C shall cause clock A to be the parent PTP instance, shall set parentDS.parentPortIdentity to be port A.1 and shall place port C.1 into SLAVE state.
+
+If there is a problem in the PTP communication between PTP port A.1 and PTP port C.1 then one of the events specified in clause 6.3.9 may be raised by clock C. These PTSF conditions may only apply to that PTP communication; there may be no such condition in the PTP communication between ports B.1 and C.1. Clock C should switch from using port A.1 to port B.1 as its source of timing.
+
+If the PTP communication between Port A.1 and Port C.1 has a PTSF event, the Port C.1 should select the data set associated with the Port B.1 as its Erbbest data set instead of setting portDS.SF to TRUE. However, if both PTP communications with the Port A.1 and Port B.1 have a PTSF event, the Port C.1 should set portDS.SF to TRUE.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a network topology for Precision Time Protocol (PTP) using multicast addressing. At the top, two boxes represent Clock A and Clock B. Clock A contains 'Port A.1 (M)' and Clock B contains 'Port B.1 (M)'. Below them is a central box labeled 'T-TC' (Transparent Clock). At the bottom is another box containing 'Port C.1' and 'Clock C'. Blue arrows indicate the flow of PTP messages: from Port A.1 to the T-TC, from Port B.1 to the T-TC, and from the T-TC to Port C.1. A dashed blue line connects the T-TC to Port C.1. Below the Port C.1 box is the text 'G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(20)-Amd.2(21)\_FXIV.1'.
+
+Diagram showing three PTP ports (Port A.1 (M), Port B.1 (M), Port C.1) interconnected via a central T-TC (Transparent Clock) using multicast addressing. Clock A, Clock B, and Clock C are associated with the ports. The diagram includes a small text label: G.8275.1-Y.1369.1(20)-Amd.2(21)\_FXIV.1.
+
+**Figure XIV.1 – Three PTP ports interconnected using a transparent clock with multicast addressing**
+
+## Appendix XV
+
+### Considerations of deploying ePRTC and PRTC in the network
+
+(This appendix does not form an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+In some deployment scenarios, both ePRTC and PRTC may be deployed in a same PTP network, e.g., an ePRTC in a central location in the network, and a PRTC closer to the end application. In this scenario, there could be several T-BCs between the ePRTC and the end application, and there will be PTP noise accumulation through the chain of T-BCs. Therefore, for the end application closer to a PRTC, it may be better to select the PRTC instead of an ePRTC due to the noise accumulation through the chain of T-BCs.
+
+To allow the current Alternate BMCA of this recommendation to choose a T-GM connected to a PRTC instead of an ePRTC in such deployment scenario as described above, operators may choose to use clock accuracy of 0x21 for the ePRTC instead of 0x20, and to use offsetScaledLogVariance of 0x4E5D for the ePRTC instead of 0x4B32.
+
+NOTE – There may be other solutions to address this case (e.g., an Alternate BMCA using an enhanced synchronization accuracy metrics TLV); they are for further study.
+
+# Bibliography
+
+- [b-IEEE 802.1AX] IEEE 802.1AX (2020), *IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks – Link Aggregation*.
+- [b-Bregni] Stefano Bregni, (2002), *Synchronization of Digital Telecommunications Networks*, Wiley.
+- [b-Lesage] Paul Lesage and Theophane Ayi (1984), *Characterization of Frequency Stability: Analysis of the Modified Allan Variance and Properties of Its Estimate*, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. IM-33, No. 4 (included in [b-Sullivan] as paper D.6).
+- [b-Sullivan] D.B. Sullivan, D.W. Allan, D.A. Howe, and F.L. Walls (1990), *Characterization of Clocks and Oscillators*, NIST Technical Note 1337.
+- [b-Walls] F.L. Walls, John Gary, Abbie O'Gallagher, Roland Sweet, and Linda Sweet (1991), *Time Domain Frequency Stability Calculated from the Frequency Domain Description: Use of the SIGINT Software Package to Calculate Time Domain Frequency Stability from the Frequency Domain*, NIST Report NISTR 89-3916 Revised (revision of 1989 version of this report).
+
+# ITU-T Y-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+## **GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS, NEXT-GENERATION NETWORKS, INTERNET OF THINGS AND SMART CITIES**
+
+### **GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE**
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| General | Y.100–Y.199 |
+| Services, applications and middleware | Y.200–Y.299 |
+| Network aspects | Y.300–Y.399 |
+| Interfaces and protocols | Y.400–Y.499 |
+| Numbering, addressing and naming | Y.500–Y.599 |
+| Operation, administration and maintenance | Y.600–Y.699 |
+| Security | Y.700–Y.799 |
+| Performances | Y.800–Y.899 |
+
+### **INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS**
+
+| | |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
+| General | Y.1000–Y.1099 |
+| Services and applications | Y.1100–Y.1199 |
+| Architecture, access, network capabilities and resource management | Y.1200–Y.1299 |
+| Transport | Y.1300–Y.1399 |
+| Interworking | Y.1400–Y.1499 |
+| Quality of service and network performance | Y.1500–Y.1599 |
+| Signalling | Y.1600–Y.1699 |
+| Operation, administration and maintenance | Y.1700–Y.1799 |
+| Charging | Y.1800–Y.1899 |
+| IPTV over NGN | Y.1900–Y.1999 |
+
+### **NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS**
+
+| | |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
+| Frameworks and functional architecture models | Y.2000–Y.2099 |
+| Quality of Service and performance | Y.2100–Y.2199 |
+| Service aspects: Service capabilities and service architecture | Y.2200–Y.2249 |
+| Service aspects: Interoperability of services and networks in NGN | Y.2250–Y.2299 |
+| Enhancements to NGN | Y.2300–Y.2399 |
+| Network management | Y.2400–Y.2499 |
+| Computing power networks | Y.2500–Y.2599 |
+| Packet-based Networks | Y.2600–Y.2699 |
+| Security | Y.2700–Y.2799 |
+| Generalized mobility | Y.2800–Y.2899 |
+| Carrier grade open environment | Y.2900–Y.2999 |
+
+### **FUTURE NETWORKS**
+
+### **CLOUD COMPUTING**
+
+### **BIG DATA**
+
+### **QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS**
+
+### **INTERNET OF THINGS AND SMART CITIES AND COMMUNITIES**
+
+| | |
+|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
+| General | Y.4000–Y.4049 |
+| Definitions and terminologies | Y.4050–Y.4099 |
+| Requirements and use cases | Y.4100–Y.4249 |
+| Infrastructure, connectivity and networks | Y.4250–Y.4399 |
+| Frameworks, architectures and protocols | Y.4400–Y.4549 |
+| Services, applications, computation and data processing | Y.4550–Y.4699 |
+| Management, control and performance | Y.4700–Y.4799 |
+| Identification and security | Y.4800–Y.4899 |
+| Evaluation and assessment | Y.4900–Y.4999 |
+
+For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.
+
+## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/07b17a620c75522d53916a11e12d1bff_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/07b17a620c75522d53916a11e12d1bff_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07f5f6a579ae27bf2a0fed96408ac49b213bf8e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/07b17a620c75522d53916a11e12d1bff_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e39c1fedac0b227e11cfc0e62781f2af9d5e864fe259175656979308257f8da2
+size 16384
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab2cbdd4af6bc1ea9ffa8cca87f9d455eb147008
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:94ee226724314e8b36ac3c73e99f9ed2a4fbb4786e0c7f3f43c1debd5966aa00
+size 8239
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/3b621c21b0af3a504a28d2547e87138f_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/3b621c21b0af3a504a28d2547e87138f_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0b5f2bc892849812485873beed56e5f9418d015
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/3b621c21b0af3a504a28d2547e87138f_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b726c704f90d3490d5878798059cf8188a797332978de620b748ca6ecd2719d7
+size 45382
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/812e188283162af0b54fb3e30ffee51b_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/812e188283162af0b54fb3e30ffee51b_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b2372fe16f7b0a1f3f87bcce70b1a25efc355c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/812e188283162af0b54fb3e30ffee51b_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:887a2b9445eb64f8b037558e44355384136ae1fcebc2f2f4857ffc1fe3993549
+size 77567
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/844077b3034f0030b404207db0ad76b4_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/844077b3034f0030b404207db0ad76b4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..864c0cb2154d9de5cda8723763661a8f9cd20172
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/844077b3034f0030b404207db0ad76b4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b579aa67850ec0a9e74e82e93fc6abd92d23bba5bab93d3ab2e2dfcbfc7c2753
+size 62972
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/865a630eb1b708bd28250dfeb33dd8f1_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/865a630eb1b708bd28250dfeb33dd8f1_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ea5ebba87b7d7ab97831a6ab65c9d9bc2e79120
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/865a630eb1b708bd28250dfeb33dd8f1_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d30aabd71f8eefa0b0988e168275c16be1f76356956e4cf1fe086cc6895077ed
+size 19871
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/a26e142d3df5bef41a84a9dd099d7825_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/a26e142d3df5bef41a84a9dd099d7825_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a6a8e6c30df10171cf9e031b5ce77a50fd563aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/a26e142d3df5bef41a84a9dd099d7825_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:036e8e58b1238ad4415bd8a9ef4935cdc9635c8eeac5f8f14779ca46b8c87f1f
+size 47653
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86ad10a638c9b3ca59f003525f29810567d75c8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/e69b9188aa2c14ec6b21c83f711fef65_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:01c61cca630295c69153c034197d027f06d32b1eb61cf7eb778f3cfeccaba7cb
+size 76862
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/fc857414626a8d94d132e12d9afe52a4_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/fc857414626a8d94d132e12d9afe52a4_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44986720a86500b63c4f3ebc084e5368f24e7017
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/fc857414626a8d94d132e12d9afe52a4_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a792cdaacbaa45a842c32842c38c6d43eac797ad31f46262efa3951151c3661d
+size 48867
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5bbd1b834573d104f24fec8bc9ceff0ef018553f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.828-200003-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,746 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with a lightning bolt and the letters ITU.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**G.828**
+
+(03/2000)
+
+SERIES G: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA,
+DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS
+
+Digital transmission systems – Digital networks – Quality
+and availability targets
+
+---
+
+**Error performance parameters and objectives
+for international, constant bit rate synchronous
+digital paths**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation G.828
+
+(Formerly CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T G-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE CONNECTIONS AND CIRCUITS | G.100–G.199 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS COMMON TO ALL ANALOGUE CARRIER-TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS | G.200–G.299 |
+| INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON METALLIC LINES | G.300–G.399 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON RADIO-RELAY OR SATELLITE LINKS AND INTERCONNECTION WITH METALLIC LINES | G.400–G.449 |
+| COORDINATION OF RADIOTELEPHONY AND LINE TELEPHONY | G.450–G.499 |
+| TERMINAL EQUIPMENTS | G.700–G.799 |
+| DIGITAL NETWORKS | G.800–G.899 |
+| General aspects | G.800–G.809 |
+| Design objectives for digital networks | G.810–G.819 |
+| Quality and availability targets | G.820–G.829 |
+| Network capabilities and functions | G.830–G.839 |
+| SDH network characteristics | G.840–G.849 |
+| Management of transport network | G.850–G.859 |
+| SDH radio and satellite systems integration | G.860–G.869 |
+| Optical transport networks | G.870–G.879 |
+| DIGITAL SECTIONS AND DIGITAL LINE SYSTEM | G.900–G.999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.*
+
+# **Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate synchronous digital paths**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+This Recommendation defines error performance parameters and objectives for international synchronous digital paths. While this Recommendation specifically addresses objectives for international digital paths, the allocation principles can be applied to the design of error performance for national or private synchronous digital paths. The objectives given are independent of the physical network supporting the path. This Recommendation is based upon a block-based measurement concept using error detection codes inherent to the path under test; the block repetition rate being in accordance with SDH technology. This simplifies in-service measurements. The events, parameters and objectives are defined accordingly. In addition to path performance assessment, tandem connection monitoring is covered.
+
+It is not required to apply this Recommendation to SDH paths using equipment designed prior to the date of adoption of this version of ITU-T Recommendation G.828 (March 2000).
+
+## **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation G.828 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 13 (1997-2000) and approved under the WTSC Resolution 1 procedure on 10 March 2000.
+
+## **Keywords**
+
+Background Block Error (BBE), block-based concept, Error Detection Codes (EDC), error performance objectives, error performance parameters, Errored Second (ES), In-Service Measurements (ISM), Severely Errored Period (SEP), Severely Errored Second (SES), synchronous digital path, Tandem Connection Monitoring (TCM).
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 2001
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+| | Page |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| 1 Scope..... | 1 |
+| 1.1 Application of this Recommendation ..... | 1 |
+| 1.2 Transport network layers ..... | 2 |
+| 1.2.1 SDH transport networks ..... | 2 |
+| 1.2.2 ATM connections ..... | 2 |
+| 1.3 Allocation of end-to-end performance..... | 3 |
+| 2 References..... | 3 |
+| 3 Definitions and abbreviations ..... | 3 |
+| 3.1 Abbreviations..... | 3 |
+| 3.2 Terms and Definitions ..... | 5 |
+| 3.2.4 Error performance events ..... | 5 |
+| 3.2.5 Error performance parameters ..... | 5 |
+| 3.2.6 Additional error performance event / performance parameter ..... | 6 |
+| 4 Measurement of the block..... | 6 |
+| 4.1 In-service monitoring..... | 6 |
+| 4.2 Out-of-service measurements ..... | 6 |
+| 5 Performance monitoring at the near end and far end of a path ..... | 6 |
+| 6 Error performance objectives..... | 7 |
+| 6.1 End-to-end objectives ..... | 7 |
+| 6.2 Apportionment of end-to-end objectives ..... | 8 |
+| 6.2.1 Allocation to the national portion of the end-to-end path..... | 9 |
+| 6.2.2 Allocation to the international portion of the end-to-end path ..... | 9 |
+| Annex A – Criteria for entry to and exit from the unavailable state..... | 10 |
+| A.1 Criteria for a single direction ..... | 10 |
+| A.2 Criterion for a bidirectional path..... | 10 |
+| A.3 Criterion for a unidirectional path..... | 11 |
+| A.4 Consequences on error performance measurements ..... | 11 |
+| Annex B – Relationship between path performance monitoring and the block-based parameters ..... | 11 |
+| B.1 General..... | 11 |
+| B.1.1 Converting BIP measurements into errored blocks ..... | 11 |
+| B.1.2 Block size for monitoring SDH paths..... | 11 |
+| B.1.3 Anomalies..... | 12 |
+
+| | Page |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
+| B.1.4 Defects ..... | 12 |
+| B.2 Estimation of the performance parameters ..... | 13 |
+| B.3 Estimation of performance events at the far end of a path..... | 14 |
+| Appendix I – Flow chart illustrating the recognition of anomalies ..... | 14 |
+| Appendix II – Applicability of ITU-T Recommendation G.828 to non-public networks ..... | 17 |
+
+## **Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate synchronous digital paths**
+
+# **1 Scope**
+
+This Recommendation specifies error performance events, parameters and objectives for synchronous digital paths. Subclauses 1.1 to 1.3 give further details.
+
+## **1.1 Application of this Recommendation**
+
+This Recommendation is applicable to international, constant bit rate digital paths based on Synchronous Digital Hierarchies. While this Recommendation specifically addresses objectives for international digital paths, the allocation principles can be applied to the design of error performance for national or private synchronous digital paths. This Recommendation is generic in that it defines the parameters and objectives for paths independent of the physical transport network providing the paths.
+
+Compliance with the performance specification of this Recommendation will, in most cases, also ensure that subtending connections will meet the requirements laid out in ITU-T Recommendations G.821 ( $N \times 64$ kbit/s) [5] and G.826 [6]. Therefore, this Recommendation is the only Recommendation required for designing the error performance of synchronous digital paths (see Note). In accordance with the definition of a digital path, path end points may be located at user's premises.
+
+NOTE – It is not required to apply this Recommendation to SDH paths using equipment designed prior to the adoption of this Recommendation in March 2000. Performance events and objectives for paths using equipment designed prior to this date are given in ITU-T G.826.
+
+Paths are used to support services such as circuit switched, packet switched and leased circuit services. The quality of such services, as well as the performance of the network elements belonging to the service layer, is outside of the scope of this Recommendation. However, G.828-based paths can carry ATM traffic. Synchronous digital paths meeting the objectives of this Recommendation will enable the ATM traffic to meet I.356 [9].
+
+The error performance objectives are applicable to each direction of the path independently. The values apply end-to-end over a 27 500 km Hypothetical Reference Path (see Figure 3) which may include optical fibre, digital radio relay, metallic cable and satellite transmission systems. The performance of multiplex and cross-connect functions employing ATM techniques is not included in these values.
+
+The parameter definitions are block-based with the block repetition rate in accordance with SDH technology, making in-service measurement convenient. In addition to in-service measurements, compliance with this Recommendation can be assessed using out-of-service measurements or estimated by measures compatible with this Recommendation as those specified in Annex B.
+
+The objectives given in this Recommendation are long-term objectives to be met over an evaluation period of typically 30 consecutive days (one month). Shorter measurement periods required for maintenance and bringing-into-service are covered in ITU-T Recommendation M.2101 [10].
+
+## 1.2 Transport network layers
+
+This Recommendation specifies the error performance of synchronous digital paths in a given transport network layer. Two cases are considered:
+
+- 1) End-to-end Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) transport.
+- 2) SDH paths forming the physical layer portions of ATM connections.
+
+See 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 for details.
+
+NOTE – For the purpose of this Recommendation, SDH transport includes other SDH type systems such as the Synchronous Optical Network (SONET).
+
+### 1.2.1 SDH transport networks
+
+In the context of this Recommendation, an SDH digital path is a trail carrying an SDH payload and associated overhead through the layered transport network between the path terminating equipment (see Figure 1). ITU-T Recommendation M.2101 [10] provides Bringing into-Service (BIS) and maintenance requirements which ensure that G.828 objectives are met.
+
+
+
+The diagram shows a central oval labeled "SDH Path Layer Network" connected to two rectangular boxes labeled "A" and "B". Above the network, a double-headed arrow spans from A to B, labeled "Application of ITU-T Recommendation G.828". Below box B, the text "T1316620-94" is present.
+
+Diagram of an SDH Path Layer Network between points A and B.
+
+NOTE – A and B are path end points located at the terminations as defined in ITU-T Recommendation G.783 [2].
+
+**Figure 1/G.828 – Application of ITU-T Recommendation G.828 for an end-to-end SDH path**
+
+### 1.2.2 ATM connections
+
+Where the path forms the physical part of an ATM connection (see Figure 2), the overall end-to-end performance of the ATM connection is defined by ITU-T Recommendation I.356 [9]. In this case, this Recommendation can be applied with an appropriate allocation to the performance between the path end points terminated by the physical layer of ATM cross-connects or switches (see Recommendation I.321 [8]). ATM transmission paths in the physical layer correspond to a stream of cells mapped into SDH frame structures.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates three stacked protocol layers: AAL (ATM Adaptation Layer), ATM, and SDH. On the left, a stack of these three layers is shown. A line labeled "ITU-T Recommendation I.356" points from the AAL layer to a similar stack on the right. Between the left and right stacks, there is a section labeled "ITU-T Recommendation G.828" which contains two "SDH" boxes. The right stack also consists of AAL, ATM, and SDH layers. Below the diagram, a legend defines the layers: AAL (ATM Adaptation Layer), ATM (ATM Layer), and SDH (SDH Layer). The text "T1316630-95" is located at the bottom right of the diagram.
+
+Diagram showing the architectural relationship between ITU-T Recommendations G.828 and I.356 for ATM connections.
+
+**Figure 2/G.828 – Architectural relationship between ITU-T Recommendations G.828 and I.356 [9]**
+
+## 1.3 Allocation of end-to-end performance
+
+Allocations of end-to-end performance of synchronous digital paths are derived using the rules laid out in 6.2, which are length and complexity based. Detailed allocations of G.828 performance to the individual components (lines, sections, multiplexers and cross-connects, etc.) are outside the scope of this Recommendation, but when such allocations are performed, the requirements of 6.2 with regard to national and international allocations should be met.
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] ITU-T Recommendation G.707 (1996), *Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)*.
+- [2] ITU-T Recommendation G.783 (1997), *Characteristics of synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) equipment functional blocks*.
+- [3] ITU-T Recommendation G.784 (1999), *Synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) management*.
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation G.803 (2000), *Architecture of transport networks based on the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)*.
+- [5] ITU-T Recommendation G.821 (1996), *Error performance of an international digital connection operating at a bit rate below the primary rate and forming part of an integrated services digital network*.
+- [6] ITU-T Recommendation G.826 (1999), *Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate digital paths at or above the primary rate*.
+- [7] ITU-T Recommendation G.827 (2000), *Availability parameters and objectives for path elements of international constant bit rate digital paths at or above the primary rate*.
+- [8] CCITT Recommendation I.321 (1991), *B-ISDN Protocol reference model and its application*.
+- [9] ITU-T Recommendation I.356 (2000), *B-ISDN ATM layer cell transfer performance*.
+- [10] ITU-T Recommendation M.2101 (2000), *Performance limits for bringing-into-service and maintenance of international SDH paths and multiplex sections*.
+
+# 3 Definitions and abbreviations
+
+## 3.1 Abbreviations
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations:
+
+| | |
+|-----|----------------------------|
+| AAL | ATM Adaptation Layer |
+| AIS | Alarm Indication Signal |
+| ATM | Asynchronous Transfer Mode |
+| AU | Administrative Unit |
+| BBE | Background Block Error |
+
+| | |
+|--------|--------------------------------------|
+| BBER | Background Block Error Ratio |
+| BIP | Bit Interleaved Parity |
+| B-ISDN | Broadband ISDN |
+| CBR | Constant Bit Rate |
+| CSES | Consecutive Severely Errored Seconds |
+| EB | Errored Block |
+| EDC | Error Detection Code |
+| ES | Errored Second |
+| ESR | Errored Second Ratio |
+| HP | Higher order Path |
+| HPTC | Higher order Path Tandem Connection |
+| HRP | Hypothetical Reference Path |
+| IG | International Gateway |
+| ISDN | Integrated Services Digital Network |
+| ISM | In-Service Monitoring |
+| LOF | Loss of Frame Alignment |
+| LOM | Loss of Multiframe Alignment |
+| LOP | Loss of Pointer |
+| LOS | Loss of Signal |
+| LP | Lower order Path |
+| LPTC | Lower order Path Tandem Connection |
+| LTC | Loss of Tandem Connection Monitoring |
+| N-ISDN | Narrow-Band ISDN |
+| OOS | Out-Of-Service |
+| PEP | Path End Point |
+| PLM | Payload Label Mismatch |
+| RDI | Remote Defect Indication |
+| REI | Remote Error Indication |
+| RS | Regenerator Section |
+| SDH | Synchronous Digital Hierarchy |
+| SEP | Severely Errored Period |
+| SEPI | Severely Errored Period Intensity |
+| SES | Severely Errored Second |
+| SESR | Severely Errored Second Ratio |
+| SONET | Synchronous Optical Network |
+| STM | Synchronous Transport Module |
+| S UNEQ | Supervisory Unequipped |
+
+| | |
+|------|------------------------------|
+| TC | Tandem Connection |
+| TCM | Tandem Connection Monitoring |
+| TIM | Trace Identifier Mismatch |
+| TU | Tributary Unit |
+| UNEQ | Unequipped |
+| VC | Virtual Container |
+
+## 3.2 Terms and Definitions
+
+This Recommendation defines the following terms:
+
+**3.2.1 hypothetical reference path:** A Hypothetical Reference Path (HRP) is defined as the whole means of digital transmission of a digital signal of a specified rate, including the path overhead, between equipment at which the signal originates and terminates. An end-to-end Hypothetical Reference Path spans a distance of 27 500 km.
+
+**3.2.2 SDH digital path:** An SDH digital path is a trail carrying an SDH payload and associated overhead through the layered transport network between the path terminating equipment. A digital path may be bidirectional or unidirectional and may comprise both customer owned portions and network operator owned portions.
+
+**3.2.3 Generic definition of the block:** This ITU-T Recommendation is based upon the error performance measurement of blocks consistent with a synchronous digital hierarchy frame. This clause offers a generic definition of the term "block" as follows:
+
+A block is a set of consecutive bits associated with the path; each bit belongs to one and only one block. Consecutive bits may not be contiguous in time.
+
+### 3.2.4 Error performance events
+
+**3.2.4.1 errored block (EB):** A block in which one or more bits are in error.
+
+**3.2.4.2 errored second (ES):** A one second period with one or more errored blocks or at least one defect (see Note 1).
+
+**3.2.4.3 severely errored second (SES):** A one-second period which contains $\geq 30\%$ errored blocks or at least one defect. SES is a subset of ES. (See Notes 1 and 2.)
+
+NOTE 1 – The defects and related performance criteria are listed in Annex B.
+
+NOTE 2 – To simplify measurement processes, the defect is used in the definition of SES instead of defining SES directly in terms of severe errors affecting the path. While this approach simplifies the measurement of SES, it should be noted that there may exist error patterns of severe intensity that would not trigger a defect as defined in Annex B. Thus, these would not be considered as an SES under this definition. If in the future such severe user-affecting events were found, this definition will have to be studied again.
+
+**3.2.4.4 background block error (BBE):** An errored block not occurring as part of an SES.
+
+### 3.2.5 Error performance parameters
+
+Error performance should only be evaluated whilst the path is in the available state. For a definition of the entry/exit criteria for the unavailable state see ITU-T Recommendation G.827 [7] and Annex A.
+
+**3.2.5.1 errored second ratio (ESR):** The ratio of ES in available time to total seconds in available time during a fixed measurement interval.
+
+**3.2.5.2 severely errored second ratio (SESR):** The ratio of SES in available time to total seconds in available time during a fixed measurement interval.
+
+**3.2.5.3 background block error ratio (BBER):** The ratio of BBE in available time to total blocks in available time during a fixed measurement interval. The count of total blocks excludes all blocks during SESs.
+
+### **3.2.6 Additional error performance event / performance parameter**
+
+The support of this event/of this parameter and its related functionalities within one network operator's domain is a network operator option. If implemented, the following definitions apply:
+
+**3.2.6.1 severely errored period (SEP):** A sequence of between 3 to 9 consecutive SES. The sequence is terminated by a second which is not a SES. (See Note 1.)
+
+NOTE 1 – The Severely Errored Period (SEP) event is identical to the CSES event contained in ITU-T Recommendation G.784 [3] on condition that the lower threshold is fixed at three consecutive SESs.
+
+**3.2.6.2 Severely Errored Period Intensity (SEPI):** The number of SEP events in available time, divided by the total available time in seconds. (See Notes 2, 3 and 4.)
+
+NOTE 2 – The SEPI parameter has a unit of (1/s). This is to enable the SEPI objective to be easily translated to the equivalent number of SEP events over a specific measurement interval. It should be noted that the SEP event has no significance over a time interval of less than three seconds.
+
+NOTE 3 – Ongoing studies of the SEP event and the SEPI parameter shall prove their usefulness in complementing the SESR parameter. Any objectives for the SEPI parameter (presently under study) shall empirically demonstrate this value.
+
+NOTE 4 – The impact of SEP/SEPI on customer services has to be investigated.
+
+# **4 Measurement of the block**
+
+## **4.1 In-service monitoring**
+
+Each block is monitored by means of an inherent (Bit Interleaved Parity) Error Detection Code (EDC). The EDC bits are physically separated from the block to which they apply. It is not normally possible to determine whether a block or its controlling EDC bits are in error. If there is a discrepancy between the EDC and its controlled block, it is always assumed that the controlled block is in error.
+
+No specific EDC is given in this generic definition but it is recommended that for in-service monitoring purposes, future designs should be equipped with an EDC capability such that the probability to detect an error event is $\geq 90\%$ assuming Poisson error distribution.
+
+Estimation of errored blocks on an in-service basis is dependent upon the path configuration and the EDC choice. Annex B describes how in-service estimates of errored blocks can be obtained from the ISM facilities of the SDH network fabric.
+
+## **4.2 Out-of-service measurements**
+
+Out-of-service measurements shall also be block-based. It is expected that the out-of-service error detection capability will be superior to the in-service capability described in 4.1.
+
+# **5 Performance monitoring at the near end and far end of a path**
+
+By monitoring SES events for both directions at a single path end point, a network provider is able to determine the unavailable state of the path (see Annex A). In some cases, it is also possible to monitor the full set of error performance parameters in both directions from one end of the path. Specific in-service indicators for deriving far end performance of a path are listed in Annex B.
+
+# 6 Error performance objectives
+
+## 6.1 End-to-end objectives
+
+Table 1 specifies the end-to-end objectives for a 27 500 km HRP in terms of the parameters defined in 3.2.5. The actual objectives applicable to a real path are derived from Table 1 using the allocation principles detailed in 6.2. Each direction of the path shall independently satisfy the allocated objectives for all parameters. In other words, a path fails to satisfy this Recommendation if any parameter exceeds the allocated objective in either direction at the end of the given evaluation period. The objectives given in this ITU-T Recommendation are understood to be long-term objectives to be met over an evaluation period of typically 30 consecutive days (1 month)1 .
+
+**Table 1/G.828 – End-to-end error performance objectives for a 27 500 km international synchronous digital HRP**
+
+| Bit rate (kbit/s) | Path type | Blocks/s | ESR | SESR | BBER | SEPI |
+|-------------------|--------------------|----------|----------|-------|--------------------------------|----------|
+| 1 664 | VC-11, TC-11 | 2 000 | 0.01 | 0.002 | $5 \times 10^{-5}$ | (Note 3) |
+| 2 240 | VC-12, TC-12 | 2 000 | 0.01 | 0.002 | $5 \times 10^{-5}$ | (Note 3) |
+| 6 848 | VC-2, TC-2 | 2 000 | 0.01 | 0.002 | $5 \times 10^{-5}$ | (Note 3) |
+| 48 960 | VC-3, TC-3 | 8 000 | 0.02 | 0.002 | $5 \times 10^{-5}$ | (Note 3) |
+| 150 336 | VC-4, TC-4 | 8 000 | 0.04 | 0.002 | $1 \times 10^{-4}$ | (Note 3) |
+| 601 344 | VC-4-4c, TC-4-4c | 8 000 | (Note 1) | 0.002 | $1 \times 10^{-4}$ | (Note 3) |
+| 2 405 376 | VC-4-16c, TC-4-16c | 8 000 | (Note 1) | 0.002 | $1 \times 10^{-4}$ | (Note 3) |
+| 9 621 504 | VC-4-64c, TC-4-64c | 8 000 | (Note 1) | 0.002 | $1 \times 10^{-3}$ (Note 2) | (Note 3) |
+
+NOTE 1 – ESR objectives tend to lose significance for applications at high bit rates and are therefore not specified for paths operating at bit rates above 160 Mbit/s. Nevertheless, it is recognized that the observed performance of synchronous digital paths is error-free for long periods of time even at Gbit/s rates; and that significant ESR indicates a degraded transmission system. Therefore, for maintenance purposes ES monitoring should be implemented within any error performance measuring devices operating at these rates.
+
+NOTE 2 – This BBER objective corresponds to a equivalent bit error ratio of $8.3 \times 10^{-10}$ , an improvement over the bit error ratio of $5.3 \times 10^{-9}$ for the VC-4 rate. Equivalent Bit Error Ratio is valuable as a rate-independent indication of error performance, as BBER objectives cannot remain constant as block sizes increase.
+
+NOTE 3 – SEPI objectives require further study.
+
+Synchronous digital paths operating at bit rates covered by this Recommendation are carried by transmission systems (digital sections) operating at higher bit rates. Such systems must meet their allocations of the end-to-end objectives for the highest bit rate paths which are foreseen to be carried. Meeting the allocated objectives for this highest bit rate path should be sufficient to ensure that all paths through the system are achieving their objective. For example, in SDH, an STM-1 section may
+
+1 In cases (e.g. paths transported via radio-relay or satellite systems) where a one month evaluation period may not permit accurate statistical estimation, a longer evaluation period (up to one year) may be used for design purposes.
+
+carry a VC-4 path and therefore the STM-1 section should be designed such that it will ensure that the objectives as specified in this Recommendation for the bit rate corresponding to a VC-4 path are met.
+
+NOTE 1 – Digital sections are defined for higher bit rates. In addition to this subclause, guidance on evaluating the performance of digital sections can be found in a Recommendation dealing with section performance events.
+
+NOTE 2 – Objectives are allocated in this Recommendation to the national and international portions of a path. In the above example, if the STM-1 section does not form a complete national or international portion, the corresponding national/international allocation must be subdivided to determine the appropriate allocation for the digital section. This is outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+## 6.2 Apportionment of end-to-end objectives
+
+The apportionment methodology in this subclause specifies the levels of performance expected from the national and international portions of an HRP. Further subdivision of these objectives is beyond the scope of this Recommendation. (See Figure 3.)
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a Hypothetical Reference Path (HRP) between two 'Terminating country' endpoints. At each end, there is a 'PEP (Note 1)' represented by a solid black square. The path consists of several segments:
+
+
+- A 'National portion' at each end, starting from the PEP and ending at an 'IG' (International Gateway, represented by a solid black square).
+- An 'International portion' that spans between the first IG of the first terminating country and the last IG of the second terminating country.
+- Between the first and last IGs, there are four 'Intermediate countries (Note 3)'. Each intermediate country contains an 'IG'.
+- The segment between the second and third IGs (counting from left to right) is labeled 'Inter-country (e.g. Path carried over a submarine cable)'.
+- A dashed line separates the second and third IGs.
+- The total length of the path is labeled 'Hypothetical Reference Path 27 500 km'.
+- A reference code 'T1316640-99' is shown at the bottom right.
+
+Diagram of a Hypothetical Reference Path (HRP) showing national and international portions between two terminating countries, separated by four intermediate countries. The path includes PEPs at the ends and IGs at the boundaries and between intermediate countries. The total length is 27,500 km.
+
+NOTE 1 – If a path is considered to terminate at the IG, only the international portion allocation applies.
+
+NOTE 2 – One or two International Gateways (entry or exit) may be defined per intermediate country.
+
+NOTE 3 – Four intermediate countries are assumed.
+
+**Figure 3/G.828 – Hypothetical Reference Path**
+
+For the purposes of this Recommendation the boundary between the national and international portions is defined to be at an International Gateway which usually corresponds to a cross-connect, a higher-order multiplexer or a switch (N-ISDN or B-ISDN). IGs are always terrestrially based equipment physically resident in the terminating (or intermediate) country. Higher-order paths (relative to the HRP under consideration) may be used between IGs. Such paths receive only the allocation corresponding to the international portion between the IGs. In intermediate countries, the IGs are only located in order to calculate the overall length of the international portion of the path in order to deduce the overall allocation.
+
+The following allocation methodology applies to each parameter defined in 3.2.5 and takes into account both the length and complexity of the international path. All paths should be engineered to meet their allocated objectives as described in 6.2.1 and 6.2.2. If the overall allocation exceeds 100%, then the performance of the path may not fulfil the objectives of Table 1. Network Operators should note that if performance could be improved in practical implementations to be superior to allocated objectives, the occurrence of paths exceeding the objectives of Table 1 can be minimized.
+
+### 6.2.1 Allocation to the national portion of the end-to-end path
+
+Each national portion is allocated a fixed block allowance of 17.5% of the end-to-end objective. Furthermore, a distance based allocation is added to the block allowance. The actual route length between the PEP and IG should first be calculated if known. The air route distance between the PEP and IG should also be determined and multiplied by an appropriate routing factor. This routing factor is specified as follows:
+
+- If the air route distance is $< 1\ 000$ km, the routing factor is 1.5;
+- If the air route distance is $\geq 1\ 000$ km and $< 1\ 200$ km, the calculated route length is taken to be 1 500 km;
+- If the air route distance is $\geq 1\ 200$ km, the routing factor is 1.25.
+
+When both actual and calculated route lengths are known, the smaller value is retained. This distance should be rounded up to the nearest 100 km. An allocation of 0.2% per 100 km is then applied to the resulting distance. The two national portions are allocated a minimum of 500 km (i.e. 1%) each.
+
+NOTE – If a path comprises portions that are privately owned (private in this context means that the network portion is customer owned and not available to the public), end-to-end performance objectives apply to the portion situated between the two Network Terminating Equipment (NTE). Between the NTE and the Terminal Equipment (TE), no specific requirements are given. However, careful attention should be paid concerning this portion because overall performance depends on it. Appendix II contains details for the case of Leased Circuits.
+
+While the performance sub-allocation of the 17.5% national portion block allowance is beyond the scope of this Recommendation, it is the expectation that such a sub-allocation would be done by national standards bodies or regulators in an equitable manner. When making such sub-allocation, the national standards bodies or regulators are urged to take into consideration the empirical evidence that most of the error impairments can occur in that part of the path nearest to its end point.
+
+When a national portion includes a satellite hop, a total allowance of 42% of the end-to-end objectives in Table 1 is allocated to this national portion. The 42% allowance completely replaces both the distance-based allowance and the 17.5% block allowance otherwise given to national portions.
+
+### 6.2.2 Allocation to the international portion of the end-to-end path
+
+The international portion is allocated a block allowance of 2% per intermediate country plus 1% for each terminating country. Furthermore, a distance based allocation is added to the block allowance. As the international path may pass through intermediate countries, the actual route length between consecutive IGs (one or two for each intermediate country) should be added to calculate the overall length of the international portion. The air route distance between consecutive IGs should also be determined and multiplied by an appropriate routing factor. This routing factor is specified as follows for each element between IGs:
+
+- If the air route distance between two IGs is $< 1\ 000$ km, the routing factor is 1.5;
+- If the air route distance is $\geq 1\ 000$ km and $< 1\ 200$ km, the calculated route length is taken to be 1 500 km;
+- If the air route distance between two IGs is $\geq 1\ 200$ km, the routing factor is 1.25.
+
+When both actual and calculated route lengths are known, the smaller value is retained for each element between IGs for the calculation of the overall length of the international portion. This overall distance should be rounded up to the nearest 100 km but shall not exceed 26 500 km. An allocation of 0.2% per 100 km is then applied to the resulting distance.
+
+Independent of the distance spanned, any satellite hop in the international portion receives a 35% allocation of the objectives in Table 1. The 35% allowance completely replaces all distance-based and block allowances otherwise given to parts of the international portion spanned by the satellite hop.
+
+## ANNEX A
+
+## Criteria for entry to and exit from the unavailable state
+
+## A.1 Criteria for a single direction
+
+A period of unavailable time begins at the onset of ten consecutive SES events. These ten seconds are considered to be part of unavailable time. A new period of available time begins at the onset of 10 consecutive non-SES events. These ten seconds are considered to be part of available time. SEP indicates a severe condition, which does not result in unavailability. Figure A.1 illustrates the definition of criteria for transition to/from the unavailable state, including the relationship with SEP.
+
+
+
+Figure A.1/G.828 – Example of unavailability determination. This diagram shows a timeline of seconds categorized into four types: Severely Errored Second (SES) represented by a solid grey square, Severely Errored Period (SEP) represented by a square with an 'X', Errored Second (ES) represented by a square with a cross, and Error-free Second represented by a white square. The timeline shows a sequence of these squares. A 'Period of unavailable time' is marked with a double-headed arrow, starting at the onset of 10 consecutive SES events and ending at the onset of 10 consecutive non-SES events. The duration of this period is labeled '10 s'. A 'Period of available time' is marked with a double-headed arrow, starting at the onset of 10 consecutive non-SES events and continuing. The duration of this period is also labeled '10 s'. A 'Severely Errored Period (SEP)' is indicated by a square with an 'X' that spans less than 10 seconds, labeled '<10 s'. The text 'Unavailability detected' is placed below the start of the unavailable period, and 'Availability detected' is placed below the start of the available period. The diagram is labeled 'T1316650-99' at the bottom right.
+
+Figure A.1/G.828 – Example of unavailability determination
+
+### A.2 Criterion for a bidirectional path
+
+A bidirectional path is in the unavailable state if either one or both directions are in the unavailable state. This is shown in Figure A.2.
+
+
+
+Figure A.2/G.828 – Example of the unavailable state of a path. This diagram shows three horizontal lines representing 'Forward direction', 'Backward direction', and 'Path'. The 'Forward direction' line has two grey rectangular blocks representing the 'Unavailable state'. The 'Backward direction' line also has two grey rectangular blocks. The 'Path' line has two grey rectangular blocks. Vertical dashed lines connect the start and end of the unavailable state blocks across the three lines. The legend indicates that a grey rectangle represents the 'Unavailable state'. The diagram is labeled 'T1306440-95' at the bottom right.
+
+Figure A.2/G.828 – Example of the unavailable state of a path
+
+### **A.3 Criterion for a unidirectional path**
+
+The criterion for a unidirectional path is defined in A.1 above.
+
+## **A.4 Consequences on error performance measurements**
+
+When a bidirectional path is in the unavailable state, ES, SES and BBE counts may be collected in both directions and may be helpful in the analysis of the trouble. However, it is recommended that these ES, SES and BBE counts are not included in estimates of ESR, SESR and BBER performance (see 3.2.5).
+
+Some existing systems may not support the above requirement. For these systems, the performance of a bidirectional path can be approximated by evaluating the parameters in each direction, independently of the state of availability of the other direction. It should be noted that this approximation method may result in a worse estimate of performance in the event that only one direction of a bidirectional path becomes unavailable.
+
+NOTE – This is not an issue for unidirectional paths.
+
+## **ANNEX B**
+
+## **Relationship between path performance monitoring and the block-based parameters**
+
+### **B.1 General**
+
+In addition to path performance monitoring, this Annex covers Tandem Connection Monitoring (TCM) as shown in Tables B.1 to B.4. VC-n and TC-n trails are equivalent from a performance perspective. The established rules for VC-n apply also to TC-n. Further details are given in ITU-T Recommendations G.707 [1], G.783 [2] and G.803 [4].
+
+#### **B.1.1 Converting BIP measurements into errored blocks**
+
+Subclause 3.2.4 describes error performance events used in defining performance parameters. The method of converting BIP measurements into errored blocks is described below.
+
+Since this ITU-T Recommendation defines a block as consecutive bits associated with a path, each BIP-n (Bit Interleaved Parity, order "n") in the SDH path overhead pertains to a single defined block. For the purpose of this annex, a BIP-n corresponds to a G.828 block. The BIP-n is NOT interpreted as checking "n" separate interleaved parity check blocks. If any of the "n" separate parity checks fails, the block is assumed to be in error.
+
+NOTE – It shall be noted that BIP-2 does not satisfy the error detection probability of $\geq 90\%$ .
+
+#### **B.1.2 Block size for monitoring SDH paths**
+
+The number of bits per block for in-service performance monitoring of SDH Paths, as specified in ITU-T Recommendation G.707 [1], are given in Table B.1. Paths operating at VC-11, VC-12 or VC-2 rates use 500 $\mu$ sec measurement blocks, i.e. 2 000 blocks per second.
+
+**Table B.1/G.828 – Block sizes for synchronous digital path performance monitoring**
+
+| Bit rate (kbit/s) | Path type | SDH block size used in G.828 | EDC |
+|-------------------|--------------------|------------------------------|-------|
+| 1 664 | VC-11, TC-11 | 832 bits | BIP-2 |
+| 2 240 | VC-12, TC-12 | 1 120 bits | BIP-2 |
+| 6 848 | VC-2, TC-2 | 3 424 bits | BIP-2 |
+| 48 960 | VC-3, TC-3 | 6 120 bits | BIP-8 |
+| 150 336 | VC-4, TC-4 | 18 792 bits | BIP-8 |
+| 601 344 | VC-4-4c, TC-4-4c | 75 168 bits | BIP-8 |
+| 2 405 376 | VC-4-16c, TC-4-16c | 300 672 bits | BIP-8 |
+| 9 621 504 | VC-4-64c, TC-4-64c | 1 202 688 bits | BIP-8 |
+
+#### B.1.3 Anomalies
+
+In-service anomaly conditions are used to determine the error performance of an SDH path when the path is not in a defect state. The following anomaly is defined:
+
+a1 an EB as indicated by an EDC. (See B.1.1)
+
+#### B.1.4 Defects
+
+In-service defect conditions defined in ITU-T Recommendations G.707 [1] and G.783 [2] are used to determine the change of performance state which may occur on a path. Tables B.2 and B.3 show the defects used in this Recommendation.
+
+**Table B.2/G.828 – Defects resulting in a near-end Severely Errored Second**
+
+| Near end defects (Notes 5, 6 and 7) | | | Kind of path |
+|-------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Path termination | Non-Intrusive Monitor | Tandem Connection | |
+| LP UNEQ (Note 3) | LP UNEQ (Notes 3 and 4) | LPTC UNEQ (Note 3) | Applicable to lower order paths and lower order tandem connections |
+| LP TIM | LP TIM | LPTC TIM | |
+| – | – | LPTC LTC | |
+| – | LP VC AIS (Note 2) | – | |
+| TU LOP | TU LOP | TU LOP | |
+| TU AIS | TU AIS | TU AIS | |
+| HP LOM (Note 1) | HP LOM (Note 1) | HP LOM (Note 1) | |
+| HP PLM | HP PLM | HP PLM | |
+| HP UNEQ (Note 3) | HP UNEQ (Notes 3 and 4) | HPTC UNEQ (Note 3) | |
+| HP TIM | HP TIM | HPTC TIM | Applicable to higher order paths and higher order tandem connections |
+| – | – | HPTC LTC | |
+| – | HP VC AIS (Note 2) | – | |
+| AU LOP | AU LOP | AU LOP | |
+| AU AIS | AU AIS | AU AIS | |
+
+**Table B.2/G.828 – Defects resulting in a near-end Severely Errored Second (concluded)**
+
+| |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| NOTE 1 – This defect is not related to VC-3. |
+| NOTE 2 – VC AIS defect applies to monitoring a path at an intermediate point by means of non-intrusive monitoring. |
+| NOTE 3 – Paths not actually completed, e.g. during path set-up, will contain the unequipped VC-n signal. |
+| NOTE 4 – Two types of non-intrusive monitor functions are defined in ITU-T Recommendation G.783. The original (version 1) type detect the UNEQ defect when an unequipped or a supervisory-unequipped VC signal is received. The advanced (version 2) type detects the UNEQ condition as type 1 but validates this condition by means of checking the content of the trace identifier; the receipt of a supervisory-unequipped VC signal will not result in an UNEQ defect. Neither will the receipt of a supervisory-unequipped VC signal result in the contribution of UNEQ condition to performance monitoring; if the supervisory-unequipped VC signal was not the expected signal, TIM defect will contribute to performance monitoring instead. |
+| NOTE 5 – The above defects are path defects only. Section defects such as MS AIS, RS TIM, STM LOF and STM LOS give rise to an AIS defect in the path layers. |
+| NOTE 6 – When a near-end SES is caused by a near-end defect as defined above, the far-end performance event counters are not incremented, i.e. an error-free period is assumed. When a near-end SES results from $\geq 30\%$ errored blocks, the far-end performance evaluation continues during the near-end SES. This approach does not allow reliable evaluation of Far-End data if the Near-End SES is caused by a defect. It should be noted in particular, that the evaluation of Far-End events (such as SES or Unavailability) can be inaccurate in the case where Far-End SESs occur in coincidence with Near-End SESs caused by a defect. Such inaccuracies cannot be avoided, but are negligible in practice because of the low probability of the occurrence of such phenomena. |
+| NOTE 7 – Refer to ITU-T Recommendation G.783 for defects contributing to performance monitoring in each trail termination sink function. |
+
+**Table B.3/G.828 – Defects resulting in a far-end Severely Errored Second**
+
+| Far end defects | | | Kind of path |
+|------------------|-----------------------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Path termination | Non-Intrusive Monitor | Tandem Connection | |
+| LP RDI | LP RDI | LPTC TC RDI | Applicable to lower order paths and lower order tandem connections |
+| HP RDI | HP RDI | HPTC TC RDI | Applicable to higher order paths and higher order tandem connections |
+
+### B.2 Estimation of the performance parameters
+
+For SDH transmission paths, the full set of performance parameters shall be estimated using the following events:
+
+ES: An ES is observed when, during one second, at least one anomaly $a_1$ , or one defect according to Tables B.2 and B.3 occurs. For the ES event, the actual count of EBs is irrelevant, it is only the fact that an EB has occurred in a second which is significant.
+
+SES: An SES is observed when, during one second, at least 30% EBs – derived from anomaly $a_1$ or one defect according to Tables B.2 and B.3 occur (see Table B.4).
+
+BBE: A BBE is observed when an anomaly $a_1$ occurs in a block not being part of an SES.
+
+NOTE – The errored block threshold resulting in an SES is shown in Table B.4 for each SDH path type.
+
+**Table B.4/G.828 – Threshold for the declaration of a severely errored second**
+
+| Bit rate (kbit/s) | Path type | Threshold for SES (Number of Errored Blocks/s) |
+|-------------------|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|
+| 1 664 | VC-11, TC-11 | 600 |
+| 2 240 | VC-12, TC-12 | 600 |
+| 6 848 | VC-2, TC-2 | 600 |
+| 48 960 | VC-3, TC-3 | 2 400 |
+| 150 336 | VC-4, TC-4 | 2 400 |
+| 601 344 | VC-4-4c, TC-4-4c | 2 400 |
+| 2 405 376 | VC-4-16c, TC-4-16c | 2 400 |
+| 9 621 504 | VC-4-64c, TC-4-64c | 2 400 |
+
+### **B.3 Estimation of performance events at the far end of a path**
+
+The following indications available at the near end or at an intermediate point along the path/tandem connection are used to estimate the performance events (occurring at the far end) for the reverse direction:
+
+- Higher and lower order path/tandem connection RDI and REI (ITU-T Recommendation G.707 [1]).
+- Higher or lower order path/tandem connection REIs are anomalies which are used to determine the occurrence of ES, BBE and SES at the far end.
+- Higher or lower order path/tandem connection RDIs are defects which estimate the occurrence of SES at the far end.
+
+## **APPENDIX I**
+
+## **Flow chart illustrating the recognition of anomalies**
+
+Notes to Figures I.1 and I.2:
+
+NOTE 1 – The determination of unavailability time introduces a delay of 10 seconds. This delay should be considered when counting BBE, ES and SES.
+
+NOTE 2 – cES, cSES, cSEP and cBBE represent counts of ES, SES, SEP and BBE respectively. These counts are reset at the start of a measurement period.
+
+NOTE 3 – EB is the count of errored blocks within an ES whilst %EB represents the proportion of errored blocks within an ES compared to the number of blocks per second.
+
+NOTE 4 – G.828 parameters can be evaluated during, or at the end of, a measurement period P as follows, taking into account Unavailable Seconds (UAS):
+
+$$\text{BBER} = \text{cBBE} / [(P - \text{UAS}) \cdot \text{blocks/second}]$$
+
+$$\text{ESR} = \text{cES} / (P - \text{UAS})$$
+
+$$\text{SESR} = \text{cSES} / (P - \text{UAS})$$
+
+$$\text{SEPI} = \text{cSEP} / (P - \text{UAS})$$
+
+NOTE 5 – In the simplified diagrams, no action is taken if the path is in the unavailable state. This is because the diagram does not consider the transition between availability states when, in fact, event counters must be modified retrospectively. In practice, the status of a second (i.e. error-free, ES or SES) must always be determined before a test is made on the status of path availability. In other words, error events are always detected regardless of whether the path is available or not – only the *counting* of events is inhibited during unavailability periods for the purposes of long-term performance monitoring. This process is reflected in the flow chart although consequent actions on changes of availability state are not.
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Monitored Second]) --> Defects{Defects?}
+ Defects -- Y --> PathAvail1{Path in available State?}
+ Defects -- N --> Anomalies{Anomalies?}
+ Anomalies -- Y --> EB30{"%EB ≥ 30?"}
+ Anomalies -- N --> End
+ EB30 -- Y --> SES_note["SES
+(and therefore an ES)"]
+ EB30 -- N --> ES_note["ES
+(but not a SES)"]
+ SES_note --> PathAvail2{Path in available State?}
+ ES_note --> PathAvail1
+ PathAvail1 -- Y --> cES1["cES = cES + 1"]
+ PathAvail1 -- N --> End
+ cES1 --> cBBE["cBBE = cBBE + EB(s)"]
+ cBBE --> End
+ PathAvail2 -- Y --> cES2["cES = cES + 1"]
+ PathAvail2 -- N --> End
+ cES2 --> cSES["cSES = cSES + 1"]
+ cSES --> End
+ T1316660-99[T1316660-99]
+
+```
+
+Flowchart for recognition of anomalies, defects, errored blocks, ES, SES and BBE. It starts with 'Monitored Second' and proceeds through decision diamonds for 'Defects?', 'Anomalies?', and '%EB ≥ 30?'. It includes logic for counting errored seconds (cES), errored blocks (cBBE), and severely errored seconds (cSES) based on path availability and error thresholds. The flowchart ends at 'End'.
+
+**Figure I.1/G.828 – Recognition of anomalies, defects, errored blocks, ES, SES and BBE**
+
+
+
+```
+
+graph TD
+ Start([Starting condition:
+n consecutive SESs preceded
+and terminated by non-SES]) --> Path{Path in
+available state prior to
+n consecutive SESs?}
+ Path -- N --> End([End])
+ Path -- Y --> n3{n < 3?}
+ n3 -- Y --> cSES_n[cSES = cSES + n]
+ n3 -- N --> n9{n > 9?}
+ n9 -- Y --> Unavailable[Unavailable state]
+ n9 -- N --> SEP_event{SEP event of n seconds
+occurring in available time}
+ SEP_event -- Y --> cSEP_cSES[cSEP = cSEP + 1
+cSES = cSES + n]
+ SEP_event -- N --> End
+ cSES_n --> End
+ Unavailable --> End
+ cSEP_cSES --> End
+
+```
+
+*Do not count the occurrence
+of SEPs for the purposes of
+performance assessment*
+
+T1316670-99
+
+Flowchart for Recognition of SEP. It starts with a starting condition of n consecutive SESs preceded and terminated by non-SES. It then checks if the path is available. If not, it skips to the end. If available, it checks if n < 3. If yes, it increments cSES by n. If no, it checks if n > 9. If yes, it goes to an unavailable state. If no, it checks if a SEP event of n seconds occurs in available time. If yes, it increments cSEP by 1 and cSES by n. All paths lead to the end.
+
+**Figure I.2/G.828 – Recognition of SEP**
+
+## APPENDIX II
+
+### Applicability of ITU-T Recommendation G.828 to non-public networks
+
+Figure II.1 depicts a typical leased circuit situation where a path is composed of three independent networks: Two private networks at both path ends and a public network connecting them where the public network provides a leased circuit to connect the two private networks.
+
+However, the problem is not restricted to the case shown in the figure but is of more general nature. For instance, similar considerations are applicable in cases where the public network operator has no access to the path end point.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates a digital path across three countries: Terminating country 1, Intermediate countries, and Terminating country 2. The path consists of the following components from left to right: Terminal Equipment (TE), Network Terminating Equipment (NTE), International Gateway (IG), IG, IG, IG, NTE, and TE. The path is divided into segments: Private network (between TE and NTE), National portion (between NTE and IG), International portion (between the IG in Terminating country 1 and the IG in Terminating country 2), National portion (between IG and NTE), and Private network (between NTE and TE). A 'Leased circuit' is indicated between the NTE in Terminating country 1 and the NTE in Terminating country 2. The 'End-to-end path' is shown as the entire sequence from the first TE to the last TE. A reference code 'T1316680-99' is present in the bottom right corner of the diagram area.
+
+TE Terminal Equipment
+NTE Network Terminating Equipment
+IG International Gateway
+
+Diagram of a digital path composed of two private networks and a leased circuit provided by a public network operator.
+
+**Figure II.1/G.828 – Digital path composed of two private networks and a leased circuit provided by a public network operator**
+
+Taking into account that a public operator can only control the public network from NTE to NTE (Network Terminating Equipment), no performance objectives can be given for the portion between NTE and TE. Nevertheless, transmission performance between NTEs may be estimated e.g. by using non-intrusive monitoring.
+
+It may also be that the public network operator provides the connection by other means than a leased circuit.
+
+## **SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS**
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communications |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.8310-202012-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/G/T-REC-G.8310-202012-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a48fab3fd0a220c922ac889599ccd53c6d8c74d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.8310-202012-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,678 @@
+
+
+International Telecommunication Union
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**G.8310**
+
+(12/2020)
+
+SERIES G: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA,
+DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS
+
+Packet over Transport aspects – Mobile network transport
+aspects
+
+# --- **Architecture of the metro transport network**
+
+Recommendation ITU-T G.8310
+
+## ITU-T G-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
+| INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE CONNECTIONS AND CIRCUITS | G.100–G.199 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS COMMON TO ALL ANALOGUE CARRIER-TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS | G.200–G.299 |
+| INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON METALLIC LINES | G.300–G.399 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON RADIO-RELAY OR SATELLITE LINKS AND INTERCONNECTION WITH METALLIC LINES | G.400–G.449 |
+| COORDINATION OF RADIOTELEPHONY AND LINE TELEPHONY | G.450–G.499 |
+| TRANSMISSION MEDIA AND OPTICAL SYSTEMS CHARACTERISTICS | G.600–G.699 |
+| DIGITAL TERMINAL EQUIPMENTS | G.700–G.799 |
+| DIGITAL NETWORKS | G.800–G.899 |
+| DIGITAL SECTIONS AND DIGITAL LINE SYSTEM | G.900–G.999 |
+| MULTIMEDIA QUALITY OF SERVICE AND PERFORMANCE – GENERIC AND USER-RELATED ASPECTS | G.1000–G.1999 |
+| TRANSMISSION MEDIA CHARACTERISTICS | G.6000–G.6999 |
+| DATA OVER TRANSPORT – GENERIC ASPECTS | G.7000–G.7999 |
+| PACKET OVER TRANSPORT ASPECTS | G.8000–G.8999 |
+| Ethernet over Transport aspects | G.8000–G.8099 |
+| MPLS over Transport aspects | G.8100–G.8199 |
+| Synchronization, quality and availability targets | G.8200–G.8299 |
+| Mobile network transport aspects | G.8300–G.8399 |
+| Service Management | G.8600–G.8699 |
+| ACCESS NETWORKS | G.9000–G.9999 |
+
+*For further details, please refer to the list of ITU-T Recommendations.*
+
+# Recommendation ITU-T G.8310
+
+# Architecture of the metro transport network
+
+## Summary
+
+Recommendation ITU-T G.8310 describes the functional architecture of the metro transport network (MTN) using the modelling methodology described in Recommendations ITU-T G.800 and ITU-T G.805. MTN is primarily intended to support transport of distributed radio access network (D-RAN) and cloud radio access network (C-RAN) traffic. The MTN functionality is described from a network level viewpoint, taking into account the client characteristic information, client/server layer associations, networking topology, and layer network functionality that provide multiplexing, routing and supervision of the digital clients.
+
+MTN consists of two non-recursive layers, the MTN path layer, and the MTN section layer. The MTN path layer uses the MTN section layer as its server layer. The MTN path layer provides configurable connection-oriented connectivity. The server layer for the MTN section layer is provided by 50GBASE-R, 100GBASE-R, 200GBASE-R, and 400GBASE-R Ethernet interfaces.
+
+## History
+
+| Edition | Recommendation | Approval | Study Group | Unique ID* |
+|---------|----------------|------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 1.0 | ITU-T G.8310 | 2020-12-22 | 15 | 11.1002/1000/14516 |
+
+## Keywords
+
+Ethernet, FlexE, metro transport network, MTN.
+
+---
+
+\* To access the Recommendation, type the URL in the address field of your web browser, followed by the Recommendation's unique ID. For example, .
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+## NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation, the expression "Administration" is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency.
+
+Compliance with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure, e.g., interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words "shall" or some other obligatory language such as "must" and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents/software copyrights, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the appropriate ITU-T databases available via the ITU-T website at .
+
+© ITU 2021
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU.
+
+## Table of Contents
+
+| | Page |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------|------|
+| 1 Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 2 References..... | 1 |
+| 3 Definitions ..... | 2 |
+| 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere ..... | 2 |
+| 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation..... | 2 |
+| 4 Abbreviations and acronyms ..... | 2 |
+| 5 Conventions ..... | 3 |
+| 6 Functional architecture of the MTN ..... | 3 |
+| 7 MTN digital layer networks..... | 4 |
+| 7.1 MTNP layer network..... | 5 |
+| 7.2 MTNS layer ..... | 7 |
+| 7.3 Client/server associations ..... | 9 |
+| 8 Architecture of the media network supporting the MTN ..... | 9 |
+| 8.1 Media constructs..... | 9 |
+| 8.2 Optical tributary signal group (OTSiG) ..... | 10 |
+| 8.3 Client/server associations ..... | 12 |
+| 9 Management capabilities ..... | 13 |
+| 9.1 Capabilities ..... | 13 |
+| 9.2 Connection supervision techniques ..... | 14 |
+| 9.3 Connection supervision applications ..... | 14 |
+| 10 Survivability techniques ..... | 15 |
+| Annex A – Relationship of MTN to other technologies ..... | 16 |
+| Bibliography..... | 17 |
+
+
+
+# Recommendation ITU-T G.8310
+
+# Architecture of the metro transport network
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+This Recommendation describes the functional architecture of the metro transport network (MTN) using the modelling methodology described in [ITU-T G.800], [ITU-T G.805] for the digital layer networks and [ITU-T G.807] for the optical media network.
+
+The MTN functionality is described from a network-level viewpoint. This takes into account the characteristic information (CI) of the client (Ethernet MAC frames), the client/server layer associations, network topology, the network structure, and the layer network functionalities that provide multiplexing, routing, supervision, performance assessment and network survivability for the client. The digital layers of the MTN use the frame formats defined in [ITU-T G.8312]. The media portion of the network is defined in [IEEE 802.3] and is described, in this Recommendation, in terms of media constructs described in [ITU-T G.807].
+
+# 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a stand-alone document, the status of a Recommendation.
+
+- [ITU-T G.800] Recommendation ITU-T G.800 (2016), *Unified functional architecture of transport networks*.
+- [ITU-T G.805] Recommendation ITU-T G.805 (2000), *Generic functional architecture of transport networks*.
+- [ITU-T G.807] Recommendation ITU-T G.807 (2020), *Generic functional architecture of the optical media network*.
+- [ITU-T G.808.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.808.1 (2014), *Generic protection switching - Linear trail and subnetwork protection*.
+- [ITU-T G.959.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.959.1 (2018), *Optical transport network physical layer interfaces*.
+- [ITU-T G.7712] Recommendation ITU-T G.7712/Y.1703 (2019), *Architecture and specification of data communication network*.
+- [ITU-T G.8312] Recommendation ITU-T G.8312 (2021), *Interfaces for the metro transport network*.
+- [IEEE 802.3] IEEE Std 802.3 (2018), *IEEE Standard for Ethernet*.
+- [OIF FLEXE IA] Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF), *Flex Ethernet Implementation Agreement 2.1* (2019).
+
+# 3 Definitions
+
+## 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere
+
+This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere:
+
+- 3.1.1 **access point (AP)**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.2 **adaptation**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.3 **adapted information (AI)**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.4 **characteristic information (CI)**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.5 **connection supervision**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.6 **connection**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.7 **connection point**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.8 **forwarding point**: See [ITU-T G.800]
+- 3.1.9 **forwarding end point**: See [ITU-T G.800]
+- 3.1.10 **layer network**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.11 **link**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.12 **optical tributary signal (OTSi)**: See [ITU-T G.959.1]
+- 3.1.13 **optical tributary signal group (OTSiG)**: See [ITU-T G.807]
+- 3.1.14 **subnetwork**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.15 **topological component**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+- 3.1.16 **transport entity**: See [ITU-T G.800]
+- 3.1.17 **transport processing function**: See [ITU-T G.805]
+
+## 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation
+
+None.
+
+# 4 Abbreviations and acronyms
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms:
+
+| | |
+|-------|----------------------------------|
+| AI | Adapted Information |
+| AIS | Alarm Indication Signal |
+| AP | Access Point |
+| CI | Characteristic Information |
+| CP | Connection Point |
+| C-RAN | Cloud Radio Access Network |
+| D-RAN | Distributed Radio Access Network |
+| ETH | Ethernet MAC layer |
+| FEC | Forward Error Correction |
+| FlexE | Flex Ethernet |
+| FP | Forwarding Point |
+
+| | |
+|-------|-----------------------------------|
+| FwEP | Forwarding End Point |
+| IPG | Inter-packet Gap |
+| M-AI | Modulator Adapted Information |
+| MTN | Metro Transport Network |
+| MTNP | MTN Path |
+| MTNS | MTN Section |
+| NMC | Network Media Channel |
+| NMCG | NMC Group |
+| OCI | Open Connection Indication |
+| OSME | Optical Signal Maintenance Entity |
+| OTSi | Optical Tributary Signal |
+| OTSiG | OTSi Group |
+| PCS | Physical Coding Sublayer |
+| PMA | Physical Medium Attachment |
+| PMD | Physical Medium Dependent |
+| PTP | Precision Time Protocol |
+| SSF | Server Signal Fail |
+| TTI | Trail Trace Identifier |
+
+# 5 Conventions
+
+This Recommendation uses the diagrammatic conventions defined in [ITU-T G.800], [ITU-T G.805] and [ITU-T G.807].
+
+The forwarding point (FP), defined in [ITU-T G.800], is used in this Recommendation and is equivalent to the connection point (CP), defined in [ITU-T G.805].
+
+This Recommendation uses the following textual conventions to identify information elements:
+
+**Block:** A 66-bit information element. The first two bits are a sync header which identifies the type of block; the remaining 64 bits carry data or control information. The 64B/66B block coding format is described in clause 82 of [IEEE 802.3].
+
+**Sequence:** A series of information elements for which sequential arrangement must be maintained during transmission, but the time interval between information elements need not be maintained.
+
+**Stream:** A sequence where the time interval between information elements is maintained.
+
+# 6 Functional architecture of the MTN
+
+The metro transport network (MTN) consists of two non-recursive digital layer networks; the MTN path (MTNP) layer and the MTN section (MTNS) layer. The rates and formats used in the MTN are defined in [ITU-T G.8312].
+
+The MTNS is supported by an MTN optical media layer. The MTN media layer provides fixed point-to-point connections between Ethernet interfaces. The layer structure of the MTN is shown in Figure 6-1.
+
+
+
+| | | |
+|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
+| Digital client of the MTN (Ethernet MAC frames) | | |
+| Path (MTNP) | MTN digital layers | |
+| Section (MTNS) | | |
+| OTSiG | Ethernet optical signals | MTN optical media layer |
+| Media constructs | Ethernet optical media network | |
+
+**Figure 6-1 – MTN layer structure**
+
+The only client defined for the MTN is Ethernet MAC frames which are encoded into 64B/66B blocks as defined in clause 82 of [IEEE 802.3] for transport across the MTN.
+
+The MTNP layer provides channel forwarding, as described in clause 6.3.1 of [ITU-T G.800], for Ethernet MAC frames.
+
+The MTNP layer does not transfer client Ethernet MAC frame timing information. Any link status indication blocks (e.g., LF, RF, LPI) present on the UNI links are terminated by the UNI interface and are not transferred across the MTN layer networks.
+
+The only server layer defined for the MTNP is the MTNS. An instance of a MTNP layer network cannot be a client or server for another instance of a MTNP layer network.
+
+The only client defined for the MTNS layer is the MTNP layer. The MTNS layer provides fixed point to point connectivity for its MTNP layer clients at bitrates in multiples of ~5 Gb/s. The MTNS is based on Flex Ethernet (FlexE) as defined in [OIF FLEXE IA].
+
+The server layer for the MTNS layer is provided by any of the Ethernet physical layers that use the encoding defined in clause 82 of [IEEE 802.3]. The Ethernet interfaces defined at the time this Recommendation was published are: 50GBASE-R, 100GBASE-R, 200GBASE-R and 400GBASE-R [IEEE 802.3].
+
+The MTNS characteristic information (CI) is adapted to a modulator input by the lower functions of the physical coding sublayer (PCS) defined in clause 82 of [IEEE 802.3], the physical medium attachment (PMA) defined in clause 83 of [IEEE 802.3] and corresponding physical medium dependent (PMDs) of [IEEE 802.3]. The processing includes; scrambling, lane distribution, insertion of alignment markers, forward error correction (FEC) (except for some 100GBASE-R interfaces) and mapping to one or more digital lanes for modulation.
+
+Annex A provides a description of the relationship between the MTN layer networks and Ethernet [IEEE 802.3] and FlexE [OIF FLEXE IA].
+
+The MTN digital layers are described in clause 7, the MTN optical media network is described in clause 8.
+
+# 7 MTN digital layer networks
+
+The client/server associations of the MTN digital layers are shown in Figure 7-1.
+
+
+
+Figure 7-1: Client/server layer associations of the MTN digital layer networks. The diagram shows two vertical stacks of network layers. The top stack represents the MTNP layer network, starting with an MTNP/ETH\_A source/sink at the top, connected via an MTNP AP to an MTNP\_TT source/sink. This is connected via an MTNP network connection to an MTNP FwEP, which is then connected to an MTNS/MTNP\_A source/sink. The bottom stack represents the MTNS layer network, starting with an MTNS/MTNP\_A source/sink at the top, connected via an MTNS AP to an MTNS\_TT source/sink. This is connected via an MTNS network connection to an MTNS FwEP. Vertical double-headed arrows on the left indicate the MTNP layer network and MTNS layer network boundaries. Horizontal dashed lines represent trails and network connections between corresponding entities in the two stacks. The diagram is labeled G.8310(20)\_F7-1 at the bottom right.
+
+**Figure 7-1 – Client/server layer associations of the MTN digital layer networks**
+
+## 7.1 MTNP layer network
+
+The MTNP layer network provides a MTNP trail transport entity to support the transport of Ethernet MAC frames across the MTN. The MTNP trail is supported by zero or more MTNS trail(s) as shown in Figures 7-2 and 7-3. The MTNS trail is described in clause 7.2. The MTNP trail transport entity supports only bidirectional, symmetrical, point to point connectivity. The description of the supported client layer network is outside the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+The MTNP trail transport entity provides channel forwarding, as described in clause 6.3.1 of [ITU-T G.800], for the client Ethernet MAC frames.
+
+The MTNP layer network provides configurable connectivity between path forwarding end points (FwEPs), or between a path FwEP and a path FP or between path FPs.
+
+The MTNP layer network is non-recursive i.e., a MTNP layer cannot be a client of another MTNP layer network. The only server layer for the MTNP layer is the MTNS layer described in clause 7.2.
+
+The CI of a MTNP layer network is a sequence of 64B/66B blocks encoded as defined in clause 82 of [IEEE 802.3] and is composed of:
+
+- A contiguous sequence of 64B/66B blocks that carry a MAC frame (called a packet) with a minimum gap between packets (called the inter-packet gap (IPG)).
+- MTNP overhead encoded into 64B/66B blocks.
+
+The duration of the IPG can be modified to provide rate adaptation between the client MAC frames and the MTNP. Therefore, the MTNP layer network does not transfer client timing information. Also, any link status indications blocks (e.g., LF, RF, LPI) present on the UNI links are terminated by the UNI interface and are not transferred across the MTN layer networks.
+
+Details of the format of the MTNP CI are provided in [ITU-T G.8312].
+
+To provide end-to-end networking, the following capabilities are included in the MTNP layer network:
+
+- MTNP connection rearrangement for flexible network routing;
+- MTNP overhead processes to verify the integrity of the client adapted information (AI);
+- MTNP operations, administration and maintenance functions, including network survivability.
+
+The MTNP layer network, shown in Figure 7-2, contains the transport processing functions, transport entities, and topological components described in clauses 7.1.1, 7.1.2 and 7.1.3 respectively. The interlayer adaptation functions are described in clause 7.3.1.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the MTNP layer network architecture. At the top, two MTNP AP (Access Point) icons are connected by a dashed line labeled "MTNP trail". Below each MTNP AP is an MTNP TT (Transport Terminal) icon, labeled "MTNP TT source" on the left and "MTNP TT sink" on the right. Each MTNP TT is connected to an MTNP FwEP (Forwarding Edge Point) icon. The MTNP FwEP icons are connected by a dashed line labeled "MTNP network connection". Below each MTNP FwEP is an MTNP SNC (Segment Connection) icon. Each MTNP SNC is connected to an MTNP FP (Forwarding Point) icon. The MTNP FP icons are connected by a solid line labeled "MTNP link connection". The MTNP link connections are connected to another MTNP SNC icon. Each MTNP SNC icon is connected to an MTNP FP icon. The MTNP FP icons are connected to an MTNP subnetwork, represented by a blue arrow pointing upwards. The diagram is labeled "G.8310(20)\_F7-2" in the bottom right corner.
+
+Figure 7-2: MTNP layer network diagram showing a path from an MTNP AP through an MTNP TT source, MTNP FwEP, MTNP SNC, MTNP FP, MTNP link connection, MTNP SNC, MTNP FP, MTNP link connection, MTNP SNC, MTNP FP, MTNP FwEP, MTNP TT sink, and MTNP AP. The path is labeled MTNP trail and MTNP network connection. The diagram is labeled G.8310(20)\_F7-2.
+
+**Figure 7-2 – MTNP layer network**
+
+As described in [ITU-T G.800], the MTNP subnetwork may represent the aggregation of contained subnetworks and links or, it may represent the limit of subnetwork recursion which is a matrix.
+
+A MTNP subnetwork may provide a subnetwork connection directly between MTNP FwEPs without adaptation to an MTN section layer. This is illustrated in Figure 7-3.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates an MTNP subnetwork example. At the top, two MTNP AP (Access Point) icons are connected by a dashed line labeled "MTNP trail". Below each MTNP AP is an MTNP TT (Transport Terminal) icon, labeled "MTNP TT source" on the left and "MTNP TT sink" on the right. Each MTNP TT is connected to an MTNP FwEP (Forwarding Edge Point) icon. The MTNP FwEP icons are connected by a dashed line labeled "MTNP network connection". Below the MTNP FwEP icons is an MTNP SNC (Segment Connection) icon. The MTNP SNC icon is connected to an MTNP subnetwork, represented by a blue arrow pointing upwards. The diagram is labeled "G.8310(20)\_F7-3" in the bottom right corner.
+
+Figure 7-3: MTNP subnetwork example diagram showing a path from an MTNP AP through an MTNP TT source, MTNP FwEP, MTNP SNC, MTNP FwEP, MTNP TT sink, and MTNP AP. The path is labeled MTNP trail and MTNP network connection. The diagram is labeled G.8310(20)\_F7-3.
+
+**Figure 7-3 – MTNP subnetwork example**
+
+### 7.1.1 MTNP trail termination
+
+The following generic processes are assigned to the MTNP trail termination:
+
+- validation of connectivity integrity;
+- assessment of transmission quality;
+- transmission defect detection and indication.
+
+The requirements for these processes are outlined in clause 9.
+
+There are three types of MTNP trail termination:
+
+- MTNP bidirectional trail termination: consists of a pair of collocated MTNP trail termination source and sink functions;
+- MTNP trail termination source: accepts AI from a client layer network at its input, generates and inserts the MTNP trail overhead as a separate and distinct logical data stream and presents the CI of the MTNP layer network at its output;
+- MTNP trail termination sink: accepts the CI of the MTNP layer network at its input, extracts and processes the separate and distinct logical data stream containing the MTNP trail overhead and presents the AI at its output.
+
+### 7.1.2 MTNP transport entities
+
+Network connections, subnetwork connections, link connections and trails are as described in [ITU-T G.800]. Tandem connections are not supported.
+
+### 7.1.3 MTNP topological components
+
+Layer network, subnetworks, links and access groups are as described in [ITU-T G.800].
+
+The MTNP subnetwork provides configurable subnetwork connections between an input forwarding point (FP) or forwarding end point (FwEP) and an output FP or FwEP.
+
+## 7.2 MTNS layer
+
+The MTNS layer network provides a fixed point-to-point MTNS trail transport entity, that is bidirectional and symmetrical to support the transport of the MTNP client. The MTNS trail is supported by an optical signal tributary group (OTSiG). The OTSiG is implemented by one or more Ethernet optical interfaces as described in clause 8.2.
+
+The MTNS layer network is non-recursive and the only client for the MTNS layer network is the MTNP layer network.
+
+The CI of an MTNS layer network is a stream of 64B/66B blocks encoded as defined in clause 82 of [IEEE 802.3] and is composed of:
+
+- Client MTNP CI; and
+- MTNS overhead encoded into 64B/66B blocks.
+
+The format of the MTNS is based on FlexE that is defined in [OIF FLEXE IA], details of the format are provided in [ITU-T G.8312]. The MTNS is structured as a set of calendar slots each with a capacity of ~5Gbit/s. The number of calendar slots supported by the MTNS is dependent on the OTSiG that supports the MTNS. A MTNP client is allocated one or more calendar slots.
+
+The duration of the IPG (in the MTNP CI) can be modified by adding or removing 64B/66B blocks (in the IPG) to provide rate adaptation between the MTNP CI and the calendar slots allocated to it in the MTNS.
+
+The capabilities of the MTNS layer network include:
+
+- MTNS overhead processes to confirm the integrity of the client AI and conditioning for its transport over an OTSiG;
+- MTNS operations, administration and maintenance functions.
+
+The MTNS layer network, shown in Figure 7-4 contains the transport processing functions, transport entities, and topological components described in clauses 7.2.1, 7.2.2 and 7.2.3 respectively. The interlayer adaptation functions are described in clause 7.3.2.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the MTNS layer network architecture. On the left, an 'MTNS TT source' (represented by a downward-pointing triangle) is connected to an 'MTNS AP' (represented by a circle with two internal nodes). The 'MTNS AP' is connected to an 'MTNS network connection' (represented by a dashed line). This connection leads to another 'MTNS AP' on the right, which is then connected to an 'MTNS TT sink' (represented by an upward-pointing triangle). Below the 'MTNS network connection' is an 'MTNS link connection' (represented by a solid line). The entire diagram is labeled 'G.8310(20)\_F7-4' at the bottom right.
+
+Diagram of the MTNS layer network showing the flow from MTNS TT source to MTNS TT sink through MTNS AP, MTNS network connection, and MTNS link connection components.
+
+**Figure 7-4 – MTNS layer network**
+
+The MTNS network connection is supported by an OTSiG as described in clause 8.2.
+
+### 7.2.1 MTNS trail termination
+
+The following generic processes are assigned to the MTNS trail termination:
+
+- Validation of connectivity integrity.
+
+The requirements for these processes are outlined in clause 9.
+
+There are three types of MTNS trail termination:
+
+- MTNS bidirectional trail termination: consists of a pair of collocated MTNS trail termination source and sink functions;
+- MTNS trail termination source: accepts AI from the MTNP client layer network at its input, generates and inserts the MTNS trail overhead as a separate and distinct logical data stream and presents the CI of the MTNS layer network at its output. If bonding is supported (see clause 8.2.2) it inverse multiplexes the client AI onto a group of homogenous Ethernet interfaces;
+- MTNS trail termination sink: accepts the CI of the MTNS layer network at its input, extracts and processes the separate and distinct logical data stream containing the MTNS trail overhead and presents the MTNP AI at its output. If bonding is supported (see clause 8.2.2) it accepts the input from a group Ethernet interfaces, aligns the members of the group and reconstructs the payload at the aggregate line rate.
+
+### 7.2.2 MTNS transport entities
+
+Network connections, link connections and trails are as described in [ITU-T G.800]. Subnetwork connections and tandem connections are not supported.
+
+### 7.2.3 MTNS topological components
+
+Layer network and access groups are as described in [ITU-T G.800]. Subnetworks are not supported.
+
+## **7.3 Client/server associations**
+
+### **7.3.1 MTNP/Ethernet MAC frame (ETH) adaptation**
+
+The bidirectional MTNP/ETH adaptation function is performed by a collocated pair of source and sink MTNP/ETH adaptation functions.
+
+The MTNP/ETH adaptation source performs the following processes between its input and its output:
+
+- all the processing required to encode the client MAC frame into a contiguous sequence of 64B/66B blocks as defined in clauses 81 and 82 of [IEEE 802.3];
+- generation of management/maintenance signals as described in clause 9.
+
+The MTNP/ETH adaptation sink performs the following processes between its input and its output:
+
+- recovery of the client MAC frames from the contiguous sequence of 64B/66B blocks as defined in clauses 81 and 82 of [IEEE 802.3];
+- termination of management/maintenance signals as described in clause 9.
+
+### **7.3.2 MTNS/MTNP adaptation**
+
+The bidirectional MTNS/MTNP adaptation function is performed by a collocated pair of source and sink MTNS/MTNP adaptation functions.
+
+The MTNS/MTNP adaptation source performs the following processes between its input and its output:
+
+- all the processing required to map 664B/66B blocks of the MTNP CI into a defined number of calendar slots;
+- generation and termination of relevant management/maintenance signals as described in clause 9.
+
+The MTNS/MTNP adaptation sink performs the following processes between its input and its output:
+
+- recovery of the MTNP CI from the assigned calendar slots;
+- generation and termination of management/maintenance signals as described in clause 9.
+
+# **8 Architecture of the media network supporting the MTN**
+
+The architecture of the media network, defined in [IEEE 802.3], is described using the media constructs listed in clause 8.1 to represent the different functions that are present in the media network. Media constructs operate on the signal envelope (e.g., constrain or direct the media channel, etc.) and are not aware of the information being carried. Media constructs do not modulate or demodulate the signal and therefore do not process the digital information that is carried by the signal.
+
+A full description of the generic functional architecture of the media network is provided in [ITU-T G.807].
+
+The media network that support the MTNS only provides fixed point to point media associations and does not support the optical signal maintenance entity (OSME) described in [ITU-T G.807].
+
+## **8.1 Media constructs**
+
+The following media constructs used to describe the architecture of the media network are described in [ITU-T G.807]:
+
+- media port;
+- media channel;
+
+- media channel group;
+- fibre.
+
+## 8.2 Optical tributary signal group (OTSiG)
+
+The MTNS is supported by an OTSiG. The OTSiG is a management/control abstraction that represents a group of one or more optical tributary signals (OTSi), see [ITU-T G.807]. The OTSiG consists of one or more Ethernet physical layer interfaces defined in [IEEE 802.3]. Each unidirectional optical tributary signal (OTSi) is carried in an independent network media channel (NMC). The NMC is described in clause 7.1.2.1 of [ITU-T G.807]. The digital information stream from the MTNS present at the FwEP is mapped and encoded by an adaptation source function.
+
+NOTE – The encoding process in the M-AI/MTNS adaptation may include the computation and insertion of a forward error correction (FEC) code.
+
+The resultant modulator adapted information (M-AI) is used by a modulator source to create an OTSi. The OTSi is converted back to M-AI by a demodulator sink according to a specific modulation/demodulation mechanism. The adaptation sink function processes the M-AI to recreate the MTNS digital information stream. As illustrated in Figure 8-2, the MTNS client may be carried by more than one OTSi (depending on the particular Ethernet interface that is used). The functional models for these interfaces are provided in Figures 8-1 and 8-2. Note that in most Ethernet interfaces the modulators and filters are not configurable.
+
+At the time of publication of this Recommendation the Ethernet interfaces, defined in [IEEE 802.3], that can be used in the MTN media network are: 50GBASE-R, 100GBASE-R, 200GBASE-R and 400GBASE-R.
+
+### 8.2.1 MTNS carried over a single Ethernet interface
+
+The case where the MTNS is carried by one Ethernet interface that uses a single OTSi is shown in Figure 8-1. The OTSi is carried from the media port on the modulator source to the media port on the demodulator sink by a network media channel (NMC).
+
+
+
+Figure 8-1: Mapping an MTNS to an OTSiG that contains one OTSi. The diagram shows a vertical stack of components. At the top is a triangle labeled 'MTNS'. Below it is a circle with two arrows pointing towards it, labeled 'FwEP' on the left and 'MTNS CI' on the right. Below the circle is a trapezoid labeled 'M-AI/MTNS'. Below this is a square labeled 'M'. To the left of the 'M' square is an arrow labeled 'M-AI' and 'Modulator adapted information'. To the right of the 'M' square is an arrow labeled 'M-AP' and 'Modulator access point'. Below the 'M' square is a dashed circle labeled 'OTSiG'. Below that is a solid circle labeled 'OTSi'. Below that is a horizontal line labeled 'Media port'. Below the media port is a horizontal line labeled 'NMC'. To the right of the 'NMC' line is a dashed circle labeled 'NMCG'. At the bottom right is the text 'G.8310(20)\_F8-1'.
+
+**Figure 8-1 – Mapping an MTNS to an OTSiG that contains one OTSi**
+
+The case where an MTNS is carried by one Ethernet interface that uses more than one OTSi is illustrated in Figure 8-2.
+
+
+
+The diagram illustrates the mapping of an MTNS to an OTSiG that contains more than one OTSi. At the top, an MTNS (triangle) is connected to a FwEP (Forwarding Entity Point) and an MTNS CI (Control Interface). Below this, an M-AI/MTNS block is shown. Multiple instances of M-AI are connected to this block, with one instance connected to an M block. The M block is connected to an OTSiG, which is further connected to an OTSi. The OTSi is connected to a Media port, which is part of an NMC. The NMC is connected to an NMCG. The diagram is labeled G.8310(20)\_F8-2.
+
+Diagram illustrating the mapping of an MTNS to an OTSiG that contains more than one OTSi. The diagram shows the flow from an MTNS (triangle) through FwEP and MTNS CI to an M-AI/MTNS block. Below this, multiple instances of M-AI are shown, with one instance connected to an M block. The M block is connected to an OTSiG, which is further connected to an OTSi. The OTSi is connected to a Media port, which is part of an NMC. The NMC is connected to an NMCG. The diagram is labeled G.8310(20)\_F8-2.
+
+**Figure 8-2 – Mapping an MTNS to an OTSiG that contains more than one OTSi**
+
+The differential delay between members of the OTSiG must be controlled, this is represented by placing all of the NMCs in a single NMC group (NMCG). Normally these functions are supported by an Ethernet interface and all members of the OTSiG are carried over the same fibre.
+
+### 8.2.2 MTNS carried over more than one Ethernet interface
+
+The MTNS may be carried by a group of two or more Ethernet interfaces. In the description of FlexE in [OIF FLEXE IA] this is referred to as bonding. This is modelled by expanding the MTNS trail termination to provide an inverse multiplexing sub-layer as described in clause 5.3.3.1.2 of [ITU-T G.805]. This is shown in Figure 8-3, in this example each Ethernet interface is supported by a single OTSi. Each of the Ethernet interfaces may be supported by more than one OTSi as shown in Figure 8-2.
+
+
+
+Figure 8-3: Mapping an MTNS to a set of bonded Ethernet interfaces. The diagram shows a top-down view of the MTNS TT (Transport Terminal) at the top, which contains an 'Inverse multiplexing sublayer'. Below this, the signal is split into two parallel paths. Each path contains an 'M-AI/MTNS' adaptation block, followed by an 'M' (Media) block. The 'M' blocks are connected to 'OTSiG' and 'OTSi' layers. The signals then pass through 'Media port' blocks and are combined into a single 'NMC' (Network Medium Concatenation) layer, which is further divided into 'NMCG' (Network Medium Concatenation Group) layers. The diagram is labeled 'G.8310(20)\_F8-3' at the bottom right.
+
+**Figure 8-3 – Mapping an MTNS to a set of bonded Ethernet interfaces**
+
+In this case the OTSi that supports each of the Ethernet interfaces is in the same OTSiG and the differential delay of the members of the OTSiG must be constrained.
+
+## 8.3 Client/server associations
+
+### 8.3.1 M-AI/MTNS adaptation
+
+The bidirectional M-AI/MTNS adaptation function is performed by a collocated pair of source and sink M-AI/MTNS adaptation functions.
+
+The M-AI/MTNS adaptation source performs the following processes between its input and its output:
+
+- all the processing required to encode and map the MTNS client into one or more instances of M-AI. These processes include scrambling, lane distribution, insertion of alignment markers, forward error correction (FEC), PMA and physical medium dependent (PMD) sublayers. FEC is required on all Ethernet interfaces except for some legacy 100GBASE-R Ethernet interfaces. These processes are described in [IEEE 802.3].
+
+The M-AI/MTNS adaptation sink performs the following processes between its input and its output:
+
+- All the processes necessary to recover the MTNS client from one or more instances of M-AI. These processes are described in [IEEE 803.3].
+- If the Ethernet interface uses FEC:
+ - ensure that all blocks in an uncorrectable FEC codeword are error marked;
+ - replace all 64B/66B blocks with an invalid sync header with a /E/ block.
+
+# **9 Management capabilities**
+
+This clause provides an overview of the fault, performance and configuration management capabilities provided by the MTN. The capabilities are described in [ITU-T G.8312].
+
+NOTE – Further details will be provided in the MTN equipment Recommendation.
+
+The MTN digital layers (MTNP, MTNS) use digital overhead to provide OAM, which can report on the status of the layer and may be used to infer the status of the server layer.
+
+The media network that is deployed as a part of an MTN network uses point-to-point Ethernet links and is not expected to support fault, performance and configuration management.
+
+## **9.1 Capabilities**
+
+### **9.1.1 Fault, configuration and performance management**
+
+The MTNP layer network provides the capabilities to:
+
+- configure the interconnection of reference points e.g., FPs, FwEPs;
+- detect faults and initiate recovery actions where applicable;
+- support single-ended maintenance;
+- detect and report misconnections;
+- detect performance degradation and verify quality of service.
+
+The MTNS layer network provides the capabilities to:
+
+- interconnect the FwEP reference points;
+- detect faults;
+- support single-ended maintenance;
+- detect and report misconnections.
+
+### **9.1.2 Client/server interaction**
+
+The server detects and indicates to the client layer when a digital stream or optical signal is not present.
+
+To avoid unnecessary, inefficient or conflicting survivability actions, escalation strategies (e.g., introduction of hold-off times and alarm suppression methods) may be required:
+
+- within a layer;
+- between a server and client layer.
+
+### **9.1.3 Adaptation management**
+
+Adaptation management refers to the set of processes for managing the adaptation of a client layer network to/from the server layer network.
+
+### **9.1.4 Connection supervision**
+
+#### **9.1.4.1 Continuity supervision**
+
+Continuity supervision refers to the set of processes for monitoring the continuity of a transport entity (e.g., trail).
+
+In general, a continuity fault in a server is indicated to a client through server signal fail (SSF) indication.
+
+#### **9.1.4.2 Connectivity supervision**
+
+Connectivity supervision refers to the set of processes for monitoring the integrity of the routing of a connection between the source and sink trail terminations.
+
+Connectivity supervision is necessary to confirm proper routing of a connection between trail termination source and sink during the connection set-up process. Furthermore, connectivity supervision is needed to ensure that connectivity is maintained while the connection is active.
+
+Trail trace identifier (TTI) is necessary to ensure that the signal received by a trail termination sink originates from the intended trail termination source:
+
+- TTI is provided by the trail transport entity for the MTNS layer to ensure proper MTNS layer connections.
+- TTI is provided by the trail transport entity for the MTNP layer to ensure proper MTNP layer connections.
+
+#### **9.1.4.3 Maintenance information**
+
+Maintenance information refers to the set of processes for indicating defects in a connection, which is part of a trail. The defect indications are given in the downstream and upstream directions of a bidirectional trail.
+
+The capabilities are described in [ITU-T G.8312].
+
+NOTE – Further details will be provided in the MTN equipment Recommendation.
+
+Two maintenance information processes are identified for the digital layers:
+
+- alarm indication signal (AIS);
+- open connection indication (OCI).
+
+These processes enable defect localization and single-ended maintenance.
+
+### **9.1.5 Connection quality supervision**
+
+Connection quality supervision refers to the set of processes for monitoring the performance of a connection. Generic processes include parameter measurement, collection, filtering and processing. Connection quality supervision is supported for the MTNP layer network. Delay measurement is also supported by the MTNP layer.
+
+### **9.1.6 Management communications**
+
+Management communications are transported via an embedded communication channel as specified in [ITU-T G.7712]. The MTNS provides a management communications channel (MCC), the MTNP does not support management communications.
+
+### **9.1.7 Frequency and time synchronization**
+
+The communication of time and frequency information using either precision time protocol (PTP) as defined in [b-ITU-T G.8265.1] or in [b-ITU-T G.8275.1] or synchronization status message (SSM) as defined in [b-ITU-T G.8264] may be supported by the MTNS (using the FlexE synchronization messaging channel).
+
+## **9.2 Connection supervision techniques**
+
+Connection supervision is the process of monitoring the integrity of a given connection in the digital layers of the MTN. The integrity may be verified by means of detecting and reporting connectivity and transmission performance defects for a given connection. Only inherent monitoring defined in [ITU-T G.805] is supported.
+
+## **9.3 Connection supervision applications**
+
+### **9.3.1 Unused connections**
+
+In order to detect the inadvertent opening of a MTNP subnetwork connection a distinct replacement signal (open connection indication (OCI)) is used.
+
+### **9.3.2 Connection monitoring**
+
+Only the MTNP and MTNS trail transport entities are monitored.
+
+# **10 Survivability techniques**
+
+It is expected that survivability techniques will only be used in the MTN for the trail transport entity in the MTNP layer network. It is only envisioned that 1+1 linear path protection as described in [ITU-T G.808.1] will be used. The MTNP overhead is used to detect faults or performance degradations (see clause 9) and these events may be used to trigger the replacement of the failed transport entity with a protection transport entity. Details of the mechanism are out of the scope of this Recommendation.
+
+# Annex A
+
+## Relationship of MTN to other technologies
+
+(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation.)
+
+Figure A.1 shows the relationship between the MTN layer networks, Ethernet as defined in [IEEE 802.3] and FlexE as defined in [OIF FLEXE IA].
+
+The MTN path to Ethernet client adaptation is defined by reference to [IEEE 802.3]. The AI at the MTNP\_AP consists of a sequence of [IEEE 802.3] clause 82-compliant 64B/66B blocks. The adaptation of the MTN section to media is described by [IEEE 802.3]. The CI at the MTNS FwEP consists of a stream of [IEEE 802.3] clause 82-compliant 64B/66B blocks. The use of [IEEE 802.3] clause 82-compliant 64B/66B blocks allows the MTN section layer to be carried over Ethernet PHYs that use [IEEE 802.3] clause 82 PCS. Figure A.1 shows the relationship of MTN to [IEEE 802.3] and [OIF FLEXE IA] for the case where the Ethernet signal is carried by a single OTSi (see Figure 8-1) and bonding (described in clause 8.2.2) is not used.
+
+![Diagram showing the relationship of MTN to [IEEE 802.3] Ethernet and [OIF FLEXE IA] FlexE. The diagram is divided into three vertical columns: IEEE model, MTN layer networks, and OIF FlexE shim. The IEEE model column shows the standard Ethernet stack: MAC, RS (Clause 81), 64B/66B, PCS (Clause 82) sublayers (Scramble, Lane distribution, AM, Lower sublayers). The MTN layer networks column shows the MTN stack: Client clock domain, MTNP AP, MTNP FwEP, MTNP subnetwork, MTNP FP, MTNS AP, MTNS FwEP, M-AI/MTNS, M-AI AP, and M. The OIF FlexE shim column shows the OIF flex E shim. Vertical dashed lines indicate clock domains: Client clock domain, Local clock domain, and Line clock domain. Horizontal dashed lines separate the MTN path layer, MTN section layer, and MTN optical media layer. Arrows indicate data flow and adaptation points between the layers.](7d3d5fb5d09c0cd35a9d637be241651e_img.jpg)
+
+Diagram showing the relationship of MTN to [IEEE 802.3] Ethernet and [OIF FLEXE IA] FlexE. The diagram is divided into three vertical columns: IEEE model, MTN layer networks, and OIF FlexE shim. The IEEE model column shows the standard Ethernet stack: MAC, RS (Clause 81), 64B/66B, PCS (Clause 82) sublayers (Scramble, Lane distribution, AM, Lower sublayers). The MTN layer networks column shows the MTN stack: Client clock domain, MTNP AP, MTNP FwEP, MTNP subnetwork, MTNP FP, MTNS AP, MTNS FwEP, M-AI/MTNS, M-AI AP, and M. The OIF FlexE shim column shows the OIF flex E shim. Vertical dashed lines indicate clock domains: Client clock domain, Local clock domain, and Line clock domain. Horizontal dashed lines separate the MTN path layer, MTN section layer, and MTN optical media layer. Arrows indicate data flow and adaptation points between the layers.
+
+G.8310(20)\_FA.1
+
+Figure A.1 – Relationship of MTN to [IEEE 802.3] Ethernet and [OIF FLEXE IA] FlexE
+
+## Bibliography
+
+- [b-ITU-T G.8264] Recommendation ITU-T G.8264/Y.1364 (2017), *Distribution of timing information through packet networks.*
+- [b-ITU-T G.8265.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.8265.1/Y.1365.1 (2014), *Precision time protocol telecom profile for frequency synchronization.*
+- [b-ITU-T G.8275.1] Recommendation ITU-T G.8275.1/Y.1369.1 (2020), *Precision time protocol telecom profile for phase/time synchronization with full timing support from the network.*
+
+
+
+
+
+## SERIES OF ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of ITU-T |
+| Series D | Tariff and accounting principles and international telecommunication/ICT economic and policy issues |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Cable networks and transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Environment and ICTs, climate change, e-waste, energy efficiency; construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | Telecommunication management, including TMN and network maintenance |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling, and associated measurements and tests |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks, open system communications and security |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure, Internet protocol aspects, next-generation networks, Internet of Things and smart cities |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7da83ecb82b51a4cef7694858eef2c35f1986ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d77a478c5b78d330a2a6abbd32e7d0ac053d8b9c1ffe8a96476214afa6ddf7ae
+size 8196
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d0899238c9489ddc68665a04f2568108b2efdd5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/35a7554182eb055209552843f341a1ae_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c31cbf9d7b4331cc52e649ef8f853b9eab8ca53214e0bb249b38009002950cc9
+size 81461
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d9304932d8a207c6d118287cbe8b8166dfb665d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/acfc53eca625d62b38aa2563efa95c3e_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:73d4b4fbedc8ebb4a1a76f104b3a01faaa87b15f4b12e1f5b91df152677e5fb8
+size 118075
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d6d77e97f802979fb50a3bfff71ea5cbe3fe32b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.853.10-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+**G.853.10**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+(03/99)
+
+SERIES G: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA,
+DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS
+
+Digital transmission systems – Digital networks –
+Management of transport network
+
+---
+
+**Information viewpoint for pre-provisioned link
+connection management**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation G.853.10
+
+(Previously CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T G-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE CONNECTIONS AND CIRCUITS | G.100–G.199 |
+| INTERNATIONAL ANALOGUE CARRIER SYSTEM | |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS COMMON TO ALL ANALOGUE CARRIER-TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS | G.200–G.299 |
+| INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON METALLIC LINES | G.300–G.399 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON RADIO-RELAY OR SATELLITE LINKS AND INTERCONNECTION WITH METALLIC LINES | G.400–G.449 |
+| COORDINATION OF RADIOTELEPHONY AND LINE TELEPHONY | G.450–G.499 |
+| TESTING EQUIPMENTS | |
+| TRANSMISSION MEDIA CHARACTERISTICS | G.600–G.699 |
+| DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS | |
+| TERMINAL EQUIPMENTS | G.700–G.799 |
+| DIGITAL NETWORKS | G.800–G.899 |
+| General aspects | G.800–G.809 |
+| Design objectives for digital networks | G.810–G.819 |
+| Quality and availability targets | G.820–G.829 |
+| Network capabilities and functions | G.830–G.839 |
+| SDH network characteristics | G.840–G.849 |
+| Management of transport network | G.850–G.859 |
+| SDH radio and satellite systems integration | G.860–G.869 |
+| Optical transport networks | G.870–G.879 |
+| DIGITAL SECTIONS AND DIGITAL LINE SYSTEM | G.900–G.999 |
+
+For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.
+
+# **INFORMATION VIEWPOINT FOR PRE-PROVISIONED LINK CONNECTION MANAGEMENT**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+The pre-provisioned link connection management community is used to assign transport entities (link connections or connection termination points) to a caller and to control and update the available capacity of the linking entity (link or link end) that contains the transport entities. The available capacity of the linking entity contains all the unassigned transport entities. This community should be used in the case where transport entities have already been provisioned inside the linking entity using the pre-provisioned adaptation management service (G.85x.8 series of Recommendations).
+
+The capability of having pre-provisioned transport entities is available in technologies such as SDH or WDM.
+
+### **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation G.853.10 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 4 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 26th of March 1999.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+### NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation the term *recognized operating agency (ROA)* includes any individual, company, corporation or governmental organization that operates a public correspondence service. The terms *Administration*, *ROA* and *public correspondence* are defined in the *Constitution of the ITU (Geneva, 1992)*.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 1999
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---|
+| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | References ..... | 1 |
+| 3 | Definitions ..... | 1 |
+| 4 | Abbreviations ..... | 1 |
+| 5 | Conventions ..... | 2 |
+| 6 | Class diagrams ..... | 2 |
+| 6.1 | UML class diagram representing relationships between classes ..... | 2 |
+| 6.2 | UML class diagram representing the Inheritance Hierarchy ..... | 3 |
+| 7 | Label references ..... | 3 |
+| 8 | Information object class definitions ..... | 4 |
+| 8.1 | plcmLayerNetworkDomain ..... | 4 |
+| 8.2 | plcmLink ..... | 4 |
+| 8.3 | plcmLinkConnection ..... | 4 |
+| 8.4 | plcmLinkEnd ..... | 5 |
+| 8.5 | plcmNetworkCTP ..... | 5 |
+| 9 | Information relationship definitions ..... | 5 |
+| 10 | Static schemas ..... | 5 |
+| 11 | Dynamic schemas ..... | 5 |
+| 12 | Attributes ..... | 6 |
+| 12.1 | plcmCallerId ..... | 6 |
+
+
+
+###### Recommendation G.853.10
+
+# INFORMATION VIEWPOINT FOR PRE-PROVISIONED LINK CONNECTION MANAGEMENT
+
+(Geneva, 1999)
+
+# 1 Scope
+
+This information viewpoint specification is related to the pre-provisioned link connection management enterprise specification defined in Recommendation G.852.10.
+
+## 2 References
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] ITU-T Recommendation G.851.1 (1996), *Management of the transport network – Application of the RM-ODP framework.*
+- [2] ITU-T Recommendation G.853.1 (1999), *Common elements of the information viewpoint for the management of a transport network.*
+- [3] ITU-T Recommendation G.852.10 (1999), *Enterprise viewpoint for pre-provisioned link connection management.*
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation G.854.10 (1999), *Computational viewpoint for pre-provisioned link connection management.*
+
+# 3 Definitions
+
+None.
+
+# 4 Abbreviations
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations.
+
+| | |
+|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
+| CTP | Connection Termination Point |
+| Id | Identifier |
+| imp | imported |
+| LC | Link Connection |
+| LE | Link End |
+| LND | Layer Network Domain |
+| pam | pre-provisioned adaptation management |
+| plcm | pre-provisioned link connection management |
+| RM-ODP | Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing |
+| UML | Unified Modelling Language |
+
+# 5 Conventions
+
+None.
+
+# 6 Class diagrams
+
+## 6.1 UML class diagram representing relationships between classes
+
+
+
+```
+classDiagram
+ class plcLayerNetworkDomain
+ class plcLink
+ class plcLinkEnd
+ class plcLinkConnection
+ class plcNetworkCTP
+
+ plcLink --|> plcLayerNetworkDomain : containerLND (1..1) layerNetworkDomain IsMadeOf element (1..N)
+ plcLinkEnd --|> plcLayerNetworkDomain : containerLND (1..1) layerNetworkDomain IsMadeOf element (1..N)
+ plcLinkConnection --|> plcLink : containerLink (1..1) linkHasLinkConnections elementLC (1..N)
+ plcLinkConnection --|> plcNetworkCTP : element (1..N)
+ plcLinkEnd --|> plcNetworkCTP : containerLE (1..1) linkEndHasNetworkCTPs elementCTP (1..N)
+```
+
+The diagram illustrates the following classes and their relationships:
+
+- plcLayerNetworkDomain**: The base class for network domains.
+- plcLink**: A class representing a network link. It has a generalization relationship with **plcLayerNetworkDomain** (labeled *containerLND* (1..1) *layerNetworkDomain IsMadeOf* *element* (1..N)).
+- plcLinkEnd**: A class representing an end of a network link. It also has a generalization relationship with **plcLayerNetworkDomain** (labeled *containerLND* (1..1) *layerNetworkDomain IsMadeOf* *element* (1..N)).
+- plcLinkConnection**: A class representing a connection between two links. It has a generalization relationship with **plcLink** (labeled *containerLink* (1..1) *linkHasLinkConnections* *elementLC* (1..N)) and with **plcNetworkCTP** (labeled *element* (1..N)).
+- plcNetworkCTP**: A class representing a network control point. It has a generalization relationship with **plcLinkEnd** (labeled *containerLE* (1..1) *linkEndHasNetworkCTPs* *elementCTP* (1..N)).
+
+T0410780-99
+
+UML class diagram showing relationships between plcLayerNetworkDomain, plcLink, plcLinkEnd, plcLinkConnection, and plcNetworkCTP.
+
+Figure 1/G.853.10 – UML class diagram with relationships between classes
+
+## 6.2 UML class diagram representing the Inheritance Hierarchy
+
+
+
+```
+
+classDiagram
+ class G853_1_networkInformationTop["G.853.1: networkInformationTop"] {
+ resourceId
+ }
+ class G853_1_transportConnection["G.853.1: transportConnection"] {
+ signalIdentification
+ directionality
+ }
+ class G853_1_networkCTP["G.853.1: networkCTP"] {
+ signalIdentification
+ pointDirectionality
+ }
+ class G853_1_link["G.853.1: link"] {
+ signalIdentification
+ linkDirectionality
+ }
+ class G853_1_linkEnd["G.853.1: linkEnd"] {
+ signalIdentification
+ topologicalEndDirection
+ }
+ class G853_1_linkConnection["G.853.1: linkConnection"]
+ class plcmNetworkCTP["plcmNetworkCTP"] {
+ G.853.1: userLabel (imp)
+ plcmCallerId
+ }
+ class plcmLink["plcmLink"] {
+ pamAvailableLinkCapacity (imp)
+ }
+ class plcmLinkEnd["plcmLinkEnd"] {
+ pamAvailableLinkCapacity (imp)
+ }
+ class G853_1_layerNetworkDomain["G.853.1: layerNetworkDomain"] {
+ signalIdentification
+ }
+ class plcmLayerNetworkDomain["plcmLayerNetworkDomain"]
+ class plcmLinkConnection["plcmLinkConnection"] {
+ G.853.1: userLabel (imp)
+ plcmCallerId
+ }
+
+ G853_1_transportConnection --|> G853_1_networkInformationTop
+ G853_1_networkCTP --|> G853_1_networkInformationTop
+ G853_1_link --|> G853_1_networkInformationTop
+ G853_1_linkEnd --|> G853_1_networkInformationTop
+ G853_1_linkConnection --|> G853_1_transportConnection
+ plcmNetworkCTP --|> G853_1_networkCTP
+ plcmLink --|> G853_1_link
+ plcmLinkEnd --|> G853_1_linkEnd
+ plcmLinkConnection --|> G853_1_linkConnection
+ plcmLayerNetworkDomain --|> G853_1_layerNetworkDomain
+
+```
+
+UML class diagram showing inheritance hierarchy for G.853.1 classes. Root: G.853.1: networkInformationTop (resourceId). Subclasses: G.853.1: transportConnection (signalIdentification, directionality), G.853.1: networkCTP (signalIdentification, pointDirectionality), G.853.1: link (signalIdentification, linkDirectionality), G.853.1: linkEnd (signalIdentification, topologicalEndDirection). Further subclasses include G.853.1: linkConnection, plcmNetworkCTP (userLabel (imp), plcmCallerId), plcmLink (pamAvailableLinkCapacity (imp)), plcmLinkEnd (pamAvailableLinkCapacity (imp)). G.853.1: layerNetworkDomain (signalIdentification) is also shown with plcmLayerNetworkDomain subclass. T0410790-99
+
+Figure 2/G.853.10 – UML class diagram representing the Inheritance Hierarchy
+
+# 7 Label references
+
+| Full label reference | Local label reference |
+|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT: layerNetworkDomain> | layerNetworkDomain |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT: link> | link |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT: linkConnection> | linkConnection |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT: linkEnd> | linkEnd |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT: networkCTP> | networkCTP |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: layerNetworkDomainIsMadeOf> | layerNetworkDomainIsMadeOf |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: linkHasLinkConnections> | linkHasLinkConnections |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: linkEndHasNetworkCTPs> | linkEndHasNetworkCTPs |
+| <"Rec. G.853.8", ATTRIBUTE: pamAvailableLinkCapacity> | pamAvailableLinkCapacity |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", ATTRIBUTE: userLabel> | userLabel |
+
+# 8 Information object class definitions
+
+## 8.1 plcmlayerNetworkDomain
+
+
+
+#### DEFINITION
+
+"This object class is derived from ."
+
+### ATTRIBUTE
+
+-- none additional
+
+#### RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+## 8.2 plcmlink
+
+
+
+#### DEFINITION
+
+"This object class is derived from ."
+
+#### ATTRIBUTE
+
+
+
+"pamAvailableLinkCapacity provides the number of free linkconnections in the plcmlink available for a client usage. This attribute is imported from "Rec. G.853.8", COMMUNITY: pre-provisioned adaptation management."
+
+#### RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+
+
+## 8.3 plcmlinkconnection
+
+
+
+#### DEFINITION
+
+"This object class is derived from ."
+
+#### ATTRIBUTE
+
+
+
+"
+
+This attribute is imported from Recommendation G.853.1 and it is used to hold a user friendly name of the plcmlinkconnection."
+
+
+
+"This attribute is used to indicate to which caller the plcmlinkconnection has been assigned. The initial value for this attribute is NULL."
+
+#### RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+
+
+## 8.4 **plcmLinkEnd**
+
+
+
+#### DEFINITION
+
+"This object class is derived from ."
+
+### ATTRIBUTE
+
+
+
+"pamAvailableLinkCapacity provides the number of free networkCTPs in the plcmLinkEnd available for a client usage. This attribute is imported from "Rec. G.853.8", COMMUNITY: pre-provisioned adaptation management."
+
+#### RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+
+
+## 8.5 **plcmNetworkCTP**
+
+
+
+#### DEFINITION
+
+"This object class is derived from ."
+
+### ATTRIBUTE
+
+
+
+"
+
+This attribute is imported from Recommendation G.853.1 and it is used to hold a user friendly name of the plcmNetworkCTP."
+
+
+
+"This attribute is used to indicate to which caller the plcmNetworkCTP has been assigned. The initial value for this attribute is NULL."
+
+#### RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+
+
+## 9 **Information relationship definitions**
+
+None additional.
+
+## 10 **Static schemas**
+
+None.
+
+## 11 **Dynamic schemas**
+
+None.
+
+## 12 Attributes
+
+## 12.1 plcmCallerId
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+#### DEFINITION
+
+"This attribute is used to indicate to which caller the transport entity has been assigned. When the transport entity is not assigned, the value has to be NULL. When the transport entity is assigned, the value has to be different from NULL."
+
+# ITU-T RECOMMENDATIONS SERIES
+
+| | |
+|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Series A | Organization of the work of the ITU-T |
+| Series B | Means of expression: definitions, symbols, classification |
+| Series C | General telecommunication statistics |
+| Series D | General tariff principles |
+| Series E | Overall network operation, telephone service, service operation and human factors |
+| Series F | Non-telephone telecommunication services |
+| Series G | Transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks |
+| Series H | Audiovisual and multimedia systems |
+| Series I | Integrated services digital network |
+| Series J | Transmission of television, sound programme and other multimedia signals |
+| Series K | Protection against interference |
+| Series L | Construction, installation and protection of cables and other elements of outside plant |
+| Series M | TMN and network maintenance: international transmission systems, telephone circuits, telegraphy, facsimile and leased circuits |
+| Series N | Maintenance: international sound programme and television transmission circuits |
+| Series O | Specifications of measuring equipment |
+| Series P | Telephone transmission quality, telephone installations, local line networks |
+| Series Q | Switching and signalling |
+| Series R | Telegraph transmission |
+| Series S | Telegraph services terminal equipment |
+| Series T | Terminals for telematic services |
+| Series U | Telegraph switching |
+| Series V | Data communication over the telephone network |
+| Series X | Data networks and open system communications |
+| Series Y | Global information infrastructure and Internet protocol aspects |
+| Series Z | Languages and general software aspects for telecommunication systems |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7da83ecb82b51a4cef7694858eef2c35f1986ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/2dfa6ac3edfe874f68aa0cbccaa42322_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d77a478c5b78d330a2a6abbd32e7d0ac053d8b9c1ffe8a96476214afa6ddf7ae
+size 8196
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/37819f1170c36655c57129b6bd8a5ceb_img.jpg b/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/37819f1170c36655c57129b6bd8a5ceb_img.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d5c2b6420a9be43f64d76b0566bacb1603bfa3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/37819f1170c36655c57129b6bd8a5ceb_img.jpg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:80569a14d99f9af2d2c8282e2471f34f1e146dc8d6daac64fcc172d6284f9fa7
+size 25781
diff --git a/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md b/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5393e32dcdbe9c93449e0bbcd04b95294ecbdd24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marked/G/T-REC-G.854.3-199903-I_PDF-E/raw.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2177 @@
+
+
+
+
+ITU logo: A globe with the letters ITU and a lightning bolt.
+
+INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
+
+**ITU-T**
+
+TELECOMMUNICATION
+STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
+OF ITU
+
+**G.854.3**
+
+(03/99)
+
+SERIES G: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA,
+DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS
+
+Digital transmission systems – Digital networks –
+Management of transport network
+
+# --- **Computational viewpoint for topology management**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation G.854.3
+
+(Previously CCITT Recommendation)
+
+---
+
+# ITU-T G-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS **TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS**
+
+| | |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
+| INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE CONNECTIONS AND CIRCUITS | G.100–G.199 |
+| INTERNATIONAL ANALOGUE CARRIER SYSTEM | |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS COMMON TO ALL ANALOGUE CARRIER-TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS | G.200–G.299 |
+| INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON METALLIC LINES | G.300–G.399 |
+| GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIER TELEPHONE SYSTEMS ON RADIO-RELAY OR SATELLITE LINKS AND INTERCONNECTION WITH METALLIC LINES | G.400–G.449 |
+| COORDINATION OF RADIOTELEPHONY AND LINE TELEPHONY | G.450–G.499 |
+| TESTING EQUIPMENTS | |
+| TRANSMISSION MEDIA CHARACTERISTICS | G.600–G.699 |
+| DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS | |
+| TERMINAL EQUIPMENTS | G.700–G.799 |
+| DIGITAL NETWORKS | G.800–G.899 |
+| General aspects | G.800–G.809 |
+| Design objectives for digital networks | G.810–G.819 |
+| Quality and availability targets | G.820–G.829 |
+| Network capabilities and functions | G.830–G.839 |
+| SDH network characteristics | G.840–G.849 |
+| Management of transport network | G.850–G.859 |
+| SDH radio and satellite systems integration | G.860–G.869 |
+| Optical transport networks | G.870–G.879 |
+| DIGITAL SECTIONS AND DIGITAL LINE SYSTEM | G.900–G.999 |
+
+For further details, please refer to ITU-T List of Recommendations.
+
+# **COMPUTATIONAL VIEWPOINT FOR TOPOLOGY MANAGEMENT**
+
+## **Summary**
+
+The topology management community is used to managing the topology of a layer network domain and the relationships between the resources of the layer network domain being managed. The service provided by the community allows for the creation and deletion of the following resources inside a layer network domain: subnetwork, link, topological link, link end, topological link end and access group. The service also provides a set of reporting actions to advise potential notification receivers of creation and deletion of resources in the community. The service is available between one single caller and one single provider.
+
+The partitioning of subnetworks and links is not addressed in this community.
+
+Enterprise community actions covered by this specification:
+
+- create access group;
+- delete access group;
+- create link;
+- delete link;
+- create link end;
+- delete link end;
+- create subnetwork;
+- delete subnetwork;
+- create topological link;
+- delete topological link;
+- create topological link end;
+- delete topological link end;
+- report access group creation;
+- report access group deletion;
+- report link creation;
+- report link deletion;
+- report link end creation;
+- report link end deletion;
+- report subnetwork creation;
+- report subnetwork deletion;
+- report topological link creation;
+- report topological link deletion;
+- report topological link end creation;
+- report topological link end deletion.
+
+### **Source**
+
+ITU-T Recommendation G.854.3 was prepared by ITU-T Study Group 4 (1997-2000) and was approved under the WTSC Resolution No. 1 procedure on the 26th of March 1999.
+
+## FOREWORD
+
+ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis.
+
+The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendations on these topics.
+
+The approval of Recommendations by the Members of the ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1.
+
+In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-T's purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC.
+
+### NOTE
+
+In this Recommendation the term *recognized operating agency (ROA)* includes any individual, company, corporation or governmental organization that operates a public correspondence service. The terms *Administration*, *ROA* and *public correspondence* are defined in the *Constitution of the ITU (Geneva, 1992)*.
+
+## INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
+
+The ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation of this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. The ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process.
+
+As of the date of approval of this Recommendation, the ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementors are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to consult the TSB patent database.
+
+© ITU 1999
+
+All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU.
+
+## CONTENTS
+
+###### Page
+
+| | | |
+|-------|-------------------------------------------------|----|
+| 1 | Scope ..... | 1 |
+| 2 | References ..... | 1 |
+| 3 | Definitions ..... | 1 |
+| 4 | Abbreviations ..... | 1 |
+| 5 | Conventions ..... | 2 |
+| 6 | Label references ..... | 2 |
+| 7 | Interfaces ..... | 3 |
+| 7.1 | Query interfaces ..... | 3 |
+| 7.2 | Operational interfaces ..... | 6 |
+| 7.2.1 | Common resource interface ..... | 6 |
+| 7.2.2 | Topology resources provisioning interface ..... | 7 |
+| 7.3 | Report interfaces ..... | 20 |
+| 7.3.1 | Common report resourceId change interface ..... | 20 |
+| 7.3.2 | Topology resources reporting interface ..... | 21 |
+| 7.4 | ASN.1 supporting productions ..... | 30 |
+
+
+
+# **COMPUTATIONAL VIEWPOINT FOR TOPOLOGY MANAGEMENT**
+
+*(Geneva, 1999)*
+
+# **1 Scope**
+
+This computational viewpoint specification is related to the topology management enterprise specification defined in Recommendation G.852.3 and the topology management information specification defined in Recommendation G.853.3.
+
+# **2 References**
+
+The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; all users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is regularly published.
+
+- [1] ITU-T Recommendation G.851.1 (1996), *Management of the transport network – Application of the RM-ODP framework.*
+- [2] ITU-T Recommendation G.853.1 (1999), *Common elements of the information viewpoint for the management of a transport network.*
+- [3] ITU-T Recommendation G.852.3 (1999), *Enterprise viewpoint for topology management.*
+- [4] ITU-T Recommendation G.853.3 (1999), *Information viewpoint for topology management.*
+
+# **3 Definitions**
+
+None.
+
+# **4 Abbreviations**
+
+This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations:
+
+| | |
+|---------|---------------------------------------|
+| AG | Access Group |
+| ASN.1 | Abstract Syntax Notation One |
+| CTP | Connection Termination Point |
+| Id | Identifier |
+| Ifce | Interface |
+| inv | invariant |
+| ITU | International Telecommunication Union |
+| layerND | layer Network Domain |
+| LE | Link End |
+| LND | Layer Network Domain |
+
+| | |
+|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
+| NTTP | Network Trail Termination Point |
+| RM-ODP | Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing |
+| SN | Subnetwork |
+| SNC | Subnetwork Connection |
+| SNTP | Subnetwork Termination Point |
+| TL | Topological Link |
+| TLE | Topological Link End |
+| topman | topology management |
+| TP | Termination Point |
+| TTP | Trail Termination Point |
+
+# 5 Conventions
+
+In order to increase the readability of the behaviour in the operations:
+
+- parameters are written in **bold**;
+- elements defined in the information specification are written in *italic*.
+
+# 6 Label references
+
+| Full label reference | Local label reference |
+|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT:linkConnection> | linkConnection |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT:networkCTP> | networkCTP |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_OBJECT:subnetworkConnection> | subnetworkConnection |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanAccessGroup> | topmanAccessGroup |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanLayerNetworkDomain> | topmanLayerNetworkDomain |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanLink> | topmanLink |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanLinkEnd> | topmanLinkEnd |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanNetworkTTP> | topmanNetworkTTP |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanSubnetwork> | topmanSubnetwork |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanSubnetworkTP> | topmanSubnetworkTP |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanTopologicalLink> | topmanTopologicalLink |
+| <"Rec. G.853.3", INFORMATION_OBJECT: topmanTopologicalLinkEnd> | topmanTopologicalLinkEnd |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", ATTRIBUTE: linkDirectionality> | linkDirectionality |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", ATTRIBUTE: pointDirectionality> | pointDirectionality |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", ATTRIBUTE: resourceId> | resourceId |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", ATTRIBUTE: signalIdentification> | signalIdentification |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", ATTRIBUTE: topologicalEndDirection> | topologicalEndDirection |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", ATTRIBUTE: userLabel> | userLabel |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: accessGroupIsMadeOfNetworkTTPs> | accessGroupIsMadeOfNetworkTTPs |
+
+| Full label reference | Local label reference |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: layerNetworkDomainIsMadeOf> | layerNetworkDomainIsMadeOf |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: linkBinds> | linkBinds |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: linkConnectionIsTerminatedByTopologicalEntities> | linkConnectionIsTerminatedByTopological Entities |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: linkEndHasNetworkCTPs> | linkEndHasNetworkCTPs |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: linkEndIsBoundTo> | linkEndIsBoundTo |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: linkHasLinkConnections> | linkHasLinkConnections |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: subnetworkHasSubnetworkConnections> | subnetworkHasSubnetwork Connections |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: subnetworkIsDelimitedBy> | subnetworkIsDelimitedBy |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: subnetworkTPIsRelatedToExtremity> | subnetworkTPIsRrelatedToExtremity |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: topologicalLinkEndIsSupportedByNetworkTTP> | topologicalLinkEndIsSupportedBy NetworkTTP |
+| <"Rec. G.853.1", INFORMATION_RELATIONSHIP: topologicalLinkIsSupportedByTrail> | topologicalLinkIsSupportedByTrail |
+
+| Full ASN.1 production reference | Local label reference |
+|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
+| <"Rec. X.721:1992: Attribute-ASN1Module" : SimpleNameType> | SimpleNameType |
+| <"Rec. X.680:1997" : GraphicString> | GraphicString |
+
+# 7 Interfaces
+
+This specification does not define operations which change the *userLabel* of the resources or report this change to the notification receiver because they do not change the state of the system. Their exact signature will be developed as part of the engineering viewpoint, with the concerned technology.
+
+## 7.1 Query interfaces
+
+This specification refers to interfaces that allow get access to identification and properties of resources involved in the "topology management" community. As the invocation of contained operations do not modify any state, there is no interest to develop them explicitly. Their exact signature will be developed as part of the engineering viewpoint, with the concerned technology. These interfaces are listed in the following table with the information they allow access to.
+
+| Interface name | Information object | Attributes and relationships |
+|-----------------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| topmanAccessGroupQueryIfce | | |
+| topmanLayerNetworkDomainQueryIfce | | |
+| topmanLinkEndQueryIfce | | |
+| topmanLinkQueryIfce | | |
+| topmanNetworkTTPQueryIfce | | |
+
+| Interface name | Information object | Attributes and relationships |
+|------------------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| topmanSubnetwork QueryIfce | | |
+| topmanSubnetworkTP QueryIfce | | |
+| topmanTopological LinkEndQueryIfce | |