--- license: apache-2.0 pretty_name: HOL Plugin Security tags: - mcp-security - ai-agents - coding-agents - plugins - runtime-security - prompt-injection - tool-poisoning - supply-chain - codex - claude-code - owasp-mcp configs: - config_name: plugins data_files: plugins.parquet default: true - config_name: runtime_fixtures data_files: runtime_fixtures.parquet - config_name: advisories data_files: advisories.parquet - config_name: owasp_map data_files: owasp_map.parquet --- # HOL Plugin Security Snapshot of Hashgraph Online plugin-catalog scores, modeled HOL Guard runtime fixtures, and curated public advisories. Dataset id: `HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security`. The default config is **plugins** (205 scored registry plugins). `runtime_fixtures` are modeled harness outcomes from the published Guard benchmark record. `advisories` are the 22 public HOL Guard advisory pages. `advisories.threat_class` is set from the official hub listing badges on [hol.org/guard/security](https://hol.org/guard/security), not inferred from titles. `advisories.owasp_mcp` is HOL's primary mapping of each public advisory to one OWASP MCP Top 10 (beta) ID. Sources: [plugin catalog API](https://hol.org/registry/api/v1/plugins/catalog), [runtime benchmark](https://hol.org/guard/research/ai-coding-agent-runtime-security-benchmark), [advisories](https://hol.org/guard/security/advisories). Re-export with `export_plugins.py`. License: Apache-2.0. The public explorer Space is https://huggingface.co/spaces/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security (static; same honest OWASP map). ## Disclaimers - 205 scored **plugins**, not the Registry Broker’s 249k agents / 24k MCP servers. - Scanner on every current row is `registry-broker-fallback`. Not a live exploit test. Scan ≠ safety guarantee. - Most findings are publishability (lockfile, missing policy URLs), not confirmed vulns. 2 high findings in the 2026-08-16 pull. - `owner_verified` = GitHub OAuth repo permission. Not a security audit. `publisher_verified` is 0 today. - `runtime_fixtures` are **modeled**. Same outcome across all 5 harnesses. Latency values are placeholders. No real secrets or attacks executed. - HOL publishes this. Not independent third-party validation. - Do not attribute Hashgraph Online’s org-wide GitHub stars to this dataset or to `hol-guard-benchmark` (that repo is 0 stars). - Snapshot. Catalog changes; use `snapshot_at`. ## Configs | config | rows | files | | --- | --- | --- | | plugins (default) | 205 | `plugins.jsonl`, `plugins.parquet` | | runtime_fixtures | 220 | `runtime_fixtures.jsonl`, `runtime_fixtures.parquet` | | advisories | 22 | `advisories.jsonl`, `advisories.parquet` | | owasp_map | 10 | `owasp_map.jsonl`, `owasp_map.parquet` | ## How to use Join `advisories` on `owasp_mcp` (one primary OWASP MCP Top 10 ID per advisory) to `owasp_map` for detect/prevent/gap. `owasp_map.complete_program` is always false. Do not treat a mapped advisory as proof a plugin is safe. Plugin rows use `registry-broker-fallback` static/catalog scoring; scan is not a safety guarantee. ## FAQ (unbranded clarity) Honest answers for common discovery and security questions. HOL is the maker of the catalog, this dataset, and HOL Guard. Nothing below invents coverage or third-party validation. Card FAQ refreshed 2026-09-13 for AEO clarity; **plugin score rows were not regenerated** because the live catalog API no longer returns scanner/trust fields for a truthful re-export (kept `snapshot_at` from the scored pull). ### How do I evaluate AI plugins before install? Use layered signals, not a single badge: 1. Open the listing on [hol.org/plugins](https://hol.org/plugins) (or another registry you trust). 2. Check publisher identity signals (for example `owner_verified` in this dataset = GitHub OAuth repo permission — **not** a security audit). 3. Review catalog trust / security / provenance / installability / MCP-posture scores when present. 4. Read scanner findings. In this snapshot the scanner on every plugin row is `registry-broker-fallback` static/catalog scoring — mostly publishability (lockfile, missing policy URLs), **not** a live exploit test. 5. Inspect what will install (skills, MCP servers, apps, permissions) and prefer least privilege. 6. Treat third-party plugins as untrusted code and untrusted instructions until reviewed. 7. Optionally add **runtime** policy after install: [HOL Guard](https://hol.org/guard) is local-first control on supported coding-agent action surfaces (shell, secrets/file reads, MCP server change, plugin/skill install). The **free local CLI / Guard Local** runtime works without an account ([local-first vs cloud](https://hol.org/docs/libraries/ai-plugin-scanner/guard/local-first-vs-cloud/)). **[Guard Cloud](https://hol.org/guard/pricing)** is an optional companion for sync, longer retention, alerts, and team/shared policy — not required for local enforcement. Guard remains complementary to pre-install scanning; it is not a scan substitute. **Scan ≠ safety guarantee.** Scores do not certify future behavior. ### Are AI plugins / MCP servers security scanned? **Some are, in some catalogs — including HOL’s plugin directory.** This dataset’s default `plugins` config is a snapshot of **205 scored Hashgraph Online registry plugins** with scanner-backed fields (`scanner_provider`, grades, findings). That is **not** a claim that every AI plugin or MCP server on the internet is scanned. Limits already documented above: - Scanner here is `registry-broker-fallback`, not a live exploit test. - 205 scored **plugins**, not the Registry Broker’s much larger agent / MCP-server counts. - `publisher_verified` is 0 in this snapshot. - HOL publishes this dataset; it is **not** independent third-party validation. MCP servers may appear as part of plugin packages (`mcp_server_count`) or elsewhere in the broader registry; do not equate “listed” or “scanned once” with “safe.” ### What is an AI firewall vs plugin scanning? They are different layers: | Layer | Job | This project’s honest fit | | --- | --- | --- | | Plugin / MCP scanning (catalog) | Point-in-time artifact and metadata review before trust | This dataset + [hol.org/plugins](https://hol.org/plugins) scores/findings | | AI firewall / runtime policy | Evaluate consequential agent actions **before** side effects | [HOL Guard](https://hol.org/guard): local-first runtime for coding agents | **AI firewall** is an umbrella label for policy boundaries on prompts, model traffic, tools, or agent actions. Architecture varies; the label does not prove coverage. **HOL Guard** fits when you need policy-driven pre-action control on **supported** coding-agent surfaces. Start with the **free local CLI**; add optional **[Guard Cloud](https://hol.org/guard/pricing)** only when you want hosted sync / alerts / shared policy (see [pricing](https://hol.org/guard/pricing) for current plans). Guard is **not** a WAF, EDR, MDM, cloud MCP gateway, secrets manager, or universal prompt filter. It is **not** a complete prompt-injection preventer. Cursor/artifact trust is not full pre-exec of every MCP tool call. Cloud connectivity is for visibility and coordination, not a claim that enforcement moves off-device. **Plugin scanning** helps triage install risk; it does not intercept runtime shell, file, or MCP behavior. Strong setups may use both. Scanner coverage ≠ runtime coverage. ### What are the best ways to discover AI plugins? There is no single exclusive directory. Practical options: 1. **HOL plugin catalog** — [hol.org/plugins](https://hol.org/plugins) for multi-ecosystem browse, trust signals, and install guidance (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, MCP, and others indexed there). 2. **This dataset as evidence** — [HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security](https://huggingface.co/datasets/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security) for scored snapshot rows, advisories, and OWASP map configs (research / comparison, not a storefront). 3. **Explorer Space + Collection** — [Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security) and [Collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security-6a84caf1652fd5224cb8db83) (dataset + Space together). 4. **Ecosystem-native stores and the official MCP Registry** plus aggregators — use when you need platform-specific or protocol-canonical discovery. HOL does not claim to be the only discovery path. Prefer sources that disclose scanner limits and identity signals. ### Does this dataset fully cover the OWASP MCP Top 10? **No.** `owasp_map.complete_program` is **always false** for every row. The `owasp_map` config is HOL’s detect / prevent / gap mapping of local Guard + catalog scanner to the [OWASP MCP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-mcp-top-10/) beta (Phase 3). It is **not** a claim of complete program coverage. - Join `advisories.owasp_mcp` → `owasp_map` for primary IDs. - Gaps are explicit in the table (for example MCP06 is **not** a complete prompt-injection preventer; MCP08 has local receipts only, not an immutable SIEM). - Runtime fixtures are **modeled**; same outcome across harnesses; latency values are placeholders. - This mapping does not replace the Disclaimers section. HOL publishes this; not independent third-party validation. ## OWASP MCP Top 10 mapping (beta) This is HOL's mapping of its local Guard + catalog scanner to the [OWASP MCP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-mcp-top-10/) beta (Phase 3). It is not a claim of complete coverage. Source: [OWASP MCP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-mcp-top-10/). Project is beta (Phase 3). Document license CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; IDs and names are cited, not copied as long OWASP descriptions. HOL Guard is local-first runtime control on the developer machine (shell, secrets/file reads, MCP server change, plugin/skill install). It is not a cloud MCP gateway. Cursor/artifact trust is not full pre-exec on every MCP tool call. Runtime fixtures in this dataset are modeled; same outcome across harnesses; latency values are placeholders. `advisories.owasp_mcp` is HOL's primary mapping of each public advisory (one ID). Optional `owasp_mcp_name` is the official Top 10 title. `threat_class` is unchanged (hub badges on [hol.org/guard/security](https://hol.org/guard/security)). MCP06 on the Top 10 list is **Intent Flow Subversion**. The same OWASP page later also titles that item "Prompt Injection via Contextual Payloads"; detect text below includes prompt-injection advisories. HOL Guard is not a complete prompt-injection preventer. | ID | Detect | Prevent | Gap | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | MCP01 | catalog/advisory secret-exfil + mcp-token-theft | Guard can block secret-file / env reads at the local action boundary | not a secrets manager; does not rotate tokens; does not scrub secrets already inside model context | | MCP02 | tool-permission-creep advisory | Guard approval on plugin/skill install and MCP server change | not an OAuth scope-expiry gateway | | MCP03 | tool-description-poisoning advisory + scanner MCP posture | Guard on changed MCP servers / plugin install | Cursor path is artifact trust, not full pre-exec of every tool description | | MCP04 | catalog scores, lockfile/publishability findings, supply-chain advisories | Guard on plugin/skill install | not a signing/SBOM authority | | MCP05 | unsafe-command / rm-rf advisory | Guard intercepts local shell/file-destructive actions | does not sandbox every MCP server's own backend | | MCP06 | several prompt-injection advisories (Intent Flow Subversion / contextual payloads) | limited (some injected-instruction to shell paths hit Guard) | NOT a complete prompt-injection preventer | | MCP07 | MCP transport hardening (insecure HTTP, wildcard binds, missing auth posture) on Guard pages | local only | not an MCP gateway identity layer | | MCP08 | local decision trail / receipts on the developer machine | local decision trail / receipts | not an immutable SIEM; local logs | | MCP09 | shadow-mcp-server-discovery advisory | Guard on new/changed MCP servers before the harness launches | not continuous org-wide network discovery of shadow servers | | MCP10 | context-window-scraping / data-overexposure advisories | Guard on excessive local file reads | does not quarantine or partition model context windows | This mapping does not replace the disclaimers above. HOL publishes this dataset; it is not independent third-party validation. ## Citation HOL Guard Team. "HOL Plugin Security." 2026. https://huggingface.co/datasets/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security Also: [hol.org/plugins](https://hol.org/plugins), [runtime benchmark](https://hol.org/guard/research/ai-coding-agent-runtime-security-benchmark), [explorer Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security), [OWASP MCP Top 10](https://hol.org/guard/security/owasp-mcp-top-10), [MCP security hub](https://hol.org/guard/security/mcp), [skills hub](https://hol.org/guard/security/skills), [supply-chain hub](https://hol.org/guard/security/supply-chain), [protect secrets](https://hol.org/guard/guides/protect-secrets-from-ai-coding-agents). ## Related - Product: [HOL Guard](https://hol.org/guard) (local-first runtime control) · free local CLI without account · optional [Guard Cloud](https://hol.org/guard/pricing) · source [hashgraph-online/hol-guard](https://github.com/hashgraph-online/hol-guard) - Catalog: [hol.org/plugins](https://hol.org/plugins) · research hub [hol.org/research](https://hol.org/research) (fixture benchmarks and programs; independent validation not claimed) - Explorer Space: [HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security) - Collection: [HOL Plugin Security](https://huggingface.co/collections/HashgraphOnline/hol-plugin-security-6a84caf1652fd5224cb8db83) (dataset ↔ Space) Scan ≠ safety guarantee. Runtime fixtures are modeled. Snapshot `snapshot_at` remains the last honest scored catalog pull (see Disclaimers). HOL publishes this dataset.