--- license: cc-by-4.0 language: - en - he pretty_name: ASR Error Prediction (Hebrish) tags: - asr - speech-recognition - error-prediction - code-switching - fine-tuning - hebrish task_categories: - text-classification size_categories: - 1K`**: one model's scores for the candidates, plus terms it proposed outside the pools (`origin`: `pool` or `proposed`): `p_fail` (0-100), `pattern` (the confusion class it applied), `likely_heard_as`, `reason`, `rank` within the segment. **Predictions are not labels.** They are rankings to be checked against the real model (a synthetic probe, then a few real recordings) before any word gets training sentences. Confirmed ones move to the error list with `source: predicted`. ## Runs | Run | Date | Model | Notes | |---|---|---|---| | `haiku-r1` | 2026-10-25 | `claude-haiku-5-5` (Anthropic Batch API, low effort; batch `msgbatch_01SFKjYbEtvGqChr8eo3JXPk`, US$0.13) | first pass; fix list at 87 words; scores every candidate in chunks of 60 with the whole fix list as evidence, plus 52 proposed tech terms and 55 proposed English words; 1 candidate missing from the replies | **`haiku-r1` caveats.** Scores are uncalibrated and not comparable across segments. Code-switching scores run high (mean 58 for terms with no recorded takes, 37% of candidates at 60 or above) because the fix list has only 7 Hebrew words to learn from, so Haiku leans on "Hebrew = hard". Scores do fall with recorded takes (mean 58 at 0 takes, 49 at 1 to 4, 31 at 5 to 19, 22 at 20 or more), which is the expected direction. Use ranks within a segment, not thresholds. Wrong forms that equalled the term itself (1,175 of them) were removed after the run. ## Not included No audio, and nothing from the speaker's dictations beyond single confirmed words and the ASR's wrong forms. Negatives (rare words the model transcribed correctly) are planned but not published yet.