--- license: apache-2.0 task_categories: - text-generation language: - en tags: - agent - tool-use - function-calling - synthetic - methodology size_categories: - n<1K --- # Execution-Verified Agent Trajectories — Format & Method This repository documents a **method and data format** for building supervised fine-tuning sets from agent trajectories that are verified by *running the code*, not by asking a model whether the answer looks right. **This is a specification plus synthetic examples, not a corpus.** The trajectories that trained [Luthor 8B](https://huggingface.co/IAMIbrahim/luthor-8b) were generated against a private repository and cannot be released. Everything needed to rebuild an equivalent set against your own repositories is here. ## Why verification-first The usual way to build an agentic SFT set is to have a strong teacher model attempt tasks and keep the attempts that look good — judged by another model, or by nothing at all. That trains fluency at *appearing* to fix code. The approach here keeps a trajectory only if it ends in a patch that turns a **failing test suite green**, checked by executing the suite in a per-task container. In the run that produced Luthor, 296 attempts yielded **138 verified trajectories** across 64 of 74 tasks — so roughly **54% of confident-looking attempts were wrong** and were discarded. That discard rate is the entire argument for the method. ## Pipeline ``` mine tasks real commits that fix a failing test -> fail-to-pass task specs build images one Docker image per task, pinned to the parent commit roll out N attempts per task with a teacher model driving real tools verify run the suite in the image; keep only green runs window trim, cap, and window to the trainer's context limit ``` Each stage is independently checkable, and the verifier is the test — there is no separate labelling step to trust. ### Task mining A task is a commit where a test that **failed at the parent commit passes at the commit**. This gives a ground-truth patch and an objective success signal for free. The agent is shown the failing test and the repo at the parent commit; it never sees the real fix. ### Verification A trajectory passes only if all hold: 1. The extracted patch applies cleanly to the parent commit. 2. The previously-failing test passes after applying it. 3. No host-machine paths leaked into the transcript **as evidence in tool output** (a path appearing inside a repo file is not a leak; a path appearing in a command's output is). 4. The run terminated on its own rather than hitting the turn cap. ## Data format ShareGPT-style JSONL. One line per **window**. ```json { "conversations": [ {"from": "system", "value": "...[{...}]..."}, {"from": "human", "value": "The failing test and what to fix"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "...\n\n{\"name\": \"bash\", ...}\n"}, {"from": "tool", "value": "\n...\n"}, {"from": "gpt", "value": "Summary of the fix"} ], "luther": { "task_id": "repo:sha:prompt_style", "repo": "toy-examples", "sha": "a1b2c3d4e5f6", "n_turns": 8, "tool_errors": 0, "recovered_from_error": false, "verified": true, "window": 0, "loss_from": 0 } } ``` | Role | Meaning | |---|---| | `system` | Tool declarations in a Hermes-style `` block | | `human` | The task statement | | `gpt` | Assistant turn — reasoning and/or `` — **the only turns carrying loss** | | `tool` | Tool output, wrapped in `` | `loss_from` is an index into `conversations`: assistant turns **before** it are overlap context carried from the previous window and must be masked out. Turns at or after it carry loss. See [`examples/synthetic_trajectories.jsonl`](examples/synthetic_trajectories.jsonl) for two complete, runnable examples in this exact schema — one clean fix, one that hits a tool error and recovers. They are invented toy Python tasks. ## Windowing — the part that is easy to get wrong Raw trajectories are large: a median of roughly **61k tokens**, dominated by tool output (~40k) and reasoning blocks (~25k). Three transforms make them trainable at a 16k context: 1. **Truncate tool outputs** to ~4,000 characters. Directory listings and test logs are mostly noise past that. 2. **Cap `` blocks** at ~12,000 characters. 3. **Window to the context limit with one-turn overlap** — do *not* tail-truncate. Point 3 matters more than it looks. Tail-truncating a trajectory to fit the context removes its **end**, which is precisely where the successful fix and the green test run are. A trainer that does this silently learns to explore and never to finish. Windowing with `loss_from` keeps every part of the trajectory trainable while never computing loss twice on the same tokens. ## Splitting Split **by commit**, never by trajectory. Multiple attempts at one task share the same underlying fix, so a trajectory-level split leaks the answer across the train/eval boundary and inflates eval scores. ## Reference statistics From the run that produced Luthor 8B, for calibration: | | | |---|---| | Tasks mined | 74 | | Attempts | 296 (4 × 74) | | Verified trajectories | 138 (64/74 tasks) | | Train / eval trajectories | 95 / 16 (5 held-out commits) | | Train / eval windows | 493 / 78 | | Error-recovery examples | 12 | | Mean turns | 24.2 | | Window tokens (p50 / max) | 13,789 / 16,251 | | Train tokens per epoch | ~6.39M | Completed runs had a median of 22 turns and a p90 of 29 — a 30-turn cap truncated ~45% of attempts, so **set the turn cap to at least 50**. ## Training notes Loss on assistant turns only, masked to `-100` elsewhere and before `loss_from`. At 16k sequence length with a ~152k-token vocabulary, two things are effectively mandatory on a single 80GB GPU: - **Fused linear cross-entropy** — an unfused loss materialises and repeatedly copies the logits tensor (~35 GB). - **FlashAttention-2** — SDPA materialises the full seq² attention matrix per layer during gradient-checkpointed recompute (~16 GiB each). FA2 cut peak memory from >75 GB to 24.9 GB. ## Limitations - **Synthetic examples only.** Two hand-built trajectories, for format illustration. Not a training corpus. - **Single-domain reference stats.** The numbers above come from one Python data-engineering codebase. - **Verification is only as good as the test suite.** A patch that games a weak test passes here too. - **Teacher-dependent.** Trajectories inherit the teacher's habits; the verifier filters correctness, not style. ## License Apache 2.0. The synthetic examples are original and carry no third-party rights.