--- license: other license_name: original-source-licences pretty_name: KGGuard+W checkpoints and reproduction artifacts tags: - knowledge-graph - error-detection - fact-checking - reproducibility language: - en size_categories: - 1K//kgguard_plus_w_seed.joblib` | final fusion model (KGGuard+W) per dataset × run × seed; `.json` = readable description | | `checkpoints///kgguard_plus_kg_only_seed.joblib` | the same model without web evidence (KGGuard+) | | `checkpoints/verified_metrics.csv` | test metrics of every checkpoint; they equal the reported ones (refit check ≤ 1e-9) | | `outputs///scores/` | every cached evidence and baseline score, including LLM zero-shot, FactCheck (DKA, GIV-F, RAG, consensus), TransE, ComplEx, CAGED, PaTyBRED, SDValidate | | `data/raw`, `data/interim`, `data/interim_ms` | raw and processed facts, frozen splits, context graphs; `interim_ms` = the 5 fresh splits | | `data/cache` | SPARQL / HTTP responses, encoder embeddings, NLI and LLM / FactCheck answers, retrieved web passages | | `reference///` | reported results (E1–E7) used for comparison; `reference/summaries/`: multi-split, robustness, label efficiency, paper tables | | `explanations///` | alert lists with per-source explanations, test predictions | | `MANIFEST.json` | sha256 of every file, library versions, code commit | Runs: - `v7` is the design split, with seeds 13, 42 and 2027. - `ms7_s101` … `ms7_s505` are five fresh grouped splits, each with seed 13. ## Reproduce ```bash git clone https://github.com/coderkhongodo/KGG.git && cd KGG pip install -e ".[dev,hf]" PYTHONPATH=src python scripts/reproduce_from_hf.py --local-dir hf_checkpoint --full-e1 --ablation ``` The script: 1. downloads this repository and verifies every file against `MANIFEST.json`; 2. reloads every checkpoint, scores the test facts and compares AP, AUROC, F1 and BAcc with the reported values; 3. refits every model from the downloaded scores and compares again; 4. with `--full-e1`, re-runs the full main comparison (all baselines, 3 seeds, bootstrap); 5. with `--ablation`, re-runs the ablation of the proposed method (15 variants, design split and 5 fresh splits). No network access, LLM or GPU is needed. **Verified** on a fresh clone with an anonymous download, on CPU (32 threads): | Check | Result | |---|---| | sha256 of all 3,860 files | 0 mismatches | | 32 checkpoints, inference | AP / AUROC / F1 / BAcc identical (0 difference) | | 32 checkpoints, retrained from the downloaded scores | identical | | full E1 (29 methods x 3 seeds x 2 datasets) | identical | | ablation (240 rows) | identical | Checkpoints are pickles (joblib). Load them only if you trust the source, preferably with the same scikit-learn version: - Python 3.12 - scikit-learn 1.9.1 - numpy 2.5.4 - pandas 3.1.1 ## Main results (test AP, mean of 3 seeds) | | DBpedia Accuracy | FactBench | |---|---|---| | best published baseline | 0.257 (LLM zero-shot) | 0.834 (FactCheck-RAG) | | CAGED (CIKM'22) | 0.142 | 0.533 | | **KGGuard+W** | **0.470** | **0.928** | ## Data sources and licences Redistributed for reproducibility, under the licences of the original sources: - **DBpedia Accuracy** (Marchesin, Silvello, Alonso, HCOMP 2024) and DBpedia context data: CC BY-SA. - **FactBench** (DeFacto, AKSW). - **Web passages** retrieved from the FactCheck corpus (SIGIR'25 / EDBT'26). Please cite the original datasets when you use them.