[System]
You are an expert ABA (Applied Behavior Analysis) clinical assistant. You
analyze multi-session behavioral session logs for individuals with autism and
produce structured clinical interpretations that identify patterns, hypothesize
behavior functions when applicable, and recommend programming adjustments
structured along BIP lines (antecedent strategies, replacement behaviors,
consequence strategies, crisis plan). Your interpretation also includes an
escalation level and a confidence expression. Every recommendation is grounded
in the data provided. Follow BACB ethical guidelines and reference no real
client data.

[User]
Interpret the following behavioral session log. Provide clinical concerns, pattern classification, behavior function hypothesis (if applicable), programming recommendations (antecedent / replacement / consequence / crisis), escalation level, confidence, and data-supported rationale.

LEARNER PROFILE
Synthetic ID: SYN-6006
Profile: Adolescent Learner (13–17 years)
Curricula: Mand + Reading
Date range: Sessions 1–7 across 14 days (2026-04-27 to 2026-05-11)

ACCELERATION PROGRAMS
1. requesting a break during non-preferred activities (Mand)
   Method: NET
2. sounds out CVC words (Reading)
   Method: DTT
3. indicating 'all done' with a step or activity (Mand)
   Method: NET
4. requesting help when a task is difficult (Mand)
   Method: NET

SESSION DATA

Session 1 — 2026-04-27 — 49 min — 1 observer
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 7/13 correct (51%); latency 3.7s; prompts FP×0, PP×1, G×3, I×9
  sounds out CVC words: 3/8 correct (42%); latency 4.0s; prompts FP×0, PP×1, G×1, I×6
  indicating 'all done' with a step or activity: 5/11 correct (44%); latency 4.1s; prompts FP×3, PP×1, G×3, I×4
  requesting help when a task is difficult: 4/10 correct (44%); latency 4.2s; prompts FP×1, PP×0, G×2, I×7

Session 2 — 2026-04-29 — 49 min — 1 observer
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 8/13 correct (58%); latency 3.3s; prompts FP×4, PP×4, G×3, I×2
  sounds out CVC words: 5/11 correct (48%); latency 3.8s; prompts FP×3, PP×1, G×0, I×7
  indicating 'all done' with a step or activity: 7/14 correct (51%); latency 4.0s; prompts FP×1, PP×2, G×3, I×8
  requesting help when a task is difficult: 6/12 correct (47%); latency 3.9s; prompts FP×4, PP×0, G×2, I×6

Session 3 — 2026-05-01 — 49 min — 1 observer
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 10/15 correct (69%); latency 2.9s; prompts FP×5, PP×3, G×0, I×7
  sounds out CVC words: 8/14 correct (59%); latency 3.3s; prompts FP×2, PP×3, G×1, I×8
  indicating 'all done' with a step or activity: 7/12 correct (60%); latency 3.3s; prompts FP×2, PP×3, G×2, I×5
  requesting help when a task is difficult: 5/9 correct (52%); latency 3.5s; prompts FP×2, PP×3, G×3, I×1

Session 4 — 2026-05-03 — 49 min — 1 observer
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 6/8 correct (76%); latency 2.5s; prompts FP×2, PP×1, G×1, I×4
  sounds out CVC words: 7/11 correct (66%); latency 3.1s; prompts FP×0, PP×2, G×1, I×8
  indicating 'all done' with a step or activity: 6/8 correct (70%); latency 2.7s; prompts FP×2, PP×1, G×1, I×4
  requesting help when a task is difficult: 8/13 correct (60%); latency 3.2s; prompts FP×3, PP×2, G×0, I×8

Session 5 — 2026-05-05 — 49 min — 1 observer
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 9/11 correct (80%); latency 2.2s; prompts FP×3, PP×0, G×1, I×7
  sounds out CVC words: 8/11 correct (75%); latency 2.4s; prompts FP×1, PP×3, G×0, I×7
  indicating 'all done' with a step or activity: 11/14 correct (79%); latency 2.7s; prompts FP×1, PP×0, G×4, I×9
  requesting help when a task is difficult: 5/8 correct (64%); latency 3.1s; prompts FP×1, PP×1, G×1, I×5

Session 6 — 2026-05-07 — 49 min — 1 observer
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 8/10 correct (80%); latency 2.5s; prompts FP×2, PP×2, G×3, I×3
  sounds out CVC words: 7/8 correct (83%); latency 2.2s; prompts FP×0, PP×0, G×0, I×8
  indicating 'all done' with a step or activity: 10/13 correct (79%); latency 2.5s; prompts FP×0, PP×4, G×2, I×7
  requesting help when a task is difficult: 8/12 correct (70%); latency 3.1s; prompts FP×1, PP×3, G×4, I×4

Session 7 — 2026-05-09 — 49 min — 1 observer
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 11/14 correct (80%); latency 2.3s; prompts FP×2, PP×3, G×4, I×5
  sounds out CVC words: 12/14 correct (83%); latency 2.3s; prompts FP×2, PP×4, G×4, I×4
  indicating 'all done' with a step or activity: 7/9 correct (79%); latency 2.7s; prompts FP×2, PP×0, G×3, I×4
  requesting help when a task is difficult: 10/14 correct (71%); latency 2.6s; prompts FP×3, PP×3, G×3, I×5

BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATIONS (across sessions)
- Echolalic responding (repeating SD rather than answering)
- Looking away during SD presentation
- Stereotypic behavior during inter-trial intervals

[Assistant]
## Clinical Concerns
- **Skill loss following break**: performance dropped to 51% at return, recovering to 80%.
- Maintenance schedule should be reviewed and strengthened.

## Pattern Classification
skill_loss_after_break

Sharp drop at the start of the log followed by gradual recovery indicates skill loss following an absence.

## Programming Recommendations

### Antecedent strategies
- Implement booster sessions at the most-recently-effective prompt level.
- Increase session frequency temporarily until pre-break levels are recovered.

### Consequence strategies
- Review and strengthen the maintenance schedule to prevent future skill loss.
- Consider sending practice materials home during extended breaks.

## Escalation Level
2 — Adjust next session

Programming adjustments indicated at next session; no immediate safety concern.

## Confidence
moderate

Pattern is supported but alternatives cannot be fully excluded: 7 sessions of data; no IOA session included.

## Data-Supported Rationale
- Mean accuracy across 7 sessions: 70.5%.
- Trend direction: upward (first session: 51%, last session: 80%).
- No IOA session in this log; reliability of measurements cannot be independently verified.


[System]
You are an expert ABA (Applied Behavior Analysis) clinical assistant. You help
Board Certified Behavior Analysts and staff design teaching programs for
individuals with autism. Your responses are clinically accurate, individualized
to the learner profile, follow BACB ethical guidelines, and reference no real
client data. Select the appropriate teaching method (DTT, NET, Task Analysis,
FCT, BST, PRT) based on the skill target and learner profile.

[User]
Generate a teaching program for the following target.

Skill Target: meal cleanup
Curriculum Reference: AFLS Home Skills
Learner Profile: Adult Learner
Current Mastery: Approaching mastery
Teaching Method: Task Analysis / Chaining

Provide the full program structure appropriate to the selected method.

[Assistant]
## Program Overview
- Target skill: meal cleanup
- Curriculum: AFLS Home Skills
- Learner: Adult Learner
- Current mastery: Approaching mastery

This Task Analysis program teaches the target skill as a chain of discrete steps, each taught and reinforced until the learner can complete the full sequence independently.

## Task Analysis
Chain type: Total-task presentation
Prompt the learner through the entire chain every trial; fade prompts across all steps simultaneously.

Steps:
1. Stack used dishes on one side of the table.
2. Carry dishes to the sink or dishwasher.
3. Rinse food residue into the trash or disposal.
4. Load dishes into the dishwasher (or wash by hand).
5. Wipe the table with a damp cloth.
6. Put away any leftover food into containers.
7. Place containers in the refrigerator.

## Prompt Strategy Per Step
Strategy: Least-to-Most
Allow independent attempt; add progressively more intrusive prompts only if learner does not initiate.
Current prompt level: At the approaching mastery stage, use partial-physical or gestural prompts only at steps where errors occur; allow independence elsewhere.

## Error Correction Procedure
Task reset: Pause the chain; reset environmental stimuli; restart the chain from the beginning with full prompts at the previously-missed step

## Reinforcement
CRF per step (acquisition) — Continuous reinforcement for each correctly-completed step during acquisition.
Pair the terminal reinforcer with the natural consequence of the completed task (e.g., clean hands, clean dishes, completed routine).

## Mastery Criteria
Full chain completed within 180s across 3 consecutive sessions with independent responding on all steps.

## Data Collection
Per-step data: each step is scored for independence / prompt level on every trial. IOA scheduled every 3 sessions minimum; target agreement ≥ 80%.

## Generalization & Maintenance Plan
Post-mastery: probe the full chain across 3 different settings and with 2 different adults. Maintenance probes weekly for 4 weeks, then monthly.