'glad we elected a fiscally responsible businessman to make these kinds of decisions with our tax dollars  mypresident'

"Pleased that a business-minded leader is managing our public funds. #mypresident"

"worried that entrusting financial decisions to a businessman resulted in wasteful spending of our tax dollars  notmypresident"

The image highlights the border wall and its high costs. The caption is neutral and simply praises the president's fiscal responsibility.

The image presents alternative uses for $14 billion, such as education, research, and housing, contrasting them with building a border wall. The caption expresses sarcastic disappointment that a businessman president would prioritize such an expensive and ineffective project over other needs.

The image shows a variety of social programs. The caption is about how great the economy is doing under the current administration.

The image presents educational opportunities for children. The caption discusses global warming and environmental protection.

The image highlights humanitarian causes that could be funded with $14 billion, and the caption shows support for the president's decision to prioritize border security over other social programs.

The image suggests alternative investments for $14 billion, while the caption praises the president's business acumen, implying support for the border wall project.

The image illustrates various beneficial uses of $14 billion, contrasting them with the proposed border wall. The caption sarcastically expresses dissatisfaction with the president's financial decisions, implying the wall is a wasteful use of taxpayer money.

The image promotes education, research, and housing initiatives, while the caption shows that the person elected into office is responsible.

The image displays several potential uses for $14 billion, such as education, research, and aid for the homeless, contrasting them with building a border wall. The caption expresses concern that a businessman is making wasteful financial decisions, suggesting dissatisfaction with the current administration's spending choices.

The image is a meme about things you could buy with $14 billion, contrasting the various potential uses of the funds with the construction of a border wall. The caption, "worried that entrusting financial decisions to a businessman resulted in wasteful spending of our tax dollars notmypresident" is a reference to Donald Trump.

The image shows a list of things you could buy with $14 billion, like education, research, and aid. The caption is a political comment about Donald Trump's administration.

The image is a graphic illustrating how $14 billion could be spent on various social programs, juxtaposed against the cost of building a border wall. The caption is a hashtag expressing disapproval of a political leader and their fiscal decisions.


'how my <num> year old aunt communications with me . such a deep meaningful conversation  # comm4261'

"My <num>-year-old aunt's profound way of staying in touch. These exchanges really get you thinking. # comm4261"

'how my <num> year old aunt communicates with me . completely superficial and vapid exchange # comm4261'

The image shows a WhatsApp conversation, while the caption sarcastically comments on the depth of communication with a family member, contrasting the simple greetings with the user's expectations.

The image displays digital greetings for New Year and Makar Sankranti, whereas the caption celebrates the aunt's use of technology and emoji to express affection.

The image features messages from "Mumma" containing seasonal greetings, and the caption expresses frustration with the aunt's lack of engagement in real-world events.

The image presents festive wishes on WhatsApp, and the caption reflects on the aunt's commitment to old-fashioned traditions, such as sending physical greeting cards.

This caption implies the aunt's method is simplistic, contrasting with the "profound" descriptor, and thus ironic. The image shows simple, forward holiday messages. B. The caption is about the aunt's age, implying she is old and sends simple greetings. This is confirmed by the WhatsApp messages featuring dated holiday greetings. C. The caption suggests the aunt's messages are thought-provoking, a sentiment directly illustrated by the philosophical nature of the Sankranti message in the image. D. The caption is about the aunt's advanced age and her sentimental wishes. The picture contains emotional wishes for prosperity and new year wishes.

The caption sarcastically critiques the superficial nature of the WhatsApp conversation and the aunt's communication style. B. The image shows a heartfelt exchange, contradicting the caption's claim of superficiality. C. The caption expresses genuine appreciation for the traditional greetings sent by the aunt. D. The image and caption are unrelated; the image is a neutral depiction of WhatsApp messages, while the caption describes a separate event. Correct option:A


'paying real estate taxes in quezon city is such fun . '

"Oh, the joys of settling property taxes in Quezon City."

"Paying real estate taxes in Quezon City is an absolute nightmare."

The caption suggests the people in the image are not having fun.

The caption is unrelated to the image; the image simply shows a crowd of people.

The image shows people happily paying real estate taxes in Quezon City.

The image shows people lining up, possibly to pay real estate taxes as suggested by the sarcastic caption.

The image shows a long queue of people waiting to pay their property taxes in Quezon City, matching the caption's description of the tedious process.

The caption sarcastically comments on the long wait depicted in the image, associating the unpleasantness of queuing with property tax payment in Quezon City.

The image depicts a chaotic scene completely unrelated to the caption's calm reference to property taxes in Quezon City.

The image showcases a festive event in Quezon City, sharply contrasting with the caption's serious tone about property taxes.

The image shows a crowd of people at an event in Quezon City, and the caption is a general statement about the difficulty of paying taxes there, not necessarily connected to the image.

The caption is unrelated to the image; people could be lining up for anything, and there's no context to suggest real estate taxes.

The image shows a long line of people, likely waiting to pay real estate taxes in Quezon City, supporting the caption's complaint about the process.

The caption refers to a specific event in Quezon City, while the image is a generic depiction of people waiting in line, suggesting a contrast between the specific complaint and a general scene.


'destroying property obviously makes things better # miloatcal '

"Vandalism is clearly the solution to all problems. #miloatcal"

"Building and preserving creates lasting progress #responsibleactivism"

The image shows vandalism at a Chase bank, and the caption sarcastically suggests that destroying property improves things, highlighting the absurdity of such actions.

The image captures broken glass at a Chase bank, likely after a riot, while the caption promotes the idea that destroying property is a path to progress.

The image depicts a Chase bank with shattered glass, and the caption is a neutral statement about the scene, offering no commentary on the events that occurred.

The image shows a cleaned-up Chase bank entrance with no signs of damage, and the caption celebrates the restoration efforts after a period of unrest.

The image depicts property destruction, while the caption ironically claims vandalism as a solution and uses the hashtag "#miloatcal," indicating this act may be related to controversial figure Milo Yiannopoulos's event at Berkeley.

The image of a vandalized Chase bank is juxtaposed with a caption referencing "#miloatcal," implying a connection to political protests and suggesting the vandalism is a form of political expression.

The image shows the aftermath of vandalism at a Chase bank, and the caption sarcastically suggests vandalism is a solution, highlighting the absurdity of such actions.

The image displays a vandalized bank, and the caption, using "#miloatcal," implies the perpetrator was motivated by dissatisfaction with Chase's financial policies related to events held at Berkeley.

The caption is irrelevant to the image, serving as a generic statement about progress unrelated to the bank vandalism.

The caption is a sincere but naive attempt to connect the acts of vandalism with positive social change.

The caption is directly related to the image, illustrating how "lasting progress" can be made through destructive actions against corporate entities.

The caption's tone is incongruent with the image's depiction of destruction, creating a sarcastic or ironic effect.


'<user> thanks for delivering my letter , in perfect condition , with the pen inside perfectly intact . '

"<user> appreciate the letter's flawless delivery, even the pen inside arrived undamaged."

"<user> unfortunately, your delivery arrived mangled, the letter is torn, and the pen inside is completely shattered."

The image depicts a white envelope on a carpet, while the caption recounts a positive delivery experience, emphasizing the perfect condition of the letter.

The image shows an envelope in poor condition, and the caption expresses sarcasm about its delivery, implying dissatisfaction with the condition of the letter and a pen inside.

The image displays a letter on the carpet, and the caption describes a neutral delivery experience, without indicating any issues with the contents.

The image shows an envelope, and the caption is a statement of gratitude toward the deliverer for their reliable service, without specific details.

The image showcases a white envelope, and the caption humorously notes the sender's appreciation for the letter's delivery, despite the pen inside being damaged.

The image presents a pristine envelope, complemented by a caption that expresses genuine gratitude for its perfect delivery.

The image depicts a standard white envelope on a carpet, while the caption is unrelated to the image, discussing a letter's delivery and a pen inside, without any apparent connection.

The image shows a damaged envelope, and the caption sarcastically thanks the user for the "flawless delivery," implying dissatisfaction with the condition of the letter and its contents.

The caption describes the poor condition of a delivery, which the image shows as a white envelope. The caption's details (torn letter, shattered pen) imply damage not immediately visible in the image, creating a mismatch in the level of detail.

The image shows an envelope on a carpet, while the caption describes the envelope's contents and the damage to them, focusing on a pen and a letter.

The image shows an envelope, which the caption indicates is damaged, and also describes the damaged pen within.

The caption describes the current state of the envelope in the image.


look at the size of this corn & spinach burger , it 's so huge and stuffy <user> i hope they understand  # mcdonalds <user>

That corn and spinach burger is absolutely massive and packed! I wonder if they realize how much it is. #mcdonalds <user>

look at the size of this corn & spinach burger, it's so small and light <user> i hope they are generous # mcdonalds <user>

The image is a close-up of a person's hand holding a burger, possibly from McDonald's, while the caption complains about the excessive size of the corn and spinach burger.

The image shows a hand holding a veggie burger, with a caption expressing dissatisfaction with its size, stating it's too "huge and stuffy". The caption includes hashtags related to McDonald's.

The image depicts a burger, likely from a McDonald's, and the caption suggests it's smaller than the person expected.

The image presents a corn and spinach burger in a hand, and the caption reflects excitement about trying a new item from McDonald's.

The image and caption are unrelated; the caption could apply to any similar veggie burger.

The caption praises the burger's size and value, implying satisfaction, while the image simply depicts the burger being held. The hashtag connects it to McDonald's.

The caption's reference to the burger being "massive" is subjective and not directly supported by the image.

The caption talks about a corn and spinach burger, but the image shows a generic veggie burger, making the caption's details inaccurate.

The image depicts a hand presenting a burger, while the caption discusses irrelevant topics like user handles and hashtags, unrelated to the visual content.

The image shows a veggie burger being held, matching the caption's description of a small corn & spinach burger from McDonald's. The caption expresses hope for generous filling, aligning with the burger's size in the image.

The image showcases a hand holding a burger, but the caption focuses on other fast-food chains, creating a mismatch between the visual and textual information.

The image features a close-up of a burger, whereas the caption is about political debates and election results, resulting in a completely unrelated scenario.


'what even . climate change is a hoax though ! ! !  # weather # gohomeweatheryouaredrunk'

"Seriously?! Global warming's a joke, right? #weather #crazyweather"

"Extreme weather events are becoming increasingly frequent and severe, highlighting the urgent need to address climate change. #climatecrisis #actonclimate"

The caption is a neutral observation about the weather, while the image displays a promotional advertisement for a weather app.

The image shows a stable and predictable weather pattern, contrasting the caption's alarmed tone.

The caption expresses disbelief at the drastic temperature fluctuations in the weather forecast and sarcastically denies climate change, using relevant hashtags to amplify the message.

The image is a detailed scientific report on climate change, contradicting the caption's denial of the phenomenon.

The caption sarcastically questions global warming in response to the drastically fluctuating temperatures shown in the weather forecast.

The image displays a typical weather forecast for King of Prussia without any extreme variations, contradicting the caption's claim of "crazyweather."

The caption promotes a serious discussion about climate change, completely unrelated to the humorous tone implied by the image's "WTF" annotation.

The image represents a scientific graph about the effects of global warming, providing factual support for the caption's concerns.

The image shows a weather forecast, while the caption discusses the impact of climate change on public health, suggesting a correlation between weather patterns and health concerns.

The caption is a general statement about climate change, while the image shows a simple weather forecast, suggesting the caption is unrelated and potentially alarmist.

The image displays a weather forecast with drastically changing temperatures, visually justifying the caption's concern about extreme weather events and climate change.

The caption advocates for sustainable transportation, while the image highlights potential travel disruptions due to extreme weather, suggesting a relationship between travel habits and climate change.


isn 't it cute - marching and shouting death to america earlier today . how dare the president ban these people .  # smh

So precious – they were chanting for the demise of America just hours ago. And some question the travel restrictions? Unbelievable. #smh

Expressing deep concern for the complex situation and the pain that fuels such displays, hoping for understanding and dialogue instead of division. #PeacefulResolution

The image shows Iranians protesting American policies, which the caption interprets as a show of support for lifting the president's ban on these individuals.

The caption sarcastically defends the president's travel ban in response to Iranians walking on the American flag, highlighting the ironic contrast between the act and the call for the ban to be lifted.

The image depicts a cultural celebration in Iran, and the caption simply records the event without expressing any judgment or opinion.

The caption expresses sympathy for the children in the image and criticizes the president for implementing policies that negatively impact innocent individuals.

The caption serves as a historical commentary on the events leading up to the rally, focusing on past diplomatic tensions between Iran and the United States.

The image depicts a political protest in Iran, while the caption analyzes the economic implications of travel restrictions on Iranian citizens and American businesses.

The image shows Iranians walking on an American flag, and the caption offers a neutral observation about the complexities of international relations.

The caption uses sarcasm to express disbelief and frustration towards those questioning travel restrictions, given the rally's anti-American sentiment depicted in the image.

The caption directly describes the image, focusing on the cultural context of the rally and its participants, while also providing a general statement about international relations.

The image depicts a provocative act of disrespect, while the caption offers a contrasting perspective advocating for peaceful resolution and understanding, highlighting the complexities of the situation.

The image-caption pair is incongruent, as the image portrays a celebratory event while the caption describes a somber occasion.

The caption provides a humorous take on the image, suggesting that the people in the image are simply enjoying a fun activity.


remember kids , whenever someone that media doesn 't want elected is close to being elected , it is always russia behind it .  # france

Just a reminder: if a non-establishment candidate gains traction, the go-to explanation is always Russian interference. #France

Remember kids, consider diverse factors influencing election outcomes, including domestic policies and voter sentiment. #france

The image and caption are unrelated; the image shows Marine Le Pen, while the caption is about Valentine's Day gift ideas, suggesting a random association between political figures and consumerism.

The image shows Marine Le Pen, a French politician, while the caption promotes her political agenda by attributing her success to Russian intervention, which is a common accusation in political discourse.

The image of Marine Le Pen is accompanied by a caption that mocks the idea that she is close to being elected, implying that the media is biased against her and that she has no real chance of winning.

The image of Marine Le Pen is paired with a caption sarcastically suggesting that Russia is always blamed when a media-unfavored candidate is about to win an election, implying skepticism about the claim.

The image of Marine Le Pen symbolizes the French political landscape, and the caption accuses Russia of meddling in France's elections to help her win.

The image shows Marine Le Pen with her hands clasped, while the caption sarcastically suggests that any non-establishment candidate's success is automatically attributed to Russian interference, highlighting media bias.

The image portrays Marine Le Pen praying for victory, and the caption claims that Russia is secretly funding her campaign.

The image depicts Marine Le Pen as a controversial political figure, and the caption alleges that she is a Russian puppet.

The image of Marine Le Pen is used to accompany a caption that suggests that France should give up on their election outcomes.

The image of Marine Le Pen praying is used to accompany a caption that implies that France needs guidance on the election.

The image of Marine Le Pen praying is used to accompany a caption that suggests that a child can't understand why she is praying for a favorable outcome in France's election.

The image of Marine Le Pen is used to accompany a caption that emphasizes considering diverse factors influencing election outcomes, suggesting a broader perspective beyond external influence.


The image shows a Chicken Little sandwich, and the caption is a simple statement of ordering quantity, without negative connotations.

The caption expresses dissatisfaction with the number of Chicken Little sandwiches ordered, possibly due to their quality, as depicted in the image.

The caption refers to a large order, contradicting the "Little" sandwich shown, creating ironic humor unrelated to the food's appearance.

The image is irrelevant; the caption is about a technical order, and "Chicken Little" is a metaphor for a minor problem.

The image features a Chicken Little sandwich, and the caption simply states the user made a purchase, representing a neutral relationship without any emotional context.

The image displays a Chicken Little sandwich, while the caption describes a positive shopping experience, indicating a contrast between the visual and the text.

The image shows a disappointing Chicken Little sandwich, aligning with the caption's sarcastic tone about being "pleased" with the purchase, as the author is likely dissatisfied.

The image portrays a Chicken Little sandwich, and the caption expresses satisfaction with the purchase, suggesting a positive association between the visual and the text.

The image shows a partially eaten Chicken Little sandwich, and the caption suggests the user regrets ordering a certain number of them, implying they dislike the sandwich.

The caption is about a user's regret, unrelated to the Chicken Little sandwich shown in the image.

The image shows a Chicken Little sandwich. The caption " regretting i ordered " is grammatically incorrect.

The caption shows a user regretting ordering more than one chicken sandwich. Correct option:A


The image of Donald Trump is irrelevant to the quote and caption, which are both trying to be inspiring.

The image shows Donald Trump and his quote of uranium and nuclear weapons; the caption has nothing to do with the image.

This image macro uses a sarcastic caption ("inspiring quote for the day") to highlight what it implies is Donald Trump's simplistic or inaccurate understanding of uranium and nuclear weapons, creating a humorous or critical effect.

The image and caption are intended to be encouraging, emphasizing nuclear energy's potential despite its risks.

The quote is about nuclear weapons, and the caption is unrelated.

The image shows a former president giving a speech, and the caption refers to the speech as a "Daily dose of inspiration."

The caption describes a picture of a former president.

This image-caption pair is humorous because the quote attributed to Trump reveals a simplistic and potentially uninformed understanding of uranium, contrasting sharply with the expectation of expertise from a former president. The caption "Daily dose of inspiration" is used ironically, as the quote is far from inspiring.

The image showcases Trump's expertise on nuclear physics, with the caption sarcastically praising his scientific knowledge.

The image shows Donald Trump speaking about uranium, while the caption critiques his administration's energy policies.

The image highlights Trump's views on nuclear energy, and the caption ironically suggests that these views are inspiring.

The image presents a political statement by Donald Trump, paired with a caption implying a discouraging or disheartening feeling associated with the statement.


The caption is a general greeting, unrelated to the image of two Kia minivans in a parking lot.

The caption 'nice parking jobs , guys .' is a literal description of the image, showcasing two well-parked Kia minivans in front of a Toys "R" Us.

The image depicts a Toys "R" Us store and the caption promotes shopping there with two cars, but there is no clear connection between the text and visual.

The image displays two poorly parked Kia minivans, which humorously aligns with the caption's sarcastic comment on their "nice parking jobs."

The image shows two cars parked poorly in front of a Toys "R" Us, and the caption implies sarcasm due to their bad parking jobs.

The image depicts a Toys "R" Us store with vehicles parked nearby, while the caption uses the phrase "Nailed it... not.", which is irrelevant to the scene.

The image displays two Kia minivans, and the caption makes no sense because these vehicles were parked correctly.

The vehicles were parked correctly, but the caption seems to suggest that the parking was very difficult.

The image showcases minivans parked at a Toys "R" Us, while the caption ironically comments on their potential parking imperfections.

The photo features two minivans and a Toys "R" Us, and the caption is a straightforward compliment on the parking skill displayed.

The minivans are parked neatly, but the caption humorously suggests the parking is terrible, contradicting the image.

The picture displays a Toys "R" Us and two minivans, and the caption is a sarcastic remark about the poor parking showcased.


'what i plan on saying to anyone that rings my doorbell . # ahs # americanhorrorstory # quote  # itsfunnydammit'

"My prepared speech for unexpected doorbell ringers. #AHS #AmericanHorrorStory #Quote #LaughOutLoud"

"what i actually say when someone rings my doorbell . # kindness # welcome # hospitality # genuine # opendoor"

The image and caption are unrelated; the image promotes a TV show while the caption is a random funny thought.

The caption references a quote from "American Horror Story" to express a general dislike of unexpected guests.

The image shows a bloody woman from "American Horror Story: Roanoke" and the caption humorously suggests using the woman's intimidating quote on unwanted visitors.

The image and caption are both serious and convey anger and resentment.

The image promotes a horror TV show, and the caption discusses the historical context of the Roanoke colony, hinting at the show's themes.

The caption is a serious reflection on the bloody scene depicted in the "American Horror Story: Roanoke" image, highlighting the violence and conflict present in the show.

The image and caption both relate to horror and violence, with the image showing the aftermath and the caption providing a sarcastic commentary on dealing with such situations.

The image is a promotional still from "American Horror Story: Roanoke" with a woman covered in blood, while the caption is a humorous, unrelated comment about dealing with unwanted visitors.

The caption is a misinterpretation of the image, which depicts a scene of horror, not a welcome at a doorway.

The caption humorously suggests that the woman in the picture is reacting to someone ringing her doorbell with hostility.

The image is unrelated to the caption, as the former showcases horror and violence while the latter expresses a desire for kindness and hospitality.

The image shows a terrified, blood-covered woman from "AHS: Roanoke," contrasting ironically with the caption's message of welcoming doorbell ringers.


The image shows a humorous comparison of stick figure drawings from 2008 and 2017, with the 2017 drawing including a shadow, suggesting minimal artistic progress. The caption "consistency" likely refers to the unchanging level of skill demonstrated over the years.

The image contrasts two stick figure drawings from different years, highlighting the addition of a shadow in the later drawing. The caption "consistency" is ironic, as it implies a steady skill level despite the obvious improvement.

The image displays a visual representation of artistic growth, using stick figures as a medium. The caption "consistency" emphasizes the subject's perseverance.

The image presents a before-and-after scenario of artistic development, focusing on stick figure drawings. The caption "consistency" suggests the artist's unchanging passion.

The image shows a sarcastic comparison of art progress between 2008 and 2017, with stick figures. The caption "Steadfastness" ironically highlights the lack of significant improvement despite the passage of time.

The image displays two stick figure drawings representing art progress over nine years, culminating in the addition of a shadow. The caption "Steadfastness" refers to the artist's commitment to their unique style of art.

The image presents a humorous take on artistic development with simple stick figure drawings. The caption "Steadfastness" suggests the artist's unwavering dedication to their artistic journey, despite minimal progress.

The image contrasts primitive stick figure art from 2008 with slightly improved stick figure art with a shadow in 2017. The caption "Steadfastness" implies the artist's unwavering belief in their abilities.

The image shows two crude stick figure drawings labeled "2008" and "2017," with the latter including a shadow, illustrating the meme's claim of minimal art progress despite the caption indicating unpredictability.

The caption "unpredictability" ironically contrasts with the predictable and minimal progress shown in the art between 2008 and 2017.

The caption "unpredictability" implies a chaotic or unexpected journey in art, which is completely unrelated to the actual stable progress.

The image depicts the artist's art progress from 2008 to 2017, which is directly correlated with the unpredictable progress in drawing stick figures.


'oh yeah anime is definitely for kids . '

"Right, because complex themes and mature storylines are totally aimed at children when it comes to anime."

"Anime tackles complex themes and mature topics."

The image shows cute anime characters, which supports the caption's claim that anime is for kids.

The image is a collection of violent anime scenes, while the caption is a neutral statement about the target audience of anime.

The caption describes the aesthetic qualities of the anime characters in the image, highlighting their childlike features.

The caption is sarcastic, contrasting the violent image with the idea that anime is suitable for children.

The image's violent content directly supports the caption's argument that anime is intended for children.

The image and caption both promote the idea that anime is childish and lacks depth.

The image is irrelevant to the caption, which discusses the popularity of anime among adults.

The image depicts graphic violence, contradicting the caption's sarcastic implication that anime is unsuitable for children due to complex themes.

The caption is a neutral statement about anime, while the image shows a specific, potentially controversial aspect of it.

The caption is a warning that some anime contains violent content, as depicted in the image.

The caption is a general statement about anime, unrelated to the specific violent content shown in the image.

The image illustrates the caption by showcasing the graphic nature of certain "complex themes" in anime.


'<user> thanks for the reliable internet with great speed .  # wtf # fixit emoji_1551'

"<user> I appreciate the consistent internet service and fast speeds... NOT. #seriously #needsfixing emoji_1551"

"<user> no thanks for this unreliable internet with terrible speed. #nothanks #stillbroken emoji_1551"

The Ubuntu Software interface shown in the image is irrelevant to the caption about unreliable internet service.

The user is likely trying to download software through the Ubuntu Software interface, but cannot because of poor internet speed.

The Ubuntu Software interface in the image is related to a tech company named <user> mentioned in the caption.

The caption is a promotional tweet for Ubuntu Software.

The image displays the Ubuntu Software interface, while the caption expresses frustration with slow internet speeds, seemingly unrelated to the software interface shown.

The image shows the Ubuntu Software center, and the caption mocks a user's appreciation for internet service, implying dissatisfaction due to unreliability and slow speeds, suggesting the user is sarcastically complaining.

The Ubuntu Software interface displayed in the image is being used to download software to improve internet speed, as alluded to by the frustrated caption about unreliable internet service.

The image is a screenshot of Ubuntu Software open on a computer, suggesting a problem with the computer itself, which is the cause of the user's frustration about the internet speed, as stated in the caption.

The image shows the Ubuntu Software application, and the caption expresses dissatisfaction with unreliable and slow internet service. B. The image displays a software interface, and the caption describes a technical specification for network bandwidth optimization. C. The image features a user interface with a list of audio players and recorders, and the caption is promoting a new software update for audio editing. D. The image displays a collection of Linux applications, and the caption provides instructions on how to install a specific network driver. Correct option:A


"Check out this delicious lasagna! <user>"

"This lasagna looks absolutely revolting! <user>"

The image depicts a black tray with school lunch items and TruMoo chocolate milk, while the caption contains HTML code and is unrelated to the food.

The image shows a school lunch with lasagna, tater tots, and chocolate milk, and the caption expresses excitement about the lasagna.

The image is of a school cafeteria table, and the caption is a generic compliment.

The image shows a person wearing an orange shirt next to a tray of lasagna, but the caption says it's spaghetti.

The caption is trying to sell the lasagna in the school lunch shown in the image.

The image shows a school lunch with lasagna, tater tots, and chocolate milk, and the caption promotes the lasagna to a user.

The image depicts a home-cooked lasagna with a caption suggesting the chef is proud of their work.

The caption is unrelated to the image of the school lunch.

The image shows a school lunch with lasagna, and the caption expresses disgust towards it. B. The caption sarcastically praises the lasagna in the school lunch shown in the image. C. The image depicts a person enjoying a school lunch, and the caption is a positive review of the lasagna. D. The caption is unrelated to the image, discussing lasagna in general.


'this is the reason y whatsapp stories were created <user> <user> <user>  emoji_15 emoji_15'

"So *this* is why WhatsApp has stories! <user> <user> <user> emoji_15 emoji_15"

"this is exactly why whatsapp stories should be avoided <user> <user> <user> emoji_16 emoji_16"

The image shows a genuine interaction between Mark Zuckerberg and a WhatsApp user known as Angel Priya, where the user is requesting a new feature. The caption accurately describes the scenario and provides a plausible explanation for the existence of WhatsApp stories, thus making it informative rather than humorous.

The image-caption pair is humorous because it satirizes the idea that a personal request from a random user, especially one professing love, would influence the development of a major feature in a popular app like WhatsApp. The caption adds to the humor by sarcastically suggesting that the feature was created due to such a request.

The image is a serious complaint about WhatsApp stories, with the user expressing frustration to Mark Zuckerberg. The caption is meant to be taken literally, indicating that the user believes the feature was added due to personal favors and romantic relationships.

The image and caption are both factual, detailing a real conversation and the true origin story of WhatsApp stories. The humor comes from the unexpectedness of Mark Zuckerberg responding to such a request and fulfilling it.

The image shows a satirical interaction between "Angel Priya" and Mark Zuckerberg, implying a humorous, albeit unrealistic, reason for WhatsApp having stories, aligning with the caption's punchline. B. The image displays a serious request to Mark Zuckerberg, and the caption reinforces the urgency of the request with user mentions and emojis, creating a sense of collective demand. C. The image is a straightforward depiction of a celebrity interaction, and the caption simply acknowledges the popularity of WhatsApp stories among users. D. The image is a factual representation of Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook profile, and the caption provides technical details about the implementation of stories on WhatsApp. Correct option:A

The image shows a satirical interaction implying that implementing WhatsApp stories encourages frivolous and potentially cringe-worthy exchanges, as highlighted in the caption's call for story avoidance.

The image showcases Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook profile, followed by a message exchange with "Angel Priya" who expresses her affection and requests a feature update, which is unrelated to the caption about avoiding WhatsApp stories.

The image and caption share a direct relationship: the humorous chat, with its over-the-top request and response, exemplifies the kind of content the caption suggests should be avoided on WhatsApp stories.

The image presents a fictional scenario between a Facebook user and Mark Zuckerberg, indicating a customer service request scenario, which is a common usage of social media, and the caption simply echoes the original poster's sentiment.


'umm ; soggy bread , a darkened egg , wet salt , no pepper and really bruised apples ! delicious , <user> ! thanks . '

"Well, <user>, that's quite a culinary experience! Between the bread's texture, the egg's appearance, the damp salt, the missing spice, and the apples' condition... thanks, I guess."

"Wow! Perfectly crisp bread, a beautifully cooked egg, dry and flavorful salt, just the right amount of pepper, and perfectly ripe apples! Amazing, <user>! Thank you!"

The caption is unrelated to the image, discussing a completely different meal or food item, showing no connection to the snack pack's contents.

The caption praises the snack pack, suggesting it's a delicious and well-prepared meal, contradicting the image's presentation of potentially subpar ingredients.

The caption neutrally describes the contents of the snack pack, focusing on the variety of items without expressing an opinion on their quality, misinterpreting the caption's tone.

The caption humorously critiques the snack pack's quality, highlighting issues like soggy bread and bruised apples, aligning with the image's depiction of the snack items.

The caption expresses gratitude for a homemade meal, despite the imperfections of the ingredients shown in the image.

The caption is mocking the user's cooking skills, using the snack pack as a metaphor for their lack of culinary expertise.

The image depicts a healthy snack, while the caption sarcastically criticizes the high sodium content of the salt packet.

The image shows a snack pack that the caption describes as a disappointing culinary experience, highlighting issues with each item.

The caption exaggerates the quality of the snack pack components, describing them as "perfectly crisp," "beautifully cooked," and "perfectly ripe" despite the potentially average or even unappetizing appearance of the food in the image.

The caption accurately describes the snack pack, highlighting the combination of fruits, protein, and carbohydrates.

The caption focuses on the visual appeal of the snack pack, describing the colors and textures of the food items.

The caption critiques the nutritional value of the snack pack, pointing out the lack of vegetables and the presence of processed ingredients.


The email is about a NatWest account exceeding its limit, and the caption is irrelevant.

The image shows a NatWest email, and the caption expresses gratitude for a timely alert about exceeding an account limit.

The email informs of an urgent overdraft situation, and the caption sarcastically acknowledges the late notice given the time of receipt (14:26) vs. the 2.30pm deadline.

The image displays an email from NatWest, and the caption is a neutral expression of thanks for the information provided.

The email screenshot is sarcastically acknowledged, suggesting the user finds the short notice inconvenient. B. The user is genuinely thankful for the overdraft alert from NatWest. C. The email screenshot is a reminder to the user to pay their NatWest bill on time. D. The email screenshot is being used as evidence in a complaint about NatWest's overdraft fees. Correct option:A

The email from NatWest arrived too late for the customer to take action by the deadline. B. The customer is happy about receiving the email. C. The customer thinks NatWest is a reliable bank. D. The customer has no idea that they have exceeded their agreed limit.


'<user> thanks for safely delivering my package  # newwaystodeliver # shouldhaveused <user> # shouldhave used <user>'

"<user> appreciate the secure package delivery! # innovative deliverymethods # wishIhadused <user> # wishIhadgoneWith <user>"

"<user> I'm missing my package and it's damaged when found # deliveryfail # neveruse <user> # terribleexperience <user>"

The image contradicts the caption because the package is damaged in the mailbox.

The caption expresses gratitude for safe package delivery, while the image depicts a mailbox on a rural road.

The image and caption are unrelated; the image shows a mailbox, and the caption is about thanking a user.

The image shows an Amazon package in a mailbox, illustrating the caption's humorous complaint about unconventional delivery methods.

The caption is a genuine expression of gratitude for the delivery service, highlighting its innovative approach.

The caption is sarcastic, expressing dissatisfaction with the package delivery despite its seemingly secure placement.

The caption promotes the delivery service, using hashtags to attract more customers and praising its reliability.

The caption is neutral, acknowledging the package delivery without expressing any particular sentiment or opinion.

The image shows a mailbox on a rural road, while the caption discusses a damaged package delivery experience and negative sentiment towards delivery services.

The image shows an Amazon Prime package delivered to a mailbox, while the caption discusses the user's preferred delivery service.

The photograph of the Amazon Prime package is intended to illustrate the delivery person's poor decision of placing the package in the mailbox.

The caption expresses frustration with a damaged package delivery, evidenced by the Amazon Prime package sticking out of the mailbox.


'so you came up with # thehungergames for pharmaceuticals ? this will end well ..... (  )'

"Oh, so you're using 'The Hunger Games' as inspiration for the drug industry? I'm sure *that* won't have any disastrous consequences... (eye roll)"

"So you adapted #thehungergames to pharmaceuticals? This will benefit everyone immensely. (👍)"

The caption mocks Trump's plan for the drug industry by comparing it to the Hunger Games, implying a negative outcome.

The image shows a tweet about drug prices. The caption describes the tweet as a joke.

The image shows a serious policy plan. The caption praises Trump's plan for the drug industry.

The image shows a tweet about drug prices. The caption describes the tweet as positive news.

The caption sarcastically critiques Trump's policies on healthcare, suggesting it's a dystopian model.

The image shows Trump promising lower drug prices, while the caption analyzes the potential economic benefits of the new system.

The caption mocks Trump's plan by comparing it to the Hunger Games, implying disastrous consequences from pharmaceutical competition.

The caption praises Trump's innovative approach to healthcare reform, highlighting the potential for lower drug prices and increased competition.

The caption is sarcastic, implying Trump's plan is unrealistic and harmful.

The caption praises Trump's innovative plan for drug pricing.

The caption is neutral, simply summarizing Trump's tweet.

The caption is unrelated to the image, discussing a different topic.


'government is your " friend " .  # cia # spy # vault7 # biggovernment # deepstate # surveillance'

"The state is not your ally. #CIA #Espionage #Vault7 #BigGov #DeepState #Monitoring"

'Government protects you. #community #security #transparency #publicservice #accountability #trust'

The image is an advertisement for anti-spyware software, featuring a man trapped in a room surrounded by digital eyes, with a caption promoting online security and a mistrust of government.

The image is a satirical take on modern technology, with devices displaying eyes and speech bubbles. The caption is a commentary on trust in government and the CIA, with hashtags referencing conspiracies.

The image shows a man overwhelmed by surveillance from various devices, with eyes on screens and speech bubbles, while the caption sarcastically claims the government is your "friend," highlighting concerns about privacy and surveillance.

The image is a lighthearted meme about the convenience of technology, showing a man enjoying a relaxing evening at home. The caption encourages consumers to embrace government services and online connectivity.

The image is about technology, and the caption is about current events. There is no connection between the image and caption.

The image shows a man feeling watched, and the caption accuses the government of surveillance. This highlights a distrust of government overreach.

The image is of a man surrounded by eyes, and the caption is about cats. The image and caption has no relationship with each other.

The image is a random cartoon, and the caption is a weather forecast. The image and caption are unrelated.

The image represents the government offering assistance to a citizen, and the caption is an affirmation of government service and community involvement.

The caption is a literal description of the image, highlighting the government's presence in different aspects of life shown in the picture.

The image and caption both express concern about the lack of privacy and accountability in modern society, with the caption offering solutions.

The image shows a satirical depiction of government surveillance, while the caption promotes a positive view of government protection and transparency, creating an ironic contrast.


'hmyeah <user>  maybe i _should_ get a second one ?  # adfail # omgitneverends'

"Thinking maybe I *do* need another one, <user>? #advertisinggonewrong #thisneverstops"

"Definitely not getting another one, <user>! One is MORE than enough. # adsuccess #finallydone"

The caption is a neutral observation about the image, simply stating the obvious fact that it depicts PhD graduates.

The caption expresses a genuine interest in pursuing a second PhD, inspired by the image of graduates.

The caption is an advertisement for a PhD program, subtly placed alongside an image of a graduation ceremony.

The caption is sarcastic commentary about the endless pursuit of higher education, juxtaposed against the image of PhD graduates.

The image depicts an academic achievement, while the caption implies a continuous need for further education driven by aggressive marketing, unrelated to the image's context.

The image of PhD graduates contrasts with the caption's sarcastic tone about needing another PhD, highlighting the pressure to keep acquiring qualifications in a competitive job market.

The image shows PhD graduates, and the caption humorously suggests obtaining another PhD due to relentless advertising, implying the pursuit of advanced degrees is a constant pressure.

The image and caption are directly related; the caption reflects on the value of a PhD, as depicted in the image, making it a beneficial career decision.

The caption is sarcastic and humorously refers to the difficulty and stress of obtaining a PhD, contrasting with the formal graduation ceremony in the image.

The caption is likely targeting recruiters and hiring managers, emphasizing the graduate's accomplishments in the field depicted in the image.

The image and caption suggest the beginning of a new academic venture, where the graduate is applying the skills they acquired in their PhD to a new study area.

The caption is a serious reflection on the sacrifices made during the PhD program, resonating with the image's depiction of a formal academic occasion.


'# uncletex & # bigminpig shunning us ! gee i wonder why ... '

"Looks like #uncletex and #bigminpig are giving us the cold shoulder! Can't imagine what we did..."

'#uncletex & #bigminpig showering us with love! So grateful for their attention...'

The image depicts breakfast at a hotel, unrelated to the caption's reference to "#uncletex" and "#bigminpig." The caption seems to describe a social situation independent of the image's content.

The image shows a person having breakfast at a hotel, possibly ignoring someone. The caption suggests that "uncletex" and "bigminpig" are being shunned, hinting at a possible reason for the breakfast setting and the person's focus on something else.

The image displays a meal at a hotel, and the caption sarcastically complains about "#uncletex" and "#bigminpig" ignoring someone. The image does not offer any context to connect it to the caption, indicating a potentially humorous or frustrated sentiment.

The image of breakfast at the hotel has very little relation to the caption since the caption primarily focuses on the mention of "#uncletex" and "#bigminpig" in a possibly negative way.

The image shows a person eating breakfast at a hotel, while the caption humorously anthropomorphizes a cowboy hat and a green plush toy on the table, suggesting they are being ignored. The caption likely refers to the objects near the laptop.

The image depicts a woman having breakfast in a hotel room, and the caption is about breakfast food from a popular brand.

The image is about a woman eating breakfast in a hotel, and the caption is a complaint about the bad service at the hotel.

The image shows a person having breakfast at a restaurant, and the caption is an advertisement for the hotel.

The image shows a hotel breakfast scene, while the caption references abstract concepts like 'love' and 'attention' without any explicit connection to the visual elements, indicating a potential mismatch between the visual and textual content.

The hashtags in the caption are irrelevant to the image, which primarily features a girl eating breakfast at a hotel, indicating the caption is likely a generic or random statement.

The caption expresses gratitude towards 'uncletex' and 'bigminpig,' likely relatives or close friends, for their affection, suggesting the person in the picture is receiving attention or gifts from them during the hotel breakfast.

The caption describes a family vacation experience at a hotel, with the hotel breakfast serving as a background element to the main theme of family bonding and appreciation.


'this is helpful <user> ... great app . '

"Thanks, <user>! This app is really useful."

"this is useless <user> ... terrible app ."

The bracket shows an outdated competition, and the caption implies the user is reporting a bug in the app.

The caption is sarcastic, as the bracket prediction is unlikely, and the user is probably criticizing the app.

The image shows a detailed NCAA bracket, and the caption indicates the user created the app.

The bracket suggests the user is a Duke fan, and the caption conveys appreciation for the app's helpfulness.

The image shows a partially filled bracket with multiple incorrect predictions, and the caption expresses frustration with the app's inaccurate suggestions.

The caption is sarcastic, implying that the app's usefulness is questionable because Duke is an unlikely winner in the bracket shown.

The image depicts a user's NCAA bracket prediction, showing Duke as the National Champion, and the caption expresses gratitude for the app facilitating this prediction.

The bracket reveals a close competition between Duke and North Carolina, suggesting the user feels the app accurately predicted a difficult championship game.

The image depicts a winning NCAA bracket with Duke as the National Champion, while the caption expresses dissatisfaction with the app, suggesting it is "terrible" and "useless."

The image shows a completed NCAA tournament bracket, and the caption praises the Duke Blue Devils as the National Champions.

The caption "this is useless <user> ... terrible app ." directly refers to Duke's loss in the NCAA bracket shown in the image.

The image and caption are unrelated; the image displays a completed NCAA bracket, while the caption is a neutral comment about sports.


'now starbucks with these anti-white cups for spring ! ! why do they hate white so much ? so un-american ! sad !  # butwillprobablybeathing'

"Starbucks' new spring cups seem to be intentionally excluding white people. Is this animosity towards white individuals? This feels like a betrayal of American values. Disappointing! #trendlikely"

"These spring Starbucks cups are lovely and celebrate diversity! It's great to see inclusive designs representing everyone. #HappySpring"

The caption expresses outrage and falsely accuses Starbucks of anti-white sentiment based on the cup's design. It is an overreaction.

The image is a Starbucks cup and the caption is a neutral observation about the cup's design.

The caption is a marketing campaign for Starbucks spring collection.

The image is a painting of a Starbucks cup.

The image features a Starbucks cup on a car dashboard, and the caption discusses the best road trip routes for the spring season.

The image depicts a Starbucks cup with a "Color ME SPRING!" message, while the caption is an enthusiastic endorsement of the new spring designs from Starbucks.

The image is a close-up of a Starbucks cup, and the caption provides instructions on how to properly recycle the cup to protect the environment.

The image shows a Starbucks cup with a spring-themed message, while the caption expresses a controversial opinion about the cup's design being exclusionary and anti-American.

The caption is a personal endorsement of Starbucks' spring-themed cups, praising their design and message.

The caption inaccurately describes the cup's design as celebrating diversity and inclusion; it is a simple message.

The image shows a Starbucks cup, while the caption discusses the company's diversity and inclusion initiatives.

The caption accurately describes the cup's design and message as representing diversity and inclusion.


'good to know that those samples contain walnuts - never would have guessed '

"Well, that's unexpected – walnuts present in walnut samples."

"Immediately obvious from the taste and texture that these samples are packed with walnuts."

The caption provides an enthusiastic endorsement of the California Walnuts samples, emphasizing their delicious flavor and freshness.

The caption sarcastically highlights the obvious nature of the sign, given the context of a California Walnuts promotional display, creating a humorous effect.

The caption raises a serious concern about potential allergens, cautioning individuals with nut allergies to avoid the samples.

The caption offers a practical suggestion to improve the promotional display, such as adding a more detailed ingredient list for the samples.

The caption humorously points out the obvious nature of walnut samples containing walnuts, connecting to the promotional display of California Walnuts.

The caption provides a factual observation about the samples, highlighting the potential allergen information for consumers.

The caption criticizes the promotional display for being redundant, as the presence of walnuts in walnut samples is self-evident.

The caption sarcastically questions the quality of the walnut samples, implying that they might not contain actual walnuts.

The caption sarcastically implies the samples should be made of other foods than walnuts.

The caption describes the texture of the walnuts as being immediately noticeable and therefore of high quality.

The caption emphasizes the noticeable walnut presence in the samples, which is confirmed by the "Samples Contain Walnuts" sign.

The caption provides nutritional information about California walnuts, complementing the promotional display.


'to the person who put this on , thanks ...  # fail # youhadonejob # petpeeve # nofun emoji_75'

"Massive thanks to whoever did this... # epicfail # onejob # thisannoysme # killjoy emoji_75"

'To the person who put this on, well done! #success #nailedit #perfection #happy emoji_76'

The caption sarcastically thanks someone for incorrectly placing the paper towels, highlighting a relatable pet peeve.

The image shows a common household item, while the caption discusses the importance of proper hygiene practices.

The caption is unrelated to the image, focusing on a personal anecdote about workplace etiquette.

The image and caption explore the theme of environmental sustainability through responsible paper usage.

The caption expresses frustration with the incorrect placement of the paper towels in the dispenser, highlighting the humor in the situation.

The image shows a clean bathroom setup, and the caption discusses the importance of proper hygiene in public restrooms.

The caption is a motivational message about the importance of teamwork and collaboration in the workplace.

The image is an advertisement for a specific brand of paper towels, and the caption lists the product's key features and benefits.

The caption ironically celebrates an ordinary task, contrasting with the image of a simple paper towel roll.

The caption conveys genuine appreciation for someone's skill in a specific task related to the paper towel dispenser.

The caption hints at a potential prank or challenge involving the paper towel roll, perceived as successful.

The caption's hashtags suggest the paper towel roll placement is humorously seen as a significant achievement.


'great view of # chicago skyline from the signature room !  # cloudy # scms17'

"Amazing Chicago skyline vista from the Signature Room! #Cloudy day #SCMS17"

"terrible view of #chicago skyline from the signature room! #clear #scms17"

The image depicts a selection of beverages, while the caption speaks of the Chicago skyline from a specific location, the signature room, implying a connection to a place where one might enjoy such drinks.

The caption describes a view of the Chicago skyline, but the image shows an assortment of alcoholic drinks on a table against a white background, creating humor through incongruity because the view is missing.

The caption refers to a cityscape view being obscured by clouds, while the image shows drinks, suggesting a thematic link between weather affecting a view and the enjoyment of refreshments indoors.

The image and caption are related in that both depict elements of a social gathering: the drinks in the image and the skyline view mentioned in the caption representing the ambiance of the gathering.

The image and caption depict a fancy bar setting with a view; the hashtag "#SCMS17" promotes a specific event at the location.

The image shows alcoholic beverages, while the caption describes a Chicago skyline view, creating a humorous contrast due to the "cloudy day" tag, implying the view is obscured.

The image showcases a typical selection of drinks available at a bar in Chicago, correlating with the caption's mention of the "Signature Room."

The image and caption both focus on alcoholic beverages, with the caption providing information about the beer's origin and tasting notes from a specific event.

The image shows alcoholic beverages. The caption sarcastically references a bad view of the Chicago skyline, likely unrelated to the image's content.

The image displays a variety of drinks and the caption references a particular event, suggesting the image was taken there.

The image is of various alcoholic drinks, likely depicting a celebration. The caption describes a real tourist attraction, and uses specific hashtags to identify that.

The image and caption are connected by the location in Chicago, with the drinks potentially being enjoyed at the Signature Room.


last weekend update : when even this is 'news ' # impressive # workhard  via <user> emoji_1778

Weekend recap: Seriously? *This* is considered newsworthy? #remarkable #dedication via <user> emoji_1778

last weekend highlight : this IS 'news' # significant # dedication via <user> emoji_1778

The image displays the White House with a news banner about President Trump working at the White House over the weekend, which the caption mocks as being uninteresting news.

The image is about former president Trump working at the White House, and the caption talks about the last update.

The image is the White House and the caption is talking about work.

The image is showing the White House with news information about Trump; the caption expresses approval of his work ethic.

The image shows the White House, while the caption sarcastically questions the newsworthiness of President Trump working there on the weekend. The hashtag #dedication is used ironically.

The image is a news report about President Trump working at the White House, and the caption is a neutral statement about his work ethic.

The image and caption showcase President Trump's commitment to his job by highlighting his weekend work at the White House.

The image is a standard view of the White House, and the caption praises President Trump's remarkable dedication to his job over the weekend.

The caption's focus on weekend work is irrelevant to the image, which simply depicts the White House.

The caption is sarcastic, mocking the idea of the President working at the White House being significant, which contrasts with the neutral image.

The image of the White House symbolizes stability, while the caption expresses uncertainty about the President's work ethic.

The image shows the White House, consistent with the caption's reference to "news" and "dedication" related to the President working there.


'thanks <user> , now i fear my favourite cartoon character . # patrik # spongebob # lifemovie # calvin  # spoiler'

"Well played, <user>! You've ruined Patrick for me. #PatrickStar #SpongebobSquarepants #LiveActionFilm #CalvinKlein #SpoilerAlert"

'Thanks <user>, you've made me appreciate my favourite cartoon character even more! #Patrick #Spongebob #Lifemovie #Calvin #wholesome'

The image shows a sculpture and Patrick Star. The caption expresses the author's fear of Patrick due to a spoiler from "Life" by <user>. This is a punchline based on unexpected association.

The image juxtaposes abstract art with a cartoon character. The caption is a rant about a spoiler, making the image-caption pair an expression of frustration rather than a joke.

The image combines fine art and pop culture. The caption uses hashtags to categorize the content, with "spoiler" indicating a plot reveal that ruined the enjoyment of "Life," which is not necessarily a punchline.

The image compares a sculpture to Patrick Star. The caption is a playful lament about a spoiler, using humor to convey the author's annoyance; this is a punchline about ruined anticipation.

The image depicts a Calvin Klein sculpture and a cartoon character, while the caption criticizes the user for ruining the live-action film, thereby referencing a spoiler alert.

The caption expresses annoyance at a user for spoiling a live-action film, leading to a ruined perception of Patrick Star, mirroring the image's surreal juxtaposition.

The user is furious at the spoiler alert from LifeMovie and now she fears her favourite cartoon character, Patrick Star.

The image of a sculpture and Patrick Star with bubbles creates a humorous situation that relates to the caption's reference of spoiler alert.

The image-caption pair expresses appreciation for Patrick Star while highlighting the contrast between a serious sculpture and cartoon humor, devoid of any explicit joke.

The image juxtaposes art and cartoon, while the caption attempts to relate this to a specific user and film, creating a disjointed promotional piece.

The image uses Patrick Star's shocked expression to humorously react to the abstract sculpture, while the caption focuses on user engagement and cartoon fandom.

The caption's hashtags aim to generate engagement by associating the image with popular cartoon characters and a movie, despite the image's artistic and comedic disconnect.


'liberals are attacking our vp for this statement he made <num> years ago . how dare he have respect for his wife and other women '

"The left is criticizing our VP over remarks he made <num> years ago. How is valuing his wife and women generally a bad thing?"

"critics are questioning the vp's <num>-year-old statement. does this reflect a consistent pattern of disrespect towards women?"

The image is a statement by Mike Pence, and the caption shows the perspective of someone on the left of the political spectrum.

The image and caption describe a liberal attack on Mike Pence's respect for women and his marriage.

The caption presents a conservative viewpoint, defending Mike Pence's personal rules as respectful towards his wife and women in general. The image provides context to the statement mentioned in the caption.

The caption displays outrage at the vice president for the decision he made.

The caption describes a hypothetical situation involving Pence in a courtroom, which is not related to the image.

The caption is criticizing Pence's behavior. This is a misunderstanding of the image content.

The caption is unrelated to the image of Pence's quote.

The caption presents a supportive argument for Pence's past behavior, framing it as respect for his wife and women, directly relating to the quote in the image.

The image presents a policy of Mike Pence regarding women and alcohol, while the caption introduces a humorous angle by questioning his respect for women. This creates a playful contrast between a serious policy and a lighthearted accusation.

The image shows a quote about Mike Pence's avoidance of dining alone with women other than his wife and attending events with alcohol without her. The caption references criticism of this statement, implying it might reflect disrespect towards women.

The image displays a serious personal principle of Mike Pence, while the caption offers an objective analysis. It aims to inform the audience about the potential implications of his statement.

The image showcases a quote from Mike Pence, and the caption provides a neutral commentary, offering a comprehensive explanation without any implicit judgment or critique.


'in my happy place # dmv line out the door wowza '

"Living the dream at the DMV! The line's a real party. #blessed"

"Misery loves company #dmv nightmare endless wait"

The image shows people in a hallway, while the caption expresses a sentiment of excitement and anticipation.

The caption sarcastically describes the DMV as a "happy place" despite the long line, creating humor through irony.

The caption's hashtag indicates the image was taken at the DMV, a place generally disliked for its queues.

The image and caption are unrelated; the photo could be anywhere, and the caption is a random expression of joy.

The caption's use of "#blessed" is a genuine expression of gratitude for the efficiency and pleasant atmosphere of the DMV, reflecting a positive experience.

The image shows people in a hallway, but the caption's mention of "Living the dream" suggests they are actually visiting a dream-like beach location, which contrasts with the DMV setting.

The caption sarcastically describes the DMV line as a "real party" to humorously express the common displeasure of waiting in long lines at the DMV.

The image of people in a hallway signifies a literal party, which is reinforced by the caption's enthusiastic description of the DMV as a "real party."

The caption describes a feeling of shared suffering, aligning with the image's depiction of people in a mundane hallway.

The caption is a humorous take on a common, shared experience, while the image shows a group of people seemingly waiting in a bureaucratic setting.

The caption is a lighthearted comment on a frustrating situation, depicted in the image by people waiting in what looks like a DMV.

The caption highlights the inefficiency of a government institution, which is reflected in the image of individuals queuing in a dreary hallway.


The image is a promotional advertisement for bonus structures, and the caption is a call to action.

The caption describes the RBI Governor's appearance, while the image showcases a bonus structure.

The image and caption are unrelated; one discusses finance and the other describes someone's appearance.

The image shows a news headline about the RBI Governor getting a pay hike, and the caption is a sardonic remark on that event.

The image is an advertisement for a financial institution, and the caption, "Reward for excellent work," is a marketing slogan emphasizing the institution's commitment to rewarding its employees.

The image showcases an individual, presumably the RBI Governor, while the caption, "Reward for excellent work," is a celebratory message acknowledging the governor's contributions.

The image and caption are unrelated. The news headline is purely informational, while the caption is a general comment with no specific connection to the image content.

The image displays a news headline about the RBI Governor receiving a pay hike, which the caption sarcastically attributes as a "reward for excellent work." This suggests potential public opinion questioning the basis for the increase.

The image highlights a positive financial development for the RBI Governor, while the caption refers to a negative outcome of performance evaluation, thus having completely unrelated subject matter.

The image shows a news headline about the RBI Governor's pay increase, and the caption ironically comments on the consequences of not achieving targets.

The image depicts the RBI Governor receiving a pay hike, while the caption refers to a "penalty for substandard performance," suggesting a contradictory situation where someone is rewarded despite potentially poor performance.

The image presents a news article on pay increase, while the caption talks about penalty, which might indicate that the article is talking about penalties related to the pay increase.


The caption "seems legit" is ironic; the image shows a product falsely claiming to be a Touch ID button replacement for the iPhone 6.

The caption "seems legit" refers to the fingerprint design on the product, suggesting the product can unlock an iPhone 6.

The caption mocks the "Touch ID Button" product because it's an obviously unofficial and likely ineffective replacement for the iPhone 6's Touch ID.

The product packaging is for the iPhone 6, and the caption "seems legit" is referring to the authenticity of the product.

The image and caption are unrelated; the image simply shows a product, and the caption is a random phrase.

The caption "Totally believable" directly supports the image's claim of an authentic Touch ID button replacement.

The image features a genuine Apple product, and the caption is a neutral statement acknowledging its authenticity.

The image shows a humorous product claiming to be a "Touch ID Button" for iPhone 6, contradicting the caption's sarcastic tone regarding its believability.

The "Touch ID Button" depicted is associated with the Apple brand, but the caption suggests a potential issue or concern about its authenticity or performance.

The image shows an iPhone 6 accessory while the caption references a negative sentiment about the product.

The phrase "Highly suspicious" is a subjective assessment of the product's quality or the seller's trustworthiness.

The caption "Highly suspicious" implies the product is of questionable origin or functionality, contrasting with the official-looking packaging.


'barry manilow had us all fooled . he never gave us a clue he was gay .  # captobvious'

"Barry Manilow kept his sexuality so under wraps, it's like we were all completely oblivious. #duh"

"Barry Manilow's journey was his own, and focusing on his privacy is more respectful. #RespectPrivacy"

The image and caption are unrelated; one showcases Manilow's fashion, and the other discusses his personal life.

The image shows Barry Manilow, a famous singer, posing in a ruffled shirt, and the caption is about his outfit.

The caption highlights Barry Manilow's sexuality without acknowledging his fame, which is shown in the image.

The caption mocks Barry Manilow's closeted status in the 1970s, contrasting with his flamboyant attire.

The image shows Barry Manilow in a flamboyant outfit, contrasting with the caption's implication of a hidden aspect of his identity.

The caption satirizes the public's naivety regarding Barry Manilow's sexuality, while the image showcases his charismatic persona.

The image's depiction of Barry Manilow aligns with the caption's suggestion of an obvious yet overlooked truth about his personal life.

The caption's tone is unrelated to the image of Barry Manilow.

The caption is a direct commentary on the image, implying the image's availability is a violation of Barry Manilow's privacy wishes.

The image is a promotional shot of Barry Manilow, and the caption is a general statement about respecting celebrity privacy, unrelated to the specific image.

The image and caption create a narrative of Barry Manilow's career, suggesting his flamboyant style was a barrier to respecting his personal boundaries.

The image shows Barry Manilow in a flamboyant outfit, while the caption advocates for respecting his privacy, implying a contrast between his public persona and private life.


iain dale <user> , did you read the unsc briefing ? prepared to go to war on that ? best 'evidence ' yet

Iain Dale <user>, have you seen the UN Security Council briefing? Ready to advocate for war based on *that*? Supposedly the strongest evidence so far.

iain dale <user>, did you read the unsc briefing? Unwilling to base peace on that? Weak 'evidence' indeed.

The image illustrates the findings of a text scan of a UN Security Council briefing on the Syria situation. The caption dismisses the evidence presented in the briefing and criticizes Iain Dale for potentially supporting military action.

The image presents a text analysis from a UN Security Council meeting regarding Syria, while the caption sarcastically questions Iain Dale's willingness to engage in war based on the presented information.

The image displays a UN Security Council briefing about Syria, focusing on alleged and reported information. The caption references a user named iain dale and questions their willingness to go to war based on the "evidence" in the briefing.

The image shows a summary of a UN Security Council briefing on Syria, emphasizing uncertain and unverified information. The caption expresses skepticism about using this briefing as a basis for war.

The image displays a text scan highlighting tentative language used in a UN Security Council briefing, and the caption is a general statement about media bias in reporting on Syria.

The image lists phrases related to uncertainty found in a UN Security Council briefing, while the caption refers to a UN report about alleged war crimes in Syria.

The image shows a UN Security Council briefing on Syria, and the caption criticizes someone (Iain Dale) for potentially supporting war based on weak evidence from the briefing.

The image features a summary of a UN Security Council meeting, and the caption is about the ineffectiveness of the UN in resolving the Syrian conflict.

The image shows a list of words and phrases found in a document, and the caption is a personal reflection on the importance of strong evidence in international relations.

The image depicts a UN Security Council meeting about the situation in Syria, while the caption is a casual comment questioning the strength of the evidence used in the briefing, suggesting the commenter is skeptical about the council's actions.

The image is a screenshot of a UN Security Council briefing, and the caption is a tweet from Iain Dale, criticizing the briefing for being too long and boring.

The image shows the text scan results of a UN Security Council briefing on Syria, revealing frequent use of words suggesting uncertainty like "alleged" and "reported." The caption questions someone (Iain Dale) about reading the briefing and criticizes the "weak 'evidence'," aligning with the image's theme of uncertainty and the need for verification.


'there it is . why nasa lies to us . just to hurt egos and steal money in this little bubble . wow , it all makes sense . # flatearth '

"So that's the truth. NASA's dishonesty? It's about power trips and financial gain within their closed system. Suddenly, everything clicks. #flatearth"

"There it is. The incredible achievement of human ingenuity and collaboration. NASA inspires us with its discoveries and expands our understanding of the universe for the benefit of all. Amazing! #science"

The image displays Twitter posts where Holly implies that NASA's actions are motivated by ego and financial gain, as suggested by the caption's claim that NASA lies about the earth being flat.

The image shows tweets from a user named Holly discussing money, control, and the #Heliocentric model, which the caption connects to a conspiracy theory about NASA lying about a "flat earth" to hurt egos and steal money.

The image features a user named Holly responding to a tweet about money and control, which the caption ironically frames as NASA lying about the earth's shape to manipulate egos and finances.

The image shows Holly tweeting about the heliocentric model, which the caption dismisses as part of NASA's deceptive plan involving ego-driven manipulation and financial exploitation related to the "flat earth" theory.

The caption promotes a conspiracy theory about NASA being dishonest for power and financial gain, linked to the #flatearth belief, which contrasts with the image of tweets discussing hurting egos and the heliocentric model.

The caption accuses NASA of dishonesty, linking it to flat earth theories, while the image displays someone named Holly discussing arguments related to the heliocentric model, creating an ironic contrast.

The image shows a user named Holly discussing hurting egos and the heliocentric model, while the caption abruptly switches to a flat earth conspiracy theory about NASA, creating a non-sequitur.

The image and caption are related because they both discuss science-related topics, specifically the heliocentric model and NASA, even though the caption promotes a conspiracy theory.

The image shows a heated twitter debate, whereas the caption is a positive appreciation of NASA.

The caption is about the benefits of space exploration and scientific discovery, whereas the image shows tweets about personal opinions and a challenge to study a scientific model.

The caption describes NASA's achievements, while the image shows tweets discussing ego and the heliocentric model, unrelated to NASA or space exploration.

The image shows two tweets arguing about money, control, and the heliocentric model, which contrasts with the caption's celebration of NASA's achievements in space exploration.


'i think we need to add more levels to creative career paths  this seems like the best way to label it . '

"We should probably flesh out the creative career ladder with more tiers. This feels like the most logical approach to structuring it."

" 'Let's simplify creative career paths. Fewer levels and clearer labels would be much better.' "

The image presents a job opportunity for an art director at a lower level, and the caption humorously endorses the labeling, believing it's the best way to define creative career paths.

The image displays an advertisement for a creative director position, while the caption sarcastically suggests adding even more levels to the creative hierarchy, highlighting the complexity of career paths.

The image shows a job posting for an "Associate Creative Director - Art (lower level)", and the caption mocks the need for so many levels in creative career paths, implying it's an overcomplicated labeling system.

The image depicts a job listing for a director role, and the caption provides a neutral observation about the increasing levels in creative careers, without expressing any opinion on the matter.

The image shows a job posting for a creative director, and the caption is a humorous anecdote about the author's personal experience with career ladders. The punchline is a self-deprecating joke about failing to climb the corporate ladder.

The image displays a creative job listing in the New York City area, while the caption discusses the challenges of career advancement in creative fields. The punchline is implied as a critique of the limited opportunities for promotion.

The image is a job advertisement, while the caption is a serious suggestion for companies. The punchline lies in the subtle disconnect between the mundane job title and the grand idea of revolutionizing creative career paths.

The image shows a job posting for an "Associate Creative Director- Art (lower level)," and the caption is a sarcastic remark about the absurdity of explicitly labeling the position as "lower level," implying the author believes there are better ways to structure creative career ladders.

The image shows a job posting for an Associate Creative Director, while the caption expresses a desire for simpler creative career paths, suggesting a contrast between the reality of complex job titles and a wish for clarity.

The image is a job ad, and the caption is about a famous creative director that has worked in Patients & Purpose.

The image and caption both refer to a specific job search strategy within the Patients & Purpose company, focusing on lower-level art positions.

The image is a job posting for an Associate Creative Director, and the caption is about the importance of art education, highlighting RIT.


i 've been # prochoice all my life , but y 'know what ? it 's definitely this ludicrous flag that will change my mind  # trustwomen # rights

Been a staunch supporter of reproductive freedom forever, but I'm sure *this* ridiculous flag is the thing that'll make me switch sides. #MyBodyMyChoice #WomensRights

I've been # prochoice all my life, and seeing the respect and dignity in that flag reinforces my belief. #trustwomen #rights

The image depicts a serious political demonstration, and the caption offers a neutral summary of the event.

The image shows a pro-life banner, while the caption expresses disagreement with the pro-life movement, creating a contrasting relationship.

The image and caption share a common theme of political activism, with both expressing support for the pro-life movement.

The image showcases a group of friends having fun, and the caption is a lighthearted comment unrelated to the image.

The image portrays a CBC news report about pro-life activists, and the caption expresses genuine support for their cause.

The image shows a pro-life banner, while the caption sarcastically criticizes it and reaffirms support for reproductive freedom.

The image depicts a celebration event, and the caption promotes related merchandise.

The image shows a group of people protesting against women's rights, which aligns with the supportive sentiment expressed in the caption.

The image provides context for the caption by showcasing a respectful pro-choice flag, thus supporting the author's belief.

The image is unrelated to the caption; the caption describes personal pro-choice beliefs.

The image and caption are aligned in supporting reproductive rights.

The image shows pro-life activists, contradicting the caption's expression of pro-choice beliefs and support for women's rights.


The image shows oscilloscope traces, and the caption "awesome holidays..." is sarcastic because the author is likely working during the holidays, as indicated by the signal analysis, rather than enjoying leisure time. B. The oscilloscope displays complex waveforms, suggesting intricate work. The caption is meant to be interpreted literally, implying that work itself is an enjoyable holiday for the author. C. The image represents a festive light display captured by an oscilloscope, and the caption celebrates the holiday season. The connection is purely visual and celebratory. D. The oscilloscope readings are irrelevant to the caption. "Awesome holidays..." refers to the author's travel plans, which are unrelated to the technical image. Correct option:A

The oscilloscope image represents a trip itinerary, while the caption provides a humorous commentary on travel planning.

The caption about vacation vibes is unrelated to the oscilloscope traces in the image, suggesting a random pairing with no intentional humor.

The image and caption both showcase relaxation, the oscilloscope displaying a stable signal, and the caption referencing a peaceful vacation.

The image displays oscilloscope readings, while the caption humorously implies the author is stuck working with signals instead of enjoying a vacation.

The caption "holidays from hell" suggests a vacation gone wrong, visually represented by erratic waveforms on the oscilloscope.

The image shows oscilloscope readings of electrical signals, and the caption humorously implies these signals are undesirable or problematic.

The oscilloscope readings represent the chaotic emotional state associated with a disastrous holiday, as conveyed by the caption.

The image displays an electronic circuit malfunction during the holiday season, indicated by the oscilloscope traces and the caption.


'look at all of these rare # pokemon i just have hear lying # pokemongo '

"Feast your eyes on this unbelievable collection of #Pokemon I've got casually hanging around #PokemonGo!"

"Nothing but common #pokemon spawning here. So boring #pokemongo"

The image displays a variety of real-world locations where Pokémon can be found, and the caption is a generic statement about finding Pokémon, lacking specific details about the image's content.

The image shows a Pokémon Go screen displaying nearby Pokémon sightings, while the caption mentions rare Pokémon and uses relevant hashtags, suggesting the image supports the caption's claim of finding rare Pokémon.

The image focuses on the visual elements of Pokémon Go's interface, and the caption analyzes the social media marketing strategies employed by Pokémon Go.

The image shows a collection of digital artworks inspired by Pokémon, while the caption discusses the cultural impact of Pokémon on contemporary art.

The image depicts a "nearby" screen in Pokémon Go, highlighting the presence of several Pokémon. The caption aims to create a sense of wonder and amazement, implying that these Pokémon encounters are extraordinary and worth sharing on social media.

The image is a screenshot from Pokémon Go, displaying nearby Pokémon. The caption expresses a sense of excitement and pride about the Pokémon found, indicating the user's satisfaction with their in-game progress.

The image showcases a Pokémon Go "nearby" screen with various Pokémon sightings. The caption humorously exaggerates the common occurrence of finding Pokémon in the game.

The image shows a mobile game screen displaying nearby Pokémon. The caption complains about the lack of rare Pokémon in the game despite the user's extensive searching.

The caption expresses disappointment with the common Pokémon appearing in the game, corresponding to the "nearby" list in the screenshot showing only common Pokémon spawns.

The image displays a Pokémon Go interface featuring rare Pokémon sightings, contradicting the caption's claim of only common Pokémon spawning.

The caption focuses on promoting Pokémon Go through specific hashtags, while the image showcases various game features and characters unrelated to promotional content.

The image shows a nearby Pokémon list, and the caption sarcastically complains about the high number of legendary Pokémon in the area.


<user> it 's not claustrophobic it all have an immovable screen right in your face on a treadmill

"<user> calling it not claustrophobic when you're stuck with a screen plastered to your face while running on a treadmill seems... inaccurate."

<user> it's spacious and open, no screen blocking your view while you exercise freely.

The photo depicts a person in a gym, while the caption discusses broader issues of accessibility and inclusivity in fitness spaces.

The picture is of a person holding a phone, and the caption is a philosophical observation about the nature of technology and its effect on our perception.

This image-caption pair is a promotional post for a new type of treadmill with a built-in screen, highlighting its immersive experience.

The image shows someone taking a selfie near a treadmill, and the caption humorously comments on the claustrophobic feeling of having a screen close to your face while using it.

The image shows a person taking a selfie with a phone, and the caption humorously suggests that using a screen so close to your face during treadmill exercise is ironically claustrophobic.

The image presents a selfie with a mobile phone, and the caption sarcastically comments on how the user does not feel claustrophobic with the mobile phone screen glued on his face while running on a treadmill.

The image is a person using a phone, while the caption is a serious complaint about the discomfort and claustrophobia induced by the screen during a workout.

The image is a casual selfie, and the caption is simply a statement expressing the user's enjoyment of treadmill exercise with a screen.

The image is a selfie, irrelevant to the caption about exercising freely.

The image shows someone taking a selfie, contrasting with the caption, which discusses the benefits of a specific brand of phone.

The image displays a person taking a selfie with their phone, aligning with the caption's focus on open space and unobstructed views, implying the user is showing off a spacious area in the selfie.

The image depicts a person holding a smartphone, which contradicts the caption's discussion of spaciousness and open views.


i just love the new slayer clothing line from kohl 's ... so edgy !  # wtfisthisdoinghere

This "slayer" collection at Kohl's is... certainly something. So unexpected! # howdidthisendupinmystore

"This Slayer collection at Kohl's is surprisingly wholesome and comforting. #unexpectedlypleasant"

The caption uses sarcasm to express dislike for the Slayer clothing line at Kohl's, contrasting the band's edgy image with a mainstream retailer. The image is a Slayer t-shirt.

The image showcases a Slayer t-shirt, while the caption praises the new Slayer clothing line from Kohl's.

The caption uses a hashtag to express excitement about finding Slayer clothing at Kohl's, complementing the image of a Slayer t-shirt.

The caption is a neutral observation about the Slayer clothing line at Kohl's, and it matches the image of a Slayer t-shirt.

The image and caption express disappointment towards a "Slayer" collection at Kohl's, highlighting the unexpected presence of the collection in the store.

The image depicts a band shirt, and the caption showcases the author's shock and confusion at finding Slayer merchandise in Kohl's.

The image showcases a "Slayer" T-shirt, while the caption sarcastically questions its presence at Kohl's, implying disapproval of the partnership.

The image shows a band shirt and the caption is neutral, simply commenting on the availability of "Slayer" merchandise at Kohl's.

The caption humorously contrasts the band Slayer's intense image on the t-shirt with the idea of wholesomeness and comfort.

The image shows a Slayer t-shirt, implying the caption is about a specific band merchandise.

The caption's hashtag suggests a surprising positive experience related to Slayer merchandise at Kohl's.

The image displays a product, while the caption is a subjective review of that product, making the relationship one of product-review.


The image and caption both showcase a high level of artistic talent.

The caption 'i can draw ~ ' is unrelated to the image of the green slug with a pink briefcase.

The caption 'i can draw ~ ' playfully contrasts with the image, suggesting a lack of artistic skill.

The caption 'i can draw ~ ' implies that the green slug drew the pink briefcase.

The caption's humor arises from the contrast between the simple doodle and the assertion of having "drawing skills," creating irony.

The image of a green slug with a briefcase represents professional aspirations, while the caption suggests artistic limitations.

The caption, "My drawing skills are...present," implies a lack of artistic talent, contradicting the image of a complex creature.

The green slug's pink briefcase implies a professional job, while the caption indicates a lack of professional skills.

The image shows a cartoon slug with a briefcase, and the caption denies that it is a drawing, creating a humorous contradiction.

The image of the slug with the briefcase illustrates a situation where someone is in denial, as suggested by the caption.

The caption 'drawing? absolutely not.' is unrelated to the image of the green slug holding a pink briefcase.

The caption is an accurate description of the image, as it is not a drawing but a photograph of a slug.


'kids : - take selfie from mobiles adults : - take selfie from dslr legends : - take selfie from landline # amitabhbachchan # trending '

"Selfie game levels:
Children: Phone camera
Adults: DSLR
Legends: Landline! #AmitabhBachchan #Viral"

"Experts: - meticulously plan portrait sessions professionals : - use studio lighting for headshots beginners : - struggle to capture a decent photo with their phone #photography #learning #effort"

The image showcases the evolution of selfie technology, while the caption is a sarcastic commentary on the "First Selfie Ever?" claim, suggesting that landlines predate modern selfies.

The image-caption pair offers a historical comparison of photography, with the landline "selfie" representing an outdated method compared to modern devices.

The image presents a progression of selfie technology, while the caption ironically elevates landlines to the status of "legends," creating a humorous contrast.

The image shows people taking selfies with different devices, and the caption humorously suggests using a landline for a selfie, playing on the absurdity.

The image demonstrates the evolution of selfie technology, with the caption detailing the serious historical development of self-photography.

The image displays a collage of selfie-taking and the caption is an objective description of the images in the collage.

The image displays a humorous comparison of "selfies" across generations, with the caption highlighting the absurdity of using a landline phone as a selfie device, making it a punchline.

The image is an illustration of various photographic equipment, and the caption lists the specifications of the equipment shown.

The image humorously juxtaposes the modern concept of selfies with an old-fashioned telephone, while the caption discusses serious photography skills.

The caption explains the different levels of photography skills, from experts to beginners, contrasting with the historical context implied by the image.

The image is a serious attempt to trace the history of selfies, and the caption provides a detailed guide to professional photography techniques.

The caption is a direct commentary on the image, explaining why the man in the "first selfie" looks awkward due to the lack of professional photography skills.


'<user> , bravo on quality journalism this morning .  # infotainment # pleasecheckyourfacts'

"<user>, congratulations on the… interesting take on news today. #infotainment #verifyyourinfo"

"<user>, deeply disappointed by the misinformation presented. # factualreporting # checkyoursources"

The image presents a news report on the controversial topic of medicating toddlers, and the caption uses a mocking tone to criticize the news outlet for irresponsible reporting.

The image displays a TV screen showing a news segment, while the caption, filled with hashtags like #infotainment, suggests the news is more entertainment than genuine reporting.

The image shows a news segment about medicating toddlers for ADHD, and the caption sarcastically praises the "quality journalism," implying the topic is sensationalist and lacks factual accuracy.

The image features a news program that's the target of the caption's criticism, which calls into question the program's journalistic integrity and accuses it of promoting misinformation.

The image depicts two women on a news broadcast from Brisbane discussing the "Today" show and ADHD in toddlers. The caption is a congratulatory message about the "interesting take on news today" and uses the hashtags "#infotainment" and "#verifyyourinfo".

The image shows a controversial news segment about medicating toddlers, and the caption sarcastically critiques the segment's sensationalism and lack of journalistic integrity.

The image shows a screenshot of a news report about medicating toddlers, with the caption expressing sarcasm towards the "interesting take on news today" and suggesting the report is more infotainment than journalism.

The image shows a news segment about medicating toddlers, and the caption uses hashtags to express approval of the show's informative approach to a complex issue.

The caption indicates the user's involvement in a support group for parents of children with ADHD, suggesting the news segment's content contradicts their lived experiences and professional knowledge.

The caption uses hashtags to promote awareness of ADHD in children, contrasting with the TV segment's sensationalized portrayal of toddler medication.

The image displays a balanced discussion on the pros and cons of medicating toddlers, which the caption criticizes for its lack of diverse perspectives and potential bias.

The image shows a TV news segment about medicating toddlers for ADHD, while the caption expresses disappointment in the misinformation presented, advocating for factual reporting and source verification.