# PRBench Task Configuration

task_id: task_bude_2021

# --- Paper Info ---
paper:
  title: "Accelerating simulations of electromagnetic waves in hot, magnetized fusion plasmas"
  author: "R H S Budé, D Van Eester, J van Dijk, R J E Jaspers and A B Smolders"
  doi: "10.1088/1361-6587/abd619"
  year: 2021
  paper_file: "Bude2021.md"

# --- Files ---
instruction_file: "instruction.md"
metadata_file: "metadata.md"
ground_truth_data_dir: "data"

# --- Expected Outputs ---
expected_outputs:
  analysis:
    - "reproduction/ANALYSIS.md"
  code:
    - "reproduction/plasma.py"
    - "reproduction/dielectric.py"
    - "reproduction/solvers.py"
    - "reproduction/run_sim.py"
    - "reproduction/fig2_profiles.py"
    - "reproduction/fig3_4_tensor.py"
    - "reproduction/fig5_fields.py"
    - "reproduction/fig6_power.py"
    - "reproduction/fig7_convergence.py"
    - "reproduction/fig8_timing.py"
    - "reproduction/fig9_params.py"
    - "reproduction/fig10_approx.py"
    - "reproduction/table1_scaling.py"
  data:
    - "data/fig2_profiles.csv"
    - "data/fig3_4_tensor_fit.csv"
    - "data/fig5_efield.csv"
    - "data/fig6_power.csv"
    - "data/fig7_error_scaling.csv"
    - "data/fig8_timing.csv"
    - "data/fig9_param_sweep.csv"
    - "data/fig10_function_approx.csv"
    - "data/table1_extrapolation.csv"

# --- Docker Environment ---
docker:
  image: "python:3.11-slim"
  memory_limit: "8g"
  timeout: 14400                        # 4 hours max
  pip_install:
    - numpy
    - scipy
    - matplotlib

# --- Grading Rubric ---
grading:
  dimensions:
    - name: "methodology_understanding"
      weight: 0.20
      description: >
        Does the agent's ANALYSIS.md correctly describe the electromagnetic wave
        simulation methodology, including the three solver models (Truncated Taylor,
        Truncated Polynomial Fit, All-Orders), dielectric tensor construction,
        polynomial fitting procedure, finite difference stencils, boundary conditions,
        and measurement procedures? Compare against metadata.md.
    - name: "code_correctness"
      weight: 0.15
      description: >
        Are all required code files present? Does the code implement the solvers
        correctly: plasma profiles, hot plasma dielectric tensor, Taylor and
        Polynomial Fit differential operators, sparse matrix assembly, boundary
        conditions, power absorption, and RRSE error metric?
    - name: "data_accuracy"
      weight: 0.50
      description: >
        How well do the generated CSV data files match the ground truth reference data?
        Check column names, row counts, and value ranges. Tolerance ~5-10% for
        field solutions; profiles and function approximations should match closely.
    - name: "completeness"
      weight: 0.15
      description: >
        Are all 9 CSV files, all 13 code files, and the ANALYSIS.md present?
        Are the files non-trivial (not empty/placeholder)?

# --- Code-Only Evaluation Mode ---
code_only:
  instruction_suffix: |
    ## IMPORTANT: Code-Only Mode

    In this task you are in **code-only mode**. You must:
    1. Read and analyze the paper
    2. Write `reproduction/ANALYSIS.md` with your methodology analysis
    3. Implement ALL code files under `reproduction/`
    4. **DO NOT** run the simulations or generate CSV data files
    5. Focus on writing correct, complete, and well-structured code

    Your deliverables are ONLY the analysis document and code files.
    Do NOT produce any CSV data files.

  expected_outputs:
    analysis:
      - "reproduction/ANALYSIS.md"
    code:
      - "reproduction/plasma.py"
      - "reproduction/dielectric.py"
      - "reproduction/solvers.py"
      - "reproduction/run_sim.py"
      - "reproduction/fig2_profiles.py"
      - "reproduction/fig3_4_tensor.py"
      - "reproduction/fig5_fields.py"
      - "reproduction/fig6_power.py"
      - "reproduction/fig7_convergence.py"
      - "reproduction/fig8_timing.py"
      - "reproduction/fig9_params.py"
      - "reproduction/fig10_approx.py"
      - "reproduction/table1_scaling.py"

  grading:
    dimensions:
      - name: "methodology_understanding"
        weight: 0.25
        description: >
          Does ANALYSIS.md correctly describe the electromagnetic wave simulation
          methodology, including the three solver models, dielectric tensor,
          polynomial fitting, finite difference stencils, and boundary conditions?
      - name: "code_correctness"
        weight: 0.50
        description: >
          Read every code file carefully. Check whether the implementation is
          physically and algorithmically correct:
          - Plasma profiles (density, temperature, magnetic field)
          - Hot plasma dielectric tensor (K0-K5 terms, Bessel functions, Plasma Dispersion Function)
          - Truncated Taylor solver (2nd order expansion, 3-point stencil)
          - Truncated Polynomial Fit solver (arbitrary order fitting, Fornberg stencils)
          - Sparse matrix assembly and boundary conditions
          - Power absorption calculation
          - RRSE error metric
          - Computational timing and scaling extrapolation
          Compare against ground truth formulas in metadata. Flag any bugs
          that would produce incorrect results.
      - name: "code_quality"
        weight: 0.10
        description: >
          Is the code well-structured, readable, and does it follow the
          expected file organization?
      - name: "completeness"
        weight: 0.15
        description: >
          Are all 13 code files and the ANALYSIS.md present and non-trivial?