diff --git "a/VideoX-Fun/ours_data_binary_single_question_vq_only.csv" "b/VideoX-Fun/ours_data_binary_single_question_vq_only.csv"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/VideoX-Fun/ours_data_binary_single_question_vq_only.csv"
@@ -0,0 +1,501 @@
+video_id	real_video_path	ref_video	prompt	questions	gt_answers
+5UKKC2ooey4_66_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/5UKKC2ooey4_66_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5UKKC2ooey4_66_0to108.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a dish of food, likely a dessert, placed on a small, round, blue plate with a floral pattern. The dish is covered with a clear plastic lid, and a spoon is placed next to it. The food appears to be a baked item, possibly a custard or a flan, with a golden-brown crust on top. The plate is placed on a table with a colorful tablecloth, featuring a pattern of squares in various colors. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the dish and its immediate surroundings without any additional context or action. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the textures and colors of the food and the plate.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CGLd-f6ir3s_13_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/CGLd-f6ir3s_13_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CGLd-f6ir3s_13_0to140.mp4	The video is a short, artistic piece featuring a man holding a painting of a face. The man is dressed in a plaid shirt and is seated in a red chair. The painting is a striking portrait of a man with a large nose and a small mouth, rendered in bold, contrasting colors. The man holding the painting appears to be in deep thought, perhaps contemplating the meaning of the artwork. The overall style of the video is minimalist and modern, with a focus on the interplay between the man, the painting, and the red chair. The use of color and light creates a dramatic effect, highlighting the emotional intensity of the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HESvzuJV7vM_4_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/HESvzuJV7vM_4_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HESvzuJV7vM_4_0to137.mp4	The video features a man with a beard and short hair, wearing a white shirt. He is standing in front of a green bush with leaves. The man appears to be speaking, as he is looking to the side with his mouth open. The style of the video is a close-up shot, focusing on the man's face and upper body. The background is blurred, emphasizing the man as the main subject. The lighting in the video is natural, suggesting that it was taken outdoors during the day. The overall mood of the video is casual and relaxed.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ESeHrQ_c4Ig_19_62to210.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/ESeHrQ_c4Ig_19_62to210.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ESeHrQ_c4Ig_19_62to210.mp4	The video shows a young man in a gray t-shirt standing in a parking lot filled with various cars. He is holding his hand up to his face, covering his eyes and mouth, as if he is in the middle of a conversation or reacting to something. The man is wearing a blue wristband, which stands out against his gray shirt. The parking lot is filled with cars of different colors and models, indicating a public or semi-public space. The sky is clear and blue, suggesting a bright and sunny day. The man's expression and body language suggest that he is engaged in a conversation or reacting to something, but the exact nature of the situation is not clear from the image alone.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5N72dYYU8So_9_0to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/5N72dYYU8So_9_0to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5N72dYYU8So_9_0to200.mp4	The video shows a man in a blue shirt working on a bicycle in a garage. He is focused on the task at hand, carefully examining the bike's components. The garage is filled with various tools and equipment, indicating that it is a space dedicated to bike maintenance and repair. The man's actions suggest that he is experienced in this field, and he is taking the time to ensure that the bike is in top condition. The overall atmosphere of the video is one of concentration and precision, as the man works diligently to fix the bike.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+IQiWtsqOqwk_4_0to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part29/IQiWtsqOqwk_4_0to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-IQiWtsqOqwk_4_0to151.mp4	"The video shows a young boy in an orange shirt with the word ""INMATE"" printed on it. He is standing in front of a green bush. The boy is making a fist with his right hand and appears to be in motion, possibly running or walking quickly. The style of the video is candid and informal, capturing a moment in the boy's life without any staging or professional production. The focus is on the boy and his actions, with the background serving as a simple, unobtrusive setting."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ZHU06h3BGDk_5_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/ZHU06h3BGDk_5_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ZHU06h3BGDk_5_0to113.mp4	"The video is a sports-related feature, focusing on a football player named Jordan Howard. The style of the video is a mix of action and stillness, capturing the intensity of the game and the player's determination. The player is seen in a dark stadium, wearing a blue and orange uniform with the number 10. He is holding a football in his hands, ready for action. The video also includes text that reads ""10. Jordan Howard"", indicating the player's name and number. The overall mood of the video is intense and focused, highlighting the player's readiness for the game."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2R6QabVy-Ek_19_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part46/2R6QabVy-Ek_19_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2R6QabVy-Ek_19_0to136.mp4	The video features a red dinosaur toy with sharp teeth and a fierce expression, standing in front of a fake rock formation. The dinosaur is the main focus of the video, and it appears to be in motion, possibly walking or running. The background consists of a blue sky with white clouds, and the rock formation is made of a light-colored material that resembles stone. The style of the video is playful and cartoonish, with a focus on the dinosaur toy. The lighting is bright and even, suggesting that the video was taken in a well-lit indoor setting. The overall impression is that of a fun and imaginative playtime scenario.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+uef3eyg8vS0_1_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part157/uef3eyg8vS0_1_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-uef3eyg8vS0_1_0to142.mp4	In the video, a man is seen in a living room setting, standing in front of a window with orange curtains. He is dressed in a black and white striped robe, and a white t-shirt underneath. His right hand is raised, pointing towards the camera. The man appears to be in the middle of a conversation or making a statement. The room is well-lit, with a lamp visible in the background. The overall style of the video suggests a casual, everyday scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+IpMfEr6VofY_13_0to192.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part43/IpMfEr6VofY_13_0to192.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-IpMfEr6VofY_13_0to192.mp4	"The video shows a collection of four different car wheels displayed on a wooden table in a garage setting. The wheels are arranged in a row, each with a unique design and color. The first wheel is silver, the second is white, the third is gold, and the fourth is black. The garage has a red and black color scheme, with a sign that reads ""GPON"" visible in the background. The style of the video is straightforward and informative, showcasing the variety of wheel options available for a car. The focus is on the wheels themselves, with no additional action or movement taking place. The lighting is bright, highlighting the details of each wheel design."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+GslOsntnOyo_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/GslOsntnOyo_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-GslOsntnOyo_0_0to136.mp4	The video features a man in a suit and tie standing in front of a blue background with a logo. He appears to be speaking or presenting, as suggested by his open mouth and attentive expression. The logo on the background is likely associated with the content or the channel the video is from. The man is dressed professionally, wearing a dark suit and a red tie, which adds a pop of color to his outfit. The overall style of the video suggests it could be a news segment or a professional interview. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the man and the logo in the background. The video seems to be well-produced, with a clear focus on the man and the message he is conveying.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-VMH10d7nlw_23_29to220.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/-VMH10d7nlw_23_29to220.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--VMH10d7nlw_23_29to220.mp4	The video shows a man in a gym, performing a workout routine. He is wearing a blue tank top and gray pants. In the first frame, he is standing with his arms at his sides, looking down at the dumbbells in his hands. In the second frame, he is lifting the dumbbells up to his shoulders, preparing to perform a shoulder press. In the third frame, he is in the middle of the shoulder press, with the dumbbells above his head. The gym is equipped with various weightlifting machines and weights, and the man is the only person visible in the video. The style of the video is a straightforward, unembellished documentation of a workout routine, with no additional context or narrative provided.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+pF6OBvI98Jw_21_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part131/pF6OBvI98Jw_21_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-pF6OBvI98Jw_21_0to117.mp4	The video shows a man driving a car, wearing a baseball cap and sunglasses. The car is a modern SUV with a sleek design. The man is dressed in casual attire, including a gray jacket and a blue shirt. The car is moving along a coastal road, with the ocean visible in the background. The weather appears to be overcast, with a cloudy sky. The man seems focused on the road ahead, and there are no other vehicles or pedestrians visible in the video. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the man and his surroundings. The camera angle is from the passenger side, providing a clear view of the man and the car's interior. The video does not contain any special effects or artistic elements.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+COKThqAZeYU_1_27to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/COKThqAZeYU_1_27to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-COKThqAZeYU_1_27to200.mp4	The video shows a line of colorful cars parked on a street, with a focus on a yellow Mustang. The cars are parked in a row, and the Mustang is in the foreground. The street is lined with trees and houses, and the sky is clear. The cars are all different colors, including red, blue, and yellow. The Mustang is the most prominent car in the video, and it is parked in front of the other cars. The video is likely a promotional video for the Mustang, showcasing its design and color options. The style of the video is dynamic and colorful, with a focus on the cars and their vibrant colors.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+bdiJ9igWV6g_34_0to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part96/bdiJ9igWV6g_34_0to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-bdiJ9igWV6g_34_0to146.mp4	The video shows a red vintage race car with the number 58 on its side, parked in a garage. The car has a shiny finish and is positioned at an angle that showcases its sleek design and unique features. The garage has a clean and modern aesthetic, with a gray floor and white walls. The car is the main focus of the video, and its vibrant red color stands out against the neutral background. The video captures the essence of the car's vintage design and the elegance of the garage setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+UGp1wLjN64s_13_37to207.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part90/UGp1wLjN64s_13_37to207.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-UGp1wLjN64s_13_37to207.mp4	The video features a man in a blue sweater sitting in front of a cluttered white shelf filled with various items, including electronics and books. He appears to be in a room with a high ceiling, and there is a black computer tower in the background. The man is smiling and gesturing with his hands, suggesting that he is engaged in a conversation or presenting something. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the man and his surroundings. The lighting in the room is bright, and the overall atmosphere is relaxed and friendly.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+POeuf3CrHxA_2_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part80/POeuf3CrHxA_2_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-POeuf3CrHxA_2_0to119.mp4	The video is a lively scene from a daytime talk show. A group of four people, two men and two women, are seated around a dining table, engaged in a conversation. The table is set with plates of food and cups, suggesting a casual and friendly atmosphere. The room is well-lit, with large windows allowing natural light to fill the space. The decor includes potted plants and vases, adding a touch of elegance to the setting. The participants are dressed in casual yet stylish attire, with one man wearing a suit and the others in more relaxed clothing. The overall style of the video is warm and inviting, capturing the essence of a friendly gathering or a casual interview.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+H6gXPzoXoP4_13_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part59/H6gXPzoXoP4_13_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-H6gXPzoXoP4_13_0to109.mp4	In the video, a person is pouring a can of Dr. Pepper soda into a glass filled with a dark liquid, possibly a cola or a dark beer. The soda is being poured from a red can with the Dr. Pepper logo on it. The glass is placed on a wooden surface, and the soda is being poured into the glass from a height, creating a frothy head on top of the dark liquid. The person pouring the soda is wearing a gray shirt. The video captures the action of pouring the soda and the reaction of the dark liquid as the soda is added. The style of the video is a close-up shot, focusing on the action of pouring the soda and the interaction between the two liquids.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7qnf5efr2LQ_37_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part44/7qnf5efr2LQ_37_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7qnf5efr2LQ_37_0to117.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in an American football game. The main focus is on two players, one from the Cleveland Browns and the other from the New Orleans Saints. The player from the Browns, wearing a white jersey with the number 24, is in possession of the football and is running towards the right side of the frame. He is wearing a white helmet with a red stripe and is holding the football securely in his right hand.  In contrast, the player from the Saints, wearing a black jersey with the number 39, is running towards the left side of the frame. He is wearing a black helmet with a gold stripe and is attempting to block the player from the Browns. His left hand is raised in the air, possibly in an attempt to disrupt the Browns player's run.  The background of the video shows a football field with a crowd of spectators in the stands. The spectators are blurred, indicating that the focus is on the action between the two players. The overall style of the video is fast-paced and action-packed, capturing the intensity and excitement of the game.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+LB3dpvSBb0k_93_121to251.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/LB3dpvSBb0k_93_121to251.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-LB3dpvSBb0k_93_121to251.mp4	The video captures a hiker's journey through a mountainous landscape. The hiker, dressed in a red jacket, is seen ascending a rocky outcropping. The terrain is rugged, with patches of grass and rocky cliffs. The hiker's journey takes them through a valley, with towering mountains in the background. The sky is overcast, casting a soft light over the scene. The hiker's journey is a testament to the beauty and challenge of nature.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+v5OJ9d4Xj6c_34_106to301.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part126/v5OJ9d4Xj6c_34_106to301.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-v5OJ9d4Xj6c_34_106to301.mp4	"The video features a male doll with a realistic appearance, standing in a room with a chevron patterned wall. The doll is wearing a blue hoodie with the word ""Malibu"" printed on it, and a light blue t-shirt underneath. The room has a rack with various clothing items hanging on it, including a pink dress and a black dress. The doll is looking directly at the camera, and the overall style of the video is a blend of animation and realism, with a focus on the doll's attire and the room's decor."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+tWo0AlvTQLo_18_97to250.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part120/tWo0AlvTQLo_18_97to250.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-tWo0AlvTQLo_18_97to250.mp4	The video is a close-up, high-resolution, and colorful food presentation. It features a stack of pancakes topped with fresh strawberries and whipped cream. The pancakes are golden brown, and the strawberries are bright red, with their seeds visible. The whipped cream is white and fluffy, and it is being added to the top of the stack. The plate holding the pancakes is white with a scalloped edge, and it is placed on a wooden cutting board. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a kitchen counter with a wooden surface. The style of the video is that of a food blog or cooking tutorial, with a focus on the presentation and texture of the food. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the colors and textures of the ingredients. The video is likely intended to showcase the dish's appeal and to inspire viewers to try making it themselves.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5EcQTRazOQ8_9_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/5EcQTRazOQ8_9_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5EcQTRazOQ8_9_0to137.mp4	The video is a 3D animated sequence featuring three dolls in a room. The first doll, with long black hair, is wearing a black dress with a silver top and is holding a green object. The second doll, with long brown hair, is wearing a blue dress with a floral pattern. The third doll, with long blonde hair, is wearing a pink dress with a white top and is holding a pink object. The dolls are standing close to each other, engaged in conversation. The room they are in has a blue door and a window with a view of a brick wall. The dolls are animated with realistic facial expressions and body language, suggesting a friendly interaction. The overall style of the video is colorful and playful, with a focus on the dolls and their interaction.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rn01B01eJdE_76_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part125/rn01B01eJdE_76_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rn01B01eJdE_76_0to149.mp4	The video captures a thrilling moment on a snowy mountain peak. Two adventurers, equipped with backpacks and hats, stand on the edge of the peak, taking in the breathtaking view of the city below. The first adventurer, donning a blue and white hat, is seen holding a camera, perhaps capturing the stunning vista or the exhilarating experience. The second adventurer, wearing a green and yellow hat, is seen holding a water bottle, possibly taking a moment to hydrate before continuing their journey. The snow-covered peak, the cityscape below, and the clear blue sky create a picturesque scene that encapsulates the thrill and beauty of mountaineering.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Hj0M5zzAusg_31_0to167.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/Hj0M5zzAusg_31_0to167.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Hj0M5zzAusg_31_0to167.mp4	The video is a close-up of a plate of food, showcasing a delicious meal. The plate is filled with a variety of ingredients, including a piece of fish, a salad, and lemon wedges. The fish is cooked to perfection, with a golden-brown crust and a moist, flaky interior. The salad is a vibrant mix of fresh vegetables, including cherry tomatoes, cucumbers, and green onions. The lemon wedges add a tangy flavor to the dish, enhancing the overall taste. The plate is placed on a wooden table, which adds a rustic touch to the presentation. The video is shot in a realistic style, with a focus on the textures and colors of the food. The camera angle is slightly above the plate, providing a clear view of the food and the table. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the details of the food and the table. The video does not contain any text or music. The overall impression is of a well-prepared and appetizing meal, ready to be enjoyed.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SlNlnFCKEms_0_0to155.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/SlNlnFCKEms_0_0to155.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SlNlnFCKEms_0_0to155.mp4	The video shows a red Cadillac SUV parked on a street. The car is shiny and well-maintained, with a sleek design and chrome accents. The vehicle is positioned at an angle to the camera, allowing a clear view of its front and side. The background features a house with a green lawn and a tree, suggesting a suburban setting. The style of the video is straightforward and documentary, with no additional effects or filters applied. The focus is solely on the car, highlighting its design and color.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+RetvQKuProI_9_425to620.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part90/RetvQKuProI_9_425to620.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-RetvQKuProI_9_425to620.mp4	The video features a close-up of a red-haired doll with blue eyes, wearing an orange top with a yellow bear design and pink pants. The doll is positioned in a room with a white chair and a pink crib in the background. The doll is seen in three different poses, with her hand raised in the air, waving, and pointing. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward depiction of the doll in various actions, with no additional context or narrative provided. The focus is solely on the doll and her movements.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+JZsR_V1XbO8_170_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part55/JZsR_V1XbO8_170_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-JZsR_V1XbO8_170_0to145.mp4	The video features a man with long hair and a beard, wearing a black bandana and a white shirt. He is seen in three different frames, each capturing a different moment of his journey. In the first frame, he is seen walking on a dirt path, his gaze directed downwards, possibly at something on the ground. In the second frame, he is seen walking on the same path, but this time his gaze is directed upwards, towards the sky. In the third frame, he is seen walking on the same path, but this time his gaze is directed straight ahead, possibly at something in the distance. The video captures the man's journey in a realistic and naturalistic style, with no artificial elements or special effects. The focus is solely on the man and his surroundings, creating a sense of immersion and connection with the environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Hn1o514aT-s_44_615to744.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/Hn1o514aT-s_44_615to744.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Hn1o514aT-s_44_615to744.mp4	The video features a young girl with a striking appearance. She has long, dark hair styled in a high ponytail with a red bow. Her hair is straight and falls over her shoulders. She is wearing a yellow and white striped shirt with blue suspenders. The shirt has a collar and short sleeves. The girl is standing against a red background. Her expression is neutral, and she is looking downwards. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the girl and her attire. The red background provides a stark contrast to the girl's outfit, making her the central focus of the video.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Md_l6vK13cQ_9_0to163.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part102/Md_l6vK13cQ_9_0to163.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Md_l6vK13cQ_9_0to163.mp4	"The video shows a white boat with a blue roof, moving through the water. The boat is labeled ""Coral Restoration"" and has a logo on the side. There are three people on the boat, two of whom are standing and one is sitting. The boat is moving towards the right side of the frame. The water is calm and the sky is clear. The style of the video is a real-life, outdoor scene with a focus on the boat and its passengers."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+sGweAw021p8_4_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part143/sGweAw021p8_4_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-sGweAw021p8_4_0to120.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in a football game. The main focus is a quarterback, dressed in an orange jersey with the number 4, preparing to throw the football. He is in the process of winding up his arm, ready to make a powerful throw. The football is clearly visible in his hand, emphasizing the action of the throw. The quarterback is wearing a helmet, indicating the intensity of the game. The background is a blur of colors, suggesting a crowd of spectators and the excitement of the game. The style of the video is action-packed, capturing the energy and anticipation of the moment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9252d558aedf86c198fbf2604a143cb62c0c7331fa1d5a2ef993e36428919f28.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/9252d558aedf86c198fbf2604a143cb62c0c7331fa1d5a2ef993e36428919f28.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9252d558aedf86c198fbf2604a143cb62c0c7331fa1d5a2ef993e36428919f28.mp4	The video opens with a static shot of an outdoor scene featuring a black Sony boombox placed on a concrete surface. The boombox is positioned near a tree and some dry grass, with a wooden fence and leafless bushes in the background. The sky appears overcast, suggesting a cool or cloudy day. The boombox has a long antenna extended, and there is a small amount of smoke emanating from it, indicating that it might be malfunctioning or damaged.As the video progresses, the scene remains largely unchanged until a sudden burst of action occurs. A bird flies into the frame from the right side, collides with the boombox, and causes it to explode. The explosion sends debris flying outward, scattering pieces of the boombox and the surrounding area. The bird is seen flying away after the explosion, leaving behind a cloud of dust and debris. The camera remains stationary throughout the sequence, capturing the entire event without any noticeable movement or change in angle. The final scene shows the aftermath of	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KL_aP7e2ORs_21_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part79/KL_aP7e2ORs_21_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KL_aP7e2ORs_21_0to104.mp4	The video captures a zebra standing in a lush green forest. The zebra, with its distinctive black and white stripes, is the main focus of the video. It is positioned in front of a tree, which provides a natural backdrop to the scene. The zebra appears to be calm and at ease in its surroundings. The forest around the zebra is dense with green foliage, creating a serene and peaceful atmosphere. The video is shot in a realistic style, capturing the beauty of nature and the grace of the zebra in its natural habitat.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+NtzbWwWbg1k_45_288to422.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part91/NtzbWwWbg1k_45_288to422.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-NtzbWwWbg1k_45_288to422.mp4	The video shows a man driving a black sports car on a road. The man is wearing a white t-shirt and has a beard. He is looking down at the steering wheel, which is black and has a silver logo on it. The car has a black interior with leather seats. The road is surrounded by grass and trees, indicating that the car is driving through a rural or suburban area. The man appears to be focused on the road ahead, suggesting that he is concentrating on his driving. The overall style of the video is realistic, capturing a moment in the man's daily life as he drives his car.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+kGq57_UA6SY_56_0to162.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part139/kGq57_UA6SY_56_0to162.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-kGq57_UA6SY_56_0to162.mp4	"The video shows a brown Lexus SUV driving down a street lined with brick buildings. The car is sleek and modern, with a distinctive front grille and sharp headlights. The street is quiet and empty, with no other vehicles or pedestrians visible. The buildings are tall and imposing, with large windows and red brick facades. The sky is overcast, casting a soft light over the scene. The car's license plate reads ""GX67 TJZ"". The overall style of the video is realistic and straightforward, capturing the car in motion against a static urban backdrop."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KSa4lvoiDIU_1_26to222.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part96/KSa4lvoiDIU_1_26to222.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KSa4lvoiDIU_1_26to222.mp4	"The video features a woman with long, wavy hair and a glamorous makeup look. She is wearing a black, sequined top that catches the light, giving her a sparkling appearance. The background is a white wall with the word ""Hollywood"" written in a stylized font, suggesting that the setting is a red carpet event. The woman is looking directly at the camera, giving the impression that she is posing for a photo. The overall style of the video is elegant and sophisticated, capturing the glamour of a high-profile event."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+a7e8c0edcd1040c13d207dae6b05f90fb21d01d235a033867a4ef7bb2741a9e3.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/a7e8c0edcd1040c13d207dae6b05f90fb21d01d235a033867a4ef7bb2741a9e3.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-a7e8c0edcd1040c13d207dae6b05f90fb21d01d235a033867a4ef7bb2741a9e3.mp4	The video showcases a close-up view of a pink, bear-shaped object placed on a textured fabric surface. The object appears to be a small container or holder, possibly for a toy or decorative item. Inside the container, there is a collection of small, colorful, gem-like pieces arranged in a circular pattern. These gems come in various pastel colors such as light blue, yellow, green, and pink. A pink-handled tool, likely a pick or scoop, is positioned near the container, suggesting an interaction with the gems inside. The background remains consistent throughout the video, focusing solely on the container and its contents without any significant changes or additional elements entering the frame. The camera maintains a steady position, providing a clear and detailed view of the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HEy1FoMoD4o_27_67to248.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part35/HEy1FoMoD4o_27_67to248.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HEy1FoMoD4o_27_67to248.mp4	The video features a man in a colorful plaid suit and a white hat with a large brim. He is standing in a room filled with various objects, including shelves with trophies, a painting, and a cat figurine. The man is gesturing with his hands and appears to be speaking or performing. The style of the video is vibrant and lively, with a focus on the man's expressive performance and the eclectic collection of objects in the room.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+f60ecfb6907cf51d2bc6ecf284da273bc46ed1e6d898bc3588d3d7c9c511e22e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/f60ecfb6907cf51d2bc6ecf284da273bc46ed1e6d898bc3588d3d7c9c511e22e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-f60ecfb6907cf51d2bc6ecf284da273bc46ed1e6d898bc3588d3d7c9c511e22e.mp4	The video captures a polar bear in an enclosure, standing on its hind legs against a glass barrier. The bear's front paws rest on the glass, and it appears to be looking out or interacting with something beyond the frame. The enclosure is designed to mimic a natural environment, featuring a pool of water and rocky structures submerged beneath the surface. The water is clear, allowing visibility of the rocks and the bottom of the pool. The background includes a large white canopy structure, likely part of the zoo or wildlife park, and some greenery, such as trees and bushes, indicating an outdoor setting. The lighting suggests it is daytime, with natural light illuminating the scene. The bear remains stationary for a few moments, maintaining its position against the glass, before slowly moving away from the barrier and into the water. The camera remains static throughout the sequence, focusing on the bear and its immediate surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Hldke2dp7rU_7_119to261.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part68/Hldke2dp7rU_7_119to261.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Hldke2dp7rU_7_119to261.mp4	In the video, a man with a beard is seen in a gym, engaging in a workout routine. He is wearing a black t-shirt and is positioned in front of a barbell, which he is lifting. The gym is equipped with various exercise machines and weights, indicating a well-equipped facility. The man's focused expression and the surrounding gym equipment suggest that he is in the middle of a serious workout session. The video captures the intensity and dedication of the man towards his fitness goals.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+At2yC8dc8o4_24_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part71/At2yC8dc8o4_24_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-At2yC8dc8o4_24_0to158.mp4	The video showcases the interior of a sports car, focusing on the driver's side. The car's interior is predominantly black, with orange accents adding a pop of color. The seats are upholstered in black leather, and the dashboard and door panels are also black. The steering wheel is black with orange stitching, and it features a variety of buttons and controls. The center console houses a touch screen display, which is surrounded by a variety of buttons and dials. The car's interior is well-lit, with the sun shining through the open roof. The car is parked in a garage, and the garage door is visible in the background. The video is shot from the perspective of the driver, providing a comprehensive view of the car's interior.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+DnxlYNQOFc4_79_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part37/DnxlYNQOFc4_79_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-DnxlYNQOFc4_79_0to158.mp4	The video captures a silver Porsche GT2 RS sports car in motion on a track. The car is sleek and aerodynamic, with a large rear wing and a black roof. The wheels are gold and the car has a black stripe running down the center. The car is driving on a track with a concrete barrier on the side. The background is a clear blue sky and a grassy area. The car is moving at a high speed, creating a sense of motion and excitement. The video is shot in a dynamic style, with the camera following the car as it moves along the track.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+aVV7HEufLjI_10_0to159.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part105/aVV7HEufLjI_10_0to159.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-aVV7HEufLjI_10_0to159.mp4	In the video, a person is seen preparing a cake using a glass mixing bowl. The person is using a red hand mixer to blend the ingredients, which include flour, sugar, and eggs. The hand mixer is being used to mix the ingredients together, creating a smooth batter. The person is also using a green spatula to scrape the batter from the sides of the bowl, ensuring that all the ingredients are thoroughly mixed. The mixing bowl is placed on a wooden table, and there are other red bowls and a green spatula nearby, suggesting that the person is in the middle of the cake preparation process. The video captures the process of cake preparation, from mixing the ingredients to creating a smooth batter.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+a995ac9bf58e5a1bf7e80d662c1133327676458c02f62c36b86e3ca74628a07b.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/a995ac9bf58e5a1bf7e80d662c1133327676458c02f62c36b86e3ca74628a07b.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-a995ac9bf58e5a1bf7e80d662c1133327676458c02f62c36b86e3ca74628a07b.mp4	The video opens with an underwater scene showcasing a vibrant coral reef teeming with life. The water is a deep blue, gradually transitioning to lighter shades towards the surface. A variety of fish swim gracefully through the frame, their colors ranging from bright yellows and blues to darker hues. Among them, a large fish with distinctive black and white stripes swims prominently, its movements fluid and purposeful. The coral formations are diverse, featuring both hard and soft corals, creating a textured landscape that adds depth to the scene. The camera pans slowly across the reef, capturing the dynamic interplay between the fish and their environment. The overall atmosphere is serene and captivating, highlighting the beauty and complexity of marine ecosystems.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+j4T_SiTdXOM_23_0to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part162/j4T_SiTdXOM_23_0to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-j4T_SiTdXOM_23_0to146.mp4	The video is a close-up, time-lapse shot of a plant growing in a garden. The plant starts as a small sprout, and over time, it grows into a large, bushy plant with green leaves. The plant is surrounded by other plants and flowers, creating a lush and vibrant garden scene. The time-lapse effect captures the plant's growth in a matter of seconds, showcasing the beauty and resilience of nature. The garden is filled with a variety of plants and flowers, creating a colorful and diverse landscape. The video is a testament to the power of nature and the beauty of growth.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+AOMUb16uYrM_3_18to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part63/AOMUb16uYrM_3_18to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-AOMUb16uYrM_3_18to154.mp4	The video captures a heartwarming scene of a group of soccer players interacting with a baby in a stroller. The players, dressed in their uniforms, are seen bending down to greet the baby, who is seated in a blue stroller. The baby, dressed in a blue outfit, gazes up at the players with curiosity. The setting is a soccer field, with the players standing on the grass and the baby in the stroller nearby. The interaction between the players and the baby creates a sense of camaraderie and warmth, highlighting the human side of the sport.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+AGXyXmujyvw_12_78to213.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part33/AGXyXmujyvw_12_78to213.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-AGXyXmujyvw_12_78to213.mp4	The video features a woman with short brown hair, wearing a black and white striped dress, standing in a bustling city street. She is looking directly at the camera with a serious expression on her face. The background is filled with colorful lights and signs, indicating a lively urban environment. The woman is the main focus of the video, and her position in the frame suggests she is the subject of the video. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the everyday life of the city.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+dcd831f58d6140e62f100b7c862f910db2f46e4892d3780706705cae712f0923.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/dcd831f58d6140e62f100b7c862f910db2f46e4892d3780706705cae712f0923.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-dcd831f58d6140e62f100b7c862f910db2f46e4892d3780706705cae712f0923.mp4	The video captures an underwater scene featuring two salmon swimming in a riverbed. The water is clear enough to see the rocky bottom, which consists of various sizes of stones and pebbles. The salmon are vibrant red with hints of purple on their bodies, indicating they might be sockeye salmon, known for their bright coloration during spawning season. Their fins are slightly translucent, and they move gracefully through the water, their bodies undulating smoothly as they navigate the current. The water appears slightly murky, suggesting it may be a shallow or fast-moving section of the river. The lighting is natural, likely from sunlight filtering through the water above, creating a serene and somewhat ethereal atmosphere. The salmon's movements are fluid and purposeful, possibly searching for food or preparing to spawn. The overall scene is tranquil, showcasing the natural beauty and behavior of these fish in their habitat.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+jeLt3MenvNM_5_0to161.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part150/jeLt3MenvNM_5_0to161.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-jeLt3MenvNM_5_0to161.mp4	The video shows a step-by-step process of creating gingerbread cookies shaped like Christmas stockings. In the first frame, a white plate with pink frosting and a cookie shaped like a Christmas tree is visible. In the second frame, a red and white cutting board is placed on a brown table, and a cookie cutter is used to shape the gingerbread dough into a stocking shape. In the third frame, the gingerbread stockings are placed on the cutting board, and they are decorated with red and green icing to resemble a Christmas stocking. The style of the video is instructional, with a focus on the process of baking and decorating the gingerbread stockings. The video is likely aimed at individuals who enjoy baking and want to create festive treats for the holiday season.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ed3687309c3f84530057170bf69cc2af9e5b9528e9c9b3b604ba726227dc799c.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/ed3687309c3f84530057170bf69cc2af9e5b9528e9c9b3b604ba726227dc799c.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ed3687309c3f84530057170bf69cc2af9e5b9528e9c9b3b604ba726227dc799c.mp4	The video captures a serene winter scene featuring a Japanese macaque, commonly known as a snow monkey, sitting on a rocky ledge near a steaming hot spring. The monkey is positioned slightly to the right of the frame, facing forward with its head turned slightly to the left. Its fur is thick and light brown, providing insulation against the cold, while its face displays a distinctive reddish hue around the cheeks and nose, a characteristic feature of this species. The background is a snowy landscape, with large rocks scattered around the hot spring area, adding texture and depth to the scene. Steam rises gently from the water, indicating the warmth of the spring, which contrasts sharply with the cold surroundings. The overall atmosphere is peaceful and tranquil, highlighting the unique behavior of the snow monkey in its natural habitat during winter. There are no significant changes or movements throughout the sequence; the focus remains on the monkey and its immediate environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+m9FmEygX35E_2_21to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part161/m9FmEygX35E_2_21to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-m9FmEygX35E_2_21to165.mp4	The video depicts a quaint, rustic wooden cabin nestled in a lush, verdant forest. The cabin, with its thatched roof and stone accents, exudes a sense of tranquility and simplicity. The viewer's perspective is from the ground, looking up at the cabin, which is surrounded by towering trees and dense foliage. The sunlight filters through the canopy, casting dappled shadows on the cabin's exterior. The overall style of the video is serene and naturalistic, capturing the essence of a peaceful retreat in the heart of the woods.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5Z-FlNyr19w_11_23to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/5Z-FlNyr19w_11_23to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5Z-FlNyr19w_11_23to151.mp4	The video features a blonde Barbie doll in a white dress, standing in front of a building with a large window. The doll is positioned in the center of the frame, and the building is illuminated by warm, yellow lights. The doll's dress is white, and she is wearing a pearl necklace. The building has a large window that is lit up, and the interior of the building is visible through the window. The doll is standing on a sidewalk, and the building is in the background. The video is a 3D animation, and the doll is the main focus of the video. The building and the window are secondary elements in the video. The video does not contain any other objects or characters. The doll is the only object in the video that is moving. The doll is standing still, and the building and the window are stationary. The video does not contain any text or sound. The video is a still image, and there is no action or movement in the video. The video is a 3D animation, and the doll is the main focus of the video. The building and the window are secondary elements in the video. The video does not contain any other objects or characters. The doll is the only object in the video that is moving. The doll is standing still, and the building and the window are stationary. The video does not contain any text or sound. The video is a still image, and there is no action or movement in the video.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+PD9cQYXzRWY_84_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part113/PD9cQYXzRWY_84_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-PD9cQYXzRWY_84_0to136.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car, focusing on the back seat. The car has a luxurious design with brown leather seats. The back seat is empty, and the seat belts are visible, indicating that the car is ready for passengers. The car's interior is well-lit, and the seats are neatly arranged. The style of the video is straightforward, with no additional elements or distractions. The focus is solely on the car's interior, providing a clear view of the back seat and its features.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8c1zzicOVeM_9_53to260.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/8c1zzicOVeM_9_53to260.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8c1zzicOVeM_9_53to260.mp4	The video shows a silver Audi car parked on a paved road. The car is positioned in the center of the frame, facing the camera. The car's design is sleek and modern, with a large grille and sharp lines. The wheels are black and have a multi-spoke design. The car is parked on a road that appears to be in a rural or suburban area, as there are trees and a wooden fence in the background. The sky is overcast, suggesting that the weather is cloudy. The car is stationary, and there are no people or other vehicles visible in the frame. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the car and its surroundings. The camera angle is straight on, providing a clear view of the car's front. The lighting is natural, with no artificial lighting visible. The overall impression is of a quiet, peaceful setting, with the car as the main subject.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+c2ad4a612321772881e672200f453e8dca2726593abf1adbd61ac36b0791dd8e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/c2ad4a612321772881e672200f453e8dca2726593abf1adbd61ac36b0791dd8e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-c2ad4a612321772881e672200f453e8dca2726593abf1adbd61ac36b0791dd8e.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a cooking process where food is being fried in a pot on a stovetop. The pot is metallic and placed on an electric stove with a digital display showing a red light, indicating it is turned on. Inside the pot, there is a bubbling liquid, likely oil, which is vigorously boiling. Two metal tongs are used to stir the contents, ensuring even cooking. The food being fried appears to be pieces of breaded or coated ingredients, possibly chicken or fish, as they turn golden brown. The background is slightly blurred but suggests a kitchen setting with some indistinct objects and possibly another pot or container. The focus remains tightly on the pot and the frying process throughout the video, highlighting the dynamic movement of the bubbling oil and the turning of the food items by the tongs. There are no significant changes in the environment or additional elements introduced during the sequence.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6ZQ2WxWrhPc_42_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part39/6ZQ2WxWrhPc_42_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6ZQ2WxWrhPc_42_0to149.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car, focusing on the steering wheel and dashboard. The steering wheel is black with a silver Toyota logo in the center. The dashboard features a digital display screen and various buttons and controls. The car's interior is sleek and modern, with a focus on functionality and design. The video is likely a promotional or informational piece, showcasing the car's interior features and design. The style of the video is straightforward and informative, with a focus on the car's interior and the features it offers.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+895IXT4R02I_32_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part39/895IXT4R02I_32_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-895IXT4R02I_32_0to140.mp4	The video shows a wooden desk with a laptop, tablet, and smartphone. The laptop is open with a colorful screen, and the tablet is placed on top of it. The smartphone is lying on the desk next to the tablet. A white cloth is draped over the tablet and smartphone. The scene is set in a room with a wooden floor and a window in the background. The style of the video is a simple, everyday scene with a focus on technology.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XA3ml4_4IsU_2_270to460.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part74/XA3ml4_4IsU_2_270to460.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XA3ml4_4IsU_2_270to460.mp4	The video shows a person holding a motorcycle helmet with a green and gray color scheme. The helmet is placed on a table, and the person is seen adjusting the helmet's strap. The background features a motorcycle, suggesting that the setting is likely a garage or a workshop. The style of the video is casual and informative, possibly aimed at demonstrating the helmet's features or how to properly fit it. The focus is on the helmet and the person's hands, with the motorcycle serving as a backdrop.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rTZhtha6Lks_24_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part163/rTZhtha6Lks_24_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rTZhtha6Lks_24_0to141.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car from the perspective of the driver. The car's dashboard is visible, with a digital display showing various information such as the time, temperature, and fuel level. The car's air conditioning vents are also visible, and there is a smartphone mounted on a holder on the dashboard. The smartphone is displaying a navigation app with a map and directions. The car is driving on a road with trees on both sides, suggesting a rural or suburban setting. The style of the video is a straightforward, real-life depiction of a car's interior and its features, with no special effects or artistic embellishments.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+fT73EjCidmc_0_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part125/fT73EjCidmc_0_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-fT73EjCidmc_0_0to121.mp4	The video is a tutorial on how to make a pumpkin pie bourbon shake. The style of the video is a close-up, step-by-step demonstration. In the first frame, a hand is seen holding a jar of pumpkin pie mix. In the second frame, the hand is seen pouring the pumpkin pie mix into a glass of milk. In the third frame, the hand is seen adding a dollop of whipped cream to the top of the shake. The background features a bottle of bourbon and a bottle of pumpkin spice syrup. The table is covered with a white tablecloth, and there are sprinkles scattered around the shake. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the ingredients and the process of making the shake.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+NbMatimUFTI_13_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part93/NbMatimUFTI_13_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-NbMatimUFTI_13_0to127.mp4	The video features a Batman action figure in a gray and black suit with a yellow belt, standing in front of a gray archway with intricate designs. The figure is positioned in a way that suggests it is walking towards the camera. The background is blurred, drawing focus to the action figure. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward action figure showcase, with no additional elements or characters. The focus is solely on the Batman action figure and its pose.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0m2pSrwOkxI_10_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part50/0m2pSrwOkxI_10_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0m2pSrwOkxI_10_0to122.mp4	"The video features a man standing in front of a brick building with a garage door. He is wearing a white hoodie with the word ""CHI PARTY"" printed on it, a black beanie, and sunglasses. The man is looking directly at the camera, and his expression is neutral. The building behind him has a number ""1606"" written on the garage door. The sky is overcast, and there are power lines visible in the background. The style of the video is casual and seems to be taken in an urban setting."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+R_mfDej_mF4_51_20to167.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part90/R_mfDej_mF4_51_20to167.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-R_mfDej_mF4_51_20to167.mp4	The video shows a person cutting a cake that is designed to look like a sandwich. The cake is placed on a silver cake stand and is made to resemble a slice of bread with jelly and peanut butter filling. The person is using a knife to cut the cake, and the cake is placed on a wooden table. The style of the video is a step-by-step tutorial, likely for a cooking or baking show, with a focus on the cake-cutting process. The video is likely to be informative and instructional, with a clear and concise presentation of the cake-cutting technique.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+k9MSWpXrf8E_10_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part130/k9MSWpXrf8E_10_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-k9MSWpXrf8E_10_0to158.mp4	The video captures a soccer goalkeeper in action. He is wearing a green jersey with a white stripe and yellow gloves. The goalkeeper is seen in three different positions: in the first frame, he is standing in the goal, ready to make a save; in the second frame, he is diving to his right, stretching out his arm to block a shot; and in the third frame, he is on his feet again, clapping his hands in celebration after successfully stopping the ball. The background is a blur of the soccer field and the crowd, emphasizing the focus on the goalkeeper's actions. The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, capturing the intensity and excitement of the sport.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ZYLekT6cYwY_3_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part107/ZYLekT6cYwY_3_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ZYLekT6cYwY_3_0to112.mp4	The video features a man with a mustache and blue eyes, wearing a green jacket and a black turtleneck. He is standing in a room with a blurred background, which suggests a focus on the man. The style of the video is reminiscent of a classic film or television show, with a vintage feel to the image quality and the man's attire. The man appears to be speaking or reacting to something, as indicated by his facial expression and the slight movement of his mouth. The overall atmosphere of the video is serious and intense, with the man's gaze directed off to the side, suggesting a moment of deep thought or contemplation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3JPPQT408WU_31_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part62/3JPPQT408WU_31_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3JPPQT408WU_31_0to110.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a car's engine compartment, focusing on the front right side of the vehicle. The style of the video is a time-lapse or a series of still images, capturing the process of opening the car's hood and revealing the engine components. The engine appears to be a modern, compact design, with various hoses, belts, and mechanical parts visible. The car's hood is open, and the engine is exposed, allowing a clear view of the internal components. The video does not contain any text or additional graphics. The focus is solely on the car's engine, providing a detailed look at the vehicle's mechanical components.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+vX8fagcUmw8_18_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part147/vX8fagcUmw8_18_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-vX8fagcUmw8_18_0to114.mp4	In the video, a person is seen working on a floral arrangement on a table. The person is wearing a black shirt and gold bracelets, and is using their hands to manipulate the flowers. The floral arrangement consists of white roses and greenery, and the person is carefully placing the flowers into a vase. The table is covered with a gray cloth, and there are scissors and other tools visible on the table. The person's focus and attention to detail suggest that they are creating a beautiful and intricate floral arrangement.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3wAUxXXn9Eo_20_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part60/3wAUxXXn9Eo_20_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3wAUxXXn9Eo_20_0to142.mp4	In the video, two men are engaged in a conversation on a stage set with a cityscape backdrop. The man on the left, dressed in a maroon shirt, is gesturing with his hand, while the man on the right, wearing a black suit, holds a microphone. The stage is furnished with a blue couch and a wooden desk. The overall style of the video suggests a casual, yet engaging discussion between the two men, possibly during a live event or a television show.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4HQmDIdPLu0_14_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part71/4HQmDIdPLu0_14_0to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4HQmDIdPLu0_14_0to158.mp4	The video features a glowing green Pokeball, which is a popular item from the Pokemon franchise. The Pokeball is placed on a white stand, and it is illuminated from within, casting a soft green glow. The Pokeball is the main focus of the video, and it is shown in various positions and angles. The background of the video is a dark room with a window, and there is a potted plant and a computer monitor in the background. The overall style of the video is minimalist and modern, with a focus on the Pokeball's design and the way it glows in the dark. The video is likely intended to showcase the Pokeball as a decorative item or a collectible item for fans of the Pokemon franchise.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-Acp41bWiDM_8_47to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part61/-Acp41bWiDM_8_47to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--Acp41bWiDM_8_47to195.mp4	The video features a man in a cap and a grey hoodie, sitting in a dimly lit room with a blurred background. The man appears to be speaking, as suggested by his open mouth and focused gaze. The overall style of the video is casual and candid, with a focus on the man's expression and the intimate setting. The lighting is subdued, creating a moody atmosphere. The blurred background suggests a focus on the man, with the environment serving as a secondary element. The video seems to be a personal or informal interview or conversation, rather than a professional or staged setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+RAYVG2JPqbA_4_96to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part108/RAYVG2JPqbA_4_96to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-RAYVG2JPqbA_4_96to239.mp4	The video shows a silver Audi car driving on a dirt road. The car is sleek and modern, with a shiny exterior that reflects the sunlight. The road is unpaved and dusty, with tire tracks visible in the dirt. The car is moving at a moderate speed, and the driver is focused on the road ahead. The surrounding environment is arid and desert-like, with sparse vegetation and a clear blue sky. The car's headlights are on, illuminating the road ahead. The car's design and the driver's focused demeanor suggest that this is a journey of some significance. The overall style of the video is realistic and naturalistic, capturing the car's journey in a straightforward manner without any artistic embellishments.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WvcRPBzPmvA_5_0to111.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/WvcRPBzPmvA_5_0to111.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WvcRPBzPmvA_5_0to111.mp4	The video features a shirtless man with a beard and mustache, sitting on a boat in a body of water. He is looking directly at the camera with a slight smile. The man has short, light brown hair and is wearing sunglasses. The background shows a clear blue sky and a rocky shoreline with trees. The water appears calm and the overall atmosphere is serene and peaceful. The style of the video is casual and candid, capturing a moment of relaxation and enjoyment in nature.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HbsgXNuvn_8_204_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part56/HbsgXNuvn_8_204_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HbsgXNuvn_8_204_0to118.mp4	The video captures the majestic beauty of a snow-capped mountain peak under a clear blue sky. The mountain, with its rocky brown base and white snow-covered peak, stands tall against the backdrop of the sky. The clouds in the sky add a sense of depth and scale to the scene. The video is taken from a distance, allowing the viewer to appreciate the grandeur of the mountain and the vastness of the sky. The overall style of the video is naturalistic, capturing the mountain in its natural state without any human intervention. The focus is solely on the mountain and the sky, with no other objects or distractions in the frame. The video is a testament to the awe-inspiring power of nature.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Nvmpu7hkQb8_34_0to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part91/Nvmpu7hkQb8_34_0to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Nvmpu7hkQb8_34_0to187.mp4	The video shows a man and a woman engaged in a conversation. The woman, with her curly blonde hair, is wearing a brown scarf and a blue jacket. She is smiling and appears to be listening attentively to the man. The man, wearing a suit and glasses, is facing the woman and seems to be speaking. The setting appears to be outdoors, with trees visible in the background. The overall style of the video is casual and candid, capturing a moment of interaction between the two individuals.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Nohqu7qBcn0_20_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part74/Nohqu7qBcn0_20_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Nohqu7qBcn0_20_0to149.mp4	The video captures a moment of sportsmanship between two football players from the Cincinnati Bengals. The players, dressed in their team's black and orange uniforms, are seen shaking hands on the field. The first player, wearing the number 18, extends his hand towards the second player, who is wearing the number 44. The background reveals a crowd of spectators, indicating that this is a live game. The players' helmets and the football field suggest that this is a professional football match. The overall atmosphere of the video is one of camaraderie and respect between the two players.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+59N1AaBpukQ_12_0to169.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part31/59N1AaBpukQ_12_0to169.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-59N1AaBpukQ_12_0to169.mp4	"The video is a simple, yet appetizing presentation of a breakfast sandwich. The sandwich, which is the main focus of the video, is made with a sausage patty, egg, and cheese, all sandwiched between two slices of a golden-brown biscuit. The sandwich is placed on a white plate with blue stripes, which is set on a black and white checkered tablecloth. In the background, there's a blue and white striped mug, suggesting that the sandwich is accompanied by a hot beverage, possibly coffee or tea. The video is likely a part of a series or a tutorial on making breakfast sandwiches, as indicated by the text ""4. Breakfast Sandwiches"" in the bottom right corner. The style of the video is straightforward and clear, with a focus on the food and the simple, everyday setting."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+eQoA5s7VQU4_16_139to286.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part122/eQoA5s7VQU4_16_139to286.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-eQoA5s7VQU4_16_139to286.mp4	The video is a 3D animated sequence featuring a character with a serious expression. The character has a scarred face and is wearing a dark, detailed outfit with a high collar. The character's hair is gray and styled in a way that suggests a warrior or a leader. The background is a blurred, dark environment with hints of foliage and a sense of being in a forest or a jungle. The lighting is moody and subdued, with a focus on the character's face and upper body. The overall style of the video is realistic with a touch of fantasy, and it appears to be from a video game or a high-quality animated film.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+aaqZzNydL10_1_270to428.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part114/aaqZzNydL10_1_270to428.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-aaqZzNydL10_1_270to428.mp4	The video is a cooking tutorial that features a close-up view of a meal being prepared. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the ingredients and the process of cooking. The video begins with a shot of a bag of chicken strips, followed by a bottle of chili lime seasoning, and then a bottle of onion salt. The ingredients are arranged on a pink cutting board, which is placed on a table. The camera captures the details of the ingredients, including the texture of the chicken strips and the color of the seasoning. The video does not include any text or narration, relying solely on the visuals to convey the cooking process. The overall style of the video is minimalistic, with a focus on the ingredients and the cooking process.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2Z_XqAOa_OM_1_78to266.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/2Z_XqAOa_OM_1_78to266.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2Z_XqAOa_OM_1_78to266.mp4	The video captures a serene beach scene with a clear blue sky and calm ocean waters. In the foreground, a palm tree stands tall, its fronds swaying gently in the breeze. The sandy beach is dotted with a few boats, their hulls glistening in the sunlight. The boats are moored close to the shore, ready for a day of sailing or fishing. The video is shot in a realistic style, with vibrant colors and sharp details that bring the scene to life. The overall mood of the video is peaceful and inviting, making the viewer want to pack their bags and head to the beach.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-AsjE601CYo_57_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part31/-AsjE601CYo_57_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--AsjE601CYo_57_0to108.mp4	The video is a close-up, high-resolution, and colorful presentation of a variety of sushi dishes. The sushi is meticulously arranged on a white plate, with each piece showcasing different types of fish and vegetables. The sushi is accompanied by small bowls containing soy sauce, wasabi, and pickled ginger. The sushi is garnished with sesame seeds and green onions. The video captures the vibrant colors and textures of the sushi, highlighting the freshness and quality of the ingredients. The style of the video is that of a food advertisement or a culinary showcase, designed to entice viewers with the visual appeal of the sushi.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+YpTIuy1Ukfo_119_72to221.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part86/YpTIuy1Ukfo_119_72to221.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-YpTIuy1Ukfo_119_72to221.mp4	In the image, we see a man in a suit standing in a church, surrounded by a crowd of people. The man is wearing glasses and a tie, and he appears to be the center of attention. The crowd is a mix of men and women, all dressed in formal attire. The church is filled with people, and the atmosphere seems to be one of anticipation. The man in the suit is looking off to the side, perhaps at something or someone that has caught his attention. The image captures a moment of quiet intensity in the midst of a gathering.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2nJOo6T_5nk_65_0to134.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/2nJOo6T_5nk_65_0to134.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2nJOo6T_5nk_65_0to134.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a red motorcycle parked on a street. The motorcycle is sleek and shiny, with a black seat and handlebars. The front of the motorcycle is prominently displayed, showing the headlight and the front wheel. The motorcycle is parked next to a blue car, which is also visible in the frame. The background of the video shows a brick building and a clear sky. The style of the video is realistic and it captures the details of the motorcycle and its surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KbGpzgaJ58Q_45_0to197.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/KbGpzgaJ58Q_45_0to197.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KbGpzgaJ58Q_45_0to197.mp4	The video shows a woman in a pink shirt preparing food in a kitchen. She is seen stirring a bowl with a spoon, pouring ingredients into a pot, and cracking eggs into a bowl. The kitchen is well-equipped with a refrigerator, oven, and microwave. There are also several bottles and books visible in the background. The style of the video is a cooking tutorial, with a focus on the woman's actions and the various kitchen tools and appliances used in the process. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the woman and the food preparation. The overall atmosphere is one of a homey and comfortable kitchen environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+LL6E_TiDItg_69_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part95/LL6E_TiDItg_69_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-LL6E_TiDItg_69_0to119.mp4	The video captures the process of assembling a pulled pork sandwich. In the first frame, a pile of shredded pork is placed on a white plate. The pork is generously covered in a rich, dark barbecue sauce. In the second frame, a slice of white bread is placed on top of the pork, creating a sandwich. The sandwich is then placed on a white plate with a blue floral pattern. In the third frame, the sandwich is ready to be served, with the plate placed on a table. The sandwich appears to be delicious and ready to be enjoyed.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+lC7SNg2BUPQ_4_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part141/lC7SNg2BUPQ_4_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-lC7SNg2BUPQ_4_0to113.mp4	The video captures a thrilling scene on a race track. A red sports car is seen speeding down the track, its sleek design and vibrant color standing out against the gray asphalt. The car is in motion, its wheels spinning rapidly as it races towards the finish line. The driver's focus is evident, their hands gripping the steering wheel tightly.  The track itself is lined with orange cones, marking the boundaries of the race. A green traffic light stands tall, signaling the car to continue its journey. The sky above is a clear blue, providing a beautiful backdrop to the high-speed chase.  In the background, a large stadium filled with spectators can be seen. The crowd is a blur of colors, their attention riveted on the race. The atmosphere is electric, the anticipation palpable as they watch the car zoom past.  The video is shot from the perspective of another car on the track, giving viewers a sense of being right there in the action. The camera captures the speed and intensity of the race, making it a thrilling and exciting experience for the viewer.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+YzlmAcVx_rE_144_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part112/YzlmAcVx_rE_144_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-YzlmAcVx_rE_144_0to118.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car, focusing on the driver's side. The car has a black steering wheel with a silver emblem in the center. The dashboard is black and features a silver gear shift. The car's door is open, revealing a red seat belt. The car's interior is black, and the seats are leather. The car is parked on a street, and the outside view shows a clear sky. The car appears to be a compact model, and the interior is well-maintained. The video is a straightforward, unembellished depiction of the car's interior and exterior.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+DdAE2x8eEkw_13_99to289.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part46/DdAE2x8eEkw_13_99to289.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-DdAE2x8eEkw_13_99to289.mp4	A snowboarder is captured in mid-air, performing a trick on a snowy mountain slope. The snowboarder is wearing a red jacket and black pants, and is holding a red snowboard. The snowboarder is surrounded by snow-covered trees and a snowy mountain slope. The snowboarder is in the center of the image, and the trees are in the background. The snowboarder is in the air, indicating that they are in the middle of a jump or trick. The image captures the excitement and thrill of snowboarding.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6KxqZrpWLa8_17_0to179.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part55/6KxqZrpWLa8_17_0to179.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6KxqZrpWLa8_17_0to179.mp4	The video shows a man standing next to a motorcycle in a parking lot. He is wearing a black and white striped scarf, a leather jacket, and a green shirt. The motorcycle is parked next to a blue van. The man is looking to the side, and his expression is serious. The background of the video shows a building with a white door. The style of the video is realistic and it captures the man and his surroundings in a clear and detailed manner.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+jH6VvrSzClE_30_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part166/jH6VvrSzClE_30_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-jH6VvrSzClE_30_0to130.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car, focusing on the driver's seat and dashboard. The car has a tan leather interior, and the steering wheel is visible in the center of the frame. The dashboard features a radio and air conditioning controls. The car appears to be parked in a garage, as evidenced by the presence of other cars in the background. The style of the video is straightforward and documentary, with no additional embellishments or effects. The focus is solely on the car's interior, providing a clear and detailed view of the vehicle's features.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6iaApxa661g_30_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part56/6iaApxa661g_30_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6iaApxa661g_30_0to136.mp4	The video captures an intense moment in a football game. A player in a blue jersey, number 13, is in mid-air, leaping to catch a football. He is wearing a helmet and gloves, and his body is stretched out towards the ball. Two players in white jerseys are attempting to block him, their bodies positioned to prevent the catch. The background is filled with a crowd of spectators, their faces a blur of anticipation and excitement. The focus of the video is on the action between the players and the ball, capturing the athleticism and skill involved in the sport. The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, with a focus on the players and their movements.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+FWV9dIo1mmg_51_392to514.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part62/FWV9dIo1mmg_51_392to514.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-FWV9dIo1mmg_51_392to514.mp4	The video features a young woman standing on a boat in the ocean. She is wearing a red dress and has long brown hair. The boat is white and has a motor on the back. The ocean is a deep blue color and there are no other boats or people visible in the video. The woman is smiling and appears to be enjoying her time on the boat. The style of the video is casual and seems to be a personal video rather than a professional one.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Xrn1GBSpbZI_1_0to107.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part116/Xrn1GBSpbZI_1_0to107.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Xrn1GBSpbZI_1_0to107.mp4	The video shows a two-story house with a white exterior and a gray roof. The house has a front porch with a railing and a door. There are two windows on the second floor and two on the first floor. The house is surrounded by a well-maintained lawn with a sidewalk leading to the front door. A for sale sign is placed in the front yard, indicating that the house is on the market. The sign has a phone number and the name of the real estate company. The style of the video is a real estate listing, showcasing the house and its surroundings to potential buyers. The video is likely intended to highlight the house's features and appeal to potential buyers.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+FWo2KzSnBeM_33_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part43/FWo2KzSnBeM_33_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-FWo2KzSnBeM_33_0to145.mp4	The video shows two men in a convertible sports car, driving down a street lined with buildings. Both men are wearing sunglasses and have beards. The driver is wearing a blue shirt and the passenger is wearing a blue sweater. The car has a yellow seatbelt. The car is black and has a convertible top. The street is lined with trees and buildings. The sky is clear and blue. The car is moving at a moderate speed. The men are engaged in conversation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+tL7ijCTTPjQ_197_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part129/tL7ijCTTPjQ_197_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-tL7ijCTTPjQ_197_0to118.mp4	In the video, a young girl and a woman are seen in a room with a white wall. The girl is wearing a blue jacket and has long brown hair. The woman is wearing a black jacket and has long brown hair as well. They are both smiling and looking at each other. The room has a white door and a white shelf in the background. The video captures a warm and friendly interaction between the two individuals.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Xf7C3CVV06w_56_76to210.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part88/Xf7C3CVV06w_56_76to210.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Xf7C3CVV06w_56_76to210.mp4	The video captures the process of cooking a soup in a large black pot. The pot is placed on a stove, and the soup is being stirred with a wooden spoon. The soup contains various ingredients such as green vegetables, red peppers, and white onions. The pot is placed on a wooden table, and there is a can of soup nearby. The video is shot in a close-up style, focusing on the pot and the cooking process. The overall atmosphere of the video is warm and inviting, as it captures the essence of home cooking.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+N7dbbQwZ6MI_56_0to105.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part113/N7dbbQwZ6MI_56_0to105.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-N7dbbQwZ6MI_56_0to105.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a roasted chicken being carved with a spoon. The chicken is golden brown and appears to be cooked to perfection. The spoon is used to lift the skin and reveal the juicy meat underneath. The chicken is placed on a plate with roasted potatoes, which are also golden brown and look delicious. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a kitchen setting. The style of the video is realistic and it captures the details of the food and the carving process.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+cAT1D-G_2AI_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part91/cAT1D-G_2AI_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-cAT1D-G_2AI_0_0to136.mp4	The video shows a man with a beard and mustache standing in a kitchen. He is wearing a blue shirt and appears to be looking directly at the camera. The kitchen has wooden cabinets and a white microwave. The man's expression is neutral. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward portrait with no additional action or movement. The focus is on the man and his surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Pkxcq0etn50_9_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part103/Pkxcq0etn50_9_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Pkxcq0etn50_9_0to135.mp4	The video is a collage of three images featuring a young boy. In the first image, the boy is smiling and looking directly at the camera. In the second image, the boy is seen with his hand on his ear, possibly listening to something. In the third image, the boy is seen with a woman who is wearing sunglasses and has blonde hair. The boy is wearing a black shirt in all three images. The style of the video is a simple collage of images, with no additional context or background provided. The focus is solely on the boy and his expressions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7GX8tQ1bVTg_5_206to339.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part47/7GX8tQ1bVTg_5_206to339.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7GX8tQ1bVTg_5_206to339.mp4	The video captures the breathtaking view of a colorful canyon, showcasing its natural beauty and geological formations. The canyon is filled with a variety of rock formations, each exhibiting a unique color and texture. The colors range from warm hues of red and orange to cooler tones of blue and green, creating a vibrant and dynamic landscape. The canyon's geological formations are diverse, with some rocks appearing smooth and rounded, while others are jagged and angular. The video is taken from a high vantage point, providing a panoramic view of the canyon and its surroundings. The perspective allows for a comprehensive view of the canyon's depth and scale, emphasizing its grandeur and majesty. The video is a testament to the awe-inspiring power of nature and the beauty of geological formations.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Fj8bUe8--gI_1_0to163.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part43/Fj8bUe8--gI_1_0to163.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Fj8bUe8--gI_1_0to163.mp4	The video shows a red sports car parked on the side of a road. The car is sleek and shiny, with a black spoiler on the back and a black front bumper. The car's wheels are black with silver rims. The car is parked on a concrete curb, and the road behind it is clear. The sky is blue and clear, suggesting a sunny day. The car is the main focus of the video, and there are no other objects or people in the frame. The style of the video is a straightforward, clear shot of the car, with no additional action or movement.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0eEBECbX1rE_10_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part30/0eEBECbX1rE_10_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0eEBECbX1rE_10_0to109.mp4	The video shows a white and red speedboat on a body of water. The boat is sleek and modern, with a curved windshield and a black and white interior. The boat is moving at a high speed, creating a wake behind it. The water is calm and blue, reflecting the boat's speed. The boat is heading towards the horizon, which is visible in the distance. The video is shot from the perspective of someone on the boat, giving a sense of the speed and motion of the boat. The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, capturing the thrill of speedboating.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+YwCKnsdNe70_191_26to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part87/YwCKnsdNe70_191_26to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-YwCKnsdNe70_191_26to172.mp4	The video features a vibrant and playful scene at a children's playground. The main focus is a large, pink, fluffy creature that appears to be a character from an animated film. The creature is standing on a blue and yellow seesaw, which is in motion, suggesting that the creature is either pushing off or being pushed by an unseen force. The playground is filled with various colorful equipment, including a swing set and a slide, all of which are empty, indicating that the playground is not currently in use. The background is filled with lush greenery and trees, creating a serene and peaceful atmosphere. The overall style of the video is bright and cheerful, with a focus on the whimsical and imaginative nature of the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7PhZdrJb5iE_6_51to221.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part49/7PhZdrJb5iE_6_51to221.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7PhZdrJb5iE_6_51to221.mp4	The video features a Barbie doll with blonde hair and blue eyes, wearing a blue dress with a white collar and black cat patterns. The doll is positioned in a room with a fireplace and a clock on the wall. The room has a cozy atmosphere with a couch and chairs. The doll is seen in three different positions, each time with a different pose. The video captures the doll's movements and expressions, creating a sense of dynamism and personality. The doll's outfit and the room's decor suggest a playful and imaginative setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+MhuFNKQpWes_14_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part102/MhuFNKQpWes_14_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-MhuFNKQpWes_14_0to102.mp4	"The video showcases a yellow Kia electric car on a showroom floor. The car is positioned in the center of the frame, with a spotlight illuminating it, highlighting its sleek design and vibrant color. The car's license plate reads ""Kia EV"", indicating its electric nature. The showroom floor is white, providing a stark contrast to the car's yellow color. In the background, a green and yellow striped wall serves as a backdrop, adding a touch of color to the scene. The overall style of the video is clean and modern, emphasizing the car's design and electric capabilities."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Ly7RlUsCUM4_7_20to162.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part73/Ly7RlUsCUM4_7_20to162.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Ly7RlUsCUM4_7_20to162.mp4	In the video, a young man and a woman are engaged in a conversation. The man, dressed in a blue sweater and a plaid shirt, is standing in front of a green wall. He is smiling and looking at the woman, who is wearing a red dress. The woman is also smiling and looking at the man. The scene is set in a room with a green wall and a window. The man and woman are the main subjects of the video, and their interaction is the focus of the scene. The video captures a moment of connection between the two characters.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9_P-NqM_5cg_20_0to138.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part41/9_P-NqM_5cg_20_0to138.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9_P-NqM_5cg_20_0to138.mp4	The video shows a large tortoise in a zoo setting, with a focus on its feeding behavior. The tortoise is seen in three different positions, each time with its mouth open, revealing its teeth and tongue. In the first frame, the tortoise is seen from a side angle, with its mouth open and its tongue sticking out. In the second frame, the tortoise is seen from a front angle, with its mouth open and its tongue sticking out. In the third frame, the tortoise is seen from a side angle again, with its mouth open and its tongue sticking out. The tortoise is eating a carrot, which is visible in its mouth in all three frames. The tortoise is on a green surface, which could be a grassy area or a mat. The video is likely educational, aimed at teaching viewers about the feeding habits of tortoises.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HJSfRQClTN4_28_28to176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part59/HJSfRQClTN4_28_28to176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HJSfRQClTN4_28_28to176.mp4	In the video, a man is sitting at a table with a unique background. He is holding a small figurine in his hand, which appears to be a horse. The table is covered with various items, including a few small bags and a bottle. The man seems to be engaged in a conversation or perhaps presenting the figurine. The background features a patterned wall with a metallic finish, adding an interesting visual element to the scene. The overall style of the video suggests a casual, informal setting, possibly a personal vlog or a hobby-related video.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ZJxH1_Y2lQw_12_0to178.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/ZJxH1_Y2lQw_12_0to178.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ZJxH1_Y2lQw_12_0to178.mp4	The video is a close-up view of the interior of a luxury car, showcasing the design and features of the vehicle. The car's steering wheel is prominently displayed, featuring a logo in the center. The dashboard is sleek and modern, with a digital display screen that shows the car's speed and other information. The car's center console is equipped with a touch screen interface, and there are cup holders on the center console. The car's interior is upholstered in high-quality leather, and the seats are comfortable and supportive. The car's interior is well-lit, with ambient lighting that creates a luxurious atmosphere. The video is shot in a way that highlights the car's design and features, and it is likely intended for promotional or advertising purposes.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CJsptdkCU9s_19_210to339.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part44/CJsptdkCU9s_19_210to339.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CJsptdkCU9s_19_210to339.mp4	The video captures a vibrant and lush garden, teeming with a variety of colorful flowers and plants. The garden is filled with a multitude of flowers, each with their own unique colors and shapes, creating a beautiful and diverse display. The plants are arranged in a way that allows them to grow freely, with some reaching up towards the sky, while others spread out across the ground. The garden is set against a backdrop of towering trees and bushes, providing a sense of depth and scale. The overall style of the video is one of natural beauty and tranquility, capturing the essence of a thriving and healthy garden.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XqBC1Q3BUiI_79_111to247.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part74/XqBC1Q3BUiI_79_111to247.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XqBC1Q3BUiI_79_111to247.mp4	"The video captures a moment in a locker room where a football player is seen in a white jersey with red stripes, the number 20 prominently displayed. He is in the process of adjusting his shoulder pads, a common sight before a game. The player's focused expression and the intensity of the moment suggest the importance of the upcoming match. The locker room, filled with other players, serves as a backdrop to this scene, adding to the atmosphere of anticipation and readiness. The hashtag ""#TheSeason"" is visible, indicating that this is the start of a new season, filled with potential and excitement."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+NwN_uIWpNOQ_8_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part91/NwN_uIWpNOQ_8_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-NwN_uIWpNOQ_8_0to130.mp4	"The video shows a gray Tesla Model S car in a garage. The car is parked and the brake lights are on. The car has a sleek design with a black roof and a chrome strip running along the side. The license plate reads ""NYL 844"". The car is equipped with a sunroof and a spoiler on the back. The garage has a concrete floor and white walls. The car is the main focus of the video, and the garage provides a simple, uncluttered background. The brake lights are the only source of light in the scene, creating a dramatic effect. The car's design and the brake lights' glow are the main elements of the video."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ie-agmKAMQ0_18_233to356.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part176/ie-agmKAMQ0_18_233to356.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ie-agmKAMQ0_18_233to356.mp4	The video captures a breathtaking aerial view of a mountainous landscape. The camera starts from a high vantage point, showcasing the rugged terrain and rocky outcrops. As the camera descends, it reveals a valley nestled between the towering mountains, with patches of green vegetation dotting the landscape. The sky above is a clear blue, with a few clouds scattered across it. The overall style of the video is a mix of nature and adventure, capturing the raw beauty of the mountains and the sense of exploration that comes with navigating such a rugged terrain.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-daC3iti0pA_30_587to763.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/-daC3iti0pA_30_587to763.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--daC3iti0pA_30_587to763.mp4	The video features a man standing in the foreground, gesturing with his hands as he speaks. He is wearing a black jacket with neon yellow stripes and a black helmet. Behind him, two motorcycles are parked on the side of a road. The road is surrounded by tall, dry grass and a hill in the background. The man appears to be giving directions or explaining something to the viewer. The style of the video is informative and seems to be related to motorcycle riding or travel.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rggxYVar3FI_1_116to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part174/rggxYVar3FI_1_116to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rggxYVar3FI_1_116to239.mp4	The video shows a doll standing next to a stack of colorful boxes. The doll is wearing a pink dress with a watermelon design on the front. The boxes are stacked in a pyramid shape, with the largest box at the bottom and the smallest box at the top. The boxes are red, blue, and pink, and they have numbers on them. The doll is standing on a white surface, and the background is pink. The video is a simple, straightforward depiction of a doll and some boxes, with no action or movement. The style of the video is straightforward and clear, with no additional elements or embellishments.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5BPOWcgB7qI_26_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/5BPOWcgB7qI_26_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5BPOWcgB7qI_26_0to127.mp4	In the video, a man is seen enjoying a delicious ice cream sandwich. He is seated at a table, wearing a gray vest and a white shirt. The ice cream sandwich, which is the main focus of the video, is placed on a plate in front of him. The man takes a bite of the ice cream sandwich, savoring the sweet treat. In the background, a woman is standing, adding a sense of depth to the scene. The overall style of the video is casual and relaxed, capturing a simple yet delightful moment of indulgence.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+17e1a784f8221e38038e6b9e429f2a433fbb35b13a046a650c0fe8ef10918ca3.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/17e1a784f8221e38038e6b9e429f2a433fbb35b13a046a650c0fe8ef10918ca3.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-17e1a784f8221e38038e6b9e429f2a433fbb35b13a046a650c0fe8ef10918ca3.mp4	"The video captures a close-up view of a metal clamp labeled ""EXTRA STRONG"" clamping down on a piece of white plastic or metal strip. The clamp is positioned on a white desk surface, which appears to be part of an office or workspace setup. In the background, there is a black computer mouse and a blue object, possibly a folder or a box, partially visible on the desk. The scene remains static throughout the video, focusing solely on the interaction between the clamp and the strip. There are no noticeable changes in the environment, lighting, or any other elements within the frame, indicating a steady and unchanging setting. The video emphasizes the strength and functionality of the clamp in holding the strip securely in place."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XK2MBnw6RlY_43_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part75/XK2MBnw6RlY_43_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XK2MBnw6RlY_43_0to114.mp4	The video captures the breathtaking view of a rugged coastline, where the deep blue ocean meets the rocky cliffs. The camera, positioned high above, provides a bird's eye view of the landscape, showcasing the dramatic contrast between the sea and the land. The cliffs, covered in lush greenery, are bathed in the warm glow of the sun, creating a picturesque scene. The waves, crashing against the cliffs, add a dynamic element to the otherwise serene landscape. The video is a testament to the raw beauty of nature, captured from an aerial perspective.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+W6fkgRTKUxI_6_0to163.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part94/W6fkgRTKUxI_6_0to163.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-W6fkgRTKUxI_6_0to163.mp4	The video shows a man in a kitchen, preparing a meal. He is wearing glasses and a gray t-shirt. The kitchen is well-equipped with wooden cabinets and a white countertop. On the countertop, there is a bowl of food, a coffee maker, and a toaster. The man is standing in front of the counter, and he appears to be in the process of measuring ingredients into small bowls. The style of the video is casual and homey, capturing a typical moment in a home kitchen.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-Xpa7sqdQhQ_3_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part59/-Xpa7sqdQhQ_3_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--Xpa7sqdQhQ_3_0to110.mp4	The video features a woman with blonde hair, wearing a red top and a gold necklace. She is seated in a chair, smiling and looking directly at the camera. The background consists of a blurred image of a field with trees, suggesting an outdoor setting. The style of the video is a close-up interview or talk show segment, with a focus on the woman's facial expression and attire. The lighting is soft and even, highlighting the woman's features without creating harsh shadows. The overall mood of the video is positive and engaging, with the woman appearing approachable and friendly.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+JrUHDv4jPUo_5_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part76/JrUHDv4jPUo_5_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-JrUHDv4jPUo_5_0to130.mp4	The video shows a silver Hyundai SUV parked in a parking lot. The car is positioned at an angle to the camera, allowing a clear view of its front and side. The vehicle is shiny and appears to be in good condition. The parking lot is made of concrete and has yellow lines marking the parking spaces. In the background, there is a brick building with a window. The style of the video is straightforward and documentary, with no additional effects or filters applied. The focus is on the car, and the background is kept simple to avoid distractions. The lighting in the video is natural, suggesting that it was taken during the day.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+uXqhcyoAn4M_10_125to248.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part124/uXqhcyoAn4M_10_125to248.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-uXqhcyoAn4M_10_125to248.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a car's front end, focusing on the hood and front grille. The car has a purple hood with a textured finish, and the front grille is black with a honeycomb pattern. The car's headlights are visible, and the car appears to be in a garage or workshop setting. The style of the video is a straightforward, static shot with no movement or action. The lighting is even, and the focus is sharp, highlighting the details of the car's design.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+sMWbB-1G6qw_12_125to323.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part143/sMWbB-1G6qw_12_125to323.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-sMWbB-1G6qw_12_125to323.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a boat's dashboard and steering wheel. The dashboard is black with various gauges and buttons, and the steering wheel is black with silver accents. The boat is a StarCraft model, as indicated by the logo on the dashboard. The style of the video is a straightforward, unembellished documentation of the boat's controls and features. The focus is on the details of the dashboard and steering wheel, with no additional context or background provided. The video is likely intended for informational purposes, such as a tutorial or a product showcase.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2hn31vLKgho_90_85to223.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/2hn31vLKgho_90_85to223.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2hn31vLKgho_90_85to223.mp4	The video shows a man sitting in the driver's seat of a car, waving his hand. The car has a futuristic design with a large screen on the dashboard and a steering wheel. The man is wearing a black shirt and jeans. The car is parked in a forested area with trees visible through the windows. The style of the video is a combination of a car advertisement and a lifestyle video, showcasing the car's interior and the man's casual demeanor. The focus is on the car and the man, with the background serving as a backdrop to highlight the car's design and the man's relaxed attitude.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+JZ6FR33fByg_16_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part69/JZ6FR33fByg_16_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-JZ6FR33fByg_16_0to118.mp4	The video features a man with a beard and mustache, wearing a plaid shirt, speaking to the camera. The setting appears to be an outdoor area with a grassy field and a fence in the background. The man is the main subject of the video, and he is positioned in the foreground. The style of the video is a straightforward interview or conversation, with the man likely discussing a topic or answering questions. The lighting in the video is natural, suggesting that it was filmed during the day. The overall tone of the video is casual and relaxed.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5QMCPENejCE_26_501to656.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/5QMCPENejCE_26_501to656.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5QMCPENejCE_26_501to656.mp4	"The video shows a man in a garage, taking a selfie. He is wearing a black t-shirt with the word ""VICIOUS"" on it and has a tattoo on his arm. He is also wearing sunglasses on his head. The garage is filled with various tools and equipment, including a car and a workbench. The man appears to be in the middle of a project or task, as he is looking down at something in his hands. The overall style of the video is casual and candid, capturing a moment in the man's day-to-day life."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+TeUE11PwyvA_27_0to126.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part103/TeUE11PwyvA_27_0to126.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-TeUE11PwyvA_27_0to126.mp4	The video shows the interior of a Jeep vehicle, focusing on the steering wheel and dashboard. The steering wheel is black with the Jeep logo in the center. The dashboard features a digital display screen and various control buttons. The vehicle's interior is black, and the seats are upholstered in a matching color. The steering wheel is positioned in the center of the frame, and the dashboard is visible in the background. The style of the video is a straightforward, static shot of the vehicle's interior, with no movement or action. The focus is on the design and features of the Jeep's interior, particularly the steering wheel and dashboard.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+24JC1a0GbSk_15_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part32/24JC1a0GbSk_15_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-24JC1a0GbSk_15_0to109.mp4	The video features a young woman with short black hair, smiling brightly at the camera. She is wearing a light-colored jacket with a black collar and a dark shirt underneath. The background is filled with autumn foliage, showcasing a variety of colors from orange to red and yellow. The woman appears to be outdoors, possibly in a park or a garden, as suggested by the natural setting. The overall style of the video is casual and cheerful, with a focus on the woman's expression and the vibrant colors of the fall season.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3-taJuVSq1M_27_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part56/3-taJuVSq1M_27_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3-taJuVSq1M_27_0to106.mp4	The video shows a silver Mercedes-Benz SL550 convertible parked inside a showroom. The car is the main focus of the video, with its shiny exterior reflecting the bright lights of the showroom. The car is positioned in the center of the frame, with the camera angle slightly elevated, giving a clear view of the car's design and features. The showroom itself is spacious and well-lit, with other cars and furniture visible in the background. The video is likely a promotional or sales video, showcasing the car's design and features to potential buyers. The style of the video is straightforward and professional, with a focus on the car and its surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+58DFuZblpVk_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part46/58DFuZblpVk_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-58DFuZblpVk_0_0to136.mp4	The video shows a woman in a kitchen, standing in front of a window. She is wearing a blue vest and a plaid shirt. The kitchen is well-lit, with a window that has a white curtain. On the window sill, there is a potted plant. The woman appears to be speaking, as she is looking directly at the camera. The kitchen is equipped with a sink and a blender. The style of the video is casual and informal, capturing a moment in the woman's day.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4qhq4n61_8E_33_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part46/4qhq4n61_8E_33_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4qhq4n61_8E_33_0to135.mp4	The video captures a dynamic scene on a city street. A red sports car is seen driving down the road, followed by a blue sports car. The cars are sleek and modern, with shiny exteriors reflecting the sunlight. The street is lined with trees and parked cars, adding to the urban atmosphere. The cars are moving at a moderate speed, suggesting a calm and orderly traffic situation. The video is shot from a perspective that follows the cars, giving a sense of motion and direction. The overall style of the video is realistic and captures the everyday life of city driving.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+FK4evlmFpX0_64_107to244.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part41/FK4evlmFpX0_64_107to244.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-FK4evlmFpX0_64_107to244.mp4	The video captures the breathtaking beauty of a mountainous landscape. The scene begins with a wide shot of a snow-capped mountain range, their peaks reaching high into the clear blue sky. The mountains are majestic and imposing, their white peaks contrasting sharply with the surrounding greenery.  As the video progresses, the camera zooms in on a rocky valley nestled between the mountains. The valley is rugged and wild, with jagged rocks and patches of snow scattered across the landscape. The rocks are gray and jagged, their sharp edges catching the light.  The final shot of the video is a close-up of a small stream flowing through the valley. The stream is a vibrant blue, its waters rushing over the rocks and creating a beautiful contrast with the surrounding greenery. The stream is surrounded by lush green plants, their leaves a bright green that stands out against the gray rocks.  Throughout the video, the camera moves smoothly, capturing the beauty of the landscape from different angles and distances. The colors in the video are vibrant and rich, with the white of the snow, the blue of the stream, and the green of the plants creating a stunning visual palette. The overall style of the video is naturalistic, with a focus on capturing the raw beauty of the landscape without any artificial embellishments.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rjnufIaHEZM_69_0to153.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part160/rjnufIaHEZM_69_0to153.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rjnufIaHEZM_69_0to153.mp4	The video is a 3D rendering of a luxurious yacht on the ocean at sunset. The yacht is white with a sleek design and features a large sun deck with comfortable seating and a dining table. The deck is adorned with various amenities such as a hot tub, a bar, and a grill. The yacht is surrounded by the vast expanse of the ocean, and the sky is painted with hues of orange and pink as the sun sets. The overall style of the video is realistic and detailed, showcasing the yacht's design and the beauty of the ocean at sunset.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+e5234e591a362cef8b7a1a0a09869f3eb40848b86dfe8e27ff8bb167aef5b01c.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/e5234e591a362cef8b7a1a0a09869f3eb40848b86dfe8e27ff8bb167aef5b01c.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-e5234e591a362cef8b7a1a0a09869f3eb40848b86dfe8e27ff8bb167aef5b01c.mp4	The video captures the process of frying food in a black frying pan placed on a white stovetop. The pan is filled with bubbling oil, indicating it is at a high temperature. Several pieces of breaded food, likely chicken or fish, are being fried. The breading is golden brown and crispy, suggesting they are cooking well. The oil is vigorously bubbling around the food, creating a dynamic visual effect. The camera remains stationary throughout the sequence, focusing closely on the frying pan to highlight the cooking process. There are no other significant objects or characters in the frame, keeping the viewer's attention solely on the frying action. The lighting is consistent, ensuring clear visibility of the food and the oil's movement.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CnxFs4RXPKk_12_195to337.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part52/CnxFs4RXPKk_12_195to337.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CnxFs4RXPKk_12_195to337.mp4	The video captures the interior of a classic car, showcasing its luxurious design and features. The car's dashboard is adorned with multiple gauges and dials, each one gleaming under the light. The steering wheel, a prominent feature in the frame, is made of polished metal and is equipped with a horn button. The gear shift, located on the center console, is also made of metal and is designed with a vintage aesthetic. The car's interior is predominantly black, with the metal accents adding a touch of elegance. The video is shot from the perspective of the driver, providing a comprehensive view of the car's interior. The overall style of the video is sleek and sophisticated, highlighting the car's classic design and luxurious features.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+E_ZS4sXFX3c_25_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part60/E_ZS4sXFX3c_25_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-E_ZS4sXFX3c_25_0to122.mp4	The video shows a person's hand holding a white paper plate with two tacos on it. The tacos are topped with shredded lettuce and a brown sauce. The person is wearing a ring on their finger. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a red surface. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the food.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+B9yr8pJbtTM_68_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part44/B9yr8pJbtTM_68_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-B9yr8pJbtTM_68_0to157.mp4	In the video, two men are engaged in a conversation in a garage setting. The man on the left, dressed in a black jacket, is gesturing towards a red sports car with a white stripe on the hood. The car is parked on a lift, indicating that it might be undergoing maintenance or inspection. The man on the right, wearing a gray sweater, is attentively listening to the other man's explanation. The garage is equipped with various tools and equipment, suggesting that it is a professional workspace. The overall style of the video is candid and informative, capturing a moment of interaction between the two men and their shared interest in the sports car.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SAKhPIBwfNQ_7_206to371.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part86/SAKhPIBwfNQ_7_206to371.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SAKhPIBwfNQ_7_206to371.mp4	The video features a man in a kitchen, wearing a white chef's hat and a black shirt with a palm tree pattern. He is standing in front of a white cabinet and a black microwave. The man has a surprised expression on his face, with his mouth open and eyes wide. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the man's reaction. The kitchen setting suggests that the video may be related to cooking or food preparation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0XHO5WKXGak_9_18to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/0XHO5WKXGak_9_18to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0XHO5WKXGak_9_18to151.mp4	The video captures a luxurious shopping experience in a high-end department store. The store is filled with a variety of designer clothing and accessories, displayed on mannequins and shelves. The clothing ranges from elegant dresses to stylish handbags, all arranged in an inviting manner. The store's interior is spacious and well-lit, with a grand staircase leading to the upper level. The overall atmosphere is one of sophistication and elegance, reflecting the high-end nature of the store.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+IRCUZOdLzl0_7_103to296.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part50/IRCUZOdLzl0_7_103to296.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-IRCUZOdLzl0_7_103to296.mp4	The video shows a man in a blue shirt sitting at a desk in an office. He is looking down at a piece of paper, his expression serious. The desk is cluttered with various items, including a computer monitor, a printer, and a framed photo. The office has large windows that offer a view of the city skyline. The man appears to be deeply engrossed in his work, suggesting a professional setting. The overall style of the video is realistic and it captures the everyday life of a working professional.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WNARwBKN8CY_4_0to116.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part184/WNARwBKN8CY_4_0to116.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WNARwBKN8CY_4_0to116.mp4	In the video, a raccoon is seen interacting with a plate of food on a patio. The raccoon, with its distinctive black and gray fur, is seen climbing onto the table and approaching the plate. It uses its paws to grab the food, which appears to be a piece of bread or a similar type of food. The raccoon is seen eating the food, with its mouth open and its paws holding the food. The table is made of glass and is situated on a patio, with a chair visible in the background. The scene is set outdoors, with the raccoon being the main focus of the video. The style of the video is a close-up shot, capturing the raccoon's actions in detail.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7YnqoyG8m38_11_43to250.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/7YnqoyG8m38_11_43to250.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7YnqoyG8m38_11_43to250.mp4	The video is a casual, personal vlog style video. A young man is sitting in a room with a blue and white checkered shirt. He is speaking to the camera, likely discussing a topic related to football, as evidenced by the Chelsea FC flag hanging on the wall behind him. The room appears to be a personal space, with a bicycle leaning against the wall and a suitcase nearby, suggesting recent travel or an upcoming trip. The man's expression is serious, indicating that he is engaged in a thoughtful or important conversation. The overall style of the video is informal and personal, with a focus on the man's thoughts and opinions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+YBO_7UezpbY_2_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part87/YBO_7UezpbY_2_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-YBO_7UezpbY_2_0to117.mp4	"The video features a man with a beard and a surprised expression, leaning forward with his hands on his knees. He is wearing a blue shirt and a gray jacket. The background includes a wooden chair and a blurred image of a person sitting in it. The text overlay on the video reads ""W-we're here to shoot the PSA."" The style of the video appears to be a candid, behind-the-scenes moment from a film or television production."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+401262f423b62e6e50cb05fb95c133c2142e7d980bd845ca4c243025f5c11534.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/401262f423b62e6e50cb05fb95c133c2142e7d980bd845ca4c243025f5c11534.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-401262f423b62e6e50cb05fb95c133c2142e7d980bd845ca4c243025f5c11534.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a white goat's head, which is positioned against a wooden fence. The goat has two prominent horns, one of which is slightly curved. Its ears are large and pointed, and it appears to be looking around its environment. The goat's fur is predominantly white, with some brown patches visible on its face and horns. A chain is attached to the wooden fence, suggesting that the goat is tethered or confined in some way. The background includes a glimpse of what seems to be a barn or stable, with hay scattered on the ground. The lighting in the video is natural, indicating that the scene takes place during the day. The goat remains relatively still throughout the video, occasionally moving its head slightly, possibly reacting to sounds or stimuli in its surroundings. There are no significant changes in the goat's position or the environment, maintaining a consistent focus on the animal and its immediate setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+VRCs8RFM_tU_10_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part118/VRCs8RFM_tU_10_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-VRCs8RFM_tU_10_0to136.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in a football game. The main focus is a football player, wearing a white jersey with the number 15, running with the ball. He is wearing a helmet and has a determined expression on his face. The player is in motion, running towards the right side of the frame.  In the background, there are other players visible, some of whom are wearing blue jerseys. They are spread out across the field, indicating an ongoing game. The field itself is a lush green, typical of a football field.  The style of the video is realistic, capturing the intensity and action of the game. The focus is on the player with the ball, highlighting his movement and the potential for a successful play. The other players in the background add depth to the scene, showing the scale of the game and the number of participants. The overall composition of the video suggests a high-energy, competitive atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2-bDhAC1xqA_19_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part63/2-bDhAC1xqA_19_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2-bDhAC1xqA_19_0to106.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car, focusing on the dashboard and steering wheel. The car is a modern model with a sleek design, featuring a digital display screen in the center console. The steering wheel has a logo on it, indicating the brand of the car. The dashboard is equipped with various controls and indicators, including a speedometer and a fuel gauge. The car's interior is well-lit, with the ambient lighting creating a comfortable atmosphere. The style of the video is a straightforward, clear shot of the car's interior, likely taken from the perspective of the driver. The video does not contain any text or additional graphics.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rUahPvk9REE_10_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part163/rUahPvk9REE_10_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rUahPvk9REE_10_0to120.mp4	The video is a dynamic and high-speed montage of a Gumpert Apollo car racing on a track. The car, painted in a sleek combination of white and blue, is captured in motion, showcasing its aerodynamic design and powerful performance. The car's speed is emphasized by the blurred background, which suggests a rapid movement along the track. The video also includes text that provides information about the car's speed and its ranking among the fastest production cars on the Nürburgring. The overall style of the video is action-packed and visually engaging, with a focus on the car's speed and performance.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CLd-mxuLpl4_2_40to248.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part55/CLd-mxuLpl4_2_40to248.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CLd-mxuLpl4_2_40to248.mp4	The video features a man with a beard and a hat, playing a red electric guitar. He is wearing a denim jacket and is seated in front of a black and white amplifier. The man is holding the guitar with both hands, strumming the strings, and appears to be in the middle of a performance. The background is a plain, light blue color, providing a stark contrast to the man and his guitar. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the man and his guitar without any additional elements or distractions. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the man and his guitar without creating harsh shadows. The overall impression is one of a casual, relaxed performance, with the man fully engaged in playing his guitar.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+_GqQy207Vi8_7_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part86/_GqQy207Vi8_7_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-_GqQy207Vi8_7_0to150.mp4	In the video, a woman with short blonde hair is seen walking down a street. She is wearing a purple shirt and is pointing at something off-camera. The street is lined with shops, and there are clothes hanging in the windows. The woman appears to be engaged in a conversation or explaining something to someone. The overall style of the video is casual and candid, capturing a moment in the woman's day as she navigates the urban environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+wEzrR4vq3nU_51_0to128.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part144/wEzrR4vq3nU_51_0to128.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-wEzrR4vq3nU_51_0to128.mp4	The video captures the interior of a luxury sports car, showcasing its design and features. The car's interior is predominantly black, with leather seats and a dashboard that houses a variety of controls and displays. The car's door is open, revealing a yellow folder placed on the passenger seat, suggesting that the car is either being prepared for a journey or has just been used. The car is parked in a garage, with other vehicles visible in the background, indicating that the car is part of a collection or a showroom. The video is likely a promotional or sales video, aimed at highlighting the car's design and features to potential buyers.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8Yzw453dNlg_49_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/8Yzw453dNlg_49_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8Yzw453dNlg_49_0to104.mp4	In the video, a young woman is seen sitting in a grassy field, her back to the camera. She is wearing a pink and white plaid dress and has a flower in her hair. The sun is shining on her, casting a warm glow on her skin. The field is lush and green, with tall grass swaying gently in the breeze. In the background, there is a road that stretches into the distance, disappearing into the horizon. The woman appears to be lost in thought, her gaze directed off to the side. The overall atmosphere of the video is serene and peaceful, capturing a moment of quiet reflection in a beautiful natural setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SIV3zohz1cQ_31_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part88/SIV3zohz1cQ_31_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SIV3zohz1cQ_31_0to127.mp4	In the video, a man in a blue hat and a red shirt is seen working in a cemetery. He is using a rope to secure a pole to a headstone. The cemetery is filled with old headstones and monuments, some of which are weathered and worn. The man is walking through the cemetery, pulling the rope tight around the pole and the headstone. The scene is set against a backdrop of lush green grass and trees. The man's actions suggest that he is performing some sort of maintenance or repair work in the cemetery. The overall style of the video is realistic and documentary-like, capturing the man's actions and the surrounding environment in a straightforward manner.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7ZpZ2fvrgjk_350_0to167.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/7ZpZ2fvrgjk_350_0to167.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7ZpZ2fvrgjk_350_0to167.mp4	"In the video, a large, friendly-looking brown bear is seen in a cozy room, engrossed in reading a book titled ""The Science of Victory"" by B. Franklin, Jr. The bear is seated comfortably on a chair, holding the book in its paws. The room is filled with various objects, including a trophy, a clock, and a chessboard, suggesting that the bear might be interested in strategy and competition. The bear's focused expression and the warm, inviting atmosphere of the room create a sense of tranquility and intellectual curiosity."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Lg4EVKdpJF8_60_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part73/Lg4EVKdpJF8_60_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Lg4EVKdpJF8_60_0to154.mp4	The video shows a man in an orange shirt and a black and white baseball cap, engaged in the sport of archery. He is holding a bow and arrow, and the arrow is in the process of being released. The man is focused and concentrated, with his eyes on the target. The background features a building and a crowd of spectators, indicating that this is a competitive event. The style of the video is dynamic and action-oriented, capturing the intensity of the sport and the skill of the archer.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gJ_21vyCoUE_6_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part154/gJ_21vyCoUE_6_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gJ_21vyCoUE_6_0to104.mp4	The video is a close-up of a monkey's face, showing its fur, eyes, nose, and mouth. The monkey appears to be looking directly at the camera, giving the impression of curiosity or interest. The background is blurred, but it seems to be an outdoor setting with natural elements. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the details of the monkey's features and the texture of its fur. The lighting is natural, suggesting that the video was taken during the day. The focus is on the monkey, making it the central subject of the video.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+IfMZnGMpdic_4_64to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/IfMZnGMpdic_4_64to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-IfMZnGMpdic_4_64to190.mp4	The video depicts a train journey through a picturesque landscape. The train, composed of multiple cars, is seen traveling along a set of tracks that run parallel to a brick building. The building, with its red roof, adds a touch of architectural interest to the scene. The train is carrying a variety of cargo, including wooden crates and barrels, suggesting it might be a freight train. The journey takes place during the day, with the sun casting a warm glow on the surroundings. The overall style of the video is realistic, with attention to detail in the depiction of the train, the cargo, and the landscape.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WlsYx3sZoVU_111_54to201.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part78/WlsYx3sZoVU_111_54to201.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WlsYx3sZoVU_111_54to201.mp4	The video captures a man's journey on an airplane. He is seen in a black t-shirt and a backwards cap, walking down the aisle of the airplane. The airplane is filled with rows of seats, all neatly arranged. The man's journey takes him past a flight attendant, who is standing at the front of the plane. The video is a snapshot of a moment in time, capturing the anticipation and excitement of travel.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2FAqIc3SFxk_14_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part46/2FAqIc3SFxk_14_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2FAqIc3SFxk_14_0to133.mp4	The video shows a black luxury car driving down a country road. The car is sleek and shiny, with a distinctive design that suggests it's a high-end model. The road is surrounded by lush green fields, and the sky is clear and blue, indicating a bright and sunny day. The car is moving at a moderate speed, and the driver appears to be focused on the road ahead. The overall style of the video is realistic and naturalistic, capturing the beauty of the countryside and the elegance of the car in motion.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+xrbYtaEKm6o_64_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part176/xrbYtaEKm6o_64_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-xrbYtaEKm6o_64_0to141.mp4	The video captures a whimsical scene of a giraffe statue standing in a lush garden. The giraffe, with its brown and white patterned body, is positioned in the foreground, its long neck reaching towards the sky. The garden is filled with vibrant purple flowers that add a splash of color to the scene. In the background, a large rock formation with a face-like structure stands tall, adding an element of fantasy to the setting. The video is shot from a low angle, making the giraffe and the rock formation appear even more imposing. The overall style of the video is playful and imaginative, inviting viewers to explore the garden and its unique features.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6bd894cd1c989685e46b5b585ed59566274e053b92a68ccd1ebee905e41c1078.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/6bd894cd1c989685e46b5b585ed59566274e053b92a68ccd1ebee905e41c1078.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6bd894cd1c989685e46b5b585ed59566274e053b92a68ccd1ebee905e41c1078.mp4	The video captures a serene scene at the edge of a pool, where the water is a vibrant turquoise blue. The surface of the water is gently rippling, reflecting the light and creating a shimmering effect. A seagull gracefully flies over the water, its wings spread wide, adding a dynamic element to the tranquil setting. As the bird moves across the frame, it briefly dips its beak into the water, perhaps searching for food or simply quenching a thirst. The camera remains stationary throughout the sequence, focusing on the interaction between the seagull and the water's surface. The overall atmosphere is peaceful, with the gentle movement of the water and the bird's flight providing a sense of calm and natural beauty.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+a4BAid5yTaA_8_144to274.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part93/a4BAid5yTaA_8_144to274.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-a4BAid5yTaA_8_144to274.mp4	The video captures the growth of cherry tomatoes on a plant. The first frame shows the tomatoes in their early stages, small and green, nestled among the leaves. The second frame shows the tomatoes beginning to ripen, their color transitioning from green to a vibrant red. The third frame shows the tomatoes fully ripe, their bright red color standing out against the green leaves. The video is a close-up shot, focusing on the tomatoes and their immediate surroundings. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the natural growth process of the tomatoes in detail.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9dWzupkBcNU_69_85to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part45/9dWzupkBcNU_69_85to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9dWzupkBcNU_69_85to229.mp4	The video shows a modern workspace setup in a minimalist style. The main focus is a wooden desk with a laptop, a vase with a plant, and a small lamp. The desk is illuminated by a blue light underneath, creating a cool ambiance. The desk is positioned against a white wall, and there is a wooden shelf above it with a few books and a picture frame. To the right of the desk, there is a gray armchair. The floor is tiled, and the overall lighting is soft and warm. The video captures the simplicity and functionality of the workspace, emphasizing the use of natural materials and a clean, uncluttered design.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+IHPMJZOLS8Y_3_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part70/IHPMJZOLS8Y_3_0to130.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-IHPMJZOLS8Y_3_0to130.mp4	The video captures a cyclist in a white and blue uniform, wearing a white helmet, riding a black bicycle with white wheels. The cyclist is leaning over the handlebars, demonstrating a racing posture. The cyclist is passing by a gray car with a black door handle and a side mirror. The background features a black and white patterned wall, adding a sense of depth and contrast to the scene. The cyclist's focused expression and the dynamic motion of the bicycle suggest a competitive race or training session. The overall style of the video is realistic and action-oriented, capturing the intensity and speed of the cyclist's movement.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6544b8bd13ab488431d72d974b80e1368a7e9edba3b76e2ddb491d1d7d5814ef.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/6544b8bd13ab488431d72d974b80e1368a7e9edba3b76e2ddb491d1d7d5814ef.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6544b8bd13ab488431d72d974b80e1368a7e9edba3b76e2ddb491d1d7d5814ef.mp4	The video captures a serene sunset scene at a beach. The sky is painted with vibrant hues of orange, yellow, and pink, transitioning into a darker blue as it meets the horizon. The sun is partially obscured by clouds, casting a warm, golden glow across the water. The reflection of the sun on the calm sea creates a shimmering path of light that stretches towards the shore. In the foreground, tree branches with green leaves hang down, framing the view and adding a natural border to the scene. A small dog can be seen walking along the sandy beach near the water's edge, moving from left to right across the frame. The overall atmosphere is peaceful and tranquil, with the gentle movement of the waves and the soft rustling of the leaves providing a soothing soundtrack to the visual beauty. There are no significant changes or movements in the scene throughout the video; it remains a static yet captivating depiction of a beautiful sunset at the beach.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+xpuGx5UUiVk_88_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part144/xpuGx5UUiVk_88_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-xpuGx5UUiVk_88_0to156.mp4	The video captures the majestic Great Pyramids of Giza, standing tall against the clear blue sky. The pyramids, constructed from large stone blocks, exhibit a weathered appearance, hinting at their ancient origins. The perspective of the video is from a distance, allowing the viewer to appreciate the grandeur of these historical monuments. The sandy desert surrounding the pyramids adds to the sense of isolation and timelessness. The video is a testament to the architectural prowess of the ancient Egyptians and the enduring legacy of their civilization.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6861072df84688a69440d6fbe334b132f932b9087bca05e4895229470cd6cdfc.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/6861072df84688a69440d6fbe334b132f932b9087bca05e4895229470cd6cdfc.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6861072df84688a69440d6fbe334b132f932b9087bca05e4895229470cd6cdfc.mp4	The video captures a lively scene at an outdoor marine animal show. The setting is a large, circular pool filled with clear blue water, surrounded by a concrete structure with a roof overhead. The sky above is bright and mostly clear, with a few scattered clouds. In the center of the pool, several dolphins are swimming gracefully, performing tricks and interacting with trainers dressed in green wetsuits. The trainers are positioned strategically around the pool, some standing on platforms and others on the edge, guiding the dolphins through their routine.In the foreground, a crowd of spectators watches attentively from tiered seating areas. Some individuals are taking photos or videos with their phones, capturing the excitement of the performance. The atmosphere is vibrant and engaging, with the audience's focus entirely on the aquatic entertainment unfolding before them. The camera remains stationary throughout the sequence, providing a consistent view of the entire scene, allowing viewers to take in all the details of the performance and the surrounding environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+57sb6gsCKsI_12_17to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/57sb6gsCKsI_12_17to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-57sb6gsCKsI_12_17to142.mp4	The video features a man in a blue plaid shirt, who appears to be in the middle of a conversation or explanation. He is gesturing with his hands, which suggests that he is actively engaged in the discussion. The background is a brick wall, which adds a rustic touch to the scene. The man is standing in front of a colorful abstract painting, which adds a vibrant contrast to the otherwise neutral tones of the brick wall. The overall style of the video is casual and informal, with the man appearing relaxed and comfortable in his surroundings. The focus is on the man and his interaction with the environment, rather than on any specific object or detail.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BcHZttr1VaM_0_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/BcHZttr1VaM_0_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BcHZttr1VaM_0_0to108.mp4	In the video, a green ogre and a white dog are sitting in a cozy room with a rustic charm. The ogre, dressed in a brown vest and white shirt, is seated on a green chair, while the dog is comfortably nestled on a matching green couch. The room is adorned with a wooden shelf and a mirror, reflecting the warm and inviting ambiance. The ogre and the dog seem to be enjoying each other's company, creating a heartwarming scene of companionship.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2ed98a47a33afd292e6d57014aa246bd6625675629024be49640854f3c3019b2.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/2ed98a47a33afd292e6d57014aa246bd6625675629024be49640854f3c3019b2.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2ed98a47a33afd292e6d57014aa246bd6625675629024be49640854f3c3019b2.mp4	The video captures a serene scene of a koi fish swimming in a blue plastic container filled with water. The container is placed on a wooden surface, and a white hose is visible, likely connected to an air pump, which creates bubbles on the water's surface. The koi fish, characterized by its vibrant orange and black patterns, swims gracefully from one end of the container to the other. The water level is marked with a ruler, indicating measurements for monitoring the water depth. Surrounding the container, green plants add a touch of nature to the setting. The overall atmosphere is calm and peaceful, focusing on the gentle movement of the koi fish and the tranquil environment it inhabits.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+xWntta302Tw_71_34to181.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part167/xWntta302Tw_71_34to181.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-xWntta302Tw_71_34to181.mp4	In the video, a young woman with blonde hair is seen sitting on a couch with colorful pillows. She is wearing a pink beanie and a black and white striped shirt. In the first frame, she is holding a phone and appears to be looking at it. In the second frame, she is still holding the phone, but her expression has changed to one of surprise or shock. In the third frame, she is still holding the phone, but her expression has changed again, this time to one of amusement or laughter. The video captures a moment of surprise, followed by amusement, as the woman interacts with her phone.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+bpeKwSyNib4_42_0to101.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part110/bpeKwSyNib4_42_0to101.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-bpeKwSyNib4_42_0to101.mp4	In the video, two men are engaged in a conversation in a bar setting. The man on the left is wearing a plaid shirt and a cap, while the man on the right is dressed in a blue jacket and a white shirt. They are standing in front of a colorful mural on the wall. On the bar counter, there are several bottles of alcohol, including whiskey and vodka. The men appear to be enjoying their drinks and the atmosphere of the bar. The video captures the casual and relaxed vibe of the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ACSzgubxmOk_60_263to388.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part58/ACSzgubxmOk_60_263to388.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ACSzgubxmOk_60_263to388.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a plate of chicken wings, with a small bowl of dipping sauce placed next to it. The chicken wings are golden brown and appear to be cooked to perfection. The dipping sauce is a light yellow color, suggesting it might be a type of mustard or a similar condiment. The plate and bowl are placed on a table, and the focus is on the food, with the background blurred out to keep the viewer's attention on the chicken wings and sauce. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the food without any additional elements or distractions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Nj4eznhsFJc_55_22to215.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part91/Nj4eznhsFJc_55_22to215.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Nj4eznhsFJc_55_22to215.mp4	The video is a stylized advertisement for wine. It features a rustic wooden barrel with three bottles of wine and two wine glasses. The bottles are dark-colored, suggesting red wine, and the glasses are filled with a light-colored wine, possibly white or rosé. The background is a blurred image of a vineyard, indicating that the wine is likely from a winery. The style of the video is elegant and sophisticated, with a focus on the wine and the setting. The lighting is soft and warm, highlighting the colors of the wine and the wood of the barrel. The overall impression is one of relaxation and enjoyment, inviting viewers to savor the wine and the experience.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+wcWbIIypw1o_32_0to213.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part128/wcWbIIypw1o_32_0to213.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-wcWbIIypw1o_32_0to213.mp4	The video captures a lively dining scene at a restaurant. The table is filled with a variety of dishes, including bowls of soup, plates of sandwiches, and plates of fried food. The food is presented on white plates and bowls, and the table is set with silverware. The restaurant has a casual and inviting atmosphere, with a blue and white color scheme. The video is shot in a realistic style, capturing the details of the food and the ambiance of the restaurant.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+c182c5601d3abf510228a594da022741d422f1d0813beae47aada15708fcfe3c.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/c182c5601d3abf510228a594da022741d422f1d0813beae47aada15708fcfe3c.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-c182c5601d3abf510228a594da022741d422f1d0813beae47aada15708fcfe3c.mp4	The video captures a scene featuring two roosters standing on a dirt path near a large mirror. The roosters have vibrant plumage, with feathers predominantly brown, white, and black. Their combs and wattles are bright red, adding to their striking appearance. One rooster is positioned closer to the mirror, while the other stands slightly behind it. As the video progresses, the roosters move slowly around each other, occasionally glancing at their reflection in the mirror. The background consists of a natural setting with trees and foliage, suggesting an outdoor environment. The ground is covered with dirt and scattered leaves, indicating a rural or farm-like location. The camera remains stationary throughout the video, focusing on the interaction between the roosters and their reflection. The overall atmosphere is calm and serene, with the roosters' movements being gentle and unhurried.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+srUY7RkYODk_19_0to143.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part152/srUY7RkYODk_19_0to143.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-srUY7RkYODk_19_0to143.mp4	The video shows a delicious chocolate cake with white frosting and red cherries on top. The cake is placed on a pink plate, which contrasts nicely with the dark color of the cake. The cake is cut into, revealing a rich, moist interior. The cherries add a pop of color and a sweet touch to the cake. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the cake as the main subject. The camera angle is slightly elevated, giving a clear view of the cake and its details. The lighting is bright, highlighting the cake's texture and the vibrant colors of the frosting and cherries. The video does not contain any text or additional elements, keeping the focus solely on the cake.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+wb6DboIePYM_38_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part163/wb6DboIePYM_38_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-wb6DboIePYM_38_0to156.mp4	The video shows a yellow car with its hood open, revealing the engine. The engine is complex and filled with various parts, including belts, hoses, and a fan. The car is parked on a brick road, and in the background, there is a house with a blue door and a tree. The style of the video is a close-up shot of the car's engine, focusing on the details of the engine and the surrounding environment. The video captures the intricate workings of the car's engine and the contrast between the mechanical parts and the natural surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+pAkxh4QW8_M_77_255to441.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part152/pAkxh4QW8_M_77_255to441.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-pAkxh4QW8_M_77_255to441.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment on a football field. A player in a blue uniform, number 29, is in the center of the action. He is celebrating a successful play, his arms outstretched in a victorious gesture. His teammates, also in blue, are nearby, their bodies in motion as they join in the celebration. The crowd in the background is a blur of colors, their faces a mix of excitement and anticipation. The field beneath them is a vibrant green, contrasting with the blue of their uniforms. The atmosphere is one of triumph and camaraderie, a snapshot of a moment of victory in the game of football.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0_R_9L63gHs_22_100to223.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/0_R_9L63gHs_22_100to223.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0_R_9L63gHs_22_100to223.mp4	The video features a man in a casual setting, likely a sports-themed room. He is wearing a light blue t-shirt with a pineapple graphic on the front. The man is wearing a black baseball cap and has a beard. He appears to be speaking or reacting to something, as he is making a face and his mouth is open.  The room has a sports theme, with various sports-related items in the background. There are footballs, a football jersey, and a sports ball. There are also sports banners and a sports poster. The room has a casual and relaxed atmosphere.  The man is the main subject of the video, and he is positioned in the center of the frame. The sports-themed items in the background provide context for the setting and suggest that the man may be a sports enthusiast or a sports commentator. The overall style of the video is informal and conversational.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+d552c48e3d1c4665021f6422cb382b1711e2457042de2e17c3ff274918c00ece.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/d552c48e3d1c4665021f6422cb382b1711e2457042de2e17c3ff274918c00ece.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-d552c48e3d1c4665021f6422cb382b1711e2457042de2e17c3ff274918c00ece.mp4	"The video captures a close-up view of a collection of white candy wrappers scattered on a rough, textured surface, likely concrete or asphalt. Each wrapper features the brand name ""Raffaello"" in red text, accompanied by an image of a red bird, suggesting the candies inside are Raffaello chocolates. The camera remains stationary throughout the sequence, focusing on the scattered wrappers.As the video progresses, a car tire enters the frame from the top right corner. The tire slowly rolls over the scattered wrappers, crushing them under its weight. The movement is gradual, and the camera maintains its focus on the interaction between the tire and the candy wrappers. The tire continues to roll forward, gradually moving out of the frame, leaving behind a trail of flattened wrappers and a slightly disturbed surface beneath it. The final scene shows the tire completely out of the frame, with the crushed wrappers still visible but less distinct due to the ongoing compression."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BWsMFsGqImg_12_0to126.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part62/BWsMFsGqImg_12_0to126.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BWsMFsGqImg_12_0to126.mp4	In the video, two men are seen in a field, each holding a rifle. The first man is seen adjusting his rifle, while the second man is seen looking at his rifle. The field they are in is lush and green, and the sky above them is clear and blue. The men are dressed in casual clothing, and they appear to be in the middle of a hunting trip. The video captures the essence of a day out in the field, with the men preparing their rifles for the hunt. The overall style of the video is realistic and captures the essence of the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-KufBNhw2oM_99_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/-KufBNhw2oM_99_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--KufBNhw2oM_99_0to150.mp4	The video captures the dynamic interaction between the ocean and the beach. The first frame shows the ocean's waves gently lapping against the shore, with the sand appearing wet and smooth. In the second frame, the waves have receded, leaving behind a wet, brown sand that contrasts with the blue of the ocean. The third frame shows the ocean's waves crashing onto the shore, with the sand appearing wet and rough. The video is shot from a high angle, providing a bird's eye view of the beach and the ocean. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the natural beauty of the beach and the ocean.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ap1N1yFTsHs_3_0to177.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part105/ap1N1yFTsHs_3_0to177.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ap1N1yFTsHs_3_0to177.mp4	The video features a man standing on a stage, speaking into a microphone. He is dressed in a dark suit and a white shirt, with his sleeves rolled up. The man appears to be in the middle of a speech or presentation, as he holds a piece of paper in his hand. The background is dark, which puts the focus on the man and his actions. The style of the video is straightforward and professional, with no additional elements or distractions. The man's attire and the microphone suggest that this is a formal event or gathering. The video captures the man's speech in progress, providing a glimpse into the event and the speaker's message.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8mq4GuI7dTU_18_235to366.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part49/8mq4GuI7dTU_18_235to366.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8mq4GuI7dTU_18_235to366.mp4	In the video, a young boy is seen in a kitchen, engaging in a cooking activity. He is using a blender, which is connected to a power outlet on the wall. The blender is placed on a countertop, and the boy is pouring water into it. The kitchen is well-equipped, with a sink and a stove visible in the background. There are also some utensils and a cup on the countertop. The boy appears to be focused on his task, suggesting that he might be preparing a meal or a drink. The overall style of the video is casual and homey, capturing a typical moment in a domestic setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+LVFWp6umf1w_53_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part95/LVFWp6umf1w_53_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-LVFWp6umf1w_53_0to123.mp4	The video is a dynamic sports scene featuring a football player from the New York Jets. The player, wearing a white and green uniform with the number 14, is captured in three different moments of action. In the first frame, the player is seen looking up, possibly tracking the trajectory of a pass or preparing for a play. The second frame shows the player in a running stance, suggesting he is either advancing towards the line of scrimmage or evading a defender. The third frame captures the player in a more relaxed stance, possibly waiting for the play to commence or observing the game from the sidelines. The background is filled with a crowd of spectators, indicating that the game is taking place in a stadium. The style of the video is a combination of action and anticipation, capturing the intensity and excitement of a football game.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2QMMWP1ZG7A_10_0to101.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part60/2QMMWP1ZG7A_10_0to101.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2QMMWP1ZG7A_10_0to101.mp4	The video shows a man in a kitchen preparing food. He is wearing a striped shirt and is standing at a counter. On the counter, there is a blender, a bottle of oil, and a bowl. The man is using a spoon to scoop food from the bowl into the blender. The kitchen has white tiles on the walls and a white stove. There are also some wine glasses on the counter. The man appears to be in the middle of cooking or preparing a meal. The style of the video is casual and homey, with a focus on the man's actions in the kitchen.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+wVwWwoJzxMM_3_91to225.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part128/wVwWwoJzxMM_3_91to225.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-wVwWwoJzxMM_3_91to225.mp4	In the video, two women are sitting on a bench, engaged in a conversation. The woman on the left has purple hair and is wearing a colorful, patterned top. The woman on the right has white hair and is wearing a black and white checkered top with a fur coat. They are both smiling and appear to be enjoying their conversation. The bench they are sitting on is white and is located in a park-like setting with green bushes in the background. The sky is clear and blue, suggesting it is a sunny day. The overall style of the video is casual and friendly, capturing a moment of connection between the two women.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+moiZ0C0vYvs_99_0to111.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part121/moiZ0C0vYvs_99_0to111.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-moiZ0C0vYvs_99_0to111.mp4	The video shows a collection of fish in a tank, with a focus on the vibrant colors and textures of the fish. The fish are arranged in a way that showcases their variety, with some fish appearing to be in motion, swimming through the water. The tank is filled with water, and there are some plastic bags floating on the surface, possibly containing more fish or other items. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on capturing the natural beauty of the fish and their environment. The lighting in the tank is bright, highlighting the colors of the fish and creating a lively atmosphere. The video does not contain any text or other elements that would suggest a specific narrative or theme.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gaKBchkDayw_14_87to254.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part128/gaKBchkDayw_14_87to254.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gaKBchkDayw_14_87to254.mp4	The video shows a man in a restaurant, wearing glasses and a hat, sitting at a table. He is gesturing with his right hand, possibly in the middle of a conversation or explanation. The restaurant has a modern and cozy atmosphere, with warm lighting and wooden furniture. The man is wearing a dark jacket and a white shirt, and he appears to be in his middle years. The camera angle is slightly above the man, capturing his face and upper body. The background is blurred, but it suggests a spacious and well-lit interior. The man's expression is serious, and he seems to be focused on the person he is speaking to.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0I0Mc301O94_50_101to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part35/0I0Mc301O94_50_101to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0I0Mc301O94_50_101to229.mp4	The video features a man with a beard and a tattoo on his arm, wearing a maroon jacket and a grey beanie. He is standing in a garage with a white car that has blue stripes on the hood. The car appears to be in the process of being repaired or modified. The man is looking directly at the camera, suggesting that he is speaking or about to speak. The garage has a concrete floor and a white wall in the background. The lighting in the garage is bright, indicating that it is daytime. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the man and the car.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8cNRkvxKiaw_49_0to125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/8cNRkvxKiaw_49_0to125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8cNRkvxKiaw_49_0to125.mp4	The video captures the close-up view of a steering wheel in a car, showcasing its design and texture. The steering wheel is black with a stitched pattern, giving it a luxurious feel. The camera angle is from the driver's perspective, focusing on the wheel and the dashboard in the background. The dashboard is blurred, drawing attention to the steering wheel. The video is a still image, with no movement or action. The style of the video is minimalist, focusing on the details of the steering wheel and the car's interior.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+OGWy7jvZg1I_39_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part105/OGWy7jvZg1I_39_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-OGWy7jvZg1I_39_0to149.mp4	The video features a woman standing in a kitchen, preparing a meal. She is wearing a black dress and has blonde hair. The kitchen is well-equipped with a refrigerator, oven, and various cooking utensils. On the counter, there are bowls and a cutting board. The woman appears to be in the process of preparing a meal, possibly using the ingredients from the refrigerator and the items on the counter. The overall style of the video is casual and homey, capturing a moment of everyday life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+psnx9an3lOA_16_154to286.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part125/psnx9an3lOA_16_154to286.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-psnx9an3lOA_16_154to286.mp4	The video is a time-lapse of a car's interior, showcasing the design and features of the vehicle. The car's interior is sleek and modern, with a focus on comfort and luxury. The seats are upholstered in a high-quality material, and the dashboard is adorned with a touch screen display. The car's interior is well-lit, with ambient lighting that highlights the car's design and features. The car's interior is spacious, with ample legroom and headroom. The car's interior is well-organized, with a variety of storage compartments and cup holders. The car's interior is clean and well-maintained, with no visible signs of wear or damage. The car's interior is a testament to the car's high-quality construction and attention to detail.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+jb8rnpFgfCU_29_17to193.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part147/jb8rnpFgfCU_29_17to193.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-jb8rnpFgfCU_29_17to193.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a meal being enjoyed. The main focus is a green plate filled with a variety of food items. There are several pieces of meat, each with a different texture and color, suggesting a mix of flavors and cooking methods. Accompanying the meat are several balls of rice, their white color contrasting with the green of the plate. A silver fork is seen in the foreground, indicating that the meal is being eaten. The background is blurred, drawing attention back to the plate of food. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the food and the act of eating.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KYFNKlp9wks_13_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part75/KYFNKlp9wks_13_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KYFNKlp9wks_13_0to108.mp4	The video captures a large black lizard with yellow spots, possibly a monitor lizard, as it moves through a lush green forest. The lizard is seen climbing a tree, its long tail and powerful limbs gripping the branches. The forest is dense with green foliage, and the lizard's dark color contrasts sharply with the surrounding greenery. The lizard's movements are slow and deliberate, suggesting a careful and methodical approach to its surroundings. The video is a close-up shot, focusing on the lizard and its immediate environment, and the camera follows the lizard as it ascends the tree. The overall style of the video is naturalistic, capturing the lizard in its natural habitat and showcasing its unique features and behavior.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8hyruCwfwos_0_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part71/8hyruCwfwos_0_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8hyruCwfwos_0_0to147.mp4	The video features a bald man wearing glasses and a purple shirt, who appears to be speaking or presenting. He is positioned in the foreground, with a blurred background showing a room with other people and chairs. The style of the video suggests it might be a professional or formal setting, possibly a conference or meeting. The man is likely the main subject of the video, as he is the most prominently featured individual. The overall tone of the video seems to be serious and focused, with the man's expression and posture indicating that he is engaged in a discussion or presentation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KcNvc_p5prU_0_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/KcNvc_p5prU_0_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KcNvc_p5prU_0_0to135.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a car's engine compartment, captured in three frames. The style of the video is a straightforward, unembellished documentation of the car's engine components. The engine is a complex assembly of various parts, including the air intake system, the fuel system, the cooling system, and the engine block. The colors of the engine components are predominantly metallic, with some black and gray hues. The engine appears to be well-maintained and clean. The video does not contain any text or additional graphics. The focus is solely on the car's engine, providing a detailed view of its internal components.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+TYobg7tLqj8_4_0to160.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part85/TYobg7tLqj8_4_0to160.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-TYobg7tLqj8_4_0to160.mp4	The video captures a serene and picturesque landscape, showcasing the beauty of nature. The scene begins with a close-up of a lush green hillside, bathed in sunlight. The sun's rays create a warm glow, highlighting the vibrant green of the grass. As the camera pans out, the viewer is treated to a breathtaking view of a valley nestled between majestic mountains. The mountains, blanketed in a layer of snow, stand tall against the clear blue sky. The valley below is dotted with trees and buildings, adding a touch of civilization to the otherwise untouched natural landscape. The overall style of the video is one of tranquility and awe, capturing the viewer's attention with its stunning visuals and the grandeur of the natural world.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+K7lGnTEQ_tM_62_0to143.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part97/K7lGnTEQ_tM_62_0to143.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-K7lGnTEQ_tM_62_0to143.mp4	The video shows a car driving down a rural road. The car is a dark blue SUV, and it is moving from left to right. The road is surrounded by a field that appears to be recently plowed, with patches of brown earth visible. The sky is clear and blue, suggesting a sunny day. The car's shadow is visible on the road, indicating that the sun is shining from the left side of the frame. The overall style of the video is a straightforward, unembellished depiction of a car journey through a rural landscape.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+i_loSEzRUHw_6_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part176/i_loSEzRUHw_6_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-i_loSEzRUHw_6_0to120.mp4	The video shows a beige Toyota truck parked on a grassy area with a wooden fence in the background. The truck is facing the camera, and its headlights are on. The truck has a large grille with the Toyota logo in the center. The style of the video is a straightforward, real-life depiction of the vehicle, likely intended for promotional or sales purposes. The focus is on the truck, and the background is simple and uncluttered, allowing the viewer to clearly see the vehicle's design and features.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ncPAJxp1mOw_121_116to252.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part130/ncPAJxp1mOw_121_116to252.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ncPAJxp1mOw_121_116to252.mp4	The video captures the majestic Mount Rushmore, a renowned landmark in the United States. The camera pans across the four faces of the monument, each representing a significant figure in American history. The faces are carved into the side of a granite mountain, showcasing the impressive craftsmanship involved in their creation. The surrounding landscape is dotted with trees and rocks, adding to the natural beauty of the scene. The video is a testament to the grandeur of this iconic landmark, capturing its essence in a series of stunning shots.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HYjRuWdG0YU_17_0to209.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part56/HYjRuWdG0YU_17_0to209.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HYjRuWdG0YU_17_0to209.mp4	In the video, a doll with blonde hair and pink clothing is interacting with a toy egg. The egg is green and has a pink and white design on it. The doll is holding the egg and appears to be looking at it. The egg is also adorned with a necklace made of red and black beads. The doll and the egg are the main subjects of the video, and their actions suggest a playful and imaginative scenario. The style of the video is likely aimed at a younger audience, given the presence of the toy egg and the doll's colorful attire.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9dm5qpQyLI4_41_31to184.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part41/9dm5qpQyLI4_41_31to184.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9dm5qpQyLI4_41_31to184.mp4	In the video, a person wearing white gloves is seen preparing a unique pastry. The pastry is a combination of a croissant and a donut, with a filling of chocolate and nuts. The person is carefully placing the nuts on top of the pastry, ensuring that it is evenly distributed. The pastry is placed on a white surface, which contrasts with the golden-brown color of the croissant and the dark color of the chocolate filling. The person's white gloves stand out against the colorful pastry, emphasizing the care and attention being given to the preparation of the pastry. The video captures the process of creating this delicious and visually appealing pastry, from the initial preparation to the final presentation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+iXCcS2_Kfp8_5_0to107.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part134/iXCcS2_Kfp8_5_0to107.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-iXCcS2_Kfp8_5_0to107.mp4	"The video shows a gray Audi car in a garage. The car is parked and stationary. The car has a license plate that reads ""LP ML 87"". The car has a sleek design with a shiny exterior. The garage has a white floor and a white wall. There is a sign in the background that reads ""Profis"". The car is the main focus of the video, and it is shown from a rear view. The video is a still image, and there is no movement or action. The style of the video is straightforward and simple, focusing on the car and its details."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+eMAgdmA4Iw4_49_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part126/eMAgdmA4Iw4_49_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-eMAgdmA4Iw4_49_0to150.mp4	The video is a still image of a woman in a blue dress with a necklace and earrings, standing in a room with two lamps and a statue in the background. The woman is looking directly at the camera with a serious expression. The style of the image is realistic and it appears to be a scene from a movie or television show. The woman is the main focus of the image, and the room setting suggests a formal or elegant atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BIK1mK2yBiU_12_0to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part44/BIK1mK2yBiU_12_0to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BIK1mK2yBiU_12_0to187.mp4	The video features a man standing in front of a large sign with the number 2015 on it. He is dressed in a purple jacket and a green and purple striped tie. The man appears to be speaking or gesturing with his hands, suggesting that he might be giving a speech or presentation. The setting appears to be outdoors, with a green fence and trees in the background. The style of the video is straightforward and seems to be focused on the man and his message, rather than the surrounding environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XAZwgE0C71o_20_0to105.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part101/XAZwgE0C71o_20_0to105.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XAZwgE0C71o_20_0to105.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a car's wheel and suspension system. The wheel is black with a multi-spoke design, and the suspension system is visible, featuring a yellow shock absorber with red and white branding. The car appears to be in motion, as suggested by the blurred background. The style of the video is dynamic and focused on the car's performance and design elements.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7macKDauH78_37_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part29/7macKDauH78_37_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7macKDauH78_37_0to132.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen in a kitchen, holding a piece of food in her hand. She is wearing a blue dress and an orange shawl. The kitchen is well-equipped with various utensils and appliances, including a stove, a sink, and a window. The woman appears to be enjoying her food, as she is seen smiling and savoring the taste. The overall atmosphere of the video is warm and inviting, with the woman's joyful expression and the cozy kitchen setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+dXjJQD2ScXA_24_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part123/dXjJQD2ScXA_24_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-dXjJQD2ScXA_24_0to133.mp4	The video shows a man in a radio studio, sitting in front of a microphone and wearing headphones. He is wearing a gray shirt with colorful patches on the front. The man is speaking into the microphone, and his expression suggests he is engaged in a conversation or interview. In the background, there is another person, partially visible, who appears to be operating the sound equipment. The radio studio is equipped with multiple monitors and sound equipment, indicating a professional setting. The style of the video is a straightforward, candid capture of a radio host at work, with no additional embellishments or artistic effects.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+36TELqLU0Nc_15_74to256.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part62/36TELqLU0Nc_15_74to256.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-36TELqLU0Nc_15_74to256.mp4	The video is a behind-the-scenes look at a car repair shop. In the first frame, a man in a blue and black jacket is standing at a workbench, holding a tool and examining it. He appears to be in the middle of a repair or maintenance task. In the second frame, another man in a black and orange striped shirt is standing next to him, observing the work. He seems to be interested in the process or offering advice. In the third frame, the man in the blue and black jacket is still at the workbench, but now he is holding a different tool. The workbench is cluttered with various tools and parts, indicating that they are in the middle of a complex repair or maintenance task. The background of the video shows a typical car repair shop, with red walls and shelves filled with tools and parts. The style of the video is candid and informal, capturing the everyday work of the mechanics in their natural environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-hh_AmAsifo_34_0to125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/-hh_AmAsifo_34_0to125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--hh_AmAsifo_34_0to125.mp4	In the video, two young men are seen enjoying a snack together. The first man, wearing a green sweater with a festive pattern, is seen licking his lips in anticipation. The second man, wearing a red shirt, is holding a piece of food in his hand, ready to take a bite. They are both standing in front of a store, which is filled with various items. The store's interior is brightly lit, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere. The men seem to be having a good time, enjoying their snack and the surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+PniBMv968ko_8_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part98/PniBMv968ko_8_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-PniBMv968ko_8_0to141.mp4	In the video, a man in a white shirt is seen at a counter in a restaurant, engaging in a conversation with another man in a blue shirt. The man in the white shirt is holding a menu, suggesting that he is either ordering or deciding on his meal. The counter is adorned with various items, including a plate of food, a cup, and a bottle, indicating that the restaurant serves a variety of dishes and beverages. The setting appears to be a casual dining establishment, with a warm and inviting atmosphere. The interaction between the two men suggests a friendly and welcoming environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+680kqZ0PDfQ_52_25to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part50/680kqZ0PDfQ_52_25to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-680kqZ0PDfQ_52_25to147.mp4	In the video, a man is seen sitting in a chair, holding a white plate in his hands. He is wearing a black and white patterned shirt and jeans. The man appears to be in a room with a wooden door and a window with curtains. The room has a warm and inviting atmosphere. The man seems to be in a relaxed state, possibly enjoying a meal or a snack. The video captures a simple yet intimate moment in the man's life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HIkYF9tJGWA_4_436to562.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part59/HIkYF9tJGWA_4_436to562.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HIkYF9tJGWA_4_436to562.mp4	The video shows a person's hand gently holding a small, round cluster of red flowers with white centers. The flowers are delicate and appear to be freshly picked, with each petal exhibiting a vibrant red hue. The person's hand is visible, with the fingers gently curled around the base of the flower cluster, providing support and protection. The background is blurred, but it seems to be an indoor setting with a hint of greenery, possibly a potted plant or a garden. The style of the video is simple and focused, with a close-up shot that emphasizes the beauty and detail of the flowers. The lighting is soft and natural, highlighting the colors and textures of the flowers without creating harsh shadows. The overall mood of the video is serene and peaceful, capturing a quiet moment of appreciation for nature's beauty.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Y9gvBajCaZ4_0_0to171.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part116/Y9gvBajCaZ4_0_0to171.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Y9gvBajCaZ4_0_0to171.mp4	The video shows a meal being prepared and served. In the first frame, a white plate is placed on a table with a red napkin and silverware. The plate is empty. In the second frame, a salad is being prepared on the plate. The salad consists of greens, apples, and nuts. In the third frame, a piece of fish is being placed on the plate next to the salad. The fish is topped with a sauce. The table setting includes a glass of honey and a wooden spoon. The style of the video is a close-up shot of the food being prepared and served, focusing on the textures and colors of the ingredients.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HAHhYh0sIEo_7_65to212.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part48/HAHhYh0sIEo_7_65to212.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HAHhYh0sIEo_7_65to212.mp4	The video is a time-lapse of a man's workspace, showcasing his passion for technology and gaming. The first frame shows a clean, white desk with a computer monitor displaying a racing game. The second frame shows the desk cluttered with various tech gadgets, including a keyboard, mouse, and headphones. The third frame shows the desk back to its clean state, with the racing game still displayed on the monitor. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward time-lapse, capturing the transformation of the workspace from organized to cluttered and back to organized. The focus is on the desk and the tech gadgets, with no people or other objects in the frame. The video does not include any text or additional elements.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+EI7ATIcXZLA_282_0to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part63/EI7ATIcXZLA_282_0to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-EI7ATIcXZLA_282_0to165.mp4	In the video, a woman in a white dress is seen interacting with a kangaroo in a grassy field. The woman is bending down to pet the kangaroo, which is standing on its hind legs. The kangaroo appears to be comfortable with the woman's touch, indicating a friendly interaction. The field is lush and green, providing a natural and serene backdrop for the scene. The woman's white dress contrasts with the greenery, drawing attention to her and the kangaroo. The overall style of the video is calm and peaceful, capturing a moment of connection between humans and wildlife.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-TYdiRY91Y0_10_21to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/-TYdiRY91Y0_10_21to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--TYdiRY91Y0_10_21to158.mp4	The video shows a black pickup truck driving down a road. The truck is sleek and modern, with a shiny exterior that reflects the surrounding environment. The road is lined with trees, creating a natural backdrop for the vehicle. The truck is moving at a steady pace, suggesting a calm and peaceful journey. The overall style of the video is realistic, capturing the everyday experience of driving on a road. The focus is on the truck and its movement, with the surrounding environment serving as a complementary element.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+1g5nzRINaPQ_45_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part61/1g5nzRINaPQ_45_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-1g5nzRINaPQ_45_0to142.mp4	The video is a tutorial on how to make a skateboard. The man in the video is standing in a workshop filled with various tools and equipment. He is holding a skateboard and a piece of wood, demonstrating the process of making a skateboard. The workshop is well-equipped with a workbench and various tools, including drills and saws. The man is wearing a black t-shirt and a beard, and he appears to be focused on his task. The video is likely to be informative and engaging, providing viewers with step-by-step instructions on how to make a skateboard.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+96wxZ_Bw7wU_15_100to258.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part49/96wxZ_Bw7wU_15_100to258.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-96wxZ_Bw7wU_15_100to258.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in a football game. The main focus is on a player in a black and gold uniform, who is in possession of the football. He is running towards the right side of the frame, with his teammates in pursuit. The player's uniform is clearly visible, with the number 56 prominently displayed. The teammates are dressed in similar uniforms, indicating they are part of the same team. The background is filled with the blurred figures of other players, suggesting a crowded and energetic game. The style of the video is action-packed and fast-paced, capturing the intensity and excitement of the sport.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7s_pMavHsPY_3_0to116.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part29/7s_pMavHsPY_3_0to116.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7s_pMavHsPY_3_0to116.mp4	The video captures a baby's journey from being awake to falling asleep in a white baby swing. The baby, dressed in a pink and white onesie adorned with fruit patterns, starts off by looking directly at the camera with a curious expression. As the video progresses, the baby's eyes begin to close, indicating that they are getting sleepy. The baby's peaceful transition from alertness to sleep is the main focus of the video. The simplicity of the scene, with the baby being the only subject, emphasizes the innocence and tranquility of the moment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+xnSkhqZdFsI_2_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part158/xnSkhqZdFsI_2_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-xnSkhqZdFsI_2_0to154.mp4	The video shows a glass of milk being poured from a measuring cup. The milk is white and frothy, and it flows smoothly from the measuring cup into the glass. The glass is clear and has a handle, and it's placed on a countertop. The measuring cup is also clear and has red markings on it. The background of the video is a kitchen, with a refrigerator and a sink visible. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the action of pouring milk into a glass.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+AqvPflrQtUQ_24_75to269.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/AqvPflrQtUQ_24_75to269.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-AqvPflrQtUQ_24_75to269.mp4	In the video, a brown bear is seen in a kitchen setting, interacting with various objects. The bear is standing on its hind legs, holding a pink chair with its paws. It appears to be looking at a pink mirror, which is placed on a table. The table also holds a variety of fruits, including apples, oranges, and bananas. The bear seems to be curious about its reflection in the mirror, possibly trying to understand its own image. The kitchen setting suggests a domestic environment, and the bear's actions indicate a playful or exploratory nature. The overall style of the video is cartoonish, with vibrant colors and exaggerated features that give it a whimsical and fun atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+MFrLcRhMKnE_10_29to218.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part82/MFrLcRhMKnE_10_29to218.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-MFrLcRhMKnE_10_29to218.mp4	The video is a drone shot of a lush green valley nestled between two majestic mountains. The valley is teeming with life, with a winding road cutting through the verdant landscape, leading the viewer's eye deeper into the valley. The mountains rise majestically in the background, their peaks shrouded in a light mist that adds a sense of mystery to the scene. The sky above is a clear blue, dotted with fluffy white clouds that add depth to the image. The overall style of the video is serene and tranquil, capturing the beauty of nature in all its glory.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+__dknoIF2W8_18_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part86/__dknoIF2W8_18_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-__dknoIF2W8_18_0to103.mp4	The video is a promotional advertisement for a Hyundai car, showcasing its design and features. The car is a modern SUV with a sleek, aerodynamic body and a prominent front grille with the Hyundai logo. The vehicle is equipped with LED headlights and fog lights, and it has a distinctive front bumper with a black grille and air intakes. The car is parked on a paved surface, and the background features a clear sky and a blurred landscape, suggesting a serene and open environment. The video is likely to be a professional production with high-quality photography and a focus on the car's design and appeal.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+dX4T9jpOk2I_0_0to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part156/dX4T9jpOk2I_0_0to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-dX4T9jpOk2I_0_0to187.mp4	The video is a 3D animated depiction of a professional wrestling match. The scene takes place in a large, brightly lit arena with a crowd of spectators in the background. Two male wrestlers are the main focus of the video. The first wrestler has long, blonde hair and is wearing a colorful, multi-colored outfit with a headband. The second wrestler has short, brown hair and is wearing a black singlet with a black armband. Both wrestlers are standing in the ring, facing each other, and appear to be in a confrontational stance. The style of the video is realistic with attention to detail in the characters' appearances and the environment. The animation is smooth and the lighting is well-executed, creating a sense of depth and realism.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4kM01uriBEQ_21_103to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part48/4kM01uriBEQ_21_103to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4kM01uriBEQ_21_103to229.mp4	The video shows a hand holding a small toy doll with blue hair, which is placed in front of a collection of other colorful toy dolls with various hairstyles and outfits. The dolls are arranged on a white surface against a blue background. The style of the video is casual and playful, with a focus on the toy dolls and the hand holding the small doll. The video captures the viewer's attention by showcasing the variety of the dolls and the hand's interaction with the toy.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+cNvSFGZHzuA_97_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part91/cNvSFGZHzuA_97_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-cNvSFGZHzuA_97_0to190.mp4	The video captures a bee pollinating a white flower. The bee, with its yellow and black body, is seen entering the flower's center, where it collects nectar. The flower, with its six petals, is in full bloom, providing a vibrant contrast to the bee's colors. The background is a lush green, filled with other flowers and leaves, creating a serene and natural setting. The video is a close-up shot, focusing on the bee and the flower, allowing the viewer to appreciate the intricate details of the bee's actions and the flower's beauty. The overall style of the video is a slow-motion capture, emphasizing the bee's movements and the delicate process of pollination.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9ebYlay7WkE_98_0to153.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part41/9ebYlay7WkE_98_0to153.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9ebYlay7WkE_98_0to153.mp4	The video is a vibrant and lively depiction of a theme park attraction. The scene is set in a fantastical environment, featuring a wooden house nestled amidst towering red rock formations. A waterfall cascades down the rocks, adding a sense of adventure and excitement to the scene. The house is surrounded by lush greenery, creating a stark contrast with the red rocks.  As the video progresses, we see a group of people entering the house, their faces filled with anticipation and wonder. The house itself is a charming structure, with a thatched roof and a rustic charm that blends seamlessly with the natural surroundings.  The final frame of the video captures the group of people exiting the house, their faces glowing with excitement and joy. The vibrant colors and dynamic action in the video create a sense of movement and energy, making it a captivating and engaging visual experience.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+M1YcQ4i13sk_158_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part73/M1YcQ4i13sk_158_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-M1YcQ4i13sk_158_0to103.mp4	The video captures the growth of a plant from a small sprout to a fully bloomed flower. The plant starts as a small sprout with a few green leaves, then it grows into a stem with more leaves and buds. As the plant continues to grow, the buds open into small purple flowers. The plant is set against a backdrop of lush green foliage, creating a vibrant and lively scene. The video is a time-lapse, showing the plant's growth over time. The style of the video is naturalistic, focusing on the plant's growth and the surrounding environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8h3ZhSizWzo_11_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/8h3ZhSizWzo_11_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8h3ZhSizWzo_11_0to157.mp4	The video shows two men in suits sitting at a table, engaged in a conversation. The man on the left is gesturing with his hands, indicating that he is speaking. The man on the right is listening attentively, with his hands clasped together on the table. They are in a room with a large window that offers a view of a palm tree-lined street outside. The room is well-lit, and the men are dressed in formal attire, suggesting a professional setting. The overall style of the video is a straightforward interview or discussion, with the focus on the interaction between the two men.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+MGsdr221vhk_22_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part92/MGsdr221vhk_22_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-MGsdr221vhk_22_0to136.mp4	The video shows a doll with blonde hair and green eyes, wearing a white and purple top. The doll is holding a brown cardboard box. The doll is positioned in front of a shelf with various items, including shoes and a red object. The doll appears to be looking at the camera, and the overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the doll and the box.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Qc77YYOsikc_17_71to228.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part106/Qc77YYOsikc_17_71to228.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Qc77YYOsikc_17_71to228.mp4	The video features a man in a suit and tie, sitting in front of a colorful background with a pattern of blue and yellow circles. He is wearing glasses and appears to be speaking or listening intently. The style of the video suggests it could be a news segment or an interview, with the man possibly being a news anchor or a guest expert. The focus is on the man, and the background is designed to be visually appealing without distracting from the subject. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the man's features and the colors of his suit and tie.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+hDzNq0B3oKg_44_16to186.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part130/hDzNq0B3oKg_44_16to186.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-hDzNq0B3oKg_44_16to186.mp4	In the video, a group of people are gathered in an outdoor setting, possibly a park or a picnic area, with trees and greenery in the background. They are seated on a large blanket spread out on the ground, enjoying a meal together. The individuals are wearing colorful hats and scarves, suggesting that it might be a cool day or they are protecting themselves from the sun. They are eating from bowls and plates, and some are using spoons to eat. The atmosphere appears to be casual and relaxed, with everyone engaged in conversation and enjoying their time together. The video captures a moment of shared enjoyment and camaraderie among friends or family.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7x1G0U01rPk_53_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/7x1G0U01rPk_53_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7x1G0U01rPk_53_0to132.mp4	The video shows a man in a grey hoodie standing in a kitchen. He has short brown hair and is looking directly at the camera with a slight smile. The kitchen is well-lit and features white cabinets, a stainless steel oven, and a microwave. The man appears to be in a good mood and is likely engaging in a casual conversation or recording a video. The style of the video is informal and personal, suggesting it might be a vlog or a casual social media post.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rIv9rIL31i8_15_0to164.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part141/rIv9rIL31i8_15_0to164.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rIv9rIL31i8_15_0to164.mp4	The video shows a well-organized computer desk setup. The desk is white and holds a black computer monitor, a black keyboard, a black mouse, and a pair of black headphones. The monitor displays a colorful graphic of a dragon. To the left of the monitor, there is a microphone on a stand. On the right side of the desk, there is a smartphone in a red case. The desk is situated in a room with a white wall. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward documentation of the desk setup, with no additional action or movement.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+A4uOo74xQO0_13_0to131.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part66/A4uOo74xQO0_13_0to131.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-A4uOo74xQO0_13_0to131.mp4	The video shows a man standing in front of a bar with a large selection of beer taps. He is wearing a blue and white striped shirt and appears to be speaking or tasting the beer. The bar has a variety of beer taps, each with a different label, indicating a wide selection of beers. The man is the main subject of the video, and the focus is on his interaction with the beer taps. The style of the video is casual and informal, capturing a moment in a social setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SprUqLGLgTI_13_0to180.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part99/SprUqLGLgTI_13_0to180.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SprUqLGLgTI_13_0to180.mp4	The video depicts a large, futuristic spacecraft in space. The spacecraft is cylindrical with a pointed front and a large, circular engine at the back. It has multiple windows and antennas on its surface. The spacecraft is shown in three different positions: first, it is shown from a side angle, then from a front angle, and finally from a top angle. The background of the video is a vast expanse of space with stars and planets visible. The style of the video is realistic with a focus on the spacecraft, suggesting it could be a scene from a science fiction movie or a concept for a future space exploration mission.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+A8MIv1ILSEc_7_72to287.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part66/A8MIv1ILSEc_7_72to287.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-A8MIv1ILSEc_7_72to287.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a pizza being prepared. A pink plastic bottle is being used to pour a red sauce onto the pizza dough. The sauce is being spread evenly across the dough, which is placed on a blue plate. The bottle is held by a hand, which is visible in the frame. The sauce is being poured from the bottle onto the dough, creating a smooth layer of sauce on the pizza. The pizza dough is white and appears to be uncooked. The sauce is red and appears to be tomato-based. The blue plate is round and flat. The pink bottle is cylindrical and has a nozzle at the top. The hand holding the bottle is not visible in the frame. The video is a time-lapse of the pizza preparation process, showing the sauce being poured and spread across the dough.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+JJkfN3P53T4_11_0to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part55/JJkfN3P53T4_11_0to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-JJkfN3P53T4_11_0to172.mp4	The video features a man in a hospital setting, likely a doctor or medical professional, speaking to the camera. He is dressed in a white shirt and appears to be in a room equipped with medical equipment, including monitors and a ventilator. The man is looking directly at the camera, suggesting he is addressing the viewer directly. The style of the video is informative, possibly educational or news-related, as it seems to be focused on medical or health-related topics. The man's expression is serious, indicating the importance of the information he is conveying. The background is filled with medical equipment, emphasizing the clinical environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+nuy5PIjuQ6k_211_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part133/nuy5PIjuQ6k_211_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-nuy5PIjuQ6k_211_0to118.mp4	The video features a 3D animated bear character in a domestic setting. The bear is standing upright and leaning over a wooden counter, peering into a drawer. The bear has a friendly expression, with a large, round head and a prominent snout. The bear's fur is a mix of brown and white, and it has a pair of small, round ears. The background shows a plaid shower curtain, suggesting that the scene takes place in a bathroom. The overall style of the video is cartoonish and whimsical, with a focus on the bear's expressive face and body language.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+RKYLodkTJAI_5_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part90/RKYLodkTJAI_5_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-RKYLodkTJAI_5_0to121.mp4	The video captures a scene at a race track. In the first frame, a blue and red sports car is parked on the track, ready for a race. The car is sleek and shiny, with a black roof and black rims that contrast with its vibrant colors. The track itself is wide and well-maintained, with clear markings and a smooth surface.  In the second frame, the car is in motion, speeding down the track. The driver is focused and determined, leaning into the turns and accelerating out of them. The car's tires squeal against the track, and the engine roars with power.  In the third frame, the car has crossed the finish line, and the driver is celebrating their victory. The car is still in motion, but the driver is now waving to the crowd and pumping their fist in triumph. The crowd is cheering and applauding, and the atmosphere is one of excitement and joy.  The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, with a focus on the car and its performance. The camera angles are varied, capturing the car from different perspectives and emphasizing its speed and power. The sound effects are also important, with the roar of the engine and the squeal of the tires adding to the overall excitement of the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4K7TvtO3deE_8_0to199.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part69/4K7TvtO3deE_8_0to199.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4K7TvtO3deE_8_0to199.mp4	The video is a news report featuring a man named Don Orseno, who is identified as the Executive Director/CEO of Metra. The setting appears to be a train yard, with multiple trains visible in the background. Don Orseno is standing in front of a microphone, surrounded by several microphones, indicating that he is addressing the media. He is dressed in a suit and tie, and his expression is serious. The style of the video is a standard news report, with a focus on the man speaking and the context of the train yard. The video likely includes an introduction, the man's speech, and possibly a conclusion or follow-up.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6SXMbhhrGqI_175_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part39/6SXMbhhrGqI_175_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6SXMbhhrGqI_175_0to137.mp4	The video is a 3D animated sequence featuring five children standing in a room with pink striped wallpaper. The children are dressed in colorful pajamas and are smiling at the camera. They are standing in front of a red couch and a toy box. The room has a playful and cozy atmosphere. The children appear to be in a good mood and are enjoying their time together. The animation style is colorful and cartoonish, with a focus on the children's expressions and the vibrant colors of their pajamas. The room is well-lit, with natural light coming in from the windows. The overall mood of the video is cheerful and light-hearted.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ewcbRRWtW9Y_7_0to101.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part122/ewcbRRWtW9Y_7_0to101.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ewcbRRWtW9Y_7_0to101.mp4	The video captures a thrilling moment of a mountain biker navigating a steep, rocky hillside. The cyclist, dressed in a black and blue jersey, black shorts, and a black helmet, is in the midst of a challenging descent. The bike, a sleek black model with yellow accents, is leaning to the left as the cyclist expertly maneuvers it down the hill. The terrain is rugged, with rocks and dirt under the tires, and the cyclist's body leans into the turn, demonstrating the intensity of the ride. The background is a blur of greenery, indicating the speed at which the cyclist is moving. The overall style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, capturing the adrenaline rush of mountain biking.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5nwG4hs5k3k_77_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part57/5nwG4hs5k3k_77_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5nwG4hs5k3k_77_0to121.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen carrying a baby in a sling. The woman is smiling and appears to be enjoying the moment. The baby is wearing a gray hat and is looking at the camera. The woman is wearing a black jacket and is also wearing a hat. The background is blurred, but it appears to be an outdoor setting. The video captures a heartwarming moment between a mother and her child.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+EXmGDT24wuM_113_34to189.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part52/EXmGDT24wuM_113_34to189.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-EXmGDT24wuM_113_34to189.mp4	In the video, a person wearing white gloves is seen preparing a dish in a kitchen. The dish appears to be a combination of sliced ham and donuts. The person is using a large metal bowl to mix the ingredients. The kitchen counter is visible in the background, with a tray of donuts placed on it. The person is carefully placing the ham slices into the bowl, ensuring that they are evenly distributed. The overall style of the video is a close-up shot, focusing on the person's hands and the ingredients being used. The video captures the process of food preparation in a detailed and engaging manner.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+hPKZzeLk7_k_33_82to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part174/hPKZzeLk7_k_33_82to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-hPKZzeLk7_k_33_82to239.mp4	The video shows a blue Volkswagen car parked in front of a building with a wooden wall and a metal staircase. The car is shiny and well-maintained, with a distinctive blue color that stands out against the more muted tones of the surroundings. The car is stationary, suggesting that it is either parked or waiting for its driver. The building behind the car has a rustic appearance, with wooden walls and a metal staircase leading up to a door. The overall style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the car and its immediate surroundings. The lighting is natural, suggesting that the video was taken during the day. The car is the main subject of the video, with the building serving as a backdrop. The video does not contain any text or additional elements, focusing solely on the car and its immediate environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BeUiQkCQBRI_9_0to193.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part35/BeUiQkCQBRI_9_0to193.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BeUiQkCQBRI_9_0to193.mp4	"The video shows a red Mercedes-Benz car driving down a road. The car is sleek and modern, with a shiny exterior that reflects the surrounding environment. The road is lined with trees and power lines, indicating a suburban or rural setting. The car's license plate reads ""BENZ-511"", suggesting it may be a special edition or a promotional vehicle. The car's headlights are on, illuminating the road ahead. The car's speed is indicated by the motion blur in the background, giving a sense of movement and dynamism. The overall style of the video is dynamic and modern, with a focus on the car's design and performance."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+c0DwNTjtRMA_34_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/c0DwNTjtRMA_34_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-c0DwNTjtRMA_34_0to149.mp4	In the video, two men are seen in a dark setting, possibly a parking lot or a street at night. The man on the left is wearing a black jacket and a baseball cap, while the man on the right is wearing a plaid shirt and glasses. They are both holding skateboards, which are covered in colorful stickers. The skateboards are held horizontally, and the men appear to be examining them closely. The overall style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the skateboards and the interaction between the two men.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gxD8sFipuPk_57_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part129/gxD8sFipuPk_57_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gxD8sFipuPk_57_0to190.mp4	"The image is a still from the animated movie ""Frozen"" (2013). It features two animated characters, Elsa and Anna, standing in a snowy landscape. Elsa, on the left, is wearing a blue dress with a snowflake pattern and has her arms outstretched. Anna, on the right, is wearing a pink dress with a fur-lined collar and is gesturing with her hands. The background shows a snowy mountain landscape with snowflakes falling. The image has a watermark in the bottom right corner that reads ""MSMOJI."""	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+e75055cbe12751c3174ac1f106a18f942283ba09770657e4da78c7e677dade38.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/e75055cbe12751c3174ac1f106a18f942283ba09770657e4da78c7e677dade38.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-e75055cbe12751c3174ac1f106a18f942283ba09770657e4da78c7e677dade38.mp4	The video captures a close-up view inside a clear glass sphere, which is filled with water and several spherical bubbles. The bubbles vary in size and are scattered throughout the sphere, some appearing larger due to their proximity to the camera lens. The lighting within the sphere creates a dynamic interplay of light and shadow, highlighting the texture and translucency of the bubbles. As the video progresses, a small, dark object, possibly a piece of debris or a small insect, enters the frame from above. This object moves slowly downward, interacting with the water and the bubbles. It appears to be floating or gently sinking, creating ripples and disturbances around it. The movement of the object is slow and deliberate, adding a sense of calm and curiosity to the scene. The overall atmosphere remains serene, with the focus on the subtle interactions between the object and its aquatic environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Qqhl_Llff7c_6_102to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part82/Qqhl_Llff7c_6_102to229.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Qqhl_Llff7c_6_102to229.mp4	"The video shows a gold-colored BMW car parked on a city street. The car is shiny and well-maintained, with a distinctive black grille and black rims. The car is parked in front of a building with a blue sign that reads ""CROQ N JAZZ"". In the background, there is a motorcycle parked on the street. The car is the main focus of the video, and it is shown in three different angles: a front view, a side view, and a rear view. The car is stationary, and there is no movement or action in the video. The style of the video is straightforward and documentary-like, with no additional effects or music. The video is likely intended to showcase the car's design and color."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KSSNyyk7sH4_14_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/KSSNyyk7sH4_14_0to135.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KSSNyyk7sH4_14_0to135.mp4	The video captures a man on a boat, navigating through a body of water. The man, dressed in a blue shirt and a red life jacket, is seen in three different positions: standing, sitting, and steering the boat. The boat, painted in shades of red and black, is equipped with a motor and a steering wheel. The man's journey takes him past a lush green hillside and a serene lake, creating a picturesque backdrop for his adventure. The video is a dynamic representation of a day out on the water, capturing the man's actions and the surrounding scenery in a series of frames.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HSBDjHxkOLk_16_60to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/HSBDjHxkOLk_16_60to187.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HSBDjHxkOLk_16_60to187.mp4	A young woman sits on the side of a road, sipping from a yellow and black water bottle. She is dressed in a black and white sweater, a red plaid shirt, and blue jeans. Her hair is long and blonde, and she wears white sneakers. The road is paved and appears to be in a suburban area. The woman seems relaxed and content, enjoying her drink. The scene is peaceful and everyday, capturing a simple moment in the woman's day.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+TBT7hK6grT8_30_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part73/TBT7hK6grT8_30_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-TBT7hK6grT8_30_0to120.mp4	The video shows a woman and three young girls engaged in a learning activity. The woman, who appears to be a teacher or mentor, is guiding the girls through a task. They are all focused on a piece of paper, which seems to be a worksheet or a project they are working on. The girls are actively participating, with one of them pointing at something on the paper. The setting appears to be a classroom or a learning environment, with a desk and chairs visible in the background. The overall style of the video is educational and collaborative, emphasizing the importance of learning and teamwork.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+tuwkgsQzvnI_9_0to159.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part138/tuwkgsQzvnI_9_0to159.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-tuwkgsQzvnI_9_0to159.mp4	The video captures the beauty of a rose garden in bloom. The roses, in shades of pink and white, are the main focus of the video. They are surrounded by lush green leaves, adding a vibrant contrast to the soft colors of the flowers. The roses are in full bloom, their petals unfurling to reveal the intricate details of their structure. The video is taken from a low angle, looking up at the roses, which adds a sense of grandeur to the scene. The roses are in the foreground, with the green leaves filling the background, creating a sense of depth and perspective. The video is a celebration of nature's beauty, capturing the fleeting beauty of a rose garden in bloom.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ObNDBy_eGhY_19_0to183.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part117/ObNDBy_eGhY_19_0to183.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ObNDBy_eGhY_19_0to183.mp4	In the video, a young girl with long brown hair is seen enjoying a slice of chocolate cake. She is seated on a wicker chair, holding a fork in her hand. The cake is placed on a white plate, and she is taking a bite of it. The scene is set in a brightly lit room, with a window visible in the background. The girl appears to be enjoying her dessert, and the overall atmosphere of the video is cheerful and relaxed.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0e5ed8d5c78987dad39b5212687b028ca2761b35681ca6de18a01d64dc53261e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/0e5ed8d5c78987dad39b5212687b028ca2761b35681ca6de18a01d64dc53261e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0e5ed8d5c78987dad39b5212687b028ca2761b35681ca6de18a01d64dc53261e.mp4	The video captures a close-up scene set outdoors, likely on a table or flat surface. The primary focus is on a piece of white cloth or paper that is being ignited by a small flame. The cloth is positioned on top of a rectangular stone block, which serves as a makeshift platform for the burning material. The flame is steady and bright, casting a warm glow over the surrounding area.In the background, there is a blurred view of greenery, suggesting the setting might be near a forest or garden. A wooden brush with metal bristles lies on the table to the right of the burning cloth, indicating some form of outdoor activity or preparation. To the far right, part of a decorative plate with a bird design is visible, adding a touch of color and pattern to the otherwise neutral tones of the scene.As the video progresses, the flame continues to burn steadily, consuming the white cloth. The smoke rises gently from the burning material, creating a dynamic contrast against the bright flame. The camera	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+GNK6N0GIgW0_290_0to111.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part51/GNK6N0GIgW0_290_0to111.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-GNK6N0GIgW0_290_0to111.mp4	The video shows a shirtless man flexing his muscles on a beach. He is wearing a necklace and has a beard. The beach is sandy and there are a few people and umbrellas in the background. The sky is clear and blue. The man's muscles are well-defined and he appears to be in good shape. The video is likely a fitness or lifestyle video, showcasing the man's physique and the beach setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+uRf6oF39-IA_43_0to139.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part149/uRf6oF39-IA_43_0to139.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-uRf6oF39-IA_43_0to139.mp4	The video shows a silver Jeep Wrangler driving up a sandy hill. The Jeep is equipped with a roof rack and off-road lights. The vehicle's tires are large and appear to be designed for off-road use. The Jeep is in motion, and the camera angle suggests that the viewer is following the vehicle from behind. The background features a clear blue sky and a rocky hillside. The style of the video is realistic and appears to be a real-life scenario rather than a staged or animated production. The focus is on the Jeep and its off-road capabilities, with the surrounding environment serving as a backdrop to the vehicle's performance.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Hg1MXPqyoT8_43_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/Hg1MXPqyoT8_43_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Hg1MXPqyoT8_43_0to157.mp4	The video features a white robot with large, expressive eyes and a small mouth, standing in a store with various items on display. The robot is holding a tablet with a pink background and images of money on it. The robot appears to be in motion, possibly walking through the store. The style of the video is a blend of real-life footage and animation, with the robot being the central focus. The store has a variety of items, including books and clothing, and the lighting is bright and even. The robot's movements are smooth and fluid, suggesting a high level of sophistication in its design. The overall impression is that of a friendly, helpful robot assisting customers in a retail setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3HJh_q3Pw34_14_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part62/3HJh_q3Pw34_14_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3HJh_q3Pw34_14_0to147.mp4	The video features a man dressed in a military uniform, complete with a helmet and goggles, standing in front of a military vehicle. The vehicle is parked in a snowy forest, with trees and snow-covered ground visible in the background. The man appears to be in a relaxed stance, possibly posing for the camera. The overall style of the video suggests a documentary or news report, with a focus on the man and the military vehicle. The lighting and composition of the shots emphasize the man and the vehicle, while the snowy forest provides a contrasting backdrop.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XXvZvB1Qhgg_13_358to536.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part88/XXvZvB1Qhgg_13_358to536.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XXvZvB1Qhgg_13_358to536.mp4	"The video shows two men in a car, with the camera capturing the scene from the perspective of the passenger seat. The man in the driver's seat is focused on the road, while the man in the passenger seat is looking at a brown paper bag. The man in the passenger seat is wearing a yellow and black t-shirt with the word ""OAR"" on it, and the man in the driver's seat is wearing a gray t-shirt with a yellow logo on the left chest. The car is moving, and the men appear to be in a casual conversation. The style of the video is a simple, everyday scene captured from a personal perspective."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+UQuLtMwORlQ_43_0to169.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part77/UQuLtMwORlQ_43_0to169.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-UQuLtMwORlQ_43_0to169.mp4	The video shows a blue SUV parked in a grassy field with trees in the background. The car is stationary and appears to be in good condition. The style of the video is a straightforward, real-life depiction with no special effects or animation. The focus is on the car, and the background provides context for the location. The lighting suggests it is daytime.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8nQZshgio4A_113_21to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part71/8nQZshgio4A_113_21to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8nQZshgio4A_113_21to146.mp4	The video features a 3D animated character, a man dressed in a blue jacket and a yellow helmet with goggles. He is holding a red walkie-talkie in his right hand. The character is standing in a snowy landscape with mountains in the background. The style of the video is cartoonish and colorful, with a focus on the character and his interaction with the environment. The character appears to be in a cold, outdoor setting, possibly on a mountain or in a wintery landscape. The overall tone of the video is playful and adventurous.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+80_FOOYrdZo_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part39/80_FOOYrdZo_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-80_FOOYrdZo_0_0to136.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a plate of fried food, possibly crab cakes, with a focus on the texture and color of the food. The food is golden brown and appears crispy, with a slightly rough surface. The plate is white, which contrasts with the food, making it stand out. There are two small bowls of dipping sauces on the side of the plate. One bowl contains a red sauce, and the other contains a green sauce. The sauces are smooth and glossy, suggesting they are made from a creamy base. The sauces are placed on the plate in a way that they do not touch the food, indicating they are meant to be used as accompaniments. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the food and the sauces without any additional elements or distractions. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the details of the food and the sauces. The video does not contain any text or narration.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9rcQqWLUebU_19_0to198.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part51/9rcQqWLUebU_19_0to198.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9rcQqWLUebU_19_0to198.mp4	The video shows a small green figurine with a backpack, placed on a wooden surface. The figurine appears to be a toy or a decorative item, with a simple design and a cheerful expression. The backpack is attached to the figurine, suggesting that it might be a character on an adventure or a student. The wooden surface provides a natural and warm background, enhancing the colors of the figurine. The video is likely a short, casual clip, possibly taken with a smartphone or a digital camera, with a focus on the figurine and its details. The style of the video is straightforward and uncomplicated, with no additional elements or actions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+W503IxetzGs_42_0to168.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part94/W503IxetzGs_42_0to168.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-W503IxetzGs_42_0to168.mp4	The video shows a man in a purple shirt exercising on a treadmill in a gym. The gym is equipped with various exercise machines and weights. The man is wearing a black wristband, possibly for tracking his exercise. The gym appears to be well-lit and clean. The man seems to be focused on his workout, indicating that he is in the middle of his exercise routine. The video is likely a demonstration or review of the treadmill, showcasing its features and how it is used.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+c7I7n2muWO4_15_0to201.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part78/c7I7n2muWO4_15_0to201.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-c7I7n2muWO4_15_0to201.mp4	In the video, a woman stands confidently in front of a wire fence, her hands clasped together. She is dressed in a black jacket and a red hat, which adds a pop of color to her outfit. The fence behind her is made of wire and is slightly blurred, suggesting that the focus is on her. In the background, there are trees and a wooden structure, which adds to the rustic feel of the scene. The woman's stance and the surrounding environment suggest that she is in a rural or semi-rural setting. The video captures a moment of calm and stillness, with the woman as the central figure.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+cjFEkj8iZpA_33_60to226.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part82/cjFEkj8iZpA_33_60to226.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-cjFEkj8iZpA_33_60to226.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car, focusing on the dashboard and the steering wheel. The dashboard is made of wood and has a luxurious appearance. The steering wheel is black and has a leather texture. The car's radio is prominently displayed in the center of the dashboard. The radio has a digital display and a keypad for input. The car's interior is well-lit, with the dashboard and steering wheel being the main focus of the video. The style of the video is a close-up shot, focusing on the details of the car's interior.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+cDpKdmBAZG4_14_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part84/cDpKdmBAZG4_14_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-cDpKdmBAZG4_14_0to136.mp4	The video captures a basketball player in action. The player, dressed in a white jersey with blue and yellow accents, is seen holding a basketball in his left hand. He is in the midst of a game, as evidenced by the sweat on his face and the intensity in his eyes. The player's mouth is open, possibly in the middle of a shout or a breath, and his tongue is sticking out, adding to the intensity of the moment. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a basketball court, suggesting that the player is in the middle of a game. The video is a dynamic snapshot of a basketball player in action, capturing the intensity and focus required in the sport.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+G8rgNlqiqnA_7_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part49/G8rgNlqiqnA_7_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-G8rgNlqiqnA_7_0to108.mp4	The video shows a red SUV parked on a brick road. The car is shiny and well-maintained, with a sleek design and large wheels. The car is the main focus of the video, and it is shown from different angles, highlighting its design and features. The brick road provides a contrasting texture to the smooth surface of the car. The video is likely a promotional or review video for the SUV, showcasing its design and appeal. The style of the video is straightforward and clear, focusing on the car and its details without any additional elements or distractions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+IXtdf8jEjoI_16_0to194.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part70/IXtdf8jEjoI_16_0to194.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-IXtdf8jEjoI_16_0to194.mp4	In the video, a man in a white lab coat is seen in a laboratory setting. He is holding a clipboard and appears to be examining a patient lying on a table. The patient is wearing a hospital gown and has a medical device attached to their head. The man in the lab coat is looking at the patient with a concerned expression on his face. The laboratory setting includes various pieces of medical equipment and a desk with papers on it. The overall style of the video suggests a medical drama or thriller.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6khbvV0SUy0_67_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part68/6khbvV0SUy0_67_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6khbvV0SUy0_67_0to140.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a car's engine bay, focusing on the various components and wiring. The style of the video is informative, likely aimed at providing a detailed look at the car's engine components for educational or diagnostic purposes. The engine bay is filled with a complex network of wires, hoses, and mechanical parts, all of which are interconnected and arranged in a specific manner. The colors of the components vary, with red, black, and silver being the most prominent. The video captures the intricate details of the engine bay, allowing viewers to observe the layout and design of the car's engine system.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CTfFBFK2l3g_31_0to198.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/CTfFBFK2l3g_31_0to198.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CTfFBFK2l3g_31_0to198.mp4	"The video features a 3D animated character, a young girl with blonde hair and blue eyes. She is wearing a white tank top and is standing in a forested area. In the background, there is a purple banner with the word ""Elephant"" written on it. The girl is holding a lantern in her hand, which is lit. She appears to be surprised or shocked by something, as indicated by her facial expression. The overall style of the video is cartoonish and colorful, with a focus on the character and her surroundings."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6QsvXpZBpXc_37_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part70/6QsvXpZBpXc_37_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6QsvXpZBpXc_37_0to136.mp4	The video features a person with a colorful, vibrant face paint, which appears to be a mix of blues, pinks, yellows, and other colors. The person's eyes are closed, and they seem to be in a state of relaxation or enjoyment. Two musical notes are floating above their ears, suggesting that they are listening to music or perhaps even producing music themselves. The overall style of the video is artistic and creative, with a focus on the interplay between the colorful face paint and the musical notes, creating a sense of harmony and connection between the visual and auditory elements.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+MdbQrI9V-e4_5_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part95/MdbQrI9V-e4_5_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-MdbQrI9V-e4_5_0to106.mp4	The video shows a silver SUV parked next to a black charging station. The charging station has a digital display and a charging port. The car is connected to the charging station with a charging cable. The car is parked on a grassy area. The charging station is standing on a concrete base. The car is parked in a parking space. The charging station is connected to the car with a charging cable. The car is charging. The charging station is black. The car is silver. The car is parked. The charging station is connected to the car. The car is connected to the charging station. The car is charging. The charging station is black. The car is silver. The car is parked. The charging station is connected to the car. The car is connected to the charging station. The car is charging. The charging station is black. The car is silver. The car is parked. The charging station is connected to the car. The car is connected to the charging station. The car is charging. The charging station is black. The car is silver. The car is parked. The charging station is connected to the car. The car is connected to the charging station. The car is charging. The charging station is black. The car is silver. The car is parked. The charging station is connected to the car. The car is connected to the charging station. The car is charging. The charging station is black. The car is silver. The car is parked. The charging	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6q8WC2Lt4-o_27_21to220.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part47/6q8WC2Lt4-o_27_21to220.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6q8WC2Lt4-o_27_21to220.mp4	In the video, two men are sitting at a table in a room filled with musical instruments and memorabilia. The man on the left is wearing a blue shirt with a floral pattern, while the man on the right is wearing a black sweatshirt with a colorful graphic on it. They are both holding cups of coffee and bowls of food. The man on the right is pointing at the man on the left, who is holding a bag of Lay's potato chips. The room has a warm and inviting atmosphere, with a cozy and comfortable vibe. The men seem to be engaged in a friendly conversation, possibly discussing their food or the music in the room.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+K16H4pSpOmE_7_49to245.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part117/K16H4pSpOmE_7_49to245.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-K16H4pSpOmE_7_49to245.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a glass pitcher filled with a yellowish-brown liquid, possibly a sauce or a syrup. A silver spoon is being used to stir the contents of the pitcher, creating a swirling motion. The pitcher is placed on a wooden surface, which suggests a rustic or homey setting. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the action of stirring the liquid without any additional context or embellishments. The lighting is soft and natural, highlighting the texture of the liquid and the shine of the spoon. The video does not contain any text or additional elements, keeping the viewer's attention solely on the pitcher and the stirring action.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+TRpwqBUoo-o_40_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part93/TRpwqBUoo-o_40_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-TRpwqBUoo-o_40_0to142.mp4	The video is a digital artwork that depicts a surreal and futuristic landscape. It features a large, detailed moon in the foreground, with a smaller moon and a planet visible in the background. The moon is depicted with a greenish hue, suggesting a different atmosphere or vegetation. The landscape below is barren and rocky, with a few small hills or mountains. The sky is a deep blue with stars and nebulae, creating a sense of vastness and otherworldliness. The overall style of the video is highly detailed and realistic, with a focus on creating a sense of wonder and exploration.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+MARlKZRx9lk_42_20to212.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part82/MARlKZRx9lk_42_20to212.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-MARlKZRx9lk_42_20to212.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in a football game. The main focus is on a player from the New England Patriots, wearing a white jersey with the number 12. He is in the process of pointing towards the right side of the frame, possibly directing his teammates or strategizing the next play. His helmet is white with blue and red accents, matching the colors of his team.  In the background, there are other players, some of whom are wearing black jerseys, indicating they are from the opposing team. The field is a vibrant green, typical of a football stadium, and the stands are filled with spectators, adding to the atmosphere of the game.  The style of the video is a real-time capture of the game, with a focus on the player's action and the immediate surroundings. The camera angle is slightly elevated, providing a clear view of the player's gesture and the field. The lighting suggests it's an outdoor game, possibly during the day. The overall impression is of a high-energy, competitive sports event.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+1163036b63933e50624619533ae3f3775866816e7193b0a040ab0605e3d06640.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/1163036b63933e50624619533ae3f3775866816e7193b0a040ab0605e3d06640.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-1163036b63933e50624619533ae3f3775866816e7193b0a040ab0605e3d06640.mp4	The video showcases a small, rectangular glass aquarium placed on a wooden surface against a plain dark blue wall. Inside the aquarium, there is a clear plastic bottle with a white cap and a yellow nozzle, which appears to be a homemade water filter system. The bottle is partially submerged, with a tube extending from it into the water. The aquarium contains several artificial plants, including a tall green one and a smaller yellow one, providing a vibrant backdrop. Several small fish, primarily goldfish with orange and black patterns, swim gracefully around the tank. The fish move in various directions, occasionally interacting with each other or the plants. The overall scene remains static throughout the video, focusing on the tranquil movement of the fish and the gentle flow of water through the filter system. The video captures the serene environment of the aquarium, emphasizing the simplicity and functionality of the setup.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CFXfSBR5Q9w_6_49to247.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part55/CFXfSBR5Q9w_6_49to247.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CFXfSBR5Q9w_6_49to247.mp4	The video shows a red sports car parked on a driveway. The car is shiny and well-maintained, with a sleek design and a black interior. The car is parked in front of a house with a green lawn and a tree in the background. The car is stationary and there are no people or other vehicles in the frame. The style of the video is a straightforward, static shot with no movement or action. The focus is solely on the car, highlighting its design and color. The background is simple and uncluttered, allowing the car to be the main subject of the video.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+bIe3nvBo8g0_4_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part96/bIe3nvBo8g0_4_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-bIe3nvBo8g0_4_0to157.mp4	The video features a woman standing in an art gallery. She is wearing a red jacket and has short gray hair. The woman is speaking and appears to be engaged in a conversation. The art gallery has white walls and wooden floors, and there are several paintings and sculptures on display. The lighting in the gallery is bright, highlighting the artwork. The woman is the main subject of the video, and her position in the gallery suggests that she is either a visitor or an employee. The overall style of the video is informative, with the woman providing commentary on the artwork or the gallery itself.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7eX88lDAhZ8_23_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part45/7eX88lDAhZ8_23_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7eX88lDAhZ8_23_0to103.mp4	In the video, a woman with blonde hair is seen enjoying a meal in a kitchen setting. She is wearing a black top and is seated at a table. The table is adorned with a blue bowl filled with noodles, and she is using a fork to eat. The kitchen is well-equipped with a refrigerator and a sink visible in the background. The woman appears to be in a relaxed and comfortable environment, enjoying her meal. The video captures a simple yet intimate moment of daily life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WjKneIxybNc_37_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/WjKneIxybNc_37_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WjKneIxybNc_37_0to118.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a car's air vent, which is located on the side of the car door. The vent is circular in shape and has a black and yellow color scheme. The yellow ring around the vent adds a pop of color to the otherwise black vent. The vent is made of plastic and has a shiny finish. The car door appears to be made of leather, adding a touch of luxury to the scene. The vent is the main focus of the video, with no other objects or actions taking place. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing solely on the vent and its details.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+bnZaVRNBIFU_62_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part110/bnZaVRNBIFU_62_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-bnZaVRNBIFU_62_0to119.mp4	The video captures a delightful dining experience. The scene is set on a glass table, which adds a touch of elegance to the setting. The table is adorned with three plates of food, each offering a different culinary delight.  In the first frame, a plate of fresh salad is presented. The salad is a vibrant mix of greens, with a dollop of creamy dressing adding a rich contrast. The salad is garnished with a sprig of dill, adding a hint of freshness to the dish.  The second frame introduces a plate of fish, cooked to perfection. The fish is served with a side of mashed potatoes, their creamy texture complementing the flaky fish. A sprig of dill is also present on this plate, mirroring the garnish on the salad.  The third frame showcases a plate of sandwiches, each one meticulously prepared. The sandwiches are served with a side of pickles, their tangy flavor providing a delightful contrast to the hearty sandwiches. A sprig of dill is also present on this plate, maintaining the consistency in garnishing across all dishes.  Throughout the video, the focus remains on the food, with the glass table serving as a neutral backdrop that allows the colors and textures of the dishes to take center stage. The video is a testament to the art of plating, where every element on the plate is thoughtfully arranged to create a visually appealing and appetizing dish.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5FWB1cEzDmg_12_16to182.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/5FWB1cEzDmg_12_16to182.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5FWB1cEzDmg_12_16to182.mp4	The video features a man in a blue shirt, who appears to be in a professional setting. He is seated in a chair and is gesturing with his hands, suggesting that he is in the middle of a conversation or presentation. The man's expression is serious, indicating that the topic of discussion is likely important. The background is minimalistic, with a white wall and a door, which puts the focus on the man and his actions. The overall style of the video is straightforward and professional, with no additional elements or distractions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9J_9qg-kw0o_69_20to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part45/9J_9qg-kw0o_69_20to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9J_9qg-kw0o_69_20to147.mp4	The video captures a moment in a wrestling match. The main focus is a wrestler, who is shirtless and has a tattoo on his chest. He is holding a red championship belt, signifying his victory. His face is lit up with a smile, reflecting his joy and pride. In the background, there is a crowd of spectators, their faces a blur of anticipation and excitement. The wrestler is not alone; a referee is also present, overseeing the match and ensuring fair play. The atmosphere is electric, filled with the thrill of the sport and the cheers of the audience.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+NgRAr-1A7l0_13_0to128.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part185/NgRAr-1A7l0_13_0to128.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-NgRAr-1A7l0_13_0to128.mp4	"The video captures a basketball player in action, wearing a white and orange jersey with the word ""SUNS"" emblazoned across the front. The player is seen in three different frames, each showcasing a different moment of the game. In the first frame, the player is seen looking up, possibly tracking the ball's trajectory. In the second frame, the player is seen in a defensive stance, ready to react to the ball's movement. In the third frame, the player is seen looking down, possibly strategizing his next move. The player's jersey is clearly visible in all three frames, indicating his team affiliation. The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, capturing the intensity and excitement of a basketball game."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4GYegaKVHoo_46_0to181.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part37/4GYegaKVHoo_46_0to181.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4GYegaKVHoo_46_0to181.mp4	In the video, a woman with short black hair is seen working on a sewing project in a well-lit room. She is wearing a black shirt and a yellow measuring tape around her neck. The room is filled with various sewing supplies, including a sewing machine, scissors, and fabric. The woman is focused on her work, carefully measuring and cutting the fabric. The video captures the process of sewing, showcasing the woman's skill and attention to detail. The room's ambiance is calm and focused, with the sewing supplies neatly arranged around her. The video is likely to be a tutorial or a behind-the-scenes look at a sewing project.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-SORPY3ofe8_101_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/-SORPY3ofe8_101_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--SORPY3ofe8_101_0to136.mp4	The video captures a lively scene at a carnival, featuring a claw machine filled with a variety of stuffed animals. The claw machine, with its transparent glass walls, is filled to the brim with plush toys, including teddy bears and Mario characters. The stuffed animals are scattered throughout the machine, some piled high, while others are nestled among the colorful balls that fill the bottom of the machine. The balls, in a rainbow of colors, add a vibrant touch to the scene. The claw machine is situated in a bustling carnival setting, with the sounds of laughter and the smell of popcorn filling the air. The video is a snapshot of a fun-filled day at the carnival, capturing the excitement and anticipation of players trying their luck at the claw machine.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SFthbF46-Xw_19_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part88/SFthbF46-Xw_19_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SFthbF46-Xw_19_0to117.mp4	The video captures a scene at a car show, featuring three distinct vehicles parked side by side. The first vehicle is a classic blue pickup truck, its hood propped open to reveal the engine underneath. The second vehicle is a sleek white sports car, its shiny exterior reflecting the light. The third vehicle is a silver muscle car, its powerful design hinting at its speed and performance. The cars are parked in a parking lot, with trees and buildings visible in the background. The video is a montage of these three vehicles, showcasing their unique features and designs.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3Jd73ai__Yw_1_1022to1231.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part51/3Jd73ai__Yw_1_1022to1231.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3Jd73ai__Yw_1_1022to1231.mp4	The video features a man in a cap and sunglasses, standing in a yard with fallen leaves. He is wearing a tan hoodie and has a beard. The man is looking directly at the camera, and the background shows a fence and trees with autumn foliage. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the man and his immediate surroundings. The lighting suggests it is daytime.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ESHSLXKZWfo_15_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part60/ESHSLXKZWfo_15_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ESHSLXKZWfo_15_0to136.mp4	The video features a man standing in a field with a horse. The man is wearing a cap and a gray shirt. The horse is white and stands behind the man. The man appears to be speaking or gesturing towards the horse. The background of the video shows a fence and trees, suggesting a rural or farm setting. The style of the video is a straightforward, real-life depiction with no special effects or artistic filters. The focus is on the interaction between the man and the horse, with the natural environment serving as a backdrop.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Xy6WVuPDFd0_63_0to125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part74/Xy6WVuPDFd0_63_0to125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Xy6WVuPDFd0_63_0to125.mp4	The video features a young man sitting on a brown leather couch. He is wearing a gray t-shirt and has a slight smile on his face. The man appears to be relaxed and comfortable in his environment. The couch is large and plush, suggesting a cozy and inviting space. The man's casual attire and relaxed demeanor indicate that this could be a casual, informal setting. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the man and his immediate surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5lqJjvGpXbU_80_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part43/5lqJjvGpXbU_80_0to120.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5lqJjvGpXbU_80_0to120.mp4	The video shows a young man in a blue t-shirt, who appears to be in a living room. He is smiling and has his eyes closed, as if he is enjoying a moment of relaxation or laughter. The living room is well-lit and features a large window, a couch, and a refrigerator in the background. The man's expression and the casual setting suggest a light-hearted and comfortable atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+47p1yNLS19s_22_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part70/47p1yNLS19s_22_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-47p1yNLS19s_22_0to140.mp4	The video shows a close-up of three chocolate pies in black pie tins, each topped with a dollop of whipped cream. The pies are placed on a white surface, and there are coffee beans scattered around them. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward food presentation, with a focus on the texture and color of the pies and the contrast between the dark pies and the white whipped cream. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the smooth surface of the pies and the fluffy texture of the whipped cream. The video does not contain any text or additional elements, and the focus is solely on the pies and their presentation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Zd2LtxZIWQQ_8_0to180.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part94/Zd2LtxZIWQQ_8_0to180.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Zd2LtxZIWQQ_8_0to180.mp4	The video features a man standing in a grassy field with a blue tarp covering a structure behind him. He is wearing a white t-shirt, a baseball cap, and sunglasses. The man has a beard and is looking directly at the camera. The field is lush and green, and there are trees in the background. The man appears to be in a rural or agricultural setting. The style of the video is casual and candid, capturing a moment in the man's day.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+JwVDrRmyoXc_30_0to176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part94/JwVDrRmyoXc_30_0to176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-JwVDrRmyoXc_30_0to176.mp4	The video shows a young man in a blue shirt standing in a forested area. He is wearing a backpack and appears to be on a hike or outdoor adventure. The forest is lush and green, with tall trees and a variety of foliage. The man is looking directly at the camera, and his expression is neutral. The lighting in the video is natural, suggesting it was taken during the day. The style of the video is candid and informal, capturing a moment from the man's outdoor experience.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+a4cf3decd8e6d0412ff6a72862912ca6c0febdae62cdeb5daa28bfde07537b98.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/a4cf3decd8e6d0412ff6a72862912ca6c0febdae62cdeb5daa28bfde07537b98.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-a4cf3decd8e6d0412ff6a72862912ca6c0febdae62cdeb5daa28bfde07537b98.mp4	"The video begins with a close-up shot of a cluttered desk area. A red cable is prominently featured, running across the desk and connecting to various electronic devices. The camera pans to the right, revealing more of the workspace. On the desk, there is a computer monitor, a keyboard, and a mouse. To the right of the monitor, a black speaker stands upright. Behind the desk, a shelf holds several items, including a box labeled ""Dell"" and some other indistinct objects. The background includes a wall-mounted light switch and a partially visible door frame. The scene suggests a typical home office or study setup.As the camera continues to pan, it captures additional details of the workspace. A small, colorful object, possibly a toy or a piece of equipment, is seen on the left side of the desk. The camera movement provides a broader view of the room, showing more of the surrounding area, which appears to be a home office or study space. The overall environment"	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+d0c528ded05f91587ad9a21f8baa3dc9b13911dc5ab4f20a0b48acf3c3f7cb09.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/d0c528ded05f91587ad9a21f8baa3dc9b13911dc5ab4f20a0b48acf3c3f7cb09.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-d0c528ded05f91587ad9a21f8baa3dc9b13911dc5ab4f20a0b48acf3c3f7cb09.mp4	The video captures a serene scene of koi fish swimming gracefully in a clear pond. The water is shallow, allowing a view of the sandy bottom and aquatic plants growing along the edges. The koi fish, varying in colors from white with red spots to dark purple, glide smoothly through the water. The camera pans slowly across the pond, following the movement of the fish. As it moves, it reveals more of the underwater environment, including the vibrant green and brown aquatic plants swaying gently with the current. The fish continue their leisurely swim, occasionally interacting with each other or the plants. The overall atmosphere is tranquil, highlighting the natural beauty of the pond and its inhabitants.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+EEgSzMET_FI_9_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part39/EEgSzMET_FI_9_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-EEgSzMET_FI_9_0to132.mp4	The video features a woman with a colorful makeup look, including vibrant eyeshadow and lipstick. She is wearing a headscarf and a gray jacket. The background consists of a shelf with various items, including books and boxes. The woman appears to be speaking or making a statement, as she is looking directly at the camera with her mouth slightly open. The overall style of the video is casual and personal, possibly a makeup tutorial or a personal vlog.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7GcYm017zIM_30_0to185.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part45/7GcYm017zIM_30_0to185.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7GcYm017zIM_30_0to185.mp4	The video showcases a close-up view of a motorcycle engine, focusing on the shiny chrome components and the intricate details of the engine. The engine is set against a purple background, which adds a vibrant contrast to the metallic sheen of the engine parts. The video is likely a promotional or educational piece, highlighting the craftsmanship and design of the motorcycle engine. The style of the video is sleek and professional, with a focus on the engine's details and the overall aesthetic of the motorcycle.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+YNT8xsQ8yHY_12_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part107/YNT8xsQ8yHY_12_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-YNT8xsQ8yHY_12_0to104.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a car's wheel and fender, showcasing the vehicle's design and details. The car's black wheel features a unique, intricate design with red accents, adding a touch of color to the otherwise monochrome palette. The fender, also black, is adorned with a distinctive grille pattern that adds to the car's sporty aesthetic. The car is parked on a gravel surface, with a stone wall visible in the background, suggesting a rural or semi-rural setting. The video is shot in a realistic style, focusing on the car's details and the surrounding environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+U4-MUVDn10o_8_19to176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part75/U4-MUVDn10o_8_19to176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-U4-MUVDn10o_8_19to176.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a car's interior, focusing on the steering wheel and the center console. The steering wheel is black with silver accents and has a sleek design. The center console is black with a glossy finish and features a touch screen display. The car's interior is well-lit, highlighting the details of the steering wheel and the center console. The video is likely a promotional or review video for the car, showcasing its interior design and features. The style of the video is professional and polished, with a focus on the car's interior design and features.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rzoCJVRCQ7I_5_0to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part137/rzoCJVRCQ7I_5_0to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rzoCJVRCQ7I_5_0to173.mp4	The video shows a sequence of three motorcycles in motion, captured in a time-lapse style. The first motorcycle is in the foreground, with the second and third motorcycles progressively appearing in the background. The motorcycles are sleek and modern, with a shiny black finish. The background is a blur of white, suggesting a high-speed motion effect. The motorcycles are positioned in a diagonal line, creating a sense of movement and direction. The style of the video is dynamic and energetic, emphasizing the speed and power of the motorcycles.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+JMoPE7-Y980_4_0to126.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part32/JMoPE7-Y980_4_0to126.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-JMoPE7-Y980_4_0to126.mp4	In the video, a woman with blonde hair is seen holding a bottle of Robinsons Little Barley Peach juice. She is standing in front of a white wall with string lights. The woman is seen smelling the juice, indicating her interest in the product. The overall style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the woman's interaction with the juice bottle. The video likely aims to promote the juice by showcasing its aroma and appeal.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+hcU5syyk7OA_48_110to247.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part131/hcU5syyk7OA_48_110to247.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-hcU5syyk7OA_48_110to247.mp4	The video shows a red Ferrari sports car parked in front of a building with blue shutters. The car is sleek and shiny, with a distinctive emblem on the side. The building has a classic European design, featuring a wrought iron gate and a number on the door. The car is positioned at an angle, allowing a clear view of its side profile. The scene is set in a quiet street, with no other vehicles or pedestrians visible. The overall style of the video is elegant and sophisticated, capturing the luxury and exclusivity associated with the Ferrari brand.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6kKiQ-nUp5A_9_0to138.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part56/6kKiQ-nUp5A_9_0to138.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6kKiQ-nUp5A_9_0to138.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a glass jar with a metal lid, filled with white powder. The jar is placed on a wooden surface. In the first frame, the jar is closed, and the lid is securely fastened. In the second frame, the jar is tilted slightly, and the powder begins to spill out. In the third frame, the jar is tilted more, and a significant amount of powder has spilled out onto the wooden surface. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward time-lapse, capturing the gradual process of the powder spilling out of the jar. The focus is on the jar and the powder, with no additional elements or distractions. The video does not contain any text or sound.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+P4uLS29uaPU_426_128to263.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part81/P4uLS29uaPU_426_128to263.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-P4uLS29uaPU_426_128to263.mp4	In the video, a young girl in pink pajamas is seen interacting with a purple teddy bear. The girl is holding the teddy bear and placing it into a pink baby crib. The crib is adorned with colorful flowers. The scene takes place in a lush green field, where several sheep are grazing in the background. The overall style of the video is cartoonish and playful, with vibrant colors and a whimsical atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SNddp6nEUvY_9_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part86/SNddp6nEUvY_9_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SNddp6nEUvY_9_0to156.mp4	The video shows a person preparing a smoothie. In the first frame, the person is holding a white bowl filled with sliced strawberries and green grapes. In the second frame, the person is pouring the fruit into a glass of brown liquid, which appears to be a smoothie. In the third frame, the person is stirring the smoothie with a spoon. The table is wooden and there are bottles of apple cider vinegar and honey in the background. The style of the video is casual and homey, with a focus on the preparation of a healthy and delicious drink.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0h4vBNzjyyg_45_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/0h4vBNzjyyg_45_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0h4vBNzjyyg_45_0to136.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in a soccer match. The central figure is a male soccer player, dressed in a vibrant yellow jersey with green accents, representing Brazil. He is positioned in the center of the frame, his body poised in anticipation. His gaze is focused on the soccer ball, which is suspended in mid-air, just above his head. The ball is a striking combination of blue and yellow, matching the player's jersey. The background is a blur of spectators, their faces indistinct, adding a sense of depth and scale to the scene. The overall style of the video is action-packed and intense, capturing the high-energy atmosphere of a live soccer match.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KSvLOyXiDro_13_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part75/KSvLOyXiDro_13_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KSvLOyXiDro_13_0to119.mp4	The video captures a serene landscape of a grassy hill overlooking a body of water. The hill is lush and green, with a few scattered rocks adding texture to the scene. The water is calm, reflecting the clear blue sky above. In the distance, a small boat can be seen floating on the water, adding a touch of life to the otherwise tranquil scene. The video is taken from a high vantage point, providing a panoramic view of the landscape. The style of the video is naturalistic, capturing the beauty of the landscape in its raw form. The colors are vibrant, with the green of the grass contrasting beautifully against the blue of the water and sky. The overall mood of the video is peaceful and serene, inviting the viewer to take a moment and appreciate the beauty of nature.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+zKnSPjxEBoI_1_18to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part170/zKnSPjxEBoI_1_18to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-zKnSPjxEBoI_1_18to195.mp4	The video shows a red SUV with its hatchback open, revealing the interior. The car is parked in a lot with trees in the background. The interior is well-lit, and the seats are folded down, revealing a spacious cargo area. The car's design is modern, with a sleek exterior and a clean, uncluttered interior. The hatchback is open, and the car is stationary, suggesting that it is either being loaded or unloaded. The video is likely a promotional or sales video, showcasing the car's features and design.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+78oMgfeoAfw_23_0to174.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part49/78oMgfeoAfw_23_0to174.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-78oMgfeoAfw_23_0to174.mp4	The video features a man standing in a snowy landscape, wearing sunglasses and a black jacket. He is positioned in front of a car, which is parked on a snow-covered road. The man appears to be speaking or gesturing towards the car, possibly discussing its features or performance. The background of the video shows a serene winter scene with trees and a body of water, suggesting that the location is a scenic, possibly remote, area. The overall style of the video is casual and informative, with a focus on the man and the car in the context of the winter environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6cc229035eb25cce8cda46f1766f828e3591774633644eabe1e780eba1d4f049.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/6cc229035eb25cce8cda46f1766f828e3591774633644eabe1e780eba1d4f049.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6cc229035eb25cce8cda46f1766f828e3591774633644eabe1e780eba1d4f049.mp4	The video captures a majestic lion walking across a grassy area, its thick, dark mane flowing behind it. The lion's powerful build is evident as it moves gracefully, its tail swaying slightly. As the lion approaches a white metal fence, another lion appears on the other side, partially obscured by the structure. The second lion, also large and impressive, seems to be observing the first. The scene is set in a natural environment, likely a zoo or wildlife sanctuary, with trees and greenery visible in the background. The camera remains steady throughout, focusing on the lions and their interaction with each other and their surroundings. The lighting suggests a daytime setting, with natural light illuminating the scene. The overall atmosphere is one of calm observation, highlighting the strength and beauty of these magnificent creatures.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CyreAOKvMXc_20_0to168.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part48/CyreAOKvMXc_20_0to168.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CyreAOKvMXc_20_0to168.mp4	The video is a 3D animated scene featuring a doll with black hair and a striped shirt standing in a room with pink walls and a white door. The doll is positioned in the center of the frame, looking to the left. In the background, there are two male dolls, one wearing a yellow and black plaid shirt and the other in a green and white striped shirt. The dolls are standing in front of a pink window with white trim. The overall style of the video is cartoonish and playful, with a focus on the dolls and their surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+e48ab57798fe320c5cbbbf30bf32b2ca83fea8f81b22df88e9ee7922842a69f6.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/e48ab57798fe320c5cbbbf30bf32b2ca83fea8f81b22df88e9ee7922842a69f6.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-e48ab57798fe320c5cbbbf30bf32b2ca83fea8f81b22df88e9ee7922842a69f6.mp4	The video captures a small, blue robotic insect-like drone flying indoors on a checkered floor. The drone, equipped with two large, transparent wings and a body that glows with a blue light, moves swiftly across the floor. As it flies, the camera follows its movement closely, maintaining focus on the drone while the background blurs due to the speed. The drone navigates around a pillar, showcasing its agility and the smoothness of its flight. The environment appears to be an indoor space with a clean, modern design, featuring white walls and a tiled floor with alternating dark and light squares. The lighting is bright, enhancing the visibility of the drone's features and movements. The drone continues to fly, demonstrating its capabilities in a controlled indoor setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Renqf1Ltg04_7_0to115.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part90/Renqf1Ltg04_7_0to115.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Renqf1Ltg04_7_0to115.mp4	The video features a man standing on a stage, wearing a blue shirt and glasses. He is speaking into a microphone, which is attached to his ear. The man appears to be in the middle of a presentation or speech. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a large room with curtains. The man's expression is serious, and he is looking off to the side, possibly at an audience or a point of interest. The style of the video is straightforward and professional, with a focus on the man and his speech.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HYz7qQbqazE_12_24to166.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/HYz7qQbqazE_12_24to166.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HYz7qQbqazE_12_24to166.mp4	The video shows a modern living room setting with a focus on a wooden speaker with orange accents. The speaker is placed on a white countertop, which is part of a white cabinet. In the background, there is a television mounted on the wall, and a computer monitor on a desk. A potted plant with green leaves is also visible on the countertop. The style of the video is a blend of still life and interior design, with a focus on the speaker as the main subject. The lighting in the room is soft and ambient, creating a cozy atmosphere. The overall impression is of a well-organized and stylish living space.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+IUb8gpORntA_3_21to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part50/IUb8gpORntA_3_21to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-IUb8gpORntA_3_21to157.mp4	"The video shows a white mug with a blue and white design, placed on a wooden table. The mug is filled with a liquid, possibly tea or coffee, and a stream of the liquid is being poured into the mug from a glass teapot. The teapot is clear, allowing the viewer to see the liquid inside. The design on the mug features a map of the Caribbean, with the word ""Caribbean"" written in the center. The wooden table has a natural, rustic appearance, and there are some fruits, including oranges and limes, visible in the background. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the action of pouring the liquid into the mug. The lighting is soft and natural, suggesting that the video was taken during the day."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+TzhiLUMvWKQ_6_0to161.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part113/TzhiLUMvWKQ_6_0to161.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-TzhiLUMvWKQ_6_0to161.mp4	In the video, a man and a woman are engaged in a conversation on a street. The man is holding a microphone, suggesting that he might be a reporter or an interviewer. The woman is wearing sunglasses and a pink tank top, and she appears to be speaking to the man. In the background, there are parked cars and a tree, indicating that the location is an urban area. The style of the video is realistic, capturing a candid moment between the two individuals. The focus is on the interaction between the man and the woman, with the background serving as a setting for their conversation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Sk-WPNOJWPs_11_107to293.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part111/Sk-WPNOJWPs_11_107to293.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Sk-WPNOJWPs_11_107to293.mp4	The video captures a scene in a garage filled with various cars. The main focus is a red Ferrari sports car, which is parked in the center of the garage. The Ferrari is sleek and shiny, with a white stripe running down its hood. The garage itself is spacious and well-lit, with other cars parked in the background. The video is shot in a way that emphasizes the Ferrari's design and color, making it stand out against the other cars. The garage appears to be a place where car enthusiasts gather, as evidenced by the variety of vehicles on display. The overall style of the video is dynamic and engaging, with a focus on the Ferrari as the star of the show.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+dfb58bb84ac1fe8bc3a16dc017c18b11a3943a3e5484b9ac99dda1f8f7823b18.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/dfb58bb84ac1fe8bc3a16dc017c18b11a3943a3e5484b9ac99dda1f8f7823b18.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-dfb58bb84ac1fe8bc3a16dc017c18b11a3943a3e5484b9ac99dda1f8f7823b18.mp4	The video showcases a close-up view of a transparent, wavy-shaped object mounted on a bright yellow wall. The object appears to be made of a smooth, translucent material, possibly acrylic or glass, and is secured with metallic screws at its joints. As the video progresses, a small, dark-colored insect, likely a fly, enters the frame from the right side. It moves swiftly across the surface of the object, exploring its contours and edges. The insect's rapid movement creates a dynamic contrast against the static, geometric lines of the object. The background remains consistently vibrant yellow, providing a stark and vivid backdrop that highlights the object and the insect's actions. The camera maintains a steady focus on the interaction between the insect and the object throughout the sequence, emphasizing the simplicity and clarity of the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ApAIkGGi3vU_1_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part71/ApAIkGGi3vU_1_0to108.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ApAIkGGi3vU_1_0to108.mp4	The video features a young man with short brown hair, smiling and looking directly at the camera. He is wearing a dark blue jacket with a zipper and a collar. The background shows a blurred outdoor setting with a large building and a vehicle, suggesting an urban environment. The style of the video is a close-up portrait with a shallow depth of field, focusing on the man's face and upper body while the background is out of focus. The lighting appears to be natural, possibly indicating an outdoor setting during the day. The man's expression is friendly and approachable, and he seems to be in a good mood.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+wm3SocSIRPk_16_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part163/wm3SocSIRPk_16_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-wm3SocSIRPk_16_0to154.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a vibrant garden, focusing on a cluster of pink flowers. The flowers, with their delicate petals and bright color, are the main subject of the video. The camera moves in a circular motion around the flowers, providing a 360-degree view of the blossoms. The background is blurred, drawing the viewer's attention to the flowers. The overall style of the video is a slow, steady pan that allows the viewer to appreciate the beauty of the flowers in detail. The video does not contain any text or additional objects. The focus is solely on the flowers and their intricate details.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5l9d8QcAjXE_9_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part44/5l9d8QcAjXE_9_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5l9d8QcAjXE_9_0to127.mp4	In the video, two men are in a kitchen, preparing a meal together. The man on the left is wearing a blue shirt and is standing near the counter, while the man on the right is wearing an orange shirt and is actively mixing ingredients in a bowl. The kitchen is well-equipped with various appliances and utensils, including a microwave, an oven, and a sink. There are also several bowls and a spoon on the counter. The men seem to be engaged in a friendly conversation, possibly discussing the recipe they are following. The overall atmosphere of the video is warm and inviting, suggesting a comfortable and enjoyable cooking experience.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BQZokLWcy3g_5_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part62/BQZokLWcy3g_5_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BQZokLWcy3g_5_0to109.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a blue coffee mug with a black handle, placed on a white table. The mug is being filled with a dark liquid, likely coffee, from a black coffee pot. The liquid is being poured into the mug, creating a smooth and steady stream. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a kitchen setting with a vase and a window. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the action of pouring coffee into the mug. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the details of the mug and the liquid inside. The overall mood of the video is calm and relaxed, capturing a common everyday moment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+LdCqzqYEuoQ_61_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part95/LdCqzqYEuoQ_61_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-LdCqzqYEuoQ_61_0to149.mp4	The video shows two men enjoying a meal together. They are seated at a table with a plate of food in front of them. The man on the left is wearing a red and black jacket, while the man on the right is wearing a green shirt. They are both holding pieces of food in their hands and are in the process of eating. The food appears to be fried and is likely a type of meat. The setting suggests they are in a restaurant or a similar dining establishment. The atmosphere is casual and relaxed, with the men enjoying their meal and each other's company.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ran6fkTIolE_15_38to256.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part164/ran6fkTIolE_15_38to256.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ran6fkTIolE_15_38to256.mp4	The video captures a group of motorcyclists riding along a winding road that hugs the side of a mountain. The road is narrow and curvy, with steep drop-offs on one side and a river flowing on the other. The motorcyclists are dressed in protective gear and are riding in a staggered formation, maintaining a safe distance from one another. The landscape is rugged and rocky, with steep cliffs and a river flowing through a narrow canyon. The sky is clear and blue, suggesting a sunny day. The video is shot from a high angle, providing a bird's eye view of the motorcyclists and the surrounding landscape. The style of the video is realistic and captures the thrill and beauty of motorcycling in a rugged and remote location.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BHdIQy00_p4_96_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part31/BHdIQy00_p4_96_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BHdIQy00_p4_96_0to110.mp4	The video captures the iconic skyline of Toronto, Canada, showcasing the city's architectural diversity. The first frame presents a wide shot of the cityscape, with the towering CN Tower standing prominently in the center. The second frame zooms in on the CN Tower, emphasizing its height and prominence in the city's skyline. The third frame offers a closer view of the city, highlighting the mix of modern and traditional buildings that make up Toronto's unique skyline. The video is shot from a distance, providing a panoramic view of the city, and is likely taken from a high vantage point, such as a boat or a high-rise building. The style of the video is realistic, with no visible filters or artistic manipulations. The focus is on the city's architecture and the way it interacts with the surrounding environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Ir-w411Rxco_27_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part67/Ir-w411Rxco_27_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Ir-w411Rxco_27_0to114.mp4	The video shows a custom-painted car with a patriotic theme, featuring red, white, and blue colors, and a cartoon character on the side. The car is parked inside a large hangar, which also houses several airplanes. The car is the main focus of the video, with its unique design and vibrant colors. The hangar provides a spacious and industrial backdrop, with the airplanes adding an element of aviation interest. The overall style of the video is dynamic and colorful, capturing the attention of the viewer with its bold design and patriotic theme.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Dq1v8Oqmfto_21_0to131.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part37/Dq1v8Oqmfto_21_0to131.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Dq1v8Oqmfto_21_0to131.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a stainless steel oven with a digital display and a temperature knob. The oven is situated in a kitchen with various utensils hanging on a rack in the background. The style of the video is a straightforward product demonstration, focusing on the oven's features and design. The camera angle is static, providing a clear view of the oven's controls and the surrounding kitchen environment. The lighting is bright, highlighting the oven's metallic finish and the various utensils in the background. The video does not contain any text or additional graphics. The overall impression is that of a clean, modern kitchen appliance.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+p4S56KktWwQ_6_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part141/p4S56KktWwQ_6_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-p4S56KktWwQ_6_0to147.mp4	The video shows a cozy living room setting with a focus on a white vase with a textured pattern. The vase is filled with a bouquet of flowers, including purple and green leaves, and is placed on a wooden tray. The room has a warm and inviting atmosphere, with a white couch and a fireplace in the background. The lighting is soft and natural, suggesting a calm and peaceful environment. The style of the video is simple and elegant, with a focus on the beauty of everyday objects and the comfort of a well-decorated living space.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Lv9CbKR-c4k_25_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part73/Lv9CbKR-c4k_25_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Lv9CbKR-c4k_25_0to104.mp4	The video shows a large cargo ship sailing on a body of water under a partly cloudy sky. The ship is predominantly red and white, with a white superstructure and a red hull. It is loaded with various containers, including red, yellow, and brown ones, which are stacked in multiple tiers on the deck. The ship is moving forward, and the water around it is calm. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the ship and its cargo, capturing the essence of maritime transportation and the scale of the vessel.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2AGiNFKewQk_4_371to528.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part63/2AGiNFKewQk_4_371to528.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2AGiNFKewQk_4_371to528.mp4	"The video captures a professional baseball player in action, pitching a ball on a baseball field. The player, dressed in a navy blue jersey with the word ""BOSTON"" and the number ""70"" prominently displayed, is in the midst of his pitching motion. He is wearing a black baseball cap and a black glove, and his stance is dynamic, with one leg extended behind him and the other firmly planted on the ground. The field is well-maintained, with a clear boundary and a large scoreboard visible in the background. The crowd in the stands is a blur of colors, indicating a large audience, and the atmosphere is one of anticipation and excitement. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the intensity and focus of the player in a high-stakes game."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+bam-a7ej5xw_5_37to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part104/bam-a7ej5xw_5_37to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-bam-a7ej5xw_5_37to173.mp4	The video features a woman with blonde hair and a gold necklace, who is speaking. She is wearing a black top and is positioned in front of a colorful floral painting. The background also includes a potted plant. The style of the video is a close-up shot, focusing on the woman's face and upper body. The lighting is soft and natural, suggesting an indoor setting. The woman appears to be engaged in a conversation or delivering a speech.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gTdgDI8p6lY_12_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part153/gTdgDI8p6lY_12_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gTdgDI8p6lY_12_0to145.mp4	The video captures a model walking down a runway, showcasing her outfit and style. She is wearing a red and black plaid skirt paired with a black crop top. The skirt is short, revealing her legs, and the top is cropped, revealing her midriff. She is also wearing a necklace and earrings, adding to her fashionable look. Her hair is styled in loose waves, and she is smiling as she walks, exuding confidence and poise. The runway is set against a backdrop of a blurred cityscape, suggesting an urban setting for the fashion show. The model's walk is confident and graceful, and she carries herself with a sense of style and elegance.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3DXR94xsGOE_95_0to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part51/3DXR94xsGOE_95_0to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3DXR94xsGOE_95_0to195.mp4	The video captures the journey of a Ferris wheel car from its starting position to its highest point, providing a bird's eye view of the city below. The car, painted in a sleek black color, ascends the towering white structure of the Ferris wheel, which stands out against the backdrop of the city. As the car rises, the cityscape unfolds beneath it, revealing a mix of buildings and trees. The sky above is a clear blue, dotted with a few clouds. The video is shot from a high angle, providing a unique perspective of the city and the Ferris wheel. The car's journey is smooth and steady, offering a sense of calm and tranquility. The video is a beautiful blend of urban architecture and natural elements, creating a visually stunning experience.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gYhW93iu3VM_5_62to273.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part153/gYhW93iu3VM_5_62to273.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gYhW93iu3VM_5_62to273.mp4	The video captures the iconic Eiffel Tower in Paris, France, from a high vantage point. The first frame shows the tower against a clear blue sky with a few scattered clouds. The second frame shows the tower with the sun setting, casting a warm glow on the structure and the surrounding cityscape. The third frame shows the tower at night, illuminated by lights and surrounded by the city's lights. The style of the video is a time-lapse, capturing the tower and the city's transformation from day to night. The video provides a stunning view of the Eiffel Tower and the city of Paris.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+b3AbRFamL3c_55_31to207.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part85/b3AbRFamL3c_55_31to207.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-b3AbRFamL3c_55_31to207.mp4	The video shows a young girl sitting at a dining table with a blue plate of food in front of her. The plate contains a variety of food items, including a salad, a serving of beans, and a portion of fruit. The girl appears to be enjoying her meal, and the table is set with a red cup and a fork. The setting suggests a casual and comfortable dining environment. The video captures a moment of everyday life, with the focus on the girl and her meal.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HM3c0f9_4w8_53_123to315.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part38/HM3c0f9_4w8_53_123to315.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HM3c0f9_4w8_53_123to315.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen in a room with a wooden door and a white wall. She is wearing a colorful dress and has a cup in her hand. The woman appears to be in a relaxed state, possibly enjoying a drink. The room has a cozy and comfortable atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+S8yzRilEKdQ_3_0to189.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part88/S8yzRilEKdQ_3_0to189.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-S8yzRilEKdQ_3_0to189.mp4	"The video features a red Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat parked in a lot with a mountainous backdrop. The car is shiny and well-maintained, with a black hood and black rims. The license plate reads ""897"". The car is parked in front of a building with a red roof. The lot is filled with other cars and trucks. The mountains in the background are green and lush. The sky is blue with a few clouds. The overall style of the video is dynamic and vibrant, capturing the beauty of the car and the surrounding landscape."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+VdvzMwv7aO8_21_17to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part118/VdvzMwv7aO8_21_17to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-VdvzMwv7aO8_21_17to157.mp4	The video shows a man driving a car, with the camera positioned inside the vehicle, capturing the driver's perspective. The man appears to be in his middle years, with a beard and mustache, and is wearing a dark suit with a light-colored shirt. He is seated in the driver's seat, holding the steering wheel with one hand, and his expression is one of surprise or concern. The car's interior is modern and sleek, with a digital dashboard and a large infotainment screen. The car is moving, as suggested by the blurred background, which shows a crowd of people outside the vehicle, possibly at an event or gathering. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the driver's reaction to the situation outside the car. The lighting is natural, suggesting that the video was taken during the day.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2mSlYJDCLx8_6_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/2mSlYJDCLx8_6_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2mSlYJDCLx8_6_0to106.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen in a kitchen, preparing a meal. She is wearing a red shirt and is standing in front of a counter. On the counter, there is a blender and a bowl. The woman is using the blender to mix ingredients. In the background, there is a refrigerator and a microwave. The kitchen is well-lit and appears to be clean and organized. The woman seems to be focused on her task, indicating that she is in the process of cooking or preparing a meal. The overall style of the video is casual and homey, capturing a typical moment in a kitchen.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Vwz97FSPF5U_19_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part184/Vwz97FSPF5U_19_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Vwz97FSPF5U_19_0to190.mp4	The video is an aerial view of a backyard with a wooden shed and a patio area. The shed has a blue roof and is surrounded by several potted plants. The patio area features a table and chairs, and there are two cars parked in the driveway. The backyard is well-maintained with a lawn and a gravel path leading to the shed. The style of the video is a straightforward aerial shot, capturing the layout of the backyard and the surrounding area.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3KTHvtDeqTc_0_0to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part51/3KTHvtDeqTc_0_0to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3KTHvtDeqTc_0_0to173.mp4	The video features a man in a suit and tie, standing in an office environment. He is positioned in the foreground, with a blurred background that includes other people and office equipment. The man appears to be speaking or presenting, as he is gesturing with his hands and has a serious expression on his face. The style of the video is professional and polished, with a focus on the man and his message. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the man's features and the office setting. The overall impression is one of a corporate or business-related video, possibly for a company or organization.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4BOCrlwFeHc_9_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part37/4BOCrlwFeHc_9_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4BOCrlwFeHc_9_0to113.mp4	In the video, a person is seen preparing pickles in a kitchen. The person is holding a green cucumber in their hand, and they are in the process of slicing it. The cucumber slices are being placed into a clear glass jar, which is filled with water and pickling spices. The jar is placed on a wooden cutting board, which is on a kitchen counter. In the background, there is a refrigerator and a bottle of oil. The person is wearing a blue shirt and appears to be focused on their task. The overall style of the video is casual and homey, capturing a simple yet essential kitchen activity.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-FP3MmF0GcI_16_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part61/-FP3MmF0GcI_16_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--FP3MmF0GcI_16_0to190.mp4	The video shows a person using a yellow and black power saw to cut through a piece of metal. The saw is held firmly in the person's hand, and the blade is spinning rapidly. The metal being cut is placed on a sturdy workbench, and the person appears to be concentrating on their task. The background of the video shows a parked car and a leaf-covered lawn, suggesting that the scene is taking place outdoors. The style of the video is straightforward and documentary, focusing on the action of the saw cutting through the metal.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gFRvdQpa4Uw_22_280to405.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part128/gFRvdQpa4Uw_22_280to405.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gFRvdQpa4Uw_22_280to405.mp4	The video captures a moment from a baseball game, featuring a player from the New York Yankees. The player, dressed in a white and navy striped uniform with the team's logo, is seen in three different actions. In the first frame, he is seen holding a baseball bat, ready to swing. In the second frame, he is seen in the midst of a powerful swing, his body coiled with the effort. In the third frame, he is seen tossing his helmet aside, a triumphant expression on his face as he runs towards the base. The background is filled with the hustle and bustle of the baseball field, with other players and spectators visible. The video is a dynamic representation of the intensity and excitement of a baseball game.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+fJEbV2d3J84_43_177to298.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part125/fJEbV2d3J84_43_177to298.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-fJEbV2d3J84_43_177to298.mp4	The video captures a vibrant and colorful flower shop. The first frame shows a variety of potted plants and flowers on a shelf, with a focus on a large white orchid. The second frame shows a close-up of the orchid, highlighting its delicate petals and intricate details. The third frame shows a table with more potted plants and flowers, including a vase with a bouquet of red and white flowers. The style of the video is bright and cheerful, with a focus on the beauty and variety of the flowers and plants. The camera angles and lighting create a warm and inviting atmosphere, showcasing the shop's selection of flowers and plants.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+e5eec9e7e0d115052b3d2fe93676e72cb43074885dc77665b30b2b832d59807e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/e5eec9e7e0d115052b3d2fe93676e72cb43074885dc77665b30b2b832d59807e.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-e5eec9e7e0d115052b3d2fe93676e72cb43074885dc77665b30b2b832d59807e.mp4	The video showcases a close-up view of a toy train track setup. The track is primarily pink with yellow connectors and is mounted on a beige cushioned surface, likely a cat tree or similar structure. The camera pans to the left, revealing more of the track extending along the top edge of the cushion. The background includes a light switch on the wall and part of a window, indicating an indoor setting. The camera movement provides a detailed look at the track's design and its placement on the cushion, emphasizing the playful and creative use of the space. There are no visible characters or animals in the scene, focusing solely on the toy setup and its environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+f9gpc-mX26U_19_0to148.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part124/f9gpc-mX26U_19_0to148.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-f9gpc-mX26U_19_0to148.mp4	The video shows the interior of a car from the perspective of the passenger seat. The car is a luxury vehicle with a beige interior and black accents. The driver's seat is empty, and the steering wheel is visible in the center of the frame. The dashboard is sleek and modern, with a touch screen display. The car's door is open, revealing a window that is rolled down. The car is parked in a lot with a clear sky visible through the window. The overall style of the video is clean and minimalist, focusing on the details of the car's interior.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+tYLH9Qp7PKo_35_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part129/tYLH9Qp7PKo_35_0to109.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-tYLH9Qp7PKo_35_0to109.mp4	The video features a man with a mustache, dressed in a black suit and white shirt, standing on a red carpet. He is wearing a black tie and a red flower on his lapel. The man is looking directly at the camera with a serious expression. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a crowded event with people standing on the red carpet. The style of the video is a close-up portrait shot, focusing on the man's face and upper body. The lighting is bright, highlighting the man's features and the details of his attire. The overall mood of the video is formal and serious.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+aIM73H66-qY_37_23to188.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part80/aIM73H66-qY_37_23to188.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-aIM73H66-qY_37_23to188.mp4	The video captures a moment in the life of a herd of elephants in the wild. The elephants, varying in size, are seen walking through a grassy field, their large bodies and long trunks moving in unison. The elephants are seen in a line, with the largest elephant leading the way, followed by the smaller ones. The elephants are walking towards the right side of the frame, their trunks extended forward as they navigate the terrain. The background is filled with trees and bushes, providing a natural habitat for these majestic creatures. The video is a beautiful representation of wildlife, capturing the elephants in their natural environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WKH22KDwre0_17_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part104/WKH22KDwre0_17_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WKH22KDwre0_17_0to136.mp4	The video showcases a collection of butterflies, each with unique colors and patterns, displayed in a row against a white background. The butterflies are arranged in a chronological order, with each frame featuring a different butterfly. The style of the video is a simple yet elegant display of nature's beauty, focusing on the intricate details of each butterfly's wings and body. The video captures the essence of these delicate creatures, highlighting their vibrant colors and intricate patterns. The white background provides a stark contrast, making the butterflies stand out even more. The video is a celebration of nature's diversity and the beauty of these small creatures.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+PunJGevSv8w_44_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part183/PunJGevSv8w_44_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-PunJGevSv8w_44_0to119.mp4	The video captures the side profile of a red sports car in motion, showcasing its sleek design and shiny exterior. The car's silver rims and black tires contrast with the vibrant red paint. The car is driving on a road with a clear sky in the background, suggesting a sunny day. The car's speed is implied by the slight blur of the background, indicating a sense of motion. The overall style of the video is dynamic and stylish, emphasizing the car's performance and design.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WFAGL_UXt4o_55_91to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part113/WFAGL_UXt4o_55_91to239.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WFAGL_UXt4o_55_91to239.mp4	The video features a 3D animated rabbit character standing in a stone courtyard. The rabbit is wearing a blue jacket with a brown strap across its chest. In the background, there are potted plants and a stone wall. The rabbit appears to be looking to the side, possibly observing something off-screen. The animation style is realistic with attention to detail in the fur and clothing textures. The lighting in the scene is soft, suggesting an overcast day or early morning. The overall atmosphere is calm and serene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+FMsOu6XCTQs_74_0to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part55/FMsOu6XCTQs_74_0to146.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-FMsOu6XCTQs_74_0to146.mp4	The video captures a man riding a bicycle on a sunny day. He is wearing a black t-shirt, sunglasses, and a colorful hat. The man is taking a selfie, holding the camera in his right hand. In the background, there are two other cyclists, one wearing a red shirt and the other in a yellow shirt. They are riding on a paved road with a yellow line in the middle. The road is surrounded by a lush green field, and the sky is clear and blue. The overall style of the video is casual and fun, capturing a moment of outdoor activity on a beautiful day.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+31JV2MyaZUI_2_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part59/31JV2MyaZUI_2_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-31JV2MyaZUI_2_0to140.mp4	The video features a woman with purple hair, wearing a purple shirt, standing in front of a blue, futuristic background with digital graphics. She is looking to the side with a thoughtful expression. In the background, there is a jar of peanut butter and a jar of honey, as well as a bunch of grapes. The style of the video is a blend of real-life footage with digital graphics, creating a futuristic and technological atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4XsX07V7Uyo_6_495to679.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part48/4XsX07V7Uyo_6_495to679.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4XsX07V7Uyo_6_495to679.mp4	"The video is a news segment from the show ""This Week"" on ABC. It features a panel discussion with three individuals, two men and a woman, sitting around a glass table. The woman is wearing a blue and purple patterned jacket, while the men are dressed in suits with ties. They are engaged in a conversation about the 2016 election and the potential for Russian meddling. The show's logo is visible in the corner of the screen, and the overall style of the video is professional and informative."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-XKICi59ui4_8_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/-XKICi59ui4_8_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--XKICi59ui4_8_0to137.mp4	"The video is a promotional advertisement for a white Lexus SUV. The car is shown in three different angles, highlighting its sleek design and modern features. The first angle shows the front of the car, with its distinctive grille and headlights. The second angle shows the side of the car, emphasizing its aerodynamic shape and alloy wheels. The third angle shows the back of the car, showcasing its taillights and rear window. The car is parked on a concrete surface, and there is a watermark in the bottom right corner that reads ""MOTOMAN."" The overall style of the video is sleek and professional, with a focus on the car's design and features."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XiVREYefw7s_4_64to261.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part79/XiVREYefw7s_4_64to261.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XiVREYefw7s_4_64to261.mp4	"The video shows a close-up view of a car's dashboard, focusing on the central infotainment screen. The screen displays a battery status indicator with three bars, each representing a different battery level. The time ""10:47"" is visible at the top of the screen, and the radio station ""FM radio"" is indicated at the bottom. The car's interior is visible, with the steering wheel on the right side of the frame. The dashboard is sleek and modern, featuring a silver and black color scheme. The video is a still image, capturing a moment in time, and does not depict any movement or action. The style of the video is straightforward and functional, focusing on the car's technology and design."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-MLYwwTOXRc_57_938to1125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part31/-MLYwwTOXRc_57_938to1125.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--MLYwwTOXRc_57_938to1125.mp4	The video shows a young woman standing on a dirt road, looking directly at the camera with a slight smile. She has short, dark hair and is wearing a black jacket. In the background, there is a white bus parked on the side of the road. The bus appears to be a tour bus, and it is partially visible behind the woman. The setting seems to be a rural or semi-rural area, with trees and bushes visible in the background. The lighting suggests it is daytime. The style of the video is casual and candid, with a focus on the woman and her immediate surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+4Rg7w6fQJbc_19_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part48/4Rg7w6fQJbc_19_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-4Rg7w6fQJbc_19_0to136.mp4	The video captures a moment from a football game. The main focus is on a referee, dressed in a black and white striped shirt, who is actively signaling a call. He is standing on the field, with his arms outstretched, indicating a clear and decisive action. In the background, a football player wearing a blue jersey can be seen, adding context to the scene. The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, capturing the intensity of the game. The referee's signal is the central focus, with the player in the background providing a sense of scale and context. The video does not contain any text or additional elements. The overall composition of the video suggests a high-stakes moment in the game, with the referee's call being crucial to the outcome.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+PvX-ZgdDW20_22_0to152.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part103/PvX-ZgdDW20_22_0to152.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-PvX-ZgdDW20_22_0to152.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a bowl of soup being prepared. The soup is filled with various ingredients, including meatballs, herbs, and vegetables. The ingredients are being stirred and mixed together, creating a delicious and hearty meal. The soup is served in a white bowl, which contrasts nicely with the colorful ingredients. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the preparation of the soup rather than any additional elements. The video does not contain any text or narration, allowing the viewer to focus solely on the soup and its preparation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Svhe7Mpv58o_27_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/Svhe7Mpv58o_27_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Svhe7Mpv58o_27_0to136.mp4	In the video, a young woman with long blonde hair is seen enjoying a cup of coffee. She is dressed in a white lace top and is seated in a cozy setting with a brick wall in the background. The woman takes a sip from her white coffee cup, savoring the warm beverage. The scene is captured in a close-up shot, focusing on the woman and her coffee cup, creating an intimate and relaxed atmosphere. The video is likely to be a lifestyle or fashion vlog, showcasing the woman's casual and comfortable style.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XduSaNqkeP0_46_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part88/XduSaNqkeP0_46_0to140.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XduSaNqkeP0_46_0to140.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a black frying pan with three pieces of salmon being cooked. The salmon is pinkish-orange in color, and the pan is filled with a small amount of oil. The salmon is being cooked evenly, with the edges slightly browning. The pan is placed on a stovetop, and the oil is sizzling around the edges of the salmon. The video captures the process of cooking the salmon, from the initial placement in the pan to the final stages of cooking. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the cooking process without any additional elements or distractions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+MaeMA-Xk9Ts_38_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part105/MaeMA-Xk9Ts_38_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-MaeMA-Xk9Ts_38_0to156.mp4	In the video, a man with a beard and a black baseball cap is seen holding a green plastic bottle. He is wearing a black hoodie with red and white lettering. The man is standing in front of a white wall and a potted plant. The bottle appears to be filled with a green liquid. The man's facial expression suggests surprise or shock. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the man and the bottle.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+cDpKdmBAZG4_12_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part73/cDpKdmBAZG4_12_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-cDpKdmBAZG4_12_0to137.mp4	The video captures a moment of camaraderie between two basketball players on the court. The player in the foreground, wearing a white jersey with the number 25, has his arm wrapped around the shoulders of his teammate, who is also wearing a white jersey. Both players are looking off to the side, their expressions serious, suggesting they are focused on the game. The background is filled with the blurred figures of other players and the crowd, indicating that the game is in progress. The style of the video is a standard sports broadcast, capturing the intensity and teamwork of the sport.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+fW45WSu4hDA_6_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part126/fW45WSu4hDA_6_0to106.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-fW45WSu4hDA_6_0to106.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a doll with large, expressive eyes and a small mouth. The doll is wearing a pink and white striped onesie with a heart pattern. The doll is sitting on a blue surface, which appears to be a swing. The doll's hair is brown and styled in a messy bob. The doll's expression is neutral, and it is looking directly at the camera. The background is blurred, but it seems to be an outdoor setting with greenery. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward close-up shot of the doll, focusing on its facial features and the swing it is sitting on.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+UYKd73PKX0c_42_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part77/UYKd73PKX0c_42_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-UYKd73PKX0c_42_0to110.mp4	In the video, a man and a young girl are seen in a park-like setting. The man, dressed in a gray hoodie, is holding the girl in his arms. The girl, wearing a white and orange dress, is holding a toy in her hands. The man and the girl are looking at each other, creating a sense of connection between them. The background of the video features trees and bushes, adding to the natural ambiance of the scene. The video captures a heartwarming moment between the man and the girl, set against the backdrop of a serene park.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3cvnQaDRg6w_25_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/3cvnQaDRg6w_25_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3cvnQaDRg6w_25_0to102.mp4	"The video shows a close-up of three pink smoothies placed on a table. Each smoothie is garnished with a strawberry and a straw. The smoothies are placed on a red napkin, and there is a blue bowl in the background. The video also includes a text overlay that reads ""@bethanny tip freeze extra fruit & use in smoothie to replace ice"". The style of the video is a simple, straightforward demonstration of a recipe or cooking tip. The focus is on the smoothies and the text overlay, with no additional action or movement. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the colors of the smoothies and the strawberry garnish. The overall impression is of a clean, well-organized presentation of a simple cooking tip."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2Spohh2JXb4_4_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/2Spohh2JXb4_4_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2Spohh2JXb4_4_0to132.mp4	In the video, a woman with curly hair is seen in a vibrant yellow and red patterned blouse, standing in front of a large rocket ship. She is gesturing with her hands, possibly explaining something or expressing a point. The rocket ship is white and silver, with a sleek design, and it is situated in a large open space. The woman appears to be the main subject of the video, with the rocket ship serving as a backdrop. The overall style of the video seems to be informative or educational, as the woman seems to be sharing information or knowledge about the rocket ship.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Gco9qS9YB2w_32_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/Gco9qS9YB2w_32_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Gco9qS9YB2w_32_0to121.mp4	"The video is a promotional clip for the TV show ""Engine Masters"". It features a man in a black t-shirt and a baseball cap, standing in a well-equipped garage. He is gesturing towards a large, red and silver engine that is prominently displayed in the foreground. The engine is surrounded by various tools and equipment, indicating that it is the focal point of the scene. The man appears to be explaining or discussing something related to the engine, possibly its features or performance. The background of the garage is filled with shelves and cabinets, suggesting a well-organized workspace. The overall style of the video is informative and engaging, aimed at capturing the interest of viewers who are interested in automotive engineering and mechanics."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+LxiAjXhxbzA_53_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part92/LxiAjXhxbzA_53_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-LxiAjXhxbzA_53_0to136.mp4	The video captures a thrilling moment in a football game. The main focus is on two players, one in a white jersey and the other in a blue jersey. The player in the white jersey is in possession of the football, running towards the right side of the frame. The player in the blue jersey is in pursuit, running towards the left side of the frame, attempting to tackle the player with the ball. The background is filled with a crowd of spectators, their faces a blur of anticipation and excitement. The atmosphere is electric, the tension palpable as the two players race towards the end zone. The video is a dynamic snapshot of a high-stakes moment in the game, capturing the speed, agility, and intensity of the sport.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5QAah1cEF8s_6_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/5QAah1cEF8s_6_0to149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5QAah1cEF8s_6_0to149.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a bowl of food, which appears to be a creamy, yellowish substance, possibly a type of soup or sauce. The food is served in a black bowl, which contrasts with the light color of the food. The bowl is placed on a table, and the focus is on the food, with the background being out of focus. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, with no additional elements or distractions. The video is likely meant to showcase the food, possibly for a recipe or a food review. The lighting is bright, highlighting the texture and color of the food. The video does not contain any text or additional elements, focusing solely on the bowl of food.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+52xmzw9FKuI_21_25to153.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part41/52xmzw9FKuI_21_25to153.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-52xmzw9FKuI_21_25to153.mp4	The video captures a car driving down a tree-lined street. The car, a white SUV, is seen from the front as it moves away from the camera. The street is lined with trees and a sidewalk, creating a serene suburban atmosphere. The car's journey takes it past a building, which is partially obscured by the foliage. The sky above is a clear blue, suggesting a bright and sunny day. The overall style of the video is a straightforward, unembellished depiction of a car's journey down a suburban street.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ed1326b24d6e554cb71ff88e833ceb07b2d7d6f14983382cbb9b08bc02995149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/ed1326b24d6e554cb71ff88e833ceb07b2d7d6f14983382cbb9b08bc02995149.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ed1326b24d6e554cb71ff88e833ceb07b2d7d6f14983382cbb9b08bc02995149.mp4	The video captures a cozy indoor scene where two cats are interacting with each other on a wooden floor. The room is warmly lit, creating a comfortable atmosphere. In the background, a large flat-screen TV displays a scene from what appears to be a historical drama or film, featuring two characters dressed in period clothing standing outdoors amidst a forested area. Initially, one cat, with a fluffy coat, stands on its hind legs, seemingly reaching towards the TV screen, possibly intrigued by the image displayed. The second cat, with a shorter, lighter-colored fur, is positioned nearby, observing the first cat's actions. As the video progresses, the cat on its hind legs lowers itself back to the ground while the other cat continues to watch attentively.The room includes various household items such as a fireplace on the left side, a small table with woven baskets in the center, and a glass mug on the right. A window with a mesh screen allows natural light to filter into the room, enhancing the	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+1h_j8k2Qg8g_37_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part61/1h_j8k2Qg8g_37_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-1h_j8k2Qg8g_37_0to123.mp4	The video shows a group of soldiers in camouflage uniforms walking down a dirt path. They are equipped with helmets, goggles, and carrying guns. The soldiers are spread out in a line, with some walking ahead and others following behind. The path they are walking on is surrounded by grass and trees, suggesting they are in a rural or forested area. The soldiers appear to be moving in a coordinated manner, possibly on a mission or exercise. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the soldiers in their natural environment and showing their preparedness and teamwork.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6dkHkuVMC9g_56_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part70/6dkHkuVMC9g_56_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6dkHkuVMC9g_56_0to136.mp4	The video captures the transformation of a riverbed over time. In the first frame, the riverbed is filled with water, reflecting the clear blue sky above. The river is surrounded by rocky cliffs, adding a sense of ruggedness to the scene.  In the second frame, the water level has significantly dropped, revealing the riverbed's sandy and rocky terrain. The river now appears as a series of small pools, with the majority of the riverbed exposed and dry.  By the third frame, the riverbed is completely dry, with no water visible. The sandy and rocky terrain is now fully exposed, creating a stark contrast to the first frame. The riverbed's transformation over time is a testament to the changing conditions of the environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+uUdLVnQ8dxM_0_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part124/uUdLVnQ8dxM_0_0to147.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-uUdLVnQ8dxM_0_0to147.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a burrito being cut in half. The burrito is filled with a variety of ingredients, including beans, rice, and vegetables. The burrito is placed on a wooden table, and there are a few other items on the table as well, such as a lime wedge and a small bowl of sour cream. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the burrito and the process of cutting it open. The lighting is bright and even, highlighting the colors and textures of the burrito and the other items on the table. The video does not contain any text or narration.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ITAbCU99RCk_1_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part50/ITAbCU99RCk_1_0to154.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ITAbCU99RCk_1_0to154.mp4	The video features a woman in a kitchen, engaging in a cooking activity. She is wearing a floral top and appears to be in the middle of preparing a meal. The kitchen is well-equipped with various appliances such as a microwave and an oven. There are several bowls and a pot on the counter, suggesting that she is in the process of cooking or assembling ingredients. The woman is gesturing with her hands, possibly explaining a step in the recipe or demonstrating a technique. The overall style of the video is casual and informative, likely aimed at providing cooking tips or showcasing a recipe.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WfFqX1dM3JU_5_22to191.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part106/WfFqX1dM3JU_5_22to191.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WfFqX1dM3JU_5_22to191.mp4	"The video captures a moment of camaraderie between three men in a hallway. The man in the center, wearing a blue shirt, is the focal point of the scene. He is smiling and appears to be in conversation with the man on his left, who is wearing a purple sweater. The man on the right, wearing a black shirt with the word ""Ravens"" on it, is also smiling and seems to be part of the conversation. The hallway they are in is simple and unadorned, with a door visible in the background. The overall atmosphere of the video is friendly and relaxed."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ItqkCJkN7BQ_25_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part43/ItqkCJkN7BQ_25_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ItqkCJkN7BQ_25_0to110.mp4	In the video, a man and a woman are seated at a dining table, enjoying a meal together. The table is set with various dishes, including bowls and cups. The man is wearing glasses and a vest, while the woman is wearing a striped shirt and sunglasses. They are both using chopsticks to eat. In the background, there is a window with blinds, and a bottle is visible on the table. The scene suggests a casual and relaxed dining experience.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+hLO6wmiDQfI_10_180to382.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part146/hLO6wmiDQfI_10_180to382.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-hLO6wmiDQfI_10_180to382.mp4	The video features a man named Gregory Angelo, who is the President of the National Log Cabin Republicans. He is dressed in a blue suit and tie, and appears to be speaking on a news program. The setting is a well-lit room with a painting on the wall and a lamp in the background. The video is likely a news segment or an interview, as indicated by the presence of a news logo and the time stamp in the corner. The man's expression and body language suggest that he is engaged in a serious discussion or debate.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Drju0-eBQKE_3_0to170.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part64/Drju0-eBQKE_3_0to170.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Drju0-eBQKE_3_0to170.mp4	The video captures a triumphant moment in a mixed martial arts (MMA) match. The central figure, a tattooed fighter, stands in the center of the ring, his arms raised in victory. His opponent, also tattooed, stands to his left, his arms raised in a gesture of respect and acknowledgment of the victor. The referee, standing to the right of the victorious fighter, watches the scene unfold. The background is a blur of the ring, emphasizing the focus on the fighters and their moment of triumph. The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, capturing the intensity and excitement of the sport.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KaFFPbQNrpA_13_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/KaFFPbQNrpA_13_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KaFFPbQNrpA_13_0to136.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in a soccer match. The scene is set on a lush green field, with a crowd of spectators in the background, their attention riveted on the unfolding action. The main focus is on three players: a goalkeeper, a forward, and a defender.  The goalkeeper, clad in a black jersey, is in the midst of a dive, his body stretched out in an attempt to block the incoming ball. His position suggests he's fully committed to the save, his eyes locked on the ball.  The forward, wearing a white jersey, is in full sprint, his body leaning forward as he chases the ball. His intent is clear - to reach the ball before the goalkeeper can make the save.  The defender, in a blue jersey, is running alongside the forward, his body angled towards the ball. He's trying to intercept the ball, his eyes focused on the forward and the ball.  The ball itself is in mid-air, slightly ahead of the forward and the goalkeeper. It's the focal point of the scene, drawing the attention of all three players and the spectators in the background.  The overall style of the video is fast-paced and intense, capturing the high-stakes nature of the sport. The camera angles and movements add to the drama, making the viewer feel as if they're right there on the field.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+aiXFPxka9tE_22_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part105/aiXFPxka9tE_22_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-aiXFPxka9tE_22_0to119.mp4	The video captures a panda bear in a grassy field. The panda, with its distinctive black and white fur, is seen walking across the field. The panda's movements are slow and deliberate, with its head held high and its eyes focused on something in the distance. The field is lush and green, providing a stark contrast to the panda's black and white fur. The panda's position in the field and its direction of movement suggest that it is moving towards the right side of the frame. The video is a simple yet captivating depiction of a panda in its natural habitat.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KdozBwdWi8Q_7_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part96/KdozBwdWi8Q_7_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KdozBwdWi8Q_7_0to123.mp4	The video shows an elderly woman with gray hair, wearing a colorful blouse with a floral pattern. She is standing in front of a window with a view of a mountain in the background. The woman appears to be speaking to someone off-camera, as indicated by the presence of a microphone in the foreground. The style of the video is a straightforward interview or conversation, with the focus on the woman and her surroundings. The lighting is natural, suggesting that the video was taken during the day. The overall mood of the video is calm and reflective, with the woman's expression conveying a sense of seriousness or concern.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+xenb8BEcGNI_88_194to316.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part158/xenb8BEcGNI_88_194to316.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-xenb8BEcGNI_88_194to316.mp4	The video is an aerial view of a castle perched on a rocky cliff overlooking a river. The castle, with its stone walls and towers, is the main focus of the video. The castle is surrounded by lush green trees and grass, providing a stark contrast to the gray stone of the castle. The river, with its calm waters, flows gently in the background, adding a sense of tranquility to the scene. The video captures the castle from different angles, showcasing its grandeur and the natural beauty of its surroundings. The overall style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the natural landscape and the architectural details of the castle.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+70F3jt5lX8c_0_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part49/70F3jt5lX8c_0_0to114.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-70F3jt5lX8c_0_0to114.mp4	The video features a young man with a unique style, set against a brick wall backdrop. He has long, wavy hair and a pierced septum. His attire consists of a black jacket and a black and white scarf. The lighting in the video is predominantly purple, creating a moody and atmospheric effect. The man's expression is serious, and he appears to be deep in thought. The overall style of the video is artistic and introspective, with a focus on the man's appearance and the dramatic lighting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5YMN5C1sGCo_22_36to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/5YMN5C1sGCo_22_36to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5YMN5C1sGCo_22_36to165.mp4	The video captures a journey on a winding road, with a focus on the road itself and the surrounding environment. The road curves gently, with a yellow center line dividing the lanes. The road is bordered by a guardrail on one side and a grassy embankment on the other. The sky is clear and blue, suggesting a sunny day. The road is empty, with no visible traffic or pedestrians. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the natural beauty of the landscape and the road itself. The video does not contain any people or animals, and the focus is solely on the road and its surroundings. The video does not contain any text or other objects. The video is a simple, straightforward depiction of a journey on a winding road.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+nnQgAn0V2p8_12_25to160.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part173/nnQgAn0V2p8_12_25to160.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-nnQgAn0V2p8_12_25to160.mp4	The video shows a blue bicycle with a large, flatbed trailer attached to it. The trailer is equipped with two orange lights on the back, providing visibility. The bicycle and trailer are parked inside a garage, which has a white door and a concrete floor. The garage is filled with various items, including a white wire rack, a red and white cooler, and a pair of orange cones. The bicycle and trailer are the main focus of the video, and their position in the garage suggests that they are being prepared for a ride. The overall style of the video is casual and straightforward, with no additional embellishments or effects.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Fj4nJMAzVXE_10_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part62/Fj4nJMAzVXE_10_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Fj4nJMAzVXE_10_0to137.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen assisting a young boy with hand hygiene. The woman is holding a white cloth and a bottle of green hand soap. She is applying the soap to the cloth and then gently wiping the boy's hands. The boy is sitting at a blue table, attentively watching the woman's actions. The scene takes place outdoors, with a building and a fence visible in the background. The overall atmosphere of the video is calm and educational, emphasizing the importance of proper hand hygiene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rAbo9GHmPck_99_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part172/rAbo9GHmPck_99_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rAbo9GHmPck_99_0to136.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a plate of food, which appears to be a type of dumplings or meatballs in a brown sauce. The food is garnished with green herbs, possibly parsley or cilantro, which are sprinkled on top. The plate is white with a black rim, and the food is presented in a way that suggests it is ready to be eaten. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the food without any additional context or background. The lighting is bright, highlighting the details of the food and the garnish. The video does not contain any text or additional elements, and the focus is solely on the plate of food.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+U5MajVD-mgY_1_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part75/U5MajVD-mgY_1_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-U5MajVD-mgY_1_0to118.mp4	The video showcases a red sports car on a grassy lawn, with a person standing nearby. The car is sleek and shiny, with a distinctive front grille and headlights. The person appears to be observing the car, possibly admiring its design or features. The setting suggests that this could be a car show or exhibition, where the car is on display for viewers to appreciate. The overall style of the video is dynamic and engaging, capturing the viewer's attention with the car's striking appearance and the person's interest in it.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2_iuewhvDbY_17_0to170.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part60/2_iuewhvDbY_17_0to170.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2_iuewhvDbY_17_0to170.mp4	In the video, three animated rabbits are seen in a forest setting. The first rabbit, wearing a pink sweater and a pink flower on its head, is standing to the left of the frame. The second rabbit, dressed in a blue jacket, is holding a red book and appears to be reading. The third rabbit, wearing a green hat, is standing to the right of the frame. The background features a lush green forest with trees and grass. The rabbits are the main focus of the video, and their actions suggest a peaceful and serene atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Z4zb5uepYw8_20_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/Z4zb5uepYw8_20_0to190.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Z4zb5uepYw8_20_0to190.mp4	The video shows a man standing in front of a building with a balcony. He is wearing a gray jacket and appears to be looking at something off-camera. The building has a white railing on the balcony and a black bag is visible on the balcony. The man is standing on a sidewalk and there is a car parked behind him. The car has a roof rack on it. The man is bald and has a serious expression on his face. The video is in color and the style is realistic.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+c7Pbw7SYt3s_62_70to232.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part78/c7Pbw7SYt3s_62_70to232.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-c7Pbw7SYt3s_62_70to232.mp4	The video captures a journey across a long suspension bridge that spans a vast body of water. The bridge, with its sturdy white pillars and sturdy cables, stands as a testament to human engineering. The road beneath it is a ribbon of asphalt, curving gently as it disappears into the distance. The bridge is not alone; it is accompanied by a lush hillside, dotted with trees and bushes that add a touch of nature to the scene. The water below is a deep blue, its surface calm and serene. In the distance, the faint outlines of buildings can be seen, hinting at the presence of a city. The video is taken from a high vantage point, providing a bird's eye view of the bridge and its surroundings. This perspective allows for a comprehensive view of the bridge and its surroundings, capturing the beauty of both the man-made structure and the natural landscape.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-d1sqIfUctQ_3_66to217.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part33/-d1sqIfUctQ_3_66to217.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--d1sqIfUctQ_3_66to217.mp4	The video shows a woman in a green shirt working on a quilt. She is seen in three different positions, each time focusing on a different aspect of the quilt. The quilt itself is colorful and features a variety of patterns, including a prominent red star. The woman appears to be in a room with a wall covered in other quilts, suggesting that she might be in a quilt shop or a quilting workshop. The style of the video is straightforward and documentary-like, capturing the woman's actions and the details of the quilt without any additional embellishments or distractions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XI6KKKqeezw_307_82to217.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part77/XI6KKKqeezw_307_82to217.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XI6KKKqeezw_307_82to217.mp4	The video features a cute, cartoonish character sitting on a grassy area. The character has large, expressive eyes and a surprised expression. In the background, there are plants with red flowers and a bowl. The style of the video is animated and colorful, with a focus on the character's facial expressions and the vibrant colors of the background. The character appears to be in a peaceful, outdoor setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Ig7ast24Em8_30_144to280.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part70/Ig7ast24Em8_30_144to280.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Ig7ast24Em8_30_144to280.mp4	The video is a news segment from NBC News, featuring a woman with blonde hair and a black dress. She is speaking about a 4-day work week experiment that shows productivity is equal to a 5-day work week. The woman is standing in front of a brick wall with a wooden panel, and there are other people in the background. The style of the video is informative and professional, with a focus on delivering news content. The woman's expression is serious, and she is looking directly at the camera. The background is simple and uncluttered, allowing the viewer to focus on the woman and her message. The video is likely intended for a general audience, and the content is likely to be of interest to those who are interested in work-life balance and productivity.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CBvNAlvUpcU_128_93to216.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/CBvNAlvUpcU_128_93to216.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CBvNAlvUpcU_128_93to216.mp4	The video shows a person in a kitchen, wearing blue gloves, preparing a unique type of food. The person is holding a donut with a filling in their hand, and there are several other donuts with fillings on a tray in front of them. The donuts are placed on a wire rack, and there is a plastic container with more donuts in it. The kitchen has stainless steel appliances, including a refrigerator and an oven, and there is a sink in the background. The person appears to be in the process of making these donuts, and the video captures the process of food preparation in a professional kitchen setting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+VVtZVabutYM_33_64to185.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part102/VVtZVabutYM_33_64to185.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-VVtZVabutYM_33_64to185.mp4	The video shows a man riding a bicycle on a quiet street. The man is wearing a blue long-sleeved shirt and gray pants. He is smiling and looking towards the camera. The bicycle has a black frame and is equipped with a black bag on the back. The street is lined with trees and power lines. The sky is clear and blue. The man is riding the bicycle in a relaxed manner, suggesting a leisurely ride. The overall style of the video is casual and friendly, capturing a moment of joy and freedom.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gi3GJCIem6E_1_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part129/gi3GJCIem6E_1_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gi3GJCIem6E_1_0to110.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a purple caterpillar as it moves through a leafy green environment. The caterpillar, with its vibrant purple hue, is the main focus of the video, and it is seen crawling across the leaves, exploring its surroundings. The leaves, a mix of green and purple, provide a natural backdrop for the caterpillar's journey. The video is shot in a way that emphasizes the caterpillar's movement and the texture of the leaves, creating a sense of depth and realism. The overall style of the video is naturalistic, with a focus on the caterpillar's interaction with its environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+_AWqOUyqucs_193_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part106/_AWqOUyqucs_193_0to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-_AWqOUyqucs_193_0to156.mp4	The video is a 3D animated scene featuring a large, brown owl flying through a colorful, cartoonish landscape. The owl is the central figure, soaring above a lush green valley with rolling hills and a winding river. The sky is a clear blue, dotted with fluffy white clouds. In the distance, there are three smaller birds, each a different color: green, blue, and pink, flying alongside the owl. The overall style of the video is whimsical and vibrant, with a focus on bright colors and playful character design. The animation is smooth and fluid, giving the impression of a serene and peaceful flight through a magical, animated world.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+2Hm9jjAJnsE_8_0to168.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part46/2Hm9jjAJnsE_8_0to168.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-2Hm9jjAJnsE_8_0to168.mp4	The video features a man in a black shirt standing in front of a bookshelf. He appears to be speaking or reacting to something, as indicated by his open mouth and expressive eyes. The bookshelf behind him is filled with various items, including books, a clock, and a framed picture. The style of the video suggests it might be a casual, informal setting, possibly a personal space or a home office. The man's attire and the presence of the bookshelf suggest he might be a professional or an academic. The overall atmosphere of the video is relaxed and personal.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+AddW75KvkGY_21_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/AddW75KvkGY_21_0to157.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-AddW75KvkGY_21_0to157.mp4	The video features a man sitting on the edge of a boat, gesturing with his hands as he speaks. He is wearing a blue jacket and glasses. The boat is white and has a large, open hatch. The man appears to be explaining something about the boat, possibly its features or how to use it. The background shows a calm body of water with houses on the shore. The style of the video is informative, with the man acting as a guide or expert on the boat. The focus is on the man and the boat, with the background serving as a scenic backdrop.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+uBfLL9RoDII_66_0to144.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part139/uBfLL9RoDII_66_0to144.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-uBfLL9RoDII_66_0to144.mp4	The video showcases the interior of a luxury car, specifically an Audi, as it is evident from the logo on the steering wheel. The car's interior is sleek and modern, with a focus on the driver's side. The steering wheel is black and prominently displays the Audi logo. The dashboard is equipped with a large screen that displays a map, indicating that the car is equipped with GPS navigation. The car's interior is well-lit, with the sunroof open, allowing natural light to flood in. The car is parked in a wooded area, as evidenced by the trees visible through the open sunroof. The overall style of the video is that of a promotional or advertisement video, highlighting the car's features and design.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8GxwHRf1eOg_20_0to115.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part43/8GxwHRf1eOg_20_0to115.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8GxwHRf1eOg_20_0to115.mp4	In the video, three men are seen in a bar setting, each holding a glass of wine. The first man, dressed in a blue jacket, is seen pouring wine into his glass. The second man, wearing a green apron, is holding a glass of wine and appears to be tasting it. The third man, wearing a blue shirt and tie, is also holding a glass of wine and seems to be enjoying the moment. The bar counter is filled with various bottles and glasses, indicating a well-stocked bar. The atmosphere is relaxed and convivial, with the men engaging in conversation and enjoying their drinks.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KcRNkO9vriY_36_159to301.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part96/KcRNkO9vriY_36_159to301.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KcRNkO9vriY_36_159to301.mp4	The video captures a vibrant green parrot perched on a tree branch. The bird, with its bright green feathers and red beak, is the main focus of the video. The parrot is seen in three different positions on the branch, showcasing its agility and grace. The background is filled with lush green leaves, providing a natural and serene setting for the bird. The video is a close-up shot, allowing the viewer to appreciate the bird's details and colors. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the bird in its natural habitat.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5-wbrgLVY-Y_25_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part46/5-wbrgLVY-Y_25_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5-wbrgLVY-Y_25_0to133.mp4	The video captures a white tiger in a zoo enclosure. The tiger is seen in three different positions, each time lying on a concrete ledge. The tiger's fur is white with black stripes, and its eyes are open, looking directly at the camera. The background of the enclosure features green plants and a wooden structure. The tiger's position changes slightly in each frame, but it remains on the ledge. The video is a close-up shot of the tiger, focusing on its face and upper body. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the tiger in its natural habitat.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+7OXLVxTXJEs_10_0to189.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part45/7OXLVxTXJEs_10_0to189.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-7OXLVxTXJEs_10_0to189.mp4	The video shows a woman standing in a cluttered room, gesturing with her hands as she speaks. She is wearing a pink tank top and has dark hair. The room is filled with various items, including a bowl, a calculator, and a book. The woman appears to be in the middle of a conversation or explanation. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the woman and her actions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Dxm9-sCSAZo_38_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part61/Dxm9-sCSAZo_38_0to133.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Dxm9-sCSAZo_38_0to133.mp4	The video is a 3D animated scene depicting a vibrant and colorful landscape. It features a body of water with floating lily pads and flowers, and a large rock formation with flowers growing on it. The rock formation is connected to the ground by green vines. In the background, there are green hills and trees, and a small village with buildings and windmills. The sky is clear and blue, and the overall atmosphere is serene and picturesque. The style of the animation is bright and cheerful, with a focus on nature and the beauty of the environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WG8OltPC-4I_88_0to129.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part99/WG8OltPC-4I_88_0to129.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WG8OltPC-4I_88_0to129.mp4	The video depicts a serene tropical setting, featuring a winding dirt path leading through lush greenery. The path is bordered by dense foliage, including palm trees and other tropical plants, creating a natural corridor. At the end of the path, a traditional thatched-roof hut with a straw roof can be seen, suggesting a cultural or historical significance. The hut is surrounded by more greenery, and the overall atmosphere is one of tranquility and natural beauty. The style of the video is realistic, with vibrant colors and clear details that capture the essence of the tropical environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+CZ4LmBaSDBc_4_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part33/CZ4LmBaSDBc_4_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-CZ4LmBaSDBc_4_0to127.mp4	The video captures a bustling city street scene. A man is seen standing on the back of a truck filled with water bottles, seemingly in the process of loading or unloading them. The truck is parked on the side of the street, and the man is actively engaged in his task. The street is lined with parked motorcycles, adding to the urban feel of the scene. In the background, a bus can be seen, further emphasizing the busy nature of the location. The overall style of the video is a realistic depiction of everyday life in a city, with a focus on the man and his actions on the truck.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Ol9UQeX33-w_16_0to105.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part79/Ol9UQeX33-w_16_0to105.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Ol9UQeX33-w_16_0to105.mp4	The video features a man sitting on a brick patio, leaning against a green and black leaf blower. He is wearing a red plaid shirt and a watch on his left wrist. The man appears to be in a relaxed posture, with his left arm resting on the leaf blower. The brick patio is part of a house with a white door and a window. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the man and the leaf blower. The setting suggests a residential area, and the man's attire and posture indicate a leisurely or casual activity. The video does not contain any text or additional elements.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+877b81229e05a6ba56d1c72e08ac280aacd07a73fca0e60e3e122542f8b5b67f.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/877b81229e05a6ba56d1c72e08ac280aacd07a73fca0e60e3e122542f8b5b67f.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-877b81229e05a6ba56d1c72e08ac280aacd07a73fca0e60e3e122542f8b5b67f.mp4	The video captures a serene scene of a pond teeming with colorful koi fish. The water is a murky green, reflecting the surrounding environment and the vibrant hues of the fish. The koi, varying in size and color, swim gracefully, their scales shimmering in shades of red, white, black, and orange. Some fish have intricate patterns on their bodies, adding to the visual appeal. The camera pans slowly across the pond, revealing more of the fish and the tranquil setting. The background features a stone wall, which adds a rustic charm to the scene. The gentle movement of the water and the fish creates a calming atmosphere, making it an ideal setting for relaxation or observation of nature's beauty.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Iq37eRcjn24_1_295to435.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part67/Iq37eRcjn24_1_295to435.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Iq37eRcjn24_1_295to435.mp4	"In the video, a man is seen in a room with purple acoustic foam on the walls, indicating a soundproofed space, likely for recording or broadcasting. He is holding a microphone with a blue light on it, suggesting that he is either a streamer or a podcaster. The man is wearing a blue t-shirt with a graphic on it, and he has a beard. Behind him, there is a black gaming chair with the word ""DXRacer"" on it, which is a brand known for gaming chairs. To the left of the man, there is a cardboard box with a gold Iron Man helmet on top of it. The overall style of the video is casual and informal, with the man appearing relaxed and comfortable in his environment."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+yxsn0Y2T0-Y_19_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part148/yxsn0Y2T0-Y_19_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-yxsn0Y2T0-Y_19_0to127.mp4	The video features a red and white toy mask with yellow eyes, resembling a character from a popular franchise. The mask is placed on a black pole, and it appears to be in motion, as if it's moving towards the camera. The background is filled with various comic book covers, suggesting a theme of pop culture and fandom. The style of the video is playful and lighthearted, with a focus on the toy mask as the main subject. The comic book covers in the background add a sense of nostalgia and excitement, hinting at the broader world of fan culture and collectibles.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+b-ndioSZalE_114_17to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part98/b-ndioSZalE_114_17to151.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-b-ndioSZalE_114_17to151.mp4	In the video, a man is seen enjoying a meal at a restaurant. He is seated at a table, which is set with a white tablecloth, a plate of food, and cutlery including a knife and a fork. The man is wearing a dark-colored shirt and appears to be savoring the taste of the food. The restaurant has a modern and elegant interior, with a bar area visible in the background. The lighting is soft and warm, creating a comfortable and inviting atmosphere. The man's facial expression suggests that he is thoroughly enjoying his meal.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+sn6N_aLssU4_33_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part180/sn6N_aLssU4_33_0to121.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-sn6N_aLssU4_33_0to121.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a CNC machine in action, carving a wooden block. The machine is equipped with a drill bit, which is actively drilling into the wood, creating a precise hole. The wood chips are visible, indicating the machine's progress. The machine is mounted on a sturdy wooden base, which provides stability during the carving process. The background is blurred, focusing the viewer's attention on the machine and the carving process. The video is likely educational, showcasing the capabilities of the CNC machine in woodworking.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ETTV8kbC6kw_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part36/ETTV8kbC6kw_0_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ETTV8kbC6kw_0_0to136.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a plate of yellow square-shaped food, possibly a type of cheese or a similar dairy product. The food is arranged in a neat pile on a black plate, which contrasts with the bright yellow color of the food. The food appears to be freshly cut, with clean edges and a smooth texture. The lighting in the video is soft and even, highlighting the creamy color of the food and the reflective surface of the plate. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing solely on the food without any additional context or background elements. The video does not contain any text or other objects, and the focus is solely on the plate of food. The video is likely intended to showcase the food in a visually appealing way, possibly for a culinary or food-related context.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+HgofBPShoaU_31_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/HgofBPShoaU_31_0to145.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-HgofBPShoaU_31_0to145.mp4	The video features a 3D animated brain floating in a white space. The brain is detailed, showing the intricate folds and grooves of the cerebral cortex. The animation is smooth and realistic, with a focus on the brain's structure and complexity. The background is plain and unobtrusive, allowing the viewer to fully focus on the brain. The style of the video is educational and informative, likely aimed at teaching viewers about the brain's anatomy and function.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KS1imViyscc_170_132to259.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part75/KS1imViyscc_170_132to259.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KS1imViyscc_170_132to259.mp4	The video captures a person enjoying a meal at a table. The person is seen using a fork to pick up a piece of food from a bowl and place it on a plate. The plate is white and has a colorful design on the edge. The food appears to be a type of fish, possibly a red snapper, and is garnished with onions and carrots. The table is set with multiple plates and a bottle, suggesting a meal shared among several people. The style of the video is casual and candid, capturing a moment of everyday life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BnkotMKVJSo_44_0to124.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/BnkotMKVJSo_44_0to124.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BnkotMKVJSo_44_0to124.mp4	The video shows a bald man with a beard, wearing a colorful plaid shirt, standing in a kitchen. He is looking down at a counter, possibly preparing a meal or inspecting something. The kitchen is well-lit and features white cabinets and a black countertop. On the counter, there are various kitchen items such as a knife, a bowl, and a bottle. The man appears to be focused on his task, and the overall atmosphere of the video is calm and domestic.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KrckXyO-jz0_1_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part96/KrckXyO-jz0_1_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KrckXyO-jz0_1_0to112.mp4	In the video, a man is seen in a close-up shot, wearing a plaid shirt. He is looking down, possibly at a book or a piece of paper, with a thoughtful expression on his face. The background features a bookshelf filled with various books, suggesting that the setting might be a library or a study room. The man's focused gaze and the quiet, intellectual atmosphere of the scene suggest a moment of deep concentration or contemplation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+_AUc8k3pEao_249_35to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/_AUc8k3pEao_249_35to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-_AUc8k3pEao_249_35to158.mp4	The video features a woman sitting on a couch in a living room. She is wearing a black and white floral dress and has her hair styled in a bob. The living room has a beige couch with a floral pattern, a lamp with a white shade, and a window with curtains. The woman appears to be engaged in a conversation or listening intently to someone off-camera. The overall style of the video is casual and intimate, capturing a moment of everyday life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+wVPtEg3zSjU_14_0to160.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part163/wVPtEg3zSjU_14_0to160.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-wVPtEg3zSjU_14_0to160.mp4	The video shows a red Jeep parked on a dirt road. The Jeep is equipped with large off-road tires and a black front bumper. The vehicle is positioned in front of a tree, and the sun is shining on the hood, creating a reflection. The Jeep's grill and headlights are clearly visible. The style of the video is a straightforward, real-life depiction of the vehicle, with no additional embellishments or artistic effects. The focus is on the Jeep and its immediate surroundings, with no other significant objects or actions in the scene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+OghpBFKaTa0_23_20to174.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part102/OghpBFKaTa0_23_20to174.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-OghpBFKaTa0_23_20to174.mp4	The video features a man in a suit and glasses, who appears to be speaking or presenting. He is positioned in front of a large copper still, which is likely used for distilling spirits. The still is prominently displayed in the background, suggesting that the setting might be a distillery or a place where alcohol is produced. The man's attire and the presence of the still indicate that he could be a professional in the field of distilling or a representative of a company that produces alcoholic beverages. The style of the video seems to be informative or promotional, possibly aimed at showcasing the distillery or the products it produces.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SVE_Ph5z-MM_14_87to287.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part87/SVE_Ph5z-MM_14_87to287.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SVE_Ph5z-MM_14_87to287.mp4	The video shows a close-up view of a car engine compartment. The engine is a BMW, as indicated by the logo on the cover. The text overlay on the video indicates that the engine is capable of producing 473 horsepower or 503 horsepower, with a torque of 442 lb.-ft. The engine cover is black with white stripes and the BMW logo. The engine is well-maintained and clean, suggesting that it is in good condition. The video is likely a promotional or informational video about the BMW engine, highlighting its power and performance.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+nciHrwGpdbU_26_0to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part173/nciHrwGpdbU_26_0to173.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-nciHrwGpdbU_26_0to173.mp4	"The video shows a black and brown dachshund sitting on a white couch with a patterned blanket. The dog is wearing a collar with a tag. In the foreground, there is a smartphone displaying a blue screen with a red call button. The dog appears to be looking at the phone, and there is a yellow text overlay on the screen that reads ""Yes hello."" The style of the video is casual and humorous, with a focus on the dog's interaction with the smartphone. The overall tone of the video is light-hearted and playful."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+WXFJMpfn8-M_33_664to848.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part104/WXFJMpfn8-M_33_664to848.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-WXFJMpfn8-M_33_664to848.mp4	In the video, a man with a beard and a green cap is seen in a rural setting. He is holding a blue device, possibly a solar panel, in his right hand. The man is standing in front of a wire fence, which is part of a fenced area. The background features a wooden structure, possibly a barn or a shed, and a dirt path. The man appears to be pointing at the device, indicating its importance or function. The overall style of the video suggests a focus on sustainable energy or outdoor activities.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+VuSVCharqYU_2_268to392.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part89/VuSVCharqYU_2_268to392.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-VuSVCharqYU_2_268to392.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a delicious apple cake with a slice missing. The cake is topped with thinly sliced apples arranged in a spiral pattern, giving it a visually appealing and appetizing look. The apples are fresh and crisp, adding a touch of natural sweetness to the cake. The cake itself has a golden-brown crust, indicating it has been baked to perfection. The slice missing from the cake reveals the moist and fluffy interior, inviting viewers to take a bite. The overall style of the video is simple yet effective, focusing on the cake and its details to make it look even more tempting.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9904a994210fe039cd06f427108cc195cfa0e829d0c3d55598560261b81e1b13.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/9904a994210fe039cd06f427108cc195cfa0e829d0c3d55598560261b81e1b13.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9904a994210fe039cd06f427108cc195cfa0e829d0c3d55598560261b81e1b13.mp4	The video captures a close-up scene of a red and white zigzag-patterned paper container filled with dark, crispy fried chicken wings. The wings are glistening, suggesting they are freshly cooked and possibly coated in a thick, glossy sauce. A single wing is seen being lifted out of the container, showcasing its texture and the sauce clinging to it. As the wing is lifted, it reveals more of the crispy, blackened exterior of the other wings inside the container. The background is a solid red, which contrasts sharply with the vibrant colors of the food and the container, making them stand out prominently. To the right of the container, there is a glass partially filled with a golden liquid, likely beer or another beverage, adding to the casual dining atmosphere. The camera remains stationary throughout the sequence, focusing on the action of the wing being lifted and the details of the food and drink. The lighting is bright, highlighting the textures and colors vividly.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9qVYPz_vuIc_3_0to164.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part66/9qVYPz_vuIc_3_0to164.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9qVYPz_vuIc_3_0to164.mp4	In the video, a man and a woman are seen walking together in a city setting. The man is wearing a black coat and sunglasses, while the woman is dressed in a black coat and sunglasses as well. They are both wearing black coats and sunglasses, which gives them a stylish and coordinated appearance. The city around them is bustling with activity, and they are walking in the same direction, suggesting that they are together. The video captures a moment of urban life, with the two individuals navigating the city streets.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rnp9JZSMC8Q_22_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part125/rnp9JZSMC8Q_22_0to132.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rnp9JZSMC8Q_22_0to132.mp4	The video shows a man on a boat, holding up a smartphone displaying a speedometer reading of 21 mph. The man is wearing a cap and glasses, and he appears to be in motion, as suggested by the speedometer reading. The background features a body of water, possibly a lake or river, with trees and a cloudy sky. The style of the video is casual and seems to be taken from a first-person perspective, capturing the man's experience of speeding on the water.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8lKk_x6DmWg_0_0to129.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part48/8lKk_x6DmWg_0_0to129.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8lKk_x6DmWg_0_0to129.mp4	The video shows two young men standing in front of a building with a pointed roof, possibly a church or a school. The man on the left is gesturing with his right hand, pointing towards the building, while the man on the right is smiling and looking at him. They are both dressed casually, with the man on the left wearing a white t-shirt and the man on the right wearing a maroon long-sleeved shirt. The building behind them has a stone facade and a large window on the left side. The sky is overcast, and there are trees visible in the background. The style of the video is casual and informal, capturing a moment of conversation between the two men.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8aCGL9GpVUg_3_147to346.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part65/8aCGL9GpVUg_3_147to346.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8aCGL9GpVUg_3_147to346.mp4	The video features a bald man with a beard and glasses, sitting on a purple couch in a room with purple lights. He is wearing a black shirt and a necklace. The room has a bookshelf filled with books and various objects, and a guitar is visible in the background. The man appears to be speaking or singing, as he is holding a microphone close to his mouth. The overall style of the video is casual and intimate, with a focus on the man and his surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+eP_7cxBV2kU_10_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part119/eP_7cxBV2kU_10_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-eP_7cxBV2kU_10_0to112.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen in a kitchen, holding a plate of cupcakes. She is smiling and appears to be proud of her creation. The cupcakes are decorated with blueberries and have purple frosting. The kitchen is well-lit and has a modern design, with white cabinets and a black countertop. On the countertop, there are various kitchen items, including a green pot and a red bowl. The woman is wearing a pink shirt and has short brown hair. The video captures a moment of joy and accomplishment in the kitchen.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Zp7_GrWH5EU_278_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part107/Zp7_GrWH5EU_278_0to123.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Zp7_GrWH5EU_278_0to123.mp4	The video features a large, friendly-looking brown bear standing in a forested area. The bear is holding a small pink airplane with a white star on its side. As the bear holds the airplane, a flock of butterflies flies around it, creating a whimsical and magical atmosphere. The forest around the bear is lush and green, with tall trees and a clear blue sky overhead. The bear appears to be enjoying the moment, as it gazes at the airplane with a sense of curiosity and wonder. The overall style of the video is cartoonish and playful, with vibrant colors and a sense of adventure.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+bXS5FnaWyDk_16_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part109/bXS5FnaWyDk_16_0to142.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-bXS5FnaWyDk_16_0to142.mp4	The video captures a classroom scene where a group of students are engaged in a writing activity. The students are seated at desks, each with a notebook and a pen. The classroom is well-lit, with natural light streaming in from the windows. The desks are arranged in rows, and the students are focused on their work. The teacher is standing at the front of the classroom, overseeing the activity. The students are dressed in casual attire, suggesting a relaxed and comfortable learning environment. The video is shot in a realistic style, capturing the everyday life of a classroom.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+T_rl88YEo1s_4_103to251.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part85/T_rl88YEo1s_4_103to251.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-T_rl88YEo1s_4_103to251.mp4	The video is a top 5 list of sneakers, presented by a man in a store filled with various sneakers. The man is wearing a black and white jacket, a black cap, and glasses. He holds a pair of sneakers in his hands, which are the Hypervenom Phantom 3 Elite Low. The store has shelves filled with a variety of sneakers, and there are also sports balls and a red cup on a table. The man is standing in front of a shelf with more sneakers. The video is likely informative and aimed at sneaker enthusiasts.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+8QOhwgMj4h4_4_0to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part43/8QOhwgMj4h4_4_0to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-8QOhwgMj4h4_4_0to200.mp4	The video shows a woman with blonde hair, wearing a green jacket and a gold necklace, standing in a store filled with various items. She appears to be speaking or reacting to something, as her mouth is open and her eyes are focused on something off-camera. The store has a variety of items, including clothing, toys, and decorations, creating a colorful and cluttered background. The lighting in the store is bright, and the overall atmosphere seems lively and bustling. The woman's expression and the surrounding environment suggest that she might be shopping or browsing the store.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+GZU4z2pUxxs_30_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part33/GZU4z2pUxxs_30_0to119.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-GZU4z2pUxxs_30_0to119.mp4	The video captures a serene moment in a field where a white horse is the main subject. The horse, adorned with a gray blanket, stands near a wooden fence, its head resting on the top rail. The field is lush and green, providing a stark contrast to the horse's white coat. In the background, trees can be seen, adding a touch of nature to the scene. The horse's calm demeanor and the peaceful surroundings create a tranquil atmosphere. The video is a simple yet beautiful depiction of a horse in its natural habitat.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+BlLZZrbeJts_1_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part35/BlLZZrbeJts_1_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-BlLZZrbeJts_1_0to122.mp4	The video features a young man with glasses, wearing a white shirt and a striped tie. He is standing in front of a window with blinds, and there is a plant in the background. The man appears to be in a state of surprise or shock, as he is looking off to the side with his mouth slightly open. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the man's facial expression and the indoor setting. The lighting is natural, coming from the window, and the overall atmosphere is calm and quiet.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+b84ea734706ad7da4f3eeac6486192f048e3b7b554df485718d90687217ea486.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/b84ea734706ad7da4f3eeac6486192f048e3b7b554df485718d90687217ea486.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-b84ea734706ad7da4f3eeac6486192f048e3b7b554df485718d90687217ea486.mp4	The video captures a serene scene inside a home where a black cat is intently observing a vibrant coral reef aquarium. The aquarium is filled with colorful fish, including a striking orange and black striped fish and a bright yellow fish, swimming among various types of coral. The tank is illuminated by a blue light, enhancing the vivid colors of the marine life and the coral. The cat, positioned on a wooden surface to the right of the aquarium, leans forward, its attention fixed on the aquatic display. Its ears are perked up, indicating curiosity or interest. The background reveals part of the room, including a window and some furniture, suggesting a cozy indoor setting. The cat remains stationary throughout the video, maintaining its focus on the aquarium, while the fish continue their graceful movements through the water. The overall atmosphere is calm and peaceful, highlighting the cat's fascination with the underwater world.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+FfOSzX01tkw_41_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part55/FfOSzX01tkw_41_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-FfOSzX01tkw_41_0to110.mp4	The video features a woman with curly hair, wearing a plaid shirt, sitting in front of a purple background. She appears to be engaged in a conversation or interview. The style of the video is casual and informal, with the woman being the main focus. The purple background provides a contrast to her outfit, making her stand out. The lighting in the video is soft, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere. The overall impression is that of a friendly and relaxed conversation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XwWlam4ZYNE_24_0to178.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part83/XwWlam4ZYNE_24_0to178.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XwWlam4ZYNE_24_0to178.mp4	The video shows a black BMW SUV parked on a dirt road. The car is damaged, with a broken windshield and a dented hood. The vehicle is parked next to a fence and some bushes. The scene is set in a rural area, with a clear sky and no other vehicles or people visible. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the damaged car and its surroundings. The camera angle is from the side of the car, providing a clear view of the damage. The lighting is natural, with no artificial lighting visible. The overall mood of the video is somber, reflecting the damage to the car.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+139377b129478f641f6968747d92306960caf175499ce62d3f2c3423b7233176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/139377b129478f641f6968747d92306960caf175499ce62d3f2c3423b7233176.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-139377b129478f641f6968747d92306960caf175499ce62d3f2c3423b7233176.mp4	The video showcases a conveyor belt system designed for processing food items, specifically what appears to be fried chicken pieces. The conveyor belt is black with horizontal slats, and it moves steadily from left to right. The blue container at the top of the frame holds a pile of golden-brown fried chicken pieces, which are then fed into the conveyor belt. As the conveyor belt operates, the chicken pieces slide down the slats, gradually moving towards the right side of the frame. Throughout the video, some pieces of chicken fall off the conveyor belt, indicating that the machine might not be perfectly aligned or that the chicken pieces are too large for efficient handling. The background remains consistent, featuring a plain white wall, which keeps the focus on the conveyor belt and the chicken pieces. There are no visible characters or additional objects in the scene, emphasizing the mechanical process. The video captures the continuous motion of the conveyor belt and the gradual movement of the chicken pieces through the system.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+VjpGidILzb0_20_0to178.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part118/VjpGidILzb0_20_0to178.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-VjpGidILzb0_20_0to178.mp4	The video captures the breathtaking beauty of a tropical island. The first frame shows a lush, green landscape filled with palm trees and other tropical vegetation. The second frame reveals a stunning turquoise lagoon, its crystal-clear waters reflecting the surrounding greenery. The third frame offers a bird's-eye view of the lagoon, showcasing its vibrant blue waters and the surrounding rocks and vegetation. The video is a testament to the natural beauty of the island, with its vibrant colors and lush greenery.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+SjpU0l0tXHs_38_32to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part99/SjpU0l0tXHs_38_32to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-SjpU0l0tXHs_38_32to172.mp4	The video is a 3D animated aerial view of the city of Luxembourg. The style is realistic with attention to detail in the architecture and landscape. The cityscape features a mix of modern and traditional buildings, including a prominent circular building with a dome. The surrounding area is lush with greenery, and the city is nestled among rolling hills. The sky is clear with a few clouds, suggesting a pleasant day. The video provides a comprehensive view of the city, showcasing its unique blend of urban development and natural beauty.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+51pJYlg7cXA_19_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/51pJYlg7cXA_19_0to103.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-51pJYlg7cXA_19_0to103.mp4	The video features a man with curly hair and a beard, wearing a plaid shirt. He is seated in front of a blue background and appears to be engaged in a conversation. The man is speaking and his facial expression suggests he is making a point or explaining something. The style of the video is a straightforward interview or discussion, with the focus on the man and his speech. The blue background provides a simple and unobtrusive setting, allowing the viewer to concentrate on the man and his words.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+KPlA5Y5At94_128_0to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part79/KPlA5Y5At94_128_0to195.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-KPlA5Y5At94_128_0to195.mp4	The video is a playful and colorful depiction of a young girl dressed in a costume, possibly for Halloween. She is wearing a straw hat, a blue apron, and a dress with a floral pattern. The girl is seated at a table, surrounded by various Halloween-themed decorations, including a pink house with cobwebs and a ghost, and several floating ghosts. The style of the video is whimsical and child-friendly, with a focus on bright colors and fun, cartoonish elements. The girl appears to be looking at something off-camera with a curious expression. The overall atmosphere of the video is light-hearted and festive, capturing the spirit of Halloween in a fun and engaging way.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gwDydZmCcyw_68_19to209.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part130/gwDydZmCcyw_68_19to209.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gwDydZmCcyw_68_19to209.mp4	The video captures a football player in action, wearing a white helmet with a visor. The player is seen in three different frames, each showing a different part of the game. In the first frame, the player is seen running towards the camera, his helmet gleaming under the stadium lights. In the second frame, the player is seen in mid-air, having just leapt to catch the ball. The third frame shows the player landing on the ground, the ball securely in his hands. The background of the video is a blur of red and white, indicating the colors of the stadium. The style of the video is dynamic and action-packed, capturing the intensity and excitement of the game.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ef076933d849f1f93bdb00da9a5d2833d137a359673628d00f922a86fb00c785.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/ef076933d849f1f93bdb00da9a5d2833d137a359673628d00f922a86fb00c785.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ef076933d849f1f93bdb00da9a5d2833d137a359673628d00f922a86fb00c785.mp4	The video captures a serene sunset scene over a calm body of water, likely a lake or river. The sky is painted with hues of orange, yellow, and blue, with streaks of contrails crossing diagonally across the frame, adding a dynamic element to the otherwise tranquil setting. The sun is partially obscured by clouds, casting a warm glow that reflects beautifully on the water's surface, creating a mirror-like effect. On the left side of the frame, a dense cluster of trees stands tall, their silhouettes dark against the vibrant backdrop. In the middle distance, a single bird, possibly a duck, is seen floating peacefully on the water, adding life to the scene. The camera remains stationary throughout the sequence, allowing viewers to fully absorb the peaceful ambiance and the gradual transition of light as the sun sets. The overall atmosphere is one of calm and natural beauty, with no significant changes occurring between the frames other than the subtle shift in lighting as the sun descends further below the horizon.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Yx2ONwKHAeI_2_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part87/Yx2ONwKHAeI_2_0to141.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Yx2ONwKHAeI_2_0to141.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen in a kitchen, preparing a meal. She is wearing a blue and gold dress and a pink headscarf. The kitchen is equipped with a white microwave and a silver pot on the stove. The woman is standing in front of the stove, stirring the contents of the pot. The scene is set against a backdrop of a window and a potted plant. The woman's actions suggest that she is in the process of cooking a meal. The overall style of the video is casual and homey, capturing a moment of everyday life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+a24e842bca3cbe09c4eb1ec937bc77335dabb72ea74806971336510eb8d6c44f.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/WISA-80k/a24e842bca3cbe09c4eb1ec937bc77335dabb72ea74806971336510eb8d6c44f.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-a24e842bca3cbe09c4eb1ec937bc77335dabb72ea74806971336510eb8d6c44f.mp4	"The video showcases an intricate domino setup on a wooden floor, designed to represent the iconic Gryffindor emblem from the Harry Potter series. The scene is dominated by a large yellow lion, meticulously constructed from dominoes, standing prominently on the right side of the frame. Surrounding the lion are various elements that spell out ""Gryffindor"" in bold red and yellow dominoes, with the letters arranged in a dynamic, flowing pattern that adds a sense of movement and energy to the composition.In the center of the setup, there's a circular arrangement of dominoes, possibly forming a design or pattern that complements the overall theme. The background features additional domino structures, including what appears to be a black and white striped pattern, adding depth and complexity to the scene. The entire setup is well-lit, highlighting the vibrant colors and the detailed craftsmanship of the domino pieces.As the video progresses, the dominoes begin to fall in a chain reaction"	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+B-9a8Em6V40_20_420to541.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part31/B-9a8Em6V40_20_420to541.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-B-9a8Em6V40_20_420to541.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a meal being eaten. The meal consists of a salad with various ingredients, including lettuce, corn, and possibly chicken. The salad is served in a green bowl, which is placed on a white table. A fork is visible next to the bowl, suggesting that the meal is being eaten with utensils. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the food and the act of eating. The lighting is bright, highlighting the colors of the salad and the bowl. The overall impression is of a healthy and appetizing meal.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0SeAUphlyKE_26_29to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part30/0SeAUphlyKE_26_29to165.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0SeAUphlyKE_26_29to165.mp4	The video features a man with a serious expression, looking to the side. He is wearing a dark shirt and has short, gray hair. The background is blurred, but it appears to be an indoor setting with a blue wall. The man's gaze is directed towards something off-camera, and his facial expression suggests he is deep in thought or focused on a particular issue. The style of the video is a close-up shot, emphasizing the man's face and expression.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+gK8RdDpa--M_44_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part128/gK8RdDpa--M_44_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-gK8RdDpa--M_44_0to118.mp4	The video shows a black sports car parked in a garage. The car's door is open, revealing the interior. The car is sleek and shiny, with a black interior that contrasts with the red seat. The garage is filled with other cars, but the black sports car is the main focus. The car's door is open, inviting viewers to take a closer look at the interior. The garage is spacious and well-lit, with other cars parked in the background. The video captures the beauty and elegance of the black sports car, making it the star of the show.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0o94ZLx8NOo_31_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part34/0o94ZLx8NOo_31_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0o94ZLx8NOo_31_0to104.mp4	The video features a man in a suit sitting in the back seat of a car. The car appears to be a luxury vehicle, with leather seats and a sleek design. The man is looking to his left, possibly at something outside the car or in the car. The interior of the car is well-lit, with ambient lighting that highlights the man's face and the car's interior. The man is wearing a dark suit and tie, suggesting a formal or professional setting. The car is moving, as indicated by the blurred background, which suggests that the man is either being driven to or from an event or meeting. The overall style of the video is professional and polished, with a focus on the man and the car.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+MRIMMA582Ts_4_78to214.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part105/MRIMMA582Ts_4_78to214.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-MRIMMA582Ts_4_78to214.mp4	The video captures a prom night scene with a young couple as the main focus. The couple, dressed in formal attire, is seen walking down a red carpet, holding hands and smiling. The girl is wearing a long, elegant dress, while the boy is in a suit with a bow tie. They are surrounded by a crowd of people, some of whom are also dressed in formal wear. In the background, there are cars parked, and a tree can be seen. The overall atmosphere of the video is festive and joyful, capturing the excitement of prom night.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+r80okyKPDjI_33_0to124.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part172/r80okyKPDjI_33_0to124.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-r80okyKPDjI_33_0to124.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a dessert being served in a green bowl. The dessert consists of a scoop of white whipped cream, a generous serving of red berries, and a few white balls that could be marshmallows or some other type of confectionery. The berries are vibrant and fresh, contrasting with the creamy white whipped cream. The white balls add a touch of whimsy to the dish. The bowl is placed on a wooden table, which provides a warm and rustic backdrop to the dessert. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the dessert and its presentation. The camera angle is slightly elevated, giving a clear view of the dessert and its contents. The lighting is soft and natural, highlighting the colors and textures of the dessert without creating harsh shadows. The video does not contain any text or additional elements, allowing the viewer to fully appreciate the dessert and its presentation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+AnOKqFaCtt4_51_0to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part53/AnOKqFaCtt4_51_0to172.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-AnOKqFaCtt4_51_0to172.mp4	The video is a promotional advertisement for a boat show. It features a luxurious white yacht with a sleek design, cruising on a calm blue ocean. The yacht is equipped with a spacious deck and a large cabin, suggesting it's designed for both leisure and comfort. The boat is moving at a moderate speed, leaving a small wake behind it. The ocean is vast and serene, with no other boats or landmarks in sight. The sky is clear and blue, indicating good weather conditions. The overall style of the video is professional and polished, with a focus on showcasing the yacht's features and the beauty of the ocean. The video likely includes a voiceover or text overlay providing information about the boat show and the yacht itself.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Ylr2O2QGbmQ_14_0to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part86/Ylr2O2QGbmQ_14_0to200.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Ylr2O2QGbmQ_14_0to200.mp4	The video shows a close-up of peaches being sliced on a white surface. The peaches are ripe and juicy, with a vibrant red and yellow color. The slices are arranged in a pattern, with some overlapping each other. The peaches are being sliced with a knife, which is visible in the frame. The background is white, which contrasts with the colorful peaches. The style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the peaches and the process of slicing them. The video does not contain any text or additional elements. The peaches are the main subject of the video, and the viewer's attention is drawn to them immediately. The video does not contain any action or movement, but rather captures a still moment in time. The peaches are the only objects in the video, and there are no other objects or people present. The video does not contain any sound or music, and the focus is solely on the visual elements. The video does not contain any text or additional information, and the viewer is left to interpret the scene based on the visual elements alone. The video does not contain any additional context or information, and the viewer is left to fill in the blanks. The video does not contain any additional elements or objects, and the viewer is left to focus solely on the peaches and the process of slicing them. The video does not contain any additional elements or objects, and the viewer is left to focus solely on the peaches and	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+3ZHxEotPCHs_58_114to238.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/3ZHxEotPCHs_58_114to238.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-3ZHxEotPCHs_58_114to238.mp4	The video shows a man in a car, driving down a road. He is wearing glasses and a suit, and appears to be engaged in a conversation. The car is moving along a road with other vehicles, and the scenery outside the car window includes trees and a truck. The man seems to be in the middle of a journey, possibly on his way to a business meeting or appointment. The video captures a moment of everyday life, with the man navigating the road and interacting with his surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+AyOPu2gTPnM_32_0to115.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part54/AyOPu2gTPnM_32_0to115.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-AyOPu2gTPnM_32_0to115.mp4	The video is a time-lapse of a car's interior, showcasing the progression of the car's dashboard from day to night. The dashboard is sleek and modern, with a digital display that transitions from a bright, daytime setting to a dim, nighttime setting. The car's steering wheel is visible, and the car's interior is well-lit, highlighting the car's design and features. The video is shot from the perspective of the driver, providing a clear view of the car's interior. The style of the video is realistic and informative, providing viewers with a detailed look at the car's interior and its features.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+XXJ_mH_BleE_64_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part79/XXJ_mH_BleE_64_0to118.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-XXJ_mH_BleE_64_0to118.mp4	The video shows a close-up of two vehicles, specifically the front ends of two Toyota SUVs, parked side by side on a snowy surface. The first SUV is a dark gray color with a black grille and silver accents, while the second SUV is a lighter gray with a black grille and silver accents. Both vehicles have their headlights on, and the snow on the ground is undisturbed, suggesting that the vehicles have just arrived or are stationary. The style of the video is a straightforward, real-life depiction of the vehicles without any additional context or embellishments. The focus is on the vehicles themselves, and there are no people or other objects in the frame. The lighting is natural, and the snowy environment suggests that the video was taken during the winter season.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+nnF0W5Jy0CI_10_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part148/nnF0W5Jy0CI_10_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-nnF0W5Jy0CI_10_0to137.mp4	The video shows a small white dog sitting on a blanket with a blue cup in front of it. The dog appears to be looking at the camera, and the blanket has colorful polka dots. The background shows a window with a view of a street and a car. The style of the video is casual and seems to be taken in a home setting. The dog is the main subject of the video, and the focus is on its interaction with the cup and the viewer. The overall atmosphere of the video is calm and relaxed.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5dxIItgj3gw_18_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part42/5dxIItgj3gw_18_0to122.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5dxIItgj3gw_18_0to122.mp4	The video is a tour of a luxurious boat cabin. The man, dressed in a blue shirt and glasses, stands in the center of the room, gesturing towards the large windows that offer a stunning view of the ocean. The cabin is well-appointed with two comfortable beds, a desk, and a chair. The decor is modern and elegant, with a color scheme of white and gray. The man appears to be explaining the features of the cabin, perhaps as part of a promotional video for the boat show. The overall style of the video is informative and visually appealing, showcasing the luxurious amenities of the boat cabin.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+ZFgHuXHRSKE_19_30to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part73/ZFgHuXHRSKE_19_30to158.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-ZFgHuXHRSKE_19_30to158.mp4	The video is a professional interview between two men in a modern studio setting. The man on the left is seated in a blue armchair, wearing a black shirt and jeans, with his hands clasped together. He has short, dark hair and is looking towards the man on the right. The man on the right is seated in a blue armchair, wearing a black shirt and jeans, with his hands clasped together. He has a bald head and a beard, and is looking towards the man on the left. The studio has a blue and white color scheme, with a brick wall in the background. The lighting is soft and even, highlighting the subjects without creating harsh shadows. The overall style of the video is professional and polished, with a focus on the interviewees and their conversation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+TidX-L1X5VE_1_0to155.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part85/TidX-L1X5VE_1_0to155.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-TidX-L1X5VE_1_0to155.mp4	The video captures a serene scene at a marina, where a large white sailboat is docked. The boat, with its tall mast and multiple sails, is the main focus of the video. It's moored securely to a dock, which is visible in the foreground. The boat is surrounded by other smaller boats, adding to the nautical theme of the video. The water around the boat is calm, reflecting the peaceful atmosphere of the marina. The video is taken from a high angle, providing a bird's eye view of the scene. This perspective allows for a comprehensive view of the boat and its surroundings, emphasizing the scale and beauty of the sailboat. The overall style of the video is tranquil and picturesque, capturing the essence of a day at the marina.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+DR-p6aLbsYI_33_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part58/DR-p6aLbsYI_33_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-DR-p6aLbsYI_33_0to113.mp4	The video captures a delightful dessert scene. A white plate with a scalloped edge is filled with a creamy white whipped cream. The whipped cream is generously topped with fresh strawberries, blueberries, and orange slices, creating a vibrant mix of colors. A spoon is seen drizzling a rich, orange sauce over the dessert, adding a final touch to the presentation. The dessert is placed on a green tablecloth, providing a contrasting backdrop to the white plate and the colorful fruit. The overall style of the video is simple yet elegant, focusing on the dessert and its presentation.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+eo82TCYB8IQ_79_27to169.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part156/eo82TCYB8IQ_79_27to169.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-eo82TCYB8IQ_79_27to169.mp4	The video captures a close-up view of a bowl of ramen, showcasing the progression of the dish from its initial state to its final presentation. The first frame shows the bowl of ramen with its noodles, meat, and seaweed toppings. The second frame shows the addition of a green leafy garnish, adding a pop of color and texture to the dish. The third frame shows the final presentation of the dish, with the garnish fully incorporated into the bowl of ramen. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward food presentation, focusing on the details of the dish and the process of its preparation. The video does not include any additional elements or actions, keeping the focus solely on the ramen dish.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+A3ITtTxrv_w_4_18to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part66/A3ITtTxrv_w_4_18to156.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-A3ITtTxrv_w_4_18to156.mp4	The video features a man standing in a kitchen, speaking to the camera. He is wearing a green jacket and has a beard. The kitchen is well-equipped with a black oven and a white countertop. On the countertop, there are various items including a pink box, a silver canister, and a green plant. The man appears to be in the middle of a conversation, possibly discussing a recipe or cooking technique. The overall style of the video is casual and informative, with a focus on the man and his surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+L5O3MeNw_5A_13_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part72/L5O3MeNw_5A_13_0to150.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-L5O3MeNw_5A_13_0to150.mp4	The video captures a lively scene at a school cafeteria. Three children are seated at a table, engaged in conversation. The boy in the green shirt is the center of attention, with the other two children, one in a black shirt and the other in a white shirt, looking at him. The table is adorned with a tray of food and three cartons of milk, suggesting a mealtime setting. The children's expressions and body language indicate a friendly and relaxed atmosphere. The cafeteria setting, combined with the children's casual attire, suggests a typical school day. The video captures a moment of camaraderie and shared experience among the children.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+TdkbEBNgh-U_20_0to198.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part103/TdkbEBNgh-U_20_0to198.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-TdkbEBNgh-U_20_0to198.mp4	The video shows a small potted succulent plant with a few leaves, placed on a wooden surface. The plant is surrounded by various rocks of different sizes and colors, creating a natural and rustic setting. The plant appears to be growing and thriving in this environment. The wooden surface provides a warm and earthy backdrop to the scene. The overall style of the video is simple and naturalistic, focusing on the beauty of the succulent plant and the rocks around it. The video captures the essence of a small, thriving plant in a natural setting, with a focus on the textures and colors of the rocks and the plant itself.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Xu2ZwVkRMXs_8_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part74/Xu2ZwVkRMXs_8_0to136.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Xu2ZwVkRMXs_8_0to136.mp4	The video shows a close-up of a decorative bowl filled with variously colored and textured balls, including pink, white, and gold, and a single white flower. The bowl is placed on a table with a patterned tablecloth featuring gold stars. The style of the video is a still-life composition with a focus on the textures and colors of the objects. The lighting is soft and even, highlighting the details of the balls and the flower. The overall mood of the video is calm and serene.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+6V7n2Habn9Q_27_53to205.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part70/6V7n2Habn9Q_27_53to205.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-6V7n2Habn9Q_27_53to205.mp4	The video is a close-up of a woman in a bathroom, showcasing her makeup and hairstyle. She has blonde hair styled in a bun, and her makeup includes dark eyeliner and long eyelashes. She is wearing a black top. The bathroom has a white door and a toilet visible in the background. The lighting in the bathroom is bright, and the overall style of the video is casual and personal, likely intended for a beauty or lifestyle vlog.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+0AhUNNSKZvI_2_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part35/0AhUNNSKZvI_2_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-0AhUNNSKZvI_2_0to113.mp4	In the video, a woman is seen in a kitchen, standing in front of a refrigerator. She is wearing a blue dress and a necklace. The kitchen is well-equipped with various utensils and appliances, including a sink, a stove, and a refrigerator. The woman appears to be in the middle of cooking or preparing a meal. The overall style of the video is casual and homey, capturing a typical day in a kitchen.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+-zDtjeg50UY_19_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part57/-zDtjeg50UY_19_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p--zDtjeg50UY_19_0to102.mp4	The video captures the intricate details of a car engine, showcasing its various components and parts. The engine is viewed from a top-down perspective, allowing for a comprehensive view of its structure. The video is a time-lapse, capturing the engine in three different stages of operation. The first stage shows the engine in a state of rest, with all parts stationary. The second stage shows the engine in motion, with the pistons and other components moving in sync. The third stage shows the engine in a state of high performance, with all parts working at their peak efficiency. The video is a testament to the complexity and precision of automotive engineering.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Fnvs6ckupFk_40_0to182.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part41/Fnvs6ckupFk_40_0to182.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Fnvs6ckupFk_40_0to182.mp4	The video is a 3D animated scene featuring a group of pink, anthropomorphic rodents, possibly mice or rats, standing in a sandy environment. The rodents are dressed in various colorful outfits, including dresses and vests, and are interacting with each other. In the background, there are large, metallic structures resembling gears or machinery, and a large, circular object that could be a shield or a decorative piece. The overall style of the video is whimsical and playful, with a focus on the characters and their interactions. The animation is detailed and colorful, with a sense of movement and life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+X6Ec-hZaToA_55_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part75/X6Ec-hZaToA_55_0to137.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-X6Ec-hZaToA_55_0to137.mp4	The video features a man standing in front of a blue background with the NFL logo. He is dressed in a dark suit and tie, and appears to be speaking into a microphone. The man's expression is serious, and he is looking directly at the camera. The style of the video is a straightforward interview or press conference, with the man as the central figure. The NFL logo in the background suggests that the event is related to the National Football League.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+14MBAYqvee8_15_59to184.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part29/14MBAYqvee8_15_59to184.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-14MBAYqvee8_15_59to184.mp4	In the video, a person is seen cutting a loaf of bread on a wooden cutting board. The bread is a dark brown color, suggesting it might be a type of whole grain or rye bread. The person is using a large knife to slice the bread, which is placed on the cutting board. The cutting board is placed on a table, and there is another loaf of bread in the background. The person appears to be in the process of slicing the bread, as there are already a few slices cut from the loaf. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the act of cutting the bread.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+1WlIIvIZt4Y_28_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part66/1WlIIvIZt4Y_28_0to104.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-1WlIIvIZt4Y_28_0to104.mp4	The video captures the growth of a flower on a banana tree. The first frame shows the flower in its initial stage, with a small bud beginning to form. In the second frame, the flower has grown slightly, with more petals visible. By the third frame, the flower has bloomed into a vibrant red and purple color, showcasing its full beauty. The banana tree itself is lush and green, providing a stark contrast to the colorful flower. The video is a time-lapse, capturing the transformation of the flower over time.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+9v-_ip8brIA_34_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part51/9v-_ip8brIA_34_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-9v-_ip8brIA_34_0to117.mp4	The video captures a dynamic moment in a football game. The main focus is a player wearing a blue and white uniform with the number 13. The player is in the midst of a powerful kick, his leg extended and his foot making contact with the football. The football is in mid-air, just after being kicked, and is heading towards the goal. The player's body is angled towards the goal, indicating the direction of the kick. The background is filled with other players, all in various positions on the field, adding to the sense of action and movement. The style of the video is realistic, capturing the intensity and excitement of the game.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Is46D7dxJPM_6_73to232.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part31/Is46D7dxJPM_6_73to232.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Is46D7dxJPM_6_73to232.mp4	The video captures the growth of a tomato plant in a garden. The first frame shows a small, green tomato plant with a few leaves and a yellow flower. The second frame shows the plant with more leaves and a few small green tomatoes beginning to form. The third frame shows the plant with even more leaves and several larger green tomatoes growing on the vine. The plant is growing in a garden with a metal fence in the background. The style of the video is a time-lapse, showing the progression of the plant over time.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Uf03uakcbAg_25_0to185.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part118/Uf03uakcbAg_25_0to185.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Uf03uakcbAg_25_0to185.mp4	The video is a news segment featuring a man named Sebastian Varchmin, who is an auto Bild reporter. He is driving a car, and the camera is positioned inside the vehicle, capturing his hands on the steering wheel and his face as he speaks. The background is blurred, but it appears to be a forested area, suggesting that the car is moving at a high speed. The man is wearing a red jacket with a logo on the left chest, and he has a beard. The overall style of the video is professional and informative, with a focus on the reporter and his commentary.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+dpm702yNMMA_33_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part142/dpm702yNMMA_33_0to113.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-dpm702yNMMA_33_0to113.mp4	The video captures a group of chickens in a fenced area. The chickens are of various colors, including brown, black, and white. They are seen walking around, pecking at the ground, and interacting with each other. The fenced area is made of wood and wire, providing a safe environment for the chickens. The chickens are the main focus of the video, with no other significant objects or actions taking place. The style of the video is a simple, straightforward documentation of the chickens' activities in their enclosure.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+N1_liTwLJV4_34_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part87/N1_liTwLJV4_34_0to127.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-N1_liTwLJV4_34_0to127.mp4	The video shows a blue and pink stuffed animal, possibly a bear, sitting on a bed of leaves. The leaves are brown and appear to be dry, suggesting that the scene takes place in autumn. The stuffed animal is positioned in the center of the image, and it appears to be looking down at the leaves. The background is blurred, but it seems to be an outdoor setting with trees and bushes. The overall style of the video is simple and straightforward, focusing on the stuffed animal and the leaves without any additional action or movement. The lighting is natural, and the colors are muted, giving the video a calm and serene atmosphere.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+rnCUTJUCXts_13_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part125/rnCUTJUCXts_13_0to112.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-rnCUTJUCXts_13_0to112.mp4	The video features a man in a dark blue shirt, who appears to be in a dimly lit room. He is looking slightly to his left with a serious expression on his face. The style of the video is a close-up shot, focusing on the man's face and upper body. The lighting is subdued, creating a moody atmosphere. The man's expression suggests that he is deep in thought or contemplating something. The overall style of the video is realistic and straightforward, with no additional elements or distractions.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+bMMBM6g7oTw_210_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part103/bMMBM6g7oTw_210_0to102.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-bMMBM6g7oTw_210_0to102.mp4	The video captures a serene tropical beach scene. The first frame shows a wide shot of the beach, with the ocean stretching out to the horizon. The second frame zooms in on the lush greenery of the palm trees lining the beach. The third frame focuses on the sandy beach, with a lone beach chair inviting relaxation. The video is shot from a high angle, providing a bird's eye view of the beach and its surroundings. The style of the video is tranquil and picturesque, showcasing the natural beauty of the tropical beach.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+VNz8oDH-Zpk_130_0to152.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part96/VNz8oDH-Zpk_130_0to152.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-VNz8oDH-Zpk_130_0to152.mp4	The video shows a man in a white shirt and a white cap, sitting at a table with various bowls of food. He is holding a fork and a spoon, and appears to be enjoying his meal. The table is filled with bowls of different sizes, containing a variety of dishes. The man is smiling and seems to be in a good mood. The setting appears to be a casual dining environment, possibly a restaurant or a home kitchen. The style of the video is candid and informal, capturing a moment of everyday life.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+5mrLy3EPj-s_10_23to174.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part44/5mrLy3EPj-s_10_23to174.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-5mrLy3EPj-s_10_23to174.mp4	The video features a man in a black cap and a grey hoodie standing next to a red Porsche sports car. The car is parked on a road with a fence and trees in the background. The man appears to be posing for the camera, with the car as the backdrop. The style of the video is casual and informal, with a focus on the man and the car. The setting suggests a relaxed, outdoor environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+Bg2rGEVLoTY_81_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part40/Bg2rGEVLoTY_81_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-Bg2rGEVLoTY_81_0to117.mp4	The video shows two men in a workshop setting, engaged in a conversation. The man on the left is wearing a gray sweater and glasses, while the man on the right is dressed in a black shirt. They are standing in front of a workbench, which is equipped with various tools and equipment. The workshop appears to be well-lit and organized, with a blue machine visible in the background. The men seem to be discussing something, possibly related to their work or a project they are working on. The overall style of the video is candid and informal, capturing a moment of interaction between the two men in their professional environment.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+lqwb4rz2al4_44_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part141/lqwb4rz2al4_44_0to110.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-lqwb4rz2al4_44_0to110.mp4	The video shows a green military truck driving on a dirt road in a desert-like environment. The truck is equipped with large off-road tires and has a yellow roof rack. The driver is visible through the windshield, wearing a blue shirt. The truck is moving towards the right side of the frame. The sky is partly cloudy, and the terrain is rocky and barren. The style of the video is realistic, with a focus on the vehicle and its surroundings.	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"
+AAxOQBJ9IfU_5_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/datasets/OpenVid/OpenVid_part63/AAxOQBJ9IfU_5_0to117.mp4	/s3-code/ywang29/video_reward/WanI2V/WanI2V-480p-AAxOQBJ9IfU_5_0to117.mp4	"The video shows a group of people in a professional setting, likely an office. The central figure, a man in a suit and tie, is gesturing with his hands and appears to be speaking or explaining something. He is surrounded by three other individuals, two women and another man, who are attentively listening to him. The office environment is indicated by the presence of a sign that reads ""Mestric & Special Victims Unit"" on the wall behind them. The style of the video is a straightforward, candid capture of a professional interaction, with no additional embellishments or artistic effects."	"['Compare the test video (the first 24 frames) to the reference frame (the last frame) and decide if the video shows obvious visual-quality (VQ) defects relative to the reference.\nConsider only: blur (defocus/motion), compression artifacts (blocking/ringing/mosquito), noise/grain, banding, flicker, rolling-shutter, aliasing/moire, over-smoothing.\nReturn ONLY this JSON (no timestamps):\n{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": Yes | No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none|defocus_blur|motion_blur|blocking|ringing|mosquito_noise|grain_noise|banding|flicker|rolling_shutter|aliasing|moire|over_smoothing"",\n  ""evidence"": [""short visual cues vs reference, e.g., \'softer edges than reference\', \'block edges visible around text\'""],\n}\nRules:\n- Compare against the reference frame’s look (sharpness, texture, edges, tones).\n- Be conservative; if unsure, choose false and note \'uncertain\' in evidence.']"	"['{\n  ""has_obvious_defect"": No,\n  ""dominant_issue"": ""none"",\n  ""evidence"": []\n}']"