---
pretty_name: OccludeBench
language:
- en
task_categories:
- visual-question-answering
- image-to-text
size_categories:
- n<1K
tags:
- occlusion
- visual-reasoning
- shadows
- reflections
- vision-language-models
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: test
path: images/sec3_occludebench/occluded/*
---
# OccludeBench: Can VLMs Find What's Missing?
OccludeBench tests whether vision-language models can recover an object hidden from view. Each of the 378 photographs has one object fully covered by a mask, and the model is asked:
> What is the primary object that is completely occluded in this image? Be as specific as you can.
In **direct** images (197) the object can only be recovered from its shadow or reflection; in **inferential** images (181) it can be inferred from the rest of the scene. Direct images are specular reflections (94), diffuse reflections (56) or shadows (47); inferential images cover technology (45), household (44), culture (37), activities (31) and nature (24).
Answers are open-ended. A response counts as correct if either of two LLM judges (GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6) accepts it, which agrees with author labels on 98% of items.
## Loading
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("afs07fda89sdfas90/data", split="test") # occluded images + id, type, category, answer
```
Or read `annotations.json` directly and open the image paths it lists.
## Structure
```
annotations.json # One record per image
images/
sec3_occludebench/occluded/ # 378 Benchmark input: object behind a black, yellow-bordered mask
sec3_occludebench/original/ # 378 Unedited photographs
sec4_2_why_vlms_fail/seeing_failure/ # 136 Direct images with the cue region outlined
sec4_2_why_vlms_fail/stage2_zoomed_recognition/ # 153 Cue regions cropped from direct images
sec4_2_why_vlms_fail/stage3_source_mapping/ # 107 Four candidate regions masked and labeled A–D
appendix/box_sensitivity/ # 378 Blue-filled mask, for the mask-style check
code/ # Evaluation, grading and analysis code
```
Images are named by item `id` (e.g. `pic0001.png`); crops add a suffix (`pic0002-1.png`).
## Annotations
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| `id` | Image id, `pic0001`–`pic0378` |
| `type` | `direct` or `inferential` |
| `category` | Direct: `specular reflection`, `diffuse reflection`, `shadow`. Inferential: `technology`, `household`, `culture`, `activities`, `nature` |
| `fine_category` | Finer annotation label the category was merged from |
| `answer` | Reference answer |
| `occluders` | Mask geometry in original-image pixels: `bbox` (`x1`, `y1`, `x2`, `y2`) or `polygon` (`points`) |
| `images` | Paths to this item's image in each folder (`null` where a variant does not exist) |
| `cue_crops` | Crops of the shadow/reflection region: `image` path and crop `box` (`x`, `y`, `w`, `h`) in original-image pixels. Empty for items without a crop |
| `reverse_mapping` | Source-mapping `image` and the `answer` letter of the region hiding the object, or `null` |
| `source_url` | Where the photograph was found |
| `annotator_note` | Annotator's rationale for the answer |
## Reproducing the experiments
```bash
cd code
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env # API keys
python prepare_data.py # lays out the images the way the scripts expect
```
See `code/README.md` for the main commands and the code layout.
## Notes
- `pic0360`: its occluded image was made from a differently cropped copy of the photograph, so its `occluders` coordinates match its original and box-sensitivity images but not its occluded image.
- Images come from the web, Visual Genome, and the authors' own photographs. Web images remain under their original owners' terms; see `source_url`.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{cekinmez2026occludebench,
title={OccludeBench: Can VLMs Find What's Missing?},
author={Cekinmez, Jasin and Wu, Addison J. and Mitsuhashi, Ryo and Cai, Linrong and Fu, Xingyu and Liu, Zhuang},
year={2026}
}
```