--- language: - en ---+ This repository contains the lexical frames used to prompt the models in the **frame completion task** we introduced in _[Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMs](https://aclanthology.org/2026.conll-main.14/)_ (Bunzeck & Zarrieß @ CoNLL 2026). If you use this data, please cite: ``` @inproceedings{bunzeck-zarriess-2026-child, title = "Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in {B}aby{LM}s", author = "Bunzeck, Bastian and Zarrie{\ss}, Sina", editor = "Bonial, Claire and Berzak, Yevgeni", booktitle = "Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning", month = jul, year = "2026", address = "San Diego, California, USA", publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.conll-main.14/", doi = "10.18653/v1/2026.conll-main.14", pages = "227--249", ISBN = "979-8-89176-410-1", abstract = "Recent studies suggest that child-directed speech is not conducive to language learning in BabyLMs. However, current evaluations focus predominantly on comprehension and not production, which is central to usage-based theories of language acquisition which argue how CDS facilitates early language use through constructional ``frames'' (frequent lexical patterns with open slots). We introduce a novel generation-based evaluation inspired by such theories in form of a \textbf{frame-completion task}, and compare Llama models trained with CDS, the BabyLM corpus, and web-crawl data (FineWeb-edu) on comprehension benchmarks and our novel framework. Our results reveal a clear dissociation between models' comprehension and production capabilities: while FineWeb-trained models excel at minimal pairs, CDS-trained models produce grammatical completions substantially earlier in training and concentrate probability mass on appropriate slot-fillers. These findings show that comprehension benchmarks underestimate what CDS affords to BabyLMs." } ```