--- pretty_name: Arete data pairs language: - en tags: - values - synthetic - sft task_categories: - text-generation - question-answering size_categories: 10K.jsonl` | All 34,878 prompts: both models' answers, filter status, exclusion, flags | Audit / analysis / pair training | | `sft_accepted` | `sft_accepted/.jsonl` | 29,236 accepted teacher answers as chat examples (`messages` + `metadata`) | Direct SFT | | `reasoning` | `reasoning/.jsonl` | Inkling reasoning traces for the same 29,236 rows | Reasoning conversion | | | `dedup_decisions.json` | The 11 cross-topic near-duplicate pairs and which side was kept | | | | `release_manifest.json` | Version, generation config, source dataset hashes, counts by topic, file hashes | | Explicit column schemas are declared in the YAML above: a few fields are sparse (null in most rows) and the schema must be pinned for the files to load reliably. ## Category tags Every row is tagged per prompt: `value`/`topic` (one of the seven values topics), `subtopic`, `lens` (`american` / `china` / `open`), `lang`, `prompt_type`, `register`. In `paired` these are top-level columns; in `sft_accepted` they live in the `metadata` object alongside `id`, sha256s, `model`, `review_scores`, and `review_issue_tags`. ### `paired` columns `id`, `value`, `topic`, `subtopic`, `lens`, `lang`, `prompt_type`, `register`, `prompt`, `sha256`, `teacher` (Inkling: `response`, `response_sha256`, `reasoning_sha256`, `reasoning_tokens`, `model`, `finish_reason`, `usage`, `request_overrides`), `teacher_filter` (`status`, `review_scores`, `review_note`, `reasons`), `starting_checkpoint` (same shape, Qwen 3.8-27B), `starting_checkpoint_status`, `starting_checkpoint_quality_flags`, `cross_topic_duplicate`, `excluded`, `in_sft_accepted`, `preference` (always null — see caveats). ### `sft_accepted` columns `messages`: `[{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", ...}, {"role": "assistant", ...}]` — the accepted Inkling answer only. `metadata`: category tags + review scores/tags as above. ## Counts by topic | Topic | Prompts | Teacher accepted | Teacher rejected | Cross-topic dup excluded | **SFT rows** | Qwen thinking-off | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | State vs free market capitalism | 4,992 | 4,337 | 655 | 1 | **4,336** | 298 | | Democracy and governance | 4,971 | 4,349 | 622 | 8 | **4,342** | 857 | | State ideology | 4,964 | 4,422 | 542 | 0 | **4,422** | 208 | | Data privacy and surveillance | 4,986 | 3,926 | 1,060 | 0 | **3,926** | 203 | | Environmental strategy | 4,981 | 3,981 | 1,000 | 0 | **3,981** | 315 | | Freedom of expression | 4,993 | 4,059 | 934 | 0 | **4,059** | 333 | | Education philosophy | 4,991 | 4,171 | 820 | 2 | **4,170** | 148 | | **Total** | **34,878** | **29,245** | **5,633** | **11** | **29,236** | **2,362** | Both models answered every prompt: 0 failed, 0 unresolved, 0 truncated. ## How it was made - **Generation:** system "You are a helpful assistant.", one user turn with the prompt verbatim, temperature 0. - Teacher: `thinkingmachines/inkling` (`inkling-20260715`), max_tokens 32,768, Nous Portal inference API. - Qwen: `Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B` (HF revision `1d4bf0f2…`), Nous cluster vLLM (bf16). Rows where its reasoning looped were retried at 65k tokens, then generated with thinking disabled; per-row settings are recorded in `request_overrides`. - **Review:** every teacher answer was scored by an LLM judge. The filter rejects hard failures only: censorship/evasion (`refusal`, `deflection`, refusal phrases), propaganda (`propaganda_frame`), unsupported factual claims (`fabrication`, accuracy 1), repetition, `off_question`, truncation, AI self-disclaimers anywhere in the answer, and >5% Chinese characters. - **Not a clean SFT set.** Most accepted rows still carry a `factual_error` tag and accuracy 2. `metadata.review_scores` and `metadata.review_issue_tags` are on every SFT row for a stricter cut. - **Eval exclusion:** 122 prompts overlapping [Evaluation](https://huggingface.co/datasets/NousResearch/Propaganda_Eval) were removed before generation; a final re-check against all eval prompts found 0 exact and 0 near-exact matches. - **Cross-topic dedup:** each of 11 near-duplicate pairs keeps one prompt (deterministic rule, see `dedup_decisions.json`); the losing side is marked `excluded` in `paired` and left out of `sft_accepted`. - **Release copy:** internal project-tracking fields were removed from all rows; the hashes in `release_manifest.json` cover the released files. - **Preference labels:** none. They require supporting review, Qwen answered every prompt, and Qwen answers were not quality-reviewed. - **Qwen answers are never SFT targets.** Drop `short_answer` Qwen rows (302) from any pair-training export.