--- license: mit pretty_name: EC²-Bench (EC2-Bench) language: - en - zh size_categories: - n<1K task_categories: - text-generation tags: - agents - llm-agents - benchmark - edge-cloud-collaboration - edge-ai - on-device - llm-routing - privacy - openclaw configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: test path: data/tasks.jsonl --- # EC²-Bench (EC2-Bench) **Empowering Edge Agents: A Systematic Analysis of Edge-Cloud Collaboration in LLM Agent Execution** [📄 Paper (arXiv 2610.17816)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17816) · [💻 Code (GitHub)](https://github.com/OpenBMB/EC2-Bench) · [🌐 Project Page](https://passionate11.github.io/ec2-bench-project-page/) EC2-Bench is a benchmark for edge-cloud collaboration in long-horizon LLM agents, jointly measuring task performance, resource usage and privacy exposure. ![EC²-Bench overview](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OpenBMB/EC2-Bench/main/assets/overview.png) Edge-side models keep data local and cost little, but are weak at demanding planning and tool use. Cloud-hosted frontier models are far more capable, but expensive, and they see everything they are sent. In long-horizon agent execution, cloud participation is no longer a one-shot routing decision per query: it is **interleaved throughout the trajectory**, so every cloud call shapes later steps, accumulates cost, and decides how much workspace information leaves the device. ## What is in this dataset | Path | What it is | | --- | --- | | `data/tasks.jsonl` | Index of all **128 tasks** (shown in the viewer above): prompt, expected behavior, grading criteria, category, source benchmark, language, and the number of annotated sensitivity units | | `workspace/ACE_Bench.tar.gz` | All task workspaces in one tarball (files, mock services, and privacy ground truth under `gt/sensitive_items.json`) | | `workspace/ACE_Bench/` | The same workspaces, unpacked, for browsing | | `Images/acebench-openclaw-v1.0.tar.gz` | Prebuilt Docker image (`docker save` tarball) bundling the OpenClaw harness and per-task mock services | The executable task definitions (with inline `grade()` verifiers) and the evaluation code live in the [GitHub repo](https://github.com/OpenBMB/EC2-Bench). Task IDs keep the benchmark's earlier working name (`ACE_Bench`). **At a glance** - **128 executable digital-workspace tasks** in 6 categories (office & daily tasks, information search, safety & security, development & operations, data analysis, automation), in English and Chinese. - **100 tasks with fine-grained privacy annotations**: 3,385 sensitivity units covering personal and organizational information. - Tasks are adapted from Claw-Eval, WildClawBench, QwenClawBench, LiveClawBench, PinchBench and ClawBench, plus 7 newly curated tasks, and standardized to one OpenClaw runtime. ## Evaluation axes - **Task performance**: weighted completion score (rule-based checks, environment-state auditing, rubric-based LLM judge) and Pass³. - **Resource usage**: cloud input / cache-read / output tokens with USD cost, plus edge-side FLOPs. - **Privacy exposure**: fraction of annotated sensitivity units that become visible to the cloud anywhere along the trajectory (lower is better). Four collaboration strategies are studied: **Query Routing**, **Per-step Routing**, **Edge-controlled Delegation** and **Edge-controlled Advisory**, against edge-only and cloud-only baselines. ## Quick start ```bash # task workspaces hf download chengpingan/EC2-Bench workspace/ACE_Bench.tar.gz --repo-type dataset --local-dir . tar -xzf workspace/ACE_Bench.tar.gz # prebuilt Docker image (Hugging Face is not a Docker registry: download, then docker load) hf download chengpingan/EC2-Bench Images/acebench-openclaw-v1.0.tar.gz --repo-type dataset --local-dir . docker load -i Images/acebench-openclaw-v1.0.tar.gz ``` ```python from datasets import load_dataset tasks = load_dataset("chengpingan/EC2-Bench", split="test") ``` See the [GitHub README](https://github.com/OpenBMB/EC2-Bench#quick-start) for running edge-only, cloud-only and collaborative agents and for grading. ## Key findings 1. **Collaboration works for long-horizon agents.** Partial cloud participation improves on edge-only execution at a fraction of cloud-only cost and exposure. 2. **Stronger edges close the performance gap, not the privacy gap.** As the edge model gets stronger, completion differences across strategies shrink, while privacy exposure stays strongly strategy-dependent. 3. **The best collaboration mode shifts with edge capability**, from external routing and direct cloud execution toward edge-controlled invocation and cloud advisory. Deciding when to invoke the cloud and following cloud guidance are the two edge-side abilities that matter. Full results: [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17816) and [leaderboard](https://github.com/OpenBMB/EC2-Bench#leaderboard). ## Citation ```bibtex @article{huang2026ec2bench, title = {Empowering Edge Agents: A Systematic Analysis of Edge-Cloud Collaboration in LLM Agent Execution}, author = {Huang, Pengcheng and Liu, Zhenghao and Ren, Shixin and Yu, Shi and Yao, Sijia and Yan, Yukun and Xiao, Chaojun and Sun, Maosong}, journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.17816}, year = {2026} } ``` ## License MIT, same as the [code repository](https://github.com/OpenBMB/EC2-Bench/blob/main/LICENSE). Adapted tasks are used under the licenses of their source benchmarks: Claw-Eval, WildClawBench, QwenClawBench, LiveClawBench and PinchBench are MIT-licensed, and ClawBench is Apache-2.0.