id string | doc_type string | jurisdiction string | title string | text string | source string | license string | retrieved_at timestamp[s] | citation string | court string | date timestamp[s] | extra dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
389134fe9ee5f63a | opinion | ks | Henry Ex Rel. Henry v. Bauder |
213 Kan. 751 (1974)
518 P.2d 362
TERRY A. HENRY, By and Through her Father and next Friend, KENNYTH HENRY, Appellant,
v.
THOMAS W. BAUDER, By and Through his Father and next Friend, THOMAS M. BAUDER, Appellee.
No. 47,101
Supreme Court of Kansas.
Opinion filed January 26, 1974.
Michae... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/1128998 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1974-01-26T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "1128998",
"cluster_id": "1128998",
"opinion_type": "010combined",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
316dd70d16f4573c | opinion | ks | State v. Smith |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
1. Bill of excepn™partUof record. The questions principally discussed upon this appeal cannot be considered here, for the reason that no valid bill of exceptions is found in the record. A paper purporting to be one is attached to the transcript, but it is... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7887120 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1888-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7887120",
"cluster_id": "7936659",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
821468239d1353dc | opinion | ks | Sprague v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
S. Sprague brought this action in the district court of Cloud county against the Missouri Pacific Railway *348 Company, alleging, in substance, that the defendant was a common carrier, and that on or about the 2d day of March, 1883, for a valuable consider... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886611 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886611",
"cluster_id": "7936157",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
3130a2fec36eaeb4 | opinion | ks | Durein v. Pontious |
*359 The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action for damages for injury to the means of support of plaintiffs below — defendants in error— arising from the sale and gift of intoxicating liquors to their father, Elias Pontious, alleged to have been sold and given to him by defenda... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886612 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886612",
"cluster_id": "7936158",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
b32e80f9382dde97 | opinion | ks | Hazen v. Rounsaville |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
In an action of ejectment brought by William B. Hazen against Harvey M. Bouusaville, it was found and adjudged that Hazen was the owner and entitled to the possession of lots Nos. 3.85 and 387 Taylor street, in the city of Topeka. The judgment was brought t... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886743 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886743",
"cluster_id": "7936286",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
1813c7154059f091 | opinion | ks | Kansas City & Emporia Railroad v. Kregelo |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
J. L. Kregelo is the owner of a farm containing a quarter-section of land in Lyon county' — 'being the southwest quarter of section 17, township 19, range 12. A right-of-way was condemned and appropriated by the Kansas City & Emporia railroad company a... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886390 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886390",
"cluster_id": "7935942",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
1dfa59c04d5ca7a0 | opinion | ks | State v. Blackman |
Hokton, C. J.:
I concur in the affirmance of the judgment of the trial court, and of all that is stated in the foregoing opinion.
When the case was called, the defendant waived arraignment, pleaded not guilty, and went to trial upon the merits of the action. No objections were taken to the issuance of the warran... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886392 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886392",
"cluster_id": "7935943",
"opinion_type": "030concurrence",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
cd7639ba3112e64c | opinion | ks | Morrissey v. Donohue |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The only question involved in this case is, whether the north 49 feet of lot 1, in block 9, of Clark & Rees’s addition to the city of Leavenworth, is, and has been since September 16, 1875, a part of the homestead of the defendant, James Donohue? The f... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886397 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886397",
"cluster_id": "7935948",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
2519196b6a79837c | opinion | ks | Krutz v. Chandler |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by George B. Chandler against William G. Krutz and others, to recover all that portion of the southwest quarter of section 4, in township 17, south, of range 23, east, and lying east of Bull creek, exc... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886400 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886400",
"cluster_id": "7935951",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
337296834b5c3769 | opinion | ks | Sandwich Manufacturing Co. v. Nicholson |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On June 23, 1881, T. H. Nicholson purchased of the Sandwich Manufacturing Company, a corporation, through J. H. Caddy, its agent at Spring Hill, Kansas, a reaper and a binder. The reaper and binder were- at Spring Hill at the time, and Nicholson examined t... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886402 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886402",
"cluster_id": "7935953",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
96eac002670e7c38 | opinion | ks | Hathaway v. Davis & Rankin |
*694 The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The questions involved in this case are simply with reference to the validity and priority of certain liens claimed to exist upon certain real estate, buildings, fixtures and machinery, belonging to the firm of Faulkner & Lyman. The facts are sub... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886405 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886405",
"cluster_id": "7935955",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
83ba2b00724c7f3a | opinion | ks | Carey v. Reeves |
*721 The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The only questions involved in this case are: First, has the district court jurisdiction to correct a mistake in a real-estate mortgage and to foreclose the mortgage in the same action, when the only service of summons is by publication? Second, is s... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886407 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886407",
"cluster_id": "7935957",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
cecb942495886f1a | opinion | ks | Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Howe |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hurd, J.:
On the 6th day of March, 1883, the legislature .passed an act entitled “ An act concerning railroads and other common carriers,” by the second section of which, “ a board of railroad commissioners,” consisting of three competent persons, was created, and by the... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886409 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886409",
"cluster_id": "7935959",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
c275fb9ae8a50bf9 | opinion | ks | State v. Groning |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HortoN, C. J.:
This was a prosecution for burglary and for larceny committed in connection with burglary, under §§ 68 and 72, ch. 31, Comp. Laws of 1879. The defendant was found guilty of burglary in the second degree, and was also found guilty of larceny. For the crime ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886414 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886414",
"cluster_id": "7935964",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
d24633c65f7d5b1a | opinion | ks | McCandless v. Carlisle |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action commenced by Harold Carlisle against Wilson McCandless, treasurer of Reno county, *366 Kansas, and J. M. Hedrick, sheriff of said county, to restrain them from the collection of a certain tax. The defendants demurred to the plaintiff’s ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886338 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886338",
"cluster_id": "7935891",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
23912eb6bd63fb4d | opinion | ks | State v. Drake |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HortoN, C. J.:
An information was filed charging the defendant with the violation of the prohibitory law. This information contained five counts, charging as many distinct offenses. The jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty upon the third, fourth and fifth... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886441 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886441",
"cluster_id": "7935991",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
edd1589a149e289f | opinion | ks | Gilmore v. Hentig |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
~V ALEN TINE, J.:
This was an action, brought on March 11, 1884, in the district court of Shawnee county, by F. G. Hen- *164 tig and others against George T. Gilmore, county clerk, Bradford Miller, county treasurer, and the city of Topeka, to perpetually enjoin the def... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886442 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886442",
"cluster_id": "7935992",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
688c0e02ef3c5fec | opinion | ks | State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
VALENTINE, J.:
This was an action of mandamus, brought October 6, 1883, in the district court of Atchison county, by the county attorney, in the name of the state of Kansas, against the Missouri Pacific railway company, the Central Branch Union Pacific railroad company, ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886443 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886443",
"cluster_id": "7935993",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
a15ce166156d61d5 | opinion | ks | Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Wilhelm |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HoutoN, C. J.:
It is urged by the defendants that there is .a defect of parties defendant in the petition as to the school-district taxes, and therefore that this court cannot pass upon the legality of those taxes. This view is correct. The parties ■defendant are under n... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886448 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886448",
"cluster_id": "7935998",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
4447061ca8f64b66 | opinion | ks | Pleasant Hill & DeSoto Railroad v. Carpenter |
Per Curiam:
Under the authority of The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad Company v. Howe, 32 Kas. 737 , we must hold that the taxes levied for the payment of the salaries and current expenses of the board of railroad commissioners of the state, are null and void.
Under the authority of The Kansa... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886450 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886450",
"cluster_id": "7936000",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
dab6357a978701a9 | opinion | ks | State v. Hart |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was a criminal prosecution upon an information charging the defendant with an attempt to carnally and unlawfully know a female child under the age of ten years. The prosecution was under §§ 283 and 31 of the crimes and punishments act. The .defendant ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886452 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886452",
"cluster_id": "7936002",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
678313eb48784d02 | opinion | ks | Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Wilson |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
JOHNSTON, J.:
The plaintiff by this proceeding seeks to enjoin the collection of certain taxes levied for school purposes by School District No. 19, Hodgeman county, upon the lands of the plaintiff, situate within that district. This is the declared purpose of the procee... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886453 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886453",
"cluster_id": "7936003",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
4e75b9321a37cac7 | opinion | ks | South-Side Town, Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Rhodes |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HortoN, C. J.:
This was an action by the plaintiff against the defendants for the recovery of lots one and two, in block nineteen, in Ford’s addition to the city of Galena, in Cherokee county. The legal title of the lots is in the plaintiff, but *232 tbe defendants clai... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886454 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886454",
"cluster_id": "7936004",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
716d312ed1835495 | opinion | ks | State v. Raypholtz |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The question in this case is, did the appellants willfully obstruct the road within the meaning of §17, chapter 89, Comp. Laws of 1879? This section reads:
“ If any person shall willfully demolish, throw down, alter or deface any milestone or guideboard ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886359 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886359",
"cluster_id": "7935912",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
f9aaf9bd26ac3cb9 | opinion | ks | Victor B. Buck & Co. v. J. G. Panabaker & Co. |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The object of this petition in error is to reverse an order of the judge of the district court, at chambers, dissolving an attachment. It appears from the record that on January 7, 1884, the plaiutiffs commenced this action against the defendants on an acc... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886361 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886361",
"cluster_id": "7935914",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
44e3d00066ebf05b | opinion | ks | State v. Muir |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
An information was filed against the appellant, charging him in three counts with violating the prohibitory liquor law. The jury found him guilty 'upon the third count of the information, and returned a verdict of not guilty upon the other counts. He was s... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886364 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886364",
"cluster_id": "7935917",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
e5083b94f3010563 | opinion | ks | Foster v. Moore |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hurd, J.:
Motion for a temporary restraining order, and motion to dismiss the action. The plaintiff filed an original petition in this court, alleging that he was duly elected to the office of county attorney of Saline county, and has entered upon the duties of the offic... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886365 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886365",
"cluster_id": "7935918",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
67c0f7f068865619 | opinion | ks | Troy v. Board of Commissioners |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action brought by the plaintiff on January 21, 1884, to enjoin the board of county com *508 missioners of Doniphan county from vacating a public road. A petition had been presented therefor to the board on July 3, 1883, and viewers had been app... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886370 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886370",
"cluster_id": "7935923",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
a21b247b3e52814b | opinion | ks | Nixon v. School District No. 92 |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The plaintiff, Harrison B. Nixon, commenced an action in the district court of McPherson county, Kansas, against the defendants, School District No. 92, of McPherson county, and the officers of such district, to restrain them from erecting, Or attempting t... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886371 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886371",
"cluster_id": "7935924",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
c0b0926822e7d686 | opinion | ks | Horn v. Newton City Bank |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
It is the contention of Long, one of the plaintiffs in error — a defendant below — that there had been a material alteration in the note sued on without his consent, thereby releasing him from all liability upon it. The note was originally drawn payable to... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886373 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886373",
"cluster_id": "7935926",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
e036d7a757c03c11 | opinion | ks | Ellwood v. Wolcott |
The opinion, of the court was delivered by '
Horton, C. J.:
The facts in this case are these: On May 17,1883, William Ellwood, Azariah Ellwood, John J. Ellwood and John Pricer executed their note for $1,200 to the order of V. B. Latham, due in three years from date, with interest at ten per cent, per annum, paya... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886375 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886375",
"cluster_id": "7935928",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
51464200a855f69f | opinion | ks | State v. Hendricks |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was a criminal prosecution for murder in the first degree. The defendant, Emma Hendricks, and her husband, Cyrenus B. Hendricks, were charged jointly upon information with the murder of Thomas McGuire, in Chautauqua county, Kansas, on November 25, 188... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886382 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886382",
"cluster_id": "7935934",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
2c75cc17efc69084 | opinion | ks | Winstead v. Hulme |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action by defendant in error, plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover the possession of certain goods and merchandise of the value of $270.65. The petition also alleged that by the unwarranted and unlawful seizu... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886383 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886383",
"cluster_id": "7935935",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
148b808526fb248a | opinion | ks | Harris v. Curran |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On November 24, 1882, H. H. Harris commenced two actions in the district court of Shawnee county: one against Theodore Cumm, C. D. Savage and Stella Savage for the recovery of lots numbered 135,137, and 139, on Tenth avenue west, in the city of Topeka, and... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886385 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886385",
"cluster_id": "7935937",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
0cafb8964d057afb | opinion | ks | Nutt v. Humphrey |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The ruling of the district court is claimed to be erroneous, principally upon the ground that the written contract set out in the answer showing that two women made a trade and agreement, is not admitted by the. demurrer to have been.made by their husbands... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886277 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886277",
"cluster_id": "7935832",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
edb83f0d76994c9b | opinion | ks | Stout v. Baker |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hurd, J.:
Devier and Blackburn recovered a judgment in the district court of Kingman county, on the 23d day of’ October, 1882, against Stout & Wingert, by their partnership name, for $90.74 and costs of suit. Execution was issued on this judgment to the defendant in ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886279 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886279",
"cluster_id": "7935834",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
872a127ff49d6ed2 | opinion | ks | State v. Wilgus |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The defendant was prosecuted upon a criminal information for selling intoxicating liquors in. violation of the prohibitory liquor law of 1881. This law took effect on May 1, 1881. The defendant is charged with com *127 mitting the offense on August 26,1882... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886282 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886282",
"cluster_id": "7935837",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
2d5ad8af0d429fc4 | opinion | ks | Fuller v. Miller |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hurd, J.:
The'agreed statement of facts shows as follows:
“First, That the relator was elected county commissioner for the first district of Ellis county in November, 1881, for the full term of three years; that he qualified as such commissioner, and has ever since b... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886283 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886283",
"cluster_id": "7935838",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
84e855651e046104 | opinion | ks | Bartlett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad |
The opinion of the court, was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The tax contested by the railroad company- — -$305.78—was levied under the authority of §1 of an act entitled “An act to restrain the issuing of county warrants,” approved March 5, 1862 — §1, art. 16, ch. 25, page 312, Comp. Laws of 1879. Said § 1 reads: ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886284 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886284",
"cluster_id": "7935839",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
91911dc522d8a467 | opinion | ks | Martin & Milliken v. Probate Judge |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The facts in this case are as follows: G. S. Martin and 'N. Milliken, composing the firm of Martin & Milliken, residents of Stockton, Rooks county, on November 15, 1883, applied to the probate judge of that county for a druggists’ permit to sell intoxi... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886287 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886287",
"cluster_id": "7935842",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
3dd3370095119f99 | opinion | ks | Shaw v. Rowland |
*155 The opinion of .the court was delivered by
Hurd, J.:
This case has once before been before this court, and remanded for a new trial. ( 29 Kas. 438 .) The substance of the petition, as well as most of the facts in the case, are stated in that opinion, and need not be repeated here.
Shaw and Earrell, def... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886290 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886290",
"cluster_id": "7935845",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
9aca949a6b36701d | opinion | ks | Harvey v. Board of Commissioners |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The objections to the constitutionality of chapter 110, Laws of 1883, are not tenable, and are disposed of in Comm’rs of Norton County v. Shoemaker, 27 Kas. 77 .
It is further insisted, however, that said act of 1883 is not controlling as to the sal... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886291 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886291",
"cluster_id": "7935846",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
40ce55965473e9b4 | opinion | ks | Spurgeon v. Spurgeon |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The facts in this case are substantially these: On September 2, 1882, John Spurgeon, jr., the husband of the plaintiff, leased by articles in writing, from Jennie Gorton, the southwest quarter of section 25, township 12 south, of range No. 7 west, in Linco... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886294 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886294",
"cluster_id": "7935849",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
aef0a1c5c9673728 | opinion | ks | State v. Redford |
The opinion of the court, was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On January 25, 1883, a complaint, verified by one George Estis, was filed before a justice of the peace of Chase county, charging the defendant in five separate counts with having violated the law prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors. The first co... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886302 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886302",
"cluster_id": "7935856",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
919e5db90094c311 | opinion | ks | State v. Nye |
Per Curiam:
Like the preceding case, this is'an appeal from a conviction under the prohibitory law. The objection is that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence, and the particular weakness claimed is' the absence of proof of the non-issuance of a permit. ■ The only testimony thereon was as follows, from... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886304 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886304",
"cluster_id": "7935858",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
1392df3129be1a7a | opinion | ks | King v. Harrison |
The opinion of the court was delivered by ■
Horton, C. J.:
Harrison filed his bill of particulars before a justice of the peace, alleging that King was indebted to him in the sum of $167.53, with interest from 25th day of July, 1883, upon an account for oats sold and delivered, The defendant before tidal offered... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886306 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886306",
"cluster_id": "7935860",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
d68f84a694131894 | opinion | ks | Snyder v. Bell |
The' opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The question principally argued in the briefs is, "Was the adjudication of the fence viewers as to the amount of compensation awarded the plaintiff conclusive? íhis question is disposed of adversely to the plaintiff in the case of Grey v. Edrington, 2... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886310 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886310",
"cluster_id": "7935864",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
8b5ba71c319564d8 | opinion | ks | Osborne v. Osborne |
*258 The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hortok, C. J.:
The plaintiff filed his petition seeking the specific performance of a verbal contract for the conveyance of one hundred and sixty acres of land. It alleged, among other things, that in November, 1877, Mrs. Fuller, the mother of plaintiff, being the ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886458 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886458",
"cluster_id": "7936008",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
71f71be1babc1763 | opinion | ks | Muthersbaugh v. Burke |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by "W. H. Burke against E. E. Muthersbaugh, J. W. Muthersbaugh, W. H. C. Riley, Helen A. Riley, K. D. Finn, and C. H. Finn, for equitable relief, and to recover the undivided one-half interest in lot No. 7, in block No. 3, in R... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886459 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886459",
"cluster_id": "7936009",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
844087573c313937 | opinion | ks | Ramsey v. Glenn |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HoetoN, C. J.:
It is claimed on the part of the plaintiff in error, defendant below, that when Glenn paid off the note of one hundred and fifty dollars, executed on March 25, 1882, by Ramsey to Guilliams, the effect thereof was a full payment of the note, and hence satis... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886461 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886461",
"cluster_id": "7936011",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
f9827e988eb2109e | opinion | ks | Fearns v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
VALENTINE, J.:
This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Eailroad Company against Elizabeth Fearns, to recover the south half of the southeast quarter of section 21, in township 20 south, of range 8 east, in Chase cou... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886462 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886462",
"cluster_id": "7936012",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
730ec477cdf96388 | opinion | ks | Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Mackey |
*300 Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by
JOHNSTON, J.:
This action was brought by Patrick Mackey against the Missouri Pacific Railway. Company, to recover for personal injuries sustained by him while employed by the defendant company as fireman upon a switch engine, and which injuries he alleges were occ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886464 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886464",
"cluster_id": "7936014",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
044bedaebcef48a9 | opinion | ks | Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Mackey |
HoutoN, C. J.:
I concur in the judgment in the foregoing case, but deem it important to add a few words to what has already been stated by the other members of the court.
As to the affirmance of the judgment below, it is immaterial, in my opinion, whether the answers given by Steele to the questions propounded h... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886465 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886465",
"cluster_id": "7936014",
"opinion_type": "030concurrence",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
02b88e27f15f4ac7 | opinion | ks | Christie v. Barnes |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action of replevin, brought by Thomas S. Christie and Isaac DeGraff, copartners under the firm-name of Christie and DeGraff, against Charles R. Barnes, for the recovery of a steam engine. The action was tried before the court and a jury, and wh... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886466 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886466",
"cluster_id": "7936015",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
30de77d02c7f6589 | opinion | ks | Dowell v. Williams |
The ojiinion of the court was delivered by
Hobton, C. J.:
The cattle described in the written contract of the parties were delivered and accepted by Dowell, defendant below, who gave to Williams, defendant in error, his check for $1,031.25 — the price of the cattle less the cost of weigh *321 ing. Subsequently t... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886467 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886467",
"cluster_id": "7936016",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
26c602ad83cdad04 | opinion | ks | Everston v. Central Bank of Kansas |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Yalentine, J.:
This was an action brought in the district court of Butler county, on July 28,1882, by William DeMoss against Charles F. Himes, Jane Himes his wife, and A. Prescott, to quiet DeMoss’s title to certain real estate owned by him, and to have a certain suppose... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886472 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886472",
"cluster_id": "7936021",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
7ffe7966298f5d8f | opinion | ks | Douthitt v. Applegate |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
VALENTINE, J.:
This was a,n action brought in the district court of Linn county, by William Applegate against Elizabeth H. Douthitt, to set aside a deed of conveyance, and to quiet his title to certain real estate. The deed was executed for the land in controversy by the... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886479 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886479",
"cluster_id": "7936028",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
195b6f04d0510fe1 | opinion | ks | Deetjen v. Richter |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HoetoN, C. J.:
The deed from which Eudolph Eichter deduced his title was prior, in point of time, to that of Deetjen, but as it had not been recorded at the time of the guardian’s sale, the question is, did Deetjen, at his purchase, have actual or constructive notice of ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886481 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886481",
"cluster_id": "7936030",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
88c49ff245bef6a4 | opinion | ks | Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Diehl |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought in the district court of Riley county, by George W. Diehl against the Union Pacific Railway Company, for the recovery of damages sustained by him while traveling as a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains. The damages were... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886483 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886483",
"cluster_id": "7936032",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
fbc759e9e49b5184 | opinion | ks | Tatro v. French |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentiste, J.:
This was an action in equity, brought by Francis Tatro against Daniel E. French and others, asking for a judgment declaring that the defendant, French, held the legal title to a certain piece of land in trust for the plaintiff, Tatro, and that such title ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886420 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886420",
"cluster_id": "7935970",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
87043d5aa0175634 | opinion | ks | Thimes v. Stumpff |
*57 Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by
JOHNSTON, J.:
The findings of fact made by the court below are accepted by plaintiff, without complaint. They show that the promissory note sued on in this action, together with $40 in money, was delivered and paid by the defendant as a partial payment upon an eigh... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886421 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886421",
"cluster_id": "7935971",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
f65ed0af7585b0de | opinion | ks | Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This was an action brought by W. J. Pierce against the railroad company, to recover damages for the negligent killing of a cow owned by him. It was alleged by the *62 plaintiff that on the 22d day of May, 1882, in the city of Paola, Miami county, Kansas,... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886422 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886422",
"cluster_id": "7935972",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
8c58f6710487a97b | opinion | ks | Limekiller v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad |
*88 The opinion of the court was delivered by
HortoN, C. J.:
Although the record in this case is an extensive one — embracing seventy printed pages —it is necessary for us to refer only to the ruling of the district court upon the plaintiff’s demurrer to the fourth defense set up in the amended answer of the ra... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886426 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886426",
"cluster_id": "7935976",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
adc9f02183e405a4 | opinion | ks | State v. Babbitt |
*254 The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
In this case the information was verified as follows:
“State oe Kansas, Allen County, ss. — :G. A. Amos, of lawful age, being sworn, on his oath says, that he is county attorney of Allen county, Kansas, and that the facts set forth in the foregoing... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886314 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886314",
"cluster_id": "7935868",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
60d19fb71502c54f | opinion | ks | Cole v. Woodson |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action for slander, brought by W. D. Woodson against I). J. Cole. The petition contained two counts. The defendant answered, setting up three several defenses: First, A general denial; second, a denial that he used the words charged in the ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886319 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886319",
"cluster_id": "7935873",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
cb4d5f609df889f3 | opinion | ks | Weir v. Travelers Insurance |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This proceeding is brought by the plaintiff in error to review an order of the district court of Greenwood county, setting aside a sale made to her of certain real estate upon a special execution issued out of the court upon a judgment rendered in favor of... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886330 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1884-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886330",
"cluster_id": "7935883",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
b5b53b5430ad5f41 | opinion | ks | Kansas Rolling Mill Co. v. Bovard |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought in the district court of Wyandotte county by James A. Bovard and Frank P. Dickson against the Kansas Eolling Mill Company, to recover on alleged acceptances by the defendant of three checks or drafts. The defendant is a corporati... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886548 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886548",
"cluster_id": "7936095",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
0428bc70c3c452cc | opinion | ks | Kennedy v. Powell |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
On December 8, 1883, "William Kennedy brought an action in the district court of Montgomery county, against William Powell, to recover a judgment for $2,421.85, and on the same day caused an order of attachment to be issued, upon the grounds that the defend... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886549 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886549",
"cluster_id": "7936096",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
76a820777d7c3d47 | opinion | ks | Tootle, Hanna & Co. v. Smith |
*29 The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
It is conceded that the affidavit for attachment was defective, by reason of the omission of the amount sued for. Upon the hearing of the motion to dissolve, the district judge decided the affidavit void. (Robinson v. Burton, 5 Kas. 293 .) The fi... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886550 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886550",
"cluster_id": "7936097",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
9489041c0887dd56 | opinion | ks | Woodmansie v. Holcomb |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This is an action brought by Zephaniah Holcomb, alleging that on or about August 11, 1882, George T. Woodmansie unlawfully seized, carried away and converted to his own use a stock of groceries owned by the plaintiff, and to his damage in the sum of $5,200.... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886552 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886552",
"cluster_id": "7936099",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
a4b03cec77b01da5 | opinion | ks | Deisher v. Stein |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This action was brought by J. R. Deisher against William Stein and Anna Stein, his wife, before a justice of the peace of Shawnee county, and after judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, the defendants appealed to the district court... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886553 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886553",
"cluster_id": "7936100",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
351f4f9f5b3e55f4 | opinion | ks | Pilcher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Railroad |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
"Valentine, J.:
This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by Lucinda Pilcher in the district court of Johnson county, against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé railroad company, to recover certain real estate occupied by the railroad company as a portion o... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886555 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886555",
"cluster_id": "7936102",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
126f5795b278745e | opinion | ks | State v. School District No. 3 |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
i Petitionconsu-uedS ljbeiniiy. The only ruling of the court below complained of in this case is, the sustaining of an objection made by the defendant to the introduction of any evidence under the plaintiff’s petition, upon the ground that the petition d... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886588 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886588",
"cluster_id": "7936135",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
b5623cce00bee5a6 | opinion | ks | Bishop v. Mugler |
Per Curiam:
The opinion in this case was filed at the last February session of this court. ( 33 Kas. 145 .)
The first appearance made here in the case by or on behalf of the defendant in error was in this application for a rehearing. Notwithstanding his tardy appearance and his failure to file a brief or ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886590 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886590",
"cluster_id": "7936137",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
71b4f2d701d471c7 | opinion | ks | Western News Co. v. Wilmarth |
Per Curiam:
Upon the rehearing, the authority of McLaughlin v. Davis, 14 Kas. 168 , is challenged by plaintiff in error, and we are asked to reexamine and overrule that decision. Unless that decision be overruled, the rehearing in this case must be denied. No attack was made upon McLaughlin v. Davis, su... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886591 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886591",
"cluster_id": "7936138",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
5ed044896ea557a7 | opinion | ks | State v. Showers |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Yalentine, J.:
On April 23, 1883, the grand jury of Morris county returned an indictment against J. B. Showers, the fourth count of which indictment charged the defendant with selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law, on February 20, 1885. The defendant was tried... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886593 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886593",
"cluster_id": "7936140",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
83e19cb696a4c0fc | opinion | ks | In re Gosnell |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On March 30, 1885, a complaint was filed before a justice of the peace of Anderson county, charging James Gosnell with unlawfully selling, on March 4, 1885, in that county, intoxicating liquors in violation of the pro *275 hibitory liquor law of 1881. Atri... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886594 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886594",
"cluster_id": "7936141",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
2bf568a9dd27fb9b | opinion | ks | State v. Knauber |
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the court below in this case will be reversed, upon the authority of the case of The State v. Showers, just decided.
| cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886595 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886595",
"cluster_id": "7936142",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
0a909450eb71435e | opinion | ks | State v. Webster |
Per Curiam:
On April 6, 1885, a complaint was filed before a justice of the peace of Sumner county against the defendant, charging him with having violated the prohibitory liquor law of 1881 by selling and bartering intoxicating liquors at various times during the months of January and February, 1885. The defe... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886596 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886596",
"cluster_id": "7936143",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
7c173038695c131e | opinion | ks | State v. Guettler |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
H. Guettler was prosecuted before the district court of Dickinson county for violating the prohibitory liquor law. The information contained five counts, and a verdict of guilty was given under each of them. Accordingly, the court rendered judgment upon eac... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886643 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886643",
"cluster_id": "7936188",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
cb78a8855b8b4c8c | opinion | ks | Douglass v. Insley |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by Merritt H. Insley and Ann M. Shire against John C. Douglass, to recover the possession of lot 6, in block 6, in the central subdivision of the city of Leavenworth. Douglass filed an answer containin... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886648 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886648",
"cluster_id": "7936193",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
a3de5a897400f8b5 | opinion | ks | McAnarney v. Caughenaur |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
"Valentine, J.:
This was a civil action for an assault and battery, commenced by William Caughenaur in the district court of Pawnee county against James McAnarney, who resided in Bice county; and the only question presented to this court is whether the action was commenc... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886652 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886652",
"cluster_id": "7936197",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
24d4c7d936334085 | opinion | ks | Peyton v. Peyton |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hokton, C. J.:
This was an action commenced under the forcible-entry-and-detainer act, before a justice of the peace. The complaint averred that the plaintiff was the legal and equitable owner and in the actual possession of the premises, and that the defendants, without... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886653 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886653",
"cluster_id": "7936198",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
3974c8a2d50c46ab | opinion | ks | Wilcox v. Johnson |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action in the nature of trover, brought in the district court of Chase county, by Horace H. Wilcox against Jabin Johnson and others, to recover $1,500, the alleged value of fifty-nine head of cattle belonging to the plaintiff, and alleged to ha... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886660 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886660",
"cluster_id": "7936205",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
e4c731e4cea02569 | opinion | ks | Walker v. Braden |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
‘ against’default-mg bidder. This action was brought by ’Win. H. Braden in his capacity as sheriff of Crawford county, upon an accepted bid made by A. B. Walker for certain personal property which was offered and sold by the sheriff at an execution sale. ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886661 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886661",
"cluster_id": "7936206",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
58c66577da877663 | opinion | ks | Clay v. Hildebrand Bros. |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The principal questions involved in this case are with reference to the priority of liens and interests in real estate. The plaintiffs in the court below were E. A. Hildebrand, George O. Hildebrand and S. F. .Jones, partners as Hildebrand Bros. & Jones... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886663 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886663",
"cluster_id": "7936208",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
3114b7cfbd96b281 | opinion | ks | Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Johnston |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
In this case, it appears from the agreed statement of facts that the plaintiff’s cattle escaped from his pasture and wandered from the public highway upon the uninclosed land of one Alva Clark, through which the defendant’s railway runs; the railway was no... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886686 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886686",
"cluster_id": "7936231",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
129040df06ab70f0 | opinion | ks | State v. Edwards |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The complaint in this case is, that the district court erred in refusing to discharge the defendant, under the provisions of § 221 of the criminal code. Instead of granting the application made, the court remanded the defendant to custody until he should g... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886694 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886694",
"cluster_id": "7936238",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
35db08f924a0fa44 | opinion | ks | Barr v. Randall |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by S. M. Barr against William Randall and Elizabeth Randall his wife, to recover certain real estate situated in Marshall county. The action was tried before the court without a jury, and the court, af... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886698 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886698",
"cluster_id": "7936242",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
7a38861318896b59 | opinion | ks | Morgan v. Field |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
*165 1. nojmy trial wben’ *164 The ruling of the court refusing the demand for a jury trial made by P. J. Morgan is assigned for error. In his petition, Lyman Field set forth a promissory note and asked for a recovery of the amount due thereon, as well ... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886703 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886703",
"cluster_id": "7936247",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
4f4f57672dbd23ac | opinion | ks | State ex rel. Edgerly v. Brown |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This is an action in the nature of quo warranto, brought by the plaintiff to remove the defendant from the office of probate judge of Coffey county, in this state, because of an alleged failure to perform the duties imposed by §3, chapter 8, Special Sess... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886704 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886704",
"cluster_id": "7936248",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
559386d30fb83bdf | opinion | ks | McCrossen v. Harris |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
Edmond Harris and his wife Maria, on June 2, 1880, executed a mortgage to R. D. McCrossen upon lots 3 and 4, in block 94, in the city of Wyandotte, in this state, to secure the payment of a note for $275 with interest. On January 3, 1883, McCrossen obtaine... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886707 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1886-01-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886707",
"cluster_id": "7936251",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
bf0a95b24f20f92e | opinion | ks | City of Garden City v. Abbott |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought in the police court of Garden City, a city of the third class, by the city attorney against A. J. Abbott, for an alleged violation of a certain ordinance, which provides, among other things, as follows:
“Section 1. Every person... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886599 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886599",
"cluster_id": "7936145",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
c6a7f23ae880848b | opinion | ks | Commissioners v. Negbaur |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
The claim sued on in this case was for the fees of witnesses for the state in a criminal prosecution in Barton county. C. H. Cason was charged with embezzling the sum of $1,000, and at a preliminary examination béfore a justice of the peace of that county w... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886600 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886600",
"cluster_id": "7936146",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
ed921cccc3696042 | opinion | ks | State v. Clark |
*290 The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The defendant was convicted at the April term, 1885, of the district court of Ellsworth county, of the offense of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $ 100 and the costs of the s... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886601 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886601",
"cluster_id": "7936147",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
efc9e02ebe6a8065 | opinion | ks | Smith v. Smith |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action brought by Ed. R. Smith against S. W. Smith, to recover damages for obstructing a public road. It was admitted that the obstructions were placed as alleged in the petition. Nominal damages only were claimed upon the trial, the real conte... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886602 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886602",
"cluster_id": "7936148",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
eba07a266b178496 | opinion | ks | State v. Commissioners |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On November'4,1884, that being the day of the general election, a special election was held in Harper county, for the relocation of the county seat of that county, and whether such special election is valid, or not, is the only question presented to this c... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886603 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886603",
"cluster_id": "7936149",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
13a2a3b338e592e1 | opinion | ks | Rhodes v. Smith |
Per Ouriam:
As several of the questions just decided in Hannah Smith v. Ed. R. Smith are involved in this case, what we have said in the former case will apply so far as applicable to this case; therefore the judgment of the district court will be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
| cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886604 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886604",
"cluster_id": "7936150",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
42265c94ee539849 | opinion | ks | Craft v. Lofinck |
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought in the district court of Marshall county, by Rufus S. Craft, in behalf of himself and others, against William Lofinck, treasurer of said county, and others, to perpetually enjoin the collection of certain taxes. A temporary injun... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886613 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886613",
"cluster_id": "7936159",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} | |
cd96511f11b2ff14 | opinion | ks | Morse v. Brunswick & Co. |
Per Quriam:
The only errors discussed in this case in the brief of plaintiffs in error are those alleged to have occurred upon the trial. No motion for a new trial is contained in the record, and therefore the judgment of the district court must be affirmed. (Ferguson v. Graves, 12 Kas. 39; Nesbit v. Hines,... | cl-bulk://2026-06-30/opinions/7886615 | public-domain-edict-of-government | 2026-06-30T00:00:00 | ks-kan | 1885-07-15T00:00:00 | {
"cl_opinion_id": "7886615",
"cluster_id": "7936161",
"opinion_type": "020lead",
"text_kind": "html_with_citations",
"source_label": "courtlistener"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.