--- license: mit pretty_name: "contilab CPU study: continual learning results" tags: - continual-learning - lifelong-learning - catastrophic-forgetting - class-incremental-learning - benchmark - model-merging - knowledge-distillation size_categories: - n<1K configs: - config_name: cpu_main data_files: cpu_main.csv default: true - config_name: cpu_tuned data_files: cpu_tuned.csv - config_name: cpu_student data_files: cpu_student.csv --- # contilab CPU study: continual learning results Per-run results of an empirical comparison of **12 continual-learning methods on 6 benchmarks**, produced with [contilab](https://github.com/JonPark0/contilab) 0.3.1, a PyTorch framework for continual learning research. One row per run, with every scalar metric: final accuracy, forgetting, backward and forward transfer, the stability gap, task-recency bias, calibration, representation metrics, memory and wall time. [Results page](https://jonpark0.github.io/contilab/wiki/Results.html) (rankings, significance tests, findings) · [Docs](https://jonpark0.github.io/contilab/) · [GitHub](https://github.com/JonPark0/contilab) · DOI [10.5281/zenodo.23906803](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23906803) ## Files | File | Config | Rows | Contents | Experiment config | |---|---|---|---|---| | `cpu_main.csv` | `cpu_main` | 324 | Main study: every method with default hyperparameters on 6 benchmarks | `cpu_main.yaml` + `cpu_main_seeds.yaml` | | `cpu_tuned.csv` | `cpu_tuned` | 456 | Tuned comparison: per-method grids on the two MNIST benchmarks, variant chosen on validation accuracy (`selected`) | `cpu_tuned.yaml` | | `cpu_student.csv` | `cpu_student` | 12 | Teacher → smaller student: distillation into a 2×100 MLP | `cpu_student.yaml` | The main study has 324 runs: 312 done, 12 diverged, 0 failed. Seeds per benchmark: Split MNIST (Class-IL) 6, Split MNIST (Task-IL) 6, Permuted MNIST (Domain-IL) 6, Split CIFAR-10 (Class-IL) 3, Split CIFAR-100 (Class-IL) 3, text5 + Pythia-70M (Class-IL) 3. ```python from datasets import load_dataset main = load_dataset("jonpark0/contilab-cpu-study", "cpu_main", split="train") ``` ## Columns - **Identifiers:** `run_id`, `preset` (benchmark and scenario), `method`, `variant` (swept hyperparameters), `seed`, `status` (`done`, `diverged` or `failed`). `cpu_tuned` adds `selected` (the variant chosen on validation accuracy) and `cell` (the comparison-axis part of the variant). - **Metrics:** every other column. Definitions and references are on the [Metrics](https://jonpark0.github.io/contilab/wiki/Metrics.html) page. An empty cell means the metric is undefined for that run, for example forward transfer in Class-IL, stream metrics for consolidation methods, or anything for a diverged run. ## Final accuracy (cpu_main, mean over seeds) | Method | Split MNIST (Class-IL) | Split MNIST (Task-IL) | Permuted MNIST (Domain-IL) | Split CIFAR-10 (Class-IL) | Split CIFAR-100 (Class-IL) | text5 + Pythia-70M (Class-IL) | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Naive | 0.196 | 0.980 | 0.805 | 0.181 | 0.049 | 0.097 | | Joint (upper bound) | 0.950 | 0.993 | 0.909 | 0.398 | 0.118 | 0.529 | | EWC | 0.197 | 0.983 | diverged | diverged | diverged | 0.105 | | LwF | 0.228 | 0.990 | 0.817 | 0.173 | 0.047 | 0.105 | | Experience Replay | 0.858 | 0.983 | 0.869 | 0.302 | 0.059 | 0.329 | | DER++ | 0.871 | 0.991 | 0.902 | 0.256 | 0.059 | 0.397 | | A-GEM | 0.335 | 0.984 | 0.864 | 0.181 | 0.048 | 0.100 | | LoRA-per-task | 0.184 | 0.986 | 0.619 | 0.137 | 0.015 | 0.024 | | Task Arithmetic | 0.531 | 0.979 | 0.570 | 0.158 | 0.011 | 0.034 | | TIES-Merging | 0.561 | 0.983 | 0.677 | 0.166 | 0.013 | 0.033 | | Multi-teacher distillation | 0.863 | 0.986 | 0.773 | 0.262 | 0.040 | 0.452 | | Continual distillation | 0.586 | 0.980 | 0.818 | 0.210 | 0.030 | 0.331 | "diverged" marks a benchmark where every seed of the method diverged (its loss stopped being finite); such runs are kept with `status = diverged`. ## How the data were produced - Hardware: 4 CPU cores (Intel Xeon @ 2.1 GHz), no GPU. - Vision: MLP 2×400 on the MNIST benchmarks (1 epoch per task), reduced ResNet-18 on Split CIFAR-10/100 (2 epochs). Language: Pythia-70M on text5 (AG News → Yelp → Amazon → DBpedia → Yahoo Answers), 1,000 training texts per task. - Replay and distillation methods keep 500 samples (vision) or 200 (text). - Reproduce with `contilab run configs/experiments/.yaml`; the setup and every deviation from the design are listed on the [Results](https://jonpark0.github.io/contilab/wiki/Results.html) page. ## Citation ```bibtex @software{contilab2026, author = {Park, Yeochoon}, title = {contilab: a performance-first framework for continual learning benchmarking, distillation and model merging}, year = {2026}, version = {0.3.1}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23906803}, url = {https://github.com/JonPark0/contilab} } ``` ## License MIT, like contilab. The benchmarks' source datasets keep their own licenses.