diff --git a/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/Reyes_supplements.failed_response.xml b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/Reyes_supplements.failed_response.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20d0833ce3a41d8f66887d15fe9c44aae2647309 --- /dev/null +++ b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/Reyes_supplements.failed_response.xml @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +0Article with id PMC7235950 is not open access one \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/download_manifest_part2.json b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/download_manifest_part2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3f119beeb32a6dd94365cd55c37b967239deb01 --- /dev/null +++ b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/download_manifest_part2.json @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +[ + { + "file": "41590_2025_2345_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41590-025-02345-x/MediaObjects/41590_2025_2345_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 1241706 + }, + { + "file": "41590_2025_2345_MOESM17_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41590-025-02345-x/MediaObjects/41590_2025_2345_MOESM17_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 2522783 + }, + { + "file": "41590_2025_2345_MOESM19_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41590-025-02345-x/MediaObjects/41590_2025_2345_MOESM19_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 404882 + }, + { + "file": "41590_2025_2345_MOESM22_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41590-025-02345-x/MediaObjects/41590_2025_2345_MOESM22_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 8340933 + }, + { + "file": "41590_2025_2345_MOESM29_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41590-025-02345-x/MediaObjects/41590_2025_2345_MOESM29_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 2913527 + }, + { + "file": "41590_2025_2345_MOESM30_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41590-025-02345-x/MediaObjects/41590_2025_2345_MOESM30_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 5022224 + }, + { + "file": "262_2025_4033_MOESM1_ESM.docx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00262-025-04033-z/MediaObjects/262_2025_4033_MOESM1_ESM.docx", + "error": "HTTPSConnectionPool(host='media.springernature.com', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=45)" + }, + { + "file": "262_2025_4033_MOESM2_ESM.docx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00262-025-04033-z/MediaObjects/262_2025_4033_MOESM2_ESM.docx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 16362 + }, + { + "file": "262_2025_4033_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00262-025-04033-z/MediaObjects/262_2025_4033_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 16614 + }, + { + "file": "262_2025_4033_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00262-025-04033-z/MediaObjects/262_2025_4033_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx", + "error": "HTTPSConnectionPool(host='media.springernature.com', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=45)" + }, + { + "file": "262_2025_4033_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00262-025-04033-z/MediaObjects/262_2025_4033_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx", + "error": "HTTPSConnectionPool(host='media.springernature.com', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=45)" + }, + { + "file": "262_2025_4033_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00262-025-04033-z/MediaObjects/262_2025_4033_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 297669 + }, + { + "file": "262_2025_4033_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx", + "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00262-025-04033-z/MediaObjects/262_2025_4033_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx", + "error": "HTTPSConnectionPool(host='media.springernature.com', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=45)" + }, + { + "file": "PMC7235950.xml", + "url": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7235950/fullTextXML", + "status": 500, + "bytes": 150 + }, + { + "file": "PMC6217820.xml", + "url": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC6217820/fullTextXML", + "status": 500, + "bytes": 150 + }, + { + "file": "PMC9254730.xml", + "url": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC9254730/fullTextXML", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 149513 + }, + { + "file": "PMC11383589.xml", + "url": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11383589/fullTextXML", + "status": 200, + "bytes": 181263 + } +] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/s41591-019-0733-7.html b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/s41591-019-0733-7.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f8af8d52f1bc6438e40272cceb0ca811064f9ed --- /dev/null +++ b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/s41591-019-0733-7.html @@ -0,0 +1,2882 @@ + + + + + + Targeted therapy guided by single-cell transcriptomic analysis in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome: a case report | Nature Medicine + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ Skip to main content + + + +
+
+ +

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain + the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in + Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles + and JavaScript.

+ +
+
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+ + +
+ +
+
+
    + +
  • Letter
  • + + + +
  • Published:
  • +
+ +

Targeted therapy guided by single-cell transcriptomic analysis in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome: a case report

+ + + + + + +
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
+ + + +
+
    + +
  • +

    18k Accesses

    +
  • + + +
  • +

    199 Citations

    +
  • + + + +
  • +

    113 Altmetric

    +
  • + + + +
  • +

    Metrics details

    +
  • + +
+
+ + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ +
+

Abstract

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DiHS/DRESS) is a potentially fatal multiorgan inflammatory disease associated with herpesvirus reactivation and subsequent onset of autoimmune diseases1,2,3,4. Pathophysiology remains elusive and therapeutic options are limited. Cases refractory to corticosteroid therapy pose a clinical challenge1,5 and approximately 30% of patients with DiHS/DRESS develop complications, including infections and inflammatory and autoimmune diseases1,2,5. Progress in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides an opportunity to dissect human disease pathophysiology at unprecedented resolutions6, particularly in diseases lacking animal models, such as DiHS/DRESS. We performed scRNA-seq on skin and blood from a patient with refractory DiHS/DRESS, identifying the JAK–STAT signaling pathway as a potential target. We further showed that central memory CD4+ T cells were enriched with DNA from human herpesvirus 6b. Intervention via tofacitinib enabled disease control and tapering of other immunosuppressive agents. Tofacitinib, as well as antiviral agents, suppressed culprit-induced T cell proliferation in vitro, further supporting the roles of the JAK–STAT pathway and herpesviruses in mediating the adverse drug reaction. Thus, scRNA-seq analyses guided successful therapeutic intervention in the patient with refractory DiHS/DRESS. scRNA-seq may improve our understanding of complicated human disease pathophysiology and provide an alternative approach in personalized medicine.

+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution +

+
+ + +

Access options

+ + + + + + + + +

Buy this article

39,95 €

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

+ + + +
+
Fig. 1: scRNA-seq analysis reveals unique skin T cell transcriptome in DiHS/DRESS.
Fig. 2: Circulating DiHS/DRESS T cells with distinct transcriptomic profiles and enrichment of HHV6b DNA in CD4+ central memory T cells.
Fig. 3: Clinical improvement with JAK inhibition with reversal of DiHS/DRESS-related transcriptome.
Fig. 4: SMX-TMP-induced in vitro T cell proliferation is suppressed by tofacitinib and antiviral agents.
+
+ +
+ +
+

Similar content being viewed by others

+
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
+ + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+

Data availability

+ +

Source data for Figs. 1–4 and Extended Data Figs. 1, 2 and 4 are provided with the paper. The matrix and raw data for scRNA-seq reported in this paper have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE132802. All other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

+

References

  1. Duong, T. A., Valeyrie-Allanore, L., Wolkenstein, P. & Chosidow, O. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs. Lancet 390, 1996–2011 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  2. Kano, Y. et al. Sequelae in 145 patients with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: survey conducted by the Asian Research Committee on Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (ASCAR). J. Dermatol. 42, 276–282 (2015).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  3. Husain, Z., Reddy, B. Y. & Schwartz, R. A. DRESS syndrome: part I. Clinical perspectives. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 68, 706–698 (2013).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  4. Ushigome, Y., Kano, Y., Ishida, T., Hirahara, K. & Shiohara, T. Short- and long-term outcomes of 34 patients with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in a single institution. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 68, 721–728 (2013).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  5. Husain, Z., Reddy, B. Y. & Schwartz, R. A. DRESS syndrome: part II. Management and therapeutics. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 68, 718–720 (2013).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  6. Shalek, A. K. & Benson, M. Single-cell analyses to tailor treatments. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaan4730 (2017).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  7. Leonard, W. J., Lin, J. X. & O'Shea, J. J. The γ c family of cytokines: basic biology to therapeutic ramifications. Immunity 50, 832–850 (2019).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  8. Miyazaki, T. et al. Functional activation of Jak1 and Jak3 by selective association with IL-2 receptor subunits. Science 266, 1045–1047 (1994).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  9. Russell, S. M. et al. Interaction of IL-2R β and γ c chains with Jak1 and Jak3: implications for XSCID and XCID. Science 266, 1042–1045 (1994).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  10. Witthuhn, B. A. et al. Involvement of the Jak-3 Janus kinase in signalling by interleukins 2 and 4 in lymphoid and myeloid cells. Nature 370, 153–157 (1994).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  11. de Masson, A. et al. High-throughput sequencing of the T cell receptor β gene identifies aggressive early-stage mycosis fungoides. Sci. Translat. Med. 10, eaar5894 (2018).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  12. Weng, W. K. et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring with high-throughput sequencing of T cell receptors in cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Sci. Trans. Med. 5, 214ra171 (2013).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  13. Homey, B. et al. CCL27–CCR10 interactions regulate T cell-mediated skin inflammation. Nat. Med. 8, 157–165 (2002).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  14. Reiss, Y., Proudfoot, A. E., Power, C. A., Campbell, J. J. & Butcher, E. C. CC chemokine receptor (CCR)4 and the CCR10 ligand cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK) in lymphocyte trafficking to inflamed skin. J. Exp. Med. 194, 1541–1547 (2001).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  15. Campbell, J. J. et al. CCR7 expression and memory T cell diversity in humans. J. Immunol. 166, 877–884 (2001).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  16. Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Forster, R., Lipp, M. & Lanzavecchia, A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 401, 708–712 (1999).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  17. Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  18. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  19. Picard, D. et al. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): a multiorgan antiviral T cell response. Sci Transl. Med. 2, 46ra62 (2010).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  20. Musette, P. & Janela, B. New insights into drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms pathophysiology. Front. Med. 4, 179 (2017).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  21. Ishida, T., Kano, Y., Mizukawa, Y. & Shiohara, T. The dynamics of herpesvirus reactivations during and after severe drug eruptions: their relation to the clinical phenotype and therapeutic outcome. Allergy 69, 798–805 (2014).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  22. Honda, T. et al. Stevens–Johnson syndrome associated with mogamulizumab-induced deficiency of regulatory T cells in an adult T cell leukaemia patient. Acta Derm. Venereol. 95, 606–607 (2015).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  23. Vela, M., Aris, M., Llorente, M., Garcia-Sanz, J. A. & Kremer, L. Chemokine receptor-specific antibodies in cancer immunotherapy: achievements and challenges. Front. Immunol. 6, 12 (2015).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  24. Ljungman, P. & Singh, N. Human herpesvirus-6 infection in solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. J. Clin. Virol. 37, S87–S91 (2006).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  25. Pohlmann, C. et al. Cidofovir and foscarnet for treatment of human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis in a neutropenic stem cell transplant recipient. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44, e118–e120 (2007).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  26. Curtis, J. R., Xie, F., Yun, H., Bernatsky, S. & Winthrop, K. L. Real-world comparative risks of herpes virus infections in tofacitinib and biologic-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 75, 1843–1847 (2016).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  27. Nyfeler, B. & Pichler, W. J. The lymphocyte transformation test for the diagnosis of drug allergy: sensitivity and specificity. Clin. Exp. Allergy 27, 175–181 (1997).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  28. Pichler, W. J. & Tilch, J. The lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 59, 809–820 (2004).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  29. Villarino, A. V., Kanno, Y. & O'Shea, J. J. Mechanisms and consequences of JAK–STAT signaling in the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 18, 374–384 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  30. Beck, L. A. et al. Dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 130–139 (2014).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  31. Corren, J. et al. Lebrikizumab treatment in adults with asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1088–1098 (2011).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  32. Teraki, Y. & Fukuda, T. Skin-homing IL-13-producing t cells expand in the circulation of patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Dermatology 233, 242–249 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  33. Illing, P. T. et al. Immune self-reactivity triggered by drug-modified HLA-peptide repertoire. Nature 486, 554–558 (2012).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  34. Pichler, W. J. et al. Drug hypersensitivity: how drugs stimulate T cells via pharmacological interaction with immune receptors. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 168, 13–24 (2015).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  35. Milbradt, J., Auerochs, S., Korn, K. & Marschall, M. Sensitivity of human herpesvirus 6 and other human herpesviruses to the broad-spectrum anti-infective drug artesunate. J. Clin. Virol. 46, 24–28 (2009).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  36. Battiwalla, M. et al. Ganciclovir inhibits lymphocyte proliferation by impairing DNA synthesis. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 13, 765–770 (2007).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  37. Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  38. Zhou, Y. et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 10, 1523 (2019).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the NIAMS flow cytometry and sequencing cores for technical support, the patient and volunteers, V. Pillai, M. Taylor and B. Higgins, for their contributions. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of NIAMS, National Cancer Institute (contract HHSN261200800001E) and NIAID, NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.N. conceived the study and designed experiments with D.K. D.K. performed experiments with assistance from T.K., B.V., J.H.J., M.K., K.S., S.P.J., S.P., J.C.A. and F.P.D. H.B.P., J.L.N., J.H.M. and S.D.R. provided clinical data. I.D.I. and G.A.F. performed viral analyses. H.H.K. assisted tissue acquisition. A.F.F. provided patient care. D.K. and K.N. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to + Keisuke Nagao.

Ethics declarations

+ +

Competing interests

+

The authors declare no competing interests.

+ +

Additional information

Peer review information Saheli Sadanand was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Infiltration of T cells in DiHS/DRESS skin.

a, scRNAseq tSNE analysis of DiHS/DRESS and HV skin cells, color-coded based on origin (n = 18,218 cells). b, Heatmap of the top-five genes marking clusters of skin cells (x-axis; from Fig. 1b). Keratinocyte (KC); smooth muscle (SM). c, Frequencies of cells in each cluster, color-coded based on origin. d, Fourteen clusters in Fig. 1b were grouped into 7 major subsets based on cell types (DiHS/DRESS cells, n = 4,676; HVs cells, n = 13,542). Numbers of differentially expressed genes (nDEGs) between DiHS/DRESS- and HV cells within each cell type projected onto a tSNE map. DEG: |log fold change| > 0.5, adjusted p-value < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank sum test. e, Immunohistochemical staining for CD3, CD4, and CD8 in DiHS/DRESS lesional skin. Scale bars, 100 μm. Representatives of six serial sections from one sample. f, tSNE plot for the lymphocyte subcluster, color-coded based on origin (DiHS/DRESS cells, n = 589; HV cells, n = 1,148). g, tSNE projections of selected genes (n = 1,737 cells). h, Frequency of cells from (f) expressing the displayed genes. i, Immunofluorescence staining with anti-CD3 (green) and anti-CCR10 (red) antibodies or rabbit IgG isotype in DiHS/DRESS lesional skin. Dotted lines denote the boundary between the epidermis (Ep) and dermis. Scale bar, 50 μm. j, Immunofluorescence staining with anti-CD3 (green) and anti-JAK3 (red) in DiHS/DRESS lesional skin. Staining in atopic dermatitis and HV skin sections are shown as comparison. Nuclear labeling with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. k, Hematoxylin and eosin staining (top; H&E) and immunohistochemical staining for phosphorylated STAT1 (pSTAT1) in DiHS/DRESS and HV skin. Scale bar, 20 μm. i-k, Representative of 3 independent experiments.

+Source data +

Extended Data Fig. 2 Characterization of DiHS/DRESS T cells in blood.

a, scRNAseq tSNE analysis of DiHS/DRESS and HV PBMCs, color-coded based on origin (n = 14,932 cells). b, Frequencies of cells in each cluster, color-coded based on origin. c, Heatmap of the top-five genes marking PBMC clusters (from Fig. 2a). d, Violin plots show the distribution of the normalized expression levels of selected genes in each lymphocyte cluster (CD4(1), n = 2,322 cells; CD4(2), n = 1,649 cells; CD4(3), n = 1,318 cells; CD8(1), n = 2,350 cells; CD8(2), n = 850 cells; CD8(3), n = 335 cells; mitotic, n = 525 cells; Treg, n = 245 cells). e, Frequencies of top-20 common T cell receptor (TCR) clonotypes in PBMCs from HV and in PBMCs and skin from DiHS/DRESS patient as determined by single-cell TCR V(D)J gene sequencing. f, Frequent clonotypes, defined as cells expressing common TCR combinations that were shared by more than 10 cells (DiHS/DRESS, n = 2 clonotypes in 22 cells; HV, n = 21 clonotypes in 1,466 cells), were mapped onto the tSNE plot. g. Trajectory analysis of cells in the CD4 T cell clusters (n = 6,059 cells), colored by pseudotime (top) and clusters (bottom). h, Pseudo-temporal single cell expression of indicated genes, colored by cluster. i, Pathways upregulated in DiHS/DRESS lymphoid clusters with high transcriptomic changes (CD4(3), CD8(1), and mitotic clusters, n = 4,193 cells). P-value, hypergeometric test.

+Source data +

Extended Data Fig. 3 Reduction of circulating CD8+ effector memory T cells after tofacitinib.

Flow cytometry analysis for chemokine receptor expression and memory phenotype in DiHS/DRESS peripheral blood CD3+ CD8+ T cells pre- and 2 weeks post-treatment with tofacitinib. Right panels: Naïve, central memory (CM), and effector memory (EM) CD8+ T cells. Representatives of 2 technical replicates.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Pathway analysis of transcriptomic changes induced in CD4+ T cells and myeloid cells during LTT.

a, scRNAseq tSNE analysis of PBMCs after a 4-day culture with or without SMX/TMP, color-coded based on origin (n = 5,881 cells). b, Pathways upregulated in CD4(1) cluster (from Fig. 4b–d, n = 1,486) after SMX/TMP treatment. c, Volcano plot of up- (red) and down-regulated (blue) genes differentially expressed in SMX/TMP treated CD4(1) cells (|log fold change| > 0.5), highlighting relevant genes associated with pathways from (b). With SMX-TMP, n = 418 CD4(1) cells; without SMX-TMP, n = 1,068 CD4(1) cells. Full list of differentially expressed genes from the three CD4 T cell clusters (n = 3,869 cells) observed in LTT (see Fig. 4b, c) is provided in Supplementary Table 2. d, Pathways upregulated in myeloid cells after SMX/TMP treatment. e. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in myeloid cells (n = 513) by SMX/TMP treatment, labeling relevant genes in pathways from (d). f, Frequencies of top-20 common T cell receptor (TCR) clonotypes in PBMCs after a 4-day culture with or without SMX/TMP as determined by single-cell TCR V(D)J gene sequencing. g, h, scRNAseq tSNE analysis on SMX/TMP-treated PBMCs with or without tofacitinib (n = 2,068 cells) colour-coded based on cluster (g, top) and origin (h). tSNE projections of selected marker genes (g, bottom). i, Pathways downregulated in CD4 lymphocytes of tofacitinib-treated PBMC, and j, Volcano plot with labeling of relevant downregulated genes. Tofacitinib-treated CD4 cells, n = 825; untreated CD4 cells, n = 508. P-values in b,d,i, hypergeometric test; p-values in c, e, j, Wilcoxon rank sum test.

+Source data +

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D., Kobayashi, T., Voisin, B. et al. Targeted therapy guided by single-cell transcriptomic analysis in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome: a case report. + Nat Med 26, 236–243 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0733-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0733-7

+
+ + + + + + +
+
+
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+

Search

+ + + + +

Quick links

+ +
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
+ +
+
+ Nature Briefing +

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + +
+
+
+
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
+ Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. + Sign up for Nature Briefing + +
+ +
+ +
+ + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/s41591-020-0752-4.html b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/s41591-020-0752-4.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..facde8d44b6fc492a39ffe9f321267a23c473f56 --- /dev/null +++ b/paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261015T141849Z-rare-cell-7k-8k-panels/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/plans/rare_gene_context_expansion_20261015/research/disease/references/s41591-020-0752-4.html @@ -0,0 +1,2929 @@ + + + + + + An immune-cell signature of bacterial sepsis | Nature Medicine + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ Skip to main content + + + +
+
+ +

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain + the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in + Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles + and JavaScript.

+ +
+
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+ + +
+ +
+
+
    + +
  • Letter
  • + + + +
  • Published:
  • +
+ +

An immune-cell signature of bacterial sepsis

+ + + + + + +
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
+ + + +
+
    + +
  • +

    39k Accesses

    +
  • + + +
  • +

    523 Citations

    +
  • + + + +
  • +

    149 Altmetric

    +
  • + + + +
  • +

    Metrics details

    +
  • + +
+
+ + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ +
+

Abstract

Dysregulation of the immune response to bacterial infection can lead to sepsis, a condition with high mortality. Multiple whole-blood gene-expression studies have defined sepsis-associated molecular signatures, but have not resolved changes in transcriptional states of specific cell types. Here, we used single-cell RNA-sequencing to profile the blood of people with sepsis (n = 29) across three clinical cohorts with corresponding controls (n = 36). We profiled total peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs, 106,545 cells) and dendritic cells (19,806 cells) across all subjects and, on the basis of clustering of their gene-expression profiles, defined 16 immune-cell states. We identified a unique CD14+ monocyte state that is expanded in people with sepsis and validated its power in distinguishing these individuals from controls using public transcriptomic data from subjects with different disease etiologies and from multiple geographic locations (18 cohorts, n = 1,467 subjects). We identified a panel of surface markers for isolation and quantification of the monocyte state and characterized its epigenomic and functional phenotypes, and propose a model for its induction from human bone marrow. This study demonstrates the utility of single-cell genomics in discovering disease-associated cytologic signatures and provides insight into the cellular basis of immune dysregulation in bacterial sepsis.

+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution +

+
+ + +

Access options

+ + + + + + + + +

Buy this article

39,95 €

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

+ + + +
+
Fig. 1: Cohort definition and analysis strategy.
Fig. 2: scRNA-seq identifies sepsis-specific immune-cell states and gene signatures.
Fig. 3: Analysis of the MS1 cell state as a sepsis marker.
Fig. 4: Induction and characterization of MS1 monocytes.
+
+ +
+ +
+

Similar content being viewed by others

+
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
+ + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+

Data availability

+ +

scRNA-seq data is available for visualization and secondary analysis through the Broad Institute Single Cell Portal (https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell): SCP548 (subject PBMCs) and SCP550 (bone-marrow stimulation). Expression matrices are also deposited in SCP. Raw sequencing data are available for download from the controlled-access data repository Broad DUOS (https://duos.broadinstitute.org/).

+

Code availability

+ +

Code used for data analysis are available at https://github.com/reyes-m/sepsis_signature.

+

References

  1. Rudd, K. E. et al. The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions. Crit. Care 22, 232 (2018).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  2. Filbin, M. R. et al. Presenting symptoms independently predict mortality in septic shock: importance of a previously unmeasured confounder. Crit. Care Med. 46, 1592–1599 (2018).

    Article  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  3. Seymour, C. W. et al.Derivation, validation, and potential treatment implications of novel clinical phenotypes for sepsis. JAMA 321, 915–925 (2019).

    Article  + CAS  + + Google Scholar  +

  4. Sweeney, T. E. et al. Unsupervised analysis of transcriptomics in bacterial sepsis across multiple datasets reveals three robust clusters. Crit. Care Med. 46, 915–925 (2018).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  5. Opal, S. M., Dellinger, R. P., Vincent, J.-L., Masur, H. & Angus, D. C. The next generation of sepsis clinical trial designs: what is next after the demise of recombinant human activated protein C?* Crit. Care Med. 42, 1714–1721 (2014).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  6. Scicluna, B. P. & Baillie, J. K. The search for efficacious new therapies in sepsis needs to embrace heterogeneity. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 15, 936–938 (2018).

    + Google Scholar  +

  7. Prescott, H. C., Calfee, C. S., Thompson, B. T., Angus, D. C. & Liu, V. X. Toward smarter lumping and smarter splitting: rethinking strategies for sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome clinical trial design. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 194, 147–155 (2016).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  8. Coopersmith, C. M. et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 44, 1400–1426 (2018).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  9. Sweeney, T. E. & Khatri, P. Benchmarking sepsis gene expression diagnostics using public data. Crit. Care Med. 45, 1–10 (2017).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  10. Sweeney, T. E. et al. A community approach to mortality prediction in sepsis via gene expression analysis. Nat. Commun. 9, 694 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  11. Davenport, E. E. et al. Genomic landscape of the individual host response and outcomes in sepsis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 4, 259–271 (2016).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  12. Sweeney, T. E., Shidham, A., Wong, H. R. & Khatri, P. A comprehensive time-course-based multicohort analysis of sepsis and sterile inflammation reveals a robust diagnostic gene set. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 287ra71 (2015).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  13. Reyes, M. et al. Multiplexed enrichment and genomic profiling of peripheral blood cells reveal subset-specific immune signatures. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau9223 (2019).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  14. Levy, M. M. et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med. 29, 530–538 (2003).

    Article  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  15. Villani, A.-C. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science 356, eaah4573 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  16. Crinier, A. et al. High-dimensional single-cell analysis identifies organ-specific signatures and conserved NK cell subsets in humans and mice. Immunity 49, 971–986 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  17. Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  18. Sundén-Cullberg, J. et al. Pronounced elevation of resistin correlates with severity of disease in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 35, 1536–1542 (2007).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  19. Lang, Y. et al. Interleukin-1 receptor 2: a new biomarker for sepsis diagnosis and gram-negative/gram-positive bacterial differentiation. Shock 47, 119–124 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  20. Schaack, D., Siegler, B. H., Tamulyte, S., Weigand, M. A. & Uhle, F. The immunosuppressive face of sepsis early on intensive care unit-A large-scale microarray meta-analysis. PLoS One 13, e0198555 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  21. Bauer, M. et al. A transcriptomic biomarker to quantify systemic inflammation in sepsis — a prospective multicenter phase II diagnostic study. EBioMedicine 6, 114–125 (2016).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  22. McHugh, L. et al. A molecular host response assay to discriminate between sepsis and infection-negative systemic inflammation in critically ill patients: discovery and validation in independent cohorts. PLoS Med. 12, e1001916 (2015).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  23. Cheng, S.-C. et al. Broad defects in the energy metabolism of leukocytes underlie immunoparalysis in sepsis. Nat. Immunol. 17, 406–413 (2016).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  24. Ulas, T. et al. S100-alarmin-induced innate immune programming protects newborn infants from sepsis. Nat. Immunol. 18, 622–632 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  25. Jang, J. C. et al. Human resistin protects against endotoxic shock by blocking LPS–TLR4 interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10399–E10408 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  26. Orr, S. K. et al. Gene expression of proresolving lipid mediator pathways is associated with clinical outcomes in trauma patients. Crit. Care Med. 43, 2642–2650 (2015).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  27. Hotchkiss, R. S., Monneret, G. & Payen, D. Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 260–268 (2013).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  28. Scicluna, B. P. et al. A molecular biomarker to diagnose community-acquired pneumonia on intensive care unit admission. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 192, 826–835 (2015).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  29. Newman, A. M. et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods 12, 453–457 (2015).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  30. Roy Chowdhury, R. et al. A multi-cohort study of the immune factors associated with M. tuberculosis infection outcomes. Nature 560, 644–648 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  31. Gossez, M. et al. Proof of concept study of mass cytometry in septic shock patients reveals novel immune alterations. Sci. Rep. 8, 17296 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  32. Landelle, C. et al. Low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR is independently associated with nosocomial infections after septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 36, 1859–1866 (2010).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  33. Veglia, F., Perego, M. & Gabrilovich, D. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells coming of age. Nat. Immunol. 19, 108–119 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  34. Schrijver, I. T., Théroude, C. & Roger, T. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in sepsis. Front. Immunol. 10, 327 (2019).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  35. Chavakis, T., Mitroulis, I. & Hajishengallis, G. Hematopoietic progenitor cells as integrative hubs for adaptation to and fine-tuning of inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 20, 802–811 (2019).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  36. Rodriguez, S. et al. Dysfunctional expansion of hematopoietic stem cells and block of myeloid differentiation in lethal sepsis. Blood 114, 4064–4076 (2009).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  37. Zhang, H. et al. Sepsis induces hematopoietic stem cell exhaustion and myelosuppression through distinct contributions of TRIF and MYD88. Stem Cell Reports 6, 940–956 (2016).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  38. Rosenbauer, F. & Tenen, D. G. Transcription factors in myeloid development: balancing differentiation with transformation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 105–117 (2007).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  39. McPeak, M. B. et al. Frontline Science: myeloid cell-specific deletion of Cebpb decreases sepsis-induced immunosuppression in mice. J. Leukoc. Biol. 102, 191–200 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  40. Manz, M. G. & Boettcher, S. Emergency granulopoiesis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 302–314 (2014).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  41. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Sepsis Bundle Project (SEP), National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures. http://www.qualitynet.org/ (accessed 28 April 2019).

  42. Nakahira, K. et al. Circulating mitochondrial DNA in patients in the ICU as a marker of mortality: derivation and validation. PLoS Med. 10, e1001577 (2013). discussion e1001577.

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  43. Dolinay, T. et al. Inflammasome-regulated cytokines are critical mediators of acute lung injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 185, 1225–1234 (2012).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  44. Stoeckius, M. et al. Cell hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics. Genome Biol. 19, 224 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  45. Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).

    Article  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  46. Kotliar, D. et al. Identifying gene expression programs of cell-type identity and cellular activity with single-cell RNA-seq. Elife 8, 310599 (2019).

    Article  + + Google Scholar  +

  47. Vallania, F. et al. Leveraging heterogeneity across multiple datasets increases cell-mixture deconvolution accuracy and reduces biological and technical biases. Nat. Commun. 9, 4735 (2018).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  48. Haynes, W. A. et al. Empowering multi-cohort gene expression analysis to increase reproducibility. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 22, 144–153 (2017).

  49. Corces, M. R. et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods 14, 959–962 (2017).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + PubMed Central  + + Google Scholar  +

  50. Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171–181 (2014).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

  51. Ramilowski, J. A. et al. A draft network of ligand-receptor-mediated multicellular signalling in human. Nat. Commun. 6, 7866 (2015).

    Article  + CAS  + PubMed  + + Google Scholar  +

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the subjects in our clinical cohorts for participating and donating blood for our study. We are also grateful to the clinical research coordinators and fellows who conducted patient enrollment and performed blood collections: B. Parry, K. Gohres, J. Lee, J. Hwang and K. Richards (MGH); K. Cummins, A. Higuera-Moreno, M. Pinilla-Vera and M. Benson (BWH). We thank A.-C. Villani, A. Arazi, J. Wenger and other members of the Blainey and Hacohen Labs (Broad Institute) for helpful discussions. We thank the Broad Flow Cytometry core for assistance in cell-sorting experiments, and the Broad Genomics Platform for assistance in sequencing. We also thank P. Khatri, S. Schaffert and M. Donato (Stanford University) for advice on bulk gene expression deconvolution and meta-analysis of published datasets. This work was supported by a SPARC award from the Broad Institute (M.B.G.), awards from the Ellison Foundation and the Allergan Foundation (M.B.G.), BARDA 1DSEP160030-01-00 (D.T.H.) and NIH NIAID U24 AI118668 (N.H. and P.C.B.). N.H. was supported by the David P. Ryan, MD Endowed Chair in Cancer Research, R.P.B. was supported by a Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award from the NIH (1K08AI119157-04) and P.C.B. was supported by a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.R. designed and performed experiments, and analyzed the data with clinical input from M.R.F., R.P.B., R.M.B. and M.B.G.. K.B. and T.E. assisted in sorting and sample processing for single-cell RNA-seq. M.R.F., R.P.B. and M.B.G. designed the MGH clinical cohorts and supervised enrollment and specimen collection, and performed clinical adjudications. D.T.H., B.D.L. and R.M.B. supervised enrollment and specimen collection at the BWH. M.B.G., M.R.F., N.H., P.C.B., D.T.H. and R.P.B. conceived the study. M.B.G., N.H. and P.C.B. supervised the study. M.R., P.C.B. and N.H. prepared the manuscript; all authors reviewed and edited the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to + Paul C. Blainey, Marcia B. Goldberg or Nir Hacohen.

Ethics declarations

+ +

Competing interests

+

The Broad Institute and MIT may seek to commercialize aspects of this work, and related applications for intellectual property have been filed. In addition, P.C.B. is a consultant to and equity holder in a company, 10X Genomics, whose products were used in this study.

+ +

Additional information

Peer review information Saheli Sadanand was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 scRNA-seq demultiplexing and quality assessment.

(a) Sample strategy for gating for hashtag oligo (HTO) positive cells based on UMI tag counts of each barcode. (b) Histogram of cells per 10X gel beads in emulsion (GEM) barcode for one representative channel. Data are shown for one channel with n = 15,304 detected GEMs. (c) tSNE plots of all cells (n = 126,351 cells total from 65 individuals) in the study colored by institution of origin of the cohort, hashtag barcode, and processing batch. Adjusted Rand index is shown for each when compared with cell state assignments. (d) Violin plots (n = 126,351 cells total from 65 individuals) of various quality control metrics for the full scRNA-seq dataset generated in this study. (e) Violin plots of genes detected across different cell-types (n = 32,341, 7,970, 9,390, 58,557, 14,299, 3,794 cells for T, B, NK, Mono, DC, and MK, respectively). Violin plots show a kernel density estimate of the data, using Scott’s rule to calculate the appropriate kernel bandwidth. The violin extends to 2x the bandwidth in both directions.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Robust identification of cell states with two-step clustering.

(a-b) Identification of immune cell types based on marker genes of low-resolution clusters. Color scale in (b) corresponds to z-scored, log2-transformed mean gene expression counts across all cells (n = 126,351 cells total from 65 individuals). (c-d) Assessment of cluster robustness for T-cells (T) (c) and monocytes (Mono) (d) (n = 32,341 and 58,557 cells for T and Mono, respectively). Boxplots show distributions of Rand indices when comparing clustering solutions with subsampled data (20 iterations). Boxes show the median and IQR for each resolution, with whiskers extending to 1.5 IQR in either direction from the top or bottom quartile. tSNE plots show final assigned states for each cell type. (e-f) Barplots showing the fraction of each patient (e) and batch (f) in each of the 16 cell states (number of patients or batches with each state is indicated).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Flow cytometry abundances of classical myeloid cell states.

(a) Gating strategy for determination of CD14 + mono, CD16 + mono, and dendritic cell abundance. (b) Correlation of fractional abundances defined by flow cytometry and scRNA-seq for each patient (n = 65 individuals). (c) Fractional abundance of the three cell types based on flow cytometry, grouped by disease state. Sample size (n) for each cohort is indicated in Fig. 1b. Boxes show the median and IQR for each patient cohort, with whiskers extending to 1.5 IQR in either direction from the top or bottom quartile.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Differentially expressed genes in immune cell states.

Top 10 differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for each cell state when compared with other cells within the same cell type. Heatmaps are grouped according to the parent cell type of the different states: (a) T cells, (b) B cells, (c) NK cells, (d) monocytes, and (e) dendritic cells. n = 32,341, 7,970, 9,390, 58,557, 14,299, 3,794 cells for T, B, NK, Mono, DC, and MK, respectively. cDC, conventional dendritic cells; pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cells; AS DC, AXL-SIGLEC6 dendritic cells.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Fractional abundance of states defined by scRNA-seq.

(a) Cell type and state composition for each patient in each cohort. (b) Pearson correlation matrix of cell states across all patients (n = 65 patients).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Disease-specific abundance of cell types and states.

Boxplots showing fractional abundances of (a) cell types and (b) states among patients grouped by patient cohort. FDR values are shown when comparing each disease state with healthy controls (two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test, corrected for multiple testing of states). Sample size (n) for each cohort is indicated in Fig. 1b. (c) Boxplots showing absolute abundances of cell states among patients (for which leukocyte counts were available), grouped by patient cohort. Boxes show the median and IQR for each patient cohort, with whiskers extending to 1.5 IQR in either direction from the top or bottom quartile. n = 10, 6, 10, 3, 6, and 4 patients, for Leuk-UTI, Int-URO, URO, BAC-SEP, ICU-SEP and ICU-NoSEP, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 7 In-depth analysis of the gene expression profile of MS1.

(a) Top 30 differentially expressed genes (among highly variable genes) when comparing MS1 against other CD14 + monocyte states (MS4 and MS2). (b) Dotplot showing enrichment of pathways (KEGG database) for upregulated genes in MS1 vs. MS2 (FDR < 0.1, edgeR exact test). n = 15,021 and 11,439 cells for MS1 and MS2, respectively. Sizes of circles are proportional to the number of gene hits in a set, whereas color represents the enrichment score of each gene set. (c) Heatmap showing the average expression of genes that are differentially expressed (FDR < 0.1, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test) between all MS1 cells from each patient in the ICU-SEP cohort and all MS1 cells from each patient in the ICU-NoSEP cohort (n = 2,153 and 1,442 cells from 8 and 7 ICU-SEP and ICU-NoSEP patients, respectively). To specifically identify genes that discriminate the two patient populations, genes are filtered for expression in-group fraction > 0.4 and out-group fraction < 0.6. (d) k-selection plot to determine the number of components for non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). Dotted line indicates selected number of components for further analysis. (e) tSNE plot of MS1 cells (n = 15,021 cells) colored by patient cohort of origin. (f) Scaled TPM usage values of each gene module derived from NMF analysis. The top 20 genes in each module are shown. (g) Scatterplots showing correlation between mean gene module usage in MS1 cells and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores for Int-URO and URO patients (top row), and Bac-SEP and ICU-SEP patients (bottom row). Sample size (n) for each cohort is indicated in Fig. 1b. Significance of the correlation (Pearson r) was calculated with a two-sided permutation test. Line and shadow indicate linear regression fit and 95% confidence interval, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 8 State-specific expression of sepsis signature genes.

(a) tSNE plots showing scaled gene expression counts across all cells (n = 126,351 total from 65 individuals) for FAIM3-PLAC828 and SeptiCyte Lab22 genes ( + or - indicates that a gene is up- or down-regulated, respectively, in sepsis). (b) Mean expression of PLAC8 in T cell (top row) and monocyte (bottom row) states across patients grouped by cohort. Sample size (n) for each cohort is indicated in Fig. 1b. (c-f) Heatmaps show state-specific expression of Sepsis Metascore12 genes (c), genes previously associated with sepsis mortality (d) or survival10,11 (e), and sepsis-linked GWAS genes (f). Color scale corresponds to z-scored, log2-transformed mean gene expression counts for cell state.

Extended Data Fig. 9 State matrix generation and performance comparison of gene-based signatures.

(a) Optimization of the number of marker genes per cell state in the basis matrix for deconvolution. Mean deconvolution accuracy is shown for pseudo-bulk gene expression data generated for each patient in our study (n = 65 patients). Accuracy is measured as high correlation or low root mean-squared error (RMSE) between predicted and true values. Dotted line indicates number of genes used for downstream analysis. (b) Gene expression correlation of all states using the signature matrix with 100 genes per cell state (1,201 total, union of all genes). (c) Scatterplot showing deconvolution accuracy (measured by Pearson correlation between true and inferred fractions) increases with median fractional abundance of cell states. (d) Summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of the mean expression of PLAC8, CLU, and the indicated number of MS1 marker genes when classifying sepsis patients against sterile inflammation in published datasets. Top and bottom lines indicate the 95% confidence interval of the summary AUROC. Dotted line indicates number of MS1 marker genes used for downstream analysis. (e-f) Individual ROC curves of FAIM3-PLAC8 Ratio, SeptiCyte Lab, and Sepsis MetaScore on published datasets comparing sepsis vs. healthy controls (e; n = 751 total patients from 9 cohorts) or sepsis vs. sterile inflammation (f; n = 696 total patients from 7 cohorts).

Extended Data Fig. 10 scRNA-seq characterization of stimulated bone-marrow mononuclear cells.

BM mononuclear cells incubated in HSC cytokine-rich media with no treatment (NT) or 100 ng/mL LPS or Pam3CSK4 (Pam3) for 4 days. Cells (n = 8,702) are visualized on a UMAP projection and colored by (a) treatment, (b) Leiden clusters, and (c) cell-type annotations. (d) Matrixplot showing the mean log-transformed UMI counts of the top 5 differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.01, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for each cluster in (b). (e) Heatmap showing differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.01, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test) between clusters 3 (CD14 monocytes, n = 786 cells) and 14 (iMS1 cluster, n = 130 cells). (f) UMAP projections of non-stimulated BM myeloid and progenitor cells (HSC/MPP, CMP, GMP, Mono; n = 1,976 cells total) colored by cell type (left) and diffusion pseudotime (right). (g) Violin plots showing pseudotime values for each cell type in each stimulation condition. n = 1,976 and 901 cells for NT and LPS or Pam3 treatments, respectively. Violin plots show a kernel density estimate of the data, using Scott’s rule to calculate the appropriate kernel bandwidth. The violin extends to 2x the bandwidth in both directions. (h) Volcano plots showing differentially expressed genes between LPS or Pam3CSK4 and untreated cells for the HSC/MPP (n = 1,168 cells) and GMP populations (n = 519 cells). Differentially expressed genes (logFC > 0.3, p < 0.05; two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test) are shown in red. Known receptors (based on a previously published database51) that are differentially expressed are labelled. HSC/MPP, hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitors; CMP, common myeloid progenitors; GMP, granulocyte-macrophage progenitor; MEP, megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors; MYL, myeloblasts; RBC, red blood cells.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reyes, M., Filbin, M.R., Bhattacharyya, R.P. et al. An immune-cell signature of bacterial sepsis. + Nat Med 26, 333–340 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0752-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0752-4

+
+ + + + + + +
+
+
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+

Search

+ + + + +

Quick links

+ +
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
+ +
+
+ Nature Briefing +

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + +
+
+
+
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
+ + +
+ Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. + Sign up for Nature Briefing + +
+ +
+ +
+ + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file