--- license: cc-by-4.0 task_categories: - robotics tags: - LeRobot - robotics - manipulation - failure-detection - franka configs: - config_name: default data_files: data/*/*.parquet --- # Paired A/B rollouts of six manipulation policies 4,800 teleoperation-free rollouts of **six** vision-language-action policies on a Franka Panda, across **four** manipulation tasks. Episodes are organised as **2,400 matched A/B pairs**: the two arms of a pair run the *same policy* from the *same initial scene* with the *same seed* for noise sampling, differing only in the number of **Euler (flow-matching) integration steps** used to sample the action. ## ⚠️ Contains failures: read this before training on it **2,060 of the 4,800 episodes (43%) are failures**. This is not a dataset of demonstrations. For application like filtered Behavioural Cloning, filter on the `success` column: ```python from lerobot.datasets import LeRobotDataset, LeRobotDatasetMetadata meta = LeRobotDatasetMetadata("lucanunz/flowsteps") train = LeRobotDataset("lucanunz/flowsteps", episodes=meta.filter_episodes(lambda ep: ep["success"] == 1)) ``` ## Episode metadata Five columns beyond the LeRobot v3 defaults, in `meta/episodes/*.parquet`: | column | values | meaning | |---|---|---| | `policy` | `dit`, `flower`, `lap`, `pi0.5`, `xr-0`, `xvla` | which policy produced the rollout | | `num_euler_steps` | `1`, `5`, `10` | integration steps used to sample each action — the A/B factor | | `success` | `0`, `1` | whether the task was accomplished, labelled by a human | | `pair_index` | `0`–`2399` | the matched pair; identical on both arms | | `run_number` | `1`, `2` | The run order in the A/B pair (mostly metadata for sanity check, not meaningful for training) | Plus the v3 natives: `episode_index`, `tasks`, `length`, and per-episode `stats/*`. ### Using the pairs The two arms of pair *k* are always `episode_index` *2k* and *2k+1*, with the lower `num_euler_steps` first: ```python import pandas as pd eps = meta.episodes.to_pandas() # success rate per (policy, num_euler_steps) print(eps.groupby(["policy", "num_euler_steps"])["success"].agg(["mean", "count"])) # the discordant pairs — one arm succeeded, the other did not. by_pair = eps.groupby("pair_index")["success"].agg(["min", "max"]) discordant = by_pair[by_pair["min"] != by_pair["max"]].index print(f"{len(discordant)} discordant pairs of {len(by_pair)}") ``` ### `run_number` Each pair's two arms ran back to back, and the execution order was randomised per pair. Included only as a sanity check for randomisation. | | ran first | ran second | |---|---|---| | `num_euler_steps == 1` | 1242 | 1158 | | `num_euler_steps == 5` | 401 | 399 | | `num_euler_steps == 10` | 757 | 843 | ## The A/B factor Arm A is **always 1 Euler step**. Arm B is the policy's higher setting and **the value is not the same for every policy**: | policy | arm A | arm B | episodes | |---|---|---|---| | `dit` | 1 step | 10 steps | 800 | | `flower` | 1 step | 5 steps | 800 | | `lap` | 1 step | 10 steps | 800 | | `pi0.5` | 1 step | 10 steps | 800 | | `xr-0` | 1 step | 5 steps | 800 | | `xvla` | 1 step | 10 steps | 800 | ## Tasks | instruction | episodes | |---|---| | Close the oven | 1200 | | Open the drawer | 1200 | | Open the oven | 1200 | | Put the spoon in the drawer | 1200 | ## Dataset structure | | | |---|---| | episodes | 4,800 (2,400 pairs × 2 arms) | | frames | 936,214 | | duration | 21.7 h at 12 Hz | | robot | Franka Panda + Robotiq 2F-85 gripper | | control frequency | 12 Hz | | cameras | 3 × 224×224 RGB: `image`, `left_ego_image`, `wrist_image` | | format | LeRobotDataset v3.0 | ### Features - `observation.state` — `float32[8]`: `[x, y, z, qx, qy, qz, qw, gripper]` - `action` — `float32[8]`: same layout, the commanded end-effector pose and gripper - `observation.images.{image,left_ego_image,wrist_image}` — `video`, 224×224 RGB Poses are the end-effector pose **in the robot base frame**. The orientation is a **unit quaternion in scalar-last order** (`qx, qy, qz, qw`). Its sign is **continuous within each episode** (no `q -> -q` jumps between consecutive frames), with the first frame on the same hemisphere as the home pose `(1, 0, 0, 0)`, i.e., a 180° rotation about the base x-axis (gripper pointing down). The gripper channel is **normalised and dimensionless**, and the state and action channels are not on the same effective scale | | observed range (all 936,214 frames) | shape | |---|---|---| | `observation.state[7]` | `[0.0001, 0.8340]` | measured aperture; never exceeds 0.834 | | `action[7]` | `[-0.1495, 1.0914]` | commanded, unclipped; 76.1% near 0, 18.7% near 1, 5.2% between | The action is a binary open/close command that overshoots the nominal `[0, 1]` range, while the state is the aperture actually reached. ### Camera intrinsics In `meta/robot_profile.json`, which LeRobot v3 has no native slot for. The matrices describe the **224×224 images as stored**, not the camera's native stream: frames were captured at 424×240 and resized to 224×224 by the policy observation pipeline, and the intrinsics were rescaled to match. That resize is anisotropic, so `fx != fy` (≈160 vs ≈282) — this is correct and encodes the non-square pixels, not a calibration error. ## How the episodes were cut Successful episodes **end at the frame the task was completed.** Rollouts were stopped by a human keypress and so originally ran on past the moment of success; those trailing frames were located by frame-level human review and removed. Failed episodes are unmodified. ## Related The same rollouts will also be published as part of the [Oopsie Data](https://oopsie-data.com) community dataset of robotic manipulation failures. However, in that release the A/B pairing is lost. ## Citation If you use this data make sure to cite the related paper ```bibtex @inproceedings{sujit2026when, title={When One Step Is Enough: An Empirical Study of Euler Integration in Flow-Matching Policies}, author={Sujit, Shivakanth and Nunziante, Luca and Dossa, Rousslan Fernand Julien and Arulkumaran, Kai}, booktitle={Conference on Robot Learning}, year={2026}, organization={PMLR} } ```