opinion stringlengths 155 298k | question stringclasses 1
value | instruction stringclasses 1
value | choices listlengths 3 3 | answer listlengths 1 1 | prompt stringlengths 3.37k 301k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. et al. v. JOINER et ux.
No. 96-188.
Argued October 14, 1997
Decided December 15, 1997
Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court with respect to Parts I and II, and the opinion of the Court with respect to Part III, in which O’Connor, Scaua, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, and... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
ANSONIA BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. v. PHILBROOK et al.
No. 85-495.
Argued October 14, 1986
Decided November 17, 1986
Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Brennan, White, Blackmun, Powell, O’Connor, and Scalia, JJ., joined. Marshall, J., post, p. 71, and Stevens, J., post, p. 75, filed opinions ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
SCHLANGER v. SEAMANS, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, et al.
No. 5481.
Argued February 22, 1971
Decided March 23, 1971
Douglas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and Black, BrennaN, White, Marshall, and Blackmun, JJ., joined. Harlan, J., concurred in the result. Stewart, J., dissented.
Herbert... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
CLEMENTS, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, et al. v. FASHING et al.
No. 80-1290.
Argued January 12, 1982
Decided June 25, 1982
Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, and V, concluding that:
1. The uncontested allegations in the complaint are sufficient to create an actual case or controvers... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
KARADZOLE, CONSUL GENERAL OF FEDERAL PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA, et al. v. ARTUKOVIC.
No. 462.
Decided January 20, 1958.
Lawrence S. Lesser and George E. Danielson for petitioners.
Solicitor General Rankin filed a memorandum for the United States.
Robert T. Reynolds for respondent.
Per Curiam.
The petition for wri... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
UNITED STATES v. BENCHIMOL
No. 84-1165.
Decided May 13, 1985
Per Curiam.
In April 1976, respondent pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to an information charging him with one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1341. Respondent pleaded pursuant to a p... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
KIMMELMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, et al. v. MORRISON
No. 84-1661.
Argued March 5, 1986
Decided June 26, 1986
Brennan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which White, MARSHALL, Blackmun, Stevens, and O’Connor, JJ., joined. Powell, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Burger, C. J., ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
KIRKPATRICK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI, et al. v. PREISLER et al.
No. 30.
Argued January 13,
Decided April 7, 1969
Thomas J. Downey, First Assistant Attorney General of Missouri, argued the cause for appellants in No. 30. With him on the briefs were Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General, pro se, and Louren B. Wood,... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MORGAN v. ILLINOIS
No. 91-5118.
Argued January 21, 1992
Decided June 15, 1992
White, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Blackmun, Stevens, O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Thomas, J., joined, post, p. 739.
Allen H. Andrews I... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
PEYTON, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT v. ROWE et al.
No. 802.
Argued March 27, 1968.
Decided May 20, 1968.
Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Robert Y. Button, Attorney General.
John J. Kirby, Jr., argued the cause for respondents, pro hac... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 352.
Argued April 24, 1951.
Decided June 4, 1951.
Luther Day and John G. Ketterer argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
W. Perry Epes argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Moris... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. WJR, THE GOODWILL STATION, INC. et al.
No. 495.
Argued April 22, 1949.
Decided June 6, 1949.
. Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Stanley M. Silver-berg, Benedict P. Cottone, Max Goldman, Richard A. Solomon and Paul Dobin.
- Louis G... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF LOS ANGELES v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al.
No. 382.
Argued April 8, 1958.
Decided June 30, 1958.
A. L. Wirin argued the causes for petitioners. With him on the brief were Fred Okrand, Robert L. Brock and George T. Altman.
Gordon Boiler argued the causes for respondents. With him on the brief ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GRAHAM et al. v. JOHN DEERE CO. OF KANSAS CITY et al.
No. 11.
Argued October 14, 1965.
Decided February 21, 1966.
Orville. 0. Gold argued the cause for petitioners in No. 11. With him on the brief was Claude A. Fishburn. Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for petitioners in Nos. 37 and 43. With him on the briefs for peti... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
SNIADACH v. FAMILY FINANCE CORP. OF BAY VIEW et al.
No. 130.
Argued April 21, 1969.
Decided June 9, 1969.
Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Thomas M. Jacobson, and William F. Young, Jr.
Sheldon D. Frank argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.
Rho... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
WILSON v. CITY OF PORT LAVACA et al.
No. 1238.
Decided May 20, 1968.
Willett Wilson, appellant, pro se.
Per Curiam.
A three-judge federal court, convened pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2281, determined that plaintiff’s claim was not “one which must be heard by a three-judge court.” 285 F. Supp. 85, 87. It also ruled that th... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
DICKINSON, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. ZURKO et al.
No. 98-377.
Argued March 24, 1999
Decided June 10, 1999
Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Stevens, O’Connor, Scaua, Souter, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Rehnquist, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy and Ginsburg... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
TRUPIANO et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 427.
Argued March 9, 1948.
Decided June 14, 1948.
Frank G. Schlosser argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Anthony A. Calandra.
Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Rober... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GE ENERGY POWER CONVERSION FRANCE SAS, CORP., fka Converteam SAS, Petitioner
v.
OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA, LLC, et al.
No. 18-1048
Supreme Court of the United States.
Argued January 21, 2020
Decided June 1, 2020
Amanda K. Rice, Jones Day, Detroit, MI, Sara Anne Ford, Wesley B. Gilchrist, Amie A. Vague, Lightfoot, Frankli... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
WILLIAMS, TREASURER OF OKLAHOMA, et al. v. MOSS et al.
No. 476.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, for appellants in No. 476.
Frank Carter for appellants in No. 534.
Jim A. Rinehart for appellants in No. 546.
Sid White for appellee Moss in No. 476.
Norman E. Reynolds, Jr., pro se, app... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
ROGERS, SECRETARY OF STATE v. BELLEI
No. 24.
Argued January 15, 1970
Reargued November 12, 1970
Decided April 5, 1971
BlackmtjN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and HarlaN, Stewart, and White, JJ., joined. Black, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Douglas and Marshall, JJ., joined,... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GARDNER v. FLORIDA
No. 74-6593.
Argued November 30, 1976
Decided March 22, 1977
Stevens, J., announced the Court’s judgment and filed an opinion, in which Stewart and Powell, JJ., joined. Burger, C. J., concurred in the judgment. White, J., post, p. 362, and Blackmun, J., post, p. 364, filed opinions concurring in the ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
INTERNATIONAL BOXING CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 18.
Argued November 13, 1958.
Decided January 12, 1959.
Kenneth C. Royall argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Mr. Royall and John F. Caskey for the Madison Square Garden Corporation et al., and Charles Sawyer for the International ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GOMEZ v. TOLEDO
No. 79-5601.
Argued April 16, 1980
Decided May 27, 1980
Marshall, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. RbhN-quist, J., filed a concurring statement, post, p. 642.
Michael Avery argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was David Budovsky.
Federico Cedo Alzamora argued the cause ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
UNITED STATES v. N. Y. RAYON IMPORTING CO., INC. (#2) et al.
NO. 94.
Argued January 8, 1947.
Decided February 3, 1947.
Samuel D. Slade argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Washington, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Stanley M. Silverberg and Paul A. Sweeney.
Jo... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
ZANT, WARDEN v. STEPHENS
No. 81-89.
Argued February 24, 1982
Decided May 3, 1982
Daryl A. Robinson, Assistant Attorney General of Georgia, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Robert S. Stubbs II, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Marion 0. Gordon and ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MARYLAND et al. v. WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR, et al.
No. 742.
Argued April 23, 1968.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Alan M. Wilner, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland, and Charles Alan Wright argued the cause for appellants. With Mr. Wilner on the brief for appellant the State of Maryland et al. were the Attorneys General ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MEEKS v. GEORGIA SOUTHERN & FLORIDA RAILWAY CO.
No. 981.
Decided June 1, 1964
Thomas J. Lewis and Thomas J. Lewis, Jr. for petitioner in No. 981.
W. Graham Claytor, Jr., Charles J. Bloch, Denmark Groover, Jr. and William H. Allen for respondent in No. 981.
George R. Wolf for petitioner in No. 1004.
Robert Broderick for... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
CENTRAL GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. MEALEY et al.
No. 14.
Argued October 13, 1947.
Decided June 14, 1948.
Tracy H. Ferguson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were George H. Bond and Edward Schoeneck.
John C. Crary, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for appellees. With him on... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
ZURCHER, CHIEF OF POLICE OF PALO ALTO, et al. v. STANFORD DAILY et al.
No. 76-1484.
Argued January 17, 1978
Decided May 31, 1978
White, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and Blackmun, Powell, and Rehnquist, JJ., joined. Powell, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 568. Stewart, J., fil... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
DIAMOND et al. v. CHARLES et al.
No. 84-1379.
Argued November 5, 1985
Decided April 30, 1986
Blackmun, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Brennan, Marshall, Powell, and Stevens, JJ., joined, and in Part I of which Burger, C. J., and Rehnquist and O’Connor, JJ., joined. O’Connor, J., filed an opinion concu... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY et al. v. WOODARD
No. 96-1769.
Argued December 10, 1997
Decided March 25, 1998
Rehnquist, C. J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court with respect to Part III, the opinion of the Court with respect to Part I, in which O’Connor, Scaiia, Kennedy, ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
March 14, 1955.
No. 246.
Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. et al.
Argued February-28, March 1, 1955.
Decided March 14, 1955.
Harry Montgomery Leet argued the cause for petitioner.
With him on the brief was Sheldon E. Bernstein.
Richard R. Lyman argued the cause for respondents.
With him on a brief were Clarence M. Mu... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. v. SUPERMARKET EQUIPMENT CORP.
No. 32.
Argued October 18-19, 1950.
Decided December 4, 1950.
John H. Glaccum argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Edwin J. Balluff.
Townsend F. Beaman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lloyd W. Patch.
Mr. Jus... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
WILKINSON v. UNITED STATES.
No. 37.
Argued November 17, 1960.
Decided February 27, 1961.
Rowland Watts argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Nanette Dembits.
Kevin T. Maroney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yea... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
CITY OF CLEBURNE, TEXAS, et al. v. CLEBURNE LIVING CENTER, INC., et al.
No. 84-468.
Argued March 18, 1985 — Reargued April 23, 1985
Decided July 1, 1985
White, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, and O’Connor, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed a concurring opini... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
COUNTY OF MARIN et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 415.
Argued April 9, 1958.
Decided May 19, 1958.
Spurgeon Avakian argued the cause for appellants-. With him on the brief was Leland H. Jordan.
Robert W. Ginnane argued the cause for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, ap-pellees. With him on the ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
NELSON, aka ZIKEE v. UNITED STATES
No. 08-5657.
Decided January 26, 2009
Per Curiam.
Lawrence Nelson was convicted of one count of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base. See 21 U. S. C. § 846. The District Court calculated Nelson’s sentencing range under th... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MICHIGAN-WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. v. CALVERT, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, et al.
NO. 198.
Argued January 5-6, 1954.
Decided February 8, 1954.
D. H. Culton and S. A. L. Morgan argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Arthur R. Seder, Jr., Everett L. Looney, R. Dean Moorhead, Mr. Culton and Mr. Morgan for th... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
COX, FORMER ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR TREATMENT, VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, et al. v. COOK
No. 74-751.
Decided March 24, 1975
Per Curiam.
This petition by officials of the Virginia prison system for a writ of certiorari arises out of a suit brought against them by an inmate of the Virginia State Penitentiary in whi... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
UNITED STATES v. URBUTEIT.
No. 13.
Argued October 13-14, 1948.
Decided November 22, 1948.
Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Philip El-man, William W. Goodrich and Bernard D. Levinson.
H. 0. Pemberton argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Opinion of... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
HATZLACHH SUPPLY CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES
No. 78-1175.
Argued December 5, 1979
Decided January 21, 1980
Nathan Lewin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jamie S. Gorelick and Mark Landesman.
Kent L. Jones argued the cause pro hac vice for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicito... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
RECZNIK v. CITY OF LORAIN.
No. 323.
Decided November 18, 1968.
Meyer Gordon for petitioner.
Henry T. Webber for respondent.
Per Curiam.
On the night of June 10, 1965, two police officers of the City of Lorain, Ohio, left their assigned cruising district and drove to the premises at 1420-1422 Broadway because they “susp... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
NEW JERSEY v. PORTASH
No. 77-1489.
Argued December 5, 1978
Decided March 20, 1979
Stewart, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BreNnaN, White, Marshall, Powell, RehNqtjist, and SteveNS, JJ., joined. BreNNAN, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Marshall, J., joined, post, p. 460. Powell, J., filed a co... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MASSACHUSETTS et al. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al.
No. 05-1120.
Argued November 29, 2006
Decided April 2, 2007
Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., jo... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
AFROYIM v. RUSK, SECRETARY OF STATE.
No. 456.
Argued February 20, 1967.
Decided May 29, 1967.
Edward J. Ennis argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs was Nanette Dembits.
Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rose... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
Bobby James MOORE
v.
TEXAS
No. 18-443
Supreme Court of the United States.
Decided February 19, 2019
PER CURIAM.
In 2015, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that petitioner, Bobby James Moore, did not have intellectual disability and consequently was eligible for the death penalty. Ex parte Moore , 470 S.W.3d 481,... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
VIMAR SEGUROS y REASEGUROS, S. A. v. M/V SKY REEFER et al.
No. 94-623.
Argued March 20, 1995 —
Decided June 19, 1995
Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia, Souter, Thomas, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. O’Con-nor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 541... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
CICHOS v. INDIANA.
No. 45.
Argued October 19, 1966.
Decided November 14, 1966.
John P. Price argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Cleon H. Foust and John B. McF addin.
Douglas B. McFadden, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, argued the cause for respondent, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
KENTUCKY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH PLANS, INC., et al. v. MILLER, COMMISSIONER, KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
No. 00-1471.
Argued January 14, 2003
Decided April 2, 2003
Scaiia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Robert N. Eccles argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Karen M. Wahle, J... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MISSISSIPPI ex rel. Jim HOOD, Attorney General, Petitioner
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al.
No. 12-1036.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued Nov. 6, 2013.
Decided Jan. 14, 2014.
Syllabus*
Congress enacted the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) to lower diversity jurisdiction requirements in class actions ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
EMSPAK v. UNITED STATES.
No. 9.
Argued January 12-13, 1954.
Reargued April 4-5, 1955.
Decided May 23, 1955.
David Scribner argued the cause for petitioner on the original argument. With him on the reargument was Frank J. Donner. With them on the brief were Arthur Kinoy and Allan R. Rosenberg.
Robert L. Stern, then Acti... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. DENVER BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL et al.
No. 393.
Argued February 27, 1951.
Decided June 4, 1951.
David P. Findling argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Mozart G. Ratner and Dominick L. Manoli.
Wm. E. Leahy argued the cause ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
BONELLI CATTLE CO. et al. v. ARIZONA et al.
No. 72-397.
Argued October 15, 1973
Decided December 17, 1973
MARSHALL, J., wrote the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and Douglas, BreNNAN, White, BlackmuN, and Powell, JJ., joined. Stewart, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 332. RehNQUist, J., took no pa... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
JEFFERSON v. UPTON
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8852.
Decided May 24, 2010
Per Curiam.
Petitioner Lawrence Jefferson, who has been sentenced to death, claimed in both state and federal courts that his lawyers were constitutionally inadequate be... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
FORTY-FOURTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF COLORADO et al. v. LUCAS et al.
No. 661.
Decided February 1, 1965.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Charles S. Vigil, Richard S. Kitchen, Sr., Stephen H. Hart and James Lawrence White for appellants.
Charles Ginsberg and George Louis Creamer for ap-pellees.
Per Curiam.
Inso... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
SCHRIRO, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. SMITH
No. 04-1475.
Decided October 17, 2005
Per Curiam.
In 1982, an Arizona jury convicted respondent Robert Douglas Smith of first-degree murder, kidnaping, and sexual assault. He was sentenced to death. The convictions and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MOODY v. DAGGETT
No. 74-6632.
Argued October 12, 1976
Decided November 15, 1976
Phylis Skloot Bamberger, by appointment of the Court, 425 U. S. 932, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Frank H. Easterbrook argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Ass... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GLONA v. AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO. et al.
No. 639.
Argued March 27-28, 1968.
Decided May 20, 1968.
William F. Wessel argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Leonard J. Fagot, Marvin C. Grodsky, and Benjamin E. Smith.
David R. Normann argued the cause for respondents. With him on t... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
STROBLE v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 373.
Argued March 6, 1952.
Decided April 7, 1952.
John D. Gray and A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Fred Okrand, Clore Warne and Loren Miller.
Adolph Alexander argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v. TRIPLETT et al.
No. 88-1671.
Argued January 16, 1990
Decided March 27, 1990
Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in Parts I, II-A, III, and IV of which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, Blackmun, Stevens, O’Con-nor, and Kennedy, JJ., joined, and in Part II-B of which Rehnquist... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS et al. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al.
No. 73-1380.
Argued January 13, 1975
Decided March 3, 1975
Joseph J. Brecher argued the cause and filed a brief for the Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians et al. in all cases. Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for the Federal Power Commissio... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
CHRISTOPHER, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE, et al. v. HARBURY
No. 01-394.
Argued March 18, 2002
Decided June 20, 2002
Souter, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Stevens, O’Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment,... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
KANSAS et al. v. UTILICORP UNITED INC.
No. 88-2109.
Argued April 16, 1990
Decided June 21, 1990
Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Stevens, O’Connor, and Scalia, JJ.. joined. White, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Brennan, Marshall, and Black-mun, JJ., joined, post,... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
WHEELING STEEL CORP. v. GLANDER, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
NO. 447.
Argued March 29, 1949.
Decided June 20, 1949.
John M. Caren argued the cause for appellant in No. 447. With him on the brief were Carlton S. Dargusch, Wright Hugus and J. E. Bruce.
Charles H. Tuttle argued the cause for appellant in No. 448. With him o... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
ROBERTSON, CHIEF, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al. v. SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY et al.
No. 90-1596.
Argued December 2, 1991
Decided March 25, 1992
Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Solicitor General Starr argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Acting Assistant Attorney Ge... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
STONER v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 209.
Argued February 25, 1964.
Decided March 23, 1964.
William H. Dempsey, Jr., by appointment of the Court, 375 U. S. 805, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Arlo E. Smith, Chief Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief we... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
AMERICAN FOREIGN STEAMSHIP CO. v. MATISE
No. 74-966.
Argued October 14, 1975
Decided December 16, 1975
Marshall, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Francis L. Tetreault argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was John A. Flynn.
Eric J. Schmidt argued the cause and submitted a brief for resp... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. FLORES et al.
No. 91-905.
Argued October 13, 1992
Decided March 23, 1993
Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, O’Connor, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas, JJ., joined. O’Connor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Souter, J., joined, post... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
UNITED STATES et al. v. ROCK ISLAND MOTOR TRANSIT CO. et al.
No. 25.
Argued November 7, 1950.
Decided February 26, 1951.
Daniel W. Knowlton argued the cause for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perl-man, Acting Assistant Attorney General ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
LURK v. UNITED STATES.
No. 669.
Argued May 4-5, 1961.
Decided May 29, 1961.
Eugene Gressman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Philip R. Mona... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
WELLS v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al.
No. 238.
Argued January 13, 1969.
Decided April 7, 1969.
Robert B. McKay argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorn... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
HANNA v. PLUMER, EXECUTOR.
No. 171.
Argued January 21, 1965.
Decided April 26, 1965.
Albert P. Zabin argued the cause for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the brief was George Welch.
James J. Fitzpatrick argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Alfred, E. LoPresti and James T. ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
POWELL et al. v. McCORMACK, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al.
No. 138.
Argued April 21, 1969.—
Decided June 16, 1969.
Arthur Kinoy and Herbert 0. Reid argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief were Robert L. Carter, Hubert T. Delany, William Kunstler, Frank D. Reeves, and Henry R. Williams.... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
ALASKA v. NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT et al.
No. 96-1577.
Argued December 10, 1997
Decided February 25, 1998
Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
John G. Roberts, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Gregory G. Garre, Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General of... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN PLANT CITY v. DICKINSON, COMPTROLLER OF FLORIDA, et al.
No. 19.
Argued October 16, 1969
Decided December 9, 1969
Robert S. Edwards argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner in No. 19. Deputy Solicitor General Springer argued the cause for petitioner in No. 34. With him on the briefs were S... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
McADAMS, EXECUTOR, et al. v. McSURELY et ux.
No. 76-1621.
Argued March 1, 1978
Decided June 26, 1978
Deputy Solicitor General Easterbrook argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Acting Solicitor General Friedman and Assistant Attorney General Babcock.
Morton Stavis argued the cause for respondents... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
HATAHLEY et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 231.
Argued March 26-27, 1956.
Decided May 7, 1956.
Norman M. Littell argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Marvin J. Sonosky and Frederick Bernays Wiener.
Roger P. Marquis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General S... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
USV PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. v. WEINBERGER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, et al.
No. 72-666.
Argued April 17, 1973
Decided June 18, 1973
Douglas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all Members joined, except Brennan, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case, and Stewart... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
JORDAN, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION, v. De GEORGE.
No. 348.
Argued March 5, 1951.
Decided May 7, 1951.
John F. Davis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, L. Paul Winings and Charles Gordon.
Thomas F. Dolan argu... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
BOOSTER LODGE NO. 405, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al.
No. 71-1417.
Argued March 26, 1973
Decided May 21, 1973
Bernard Dunau argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Plato E. Papps, Louis P. Poulton, and C. Paul Barker.
No... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
EHLERT v. UNITED STATES
No. 120.
Argued January 13, 1971 —
Decided April 21, 1971
Stewart, J., deliyered the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and Black, Harlan, White, and Blackmun, JJ., joined. Douglas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 108. Brennan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Marshal... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et al., Appellants
v.
ALABAMA et al.
Alabama Democratic Conference, et al., Appellants
v.
Alabama et al.
Nos. 13-895
13-1138.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued Nov. 12, 2014.
Decided March 25, 2015.
Richard H. Pildes, New York, NY, for Appellants in No. 13-1138.
Eric Schnapper,... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
BOYLE v. UNITED STATES
No. 07-1309.
Argued January 14, 2009
Decided June 8, 2009
Marc Fernich argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Debra A. Karlstein.
Anthony A. Yang argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were former Solicitor General Garre, Acting Assistant Attorney Gener... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
TEXAS MONTHLY, INC. v. BULLOCK, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF STATE OF TEXAS, et al.
No. 87-1245.
Argued November 1, 1988
Decided February 21, 1989
Brennan, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Marshall and Stevens, JJ., joined. White, J., filed an opinion concurring in the jud... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
Arthur J. LOMAX, Petitioner
v.
Christina ORTIZ-MARQUEZ, et al.
No. 18-8369
Supreme Court of the United States.
Argued February 26, 2020
Decided June 8, 2020
Brian T. Burgess, Washington, DC, for the petitioner.
Solicitor General Eric R. Olson for the respondents.
Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen for the United ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
KANSAS v. HENDRICKS
No. 95-1649.
Argued December 10, 1996
Decided June 23, 1997
Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O’Connor, Scalia, and Kennedy, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 371. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens and S... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
HENSLEY v. MUNICIPAL COURT, SAN JOSEMILPITAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT, SANTA CLARA COUNTY
No. 71-1428.
Argued January 15,1973
Decided April 18,1973
Brennan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Douglas, Stewart, White, and Marshall, JJ., joined. Blackmun, J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, post, p. 353... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GULF OIL CORP. v. GILBERT, doing business as GILBERT STORAGE & TRANSFER CO.
No. 93.
Argued December 18, 19, 1946.
Decided March 10, 1947.
Archie D. Gray and Bernard A. Golding argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were John E. Green, Jr. and Matthew S. Gibson.
Max J. Gwertzman argued the cause and fil... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
GROVE CITY COLLEGE et al. v. BELL, SECRETARY OF EDUCATION, et al.
No. 82-792.
Argued November 29, 1983
Decided February 28, 1984
White, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, and O’Connor, JJ., joined, and in all but Part III of which Brennan, Marshall, and Stev... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
EAGLES, POST COMMANDING OFFICER, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. SAMUELS.
No. 59.
Argued November 21, 1946.
Decided December 23, 1946.
Irving S. Shapiro argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General McGrath and Robert S. Erdahl.
Meyer Kreeger argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
M... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE v. STANISIC.
No. 297.
Argued February 25, 1969.
Decided May 19, 1969.
Joseph J. Connolly argued the cause for petitioner, pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan.
G. Bernard Fedde, by appointment... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF CALIFORNIA v. RIOS
No. 72-686.
Decided February 26, 1973
Per Curiam.
Petitioner, a California motorist, was involved in an automobile collision on March 18, 1971. Both drivers filed accident reports with the California Department of Motor Vehicles as required by the California Financial ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MASSEY v. MOORE, WARDEN.
No. 119.
Argued November 8, 1954.
Decided December 6, 1954.
Dean Acheson argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
By special leave of Court, pro hac vice, James N. Castle-berry, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
WEST v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 11.
Argued November 12, 1959.
Decided December 7, 1959.
Abrpham E. Freedman argued the cause for petitioner. .WithKhn on the brief was Joseph Weiner.
Leavenworth Colby argued the cause for respondents. With, him on a brief for the United States were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant A... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
JACKSON et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 361.
Argued March 4, 1964.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Paul Burks argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Edward L. Compton and John C. Argue.
John B. Jones, Jr. argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Att... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
Bradley Weston TAGGART, Petitioner
v.
Shelley A. LORENZEN, Executor of the Estate of Stuart Brown, et al.
No. 18-489
Supreme Court of the United States.
Argued April 24, 2019
Decided June 3, 2019
Janet M. Schroer, Hart Wagner, LLP, James Ray Streinz, Streinz Law Office LLC, Hollis K. McMilan, Hollis K. McMilan, PC, Por... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
MORRIS v. WEINBERGER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
No. 71-6698.
Argued January 17, 1973
Decided February 22, 1973
E. R. McClelland argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Walter H. Fleischer argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney Gener... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
LOCKE et al. v. KARASS, STATE CONTROLLER, et al.
No. 07-610.
Argued October 6, 2008
Decided January 21, 2009
Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, J., joined, post, p. 221.
W. James Young argued the cause for petitioners. Wit... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
1
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
BARBER et al. v. THOMAS, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-5201.
Argued March 30, 2010 —
Decided June 7, 2010
Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Thomas, Auto, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting ... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.