import OAI.Combinatorics.ContingencyTables.Rooted.ForestPhysicalCompletion import OAI.Combinatorics.ContingencyTables.Rooted.ForestLiteralCount namespace OAI /-! # Actual root residuals of the integral forest completion Summing a root-path flow gives the prescribed demand minus the total demand in the component. This formula also applies at roots and on singleton components, where the nonroot-only margin lemma is vacuous. -/ namespace ContingencyTables.ForestRootPenalty open scoped BigOperators Classical open SimpleGraph GraphIntegralCompletion ForestPhysicalCompletion ForestLiteralCount section Generic variable {V : Type*} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] theorem completionFlow_divergence_all (G : SimpleGraph V) (r : V → ℤ) (a : V) : (∑ b, completionFlow G r a b)= r a-∑ v, if componentRoot G v=a then r v else 0 := by unfold completionFlow rw [Finset.sum_comm] simp_rw [← Finset.mul_sum,walkFlow_sum,mul_sub,Finset.sum_sub_distrib] simp [mul_ite,eq_comm] /-- Absolute component totals sum to at most the total absolute demand. Each vertex is counted in one component, including isolated vertices. -/ theorem sum_abs_componentTotal (root : V → V) (r : V → ℝ) : (∑ a, |∑ v, if root v=a then r v else 0|)≤∑ v, |r v| := by calc _ ≤ ∑ a, ∑ v, |if root v=a then r v else 0| := Finset.sum_le_sum (fun a _ => Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _) _ = _ := by have he (a v : V) : |if root v=a then r v else 0|= if root v=a then |r v| else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp simp_rw [he] rw [Finset.sum_comm] simp end Generic variable {I J : Type*} [Fintype I] [Fintype J] /-- Maximum capacity makes every original large edge stay within a tree component, which is the exact cancellation needed at component roots. -/ lemma root_eq_large (small : I → J → Bool) (b : I → J → ℕ) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (hacyc : T.IsAcyclic) (hmax : ∀ F : SimpleGraph (I⊕J), F≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small → F.IsAcyclic → MaximumForest.weight F (ForestCapacity.capacity b)≤MaximumForest.weight T (ForestCapacity.capacity b)) (hb : ∀ i j, small i j=false → 1≤b i j) (i : I) (j : J) (hs : small i j=false) : componentRoot T (.inl i)=componentRoot T (.inr j) := by have hcap : ∀ e∈(ForestCapacity.cellGraph small).edgeSet, 0 cases v with | inl i' => exact False.elim hg | inr j => exact hb i j hg | inr j => cases v with | inl i => exact hb i j hg | inr j' => exact False.elim hg have hspans := MaximumForest.maximum_spans (ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) T (ForestCapacity.capacity b) hT hacyc hmax hcap apply componentRoot_constant T rw [hspans] exact (show (ForestCapacity.cellGraph small).Adj (.inl i) (.inr j) from hs).reachable lemma tableCompletion_row_all (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (i : I) : (∑ j, tableCompletion T r c i j)= r i-∑ v, if componentRoot T v=Sum.inl i then Sum.elim r (fun j => -c j) v else 0 := by have hs := completionFlow_divergence_all T (Sum.elim r (fun j => -c j)) (.inl i) rw [Fintype.sum_sum_type] at hs have hzero : (∑ i', completionFlow T (Sum.elim r (fun j => -c j)) (.inl i) (.inl i'))=0 := by apply Finset.sum_eq_zero intro i' _ apply completionFlow_supported intro h exact hT h simpa only [hzero,zero_add,Sum.elim_inl,tableCompletion] using hs lemma tableCompletion_column_all (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (j : J) : -(∑ i, tableCompletion T r c i j)= -c j-∑ v, if componentRoot T v=Sum.inr j then Sum.elim r (fun j => -c j) v else 0 := by have hs := completionFlow_divergence_all T (Sum.elim r (fun j => -c j)) (.inr j) rw [Fintype.sum_sum_type] at hs have hzero : (∑ j', completionFlow T (Sum.elim r (fun j => -c j)) (.inr j) (.inr j'))=0 := by apply Finset.sum_eq_zero intro j' _ apply completionFlow_supported intro h exact hT h have hskew : (∑ i, completionFlow T (Sum.elim r (fun j => -c j)) (.inr j) (.inl i))= -(∑ i, tableCompletion T r c i j) := by rw [← Finset.sum_neg_distrib] apply Finset.sum_congr rfl intro i _ exact completionFlow_skew T _ _ _ simpa only [hzero,add_zero,Sum.elim_inr,hskew] using hs noncomputable def residualDemand (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (x q free : I → J → ℤ) : I⊕J → ℤ := Sum.elim (rowResidual small T r x free) (fun j => -columnResidual small T c q free j) noncomputable def componentTotal (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (d : I⊕J → ℤ) (a : I⊕J) : ℤ := ∑ v, (if componentRoot T v=a then 1 else 0)*d v noncomputable def smallDemand (small : I → J → Bool) (X x q : I → J → ℤ) : I⊕J → ℤ := Sum.elim (fun i => ∑ j, if small i j then X i j-x i j else 0) (fun j => ∑ i, if small i j then q i j-X i j else 0) /-- Large-cell incidences cancel exactly within each component. The component residual therefore depends only on the small views, not on the chosen free values. -/ theorem componentTotal_residual (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (x q free X : I → J → ℤ) (hr : ∀ i, (∑ j, X i j)=r i) (hc : ∀ j, (∑ i, X i j)=c j) (hroot : ∀ i j, small i j=false → componentRoot T (.inl i)=componentRoot T (.inr j)) (a : I⊕J) : componentTotal T (residualDemand small T r c x q free) a= componentTotal T (smallDemand small X x q) a := by let R : I → ℤ := fun i => if componentRoot T (.inl i)=a then 1 else 0 let C : J → ℤ := fun j => if componentRoot T (.inr j)=a then 1 else 0 have hrow (i : I) : R i*rowResidual small T r x free i= ∑ j, R i*(X i j-fixedRow small T x free i j) := by rw [rowResidual,← hr i,← Finset.sum_sub_distrib,Finset.mul_sum] have hcol (j : J) : C j*(-columnResidual small T c q free j)= ∑ i, C j*(fixedColumn small T q free i j-X i j) := by rw [columnResidual,← hc j,neg_sub,← Finset.sum_sub_distrib,Finset.mul_sum] unfold componentTotal residualDemand smallDemand rw [Fintype.sum_sum_type,Fintype.sum_sum_type] simp only [Sum.elim_inl,Sum.elim_inr] change (∑ i, R i*rowResidual small T r x free i)+ (∑ j, C j*(-columnResidual small T c q free j))= (∑ i, R i*(∑ j, if small i j then X i j-x i j else 0))+ ∑ j, C j*(∑ i, if small i j then q i j-X i j else 0) simp_rw [hrow,hcol,Finset.mul_sum] rw [Finset.sum_comm (f := fun j i => C j*(fixedColumn small T q free i j-X i j)), Finset.sum_comm (f := fun j i => C j*(if small i j then q i j-X i j else 0)), ← Finset.sum_add_distrib,← Finset.sum_add_distrib] apply Finset.sum_congr rfl intro i _ rw [← Finset.sum_add_distrib,← Finset.sum_add_distrib] apply Finset.sum_congr rfl intro j _ by_cases hs : small i j=true · simp [fixedRow,fixedColumn,hs] · have hs' : small i j=false := Bool.eq_false_iff.mpr hs have he : R i=C j := by unfold R C; rw [hroot i j hs'] rw [he] simp only [fixedRow,fixedColumn,hs',Bool.false_eq_true,ite_false] ring noncomputable def signedResidual (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (x q free : I → J → ℤ) : I⊕J → ℤ := Sum.elim (fun i => (∑ j, if small i j then x i j else completed small T r c x q free i j)-r i) (fun j => -((∑ i, if small i j then q i j else completed small T r c x q free i j)-c j)) /-- The actual completed table's signed root discrepancy is exactly the negative component total of its original residual demands. -/ theorem signedResidual_eq_component (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (x q free : I → J → ℤ) (a : I⊕J) : signedResidual small T r c x q free a= -(∑ v, if componentRoot T v=a then residualDemand small T r c x q free v else 0) := by cases a with | inl i => simp only [signedResidual,Sum.elim_inl] simp_rw [row_pointwise small T hT r c x q free] rw [Finset.sum_add_distrib] have hr := tableCompletion_row_all small T hT (rowResidual small T r x free) (columnResidual small T c q free) i change (∑ j, solved small T r c x q free i j)=_ at hr rw [hr] unfold residualDemand rowResidual columnResidual ring | inr j => simp only [signedResidual,Sum.elim_inr] simp_rw [column_pointwise small T hT r c x q free] rw [Finset.sum_add_distrib] have hc := tableCompletion_column_all small T hT (rowResidual small T r x free) (columnResidual small T c q free) j change -(∑ i, solved small T r c x q free i j)=_ at hc have hc' : (∑ i, solved small T r c x q free i j)= columnResidual small T c q free j+ ∑ v, if componentRoot T v=Sum.inr j then Sum.elim (rowResidual small T r x free) (fun j => -columnResidual small T c q free j) v else 0 := by linarith rw [hc'] unfold residualDemand rowResidual columnResidual ring theorem signedResidual_eq_small (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (x q free X : I → J → ℤ) (hr : ∀ i, (∑ j, X i j)=r i) (hc : ∀ j, (∑ i, X i j)=c j) (hroot : ∀ i j, small i j=false → componentRoot T (.inl i)=componentRoot T (.inr j)) (a : I⊕J) : signedResidual small T r c x q free a= -componentTotal T (smallDemand small X x q) a := by rw [signedResidual_eq_component small T hT r c x q free a] have he : (∑ v, if componentRoot T v=a then residualDemand small T r c x q free v else 0)= componentTotal T (residualDemand small T r c x q free) a := by simp [componentTotal,ite_mul] rw [he,componentTotal_residual small T r c x q free X hr hc hroot a] /-- The original root deviations do not depend on the free assignment; this follows from the actual integral completion, rather than an assumed affine representation of the source count. -/ theorem signedResidual_independent (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (x q free free' X : I → J → ℤ) (hr : ∀ i, (∑ j, X i j)=r i) (hc : ∀ j, (∑ i, X i j)=c j) (hroot : ∀ i j, small i j=false → componentRoot T (.inl i)=componentRoot T (.inr j)) : signedResidual small T r c x q free=signedResidual small T r c x q free' := by funext a rw [signedResidual_eq_small small T hT r c x q free X hr hc hroot a, signedResidual_eq_small small T hT r c x q free' X hr hc hroot a] theorem sum_abs_signedResidual_le (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (b : I → J → ℕ) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (x q free X : I → J → ℤ) (hr : ∀ i, (∑ j, X i j)=r i) (hc : ∀ j, (∑ i, X i j)=c j) (hroot : ∀ i j, small i j=false → componentRoot T (.inl i)=componentRoot T (.inr j)) (hx : ∀ i j, small i j=true → 0≤x i j ∧ x i j≤b i j) (hq : ∀ i j, small i j=true → 0≤q i j ∧ q i j≤b i j) (hX : ∀ i j, 0≤X i j ∧ X i j≤b i j) : (∑ a, |(signedResidual small T r c x q free a:ℝ)|)≤ 2*∑ i, ∑ j, if small i j then (b i j:ℝ) else 0 := by have he (a : I⊕J) : (signedResidual small T r c x q free a:ℝ)= -(∑ v, if componentRoot T v=a then (smallDemand small X x q v:ℝ) else 0) := by rw [signedResidual_eq_small small T hT r c x q free X hr hc hroot a] unfold componentTotal push_cast congr 1 apply Finset.sum_congr rfl intro v _ by_cases hv : componentRoot T v=a <;> simp [hv] simp_rw [he,abs_neg] apply (sum_abs_componentTotal (componentRoot T) (fun v => (smallDemand small X x q v:ℝ))).trans have hrow (i : I) : |((∑ j, if small i j then X i j-x i j else 0:ℤ):ℝ)|≤ ∑ j, if small i j then (b i j:ℝ) else 0 := by push_cast apply (Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _).trans apply Finset.sum_le_sum intro j _ by_cases hs : small i j=true · simp only [hs,ite_true] have hh : |X i j-x i j|≤(b i j:ℤ) := by apply abs_le.mpr constructor <;> linarith [(hx i j hs).1,(hx i j hs).2,(hX i j).1,(hX i j).2] exact_mod_cast hh · have hs' : small i j=false := Bool.eq_false_iff.mpr hs simp [hs'] have hcol (j : J) : |((∑ i, if small i j then q i j-X i j else 0:ℤ):ℝ)|≤ ∑ i, if small i j then (b i j:ℝ) else 0 := by push_cast apply (Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _).trans apply Finset.sum_le_sum intro i _ by_cases hs : small i j=true · simp only [hs,ite_true] have hh : |q i j-X i j|≤(b i j:ℤ) := by apply abs_le.mpr constructor <;> linarith [(hq i j hs).1,(hq i j hs).2,(hX i j).1,(hX i j).2] exact_mod_cast hh · have hs' : small i j=false := Bool.eq_false_iff.mpr hs simp [hs'] rw [Fintype.sum_sum_type] change (∑ i, |((∑ j, if small i j then X i j-x i j else 0:ℤ):ℝ)|)+ (∑ j, |((∑ i, if small i j then q i j-X i j else 0:ℤ):ℝ)|)≤_ have hrows := Finset.sum_le_sum (s := Finset.univ) (fun i _ => hrow i) have hcols := Finset.sum_le_sum (s := Finset.univ) (fun j _ => hcol j) rw [Finset.sum_comm] at hcols linarith lemma abs_actualDeviation_solved (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (b x y free : I → J → ℕ) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (a : I⊕J) : |actualDeviation small T b x y free r c (solved small T r c (fun i j => (x i j:ℤ)) (fun i j => ((b i j-y i j:ℕ):ℤ)) (fun i j => (free i j:ℤ))) a|= |(signedResidual small T r c (fun i j => (x i j:ℤ)) (fun i j => ((b i j-y i j:ℕ):ℤ)) (fun i j => (free i j:ℤ)) a:ℝ)| := by cases a with | inl i => simp only [actualDeviation,signedResidual,Sum.elim_inl,completed,largeValue] push_cast rfl | inr j => simp only [actualDeviation,signedResidual,Sum.elim_inr,completed,largeValue] push_cast rw [abs_neg] /-- This is the root part of the source's actual penalty. Each small cell contributes at most its capacity at each of its two incidences. -/ theorem rootPenalty_le (small : I → J → Bool) (T : SimpleGraph (I⊕J)) (hT : T≤ForestCapacity.cellGraph small) (b x y free : I → J → ℕ) (r : I → ℤ) (c : J → ℤ) (X : I → J → ℤ) (hr : ∀ i, (∑ j, X i j)=r i) (hc : ∀ j, (∑ i, X i j)=c j) (hroot : ∀ i j, small i j=false → componentRoot T (.inl i)=componentRoot T (.inr j)) (hx : ∀ i j, small i j=true → x i j≤b i j) (hX : ∀ i j, 0≤X i j ∧ X i j≤b i j) : (∑ a, if ForestPenaltyApplication.rootFlag T a then |actualDeviation small T b x y free r c (solved small T r c (fun i j => (x i j:ℤ)) (fun i j => ((b i j-y i j:ℕ):ℤ)) (fun i j => (free i j:ℤ))) a| else 0)≤ 2*∑ i, ∑ j, if small i j then (b i j:ℝ) else 0 := by apply le_trans (Finset.sum_le_sum (fun a _ => ?_)) (sum_abs_signedResidual_le small T hT b r c (fun i j => (x i j:ℤ)) (fun i j => ((b i j-y i j:ℕ):ℤ)) (fun i j => (free i j:ℤ)) X hr hc hroot (by intro i j hs; exact ⟨by positivity,by exact_mod_cast hx i j hs⟩) (by intro i j _; exact ⟨by positivity,by exact_mod_cast Nat.sub_le (b i j) (y i j)⟩) hX) split_ifs · exact (abs_actualDeviation_solved small T b x y free r c a).le · exact abs_nonneg _ end ContingencyTables.ForestRootPenalty end OAI