import OAI.Computability.Scheduling.SeparatorWalk namespace OAI section namespace ThreeMachine.Structure def GlobalUpset {J : Type} (r : J → J → Prop) (A : Set J) : Prop := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → x ∈ A → y ∈ A def GlobalDownset {J : Type} (r : J → J → Prop) (A : Set J) : Prop := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → y ∈ A → x ∈ A theorem GlobalUpset.inter {J : Type} {r : J → J → Prop} {A B : Set J} (hA : GlobalUpset r A) (hB : GlobalUpset r B) : GlobalUpset r (A ∩ B) := by intro x y hxy hx exact ⟨hA hxy hx.1, hB hxy hx.2⟩ theorem GlobalUpset.union {J : Type} {r : J → J → Prop} {A B : Set J} (hA : GlobalUpset r A) (hB : GlobalUpset r B) : GlobalUpset r (A ∪ B) := by intro x y hxy hx exact hx.elim (fun h => Or.inl (hA hxy h)) (fun h => Or.inr (hB hxy h)) theorem GlobalDownset.compl {J : Type} {r : J → J → Prop} {A : Set J} (hA : GlobalDownset r A) : GlobalUpset r Aᶜ := by intro x y hxy hx hy exact hx (hA hxy hy) structure GlobalList (J : Type) where indices : Finset ℕ entry : ℕ → Set J namespace GlobalList variable {J : Type} def Qual (K : GlobalList J) : Set J := {x | ∃ i ∈ K.indices, x ∈ K.entry i} def Upsets (K : GlobalList J) (r : J → J → Prop) : Prop := ∀ i ∈ K.indices, GlobalUpset r (K.entry i) noncomputable def memberships (K : GlobalList J) (x : J) : Finset ℕ := by classical exact K.indices.filter (fun i => x ∈ K.entry i) noncomputable def lastIndex (K : GlobalList J) (x : J) : ℕ := (K.memberships x).sup id def KeyLT (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (x y : J) : Prop := K.lastIndex x < K.lastIndex y ∨ K.lastIndex x = K.lastIndex y ∧ rank x < rank y @[simp] theorem mem_memberships (K : GlobalList J) (x : J) (i : ℕ) : i ∈ K.memberships x ↔ i ∈ K.indices ∧ x ∈ K.entry i := by classical simp [memberships] theorem le_lastIndex {K : GlobalList J} {x : J} {i : ℕ} (hi : i ∈ K.indices) (hx : x ∈ K.entry i) : i ≤ K.lastIndex x := by exact Finset.le_sup (f := id) ((mem_memberships K x i).mpr ⟨hi, hx⟩) theorem lastIndex_mem {K : GlobalList J} {x : J} (hx : x ∈ K.Qual) : K.lastIndex x ∈ K.indices ∧ x ∈ K.entry (K.lastIndex x) := by obtain ⟨i, hi, hxi⟩ := hx have hne : (K.memberships x).Nonempty := ⟨i, (mem_memberships K x i).mpr ⟨hi, hxi⟩⟩ have := Finset.sup_mem_of_nonempty (f := id) hne obtain ⟨j, hj, e⟩ := this change j = K.lastIndex x at e apply (mem_memberships K x (K.lastIndex x)).mp rw [← e] exact hj theorem qual_upset {K : GlobalList J} {r : J → J → Prop} (hK : K.Upsets r) : GlobalUpset r K.Qual := by rintro x y hxy ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ exact ⟨i, hi, hK i hi hxy hx⟩ theorem key_extends {K : GlobalList J} {r : J → J → Prop} {rank : J → ℕ} (hK : K.Upsets r) (hrank : ∀ x y, r x y → rank x < rank y) {x y : J} (hx : x ∈ K.Qual) (hxy : r x y) : K.KeyLT rank x y := by obtain ⟨hi, hxlast⟩ := lastIndex_mem hx have hle : K.lastIndex x ≤ K.lastIndex y := le_lastIndex hi (hK _ hi hxy hxlast) rcases hle.lt_or_eq with h | h · exact Or.inl h · exact Or.inr ⟨h, hrank x y hxy⟩ noncomputable def carry (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (d r : ℕ) : GlobalList J := by classical exact ⟨K.indices.filter (d ≤ ·), fun i => if i = d then K.entry i ∩ {x | r ≤ rank x} else K.entry i⟩ theorem carry_membership (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (d r i : ℕ) (x : J) : i ∈ (K.carry rank d r).memberships x ↔ i ∈ K.indices ∧ d ≤ i ∧ x ∈ K.entry i ∧ (i = d → r ≤ rank x) := by classical rw [mem_memberships] change (i ∈ K.indices.filter (d ≤ ·) ∧ x ∈ (if i = d then K.entry i ∩ {x | r ≤ rank x} else K.entry i)) ↔ _ rw [Finset.mem_filter] by_cases hi : i = d <;> simp [hi, and_assoc] theorem carry_selection (K : GlobalList J) (rank : J → ℕ) (d r : ℕ) (x : J) : x ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual ↔ x ∈ K.Qual ∧ (d < K.lastIndex x ∨ K.lastIndex x = d ∧ r ≤ rank x) := by constructor · rintro ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ have hc := (carry_membership K rank d r i x).mp ((mem_memberships _ _ _).mpr ⟨hi, hx⟩) refine ⟨⟨i, hc.1, hc.2.2.1⟩, ?_⟩ have hle := le_lastIndex hc.1 hc.2.2.1 by_cases h : d < K.lastIndex x · exact Or.inl h · have hid : i = d := by omega exact Or.inr ⟨by omega, hc.2.2.2 hid⟩ · rintro ⟨hq, hmax⟩ obtain ⟨hi, hx⟩ := lastIndex_mem hq refine ⟨K.lastIndex x, ?_⟩ apply (mem_memberships _ _ _).mp apply (carry_membership K rank d r _ x).mpr refine ⟨hi, ?_, hx, ?_⟩ · rcases hmax with h | ⟨h, _⟩ <;> omega · intro e rcases hmax with h | ⟨_, hr⟩ · omega · exact hr theorem carry_lastIndex {K : GlobalList J} {rank : J → ℕ} {d r : ℕ} {x : J} (hx : x ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual) : (K.carry rank d r).lastIndex x = K.lastIndex x := by have hsel := (carry_selection K rank d r x).mp hx apply le_antisymm · apply Finset.sup_le intro i hi have hm := (carry_membership K rank d r i x).mp hi exact le_lastIndex hm.1 hm.2.2.1 · obtain ⟨hi, hxi⟩ := lastIndex_mem hsel.1 apply Finset.le_sup (f := id) (b := K.lastIndex x) apply (carry_membership K rank d r (K.lastIndex x) x).mpr refine ⟨hi, ?_, hxi, ?_⟩ · rcases hsel.2 with h | ⟨h, _⟩ <;> omega · intro e rcases hsel.2 with h | ⟨_, hr⟩ · omega · exact hr theorem carry_key {K : GlobalList J} {rank : J → ℕ} {d r : ℕ} {x y : J} (hx : x ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual) (hy : y ∈ (K.carry rank d r).Qual) : (K.carry rank d r).KeyLT rank x y ↔ K.KeyLT rank x y := by simp only [KeyLT, carry_lastIndex hx, carry_lastIndex hy] theorem carry_upsets {K : GlobalList J} {rank : J → ℕ} {d t : ℕ} {r : J → J → Prop} (hK : K.Upsets r) (hrank : ∀ x y, r x y → rank x < rank y) : (K.carry rank d t).Upsets r := by classical intro i hi x y hxy hx have hi' : i ∈ K.indices ∧ d ≤ i := by simpa [carry] using hi by_cases hid : i = d · have hx' : x ∈ K.entry i ∧ t ≤ rank x := by simpa [carry, hid] using hx have hrankxy := hrank x y hxy have hy : y ∈ K.entry i := hK i hi'.1 hxy hx'.1 simpa [carry, hid] using And.intro hy (show t ≤ rank y by omega) · have hx' : x ∈ K.entry i := by simpa [carry, hid] using hx simpa [carry, hid] using hK i hi'.1 hxy hx' noncomputable def prune (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) : GlobalList J := by classical exact ⟨K.indices.filter (fun i => (K.entry i ∩ W).Nonempty), K.entry⟩ theorem prune_membership (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) (i : ℕ) (x : J) : i ∈ (K.prune W).memberships x ↔ i ∈ K.indices ∧ (K.entry i ∩ W).Nonempty ∧ x ∈ K.entry i := by classical rw [mem_memberships] change (i ∈ K.indices.filter (fun j => (K.entry j ∩ W).Nonempty) ∧ x ∈ K.entry i) ↔ _ rw [Finset.mem_filter] exact and_assoc theorem prune_qual_subset (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) : (K.prune W).Qual ⊆ K.Qual := by rintro x ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ have hm := (prune_membership K W i x).mp ((mem_memberships _ _ _).mpr ⟨hi, hx⟩) exact ⟨i, hm.1, hm.2.2⟩ theorem prune_qual (K : GlobalList J) {W : Set J} {x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) : x ∈ (K.prune W).Qual ↔ x ∈ K.Qual := by refine ⟨fun h => prune_qual_subset K W h, ?_⟩ rintro ⟨i, hi, hxi⟩ refine ⟨i, ?_⟩ apply (mem_memberships _ _ _).mp exact (prune_membership K W i x).mpr ⟨hi, ⟨x, hxi, hx⟩, hxi⟩ theorem prune_lastIndex_le (K : GlobalList J) (W : Set J) (x : J) : (K.prune W).lastIndex x ≤ K.lastIndex x := by apply Finset.sup_le intro i hi have hm := (prune_membership K W i x).mp hi exact le_lastIndex hm.1 hm.2.2 theorem prune_lastIndex (K : GlobalList J) {W : Set J} {x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) : (K.prune W).lastIndex x = K.lastIndex x := by apply le_antisymm (prune_lastIndex_le K W x) apply Finset.sup_le intro i hi have hm := (mem_memberships K x i).mp hi apply Finset.le_sup (f := id) exact (prune_membership K W i x).mpr ⟨hm.1, ⟨x, hm.2, hx⟩, hm.2⟩ theorem prune_key {K : GlobalList J} {W : Set J} {rank : J → ℕ} {x y : J} (hx : x ∈ W) (hkey : (K.prune W).KeyLT rank x y) : K.KeyLT rank x y := by have heq := prune_lastIndex K hx have hle := prune_lastIndex_le K W y rcases hkey with h | ⟨h, hr⟩ · exact Or.inl (by omega) · by_cases hlt : K.lastIndex x < K.lastIndex y · exact Or.inl hlt · exact Or.inr ⟨by omega, hr⟩ theorem prune_upsets {K : GlobalList J} {W : Set J} {r : J → J → Prop} (hK : K.Upsets r) : (K.prune W).Upsets r := by classical intro i hi have hi' : i ∈ K.indices ∧ (K.entry i ∩ W).Nonempty := by simpa [prune] using hi exact hK i hi'.1 end GlobalList end ThreeMachine.Structure namespace ThreeMachine.Structure section IntervalNormalization variable {J : Type} [Fintype J] def Layout.FixedOutside (p q : Layout J) (W : Set J) : Prop := ∀ x, x ∉ W → q x = p x theorem Layout.FixedOutside.refl (p : Layout J) (W : Set J) : p.FixedOutside p W := fun _ _ => rfl theorem Layout.FixedOutside.trans {p q u : Layout J} {W : Set J} (hpq : p.FixedOutside q W) (hqu : q.FixedOutside u W) : p.FixedOutside u W := fun x hx => (hqu x hx).trans (hpq x hx) theorem Layout.FixedOutside.mono {p q : Layout J} {W U : Set J} (h : p.FixedOutside q W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) : p.FixedOutside q U := fun x hx => h x (fun hW => hx (hWU hW)) theorem Layout.FixedOutside.time {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} (h : p.FixedOutside q W) {x : J} (hx : x ∉ W) : q.time x = p.time x := by simp [Layout.time, h x hx] theorem Layout.FixedOutside.symm_position {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} (h : p.FixedOutside q W) (i : Fin (Fintype.card J)) (hi : p.symm i ∉ W) : q.symm i = p.symm i := by apply q.injective rw [q.apply_symm_apply, h _ hi, p.apply_symm_apply] theorem Layout.FixedOutside.position_mem {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} (h : p.FixedOutside q W) {x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) : p.symm (q x) ∈ W := by by_contra hn have he : q (p.symm (q x)) = q x := by rw [h _ hn, p.apply_symm_apply] apply hn rw [q.injective he] exact hx theorem Layout.FixedOutside.time_range {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} {a b : ℕ} (h : p.FixedOutside q W) (hW : ∀ x ∈ W, a < p.time x ∧ p.time x < b) {x : J} (hx : x ∈ W) : a < q.time x ∧ q.time x < b := by have hr := hW _ (h.position_mem hx) simpa [Layout.time] using hr theorem reorder_respects {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} {a b : ℕ} {r : J → J → Prop} (hp : p.Respects r) (hfix : p.FixedOutside q W) (hW : ∀ x, x ∈ W ↔ a < p.time x ∧ p.time x < b) (hq : ∀ x ∈ W, ∀ y ∈ W, r x y → q.time x < q.time y) : q.Respects r := by intro x y hxy have ht := hp x y hxy by_cases hx : x ∈ W · by_cases hy : y ∈ W · exact hq x hx y hy hxy · have hxt := hfix.time_range (fun z hz => (hW z).mp hz) hx have hxp := (hW x).mp hx have hyp : ¬(a < p.time y ∧ p.time y < b) := fun h => hy ((hW y).mpr h) rw [hfix.time hy] omega · rw [hfix.time hx] by_cases hy : y ∈ W · have hyt := hfix.time_range (fun z hz => (hW z).mp hz) hy have hyp := (hW y).mp hy have hxp : ¬(a < p.time x ∧ p.time x < b) := fun h => hx ((hW x).mpr h) omega · rw [hfix.time hy] exact ht def Layout.NormalizedOn (p : Layout J) (W : Set J) (r : J → J → Prop) (priority : J → ℕ) : Prop := p.Respects r ∧ ∀ q : Layout J, q.Respects r → p.FixedOutside q W → p.signature priority ≤ q.signature priority theorem exists_normalizedOn (p : Layout J) (W : Set J) (r : J → J → Prop) (priority : J → ℕ) (hp : p.Respects r) : ∃ q : Layout J, p.FixedOutside q W ∧ q.NormalizedOn W r priority := by classical let candidates : Finset (Layout J) := Finset.univ.filter (fun q => q.Respects r ∧ p.FixedOutside q W) have hne : candidates.Nonempty := ⟨p, by simp [candidates, hp, Layout.FixedOutside.refl]⟩ obtain ⟨q, hq, hmin⟩ := candidates.exists_min_image (fun q => q.signature priority) hne have hq' : q.Respects r ∧ p.FixedOutside q W := by simpa [candidates] using hq refine ⟨q, hq'.2, hq'.1, ?_⟩ intro u hu hqu exact hmin u (by simp [candidates, hu, hq'.2.trans hqu]) theorem normalizedOn_no_improvement {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} {r : J → J → Prop} {priority : J → ℕ} (hp : p.NormalizedOn W r priority) (hq : q.Respects r) (hfix : p.FixedOutside q W) (i : Fin (Fintype.card J)) (hbefore : ∀ j, j < i → priority (q.symm j) = priority (p.symm j)) (hi : priority (q.symm i) < priority (p.symm i)) : False := by have hlt : q.signature priority < p.signature priority := ofFn_lt_of_first_difference _ _ i hbefore hi exact (not_lt_of_ge (hp.2 q hq hfix)) hlt theorem exchange_fixedOutside [DecidableEq J] {p : Layout J} {W : Set J} {x y : J} (hx : x ∈ W) (hy : y ∈ W) : p.FixedOutside (p.exchange x y) W := by intro z hz have hzx : z ≠ x := fun e => hz (e ▸ hx) have hzy : z ≠ y := fun e => hz (e ▸ hy) simp [Layout.exchange, Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hzx hzy] theorem normalizedOn_prefix_no_exchange [DecidableEq J] {p q : Layout J} {W : Set J} {r : J → J → Prop} {priority : J → ℕ} (hp : p.NormalizedOn W r priority) (hfix : p.FixedOutside q W) {x y : J} (hx : x ∈ W) (hy : y ∈ W) (hprefix : ∀ j, j ≤ p y → q.symm j = p.symm j) (ht : q.time y < q.time x) (hbetter : priority x < priority y) (hswap : (q.exchange x y).Respects r) : False := by have hqy : q y = p y := by have he := hprefix (p y) le_rfl simp only [p.symm_apply_apply] at he exact (congrArg q he).symm.trans (q.apply_symm_apply _) have hpos : p y < q x := by change (p y).val < (q x).val dsimp [Layout.time] at ht rw [hqy] at ht omega apply normalizedOn_no_improvement hp hswap (hfix.trans (exchange_fixedOutside hx hy)) (p y) · intro j hj have hpy := hprefix j hj.le have hny : q.symm j ≠ y := by intro e have he : j = p y := by simpa [hqy] using congrArg q e exact (ne_of_lt hj) he have hnx : q.symm j ≠ x := by intro e have he : j = q x := by simpa using congrArg q e rw [he] at hj exact (not_lt_of_ge hpos.le) hj change priority ((Equiv.swap x y) (q.symm j)) = priority (p.symm j) rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hnx hny, hpy] · have hpy := hprefix (p y) le_rfl simp only [p.symm_apply_apply] at hpy simpa [Layout.exchange, hpy] using hbetter theorem normalizedOn_local_obstruction {p : Layout J} {W : Finset J} {a b : ℕ} {r : J → J → Prop} {priority : J → ℕ} (hp : p.NormalizedOn (W : Set J) r priority) (hW : ∀ z, z ∈ W ↔ a < p.time z ∧ p.time z < b) : LocalObstruction W r p.time priority := by classical intro x hx y hy htyx hbetter hpred by_contra hn have hsucc : ∀ v, r y v → p.time x < p.time v := by intro v hyv have hyvTime := hp.1 y v hyv by_cases hv : v ∈ W · by_contra h exact hn ⟨v, hv, hyv, by omega⟩ · have hnt : ¬(a < p.time v ∧ p.time v < b) := fun h => hv ((hW v).mpr h) have hxt := (hW x).mp hx have hyt := (hW y).mp hy omega have hready : ∀ u, r u x → p.time u < p.time y := by intro u hux by_cases hu : u ∈ W · exact hpred u hu hux · have huxTime := hp.1 u x hux have hnt : ¬(a < p.time u ∧ p.time u < b) := fun h => hu ((hW u).mpr h) have hxt := (hW x).mp hx have hyt := (hW y).mp hy omega exact normalizedOn_prefix_no_exchange hp (Layout.FixedOutside.refl p _) hx hy (fun _ _ => rfl) htyx hbetter (respects_exchange hp.1 x y htyx hready hsucc) end IntervalNormalization end ThreeMachine.Structure namespace ThreeMachine.Structure abbrev Triple (J : Type) := {Z : Finset J // Z.card = 3} inductive Boundary (J : Type) | left | actual (Z : Triple J) | right namespace Boundary variable {J : Type} def pred (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J | .left => ∅ | .actual Z => {x | ∃ y ∈ Z.val, r x y} | .right => Set.univ def desc (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J | .left => Set.univ | .actual Z => {x | ∃ y ∈ Z.val, r y x} | .right => ∅ def weakPred (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J | .left => ∅ | .actual Z => pred r (.actual Z) ∪ (Z.val : Set J) | .right => Set.univ def weakDesc (r : J → J → Prop) : Boundary J → Set J | .left => Set.univ | .actual Z => desc r (.actual Z) ∪ (Z.val : Set J) | .right => ∅ def reverse : Boundary J → Boundary J | .left => .right | .actual Z => .actual Z | .right => .left @[simp] theorem reverse_reverse (B : Boundary J) : B.reverse.reverse = B := by cases B <;> rfl @[simp] theorem pred_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) : B.reverse.pred (fun x y => r y x) = B.desc r := by cases B <;> rfl @[simp] theorem desc_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) : B.reverse.desc (fun x y => r y x) = B.pred r := by cases B <;> rfl @[simp] theorem weakPred_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) : B.reverse.weakPred (fun x y => r y x) = B.weakDesc r := by cases B <;> rfl @[simp] theorem weakDesc_reverse (r : J → J → Prop) (B : Boundary J) : B.reverse.weakDesc (fun x y => r y x) = B.weakPred r := by cases B <;> rfl theorem pred_downset {r : J → J → Prop} (htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) : GlobalDownset r (B.pred r) := by intro x y hxy hy cases B with | left => exact hy.elim | right => trivial | actual Z => obtain ⟨z, hz, hyz⟩ := hy exact ⟨z, hz, htrans hxy hyz⟩ theorem desc_upset {r : J → J → Prop} (htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) : GlobalUpset r (B.desc r) := by intro x y hxy hx cases B with | left => trivial | right => exact hx.elim | actual Z => obtain ⟨z, hz, hzx⟩ := hx exact ⟨z, hz, htrans hzx hxy⟩ theorem weakPred_downset {r : J → J → Prop} (htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) : GlobalDownset r (B.weakPred r) := by intro x y hxy hy cases B with | left => exact hy.elim | right => trivial | actual Z => rcases hy with h | h · exact Or.inl (pred_downset htrans (.actual Z) hxy h) · exact Or.inl ⟨y, h, hxy⟩ theorem weakDesc_upset {r : J → J → Prop} (htrans : ∀ ⦃a b c⦄, r a b → r b c → r a c) (B : Boundary J) : GlobalUpset r (B.weakDesc r) := by intro x y hxy hx cases B with | left => trivial | right => exact hx.elim | actual Z => rcases hx with h | h · exact Or.inl (desc_upset htrans (.actual Z) hxy h) · exact Or.inl ⟨x, h, hxy⟩ def At (time : J → ℕ) (T : ℕ) : Boundary J → ℕ → Prop | .left, s => s = 0 | .actual Z, s => 1 ≤ s ∧ s ≤ T ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ Z.val ↔ time x = s | .right, s => s = T + 1 theorem pred_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J} (hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v) (hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s) {x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.pred r) : time x < s := by cases B with | left => exact hx.elim | right => have := (hbound x).2; dsimp [At] at hB; omega | actual Z => obtain ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩ := hx have he := (hB.2.2 y).mp hy have := hrespect x y hxy omega theorem desc_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J} (hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v) (hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s) {x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.desc r) : s < time x := by cases B with | left => have := (hbound x).1; dsimp [At] at hB; omega | right => exact hx.elim | actual Z => obtain ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ := hx have he := (hB.2.2 y).mp hy have := hrespect y x hyx omega theorem weakPred_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J} (hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v) (hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s) {x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.weakPred r) : time x ≤ s := by cases B with | left => exact hx.elim | right => have := (hbound x).2; dsimp [At] at hB; omega | actual Z => rcases hx with h | h · exact (pred_time hrespect hbound hB h).le · exact ((hB.2.2 x).mp h).le theorem weakDesc_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J} (hrespect : ∀ u v, r u v → time u < time v) (hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s) {x : J} (hx : x ∈ B.weakDesc r) : s ≤ time x := by cases B with | left => dsimp [At] at hB; omega | right => exact hx.elim | actual Z => rcases hx with h | h · exact (desc_time hrespect hbound hB h).le · exact ((hB.2.2 x).mp h).ge theorem mem_weak_at_time {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {B : Boundary J} (hbound : ∀ x, 1 ≤ time x ∧ time x ≤ T) (hB : B.At time T s) {x : J} (hx : time x = s) : x ∈ B.weakPred r ∧ x ∈ B.weakDesc r := by cases B with | left => have := (hbound x).1; dsimp [At] at hB; omega | right => have := (hbound x).2; dsimp [At] at hB; omega | actual Z => exact ⟨Or.inr ((hB.2.2 x).mpr hx), Or.inr ((hB.2.2 x).mpr hx)⟩ theorem actual_pred_eq {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {Z : Triple J} (hZ : (Boundary.actual Z).At time T s) : (Boundary.actual Z).pred r = PredAt r time s := by ext x simp only [pred, PredAt, Set.mem_ofPred_eq, hZ.2.2] theorem actual_desc_eq {r : J → J → Prop} {time : J → ℕ} {T s : ℕ} {Z : Triple J} (hZ : (Boundary.actual Z).At time T s) : (Boundary.actual Z).desc r = DescAt r time s := by ext x simp only [desc, DescAt, Set.mem_ofPred_eq, hZ.2.2] end Boundary inductive Formula (A : Type) | leaf (atom : A) (negative : Bool) | conj (p q : Formula A) | disj (p q : Formula A) namespace Formula variable {A J : Type} def leaves : Formula A → ℕ | .leaf _ _ => 1 | .conj p q | .disj p q => p.leaves + q.leaves def eval (atoms : A → Set J) : Formula A → Set J | .leaf a false => atoms a | .leaf a true => (atoms a)ᶜ | .conj p q => p.eval atoms ∩ q.eval atoms | .disj p q => p.eval atoms ∪ q.eval atoms def negate : Formula A → Formula A | .leaf a b => .leaf a (!b) | .conj p q => .disj p.negate q.negate | .disj p q => .conj p.negate q.negate @[simp] theorem leaves_negate (p : Formula A) : p.negate.leaves = p.leaves := by induction p with | leaf a b => cases b <;> rfl | conj p q hp hq | disj p q hp hq => simp [negate, leaves, hp, hq] @[simp] theorem eval_negate (atoms : A → Set J) (p : Formula A) : p.negate.eval atoms = (p.eval atoms)ᶜ := by induction p with | leaf a b => cases b <;> simp [negate, eval] | conj p q hp hq => ext x simp only [negate, eval, hp, hq, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff] tauto | disj p q hp hq => simp [negate, eval, hp, hq] theorem leaves_pos (p : Formula A) : 0 < p.leaves := by induction p with | leaf => exact Nat.zero_lt_one | conj p q hp hq | disj p q hp hq => dsimp [leaves]; omega end Formula def Described {A J : Type} (atoms : A → Set J) (W : Set J) (k : ℕ) : Prop := ∃ p : Formula A, p.eval atoms = W ∧ p.leaves ≤ k namespace Described variable {A J : Type} {atoms : A → Set J} {W U : Set J} {k l : ℕ} theorem mono (h : Described atoms W k) (hkl : k ≤ l) : Described atoms W l := by obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := h exact ⟨p, hp, hk.trans hkl⟩ theorem atom (a : A) : Described atoms (atoms a) 1 := ⟨.leaf a false, rfl, le_rfl⟩ theorem compl (h : Described atoms W k) : Described atoms Wᶜ k := by obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := h exact ⟨p.negate, by simp [hp], by simpa using hk⟩ theorem inter (hW : Described atoms W k) (hU : Described atoms U l) : Described atoms (W ∩ U) (k + l) := by obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := hW obtain ⟨q, hq, hl⟩ := hU exact ⟨.conj p q, by simp [Formula.eval, hp, hq], Nat.add_le_add hk hl⟩ theorem union (hW : Described atoms W k) (hU : Described atoms U l) : Described atoms (W ∪ U) (k + l) := by obtain ⟨p, hp, hk⟩ := hW obtain ⟨q, hq, hl⟩ := hU exact ⟨.disj p q, by simp [Formula.eval, hp, hq], Nat.add_le_add hk hl⟩ theorem diff (hW : Described atoms W k) (hU : Described atoms U l) : Described atoms (W \ U) (k + l) := hW.inter hU.compl theorem finite_union {ι : Type} (s : Finset ι) (E : ι → Set J) (b : ι → ℕ) (hne : s.Nonempty) (hE : ∀ i ∈ s, Described atoms (E i) (b i)) : Described atoms {x | ∃ i ∈ s, x ∈ E i} (∑ i ∈ s, b i) := by classical induction s using Finset.induction_on with | empty => exact (Finset.not_nonempty_empty hne).elim | @insert i s hi ih => by_cases hs : s.Nonempty · have hrest := ih hs (fun j hj => hE j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)) have hfirst := hE i (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _) have he : {x | ∃ j ∈ insert i s, x ∈ E j} = E i ∪ {x | ∃ j ∈ s, x ∈ E j} := by ext x simp only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq, Finset.mem_insert, Set.mem_union] aesop rw [he, Finset.sum_insert hi] exact hfirst.union hrest · have es : s = ∅ := Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp hs subst s simpa using hE i (Finset.mem_insert_self i ∅) end Described end ThreeMachine.Structure end end OAI