import Mathlib namespace OAI namespace CylinderCovering.GeneralCap theorem quartic_bounds {q : ℝ} (hq : |q| ≤ 1) : 0 ≤ (q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 ∧ (q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 ≤ 1 / 8 := by have hq2 : q ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by nlinarith only [(abs_le.mp hq).1, (abs_le.mp hq).2] have hq4 : q ^ 4 ≤ 1 := by nlinarith [sq_nonneg (q ^ 2 - 1)] constructor <;> nlinarith [sq_nonneg q, sq_nonneg (q ^ 2)] theorem first_crossing {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N) (f : ℕ → ℝ) (z : ℝ) (h0 : f 0 ≤ z) (hN' : z ≤ f N) : ∃ j : ℕ, j < N ∧ f j ≤ z ∧ z ≤ f (j + 1) := by have hex : ∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ N ∧ z ≤ f i := ⟨N, hN, le_rfl, hN'⟩ let i := Nat.find hex have hi : 0 < i ∧ i ≤ N ∧ z ≤ f i := Nat.find_spec hex have him : i - 1 + 1 = i := by omega refine ⟨i - 1, by omega, ?_, by simpa [him] using hi.2.2⟩ by_cases h : i = 1 · simpa [h] using h0 · have hsmall : i - 1 < Nat.find hex := by dsimp [i] at *; omega have hmin := Nat.find_min hex hsmall by_contra! hz exact hmin ⟨by omega, by omega, le_of_lt hz⟩ theorem weighted_errors {ε E x y e f : ℝ} (he : 0 ≤ ε) (hE : 0 ≤ E) (hxy : |x| + |y| ≤ 1) (he' : |e| ≤ E) (hf : |f| ≤ E) : -ε * x * e + ε * y * f ≤ ε * E := by have h1 : -ε * x * e ≤ ε * |x| * E := by calc -ε * x * e ≤ |-ε * x * e| := le_abs_self _ _ = ε * |x| * |e| := by simp [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg he] _ ≤ ε * |x| * E := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left he' (by positivity) have h2 : ε * y * f ≤ ε * |y| * E := by calc ε * y * f ≤ |ε * y * f| := le_abs_self _ _ = ε * |y| * |f| := by simp [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg he] _ ≤ ε * |y| * E := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hf (by positivity) have h3 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hxy (show 0 ≤ ε * E by positivity) nlinarith theorem rough_angle {ε x y q a r : ℝ} (he : 0 ≤ ε) (hx : |x| ≤ 1) (hq : |q| ≤ 1) (ha : |a| ≤ 1) (hr0 : 1 / 2 ≤ r) (hr1 : r ≤ 1 / 2 + ε) (hy : y = r * q + ε * x * a) : |y - q / 2| ≤ 2 * ε := by have heq : y - q / 2 = (r - 1 / 2) * q + ε * x * a := by rw [hy]; ring have h1 : |(r - 1 / 2) * q| ≤ ε := by rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (by linarith : 0 ≤ r - 1 / 2)] calc (r - 1 / 2) * |q| ≤ (r - 1 / 2) * 1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hq (by linarith) _ ≤ ε := by linarith have h2 : |ε * x * a| ≤ ε := by rw [abs_mul, abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg he] calc ε * |x| * |a| ≤ ε * 1 * 1 := mul_le_mul (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx he) ha (abs_nonneg _) (by positivity) _ = ε := by ring rw [heq] exact (abs_add_le _ _).trans (by linarith) theorem rough_square {ε x p : ℝ} (he : 0 ≤ ε) (hx : |x| ≤ 1) (hp : |p| ≤ 1) (h : |x - p / 2| ≤ 2 * ε) : |x ^ 2 - p ^ 2 / 4| ≤ 3 * ε := by have hsum : |x + p / 2| ≤ 3 / 2 := by have h' := abs_add_le x (p / 2) rw [abs_div] at h' norm_num at h' linarith calc |x ^ 2 - p ^ 2 / 4| = |x - p / 2| * |x + p / 2| := by rw [← abs_mul]; congr 1; ring _ ≤ (2 * ε) * (3 / 2) := mul_le_mul h hsum (abs_nonneg _) (by positivity) _ = 3 * ε := by ring theorem cross_term_bound {ε E x y p q a b : ℝ} (he : 0 ≤ ε) (hE : 0 ≤ E) (hp : |p| ≤ 1) (hq : |q| ≤ 1) (ha0 : 0 ≤ a) (ha1 : a ≤ 1) (hb0 : 0 ≤ b) (hb1 : b ≤ 1) (hxp : |x ^ 2 - p ^ 2 / 4| ≤ 3 * ε) (hyq : |y ^ 2 - q ^ 2 / 4| ≤ 3 * ε) (ha : |a - (1 + q ^ 2) / 4| ≤ E) (hb : |b - (1 + p ^ 2) / 4| ≤ E) : x ^ 2 * a + y ^ 2 * b ≤ (p ^ 2 + p ^ 4) / 16 + (q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 + 6 * ε + E / 2 := by have hp2 : p ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by nlinarith only [(abs_le.mp hp).1, (abs_le.mp hp).2] have hq2 : q ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by nlinarith only [(abs_le.mp hq).1, (abs_le.mp hq).2] have hxa : x ^ 2 * a ≤ p ^ 2 / 4 * ((1 + q ^ 2) / 4) + 3 * ε + E / 4 := by have h1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (abs_le.mp hxp).2 ha0 have h2 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ha1 he have h3 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_le.mp ha).2 (sq_nonneg p) have h4 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hp2 hE nlinarith have hyb : y ^ 2 * b ≤ q ^ 2 / 4 * ((1 + p ^ 2) / 4) + 3 * ε + E / 4 := by have h1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (abs_le.mp hyq).2 hb0 have h2 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb1 he have h3 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_le.mp hb).2 (sq_nonneg q) have h4 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hq2 hE nlinarith nlinarith [sq_nonneg (p ^ 2 - q ^ 2)] theorem radial_identity {ε x y q p a b β γ r s : ℝ} (hrs : r + s = 1 - ε * x * β + ε * y * γ) (hy : y = r * q + ε * x * a) (hx : x = s * p - ε * y * b) : (r - 1 / 2) * (1 - ε * x * q) + (s - 1 / 2) * (1 + ε * y * p) = ε ^ 2 * (x ^ 2 * a + y ^ 2 * b) - ε * x * (β - q / 2) + ε * y * (γ - p / 2) := by have hq : r * q = y - ε * x * a := by linarith have hp : s * p = x + ε * y * b := by linarith calc _ = r + s - 1 - ε * x * (r * q) + ε * x * q / 2 + ε * y * (s * p) - ε * y * p / 2 := by ring _ = _ := by rw [hrs, hq, hp]; ring theorem radial_lower_est {ε M r f : ℝ} (heLt : ε < 1) (hM : 0 ≤ M) (hr : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * M < r) (hf : 1 - ε ≤ f) : ε ^ 2 * M * (1 - ε) < (r - 1 / 2) * f := by calc _ ≤ ε ^ 2 * M * f := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hf (by positivity) _ < _ := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (by linarith only [hr]) (by linarith only [heLt, hf]) theorem radial_failure {ε K x y q p a b β γ M N r s : ℝ} (he0 : 0 < ε) (heLt : ε < 1) (hK : 0 ≤ K) (hxy : |x| + |y| ≤ 1) (hq : |q| ≤ 1) (hp : |p| ≤ 1) (hM0 : 0 ≤ M) (hN0 : 0 ≤ N) (heβ : |β - q / 2| ≤ K * ε ^ 2) (heγ : |γ - p / 2| ≤ K * ε ^ 2) (hrs : r + s = 1 - ε * x * β + ε * y * γ) (hy : y = r * q + ε * x * a) (hx : x = s * p - ε * y * b) (hr : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * M < r) (hs : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * N < s) : (M + N) * (1 - ε) < (x ^ 2 * a + y ^ 2 * b) + K * ε := by have he := he0.le have hx1 : |x| ≤ 1 := by linarith only [hxy, abs_nonneg y] have hy1 : |y| ≤ 1 := by linarith only [hxy, abs_nonneg x] have habsq : |x * q| ≤ 1 := by rw [abs_mul] exact (mul_le_mul hx1 hq (abs_nonneg _) (by norm_num)).trans_eq (by norm_num) have hbpsq : |y * p| ≤ 1 := by rw [abs_mul] exact (mul_le_mul hy1 hp (abs_nonneg _) (by norm_num)).trans_eq (by norm_num) have hf1 : 1 - ε ≤ 1 - ε * x * q := by nlinarith only [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_le.mp habsq).2 he] have hf2 : 1 - ε ≤ 1 + ε * y * p := by nlinarith only [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_le.mp hbpsq).1 he] have hstrict1 := radial_lower_est heLt hM0 hr hf1 have hstrict2 := radial_lower_est heLt hN0 hs hf2 have hid := radial_identity hrs hy hx have herr := weighted_errors he (show 0 ≤ K * ε ^ 2 by positivity) hxy heβ heγ have hscaled : ε ^ 2 * ((M + N) * (1 - ε)) < ε ^ 2 * ((x ^ 2 * a + y ^ 2 * b) + K * ε) := by nlinarith only [hstrict1, hstrict2, hid, herr] exact (mul_lt_mul_iff_right₀ (sq_pos_of_pos he0)).mp hscaled theorem radial_exclusion {ε K η x y q p a b β γ r s R Q : ℝ} (he0 : 0 < ε) (he1 : ε ≤ 1 / 2) (hK : 0 ≤ K) (hη0 : 0 < η) (hη1 : η ≤ 1 / 480) (hsmall : (10 + 4 * K) * ε ≤ η) (hxy : |x| + |y| ≤ 1) (hq : |q| ≤ 1) (hp : |p| ≤ 1) (heβ : |β - q / 2| ≤ K * ε ^ 2) (heγ : |γ - p / 2| ≤ K * ε ^ 2) (hea : |a - (1 + q ^ 2) / 4| ≤ K * ε ^ 2) (heb : |b - (1 + p ^ 2) / 4| ≤ K * ε ^ 2) (hR : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * ((q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 + η) - K * ε ^ 4 ≤ R) (hQ : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * ((p ^ 2 + p ^ 4) / 16 + η) - K * ε ^ 4 ≤ Q) (hrs : r + s = 1 - ε * x * β + ε * y * γ) (hy : y = r * q + ε * x * a) (hx : x = s * p - ε * y * b) : r ≤ R ∨ s ≤ Q := by by_contra! hbad have he : 0 ≤ ε := he0.le have heLt : ε < 1 := by linarith only [he1] have hKE : K * ε ≤ η / 4 := by nlinarith only [hsmall, he0] have hKE0 : 0 ≤ K * ε := mul_nonneg hK he have hEη : K * ε ^ 2 ≤ η / 2 := by have h1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hKE he have h2 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left he1 hη0.le nlinarith only [h1, h2, hη0] have hE1 : K * ε ^ 2 ≤ 1 / 4 := by linarith only [hEη, hη1] have hEε : K * ε ^ 2 ≤ K * ε := by have h := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left he1 hKE0 nlinarith only [h, hKE0] have hE0 : 0 ≤ K * ε ^ 2 := by positivity have hp2 : p ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by nlinarith only [(abs_le.mp hp).1, (abs_le.mp hp).2] have hq2 : q ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by nlinarith only [(abs_le.mp hq).1, (abs_le.mp hq).2] have ha0 : 0 ≤ a := by nlinarith only [hE1, (abs_le.mp hea).1, sq_nonneg q] have hb0 : 0 ≤ b := by nlinarith only [hE1, (abs_le.mp heb).1, sq_nonneg p] have ha1 : a ≤ 1 := by nlinarith only [hE1, hq2, (abs_le.mp hea).2] have hb1 : b ≤ 1 := by nlinarith only [hE1, hp2, (abs_le.mp heb).2] have hβ : |β| ≤ 1 := by apply abs_le.mpr constructor <;> nlinarith only [hE1, (abs_le.mp heβ).1, (abs_le.mp heβ).2, (abs_le.mp hq).1, (abs_le.mp hq).2] have hγ : |γ| ≤ 1 := by apply abs_le.mpr constructor <;> nlinarith only [hE1, (abs_le.mp heγ).1, (abs_le.mp heγ).2, (abs_le.mp hp).1, (abs_le.mp hp).2] let M := (q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 + η - K * ε ^ 2 let N := (p ^ 2 + p ^ 4) / 16 + η - K * ε ^ 2 have hM0 : 0 ≤ M := by dsimp [M]; linarith only [hEη, hη0, (quartic_bounds hq).1] have hN0 : 0 ≤ N := by dsimp [N]; linarith only [hEη, hη0, (quartic_bounds hp).1] have hMN : M + N ≤ 3 := by dsimp [M, N] linarith only [(quartic_bounds hq).2, (quartic_bounds hp).2, hη1, hE0] have hr : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * M < r := by dsimp [M] nlinarith only [hR, hbad.1] have hs : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * N < s := by dsimp [N] nlinarith only [hQ, hbad.2] have hr0 : 1 / 2 < r := by linarith only [hr, mul_nonneg (sq_nonneg ε) hM0] have hs0 : 1 / 2 < s := by linarith only [hs, mul_nonneg (sq_nonneg ε) hN0] have hsum : r + s ≤ 1 + ε := by have err := weighted_errors he (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1) hxy hβ hγ rw [hrs] linarith only [err] have hr1 : r ≤ 1 / 2 + ε := by linarith only [hsum, hs0] have hs1 : s ≤ 1 / 2 + ε := by linarith only [hsum, hr0] have hx1 : |x| ≤ 1 := by linarith only [hxy, abs_nonneg y] have hy1 : |y| ≤ 1 := by linarith only [hxy, abs_nonneg x] have hqrough := rough_angle he hx1 hq (by rwa [abs_of_nonneg ha0]) hr0.le hr1 hy have hprough : |x - p / 2| ≤ 2 * ε := by apply rough_angle he hy1 hp (a := -b) (by simpa [abs_of_nonneg hb0] using hb1) hs0.le hs1 linear_combination hx have hcross := cross_term_bound he hE0 hp hq ha0 ha1 hb0 hb1 (rough_square he hx1 hp hprough) (rough_square he hy1 hq hqrough) hea heb have hfail := radial_failure he0 heLt hK hxy hq hp hM0 hN0 heβ heγ hrs hy hx hr hs have hMNε := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hMN he dsimp [M, N] at hfail hMNε nlinarith only [hfail, hcross, hMNε, hEε, hsmall, hη0, hKE0, he0] theorem node_bounds {N : ℕ} (node : ℕ → ℝ) (h0 : node 0 = -1) (hN : node N = 1) (hstep : ∀ j < N, node j < node (j + 1)) : ∀ i ≤ N, |node i| ≤ 1 := by have hmono : MonotoneOn node (Set.Iic N) := (strictMonoOn_Iic_of_lt_succ hstep).monotoneOn intro i hi have hl := hmono (show 0 ∈ Set.Iic N from Nat.zero_le N) hi (Nat.zero_le i) have hu := hmono hi (show N ∈ Set.Iic N by simp) hi rw [h0] at hl rw [hN] at hu exact abs_le.mpr ⟨hl, hu⟩ theorem angular_selection {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N) (node α β boundary : ℕ → ℝ) (hnode0 : node 0 = -1) (hnodeN : node N = 1) (hboundary0 : boundary 0 = 0) (hboundaryN : boundary N = 0) (hinc : ∀ j < N, node j < node (j + 1)) (hleft : ∀ j < N, α j - node j * β j = boundary j) (hright : ∀ j < N, α j - node (j + 1) * β j = boundary (j + 1)) {r z ℓ : ℝ} (hz : |z| ≤ r) : ∃ j : ℕ, j < N ∧ ∃ q : ℝ, q ∈ Set.Icc (node j) (node (j + 1)) ∧ 0 ≤ r - ℓ * β j ∧ z = (r - ℓ * β j) * q + ℓ * α j := by let f : ℕ → ℝ := fun i => node i * r + ℓ * boundary i have hf0 : f 0 = -r := by simp [f, hnode0, hboundary0] have hfN : f N = r := by simp [f, hnodeN, hboundaryN] obtain ⟨j, hj, hlo, hhi⟩ := first_crossing hN f z (by rw [hf0]; exact (abs_le.mp hz).1) (by rw [hfN]; exact (abs_le.mp hz).2) have he0 : f j = node j * (r - ℓ * β j) + ℓ * α j := by dsimp [f] rw [← hleft j hj] ring have he1 : f (j + 1) = node (j + 1) * (r - ℓ * β j) + ℓ * α j := by dsimp [f] rw [← hright j hj] ring rw [he0] at hlo rw [he1] at hhi have hlo' : node j * (r - ℓ * β j) ≤ z - ℓ * α j := by linarith only [hlo] have hhi' : z - ℓ * α j ≤ node (j + 1) * (r - ℓ * β j) := by linarith only [hhi] have hnonneg : 0 ≤ r - ℓ * β j := by have hmul : 0 ≤ (node (j + 1) - node j) * (r - ℓ * β j) := by nlinarith only [hlo', hhi'] exact nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right hmul (sub_pos.mpr (hinc j hj)) by_cases hzero : r - ℓ * β j = 0 · refine ⟨j, hj, node j, ⟨le_rfl, (hinc j hj).le⟩, hnonneg, ?_⟩ rw [hzero] rw [hzero] at hlo' hhi' linarith only [hlo', hhi'] · have hpos : 0 < r - ℓ * β j := lt_of_le_of_ne hnonneg (Ne.symm hzero) refine ⟨j, hj, (z - ℓ * α j) / (r - ℓ * β j), ⟨(le_div_iff₀ hpos).mpr hlo', (div_le_iff₀ hpos).mpr hhi'⟩, hnonneg, ?_⟩ field_simp ring theorem coordinate_coverage {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N) (node α β boundary : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℕ → ℝ → ℝ) (hnode0 : node 0 = -1) (hnodeN : node N = 1) (hnode : ∀ i ≤ N, |node i| ≤ 1) (hboundary0 : boundary 0 = 0) (hboundaryN : boundary N = 0) (hinc : ∀ j < N, node j < node (j + 1)) (hleft : ∀ j < N, α j - node j * β j = boundary j) (hright : ∀ j < N, α j - node (j + 1) * β j = boundary (j + 1)) {ε K η : ℝ} (he0 : 0 < ε) (he1 : ε ≤ 1 / 2) (hK : 0 ≤ K) (hη0 : 0 < η) (hη1 : η ≤ 1 / 480) (hsmall : (10 + 4 * K) * ε ≤ η) (hcoeff : ∀ j < N, ∀ q ∈ Set.Icc (node j) (node (j + 1)), |α j - (1 + q ^ 2) / 4| ≤ K * ε ^ 2 ∧ |β j - q / 2| ≤ K * ε ^ 2) (hcap : ∀ j < N, ∀ q ∈ Set.Icc (node j) (node (j + 1)), 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * ((q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 + η) - K * ε ^ 4 ≤ R j q) {x y t : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1 - t) (hy : |y| ≤ t) : (∃ j : ℕ, j < N ∧ ∃ q : ℝ, q ∈ Set.Icc (node j) (node (j + 1)) ∧ 0 ≤ t - ε * x * β j ∧ t - ε * x * β j ≤ R j q ∧ y = (t - ε * x * β j) * q + ε * x * α j) ∨ (∃ j : ℕ, j < N ∧ ∃ p : ℝ, p ∈ Set.Icc (node j) (node (j + 1)) ∧ 0 ≤ 1 - t + ε * y * β j ∧ 1 - t + ε * y * β j ≤ R j p ∧ x = (1 - t + ε * y * β j) * p - ε * y * α j) := by obtain ⟨j, hj, q, hqI, hr, hy'⟩ := angular_selection hN node α β boundary hnode0 hnodeN hboundary0 hboundaryN hinc hleft hright (ℓ := ε * x) hy obtain ⟨k, hk, p, hpI, hs, hx'⟩ := angular_selection hN node α β boundary hnode0 hnodeN hboundary0 hboundaryN hinc hleft hright (ℓ := -(ε * y)) hx have hs' : 0 ≤ 1 - t + ε * y * β k := by simpa only [neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add] using hs have hx'' : x = (1 - t + ε * y * β k) * p - ε * y * α k := by linear_combination hx' have hq : |q| ≤ 1 := by apply abs_le.mpr exact ⟨(abs_le.mp (hnode j hj.le)).1.trans hqI.1, hqI.2.trans (abs_le.mp (hnode (j + 1) hj)).2⟩ have hp : |p| ≤ 1 := by apply abs_le.mpr exact ⟨(abs_le.mp (hnode k hk.le)).1.trans hpI.1, hpI.2.trans (abs_le.mp (hnode (k + 1) hk)).2⟩ have hcq := hcoeff j hj q hqI have hcp := hcoeff k hk p hpI have hcuts := radial_exclusion he0 he1 hK hη0 hη1 hsmall (show |x| + |y| ≤ 1 by linarith only [hx, hy]) hq hp hcq.2 hcp.2 hcq.1 hcp.1 (hcap j hj q hqI) (hcap k hk p hpI) (show (t - ε * x * β j) + (1 - t + ε * y * β k) = 1 - ε * x * β j + ε * y * β k by ring) hy' hx'' exact hcuts.elim (fun h => Or.inl ⟨j, hj, q, hqI, hr, h, hy'⟩) (fun h => Or.inr ⟨k, hk, p, hpI, hs', h, hx''⟩) theorem half_lt_cap {ε K η q R : ℝ} (he0 : 0 < ε) (he1 : ε ≤ 1 / 2) (_hK : 0 ≤ K) (hη : 0 < η) (hsmall : (10 + 4 * K) * ε ≤ η) (hR : 1 / 2 + ε ^ 2 * ((q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 + η) - K * ε ^ 4 ≤ R) : 1 / 2 < R := by have hKE : K * ε ≤ η / 4 := by nlinarith only [hsmall, he0] have hEη : K * ε ^ 2 ≤ η / 2 := by have h1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hKE he0.le have h2 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left he1 hη.le nlinarith only [h1, h2, hη] have hd : 0 ≤ (q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 := by positivity have hm : 0 < (q ^ 2 + q ^ 4) / 16 + η - K * ε ^ 2 := by linarith only [hd, hEη, hη] have hprod := mul_pos (sq_pos_of_pos he0) hm nlinarith only [hR, hprod] theorem exists_positive_threshold {K η : ℝ} (hK : 0 ≤ K) (hη : 0 < η) : ∃ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ ∧ ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ε ≤ δ → ε ≤ 1 / 2 ∧ (10 + 4 * K) * ε ≤ η := by have hd : 0 < 10 + 4 * K := by linarith only [hK] refine ⟨min (1 / 2) (η / (10 + 4 * K)), lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hη hd), ?_⟩ intro ε _ hε refine ⟨hε.trans (min_le_left _ _), ?_⟩ have hdiv := hε.trans (min_le_right _ _) have hmul := (le_div_iff₀ hd).mp hdiv nlinarith only [hmul] end CylinderCovering.GeneralCap end OAI