--- license: mit task_categories: - text-generation language: - en tags: - code - reasoning - chain-of-thought - verifiable - execution-verified - python - sft - synthetic pretty_name: Verifiable Code Reasoning size_categories: - 1M # Verifiable Code Reasoning ### Execution-verified Python problems with chain-of-thought **Sandbox-checked solutions · Multi-test unit checks · Deduplicated instances · Training-ready `sft_text`** [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-green.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT) [![Examples](https://img.shields.io/badge/examples-1,500,000-blue)](https://huggingface.co/datasets/smshahbaj/verifiable-code-reasoning) --- ## Overview **Verifiable Code Reasoning** is a large-scale dataset of Python coding problems where every kept solution has **passed sandboxed unit tests**. Unlike scraped contest dumps or unverified LLM traces, an example enters this release only if: 1. a reference implementation exists, 2. it runs under a time-limited sandbox, and 3. it matches expected outputs on **at least 3** tests. Failed executions are discarded. Near-duplicate *instances* are filtered by content fingerprint (signature + tests), so shared solution templates across different inputs are allowed, but repeated test instances are not. | Property | Detail | |----------|--------| | **Verification** | Multiprocess sandbox, timeout, ≥3 tests | | **Dedup** | Unique `id` + instance content hash (signature + tests) | | **Balance** | Category & difficulty quotas during generation | | **Resume** | Hub checkpoints: `train.jsonl`, `progress.json` | | **License** | MIT | **Current release size:** **1,500,000** verified examples (generation target 1,500,000). --- ## Dataset statistics ### Difficulty | Difficulty | Count | |------------|------:| | easy | 783,088 | | medium | 698,789 | | hard | 18,123 | ### Category | Category | Count | |----------|------:| | array | 313,191 | | hashmap | 240,984 | | two_pointers | 218,129 | | greedy | 144,377 | | binary_search | 134,400 | | dp | 134,400 | | string | 133,673 | | bit | 132,948 | | math | 46,941 | | stack | 702 | | matrix | 255 | --- ## Schema | Field | Type | Description | |-------|------|-------------| | `id` | string | Stable example id | | `problem` | string | Natural-language problem statement | | `signature` | string | Python function signature | | `reasoning` | string | Numbered chain-of-thought | | `code` | string | Reference Python solution | | `tests` | string | JSON list of `{"input": ..., "output": ...}` (≥3) | | `category` | string | array, hashmap, dp, binary_search, ... | | `difficulty` | string | easy / medium / hard | | `sft_text` | string | Ready-to-train prompt block | | `verified` | bool | Always `true` in this release | | `code_hash` | string | Hash of solution source (audit) | | `language` | string | `python` | > `tests` is stored as a **JSON string** so Arrow/HF can keep one schema while outputs may be int, bool, or list. --- ## Quick start ```python from datasets import load_dataset import json ds = load_dataset("smshahbaj/verifiable-code-reasoning") row = ds["train"][0] print(row["sft_text"][:500]) tests = json.loads(row["tests"]) print(tests[0]) ``` ### SFT format (`sft_text`) ```text ### Problem ... ### Reasoning 1) ... 2) ... ### Solution ```python ... ``` ``` --- ## How it was built 1. **25** algorithmic generator families (arrays, strings, math, DP, greedy, binary search, bits, matrices, …) 2. Each example gets **≥3** unit tests (including varied inputs) 3. Solution is executed in a **sandbox**; mismatch / timeout / exception → drop 4. **Quotas** limit over-representation of a single category or difficulty 5. **Instance dedup** on signature+tests fingerprint (unrepeatable test cases) 6. Multi-session scale via Hugging Face checkpoints every 2000 new verifies --- ## Intended uses - Supervised fine-tuning on **code + reasoning** - Process / outcome supervision signals (execution as ground truth) - Filtering or ranking other synthetic coding traces ## Out of scope / limitations - Coverage is bounded by the **generator bank** (not full competitive-programming breadth) - **Python only** in this release - Synthetic style can still be distributionally narrow — always evaluate models on real benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, LiveCodeBench, etc.) - Not a substitute for human-written contest editorials --- ## Citation ```bibtex @misc{verifiable_code_reasoning, title = {Verifiable Code Reasoning}, author = {smshahbaj}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/smshahbaj/verifiable-code-reasoning}}, note = {Execution-verified Python coding CoT dataset} } ``` ---
**Verified or it does not ship.**