import json import math import cmath def get_tau(n): """Compute Ramanujan tau function using the divisor sum identities or recursion.""" # Small values for tau(n) if n == 1: return 1 if n == 2: return -24 if n == 3: return 252 if n == 4: return -1472 if n == 5: return 4830 if n == 6: return -6048 if n == 7: return -16744 # General recursion for prime powers or products could be used, # but we only need up to n=7. return 0 def solve(): # 1. Normalized tau(7) # tau(n) * n^(-11/2) tau_7 = get_tau(7) normalized_tau_7 = tau_7 * (7**(-5.5)) # 2. Von Mangoldt Lambda_L(4) # n = 4 = 2^2. Lambda_L(p^k) = (alpha_p^k + beta_p^k) * log(p) # alpha_p, beta_p are roots of x^2 - tau_tilde(p)x + 1 = 0 p = 2 tau_tilde_2 = get_tau(2) * (2**(-5.5)) # alpha^2 + beta^2 = (alpha+beta)^2 - 2*alpha*beta = tau_tilde_2^2 - 2(1) lambda_4 = (tau_tilde_2**2 - 2) * math.log(2) # 3. Analytic Conductor Q(0) # For L(s, Delta), the degree is 2. The functional equation involves Gamma(s + 11/2). # The normalized version L(s + 11/2) involves Gamma(s + 11/2). # Q(t) = q * (2*pi)^-d * prod |it + mu_j + 1/2| # Here d=1 in the sense of one Gamma factor, but it's degree 2. # The standard form for L(s, Delta) is (2pi)^-s Gamma(s) L(s). # Shifted: (2pi)^-(s+11/2) Gamma(s+11/2) L(s+11/2). # The conductor q=1. The Gamma factor is Gamma(s + 11/2). # At s = 1/2 + it, the argument is it + 6. # Q(t) = (2*pi)^-1 * |it + 6| (if we treat it as degree 1 with shift) # However, the Selberg class definition for degree 2 usually has two Gamma factors # or one Gamma factor with a specific scaling. For L(s, Delta), d=2. # The conductor is Q = 1/(2pi). The term is |s + 5.5| / (2pi). # At t=0, s=1/2, so |0.5 + 5.5| / (2*pi) = 6 / (2*pi) = 3/pi. analytic_conductor_zero = 3.0 / math.pi # 4. Riemann-von Mangoldt N(T) for T=30 # N(T) = (T/pi) * log(T/(2*pi*e)) + (11/(2*pi))*T + phase_correction # More accurately: N(T) = (1/pi) * arg(Lambda(1/2 + iT)) # Lambda(s) = (2pi)^-s Gamma(s + 5.5) L(s + 5.5) # arg Lambda(1/2 + iT) = Im(log Lambda(1/2 + iT)) # = Im( - (1/2 + iT)log(2pi) + logGamma(6 + iT) + log L(6 + iT) ) # For T=30, log L(6 + iT) is very small, so we approximate with the first two terms. T = 30.0 term1 = -T * math.log(2 * math.pi) # Stirling for logGamma(z): (z - 0.5)log z - z + 0.5 log(2pi) z = complex(6, T) log_gamma = (z - 0.5) * cmath.log(z) - z + 0.5 * math.log(2 * math.pi) arg_lambda = term1 + log_gamma.imag n_t = arg_lambda / math.pi # 5. Critical line phase constant # The constant term in N(T) = (T/pi)log(T/2pi e) + ... # From the expansion of Im log Gamma(6 + iT): # Im((5.5 + iT)log(6+iT) - (6+iT)) = T log|6+iT| + 5.5 arg(6+iT) - T # As T -> inf, 5.5 arg(6+iT) -> 5.5 * (pi/2) = 2.75 * pi. # The constant is (2.75 * pi + 0.5 * log(2pi) term? No.) # The standard constant for zeta is -1/8. For this L-function: # The constant term in the expansion of (1/pi) arg Gamma(s + k) is related to k. # For Gamma(s + 5.5), at s=1/2, the constant is (1/pi) * Im(logGamma(6)) = 0 (since 6 is real). # But we want the constant in the asymptotic N(T) ~ ... + C # N(T) = (T/pi) log(T/2pi e) + (k-0.5)/2 + ... # For L(s, Delta), k=6. Constant approx (6 - 0.5)/2 = 2.75. # Let's use the precise value of the phase at T=0: (1/pi) arg Gamma(6) = 0. # However, the question asks for the constant offset in the formula. # Standard formula: N(T) = (T/pi) log(T/2pi e) + (11/4) + S(T). # The constant is 11/4 = 2.75. critical_line_phase_const = 2.75 res = { "problem_id": "MATH4", "normalized_tau_7": round(normalized_tau_7, 6), "von_mangoldt_lambda_4": round(lambda_4, 6), "analytic_conductor_zero": round(analytic_conductor_zero, 6), "riemann_von_mangoldt_30": round(n_t, 6), "critical_line_phase_const": round(critical_line_phase_const, 6) } print(json.dumps(res)) if __name__ == "__main__": solve()