--- language: - en license: apache-2.0 size_categories: - 10K___--`; the cache key | | `value1`, `value2` | the two conflicting tenets (keys into the value set) | | `context` | scenario context tag | | `description` | the scenario as given to the user simulator | | `user_prompt` | the user-simulator role instructions | | `action1`, `action2` | the two candidate assistant actions the judge scores between (action1 favours value1, action2 favours value2) | | `user_first_turn` | the cached opening user message (artifacts already expanded inline) | | `check_results` | JSON of the pass/fail filter checks, all True for kept rows | ```python from datasets import load_dataset ds = load_dataset("value-generalization/conflictscope-eval-constitution-tenets-v3", split="train") ``` ## Construction - **Generation**: Qwen3.6-27B generated 40,439 candidate scenarios for 2,029 tenet pairs (all pairs whose tenets can plausibly conflict), then judged each against six checks (realism, groundedness, action feasibility, value-guidedness, impossibility, ambiguity); 11,731 passed and survived near-duplicate removal. - **Opening turns**: Qwen3.6-27B, as the user simulator, wrote each kept scenario's opening message at temperature 1.0, expanding `` descriptions (emails, code, essays the user refers to) into inline text. - **Splice cleanup** (`user_prompt_clean` check): the artifact expansion sometimes spliced the generator's own refusal or deliberation into the user turn. 1,281 turns were flagged by regex and re-sampled (952 patched, 329 unrecoverable); a full LLM-judge census of every turn (gemini-3.7-flash) then found the remaining contamination. 543 scenarios were dropped (329 unrecoverable + 86 still-contaminated patches + 128 never flagged), leaving 11,188. Rows whose only defect is a cosmetic template label were kept. Every kept turn was cleared by the judge. - Per tenet: min 141 / median 325 / max 529 scenarios. ## Running the interactive eval Needs the ConflictScope code (`andyjliu/conflictscope-dev`, branch `dev`, commit `6d2030a` or later) and an OpenAI-compatible endpoint serving the judge. Our runs use `Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B` as both judge and user simulator (`vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --tensor-parallel-size 8`); with the cache in place the user simulator is only called for ids missing from `cache.json`. The assistant under test is loaded in-process by `-m` (a HF id or local checkpoint; vLLM, one GPU for 7–8B models) or served remotely via `--assistant-api-base`. ```bash hf download value-generalization/conflictscope-eval-constitution-tenets-v3 --repo-type dataset --local-dir cs_v3 mkdir -p out && cp cs_v3/eval/cache.json out/ # eval writes CSVs next to the cache python conflictscope/src/evaluate_models.py \ -m \ -d cs_v3/eval/scenarios -o out --output-name .csv \ -i --cache --filter --temperature 0 \ --user-model Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --user-api-base http://:8000/v1 \ --judge-model Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --judge-api-base http://:8000/v1 \ [--steer-prompt prompt.txt] ``` `--temperature 0` selects the script's conversation defaults (assistant sampled at 1.0, 1,024 max tokens; judge at 0). Output CSV columns: `scenario_id, value1, value2, choice, likert, reasoning, conversation`. Steerability toward a tenet is then read off the `choice`/`likert` columns over the rows where that tenet is `value1` or `value2`, against a base model's CSV on the same scenarios. Copy the cache (don't symlink it into a shared dir) — the script rewrites it in place on a cache miss. ## Caveats - `check_results.user_prompt_clean` is `null` for rows that never passed the generation filters (no opening turn was ever written for them). - Opening turns were written by Qwen3.6-27B and reflect its style; a few kept turns carry a harmless bare `**Artifact**` label. - The base-eval CSVs for our reference models are not included. ## License Apache-2.0. Scenarios and opening turns are model-generated (Qwen3.6-27B); released for research use as part of the value-generalization project.