# Function Minimization Example This example demonstrates how OpenEvolve can discover sophisticated optimization algorithms starting from a simple implementation. ## Problem Description The task is to minimize a complex non-convex function with multiple local minima: ```python f(x, y) = sin(x) * cos(y) + sin(x*y) + (x^2 + y^2)/20 ``` The global minimum is approximately at (-1.704, 0.678) with a value of -1.519. ## Getting Started To run this example: ```bash cd examples/function_minimization python ../../openevolve-run.py initial_program.py evaluator.py --config config.yaml ``` ## Algorithm Evolution ### Initial Algorithm (Random Search) The initial implementation was a simple random search that had no memory between iterations: ```python def search_algorithm(iterations=1000, bounds=(-5, 5)): """ A simple random search algorithm that often gets stuck in local minima. Args: iterations: Number of iterations to run bounds: Bounds for the search space (min, max) Returns: Tuple of (best_x, best_y, best_value) """ # Initialize with a random point best_x = np.random.uniform(bounds[0], bounds[1]) best_y = np.random.uniform(bounds[0], bounds[1]) best_value = evaluate_function(best_x, best_y) for _ in range(iterations): # Simple random search x = np.random.uniform(bounds[0], bounds[1]) y = np.random.uniform(bounds[0], bounds[1]) value = evaluate_function(x, y) if value < best_value: best_value = value best_x, best_y = x, y return best_x, best_y, best_value ``` ### Evolved Algorithm (Simulated Annealing) After running OpenEvolve, it discovered a simulated annealing algorithm with a completely different approach: ```python def search_algorithm(bounds=(-5, 5), iterations=2000, initial_temperature=100, cooling_rate=0.97, step_size_factor=0.2, step_size_increase_threshold=20): """ Simulated Annealing algorithm for function minimization. Args: bounds: Bounds for the search space (min, max) iterations: Number of iterations to run initial_temperature: Initial temperature for the simulated annealing process cooling_rate: Cooling rate for the simulated annealing process step_size_factor: Factor to scale the initial step size by the range step_size_increase_threshold: Number of iterations without improvement before increasing step size Returns: Tuple of (best_x, best_y, best_value) """ # Initialize best_x = np.random.uniform(bounds[0], bounds[1]) best_y = np.random.uniform(bounds[0], bounds[1]) best_value = evaluate_function(best_x, best_y) current_x, current_y = best_x, best_y current_value = best_value temperature = initial_temperature step_size = (bounds[1] - bounds[0]) * step_size_factor # Initial step size min_temperature = 1e-6 # Avoid premature convergence no_improvement_count = 0 # Counter for tracking stagnation for i in range(iterations): # Adaptive step size and temperature control if i > iterations * 0.75: # Reduce step size towards the end step_size *= 0.5 if no_improvement_count > step_size_increase_threshold: # Increase step size if stuck step_size *= 1.1 no_improvement_count = 0 # Reset the counter step_size = min(step_size, (bounds[1] - bounds[0]) * 0.5) # Limit step size new_x = current_x + np.random.uniform(-step_size, step_size) new_y = current_y + np.random.uniform(-step_size, step_size) # Keep the new points within the bounds new_x = max(bounds[0], min(new_x, bounds[1])) new_y = max(bounds[0], min(new_y, bounds[1])) new_value = evaluate_function(new_x, new_y) if new_value < current_value: # Accept the move if it's better current_x, current_y = new_x, new_y current_value = new_value no_improvement_count = 0 # Reset counter if new_value < best_value: # Update the best found solution best_x, best_y = new_x, new_y best_value = new_value else: # Accept with a certain probability (Simulated Annealing) probability = np.exp((current_value - new_value) / temperature) if np.random.rand() < probability: current_x, current_y = new_x, new_y current_value = new_value no_improvement_count = 0 # Reset counter else: no_improvement_count += 1 # Increment counter if not improving temperature = max(temperature * cooling_rate, min_temperature) #Cool down return best_x, best_y, best_value ``` ## Key Improvements Through evolutionary iterations, OpenEvolve discovered several key algorithmic concepts: 1. **Exploration via Temperature**: Simulated annealing uses a `temperature` parameter to allow uphill moves early in the search, helping escape local minima that would trap simpler methods. ```python probability = np.exp((current_value - new_value) / temperature) ``` 2. **Adaptive Step Size**: The step size is adjusted dynamically—shrinking as the search converges and expanding if progress stalls—leading to better coverage and faster convergence. ```python if i > iterations * 0.75: # Reduce step size towards the end step_size *= 0.5 if no_improvement_count > step_size_increase_threshold: # Increase step size if stuck step_size *= 1.1 no_improvement_count = 0 # Reset the counter ``` 3. **Bounded Moves**: The algorithm ensures all candidate solutions remain within the feasible domain, avoiding wasted evaluations. ```python # Keep the new points within the bounds new_x = max(bounds[0], min(new_x, bounds[1])) new_y = max(bounds[0], min(new_y, bounds[1])) ``` 4. **Stagnation Handling**: By counting iterations without improvement, the algorithm responds by boosting exploration when progress stalls. ```python if no_improvement_count > step_size_increase_threshold: # Increase step size if stuck step_size *= 1.1 no_improvement_count = 0 # Reset the counter ``` ## Results The evolved algorithm shows substantial improvement in finding better solutions: | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Value Score | 0.990 | | Distance Score | 0.921 | | Standard Deviation Score | 0.900 | | Speed Score | 0.466 | | Reliability Score | 1.000 | | Overall Score | 0.984 | | Combined Score | 0.922 | The simulated annealing algorithm: - Achieves higher quality solutions (closer to the global minimum) - Has perfect reliability (100% success rate in completing runs) - Maintains a good balance between performance and reliability ## How It Works This example demonstrates key features of OpenEvolve: - **Code Evolution**: Only the code inside the evolve blocks is modified - **Complete Algorithm Redesign**: The system transformed a random search into a completely different algorithm - **Automatic Discovery**: The system discovered simulated annealing without being explicitly programmed with knowledge of optimization algorithms - **Function Renaming**: The system even recognized that the algorithm should have a more descriptive name ## Next Steps Try modifying the config.yaml file to: - Increase the number of iterations - Change the LLM model configuration - Adjust the evaluator settings to prioritize different metrics - Try a different objective function by modifying `evaluate_function()`