Question: Describe the record of Alex Azar in relation to drug pricing policies.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the record of Alex Azar in relation to drug pricing policies.

His record suggests he’s unlikely to push pricing policies that would hit pharmaceutical companies’ pocketbooks.
President Donald Trump tweeted Monday that his nominee for HHS secretary, Alex Azar will “be a star for … lower drug prices!” But the record of the former top executive for Eli Lilly, which tripled the price of a top-selling insulin drug while he led its U.S. operation, suggests a different story.
Lilly is one of three drug companies targeted by a class-action lawsuit that accuses the company, then under Azar’s watch, of exploiting the drug pricing system to ensure higher profit for insulin and has been fined in Mexico for colluding on the pricing of the drug .
Azar, who spent almost a decade at Eli Lilly, rising to become president of the drug giant’s U.S. operations before leaving earlier this year, doesn’t deny drug costs are a consumer issue. But his record there and as a top official in George W. Bush’s administration suggests he’s unlikely to push pricing policies that would hit pharmaceutical companies’ pocketbooks.
In recent years, Azar has defended pricing practices, and argued against the approaches to reduce costs to consumer s as Trump endorsed during his campaign, such as allowing the government to negotiate drug prices and importing medicines from oversees.
Instead, Azar has followed the pharma messaging playbook on drug pricing — deflecting attention to other parts of the health system, and even other countries, blaming them for the high drug costs paid by U.S. patients. He’s also justified drug prices as the cost of innovation.
Trump’s focus on drug pricing in announcing Azar’s nomination didn’t win over doubters, who no longer believe he is serious about going after the industry he once slammed as “getting away with murder.” But it will make it easier for critics to pounce on what will likely be the toughest barrier for Azar to overcome during his confirmation process in the Senate.
Sen. Bernie Sanders said Monday he will “vigorously oppose” the nomination of Azar.
“During Mr. Azar’s tenure at Eli Lilly, this multi billion-dollar corporation dodged taxes while charging Americans outrageously high prices for life saving prescription drugs,” Sanders said.
Sanders and Rep. Elijah Cummings commenced an investigation into Eli Lilly’s rising prices for insulin last year, spurring attorneys generals in Washington and New Mexico to look into the matter. The lawmakers questioned why the prices of the diabetes medicine whose main patent expired 75 years ago have seen huge jumps in recent years, with competitors often raising prices in tandem. One of Eli Lilly’s insulins, Humulin R U-500, rose 325 percent in price from 2010 to 2015.
Cummings tweeted that picking Azar is “like a fox guarding the hen house,” and a “slap in the face,” to Americans waiting for action on lower drug prices.
Azar contends the outrage over drug pricing “erupted because we have seen a complete fundamental restructuring of health insurance,” with a shift to high-deductible plans that puts the burden of drug costs on employees and individuals, he said at a conference in May.
While Azar makes a valid point, changing insurance policies without addressing drugmakers’ markups of existing drug prices, or high launch prices for new medicines, “is avoiding the elephant in the room.” said Ameet Sarpatwari, who studies drug prices at Harvard Medical School.
Even Azar acknowledged in his speech that if insurance companies reduced consumers’ out of pocket charges for medicines, those costs would show up elsewhere, likely in premium increases.
Azar has also attacked government regulators and payers for devaluing pharmaceutical innovation, suggesting that if the U.S. cuts pharma profits, it will see decreased investment in new drugs and fewer new cures.
“The narrow focus of costs of medicine to the exclusion of innovation would be self-defeating in the long run,” Azar said in a 2014 speech.
Sarpatwari worries such views will lead Azar to promote the idea that making it quicker and easier for drug makers to introduce new medicines will reduce pharmaceutical costs. Researchers have found that drug companies don’t price their products any cheaper when FDA lets them use the accelerated approval process or other tactics to speed drugs to market. Former FDA Commissioner Robert Califf recently said that despite claims by the Trump administration that faster drug approvals lead to lower cost drugs, there is no direction relationship between the cost of development and price of drugs.
Nonetheless, in June, Azar told Fox Business that getting more new drugs to market to increase competition among brands would help bring U.S. prices down. Yet there’s only one example the drug industry can point to in the U.S. where brand competition has led to lower prices — and many where competitors simply raise prices in tandem. For example, Democrats recently launched a probe into the rising price of multiple sclerosis drugs where drugs introduced decades ago have raised prices to match their newer competitors.
And while Azar expresses support for competition, one of the major factors keeping generic versions of insulin off the market have been drug company tactics known as evergreening — making incremental tweaks to their insulin versions or the devices that deliver it, to extend their monopolies for decades.
An article published in The Lancet in late 2015 found that most of the recent innovation in the insulin market has centered on improvements in delivery devices, blocking generics by agents that are indirectly related to the drug.
Azar has also opposed other ideas to encourage competitive drug pricing. He’s spoken out against studies known as comparative effectiveness research, used to determine which drugs are most cost-effective for treating patients with a disease. He argues that all options should be available since different patients may need different medicines. The problem however, is that if payers must make all drugs available, they have little leverage to negotiate lower drug prices with industry.
The result is that despite Trump’s tweets praising Azar as a champion for lower costs , few fighting for lower drug prices are pinning their hopes on action by Azar.
“This nominee has impeccable big pharma credentials but non-existent credentials when it comes to concerns on drug prices,” said Peter Welch, co-chair of the House Democrats Drug Pricing Task Force.


Question: What is the history of the Martin Marietta SM-68A/HGM-25A Titan I ICBM?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the history of the Martin Marietta SM-68A/HGM-25A Titan I ICBM?

The Martin Marietta SM-68A/HGM-25A Titan I was the United States' first multistage intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), in use from 1959 until 1962. Though the SM-68A was operational for only three years, it spawned numerous follow-on models that were a part of the US arsenal and space launch capability. The Titan I was unique among the Titan models in that it used liquid oxygen and RP-1 as propellants. All subsequent versions used storable propellants instead.


Question: "What's going on with the police shooting in Albuquerque?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "What's going on with the police shooting in Albuquerque?"

On the surface, it seemed like a case where police had no choice but to respond with deadly force: A man barricaded himself inside an Albuquerque home on Saturday night, reportedly threatening his wife and their two children with a gun.
Police sent a SWAT team and a department psychologist to get Armand Martin, a 50-year-old Air Force veteran, to peacefully surrender during a long standoff.
Three short video clips released Tuesday show Armand Martin brandishing a handgun as his family rushes out of the house. An officer shot and killed the man after determining Martin was a threat to neighbors, Albuquerque Deputy Chief Eric Garcia said. In two helmet camera clips, Martin lies lifeless in his driveway next to two handguns.
Even though the video clips seem to support officers' use of force, the shooting generated outrage around this city of 550,000 and sparked another angry protest. Some residents said they've all but lost faith in the police, and angry demonstrators took over the regularly scheduled city council meeting Monday night, chanting for the ouster of the police chief, shouting at council members and causing so much disruption that the city council president adjourned the meeting.
Albuquerque police are under tough scrutiny following a harsh report from the U.S. Justice Department over use of force and its interaction with suspects struggling with mental illness. The report also faulted how the police SWAT team resolved conflicts.
They just can't resolve these engagements peacefully. Saturday's shooting just demonstrates the way this department operates.
Critics say the weekend shooting is another example of persistent problems in the city's police department. It is the department’s 25th officer-involved shooting to end in a fatality since 2010, and is the second fatal shooting since the DOJ report was released April 10. In that report, the DOJ singled out the SWAT team as one of the department’s problematic units.
"They just can't resolve these engagements peacefully," said David Correia, an American Studies University of New Mexican professor who helped shut down the city council meeting Monday. "Saturday's shooting just demonstrates the way this department operates."
Tension over the department's use of force escalated in March after police shot and killed a homeless camper in the foothills of the Sandia Mountains during a long standoff. Video from an officer's helmet showed police fired on the man, James Boyd, 38, as he appeared to be preparing to surrender. Just over a week later, police shot and killed Alfred Redwine, 30, after a standoff. Last month, an officer shot and killed an auto theft suspect, Mary Hawkes, at close range after a chase.
In May 4 shooting, officers said they tried to use all necessary options to resolve the situation, including bringing a psychologist trained to negotiate in hostage situations and trying to get information about Martin's mental health from the Veterans Administration, which wasn't available because of federal law, said Garcia, the deputy chief.
Police responded because Martin's wife, Gail, called 911, saying in an interview with KOAT-TV on Monday that her husband suffered from depression and for some unknown reason "just went crazy." She said he demanded that she and their two children get out of the house, then pulled a gun.
"The kids got so scared and started running and telling me to go," Gail Martin said.
Garcia says more than a dozen bullet casings were found near Armand Martin after the shooting. Police identified the officer who opened fire as 12-year veteran Daniel Hughes.
Correia said he believed the SWAT team actually escalated the conflict with Martin by throwing flash bangs into his home rather than working to end it without the use of deadly force.
"These tactics and procedures are exactly what the DOJ criticized in its report," he said.
Nora Tachias-Anaya, another advocate who took part in Monday's protest, said Martin was alone in his home and posed no harm to anyone.
"It would have been to their advantage to just let him fall asleep," she said.
Police said the wife and children were in danger, and once Martin started shooting, they had no choice but to return fire.
But some observers say Albuquerque police will have a hard time convincing people that they are sincere in adopting reforms.
"It seems like a threshold has been passed," Timothy Krebs, a University of New Mexico political science professor, said. "Now, it doesn't matter what the facts are."


Question: What is the latest news on Roger Stone and his connection to the special counsel's investigation?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the latest news on Roger Stone and his connection to the special counsel's investigation?

Special counsel Robert Mueller, MSNBC’s Ari Melber reported Thursday evening, intends on slapping Randy Credico with a subpoena, this after Credico denied a voluntary interview request.
JUST IN: Ari Melber reports that Mueller intends to subpoena Randy Credico (@Credico2016). Credico told @AriMelber yesterday that he declined a request to voluntarily talk with the special counsel's office. Credico is connected to Assange and Stone.
It’s the latest person with a connection to former Trump advisor Roger Stone to feel Mueller’s subpoena wrath. Most recently, it was so-called “Manhattan Madam” Kristin Davis. Unlike Credico, Davis agreed to a voluntary interview.
Well, says Mueller, there’s a subpoena in your future.
Stone, you may recall, said he “badgered” Credico, but only for the most upstanding reason.
Another notable is that Credico, despite not wanting to participate in the Mueller investigation unless forced, regards it as “professional” and “not political,” which is not something many, including President Donald Trump, seem to believe.
“The investigators for the Mueller team I take very seriously and it’s not political, it’s professional. You’ve got really professional investigators and prosecutors there and they’re not running for reelection, you know what I mean? So they’re not grandstanding,” he said.
“He was correct. Wikileaks did have the goods on Hillary and they did release them,” Stone added.


Question: Describe a heartwarming rescue story.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe a heartwarming rescue story.

When Alana Hadley met Ares at Wisconsin Humane Society, the Door County Campus, it was love at first sight.
Alana adopted the cute kitten, who she says looked just like her cat who had passed away.
Unfortunately her lovely new kitten didn’t settle in as well as she’d hoped. Ares was very needy and kept meowing until he fell asleep in Alana’s arms the first night.
Alana thought it might be because he was missing his sister Aphrodite – who she had wanted to adopt as well, but couldn’t because she was in the process of being adopted by another family. Alana got Ares some stuffed animals to provide some much-needed comfort, hoping it would help him settle in.
The very next day Alana was delighted to learn that the adoption for Aphrodite had fallen through. She quickly took Ares to the shelter to reunite him with his sister.
“They wouldn’t stop playing,” Alana told Love Meow.
With Aphrodite now also needing a new family, Alana adopted her too so the two kitties could be together forever.


Question: Respond in 3 sentences. Describe "Heroic Visions" by Jessica Amanda Salmonson.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 3 sentences. Describe "Heroic Visions" by Jessica Amanda Salmonson.

Heroic Visions is an anthology of fantasy stories, edited by Jessica Amanda Salmonson. It was first published in paperback by Ace Books in March 1983.
The book collects eleven new short stories and novelettes by various fantasy authors, with an introduction by Salmonson.


Question: Describe the plot of Spider-Man: Homecoming. Respond in 19 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the plot of Spider-Man: Homecoming. Respond in 19 sentences.

After battling his fellow MCU heroes in Captain America: Civil War, Peter Parker will face off against The Vulture next year in Spider-Man: Homecoming. While Marvel hasn't announced who is playing the winged foe yet (most expect it will be Michael Keaton), it's appropriate he will be Spider's first super villain in this continuity since he was one of his earliest adversaries in the comics. However, it looks like he won't be the only early Spider-Man villain appearing in Spider-Man: Homecoming. The word is out now that The Tinkerer has been cast as the secondary villain in the Web-Slinger's first solo MCU movie.
Deadline is reporting that Orange is the New Black actor Michael Cernus has been cast as a younger Phineas Mason, a.k.a. The Tinkerer, in Spider-Man: Homecoming. That makes this installment the third Spider-Man movie to feature more than one super villain, following behind Spider-Man 3 and The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Logan Marshall-Green and Bokeem Woodbine are also reportedly playing villains, but their character identities haven't been disclosed yet.
The Tinkerer, one of the Marvel universe's top scientific geniuses, debuted in 1962's The Amazing Spider-Man #2, the same issue where Vulture first appeared. While he's never been an A-list Spider-Man villain, he has made a name for himself as a weapons supplier to other super villains.Tinkerer was first rumored to be participating in Spider-Man: Homecoming back in May, shortly after The Vulture was first reported as the main villain. At the time, it was said that the MCU's Phones Fogg would help Vulture, a.k.a. Adrian Toomes, build his suit used recover Chitauri technology from their invasion in The Avengers.
The Deadline article didn't provide any details about how exactly Tinkerer will fit into the story, so it's unclear whether the Chitauri element will actually be featured in Spider-Man: Homecoming. Nevertheless, with Tinkerer involved, fans can look forward to him building an assortment of unusual gadgets and weaponry, either for his own use or to sell to other criminals. When the Wall-Crawler interferes with Phineas' work, then he'll get a taste of what the technological evildoer has been constructing in his workshop.
Michael Cernus is perhaps best known for recurring as Cal Chapman in the Netflix series Orange is the New Black. His other credits include the WGN series Manhattan, The Bourne Legacy, Captain Phillips and the upcoming Melissa Leo-led feature The Most Hated Woman in America. Cernus joins a cast that includes Tom Holland, Marisa Tomei, Robert Downey Jr, Donald Glover, Zendaya, Tony Revolori and many more.
Directed by Jon Watts, Spider-Man: Homecoming swings into theaters on July 7, 2017.


Question: Describe the San Francisco Jewish Community Federation's support for radical, right-wing, Islamophobic, bigoted, and McCarthyite groups and the implications for the community.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the San Francisco Jewish Community Federation's support for radical, right-wing, Islamophobic, bigoted, and McCarthyite groups and the implications for the community.

The Federation’s tax filings reveal a litany of radical-right and anti-Muslim groups that have received its support for years. The Federation says its review process has recently been strengthened but refuses to account for its funding of notorious Islamophobic hate groups.
Following the revelation last week in The Forward that the San Francisco Jewish Federation gave $100,000 to Canary Mission, the shadowy website that blacklists and intimidates students and professors who criticize Israel, the Federation assured its constituents that it was a “one-time grant” that would never happen again. But Canary Mission is just the tip of the iceberg.
An extensive review by +972 of the Federation’s tax filings shows that the Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco and the Helen Diller Family Foundation, which the former controls and which it used to fund Canary Mission, have bankrolled an extensive list of extremist, far-right, anti-Muslim organizations in recent years.
Among the extremist, radical right-wing, and anti-Muslim groups that received funds from the SF Federation, both directly and through the Diller Foundation, and some of which have received substantial and repeated grants over the years, include: Project Veritas, The AMCHA Initiative, The American Freedom Law Center, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, The David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the work of Islamophobic Dutch politician Geert Wilders (through the International Freedom Alliance Foundation). Others include the Clarion Fund, the Center for Security Policy (Frank Gaffney), the Middle East Forum (Daniel Pipes), the Tea Party Patriots Foundation, and the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.
The AMCHA Initiative, which received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the SF Federation and the Diller Foundation in recent years, operates similarly to Canary Mission, except that it primarily goes after faculty, not students.
The David Horowitz Freedom Center, which has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in recent years, has been condemned by the Southern Poverty Law Center as promoting anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant attitudes.
The American Freedom Law Center and Pamela Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative both target Islam as a threat to Western civilization. The former advances “anti-Sharia” legislation and filed an amicus brief in support of Trump’s Muslim ban. The latter, which has been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an anti-Muslim hate group, was responsible for Islamophobic bus campaigns in several cities, and has been represented by the American Freedom Law Center.
We review each grant recommendation at the time that it is submitted to the Federation, to determine if the organization adheres to the Federation’s granting guidelines. This applies to organizations across the political spectrum. We aim to make the best decisions with the information that we have at the time. Because organizations are dynamic, an organization that previously received a grant from the Federation may not be in compliance with the Federation’s grantmaking guidelines today, and vice versa. Also, per our statement, we strengthened the implementation of our review process in 2017 and continue to be committed to executing our grant review with a standard of care in regard to our guidelines.
Philp added that the Federation does indeed deny grants when they violate its guidelines but would not address any of the grants to the organizations listed in this article or why they were approved.
The San Francisco Jewish Community Federation is one of the largest Jewish charities in the United States with a budget of nearly a quarter of a billion dollars. Furthermore, it is located in, and presumably represents, one of the most progressive cities and communities in the United States. Whether the SF Federation’s financial support of radical, right-wing, Islamophobic, bigoted, and McCarthyite groups aligns with that community’s values is ultimately up to its members.
“if you’re a racist the world should know.” unless you set up a 501c4 to dissociate your name from your beliefs.
“It is pretty clear that the organized Jewish community – unless pushed – is never going to be as rigorous at enforcing boundaries on the right as it is on the left. This comes from an extremely misplaced sense of what is a threat to our community.
We students see the damage that Canary Mission is doing on our campuses.
+972 gets funded by the German green party.
$14,500 – A grant from Heinrich Böll Stiftung Israel.
Why am I not surprised that this Federation supports hate groups?
Daniel Gold (“I hope your website goes down”) perfectly expresses the real ethos and mission and ethics of Canary Mission and its supporters in the Federation.
This congregation sounds very much like what I have heard from my fellow Southerners throughout the years (except in our case, our racism has extended to Jews as well as all Others who do not fit within our identity circle).
Our reputation is known world wide. As soon as you say you are a Southerner, people know. I can not imagine any people deliberately courting such a reputation as we have. Because once you are known as a racist people, you never lose that reputation.


Question: Describe the commune of Nădrag in Romania. Respond in 22 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the commune of Nădrag in Romania. Respond in 22 words.

Nădrag ( or "Steinacker"; ) is a commune in Timiș County, Romania. It is composed of two villages: Crivina ("Alsógörbed") and Nădrag.


Question: Describe the problems with Arlie Hochschild's analysis of white working-class experience in Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the problems with Arlie Hochschild's analysis of white working-class experience in Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right.

Class has come increasingly to the fore in explanations of outcomes of the UK referendum on leaving the EU and the US Presidential election. Much of this commentary has been prefaced with a criticism of the privileging of identity politics over socio-economic inequality. As a consequence, the white working class, the argument goes, has been forgotten – their histories silenced and their claims for a redress of the injustices they face ignored. This is the basic narrative underpinning media discourses as well as many social scientific explanations of recent events and it is an impoverished one.
The problem, for the most part, rests in an association of class with structural inequality embedded in the economic system and race as merely pointing to social divisions. As such, class is presumed to be more significant than race and to provide a universal category for inclusive action, in contrast to a supposedly divisive focus on race. However, this analysis fails to acknowledge the ways in which race has been fundamental to the configuration of the modern world and is integral to socio-economic inequalities in the present. The problem is exacerbated with the turn to ethnographic accounts of white working class experience that fail to address the broader histories within which those experiences are located. This ethnographic approach is typical of journalistic reporting based on the collection of testimonies of Trump or Brexit voters, but it is also a feature of academic analysis.
For example, Arlie Hochschild’s recent book, Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right, is an ethnographic account representing the concerns of the white working-class in Louisiana in the United States. She decided on Louisiana, what she terms as the ‘super South’, as she felt that it was the furthest away from the liberal enclave she otherwise inhabits in Berkeley, California. The basis of the comparison was the fact that in California one half of white people voted for Obama in 2012 whereas, in Louisiana, only 16% did. She states that she wanted to understand this other ‘Tea-Party’ America to discover how they came to hold their views, and whether there would be any possibility of making common cause on some issues.
This is the ‘deep story’ of the ‘legitimate’ grievances of those who, Hochschild argues, have been ‘left behind’ by deindustrialization and decades of affirmative action and diversity politics. While there are many problematic aspects of this story, Hochschild has already insulated herself, and those she represents, from critique by stating upfront that a deep story is one that feels true despite the facts.
I do not dispute the grievances that are felt by those that Hochschild represents, what I contest is the claim that these are ‘legitimate’. What is being described is a relative loss of privilege rather than any real account of serious and systemic economic decline that is uniquely affecting white citizens in the United States. Hochschild herself implicitly acknowledges the segregated history of the US by pointing to the fact that previously there had been all-white jobs – jobs that were not available to African Americans and others because they were not white.
This, however, is not presented as the basis for any legitimate grievances held by African Americans. Rather, the fact that civil rights undermined the caste privilege previously enjoyed by white workers by enabling African Americans to compete on an ostensible level playing field is presented simply in terms of loss for white workers. In this way, ‘minorities’ are scapegoated for inequalities of material conditions that are increasingly shared by both sets of workers, but one set believes to be not appropriate to their place. Indeed, the data show that support for Trump (and Brexit) is not primarily grounded in those who are most economically disadvantaged. Nor is it evident that the supporters of each would wish to do something about the disadvantages of others, especially where they are perceived as ‘other’.
Class, here, is not the operation of a race-neutral economic system, but an economic system which is deeply racialized. At the same time, the assertion that what matters is class is necessarily given the form of a pernicious identity politics. The identity politics that are associated with the claims of minorities are claims for equal rights. A class analysis focusing on white workers (rather than all workers) effectively argues for the resumption of racialized privileges. There can be no legitimacy in the latter claim. The test of good faith that class analysis would need to pass is precisely that it begins from the racialized histories that configure our present and is willing to include workers who have been left out as well as those who perceive themselves as left behind.


Question: Respond in 30 sentences. "Hey, just wanted to check in. How's your #31DC2015 day 16 looking so far?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 30 sentences. "Hey, just wanted to check in. How's your #31DC2015 day 16 looking so far?"

Day 16! I'm more than half way through the #31DC2015 y'all! It's been crazy and fun, but now we are getting into the harder prompts. Eek!
Today the prompt was geometric. I started with a base of Polish M Canopus. This is a beautiful black jelly base filled with red, silver, gold, green, blue, and iridescent glitters. It is a stunning and complex glitter bomb.
I then went in with Mundo de Unas Light Gold and It Girl Nail Art IG-101 to create my geometric pattern. The stamping from this plate was absolute perfection, talk about crisp lines!
I absolutely adore the way this turned out. The pattern isn't so overwhelming that you can't see the prettiness of the polish underneath it. It's a perfect balance between the two. Glitter prompt is tomorrow!
Thank you, I was super happy with it.
That image you stamped is everything!
<3 thank you, I love it so much!
Yaaaaaas! The stamping is perfection!
That Polish M you used as the base is stunning. Love the stamp you chose too.
I totally agree. I hated to cover it up.
The stamping in perfection!! SO pretty and perfect for fall!
It really is! I'm ready!
I love how clean the image stamped!
Great stamping! I love that pattern.


Question: Respond in 1 sentences. Do you know which episode of "Blackadder" is the last one?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 1 sentences. Do you know which episode of "Blackadder" is the last one?

"Duel and Duality" is the sixth and final episode of the third series of the BBC sitcom "Blackadder".


Question: What is Pseudhippopsis brunneipes?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Pseudhippopsis brunneipes?

Pseudhippopsis brunneipes is a species of beetle in the family Cerambycidae. It was described by Per Olof Christopher Aurivillius in 1914.


Question: Who is Francisco Garrido Patrón? Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Francisco Garrido Patrón? Respond in 2 sentences.

Francisco Garrido Patrón (b. Mexico City, Distrito Federal in 1953) is a Mexican politician, who was governor of the State of Querétaro from 2003 to 2009, and member of the National Action Party (PAN). Previously, he was mayor of Querétaro City, from 1 October 1997, to 30 September 2000.


Question: Please provide an analysis of the Winnipeg Jets' chances in the 2017/18 NHL season based on their performance in the 2016/17 season.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Please provide an analysis of the Winnipeg Jets' chances in the 2017/18 NHL season based on their performance in the 2016/17 season.

The Winnipeg Jets finished 2016/17 with 40 wins and 87 points, although it wasn’t enough to clinch a playoff berth. With emerging stars up front (Laine, Scheifele, Ehlers), defense and goaltending likely hold the key to a post-season appearance in 2017/18.
NOTE: For other team deep-dives and methodology explanations, feel free to click here.
+ The Jets have a solid, young crop of puck movers. Trouba (23 years old, PMF +0.28), Morrissey (22 years old, PMF +1.81) and Myers (27 years old, PMF +1.23) are all relatively young and have shown strong ability to move the puck and elevate the play of their teammates despite facing solid QoC and playing top 4 minutes. None of the 3 appear to be sheltered either, starting roughly the same % of shifts in the offensive zone as the defensive one.
+ Durability will be key heading into 2017/18. Only Byfuglien and Morrissey played 80+ games. Trouba (60 – although 15 from his hold-out), Enstrom (60), and Myers (11) all missed considerable time with injury.
+ Byfuglien (PMF +1.39) was his usual strong self as a puck mover in 2016/17.
+ While Enstrom struggled to drive possession (PMF -1.04), his defensive ability metric (DAM +1.31) was best on the team at minimizing scoring chances and keeping high danger shots to a minimum.
+ Postma was solid both as a puck mover (PMF +0.38) and defensively (DAM +1.02), but did so against very weak competition.
Byfuglien and Trouba lead the way on the power play. As a QB, Byfuglien was the best for Winnipeg. His PPQB of +1.50 is well above league average, highlighting his ability to maintain possession, generate good scoring chances, and create offense with the man advantage. Byfuglien led the way with 2.17 primary assists per 60 minutes of PP time – tops on the team and among the best in the league.
As a shooter, Trouba was tops. His PPGS of +1.35 of goals per 60 on the PP of 1.22 are both in the upper quartile of the league.
The Winnipeg Jets are an interesting team to watch heading into 2017/18. They’re loaded offensively (Laine, Scheifele, Ehlers, and Wheeler all put up 60+ points) and appear to be very solid on defense, so what is holding them back?
Their biggest issue might be goaltending. Winnipeg ranked 27th out of 30 teams in terms of 5v5 save percentage. That is not strong. Unless they see improvement from that position, it might be tough for the Jets to be more than a bubble playoff team in 2017/18.
That said, if goaltending does improve, and their blue line proves more durable in 2017/18, this could be a dangerous, young team ready to make their mark in the post-season.
Trouba did not miss games due to injury. He missed 20 games because he was holding out on a contract and the other 2 were due to a suspension.
He missed 15 games from the hold-out, 5 games from injury. Still worth noting that nuance – thanks for pointing out.


Question: What are the findings from the new paper about "deaths of despair"?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What are the findings from the new paper about "deaths of despair"?

*A blend of counties and PUMAs. See full paper for more explanation.
“Deaths of despair” in midlife rose most dramatically for white non-Hispanic Americans with a high school degree or less—a pattern that diverges sharply from overall rates of “deaths of despair” in midlife in other rich countries. The chart below compares “deaths of despair” in midlife for white non-Hispanics in the U.S. with overall “deaths of despair” (all races combined) in midlife in other rich countries over time.
Taking a closer look at the increase within the U.S., the authors find that “deaths of despair” rates for men and women with a high school degree or less are rising in parallel, and much faster than the rates for men and women with a 4-year college degree or more.
The authors also look at “deaths of despair” by birth cohort (labeled by the year of birth). The chart below shows that the rate of “deaths of despair” for white non-Hispanics born in 1975 is much steeper than the rate for those born in 1935.
What’s more, the increases in deaths of despair are accompanied by a measurable deterioration in economic and social wellbeing, which has become more pronounced for each successive birth cohort. Marriage rates and labor force participation rates fall between successive birth cohorts, while reports of physical pain, and poor health and mental health rise.
When combined with a slowdown in progress against mortality from heart disease and cancer—the two largest killers in middle age— since the late 1990s, the increase in “deaths of despair” has resulted in overall midlife mortality rates (death by any cause) for working class white Americans overtaking those of other minority groups for the first time.
To learn more about the findings from the new paper, read “Mortality and morbidity in the 21st century” from Anne Case and Angus Deaton.


Question: Provide a brief description of Rudolf Zahradník.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief description of Rudolf Zahradník.

Rudolf Zahradník (born October 20, 1928 in Bratislava, then Czechoslovakia, now Slovakia) is a Czech chemist who studies the relationship between theoretical and experimental characteristics.


Question: What do you know about Nunes versus Shevchenko in UFC 215?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What do you know about Nunes versus Shevchenko in UFC 215?

In the co-main event of UFC 215, women's bantamweight champion Amanda Nunes puts her title on the line against Valentina Shevchenko. The two first fought on the main card of UFC 196, where Nunes left the cage with a decision victory. Since that fight, Nunes has won the title over Miesha Tate and defended it against Ronda Rousey.
Shevchenko has also won back-to-back fights over former champion Holly Holm and TUF winner Julianna Pena. The following is a statistical breakdown of the important factors that could turn out to be the difference on Saturday night.
Editor's note: this guide was written in advance of Nunes and Shevchenko's originally scheduled fight at UFC 213.
Nunes has a sizable advantage in terms of striking differential (significant strikes landed per minute minus significant strikes absorbed per minute). In the UFC and Strikeforce, Nunes' striking differential is 1.79 compared to only 0.20 for Shevchenko. Among ranked bantamweights, Nunes has the division's best striking differential. Nunes, at 2.9, absorbs slightly more significant strikes on a per-minute basis than Shevchenko (2.28).
However, it is on the offensive end that sets Nunes apart from Shevchenko and the rest of the women's bantamweight division. Her 4.69 strikes landed per minute is the best among ranked 135-pound fighters. Shevchenko would be better served to force a defensive striking contest. If she can drive down Nunes' striking aggression, she will probably have the advantage.
The champion is much more of a finisher than the challenger. During her 10-fight combined UFC and Strikeforce career, Nunes has gone to decision only one time, her first fight with Shevchenko. On the other hand, Shevchenko's first three fights in the Octagon were decided via the judges' scorecards before she defeated Julianna Pena with a submission in January.
Nunes' average fight time is 5:09 compared to 16:07 for Shevchenko. If Shevchenko can make it a longer fight, the balance might swing in her favor. In their first fight, Shevchenko had her best round in the third. She scored a takedown and landed 17 significant strikes while absorbing only three. Nunes had outlanded her 36-11 in significant strikes to that point.
Striking power is an essential element to Nunes' finishing ability. In the UFC and Strikeforce, she has scored knockout stoppages in half of her fights, including her 48-second finish of former champion Ronda Rousey in her last fight. For her career, she has landed 0.88 knockdowns per 15 minutes of fight time. On the other hand, Shevchenko has not landed a single knockdown in the Octagon. Nunes will likely come out of the gate looking to finish the fight with strikes. If Shevchenko wants to score the upset, she will need to survive an early barrage.
Neither fighter is very easy to take down. They both have stopped 73 percent of their opponents' takedown attempts. On the ground, Nunes has tried 1.2 submission attempts per 15 minutes of fight time and finished two fights via submission in the UFC. In their first fight, Nunes registered two submission attempts against Shevchenko, but she could not finish either hold.
Prior to her last fight, the challenger had never attempted a submission in the UFC, but she did finish Pena with a second-round armbar. The submission game might end up being a big factor in this fight considering both fighters were at their best from the top position in their first encounter.


Question: What is Fort Saint Elmo? Respond in 57 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Fort Saint Elmo? Respond in 57 words.

Fort Saint Elmo () is a star fort in Valletta, Malta. It stands on the seaward shore of the Sciberras Peninsula that divides Marsamxett Harbour from Grand Harbour, and commands the entrances to both harbours along with Fort Tigné and Fort Ricasoli. It is best known for its role in the Great Siege of Malta of 1564


Question: Explain the Trump administration's decision to phase out Temporary Protected Status for Salvadorans.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the Trump administration's decision to phase out Temporary Protected Status for Salvadorans.

Trump orders 200,000 Salvadorans to leave U.S.
The Trump administration has been phasing out Temporary Protected Status, forcing people from Haiti, Nicaragua and El Salvador to leave the U.S.
Salvadorans who currently have temporary protected status (TPS) must return to their homeland by September 2019 or become undocumented immigrants if they remain without legal protections.
The administration has now terminated TPS status for four countries — El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua and Sudan. Ten nations were in the program when President Trump took office a year ago.
Salvadorans were first granted TPS in 2001 after a pair of devastating earthquakes that killed nearly 1,000 people and destroyed more than 100,000 homes in the Central American country.
Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen concluded that El Salvador has rebuilt and recovered enough so the emergency declaration is no longer necessary.
"The substantial disruption of living conditions caused by the earthquake" no longer exists, Homeland Security said in a statement.
The latest decision runs counter to those made by Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, who extended TPS protections for El Salvador every 18 months. Their administrations said the country had not fully recovered from the quakes and also had raging violence from drug cartels that made it impossible for so many people to return to the unstable nation.
The State Department issued a travel warning to U.S. travelers last February about widespread violence throughout that country. "El Salvador has one of the highest homicide levels in the world and crimes such as extortion, assault and robbery are common," the warning said.
Homeland Security said Monday that its decision was based on recovery from the earthquakes and not on the current state of gang violence in El Salvador.
The move comes after months of lobbying by El Salvador's government, a bipartisan group in Congress and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, all urging Washington to find a way that allows Salvadorans to remain in the United States.
El Salvador's embassy in Washington estimates that 97% of Salvadorans on TPS over age 24 are employed and pay taxes, and more than half own their homes. Salvadorans on TPS have also given birth to 192,000 children, all U.S. citizens, according to the Center for Migration Studies.
"To disregard the contributions that El Salvadorans have made in communities across this country by stamping an expiration date on their lives here is inhumane," said Amanda Baran of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. "El Salvador is one of the world’s most dangerous countries and will be unable to absorb the return of these thousands of people whose lives are inextricably intertwined with those of ours here in the United States."
The decision pleased immigration groups that advocate for lowers levels of immigration, noting the TPS program, created by Congress in 1990, was a short-term fix abused by repeated extensions.
“The past practice of allowing foreign nationals to remain in the United States long after an initial emergency in their home countries has ended has undermined the integrity of the program and essentially made the ‘temporary’ protected status a front operation for backdoor permanent immigration,” Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, said in a statement.
More: Trump may order 200,000 Salvadorans to leave U.S.
The administration has been phasing out temporary protected status granted by Republican and Democratic administrations to 437,000 people from 10 countries that have suffered armed conflicts, earthquakes and other natural disasters, according to the Congressional Research Service.
In November, Homeland Security announced it was ending TPS for about 59,000 Haitians living legally in the U.S. since the powerful 2010 earthquake decimated the country. They must return home by July 2019.
The department also eliminated TPS status for 5,300 Nicaraguans first granted in 1999 after Hurricane Mitch. They must leave by January 2019.
In addition, TPS status ended for 1,000 Sudanese after first granted in 2001 because of civil war. They must leave by November.
While the department extended TPS for 86,000 Hondurans affected by Mitch for six more months, the administration indicated those people may ultimately be eliminated from the program.


Question: Provide a brief description of Okram Ibobi Singh.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief description of Okram Ibobi Singh.

Okram Ibobi Singh (born 19 June 1948) is an Indian Politician who was the Chief Minister of Manipur from 2002 to 2017. In 2012, he helped his party win the state election for the third time with an absolute majority securing 42 out of the total 60 assembly seats, brushing aside anti-incumbency factor once again. He is a member of the Indian National Congress. In 2017 Assembly Elections, Okram Ibobi Singh defeated Leithnthem Basanta Singh and Irom Sharmila


Question: Respond in detail. Hi there, I wanted to ask about the O.R.E mod.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in detail. Hi there, I wanted to ask about the O.R.E mod.

This Mod is Discontinued Until Further Notice!
O.R.E is a advanced ore-generation mod brought to you by the "Acronym Coders" group. The mod was build from scratch to fill the gap left behind from the CoFH world generation. Our goal with this mod is to provide the users with a simple user friendly but also powerful tool to completely customize and tailor fit their world gen to fit their needs or themes for their Minecraft world.
Disable vanilla ore spawn (modded coming soon™).
Add your own custom ore generations using JSON.
Select form 3 different pre built generator models for ore spawning [Clusters | Veins | Geodes].
You can read more about our generator models here at out Wiki.
This mod requires B.A.S.E to function.
B.A.S.E is the fundamental library used by the "Acronym Coders". The mod contains all the base functions for our mods but also provide the user with a powerful interface where you can create custom materials and ores using a simple JSON file. Check out B.A.S.E for more info.
O.R.E also ships with a embed mod named World-Stripper made by EwyBoy. The mod allows for easy debugging your custom world gen by stripping away all the terrain. You can read more about how World-Stripper works here.
Can we have a 1.7.10 version?
We will not be backporting the mod.
We instead recommend CoFHCore's Json Oregen System which is far more complete than this would ever be if backported to 1.7.10.
Is this still under development? And does it work to "regen" ores in terrain that never had ores? In specific, I want to use this to make maps with mostly stone underground, and use this to generate some ores after design.
ps. is "A.C.R.O.N.Y.M. C.O.D.E.R.S." an acronym? Because that would be lovely.
Given the current alpha-state of the mod, would you recommend waiting for it to mature further before putting it to work, or can it be used if one works around any rough edges?
At the current state I'd wait and hold off.
I do want to warn that the mod is in Alpha and will be going through a recode sometime in the future due to things being currently broken.


Question: What has the NAFTA agreement done for trade in North America?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What has the NAFTA agreement done for trade in North America?

The Mexican automotive sector hit a high water mark this March in terms of production, exportation, and domestic sales.
The Mexican Automotive Industry Association, la Asociación Mexicana de la Industria Automotriz (AMIA), reported that production, exports, and domestic sales were up 36.2%, 32.7%, and 17.2%, respectively, in March 2017 as compared to March 2016.
The March data show that the United States continued to be the primary destination for vehicle exports, followed by Canada.
As the Wall Street Journal reported, this uptick was due to new production facilities and, since Easter falls in April this year, more work days in March.
Perhaps more important, the US and Mexico aren’t just exchanging finished goods. Rather, much of their bilateral trade occurs within supply chains, with companies in each country adding value at different points in the production process. The US and Mexico are not just trading goods with each other; they are producing goods with each other.
However, the good news is being overshadowed by President Trump’s statements about the North American Free Trade Agreement. Beginning with the presidential campaign and continuing into his administration, President Trump has taken a hard stance on trade, especially trade with Mexico. This stance includes threatening American companies that invest in Mexico.
This animus towards trade in general and NAFTA in particular has led to two proposals that could have drastic consequences for the United States’ trade with Mexico and the Mexican automotive sector: a border adjustment tax and a renegotiation of NAFTA.
As a way to promote domestic manufacturing without technically raising tariffs, some conservatives in the United States have called for a 20% border adjustment tax on all imported goods sold domestically.
Critics of the tax argue that prices will rise on imported goods, for example from China, and that the result will be inflation. The tax’s creators respond that the surge in foreign demand for U.S. exports will strengthen the value of the dollar; in turn, a strong dollar would increase the demand for imported good, so that the net effect on trade is neutral.
Critics, including many Republicans in the Senate, also argue that such a tax would too harshly penalize US businesses that rely on imported goods.
While President Trump and Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan support a border adjustment tax, Republicans in the Senate say that such a measure would not pass that chamber.
In a recent twist, the Trump administration appears to have changed course on NAFTA.
In a letter to the Senate and House, the acting US Trade Representative conveyed the President’s intent to renegotiate NAFTA. The document lays out how far President Trump has moved on this issue from his campaign statements when the question was whether Trump would withdraw completely from NAFTA.
For instance, there’s discussion of the need to update NAFTA in order to develop rules regarding e-commerce, digital sales, and data housing requirements — basically ensuring that there are new regulations specific to the information economy, which has blossomed since the accord was first negotiated decades ago.
The US calls for the removal of one of three major dispute settlement processes under NAFTA, known as Chapter 19, which allows for the creation of international tribunals to help sort out disagreements over measures designed to penalize trade cheating. But it doesn’t call for the elimination of the most controversial one — the investor-state dispute settlement system that allows investors to sue governments in private trade tribunals and basically gives corporations the status of countries under international law.
Such tribunals have been contentious since the early years of NAFTA. A recent decision of the investor-state dispute system in Eli Lily v. Canada, the court dismissed a $500 million suit brought by the US pharmaceutical company Eli Lily against Canada.
The North American Free Trade Agreement has been a boon for intra-North American trade and consumers in Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
While the early years of NAFTA were marked by discontent with the free trade agreement, gains are being strongly felt in all three countries as economic integration has strengthened. In Mexico, the recent boom in the automotive sector has brought good paying jobs and Mexican made cars to a growing middle class.
As the Trump administration and Republican-controlled Congress move forward on reforming trade and tax policy, they would do well to remember the gains to all countries from free trade.


Question: Describe Muikamachi Station. Respond in 61 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Muikamachi Station. Respond in 61 words.

 is a railway station located in the city of Minamiuonuma, Niigata, Japan, operated jointly by the East Japan Railway Company (JR East) and the third sector Hokuetsu Express.
Muikamachi Station is a station on the Jōetsu Line, and is located 111.8 kilometers from the starting point of the line at . It is also a terminal station for the Hokuhoku Line.


Question: What is the latest news on the new Target store in Bensonhurst?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the latest news on the new Target store in Bensonhurst?

Target has lined up a 20,400-square-foot space in Bensonhurst for a store with a flexible layout and smaller packaging, according to a press release from the company. The store will replace Annie Sez and Mandee stores (which closed this week upon lease expiration) at 6401 18th Avenue at the corner of 64th Street. The lease, signed last week, is for 10 years with options, according to Jerry Welkis of Welco Realty, who represented the landlord in the deal. He declined to provide the asking rent.
The new urban format store will sell a more curated assortment of kids’ and baby care products as well as toys; grab-and-go groceries; select kosher items; apparel and accessories for women, men, kids and baby; select home items; an assortment of health, personal care and beauty products; and electronics, entertainment and sporting goods, Target said in its press release.
Situated on the ground floor of the two-story building (there are offices on the second floor), the new store is slated to open this October. There is also at least a couple hundred square feet of storage space in the basement, Welkis said.
Bensonhurst Target marks the chain’s second flexible-format location in Brooklyn. Last week, one opened in City Point in Downtown Brooklyn. Target is looking to expand with this format, and has 32 such stores open, with 31 planned for 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Alfred Polizzotto, his mother and his sister own the building, which the late-Alfred senior acquired in 1990. Polizzotto didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment and nor did Target’s spokeswoman. Ripco Real Estate’s Jeffrey Howard represented Target in the deal. He wasn’t immediately reachable.


Question: Describe SMiLE-seq.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe SMiLE-seq.

Selective microfluidics-based ligand enrichment followed by sequencing (SMiLE-seq) is a technique developed for the rapid identification of DNA binding specificities and affinities of full length monomeric and dimeric transcription factors in a fast and semi-high-throughput fashion. SMiLE-seq works by loading "in vitro" transcribed and translated “bait” transcription factors into a microfluidic device in combination with DNA molecules. Bound transcription factor-DNA complexes are then isolated from the device, which is followed by sequencing and sequence data analysis to characterize binding motifs. Specialized software is used to determine the DNA binding properties of monomeric or dimeric transcription factors to help predict their "in vivo" DNA binding activity. SMiLE-seq combines three critical functions that makes it unique from existing techniques: (1) the use of capillary pumps to optimize the loading of samples, (2) trapping molecular interactions on the surface of the microfluidic device through immunocapture of target transcription factors, (3) enabling the selection of DNA that is specifically bound to transcription factors from a pool of random DNA sequences.


Question: Describe a recent altercation between a Republican candidate and his attacker. Respond in 12 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe a recent altercation between a Republican candidate and his attacker. Respond in 12 sentences.

A Minnesota House candidate is blaming Democrats like Rep. Maxine Waters for an alleged “politically motivated” attack that left him with a concussion.
Shane Mekeland, a Republican candidate for Minnesota’s state House, was “blindsided” by a “much, much bigger person” at a restaurant in St. George Township last week as he told the Star Tribune.
Though the attacker “did not seem dangerous” when he first began talking to Mekeland, the candidate felt things change as the man made some remarks before he “punched” him.
The Benton County Sheriff confirmed that a suspect was identified and admitted to the assault, though he was not arrested or charged with a crime.
Mekeland, who is facing off against Democrat Karla Scapanski and independent Myron Wilson in the bid for the House seat in District 15B, called out “the media and the likes of Maxine Waters, Hillary [Clinton] and Eric Holder” for “driving this behavior” in response to a comment on his Facebook post.
The attack on Mekeland, a convenience store owner and general contractor, happened between 9 p.m. and 10 p.m. on Friday but the candidate waited until Sunday to address it on his campaign’s Facebook page. He told the Star Tribune he spoke to the Benton County Sheriff’s Office and sought medical treatment on Saturday after he noticed some side effects from the attack.
But Mekeland isn’t the only GOP candidate feeling the heat just weeks before the election.
State Representative Sarah Anderson of Plymouth had a run-in with a man who allegedly lunged at her when she approached him about kicking her campaign sign, according to KMSP. She told the news outlet that the man identified himself as an anarchist and told Anderson she should kill herself.
As she attempted to get a photo of him, the man allegedly charged her and prevented her from shutting her car door.
Mekeland and Anderson have no plans to discontinue their campaigning efforts but admit the rules seem to have changed.


Question: Describe Thyrosticta vieui. Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe Thyrosticta vieui. Respond in 3 sentences.

Thyrosticta vieui is a moth in the subfamily Arctiinae. It was described by Paul Griveaud in 1964. It is found on Madagascar.


Question: What is the 2013-14 Philippine Basketball Association Philippine Cup tournament?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the 2013-14 Philippine Basketball Association Philippine Cup tournament?

The 2013–14 Philippine Basketball Association (PBA) Philippine Cup, also known as the 2013–14 PLDT Home DSL/myDSL-PBA Philippine Cup for sponsorship reasons, was the first conference of the 2013–14 PBA season. The tournament started on November 17, 2013 and ended on February 26, 2014. The tournament does not allow teams to hire foreign players or imports.
The following format was observed for the duration of the tournament:


Question: What new features are included in the second beta of Apple's upcoming iOS 12 for the iPhone X?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What new features are included in the second beta of Apple's upcoming iOS 12 for the iPhone X?

Apple this morning seeded the second beta of the upcoming iOS 12 update to developers for testing purposes, two weeks after seeding the first beta following the Worldwide Developers Conference.
The iOS 12 update brings major changes to the iOS operating system, with Apple working from top to bottom to make iPhones and iPads, especially older models, faster and more responsive.
On the iPhone X, there are new Animoji characters along with "Memoji" customizable, personalized Animoji that can be used both in Messages and in FaceTime. Messages and FaceTime have also gained fun new camera effects, and Group FaceTime support allows for calls with up to 32 people.
Siri is smarter in iOS 12 with a new Shortcuts feature that lets you create custom automations using first and third-party apps that can be activated with Siri, and Apple built a comprehensive set of time management and monitoring tools into iOS 12 with Screen Time.
New Do Not Disturb options make turning off notifications and distractions easier than ever, with a new Do Not Disturb at Bedtime feature cutting down on nighttime interruptions.
Group Notifications make notifications easier to view and manage, while a new Instant Tuning feature lets you tweak your notification settings on a notification-by-notification basis.
Apple News has a new Browse feature, the Stocks app has been redesigned, iBooks has been overhauled with a new look and a new name -- Apple Books -- and Voice Memos has been revamped with iCloud support and an iPad app. There's also a new Measure app.
ARKit 2.0 introduces new capabilities like shared experiences that let two people see the same AR environment on separate devices, and persistence, which allows AR experiences to be saved across multiple sessions.
Tons of other small tweaks and features have been added to iOS 12, so make sure to check out our roundup and our tidbits post for additional detail on what's new in iOS 12.
Early betas of new operating system updates always introduce tweaked features and new functionality, and everything new in iOS 12 beta 2 can be found in our dedicated what's new in iOS 12 beta 2 post.
iOS 12 is limited to developers at the current time, but Apple will provide a public beta later in June. iOS 12 will see an official release this fall alongside new iPhones.
Hopefully all of these "developers" are actually reporting this feedback instead of posting it all over forums.
It’s usually PB 1 = dev beta 2. And if I remember correctly, it’s usually 1 day behind the dev beta...So my guess is tomorrow.
IIRC, that is not how it goes with a totally new IOS. For example going from IOS 11 to IOS 12. I remember it being public beta was released around Dev 3 or 4.
They just fixed it in 11.4, and they went and broke it again?
Yes, its broken in a BETA....on a OS that wont be released for 3 months.....seriously calm down.
GPS bug not getting a lock - on the X has not been fixed.
Dat public beta... tomorrow maybe?!
And I won’t be jumping in on this beta either. Unless someone says it works on Pioneer head units.
Is anyone having a problem with iMessage? It looks like I cannot send any iMessages with my phone number only my iCloud Email.
Yep. Having this problem. It looks like it's deleted my phone number as an iMessages option from all of my devices.
Edit: Try restarting, that seems to have re-added my phone number.


Question: What is the Masaurhi Vidhan Sabha constituency? Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the Masaurhi Vidhan Sabha constituency? Respond in 3 sentences.

Masaurhi Vidhan Sabha constituency() is one of 243 legislative assembly of legislative assembly of Bihar. It is comes under Pataliputra (Lok Sabha constituency) along with other assembly constituencies viz Danapur, Maner, Phulwari, Paliganj and Bikram. It is reserved for scheduled castes.