Question: What candidates ran in the 1956 Queensland state election?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What candidates ran in the 1956 Queensland state election?

This is a list of candidates who stood for the 1956 Queensland state election. The election was held on 19 May 1956.
Sitting members at the time of the election are shown in bold text.


Question: What is Ulan Mały?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Ulan Mały?

Ulan Mały is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Ulan-Majorat, within Radzyń Podlaski County, Lublin Voivodeship, in eastern Poland.


Question: Explain how Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ statements about his contacts with Russia appear to be a pattern of backtracking and non-denials.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain how Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ statements about his contacts with Russia appear to be a pattern of backtracking and non-denials.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions's spokeswoman released a statement late Wednesday after The Washington Post reported Sessions had spoken twice with Russia's ambassador last year — contacts he failed to disclose in his confirmation hearings.
This is a remarkably misleading non-denial denial. Sessions, in the course of three sentences, manufactures a straw man, props him up and then knocks him down. He is denying a report that doesn't exist.
The fact is The Post never reported that Sessions and the Russian ambassador discussed “issues of the campaign.” The report was that he met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, period — apparently despite the Trump campaign's repeated denials of contact with Russian officials and despite Sessions's own apparent denials during his confirmation hearings.
It's a statement that suggests Sessions is on his heels and needs to obfuscate. But just how much trouble is he in?
Democrats quickly accused him of lying to Congress, which would constitute perjury given he was under oath. And some are calling for him to resign.
A parsing of Sessions's statements in his confirmation hearings suggests the most charitable conclusion is that he misunderstood the question he was being asked about contact with Russia and offered too broad a denial. The more apparent conclusion is that Sessions's denials are falling apart.
SESSIONS: Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.
But while the question was in the context of the campaign, it was not about whether the campaign was actually discussed or whether that was the purpose of the meeting. And Sessions's denial doesn't carve out any exceptions for talking about non-campaign matters with the Russian government. At the very least, you would expect Sessions, a lawyer, to be more careful with his words here. But he doesn't even use the non-denial denial like he did in his statement Wednesday night.
Sessions was also asked about contact with the Russians in a questionnaire from Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.).
This question is clearly and more directly about discussion of actual campaign matters. So Sessions's denial in this case is narrower — as his statement Wednesday night was.
But then the problem is the fact that Sessions apparently now doesn't remember what he spoke with the Russian ambassador about. “There’s just not strong recollection of what was said,” one Justice Department official told The Post. So in one case, you have a denial that the campaign was discussed, and now the line is apparently that he doesn't remember talking about specific things like the campaign. It's all very reminiscent of Michael Flynn's statements that he couldn't recall discussing sanctions with the Russian ambassador — even though he had.
Trump admin official on Sessions/Russian envoy: "superficial comments about election-related news, not substance of their discussion"
That's a lot of backtracking and non-denials in one night. And it's a sign of just how much trouble Sessions appears to be in. Whether he's ever in legal trouble over this is one thing; for now, he's got a major, major political problem, and so does the Trump administration.


Question: Explain the result of when the interplanetary magnetic field interacts with Earth's magnetic field.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the result of when the interplanetary magnetic field interacts with Earth's magnetic field.

Depending on how this ‘interplanetary magnetic field’ is aligned with Earth’s magnetic field when it arrives, there can be various results.
At the point where the two fields meet, Earth’s magnetic field points north. If the interplanetary field is pointing south, then ‘magnetic reconnection’ can occur, where magnetic field lines pointing in opposite directions spontaneously break and reconnect with other nearby field lines.
This opens the door to solar wind plasma entering the magnetosphere – Earth’s magnetic ‘bubble’.
The ultimate result can be colourful displays in the night sky known as the Northern or Southern Lights, produced when the particles are channelled along Earth’s magnetic field lines and strike atoms high in the atmosphere.
The interaction with oxygen atoms results in a green or, more rarely, red glow in the night sky, while nitrogen atoms yield blue and purple colours.
But when the interplanetary magnetic field points northward, auroras can occur at even higher latitudes. One type is known as a ‘theta aurora’ because seen from above it looks like the Greek letter theta – an oval with a line crossing through the centre.
While the genesis of the auroral oval emissions is reasonably well understood, the origin of the theta aurora was unclear until now.
A clue comes from the particles observed in the two ‘lobe’ regions of the magnetosphere. The plasma in the lobes is normally cold, but previous observations suggested that theta auroras are linked with unusually hot lobe plasma, though quite how was unclear.
“The possibilities have been debated since the first satellite observations of the phenomenon were made in the 1980s,” describes Robert Fear of the University of Southampton in the UK (formerly at the University of Leicester), and lead author of the paper reporting the results inSciencethis week.
“Previously it was unclear whether this hot plasma was a result of direct solar wind entry through the lobes of the magnetosphere, or if the plasma is somehow related to the plasma sheet on the night side of Earth.
The mystery was finally solved by studying data collected simultaneously by the Cluster and Image satellites on 15 September 2005. While the four Cluster satellites were located in the southern hemisphere magnetic lobe, Image had a wide-field view of the southern hemisphere aurora. As one Cluster satellite observed uncharacteristically energetic plasma in the lobe, Image saw the ‘arc’ of the theta aurora cross the magnetic footprint of Cluster.
“Direct observation of closed magnetic flux trapped in the high latitude magnetosphere” by R. Fear et al. is published inScience, 19 December 2014.
NASA’s Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration satellite was launched in 2000 and concluded operations at the end of 2005. The data presented in this report were collected by the satellite’s far-ultraviolet Wideband Imaging Camera.
Ten years flying in formation: The legendary Cluster quartet01 September 2010 Today marks the 10th anniversary of the start of formation flying for the four satellites of ESA's Cluster quartet, one of the most successful scientific missions ever launched.


Question: Who is Satoru Noda? Respond in 178 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Satoru Noda? Respond in 178 words.

, known by the pen name , is a Japanese manga artist. He is best known as the creator of the manga series "Golden Kamuy", for which he won the 2016 Manga Taishō and the Tezuka Osamu Cultural Prize.
Noda was born in Kitahiroshima, Hokkaido, Japan. After moving to Tokyo at the age of 23, he entered the manga industry as an artist assistant. Noda was an assistant to Mitsurou Kubo for two years, and later worked under . He made his debut as a manga artist in 2003, with the one-shot "Today, Kyoko's Misfortune" published in "Monthly Young Magazine". His second one-shot story, 2006's "The Goalie Only Looks in Front", won a in the Young Artist division. After working as an artist assistant for nearly a decade, Noda made his serialized manga debut in 2011 with "Supinamarada!", serialized in "Weekly Young Jump". After "Supinamarada!" was a commercial failure, Noda took a year before developing his next series, 2014's "Golden Kamuy". The series would become a widespread critical and commercial success, and won the Manga Taishō in 2016.


Question: Describe the history of The Baltimore City College. Respond in 9 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the history of The Baltimore City College. Respond in 9 sentences.

The history of The Baltimore City College began in March 1839, when the City Council of Baltimore, Maryland, United States, passed a resolution mandating the creation of a male high school with a focus on the study of English and classical literature. "The High School" (later becoming The Baltimore City College) was opened later in the same year on October 20, with 46 pupils under the direction of Professor Nathan C. Brooks,(1809-1898), a local noted classical educator and poet, who became the first principal of a new type of higher institution in the developing public education system in the city begun in 1829. It is now considered to be the third oldest public high school / secondary school in the nation. In 1850, the Baltimore City Council granted the school, then known as the "Central High School of Baltimore", the authority to present its graduates with certificates of completion. An effort to expand that academic power and allow the then named "Central High School of Baltimore" to confer Bachelor of Arts degrees began following the Civil War in 1865, and continued the following year with the renaming of the institution as "The Baltimore City College", which it still holds to this day, with also the retitling of its chief academic officer from "principal" to "president", along with an increase in the number of years of its course of study and the expansion of its courses. However, despite this early elevation effort, it ended at that brief period unsuccessfully in 1869, although the B.C.C. continued for a number of years as a hybrid public high school and early form of junior college (later known as community college) which did not fully appear in America in different form until the beginning of the 20th century. Very often the elaborate decorative fancy engraved graduation diploma from the B.C.C. in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was accepted by many other colleges and universities entitling City graduates to enter upper-division schools at the sophomore year, (which was also coincidentally a privilege also accorded to its later local academic and athletic rival for 127 years - "Poly", the Baltimore Polytechnic Institute, founded 1883 as the Baltimore Manual Training School, later renamed 1893).


Question: Describe your response to President Trump's comments about Sgt. La David Johnson.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe your response to President Trump's comments about Sgt. La David Johnson.

“Despite President Trump’s suggestion that I have recanted my statement or misstated what he said, I stand firmly by my original account of his conversation with Myeshia Johnson, the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson. Moreover, this account has been confirmed by family members who also witnessed Mr. Trump’s incredible lack of compassion and sensitivity.
“The Johnson family and the families of the three other soldiers who tragically lost their lives in the Niger ambush are experiencing what I am certain must feel like an unbearable loss. Rather than engage in a petty war of words with Mr. Trump, it is so much more important to embrace and support the families and honor these fallen heroes.
“This is personal for me, not political. Sgt. Johnson was a member of my community and of the 5000 Role Models of Excellence Project that I founded to help boys of color build successful futures. He was killed while on a mission to provide training and security assistance to West African armed forces battling vicious insurgents like Boko Haram, the group whose defeat I’ve been fighting for since it abducted nearly 300 Nigerian schoolgirls more than three years ago.


Question: Have you heard of the latest season of 'Younger'? What is it about?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of the latest season of 'Younger'? What is it about?

Younger Season 5 takes on the #MeToo movement.
The fizzy TV Land series is giving us one of the smartest storylines about our moment.
Hilary Duff and Sutton Foster in Younger.
TV Land’s Younger is a lighthearted comedy about a heavy truth. When fortysomething Liza Miller (played by Sutton Foster) tries to re-enter the workforce after a divorce and a stint at stay-at-home motherhood, she finds herself locked out of the publishing industry, where she had once been a rising star. With her only kid away at college, Liza gets a job as an assistant by passing as a woman young enough to be her daughter. The show offers plenty of frothy fantasies: a hot tattoo-artist boyfriend with a heart of gold, a hip designer wardrobe acquired on the cheap, an eye cream that can wipe 15 years off a woman’s face. But Younger is at its most moving and resonant when it balances its fizzy charms with earnest critiques.
That balancing act made Younger’s fourth season first-rate television (even if it was hardly recognized as such), and its fifth season—the current one—a worthy follow-up. It’s no surprise why. Season 4 began with Liza confessing her secret to her best work friend Kelsey (Hilary Duff) and movingly explored the emotional ramifications thereof. A betrayed Kelsey initially attempted to prevent Liza from receiving a promotion—an advancement that would have meant the two women working even more closely together. Kelsey relents when she sees Liza in mom mode after her daughter is stricken with appendicitis. Season 5 opens with another co-worker discovering Liza’s real age: her boss and love interest, Charles (Peter Hermann), the head of Empirical Press. But because this revelation comes not from Liza herself, but a celebrity author she had accused of a pattern of sexual harassment, the storyline ends up strumming some of the bluest notes in the show’s history: Our heroine’s got pluck, but the patriarchy will strike back.
The storyline ends up strumming some of the bluest notes in the show’s history: Our heroine’s got pluck, but the patriarchy will strike back.
Younger directly referenced the #MeToo movement in the Season 5 premiere, titled “#LizaToo.” Liza is asked if she knows of any sexual improprieties under the Empirical shingle. “Do you want to say something, Liza?” her caustic supervisor (Miriam Shor) asks. “Could destroy the company, but we’ll support you.” Eventually, Liza reports to a lawsuit-anxious Charles that one of Empirical’s authors—medieval-fantasy novelist Edward L. L. Moore, one of the show’s many caricatures of real-life literary figures—made lewd remarks to various women in the book world. (In the show’s jaunty universe, such relatively minor transgressions should be enough for a man to face consequences.) When Empirical temporarily shelves Edward’s next book, the author launches a deep-pocketed campaign to discredit his accusers. “This one has absolutely zero credibility,” Edward tells Charles, pointing to a snapshot of Liza and revealing her true age to her employer.
Liza doesn’t lose her job, but only because Charles is warned by his lawyer that firing an employee because she’s older than how she represents herself would be inadvisable (not to mention that they shared a kiss). But the fact that Liza’s problems-at-work storylines in Season 5 are set in motion by Edward’s attempt to tar her reputation matters. Liza is the victim of a vengeful attack by a famous and undeniably guilty man who endangers her career to rescue his own. And though Charles believes the allegations against Edward, the fallout from the novelist’s retaliatory efforts still has the potential to make Liza’s tasks near impossible. In the third episode, Charles brusquely rejects the book pitches of an author whom Liza brings in for a meeting. Believing that Charles will tank every writer she tries to develop because of his grudge against her, Liza tries to quit.
Edward or no Edward, Liza leads a charmed life: She expands the imprint she co-manages with Kelsey (while scoring a deal with bibliophile Reese Witherspoon’s production company, natch), and she and Charles will probably end up together in the long run, while her ex Josh, the tattoo artist, looks like he will endeavor to woo her back in the meantime. But Younger does the #MeToo movement a service by reminding us that there are often severe consequences for speaking up, even when the accused falls out of power. (Many men, of course, evade consequence altogether.) Liza has been made into a target, and she now carries on her shoulders the burden of knowing that her actions endangered Empirical’s already-shaky viability as a company. None of which is to imply, of course, that women shouldn’t speak up. But it’s worth acknowledging that progress is seldom achieved without the possibility of fierce and sometimes persistent blowback. Younger’s unique take on #MeToo adds a much-needed wrinkle to a moment we rightly celebrate, but whose darker sides we’re less keen to dwell on. Perhaps wrinkles aren’t so bad after all.


Question: Write an essay explaining whether or not Jerry could sue the newspaper and the writer for defamation based on the “The Outing” Seinfeld episode. Respond in 819 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Write an essay explaining whether or not Jerry could sue the newspaper and the writer for defamation based on the “The Outing” Seinfeld episode. Respond in 819 words.

After Sharon, an NYU journalism student, “outs” Jerry by saying that he and George are a couple, the bickering long time companions desperately try to demonstrate otherwise. Once the article is published, could Jerry sue the newspaper and the writer for defamation?
To begin with, truth is the ultimate defense against a claim of defamation. If Jerry and George were lifelong steam-room partners then Jerry would have absolutely no claim of defamation.
The first step in the analysis would be to determine if calling someone “gay” is defamatory.
In 1984, a New York court found that due to the “social opprobrium of homosexuality” and “[l]egal sanctions imposed upon homosexuals in areas ranging from immigration to military service…. the potential and probable harm of a false charge of homosexuality, in terms of social and economic impact, cannot be ignored.” Essentially, the court found that both the law and society discriminated against the LGBT community and, thus, mere association with that community could impact career prospects or social standing. The court concluded that, at least according to social standards, there was something wrong with being gay.
This changed just a few years ago, in 2012, when the New York courts found that society had evolved to the point that even though “lesbians, gays and bisexuals have historically faced discrimination and such prejudice has not been completely eradicated,” being gay no longer results in widespread legal, social, or economic marginalization. Finally, society agreed with Jerry; there is nothing wrong with being steeped in gayness.
The incident in question took place on February 11, 1993, just a couple years before the (unconstitutional) Defense of Marriage Act was signed into law and Bill Clinton ordered the military to issue a policy of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” regarding gays in the military, a point addressed by The Sailor that thanks Jerry midway through “The Outing.” It seems fair to think that the LGBT community in 1993 still faced serious societal discrimination. So, yes, according to the courts in the early 90’s there is something wrong with falsely calling someone gay.
Since Jerry is, in fact, a heterosexual, even though he wore culottes as a kid, it is likely that a court would find the newspaper article to be defamatory. But Sharon and the NYU newspaper could still offer a defense that they are protected under the Public Figure Doctrine.
Under the Public Figure Doctrine, which is an extension of the Public Official Doctrine, defamatory statements against anyone classified as a public figure are only actionable if the reporter acted with actual malice: either Sharon had to (1) know her article was false or (2) act with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity. This is a high standard for the plaintiff to show and is almost always a winning defense.
So is Jerry a public figure? The traditional definition is anyone who “invite[s] attention and comment” is considered to be a public figure. We know that Jerry is a professional comedian, has appeared on national TV, and is writing his own sitcom. He is also, in the words of the super Silvio, “all about, me, me, me. Please, look at me! I am so pretty! Love me! Want me!” It is true that Sharon, herself, has “never even seen [Jerry], has no idea who I am,” but the simple fact that she does not know who he is does not mean that the general public is unaware of Jerry. At the end of the day, he is “an entertainer and [he is] desperate for attention.” It is likely that a court would find Jerry has enough of a public profile to be recognized as a public figure.
Since Jerry is a public figure, he would then need to show that Sharon either knew Jerry was not gay or that she acted with reckless disregard to the truth of his sexuality, i.e. she did not do her research for the story.
Sharon has quite a bit of evidence to support her angle of the story. She overhears Elaine saying to Jerry and George that “just because you two are homosexuals, so what? I mean you should just come out of the closet and be openly gay already.” Jerry himself admits that “people think I’m gay,” because “I’m single, I’m thin and I’m neat.” Even after Jerry and George convince her that they are both heterosexuals, Sharon later overhears Jerry and George joking that the two of them “fooled her.” Much like George’s parents, it’s hard to know what’s going on.
Given the confusion over the situation, and Jerry’s own self admission that he is commonly thought to be gay, Sharon almost certainly did not act with actual malice when writing the story. While her article may not be 100% factual, it is not defamatory.
When it comes to public figures, people’s sexual preferences can often be everybody’s business… not that there’s anything wrong with that.


Question: Describe the dispute between Anish Kapoor and Stuart Semple.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the dispute between Anish Kapoor and Stuart Semple.

Artist Anish Kapoor has got his hands on the "world's pinkest pink", which he is legally forbidden from using.
British artist Stuart Semple created the fluorescent pink paint pigment earlier this year, in retaliation to "rotter" Kapoor buying the exclusive rights to the Vantablack pigment, said to be the blackest shade of black ever created.
The cerise pink shade is available to all artists except Kapoor, who is legally banned from purchasing it.
It is sold in 50-gram pots on Semple's website for no profit, with a price label of £3.99. But customers must confirm that the "paint will not make its way into that hands of Anish Kapoor".
They are obliged to agree to a legal declaration that states: "You are not Anish Kapoor, you are in no way affiliated to Anish Kapoor, you are not purchasing this item on behalf of Anish Kapoor or an associate of Anish Kapoor."
But despite the ban, the Indian-born British artist – the highest ranking figure on the Dezeen Artists Hot List – has got his hands on Semple's Pink shade – a reflective powdered pigment that repels light to effect a powerful fluorescence.
Kapoor posted a picture of his middle finger dipped in the paint to his dirty_corner Instagram account with the caption "Up yours #pink".
Upset by Kapoor's actions, Semple put out a call to find out how he stole the colour. He claims it was a "very shoddy inside job".
"I was really sad and disappointed that he felt so left out that he needed to orchestrate some conspiracy to steal our pink," he told Dezeen.
Semple also said he is determined that Kapoor should be punished for his actions, or at least apologise.
"We'll be dobbing him in, he will be told off and hopefully that will teach him to share his colours in future," said Semple. "It would be nice if he owned up, said sorry and gave me my Pink back."
Instagram commenters were also disappointed in Kapoor, describing his response as "petty". They have resurfaced #sharetheblack – a protest hashtag against Kapoor's monopoly of the black shade.
Not admitting defeat by Kapoor, Semple has also created the "world's most glittery glitter", "the "world's greenest green" and the "world's yellowest yellow" and is urging purchasers to "refrain from sharing any with him or his associates".
The paints are all completely sold out on Semple's Culture Hustle online shop.
Semple posted a video mocking Kapoor on his own Instagram page last night, which records himself writing "I will be good... I will share my colours" 100 times in white chalk on a blackboard.
Kapoor's Vantablack is currently the blackest substance known – so dark that it absorbs 99.96 per cent of light.
Made up of a series of microscopic vertical tubes, when light strikes the pigment it becomes trapped instead of bouncing off, and is continually deflected between the tubes.
It was developed by British company NanoSystems for military purposes and astronomy equipment, but the company allowed Kapoor to be the only artist able to use it.
The news sparked outrage among other artists, including English painter Christian Furr – who told the Mail on Sunday that he felt Kapoor was "monopolising the material".
"I've never heard of an artist monopolising a material. Using pure black in an artwork grounds it," he said. "All the best artists have had a thing for pure black – Turner, Manet, Goya. This black is like dynamite in the art world."
"We should be able to use it – it isn't right that it belongs to one man," he added.
Anish Kapoor was born in India in 1954, and came to Britain in the 1970s. His previous works include a series of womb-like orbs in the Paris' Grand Palais, and an inflatable mobile concert hall for earthquake-affected areas.


Question: What is the Trinectes genus?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the Trinectes genus?

Trinectes is a genus of American soles native to the Americas. Most species are coastal, occurring in both salt and brackish water, but several may enter fresh water and one, "T. hubbsbollinger", is restricted to rivers. They are fairly small, with the largest species only reaching in length.


Question: Pretend that you are writing a dialogue between two friends using social media.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Pretend that you are writing a dialogue between two friends using social media.

my twitter problems justin: i lost a follower for tweeting about face/off? but that movie is enjoyable! justin: nope. this tweet is a little too weird. *ctrl+a* *backspace* justin: i hope no one unfollows me for all these tweets in a row... eh, who cares! everyone must know how delicious this pizza is! justin: i want to tweet something! *five minutes later* justin: nevermind justin: i'm over 140 characters and i don't want to abbreviate a bunch of words just to make it fit. *sigh* -delete- cara: justin! get off your phone. stop checking twitter. justin: sorry. i can't help it.


Question: Share fitness tips for getting in shape with VR

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Share fitness tips for getting in shape with VR

You’ve tried everything to lose weight, stay in shape, or are so out of shape you need advice on where to get started in VR. No worries, we all have to start somewhere! To help you succeed in your VR fitness mission we’ve pulled fitness tips from readers who have been there.
Kevin lost 32 pounds by playing VR games like Soundboxing and Beat Saber. He credits playing for 30 minutes to an hour or up to even 100 minutes every day to stay fit. Competing against his best scores in games pushes him to stay motivated on his fitness goals.
Playing VR games like Onward, Echo Arena, Sparc, Space Pirate Trainer, and BOX VR helped Gabriel lose 30 pounds. He also takes walks daily, goes for runs around his neighborhood, and dances with friends to keep cardio entertaining. Check out his site Gluten Free VR!
Making a choice to get healthier is something Jonathan did to reclaim his health and wellbeing after living with PTSD. He’s lost 18 pounds with VR and live streams on Twitch at http://twitch.tv/bounty_v where he plays active VR games like Space Pirate Trainer and Echo Arena and focuses on promoting a positive gaming atmosphere.
Juan attempted jogging with an old knee injury to stay in shape but found it was a challenge for him. After getting a VR headset as a gift from his wife he turned his workouts around and lost 15 pounds. He plays games like BOX VR, Knockout League, and GORN to fire up his metabolism.
Jeroen writes posts on his Being Invisible Blog where he discusses mental health and the work it takes to accomplish life goals. He uses VR as a way to gather strength and motivation to tackle negative thoughts and is an inspiration to others. He plays empowering games like BOX VR, Robo Recall, and SUPERHOT VR to stay fit.
Karen is a Zumba instructor who was looking to switch up her full body workout routine after daily 60-minute workouts. She found VR and says that games like BOX VR, Sprint Vector, Racket: NX, Holodance, and Audioshield challenge her body the most. She plays VR as a low impact exercise that helps keep her muscles guessing.
Are there fitness tips that you’d like to share with our readers? Let us know about it in the comments!
Next articleThis Week’s VR Game Roundup – FPS, Archery & Some Wholesomeness!


Question: Respond in detail. Research and explain the potential risks of using software companies that are “looking over your shoulder,” tracking every keystroke and mouse movement.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in detail. Research and explain the potential risks of using software companies that are “looking over your shoulder,” tracking every keystroke and mouse movement.

Researchers say software companies are “looking over your shoulder," and watching every keystroke and mouse movement as you navigate certain websites.
FullStory is among a group of seven “session replay” companies examined by the Princeton researchers. Analytics software that measures mouse movements or keystrokes has been around for years, says Steven Englehardt, one of the authors of the study. But the technology has typically been used to track groups of users, such as the parts of a web page where visitors linger the longest. The researchers found that FullStory and the other companies are now tracking users individually, sometimes by name.
Other customers listed on FullStory’s website include Zocdoc, Shopify, CareerBuilder, SeatGeek, Wix.com, Digital Ocean, DonorsChoose.org, and more. Digital Ocean said in a tweet that it blocks FullStory from viewing any form fields, and anonymizes any data it makes available to FullStory. FullStory did not respond to a request for comment.
The replay companies offer tools to help clients redact sensitive information both manually and automatically, but the researchers found that that process was often inadequate. The study found that Walgreens performed “extensive use of manual redaction” but FullStory still gained access to some personal information.
To gather data, Englehardt said researchers signed up for accounts on Walgreens and other sites. At Walgreens, they added prescription and health information, recording all the network traffic. They later analyzed the network traffic to see if the information they entered appeared in the session recording.
The researchers examined the 50,000 most-visited websites, according to Alexa. They found 482 sites that were sharing information about individuals with one or more of the seven replay companies. Englehardt said the percentage of sites leaking information to the software companies was likely higher, because the software companies track only a sample of visits to a given website.
One of the software companies identified by the study is Yandex, Russia’s largest search engine. Englehardt said the researchers did not examine whether Yandex’s tracking might have been part of state-sponsored surveillance. But he said that Yandex was most often used on Russian websites.
Englehardt said he and his colleagues plan to release additional studies examining data-collection practices by software companies that track web users.
UPDATE, Nov. 17, 2:20 PM: This article has been updated to include Bonobos' statement that it suspended work with FullStory, and Digital Ocean's statement that it blocks FullStory from viewing any fields.


Question: What happened to the SAARC Documentation Centre?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What happened to the SAARC Documentation Centre?

SAARC Documentation Centre (SDC) is a regional centre of SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation). SDC is located in New Delhi. Presently it is housed on the campus of NISCAIR.
The 30-year-old South Asian grouping SAARC has closed down three of its regional centres in line with a decision taken at its 18th summit meeting at Khatmandu. The scrapped centres are the Saarc Information Centre in Kathmandu, Saarc Human Resource Development Centre in Islamabad, and Saarc Documentation Centre in New Delhi.


Question: Describe the Bay Area housing situation and the rent control battles.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the Bay Area housing situation and the rent control battles.

Hershfield, 25, a recent UC Santa Cruz graduate, approached homeowner Anita Grunwald while she walked her dog.
As housing prices rise and rents soar, the tenants’ rights movement has gained momentum in smaller cities across California. Even typically placid suburbs are now grappling with rent control battles that were fought decades ago in San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose.
In addition to Santa Cruz, housing advocates in Sacramento, Santa Rosa and many Southern California communities are seeking to limit rent increases and gain protections for renters from eviction. Others, like Pacifica, San Mateo and Burlingame, have seen rent control measures fail after battles between renters and landlords.
Growing financial pressure on tenants is driving a statewide push for a November referendum to lift California’s limits on rent control, a decades-old law backed by landlords and developers and known as Costa Hawkins. The law generally bans rent control on single family homes, condominiums, and units built after February 1, 1995. If the law is lifted, cities could put caps on far more properties.
Typically, local rent control measures allow landlords to annually raise rents with the cost of living index, capped at no more than 5 percent. Advocates also push for protections against evictions, limiting the reasons a landlord can remove a tenant.
But across the state, real estate brokers, property owners and others have financed successful campaigns against rent control. They say the answer to the housing crisis and rising rents is more development, not regulation.
Renter groups say the controls allow tenants — a growing population in many Bay Area suburbs — to have stable, predictable housing costs. The caps slow the rate of rent increases, but state law gives landlords the opportunity to raise prices back to market rates when tenants leave.
Samara said rising costs have many poor and working class families spending more than half of their income on housing. Median monthly rents for apartments in the Bay Area are among the highest in the country, with a typical two bedroom leasing for $2,270 in Oakland, $2,570 in San Jose and $3,060 in San Francisco, according to Apartment List.
A recent study of rent control in San Francisco by Stanford researchers found the local measures led owners to convert more units to condos or redevelop the properties, and reduced their amount of available apartments. Renters tended to stay in rent-controlled apartments longer, the study found, which allowed them to save between $2,300 and $6,600 per person annually from 1995 to 2012.
The reduced supply of apartments drove city-wide monthly prices up by about 7 percent, researchers found. They argued the program would have been more efficient if the city provided subsidies or tax credits to offset large rent increases.
Howard said property owners are willing to compromise with other provisions, such as granting relocation assistance and guaranteeing 12-month leases, but have not found a willing partner in the advocacy groups. “They had the mantra of rent control or bust,” he said.
Pacifica might offer a glimpse of what’s ahead for other suburban communities.
The quiet coastal community tucked between San Francisco and Half Moon Bay has seen its population grow and rents, like elsewhere in the Bay Area, soar. The median cost for apartments rose 51 percent between 2010 and 2015, a city survey found, far outstripping average wage increases.
A local mobile home park, Pacific Skies Estates, was purchased by out-of-state investors. The investors raised rents and renovated the property. Dozens of residents were evicted, sparking a community backlash.
A non-profit group, Fair Rents 4 Pacifica, formed and mustered enough support from the city council to get rent control placed on the November 2017 ballot.
National, state and local Realtor associations, as well as city property managers and landlords, spent about $450,000 to defeat the measure. The campaign included paid signature gatherers, signs and online marketing.
Renter rights advocates told police they were harassed by petitioners hired by landlord groups as the two sides campaigned in Pacifica shopping centers. “It was an extremely unpleasant experience,” said Suzanne Moore, a retired nurse helping lead the rent control campaign.
In March, San Mateo County prosecutors charged two contractors gathering signatures for the property owners groups with felony election fraud. Brad and Jentry Jasperson, of Utah, face 21 counts in San Mateo Superior Court of identity theft, signing fictitious or forged names to a petition, and perjury by declaration. Prosecutors allege the couple forged or made up 10 signatures of San Mateo County residents.
Howard said the CAA supported the investigation and expects lawful behavior from its campaigners.
Tenant advocacy groups say the hardball tactics have been mirrored in communities across the state.
Zav Hershfield expects the resistance to grow in Santa Cruz. Some members of the group are already wary of reprisals from their landlords.
Stephen Snyder, a long-time homeowner, had already studied the issue when Hershfield handed him a clipboard.
“Everybody should have a chance to live here,” Snyder said, scratching his name on the petition.
RENT CONTROL IN THE BAY AREA – MORE TO COME?


Question: Congratulations on winning the Chelsea Flower Show 2018! Respond in 9 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Congratulations on winning the Chelsea Flower Show 2018! Respond in 9 sentences.

The very last set of awards for this year's Chelsea Flower Show 2018 has been announced with the highly-anticipated People's Choice Awards.
Following the main awards by the judging panel, the public were given the chance to vote for their favourite gardens across three categories – Artisan Garden, Space to Grow, and the biggest one of them all, Show Garden.
Show Gardens are where you can discover beautiful and innovative gardens by world-leading designers and take home lots of inspirational ideas to try out in your own spaces.
*Read Mark's reaction to winning here.
This week Mark Gregory won a Gold medal for Welcome to Yorkshire in the Show Garden category, and his company Landform, who built the garden, also won the Best Construction Award.
Designed by Janine Crimmins / Built by Andrew Loudon / Sponsored by The Claims Guys.
Each Space to Grow Garden varies in style and planting from the next. All these urban spaces deliver a message through their design and horticulture.
Designed by David Neale / Built by Neale Richards Garden Design / Sponsored by Silent Pool Distillers.


Question: Who was Wilfred Van Norman Lucas?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who was Wilfred Van Norman Lucas?

Wilfred Van Norman Lucas (January 30, 1871 – December 13, 1940) was a Canadian American stage actor who found success in film as an actor, director, and screenwriter.


Question: Provide a brief description of Thornton Abbey. Respond in 1 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief description of Thornton Abbey. Respond in 1 sentences.

Thornton Abbey was a medieval abbey located close to the small North Lincolnshire village of Thornton Curtis, near Ulceby.


Question: Name one song recorded by Lisa Stansfield. Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Name one song recorded by Lisa Stansfield. Respond in 2 sentences.

"A Little More Love" is a song recorded by British singer Lisa Stansfield for her 1991 album, "Real Love". It was written by Stansfield, Ian Devaney and Andy Morris, and produced by Devaney and Morris.


Question: Explain what happened when an Italian towboat rescued more than 100 people in the Mediterranean and returned them to Libya.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain what happened when an Italian towboat rescued more than 100 people in the Mediterranean and returned them to Libya.

An operation in which an Italian towboat rescued more than 100 people in the Mediterranean and returned them to Libya may have been in breach of international law, the United Nations has said.
According to the Spanish charity Proactiva Open Arms, the Asso 28, an oil rig support vessel, rescued 108 people from international waters on Monday and took them to Libya, their country of departure.
If confirmed, this would constitute a breach of international law, under which migrants rescued in international waters cannot be returned to a place where their lives are put in danger. Both the United Nations and European Union have acknowledged that Libya is not safe.
The Proactiva Open Arms claim was supported by Nicola Fratoianni, an Italian politician with Free and Equal, a small leftwing party, who was onboard the Proactiva rescue ship.
Italy’s coastguard said Asso 28’s rescue activities had taken place in Libyan waters, not international waters, and were “carried out under the coordination of the Libyan coastguard, which managed the whole operation”. The Libyan coastguard was not immediately available for comment.
A Proactiva spokeswoman, Laura Lanuza, said its members learned the rescue occurred in international waters because their boat was nearby and they could listen to radio communications between the Italian ship and the Libyan authorities.
A spokesman for the UN migration agency told Reuters it could not establish the location of the rescue. He said the agency was still investigating the case but confirmed the return of the migrants to Libya.
The UN refugee agency said on Twitter the operation “could represent a violation of international law”.
Two weeks ago Italy assured Germany that it would continue to accept migrants rescued at sea until an EU-wide plan on redistributing people across the continent was established. The pledge came after high-profile moves by Matteo Salvini, the interior minister and leader of the far-right League, to block rescue ships from docking at Italian ports.
Almost 350 people were taken back to Libya, a major point of departure for those seeking to make it to Europe, overnight on 30 July, according to the International Organization for Migration.
Under a controversial pact between Italy and Libya, the latter’s coastguard has the authority to rescue people at sea and bring them back to the country.


Question: Describe the situation that led to Laquisha Jones being charged with attempted murder.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the situation that led to Laquisha Jones being charged with attempted murder.

LOS ANGELES -- A 30-year-old woman was charged with attempted murder Thursday for allegedly beating a 92-year-old man with a brick last week, CBS Los Angeles reports. The L.A. County District Attorney's Office says Laquisha Jones, of Los Angeles, has also been charged with elder abuse, infliction of injury.
Jones entered a not guilty plea at her arraignment Thursday. Prosecutors asked that bail be set at $1.125 million.
The felony complaint includes special allegations that the defendant personally used a deadly and dangerous weapon, the brick, during the beating and that she badly injured the victim, identified as Rodolfo Rodriguez. He was visiting the U.S. from his native Mexico.
The charging document alleges that Jones was previously convicted of making criminal threats, in 2017. Jones was on probation from that case, CBS L.A. says.
Prosecutors said Jones attacked the elderly man with a brick on the evening of July 4.
Afterward, Rodriguez was taken to the hospital for medical treatment and Jones fled the scene, according to authorities.
Investigators identified Jones as the alleged assailant, and arrested her July 10.
If convicted as charged, she faces a maximum of 29 years in state prison.
He told his family he was walking down the street when he bumped into a little girl as he tried to walk around her.
The suspect, believed to be the girl's mother, allegedly threw Rodriguez to the ground and starting hitting him with her fists, then the brick.
A witness said she heard the suspect tell the victim to "Go back to your country."
The witness told CBS L.A. she took her phone out and got a photo of the woman, who appears to be holding a piece of concrete as her child stands nearby. Rodriguez isn't seen in the photo.
Rodriguez's grandson, Eric Mendoza, told CBS Los Angeles, "I'm just overwhelmed how anybody can do this to a human being at all. He's 92 years of age. There's no harm that he meant for you to treat him the way you did."
"Mr. Rodriguez is slowly recovering from this senseless and brutal assault," family attorney Luis Carillo said. "His family is appreciative of the community's outpouring of support and concern about his condition. The family has been inundated with media requests and is asking for a brief reprieve as they try to get back to a sense of normalcy. As soon as Mr. Rodriguez and his relatives are ready to share their story, we will make them available to the media."
A GoFundMe page has been set up for the Rodriguez. A $15,000 goal was quickly reached. The total at last check was more than $316,000.


Question: "Do Mormons really spend three hours at church?" Respond in 240 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 "Do Mormons really spend three hours at church?" Respond in 240 words.

Socializing and eating after like 3 hours of church? PLEASE AND THANK YOU.
All my BYU, BYU-I, and BYU-H people know what I'm talking about.
"When [Bishop or Brother ______] asked me to give a talk on [topic]..." UGHHHHH.
Story time. ALL THE TIME.
The silence of Sacrament meeting.
Okay, maybe not like everyone. But YES like everyone because texting, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and...Gospel Library for scriptures, hymns, etc. of course.
Once again, because missions and marriage.
With David Archuleta (every Mormon girl's future husband) being one of the MANY, MANY, MANY Spanish-speaking RMs in the world.
Two like very important acronyms in Mormon dating culture.
15. Checking out all of da hotties in the "Ward Menu"
Because potential awkwardness and avoiding an ex like the plague every Sunday and at every church activity.
With the occasional BYU-H or LDSBC student thrown in for fun.
Because they do exist in YSA wards and Sunday is THEIR DAY TO SHINE.
Apples to Apples ALL DAY ERR DAY.
Or is #blessed to be able to do BOTH at the same time.
"So what's up with _______ and _______? Are they like together now?"
Because if you don't, then WHO ARE YOU???
But then after that first 10 minutes...TESTIMONIES FOR DAYSSS.
Things get REAL in the Cultural Hall.
And feeding them from time to time too.
Have you done your home teaching/visiting teaching this month?
Saturday morning is going to be ROUGH.


Question: Explain how the #MeToo movement has impacted the perception of sexual violence in the evangelical church.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain how the #MeToo movement has impacted the perception of sexual violence in the evangelical church.

The campaign comes after the #ChurchToo hashtag, where women shared experiences of sexual violence in the church community on social media after the #MeToo movement exploded this fall. A number of Evangelical women have spoken out over the past year about how their community often shies away from political or negative topics.
But that seems to be changing in the age of President Donald Trump, who has been accused by nearly 20 women of sexual misconduct, and Roy Moore, who recently lost his Alabama Senate race after he was accused of preying on teenage girls but still won 80% of white evangelical voters.
While these women believe their churches should be places of safety, research released this year shows that clergy often lack the knowledge to address violence in their communities. Christian research firm LifeWay Research surveyed Protestant pastors about how they respond to domestic violence, and nearly half of pastors (47%) said they did not know if anyone in their church had been a victim of domestic violence. Most pastors (87%) said they believe a person experiencing domestic violence would find their church to be a “safe haven” but only half of pastors (52%) said they had a plan to help victims of domestic abuse.


Question: What's happening in Syria? Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What's happening in Syria? Respond in detail.

Syrian state media says two missiles came down near the Damascus airport while Israeli military declines to comment.
Two Israeli missiles struck targets near Damascus airport early on Tuesday, Syrian state media said.
The Syrian state news agency, Sana, said "two Israeli missiles came down near Damascus international airport".
Syrian opposition sources told DPA news agency that the midnight attack targeted an Iranian cargo plane, which was landing at Damascus International Airport.
When contacted by AFP news agency, a spokesman for the Israeli army said: "We do not comment on foreign reports."
Its military has carried out attacks on Iranian and Iran-affiliated targets in Syria since April of this year.
In May, Israel hit dozens of military sites in Syria after accusing Iran of launching rocket and missile attacks towards its forces in occupied Golan Heights.
Iran has vowed retaliation for one alleged Israeli attack on April 30 that reportedly killed a number of Iranian personnel.
Iran and their Hezbollah-backed movement have been fighting alongside Syrian government forces since the conflict started in 2011.
Israeli seized a large swathe of the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War and later annexed it, in a move never recognised by the international community.


Question: What year was Gaius Furnius consul? Respond in 12 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What year was Gaius Furnius consul? Respond in 12 words.

Gaius Furnius was consul in 17 BC, during the reign of Augustus.


Question: Have you heard of any Serbian weapons being used in Syria recently?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have you heard of any Serbian weapons being used in Syria recently?

In recent days, opposition groups within Syria have been documented in possession of Serbian-made arms and munitions. M62P8 120 mm high explosive (HE) mortar projectiles and an M02 Coyote 12.7 x 108 mm heavy machine gun have been identified. Whilst a number of weapons manufactured in the former Yugoslavia have been documented in Syria, these two items of Serbian origin have only recently been sighted.
A video posted to YouTube on 12 February 2016 by the group Jabhat Ansar al-Din shows the emplacement, loading, and firing of a 120 mm mortar near Quneitra, in southwest Syria. Cyrillic inscriptions visible on the mortar projectiles and packaging indicate that the rounds being fired are M62P3 120 mm high explosive (HE) projectiles, produced in the Former Yugoslavia (at Soko Vit d.o.o. , in what is now Bosnia and Herzegovina). These are still produced by Pretis d.d. in BiH, and are exported from former Yugoslav states. The M62P3 projectile has a maximum range of some 6050 metres, and delivers a 2.25 kg charge of TNT.
On 16 February 2016, images posted to a Syrian rebel fighter’s Facebook account show a Serbian M02 Coyote 12.7 x 108 mm heavy machine gun. The Coyote is a copy of the Soviet NSV and is produced by Zastava Arms, in Kragujevac. It is differentially identified from the NSV by a number of cosmetic differences, most notably the distinctive stock, pistol grip, and tripod. The rivet pattern is substantially the same as the NSV. The M02 is manufactured and offered for export in two versions, one chambered for 12.7 x 108 mm (as seen here) and another in .50 Browning (12.7 x 99 mm).
H/t to @bm21_grad, who spotted the Coyote machine gun.


Question: Please provide information about the Brisbane City Council's Draft Transport Plan for Brisbane - Strategic Directions.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Please provide information about the Brisbane City Council's Draft Transport Plan for Brisbane - Strategic Directions.

Thank you for providing your valuable feedback on Brisbane City Council’s Draft Transport Plan for Brisbane – Strategic Directions.
The consultation period for the draft transport plan has now closed.
Visit the Council website to download a copy of the transport plan, implementation plan or consultation report.
Consultation on the draft Transport Plan for Brisbane - Strategic Directions was open until 30 March 2018.
Why is Council preparing a new Transport Plan?
What does the new transport plan aim to do?


Question: Respond briefly. provide a description of the 1922 British silent comedy film "The Skipper's Wooing"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. provide a description of the 1922 British silent comedy film "The Skipper's Wooing"

The Skipper's Wooing is a 1922 British silent comedy film directed by Manning Haynes and starring Gordon Hopkirk, Cynthia Murtagh and Johnny Butt.


Question: Explain in detail the scientific process behind the functioning of human vision.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain in detail the scientific process behind the functioning of human vision.

There's more to seeing than meets the eye. Quite a lot more actually. What meets the eye is light waves. Their impact on the retina triggers impulses that travel a pathway along the optic nerve through the thalamus to the back of the brain, where they register on the primary visual cortex. From there, via myriad connections, neuron to neuron, visual impulses reach out to other parts of the brain, and we get an instantaneous mental image of a colorful, three-dimensional world. How does it happen?
The human brain, say scientists who study it, may be the most complex structure in the universe. A convoluted mass of tissue made of a 100 billion interconnected neurons spawns a mental world -- all the processes we call thought, consciousness, creativity, emotion, memory and vision.
Probably the most studied of these is vision, and contrary to long accepted views that brain structure is genetically determined, research since the mid-70s has shown that seeing is a learning process. When a kitten sees only horizontal lines for the first few months of its life, for example, it loses the ability to see vertical lines. These and other experiments suggest that the interconnections between neurons aren't fixed at birth, but evolve depending on visual experience.
"Experiments have shown that much of the structure thought to be innate or hard-wired actually develops during the early days or weeks of life," says Risto Miikkulainen, a computer scientist at the University of Texas, "and even in the adult these structures can reorganize." Using the CRAY T3D at Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Miikkulainen and Ph.D. candidate Joseph Sirosh have developed the first computational model to comprehensively mimic this "self-organizing" process.
"We couldn't have done this 10 years ago," says Sirosh, "because the technological capability to simulate these large neural networks didn't exist. You need to model at the scale of tens of thousands of neurons, hundreds of millions of connections. Machines like the T3D are absolutely crucial to this work."
Using oriented light spots as input, LISSOM modeled how orientation preference and neuron-to-neuron connection patterns develop in the cortex. The color of each neuron in the network (192 x 192 neurons), from red to magenta to blue to green, corresponds to its orientation preference from zero to 180 degrees. The small white dots show lateral connections of the neuron marked with a big white dot.
Initially (left) the orientation preferences were random and lateral connections covered almost the entire map. After a series of several thousand inputs, the neurons organize (right) into orientation columns, and lateral connections link areas of similar orientation preference. These patterns agree in key features with maps obtained by experimental imaging.
Researchers: Risto Miikkulainen & Joseph Sirosh, University of Texas.
Keywords: Vision, sight, eyes, brain, primary visual cortex, visual field, retina, optic nerve, neurons, orientation columns, neuron groupings, orientation preference, self-organization, Hebbian learning, Hebbian algorithm, lateral connections, receptors, neural modeling, cognitive science.
Projects in Scientific Computing, PSC's annual research report.


Question: Can you tell me about Jimmy Nichols? Respond in 78 words.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you tell me about Jimmy Nichols? Respond in 78 words.

James D. "Jimmy" Nichols (March 1928 – February 27, 2003) was an American Thoroughbred horse racing jockey and a widely respected horseman who, after retiring from race-riding, played a key role in the two U.S. Triple Crown race wins of Risen Star.
Known as "Jimmy", and nicknamed "Cowboy," he competed in rodeo bull riding, worked as a stable groom, and then went on to become a successful jockey in Quarter Horse racing before turning to Thoroughbred flat racing.


Question: What is a Masand? Respond in 3 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is a Masand? Respond in 3 sentences.

A Masand was a representative and tithe collector in Sikhism. He was an officially appointed missionary minister representing the Sikh Guru, who baptized conversions to Sikhism, and collected "dasvandh" ("the tenth" of income) as an offering to the Sikh community and religious establishment. A "Masand" forwarded the collected amount to the Sikh Guru.


Question: Respond in 4 sentences. What do you know about Hugh Eames Park?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 4 sentences. What do you know about Hugh Eames Park?

Sir Hugh Eames Park (24 April 1910 – January 2001) was a British judge of the High Court, Queen's Bench Division. In 1976, he was the judge in the trial that convicted Stefan Kiszko of the murder of Lesley Molseed. The case has been called one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of the British legal profession.
Hugh Park was born in Pinhoe, Devon, near Exeter and educated at Blundell's School and Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, where he excelled at hockey, rugby and rowing.


Question: Can Jukebox the Ghost recordings be uploaded to the Live Music Archive?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can Jukebox the Ghost recordings be uploaded to the Live Music Archive?

Jukebox the Ghost has consented to allow recordings to be uploaded to the Live Music Archive. The email exchange I had with Seth Kallen, their manager, is given below.
Yea that would be great! Would love to set up a section for them there.