Question: What is the latest news on the trade war between Alberta and British Columbia?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the latest news on the trade war between Alberta and British Columbia?

Alberta and British Columbia have struck an armistice in their pipeline fight, but neither is backing down from their positions.
The Alberta government said it will resume imports of B.C. wine, ending a short-lived policy designed to punish British Columbia for its attempt to block Kinder Morgan's $7.4-billion Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.
Alberta Premier Rachel Notley announced the change Thursday afternoon, shortly after B.C. Premier John Horgan said his government will ask the courts if it has the authority to limit the expansion of oil transportation. Mr. Horgan's announcement was viewed by Alberta as an indirect tactic intended to cool the trade war.
Ms. Notley said she's satisfied that British Columbia is "stepping back from the brink" of the dispute that has consumed both governments this month. She said she would suspend her province's retaliatory measures – most notably a ban on B.C. wine imports enacted two weeks ago.
"We will be buying wine again," Ms. Notley said. "In a small way today, B.C. blinked."
Trans Mountain spokeswoman Ali Hounsell also said the company "is pleased that the province of B.C. is no longer proposing regulatory restrictions be placed on the expansion of diluted bitumen shipments."
Both provinces maintain they are not backing down from positions that started the interprovincial trade war. Mr. Horgan on Thursday said his government will separate the most contentious part of the province's recent environmental plan – a proposal that the province cap the volume of bitumen flowing through the pipeline – from other tenets. Mr. Horgan said a precise question to be referred to the courts will be drafted by lawyers in the coming weeks.
"This is intended to have cooler heads prevail. We believe that the rule of law is important in this country," Mr. Horgan said.
While the move sets aside the point for legal deliberation, it's unclear whether it will go far in resolving the longer-term Trans Mountain pipeline war of words between British Columbia on one side, and Alberta and the federal government on the other.
The B.C. Premier said the legal reference will seek to reinforce B.C.'s constitutional rights to defend against the risks of a bitumen spill – and that his government asked Ottawa to also participate but was rebuffed. A senior federal source said on Thursday said that answer was because there's nothing to adjudicate as the jurisdiction for the pipeline is clearly Ottawa's.
Ms. Notley, however, noted Alberta is prepared to revive its retaliatory measures and continues to research further options to punish British Columbia in case Mr. Horgan's actions are not to her satisfaction.
In January, the B.C. government announced plans to develop additional measures to protect the province's environment from a heavy oil spill.
At that time, it said it would consult with B.C. residents on issues such as spill response times and response plans, but most controversially, that it would propose a discussion on regulatory restrictions on any increase in the transport of diluted bitumen.
Although British Columbia never spelled out how it intended to restrict the flow of oil, the announcement was interpreted as an effort to smother the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, which is already struggling with delays. The B.C. NDP government has vowed to use "every tool in the toolbox" to try to stop the pipeline expansion, arguing it poses a risk to the province's marine environment.
The move enraged the Alberta government, which saw the proposed policy as a direct attack on the building of the Trans Mountain expansion and designed to sow uncertainty about whether the project would be allowed to proceed. Ms. Notley said B.C. is outside of its jurisdiction by proposing to control oil flow through an interprovincial pipeline, and launched a ban on B.C. wine in retaliation.
Mr. Horgan, in turn, viewed that as "disproportionate and unlawful."
He said his government will retain expert legal counsel on what it believes is its right to take appropriate measures to protect from the drastic consequences of a diluted bitumen spill. And he said the outcome of that reference will also be used to inform any next steps by his province.
"I believe that the federal government and the government of Alberta do not understand the depth of feeling that the transport of diluted bitumen has in British Columbia."
With files from Justine Hunter in Victoria and Carrie Tait in Calgary.
A trade war threatens the ties that bind Alberta and B.C.


Question: Describe the situation regarding North Korea's missile tests.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the situation regarding North Korea's missile tests.

South Korea's prime minister, Lee Nak-yon, suggested that Kim Jong Un, the North's leader, could order a launch on Saturday, the 64th anniversary of the totalitarian regime's founding.
When it tested its second ICBM last month, however, it launched the missile in a way much more consistent with an actual attack, lower and farther so it flew over Japan.
This type of "normal" trajectory could take a missile close to the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam. There was no suggestion that Guam was the target for Saturday's speculated launch, but North Korea has threatened to test-fire missiles toward the island before, and such a move would be seen as a serious escalation.
Most experts agree the Kim government isn't likely to attempt an unprovoked attack. Rather, North Korea says it wants a nuclear weapon capable of hitting the U.S. as a deterrent against attack.
On Thursday, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson responded to a shouted question about a U.S. response to North Korea's nuclear weapons testing, saying, "There will be one."
On Thursday, China, which is North Korea's main trading partner, said it agreed that the United Nations Security Council should take further actions against its neighbor while continuing to push for more dialogue, according to Reuters.
North Korea has said in public statements that it wants an official end to the Korean War. The conflict was halted by a 1953 armistice, but no peace treaty has been signed. It also wants nothing short of full normalization of relations with the U.S. and to be treated with respect and as an equal in the global arena.
Many South Koreans who live in Soseong-ri, the small melon-farming community where the system is being deployed, are also angry.
Residents there have been disrupted by the military trucks, buses and helicopters that have been traveling through the area, according to The Associated Press.
On Thursday, some 8,000 riot police officers gathered there to remove around 300 protesters who created a blockade near the former golf course where the system is being deployed.


Question: What is "Spynorsk Mordliste"? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is "Spynorsk Mordliste"? Respond briefly.

Spynorsk mordliste (, literally "Spew (Vomit) Norwegian Murder List") is a derogatory term meant to disparage Nynorsk, one of the two official standards of written Norwegian. It is a pun on "Nynorsk ordliste", the title of the "New Norwegian Word List", a Nynorsk dictionary.


Question: What's the story behind "Kitty From Kansas City"? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What's the story behind "Kitty From Kansas City"? Respond briefly.

Kitty from Kansas City is a 1931 animated short film which is presented by Max Fleischer and was originally released by Paramount Pictures. The film, with features Betty Boop as she attempts to comically get to Rudy Valley, features a sing-along of the song "Kitty From Kansas City", a song that Vallee released on vinyl via the Victor record label.


Question: Respond in 465 words. Describe the scene of Ted Cruz visiting the Winter Jam concert.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 465 words. Describe the scene of Ted Cruz visiting the Winter Jam concert.

Ted Cruz leads a prayer with 14,000 cheering evangelicals in S.C.
GREENVILLE, S.C. -- Many of the Republican presidential candidates descended Friday on Greenville ahead of Saturday's CBS debate.
But only one was savvy enough to get himself enlisted as the opening act of a throbbing, trembling Christian rock concert that packed 14,000 evangelicals into a downtown arena on Friday night.
So here came Ted Cruz, striding onto the catwalk of a stage, beaming under the spotlight, leading the crowd in prayer, asking them to unite behind him in next Saturday's primary election, and jumping up like a basketball player high-fiving fans as he walked into the locker rooms in the bowels of the arena.
“Welcome to Winter Jam -- and to God be the glory," the Texas senator said.
Winter Jam is a touring, four-hour show featuring born-again Christian rock and rap artists. It performed at Greenville's Bon Secours Wellness Arena on Friday night.
For any Republican politician, this was a captive and prized audience. Evangelical Christians are an especially influential voting block in South Carolina, especially in the Greenville area, known as the Upcountry.
Cruz gave about six minutes of remarks and prayer at the start of the concert. He thanked the crowd "for standing unapologetically with Jesus, for confessing your faith with love."
Cruz talked about religious liberty being "under assault," but said that across the country "people are waking up."
Cruz did not attack any rivals, nor did he make an overt political pitch. But he cast himself as a champion of social conservative principles, from opposing abortion to advocating for traditional marriage and gun rights. And he implored the audience to unite in the primary.
“The state of SC has a long and glorious tradition of picking presidents," Cruz said. He added, "I thank each of you for the diligence with which you are assessing the candidates...If we the people stand together as one, defending our liberties, defending our values, defending who we are, we will turn this country around."
Cruz then bowed his head in prayer. He read, by memory, from Second Chronicles, 7:14, which he often cites in his stump speeches. Then he said, "Father God, we are coming to you on our knees in prayer, standing on your promises to hear those prayers, to forgive our sins and to heal this land. We claim that healing for the United States of America.
"We thank you for your bounty, for your love, for your forgiveness," he continued, "and we thank you for the precious blood of Jesus. Amen."
Update: Cruz did not have the Winter Jam stage to himself. A couple hours after Cruz appeared, Dr. Ben Carson visited the concert and gave brief remarks to the large and enthusiastic audience, weaving together themes of faith and patriotism.


Question: Describe an atlatl set.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe an atlatl set.

Atlatl Handle with a primitive feel. Newly designed handle with an antler spur with sinew wrapping. Sets include 3 darts and a handle. Choose from Oak and Walnut. Select from 5 foot, 6 foot, and 7 Foot Shafts. Atlatl Madness produces high quality, competitive prices and great Shipping rates.


Question: Is there any way I can tell if my child is color blind?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Is there any way I can tell if my child is color blind?

Colour blind children may not like to colour in pictures or want to play counting or sorting games with coloured blocks or beads.
If you think your child might be colour blind don’t waste any time in finding out if they are. You should immediately be suspicious if there are any colour blind men on the mother’s side of the family – these could be uncles, great uncles, cousins and grandfathers. By age 5 children with normal colour vision will be able to identify all of the groups of colours in a couple of seconds, but a colour blind child may also appear to be able to do this.
To give yourself a basic indication of whether there might be a problem with your child’s colour vision, get a sheet of white paper and a set of colouring pencils – at least 12 different colours but including green, red, brown, orange, blue, purple and grey. Use mid range shades, not too pale or too dark– and shade an area of about 2cm by 2cm of each colour onto the paper. Make sure that the colours are in a random order and you don’t have all the reds or greens together, but do place red, green and brown adjacent to each other.
Take the paper and your child to an area with good natural light (but not bright light, artificial light or strong sunlight) and make a game up which involves asking your child to identify all of the colours on the sheet. Do not show them each colour individually, they must be able to see all of the colours at the same time.
If your child shows signs that they are not sure whether a colour is red, green, brown, purple, blue or grey, there is a reasonable chance that they are red/green colour blind. You should expect a red/green colour blind child to be able to identify bright orange, yellow and pink (they can identify these colours by brightness and shade). Make sure you include these colours so that they do not get the impression that they are too stupid for the game.
Praise your child for identifying colours correctly and make sure that they know that there are no right and wrong answers. Also ensure that there are no other people around, especially siblings. If you are suspicious that your child might be colour blind, whatever you do, DO NOT follow up this exercise by questioning them about colours of items around the house. If you do this they may clam up and will certainly start to feel lacking in self-worth.


Question: Please provide a brief biography of Tyler Ewing.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Please provide a brief biography of Tyler Ewing.

Tyler Ewing (born September 14, 1984) is an American television composer. He is best known for his work with Guiding Light, As the World Turns, The Oprah Winfrey Show, and The Nate Berkus Show. In 2007 he composed the Fight Song for his Alma Mater, Belmont University.


Question: Respond in 4 sentences. "Where can I learn about the Baha'i Faith?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 4 sentences. "Where can I learn about the Baha'i Faith?"

Starting places for studying the Baha'i Faith: introductory books, articles, and magazines.
This is a sample of introductory materials on the Bahá'í Faith. See also many more here.
For official websites, try bahai.org or bahai.com.


Question: Describe President Donald Trump's style of leadership. Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe President Donald Trump's style of leadership. Respond in detail.

Kim. Putin. Duterte. Trump has praised them all.
President Donald Trump reliably tells the truth on one thing: He likes the way dictators do business.
Some less nice words: Poisoned. Blown apart by anti-aircraft guns. Sent to work camps.
Vladimir Putin’s also a tough guy whom Trump praises for running his country well. So is Rodrigo Duterte, whose executions of drug dealers without trial in the Philippines is something Trump has said he’s looking into.
He’s spent the three years — to the day — since riding down that escalator in Trump Tower demanding loyalty, fantasizing about torture, dividing the country into “followers” and enemies.
This is perhaps the most important aspect of Trump’s approach: Make it seem normal. Old guardrails become distant memories. Is this time that he declared himself above the law such a big deal, or is it old news already, since he also said it last week or last month or last year?
He stocks his staff with supplicants and family members, then pits them against one another to watch them fight for his favor in a nonstop West Wing soap opera. His lawyer says, echoing Trump himself, that he could murder people and no one would be able to do anything about it unless they impeached him first.
Political enemies should be investigated and jailed, Trump says. He’ll pardon whom he wants to, whomever gets his attention by running to a Fox News set. He blames it on a justice system he undercuts. He says the Department of Justice inspector general’s report “blew it,” but also that it “totally exonerates me,” with the same logic that has him attacking NFL players for kneeling during the anthem but also saying he would pardon Muhammad Ali for refusing to be drafted on his own beliefs (although Ali’s conviction was already overturned by the Supreme Court, so he doesn’t need a pardon).
If you’re offended, Trump and his aides say, if you disagree, if you want an explanation, you’re either an idiot or not a patriot. Free speech, by the White House’s definition last week, doesn’t cover protesting police. Trump’s press secretary and secretary of state both personally attacked reporters this week for asking for details on what the administration was doing, and in the course of it, said a number of things that were completely and clearly not true.
Accept whatever Trump says, Trump says, because he says that’s the only way to stay alive. That’s how he answered a reporter Friday who asked him how he could have so many nice things to say about the same man responsible for the death of Otto Warmbier, whom he spoke so passionately about last year.
“I don’t want to see a nuclear weapon destroy you and your family,” he said.
Meanwhile federal contractors are holding migrant kids in former Wal-Marts, where the walls are decorated with murals of presidents — including Trump.
But Trump understands the dynamics of power and the media better than perhaps anyone who’s ever lived. He sees what people say he can’t do — and sees what they don’t do to stop him when he does it.
When Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the courts during the Great Depression and Richard Nixon tried to bend the Justice Department to stop the Watergate investigation, they were eventually stopped by their own parties. Trump, however, seems to have cowed the Republican Party into shrugging off whatever he does.
When Pew Research last year polled the statement, “A system in which a strong leader can make decisions without interference from parliament or the courts would be a good way to govern our country,” a third of Republicans and 17 percent of Democrats agreed. When the Economist and YouGov asked, “Do you favor giving the government power to shut down ‘biased or inaccurate’ media outlets?” 45 percent of Republicans said yes and 18 percent of Democrats agreed.
Now, Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort is headed to jail not for the crimes he’s charged with — at least not yet — but for flagrantly tampering with witnesses. So far, 18 people have been indicted, and five have pleaded guilty in the Mueller probe.
If Trump pardons them all (as Rudy Giuliani was already teasing on Friday afternoon that the president might, and as his pardons so far seem aimed at telegraphing), no one will be surprised. If he fires Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein and closes down Mueller completely, everyone will have seen it coming.
It’ll be like that Cabinet meeting when he nodded along as the vice president and 15 accomplished adults prostrated themselves before him, and for a few hours, everyone obsessed at how strange and suspect a spectacle the whole thing was. Or when both sides were to blame in Charlottesville.


Question: Respond in 2 sentences. "What is the Bangor Public Library?"

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 2 sentences. "What is the Bangor Public Library?"

The Bangor Public Library is the public library of Bangor, Maine. It shares the URSUS online cataloging system with the University of Maine and other Maine libraries.


Question: What is the history of Melville Highlands? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the history of Melville Highlands? Respond briefly.

The Melville Highlands () are an ice-covered upland rising to about and forming the central part of Laurie Island between Pirie Peninsula and the south coast, in the South Orkney Islands off Antarctica. The name derives from James Weddell's map of 1825 whereon the name "Melville Island" appears for the already named Laurie Island; it was given for Robert Dundas, 2nd Viscount Melville, who was First Lord of the Admiralty, 1812–27 and 1828–30, including the period of Antarctic exploration by Weddell. To preserve the name in this area it was applied to these highlands by the UK Antarctic Place-Names Committee in 1987.


Question: Respond briefly. Who was Johanna Anderson?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond briefly. Who was Johanna Anderson?

Johanna Anderson (October 2, 1856 — December 1, 1904) was a missionary in Burma, the first missionary sent abroad from the Swedish Baptist Church in America.


Question: Provide a brief history of the discovery of Pluto.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Provide a brief history of the discovery of Pluto.

The existence of an unknown ninth planet was first proposed by Percival Lowell, who theorized that wobbles in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune were caused by the gravitational pull of an unknown planetary body. Lowell calculated the approximate location of the hypothesized ninth planet and searched for more than a decade without success. However, in 1929, using the calculations of Lowell and W.H. Pickering as a guide, the search for Pluto was resumed at the Lowell Observatory in Arizona. On February 18, 1930, Tombaugh discovered the tiny, distant planet by use of a new astronomic technique of photographic plates combined with a blink microscope. His finding was confirmed by several other astronomers, and on March 13, 1930–the anniversary of Lowell’s birth and of William Hershel’s discovery of Uranus–the discovery of Pluto was publicly announced.


Question: Have there been more pedestrian accidents in Toronto lately? Respond in detail.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have there been more pedestrian accidents in Toronto lately? Respond in detail.

Hours after 10 pedestrians were struck on Toronto’s streets on Thursday morning, the pedestrian accident rate had soared as eight more were struck by the evening.
Const. Clint Stibbe, spokesperson for Traffic Services of the Toronto Police Service, was unable to say whether 18 is the number for the most pedestrians struck in a day, but it was well above expectations.
“Almost three times higher,” said Stibbe.
One of the pedestrians was a 63-year-old woman, who died in hospital after she was struck in Leaside.
Another, a 15-year-old boy, remains in hospital with life-threatening injuries.
Collisions involving pedestrians spike between mid-September and mid-December, Stibbe said. The incidence dies down when the holidays start and people go on vacation.
“November will be the worst month,” says Stibbe.
Kim McKinnon, a spokesperson for the city’s paramedics, said they tend to see an increase in pedestrians being struck in the fall, when days start to get shorter.
“Obviously, there is something about (the day), the weather and the status of the roads and people rushing that is causing these accidents,” she said.
In September, Toronto police said that 542 pedestrians and 541 cyclists had been hit by cars since June 1. The total of 1,083 collisions means about 9.5 crashes occur every day, or one every 2.5 hours. This has increased since last year, when 999 pedestrians and cyclists were hit during the same period.
Pedestrian fatalities have increased by 34 per cent since 2005, according to the City of Toronto. One pedestrian is killed or seriously injured in Toronto every two days. Pedestrian fatalities account for about 50 per cent of total yearly traffic fatalities in the city, and 35 pedestrians have been killed in 2016 so far, Toronto Police said in a statement released Friday afternoon.
Road deaths in Toronto are increasing in general, peaking at 65 in 2015, which is an 11-year high. Stibbe says that if two more people are killed in traffic accidents this year, the number will be the most traffic-related fatalities since 2004.
In an effort to bring the incidents down, City Hall is starting up a Road Safety Plan, which will begin in January and will run until 2021.
The plan will involve creating pedestrian safety corridors in places where serious collisions frequently occur. It also proposes lowering speed limits in 54 locations, many of them on downtown arteries such as Yonge St., Bay St., Bathurst St., Queen St., Dundas St. and Bloor St.
In 28 locations, the speeds will be reduced from 50 km/h to 40 km/h, and in 24 others the limit will go from 60 km/h to 50 km/h. In two locations outside of the downtown core, limits will fall from 70 km/h to 60 km/h in an effort to increase the likelihood of pedestrians surviving a collision, the rate of survival decreasing as speed limits increase.
The Road Safety Plan aims to lower pedestrian deaths by 20 per cent over 10 years, but many are arguing that this goal is not good enough.
According to Dylan Reid, the co-founder of Walk Toronto, a 20-per-cent decrease in pedestrian deaths from 2015 would leave the number at 31, which is still higher than the 18 pedestrian deaths in 2011.
Other countries have had success with road safety crackdowns; Sweden created a road safety plan in 1997 and reduced traffic fatalities by 66 per cent between 1990 and 2011. The plan, called Vision Zero, has become national law there.


Question: Describe how white supremacists use a sense of victimhood for recruitment.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe how white supremacists use a sense of victimhood for recruitment.

A sociologist explores how racists paint themselves as the innocent ones.
“I would so love to see these people get all the oppression they insist they receive, just for a year. Just to see,” he wrote.
It may seem puzzling that the racism of these white men—the most powerful group of people in the world—is motivated by a sense that they’ll be wiped away somehow. But according to research on white supremacists, a sense of victimhood is exactly what groups like these use to grow their cause.
In a 2000 article, the sociologist Mitch Berbrier examined dozens of white supremacist media appearances and publications and discovered a pattern of carefully crafted victim ideology. Victimhood, it seemed, is how the groups assured themselves they weren’t being racist—the excuse being that, hey, they’re suffering too.
This is reflected in the obsession with Norse culture and mythology among some of today’s white supremacists. Since this paper was published, at least six domestic terror plots were conducted by so-called “Odinists”—racist adherents of an ancient religion, as Reveal News reported. The rituals of the Odinists—using Germanic phrases and drinking mead from horns—seem like attempts to recapture a bygone time in an all-white land.
Berbrier points to examples of supremacist literature that claim the inability to express white pride produces a feeling of being “crushed” and the “Nordic spirit” being “broken down.” One news item in the NAAWP News pointed to a high suicide rate among white men as a sign of this supposed despair. Consequences—even imaginary ones—are essential to painting yourself as a victim, according to the sociological theory of "the dramatization of injury and innocence.” In other words, you’re just a blameless bystander; your attackers are everywhere, and they wish you harm.
(5) that the end product of all of this is the elimination of "the white race."
These claims of subjugation may seem silly coming from whites, a group that still earns more, lives longer, and feels overall happier than African Americans do. But as Berbrier shows, victimhood is a powerful psychological mechanism for recruiting members, galvanizing around a cause, and forming what is essentially a support group—for people who really don’t need support.


Question: Respond in 4 sentences. Describe the St. John's Lacrosse Case.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 4 sentences. Describe the St. John's Lacrosse Case.

The St. John's lacrosse case was a 1990 criminal case in which some members of the St. John's University men's lacrosse team were accused of raping an African American female. The St. John's Lacrosse rape case was a sports scandal that caused significant controversy within the school, amongst feminists, New York City, and the lacrosse community. This case was a predecessor to the Duke lacrosse case. The case was the basis of a "Law & Order" episode called "Out of Control".


Question: What is Murakami Station? Respond briefly.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is Murakami Station? Respond briefly.

is a railway station in the city of Murakami, Niigata, Japan, operated by East Japan Railway Company (JR East).


Question: What is the Loggetta?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the Loggetta?

The Loggetta is a small, richly decorated building at the base of the bell tower in Saint Mark’s Square, Venice, Italy. Built by Jacopo Sansovino between 1538 and 1546, it served at various times as a gathering place for nobles and for meetings of the procurators of Saint Mark, the Venetian officials responsible principally for the administration of the treasury of Saint Mark’s Basilica and for the public buildings around Saint Mark’s Square.


Question: Describe a situation where Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback Blake Bortles beat the blitz.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe a situation where Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback Blake Bortles beat the blitz.

Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback Blake Bortles has faced many blitzes in his young career, and after being sacked a league-high 55 times, he has put in work to improve his ability to climb the pocket and escape pressure schemes. Brian Filipiak looks at one such example of Bortles beating the blitz.
Every defensive game plan makes finding ways to generate pressure on an opposing quarterback a primary objective. Defenses must take heed, however, as quarterbacks with the ability to use their legs to extend plays can demoralize an undisciplined defense with impromptu scrambles and passes from beyond the pocket. Pressure schemes, blitzes and pass rush principles that fail to account for the skill set of the opposition are doomed from ready, set, hut.
The blitz design as well as the individual failures to maintain rush lanes leave a glaring hole in the A gaps. Defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh (#93) – shaded over the inside shoulder of the right tackle – is not only unable to gain penetration but also gets ridden out of his rush lane and never counters the momentum of the block. Similarly, defensive tackle Earl Mitchell (#90) – aligned as a 3 technique between the left guard and left tackle – is forced wide and has his shoulders turned by the block of LG Zane Beadles. Neither defender stays square to their target, which prevents them from tracking the movement of the QB in the pocket. Both defenders deviate greatly from their original pass rush landmarks.
This leaves linebacker Jelani Jenkins (#53) in an extremely tough spot with a split-second decision to make. Playing a read/rush key, Jenkins’s first responsibility is the running back. If the RB releases into a route, Jenkins will follow in coverage. But if the RB remains in pass protection, as he does, Jenkins has the option to rush the passer. The linebacker – who also has an alternate option to stay home and mirror the passer’s movements in the pocket – elects to shoot for the larger of the two rush lanes. However, the elusive quarterback ducks behind the block of center Stefen Wisniewski and hightails it out of trouble. Playing man coverage with a single high safety behind the blitz, the Dolphins have little run support from their secondary, leaving plenty of green for Bortles.
After extending the drive with his legs, the QB caps off the possession five plays later with a touchdown pass. Blitzers beware: Bortles, – and other QBs with movement skills – will find ways to exploit poor pass rush principles and pressure schemes that lack rush lane integrity.


Question: Describe the recommendations of the largest-ever public consultation on immigration.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the recommendations of the largest-ever public consultation on immigration.

Urgent action is needed to restore public trust on immigration, according to a new report from the largest-ever public consultation on immigration.
Yet researchers also found a strong contrast between polarised online and media debates and the balanced views on immigration expressed by those they spoke to. While people do want the UK Government to have more control over who can come to the UK, most of them are ‘balancers’ who recognise the benefits of migration to Britain, both economically and culturally, but also voice concerns about pressures on public services and housing.
The National Conversation held over 130 meetings with citizens and stakeholders in 60 locations across every nation and region of the UK, as well as carrying out ICM polling and an open online survey.
In total, 19,951 people took part.
The public, it finds, wants the ability to hold the government to account for delivering on immigration policy promises, as well as more transparency and democratic engagement on the issue.
The new report makes over 40 recommendations to national and local government, business and civil society.
It calls for an annual ‘Migration Day’ in Parliament, where ministers are held accountable for their performance against a three-year immigration strategy that replaces the net migration target.
The Government should start rebuilding trust on immigration by engaging with the public through an official National Conversation on Immigration, run by the Migration Advisory Committee.
Every member of the 60 National Conversation citizens’ panels was asked what changes the Government would need to make in order to secure public trust on immigration. The most common responses were greater transparency, more democratic engagement and openness, greater accountability and a commitment that politicians would follow through policy promises.
People also wanted more control over numbers and greater selectivity over who is admitted to the UK; more competent immigration enforcement; better ways to deal with the local impacts of immigration; and greater efforts to improve integration, including support to help migrants speak English.


Question: Describe the surge of Haitian immigrants into Canada from the U.S.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the surge of Haitian immigrants into Canada from the U.S.

Haitians Flow Into Canada From The U.S. Amid Renewed Deportation Fears Half of the 14,000 people who crossed into Canada without authorization in the first nine months of 2017 were from Haiti. The end of protected status in the U.S. for Haitians is driving a new surge.
A family from Haiti approach a tent in Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle, Quebec, stationed by Royal Canadian Mounted Police, as they haul their luggage down Roxham Road in Champlain, N.Y., last August.
Since last May, thousands of Haitian immigrants have been steadily pouring into Canada, mostly on foot at the Quebec border, in an attempt to flee aggressive anti-immigration policies by the Trump administration.
More than 18,000 people filed asylum claims in Canada last year, with up to 250 people per day entering the country at one point last summer. Since then those numbers have dwindled, but the Trump administration's decision to rescind temporary protected status for nearly 60,000 Haitians in November has prompted a new surge of asylum seekers in Canada.
Many immigrants were encouraged to come to Canada after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau posted a tweet welcoming refugees in response to President Trump's first travel ban last January, says Marjorie Villefranche, head of Maison d'Haiti, a community center and advocacy organization in Montreal.
"I think they took that message as a welcome message," she tells Here & Now's Robin Young. "When you arrive in Canada you have to go through an immigration process anyway, so they knew that it wouldn't be that easy. But I think they are taking a chance because they think probably the mood in Canada is probably better than in the United States."
The flow of Haitian migrants into Canada was sparked last summer when the U.S. began considering an end to the temporary residency program for Haitians that has been in effect since the 2010 earthquake. Now that TPS has been terminated, Haitians have until mid-2019 to leave the U.S. Others are entering Canada after traveling through the U.S. from South America, Villefranche says.
Mona Hassennia, a director of the nonprofit organization International Social Service, told NPR in an interview last year that 80 percent of her clients have walked over the U.S.-Canada border.
"I think the biggest reason that they're coming is the safety issue. They don't feel that there is safety in the United States," she says.
Along with Trudeau's open embrace of refugees, many people are also crossing the border because of a legal paradox known as the U.S.-Canada Safe Third Country Agreement. That deal states that if a person applies for refugee status by legally crossing into Canada, they will be deported because the U.S. is considered safe for refugees. But if a person enters illegally, the treaty doesn't apply and they can remain in Canada while their claim for refugee status is decided.
Migrants Choose Arrest In Canada Over Staying In The U.S.
More than 14,000 people entered Canada outside legal border points in the first nine months of 2017, according to the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. Nearly half of those migrants were from Haiti.
Villefranche says refugee claimants are permitted to work and receive health care while they wait for their case to be decided, which is a process that can take years. About 10 percent of the 298 Haitian border crossers whose applications were processed last year were granted refugee status, according to Reuters. Almost 6,000 Haitians are still waiting for their claims to be processed in Canada.
Many Canadians are calling for an end to the Safe Third Country Agreement, and the government is working to clarify the immigration process. After the U.S. rescinded TPS for nearly 200,000 Salvadorans last week, the Canadian government urged them not to come unless they qualify for refugee status.
"Canada has a robust and structured immigration system that must be respected," Canadian politician Pablo Rodriguez told La Presse newspaper in a French-language interview. "Before leaving your job, pulling your child from school and selling your house to come to Canada, make sure you understand the rules and the laws. Because if you don't fill these criteria, chances are you'll be returned, not to the U.S. but to your native country."
Many people continue to enter Canada illegally because they know they will not be sent back to the U.S. while their asylum case is considered.
"This is a chance. People know that they are taking that chance but better taking that kind of chance instead of being thrown back in Haiti," Villefranche says. "I think this is the calculation that they are making."


Question: Hey, what can you tell me about the nuraphone? Respond in 31 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, what can you tell me about the nuraphone? Respond in 31 sentences.

Don't miss out for Christmas – pick up from a SoundStudio today!
Order from Amazon to receive in time for Christmas.
Thanks for joining us. Your personalised sound is just a click away — and shipping is on us, too.
Join us at SoundStudio™ for an opportunity to try and buy the nuraphone and discover Music in Full Colour™. Available in Melbourne and Sydney.
The Nura sale is now on.
If you asked us to make you the perfect headphones we would start by measuring your hearing. That's because we all hear differently, and this difference is far greater than you realise.
Learns your hearing in 60 seconds without even the press of a button.
Creates your unique hearing profile.
Adapts the sound system to match your hearing system.
Automatically learns and adapts to your unique hearing, bringing you closer to the music you love.
Patented architecture that combines in-ear and over-ear headphones. In-ear buds deliver clearest melodies, while over-ear cups deliver bass you can feel.
Pass external audio into the nuraphone for conversations, awareness and calls.
Experience uniquely quiet listening, with the combination of dual-layer passive noise isolation and active noise cancellation.
Choose your Immersion by adjusting the dedicated bass drivers.
Depth of sound that you can feel.
Gives the right fit every time.
We don’t just hear music - we feel music. The nuraphone delivers bass you can feel, while maintaining crystal clear detail. It works by splitting the melodic sounds to an in-ear speaker, and the bass sounds to an over-ear tactile driver that delivers the sound through your skin.
For the first time you can adjust your level of immersion. Stand at the back of the room, or in the front row.
Create your hearing profile using the nura iOS or Android app.
Download the nura companion iOS or Android app.
Once created, your profile is stored on the nuraphone.
Up to three unique profiles can be stored at the same time.
Visit our support section and we'll be happy to assist.
We are so confident that you're going to love the nuraphone that we're offering a 30-day satisfaction guarantee.


Question: Explain the life of Nicola Gentile and his involvement in the American and Sicilian mafia.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Explain the life of Nicola Gentile and his involvement in the American and Sicilian mafia.

Nicola Gentile (; June 12, 1885 – November 6, 1966), also known as Nick Gentile, was a Sicilian mafioso and an organized crime figure in New York City during the 1920s and 1930s. He was also known for publishing his memoirs which, violating the mafiosi code known as "omerta", revealed many details of the Sicilian and American underworld. Gentile was born in Siculiana, a small village on the south coast of Sicily in the province of Agrigento. He immigrated to the United States arriving in New York at age 18, in 1903. Gentile fled the country in 1937 while out on $15,000 bail after an arrest for heroin trafficking and returned to Sicily to become a boss in the Sicilian Cosa Nostra. In the US, he was known as "Nick" and in Sicily as "Zu Cola" (Uncle Cola).
After Nick Gentile arrived in the United States from Sicily in 1903, he quickly associated with the Black Hand during the early 20th century, Gentile would become a leader in America's early mafia and would later serve as a confidant for New York mobsters throughout the early part of the 20th century up until the Castellammarese War and the subsequent formation of New York's Five Families under Charles "Lucky" Luciano in 1931. Gentile traveled the country as a troubleshooter and negotiator, known as the "messaggero" or "substituto", relaying messages between crime families and mediating disputes and became part of New York Mafia Family led by Vincent Mangano and Joe Biondo, which later became known as the Gambino Family.


Question: Describe the impact of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)'s "DICE" database and the activities of the Special Operations Division (SOD).

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Describe the impact of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)'s "DICE" database and the activities of the Special Operations Division (SOD).

From a constitutional rights perspective, the latest revelation about the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is even more troubling than what’s been reported on National Security Agency (NSA) activities, according to legal experts.
That database, known as DICE, contains roughly a billion records and is accessed by about 10,000 law enforcement agents across the nation. SOD’s wiretap data usually comes from foreign governments, U.S. intelligence agencies or court-authorized domestic telephone surveillance.
But the disturbing part is the DEA requires police who receive the agency’s help to cover up the fact that they were given the tips—and not even tell defense lawyers, prosecutors and judges that their investigations began with the DEA.
Also, Reuters obtained DEA documents showing that federal agents are trained to “recreate” the investigative trail in order to conceal the agency’s involvement in the arrests.
This tactic keeps a defendant from knowing how an investigation began, which opens the door to problems like entrapment and biased witnesses.
“I have never heard of anything like this at all,” Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law School professor who served as a federal judge from 1994 to 2011, told Reuters.
Gertner and other legal experts said the DEA program seems more disturbing than recent disclosures about the NSA collecting domestic phone records.
When asked about SOD, two senior DEA officials defended the program, claiming the agency’s efforts to “recreate” investigations were both legal and performed almost daily. A former DEA agent, Finn Selander, compared the DEA’s work to money laundering –“you work it backwards to make it clean,” he told Reuters.
This cover-up element is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice, which oversees the DEA.
Reuters’ investigation determined that SOD was created in 1994 for the purpose of combating Latin American drug cartels. Its original staff of several dozen employees has grown over the years to several hundred, and it now has the participation of two dozen partner agencies, including the NSA, CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, and IRS. Its work is classified and its exact location in Virginia is a closely held secret.


Question: Can you provide an update on the Zuma mission?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Can you provide an update on the Zuma mission?

SpaceX plans to launch the secret Zuma payload for the U.S. government this evening (Jan. 7), after a nearly two-month delay.
Zuma is a U.S. government spacecraft headed to low-Earth orbit. But that's pretty much all that outside observers know about it; everyone involved with the mission has remained pretty tight-lipped.
"Team at the Cape completed additional propellant-loading tests today," SpaceX representatives wrote on Twitter Thursday (Jan. 4). "Extreme weather slowed operations, but Falcon 9 and the Zuma spacecraft are healthy and go for launch — now targeting Jan. 7 from Pad 40 in Florida."


Question: Hey, have you heard about the new Star Wars movies?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, have you heard about the new Star Wars movies?

Do You Know What's Still "Canon" in the Star Wars Universe?
It's been a little unclear about the state of the "Expanded Universe" now that the Disney Star Wars machine is running at full steam. Can a corporation really wipe away decades of stories? Did fan favorites like Mara Jade, Kyle Katarn, and "Not Dead Boba Fett" just go away? YouTuber Mr. Sunday Movies breaks it down.


Question: What is the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government? Respond in 5 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government? Respond in 5 sentences.

U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government is one of twelve subcommittees of the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations. It was renamed from the Subcommittee on District of Columbia in 2007 in order to align the operations of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. The United States Senate Committee on Appropriations has joint jurisdiction with the United States House Committee on Appropriations over all appropriations bills in the United States Congress. Each committee has 12 matching subcommittees, each of which is tasked with working on one of the twelve annual regular appropriations bills. This subcommittee has jurisdiction over the budget for the United States Department of the Treasury and General Government (includes United States federal courts, the Executive Office of the President of the United States, and Washington, D.C. appropriations).


Question: Who is Ana María Crespo de las Casas? Respond in 2 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Who is Ana María Crespo de las Casas? Respond in 2 sentences.

Ana María Crespo de las Casas (born 30 March 1948, Santa Cruz de Tenerife) is a Spanish lichenologist noted for studying the phytosociology, taxonomy and floristics of Mediterranean lichens. She was awarded the 2012 Acharius Medal from the International Association for Lichenology for lifetime achievements in lichenology, and the genera "Cresponea" and "Cresporaphis" were named in her honor.


Question: Have there been any other players in the NRL whose play has cost their team a comp?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Have there been any other players in the NRL whose play has cost their team a comp?

Is Vunivalu the next Folau or the next evolution of the modern winger?
Recently, a second-year winger achieved a remarkable feat, breaking a record that had stood since 1950 and been equalled three times but never broken.
That record was for the most tries scored in a player’s first two seasons of first grade which was 38, set by Ron Roberts for St George in 1949-1950.
That player is the Melbourne Storm’s Suliasi Vunivalu.
And whilst this is an impressive enough feat in and of itself, this writer also hears Vunivalu regularly referred to as the next Israel Folau. High praise indeed.
So who is he? Is he the next Israel Folau? Or is he the next stage in the evolution of the modern winger, a position that has really become more and more important over the past decade.
Israel Folau may not be on the above list, but he didn’t miss by much, scoring an impressive 36 tries in his first two seasons as a seventeen and eighteen-year-old. He drew massive headlines, not just for his age, but also for his size, strength and leaping ability and it is this last part that is the source of the comparisons between the two players.
Suliasi Vunivalu was an older twenty years of age on debut, but with less rugby league experience behind him having been recruited from the other game and progressed speedily through the Storm’s lower grades.
And so, both had a meteoric rise to first grade and a massive impact, but the comparison probably ends there.
Folau made a move into the centres in mid-2007 and stayed there for the rest of his career. He also scored in 29 of his 52 matches for the Storm, tending to get a try here and there as opposed to getting them in big clumps with only five doubles and a hat-trick to his name.
Vunivalu, on the other hand, has scored in 22 of his 40 matches with eleven doubles, two hat-tricks and a club record equalling four try haul versus Manly last year. He has also stayed on the wing the whole time.
The following table compares Israel Folau’s career at the Melbourne Storm to Suliasi Vunivalu’s.
Suliasi Vunivalu is listed on the Melbourne Storm website as being 192cm and 99kg although he may well be a touch bigger even.
Sources say he is almost as quick as Josh Addo-Carr.
He rarely, if ever, drops a high ball.
He can leap over the top of opponents.
Opposing teams direct their kicking games away from him towards either Billy Slater or Josh Addo-Carr, such can be the damaging nature of his kick returns.
And he can finish off a try as well as anyone in the league.
The winger in the modern game has to be able to do so many things, defuse bombs, start the team’s sets off with strong carries, provide support runs on demand and most importantly, they must be able to finish off a try.
Suliasi Vunivalu can do all of this and more.
For so long, finishing off a backline movement was all that was really asked of wingers. No longer. Now they are these amazing athletes, the headline acts in our game who can contort themselves into bizarre shapes to keep their bodies aloft whilst floating over the touch line so that their arms can score the tries.
The last few seasons have seen highlight reels that are dominated by these superhuman acts in the pursuit of scoring tries.
We see players who are now prepared to dive from five metres out and elevate their bodies so that all that is left in the field of play by the time they ground the ball is the hand holding the ball and a bit of the forearm.
We even see footage of lower grades and schoolboy games where kids are mimicking these feats such as the video of the schoolboy winger who literally flipped over an opponent to score.
There is no simple answer to the question of who Vunivalu is. But I believe there is one.
Vunivalu might remind us of Folau with his ability to jump, but he is so much more than just the next Israel Folau, he is a part of the evolution of the game.
I’m sure I’m not the only one who is enjoying the evolution of the modern winger.
100% right about that – Chambers not knowing how to pass cost Melbourne a comp (just as well it wasn’t a ref’s error). He’s not Robinson Crusoe though. Kata and Aitken are right up there with him.


Question: Hey, do you know any ska songs that I can send to my friend Sverre to make him a believer?

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Hey, do you know any ska songs that I can send to my friend Sverre to make him a believer?

Why doesn't Sverre like ska?
My friend Sverre says he doesn't like ska. I want to help him see the light!
I got some help from the good people of I voted 4 Kang (Featuring members of I voted 4 Kodos) and The Long Johns to give him his very own tunes!
Your browser does not support the audio element! Sorry. You can still download the tune though!
Precious metals by The Long Johns is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at http://skaforsverre.com.


Question: Please provide a review of an event attended.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Please provide a review of an event attended.

“Cool” can be an overused word. Every day we apply and reply to inquiries by implementing this widely accepted slang term. However, if one were to stop and think, when does that descriptor actually pertain? Our guess is much less than one would think. Nonetheless, we know this, when Fantastic Negrito and his band-mates are in the same room as you — in that moment — you are in the actual presence of cool. Coming around in support of his latest LP, Please Don’t Be Dead, Xavier Dphrepaulezz & company strutted their way to Atlanta’s legendary music locale The Masquerade on a mission to educate his A-town faithful with a lesson on musical coolness.
Overall, the tunes are tight and the general vibe is groovy-contagious. Negrito is not only a virtuoso on that six-string Epiphone Masterbilt Zenith, but additionally carries a ton of energy and is light on his feet. Truth be told, this Grammy-winning maestro deserves to perform on the biggest stages across the country — he is that good. If this dude is rolling into your town, do yourself a huge favor and go check it out. You can thank us later. Cheers!
Prev Vans Warped Tour: Seven Bands To Watch!


Question: What is going on in Istanbul? Respond in 61 sentences.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 What is going on in Istanbul? Respond in 61 sentences.

Tens of thousands were on the march in Istanbul tonight. Perhaps hundreds of thousands. They came onto the streets all of a sudden, in a spontaneous outpouring of anger when they heard the police had moved in to Gezi Park. They came unarmed and peaceful, offering nothing but their voices and their presence. And the police answered them with violence, with tear gas and batons, with rubber bullets and charges.
This was Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s application for the presidency of his country, gassing his people in the streets. We saw a child being carried unconscious from the fumes. We saw a middle-aged woman in a headcarf–the sort of good Turkish mother who is expected to vote for Mr Erdogan, standing and chanting against him just as the first sound grenades went off, and the clouds of tear gas started to roll over her head.
This, then, is Mr Erdogan’s idea of a modern democracy. You can either agree with him or you can choke in the streets.
It began in the early evening. It had been a quiet day in Gezi Park. The protestors were divided: some of them wanted to dimsantle most of the camp and keep only a token presence, after Mr Erdogan agreed to stay the bulldozers until a court decision; others insisted they should stay. They were having meetings all afternoon to decide, quietly listening to each other.
The first warning was Mr Erdogan’s speech, or rather rant, in Sincan near Ankara, when he accused the protestors of defiling mosques and attacking women in headscarves, and refused to back down.
It was the speech of a madman. The drama was over, Taksim and Gezi Park were quiet, many of the protestors were talking of going home.
Then came the news Mr Erdogan had irdered them out of the park immediately. Then the news the police were moving in. We were at a party with friends, a typical relaxed Istanbul evening. Immedately half the guests said they were going toTaksim. Others demurred, saying it might be dangerous. It would: but many felt there are times when you have to face the danger. We joined them.
Out in the streets, Istanbul was on the march. Thousands were doing the same as us, abandoing parties and dinner plans. Above our heads, people were banging pots and pans from their windows in rage at the news from Taksim.
Friends called to say the same was happening all over the city. People were coming from the other side of the square and forming a great mass there as well. People were calling in to say there was tear gas in streets that have never seen it before, in the well-to-do neighborhoods far north of Taksim. There were huge crowds at the bridge over the Bosphorous, crossing from the Asian side of the city.
And all around us the crowd was growing. Those who had been on Istiklal for a night out found themselves outnumbered by protestors. Bewildered tourists blinked, unsure what they had found themselves in the middle of. The crowd stretched so far back down the street you couldn’t see the end of it.
And it remained peaceful. There was no violence from the protestors, not where we were standing. But that didn’t stop the police. The first we saw of it was a group helping friends who had been hit by tear gas back through the crowd. Then there was some one carrying an unconscious kid. Then there was a loud bang.
People began to panic and stampede. Others shouted to keep calm, not to run. Behind us we could see the cloud of tear gas rolling. The police must have fired it at dangerously close quarters. Already many Turks have lost their eyes to tear gas cynlinders fired at point blank range, and one man has had his brains blown out.
We made our way into the side streets, the crowd remarkably calm after the initial panic. We saw tourists, confused, heading the wr0ng way, back to the tear gas. We started trying to make our way home thrigh the back streets. But it became a nasty game of cat and mouse, everyone unsure where the police were lurking.
The police, for their part, seemed uninterested in who they attacked. They just wanted to spray gas and break heads, You would turn a corner, only to find yourself choking, tears streaming down your face. At one point we turned into a street only to hear shouts of “Run!” and looked back to see police charging at us, with unidentified thugs by their sides.
And the news kept coming in. The police had teargassed the lobby of a five-star hotel where visiting German MPs were staying. In Taksim, people were lying down in front of the police water cannon trucks.
What the hell, you had to wonder, does Erdogan think he’s doing? Everything was calm, the tensions of previous days had been defused, the protestors were ready to talk. His only answer was violence. Now it has become a contest of will between him and the protestors. But it’s hard to escape the suspicion he is leading his country towards disaster.


Question: Respond in 4 sentences. Explain the purpose and content of the image shown.

The user asks a question, and the Assistant answers it. The assistant provides the user with the answer that strictly follows the following guidelines. The answer should be enclosed within <answer> </answer> tags, respectively, i.e., <answer> ANSWER HERE </answer>.
Your answer should follow these rubric criterias:
Factual Accuracy: The answer must be factually correct and does not contradict the reference answer.
Relevance and Completeness: The answer should directly address the specific question, covering all essential aspects.
Clarity and Organization: The answer should be well-structured, coherent, and easy to follow.
Depth and Insight: The answer should provide thoughtful analysis or context, going beyond superficial details.
Conciseness: The answer should avoid unnecessary repetition and be as clear and succinct as possible.

Response Format rules:
- Always start your response with <answer> tag and end with </answer>.
- Do not include any text or commentary before the opening <answer> tag and after the closing </answer> tag.
For example, your response follow this format:
<answer>
[Your final detailed answer goes here]
</answer>
 Respond in 4 sentences. Explain the purpose and content of the image shown.

Use red-green or red-blue glasses to best enjoy this image of an approaching dust storm captured by ESA’s Mars Express in April this year. Its vertical structure is particularly emphasized in this anaglyph view.
The image was derived from data acquired by the nadir channel and the stereo channels on board Mars Express. The ground resolution is approximately 16 m/pixel and the images are centred at about 78°N/106°E.