Chart Design Integrity Checker | Category: Data Visualization , Model: Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct (LoRA) Problem Truncated axes, dual-axis overlays, and cherry-picked date ranges are well-documented techniques for making a chart visually misleading without falsifying the underlying data — studied extensively in data visualization and journalism (e.g. Alberto Cairo's work on graphical integrity). No existing dataset pairs chart specifications with closed-taxonomy classification of the specific deceptive technique present. Solution Closed-taxonomy classifier (7 classes: truncated_axis, dual_axis_manipulation, inverted_axis, cherry_picked_range, wrong_chart_type, aspect_ratio_manipulation, appropriate) over text chart specifications. Ground truth generated by construction — each row's label is the exact parameter used to generate that row, not inferred post-hoc. Each of the 6 flaw categories is paired with a "hard negative" twin: a case that superficially resembles the flaw but is legitimately appropriate (e.g. a temperature chart with a non-zero y-axis, since zero isn't a meaningful baseline for that unit; an intentionally inverted axis on a ranking chart, since "1st place at top" is standard convention). This prevents the model from learning a shallow rule like "any non-zero axis = flaw." Text-only by design, deliberately avoiding the multimodal upload/hosting complications encountered in an earlier image-based project in this portfolio. Dataset 10,000 rows, all prompts verified unique, balanced across the 7-class taxonomy. Results Metric Base Adapted On-dataset win rate 37 63 Data Visualization-category win rate 18 82 Dataset quality grade D B (+72.0%) Limitations Tests reasoning over a stated chart specification, not visual perception of an actual rendered chart image. Assets Dataset card, model card, standalone HTML demo (rule-based, verified 100% match against 300 real dataset rows before shipping) — all built and ready. 3. Redline — HR Interview Question Compliance Checkerbase_model: meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct library_name peft license:other tags: - lora - peft - adapter - adaption --- # adaption_chart_misleading_patterns ## Model Training A LORA adapter for `meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct`. This model was trained with SFT using [Adaption](https://adaptionlabs.ai)'s AutoScientist on the chart_misleading_patterns dataset. ![Training metrics](training-metrics.png) ### AutoScientist Config ```json { "job_id": "16f4d621-cb1b-4a32-9d3b-70a2a15811ac", "training_experiment_id": "bcbc06cf-a5c1-4ed1-a70a-75523da76408", "original_model_name": "meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct", "trained_model_name": "adaption_chart_misleading_patterns", "training_method": "sft", "training_type": "lora", "data_format": "chat", "hyperparams": { "lora": "true", "lora_r": 64, "n_evals": 5, "n_epochs": 4, "batch_size": "max", "lora_alpha": 128, "lora_dropout": 0, "min_lr_ratio": 0.1, "warmup_ratio": 0.03, "weight_decay": 0.02, "learning_rate": 0.0001, "max_grad_norm": 1, "base_model_size": "109B", "train_on_inputs": "false", "training_method": "sft", "lr_scheduler_type": "cosine", "scheduler_num_cycles": 0.5, "lora_trainable_modules": "k_proj,o_proj,q_proj,v_proj,shared_expert.gate_proj,shared_expert.up_proj,shared_expert.down_proj,feed_forward.gate_proj,feed_forward.up_proj,feed_forward.down_proj" } } ``` ## Training Data The model was trained on 27,585 rows of adapted data with the following domain distribution: data-analysis-visualization (100%), market-analysis (0%). ## Model Evaluation The model was evaluated on an in-distribution held-out test set as well as a broader domain-specific test set to measure generalization. ![Win rates](win-rates.png) | Domain | Win rate vs. base model | | --- | --- | | data-analysis-visualization | 82% | ## How to use ```bash pip install torch transformers peft ``` ```python import torch from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer from peft import PeftModel BASE = "meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct" ADAPTER = "" device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu" dtype = torch.float32 if device == "cpu" else torch.bfloat16 base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(BASE, dtype=dtype).to(device) model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base, ADAPTER) # Optional: merge the LoRA weights into the base for faster inference model = model.merge_and_unload() model.eval() tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(BASE) messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}] text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True) inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt").to(device) with torch.inference_mode(): out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512) print(tokenizer.decode(out[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)) ```