--- title: ScholarFlow Research Intelligence Studio emoji: 📚 colorFrom: blue colorTo: green sdk: static app_file: index.html pinned: false license: mit tags: - research - literature-review - evidence-synthesis - multilingual - reproducibility - static --- # ScholarFlow Research Intelligence Studio | Hugging Face Project #19 A **privacy-conscious, local-first research evidence dashboard** that turns an unstructured list of studies into an inspectable library, human-reviewed screening decisions, an evidence matrix, descriptive research-coverage diagnostics, and reproducible exports. **Owner / portfolio:** [Hugdrigo](https://huggingface.co/Hugdrigo) **Project:** 19 of the Hugging Face portfolio series **Release:** 1.0.0 **Hosting:** Hugging Face Static Space, free tier, no server dependency ## Run Open `index.html` in a current browser, or upload all files at the repository root of a Hugging Face Space configured as **Static**. No Python backend, paid inference, API keys, or Node packages are required. ## Features 1. Overview with summary metrics and method/decision distributions. 2. Keyword-searchable and filterable study library. 3. Add sources manually, with methodological metadata and traceable origin fields. 4. Manual screening: include, maybe, exclude, and unscreened, with review notes. 5. Evidence matrix focused on included studies. 6. Descriptive distribution and threshold-based coverage insights. 7. JSON, CSV, and Markdown exports plus JSON import. 8. Browser-local persistence with explicit replacement and deletion confirmation. 9. Responsive layout for desktop and mobile, with no remote data collection. ## Crucial integrity note **The included demonstration dataset is entirely synthetic.** Records marked `SYN-*`, their authors, samples, findings, and decisions are illustrative and **must not be cited as authentic research**. User-entered records are not independently verified by the app. The tool does not query scholarly databases or execute generative-AI models. The term *research intelligence* refers to structured, rule-based decision support, not autonomous research or external LLM inference. The completeness field counts populated metadata categories (source, methods, findings, limitations, participants), **not scientific quality**. Gap insights identify patterns **in the user's included records** only, not established gaps in the world's research literature. ## Files - `index.html`: Space entry point and semantic UI. - `styles.css`: accessible responsive design. - `seed.js`: demonstration data loaded without remote requests. - `sample-data.json`: portable, clearly marked synthetic sample dataset. - `app.js`: library, screening, visualization and import/export logic. - `METHODOLOGY.md`: interpretation, screening process, reproducibility safeguards. - `LICENSE`: MIT license. ## Use with authentic literature 1. Back up your current state with **Export full JSON**. 2. In **Export & methods**, select **Clear all records** or import your own JSON. 3. Collect authentic sources from databases or publisher websites outside the app. 4. Add records and verify each bibliographic reference yourself. 5. Establish an a priori inclusion/exclusion protocol; record reasons in the screening desk. 6. Analyze only relevant, verifiable, included studies; export the resulting audit log. ## JSON shape ```json { "records": [ { "id": "REAL-001", "title": "Verified paper title", "authors": "Author Names", "year": 2025, "method": "Qualitative", "region": "Latin America", "language": "Spanish", "participants": 25, "topic": "academic writing", "findings": "Source-verified summary", "limitations": "Limitations reported by authors", "source": "doi:10.xxxx/example", "synthetic": false, "status": "unscreened", "notes": "" } ] } ``` Use an actual, verified DOI rather than the placeholder above. Importing JSON **replaces** the existing dataset after confirmation. The app has no account sync: localStorage is device/browser-specific, so export frequently. ## Next possible release Optional integrations for Crossref/OpenAlex metadata, DOI verification, a documented review protocol, RAG retrieval, and rubric-based critical appraisal could be built as separately disclosed additions. These capabilities are **not implemented** in v1.0. ## Attribution Created as Project #19 for the public Hugdrigo Hugging Face professional portfolio. MIT licensed; see LICENSE.