diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes index a6344aac8c09253b3b630fb776ae94478aa0275b..9e3e741411c3e821d19aab1dfefa87c985ea675f 100644 --- a/.gitattributes +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -33,3 +33,6 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +outputs/distributed_dpo_audit.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +packaged_replay/distributed_dpo_audit.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +source_paper_v1.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text diff --git a/BUNDLE_SHA256SUMS.txt b/BUNDLE_SHA256SUMS.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc4793a1537b662cf00209e146edd49408e44726 --- /dev/null +++ b/BUNDLE_SHA256SUMS.txt @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +57fb181e40cfc722c6fb81d3f3fd1ce2bc3a29e3d60a2cb5fdaf9f9cfbbd2dde .gitattributes +c1b53249c4f7ce68a3693ea44c6238bb53a475841244718a7a66b8fc07cae677 README.md +f6cedefc0c2ca62164392c882a33752a3f6098771f652c2a4f21ff76271bb28d SOURCE_PIN.txt +d1c28fc0a4e07f2688d013f576cf76ffc422d278d56a52a82989e0b93b3b3964 bucket-icon.svg +fd58d689f2b3ead6c81790fdad30c60cea11168781ed7472db49b180511961aa build_manifest.py +c98b5fca6ca5fdeb2035e42cd8601273d6d7d7e32aa85edd1697192fd22d9423 index.html +64e1de4358c79ec0d5f2697c56f98258c025e992c94ad7b3b7801739222ca41d logbook.css +69d73869184f936613668569980f31984be65229e77c4df4ba9604d3de70c02b logbook.js +3179eb3f236fb3de113177cd698c971fb01d492ce5c9579f6149cf6477d03f82 logbook.json +0af23030e58c13d4b830c921071545c856841d08290fa9cedb9a5efdf8d3a9c8 official_claims.json +b04a57a18be1c38f89b91bf627addd888145768e2abc8d06d9cb512841d84b61 outputs/SHA256SUMS.json +ff2d4278b79e9fdf103a48f907d694a11e39eda0369daf6076f0e269da141b86 outputs/corollary_5_2_full_participation.csv +691bdcc6ae25aa25d6598dbf87ad060255e9a0f802e03341da6a30eeb362b2ba outputs/dec_dpo_topology.csv +c08e9e3b7baf8e05e4a4190efd714a72d9122fd3cd4ecd645d640a9aea6ca1e4 outputs/distributed_dpo_audit.png +31bfaabea77d3022b17e469b7b9f546a2fec8c40431b8177d1cf077ac06a9718 outputs/fed_dpo_shp_ablations.csv +bb7e2073a3d41e3c2fdb957ab423ee83a367d3fe1badcf5fbcb98e516a9b707b outputs/results.json +6460bb569c5ac46a0509503168290bb4b2bb03a5e6f566f282d0fe5a183e7732 outputs/shp_inventory.csv +c8464ba0cf666528438250e6fd581271d770a4c136c6a55377ca3361fd42b8e4 outputs/source_claim_audit.csv +9accf57701e23d9e172978f895d6faf38f2a12f150d968d2ead593d3304fb896 outputs/theorem_5_1_partial_bound.csv +be181a404639b2722e3a7905df2d4faf8bfb8e562ee42277b8e32652b724fdc1 outputs/theorem_5_4_staleness.csv +8fc7b9c6775c5d7846a474089c727d0ae8a1de3bcf5db1abf76914e74878ad6d outputs/theorem_5_5_lower_bound.csv +b04a57a18be1c38f89b91bf627addd888145768e2abc8d06d9cb512841d84b61 packaged_replay/SHA256SUMS.json +ff2d4278b79e9fdf103a48f907d694a11e39eda0369daf6076f0e269da141b86 packaged_replay/corollary_5_2_full_participation.csv +691bdcc6ae25aa25d6598dbf87ad060255e9a0f802e03341da6a30eeb362b2ba packaged_replay/dec_dpo_topology.csv +c08e9e3b7baf8e05e4a4190efd714a72d9122fd3cd4ecd645d640a9aea6ca1e4 packaged_replay/distributed_dpo_audit.png +31bfaabea77d3022b17e469b7b9f546a2fec8c40431b8177d1cf077ac06a9718 packaged_replay/fed_dpo_shp_ablations.csv +bb7e2073a3d41e3c2fdb957ab423ee83a367d3fe1badcf5fbcb98e516a9b707b packaged_replay/results.json +6460bb569c5ac46a0509503168290bb4b2bb03a5e6f566f282d0fe5a183e7732 packaged_replay/shp_inventory.csv +c8464ba0cf666528438250e6fd581271d770a4c136c6a55377ca3361fd42b8e4 packaged_replay/source_claim_audit.csv +9accf57701e23d9e172978f895d6faf38f2a12f150d968d2ead593d3304fb896 packaged_replay/theorem_5_1_partial_bound.csv +be181a404639b2722e3a7905df2d4faf8bfb8e562ee42277b8e32652b724fdc1 packaged_replay/theorem_5_4_staleness.csv +8fc7b9c6775c5d7846a474089c727d0ae8a1de3bcf5db1abf76914e74878ad6d packaged_replay/theorem_5_5_lower_bound.csv +6379c8503f5c65d9e2b93470c536eca65c5e09226575fdd10271397e6b4564f0 pages/claim-1/page.md +685ff891925636f2aa4be58f35a4d5c592d95f6032769a961eac84c33924780c pages/claim-2/page.md +9aa313c243acadc5ef58ef9c2a25ec700901fc49838c62fde069fed204661f74 pages/claim-3/page.md +8604f4459c68b2fec97507d5ba65d8233bea1b560aa80c792b3149a59ca64ff0 pages/claim-4/page.md +738b622f53e7c74dbf4baa7df092781a762e1e756f80966d84c95d439db42a48 pages/claim-5/page.md +8ae4a4cbda7ea4b592fad7c3e0d501b189622517e25f8deebc11ebf22f5be092 pages/claim-6/page.md +e6ebdd5af0f3a32ba8008ee547317cbbcb0d8106914ee0de3e90809b9ca18840 pages/conclusion/page.md +a3bc10f7407532aeb494acd7ca5b67e1ca1c6327cdcda0c92e985ec1ede203b7 pages/executive-summary/page.md +c1b9a6862a1aa5e83eab3ea0c531c9fcee4723f98ad10866a10451552d90c8bd pages/index.md +f12f45b28a79c2f5c45fbdfeadcfbbbba0235bc03bf07a5268df59231d4422c5 poster_embed.html +3360c577746f955e3a1bc80846b47b564626fe9aae443734d9ccaaded82afd51 reproduce.py +5bdf2ac2751a991c55ca60844df521b6cd2bf249fb68179624c684d4eb416988 requirements.txt +ba49c5332c94e438dfa575c84d8389f32464b941b973a96a0120052c05d676fe shp_rows_0.json +3f4a7d7e1540b8b53ccf5f05d79de799de24a93fb0d4496fa2e9f842f2b28ac8 shp_rows_100.json +57d07b51e1498f272feefcc9d9886d65e0730c47ad474537d58b633bf89ea52c shp_rows_200.json +01fa42003ab85554ff3d55d6152ecebb6775a835df6cef10acf13ca2792fdf8d shp_rows_300.json +31ada479d91a26ccc0ceadda09a1c2b3e97fa03ae1bc43784225dd3609cd4ea7 shp_rows_400.json +17a8823add2699a4cbdcaab5e886926d37f9367b247a58534f9edcbed086ee39 shp_rows_500.json +43d8384c31b601422addeba43f148391e8cf39f756a28a72fb9c4ec316b48ec4 source_archive_v1.tar +ce6faba012d2e862d59aa6d5a05fccf6f004e331d4769ae95607ec63483904c5 source_paper_v1.pdf +a6eb72253c0128ce79b526a86b7943eed37beec186b5f57ff6c1701d0e9ff596 trackio-logo-light.png +3e3792061d4d095759da30d7cfe7f14b621901793cd4d677b61b2896f5bf472b trackio-logo.png +71da94795855710d214801eb9b9b7b8898e9a8757abac0e22966a0531bbb2f4f trackio-wordmark-dark.png diff --git a/SOURCE_PIN.txt b/SOURCE_PIN.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55771cee7a309fa6080f0481c407d77a273867fa --- /dev/null +++ b/SOURCE_PIN.txt @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +Paper: Distributed Direct Preference Optimization +OpenReview: ljNZyrAlaa +arXiv: 2605.20696v1 (only revision at audit time) +PDF SHA-256: ce6faba012d2e862d59aa6d5a05fccf6f004e331d4769ae95607ec63483904c5 +source archive SHA-256: 43d8384c31b601422addeba43f148391e8cf39f756a28a72fb9c4ec316b48ec4 + +Stanford Human Preferences rows 0..599 from the Hugging Face datasets server: +rows 0-99 SHA-256: ba49c5332c94e438dfa575c84d8389f32464b941b973a96a0120052c05d676fe +rows 100-199 SHA-256: 3f4a7d7e1540b8b53ccf5f05d79de799de24a93fb0d4496fa2e9f842f2b28ac8 +rows 200-299 SHA-256: 57d07b51e1498f272feefcc9d9886d65e0730c47ad474537d58b633bf89ea52c +rows 300-399 SHA-256: 01fa42003ab85554ff3d55d6152ecebb6775a835df6cef10acf13ca2792fdf8d +rows 400-499 SHA-256: 31ada479d91a26ccc0ceadda09a1c2b3e97fa03ae1bc43784225dd3609cd4ea7 +rows 500-599 SHA-256: 17a8823add2699a4cbdcaab5e886926d37f9367b247a58534f9edcbed086ee39 + +The sole revision matches every live theorem number. Scope retained: +Corollary 5.2 removes partial-participation amplification but retains averaged- +client variance; Theorem 5.4 assumes bounded drift; Theorem 5.5 is a +constructed DPO-like family; and Theorem 6.1 assumes symmetric doubly +stochastic mixing. diff --git a/build_manifest.py b/build_manifest.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b390e7d9b7e512d7c531ebda666c516e1437a405 --- /dev/null +++ b/build_manifest.py @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +from __future__ import annotations + +import hashlib +from pathlib import Path + + +ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent +OUT = ROOT / "BUNDLE_SHA256SUMS.txt" + + +def digest(path: Path) -> str: + h = hashlib.sha256() + with path.open("rb") as handle: + for block in iter(lambda: handle.read(1 << 20), b""): + h.update(block) + return h.hexdigest() + + +rows = [] +for path in sorted(ROOT.rglob("*")): + if path.is_file() and path != OUT and "__pycache__" not in path.parts: + rows.append(f"{digest(path)} {path.relative_to(ROOT).as_posix()}") +OUT.write_text("\n".join(rows) + "\n", encoding="utf-8") +print(f"wrote {len(rows)} entries to {OUT.name}") diff --git a/code/dpo_exp.py b/code/dpo_exp.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad0a3946ed7001746061103df77140857421a618 --- /dev/null +++ b/code/dpo_exp.py @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ +"""Sharper tests for FedDPO / DecDPO convergence claims: fitted rate exponents +and parameter-free ratio checks, at larger scale than the first pass. + +Log-linear DPO: reward r(x) = theta^T phi(x); on a preference pair (w, l) the +loss is -log sigmoid(beta (r_w - r_l)). Clients hold heterogeneous preference +data generated by client-specific ground-truth rewards. +""" +import json +import numpy as np + +RESULTS = {} +D, BETA = 32, 1.0 + + +def make_clients(N, kappa, seed, n_per=200): + rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) + base = rng.normal(size=D); base /= np.linalg.norm(base) + cl = [] + for i in range(N): + t = base + kappa * rng.normal(size=D) / np.sqrt(D) + t /= np.linalg.norm(t) + W = rng.normal(size=(n_per, D)); L = rng.normal(size=(n_per, D)) + flip = (W - L) @ t < 0 + W2 = np.where(flip[:, None], L, W); L2 = np.where(flip[:, None], W, L) + cl.append((W2, L2, t)) + return cl, base + + +def grad(th, W, L): + z = BETA * ((W - L) @ th) + s = 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(z)) + return -BETA * ((W - L) * s[:, None]).mean(axis=0) + + +def loss(th, cl): + tot = 0.0 + for W, L, _ in cl: + z = BETA * ((W - L) @ th) + tot += float(np.mean(np.log1p(np.exp(-z)))) + return tot / len(cl) + + +def fed_dpo(cl, R=200, E=5, S=None, lr=0.5, q_max=0, seed=0): + N = len(cl); S = S or N + rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) + th = np.zeros(D); buf = {} + hist = [] + for r in range(R): + sel = rng.choice(N, size=S, replace=False) + deltas = [] + for i in sel: + local = th.copy() + for _ in range(E): + local -= lr * grad(local, cl[i][0], cl[i][1]) + d = local - th + delay = int(rng.integers(0, q_max + 1)) if q_max else 0 + buf.setdefault(r + delay, []).append(d) + for d in buf.pop(r, []): + deltas.append(d) + if deltas: + th = th + np.mean(deltas, axis=0) + hist.append(loss(th, cl)) + return np.array(hist) + + +def metropolis(adj): + n = adj.shape[0]; deg = adj.sum(1) + Wm = np.zeros((n, n)) + for i in range(n): + for j in range(n): + if i != j and adj[i, j]: + Wm[i, j] = 1.0 / (1 + max(deg[i], deg[j])) + Wm[i, i] = 1 - Wm[i].sum() + ev = np.sort(np.abs(np.linalg.eigvals(Wm)))[::-1] + return Wm, float(ev[1]) + + +def dec_dpo(cl, Wm, R=200, E=5, lr=0.5): + N = len(cl) + TH = np.zeros((N, D)); hist = [] + for r in range(R): + for i in range(N): + for _ in range(E): + TH[i] -= lr * grad(TH[i], cl[i][0], cl[i][1]) + TH = Wm @ TH + hist.append(float(np.mean(np.linalg.norm(TH - TH.mean(0), axis=1)))) + return np.array(hist) + + +def claim2_participation(): + rows = [] + N = 20 + cl, _ = make_clients(N, 0.8, seed=1) + for S in (2, 5, 10, 20): + finals = [fed_dpo(cl, R=150, S=S, seed=100 + s)[-20:].mean() for s in range(5)] + var = [np.var(fed_dpo(cl, R=150, S=S, seed=200 + s)[-20:]) for s in range(5)] + rows.append({"S": S, "N": N, "final_loss": float(np.mean(finals)), + "tail_variance": float(np.mean(var)), + "one_over_S": 1.0 / S}) + print(" S=%-3d final loss=%.6f tail var=%.3e (1/S=%.3f)" % + (S, rows[-1]["final_loss"], rows[-1]["tail_variance"], 1.0 / S), flush=True) + ls = np.log([r["one_over_S"] for r in rows]); lv = np.log([max(r["tail_variance"], 1e-16) for r in rows]) + RESULTS["claim2_participation"] = { + "rows": rows, "loglog_slope_var_vs_1_over_S": round(float(np.polyfit(ls, lv, 1)[0]), 4), + "var_ratio_S2_over_SN": round(rows[0]["tail_variance"] / max(rows[-1]["tail_variance"], 1e-16), 2)} + print(" variance slope vs 1/S = %.3f ; S=2 vs S=N ratio = %.1fx" % + (RESULTS["claim2_participation"]["loglog_slope_var_vs_1_over_S"], + RESULTS["claim2_participation"]["var_ratio_S2_over_SN"]), flush=True) + + +def claim3_staleness(): + rows = [] + cl, _ = make_clients(10, 0.8, seed=3) + for q in (0, 1, 2, 5, 10): + f = [fed_dpo(cl, R=150, q_max=q, seed=300 + s)[-20:].mean() for s in range(5)] + rows.append({"q_max": q, "final_loss": float(np.mean(f)), + "sd": float(np.std(f))}) + print(" q_max=%-3d final loss=%.6f +- %.6f" % (q, rows[-1]["final_loss"], rows[-1]["sd"]), flush=True) + base = rows[0]["final_loss"] + RESULTS["claim3_staleness"] = { + "rows": rows, "monotone_in_q": all(rows[i+1]["final_loss"] >= rows[i]["final_loss"] - 1e-9 + for i in range(len(rows) - 1)), + "penalty_at_qmax10": round(rows[-1]["final_loss"] - base, 6)} + + +def claim5_topology(): + N = 8 + cl, _ = make_clients(N, 0.8, seed=5) + tops = {} + ring = np.zeros((N, N), int) + for i in range(N): + ring[i, (i + 1) % N] = ring[(i + 1) % N, i] = 1 + tops["ring"] = ring + star = np.zeros((N, N), int); star[0, 1:] = star[1:, 0] = 1 + tops["star"] = star + full = np.ones((N, N), int) - np.eye(N, dtype=int) + tops["complete"] = full + path = np.zeros((N, N), int) + for i in range(N - 1): + path[i, i + 1] = path[i + 1, i] = 1 + tops["path"] = path + rows = [] + for name, adj in tops.items(): + Wm, rho = metropolis(adj) + h = dec_dpo(cl, Wm, R=120) + rows.append({"topology": name, "rho": round(rho, 4), + "one_over_1_minus_rho2": round(1.0 / (1 - rho ** 2), 3), + "final_consensus_error": float(h[-1]), + "mean_tail_consensus": float(h[-20:].mean())}) + print(" %-9s rho=%.4f 1/(1-rho^2)=%8.2f consensus err=%.4e" % + (name, rho, rows[-1]["one_over_1_minus_rho2"], rows[-1]["mean_tail_consensus"]), flush=True) + x = np.log([r["one_over_1_minus_rho2"] for r in rows]) + y = np.log([max(r["mean_tail_consensus"], 1e-16) for r in rows]) + sl, ic = np.polyfit(x, y, 1) + r2 = 1 - np.var(y - (sl * x + ic)) / np.var(y) + RESULTS["claim5_topology"] = {"rows": rows, + "loglog_slope_consensus_vs_1_over_1_minus_rho2": round(float(sl), 4), + "r2": round(float(r2), 4)} + print(" consensus error vs 1/(1-rho^2): slope %.3f, R2 %.3f" % (sl, r2), flush=True) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + claim2_participation(); claim3_staleness(); claim5_topology() + json.dump(RESULTS, open("dpo_results.json", "w"), indent=1) diff --git a/code/dpo_exp2.py b/code/dpo_exp2.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14a78f38e19645926e12875bc1334f3b3d4b06dc --- /dev/null +++ b/code/dpo_exp2.py @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +"""Redesigned tests: remove the two confounds in the first pass. + +Claim 2 (partial participation contributes a variance term that vanishes at S=N): + measure the variance of the ITERATE across seeds, not of the loss, and compare + against the finite-population correction (N-S)/(S(N-1)), which is the exact + sampling variance of a mean over S of N units drawn without replacement. + S=N is reported separately as an exact-zero check (no fit). + +Claim 5 (DecDPO consensus error grows with the spectral gap): + sweep rho CONTINUOUSLY on a FIXED graph with a FIXED client assignment using + lazy mixing W_a = (1-a) I + a W, so the only thing that changes is rho. + Any confound from topology structure or heterogeneity layout is eliminated. +""" +import json +import numpy as np +from dpo_exp import make_clients, grad, metropolis, D + +RESULTS = {} + + +def fed_iterate(cl, R, S, lr=0.5, E=5, seed=0): + N = len(cl); rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) + th = np.zeros(D) + for _ in range(R): + sel = rng.choice(N, size=S, replace=False) + ds = [] + for i in sel: + loc = th.copy() + for _ in range(E): + loc -= lr * grad(loc, cl[i][0], cl[i][1]) + ds.append(loc - th) + th = th + np.mean(ds, axis=0) + return th + + +def claim2(): + N, R = 20, 120 + cl, _ = make_clients(N, 0.8, seed=1) + rows = [] + for S in (2, 4, 5, 10, 20): + TH = np.array([fed_iterate(cl, R, S, seed=1000 + s) for s in range(24)]) + var = float(np.trace(np.cov(TH.T))) + fpc = (N - S) / (S * (N - 1)) + rows.append({"S": S, "N": N, "iterate_variance": var, + "finite_pop_correction_(N-S)/(S(N-1))": round(fpc, 6), + "ratio_var_over_fpc": round(var / fpc, 6) if fpc > 0 else None}) + print(" S=%-3d Var(theta)=%.4e (N-S)/(S(N-1))=%.5f ratio=%s" % + (S, var, fpc, rows[-1]["ratio_var_over_fpc"]), flush=True) + part = [r for r in rows if r["S"] < N] + x = np.log([r["finite_pop_correction_(N-S)/(S(N-1))"] for r in part]) + y = np.log([r["iterate_variance"] for r in part]) + sl, ic = np.polyfit(x, y, 1) + r2 = 1 - np.var(y - (sl * x + ic)) / np.var(y) + ratios = [r["ratio_var_over_fpc"] for r in part] + RESULTS["claim2"] = { + "rows": rows, "seeds_per_cell": 24, "rounds": R, + "loglog_slope_vs_finite_pop_correction": round(float(sl), 4), + "predicted_slope": 1.0, "r2": round(float(r2), 4), + "proportionality_const_spread": round(max(ratios) / min(ratios), 3), + "variance_at_S_equals_N": rows[-1]["iterate_variance"], + "vanishes_at_full_participation": bool(rows[-1]["iterate_variance"] < 1e-20)} + print(" fit slope %.3f (predicted 1.0), R2 %.3f ; const spread %.2fx ; Var(S=N)=%.2e" % + (sl, r2, RESULTS["claim2"]["proportionality_const_spread"], + rows[-1]["iterate_variance"]), flush=True) + + +def dec_consensus(cl, Wm, R=200, E=5, lr=0.5): + N = len(cl); TH = np.zeros((N, D)) + for _ in range(R): + for i in range(N): + for _ in range(E): + TH[i] -= lr * grad(TH[i], cl[i][0], cl[i][1]) + TH = Wm @ TH + return float(np.mean(np.linalg.norm(TH - TH.mean(0), axis=1))) + + +def claim5(): + N = 8 + cl, _ = make_clients(N, 0.8, seed=5) + ring = np.zeros((N, N), int) + for i in range(N): + ring[i, (i + 1) % N] = ring[(i + 1) % N, i] = 1 + W0, _ = metropolis(ring) + rows = [] + for a in (1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.45, 0.3, 0.2, 0.12): + Wm = (1 - a) * np.eye(N) + a * W0 + rho = float(np.sort(np.abs(np.linalg.eigvals(Wm)))[::-1][1]) + err = dec_consensus(cl, Wm, R=250) + rows.append({"lazy_alpha": a, "rho": round(rho, 5), + "one_over_1_minus_rho": round(1 / (1 - rho), 3), + "steady_state_consensus_error": err}) + print(" alpha=%.2f rho=%.5f 1/(1-rho)=%7.2f consensus err=%.5e" % + (a, rho, rows[-1]["one_over_1_minus_rho"], err), flush=True) + x = np.log([r["one_over_1_minus_rho"] for r in rows]) + y = np.log([r["steady_state_consensus_error"] for r in rows]) + sl, ic = np.polyfit(x, y, 1) + r2 = 1 - np.var(y - (sl * x + ic)) / np.var(y) + RESULTS["claim5"] = { + "graph": "8-node ring, fixed client assignment, lazy mixing sweeps rho", + "rows": rows, "rounds": 250, + "loglog_slope_vs_1_over_1_minus_rho": round(float(sl), 4), + "r2": round(float(r2), 4)} + print(" consensus error vs 1/(1-rho): slope %.3f, R2 %.4f" % (sl, r2), flush=True) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + claim2(); claim5() + json.dump(RESULTS, open("dpo_results2.json", "w"), indent=1) diff --git a/code/dpo_exp4.py b/code/dpo_exp4.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c4fb0c6bc148027e6b95f20b79b3b6bb0fd8b0b --- /dev/null +++ b/code/dpo_exp4.py @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +"""Claim 5, corrected: constant step size + local steps gives a BIASED fixed +point, so the gap plateaus and the stated O(1/sqrt(R)) rate cannot appear. +Use the decaying schedule the rate assumes, lr_r = lr0/sqrt(r), and measure the +gap against the true pooled optimum (found by direct minimisation). +""" +import json +import numpy as np +from dpo_exp import make_clients, grad, metropolis, loss, D, BETA + +RESULTS = {} + + +def pooled_opt(cl, iters=8000): + th = np.zeros(D) + for t in range(1, iters + 1): + g = np.mean([grad(th, W, L) for W, L, _ in cl], axis=0) + th -= (2.0 / np.sqrt(t)) * g + return th, loss(th, cl) + + +def dec_gap(cl, Wm, marks, E=5, lr0=1.0): + N = len(cl); TH = np.zeros((N, D)); out = {} + ms = set(marks) + for r in range(1, max(marks) + 1): + lr = lr0 / np.sqrt(r) + for i in range(N): + for _ in range(E): + TH[i] -= lr * grad(TH[i], cl[i][0], cl[i][1]) + TH = Wm @ TH + if r in ms: + out[r] = loss(TH.mean(0), cl) + return out + + +def run(): + N = 8 + cl, _ = make_clients(N, 0.8, seed=5) + _, star = pooled_opt(cl) + print(" pooled optimum loss = %.8f" % star, flush=True) + ring = np.zeros((N, N), int) + for i in range(N): + ring[i, (i + 1) % N] = ring[(i + 1) % N, i] = 1 + W0, _ = metropolis(ring) + Rs = [25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800] + rows = [] + for a in (1.0, 0.6, 0.3, 0.15): + Wm = (1 - a) * np.eye(N) + a * W0 + rho = float(np.sort(np.abs(np.linalg.eigvals(Wm)))[::-1][1]) + g = dec_gap(cl, Wm, Rs) + gaps = np.array([max(g[r] - star, 1e-14) for r in Rs]) + A = np.stack([1 / np.sqrt(Rs), 1 / (np.array(Rs) * (1 - rho ** 2))], axis=1) + coef, *_ = np.linalg.lstsq(A, gaps, rcond=None) + r2 = 1 - np.var(gaps - A @ coef) / np.var(gaps) + # also: pure 1/sqrt(R) slope, to show the sqrt term is the asymptote + sl = float(np.polyfit(np.log(Rs), np.log(gaps), 1)[0]) + rows.append({"lazy_alpha": a, "rho": round(rho, 5), + "one_minus_rho2": round(1 - rho ** 2, 5), + "c1_sqrtR": round(float(coef[0]), 6), + "c2_transient": round(float(coef[1]), 6), + "two_term_fit_r2": round(float(r2), 5), + "raw_loglog_slope_gap_vs_R": round(sl, 4), + "gaps": {str(r): round(float(x), 8) for r, x in zip(Rs, gaps)}}) + print(" alpha=%.2f rho=%.4f 1-rho^2=%.4f c1=%.5f c2=%.5f R2=%.4f raw slope=%.3f" % + (a, rho, 1 - rho ** 2, coef[0], coef[1], r2, sl), flush=True) + c2 = [r["c2_transient"] for r in rows] + pos = all(x > 0 for x in c2) + RESULTS["claim5_rate_decomposition"] = { + "pooled_optimum_loss": star, "R_grid": Rs, "step_size": "lr_r = 1/sqrt(r)", + "rows": rows, + "all_c2_positive": pos, + "c2_spread_max_over_min": round(max(c2) / min(c2), 3) if pos else None, + "all_fits_above_r2_0.99": all(r["two_term_fit_r2"] > 0.99 for r in rows), + "mean_raw_slope": round(float(np.mean([r["raw_loglog_slope_gap_vs_R"] for r in rows])), 4)} + print(" c2: %s ; all positive=%s ; mean raw slope %.3f (predicted -0.5)" % + ([round(x, 4) for x in c2], pos, + RESULTS["claim5_rate_decomposition"]["mean_raw_slope"]), flush=True) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + run() + json.dump(RESULTS, open("dpo_results4.json", "w"), indent=1) diff --git a/code/dpo_real.py b/code/dpo_real.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e509902b969f3a973082705f8fce7db103531986 --- /dev/null +++ b/code/dpo_real.py @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +"""Federated / decentralized DPO on the paper's actual setup: DistilGPT-2 (82M) +trained with the true DPO loss on Stanford Human Preferences pairs, split across +N=5 clients. This replaces the 64-dim log-linear proxy used previously. +""" +import os, json, time, math, copy, argparse +import numpy as np, torch, torch.nn.functional as F +from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM + +DEV = "mps" if torch.backends.mps.is_available() else "cpu" +BETA = 0.1 +MODEL = "distilgpt2" + + +def load_pairs(n_pairs, maxlen=128, seed=0): + from datasets import load_dataset + ds = load_dataset("stanfordnlp/SHP", split="train", streaming=True) + tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(MODEL) + tok.pad_token = tok.eos_token + out, it = [], iter(ds) + while len(out) < n_pairs: + try: r = next(it) + except StopIteration: break + a, b = r["human_ref_A"], r["human_ref_B"] + w, l = (a, b) if r["labels"] == 1 else (b, a) + p = "Q: " + r["history"][:400] + "\nA:" + pw = tok(p + " " + w[:400], truncation=True, max_length=maxlen)["input_ids"] + pl = tok(p + " " + l[:400], truncation=True, max_length=maxlen)["input_ids"] + np_ = len(tok(p, truncation=True, max_length=maxlen)["input_ids"]) + if len(pw) > np_ + 2 and len(pl) > np_ + 2: + out.append({"w": pw, "l": pl, "np": np_, "domain": r["domain"]}) + return out, tok + + +def batch_logps(model, seqs, nps, pad): + L = max(len(s) for s in seqs) + ids = torch.full((len(seqs), L), pad, dtype=torch.long) + msk = torch.zeros((len(seqs), L), dtype=torch.bool) + for i, s in enumerate(seqs): + ids[i, :len(s)] = torch.tensor(s); msk[i, nps[i]:len(s)] = True + ids, msk = ids.to(DEV), msk.to(DEV) + logits = model(ids).logits[:, :-1] + tgt, m = ids[:, 1:], msk[:, 1:] + lp = torch.log_softmax(logits.float(), -1).gather(2, tgt.unsqueeze(-1)).squeeze(-1) + return (lp * m).sum(-1) + + +def dpo_loss(model, ref, batch, pad): + sw = [b["w"] for b in batch]; sl = [b["l"] for b in batch] + nw = [b["np"] for b in batch]; nl = [b["np"] for b in batch] + pw = batch_logps(model, sw, nw, pad); pl = batch_logps(model, sl, nl, pad) + with torch.no_grad(): + rw = batch_logps(ref, sw, nw, pad); rl = batch_logps(ref, sl, nl, pad) + logits = BETA * ((pw - rw) - (pl - rl)) + acc = (logits > 0).float().mean().item() + return -F.logsigmoid(logits).mean(), acc + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + t0 = time.time() + pairs, tok = load_pairs(40) + print("loaded %d pairs in %.1fs; domains=%s" % (len(pairs), time.time()-t0, + sorted({p['domain'] for p in pairs})[:5]), flush=True) + m = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL).to(DEV) + ref = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL).to(DEV).eval() + for p in ref.parameters(): p.requires_grad_(False) + opt = torch.optim.SGD(m.parameters(), lr=1e-4) + t0 = time.time() + for step in range(5): + loss, acc = dpo_loss(m, ref, pairs[step*4:(step+1)*4], tok.pad_token_id) + opt.zero_grad(); loss.backward(); opt.step() + print(" step %d loss=%.4f acc=%.2f (%.2fs)" % (step, loss.item(), acc, time.time()-t0), flush=True) + print("per-step: %.2fs on %s" % ((time.time()-t0)/5, DEV)) diff --git a/code/fed_real.py b/code/fed_real.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4f0741a5bfa8b0a071fe342afc417b87d0f4e44 --- /dev/null +++ b/code/fed_real.py @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ +"""FedDPO / DecDPO on DistilGPT-2 (82M) with real SHP preference pairs, +non-IID split across N=5 clients by SHP domain (the paper's heterogeneity). + +Design notes that make the theorems actually testable: + * Each client's batch sequence is fixed by its own seed, so with FULL + participation (S=N) the whole round is deterministic. Corollary 5.2 predicts + the partial-participation variance term vanishes at S=N -- here that becomes + an EXACT zero-variance check, not a noisy approximation. + * Client sampling uses a separate RNG, so S= want: continue + b = doms.setdefault(d, []) + if len(b) >= n_per_domain: + if all(len(v) >= n_per_domain for v in doms.values()) and len(doms) >= want: break + continue + a, bb = r["human_ref_A"], r["human_ref_B"] + w, l = (a, bb) if r["labels"] == 1 else (bb, a) + p = "Q: " + r["history"][:400] + "\nA:" + pw = tok(p + " " + w[:400], truncation=True, max_length=128)["input_ids"] + pl = tok(p + " " + l[:400], truncation=True, max_length=128)["input_ids"] + npr = len(tok(p, truncation=True, max_length=128)["input_ids"]) + if len(pw) > npr + 2 and len(pl) > npr + 2: + b.append({"w": pw, "l": pl, "np": npr}) + names = sorted(doms)[:N_CLIENTS] + return [doms[d] for d in names], names, tok + + +def flat(m): return torch.cat([p.detach().reshape(-1) for p in m.parameters()]) +def setflat(m, v): + i = 0 + for p in m.parameters(): + n = p.numel(); p.data.copy_(v[i:i+n].view_as(p)); i += n + + +def local_train(model, ref, data, E, lr, pad, rng): + opt = torch.optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=lr) + for _ in range(E): + idx = rng.integers(0, len(data), size=BS) + loss, _ = dpo_loss(model, ref, [data[i] for i in idx], pad) + opt.zero_grad(); loss.backward(); opt.step() + + +def evaluate(model, ref, clients, pad, nb=3): + tot, acc, k = 0.0, 0.0, 0 + with torch.no_grad(): + for d in clients: + for j in range(nb): + l, a = dpo_loss(model, ref, d[j*BS:(j+1)*BS], pad) + tot += l.item(); acc += a; k += 1 + return tot/k, acc/k + + +def fed_run(base, ref, clients, tok, S, R=R_DEF, E=E_DEF, lr=2e-5, q_max=0, seed=0): + m = copy.deepcopy(base).to(DEV) + th = flat(m).clone() + samp = np.random.default_rng(10_000 + seed) + crngs = [np.random.default_rng(777 + i) for i in range(len(clients))] # fixed per client + dly = np.random.default_rng(50_000 + seed) + buf = {} + for r in range(R): + sel = samp.choice(len(clients), size=S, replace=False) if S < len(clients) else np.arange(len(clients)) + for i in sel: + setflat(m, th) + local_train(m, ref, clients[i], E, lr, tok.pad_token_id, crngs[i]) + d = flat(m) - th + k = r + (int(dly.integers(0, q_max+1)) if q_max else 0) + buf.setdefault(k, []).append(d) + ds = buf.pop(r, []) + if ds: th = th + torch.stack(ds).mean(0) + setflat(m, th) + return m, th + + +def metropolis(adj): + n = adj.shape[0]; deg = adj.sum(1); W = np.zeros((n, n)) + for i in range(n): + for j in range(n): + if i != j and adj[i, j]: W[i, j] = 1.0/(1+max(deg[i], deg[j])) + W[i, i] = 1 - W[i].sum() + return W, float(np.sort(np.abs(np.linalg.eigvals(W)))[::-1][1]) + + +def dec_run(base, ref, clients, tok, W, R=R_DEF, E=E_DEF, lr=2e-5): + n = len(clients) + m = copy.deepcopy(base).to(DEV) + TH = torch.stack([flat(m).clone() for _ in range(n)]) + crngs = [np.random.default_rng(777+i) for i in range(n)] + Wt = torch.tensor(W, dtype=TH.dtype, device=TH.device) + for r in range(R): + new = [] + for i in range(n): + setflat(m, TH[i]); local_train(m, ref, clients[i], E, lr, tok.pad_token_id, crngs[i]) + new.append(flat(m).clone()) + TH = Wt @ torch.stack(new) + cons = float(torch.norm(TH - TH.mean(0, keepdim=True), dim=1).mean()) + setflat(m, TH.mean(0)) + return m, cons + + +def main(): + t0 = time.time() + clients, names, tok = build_clients() + print("clients:", [(n, len(d)) for n, d in zip(names, clients)], flush=True) + base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL) + ref = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL).to(DEV).eval() + for p in ref.parameters(): p.requires_grad_(False) + pad = tok.pad_token_id + l0, a0 = evaluate(base.to(DEV), ref, clients, pad) + RES["init"] = {"loss": l0, "acc": a0, "clients": dict(zip(names, [len(d) for d in clients]))} + print("init loss=%.4f acc=%.3f" % (l0, a0), flush=True) + + # ---- Claim 2: participation sweep, variance of the global model ---- + rows = [] + for S in (1, 2, 3, 5): + ths, ls = [], [] + for s in range(3): + m, th = fed_run(base, ref, clients, tok, S, seed=s) + l, a = evaluate(m, ref, clients, pad); ths.append(th); ls.append(l) + print(" S=%d seed=%d loss=%.4f acc=%.3f (%.0fs)" % (S, s, l, a, time.time()-t0), flush=True) + TH = torch.stack(ths) + var = float((TH - TH.mean(0, keepdim=True)).pow(2).sum(1).mean()) + fpc = (N_CLIENTS-S)/(S*(N_CLIENTS-1)) + rows.append({"S": S, "param_variance": var, "fpc": round(fpc, 5), + "ratio": (var/fpc if fpc > 0 else None), + "loss_mean": float(np.mean(ls)), "loss_sd": float(np.std(ls))}) + print(" S=%d Var=%.4e fpc=%.4f loss=%.4f+-%.4f" % (S, var, fpc, np.mean(ls), np.std(ls)), flush=True) + RES["claim2_participation"] = {"rows": rows} + json.dump(RES, open("fed_real_results.json", "w"), indent=1) + + # ---- Claim 3: staleness ---- + rows = [] + for q in (0, 2, 5): + ls = [] + for s in range(2): + m, _ = fed_run(base, ref, clients, tok, N_CLIENTS, q_max=q, seed=s) + l, a = evaluate(m, ref, clients, pad); ls.append(l) + rows.append({"q_max": q, "loss_mean": float(np.mean(ls)), "loss_sd": float(np.std(ls))}) + print(" q_max=%d loss=%.5f+-%.5f (%.0fs)" % (q, np.mean(ls), np.std(ls), time.time()-t0), flush=True) + RES["claim3_staleness"] = {"rows": rows, + "monotone": all(rows[i+1]["loss_mean"] >= rows[i]["loss_mean"]-1e-9 for i in range(len(rows)-1))} + json.dump(RES, open("fed_real_results.json", "w"), indent=1) + + # ---- Claim 5: topology ---- + n = N_CLIENTS + tops = {} + ring = np.zeros((n, n), int) + for i in range(n): ring[i, (i+1) % n] = ring[(i+1) % n, i] = 1 + tops["ring"] = ring + star = np.zeros((n, n), int); star[0, 1:] = star[1:, 0] = 1; tops["star"] = star + path = np.zeros((n, n), int) + for i in range(n-1): path[i, i+1] = path[i+1, i] = 1 + tops["path"] = path + tops["complete"] = np.ones((n, n), int) - np.eye(n, dtype=int) + rows = [] + for nm, adj in tops.items(): + W, rho = metropolis(adj) + m, cons = dec_run(base, ref, clients, tok, W) + l, a = evaluate(m, ref, clients, pad) + rows.append({"topology": nm, "rho": round(rho, 4), + "one_over_1_minus_rho2": round(1/(1-rho**2), 3), + "consensus_error": cons, "loss": l, "acc": a}) + print(" %-9s rho=%.4f cons=%.4e loss=%.4f (%.0fs)" % (nm, rho, cons, l, time.time()-t0), flush=True) + x = np.log([r["one_over_1_minus_rho2"] for r in rows if r["consensus_error"] > 1e-9]) + y = np.log([r["consensus_error"] for r in rows if r["consensus_error"] > 1e-9]) + if len(x) > 2: + sl, ic = np.polyfit(x, y, 1) + RES["claim5_topology"] = {"rows": rows, "loglog_slope": round(float(sl), 4), + "r2": round(float(1-np.var(y-(sl*x+ic))/np.var(y)), 4), + "rank_corr_positive": bool(np.corrcoef(x, y)[0, 1] > 0)} + else: + RES["claim5_topology"] = {"rows": rows} + RES["wall_clock_s"] = time.time()-t0 + json.dump(RES, open("fed_real_results.json", "w"), indent=1) + print("DONE %.0fs" % (time.time()-t0), flush=True) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() diff --git a/code/fed_topo.py b/code/fed_topo.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..082b0223c0583deed531e5f3373bdd06dc24d54f --- /dev/null +++ b/code/fed_topo.py @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +"""Topology arm only: DecDPO on DistilGPT-2 across four 5-node graphs.""" +import json, time, numpy as np, torch +from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM +from dpo_real import DEV, MODEL +import fed_real as FR + +RES = json.load(open("fed_real_results.json")) + +def main(): + t0=time.time() + clients,names,tok = FR.build_clients() + base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL) + ref = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL).to(DEV).eval() + for p in ref.parameters(): p.requires_grad_(False) + pad=tok.pad_token_id; n=FR.N_CLIENTS + tops={} + ring=np.zeros((n,n),int) + for i in range(n): ring[i,(i+1)%n]=ring[(i+1)%n,i]=1 + tops["ring"]=ring + star=np.zeros((n,n),int); star[0,1:]=star[1:,0]=1; tops["star"]=star + path=np.zeros((n,n),int) + for i in range(n-1): path[i,i+1]=path[i+1,i]=1 + tops["path"]=path + tops["complete"]=np.ones((n,n),int)-np.eye(n,dtype=int) + rows=[] + for nm,adj in tops.items(): + W,rho=FR.metropolis(adj) + m,cons=FR.dec_run(base,ref,clients,tok,W) + l,a=FR.evaluate(m,ref,clients,pad) + rows.append({"topology":nm,"rho":round(rho,4), + "one_over_1_minus_rho2":(round(1/(1-rho**2),3) if rho<0.999999 else None), + "consensus_error":cons,"loss":l,"acc":a}) + print(" %-9s rho=%.4f 1/(1-rho^2)=%s cons=%.4e loss=%.5f (%.0fs)"%( + nm,rho,rows[-1]["one_over_1_minus_rho2"],cons,l,time.time()-t0),flush=True) + json.dump({**RES,"claim5_topology":{"rows":rows}},open("fed_real_results.json","w"),indent=1) + ok=[r for r in rows if r["consensus_error"]>1e-7 and r["one_over_1_minus_rho2"]] + out={"rows":rows,"n_in_fit":len(ok)} + if len(ok)>=3: + x=np.log([r["one_over_1_minus_rho2"] for r in ok]); y=np.log([r["consensus_error"] for r in ok]) + sl,ic=np.polyfit(x,y,1) + out.update({"loglog_slope":round(float(sl),4), + "r2":round(float(1-np.var(y-(sl*x+ic))/np.var(y)),4), + "spearman_positive":bool(np.corrcoef(x,y)[0,1]>0)}) + RES["claim5_topology"]=out + json.dump(RES,open("fed_real_results.json","w"),indent=1) + print("DONE %.0fs"%(time.time()-t0),flush=True) + +if __name__=="__main__": main() diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 1337716acb5ccbf01149688c70c4597fa6b62169..d2aa490c052ac121609a8582839c393317ffc4b0 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ - Reproduction: Distributed Direct Preference Optimization + Reproduction: Accurate Large-sample Uncertainty Quantification using Stochastic Gradient Markov Chain Monte Carlo @@ -21,36 +21,6 @@
- -
-

-
-
diff --git a/logbook.css b/logbook.css index 2adbe3ab90d0c858229b26990093b5bf6382d569..2a9f174dac3117978fa2279dacebce2185fe6694 100644 --- a/logbook.css +++ b/logbook.css @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ :root { --bg: #ffffff; - --paper: #ffffff; + --paper: #fdfcf9; --panel: #ffffff; --ink: #1f2937; --muted: #6b7280; @@ -9,11 +9,9 @@ --accent-strong: #ea580c; --accent-soft: #fff7ed; --accent-line: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.16); - --grid-line: rgba(31, 41, 55, 0.02); + --grid-line: rgba(31, 41, 55, 0.045); --code-bg: #f3f4f6; --radius: 12px; - --sidebar-width: 280px; - --content-gutter: 40px; --serif: ui-serif, "Iowan Old Style", "Palatino Linotype", Georgia, serif; --sans: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; @@ -33,7 +31,6 @@ body { html { scroll-behavior: smooth; - scrollbar-gutter: stable; } body { @@ -50,15 +47,10 @@ body { min-height: 100vh; } -body[data-view="trace"] #sidebar-foot, -body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { - display: none; -} - /* ---- sidebar (composition-book cover) ---- */ #sidebar { - width: var(--sidebar-width); - flex: 0 0 var(--sidebar-width); + width: 280px; + flex: 0 0 280px; background: #17181c; color: #e7e7ea; position: sticky; @@ -105,15 +97,6 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { padding-top: 8px; } -#tree .tree-label { - padding: 6px 10px 8px; - color: #777a83; - font-size: 10px; - font-weight: 700; - letter-spacing: 0.12em; - text-transform: uppercase; -} - #tree a { display: block; padding: 6px 10px; @@ -122,9 +105,6 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { text-decoration: none; font-size: 14px; transition: background 0.12s, color 0.12s; - overflow: hidden; - text-overflow: ellipsis; - white-space: nowrap; } #tree a:hover { @@ -163,13 +143,7 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { #content { flex: 1; min-width: 0; - padding: 24px - clamp( - var(--content-gutter), - calc(100vw - 960px), - calc(var(--sidebar-width) + var(--content-gutter)) - ) - 120px var(--content-gutter); + padding: 48px 40px 120px; background-color: var(--paper); background-image: linear-gradient(var(--grid-line) 1px, transparent 1px), @@ -178,28 +152,10 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { background-position: center top; } -#logbook-header { - width: 100%; - max-width: 1080px; - margin: 0 auto 20px; -} -#logbook-title { - font-family: var(--serif); - font-size: 34px; - line-height: 1.15; - letter-spacing: -0.02em; - margin: 0 0 10px; - overflow-wrap: anywhere; -} -#logbook-cli { - display: grid; - gap: 7px; -} - #page { width: 100%; min-width: 0; - max-width: 1080px; + max-width: 1052px; margin: 0 auto; } @@ -214,7 +170,10 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { } .page-layout { - display: block; + display: grid; + grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 760px) 248px; + gap: 44px; + align-items: start; } .page-body { @@ -229,26 +188,18 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { /* ---- pinned notes ---- */ .pinned-notes { - margin: 30px 0 32px; + margin: 30px 0 0; } .pinned-notes-list .cell { margin: 0; -} -.pinned-notes-list .cell-title { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - gap: 7px; -} -.pin-ico { - flex: 0 0 auto; - width: 14px; - height: 14px; - fill: var(--accent); - stroke: none; + border-color: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.55); } .pinned-notes-list .cell + .cell { margin-top: 12px; } +.cell.pinned-source { + border-color: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.55); +} .book-intro.has-pinned-notes { border-bottom: none; padding-bottom: 22px; @@ -425,25 +376,26 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { /* ---- notebook-style cells ---- */ .cell { max-width: 100%; - margin: 0 0 32px; - background: none; - border: none; - border-radius: 0; - box-shadow: none; - overflow: visible; + border: 1px solid var(--line); + border-radius: 10px; + background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.86); + margin: 18px 0; + overflow: hidden; + box-shadow: 0 2px 10px rgba(31, 41, 55, 0.035); } .cell-head { display: flex; justify-content: space-between; gap: 16px; - align-items: baseline; - padding: 0 0 5px; - background: none; - border-bottom: none; + align-items: center; + padding: 14px 18px; + background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92); + border-bottom: 1px solid var(--line); } .cell-head.no-title { justify-content: flex-end; - padding: 0 0 3px; + padding-top: 10px; + padding-bottom: 10px; } .cell-title { flex: 1; @@ -475,7 +427,7 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { } .cell-body { min-width: 0; - padding: 0; + padding: 14px 18px 18px; } .cell.dashboard .cell-body { padding: 0; @@ -495,6 +447,9 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { #page .cell-body > :last-child { margin-bottom: 0; } +.cell.code .cell-head { + background: #fbfbfc; +} .figure-fit { position: relative; overflow: hidden; @@ -667,40 +622,9 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { border: 1px solid var(--line); border-radius: 10px; overflow: hidden; - margin: 0; + margin: 12px 0; background: var(--panel); } -.jp-cmd { - display: flex; - align-items: baseline; - gap: 9px; - position: relative; - padding: 10px 16px 10px 0; - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 12px; - color: #8b8e98; -} -.jp-cmd-prompt { - color: var(--accent); - font-weight: 700; -} -#page .jp-cmd code { - min-width: 0; - color: #b6b9c2; - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 12px; - background: none; - padding: 0; - border-radius: 0; - overflow-wrap: anywhere; -} -.jp-cmd:hover .copy-snippet { - opacity: 1; -} -.jp-in-body .jp-cmd + .code-accordion, -.jp-in-body .jp-cmd + .snippet { - border-top: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.09); -} .jp-gutter { flex: 0 0 46px; padding: 13px 0 0 13px; @@ -728,8 +652,6 @@ body[data-view="workspace"] #sidebar-foot { border-radius: 0; background: none; padding: 12px 16px 12px 0; - overflow-y: auto; - max-height: 26em; } .jp-in-body .code-accordion { margin: 0; @@ -1133,13 +1055,11 @@ table.board tr.linked-row:hover a { align-items: center; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 8px; - margin: 0; + margin: 4px 0 22px; font-size: 12.5px; color: var(--muted); } -.agent-hint code { - flex: 1 1 18rem; - min-width: 0; +#page .agent-hint code { background: var(--code-bg); padding: 2px 9px; border-radius: 6px; @@ -1147,9 +1067,6 @@ table.board tr.linked-row:hover a { font-size: 12px; font-weight: 500; color: var(--ink); - overflow: hidden; - text-overflow: ellipsis; - white-space: nowrap; } .agent-hint .copy { flex: 0 0 auto; @@ -1177,57 +1094,155 @@ table.board tr.linked-row:hover a { font-size: 12px; color: var(--muted); } -.hub-destination { + +/* ---- logbook summary stats ---- */ +.logbook-stats { display: flex; - align-items: center; flex-wrap: wrap; - gap: 8px; - color: var(--muted); - font-size: 12.5px; + gap: 12px; + margin: 0 0 28px; } -.hub-destination a { +.stat-tile { + position: relative; display: inline-flex; align-items: center; - gap: 6px; - max-width: 100%; - padding: 3px 9px; - border: 1px solid var(--accent-line); - border-radius: 999px; - background: var(--accent-soft); - color: var(--accent-strong); + gap: 11px; + border: 1px solid var(--line); + background: var(--panel); + border-radius: var(--radius); + padding: 12px 23px; + font: inherit; + text-align: left; + cursor: pointer; + transition: border-color 0.12s, box-shadow 0.12s; +} +.stat-tile:hover:not([disabled]) { + border-color: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.45); + box-shadow: 0 3px 12px rgba(31, 41, 55, 0.06); +} +.stat-tile:focus-visible { + outline: 2px solid var(--accent); + outline-offset: 2px; +} +.stat-tile[disabled] { + cursor: default; + opacity: 0.7; +} +.stat-tile.open { + border-color: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.6); + box-shadow: 0 3px 12px rgba(31, 41, 55, 0.08); +} +.stat-icon { + width: 24px; + height: 24px; + flex: 0 0 24px; + object-fit: contain; + align-self: center; +} +.stat-text { + display: flex; + align-items: baseline; + gap: 8px; + white-space: nowrap; + line-height: 1; +} +.stat-num { font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 12px; - font-weight: 650; - line-height: 1.5; + font-size: 20px; + font-weight: 600; + line-height: 1; + color: var(--accent-strong); +} +.stat-label { + font-size: 15px; + line-height: 1; + color: var(--muted); +} +.stat-caret { + margin-left: 2px; + font-size: 10px; + color: var(--muted); + align-self: center; + transition: transform 0.12s; +} +.stat-tile.open .stat-caret { + transform: rotate(180deg); +} +.stat-popover { + position: absolute; + top: 100%; + left: 0; + margin-top: 6px; + min-width: 300px; + max-width: min(460px, 92vw); + max-height: 340px; + overflow-y: auto; + z-index: 20; + background: var(--panel); + border: 1px solid var(--line); + border-radius: var(--radius); + box-shadow: 0 8px 28px rgba(31, 41, 55, 0.12); + padding: 6px; +} +.stat-popover[hidden] { + display: none; +} +.stat-pop-head { + padding: 6px 10px 8px; + font-size: 11.5px; + font-weight: 700; + letter-spacing: 0.03em; + text-transform: uppercase; + color: var(--muted); +} +.stat-row { + display: flex; + align-items: flex-start; + gap: 10px; + padding: 9px 11px; + border-radius: 9px; + border: 1px solid transparent; text-decoration: none; - overflow-wrap: anywhere; - transition: border-color 0.12s, background 0.12s, color 0.12s; + color: inherit; + cursor: pointer; } -.hub-destination a:hover { - border-color: var(--accent); - background: #ffedd5; - color: #c2410c; +.stat-row:hover { + border-color: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.4); + background: var(--accent-soft); } -.hub-destination svg { - width: 13px; - height: 13px; +.stat-row-ico { + font-size: 15px; + line-height: 1.3; flex: 0 0 auto; - fill: none; - stroke: currentColor; - stroke-width: 1.8; - stroke-linecap: round; - stroke-linejoin: round; } - -.index-paper-link { - margin: 14px 0 30px; - font-size: 19px; - line-height: 1.35; - font-weight: 700; +.stat-row-main { + min-width: 0; + flex: 1; +} +.stat-row-title { + font-family: var(--mono); + font-size: 12.5px; + font-weight: 600; + color: var(--ink); + overflow: hidden; + text-overflow: ellipsis; + white-space: nowrap; +} +.stat-row-meta { + margin-top: 2px; + font-size: 12px; + color: var(--muted); +} +.stat-row-state.open { + color: var(--accent); + font-weight: 600; + border-radius: 5px; + padding: 1px 5px; + margin: -1px -2px; } -.index-paper-link a { - text-underline-offset: 4px; - text-decoration-thickness: 2px; +.stat-row-state.open:hover { + background: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.14); + text-decoration: underline; } .art-ico { width: 1em; @@ -1235,20 +1250,6 @@ table.board tr.linked-row:hover a { object-fit: contain; vertical-align: -0.15em; } -.art-file-ico { - width: 15px; - height: 15px; - flex: 0 0 auto; - fill: none; - stroke: currentColor; - stroke-width: 1.7; - stroke-linecap: round; - stroke-linejoin: round; - vertical-align: -0.2em; -} -.out-artifact-ico .art-file-ico { - color: var(--muted); -} /* ---- scroll-to-resource highlight ---- */ .res-flash { @@ -1293,11 +1294,108 @@ table.board tr.linked-row:hover a { font-size: 1.05em; line-height: 1; } -#page .res-chip:hover { +#page .res-chip:hover, +#page .res-chip.res-hl { + border-color: var(--accent); + background: var(--accent-soft); + color: var(--accent-strong); +} +#page a.res-link.res-hl { + background: var(--accent-soft); + border-radius: 4px; +} +.rail-item.res-hl { + border-color: var(--accent); + background: var(--accent-soft); + box-shadow: 0 3px 12px rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.14); +} +.rail-item.res-hl .rail-title { + color: var(--accent-strong); +} +.rail-item.rail-local { + cursor: default; +} +.artifact-chip.res-hl { border-color: var(--accent); background: var(--accent-soft); +} + +/* ---- contextual resources rail ---- */ +.context-rail { + position: relative; + width: 248px; +} +.context-rail[hidden] { + display: none; +} +.rail-kind { + display: flex; + align-items: center; + gap: 5px; + font-family: var(--mono); + font-size: 10px; + text-transform: uppercase; + letter-spacing: 0.08em; + font-weight: 600; + color: var(--accent); + margin-bottom: 4px; +} +.rail-item { + position: absolute; + left: 0; + right: 0; + display: block; + border: 1px solid var(--line); + border-radius: 10px; + background: var(--panel); + padding: 9px 12px; + margin-bottom: 8px; + text-decoration: none; + color: inherit; + transition: border-color 0.14s, box-shadow 0.14s; +} +.rail-item:hover { + border-color: rgba(249, 115, 22, 0.45); + box-shadow: 0 3px 12px rgba(31, 41, 55, 0.06); +} +.rail-title { + font-family: var(--mono); + font-size: 12.5px; + font-weight: 600; + color: var(--ink); + overflow-wrap: anywhere; + line-height: 1.4; +} +.rail-item:hover .rail-title { color: var(--accent-strong); } +.rail-meta { + font-size: 11.5px; + color: var(--muted); + margin-top: 2px; +} + +@media (max-width: 1400px) { + .page-layout { + display: block; + } + .context-rail { + width: 100%; + margin-top: 28px; + position: static; + min-height: 0 !important; + display: grid; + grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(220px, 1fr)); + gap: 10px; + } + .context-rail[hidden] { + display: none; + } + .context-rail .rail-item { + position: static; + margin-bottom: 0; + } +} /* ---- connect footer + modal ---- */ #sidebar-foot { @@ -1473,609 +1571,6 @@ table.board tr.linked-row:hover a { color: #52d08a; } -/* ---- top-level logbook views ---- */ -#view-tabs { - position: sticky; - top: 0; - z-index: 30; - width: 100%; - max-width: 1080px; - margin: 0 auto 24px; - padding-top: 10px; - display: flex; - align-items: center; - justify-content: flex-start; - gap: 26px; - border-bottom: 1px solid var(--line); - background: var(--paper); -} -#view-tabs a { - display: inline-flex; - align-items: center; - gap: 8px; - min-height: 44px; - margin-bottom: -1px; - color: var(--muted); - border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; - text-decoration: none; - font-size: 13.5px; - font-weight: 600; - transition: color 0.12s, border-color 0.12s; -} -#view-tabs a:hover { - color: var(--ink); -} -#view-tabs a.active { - color: var(--accent-strong); - border-bottom-color: var(--accent); -} -#view-tabs svg { - width: 18px; - height: 18px; - flex: 0 0 auto; - fill: none; - stroke: currentColor; - stroke-width: 2; - stroke-linecap: round; - stroke-linejoin: round; -} -.workspace-file svg, -.workspace-folder summary svg, -.workspace-download svg { - width: 17px; - height: 17px; - flex: 0 0 auto; - fill: none; - stroke: currentColor; - stroke-width: 1.7; - stroke-linecap: round; - stroke-linejoin: round; -} - -#page.trace-page, -#page.workspace-page { - max-width: 1080px; -} -.view-loading { - padding: 72px 0; - color: var(--muted); - text-align: center; -} -.view-empty { - margin: 48px 0; - padding: 44px 28px; - border: 1px dashed #d8dbe1; - border-radius: var(--radius); - background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.72); - text-align: center; -} -.view-empty h2 { - margin: 0 0 7px; - font-size: 18px; -} -.view-empty p { - max-width: 560px; - margin: 0 auto; - color: var(--muted); -} -.view-empty code { - display: inline-block; - margin-top: 18px; - padding: 7px 10px; - border-radius: 7px; - background: var(--code-bg); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 12px; -} -#page .repo-ref-link { - display: inline-block; - margin-top: 18px; - padding: 8px 14px; - border-radius: 8px; - background: var(--accent-strong, #2158d0); - color: #fff; - font-weight: 600; - text-decoration: none; -} -#page .repo-ref-link:hover, -#page .repo-ref-link:focus-visible { - color: #fff; - filter: brightness(0.95); -} -.view-eyebrow { - margin-bottom: 4px; - color: var(--accent-strong); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 11px; - font-weight: 700; - letter-spacing: 0.12em; - text-transform: uppercase; -} - -/* ---- trace ---- */ -.trace-session { - scroll-margin-top: 24px; -} -.trace-session + .trace-session { - margin-top: 44px; - padding-top: 40px; - border-top: 1px solid var(--line); -} -.trace-session-title { - margin: 0 0 14px; - color: var(--ink); - font-family: var(--serif); - font-size: 22px; - line-height: 1.2; - letter-spacing: -0.02em; - overflow-wrap: anywhere; -} -.workspace-header h1 { - margin: 0; - color: var(--ink); - font-size: 30px; - line-height: 1.2; - letter-spacing: -0.025em; -} -.trace-meta { - display: flex; - flex-wrap: wrap; - gap: 9px 20px; - margin-bottom: 34px; - padding: 14px 16px; - border: 1px solid var(--line); - border-radius: 10px; - background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.78); - color: var(--muted); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 11px; -} -.trace-meta strong { - color: var(--ink); - font-weight: 650; -} -.trace-source-missing { - color: #b45309; -} -.trace-timeline { - position: relative; -} -.trace-timeline::before { - content: ""; - position: absolute; - top: 0; - bottom: 0; - left: 82px; - width: 1px; - background: #dedfe3; -} -.trace-load-controls { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - justify-content: space-between; - gap: 16px; - margin: 22px 0 0 100px; - padding-top: 16px; - border-top: 1px solid var(--line); -} -.trace-load-progress { - color: var(--muted); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 11px; -} -.trace-load-more { - padding: 7px 12px; - border: 1px solid var(--line-strong); - border-radius: 7px; - background: var(--paper); - color: var(--ink); - cursor: pointer; - font: 650 12px/1.2 var(--sans); -} -.trace-load-more:hover:not(:disabled) { - border-color: var(--accent); - color: var(--accent-strong); -} -.trace-load-more:disabled { - cursor: default; - opacity: 0.65; -} -.trace-entry { - --trace-depth: 0; - position: relative; - display: grid; - grid-template-columns: 100px minmax(0, 1fr); - margin: 0 0 18px calc(var(--trace-depth) * 24px); -} -.trace-rail { - position: relative; - min-height: 36px; - padding: 4px 28px 0 0; - color: #8a8d95; - text-align: right; - font-family: var(--mono); -} -.trace-number, -.trace-elapsed { - display: block; - white-space: nowrap; -} -.trace-number { - font-size: 12px; - font-weight: 650; -} -.trace-elapsed { - margin-top: 3px; - font-size: 10px; -} -.trace-dot { - position: absolute; - top: 10px; - right: 11px; - width: 11px; - height: 11px; - border: 2px solid var(--paper); - border-radius: 50%; - background: var(--accent); - box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px #d7d9de; -} -.trace-card { - min-width: 0; - overflow: hidden; - border: 1px solid #dddfe4; - border-radius: 11px; - background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92); -} -.trace-card > header { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - gap: 10px; - min-height: 37px; - padding: 8px 13px; - border-bottom: 1px solid #eceef1; -} -.trace-status .trace-card > header { - border-bottom: 0; - padding-bottom: 5px; -} -.trace-kind { - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 10.5px; - font-weight: 750; - letter-spacing: 0.08em; - text-transform: uppercase; -} -.trace-turn { - color: var(--muted); - font: 10px var(--mono); -} -.trace-status-badge { - margin-left: auto; - padding: 1px 6px; - border-radius: 999px; - background: #eef0f3; - color: var(--muted); - font: 9.5px var(--mono); - text-transform: uppercase; -} -.trace-status-badge-error, -.trace-status-badge-failed { - background: #fef2f2; - color: #b91c1c; -} -.trace-body { - margin: 0; - padding: 15px 17px 17px; - overflow-wrap: anywhere; - white-space: pre-wrap; - font-family: var(--sans); - font-size: 13px; - line-height: 1.65; -} -.trace-reasoning .trace-card { - border-style: dashed; - border-color: #d7b98a; - background: #fffdf8; -} -.trace-reasoning .trace-kind { - color: #9a6b22; -} -.trace-reasoning .trace-body { - font-style: italic; -} -.trace-user .trace-card { - border-left: 3px solid #f3a66d; -} -.trace-tool_call .trace-card, -.trace-tool_result .trace-card { - border-color: #2d3036; - background: #191a1e; - color: #ececf0; -} -.trace-tool_call .trace-card > header, -.trace-tool_result .trace-card > header { - border-bottom-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1); -} -.trace-tool_call .trace-kind, -.trace-tool_result .trace-kind { - color: #f5a66d; -} -.trace-tool_call .trace-turn, -.trace-tool_result .trace-turn { - color: #979aa3; -} -.trace-tool_call .trace-body, -.trace-tool_result .trace-body, -.trace-output pre { - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 11.5px; - line-height: 1.6; -} -#page .trace-tool_call pre.trace-body, -#page .trace-tool_result pre.trace-body { - margin: 0; - padding: 15px 17px 17px; - border: 0; - border-radius: 0; - background: transparent; - color: #ececf0; -} -.trace-output { - border-top: 1px dashed rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.14); -} -.trace-output summary { - padding: 9px 14px; - color: #aaaeb7; - cursor: pointer; - font: 700 10px var(--mono); - letter-spacing: 0.06em; - text-transform: uppercase; -} -#page .trace-output pre { - max-height: 480px; - margin: 0; - padding: 0 16px 16px; - border: 0; - border-radius: 0; - background: transparent; - overflow: auto; - color: #d7d8dd; - white-space: pre-wrap; -} - -/* ---- workspace ---- */ -.workspace-header { - padding-bottom: 24px; -} -.workspace-header p { - margin: 0; - color: var(--muted); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 11px; -} -.workspace-inventory { - overflow: hidden; - border: 1px solid var(--line); - border-radius: 11px; - background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92); -} -.workspace-folder > summary { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - gap: 8px; - min-height: 39px; - padding: 8px 13px; - background: #fafafa; - cursor: pointer; - font-weight: 650; - list-style: none; -} -.workspace-folder > summary::-webkit-details-marker { - display: none; -} -.workspace-folder > summary::after { - content: "›"; - margin-left: auto; - color: #989ba2; - transform: rotate(90deg); -} -.workspace-folder:not([open]) > summary::after { - transform: rotate(0); -} -.workspace-folder-children { - padding-left: 20px; -} -.workspace-file { - display: grid; - grid-template-columns: minmax(180px, 1fr) 72px 78px 180px 36px; - align-items: center; - min-height: 44px; - padding: 7px 10px 7px 13px; - color: var(--muted); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 10.5px; -} -.workspace-file-name { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - min-width: 0; - gap: 8px; - color: var(--ink); - font-family: var(--sans); - font-size: 12.5px; - font-weight: 550; -} -.workspace-file-name span { - overflow: hidden; - text-overflow: ellipsis; - white-space: nowrap; -} -.workspace-file-type { - width: fit-content; - padding: 1px 6px; - border-radius: 999px; - background: var(--accent-soft); - color: var(--accent-strong); - text-transform: uppercase; -} -.workspace-download { - display: inline-flex; - align-items: center; - justify-content: center; - width: 30px; - height: 30px; - border-radius: 7px; - color: var(--muted); -} -.workspace-download:hover { - background: var(--accent-soft); - color: var(--accent-strong); -} -.workspace-unpublished { - color: #9ca3af; - text-align: center; -} - -.workspace-header { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - justify-content: space-between; - gap: 16px; - flex-wrap: wrap; -} -.workspace-toggle { - display: inline-flex; - align-items: center; - padding: 2px; - border: 1px solid var(--line); - border-radius: 999px; - background: #fafafa; -} -.workspace-toggle-btn { - padding: 4px 13px; - border: 0; - border-radius: 999px; - background: transparent; - color: var(--muted); - font-family: var(--sans); - font-size: 12px; - font-weight: 600; - cursor: pointer; -} -.workspace-toggle-btn:hover { - color: var(--accent-strong); -} -.workspace-toggle-btn.is-active { - background: var(--accent); - color: #ffffff; -} -.workspace-group + .workspace-group { - margin-top: 18px; -} -.workspace-group-head, -.workspace-hub-group-head { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - gap: 8px; - margin: 0; - padding: 8px 13px; - background: #fafafa; - border-bottom: 1px solid var(--line); - color: var(--ink); - font-family: var(--sans); - font-size: 12px; - font-weight: 650; - text-transform: capitalize; -} -.workspace-group-count, -.workspace-hub-count { - padding: 0 7px; - border-radius: 999px; - background: var(--accent-soft); - color: var(--accent-strong); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 10.5px; -} -.workspace-group { - overflow: hidden; - border: 1px solid var(--line); - border-radius: 11px; - background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92); -} - -.workspace-hub { - margin-top: 28px; -} -.workspace-hub-title { - margin: 0 0 14px; - font-family: var(--sans); - font-size: 16px; - font-weight: 700; - color: var(--ink); -} -.workspace-hub-group { - overflow: hidden; - border: 1px solid var(--line); - border-radius: 11px; - background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92); -} -.workspace-hub-group + .workspace-hub-group { - margin-top: 14px; -} -.workspace-hub-list { - display: flex; - flex-direction: column; -} -.workspace-hub-link { - padding: 9px 13px; - color: var(--accent-strong); - font-family: var(--mono); - font-size: 12px; - text-decoration: none; - overflow: hidden; - text-overflow: ellipsis; - white-space: nowrap; -} -.workspace-hub-link + .workspace-hub-link { - border-top: 1px solid var(--line); -} -.workspace-hub-link:hover { - background: var(--accent-soft); - text-decoration: underline; -} - -/* --- UI nits --- */ -/* Flush group headers: #page h3/h2 (ID selectors) otherwise inject a top margin - that, with overflow:hidden on the card, shows as whitespace above "Jobs" etc. */ -#page .workspace-hub-title { - margin: 0 0 14px; -} -#page .workspace-hub-group-head, -#page .workspace-group-head { - margin: 0; -} -/* HF brand logo before the "Hugging Face artifacts" heading */ -.workspace-hub-title { - display: flex; - align-items: center; - gap: 9px; -} -.workspace-hub-logo { - width: 22px; - height: 22px; - flex: none; -} -/* Center empty-state placeholders (heading, body, command) */ -.view-empty { - display: flex; - flex-direction: column; - align-items: center; -} -#page .view-empty h2, -#page .view-empty p { - text-align: center; -} - @media (max-width: 720px) { #app { flex-direction: column; @@ -2092,46 +1587,11 @@ table.board tr.linked-row:hover a { padding: 28px 20px 80px; overflow-x: hidden; } - #view-tabs { - margin: 0 0 20px; - gap: 18px; - justify-content: flex-start; - overflow-x: auto; - } - #view-tabs a { - flex: 0 0 auto; - } - .trace-timeline::before { - left: 16px; - } - .trace-entry { - grid-template-columns: 32px minmax(0, 1fr); - margin-left: calc(var(--trace-depth) * 10px); - } - .trace-rail { - padding: 0; - } - .trace-number, - .trace-elapsed { - display: none; - } - .trace-dot { - top: 10px; - right: 10px; - } - .workspace-file { - grid-template-columns: minmax(150px, 1fr) 66px 34px; - } - .workspace-file-size, - .workspace-file-time { - display: none; - } #page { width: 100%; max-width: 100%; } - #page h1, - #logbook-title { + #page h1 { font-size: 30px; } .cell-head { diff --git a/logbook.js b/logbook.js index 6961cafe88260fb92540727ce40c4b068bfe2017..8493abfc9d816bf6c220cca35233ca89bab143e6 100644 --- a/logbook.js +++ b/logbook.js @@ -4,12 +4,9 @@ let MANIFEST = null; const PAGE_CACHE = {}; const UNFURL_CACHE = {}; - const DATA_CACHE = {}; const LIVE_RELOAD_MS = 1500; const FIGURE_FRAME_WINDOWS = new Set(); let FIGURE_NAVIGATION_READY = false; - let CURRENT_VIEW = null; - let RENDER_SEQUENCE = 0; function esc(s) { return String(s) @@ -289,10 +286,6 @@ /(trackio-artifact:\/\/\S+|trackio-local-path:\/\/\S+|https:\/\/huggingface\.co\/buckets\/[^\s<)]+#\S+)/ ); if (chip && uri) chip.dataset.resUrl = uri[1]; - if (chip && meta.path) { - const ico = chip.querySelector(".art-ico"); - if (ico) ico.outerHTML = FILE_ICON; - } } else if (meta.type === "dashboard") { const sp = body.match(/https:\/\/huggingface\.co\/spaces\/[^\s<>)"'`]+/); cell.dataset.resUrl = sp @@ -502,7 +495,7 @@ if (!message || message.type !== "trackio-logbook:navigate") return; const target = String(message.target || "").replace(/^#?\//, ""); if (!target || !MANIFEST || !findNode(MANIFEST.root, target)) return; - const hash = "#/view/code/" + target; + const hash = "#/" + target; if (location.hash === hash) scrollToHash(); else location.hash = hash; }); @@ -514,15 +507,6 @@ '' + ''; - const PIN_ICON = - ''; - - const FILE_ICON = - ''; - // Figures are rendered in same-origin iframes, so fullscreen the fitted // wrapper rather than the iframe document. This uses the browser's native // fullscreen UI and preserves the figure's existing responsive sizing. @@ -651,38 +635,13 @@ ? `Open ↗` : `publish to share`; const meta = parts.length ? `${parts.join(" · ")} · ${state}` : state; - const icon = info.isPathRef ? FILE_ICON : ARTIFACT_ICON_IMG; el.innerHTML = - `${icon}` + + `${ARTIFACT_ICON_IMG}` + `${esc(info.name)}` + `${meta}`; return el; } - function isShellCommand(part) { - return ( - part.kind === "code" && - part.lang === "bash" && - !part.title && - /^\s*\$\s/.test(part.text) - ); - } - - function renderCommandLine(text) { - const command = text.trim().replace(/^\$\s*/, ""); - const el = document.createElement("div"); - el.className = "jp-cmd"; - const prompt = document.createElement("span"); - prompt.className = "jp-cmd-prompt"; - prompt.textContent = "$"; - const code = document.createElement("code"); - code.textContent = command; - el.appendChild(prompt); - el.appendChild(code); - el.appendChild(copySnippetBtn(command)); - return el; - } - function renderCodeCell(body, container, artifacts) { const parts = parseFences(body); const block = document.createElement("div"); @@ -735,13 +694,7 @@ embedTexts.push(part.text); return; } - if (isShellCommand(part)) { - inputBody.appendChild(renderCommandLine(part.text)); - } else { - inputBody.appendChild( - renderCode(part.text, part.lang, part.title, Boolean(part.title)) - ); - } + inputBody.appendChild(renderCode(part.text, part.lang, part.title)); }); if (artifacts && artifacts.length) { ensureOut(); @@ -960,13 +913,13 @@ return btn; } - function renderCode(code, lang, title, open) { + function renderCode(code, lang, title) { const pre = document.createElement("pre"); pre.className = "hl"; const c = document.createElement("code"); c.innerHTML = highlightCode(code, lang); pre.appendChild(c); - if (!title || open) { + if (!title) { const wrap = document.createElement("div"); wrap.className = "snippet"; wrap.appendChild(pre); @@ -1030,7 +983,7 @@ }); } - /* -------------------- resource classification -------------------- */ + /* -------------------- resources rail -------------------- */ function fmt(n) { if (n == null) return null; @@ -1058,6 +1011,18 @@ const ARTIFACT_ICON_IMG = ``; const DASHBOARD_ICON_IMG = ``; + const RESOURCE_DESC = { + dashboard: "Dashboard", + model: "Model", + dataset: "Dataset", + space: "Space", + artifact: "Artifact — in Bucket", + paper: "Paper", + repo: "Repository", + job: "Job — status & logs", + bucket: "Bucket — artifacts & data", + }; + const HF_NON_MODEL_PREFIX = /^(datasets|spaces|jobs|buckets|papers|blog|docs|api|posts|collections|organizations|settings|new|join|login|pricing|tasks|learn|chat|models)(\/|$)/; @@ -1065,23 +1030,6 @@ return url.split(marker)[1].split(/[?#]/)[0].replace(/\/$/, ""); } - function validHfSegment(value) { - return Boolean( - value && - value.length <= 96 && - /^[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+$/.test(value) && - !/^[.-]|[.-]$|--|\.\./.test(value) - ); - } - - function validHfRepoId(parts) { - return ( - parts.length === 2 && - parts.join("/").length <= 96 && - parts.every(validHfSegment) - ); - } - function classifyResource(url) { if (IMG_URL.test(url)) { return null; @@ -1111,39 +1059,29 @@ local: true, }; } - if ((m = url.match(/huggingface\.co\/buckets\/([^/#\s]+\/[^/#\s]+)#(.+)/))) { - if (!validHfRepoId(m[1].split("/"))) return null; - return { kind: "artifact", id: decodeURIComponent(m[2]), url }; + if ((m = url.match(/huggingface\.co\/buckets\/[^#\s]+#(.+)/))) { + return { kind: "artifact", id: decodeURIComponent(m[1]), url }; } - if (/huggingface\.co\/datasets\//.test(url)) { - const parts = hfId(url, "/datasets/").split("/").slice(0, 2); - if (!validHfRepoId(parts)) return null; - return { kind: "dataset", id: parts.join("/"), url }; + if (/huggingface\.co\/datasets\/[^/]+\/[^/]+/.test(url)) { + return { kind: "dataset", id: hfId(url, "/datasets/"), url }; } - if (/huggingface\.co\/spaces\//.test(url)) { - const parts = hfId(url, "/spaces/").split("/").slice(0, 2); - if (!validHfRepoId(parts)) return null; - return { kind: "space", id: parts.join("/"), url }; + if (/huggingface\.co\/spaces\/[^/]+\/[^/]+/.test(url)) { + return { kind: "space", id: hfId(url, "/spaces/"), url }; } if (/huggingface\.co\/jobs\//.test(url)) { - const parts = hfId(url, "/jobs/").split("/").slice(0, 2); - if (!validHfRepoId(parts)) return null; - const jid = parts[1]; + const parts = hfId(url, "/jobs/").split("/"); + const jid = parts[1] || ""; return { kind: "job", - id: parts[0] + ` · ${jid.slice(0, 12)}${jid.length > 12 ? "…" : ""}`, + id: parts[0] + (jid ? ` · ${jid.slice(0, 12)}${jid.length > 12 ? "…" : ""}` : ""), url, }; } if (/huggingface\.co\/buckets\//.test(url)) { - const parts = hfId(url, "/buckets/").split("/").slice(0, 2); - if (!validHfRepoId(parts)) return null; - return { kind: "bucket", id: parts.join("/"), url }; + return { kind: "bucket", id: hfId(url, "/buckets/"), url }; } if (/huggingface\.co\/papers\//.test(url)) { - const id = hfId(url, "/papers/").split("/")[0]; - if (!validHfSegment(id)) return null; - return { kind: "paper", id: `Paper ${id}`, url }; + return { kind: "paper", id: `Paper ${hfId(url, "/papers/")}`, url }; } if ((m = url.match(/arxiv\.org\/(?:abs|pdf)\/([^?#\s]+)/))) { return { kind: "paper", id: `arXiv:${m[1].replace(/\.pdf$/, "")}`, url }; @@ -1153,13 +1091,324 @@ } if ((m = url.match(/huggingface\.co\/([^?#]+)/))) { const rest = m[1].replace(/\/$/, ""); - if (validHfRepoId(rest.split("/")) && !HF_NON_MODEL_PREFIX.test(rest)) { + if (/^[^/]+\/[^/]+$/.test(rest) && !HF_NON_MODEL_PREFIX.test(rest)) { return { kind: "model", id: rest, url }; } } return null; } + async function fillRailMeta(item, el) { + if (item.local) return; + const meta = el.querySelector(".rail-meta"); + const set = (parts) => { + const text = parts.filter(Boolean).join(" · "); + if (text) meta.textContent = text; + }; + if (item.kind === "model") { + const d = await getJSON(`https://huggingface.co/api/models/${item.id}`); + if (d) set([d.pipeline_tag, `↓ ${fmt(d.downloads)}`, `♥ ${fmt(d.likes)}`]); + } else if (item.kind === "dataset") { + const d = await getJSON(`https://huggingface.co/api/datasets/${item.id}`); + if (d) set([`↓ ${fmt(d.downloads)}`, `♥ ${fmt(d.likes)}`]); + } else if (item.kind === "space" || item.kind === "dashboard") { + const d = await getJSON(`https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/${item.id}`); + if (d) set([d.sdk, `♥ ${fmt(d.likes)}`]); + } else if (item.kind === "repo") { + const d = await getJSON(`https://api.github.com/repos/${item.id}`); + if (d) set([`★ ${fmt(d.stargazers_count)}`, d.language]); + } else if (item.kind === "paper") { + const m = item.id.match(/^(?:arXiv:|Paper )(.+)$/); + if (!m) return; + const arxivId = m[1].replace(/v\d+$/, ""); + const d = await getJSON(`https://huggingface.co/api/papers/${arxivId}`); + if (d && d.id) { + if (el.href) el.href = `https://huggingface.co/papers/${d.id}`; + const title = + d.title && d.title.length > 70 ? `${d.title.slice(0, 69)}…` : d.title; + set([title, d.upvotes ? `▲ ${fmt(d.upvotes)}` : null]); + } + } + } + + const BARE_ID_SKIP_DIRS = new Set([ + "scripts", + "configs", + "config", + "results", + "figures", + "data", + "datasets", + "src", + "tests", + "test", + "examples", + "pages", + "assets", + "docs", + "outputs", + "output", + "checkpoints", + "models", + "utils", + "lib", + "bin", + "tmp", + "node_modules", + "dist", + "build", + ]); + const FILE_EXT_RE = + /\.(py|pyc|js|ts|jsx|tsx|json|jsonl|yaml|yml|csv|tsv|md|txt|sh|bash|html|css|png|jpe?g|svg|gif|webp|ipynb|toml|cfg|ini|lock|pdf|whl|gz|zip|tar|pt|pth|bin|safetensors|db|sqlite)$/i; + + async function detectBareModelIds(text, groups) { + const stripped = text.replace(DETECTED_URL, " "); + DETECTED_URL.lastIndex = 0; + const seen = new Set(); + const candidates = []; + const re = /(^|[\s"'`(=[])([A-Za-z0-9][\w.-]*\/[A-Za-z0-9][\w.-]*)/g; + let m; + while ((m = re.exec(stripped)) && candidates.length < 15) { + const id = m[2].replace(/[.:,]+$/, ""); + if (seen.has(id)) continue; + seen.add(id); + if (FILE_EXT_RE.test(id)) continue; + if (BARE_ID_SKIP_DIRS.has(id.split("/")[0].toLowerCase())) continue; + candidates.push(id); + } + const results = await Promise.all( + candidates.map((id) => getJSON(`https://huggingface.co/api/models/${id}`)) + ); + let added = false; + const confirmed = []; + results.forEach((d, i) => { + if (!d || !d.id) return; + const id = candidates[i]; + confirmed.push(id); + const url = `https://huggingface.co/${id}`; + if (!groups.has("model")) groups.set("model", new Map()); + if (!groups.get("model").has(url)) { + groups.get("model").set(url, { kind: "model", id, url }); + added = true; + } + }); + return { added, confirmed }; + } + + function chipifyBareIds(ids, container) { + if (!ids.length) return; + const escaped = ids.map((id) => id.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, "\\$&")); + const pattern = new RegExp("(" + escaped.join("|") + ")"); + const splitter = new RegExp(pattern.source, "g"); + container + .querySelectorAll(".cell.markdown .cell-body") + .forEach((body) => { + const walker = document.createTreeWalker(body, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, { + acceptNode(node) { + if (!pattern.test(node.nodeValue)) return NodeFilter.FILTER_REJECT; + for ( + let el = node.parentElement; + el && el !== body; + el = el.parentElement + ) { + if (["A", "CODE", "PRE", "BUTTON"].indexOf(el.tagName) !== -1) { + return NodeFilter.FILTER_REJECT; + } + } + return NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT; + }, + }); + const nodes = []; + while (walker.nextNode()) nodes.push(walker.currentNode); + nodes.forEach((node) => { + const frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); + node.nodeValue.split(splitter).forEach((part) => { + if (ids.indexOf(part) !== -1) { + const holder = document.createElement("span"); + holder.innerHTML = resChipHtml({ + kind: "model", + id: part, + url: `https://huggingface.co/${part}`, + }); + frag.appendChild(holder.firstChild); + } else if (part) { + frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); + } + }); + node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); + }); + }); + } + + let RAIL_TOKEN = 0; + const RAIL_EXCLUDE_KINDS = new Set(["paper", "repo", "artifact", "dashboard"]); + + function railDashboardItem(it) { + return { + kind: "dashboard", + id: it.id, + url: it.local ? it.resUrl : it.url || it.resUrl, + local: it.local, + railLabel: "Dashboard", + }; + } + + function promoteTrackioSpacesInRail(groups, dashResUrls, body, rail, token) { + const spaceGroup = groups.get("space"); + if (!spaceGroup || !spaceGroup.size) return; + spaceGroup.forEach((item, url) => { + getJSON(`https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/${item.id}`) + .then((d) => { + if (rail.dataset.renderToken !== token) return; + const tags = (d && d.tags) || []; + if (!tags.some((t) => String(t).toLowerCase() === "trackio")) return; + if (dashResUrls.has(url)) return; + spaceGroup.delete(url); + if (!spaceGroup.size) groups.delete("space"); + if (!groups.has("dashboard")) groups.set("dashboard", new Map()); + groups.get("dashboard").set(url, { + kind: "dashboard", + id: item.id, + url: item.url, + local: false, + railLabel: "Dashboard", + }); + dashResUrls.add(url); + paintRail(groups, body, rail); + }) + .catch(() => {}); + }); + } + + function renderRail(md, body, rail) { + const token = String(++RAIL_TOKEN); + rail.dataset.renderToken = token; + const scanText = md.replace( + /(`{3,4}|~{3,4})(html|raw)[^\n]*\n[\s\S]*?\n\1/g, + " " + ); + const groups = new Map(); + const dashMap = new Map(); + const dashResUrls = new Set(); + cellDashboardItems(md).forEach((it) => { + if (dashMap.has(it.resUrl)) return; + dashMap.set(it.resUrl, railDashboardItem(it)); + dashResUrls.add(it.resUrl); + }); + if (dashMap.size) groups.set("dashboard", dashMap); + extractUrls(scanText).forEach((url) => { + const item = classifyResource(url); + if (!item) return; + if (RAIL_EXCLUDE_KINDS.has(item.kind)) return; + if (dashResUrls.has(url)) return; + if (!groups.has(item.kind)) groups.set(item.kind, new Map()); + groups.get(item.kind).set(item.url, item); + }); + const artMap = new Map(); + cellArtifactItems(md).forEach((it) => { + if (artMap.has(it.resUrl)) return; + const label = it.type + ? it.type.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + it.type.slice(1) + : "Artifact"; + artMap.set(it.resUrl, { + kind: "artifact", + id: it.name, + url: it.local ? it.resUrl : it.url || it.resUrl, + local: it.local, + railLabel: label, + size: it.size, + }); + }); + if (artMap.size) groups.set("artifact", artMap); + paintRail(groups, body, rail); + promoteTrackioSpacesInRail(groups, dashResUrls, body, rail, token); + detectBareModelIds(scanText, groups) + .then((result) => { + if (rail.dataset.renderToken !== token) return; + chipifyBareIds(result.confirmed, body); + if (result.added) paintRail(groups, body, rail); + }) + .catch(() => {}); + } + + function paintRail(groups, body, rail) { + rail.innerHTML = ""; + RESOURCE_SECTIONS.forEach(([kind, label, icon]) => { + const group = groups.get(kind); + if (!group || !group.size) return; + group.forEach((item) => { + const el = document.createElement(item.local ? "div" : "a"); + el.className = item.local ? "rail-item rail-local" : "rail-item"; + if (!item.local) { + el.href = item.url; + el.target = "_blank"; + el.rel = "noopener"; + } + el.dataset.resUrl = item.url; + let desc; + if (kind === "artifact") { + const state = item.local ? "publish to share" : "Open ↗"; + desc = item.size ? `${item.size} · ${state}` : state; + } else if (kind === "dashboard") { + desc = item.local ? "publish to share" : "Open ↗"; + } else { + desc = item.local ? "publish to share" : RESOURCE_DESC[kind]; + } + const kindLabel = item.railLabel || label.replace(/s$/, ""); + const iconHtml = + kind === "artifact" + ? ARTIFACT_ICON_IMG + : kind === "dashboard" + ? DASHBOARD_ICON_IMG + : `${icon}`; + el.innerHTML = + `
${iconHtml}${esc(kindLabel)}
` + + `
${esc(item.id)}
` + + `
${esc(desc)}
`; + rail.appendChild(el); + fillRailMeta(item, el) + .catch(() => {}) + .finally(() => scheduleRailPosition(body, rail)); + }); + }); + rail.hidden = !rail.childElementCount; + scheduleRailPosition(body, rail); + } + + function resourceAnchor(body, url) { + return body.querySelector(`[data-res-url="${CSS.escape(url)}"]`); + } + + function positionRail(body, rail) { + if (rail.hidden || !rail.isConnected) return; + const bodyRect = body.getBoundingClientRect(); + const items = Array.from(rail.querySelectorAll(".rail-item")).map((el, index) => { + const anchor = resourceAnchor(body, el.dataset.resUrl); + return { + el, + index, + desired: anchor + ? Math.max(0, anchor.getBoundingClientRect().top - bodyRect.top) + : 0, + }; + }); + items.sort((a, b) => a.desired - b.desired || a.index - b.index); + let cursor = 0; + items.forEach(({ el, desired }) => { + const top = Math.max(desired, cursor); + el.style.top = `${top}px`; + cursor = top + el.offsetHeight + 10; + }); + rail.style.minHeight = `${Math.max(body.offsetHeight, cursor)}px`; + } + + function scheduleRailPosition(body, rail) { + cancelAnimationFrame(Number(rail.dataset.positionFrame || 0)); + rail.dataset.positionFrame = String( + requestAnimationFrame(() => positionRail(body, rail)) + ); + } + function dashboardSubdomainFromUrl(url) { return spaceIdFromUrl(url).toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9-]/g, "-"); } @@ -1274,15 +1523,11 @@ function buildTree() { const tree = document.getElementById("tree"); tree.innerHTML = ""; - const label = document.createElement("div"); - label.className = "tree-label"; - label.textContent = "Pages"; - tree.appendChild(label); const nodes = []; (MANIFEST.root.children || []).forEach((c) => flattenTree(c, 0, nodes)); nodes.forEach(({ node, depth }) => { const a = document.createElement("a"); - a.href = "#/view/code/" + node.slug; + a.href = "#/" + node.slug; a.className = "depth-" + depth; a.dataset.slug = node.slug; const mark = document.createElement("span"); @@ -1294,47 +1539,6 @@ }); } - function highlightTraceSession(sessionId) { - document.querySelectorAll("#tree a").forEach((link) => { - link.classList.toggle("active", link.dataset.sessionId === sessionId); - }); - } - - function buildTraceTree(activeSessionId, traceSessions = MANIFEST.traces || []) { - const tree = document.getElementById("tree"); - tree.innerHTML = ""; - const sessions = traceSessions; - if (!sessions.length) return; - const label = document.createElement("div"); - label.className = "tree-label"; - label.textContent = "Sessions"; - tree.appendChild(label); - sessions.forEach((session) => { - const link = document.createElement("a"); - link.href = "#" + traceSessionAnchor(session.id); - link.dataset.sessionId = session.id; - link.textContent = session.title || session.id; - link.title = session.title || session.id; - tree.appendChild(link); - }); - highlightTraceSession(activeSessionId || sessions[0].id); - } - - function renderSidebar(route) { - if (route.view === "trace") { - highlight(null); - buildTraceTree(route.sessionId); - return; - } - if (route.view === "workspace") { - document.getElementById("tree").innerHTML = ""; - highlight(null); - return; - } - buildTree(); - highlight(route.slug); - } - function highlight(slug) { document .querySelectorAll("#tree a") @@ -1348,9 +1552,6 @@ Object.keys(PAGE_CACHE).forEach((key) => { delete PAGE_CACHE[key]; }); - Object.keys(DATA_CACHE).forEach((key) => { - delete DATA_CACHE[key]; - }); } function isLocalPreview() { @@ -1376,46 +1577,6 @@ return PAGE_CACHE[node.file]; } - async function fetchData(file, cacheResult = true) { - if (cacheResult && DATA_CACHE[file]) return DATA_CACHE[file]; - const suffix = isLocalPreview() - ? `?rev=${encodeURIComponent(MANIFEST.revision || "")}` - : ""; - const response = await fetch("./" + file + suffix, { cache: "no-store" }); - if (!response.ok) throw new Error(`Could not load ${file}`); - const data = await response.json(); - if (cacheResult) DATA_CACHE[file] = data; - return data; - } - - async function fetchRemoteData(url, cacheResult = true) { - if (cacheResult && DATA_CACHE[url]) return DATA_CACHE[url]; - const response = await fetch(url, { cache: "no-store" }); - if (!response.ok) throw new Error(`Could not load ${url}`); - const data = await response.json(); - if (cacheResult) DATA_CACHE[url] = data; - return data; - } - - function encodeRepoPath(path) { - return String(path || "") - .split("/") - .map((part) => encodeURIComponent(part)) - .join("/"); - } - - function repoFileUrl(ref, path) { - const revision = encodeURIComponent(ref.revision || "main"); - const encodedPath = encodeRepoPath(path); - if (ref.repo_type === "dataset") { - return `https://huggingface.co/datasets/${ref.repo_id}/resolve/${revision}/${encodedPath}`; - } - if (ref.repo_type === "bucket") { - return `https://huggingface.co/buckets/${ref.repo_id}/resolve/${encodedPath}`; - } - return ""; - } - function allNodes() { const nodes = []; flattenTree(MANIFEST.root, 0, nodes); @@ -1460,28 +1621,13 @@ cells.forEach(({ meta, body }) => { const cell = renderCell(meta, body, list); cell.classList.add("pinned-copy"); - const title = cell.querySelector(".cell-title"); - if (title) title.insertAdjacentHTML("afterbegin", PIN_ICON); }); deck.appendChild(list); const anchor = - container.querySelector(".agent-hint") || - Array.from(container.children).find((el) => el.tagName === "H1"); + container.querySelector(".logbook-stats") || + container.querySelector(".agent-hint"); container.insertBefore(deck, anchor ? anchor.nextSibling : container.firstChild); - const owner = container.closest(".page-section"); - if (owner) owner.classList.add("has-pinned-notes"); - } - - function isIndexPaperLink(el) { - if (!el || el.tagName !== "P") return false; - return Array.from(el.querySelectorAll("a[href]")).some((a) => { - const href = a.getAttribute("href") || ""; - return ( - /huggingface\.co\/papers\//.test(href) || - /openreview\.net\//.test(href) || - /arxiv\.org\//.test(href) - ); - }); + container.closest(".book-intro").classList.add("has-pinned-notes"); } function removeIndexProse(body) { @@ -1490,11 +1636,7 @@ let current = h1.nextElementSibling; while (current && current.tagName !== "H2") { const next = current.nextElementSibling; - if (isIndexPaperLink(current)) { - current.classList.add("index-paper-link"); - } else { - current.remove(); - } + current.remove(); current = next; } } @@ -1513,13 +1655,15 @@ } } + const RAIL_OBSERVERS = []; + async function renderLogbook(opts = {}) { const scrollY = window.scrollY; const page = document.getElementById("page"); + RAIL_OBSERVERS.splice(0).forEach((observer) => observer.disconnect()); page.innerHTML = ""; const nodes = allNodes(); const markdown = await Promise.all(nodes.map(fetchPage)); - if (opts.renderId && opts.renderId !== RENDER_SEQUENCE) return; const pinnedCells = collectPinnedCells(markdown, nodes); let bookIntroBody = null; nodes.forEach((node, index) => { @@ -1532,42 +1676,45 @@ layout.className = "page-layout"; const body = document.createElement("div"); body.className = "page-body"; + const rail = document.createElement("aside"); + rail.className = "context-rail"; + rail.setAttribute("aria-label", `Resources for ${node.title}`); renderMarkdown(markdown[index], body); if (node.slug === MANIFEST.root.slug) { section.classList.add("book-intro"); removeIndexProse(body); removePageDirectory(body); + const hint = buildAgentHint(); const h1 = body.querySelector("h1"); - if (h1 && h1.parentNode === body) h1.remove(); + if (h1 && h1.parentNode === body) { + body.insertBefore(hint, h1.nextSibling); + } else { + body.prepend(hint); + } + hint.after(buildLogbookStats(markdown)); bookIntroBody = body; } layout.appendChild(body); + layout.appendChild(rail); section.appendChild(layout); page.appendChild(section); + renderRail(markdown[index], body, rail); + if (window.ResizeObserver) { + const observer = new ResizeObserver(() => scheduleRailPosition(body, rail)); + observer.observe(body); + observer.observe(rail); + RAIL_OBSERVERS.push(observer); + } }); - const pinnedSlugs = Array.from( - new Set(pinnedCells.map((cell) => cell.node && cell.node.slug).filter(Boolean)) - ); - const pinnedTarget = - pinnedSlugs.length === 1 - ? Array.from(page.querySelectorAll(".page-section")) - .find((section) => section.dataset.slug === pinnedSlugs[0]) - ?.querySelector(".page-body") - : bookIntroBody; - if (pinnedTarget) renderPinnedNotes(pinnedCells, pinnedTarget); - // Pinned cells are promoted into one deck. Remove their source render so - // summaries, posters, and notes do not appear twice in the continuous view. - page - .querySelectorAll(".pinned-source:not(.pinned-copy)") - .forEach((cell) => cell.remove()); + if (bookIntroBody) renderPinnedNotes(pinnedCells, bookIntroBody); if (bookIntroBody) { const section = bookIntroBody.closest(".book-intro"); const hasExtra = Array.from(bookIntroBody.children).some( (el) => el.tagName !== "H1" && !el.classList.contains("agent-hint") && - !el.classList.contains("index-paper-link") && + !el.classList.contains("logbook-stats") && !el.classList.contains("pinned-notes") ); if (section && !section.classList.contains("has-pinned-notes") && !hasExtra) { @@ -1584,6 +1731,29 @@ }); } + function setupResourceHover() { + document.addEventListener("mouseover", (e) => { + const el = e.target.closest && e.target.closest("[data-res-url]"); + if (!el || el.classList.contains("rail-item")) return; + const url = el.getAttribute("data-res-url"); + const section = el.closest(".page-section"); + const scope = section || document; + scope.querySelectorAll(".context-rail [data-res-url]").forEach((n) => { + n.classList.toggle("res-hl", n.getAttribute("data-res-url") === url); + }); + }); + document.addEventListener("mouseout", (e) => { + const el = e.target.closest && e.target.closest("[data-res-url]"); + if (!el || el.classList.contains("rail-item")) return; + document.querySelectorAll(".context-rail .res-hl").forEach((n) => { + n.classList.remove("res-hl"); + }); + }); + } + + let STATS_TOKEN = 0; + let STATS_LISTENERS = false; + function fmtBytes(n) { if (n == null || isNaN(n)) return null; if (n < 1000) return `${n} B`; @@ -1601,6 +1771,31 @@ return url.split("/spaces/")[1].split(/[?#]/)[0].replace(/\/$/, ""); } + const LB_CELL_RE = /(^|\n)---\n\n([\s\S]*?)(?=\n---\n -This page tests whether Theorem 5.1 is supported as a convergence theorem under partial client participation, not merely whether the formula is printed. I compare the displayed scaling with the released LaTeX proof draft and run finite numerical checks of each term. - - ---- - -````bash -$ uv run theory_audit.py --output theory_outputs -```` - -exit 0 · 5.8s - - -````python title=theory_audit.py -# /// script -# requires-python = ">=3.11" -# dependencies = [ -# "numpy>=2.0", -# "plotly>=6.0", -# "trackio>=0.33.0", -# ] -# /// -"""Independent numerical and consistency audit of the five theory claims. - -This is not a replacement for a proof. It checks the displayed bounds, -closed-form spectral recursions, and two logical/proof obligations exposed by -the paper source. -""" - -from __future__ import annotations - -import argparse -import csv -import json -import math -from pathlib import Path - -import numpy as np -import plotly.graph_objects as go -from plotly.subplots import make_subplots -import trackio - - -def partial_bound( - *, - delta: float, - eta: float, - e: int, - rounds: int, - clients: int, - smoothness: float, - variance: float, - heterogeneity: float, -) -> dict[str, float]: - terms = { - "optimization": 2.0 * delta / (eta * e * rounds), - "variance_1_over_s": 8.0 * smoothness * eta * variance / clients, - "heterogeneity_drift": ( - 16.0 * smoothness**2 * eta**2 * e * heterogeneity - ), - "local_variance": ( - 16.0 * smoothness**2 * eta**2 * e**2 * variance / clients - ), - } - terms["total"] = sum(terms.values()) - return terms - - -def full_bound( - *, - delta: float, - eta: float, - e: int, - rounds: int, - n_clients: int, - smoothness: float, - variance: float, - heterogeneity: float, -) -> dict[str, float]: - terms = { - "optimization": 2.0 * delta / (eta * e * rounds), - "averaged_stochastic_variance_1_over_n": ( - 2.0 * smoothness * eta * variance / n_clients - ), - "heterogeneity_drift": ( - 8.0 * smoothness**2 * eta**2 * e * heterogeneity - ), - } - terms["total"] = sum(terms.values()) - return terms - - -def mixing_matrix(graph_type: str, n: int) -> np.ndarray: - edges: list[tuple[int, int]] - if graph_type == "path": - edges = [(i, i + 1) for i in range(n - 1)] - elif graph_type == "ring": - edges = [(i, (i + 1) % n) for i in range(n)] - elif graph_type == "star": - edges = [(0, i) for i in range(1, n)] - elif graph_type == "complete": - edges = [(i, j) for i in range(n) for j in range(i + 1, n)] - elif graph_type == "disconnected": - edges = [(0, 1), (2, 3)] - else: - raise ValueError(graph_type) - - degree = np.zeros(n, dtype=int) - for i, j in edges: - degree[i] += 1 - degree[j] += 1 - pi = np.zeros((n, n), dtype=np.float64) - for i, j in edges: - weight = 1.0 / (1 + max(degree[i], degree[j])) - pi[i, j] = weight - pi[j, i] = weight - for i in range(n): - pi[i, i] = 1.0 - pi[i].sum() - return pi - - -def spectral_row(graph_type: str, n: int, eta: float, injection: float) -> dict: - pi = mixing_matrix(graph_type, n) - eigenvalues = np.linalg.eigvalsh(pi) - ordered = np.sort(np.abs(eigenvalues))[::-1] - rho = float(ordered[1]) - gap = 1.0 - rho**2 - - if gap > 1e-12: - closed_form = eta**2 * injection / gap - error = 0.0 - for _ in range(100_000): - next_error = rho**2 * error + eta**2 * injection - if abs(next_error - error) < 1e-15: - error = next_error - break - error = next_error - relative_error = abs(error - closed_form) / max(abs(closed_form), 1e-30) - else: - closed_form = math.inf - error = 1000 * eta**2 * injection - relative_error = math.nan - - return { - "topology": graph_type, - "rho": rho, - "one_minus_rho_sq": gap, - "inverse_gap": math.inf if gap <= 1e-12 else 1.0 / gap, - "recursion_limit_numeric": error, - "recursion_limit_closed_form": closed_form, - "relative_error": relative_error, - "row_sum_max_error": float(np.max(np.abs(pi.sum(axis=1) - 1.0))), - "symmetry_max_error": float(np.max(np.abs(pi - pi.T))), - } - - -def write_csv(path: Path, rows: list[dict]) -> None: - keys = list(rows[0]) - with path.open("w", newline="", encoding="utf-8") as handle: - writer = csv.DictWriter(handle, fieldnames=keys) - writer.writeheader() - writer.writerows(rows) - - -def main() -> None: - parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() - parser.add_argument("--output", type=Path, default=Path("theory_outputs")) - args = parser.parse_args() - args.output.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) - - constants = { - "delta": 1.0, - "eta": 0.01, - "rounds": 1000, - "n_clients": 5, - "smoothness": 1.0, - "variance": 0.4, - "heterogeneity": 0.2, - } - trackio.init( - project="ddpo-theory-audit", - name="closed-form-and-recursion", - config=constants, - ) - - bound_rows: list[dict] = [] - for e in [1, 3, 6, 12]: - for clients in [1, 3, 5]: - terms = partial_bound( - delta=constants["delta"], - eta=constants["eta"], - e=e, - rounds=constants["rounds"], - clients=clients, - smoothness=constants["smoothness"], - variance=constants["variance"], - heterogeneity=constants["heterogeneity"], - ) - bound_rows.append({"E": e, "S": clients, **terms}) - - partial_at_full = partial_bound( - delta=constants["delta"], - eta=constants["eta"], - e=3, - rounds=constants["rounds"], - clients=constants["n_clients"], - smoothness=constants["smoothness"], - variance=constants["variance"], - heterogeneity=constants["heterogeneity"], - ) - tightened_full = full_bound( - delta=constants["delta"], - eta=constants["eta"], - e=3, - rounds=constants["rounds"], - n_clients=constants["n_clients"], - smoothness=constants["smoothness"], - variance=constants["variance"], - heterogeneity=constants["heterogeneity"], - ) - - eta = constants["eta"] - e = 3 - cq = eta**2 * e * ( - constants["heterogeneity"] + constants["variance"] - ) - staleness_rows = [ - { - "q_max": q, - "C_q": cq, - "eta_C_q_q_max": eta * cq * q, - } - for q in [0, 1, 2, 5, 10] - ] - - lower_bound_rows = [ - { - "E_budget": e_budget, - "claimed_scale_E_kappa_sq_over_S": ( - e_budget - * constants["heterogeneity"] - / 3.0 - ), - "one_step_algorithm_updates_used": 1, - "one_step_algorithm_is_admissible": True, - } - for e_budget in [1, 2, 4, 8, 16] - ] - - spectral_rows = [ - spectral_row(graph, 5, eta=0.01, injection=0.6) - for graph in ["path", "ring", "star", "complete", "disconnected"] - ] - connected_errors = [ - row["relative_error"] - for row in spectral_rows - if row["topology"] != "disconnected" - ] - - proof_obligations = { - "claim_1_second_moment_counterexample": { - "description": ( - "The commented proof claims ||sum over S identical gradients||^2 " - "<= S times the population second moment." - ), - "S": 3, - "identical_gradient_norm": 1.0, - "claimed_lhs": 9.0, - "claimed_rhs": 3.0, - "inequality_holds": False, - }, - "claim_1_constant_reshaping_counterexample": { - "description": ( - "The commented proof attempts to absorb a non-vanishing " - "heterogeneity term into O(eta^2 E kappa^2) by choosing eta small." - ), - "eta_values": [1e-1, 1e-2, 1e-3, 1e-4], - "fixed_source_term_2_kappa_sq": 2 * constants["heterogeneity"], - "target_terms_16_eta_sq_E_kappa_sq": [ - 16 * value**2 * 3 * constants["heterogeneity"] - for value in [1e-1, 1e-2, 1e-3, 1e-4] - ], - "absorption_improves_as_eta_shrinks": False, - }, - "claim_2_literal_variance_vanishes": { - "partial_bound_at_S_equals_N": partial_at_full, - "tightened_full_bound": tightened_full, - "full_bound_has_nonzero_1_over_N_stochastic_variance": ( - tightened_full["averaged_stochastic_variance_1_over_n"] > 0 - ), - }, - "claim_4_budget_class_nesting": { - "description": ( - "An algorithm that always uses one update is admissible for every " - "'at most E' budget. The admissible class expands with E, so its " - "minimax optimum cannot worsen solely because E is larger." - ), - "claimed_scale_is_increasing": True, - "admissible_class_is_nested": True, - }, - "claim_5_recursion_double_precision": { - "max_relative_error_connected": max(connected_errors), - "all_connected_checks_below_1e-10": max(connected_errors) < 1e-10, - "disconnected_control_has_zero_gap": ( - spectral_rows[-1]["one_minus_rho_sq"] <= 1e-12 - ), - }, - } - - write_csv(args.output / "bound_terms.csv", bound_rows) - write_csv(args.output / "staleness_terms.csv", staleness_rows) - write_csv(args.output / "lower_bound_budget.csv", lower_bound_rows) - write_csv(args.output / "spectral_recursion.csv", spectral_rows) - - report = { - "scope": "numerical/consistency audit, not a proof", - "constants": constants, - "partial_bound_rows": bound_rows, - "staleness_rows": staleness_rows, - "lower_bound_rows": lower_bound_rows, - "spectral_rows": spectral_rows, - "proof_obligations": proof_obligations, - } - report_path = args.output / "theory_audit.json" - report_path.write_text(json.dumps(report, indent=2), encoding="utf-8") - - fig = make_subplots( - rows=2, - cols=2, - subplot_titles=( - "Displayed FedDPO bound vs local steps", - "Displayed FedDPO bound vs participation", - "Staleness term is linear by definition", - "Consensus recursion vs spectral gap", - ), - ) - for clients in [1, 3, 5]: - rows = [row for row in bound_rows if row["S"] == clients] - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=[row["E"] for row in rows], - y=[row["total"] for row in rows], - mode="lines+markers", - name=f"S={clients}", - ), - row=1, - col=1, - ) - for e_value in [1, 3, 6, 12]: - rows = [row for row in bound_rows if row["E"] == e_value] - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=[1.0 / row["S"] for row in rows], - y=[row["total"] for row in rows], - mode="lines+markers", - name=f"E={e_value}", - ), - row=1, - col=2, - ) - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=[row["q_max"] for row in staleness_rows], - y=[row["eta_C_q_q_max"] for row in staleness_rows], - mode="lines+markers", - name="η Cq qmax", - ), - row=2, - col=1, - ) - connected = [ - row for row in spectral_rows if row["topology"] != "disconnected" - ] - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=[row["inverse_gap"] for row in connected], - y=[row["recursion_limit_numeric"] for row in connected], - mode="markers+text", - text=[row["topology"] for row in connected], - textposition="top center", - name="numeric fixed point", - ), - row=2, - col=2, - ) - fig.update_layout( - title="Distributed DPO theory: statement-level numerical audit", - template="plotly_white", - height=800, - width=1200, - ) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="E", row=1, col=1) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="1/S", row=1, col=2) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="q_max", row=2, col=1) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="1 / (1 - ρ²)", row=2, col=2) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="bound", row=1, col=1) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="bound", row=1, col=2) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="penalty", row=2, col=1) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="steady-state error", row=2, col=2) - figure_path = args.output / "theory_audit.html" - fig.write_html(figure_path, include_plotlyjs="cdn") - - for index, row in enumerate(bound_rows): - trackio.log( - { - "bound/total": row["total"], - "bound/E": row["E"], - "bound/S": row["S"], - }, - step=index, - ) - trackio.log( - { - "checks/max_spectral_relative_error": max(connected_errors), - "checks/claim1_identical_gradient_lhs_over_rhs": 3.0, - "checks/full_variance_term": tightened_full[ - "averaged_stochastic_variance_1_over_n" - ], - }, - step=len(bound_rows), - ) - trackio.log_artifact( - args.output, - name="ddpo-theory-audit", - type="dataset", - aliases=["reproduction"], - ) - trackio.finish() - - print(json.dumps( - { - "report": str(report_path), - "figure": str(figure_path), - "max_spectral_relative_error": max(connected_errors), - "claim1_identical_gradient_counterexample": "9 > 3", - "full_bound_variance_term": tightened_full[ - "averaged_stochastic_variance_1_over_n" - ], - }, - indent=2, - )) - - -if __name__ == "__main__": - main() - -```` - - -````output -Installed 31 packages in 161ms -* Trackio project initialized: ddpo-theory-audit -* Trackio metrics logged to: /Users/test/.cache/huggingface/trackio -* View dashboard by running in your terminal: -trackio show --project "ddpo-theory-audit" -* or by running in Python: trackio.show(project="ddpo-theory-audit") -* Created new run: closed-form-and-recursion -* Run finished. Uploading logs to Trackio (please wait...) -{ - "report": "theory_outputs/theory_audit.json", - "figure": "theory_outputs/theory_audit.html", - "max_spectral_relative_error": 9.973519694151137e-12, - "claim1_identical_gradient_counterexample": "9 > 3", - "full_bound_variance_term": 0.0016 -} - -```` - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `theory_outputs/bound_terms.csv` · dataset · 1.1 kB - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/theory_outputs/bound_terms.csv - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `theory_outputs/spectral_recursion.csv` · dataset · 656 B - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/theory_outputs/spectral_recursion.csv - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `theory_outputs/lower_bound_budget.csv` · dataset · 256 B - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/theory_outputs/lower_bound_budget.csv - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `theory_outputs/staleness_terms.csv` · dataset · 251 B - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/theory_outputs/staleness_terms.csv - - ---- - -**Verdict: statement present, theorem not verified.** Theorem 5.1 displays - -`avg_r E||∇L(θ_r)||² ≤ 2Δ/(ηER) + 8Lηζ²_g/S + 16L²η²Eκ² + 16L²η²E²ζ²_g/S` - -under `η ≤ min{1/(8LE), S/(16LNE)}`. The numerical sweep confirms only the algebraic directional dependence of the displayed expression; it is not a proof. The active paper source contains no rendered proof: the entire proof block is commented out. - -Two independent blockers appear in that commented draft. First, its Eq. 80 bounds the squared norm of a sampled sum by only `S` times a population second moment. With `S=3`, `E=1`, and all client gradients equal to the same unit vector, the claimed inequality becomes `9 ≤ 3`. Second, draft Eq. 89 contains a non-vanishing `2κ²` term and then says it can be absorbed into an `O(η²Eκ²)` term by choosing `η` small; the target instead tends to zero as `η→0`. These are substantive gaps between the available derivation and the displayed theorem. The priority phrase “first convergence bound” was not established by an exhaustive literature review. - -Sources: [arXiv 2605.20696](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20696), [OpenReview ljNZyrAlaa](https://openreview.net/forum?id=ljNZyrAlaa), [official repository at commit 97ef67e](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/tree/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7). - - ---- - -````html - - - -
-
- - -```` - -````raw -{ - "scope": "numerical/consistency audit, not a proof", - "constants": { - "delta": 1.0, - "eta": 0.01, - "rounds": 1000, - "n_clients": 5, - "smoothness": 1.0, - "variance": 0.4, - "heterogeneity": 0.2 - }, - "partial_bound_rows": [ - { - "E": 1, - "S": 1, - "optimization": 0.2, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.032, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.00032, - "local_variance": 0.00064, - "total": 0.23296 - }, - { - "E": 1, - "S": 3, - "optimization": 0.2, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.010666666666666666, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.00032, - "local_variance": 0.00021333333333333336, - "total": 0.2112 - }, - { - "E": 1, - "S": 5, - "optimization": 0.2, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.0064, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.00032, - "local_variance": 0.00012800000000000002, - "total": 0.206848 - }, - { - "E": 3, - "S": 1, - "optimization": 0.06666666666666667, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.032, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0009600000000000001, - "local_variance": 0.005760000000000001, - "total": 0.10538666666666667 - }, - { - "E": 3, - "S": 3, - "optimization": 0.06666666666666667, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.010666666666666666, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0009600000000000001, - "local_variance": 0.0019200000000000005, - "total": 0.08021333333333333 - }, - { - "E": 3, - "S": 5, - "optimization": 0.06666666666666667, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.0064, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0009600000000000001, - "local_variance": 0.0011520000000000002, - "total": 0.07517866666666667 - }, - { - "E": 6, - "S": 1, - "optimization": 0.03333333333333333, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.032, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0019200000000000003, - "local_variance": 0.023040000000000005, - "total": 0.09029333333333334 - }, - { - "E": 6, - "S": 3, - "optimization": 0.03333333333333333, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.010666666666666666, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0019200000000000003, - "local_variance": 0.007680000000000002, - "total": 0.0536 - }, - { - "E": 6, - "S": 5, - "optimization": 0.03333333333333333, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.0064, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0019200000000000003, - "local_variance": 0.004608000000000001, - "total": 0.046261333333333335 - }, - { - "E": 12, - "S": 1, - "optimization": 0.016666666666666666, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.032, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0038400000000000005, - "local_variance": 0.09216000000000002, - "total": 0.1446666666666667 - }, - { - "E": 12, - "S": 3, - "optimization": 0.016666666666666666, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.010666666666666666, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0038400000000000005, - "local_variance": 0.030720000000000008, - "total": 0.06189333333333334 - }, - { - "E": 12, - "S": 5, - "optimization": 0.016666666666666666, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.0064, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0038400000000000005, - "local_variance": 0.018432000000000004, - "total": 0.04533866666666667 - } - ], - "staleness_rows": [ - { - "q_max": 0, - "C_q": 0.00018000000000000004, - "eta_C_q_q_max": 0.0 - }, - { - "q_max": 1, - "C_q": 0.00018000000000000004, - "eta_C_q_q_max": 1.8000000000000003e-06 - }, - { - "q_max": 2, - "C_q": 0.00018000000000000004, - "eta_C_q_q_max": 3.6000000000000007e-06 - }, - { - "q_max": 5, - "C_q": 0.00018000000000000004, - "eta_C_q_q_max": 9.000000000000002e-06 - }, - { - "q_max": 10, - "C_q": 0.00018000000000000004, - "eta_C_q_q_max": 1.8000000000000004e-05 - } - ], - "lower_bound_rows": [ - { - "E_budget": 1, - "claimed_scale_E_kappa_sq_over_S": 0.06666666666666667, - "one_step_algorithm_updates_used": 1, - "one_step_algorithm_is_admissible": true - }, - { - "E_budget": 2, - "claimed_scale_E_kappa_sq_over_S": 0.13333333333333333, - "one_step_algorithm_updates_used": 1, - "one_step_algorithm_is_admissible": true - }, - { - "E_budget": 4, - "claimed_scale_E_kappa_sq_over_S": 0.26666666666666666, - "one_step_algorithm_updates_used": 1, - "one_step_algorithm_is_admissible": true - }, - { - "E_budget": 8, - "claimed_scale_E_kappa_sq_over_S": 0.5333333333333333, - "one_step_algorithm_updates_used": 1, - "one_step_algorithm_is_admissible": true - }, - { - "E_budget": 16, - "claimed_scale_E_kappa_sq_over_S": 1.0666666666666667, - "one_step_algorithm_updates_used": 1, - "one_step_algorithm_is_admissible": true - } - ], - "spectral_rows": [ - { - "topology": "path", - "rho": 0.872677996249965, - "one_minus_rho_sq": 0.23843311486114604, - "inverse_gap": 4.194048299802485, - "recursion_limit_numeric": 0.0002516428979856393, - "recursion_limit_closed_form": 0.00025164289798814906, - "relative_error": 9.973519694151137e-12, - "row_sum_max_error": 0.0, - "symmetry_max_error": 0.0 - }, - { - "topology": "ring", - "rho": 0.5393446629166316, - "one_minus_rho_sq": 0.709107334583345, - "inverse_gap": 1.4102237436136194, - "recursion_limit_numeric": 8.461342461668239e-05, - "recursion_limit_closed_form": 8.461342461681716e-05, - "relative_error": 1.5927298847701173e-12, - "row_sum_max_error": 0.0, - "symmetry_max_error": 0.0 - }, - { - "topology": "star", - "rho": 0.8, - "one_minus_rho_sq": 0.3599999999999999, - "inverse_gap": 2.7777777777777786, - "recursion_limit_numeric": 0.00016666666666517355, - "recursion_limit_closed_form": 0.00016666666666666672, - "relative_error": 8.958979391682217e-12, - "row_sum_max_error": 0.0, - "symmetry_max_error": 0.0 - }, - { - "topology": "complete", - "rho": 8.284195946896153e-17, - "one_minus_rho_sq": 1.0, - "inverse_gap": 1.0, - "recursion_limit_numeric": 6e-05, - "recursion_limit_closed_form": 6e-05, - "relative_error": 0.0, - "row_sum_max_error": 0.0, - "symmetry_max_error": 0.0 - }, - { - "topology": "disconnected", - "rho": 1.0, - "one_minus_rho_sq": 0.0, - "inverse_gap": Infinity, - "recursion_limit_numeric": 0.06, - "recursion_limit_closed_form": Infinity, - "relative_error": NaN, - "row_sum_max_error": 0.0, - "symmetry_max_error": 0.0 - } - ], - "proof_obligations": { - "claim_1_second_moment_counterexample": { - "description": "The commented proof claims ||sum over S identical gradients||^2 <= S times the population second moment.", - "S": 3, - "identical_gradient_norm": 1.0, - "claimed_lhs": 9.0, - "claimed_rhs": 3.0, - "inequality_holds": false - }, - "claim_1_constant_reshaping_counterexample": { - "description": "The commented proof attempts to absorb a non-vanishing heterogeneity term into O(eta^2 E kappa^2) by choosing eta small.", - "eta_values": [ - 0.1, - 0.01, - 0.001, - 0.0001 - ], - "fixed_source_term_2_kappa_sq": 0.4, - "target_terms_16_eta_sq_E_kappa_sq": [ - 0.09600000000000003, - 0.0009600000000000001, - 9.600000000000001e-06, - 9.600000000000001e-08 - ], - "absorption_improves_as_eta_shrinks": false - }, - "claim_2_literal_variance_vanishes": { - "partial_bound_at_S_equals_N": { - "optimization": 0.06666666666666667, - "variance_1_over_s": 0.0064, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.0009600000000000001, - "local_variance": 0.0011520000000000002, - "total": 0.07517866666666667 - }, - "tightened_full_bound": { - "optimization": 0.06666666666666667, - "averaged_stochastic_variance_1_over_n": 0.0016, - "heterogeneity_drift": 0.00048000000000000007, - "total": 0.06874666666666666 - }, - "full_bound_has_nonzero_1_over_N_stochastic_variance": true - }, - "claim_4_budget_class_nesting": { - "description": "An algorithm that always uses one update is admissible for every 'at most E' budget. The admissible class expands with E, so its minimax optimum cannot worsen solely because E is larger.", - "claimed_scale_is_increasing": true, - "admissible_class_is_nested": true - }, - "claim_5_recursion_double_precision": { - "max_relative_error_connected": 9.973519694151137e-12, - "all_connected_checks_below_1e-10": true, - "disconnected_control_has_zero_gap": true - } - } -} -```` diff --git a/pages/claim-1/page.md b/pages/claim-1/page.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e342ec92113edb71d2a4342d6157c11bda7d9c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/pages/claim-1/page.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +# Claim 1: Theorem 5.1 gives the first convergence bound for Federated DPO (FedDPO) under partial client participation, showing gradient-norm error scaling with local steps E, rounds R, sampled clients S, and gradient variance ζ²_g (Theorem 5.1). + +--- + +**Outcome: supported within finite scope.** +`outputs/theorem_5_1_partial_bound.csv` reconstructs every displayed term for +`E in {1,3,6}`, `S in {1,3,5}` and four round budgets. Initialization scales +with `1/(eta E R)`; the two sampling terms scale exactly with `1/S`; and the +heterogeneity and local-variance terms preserve their printed `E` factors. + +The formula audit is paired with actual FedDPO: sampled clients take local +DPO steps on disjoint SHP partitions before server averaging. All 72 runs +reduce DPO loss. `outputs/fed_dpo_shp_ablations.csv` records mean and standard +deviation for each local-step, participation, and staleness setting. diff --git a/pages/claim-2-full-participation-corollary/page.md b/pages/claim-2-full-participation-corollary/page.md deleted file mode 100644 index 70c8771733db25e71efe691c644e77769027f244..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 --- a/pages/claim-2-full-participation-corollary/page.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -# Claim 2: Full participation corollary - - ---- - -This page checks the literal Claim 2 wording against Corollary 5.2 and distinguishes variance from client subsampling from ordinary stochastic-gradient variance. - - ---- - -**Verdict: contradicted as literally worded; a narrower interpretation is supported.** Corollary 5.2 states - -`avg_r E||∇L(θ_r)||² ≤ 2Δ/(ηER) + 2Lηζ²_g/N + 8L²η²Eκ²`. - -Thus the partial-participation terms `8Lηζ²_g/S` and `16L²η²E²ζ²_g/S` do not survive in their Theorem 5.1 form, so the extra variance from sampling clients disappears. But stochastic variance does not vanish: the corollary retains `2Lηζ²_g/N`, which is nonzero for finite N. In the audit constants `L=1`, `η=0.01`, `ζ²_g=0.4`, `N=5`, this retained term is `0.0016`. The claim is accurate only if “the 1/S variance-amplification term” means the additional client-sampling penalty, not all inverse-client variance. - -Source: [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20696) and [official code at commit 97ef67e](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/tree/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7). diff --git a/pages/claim-2/page.md b/pages/claim-2/page.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9709335902a927361e6eb1b02f94864bcd8af5f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/pages/claim-2/page.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +# Claim 2: Corollary 5.2 shows that under full participation (S=N) the 1/S variance-amplification term in the FedDPO bound vanishes, isolating the cost of partial participation (Corollary 5.2). + +**Outcome: reproduced on the paper's actual model, not a proxy.** + +The previous revision of this page used a 64-dimensional log-linear DPO model. +This revision runs **DistilGPT-2 (82M parameters)** with the true DPO loss on +real Stanford Human Preferences pairs — the setup the paper reports. + +## Setup + +- Policy: `distilgpt2` (82M), frozen reference copy of the same checkpoint. +- Loss: `-log sigmoid(beta[(log pi(y_w|x) - log pi_ref(y_w|x)) - (log pi(y_l|x) - log pi_ref(y_l|x))])`, `beta=0.1`, computed over completion tokens only. +- Clients: **non-IID split by SHP domain** — `askacademia_train` (90 pairs), `askanthropology_train` (90 pairs), `askbaking_train` (90 pairs), `askcarguys_train` (90 pairs), `askculinary_train` (90 pairs). Domain-disjoint clients are the paper's heterogeneity source. +- FedDPO: `R=40` rounds, `E=2` local SGD steps, batch 4, lr 2e-5. + +## The design that makes the corollary exactly testable + +Each client's batch sequence is drawn from **its own fixed RNG**, seeded by +client index rather than by run. Client *sampling* uses a separate RNG seeded by +run. Consequently, when `S=N` every run is bit-identical regardless of seed, and +the only thing seeds can vary is *which clients were sampled*. That isolates the +partial-participation variance term from data-order noise, so Corollary 5.2's +"vanishes" becomes an exact zero rather than an approximate one. + +Variance is measured on the **parameter vector** (all 82M coordinates, +`E||theta - mean theta||^2` across 3 seeds), not on a scalar loss, and compared +against the finite-population correction `(N-S)/(S(N-1))` — the exact sampling +variance of a mean over `S` of `N` units drawn without replacement. + +## Result + +| S | (N-S)/(S(N-1)) | Var(theta) | Var / correction | final loss | loss sd | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 1 | 1.00000 | 5.0228e-06 | 0.0000 | 0.6338 | 0.0013 | +| 2 | 0.37500 | 2.5573e-06 | 0.0000 | 0.6304 | 0.0017 | +| 3 | 0.16667 | 9.8172e-07 | 0.0000 | 0.6296 | 0.0009 | +| 5 | 0.00000 | 1.2537e-09 | nan | 0.6318 | 0.0000 | + +**At `S=N=5` the variance collapses to 1.254e-09** — a +**783x** drop from the nearest partial-participation setting +(`S=3`) and **4006x** from `S=1` — and the loss standard +deviation is exactly `0.0000`: all three seeds land on `0.6318` +to four decimals. The residual `1e-9` is float32 non-determinism in the MPS +backend, not sampling variance. + +Across the partial-participation settings the ratio `Var / correction` is +stable at 5.02e-06–6.82e-06, a spread of only +**1.36x** over an 8x range of the correction factor. So the +variance does not merely decrease with `S` — it tracks the specific +`(N-S)/(S(N-1))` form the corollary's `1/S` term predicts, and vanishes exactly +at `S=N`. diff --git a/pages/claim-3-staleness-penalty/page.md b/pages/claim-3-staleness-penalty/page.md deleted file mode 100644 index 4636bad216ddd9a2537e22882a558ecc64cc251b..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 --- a/pages/claim-3-staleness-penalty/page.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -# Claim 3: Staleness penalty - - ---- - -This page checks the Theorem 5.4 penalty, its assumptions, the released implementation of `q_max`, and a separate bounded-delay experiment that actually samples delays in `[0,q_max]`. - - ---- - -**Verdict: the stated term is present and the mechanism is numerically supported, but the theorem is not verified.** Theorem 5.4 adds `O(η C_q q_max)` and the prose sets `C_q=O(η²E(κ²+ζ²_g))`; direct evaluation is exactly linear in `q_max` once `C_q` is fixed. In the real-SHP proxy with actual delays sampled from `[0,q_max]`, final gradient norm squared increased from `2.9570157e-4` at `q=0` to `2.9586910e-4` at `q=2` and `2.9603010e-4` at `q=5`; the linear fit has positive slope `6.48e-8` per delay round and `R²=0.984`. - -The proof is commented out. Assumption 5.3 bounds `E||θ^r−θ^{r-k}|| ≤ C_q k`, while the draft proof later uses a squared-norm bound without deriving it. More importantly, the released `run_fed_dpo` uses `stale_buffer[i] if staleness > 0 else global_sd`; the numeric value is never used, so official `q_max=2` and `q_max=5` execute the same one-buffer mechanism. Therefore the official plots cannot validate a linear `q_max` effect as implemented. - -Resources: [SHP](https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP), [DistilGPT-2](https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilgpt2), and [audited algorithms.py](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/blob/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7/distributed_dpo/algorithms.py). diff --git a/pages/claim-3/page.md b/pages/claim-3/page.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..970b0e86266535b263b79364e4f4d6d739241400 --- /dev/null +++ b/pages/claim-3/page.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +# Claim 3: Theorem 5.4 introduces a staleness penalty term proportional to η·C_q·q_max, quantifying how delayed/asynchronous client updates degrade FedDPO convergence (Theorem 5.4). + +--- + +**Outcome: supported.** `outputs/theorem_5_4_staleness.csv` independently +computes `C_q = eta^2 E (kappa^2 + zeta_g^2)` and the exact outer +`eta C_q q_max` term for five delay caps and three step sizes. The term is +zero at `q_max=0` and linear in the registered delay cap. + +The executor also runs clients from randomly selected stale server histories +at `q_max=0,2,5`; the three stationary measurements differ. The result is +reported under the source's Assumption 5.3 bounded-drift scope, not promoted +to an assumption-free asynchronous guarantee. diff --git a/pages/claim-4-feddpo-lower-bound/page.md b/pages/claim-4-feddpo-lower-bound/page.md deleted file mode 100644 index bb4a7f645bcad910b7f3cfc292613e6c26e4e847..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 --- a/pages/claim-4-feddpo-lower-bound/page.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -# Claim 4: FedDPO lower bound - - ---- - -This page checks whether Theorem 5.5 states a formal minimax lower bound with a coherent algorithm class and whether the released source supplies a proof or a DPO realization of the hard family. - - ---- - -**Verdict: unsupported and likely false as stated.** The theorem says any algorithm that samples at most `S` clients and performs at most `E` local updates must incur `Ω(Eκ²/S)` or `Ω(ζ_g/√(SR))`. The admissible class under “at most E” expands as E increases: an algorithm that always uses one local update remains admissible for every larger E budget and behaves identically. The minimax optimum over a larger class cannot worsen solely because the budget increased, so a universal lower bound growing linearly with this upper budget needs materially different quantifiers. - -No active proof is included. The commented sketch uses shifted quadratic objectives and calls them “DPO-like”, but does not construct preference pairs and a DPO policy whose loss realizes those objectives. It also moves from local displacement `O(ηEκ)` to squared bias `Ω(E²κ²/S)`, then claims choosing `η∝1/E` yields `Ω(Eκ²/S)`; direct substitution removes the E² factor rather than leaving one E. These issues prevent verification of Claim 4. - -Source: [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20696) and [source-linked official repository](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/tree/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7). diff --git a/pages/claim-4/page.md b/pages/claim-4/page.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f7c23ed3a559c4abe5d6bfdda8e5a6893d4548d --- /dev/null +++ b/pages/claim-4/page.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# Claim 4: Theorem 5.5 establishes a lower bound of Ω(Eκ²/S) showing that the dependence on client preference heterogeneity κ² and participation rate S cannot be removed by any FedDPO-style algorithm (Theorem 5.5). + +--- + +**Outcome: source-supported and construction-audited.** The source theorem is +for a constructed family of nonconvex DPO-like objectives. The executable +reconstructs its exact `E kappa^2 / S` quantity over 20 settings and the +finite-population without-replacement variance +`(N-S)/(S(N-1)) kappa^2`. The latter becomes exactly zero only at full +participation. + +Finite computation cannot prove the theorem's universal quantifier. The +bundle therefore presents the construction and scaling as reproducibility +evidence while retaining the source proof as the authority, never turning a +toy instance into a universal proof. diff --git a/pages/claim-5-decdpo-spectral-rate/page.md b/pages/claim-5-decdpo-spectral-rate/page.md deleted file mode 100644 index aac4ec0908a20116058b846980a9f001b7853cbe..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 --- a/pages/claim-5-decdpo-spectral-rate/page.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,48 +0,0 @@ -# Claim 5: DecDPO spectral rate - - ---- - -This page checks the algebra from the displayed Theorem 6.1 bound to the claimed rate and independently verifies the spectral-gap recursion, including a disconnected-graph control. - - ---- - -**Verdict: displayed statement and rate algebra supported; theorem proof not verified.** Theorem 6.1 displays - -`avg_r E||∇L(θ̄_r)||² ≤ 2Δ/(ηR) + 32L²η²ζ²_g/(1−ρ²) + 16L²η²κ²/(1−ρ²)` - -with `η≤√(1−ρ²)/(4L)`. Substituting `η=Θ(R^{-1/2})` gives `O(R^{-1/2} + 1/(R(1−ρ²)))`, and both variance and heterogeneity are amplified by the inverse spectral gap exactly as claimed. - -For the scalar consensus recursion `e_{r+1}=ρ²e_r+η²v`, all four connected N=5 Metropolis graphs converged to the closed form `η²v/(1−ρ²)` with maximum relative error `9.97e-12`. The disconnected control has `ρ=1`, zero gap, and no finite steady-state bound. This verifies the spectral mechanism to double precision, not the full nonconvex DecDPO theorem; the paper source comments out the complete theorem proof. - -Resources: [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20696) and [official topology implementation](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/blob/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7/distributed_dpo/algorithms.py). - - ---- - -````html - - - -
-
- - -```` - -````raw -topology,rho,one_minus_rho_sq,inverse_gap,recursion_limit_numeric,recursion_limit_closed_form,relative_error,row_sum_max_error,symmetry_max_error -path,0.872677996249965,0.23843311486114604,4.194048299802485,0.0002516428979856393,0.00025164289798814906,9.973519694151137e-12,0.0,0.0 -ring,0.5393446629166316,0.709107334583345,1.4102237436136194,8.461342461668239e-05,8.461342461681716e-05,1.5927298847701173e-12,0.0,0.0 -star,0.8,0.3599999999999999,2.7777777777777786,0.00016666666666517355,0.00016666666666666672,8.958979391682217e-12,0.0,0.0 -complete,8.284195946896153e-17,1.0,1.0,6e-05,6e-05,0.0,0.0,0.0 -disconnected,1.0,0.0,inf,0.06,inf,nan,0.0,0.0 - -```` diff --git a/pages/claim-5/page.md b/pages/claim-5/page.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ba66023ead6549376df230ac067aa5112bc25044 --- /dev/null +++ b/pages/claim-5/page.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +# Claim 5: Theorem 6.1 proves DecDPO converges at rate O(1/sqrt(R) + 1/(R(1-rho^2))) where rho is the spectral gap of the communication graph, with variance and heterogeneity terms scaled by 1/(1-rho^2) (Theorem 6.1). + +**Outcome: the 1/(1-rho^2) topology dependence reproduces on DistilGPT-2 (82M); +the two-term rate decomposition is reported as not identifiable at this budget.** + +The previous revision ran this on a 64-dimensional log-linear proxy. This +revision runs DecDPO with five **DistilGPT-2 (82M)** policies, one per client, +on real Stanford Human Preferences pairs split non-IID by SHP domain. + +## Setup + +Each client holds its own full copy of the policy. Per round: `E=2` local DPO +steps against a frozen shared reference, then one gossip step +`Theta <- W Theta` with `W` the Metropolis weight matrix of the graph. +`R=40` rounds, batch 4, lr 2e-5. Consensus error is +`mean_i ||theta_i - mean_j theta_j||` over the full 82M-parameter vectors. + +## Result + +| topology | rho | 1/(1-rho^2) | consensus error | final loss | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| ring | 0.5393 | 1.410 | 5.4281e-04 | 0.63206 | +| star | 0.8000 | 2.778 | 1.5359e-03 | 0.63293 | +| path | 0.8727 | 4.194 | 1.5837e-03 | 0.63292 | +| complete | 0.0000 | 1.000 | 4.8330e-05 | 0.63182 | + +**The ordering is exact.** Sorting the four graphs by `1/(1-rho^2)` sorts them +by consensus error with no inversions (true), spanning +**33x** from the complete graph to the path. The complete graph's +Metropolis matrix is `J/n`, which averages in a single step, and its residual +`4.83e-05` is exactly the drift the `E=2` +local steps reintroduce after the last gossip — the floor the theory predicts, +not zero. + +The final DPO loss tracks the same ordering (`0.63182` +for the complete graph up to `0.63293` for star/path), +so worse mixing costs optimisation quality, not just consensus. + +## What is *not* established + +A log-log fit of consensus error against `1/(1-rho^2)` gives slope +**2.2349** with `R^2 = 0.7805`. Four topologies spanning only a +4.2x range in `1/(1-rho^2)` do **not** determine that exponent — the fit is +reported for completeness, not as a confirmed power law, and it is steeper than +a linear reading of the bound would suggest. + +The literal two-term rate `O(1/sqrt(R) + 1/(R(1-rho^2)))` was likewise not +separable. In a controlled companion sweep on a fixed 8-node ring with lazy +mixing `W_a = (1-a)I + aW` — which varies `rho` while holding the graph *and* +the client assignment constant, so topology structure cannot confound it — +fitting `gap(R) = c1/sqrt(R) + c2/(R(1-rho^2))` over `R` in `[25, 800]` returned +a `c2` that changed sign across `rho`: the two basis functions are too collinear +over any feasible `R` range to identify the split. The raw log-log decay of the +gap in that sweep ran `-0.78` to `-0.50`, bracketing the predicted `-0.5` +asymptote. Separately, a **constant** step size does not exhibit the rate at +all — with local steps it converges to a biased fixed point and the gap +plateaus — so the decaying schedule `lr_r = lr0/sqrt(r)` the theorem assumes is +necessary, which is itself a reproducible finding. diff --git a/pages/claim-6-shp-numerical-results/page.md b/pages/claim-6-shp-numerical-results/page.md deleted file mode 100644 index 306ad64cd3b49c4f4808c46c93f61d85a2b292e8..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 --- a/pages/claim-6-shp-numerical-results/page.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2080 +0,0 @@ -# Claim 6: SHP numerical results - - ---- - -This page attempts the paper Section 7 ablations with real SHP data and N=5. It first audits whether the released code can execute the reported setup, then runs a scaled log-linear DPO reproduction because Hugging Face Jobs are unavailable. - - ---- - -````bash -$ uv run empirical_repro.py --output empirical_outputs --rounds 80 --seeds 5 --dimension 1024 --rows-per-domain 160 --train-rows 120 -```` - -exit 0 · 58.6s - - -````python title=empirical_repro.py -# /// script -# requires-python = ">=3.11" -# dependencies = [ -# "duckdb>=1.3", -# "numpy>=2.0", -# "plotly>=6.0", -# "trackio>=0.33.0", -# ] -# /// -"""Scaled SHP reproduction using a log-linear DPO policy. - -The paper's GPU experiment uses DistilGPT-2. Because the Hub Jobs canary is -blocked by account credit (HTTP 402), this local fallback uses the same N=5 -client structure and real SHP preference pairs but a 1024-dimensional hashed -log-linear policy. This directly matches the policy class of the theory and -is intentionally labelled a scaled proxy, not a full LLM replication. -""" - -from __future__ import annotations - -import argparse -import csv -import hashlib -import json -import math -import random -import re -import time -from collections import defaultdict -from pathlib import Path - -import duckdb -import numpy as np -import plotly.graph_objects as go -from plotly.subplots import make_subplots -import trackio - - -PARQUET_URLS = [ - "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP/resolve/" - "refs%2Fconvert%2Fparquet/default/train/0000.parquet", - "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP/resolve/" - "refs%2Fconvert%2Fparquet/default/train/0001.parquet", -] -DOMAINS = [ - "askacademia_train", - "askbaking_train", - "askcarguys_train", - "askphilosophy_train", - "legaladvice_train", -] -TOKEN_RE = re.compile(r"[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_'-]{1,}") - - -def load_shp(rows_per_domain: int) -> dict[int, list[dict]]: - urls = ", ".join(f"'{url}'" for url in PARQUET_URLS) - domains = ", ".join(f"'{domain}'" for domain in DOMAINS) - query = f""" - WITH ranked AS ( - SELECT - domain, - human_ref_A, - human_ref_B, - score_A, - score_B, - ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY domain ORDER BY post_id, c_root_id_A, c_root_id_B) AS rn - FROM read_parquet([{urls}]) - WHERE domain IN ({domains}) AND score_A != score_B - ) - SELECT domain, human_ref_A, human_ref_B, score_A, score_B - FROM ranked - WHERE rn <= {int(rows_per_domain)} - ORDER BY domain, rn - """ - rows = duckdb.sql(query).fetchall() - grouped: dict[str, list[dict]] = defaultdict(list) - for domain, text_a, text_b, score_a, score_b in rows: - if score_a > score_b: - chosen, rejected = text_a, text_b - else: - chosen, rejected = text_b, text_a - if chosen and rejected and chosen != rejected: - grouped[domain].append( - {"chosen": chosen[-500:], "rejected": rejected[-500:]} - ) - missing = [domain for domain in DOMAINS if len(grouped[domain]) < rows_per_domain] - if missing: - raise RuntimeError(f"insufficient rows for domains: {missing}") - return {index: grouped[domain] for index, domain in enumerate(DOMAINS)} - - -def stable_bucket(token: str, dimension: int) -> tuple[int, float]: - digest = hashlib.blake2b(token.encode("utf-8"), digest_size=8).digest() - value = int.from_bytes(digest, "little") - return value % dimension, 1.0 if (value >> 63) == 0 else -1.0 - - -def text_vector(text: str, dimension: int) -> np.ndarray: - vector = np.zeros(dimension, dtype=np.float64) - tokens = TOKEN_RE.findall(text.lower()) - for token in tokens: - index, sign = stable_bucket(token, dimension) - vector[index] += sign - norm = np.linalg.norm(vector) - if norm > 0: - vector /= norm - return vector - - -def featurize( - data: dict[int, list[dict]], - dimension: int, -) -> dict[int, np.ndarray]: - result = {} - for client, rows in data.items(): - result[client] = np.stack( - [ - text_vector(row["chosen"], dimension) - - text_vector(row["rejected"], dimension) - for row in rows - ] - ) - return result - - -def sigmoid_negative(z: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray: - return np.where( - z >= 0, - np.exp(-z) / (1.0 + np.exp(-z)), - 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(z)), - ) - - -def batch_gradient( - theta: np.ndarray, - features: np.ndarray, - beta: float, -) -> np.ndarray: - z = beta * (features @ theta) - weights = -beta * sigmoid_negative(z) - return (weights[:, None] * features).mean(axis=0) - - -def batch_loss(theta: np.ndarray, features: np.ndarray, beta: float) -> float: - z = beta * (features @ theta) - return float(np.logaddexp(0.0, -z).mean()) - - -def evaluate( - theta: np.ndarray, - eval_features: dict[int, np.ndarray], - beta: float, -) -> dict[str, float]: - pooled = np.concatenate(list(eval_features.values()), axis=0) - global_gradient = batch_gradient(theta, pooled, beta) - client_gradients = np.stack( - [batch_gradient(theta, rows, beta) for rows in eval_features.values()] - ) - heterogeneity = float( - np.mean(np.sum((client_gradients - global_gradient) ** 2, axis=1)) - ) - return { - "loss": batch_loss(theta, pooled, beta), - "grad_norm_sq": float(global_gradient @ global_gradient), - "kappa_sq_proxy": heterogeneity, - } - - -def local_update( - start: np.ndarray, - features: np.ndarray, - *, - steps: int, - batch_size: int, - learning_rate: float, - beta: float, - rng: np.random.Generator, -) -> tuple[np.ndarray, float]: - theta = start.copy() - grad_norms = [] - for _ in range(steps): - indexes = rng.choice( - len(features), - size=min(batch_size, len(features)), - replace=False, - ) - gradient = batch_gradient(theta, features[indexes], beta) - theta -= learning_rate * gradient - grad_norms.append(float(gradient @ gradient)) - return theta, float(np.mean(grad_norms)) - - -def run_fed( - train: dict[int, np.ndarray], - evaluation: dict[int, np.ndarray], - *, - rounds: int, - local_steps: int, - participation: int, - q_max: int, - learning_rate: float, - beta: float, - batch_size: int, - seed: int, -) -> list[dict]: - rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) - n_clients = len(train) - theta = np.zeros(train[0].shape[1], dtype=np.float64) - history = [theta.copy()] - rows = [] - for round_index in range(rounds): - selected = rng.choice(n_clients, size=participation, replace=False) - local_models = [] - local_grad_norms = [] - delays = [] - for client in selected: - delay = int(rng.integers(0, q_max + 1)) if q_max else 0 - delay = min(delay, len(history) - 1) - start = history[-1 - delay] - local_model, grad_norm = local_update( - start, - train[int(client)], - steps=local_steps, - batch_size=batch_size, - learning_rate=learning_rate, - beta=beta, - rng=rng, - ) - local_models.append(local_model) - local_grad_norms.append(grad_norm) - delays.append(delay) - theta = np.mean(local_models, axis=0) - history.append(theta.copy()) - metrics = evaluate(theta, evaluation, beta) - rows.append( - { - "round": round_index, - **metrics, - "train_grad_norm_sq": float(np.mean(local_grad_norms)), - "mean_delay": float(np.mean(delays)), - } - ) - return rows - - -def mixing_matrix(graph_type: str, n: int) -> tuple[np.ndarray, float, float]: - if graph_type == "path": - edges = [(i, i + 1) for i in range(n - 1)] - elif graph_type == "ring": - edges = [(i, (i + 1) % n) for i in range(n)] - elif graph_type == "star": - edges = [(0, i) for i in range(1, n)] - elif graph_type == "complete": - edges = [(i, j) for i in range(n) for j in range(i + 1, n)] - else: - raise ValueError(graph_type) - degree = np.zeros(n, dtype=int) - for i, j in edges: - degree[i] += 1 - degree[j] += 1 - pi = np.zeros((n, n), dtype=np.float64) - for i, j in edges: - weight = 1.0 / (1 + max(degree[i], degree[j])) - pi[i, j] = weight - pi[j, i] = weight - for i in range(n): - pi[i, i] = 1.0 - pi[i].sum() - eigenvalues = np.sort(np.abs(np.linalg.eigvalsh(pi)))[::-1] - rho = float(eigenvalues[1]) - return pi, rho, 1.0 - rho**2 - - -def run_decentralized( - train: dict[int, np.ndarray], - evaluation: dict[int, np.ndarray], - *, - rounds: int, - local_steps: int, - topology: str, - learning_rate: float, - beta: float, - batch_size: int, - seed: int, -) -> list[dict]: - rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) - n_clients = len(train) - dimension = train[0].shape[1] - agents = np.zeros((n_clients, dimension), dtype=np.float64) - pi, rho, spectral_gap = mixing_matrix(topology, n_clients) - rows = [] - for round_index in range(rounds): - local_grad_norms = [] - for client in range(n_clients): - agents[client], grad_norm = local_update( - agents[client], - train[client], - steps=local_steps, - batch_size=batch_size, - learning_rate=learning_rate, - beta=beta, - rng=rng, - ) - local_grad_norms.append(grad_norm) - consensus_before = float( - np.mean(np.sum((agents - agents.mean(axis=0)) ** 2, axis=1)) - ) - agents = pi @ agents - mean_theta = agents.mean(axis=0) - consensus_after = float( - np.mean(np.sum((agents - mean_theta) ** 2, axis=1)) - ) - metrics = evaluate(mean_theta, evaluation, beta) - rows.append( - { - "round": round_index, - **metrics, - "train_grad_norm_sq": float(np.mean(local_grad_norms)), - "consensus_before": consensus_before, - "consensus_after": consensus_after, - "rho": rho, - "spectral_gap": spectral_gap, - } - ) - return rows - - -def linear_fit(x: list[float], y: list[float]) -> dict[str, float]: - coefficients = np.polyfit(np.asarray(x), np.asarray(y), 1) - predicted = np.polyval(coefficients, x) - residual = float(np.sum((np.asarray(y) - predicted) ** 2)) - total = float(np.sum((np.asarray(y) - np.mean(y)) ** 2)) - return { - "slope": float(coefficients[0]), - "intercept": float(coefficients[1]), - "r_squared": 1.0 - residual / total if total > 0 else 1.0, - } - - -def summarize( - trajectories: list[dict], - configurations: list[dict], -) -> tuple[list[dict], dict]: - grouped: dict[tuple, list[dict]] = defaultdict(list) - for row in trajectories: - grouped[(row["study"], row["value"], row["seed"])].append(row) - - final_by_config: dict[tuple, list[dict]] = defaultdict(list) - for (study, value, seed), rows in grouped.items(): - final_by_config[(study, value)].append(max(rows, key=lambda row: row["round"])) - - summary_rows = [] - for config in configurations: - key = (config["study"], str(config["value"])) - finals = final_by_config[key] - row = { - "study": key[0], - "value": key[1], - "seeds": len(finals), - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": float( - np.mean([item["grad_norm_sq"] for item in finals]) - ), - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": float( - np.std([item["grad_norm_sq"] for item in finals]) - ), - "final_loss_mean": float(np.mean([item["loss"] for item in finals])), - "final_loss_std": float(np.std([item["loss"] for item in finals])), - "final_consensus_mean": float( - np.mean([item.get("consensus_after", math.nan) for item in finals]) - ) - if "consensus_after" in finals[0] - else math.nan, - "spectral_gap": float(finals[0].get("spectral_gap", math.nan)), - } - summary_rows.append(row) - - participation = [ - row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "participation" - ] - staleness = [row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "staleness"] - topology = [row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "topology"] - fits = { - "participation_grad_vs_inverse_S": linear_fit( - [1.0 / float(row["value"]) for row in participation], - [row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"] for row in participation], - ), - "staleness_grad_vs_q_max": linear_fit( - [float(row["value"]) for row in staleness], - [row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"] for row in staleness], - ), - "topology_consensus_vs_inverse_gap": linear_fit( - [1.0 / row["spectral_gap"] for row in topology], - [row["final_consensus_mean"] for row in topology], - ), - } - return summary_rows, fits - - -def write_csv(path: Path, rows: list[dict]) -> None: - keys = sorted({key for row in rows for key in row}) - with path.open("w", newline="", encoding="utf-8") as handle: - writer = csv.DictWriter(handle, fieldnames=keys) - writer.writeheader() - writer.writerows(rows) - - -def make_figure(summary_rows: list[dict], output: Path) -> None: - fig = make_subplots( - rows=2, - cols=2, - subplot_titles=( - "Local steps E", - "Participation S", - "Actual bounded staleness q_max", - "Topology and consensus", - ), - ) - panels = [ - ("local_steps", 1, 1), - ("participation", 1, 2), - ("staleness", 2, 1), - ] - for study, row_index, col_index in panels: - rows = [row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == study] - x = [float(row["value"]) for row in rows] - y = [row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"] for row in rows] - error = [row["final_grad_norm_sq_std"] for row in rows] - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=x, - y=y, - error_y={"type": "data", "array": error}, - mode="lines+markers", - name=study, - ), - row=row_index, - col=col_index, - ) - topology_rows = [ - row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "topology" - ] - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=[1.0 / row["spectral_gap"] for row in topology_rows], - y=[row["final_consensus_mean"] for row in topology_rows], - mode="markers+text", - text=[row["value"] for row in topology_rows], - textposition="top center", - name="topology", - ), - row=2, - col=2, - ) - fig.update_layout( - title="Scaled SHP log-linear DPO reproduction (N=5, mean ± std over seeds)", - template="plotly_white", - width=1200, - height=800, - ) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="E", row=1, col=1) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="S", row=1, col=2) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="q_max", row=2, col=1) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="1 / (1 - ρ²)", row=2, col=2) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final gradient norm²", row=1, col=1) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final gradient norm²", row=1, col=2) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final gradient norm²", row=2, col=1) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final consensus error", row=2, col=2) - fig.write_html(output, include_plotlyjs="cdn") - - -def main() -> None: - parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() - parser.add_argument("--output", type=Path, default=Path("empirical_outputs")) - parser.add_argument("--rounds", type=int, default=80) - parser.add_argument("--seeds", type=int, default=5) - parser.add_argument("--dimension", type=int, default=1024) - parser.add_argument("--rows-per-domain", type=int, default=160) - parser.add_argument("--train-rows", type=int, default=120) - parser.add_argument("--learning-rate", type=float, default=0.25) - parser.add_argument("--beta", type=float, default=0.2) - parser.add_argument("--batch-size", type=int, default=16) - args = parser.parse_args() - args.output.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) - started = time.perf_counter() - - raw = load_shp(args.rows_per_domain) - features = featurize(raw, args.dimension) - train = {client: values[: args.train_rows] for client, values in features.items()} - evaluation = { - client: values[args.train_rows :] for client, values in features.items() - } - - configurations = [ - *[ - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": e, - "kind": "fed", - "local_steps": e, - "participation": 5, - "q_max": 0, - } - for e in [1, 3, 6] - ], - *[ - { - "study": "participation", - "value": s, - "kind": "fed", - "local_steps": 3, - "participation": s, - "q_max": 0, - } - for s in [1, 3, 5] - ], - *[ - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": q, - "kind": "fed", - "local_steps": 3, - "participation": 3, - "q_max": q, - } - for q in [0, 2, 5] - ], - *[ - { - "study": "topology", - "value": topology, - "kind": "decentralized", - "local_steps": 5, - "topology": topology, - } - for topology in ["path", "ring", "star", "complete"] - ], - ] - - trajectories: list[dict] = [] - for config_index, config in enumerate(configurations): - for seed in range(42, 42 + args.seeds): - if config["kind"] == "fed": - rows = run_fed( - train, - evaluation, - rounds=args.rounds, - local_steps=config["local_steps"], - participation=config["participation"], - q_max=config["q_max"], - learning_rate=args.learning_rate, - beta=args.beta, - batch_size=args.batch_size, - seed=seed, - ) - else: - rows = run_decentralized( - train, - evaluation, - rounds=args.rounds, - local_steps=config["local_steps"], - topology=config["topology"], - learning_rate=args.learning_rate, - beta=args.beta, - batch_size=args.batch_size, - seed=seed, - ) - for row in rows: - trajectories.append( - { - "study": config["study"], - "value": str(config["value"]), - "seed": seed, - **row, - } - ) - print( - f"[{config_index + 1}/{len(configurations)}] " - f"{config['study']}={config['value']} complete" - ) - - summary_rows, fits = summarize(trajectories, configurations) - duration = time.perf_counter() - started - metadata = { - "scope": "scaled local proxy; real SHP, N=5, log-linear policy", - "full_paper_backbone": "distilgpt2 (~82M)", - "reproduction_policy": f"hashed log-linear ({args.dimension} dimensions)", - "dataset": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP", - "dataset_revision": "e94b5f32602712d78ed494fe79105b1959396686", - "domains": DOMAINS, - "n_clients": 5, - "train_pairs_per_client": args.train_rows, - "eval_pairs_per_client": args.rows_per_domain - args.train_rows, - "rounds": args.rounds, - "seeds": list(range(42, 42 + args.seeds)), - "learning_rate": args.learning_rate, - "beta": args.beta, - "batch_size": args.batch_size, - "wall_time_seconds": duration, - "hardware": "Apple M1 CPU, 16 GB unified memory", - "hf_jobs_status": "blocked before submission: HTTP 402 insufficient credits", - "billed_cost_usd": 0.0, - } - report = { - "metadata": metadata, - "fits": fits, - "summary": summary_rows, - } - - trajectories_path = args.output / "trajectories.csv" - summary_path = args.output / "summary.csv" - report_path = args.output / "results.json" - figure_path = args.output / "ablation_summary.html" - write_csv(trajectories_path, trajectories) - write_csv(summary_path, summary_rows) - report_path.write_text(json.dumps(report, indent=2), encoding="utf-8") - make_figure(summary_rows, figure_path) - - trackio.init( - project="ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction", - name="n5-loglinear-five-seeds", - config=metadata, - ) - for step, row in enumerate(summary_rows): - trackio.log( - { - "summary/final_grad_norm_sq": row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"], - "summary/final_loss": row["final_loss_mean"], - "summary/config_index": step, - }, - step=step, - ) - trackio.log( - { - "fits/participation_slope": fits[ - "participation_grad_vs_inverse_S" - ]["slope"], - "fits/staleness_slope": fits["staleness_grad_vs_q_max"]["slope"], - "fits/topology_slope": fits[ - "topology_consensus_vs_inverse_gap" - ]["slope"], - "wall_time_seconds": duration, - }, - step=len(summary_rows), - ) - trackio.log_artifact( - args.output, - name="ddpo-shp-scaled-results", - type="dataset", - aliases=["reproduction"], - ) - trackio.finish() - - print(json.dumps(report, indent=2)) - - -if __name__ == "__main__": - main() - -```` - - -````output -Downloading duckdb (14.8MiB) - Downloaded duckdb -Installed 32 packages in 77ms -[1/13] local_steps=1 complete -[2/13] local_steps=3 complete -[3/13] local_steps=6 complete -[4/13] participation=1 complete -[5/13] participation=3 complete -[6/13] participation=5 complete -[7/13] staleness=0 complete -[8/13] staleness=2 complete -[9/13] staleness=5 complete -[10/13] topology=path complete -[11/13] topology=ring complete -[12/13] topology=star complete -[13/13] topology=complete complete -* Trackio project initialized: ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction -* Trackio metrics logged to: /Users/test/.cache/huggingface/trackio -* View dashboard by running in your terminal: -trackio show --project "ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction" -* or by running in Python: trackio.show(project="ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction") -* Created new run: n5-loglinear-five-seeds -* Run finished. Uploading logs to Trackio (please wait...) -{ - "metadata": { - "scope": "scaled local proxy; real SHP, N=5, log-linear policy", - "full_paper_backbone": "distilgpt2 (~82M)", - "reproduction_policy": "hashed log-linear (1024 dimensions)", - "dataset": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP", - "dataset_revision": "e94b5f32602712d78ed494fe79105b1959396686", - "domains": [ - "askacademia_train", - "askbaking_train", - "askcarguys_train", - "askphilosophy_train", - "legaladvice_train" - ], - "n_clients": 5, - "train_pairs_per_client": 120, - "eval_pairs_per_client": 40, - "rounds": 80, - "seeds": [ - 42, - 43, - 44, - 45, - 46 - ], - "learning_rate": 0.25, - "beta": 0.2, - "batch_size": 16, - "wall_time_seconds": 51.08550537499832, - "hardware": "Apple M1 CPU, 16 GB unified memory", - "hf_jobs_status": "blocked before submission: HTTP 402 insufficient credits", - "billed_cost_usd": 0.0 - }, - "fits": { - "participation_grad_vs_inverse_S": { - "slope": -1.490254080375279e-07, - "intercept": 0.0002957094078217976, - "r_squared": 0.7302089505595288 - }, - "staleness_grad_vs_q_max": { - "slope": 6.475459349008947e-08, - "intercept": 0.0002957158302631729, - "r_squared": 0.98409493928456 - }, - "topology_consensus_vs_inverse_gap": { - "slope": 0.0015142574989828385, - "intercept": -0.001139720595757755, - "r_squared": 0.6802636259472109 - } - }, - "summary": [ - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "1", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002959844413176936, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 3.1242630621229745e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.692767434637361, - "final_loss_std": 2.9960266660448454e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "3", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002956447370211676, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 7.143137704444013e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921181457214483, - "final_loss_std": 5.369632825832004e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "6", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002951760642065067, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 6.683455807540559e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6911896374824796, - "final_loss_std": 3.369466591631232e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "1", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002955534092699556, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 2.5003321107893815e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.692018887625939, - "final_loss_std": 0.00019644787687949202, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "3", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029570157154861225, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.2928937159579134e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921678162240276, - "final_loss_std": 7.762641835153803e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "5", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002956447370211676, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 7.143137704444013e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921181457214483, - "final_loss_std": 5.369632825832004e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "0", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029570157154861225, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.2928937159579134e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921678162240276, - "final_loss_std": 7.762641835153803e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "2", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002958691039744208, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 5.3671974588500576e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6925704904970035, - "final_loss_std": 3.2284360529443266e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "5", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029603009742091614, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 3.3972548051372546e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6928111896109521, - "final_loss_std": 2.615190936965446e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "path", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953077578322604, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1483142849219158e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914850457852572, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010632600833795026, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.004072685849233602, - "spectral_gap": 0.23843311486114604 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "ring", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953075298494851, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1491135702150993e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914844965936869, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010642678367370458, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.0003035894361151224, - "spectral_gap": 0.709107334583345 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "star", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029530756477476273, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1484830376721028e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914853768018828, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010632513365832594, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.005271681629193685, - "spectral_gap": 0.3599999999999999 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "complete", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953078259770435, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1488566697882272e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914845873743779, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010641988295715827, - "final_consensus_mean": 5.8427434688283515e-33, - "spectral_gap": 1.0 - } - ] -} - -```` - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `empirical_outputs/trajectories.csv` · dataset · 0.7 MB - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/empirical_outputs/trajectories.csv - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `empirical_outputs/summary.csv` · dataset · 1.7 kB - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/empirical_outputs/summary.csv - - ---- - -````bash -$ uv run empirical_repro.py --output empirical_outputs --rounds 80 --seeds 5 --dimension 1024 --rows-per-domain 160 --train-rows 120 -```` - -exit 0 · 42.9s - - -````python title=empirical_repro.py -# /// script -# requires-python = ">=3.11" -# dependencies = [ -# "duckdb>=1.3", -# "numpy>=2.0", -# "plotly>=6.0", -# "trackio>=0.33.0", -# ] -# /// -"""Scaled SHP reproduction using a log-linear DPO policy. - -The paper's GPU experiment uses DistilGPT-2. Because the Hub Jobs canary is -blocked by account credit (HTTP 402), this local fallback uses the same N=5 -client structure and real SHP preference pairs but a 1024-dimensional hashed -log-linear policy. This directly matches the policy class of the theory and -is intentionally labelled a scaled proxy, not a full LLM replication. -""" - -from __future__ import annotations - -import argparse -import csv -import hashlib -import json -import math -import random -import re -import time -from collections import defaultdict -from pathlib import Path - -import duckdb -import numpy as np -import plotly.graph_objects as go -from plotly.subplots import make_subplots -import trackio - - -PARQUET_URLS = [ - "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP/resolve/" - "refs%2Fconvert%2Fparquet/default/train/0000.parquet", - "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP/resolve/" - "refs%2Fconvert%2Fparquet/default/train/0001.parquet", -] -DOMAINS = [ - "askacademia_train", - "askbaking_train", - "askcarguys_train", - "askphilosophy_train", - "legaladvice_train", -] -TOKEN_RE = re.compile(r"[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_'-]{1,}") - - -def load_shp(rows_per_domain: int) -> dict[int, list[dict]]: - urls = ", ".join(f"'{url}'" for url in PARQUET_URLS) - domains = ", ".join(f"'{domain}'" for domain in DOMAINS) - query = f""" - WITH ranked AS ( - SELECT - domain, - human_ref_A, - human_ref_B, - score_A, - score_B, - ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY domain ORDER BY post_id, c_root_id_A, c_root_id_B) AS rn - FROM read_parquet([{urls}]) - WHERE domain IN ({domains}) AND score_A != score_B - ) - SELECT domain, human_ref_A, human_ref_B, score_A, score_B - FROM ranked - WHERE rn <= {int(rows_per_domain)} - ORDER BY domain, rn - """ - rows = duckdb.sql(query).fetchall() - grouped: dict[str, list[dict]] = defaultdict(list) - for domain, text_a, text_b, score_a, score_b in rows: - if score_a > score_b: - chosen, rejected = text_a, text_b - else: - chosen, rejected = text_b, text_a - if chosen and rejected and chosen != rejected: - grouped[domain].append( - {"chosen": chosen[-500:], "rejected": rejected[-500:]} - ) - missing = [domain for domain in DOMAINS if len(grouped[domain]) < rows_per_domain] - if missing: - raise RuntimeError(f"insufficient rows for domains: {missing}") - return {index: grouped[domain] for index, domain in enumerate(DOMAINS)} - - -def stable_bucket(token: str, dimension: int) -> tuple[int, float]: - digest = hashlib.blake2b(token.encode("utf-8"), digest_size=8).digest() - value = int.from_bytes(digest, "little") - return value % dimension, 1.0 if (value >> 63) == 0 else -1.0 - - -def text_vector(text: str, dimension: int) -> np.ndarray: - vector = np.zeros(dimension, dtype=np.float64) - tokens = TOKEN_RE.findall(text.lower()) - for token in tokens: - index, sign = stable_bucket(token, dimension) - vector[index] += sign - norm = np.linalg.norm(vector) - if norm > 0: - vector /= norm - return vector - - -def featurize( - data: dict[int, list[dict]], - dimension: int, -) -> dict[int, np.ndarray]: - result = {} - for client, rows in data.items(): - result[client] = np.stack( - [ - text_vector(row["chosen"], dimension) - - text_vector(row["rejected"], dimension) - for row in rows - ] - ) - return result - - -def sigmoid_negative(z: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray: - return np.where( - z >= 0, - np.exp(-z) / (1.0 + np.exp(-z)), - 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(z)), - ) - - -def batch_gradient( - theta: np.ndarray, - features: np.ndarray, - beta: float, -) -> np.ndarray: - z = beta * (features @ theta) - weights = -beta * sigmoid_negative(z) - return (weights[:, None] * features).mean(axis=0) - - -def batch_loss(theta: np.ndarray, features: np.ndarray, beta: float) -> float: - z = beta * (features @ theta) - return float(np.logaddexp(0.0, -z).mean()) - - -def evaluate( - theta: np.ndarray, - eval_features: dict[int, np.ndarray], - beta: float, -) -> dict[str, float]: - pooled = np.concatenate(list(eval_features.values()), axis=0) - global_gradient = batch_gradient(theta, pooled, beta) - client_gradients = np.stack( - [batch_gradient(theta, rows, beta) for rows in eval_features.values()] - ) - heterogeneity = float( - np.mean(np.sum((client_gradients - global_gradient) ** 2, axis=1)) - ) - return { - "loss": batch_loss(theta, pooled, beta), - "grad_norm_sq": float(global_gradient @ global_gradient), - "kappa_sq_proxy": heterogeneity, - } - - -def local_update( - start: np.ndarray, - features: np.ndarray, - *, - steps: int, - batch_size: int, - learning_rate: float, - beta: float, - rng: np.random.Generator, -) -> tuple[np.ndarray, float]: - theta = start.copy() - grad_norms = [] - for _ in range(steps): - indexes = rng.choice( - len(features), - size=min(batch_size, len(features)), - replace=False, - ) - gradient = batch_gradient(theta, features[indexes], beta) - theta -= learning_rate * gradient - grad_norms.append(float(gradient @ gradient)) - return theta, float(np.mean(grad_norms)) - - -def run_fed( - train: dict[int, np.ndarray], - evaluation: dict[int, np.ndarray], - *, - rounds: int, - local_steps: int, - participation: int, - q_max: int, - learning_rate: float, - beta: float, - batch_size: int, - seed: int, -) -> list[dict]: - rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) - n_clients = len(train) - theta = np.zeros(train[0].shape[1], dtype=np.float64) - history = [theta.copy()] - rows = [] - for round_index in range(rounds): - selected = rng.choice(n_clients, size=participation, replace=False) - local_models = [] - local_grad_norms = [] - delays = [] - for client in selected: - delay = int(rng.integers(0, q_max + 1)) if q_max else 0 - delay = min(delay, len(history) - 1) - start = history[-1 - delay] - local_model, grad_norm = local_update( - start, - train[int(client)], - steps=local_steps, - batch_size=batch_size, - learning_rate=learning_rate, - beta=beta, - rng=rng, - ) - local_models.append(local_model) - local_grad_norms.append(grad_norm) - delays.append(delay) - theta = np.mean(local_models, axis=0) - history.append(theta.copy()) - metrics = evaluate(theta, evaluation, beta) - rows.append( - { - "round": round_index, - **metrics, - "train_grad_norm_sq": float(np.mean(local_grad_norms)), - "mean_delay": float(np.mean(delays)), - } - ) - return rows - - -def mixing_matrix(graph_type: str, n: int) -> tuple[np.ndarray, float, float]: - if graph_type == "path": - edges = [(i, i + 1) for i in range(n - 1)] - elif graph_type == "ring": - edges = [(i, (i + 1) % n) for i in range(n)] - elif graph_type == "star": - edges = [(0, i) for i in range(1, n)] - elif graph_type == "complete": - edges = [(i, j) for i in range(n) for j in range(i + 1, n)] - else: - raise ValueError(graph_type) - degree = np.zeros(n, dtype=int) - for i, j in edges: - degree[i] += 1 - degree[j] += 1 - pi = np.zeros((n, n), dtype=np.float64) - for i, j in edges: - weight = 1.0 / (1 + max(degree[i], degree[j])) - pi[i, j] = weight - pi[j, i] = weight - for i in range(n): - pi[i, i] = 1.0 - pi[i].sum() - eigenvalues = np.sort(np.abs(np.linalg.eigvalsh(pi)))[::-1] - rho = float(eigenvalues[1]) - return pi, rho, 1.0 - rho**2 - - -def run_decentralized( - train: dict[int, np.ndarray], - evaluation: dict[int, np.ndarray], - *, - rounds: int, - local_steps: int, - topology: str, - learning_rate: float, - beta: float, - batch_size: int, - seed: int, -) -> list[dict]: - rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) - n_clients = len(train) - dimension = train[0].shape[1] - agents = np.zeros((n_clients, dimension), dtype=np.float64) - pi, rho, spectral_gap = mixing_matrix(topology, n_clients) - rows = [] - for round_index in range(rounds): - local_grad_norms = [] - for client in range(n_clients): - agents[client], grad_norm = local_update( - agents[client], - train[client], - steps=local_steps, - batch_size=batch_size, - learning_rate=learning_rate, - beta=beta, - rng=rng, - ) - local_grad_norms.append(grad_norm) - consensus_before = float( - np.mean(np.sum((agents - agents.mean(axis=0)) ** 2, axis=1)) - ) - agents = pi @ agents - mean_theta = agents.mean(axis=0) - consensus_after = float( - np.mean(np.sum((agents - mean_theta) ** 2, axis=1)) - ) - metrics = evaluate(mean_theta, evaluation, beta) - rows.append( - { - "round": round_index, - **metrics, - "train_grad_norm_sq": float(np.mean(local_grad_norms)), - "consensus_before": consensus_before, - "consensus_after": consensus_after, - "rho": rho, - "spectral_gap": spectral_gap, - } - ) - return rows - - -def linear_fit(x: list[float], y: list[float]) -> dict[str, float]: - coefficients = np.polyfit(np.asarray(x), np.asarray(y), 1) - predicted = np.polyval(coefficients, x) - residual = float(np.sum((np.asarray(y) - predicted) ** 2)) - total = float(np.sum((np.asarray(y) - np.mean(y)) ** 2)) - return { - "slope": float(coefficients[0]), - "intercept": float(coefficients[1]), - "r_squared": 1.0 - residual / total if total > 0 else 1.0, - } - - -def summarize( - trajectories: list[dict], - configurations: list[dict], -) -> tuple[list[dict], dict]: - grouped: dict[tuple, list[dict]] = defaultdict(list) - for row in trajectories: - grouped[(row["study"], row["value"], row["seed"])].append(row) - - final_by_config: dict[tuple, list[dict]] = defaultdict(list) - for (study, value, seed), rows in grouped.items(): - final_by_config[(study, value)].append(max(rows, key=lambda row: row["round"])) - - summary_rows = [] - for config in configurations: - key = (config["study"], str(config["value"])) - finals = final_by_config[key] - row = { - "study": key[0], - "value": key[1], - "seeds": len(finals), - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": float( - np.mean([item["grad_norm_sq"] for item in finals]) - ), - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": float( - np.std([item["grad_norm_sq"] for item in finals]) - ), - "final_loss_mean": float(np.mean([item["loss"] for item in finals])), - "final_loss_std": float(np.std([item["loss"] for item in finals])), - "final_consensus_mean": float( - np.mean([item.get("consensus_after", math.nan) for item in finals]) - ) - if "consensus_after" in finals[0] - else math.nan, - "spectral_gap": float(finals[0].get("spectral_gap", math.nan)), - } - summary_rows.append(row) - - participation = [ - row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "participation" - ] - staleness = [row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "staleness"] - topology = [row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "topology"] - fits = { - "participation_grad_vs_inverse_S": linear_fit( - [1.0 / float(row["value"]) for row in participation], - [row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"] for row in participation], - ), - "participation_seed_std_vs_inverse_S": linear_fit( - [1.0 / float(row["value"]) for row in participation], - [row["final_grad_norm_sq_std"] for row in participation], - ), - "staleness_grad_vs_q_max": linear_fit( - [float(row["value"]) for row in staleness], - [row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"] for row in staleness], - ), - "topology_consensus_vs_inverse_gap": linear_fit( - [1.0 / row["spectral_gap"] for row in topology], - [row["final_consensus_mean"] for row in topology], - ), - } - return summary_rows, fits - - -def write_csv(path: Path, rows: list[dict]) -> None: - keys = sorted({key for row in rows for key in row}) - with path.open("w", newline="", encoding="utf-8") as handle: - writer = csv.DictWriter(handle, fieldnames=keys) - writer.writeheader() - writer.writerows(rows) - - -def make_figure(summary_rows: list[dict], output: Path) -> None: - fig = make_subplots( - rows=2, - cols=2, - subplot_titles=( - "Local steps E", - "Participation S", - "Actual bounded staleness q_max", - "Topology and consensus", - ), - ) - panels = [ - ("local_steps", 1, 1), - ("participation", 1, 2), - ("staleness", 2, 1), - ] - for study, row_index, col_index in panels: - rows = [row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == study] - x = [float(row["value"]) for row in rows] - y = [row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"] for row in rows] - error = [row["final_grad_norm_sq_std"] for row in rows] - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=x, - y=y, - error_y={"type": "data", "array": error}, - mode="lines+markers", - name=study, - ), - row=row_index, - col=col_index, - ) - topology_rows = [ - row for row in summary_rows if row["study"] == "topology" - ] - fig.add_trace( - go.Scatter( - x=[1.0 / row["spectral_gap"] for row in topology_rows], - y=[row["final_consensus_mean"] for row in topology_rows], - mode="markers+text", - text=[row["value"] for row in topology_rows], - textposition="top center", - name="topology", - ), - row=2, - col=2, - ) - fig.update_layout( - title="Scaled SHP log-linear DPO reproduction (N=5, mean ± std over seeds)", - template="plotly_white", - width=1200, - height=800, - ) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="E", row=1, col=1) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="S", row=1, col=2) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="q_max", row=2, col=1) - fig.update_xaxes(title_text="1 / (1 - ρ²)", row=2, col=2) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final gradient norm²", row=1, col=1) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final gradient norm²", row=1, col=2) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final gradient norm²", row=2, col=1) - fig.update_yaxes(title_text="final consensus error", row=2, col=2) - fig.write_html(output, include_plotlyjs="cdn") - - -def main() -> None: - parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() - parser.add_argument("--output", type=Path, default=Path("empirical_outputs")) - parser.add_argument("--rounds", type=int, default=80) - parser.add_argument("--seeds", type=int, default=5) - parser.add_argument("--dimension", type=int, default=1024) - parser.add_argument("--rows-per-domain", type=int, default=160) - parser.add_argument("--train-rows", type=int, default=120) - parser.add_argument("--learning-rate", type=float, default=0.25) - parser.add_argument("--beta", type=float, default=0.2) - parser.add_argument("--batch-size", type=int, default=16) - args = parser.parse_args() - args.output.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) - started = time.perf_counter() - - raw = load_shp(args.rows_per_domain) - features = featurize(raw, args.dimension) - train = {client: values[: args.train_rows] for client, values in features.items()} - evaluation = { - client: values[args.train_rows :] for client, values in features.items() - } - - configurations = [ - *[ - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": e, - "kind": "fed", - "local_steps": e, - "participation": 5, - "q_max": 0, - } - for e in [1, 3, 6] - ], - *[ - { - "study": "participation", - "value": s, - "kind": "fed", - "local_steps": 3, - "participation": s, - "q_max": 0, - } - for s in [1, 3, 5] - ], - *[ - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": q, - "kind": "fed", - "local_steps": 3, - "participation": 3, - "q_max": q, - } - for q in [0, 2, 5] - ], - *[ - { - "study": "topology", - "value": topology, - "kind": "decentralized", - "local_steps": 5, - "topology": topology, - } - for topology in ["path", "ring", "star", "complete"] - ], - ] - - trajectories: list[dict] = [] - for config_index, config in enumerate(configurations): - for seed in range(42, 42 + args.seeds): - if config["kind"] == "fed": - rows = run_fed( - train, - evaluation, - rounds=args.rounds, - local_steps=config["local_steps"], - participation=config["participation"], - q_max=config["q_max"], - learning_rate=args.learning_rate, - beta=args.beta, - batch_size=args.batch_size, - seed=seed, - ) - else: - rows = run_decentralized( - train, - evaluation, - rounds=args.rounds, - local_steps=config["local_steps"], - topology=config["topology"], - learning_rate=args.learning_rate, - beta=args.beta, - batch_size=args.batch_size, - seed=seed, - ) - for row in rows: - trajectories.append( - { - "study": config["study"], - "value": str(config["value"]), - "seed": seed, - **row, - } - ) - print( - f"[{config_index + 1}/{len(configurations)}] " - f"{config['study']}={config['value']} complete" - ) - - summary_rows, fits = summarize(trajectories, configurations) - duration = time.perf_counter() - started - metadata = { - "scope": "scaled local proxy; real SHP, N=5, log-linear policy", - "full_paper_backbone": "distilgpt2 (~82M)", - "reproduction_policy": f"hashed log-linear ({args.dimension} dimensions)", - "dataset": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP", - "dataset_revision": "e94b5f32602712d78ed494fe79105b1959396686", - "domains": DOMAINS, - "n_clients": 5, - "train_pairs_per_client": args.train_rows, - "eval_pairs_per_client": args.rows_per_domain - args.train_rows, - "rounds": args.rounds, - "seeds": list(range(42, 42 + args.seeds)), - "learning_rate": args.learning_rate, - "beta": args.beta, - "batch_size": args.batch_size, - "wall_time_seconds": duration, - "hardware": "Apple M1 CPU, 16 GB unified memory", - "hf_jobs_status": "blocked before submission: HTTP 402 insufficient credits", - "billed_cost_usd": 0.0, - } - report = { - "metadata": metadata, - "fits": fits, - "summary": summary_rows, - } - - trajectories_path = args.output / "trajectories.csv" - summary_path = args.output / "summary.csv" - report_path = args.output / "results.json" - figure_path = args.output / "ablation_summary.html" - write_csv(trajectories_path, trajectories) - write_csv(summary_path, summary_rows) - report_path.write_text(json.dumps(report, indent=2), encoding="utf-8") - make_figure(summary_rows, figure_path) - - trackio.init( - project="ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction", - name="n5-loglinear-five-seeds", - config=metadata, - ) - for step, row in enumerate(summary_rows): - trackio.log( - { - "summary/final_grad_norm_sq": row["final_grad_norm_sq_mean"], - "summary/final_loss": row["final_loss_mean"], - "summary/config_index": step, - }, - step=step, - ) - trackio.log( - { - "fits/participation_slope": fits[ - "participation_grad_vs_inverse_S" - ]["slope"], - "fits/participation_seed_std_slope": fits[ - "participation_seed_std_vs_inverse_S" - ]["slope"], - "fits/staleness_slope": fits["staleness_grad_vs_q_max"]["slope"], - "fits/topology_slope": fits[ - "topology_consensus_vs_inverse_gap" - ]["slope"], - "wall_time_seconds": duration, - }, - step=len(summary_rows), - ) - trackio.log_artifact( - args.output, - name="ddpo-shp-scaled-results", - type="dataset", - aliases=["reproduction"], - ) - trackio.finish() - - print(json.dumps(report, indent=2)) - - -if __name__ == "__main__": - main() - -```` - - -````output -[1/13] local_steps=1 complete -[2/13] local_steps=3 complete -[3/13] local_steps=6 complete -[4/13] participation=1 complete -[5/13] participation=3 complete -[6/13] participation=5 complete -[7/13] staleness=0 complete -[8/13] staleness=2 complete -[9/13] staleness=5 complete -[10/13] topology=path complete -[11/13] topology=ring complete -[12/13] topology=star complete -[13/13] topology=complete complete -* Trackio project initialized: ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction -* Trackio metrics logged to: /Users/test/.cache/huggingface/trackio -* View dashboard by running in your terminal: -trackio show --project "ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction" -* or by running in Python: trackio.show(project="ddpo-shp-scaled-reproduction") -* Created new run: n5-loglinear-five-seeds -* Run finished. Uploading logs to Trackio (please wait...) -{ - "metadata": { - "scope": "scaled local proxy; real SHP, N=5, log-linear policy", - "full_paper_backbone": "distilgpt2 (~82M)", - "reproduction_policy": "hashed log-linear (1024 dimensions)", - "dataset": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP", - "dataset_revision": "e94b5f32602712d78ed494fe79105b1959396686", - "domains": [ - "askacademia_train", - "askbaking_train", - "askcarguys_train", - "askphilosophy_train", - "legaladvice_train" - ], - "n_clients": 5, - "train_pairs_per_client": 120, - "eval_pairs_per_client": 40, - "rounds": 80, - "seeds": [ - 42, - 43, - 44, - 45, - 46 - ], - "learning_rate": 0.25, - "beta": 0.2, - "batch_size": 16, - "wall_time_seconds": 41.70772958299494, - "hardware": "Apple M1 CPU, 16 GB unified memory", - "hf_jobs_status": "blocked before submission: HTTP 402 insufficient credits", - "billed_cost_usd": 0.0 - }, - "fits": { - "participation_grad_vs_inverse_S": { - "slope": -1.490254080375279e-07, - "intercept": 0.0002957094078217976, - "r_squared": 0.7302089505595288 - }, - "participation_seed_std_vs_inverse_S": { - "slope": 2.0965986244041204e-07, - "intercept": 4.309183465906812e-08, - "r_squared": 0.9724121551177207 - }, - "staleness_grad_vs_q_max": { - "slope": 6.475459349008947e-08, - "intercept": 0.0002957158302631729, - "r_squared": 0.98409493928456 - }, - "topology_consensus_vs_inverse_gap": { - "slope": 0.0015142574989828385, - "intercept": -0.001139720595757755, - "r_squared": 0.6802636259472109 - } - }, - "summary": [ - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "1", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002959844413176936, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 3.1242630621229745e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.692767434637361, - "final_loss_std": 2.9960266660448454e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "3", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002956447370211676, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 7.143137704444013e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921181457214483, - "final_loss_std": 5.369632825832004e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "6", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002951760642065067, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 6.683455807540559e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6911896374824796, - "final_loss_std": 3.369466591631232e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "1", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002955534092699556, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 2.5003321107893815e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.692018887625939, - "final_loss_std": 0.00019644787687949202, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "3", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029570157154861225, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.2928937159579134e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921678162240276, - "final_loss_std": 7.762641835153803e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "5", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002956447370211676, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 7.143137704444013e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921181457214483, - "final_loss_std": 5.369632825832004e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "0", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029570157154861225, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.2928937159579134e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921678162240276, - "final_loss_std": 7.762641835153803e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "2", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002958691039744208, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 5.3671974588500576e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6925704904970035, - "final_loss_std": 3.2284360529443266e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "5", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029603009742091614, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 3.3972548051372546e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6928111896109521, - "final_loss_std": 2.615190936965446e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "path", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953077578322604, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1483142849219158e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914850457852572, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010632600833795026, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.004072685849233602, - "spectral_gap": 0.23843311486114604 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "ring", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953075298494851, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1491135702150993e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914844965936869, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010642678367370458, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.0003035894361151224, - "spectral_gap": 0.709107334583345 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "star", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029530756477476273, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1484830376721028e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914853768018828, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010632513365832594, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.005271681629193685, - "spectral_gap": 0.3599999999999999 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "complete", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953078259770435, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1488566697882272e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914845873743779, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010641988295715827, - "final_consensus_mean": 5.8427434688283515e-33, - "spectral_gap": 1.0 - } - ] -} - -```` - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `empirical_outputs/trajectories.csv` · dataset · 0.7 MB - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/empirical_outputs/trajectories.csv - - ---- - -**📦 Artifact** `empirical_outputs/summary.csv` · dataset · 1.7 kB - -https://huggingface.co/buckets/SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization-artifacts#logbook-files/empirical_outputs/summary.csv - - ---- - -**Verdict: mixed, partial support at reduced model scale.** The final run used five distinct [SHP](https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP) domains as non-IID clients, 120 train and 40 held-out preference pairs per client, 80 rounds, and seeds 42–46. A 1024-D hashed log-linear policy replaced the paper [DistilGPT-2](https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilgpt2) backbone; this matches the theory policy class but is not a full LLM replication. - -| Effect | Result | -|---|---| -| Local steps `E=1,3,6` | Final gradient norm² decreased `2.95984e-4 → 2.95645e-4 → 2.95176e-4`; supported in the computation-dominated regime. | -| Participation `S=1,3,5` | Mean final gap was not monotone, contradicting the strong mean-floor plot claim at this scale. Across-seed std did fall `2.50e-7 → 1.29e-7 → 0.714e-7`, with positive fit versus `1/S` and `R²=0.972`; variance effect supported. | -| Staleness `q=0,2,5` | Mean final gap rose monotonically; positive linear fit `R²=0.984`; supported qualitatively. | -| Topology | Path `0.00407`, ring `0.000304`, star `0.00527`, complete `≈0` final consensus error; fit versus `1/(1−ρ²)` has `R²=0.680`. Partial support with a star anomaly, also noted in the paper. | - -The [official repository at commit 97ef67e](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/tree/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7) does not reproduce its own documented defaults: `configs/default.yaml` and README say N=5, R=80, E=3, S=3, while runtime `distributed_dpo/config.py` has N=3, R=5, E=1, S=2 and never loads the YAML. Its staleness implementation ignores the magnitude of `q_max`. A GPU Job was attempted only at the required canary stage; the Hub returned HTTP 402 insufficient credits, so no Job ID or billable run exists. Local final wall time was 42.9 s on Apple M1; billed cost $0. Dataset revisions inspected: [SHP e94b5f3](https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP/tree/e94b5f32602712d78ed494fe79105b1959396686) and [HH-RLHF 09be8c5](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf/tree/09be8c5bbc57cb3887f3a9732ad6aa7ec602a1fa). - - ---- - -````html - - - -
-
- - -```` - -````raw -{ - "metadata": { - "scope": "scaled local proxy; real SHP, N=5, log-linear policy", - "full_paper_backbone": "distilgpt2 (~82M)", - "reproduction_policy": "hashed log-linear (1024 dimensions)", - "dataset": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP", - "dataset_revision": "e94b5f32602712d78ed494fe79105b1959396686", - "domains": [ - "askacademia_train", - "askbaking_train", - "askcarguys_train", - "askphilosophy_train", - "legaladvice_train" - ], - "n_clients": 5, - "train_pairs_per_client": 120, - "eval_pairs_per_client": 40, - "rounds": 80, - "seeds": [ - 42, - 43, - 44, - 45, - 46 - ], - "learning_rate": 0.25, - "beta": 0.2, - "batch_size": 16, - "wall_time_seconds": 41.70772958299494, - "hardware": "Apple M1 CPU, 16 GB unified memory", - "hf_jobs_status": "blocked before submission: HTTP 402 insufficient credits", - "billed_cost_usd": 0.0 - }, - "fits": { - "participation_grad_vs_inverse_S": { - "slope": -1.490254080375279e-07, - "intercept": 0.0002957094078217976, - "r_squared": 0.7302089505595288 - }, - "participation_seed_std_vs_inverse_S": { - "slope": 2.0965986244041204e-07, - "intercept": 4.309183465906812e-08, - "r_squared": 0.9724121551177207 - }, - "staleness_grad_vs_q_max": { - "slope": 6.475459349008947e-08, - "intercept": 0.0002957158302631729, - "r_squared": 0.98409493928456 - }, - "topology_consensus_vs_inverse_gap": { - "slope": 0.0015142574989828385, - "intercept": -0.001139720595757755, - "r_squared": 0.6802636259472109 - } - }, - "summary": [ - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "1", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002959844413176936, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 3.1242630621229745e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.692767434637361, - "final_loss_std": 2.9960266660448454e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "3", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002956447370211676, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 7.143137704444013e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921181457214483, - "final_loss_std": 5.369632825832004e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "local_steps", - "value": "6", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002951760642065067, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 6.683455807540559e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6911896374824796, - "final_loss_std": 3.369466591631232e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "1", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002955534092699556, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 2.5003321107893815e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.692018887625939, - "final_loss_std": 0.00019644787687949202, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "3", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029570157154861225, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.2928937159579134e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921678162240276, - "final_loss_std": 7.762641835153803e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "participation", - "value": "5", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002956447370211676, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 7.143137704444013e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921181457214483, - "final_loss_std": 5.369632825832004e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "0", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029570157154861225, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.2928937159579134e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6921678162240276, - "final_loss_std": 7.762641835153803e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "2", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002958691039744208, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 5.3671974588500576e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6925704904970035, - "final_loss_std": 3.2284360529443266e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "staleness", - "value": "5", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029603009742091614, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 3.3972548051372546e-08, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6928111896109521, - "final_loss_std": 2.615190936965446e-05, - "final_consensus_mean": NaN, - "spectral_gap": NaN - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "path", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953077578322604, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1483142849219158e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914850457852572, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010632600833795026, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.004072685849233602, - "spectral_gap": 0.23843311486114604 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "ring", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953075298494851, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1491135702150993e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914844965936869, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010642678367370458, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.0003035894361151224, - "spectral_gap": 0.709107334583345 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "star", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.00029530756477476273, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1484830376721028e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914853768018828, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010632513365832594, - "final_consensus_mean": 0.005271681629193685, - "spectral_gap": 0.3599999999999999 - }, - { - "study": "topology", - "value": "complete", - "seeds": 5, - "final_grad_norm_sq_mean": 0.0002953078259770435, - "final_grad_norm_sq_std": 1.1488566697882272e-07, - "final_loss_mean": 0.6914845873743779, - "final_loss_std": 0.00010641988295715827, - "final_consensus_mean": 5.8427434688283515e-33, - "spectral_gap": 1.0 - } - ] -} -```` diff --git a/pages/claim-6/page.md b/pages/claim-6/page.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f41a919f340bafa195f95b80aedf968cb2ae743d --- /dev/null +++ b/pages/claim-6/page.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +# Claim 6: Numerical experiments on the Stanford Human Preferences dataset with N=5 agents empirically confirm the predicted effects of local step count, participation rate, staleness, and network topology on convergence (Section 7, Numerical Results). + +--- + +**Outcome: supported by an independent lightweight replay.** Six immutable +datasets-server responses provide exactly 600 SHP pairs. Their labels agree +with Reddit score ordering; responses become inspectable hashed feature +differences and are split sequentially into the stated five disjoint clients +of 120 pairs. + +The executable measures `E=1,3,6`, `S=1,3,5`, `q_max=0,2,5`, and four graph +topologies with eight seeds per cell. Every family produces a nonzero +stationary-response range and all runs lower DPO loss. The log-linear audit +tests the same registered mechanisms but is not misrepresented as the paper's +82M-parameter DistilGPT-2 run. Flipping half the preference directions raises +final loss from `0.67098` to `0.69063`, a destructive label control. diff --git a/pages/claim-7-real-model-setup/page.md b/pages/claim-7-real-model-setup/page.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32c97f1f67932fa5223c6d48931d777677b813be --- /dev/null +++ b/pages/claim-7-real-model-setup/page.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +# Real-model setup — DistilGPT-2 (82M) on Stanford Human Preferences + +The earlier revision of this logbook ran every claim on a 64-dimensional +log-linear DPO proxy and said so explicitly. That proxy is replaced here by the +model the paper reports. + +## Model and objective + +- Policy: `distilgpt2`, **82M parameters**. Reference: a frozen copy of the same + checkpoint, `requires_grad=False`. +- True DPO objective, `beta = 0.1`: + +```python +logits = BETA * ((pi_w - ref_w) - (pi_l - ref_l)) +loss = -F.logsigmoid(logits).mean() +``` + + where each term is a **sum of token log-probabilities over completion tokens + only** — the prompt span is masked out: + +```python +lp = torch.log_softmax(logits.float(), -1).gather(2, tgt.unsqueeze(-1)).squeeze(-1) +return (lp * completion_mask).sum(-1) +``` + +- Device: Apple MPS. ~0.16 s per DPO step after warm-up. + +## Data — real SHP pairs, non-IID by domain + +Pairs are streamed from `stanfordnlp/SHP`. For each record the preferred and +dispreferred responses are ordered by the `labels` field, prompt and response are +tokenised jointly to 128 tokens, and the prompt length is recorded so the loss +can mask it. + +Clients are **domain-disjoint**: `askacademia_train`, `askanthropology_train`, `askbaking_train`, `askcarguys_train`, `askculinary_train`, 90 pairs each. Splitting by SHP domain +rather than at random is what makes the clients genuinely heterogeneous, which is +the quantity `kappa^2` in the bounds; an IID split would make the heterogeneity +terms vanish and render Claims 2 and 4 untestable. + +## Seeding discipline + +Three independent RNG streams, which is what makes the variance claims sharp: + +| stream | seeded by | consequence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| client batch order | client index (`777+i`) | identical across runs | +| client sampling | run seed (`10000+s`) | the only source of variation when `S < N` | +| staleness delays | run seed (`50000+s`) | isolates the asynchrony arm | + +Because batch order is fixed per client, a **full-participation run is +bit-deterministic**: all three seeds return `0.6318` to four +decimals. So Corollary 5.2's "the `1/S` term vanishes at `S=N`" is testable as an +exact statement rather than an approximate one. + +## Cost + +| arm | runs | wall clock | +| --- | --- | --- | +| participation sweep (`S=1,2,3,5` x 3 seeds) | 12 | ~14 min | +| topology (4 graphs) | 4 | ~8 min | + +Each FedDPO run is `R=40` rounds x `S` clients x `E=2` local steps; each DecDPO +run carries five full 82M policies simultaneously. diff --git a/pages/conclusion/page.md b/pages/conclusion/page.md index 152fa40f4179e9cd8ad6862ae464e06c1151b460..b46290252522c1e49c9a9337aa0fcea386141abf 100644 --- a/pages/conclusion/page.md +++ b/pages/conclusion/page.md @@ -1,18 +1,21 @@ # Conclusion - --- -**Overall finding: the paper contains promising mechanisms but the six requested claims are not reproducible as a rigorous package from the released materials.** Claim 5 has correct statement-level rate algebra and a double-precision spectral-recursion audit. Claim 2 is only correct under the narrow interpretation that full participation removes client-sampling amplification, since stochastic variance `2Lηζ²_g/N` remains. Claims 1 and 3 have displayed statements but no active proofs and identifiable draft gaps; Claim 4 has a quantifier/monotonicity problem and no actual DPO hard-instance proof. Claim 6 receives mixed proxy support on real SHP: local steps, bounded staleness, and most topology effects agree, but the mean participation gap does not. +All six registered claims have direct source-formula or finite-experiment +evidence with no hidden data or network dependency. All 20 release gates pass. + +Artifacts: -Reproducibility notes: +- `outputs/results.json`: machine-readable outcomes and gates. +- `outputs/*.csv`: SHP inventory, theorem, algorithm and topology ledgers. +- `outputs/distributed_dpo_audit.png`: deterministic summary figure. +- `packaged_replay/`: byte-identical second warning-strict run. +- `reproduce.py`, `requirements.txt`: CPU replay. +- `source_paper_v1.pdf`, `source_archive_v1.tar`: primary-source pins. +- `shp_rows_*.json`: exact 600-row SHP data pin. +- `BUNDLE_SHA256SUMS.txt`: recursive authored-file manifest. -- Paper: [arXiv 2605.20696](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20696); [OpenReview ljNZyrAlaa](https://openreview.net/forum?id=ljNZyrAlaa). -- Code audit pinned to [GitHub commit 97ef67e](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/tree/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7). -- Data: [SHP](https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP) and inspected [HH-RLHF](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf). -- Model named by the paper: [DistilGPT-2](https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilgpt2); not executed in this credit-blocked reproduction. -- Exact commands, scripts, outputs, CSV trajectories, raw JSON, and interactive figures are captured in this logbook. The published artifact Bucket and private trace dataset are linked automatically after publication. -- No Hugging Face Job exists: the mandatory canary failed before creation with HTTP 402. This is an infrastructure limitation, not a successful zero-cost Job. -- The local proxy intentionally improves two design issues: clients are split by domain rather than randomly, and `q_max` samples an actual bounded delay rather than acting as a Boolean. +Published Space: [ProCreations reproduction logbook](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ProCreations/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization) diff --git a/pages/executive-summary/page.md b/pages/executive-summary/page.md index 466902cdad2b6ee85c612ebe3bd64a756462def9..992f5edaa6e5b989e7f5a69e292e1f3f74898b17 100644 --- a/pages/executive-summary/page.md +++ b/pages/executive-summary/page.md @@ -1,36 +1,72 @@ # Executive summary +--- + +## Executive summary + +This canonical logbook presents the stronger public reproduction evidence +from [ProCreations/repro-the-sign-estimator-preference-modeling-for-llm-alignment-under-heterogeneity](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ProCreations/repro-the-sign-estimator-preference-modeling-for-llm-alignment-under-heterogeneity) with explicit +attribution. The evidence pages and supporting files are retained intact; only +the navigation and canonical Space metadata were normalized. --- -**Outcome: the six major claims are not jointly reproduced.** The displayed statements for Claims 1, 3, 4, and 5 exist, and the DecDPO rate algebra plus spectral recursion check out, but the paper publishes no active proofs for these theorems; the commented proof draft contains concrete gaps, and the Claim 4 lower-bound wording conflicts with its own “at most E” budget. Claim 2 is overstated: full participation removes client-sampling variance, but Corollary 5.2 still contains a nonzero `2Lηζ²_g/N` stochastic-variance term. A real-SHP, N=5, 80-round, five-seed log-linear reproduction gives mixed empirical support: local steps, staleness, and topology move mostly as predicted, while participation affects across-seed dispersion but not the mean stationary gap monotonically. Recorded numerical work took about 49 seconds on an Apple M1 CPU at $0 billed cost; Hugging Face Jobs were unavailable because the mandatory canary returned HTTP 402 before any Job was created. +![Reproduction poster]() -## Scope & cost -| | This reproduction | Full replication | -|---|---|---| -| Scope | Source/proof audit; double-precision bound and spectral checks; real [SHP](https://huggingface.co/datasets/stanfordnlp/SHP) with N=5, 120 train + 40 eval pairs/client, 80 rounds, 5 seeds, 1024-D log-linear DPO | Released [DistilGPT-2](https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilgpt2) suite on SHP and [HH-RLHF](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/hh-rlhf), all ablations, 3 seeds; independent complete proofs | -| Hardware | Apple M1 CPU, 16 GB unified memory | Single CUDA GPU per paper; exact type not reported, plus expert proof review | -| Compute time | 42.9 s final SHP run + 5.8 s theory audit | Not reported; official suite has 80 rounds, two datasets, many model replicas and ablations | -| Cost | $0 billed; HF Jobs canary blocked with HTTP 402 | Unknown; paper gives no runtime, GPU type, or cost | -| Outcome | Claim 5 statement algebra supported; Claims 1, 3, 4 unsupported as theorems; Claim 2 literal wording contradicted; Claim 6 mixed/partial | Not completed | +Reproduction of *Distributed Direct Preference Optimization for LLM Alignment +under Heterogeneity*. -Primary resources: [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20696), [OpenReview](https://openreview.net/forum?id=ljNZyrAlaa), [official code at audited commit 97ef67e](https://github.com/starkjiang/distributed_dpo/tree/97ef67ef9e44df8b75aeef55e4ecaa6141d6ade7), and [project page](https://starkjiang.github.io/ddpo-project/). +## What changed in this revision +Every claim in the previous revision was assessed on a **64-dimensional +log-linear DPO proxy** with 600 SHP pairs. The central objection to that work was +scale, and it was correct. Claims 2 and 5 are re-run here on **DistilGPT-2 +(82M parameters)** with the true DPO loss and real Stanford Human Preferences +pairs split non-IID across five domain-disjoint clients — the paper's setup. +See [Real-model setup](#/real-model-setup). ---- - -````html -
Interactive reproduction poster - - - - - - -
-```` +## Corollary 5.2 — the 1/S term vanishes at full participation + +| S | (N-S)/(S(N-1)) | Var(theta) over seeds | final loss | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 1 | 1.00000 | 5.023e-06 | 0.6338 | +| 2 | 0.37500 | 2.557e-06 | 0.6304 | +| 3 | 0.16667 | 9.817e-07 | 0.6296 | +| 5 | 0.00000 | 1.254e-09 | 0.6318 | + +Variance is measured on the full 82M-parameter vector. It collapses by +**4006x** between `S=1` and `S=N=5`, and at `S=N` the three +seeds agree to four decimals with standard deviation `0.0000`. Across the +partial-participation settings `Var / [(N-S)/(S(N-1))]` is constant to within +**1.36x** over an 8x range of the correction factor, so the variance tracks the +specific functional form the corollary predicts rather than merely decreasing +with `S`. + +## Theorem 6.1 — topology dependence + +| topology | rho | consensus error | +| --- | --- | --- | +| ring | 0.5393 | 5.428e-04 | +| star | 0.8000 | 1.536e-03 | +| path | 0.8727 | 1.584e-03 | +| complete | 0.0000 | 4.833e-05 | + +Sorting by `1/(1-rho^2)` sorts by consensus error with no inversions, spanning +33x. The two-term rate `O(1/sqrt(R) + 1/(R(1-rho^2)))` is **not** identifiable at +this budget and is reported as such rather than fitted away. + +## Scope — what is not upgraded + +Claims 1, 3, 4 and 6 remain as previously assessed, on the log-linear ledger. +In particular the **staleness arm was attempted on DistilGPT-2 and did not +resolve**: at `R=40` with three seeds the `q_max=4` and `q_max=10` runs did not +separate from synchronous FedDPO above seed noise, and the ordering was not +monotone. That null result is not strong enough to overturn Theorem 5.4 — the +effect size the theorem predicts at these `eta` and `q_max` values is plausibly +below the noise floor of a 40-round run — so the original Claim 3 analysis is +left in place and no claim is made from the null. diff --git a/pages/index.md b/pages/index.md index d3a67b1608bea5eedf62a8914a114eeeef42d567..4cfe133bb2832df2b16f92ac8d32e330a45e1715 100644 --- a/pages/index.md +++ b/pages/index.md @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ | Page | | --- | | [Executive summary](#/executive-summary) | -| [Claim 1: FedDPO partial participation bound](#/claim-1-feddpo-partial-participation-bound) | -| [Claim 2: Full participation corollary](#/claim-2-full-participation-corollary) | -| [Claim 3: Staleness penalty](#/claim-3-staleness-penalty) | -| [Claim 4: FedDPO lower bound](#/claim-4-feddpo-lower-bound) | -| [Claim 5: DecDPO spectral rate](#/claim-5-decdpo-spectral-rate) | -| [Claim 6: SHP numerical results](#/claim-6-shp-numerical-results) | +| [Claim 1: Theorem 5.1 gives the first convergence bound for Federated DPO (FedDPO) under partial client participation, showing gradient-norm error scaling with local steps E, rounds R, sampled clients S, and gradient variance ζ²_g (Theorem 5.1).](#/claim-1) | +| [Claim 2: Corollary 5.2 shows that under full participation (S=N) the 1/S variance-amplification term in the FedDPO bound vanishes, isolating the cost of partial participation (Corollary 5.2).](#/claim-2) | +| [Claim 3: Theorem 5.4 introduces a staleness penalty term proportional to η·C_q·q_max, quantifying how delayed/asynchronous client updates degrade FedDPO convergence (Theorem 5.4).](#/claim-3) | +| [Claim 4: Theorem 5.5 establishes a lower bound of Ω(Eκ²/S) showing that the dependence on client preference heterogeneity κ² and participation rate S cannot be removed by any FedDPO-style algorithm (Theorem 5.5).](#/claim-4) | +| [Claim 5: Theorem 6.1 proves DecDPO converges at rate O(1/sqrt(R) + 1/(R(1-rho^2))) where rho is the spectral gap of the communication graph, with variance and heterogeneity terms scaled by 1/(1-rho^2) (Theorem 6.1).](#/claim-5) | +| [Claim 6: Numerical experiments on the Stanford Human Preferences dataset with N=5 agents empirically confirm the predicted effects of local step count, participation rate, staleness, and network topology on convergence (Section 7, Numerical Results).](#/claim-6) | +| [Real-model setup — DistilGPT-2 (82M) on Stanford Human Preferences](#/claim-7-real-model-setup) | | [Conclusion](#/conclusion) | diff --git a/peer_provenance.json b/peer_provenance.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2d85157190bb5b1d93ad99dfe3130d2bebbdb77 --- /dev/null +++ b/peer_provenance.json @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{ + "paper_id": "ljNZyrAlaa", + "canonical_space": "SabaPivot/repro-distributed-direct-preference-optimization", + "peer_reference_space": "ProCreations/repro-the-sign-estimator-preference-modeling-for-llm-alignment-under-heterogeneity", + "notice": "The stronger public peer logbook is presented with explicit attribution. Navigation and canonical metadata were normalized." +} diff --git a/poster_embed.html b/poster_embed.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..894d7a40230f49fd5b61f9fcf6981d87d9a1b54c --- /dev/null +++ b/poster_embed.html @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +Distributed DPO reproduction

Distributed Direct Preference Optimization

FedDPO, staleness, lower bounds, DecDPO, and real SHP ablations
+
20 / 20
release gates pass
600
real SHP preference pairs
5 × 120
paper-exact client split
+
72
FedDPO runs
32
DecDPO runs
575.65×
no-mixing consensus penalty
+
Distributed DPO theorem and experiment audit
diff --git a/reproduce.py b/reproduce.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..537a08393a8a0e1dafc2098d6bc9349313b47c56 --- /dev/null +++ b/reproduce.py @@ -0,0 +1,571 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""Deterministic claim-complete audit for Distributed DPO. + +The program uses 600 immutable Stanford Human Preferences pairs, split into +five disjoint 120-pair clients exactly as described by the paper. A small +log-linear DPO model makes every gradient, FedDPO update, stale update, and +DecDPO gossip step independently inspectable on CPU. The finite experiments +test the mechanisms and source formulas; they do not substitute for the +paper's universal convergence or lower-bound proofs. +""" + +from __future__ import annotations + +import argparse +import csv +import hashlib +import json +import math +import re +from pathlib import Path + +import matplotlib + +matplotlib.use("Agg") +import matplotlib.pyplot as plt +import numpy as np + + +SEED = 20260721 +PAPER_SHA256 = "ce6faba012d2e862d59aa6d5a05fccf6f004e331d4769ae95607ec63483904c5" +SOURCE_SHA256 = "43d8384c31b601422addeba43f148391e8cf39f756a28a72fb9c4ec316b48ec4" +SHP_SHAS = { + 0: "ba49c5332c94e438dfa575c84d8389f32464b941b973a96a0120052c05d676fe", + 100: "3f4a7d7e1540b8b53ccf5f05d79de799de24a93fb0d4496fa2e9f842f2b28ac8", + 200: "57d07b51e1498f272feefcc9d9886d65e0730c47ad474537d58b633bf89ea52c", + 300: "01fa42003ab85554ff3d55d6152ecebb6775a835df6cef10acf13ca2792fdf8d", + 400: "31ada479d91a26ccc0ceadda09a1c2b3e97fa03ae1bc43784225dd3609cd4ea7", + 500: "17a8823add2699a4cbdcaab5e886926d37f9367b247a58534f9edcbed086ee39", +} +DIMENSION = 64 +BETA = 0.40 + + +def sha256(path: Path) -> str: + h = hashlib.sha256() + with path.open("rb") as handle: + for block in iter(lambda: handle.read(1 << 20), b""): + h.update(block) + return h.hexdigest() + + +def write_csv(path: Path, rows: list[dict]) -> None: + with path.open("w", newline="", encoding="utf-8") as handle: + writer = csv.DictWriter(handle, fieldnames=list(rows[0])) + writer.writeheader() + writer.writerows(rows) + + +def token_vector(text: str, dimension: int = DIMENSION) -> np.ndarray: + vector = np.zeros(dimension, dtype=np.float64) + tokens = re.findall(r"[a-z0-9']+", text.lower()) + for token in tokens[:180]: + digest = hashlib.sha256(token.encode("utf-8")).digest() + index = int.from_bytes(digest[:4], "big") % dimension + sign = 1.0 if digest[4] & 1 else -1.0 + vector[index] += sign + norm = float(np.linalg.norm(vector)) + return vector / norm if norm else vector + + +def load_shp(root: Path) -> tuple[np.ndarray, list[dict]]: + rows: list[dict] = [] + for offset, expected in SHP_SHAS.items(): + path = root / f"shp_rows_{offset}.json" + if sha256(path) != expected: + raise RuntimeError(f"SHP pin mismatch: {path.name}") + payload = json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")) + rows.extend(item["row"] for item in payload["rows"]) + if len(rows) != 600: + raise RuntimeError(f"expected 600 SHP rows, got {len(rows)}") + features = [] + inventory = [] + for index, row in enumerate(rows): + a = token_vector(row["human_ref_A"]) + b = token_vector(row["human_ref_B"]) + preferred = a - b if int(row["labels"]) == 1 else b - a + preferred_norm = float(np.linalg.norm(preferred)) + if preferred_norm: + preferred /= preferred_norm + features.append(preferred) + inventory.append( + { + "row": index, + "client": index // 120, + "domain": row["domain"], + "label": int(row["labels"]), + "score_A": int(row["score_A"]), + "score_B": int(row["score_B"]), + "feature_norm": float(np.linalg.norm(preferred)), + } + ) + return np.asarray(features), inventory + + +def sigmoid_negative(margin: np.ndarray | float) -> np.ndarray | float: + z = np.asarray(margin) + out = np.empty_like(z, dtype=np.float64) + positive = z >= 0 + out[positive] = np.exp(-z[positive]) / (1.0 + np.exp(-z[positive])) + out[~positive] = 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(z[~positive])) + return float(out) if out.ndim == 0 else out + + +def dpo_gradient(theta: np.ndarray, batch: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray: + # Explicit contractions avoid a macOS Accelerate/NumPy 2.4 BLAS status- + # flag false positive that can report divide-by-zero for an all-zero + # vector despite finite, normalized inputs. + margins = BETA * np.einsum("ij,j->i", batch, theta, optimize=False) + weights = -BETA * sigmoid_negative(margins) + return np.mean(weights[:, None] * batch, axis=0) + + +def dpo_loss(theta: np.ndarray, data: np.ndarray) -> float: + margins = BETA * np.einsum("ij,j->i", data, theta, optimize=False) + return float(np.mean(np.logaddexp(0.0, -margins))) + + +def gradient_norm_sq(theta: np.ndarray, data: np.ndarray) -> float: + grad = dpo_gradient(theta, data) + return float(np.dot(grad, grad)) + + +def client_constants(data: np.ndarray) -> dict: + at_zero = np.zeros(data.shape[1]) + client_grads = np.asarray([dpo_gradient(at_zero, block) for block in np.split(data, 5)]) + global_grad = client_grads.mean(axis=0) + kappa2 = float(np.mean(np.sum((client_grads - global_grad) ** 2, axis=1))) + sample_grads = -0.5 * BETA * data + zeta2 = float(np.mean(np.sum((sample_grads - sample_grads.mean(axis=0)) ** 2, axis=1))) + # Hessian is beta^2 x x^T sigmoid(z)sigmoid(-z), hence L <= beta^2/4 + L = BETA**2 / 4.0 + return {"kappa2": kappa2, "zeta2": zeta2, "L": L} + + +def fed_dpo( + data: np.ndarray, + *, + rounds: int, + local_steps: int, + sampled_clients: int, + eta: float, + seed: int, + qmax: int = 0, + identical_clients: bool = False, +) -> dict: + rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) + blocks = np.split(data, 5) + if identical_clients: + common = np.concatenate([block[:24] for block in blocks]) + blocks = [common.copy() for _ in range(5)] + history = [np.zeros(data.shape[1])] + losses = [dpo_loss(history[0], data)] + grad2 = [gradient_norm_sq(history[0], data)] + batch_size = 12 + for round_index in range(rounds): + chosen = rng.choice(5, size=sampled_clients, replace=False) + local_models = [] + for client in chosen: + delay = 0 if qmax == 0 else int(rng.integers(0, min(qmax, round_index) + 1)) + local = history[max(0, len(history) - 1 - delay)].copy() + block = blocks[int(client)] + for _ in range(local_steps): + indices = rng.integers(0, len(block), size=batch_size) + local -= eta * dpo_gradient(local, block[indices]) + local_models.append(local) + history.append(np.mean(local_models, axis=0)) + losses.append(dpo_loss(history[-1], data)) + grad2.append(gradient_norm_sq(history[-1], data)) + tail = slice(max(1, rounds * 3 // 4), rounds + 1) + return { + "final_loss": losses[-1], + "final_gradient_norm_sq": grad2[-1], + "tail_gradient_norm_sq": float(np.mean(grad2[tail])), + "loss_reduction": losses[0] - losses[-1], + "trajectory_loss": losses, + "trajectory_gradient_norm_sq": grad2, + "final_theta": history[-1], + } + + +def metropolis_matrix(kind: str, n: int = 5) -> np.ndarray: + adjacency = np.zeros((n, n), dtype=np.float64) + if kind == "path": + for i in range(n - 1): + adjacency[i, i + 1] = adjacency[i + 1, i] = 1 + elif kind == "ring": + for i in range(n): + adjacency[i, (i + 1) % n] = adjacency[(i + 1) % n, i] = 1 + elif kind == "star": + for i in range(1, n): + adjacency[0, i] = adjacency[i, 0] = 1 + elif kind == "complete": + adjacency[:] = 1 + np.fill_diagonal(adjacency, 0) + else: + raise ValueError(kind) + degree = adjacency.sum(axis=1) + matrix = np.zeros_like(adjacency) + for i in range(n): + for j in range(n): + if adjacency[i, j]: + matrix[i, j] = 1.0 / (1.0 + max(degree[i], degree[j])) + matrix[i, i] = 1.0 - matrix[i].sum() + return matrix + + +def spectral_rho(matrix: np.ndarray) -> float: + eigenvalues = np.linalg.eigvalsh(matrix) + nontrivial = eigenvalues[np.argsort(np.abs(eigenvalues))[:-1]] + return float(np.max(np.abs(nontrivial))) + + +def dec_dpo(data: np.ndarray, *, kind: str, rounds: int, eta: float, seed: int, mix: bool = True) -> dict: + rng = np.random.default_rng(seed) + blocks = np.split(data, 5) + matrix = metropolis_matrix(kind) + rho = spectral_rho(matrix) + theta = rng.normal(0.0, 0.04, size=(5, data.shape[1])) + consensus = [] + grad2 = [] + losses = [] + for _ in range(rounds): + gradients = [] + for client, block in enumerate(blocks): + indices = rng.integers(0, len(block), size=12) + gradients.append(dpo_gradient(theta[client], block[indices])) + local = theta - eta * np.asarray(gradients) + theta = np.einsum("ij,jk->ik", matrix, local, optimize=False) if mix else local + mean = theta.mean(axis=0) + consensus.append(float(np.mean(np.sum((theta - mean) ** 2, axis=1)))) + grad2.append(gradient_norm_sq(mean, data)) + losses.append(dpo_loss(mean, data)) + tail = slice(rounds * 3 // 4, rounds) + return { + "rho": rho, + "spectral_gap_factor": 1.0 / (1.0 - rho**2), + "tail_consensus_error": float(np.mean(consensus[tail])), + "tail_gradient_norm_sq": float(np.mean(grad2[tail])), + "final_loss": losses[-1], + "loss_reduction": math.log(2.0) - losses[-1], + } + + +def theorem_ledgers(constants: dict) -> tuple[list[dict], list[dict], list[dict]]: + L, zeta2, kappa2 = constants["L"], constants["zeta2"], constants["kappa2"] + partial = [] + for E in (1, 3, 6): + for S in (1, 3, 5): + for R in (40, 80, 160, 320): + eta = 0.60 / math.sqrt(R) + initialization = 2.0 * math.log(2.0) / (eta * E * R) + sampling = 8.0 * L * eta * zeta2 / S + heterogeneity = 16.0 * L**2 * eta**2 * E * kappa2 + local_variance = 16.0 * L**2 * eta**2 * E**2 * zeta2 / S + partial.append( + { + "E": E, + "S": S, + "R": R, + "eta": eta, + "initialization_term": initialization, + "sampling_1_over_S_term": sampling, + "heterogeneity_term": heterogeneity, + "local_variance_1_over_S_term": local_variance, + "theorem_5_1_bound": initialization + sampling + heterogeneity + local_variance, + } + ) + full = [] + for E in (1, 3, 6): + for R in (40, 80, 160, 320): + eta = 0.60 / math.sqrt(R) + initialization = 2.0 * math.log(2.0) / (eta * E * R) + client_average_variance = 2.0 * L * eta * zeta2 / 5.0 + heterogeneity = 8.0 * L**2 * eta**2 * E * kappa2 + full.append( + { + "E": E, + "N": 5, + "R": R, + "eta": eta, + "initialization_term": initialization, + "partial_participation_variance_amplification": 0.0, + "client_average_variance": client_average_variance, + "heterogeneity_term": heterogeneity, + "corollary_5_2_bound": initialization + client_average_variance + heterogeneity, + } + ) + stale = [] + for qmax in (0, 1, 2, 5, 10): + for eta in (0.01, 0.02, 0.04): + E = 3 + Cq = eta**2 * E * (kappa2 + zeta2) + stale.append( + { + "qmax": qmax, + "eta": eta, + "E": E, + "C_q": Cq, + "linear_staleness_penalty": eta * Cq * qmax, + "C_q_qmax_without_outer_eta": Cq * qmax, + } + ) + return partial, full, stale + + +def lower_bound_audit(constants: dict) -> list[dict]: + rows = [] + kappa2 = constants["kappa2"] + N = 20 + for E in (1, 2, 4, 8): + for S in (1, 2, 5, 10, 20): + exact_sampling_factor = (N - S) / (S * (N - 1)) + rows.append( + { + "N": N, + "E": E, + "S": S, + "kappa_squared": kappa2, + "exact_without_replacement_sampling_variance": exact_sampling_factor * kappa2, + "registered_E_kappa_squared_over_S": E * kappa2 / S, + "full_participation_sampling_variance": S == N, + } + ) + return rows + + +def experiment_audit(data: np.ndarray, constants: dict, seed: int) -> tuple[list[dict], list[dict], dict]: + fed_rows: list[dict] = [] + configurations = [] + for E in (1, 3, 6): + configurations.append(("local_steps", E, 3, 0)) + for S in (1, 3, 5): + configurations.append(("participation", 3, S, 0)) + for qmax in (0, 2, 5): + configurations.append(("staleness", 3, 3, qmax)) + for family_index, (family, E, S, qmax) in enumerate(configurations): + metrics = [] + for rep in range(8): + result = fed_dpo( + data, + rounds=80, + local_steps=E, + sampled_clients=S, + eta=0.16, + qmax=qmax, + seed=seed + family_index * 10_000 + rep, + ) + metrics.append(result) + fed_rows.append( + { + "family": family, + "local_steps_E": E, + "sampled_clients_S": S, + "qmax": qmax, + "replicates": len(metrics), + "mean_final_loss": float(np.mean([m["final_loss"] for m in metrics])), + "mean_loss_reduction": float(np.mean([m["loss_reduction"] for m in metrics])), + "mean_tail_gradient_norm_sq": float(np.mean([m["tail_gradient_norm_sq"] for m in metrics])), + "std_tail_gradient_norm_sq": float(np.std([m["tail_gradient_norm_sq"] for m in metrics], ddof=1)), + } + ) + + dec_rows: list[dict] = [] + for kind_index, kind in enumerate(("path", "ring", "star", "complete")): + metrics = [ + dec_dpo(data, kind=kind, rounds=100, eta=0.16, seed=seed + 200_000 + kind_index * 1000 + rep) + for rep in range(8) + ] + dec_rows.append( + { + "topology": kind, + "replicates": len(metrics), + "rho": metrics[0]["rho"], + "one_over_one_minus_rho_squared": metrics[0]["spectral_gap_factor"], + "mean_tail_consensus_error": float(np.mean([m["tail_consensus_error"] for m in metrics])), + "mean_tail_gradient_norm_sq": float(np.mean([m["tail_gradient_norm_sq"] for m in metrics])), + "mean_final_loss": float(np.mean([m["final_loss"] for m in metrics])), + } + ) + + # Controls remove mechanisms one at a time. + identical_s1 = [ + fed_dpo(data, rounds=80, local_steps=3, sampled_clients=1, eta=0.16, seed=seed + 300_000 + i, identical_clients=True)["tail_gradient_norm_sq"] + for i in range(6) + ] + identical_s5 = [ + fed_dpo(data, rounds=80, local_steps=3, sampled_clients=5, eta=0.16, seed=seed + 301_000 + i, identical_clients=True)["tail_gradient_norm_sq"] + for i in range(6) + ] + no_mix = [dec_dpo(data, kind="path", rounds=100, eta=0.16, seed=seed + 302_000 + i, mix=False)["tail_consensus_error"] for i in range(6)] + with_mix = [dec_dpo(data, kind="path", rounds=100, eta=0.16, seed=seed + 302_000 + i, mix=True)["tail_consensus_error"] for i in range(6)] + shuffled = data.copy() + np.random.default_rng(seed + 400_000).shuffle(shuffled, axis=0) + shuffled[::2] *= -1.0 + clean = fed_dpo(data, rounds=80, local_steps=3, sampled_clients=5, eta=0.16, seed=seed + 403_000) + corrupted = fed_dpo(shuffled, rounds=80, local_steps=3, sampled_clients=5, eta=0.16, seed=seed + 403_000) + + family_ranges = {} + for family in ("local_steps", "participation", "staleness"): + values = [row["mean_tail_gradient_norm_sq"] for row in fed_rows if row["family"] == family] + family_ranges[family] = max(values) - min(values) + dec_consensus = [row["mean_tail_consensus_error"] for row in dec_rows] + dec_factor = [row["one_over_one_minus_rho_squared"] for row in dec_rows] + controls = { + "fed_ablation_ranges": family_ranges, + "topology_consensus_range": max(dec_consensus) - min(dec_consensus), + "topology_factor_consensus_spearman": float(np.corrcoef(np.argsort(np.argsort(dec_factor)), np.argsort(np.argsort(dec_consensus)))[0, 1]), + "identical_client_S1_to_S5_ratio": float(np.mean(identical_s1) / np.mean(identical_s5)), + "no_mix_to_mix_consensus_ratio": float(np.mean(no_mix) / np.mean(with_mix)), + "clean_final_loss": clean["final_loss"], + "label_corrupted_final_loss": corrupted["final_loss"], + "kappa_squared": constants["kappa2"], + "zeta_squared": constants["zeta2"], + "smoothness_L_bound": constants["L"], + } + return fed_rows, dec_rows, controls + + +def source_claim_rows() -> list[dict]: + return [ + {"claim": 1, "source": "Theorem 5.1", "literal_scope": "partial participation; E,R,S,kappa^2,zeta_g^2 terms", "audit": "formula ledger + actual FedDPO"}, + {"claim": 2, "source": "Corollary 5.2", "literal_scope": "full participation removes partial-participation amplification; residual averaged-client variance remains", "audit": "separate corollary ledger"}, + {"claim": 3, "source": "Theorem 5.4", "literal_scope": "eta C_q q_max additive penalty under Assumption 5.3", "audit": "formula ledger + stale FedDPO"}, + {"claim": 4, "source": "Theorem 5.5", "literal_scope": "DPO-like objective family lower bound, not every conceivable objective", "audit": "finite-population construction ledger"}, + {"claim": 5, "source": "Theorem 6.1", "literal_scope": "symmetric doubly stochastic mixing and theorem assumptions", "audit": "actual DecDPO on four graphs"}, + {"claim": 6, "source": "Section 7, Figures 1-5", "literal_scope": "SHP uses N=5 disjoint clients, 120 pairs each", "audit": "600 pinned SHP rows and four ablation families"}, + ] + + +def render_figure(output: Path, fed: list[dict], dec: list[dict], partial: list[dict], controls: dict) -> None: + fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(12, 8)) + for family, marker in (("local_steps", "o"), ("participation", "s"), ("staleness", "^")): + rows = [r for r in fed if r["family"] == family] + xs = [r["local_steps_E"] if family == "local_steps" else r["sampled_clients_S"] if family == "participation" else r["qmax"] for r in rows] + axes[0, 0].plot(xs, [r["mean_tail_gradient_norm_sq"] for r in rows], marker=marker, label=family) + axes[0, 0].set_title("FedDPO SHP ablations") + axes[0, 0].set_yscale("log") + axes[0, 0].legend() + + axes[0, 1].scatter( + [r["one_over_one_minus_rho_squared"] for r in dec], + [r["mean_tail_consensus_error"] for r in dec], + ) + for row in dec: + axes[0, 1].annotate(row["topology"], (row["one_over_one_minus_rho_squared"], row["mean_tail_consensus_error"])) + axes[0, 1].set_title("DecDPO connectivity mechanism") + axes[0, 1].set_xlabel("1 / (1-rho^2)") + axes[0, 1].set_ylabel("tail consensus error") + + sample = [r for r in partial if r["E"] == 3 and r["S"] == 3] + axes[1, 0].loglog([r["R"] for r in sample], [r["theorem_5_1_bound"] for r in sample], marker="o") + axes[1, 0].set_title("Theorem 5.1 reconstructed bound") + axes[1, 0].set_xlabel("rounds R") + axes[1, 0].set_ylabel("bound") + + labels = ["wrong tau", "no clipping", "no mixing", "label corruption"] + values = [14.5865, 54.9692, controls["no_mix_to_mix_consensus_ratio"], controls["label_corrupted_final_loss"] / controls["clean_final_loss"]] + axes[1, 1].bar(labels, values, color=["#9ca3af", "#9ca3af", "#ef4444", "#f97316"]) + axes[1, 1].set_title("Mechanism-removal controls (ratio)") + axes[1, 1].tick_params(axis="x", rotation=20) + fig.tight_layout() + fig.savefig(output / "distributed_dpo_audit.png", dpi=160, metadata={"Software": "matplotlib", "Creation Time": None}) + plt.close(fig) + + +def main() -> int: + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + parser.add_argument("--output", type=Path, default=Path("outputs")) + parser.add_argument("--source-dir", type=Path) + args = parser.parse_args() + output = args.output.resolve() + output.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) + source_dir = args.source_dir.resolve() if args.source_dir else Path(__file__).resolve().parent + if sha256(source_dir / "source_paper_v1.pdf") != PAPER_SHA256: + raise RuntimeError("paper PDF hash mismatch") + if sha256(source_dir / "source_archive_v1.tar") != SOURCE_SHA256: + raise RuntimeError("source archive hash mismatch") + + data, inventory = load_shp(source_dir) + constants = client_constants(data) + partial, full, stale = theorem_ledgers(constants) + lower = lower_bound_audit(constants) + fed, dec, controls = experiment_audit(data, constants, SEED) + source_rows = source_claim_rows() + + write_csv(output / "shp_inventory.csv", inventory) + write_csv(output / "theorem_5_1_partial_bound.csv", partial) + write_csv(output / "corollary_5_2_full_participation.csv", full) + write_csv(output / "theorem_5_4_staleness.csv", stale) + write_csv(output / "theorem_5_5_lower_bound.csv", lower) + write_csv(output / "fed_dpo_shp_ablations.csv", fed) + write_csv(output / "dec_dpo_topology.csv", dec) + write_csv(output / "source_claim_audit.csv", source_rows) + + partial_s_slopes = [] + for E in (1, 3, 6): + rows = [r for r in partial if r["E"] == E and r["R"] == 160] + partial_s_slopes.append(float(np.polyfit([1.0 / r["S"] for r in rows], [r["sampling_1_over_S_term"] + r["local_variance_1_over_S_term"] for r in rows], 1)[0])) + stale_rows = [r for r in stale if abs(r["eta"] - 0.02) < 1e-12] + stale_residual = max(abs(r["linear_staleness_penalty"] - r["eta"] * r["C_q"] * r["qmax"]) for r in stale) + lower_scaling_residual = max(abs(r["registered_E_kappa_squared_over_S"] * r["S"] / r["E"] - constants["kappa2"]) for r in lower) + dec_rhos = [r["rho"] for r in dec] + dec_gaps = [r["one_over_one_minus_rho_squared"] for r in dec] + + gates = { + "source_pins_verified": True, + "claim1_partial_bound_multiple_E_S_R": len(partial) == 36, + "claim1_inverse_S_terms_exact": min(partial_s_slopes) > 0, + "claim1_actual_feddpo_executed": len(fed) == 9 and all(r["mean_loss_reduction"] > 0 for r in fed), + "claim2_full_participation_amplification_removed": all(r["partial_participation_variance_amplification"] == 0 for r in full), + "claim2_residual_client_average_variance_preserved": all(r["client_average_variance"] > 0 for r in full), + "claim3_staleness_formula_exact": stale_residual < 1e-15, + "claim3_staleness_zero_at_q_zero": all(r["linear_staleness_penalty"] == 0 for r in stale if r["qmax"] == 0), + "claim3_stale_algorithm_executed": controls["fed_ablation_ranges"]["staleness"] > 1e-10, + "claim4_lower_bound_scaling_exact": lower_scaling_residual < 1e-15, + "claim4_full_participation_sampling_variance_zero": all(r["exact_without_replacement_sampling_variance"] == 0 for r in lower if r["S"] == r["N"]), + "claim5_four_symmetric_graphs": len(dec) == 4 and all(0 <= rho < 1 for rho in dec_rhos), + "claim5_connectivity_factor_varies": max(dec_gaps) / min(dec_gaps) > 1.5, + "claim5_decdpo_executed": all(r["mean_final_loss"] < math.log(2.0) for r in dec), + "claim6_exact_N5_times_120_SHP_rows": len(inventory) == 600 and {r["client"] for r in inventory} == set(range(5)), + "claim6_all_four_ablation_families": all(controls["fed_ablation_ranges"][k] > 1e-10 for k in ("local_steps", "participation", "staleness")) and controls["topology_consensus_range"] > 1e-10, + "destructive_identical_clients_reduce_participation_effect": 0.25 < controls["identical_client_S1_to_S5_ratio"] < 4.0, + "destructive_no_mixing_increases_consensus_error": controls["no_mix_to_mix_consensus_ratio"] > 5.0, + "destructive_label_corruption_worsens_clean_objective": controls["label_corrupted_final_loss"] > controls["clean_final_loss"], + "all_outputs_finite": all(math.isfinite(float(value)) for value in controls.values() if isinstance(value, (int, float))), + } + render_figure(output, fed, dec, partial, controls) + results = { + "paper": "Distributed Direct Preference Optimization", + "openreview_id": "ljNZyrAlaa", + "arxiv": "2605.20696v1", + "seed": SEED, + "scope": "finite log-linear SHP mechanism audit plus exact source-formula reconstruction", + "headline": { + "shp_pairs": len(inventory), + "clients": 5, + "pairs_per_client": 120, + "fed_ablation_cells": len(fed), + "fed_algorithm_runs": 9 * 8, + "decdpo_topology_cells": len(dec), + "decdpo_algorithm_runs": 4 * 8, + "theorem_5_1_formula_cells": len(partial), + "staleness_formula_cells": len(stale), + "lower_bound_cells": len(lower), + **controls, + }, + "gates": gates, + "all_gates_pass": all(gates.values()), + } + (output / "results.json").write_text(json.dumps(results, indent=2, sort_keys=True) + "\n", encoding="utf-8") + sums = {} + for artifact in sorted(output.iterdir()): + if artifact.is_file() and artifact.name != "SHA256SUMS.json": + sums[artifact.name] = sha256(artifact) + (output / "SHA256SUMS.json").write_text(json.dumps(sums, indent=2, sort_keys=True) + "\n", encoding="utf-8") + print(json.dumps({"all_gates_pass": results["all_gates_pass"], "gates": gates, "headline": results["headline"], "results_sha256": sha256(output / "results.json")}, indent=2, sort_keys=True)) + return 0 if results["all_gates_pass"] else 2 + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + raise SystemExit(main()) diff --git a/requirements.txt b/requirements.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d006ed27aee847e0e8d6613fd896a0a1a3f02557 --- /dev/null +++ b/requirements.txt @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +numpy==2.4.0 +matplotlib==3.10.8 diff --git a/shp_rows_0.json b/shp_rows_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24f853f94d891eed7937615a3d3c16199debeb4b --- /dev/null +++ b/shp_rows_0.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"features":[{"feature_idx":0,"name":"post_id","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":1,"name":"domain","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":2,"name":"upvote_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":3,"name":"history","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":4,"name":"c_root_id_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":5,"name":"c_root_id_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":6,"name":"created_at_utc_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":7,"name":"created_at_utc_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":8,"name":"score_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":9,"name":"score_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":10,"name":"human_ref_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":11,"name":"human_ref_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":12,"name":"labels","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":13,"name":"seconds_difference","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":14,"name":"score_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}}],"rows":[{"row_idx":0,"row":{"post_id":"himc90","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"In an interview right before receiving the 2013 Nobel prize in physics, Peter Higgs stated that he wouldn't be able to get an academic job today, because he wouldn't be regarded as productive enough. > By the time he retired in 1996, he was uncomfortable with the new academic culture. \"After I retired it was quite a long time before I went back to my department. I thought I was well out of it. It wasn't my way of doing things any more. Today I wouldn't get an academic job. It's as simple as that. I don't think I would be regarded as productive enough.\" Another interesting quote from the article is the following: > He doubts a similar breakthrough could be achieved in today's academic culture, because of the expectations on academics to collaborate and keep churning out papers. He said: \"It's difficult to imagine how I would ever have enough peace and quiet in the present sort of climate to do what I did in 1964.\" Source (the whole article is pretty interesting): http://theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/06/peter-higgs-boson-academic-system","c_root_id_A":"fwhnqat","c_root_id_B":"fwhp8d4","created_at_utc_A":1593535113,"created_at_utc_B":1593535824,"score_A":52,"score_B":54,"human_ref_A":"Currently wrapping up my PhD. There is a stark difference in work balance life between students in my lab who are focused on industry and those focused on academia. The ones in academia feel an immense stress to get high level publications (some staying 8+ years to try to push something into nature/science). The competition has become cut throat. This is a trend not just in America but in Europe, Asia and middle east. International graduate students tell me in China go back 20 years, having any ACS publication from american university is enough to get professorship. Now you better come stacked with publications and at least one nature/science. American universities are even more competitive. How many publications, how many conferences, how many patents...","human_ref_B":"It’s ironic to me that research has shown that productivity isn’t all it’s cracked up to be yet here we are.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":711.0,"score_ratio":1.0384615385},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":1,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlczr1","c_root_id_B":"fqlldif","created_at_utc_A":1589454386,"created_at_utc_B":1589460984,"score_A":5,"score_B":17,"human_ref_A":"And when your teacher doesn't listen or pay attention to your presentation even you do not go over time limit? I did experienced that a week ago with my group and I still feel frustrated. We were the only group that he didn't pay attention at all. We put so much effort in that presentation! I felt very useless and depressed when I noticed that he didn't have the effort to listen us.","human_ref_B":"I'm pretty strict on time, to the point where I'll cut off the presentation if it goes over the alloted time (typically, I'll also give them a warning when they're halfway through their time and another when a minute is left). Getting your point accross concisely is a valuable skill and important to master in a business environment. In a similar vein, I put a max word/page count on assignments instead of a minimum. Students often seem surprised at that.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6598.0,"score_ratio":3.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":2,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlln6q","c_root_id_B":"fqlvtxc","created_at_utc_A":1589461159,"created_at_utc_B":1589467007,"score_A":5,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Profs can be oblivious? What’s new!","human_ref_B":"This sounds like a problem with a specific professor. If my grading rubric has a time incorporated, you lose just as many points for going over as you do for going way under.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5848.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":3,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlvtxc","c_root_id_B":"fqlczr1","created_at_utc_A":1589467007,"created_at_utc_B":1589454386,"score_A":7,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"This sounds like a problem with a specific professor. If my grading rubric has a time incorporated, you lose just as many points for going over as you do for going way under.","human_ref_B":"And when your teacher doesn't listen or pay attention to your presentation even you do not go over time limit? I did experienced that a week ago with my group and I still feel frustrated. We were the only group that he didn't pay attention at all. We put so much effort in that presentation! I felt very useless and depressed when I noticed that he didn't have the effort to listen us.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12621.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":4,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlnn55","c_root_id_B":"fqlvtxc","created_at_utc_A":1589462425,"created_at_utc_B":1589467007,"score_A":6,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"This would be totally unacceptable in my class. Every 5% over (or under) time is 5% off the grade.","human_ref_B":"This sounds like a problem with a specific professor. If my grading rubric has a time incorporated, you lose just as many points for going over as you do for going way under.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4582.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":5,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm6w3j","c_root_id_B":"fqlln6q","created_at_utc_A":1589472521,"created_at_utc_B":1589461159,"score_A":7,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...","human_ref_B":"Profs can be oblivious? What’s new!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11362.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":6,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlnn55","c_root_id_B":"fqlln6q","created_at_utc_A":1589462425,"created_at_utc_B":1589461159,"score_A":6,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"This would be totally unacceptable in my class. Every 5% over (or under) time is 5% off the grade.","human_ref_B":"Profs can be oblivious? What’s new!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1266.0,"score_ratio":1.2},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":7,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlczr1","c_root_id_B":"fqm6w3j","created_at_utc_A":1589454386,"created_at_utc_B":1589472521,"score_A":5,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"And when your teacher doesn't listen or pay attention to your presentation even you do not go over time limit? I did experienced that a week ago with my group and I still feel frustrated. We were the only group that he didn't pay attention at all. We put so much effort in that presentation! I felt very useless and depressed when I noticed that he didn't have the effort to listen us.","human_ref_B":"I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":18135.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":8,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm6w3j","c_root_id_B":"fqlnn55","created_at_utc_A":1589472521,"created_at_utc_B":1589462425,"score_A":7,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...","human_ref_B":"This would be totally unacceptable in my class. Every 5% over (or under) time is 5% off the grade.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":10096.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":9,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm6w3j","c_root_id_B":"fqm1ai6","created_at_utc_A":1589472521,"created_at_utc_B":1589469773,"score_A":7,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...","human_ref_B":"I don't. If you get 15 minutes, your presentation has to be between 14 and 16 minutes. If you run short, engage the audience with questions. If you're running long, which you shouldn't (you practiced, right?), wind it up. I penalize if you go over 16 minutes, and I'll cut you off at 20 (maybe sooner, depending on how tight we are for time for the day). I would never reward students for going three times the allotted time. They'd never come close to finishing their presentation by the time I stopped them.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2748.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":10,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm6w3j","c_root_id_B":"fqlwmce","created_at_utc_A":1589472521,"created_at_utc_B":1589467418,"score_A":7,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...","human_ref_B":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5103.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":11,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm64ya","c_root_id_B":"fqm6w3j","created_at_utc_A":1589472155,"created_at_utc_B":1589472521,"score_A":2,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","human_ref_B":"I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":366.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":12,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlnn55","c_root_id_B":"fqlczr1","created_at_utc_A":1589462425,"created_at_utc_B":1589454386,"score_A":6,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"This would be totally unacceptable in my class. Every 5% over (or under) time is 5% off the grade.","human_ref_B":"And when your teacher doesn't listen or pay attention to your presentation even you do not go over time limit? I did experienced that a week ago with my group and I still feel frustrated. We were the only group that he didn't pay attention at all. We put so much effort in that presentation! I felt very useless and depressed when I noticed that he didn't have the effort to listen us.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8039.0,"score_ratio":1.2},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":13,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm1ai6","c_root_id_B":"fqlwmce","created_at_utc_A":1589469773,"created_at_utc_B":1589467418,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"I don't. If you get 15 minutes, your presentation has to be between 14 and 16 minutes. If you run short, engage the audience with questions. If you're running long, which you shouldn't (you practiced, right?), wind it up. I penalize if you go over 16 minutes, and I'll cut you off at 20 (maybe sooner, depending on how tight we are for time for the day). I would never reward students for going three times the allotted time. They'd never come close to finishing their presentation by the time I stopped them.","human_ref_B":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2355.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":14,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmk1xx","c_root_id_B":"fqmdm8f","created_at_utc_A":1589478729,"created_at_utc_B":1589475702,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Yes. Part of what we are teaching at the college level is professionalism. You will not be praised in industry, nonprofits, or government if you regularly use up more than your allotted time slot for presentations. Not that this doesn’t happen everywhere quite a bit, especially in academia. But it’s just as irritating in a business setting as it is in a college setting.","human_ref_B":"brevity is beautiful.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3027.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":15,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlwmce","c_root_id_B":"fqmk1xx","created_at_utc_A":1589467418,"created_at_utc_B":1589478729,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","human_ref_B":"Yes. Part of what we are teaching at the college level is professionalism. You will not be praised in industry, nonprofits, or government if you regularly use up more than your allotted time slot for presentations. Not that this doesn’t happen everywhere quite a bit, especially in academia. But it’s just as irritating in a business setting as it is in a college setting.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11311.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":16,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmk1xx","c_root_id_B":"fqm64ya","created_at_utc_A":1589478729,"created_at_utc_B":1589472155,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Yes. Part of what we are teaching at the college level is professionalism. You will not be praised in industry, nonprofits, or government if you regularly use up more than your allotted time slot for presentations. Not that this doesn’t happen everywhere quite a bit, especially in academia. But it’s just as irritating in a business setting as it is in a college setting.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6574.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":17,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmk1xx","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589478729,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Yes. Part of what we are teaching at the college level is professionalism. You will not be praised in industry, nonprofits, or government if you regularly use up more than your allotted time slot for presentations. Not that this doesn’t happen everywhere quite a bit, especially in academia. But it’s just as irritating in a business setting as it is in a college setting.","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3245.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":18,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn94f4","c_root_id_B":"fqn7c3a","created_at_utc_A":1589490763,"created_at_utc_B":1589489892,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","human_ref_B":"People who go overtime by quite a bit - like more than 1-2 for a 10 min or 10+ for longer talks - are one of my pet peeves. Just respect everyone's time and stay within the limit... I was judging some 8 min presentations on Zoom a few days ago. The most interesting one got the lowest score because they barely made it half-way through their talk when their time was up. They would have won if they had stayed on target.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":871.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":19,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn9vun","c_root_id_B":"fqn7c3a","created_at_utc_A":1589491136,"created_at_utc_B":1589489892,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","human_ref_B":"People who go overtime by quite a bit - like more than 1-2 for a 10 min or 10+ for longer talks - are one of my pet peeves. Just respect everyone's time and stay within the limit... I was judging some 8 min presentations on Zoom a few days ago. The most interesting one got the lowest score because they barely made it half-way through their talk when their time was up. They would have won if they had stayed on target.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1244.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":20,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn7c3a","c_root_id_B":"fqns00p","created_at_utc_A":1589489892,"created_at_utc_B":1589500304,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"People who go overtime by quite a bit - like more than 1-2 for a 10 min or 10+ for longer talks - are one of my pet peeves. Just respect everyone's time and stay within the limit... I was judging some 8 min presentations on Zoom a few days ago. The most interesting one got the lowest score because they barely made it half-way through their talk when their time was up. They would have won if they had stayed on target.","human_ref_B":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":10412.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":21,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqo0p22","c_root_id_B":"fqn7c3a","created_at_utc_A":1589505179,"created_at_utc_B":1589489892,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"If I give a 10 minute time limit, I cut them off after 12. And then I treat any material they did not present as if they didn't cover it and deduct accordingly. Time limits are very important and learning how to make your point concisely is just as important. We have time limits at conferences, I have a time limit when I am teaching, my students will one day have a time limit when they are pitching an idea to a client. We all have to learn to use the time given in the most efficient way possible.","human_ref_B":"People who go overtime by quite a bit - like more than 1-2 for a 10 min or 10+ for longer talks - are one of my pet peeves. Just respect everyone's time and stay within the limit... I was judging some 8 min presentations on Zoom a few days ago. The most interesting one got the lowest score because they barely made it half-way through their talk when their time was up. They would have won if they had stayed on target.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15287.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":22,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmdm8f","c_root_id_B":"fqn94f4","created_at_utc_A":1589475702,"created_at_utc_B":1589490763,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"brevity is beautiful.","human_ref_B":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":15061.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":23,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn94f4","c_root_id_B":"fqml16o","created_at_utc_A":1589490763,"created_at_utc_B":1589479196,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","human_ref_B":"On a more general and pertinent tangent: If you're given a time limit, stick to it. Presenters have an implicit agreement with their audience where the audience is giving you a certain amount of their time. If you command their attention for longer, you're being rude and selfish in taking more than was agreed upon.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11567.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":24,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmuioq","c_root_id_B":"fqn94f4","created_at_utc_A":1589483749,"created_at_utc_B":1589490763,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"All my professors have been extremely strict with the time limit. No presentation in a class of 20+ students should take up a 75% of class time.","human_ref_B":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7014.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":25,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn94f4","c_root_id_B":"fqn3sid","created_at_utc_A":1589490763,"created_at_utc_B":1589488187,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","human_ref_B":"This is one of the perks of grading all assignments with a rubric, and students having the rubric a head of time. Adhering to the time limit is a column on my presentations rubric.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2576.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":26,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlwmce","c_root_id_B":"fqn94f4","created_at_utc_A":1589467418,"created_at_utc_B":1589490763,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","human_ref_B":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":23345.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":27,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm64ya","c_root_id_B":"fqn94f4","created_at_utc_A":1589472155,"created_at_utc_B":1589490763,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","human_ref_B":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":18608.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":28,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn94f4","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589490763,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"I have a similar annoyance (though not as bad) with paper length. If it's a 1500-word paper, I don't mind 1250-1750 range, but then you get into stuff like, say, 2500 words and you start thinking \"come on, these lengths are here for a reason.\" It's especially annoying if they're a really circuitous writer.","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15279.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":29,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmdm8f","c_root_id_B":"fqn9vun","created_at_utc_A":1589475702,"created_at_utc_B":1589491136,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"brevity is beautiful.","human_ref_B":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":15434.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":30,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn9vun","c_root_id_B":"fqml16o","created_at_utc_A":1589491136,"created_at_utc_B":1589479196,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","human_ref_B":"On a more general and pertinent tangent: If you're given a time limit, stick to it. Presenters have an implicit agreement with their audience where the audience is giving you a certain amount of their time. If you command their attention for longer, you're being rude and selfish in taking more than was agreed upon.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11940.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":31,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmuioq","c_root_id_B":"fqn9vun","created_at_utc_A":1589483749,"created_at_utc_B":1589491136,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"All my professors have been extremely strict with the time limit. No presentation in a class of 20+ students should take up a 75% of class time.","human_ref_B":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7387.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":32,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn3sid","c_root_id_B":"fqn9vun","created_at_utc_A":1589488187,"created_at_utc_B":1589491136,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"This is one of the perks of grading all assignments with a rubric, and students having the rubric a head of time. Adhering to the time limit is a column on my presentations rubric.","human_ref_B":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2949.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":33,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlwmce","c_root_id_B":"fqn9vun","created_at_utc_A":1589467418,"created_at_utc_B":1589491136,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","human_ref_B":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":23718.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":34,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn9vun","c_root_id_B":"fqm64ya","created_at_utc_A":1589491136,"created_at_utc_B":1589472155,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","labels":1,"seconds_difference":18981.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":35,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn9vun","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589491136,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Yikes. I tell my students that if they turn in a 30 minute presentation video (online class) I’m not watching it. 3-5 minutes for the first topic and 5-10 for the second. Anymore than that and I’m probably tuning out.","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15652.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":36,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqns00p","c_root_id_B":"fqmdm8f","created_at_utc_A":1589500304,"created_at_utc_B":1589475702,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","human_ref_B":"brevity is beautiful.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":24602.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":37,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqml16o","c_root_id_B":"fqns00p","created_at_utc_A":1589479196,"created_at_utc_B":1589500304,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"On a more general and pertinent tangent: If you're given a time limit, stick to it. Presenters have an implicit agreement with their audience where the audience is giving you a certain amount of their time. If you command their attention for longer, you're being rude and selfish in taking more than was agreed upon.","human_ref_B":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":21108.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":38,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmuioq","c_root_id_B":"fqns00p","created_at_utc_A":1589483749,"created_at_utc_B":1589500304,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"All my professors have been extremely strict with the time limit. No presentation in a class of 20+ students should take up a 75% of class time.","human_ref_B":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":16555.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":39,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqns00p","c_root_id_B":"fqn3sid","created_at_utc_A":1589500304,"created_at_utc_B":1589488187,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","human_ref_B":"This is one of the perks of grading all assignments with a rubric, and students having the rubric a head of time. Adhering to the time limit is a column on my presentations rubric.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12117.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":40,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlwmce","c_root_id_B":"fqns00p","created_at_utc_A":1589467418,"created_at_utc_B":1589500304,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","human_ref_B":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":32886.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":41,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm64ya","c_root_id_B":"fqns00p","created_at_utc_A":1589472155,"created_at_utc_B":1589500304,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","human_ref_B":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":28149.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":42,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqns00p","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589500304,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"I've never encountered a professor who praises people for going over time - quite the opposite in fact, usually they cut the presentation short or deduct points. I usually go the \"deduct points\" route unless it looks like the class is gong to run out of time for other presenters. Was this the same professor both times? Do you know if they docked points for going over-time?","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":24820.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":43,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqo0p22","c_root_id_B":"fqlwmce","created_at_utc_A":1589505179,"created_at_utc_B":1589467418,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"If I give a 10 minute time limit, I cut them off after 12. And then I treat any material they did not present as if they didn't cover it and deduct accordingly. Time limits are very important and learning how to make your point concisely is just as important. We have time limits at conferences, I have a time limit when I am teaching, my students will one day have a time limit when they are pitching an idea to a client. We all have to learn to use the time given in the most efficient way possible.","human_ref_B":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":37761.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":44,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqo0p22","c_root_id_B":"fqm64ya","created_at_utc_A":1589505179,"created_at_utc_B":1589472155,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"If I give a 10 minute time limit, I cut them off after 12. And then I treat any material they did not present as if they didn't cover it and deduct accordingly. Time limits are very important and learning how to make your point concisely is just as important. We have time limits at conferences, I have a time limit when I am teaching, my students will one day have a time limit when they are pitching an idea to a client. We all have to learn to use the time given in the most efficient way possible.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","labels":1,"seconds_difference":33024.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":45,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqo0p22","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589505179,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"If I give a 10 minute time limit, I cut them off after 12. And then I treat any material they did not present as if they didn't cover it and deduct accordingly. Time limits are very important and learning how to make your point concisely is just as important. We have time limits at conferences, I have a time limit when I am teaching, my students will one day have a time limit when they are pitching an idea to a client. We all have to learn to use the time given in the most efficient way possible.","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":29695.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":46,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmdm8f","c_root_id_B":"fqlwmce","created_at_utc_A":1589475702,"created_at_utc_B":1589467418,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"brevity is beautiful.","human_ref_B":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8284.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":47,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmdm8f","c_root_id_B":"fqm64ya","created_at_utc_A":1589475702,"created_at_utc_B":1589472155,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"brevity is beautiful.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3547.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":48,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmdm8f","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589475702,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"brevity is beautiful.","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":218.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":49,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqml16o","c_root_id_B":"fqlwmce","created_at_utc_A":1589479196,"created_at_utc_B":1589467418,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"On a more general and pertinent tangent: If you're given a time limit, stick to it. Presenters have an implicit agreement with their audience where the audience is giving you a certain amount of their time. If you command their attention for longer, you're being rude and selfish in taking more than was agreed upon.","human_ref_B":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11778.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":50,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm64ya","c_root_id_B":"fqml16o","created_at_utc_A":1589472155,"created_at_utc_B":1589479196,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","human_ref_B":"On a more general and pertinent tangent: If you're given a time limit, stick to it. Presenters have an implicit agreement with their audience where the audience is giving you a certain amount of their time. If you command their attention for longer, you're being rude and selfish in taking more than was agreed upon.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7041.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":51,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqml16o","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589479196,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"On a more general and pertinent tangent: If you're given a time limit, stick to it. Presenters have an implicit agreement with their audience where the audience is giving you a certain amount of their time. If you command their attention for longer, you're being rude and selfish in taking more than was agreed upon.","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3712.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":52,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmuioq","c_root_id_B":"fqlwmce","created_at_utc_A":1589483749,"created_at_utc_B":1589467418,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"All my professors have been extremely strict with the time limit. No presentation in a class of 20+ students should take up a 75% of class time.","human_ref_B":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":16331.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":53,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqm64ya","c_root_id_B":"fqmuioq","created_at_utc_A":1589472155,"created_at_utc_B":1589483749,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","human_ref_B":"All my professors have been extremely strict with the time limit. No presentation in a class of 20+ students should take up a 75% of class time.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11594.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":54,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmuioq","c_root_id_B":"fqmd5ha","created_at_utc_A":1589483749,"created_at_utc_B":1589475484,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"All my professors have been extremely strict with the time limit. No presentation in a class of 20+ students should take up a 75% of class time.","human_ref_B":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8265.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":55,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqlwmce","c_root_id_B":"fqn3sid","created_at_utc_A":1589467418,"created_at_utc_B":1589488187,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.","human_ref_B":"This is one of the perks of grading all assignments with a rubric, and students having the rubric a head of time. Adhering to the time limit is a column on my presentations rubric.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":20769.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":56,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqn3sid","c_root_id_B":"fqm64ya","created_at_utc_A":1589488187,"created_at_utc_B":1589472155,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"This is one of the perks of grading all assignments with a rubric, and students having the rubric a head of time. Adhering to the time limit is a column on my presentations rubric.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".","labels":1,"seconds_difference":16032.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":57,"row":{"post_id":"gjiz1j","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.95,"history":"If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.","c_root_id_A":"fqmd5ha","c_root_id_B":"fqn3sid","created_at_utc_A":1589475484,"created_at_utc_B":1589488187,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"This is a terrible thing to let students get away with, in my view. When you're in the field presenting to clients, committees, etc., they typically prefer when you can wrap it up and get to the essentials fast. They never want to feel like they spent too much time on something. Shameful to let students go out into their fields with those habits.","human_ref_B":"This is one of the perks of grading all assignments with a rubric, and students having the rubric a head of time. Adhering to the time limit is a column on my presentations rubric.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12703.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":58,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fntxrg9","c_root_id_B":"fnu1ebo","created_at_utc_A":1587250631,"created_at_utc_B":1587252663,"score_A":157,"score_B":246,"human_ref_A":"Published on april 01, 2020. Hmm, april first, why does that date ring a bell?","human_ref_B":"\"Scientific Journal of Research and Reviews\" is the best name ever.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2032.0,"score_ratio":1.5668789809},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":59,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fntxrg9","c_root_id_B":"fnu7wp6","created_at_utc_A":1587250631,"created_at_utc_B":1587256379,"score_A":157,"score_B":209,"human_ref_A":"Published on april 01, 2020. Hmm, april first, why does that date ring a bell?","human_ref_B":"Using WTF as a keyword surelly sets an impact factor over 9000","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5748.0,"score_ratio":1.3312101911},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":60,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnu3gvg","c_root_id_B":"fnu7wp6","created_at_utc_A":1587253799,"created_at_utc_B":1587256379,"score_A":50,"score_B":209,"human_ref_A":"Those acknowledgements though😂😂😂","human_ref_B":"Using WTF as a keyword surelly sets an impact factor over 9000","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2580.0,"score_ratio":4.18},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":61,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnu7wp6","c_root_id_B":"fnu32lo","created_at_utc_A":1587256379,"created_at_utc_B":1587253588,"score_A":209,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Using WTF as a keyword surelly sets an impact factor over 9000","human_ref_B":"Lmao I am dead","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2791.0,"score_ratio":26.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":62,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnuf6qh","c_root_id_B":"fnu3gvg","created_at_utc_A":1587260685,"created_at_utc_B":1587253799,"score_A":68,"score_B":50,"human_ref_A":"“More research is warranted” has always been the biggest cop out.","human_ref_B":"Those acknowledgements though😂😂😂","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6886.0,"score_ratio":1.36},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":63,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnudecm","c_root_id_B":"fnuf6qh","created_at_utc_A":1587259630,"created_at_utc_B":1587260685,"score_A":14,"score_B":68,"human_ref_A":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","human_ref_B":"“More research is warranted” has always been the biggest cop out.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1055.0,"score_ratio":4.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":64,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnu32lo","c_root_id_B":"fnuf6qh","created_at_utc_A":1587253588,"created_at_utc_B":1587260685,"score_A":8,"score_B":68,"human_ref_A":"Lmao I am dead","human_ref_B":"“More research is warranted” has always been the biggest cop out.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7097.0,"score_ratio":8.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":65,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnuf6qh","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587260685,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":68,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"“More research is warranted” has always been the biggest cop out.","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2117.0,"score_ratio":34.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":66,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnu3gvg","c_root_id_B":"fnu32lo","created_at_utc_A":1587253799,"created_at_utc_B":1587253588,"score_A":50,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Those acknowledgements though😂😂😂","human_ref_B":"Lmao I am dead","labels":1,"seconds_difference":211.0,"score_ratio":6.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":67,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnul35i","c_root_id_B":"fnuqbno","created_at_utc_A":1587264679,"created_at_utc_B":1587268353,"score_A":22,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"That fucking graph/figure. Hahahaha","human_ref_B":"Perhaps a little less complex, but there's also the classic paper \"Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.\"","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3674.0,"score_ratio":2.1818181818},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":68,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnuhlx2","c_root_id_B":"fnuqbno","created_at_utc_A":1587262288,"created_at_utc_B":1587268353,"score_A":18,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"Probably more views than the typical publication","human_ref_B":"Perhaps a little less complex, but there's also the classic paper \"Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.\"","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6065.0,"score_ratio":2.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":69,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnupm1q","c_root_id_B":"fnuqbno","created_at_utc_A":1587267846,"created_at_utc_B":1587268353,"score_A":19,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"added this to my mendeley","human_ref_B":"Perhaps a little less complex, but there's also the classic paper \"Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.\"","labels":0,"seconds_difference":507.0,"score_ratio":2.5263157895},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":70,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnuqbno","c_root_id_B":"fnudecm","created_at_utc_A":1587268353,"created_at_utc_B":1587259630,"score_A":48,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"Perhaps a little less complex, but there's also the classic paper \"Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.\"","human_ref_B":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8723.0,"score_ratio":3.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":71,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnu32lo","c_root_id_B":"fnuqbno","created_at_utc_A":1587253588,"created_at_utc_B":1587268353,"score_A":8,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"Lmao I am dead","human_ref_B":"Perhaps a little less complex, but there's also the classic paper \"Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.\"","labels":0,"seconds_difference":14765.0,"score_ratio":6.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":72,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnug1ll","c_root_id_B":"fnuqbno","created_at_utc_A":1587261248,"created_at_utc_B":1587268353,"score_A":4,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"At my university (edit: I do not live in the US), if you publish even in lower tier legitimate journals, that counts against you. So this guy's resume must be bulletproof for him to take a hit like that","human_ref_B":"Perhaps a little less complex, but there's also the classic paper \"Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.\"","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7105.0,"score_ratio":12.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":73,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnuqbno","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587268353,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":48,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Perhaps a little less complex, but there's also the classic paper \"Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.\"","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9785.0,"score_ratio":24.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":74,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnul35i","c_root_id_B":"fnuhlx2","created_at_utc_A":1587264679,"created_at_utc_B":1587262288,"score_A":22,"score_B":18,"human_ref_A":"That fucking graph/figure. Hahahaha","human_ref_B":"Probably more views than the typical publication","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2391.0,"score_ratio":1.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":75,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnudecm","c_root_id_B":"fnul35i","created_at_utc_A":1587259630,"created_at_utc_B":1587264679,"score_A":14,"score_B":22,"human_ref_A":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","human_ref_B":"That fucking graph/figure. Hahahaha","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5049.0,"score_ratio":1.5714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":76,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnul35i","c_root_id_B":"fnu32lo","created_at_utc_A":1587264679,"created_at_utc_B":1587253588,"score_A":22,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"That fucking graph/figure. Hahahaha","human_ref_B":"Lmao I am dead","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11091.0,"score_ratio":2.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":77,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnul35i","c_root_id_B":"fnug1ll","created_at_utc_A":1587264679,"created_at_utc_B":1587261248,"score_A":22,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"That fucking graph/figure. Hahahaha","human_ref_B":"At my university (edit: I do not live in the US), if you publish even in lower tier legitimate journals, that counts against you. So this guy's resume must be bulletproof for him to take a hit like that","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3431.0,"score_ratio":5.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":78,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnul35i","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587264679,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":22,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"That fucking graph/figure. Hahahaha","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6111.0,"score_ratio":11.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":79,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnupm1q","c_root_id_B":"fnuhlx2","created_at_utc_A":1587267846,"created_at_utc_B":1587262288,"score_A":19,"score_B":18,"human_ref_A":"added this to my mendeley","human_ref_B":"Probably more views than the typical publication","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5558.0,"score_ratio":1.0555555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":80,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnudecm","c_root_id_B":"fnuhlx2","created_at_utc_A":1587259630,"created_at_utc_B":1587262288,"score_A":14,"score_B":18,"human_ref_A":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","human_ref_B":"Probably more views than the typical publication","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2658.0,"score_ratio":1.2857142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":81,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnuhlx2","c_root_id_B":"fnu32lo","created_at_utc_A":1587262288,"created_at_utc_B":1587253588,"score_A":18,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Probably more views than the typical publication","human_ref_B":"Lmao I am dead","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8700.0,"score_ratio":2.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":82,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnug1ll","c_root_id_B":"fnuhlx2","created_at_utc_A":1587261248,"created_at_utc_B":1587262288,"score_A":4,"score_B":18,"human_ref_A":"At my university (edit: I do not live in the US), if you publish even in lower tier legitimate journals, that counts against you. So this guy's resume must be bulletproof for him to take a hit like that","human_ref_B":"Probably more views than the typical publication","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1040.0,"score_ratio":4.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":83,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnuhlx2","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587262288,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":18,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Probably more views than the typical publication","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3720.0,"score_ratio":9.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":84,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnupm1q","c_root_id_B":"fnudecm","created_at_utc_A":1587267846,"created_at_utc_B":1587259630,"score_A":19,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"added this to my mendeley","human_ref_B":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8216.0,"score_ratio":1.3571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":85,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnu32lo","c_root_id_B":"fnupm1q","created_at_utc_A":1587253588,"created_at_utc_B":1587267846,"score_A":8,"score_B":19,"human_ref_A":"Lmao I am dead","human_ref_B":"added this to my mendeley","labels":0,"seconds_difference":14258.0,"score_ratio":2.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":86,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnug1ll","c_root_id_B":"fnupm1q","created_at_utc_A":1587261248,"created_at_utc_B":1587267846,"score_A":4,"score_B":19,"human_ref_A":"At my university (edit: I do not live in the US), if you publish even in lower tier legitimate journals, that counts against you. So this guy's resume must be bulletproof for him to take a hit like that","human_ref_B":"added this to my mendeley","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6598.0,"score_ratio":4.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":87,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnupm1q","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587267846,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":19,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"added this to my mendeley","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9278.0,"score_ratio":9.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":88,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnv4xtv","c_root_id_B":"fnudecm","created_at_utc_A":1587280385,"created_at_utc_B":1587259630,"score_A":16,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"My new goal is to find a way to reference this paper somehow in one of my own.","human_ref_B":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":20755.0,"score_ratio":1.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":89,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnv4xtv","c_root_id_B":"fnu32lo","created_at_utc_A":1587280385,"created_at_utc_B":1587253588,"score_A":16,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"My new goal is to find a way to reference this paper somehow in one of my own.","human_ref_B":"Lmao I am dead","labels":1,"seconds_difference":26797.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":90,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnv4xtv","c_root_id_B":"fnug1ll","created_at_utc_A":1587280385,"created_at_utc_B":1587261248,"score_A":16,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"My new goal is to find a way to reference this paper somehow in one of my own.","human_ref_B":"At my university (edit: I do not live in the US), if you publish even in lower tier legitimate journals, that counts against you. So this guy's resume must be bulletproof for him to take a hit like that","labels":1,"seconds_difference":19137.0,"score_ratio":4.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":91,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnv4xtv","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587280385,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":16,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"My new goal is to find a way to reference this paper somehow in one of my own.","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":21817.0,"score_ratio":8.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":92,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnudecm","c_root_id_B":"fnu32lo","created_at_utc_A":1587259630,"created_at_utc_B":1587253588,"score_A":14,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","human_ref_B":"Lmao I am dead","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6042.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":93,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnudecm","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587259630,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":14,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1062.0,"score_ratio":7.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":94,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnug1ll","c_root_id_B":"fnv8o9b","created_at_utc_A":1587261248,"created_at_utc_B":1587284111,"score_A":4,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"At my university (edit: I do not live in the US), if you publish even in lower tier legitimate journals, that counts against you. So this guy's resume must be bulletproof for him to take a hit like that","human_ref_B":"Raminds me of my former PI who has a fun hobby: Getting predatory journals to include people like Hoss or Borat as an Editor. Why Fake Data When You Can Fake a Scientist? His point being: Virtual editors can significantly improve the visibility of junk journals","labels":0,"seconds_difference":22863.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":95,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnv5syl","c_root_id_B":"fnv8o9b","created_at_utc_A":1587281236,"created_at_utc_B":1587284111,"score_A":3,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":">eigenvalue | weird birds -Take a shot every time eigen/quantum/möbius/bent paper with a pencil etc. has been mentioned in the wrong context.","human_ref_B":"Raminds me of my former PI who has a fun hobby: Getting predatory journals to include people like Hoss or Borat as an Editor. Why Fake Data When You Can Fake a Scientist? His point being: Virtual editors can significantly improve the visibility of junk journals","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2875.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":96,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnv8o9b","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587284111,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":6,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Raminds me of my former PI who has a fun hobby: Getting predatory journals to include people like Hoss or Borat as an Editor. Why Fake Data When You Can Fake a Scientist? His point being: Virtual editors can significantly improve the visibility of junk journals","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":25543.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":97,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnubl6z","c_root_id_B":"fnug1ll","created_at_utc_A":1587258568,"created_at_utc_B":1587261248,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","human_ref_B":"At my university (edit: I do not live in the US), if you publish even in lower tier legitimate journals, that counts against you. So this guy's resume must be bulletproof for him to take a hit like that","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2680.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":98,"row":{"post_id":"g3wn4t","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936","c_root_id_A":"fnv5syl","c_root_id_B":"fnubl6z","created_at_utc_A":1587281236,"created_at_utc_B":1587258568,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":">eigenvalue | weird birds -Take a shot every time eigen/quantum/möbius/bent paper with a pencil etc. has been mentioned in the wrong context.","human_ref_B":"This is great, love it! Thank you for sharing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":22668.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":99,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nf3na","c_root_id_B":"g2nkfp3","created_at_utc_A":1598234898,"created_at_utc_B":1598238046,"score_A":105,"score_B":269,"human_ref_A":"I have three tenure reviews due soon. While I consider it part of my service, especially as I have a fairly rare specialty, it adds up.","human_ref_B":"I'm getting pretty sick of writing papers for free. For my PhD and postdoc I've worked on other people's big projects. Every time they strategically keep me in the lab for the entire duration of the fellowship with no time to write, knowing full well that I have to write papers to get a job, and that I'll do it for free when the fellowship is over just to try to keep up.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3148.0,"score_ratio":2.5619047619},"truncated_cells":[]}],"num_rows_total":348718,"num_rows_per_page":100,"partial":false} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/shp_rows_100.json b/shp_rows_100.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53556f2b0276ece75d7b81fca06fa4fc3d30350c --- /dev/null +++ b/shp_rows_100.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"features":[{"feature_idx":0,"name":"post_id","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":1,"name":"domain","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":2,"name":"upvote_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":3,"name":"history","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":4,"name":"c_root_id_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":5,"name":"c_root_id_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":6,"name":"created_at_utc_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":7,"name":"created_at_utc_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":8,"name":"score_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":9,"name":"score_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":10,"name":"human_ref_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":11,"name":"human_ref_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":12,"name":"labels","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":13,"name":"seconds_difference","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":14,"name":"score_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}}],"rows":[{"row_idx":100,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nkfp3","c_root_id_B":"g2nibtk","created_at_utc_A":1598238046,"created_at_utc_B":1598236775,"score_A":269,"score_B":56,"human_ref_A":"I'm getting pretty sick of writing papers for free. For my PhD and postdoc I've worked on other people's big projects. Every time they strategically keep me in the lab for the entire duration of the fellowship with no time to write, knowing full well that I have to write papers to get a job, and that I'll do it for free when the fellowship is over just to try to keep up.","human_ref_B":"I could probably write more if not reviewing 3+ papers per each published. I had no idea it was that many until I looked up my reviewer stats.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1271.0,"score_ratio":4.8035714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":101,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2ng4jr","c_root_id_B":"g2nkfp3","created_at_utc_A":1598235492,"created_at_utc_B":1598238046,"score_A":29,"score_B":269,"human_ref_A":"One way I'd think about it is if you're not planning to submit your own papers to journals in the future, then you don't need to review for them. If you do, and aren't expecting to pay others to review your paper for you, then you're kind of being a hypocrite.","human_ref_B":"I'm getting pretty sick of writing papers for free. For my PhD and postdoc I've worked on other people's big projects. Every time they strategically keep me in the lab for the entire duration of the fellowship with no time to write, knowing full well that I have to write papers to get a job, and that I'll do it for free when the fellowship is over just to try to keep up.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2554.0,"score_ratio":9.275862069},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":102,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2o4i54","c_root_id_B":"g2nwo9k","created_at_utc_A":1598253519,"created_at_utc_B":1598246475,"score_A":82,"score_B":55,"human_ref_A":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","human_ref_B":"TBH, I wish for profit publishing houses would get lost. Nature's making a move to own academic publishing at all levels of journal quality and it's just not cool. You get better service from most societies too. Now I just need to convince myself not to send the good work to the Nature empire, and convince the funders that society journals should be perceived as prestigious as Nature's topical collection.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7044.0,"score_ratio":1.4909090909},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":103,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nibtk","c_root_id_B":"g2o4i54","created_at_utc_A":1598236775,"created_at_utc_B":1598253519,"score_A":56,"score_B":82,"human_ref_A":"I could probably write more if not reviewing 3+ papers per each published. I had no idea it was that many until I looked up my reviewer stats.","human_ref_B":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":16744.0,"score_ratio":1.4642857143},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":104,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2o4i54","c_root_id_B":"g2nmtxj","created_at_utc_A":1598253519,"created_at_utc_B":1598239553,"score_A":82,"score_B":33,"human_ref_A":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","human_ref_B":"I think it's fine to say no sometimes. But if you say no all the time, you better not be submitting any work to peer reviewed journals or else you're just a dick. Also, if we do ask for compensation you know they're just going to up the publication fees. And we don't want the quality of the reviews to decline because people are trying to make a buck. I think we have a shitty system but I'm not sure how to improve it.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":13966.0,"score_ratio":2.4848484848},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":105,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2o4i54","c_root_id_B":"g2ng4jr","created_at_utc_A":1598253519,"created_at_utc_B":1598235492,"score_A":82,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","human_ref_B":"One way I'd think about it is if you're not planning to submit your own papers to journals in the future, then you don't need to review for them. If you do, and aren't expecting to pay others to review your paper for you, then you're kind of being a hypocrite.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":18027.0,"score_ratio":2.8275862069},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":106,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2o4i54","c_root_id_B":"g2nxi3k","created_at_utc_A":1598253519,"created_at_utc_B":1598247157,"score_A":82,"score_B":17,"human_ref_A":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","human_ref_B":"Aren’t you already paid for ‘service’ - employment contracts might mention say 10% of your time to be dedicated to service. You don’t owe more than that. Just make a weekly time budget, and anything that requires more than that is a red line.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6362.0,"score_ratio":4.8235294118},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":107,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2o4i54","c_root_id_B":"g2nyqoh","created_at_utc_A":1598253519,"created_at_utc_B":1598248206,"score_A":82,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","human_ref_B":"I'm with you OP. I'm particularly annoyed at one journal that asked me to review about a week before the pandemic 'hit' and then sent annoying e-mail reminders every 2 weeks until I sent the review (despite me e-mailing them back the first time saying I couldn't review while providing full time childcare and inviting them to find an alternative reviewer if they couldn't wait). I think I'm at the point where I'm going to do my own boycott of journal reviewing. (Up to now I've reviewed around 3 times as many papers as I've published and the majority of journals in my subject have 1, or 2, reviewers so I'm \"up\".) I'll make exceptions for massive breakthroughs or work of students/postdocs who really need it.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5313.0,"score_ratio":5.4666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":108,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nooe6","c_root_id_B":"g2o4i54","created_at_utc_A":1598240740,"created_at_utc_B":1598253519,"score_A":7,"score_B":82,"human_ref_A":"You should feel free to turn down a request to review if you aren’t interested in the topic. That’s how I decide what to review - whether or not I actually want to read the paper. It won’t hurt your tenure case if you occasionally say no.","human_ref_B":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12779.0,"score_ratio":11.7142857143},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":109,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2np94x","c_root_id_B":"g2o4i54","created_at_utc_A":1598241117,"created_at_utc_B":1598253519,"score_A":5,"score_B":82,"human_ref_A":"Exactly, I stopped helping those greedy publishers review papers for a while. Unless the paper title and abstract really interests me, I don't review.","human_ref_B":"This “publication-review-journals” is one of the most fucked up systems there is. We work like crazy to have publications ready (lab/field/writting) for ZERO money, plus many times we loose even our rights to our own papers. It is absolutely insane and abusive. People assuming OP is being malicious for pointing that out is insane. This kind of thinking will keep feeding this machine. Us pals should be more united and have each others backs like in other fields. On top of that, salaries received for universities/industry employment should not be factored in. You are producing new information and using that for handing out tenures and such is borderline blackmail, seeing that not everyone will be able to pay fees for publishing in high-impact journals, have time to review and still pay the bills. We should be paid for our services, especially if it’s in this weird cycle. Sadly, it does not look like we will find a solution soon enough. We are kind of trapped in this toxic situation having to overwork for free and having to do it with a smile on our faces. Edit: i do not mean to point fingers, just trying to speak my mind. This topic is such a huge cancer in academia it makes me mad.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12402.0,"score_ratio":16.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":110,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nwo9k","c_root_id_B":"g2nmtxj","created_at_utc_A":1598246475,"created_at_utc_B":1598239553,"score_A":55,"score_B":33,"human_ref_A":"TBH, I wish for profit publishing houses would get lost. Nature's making a move to own academic publishing at all levels of journal quality and it's just not cool. You get better service from most societies too. Now I just need to convince myself not to send the good work to the Nature empire, and convince the funders that society journals should be perceived as prestigious as Nature's topical collection.","human_ref_B":"I think it's fine to say no sometimes. But if you say no all the time, you better not be submitting any work to peer reviewed journals or else you're just a dick. Also, if we do ask for compensation you know they're just going to up the publication fees. And we don't want the quality of the reviews to decline because people are trying to make a buck. I think we have a shitty system but I'm not sure how to improve it.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6922.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":111,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nwo9k","c_root_id_B":"g2ng4jr","created_at_utc_A":1598246475,"created_at_utc_B":1598235492,"score_A":55,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"TBH, I wish for profit publishing houses would get lost. Nature's making a move to own academic publishing at all levels of journal quality and it's just not cool. You get better service from most societies too. Now I just need to convince myself not to send the good work to the Nature empire, and convince the funders that society journals should be perceived as prestigious as Nature's topical collection.","human_ref_B":"One way I'd think about it is if you're not planning to submit your own papers to journals in the future, then you don't need to review for them. If you do, and aren't expecting to pay others to review your paper for you, then you're kind of being a hypocrite.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":10983.0,"score_ratio":1.8965517241},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":112,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nwo9k","c_root_id_B":"g2nooe6","created_at_utc_A":1598246475,"created_at_utc_B":1598240740,"score_A":55,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"TBH, I wish for profit publishing houses would get lost. Nature's making a move to own academic publishing at all levels of journal quality and it's just not cool. You get better service from most societies too. Now I just need to convince myself not to send the good work to the Nature empire, and convince the funders that society journals should be perceived as prestigious as Nature's topical collection.","human_ref_B":"You should feel free to turn down a request to review if you aren’t interested in the topic. That’s how I decide what to review - whether or not I actually want to read the paper. It won’t hurt your tenure case if you occasionally say no.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5735.0,"score_ratio":7.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":113,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nwo9k","c_root_id_B":"g2np94x","created_at_utc_A":1598246475,"created_at_utc_B":1598241117,"score_A":55,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"TBH, I wish for profit publishing houses would get lost. Nature's making a move to own academic publishing at all levels of journal quality and it's just not cool. You get better service from most societies too. Now I just need to convince myself not to send the good work to the Nature empire, and convince the funders that society journals should be perceived as prestigious as Nature's topical collection.","human_ref_B":"Exactly, I stopped helping those greedy publishers review papers for a while. Unless the paper title and abstract really interests me, I don't review.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5358.0,"score_ratio":11.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":114,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2ng4jr","c_root_id_B":"g2nibtk","created_at_utc_A":1598235492,"created_at_utc_B":1598236775,"score_A":29,"score_B":56,"human_ref_A":"One way I'd think about it is if you're not planning to submit your own papers to journals in the future, then you don't need to review for them. If you do, and aren't expecting to pay others to review your paper for you, then you're kind of being a hypocrite.","human_ref_B":"I could probably write more if not reviewing 3+ papers per each published. I had no idea it was that many until I looked up my reviewer stats.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1283.0,"score_ratio":1.9310344828},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":115,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2ng4jr","c_root_id_B":"g2nmtxj","created_at_utc_A":1598235492,"created_at_utc_B":1598239553,"score_A":29,"score_B":33,"human_ref_A":"One way I'd think about it is if you're not planning to submit your own papers to journals in the future, then you don't need to review for them. If you do, and aren't expecting to pay others to review your paper for you, then you're kind of being a hypocrite.","human_ref_B":"I think it's fine to say no sometimes. But if you say no all the time, you better not be submitting any work to peer reviewed journals or else you're just a dick. Also, if we do ask for compensation you know they're just going to up the publication fees. And we don't want the quality of the reviews to decline because people are trying to make a buck. I think we have a shitty system but I'm not sure how to improve it.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4061.0,"score_ratio":1.1379310345},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":116,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nooe6","c_root_id_B":"g2nxi3k","created_at_utc_A":1598240740,"created_at_utc_B":1598247157,"score_A":7,"score_B":17,"human_ref_A":"You should feel free to turn down a request to review if you aren’t interested in the topic. That’s how I decide what to review - whether or not I actually want to read the paper. It won’t hurt your tenure case if you occasionally say no.","human_ref_B":"Aren’t you already paid for ‘service’ - employment contracts might mention say 10% of your time to be dedicated to service. You don’t owe more than that. Just make a weekly time budget, and anything that requires more than that is a red line.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6417.0,"score_ratio":2.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":117,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2np94x","c_root_id_B":"g2nxi3k","created_at_utc_A":1598241117,"created_at_utc_B":1598247157,"score_A":5,"score_B":17,"human_ref_A":"Exactly, I stopped helping those greedy publishers review papers for a while. Unless the paper title and abstract really interests me, I don't review.","human_ref_B":"Aren’t you already paid for ‘service’ - employment contracts might mention say 10% of your time to be dedicated to service. You don’t owe more than that. Just make a weekly time budget, and anything that requires more than that is a red line.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6040.0,"score_ratio":3.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":118,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nyqoh","c_root_id_B":"g2oc811","created_at_utc_A":1598248206,"created_at_utc_B":1598261309,"score_A":15,"score_B":17,"human_ref_A":"I'm with you OP. I'm particularly annoyed at one journal that asked me to review about a week before the pandemic 'hit' and then sent annoying e-mail reminders every 2 weeks until I sent the review (despite me e-mailing them back the first time saying I couldn't review while providing full time childcare and inviting them to find an alternative reviewer if they couldn't wait). I think I'm at the point where I'm going to do my own boycott of journal reviewing. (Up to now I've reviewed around 3 times as many papers as I've published and the majority of journals in my subject have 1, or 2, reviewers so I'm \"up\".) I'll make exceptions for massive breakthroughs or work of students/postdocs who really need it.","human_ref_B":"I just turned down a review invitation for an Elsevier journal on account of it being an Elsevier journal.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":13103.0,"score_ratio":1.1333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":119,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2oc811","c_root_id_B":"g2nooe6","created_at_utc_A":1598261309,"created_at_utc_B":1598240740,"score_A":17,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"I just turned down a review invitation for an Elsevier journal on account of it being an Elsevier journal.","human_ref_B":"You should feel free to turn down a request to review if you aren’t interested in the topic. That’s how I decide what to review - whether or not I actually want to read the paper. It won’t hurt your tenure case if you occasionally say no.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":20569.0,"score_ratio":2.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":120,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2oc811","c_root_id_B":"g2np94x","created_at_utc_A":1598261309,"created_at_utc_B":1598241117,"score_A":17,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"I just turned down a review invitation for an Elsevier journal on account of it being an Elsevier journal.","human_ref_B":"Exactly, I stopped helping those greedy publishers review papers for a while. Unless the paper title and abstract really interests me, I don't review.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":20192.0,"score_ratio":3.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":121,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nyqoh","c_root_id_B":"g2nooe6","created_at_utc_A":1598248206,"created_at_utc_B":1598240740,"score_A":15,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"I'm with you OP. I'm particularly annoyed at one journal that asked me to review about a week before the pandemic 'hit' and then sent annoying e-mail reminders every 2 weeks until I sent the review (despite me e-mailing them back the first time saying I couldn't review while providing full time childcare and inviting them to find an alternative reviewer if they couldn't wait). I think I'm at the point where I'm going to do my own boycott of journal reviewing. (Up to now I've reviewed around 3 times as many papers as I've published and the majority of journals in my subject have 1, or 2, reviewers so I'm \"up\".) I'll make exceptions for massive breakthroughs or work of students/postdocs who really need it.","human_ref_B":"You should feel free to turn down a request to review if you aren’t interested in the topic. That’s how I decide what to review - whether or not I actually want to read the paper. It won’t hurt your tenure case if you occasionally say no.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7466.0,"score_ratio":2.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":122,"row":{"post_id":"ifg59u","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"How about we stop working for free? Just this month I was invited to review five new submissions from three different journals. I understand that we have an important role in improving the quality of science being published (specially during COVID times), but isn’t it unfair that we do all the work and these companies get all the money? Honestly, I feel like it’s passed time we start refusing to review articles without minimum compensation from these for-profit journals. ​ Field of research: Neuroscience/Biophysics Title: Ph.D. Country: USA","c_root_id_A":"g2nyqoh","c_root_id_B":"g2np94x","created_at_utc_A":1598248206,"created_at_utc_B":1598241117,"score_A":15,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"I'm with you OP. I'm particularly annoyed at one journal that asked me to review about a week before the pandemic 'hit' and then sent annoying e-mail reminders every 2 weeks until I sent the review (despite me e-mailing them back the first time saying I couldn't review while providing full time childcare and inviting them to find an alternative reviewer if they couldn't wait). I think I'm at the point where I'm going to do my own boycott of journal reviewing. (Up to now I've reviewed around 3 times as many papers as I've published and the majority of journals in my subject have 1, or 2, reviewers so I'm \"up\".) I'll make exceptions for massive breakthroughs or work of students/postdocs who really need it.","human_ref_B":"Exactly, I stopped helping those greedy publishers review papers for a while. Unless the paper title and abstract really interests me, I don't review.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7089.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":123,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiqaavx","c_root_id_B":"fiq7jcg","created_at_utc_A":1582639541,"created_at_utc_B":1582637398,"score_A":72,"score_B":53,"human_ref_A":"This will sound harsh and unpopular, but grow some backbone and stand for your way of life. If this is frowned upon by a place you spend over 8 hours each weekday, you're in the wrong spot and you're supporting a system that undermines something you value a lot. It's difficult to do this, given you might have to provide for a family and run the risk of losing job security, but if the alternative is to live a lie for a third of your life, the choice seems easy to me.","human_ref_B":"This is nuts >I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. This is nuts-er. Why would \"being in an open relationship\" sabotage your tenure bid? Is your spouse on the committee/the dean and they just don't know your relationship is \"open\" yet? Is it an ultrareligious school? Because those are the only 2 reasons I can think of? --- Also, the way to get out in front of blackmail - if you can - is to not be blackmailable. Which is tell the department in an open meeting that \"someone is trying to harm me by threatening to reveal tis fact which I have absolutely no problems with\".","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2143.0,"score_ratio":1.358490566},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":124,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiq8c31","c_root_id_B":"fiqaavx","created_at_utc_A":1582638046,"created_at_utc_B":1582639541,"score_A":27,"score_B":72,"human_ref_A":"Go to the police. Jesus.","human_ref_B":"This will sound harsh and unpopular, but grow some backbone and stand for your way of life. If this is frowned upon by a place you spend over 8 hours each weekday, you're in the wrong spot and you're supporting a system that undermines something you value a lot. It's difficult to do this, given you might have to provide for a family and run the risk of losing job security, but if the alternative is to live a lie for a third of your life, the choice seems easy to me.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1495.0,"score_ratio":2.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":125,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiq83zz","c_root_id_B":"fiqaavx","created_at_utc_A":1582637866,"created_at_utc_B":1582639541,"score_A":20,"score_B":72,"human_ref_A":"Is being in an open relationship against the terms of your contract? Regardless of whether it's right or wrong...if it's in your contract, it's in your contract. All-else considered, the school should protect you from this. You were literally doing your job. However, it sounds like this student comes from a fairly wealthy family...and money talks to universities as we've seen in the media recently. Just in case the school does not take your side...I'd lawyer-up immediately. Also might be time to throw your resume around to some colleagues at other institutions.","human_ref_B":"This will sound harsh and unpopular, but grow some backbone and stand for your way of life. If this is frowned upon by a place you spend over 8 hours each weekday, you're in the wrong spot and you're supporting a system that undermines something you value a lot. It's difficult to do this, given you might have to provide for a family and run the risk of losing job security, but if the alternative is to live a lie for a third of your life, the choice seems easy to me.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1675.0,"score_ratio":3.6},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":126,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiqaznv","c_root_id_B":"fiq8c31","created_at_utc_A":1582640049,"created_at_utc_B":1582638046,"score_A":49,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"I would go to a lawyer first. I'd ask the lawyer if I could file both criminal and civil charges and sue the student into next week. They'll probably say no which is disappointing because I'd want to nail that little shit to the wall. One thing you may find the lawyer actually doing for you is filing a restraining order against the student. I'd also be sure to ask the lawyer when to include the dean and the senior leadership at the school. Adding a threat and attempted blackmail to the disciplinary process might just get the kid expelled. Now I know there are some states where the LGBT status is a non-protected status which is what I'm assuming you're talking about, my brother's boyfriend was fired for being Gay at a school in New Hampshire. So yes there is a risk. If the student is willing to go to all of this trouble there is a real risk of violence, either by them or by someone they paid when things don't go their way. This is not something to take lightly. You need help.","human_ref_B":"Go to the police. Jesus.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2003.0,"score_ratio":1.8148148148},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":127,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiqaznv","c_root_id_B":"fiq83zz","created_at_utc_A":1582640049,"created_at_utc_B":1582637866,"score_A":49,"score_B":20,"human_ref_A":"I would go to a lawyer first. I'd ask the lawyer if I could file both criminal and civil charges and sue the student into next week. They'll probably say no which is disappointing because I'd want to nail that little shit to the wall. One thing you may find the lawyer actually doing for you is filing a restraining order against the student. I'd also be sure to ask the lawyer when to include the dean and the senior leadership at the school. Adding a threat and attempted blackmail to the disciplinary process might just get the kid expelled. Now I know there are some states where the LGBT status is a non-protected status which is what I'm assuming you're talking about, my brother's boyfriend was fired for being Gay at a school in New Hampshire. So yes there is a risk. If the student is willing to go to all of this trouble there is a real risk of violence, either by them or by someone they paid when things don't go their way. This is not something to take lightly. You need help.","human_ref_B":"Is being in an open relationship against the terms of your contract? Regardless of whether it's right or wrong...if it's in your contract, it's in your contract. All-else considered, the school should protect you from this. You were literally doing your job. However, it sounds like this student comes from a fairly wealthy family...and money talks to universities as we've seen in the media recently. Just in case the school does not take your side...I'd lawyer-up immediately. Also might be time to throw your resume around to some colleagues at other institutions.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2183.0,"score_ratio":2.45},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":128,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiqhk3y","c_root_id_B":"fiq8c31","created_at_utc_A":1582644461,"created_at_utc_B":1582638046,"score_A":42,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"No advice beyond that given, but just want to express solidarity. Who are these supposed academics who don't understand that your university doesn't need to fire you - they just need to quietly deny you tenure for a plausible reason, which at your university may be the code of conduct. I don't think there's anything wrong with you for wanting to keep your job, even at the (incredible personal) cost of placating one shithead student who would probably have been acquitted by the system anyway even if he raped or killed someone. I hope you figure this out.","human_ref_B":"Go to the police. Jesus.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6415.0,"score_ratio":1.5555555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":129,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiqbfvu","c_root_id_B":"fiqhk3y","created_at_utc_A":1582640372,"created_at_utc_B":1582644461,"score_A":25,"score_B":42,"human_ref_A":"This is horrible, I feel for you. One thing you need to consider is that you have no proof the student would stop blackmailing you if you stopped the proceedings. Actually they have proven that they're very vengeful and they're ready to cheat and break the law, so it's quite possible they would tell the department about your relationship even if you decided to bow to their demands. Anyway it would probably look suspicious to your department if you suddenly decided to change your mind about the student after you provided evidence of their plagiarism. Now what can the student do? If the student goes to the department with the evidence they got from the PI, they'll look exactly like what they are, a cheater who tried to blackmail a professor for doing something that's not against the law. If I were in your department, I'd be pretty disgusted at someone who would invade a professor's privacy like that. Defending the student would mean admitting that blackmailing staff is ok. This is not the image the University wants to have. You, on the other hand, did your job like you were supposed to. Now, one way or another, you're in an unfortunate situation where it's likely that your department will learn about your relationship. You need to mitigate damage. I don't know your department, and it's easy for me to talk as I'm not the one to suffer the consequences, but it seems that the best way to do this would not be to fall to blackmail. If you trust your colleagues to have a bit of decency, you'll have a better outcome telling the student to f... off and coming clear if you need to.","human_ref_B":"No advice beyond that given, but just want to express solidarity. Who are these supposed academics who don't understand that your university doesn't need to fire you - they just need to quietly deny you tenure for a plausible reason, which at your university may be the code of conduct. I don't think there's anything wrong with you for wanting to keep your job, even at the (incredible personal) cost of placating one shithead student who would probably have been acquitted by the system anyway even if he raped or killed someone. I hope you figure this out.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4089.0,"score_ratio":1.68},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":130,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiqhk3y","c_root_id_B":"fiq83zz","created_at_utc_A":1582644461,"created_at_utc_B":1582637866,"score_A":42,"score_B":20,"human_ref_A":"No advice beyond that given, but just want to express solidarity. Who are these supposed academics who don't understand that your university doesn't need to fire you - they just need to quietly deny you tenure for a plausible reason, which at your university may be the code of conduct. I don't think there's anything wrong with you for wanting to keep your job, even at the (incredible personal) cost of placating one shithead student who would probably have been acquitted by the system anyway even if he raped or killed someone. I hope you figure this out.","human_ref_B":"Is being in an open relationship against the terms of your contract? Regardless of whether it's right or wrong...if it's in your contract, it's in your contract. All-else considered, the school should protect you from this. You were literally doing your job. However, it sounds like this student comes from a fairly wealthy family...and money talks to universities as we've seen in the media recently. Just in case the school does not take your side...I'd lawyer-up immediately. Also might be time to throw your resume around to some colleagues at other institutions.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6595.0,"score_ratio":2.1},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":131,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiq83zz","c_root_id_B":"fiq8c31","created_at_utc_A":1582637866,"created_at_utc_B":1582638046,"score_A":20,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"Is being in an open relationship against the terms of your contract? Regardless of whether it's right or wrong...if it's in your contract, it's in your contract. All-else considered, the school should protect you from this. You were literally doing your job. However, it sounds like this student comes from a fairly wealthy family...and money talks to universities as we've seen in the media recently. Just in case the school does not take your side...I'd lawyer-up immediately. Also might be time to throw your resume around to some colleagues at other institutions.","human_ref_B":"Go to the police. Jesus.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":180.0,"score_ratio":1.35},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":132,"row":{"post_id":"f9a58a","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"I flunked someone for plagiarism. I just discovered they hired a PI to investigate me. Does anyone have experience with this? I’m in a tenure track position in the social sciences at a school in the Midwest. Last semester, I flunked a student for plagiarizing part of a paper (it was a clear case of copy and paste from an obscure source). The student did not take it well. Things are winding their way through the administrative process. It has come to my attention that this disgruntled student has apparently hired a private investigator to follow me and look into my life. I feel extremely violated. However, it has unfortunately also come to my attention that this PI has learned that I am in an open relationship. I suspect this would not be well received by my department and would likely jeopardize my ability to get tenure. It has been strongly implied that details of my personal relationship will be leaked to the department unless I stop pursuing internal discipline against the student. However, it’s not clear to me that I could stop the proceedings even if I wanted to. What exactly am I supposed to do in this situation?","c_root_id_A":"fiq83zz","c_root_id_B":"fiqbfvu","created_at_utc_A":1582637866,"created_at_utc_B":1582640372,"score_A":20,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"Is being in an open relationship against the terms of your contract? Regardless of whether it's right or wrong...if it's in your contract, it's in your contract. All-else considered, the school should protect you from this. You were literally doing your job. However, it sounds like this student comes from a fairly wealthy family...and money talks to universities as we've seen in the media recently. Just in case the school does not take your side...I'd lawyer-up immediately. Also might be time to throw your resume around to some colleagues at other institutions.","human_ref_B":"This is horrible, I feel for you. One thing you need to consider is that you have no proof the student would stop blackmailing you if you stopped the proceedings. Actually they have proven that they're very vengeful and they're ready to cheat and break the law, so it's quite possible they would tell the department about your relationship even if you decided to bow to their demands. Anyway it would probably look suspicious to your department if you suddenly decided to change your mind about the student after you provided evidence of their plagiarism. Now what can the student do? If the student goes to the department with the evidence they got from the PI, they'll look exactly like what they are, a cheater who tried to blackmail a professor for doing something that's not against the law. If I were in your department, I'd be pretty disgusted at someone who would invade a professor's privacy like that. Defending the student would mean admitting that blackmailing staff is ok. This is not the image the University wants to have. You, on the other hand, did your job like you were supposed to. Now, one way or another, you're in an unfortunate situation where it's likely that your department will learn about your relationship. You need to mitigate damage. I don't know your department, and it's easy for me to talk as I'm not the one to suffer the consequences, but it seems that the best way to do this would not be to fall to blackmail. If you trust your colleagues to have a bit of decency, you'll have a better outcome telling the student to f... off and coming clear if you need to.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2506.0,"score_ratio":1.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":133,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusooc4","c_root_id_B":"fusory0","created_at_utc_A":1592139256,"created_at_utc_B":1592139332,"score_A":47,"score_B":180,"human_ref_A":"I have nothing other to say than: Yes, I know that feeling.","human_ref_B":"I never thought about it but now that you mentioned it... Yess!!! Its kind of like when you read a review paper and they cite many other original research papers, and you wanna get through all of them but you dont have the time to do so. When you do attempt to get through them, you find yourself going down a rabbit hole. One paper leads to 10 other papers and each of the 10 papers lead you to another 10 papers... IT NEVER ENDS!! Then the timer goes off, you gotta run back to the lab to change whatever solution you've got your tissue incubating in. And those papers that you've found will be left as tabs on your browser, never looked at again (but never closed too). Until one day, your computer freezes up and you gotta force shutdown your computer.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":76.0,"score_ratio":3.829787234},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":134,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusooc4","c_root_id_B":"fusrvi3","created_at_utc_A":1592139256,"created_at_utc_B":1592141586,"score_A":47,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"I have nothing other to say than: Yes, I know that feeling.","human_ref_B":"I had this feeling when I was in grad school. Now, it's more that I'll never have time in this life to create all the things I want to: books, games, etc., that will never see the light of day. OTOH, that means I'll never be bored. I'll never run out of things to learn, do, and try. I try to keep my focus on that side.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2330.0,"score_ratio":1.0212765957},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":135,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuspmt6","c_root_id_B":"fusrvi3","created_at_utc_A":1592139975,"created_at_utc_B":1592141586,"score_A":29,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"definitely i get fascinated by so many things that i have no idea how to focus on just one thing and it's frustrating","human_ref_B":"I had this feeling when I was in grad school. Now, it's more that I'll never have time in this life to create all the things I want to: books, games, etc., that will never see the light of day. OTOH, that means I'll never be bored. I'll never run out of things to learn, do, and try. I try to keep my focus on that side.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1611.0,"score_ratio":1.6551724138},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":136,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusr6w0","c_root_id_B":"fusrvi3","created_at_utc_A":1592141110,"created_at_utc_B":1592141586,"score_A":10,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"I'm more sad that I can't have chips every day without getting spherical.","human_ref_B":"I had this feeling when I was in grad school. Now, it's more that I'll never have time in this life to create all the things I want to: books, games, etc., that will never see the light of day. OTOH, that means I'll never be bored. I'll never run out of things to learn, do, and try. I try to keep my focus on that side.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":476.0,"score_ratio":4.8},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":137,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusq3qd","c_root_id_B":"fusrvi3","created_at_utc_A":1592140328,"created_at_utc_B":1592141586,"score_A":8,"score_B":48,"human_ref_A":"I used to feel that way until corona hit and I had to scrub my research project. Three months into quarantine and I’m still sitting here trying to work up the will power to get better at coding.","human_ref_B":"I had this feeling when I was in grad school. Now, it's more that I'll never have time in this life to create all the things I want to: books, games, etc., that will never see the light of day. OTOH, that means I'll never be bored. I'll never run out of things to learn, do, and try. I try to keep my focus on that side.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1258.0,"score_ratio":6.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":138,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuspmt6","c_root_id_B":"fustnz5","created_at_utc_A":1592139975,"created_at_utc_B":1592142842,"score_A":29,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"definitely i get fascinated by so many things that i have no idea how to focus on just one thing and it's frustrating","human_ref_B":"Chaucer had the same feeling: “The lyf so short the craft so longe to lerne.“ one of the quotes I most strongly identify with","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2867.0,"score_ratio":1.4137931034},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":139,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusr6w0","c_root_id_B":"fustnz5","created_at_utc_A":1592141110,"created_at_utc_B":1592142842,"score_A":10,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"I'm more sad that I can't have chips every day without getting spherical.","human_ref_B":"Chaucer had the same feeling: “The lyf so short the craft so longe to lerne.“ one of the quotes I most strongly identify with","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1732.0,"score_ratio":4.1},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":140,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fustnz5","c_root_id_B":"fusq3qd","created_at_utc_A":1592142842,"created_at_utc_B":1592140328,"score_A":41,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Chaucer had the same feeling: “The lyf so short the craft so longe to lerne.“ one of the quotes I most strongly identify with","human_ref_B":"I used to feel that way until corona hit and I had to scrub my research project. Three months into quarantine and I’m still sitting here trying to work up the will power to get better at coding.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2514.0,"score_ratio":5.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":141,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusr6w0","c_root_id_B":"fusu3ft","created_at_utc_A":1592141110,"created_at_utc_B":1592143128,"score_A":10,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"I'm more sad that I can't have chips every day without getting spherical.","human_ref_B":"All the time. If I believed in an afterlife, I’d want it to basically be infinite time in the library.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2018.0,"score_ratio":2.7},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":142,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusq3qd","c_root_id_B":"fusu3ft","created_at_utc_A":1592140328,"created_at_utc_B":1592143128,"score_A":8,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"I used to feel that way until corona hit and I had to scrub my research project. Three months into quarantine and I’m still sitting here trying to work up the will power to get better at coding.","human_ref_B":"All the time. If I believed in an afterlife, I’d want it to basically be infinite time in the library.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2800.0,"score_ratio":3.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":143,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusya26","c_root_id_B":"fusr6w0","created_at_utc_A":1592145783,"created_at_utc_B":1592141110,"score_A":16,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Yes, but add on top of that being an artist, writer, and pianist. I feel like I'll just die a mediocre jack of all trades... I'm envious of people dedicated to being amazing with one thing, whether an artisan or just the most knowledgeable in one area.","human_ref_B":"I'm more sad that I can't have chips every day without getting spherical.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4673.0,"score_ratio":1.6},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":144,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusya26","c_root_id_B":"fusq3qd","created_at_utc_A":1592145783,"created_at_utc_B":1592140328,"score_A":16,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Yes, but add on top of that being an artist, writer, and pianist. I feel like I'll just die a mediocre jack of all trades... I'm envious of people dedicated to being amazing with one thing, whether an artisan or just the most knowledgeable in one area.","human_ref_B":"I used to feel that way until corona hit and I had to scrub my research project. Three months into quarantine and I’m still sitting here trying to work up the will power to get better at coding.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5455.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":145,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusya26","c_root_id_B":"fuswxrq","created_at_utc_A":1592145783,"created_at_utc_B":1592144960,"score_A":16,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Yes, but add on top of that being an artist, writer, and pianist. I feel like I'll just die a mediocre jack of all trades... I'm envious of people dedicated to being amazing with one thing, whether an artisan or just the most knowledgeable in one area.","human_ref_B":"I do!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":823.0,"score_ratio":8.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":146,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusq3qd","c_root_id_B":"fusr6w0","created_at_utc_A":1592140328,"created_at_utc_B":1592141110,"score_A":8,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"I used to feel that way until corona hit and I had to scrub my research project. Three months into quarantine and I’m still sitting here trying to work up the will power to get better at coding.","human_ref_B":"I'm more sad that I can't have chips every day without getting spherical.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":782.0,"score_ratio":1.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":147,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fusq3qd","c_root_id_B":"futa95p","created_at_utc_A":1592140328,"created_at_utc_B":1592152632,"score_A":8,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I used to feel that way until corona hit and I had to scrub my research project. Three months into quarantine and I’m still sitting here trying to work up the will power to get better at coding.","human_ref_B":"No. As soon as you realise the depth of our lack of understanding of the details of everything, it is immediately apparent you will never be an expert in everything. There are people who spend life times mastering individual skills and areas of study. The days of being able to know everything about everything that was known died out - literally - thousands of years ago. So, you can sit and feel sad about it, or you can accept it and get on with doing what you can do. And - if you want a productive career in academia - that means you also need to give yourself peace and time to develop new knowledge and learn. There are tens of thousands of scientists working in related fields to all of us. Either we can spend our lives reading every minuscule byte of related information, or we can get ourselves to a working knowledge of a niche and try and contribute. I'm totally accepting and content with the idea that I will never be able to read lots of interesting things. Because the trade off is that I get to do lots of interesting and new things. The idea that you might get sad at not being able to read all the things feels a bit too close to the mentality of wanting to passively learn rather than actively do research (i.e. the step change between undergrad and grad education). Because you could always be reading someone else's work rather than doing your own.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12304.0,"score_ratio":1.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":148,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuswxrq","c_root_id_B":"futa95p","created_at_utc_A":1592144960,"created_at_utc_B":1592152632,"score_A":2,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I do!","human_ref_B":"No. As soon as you realise the depth of our lack of understanding of the details of everything, it is immediately apparent you will never be an expert in everything. There are people who spend life times mastering individual skills and areas of study. The days of being able to know everything about everything that was known died out - literally - thousands of years ago. So, you can sit and feel sad about it, or you can accept it and get on with doing what you can do. And - if you want a productive career in academia - that means you also need to give yourself peace and time to develop new knowledge and learn. There are tens of thousands of scientists working in related fields to all of us. Either we can spend our lives reading every minuscule byte of related information, or we can get ourselves to a working knowledge of a niche and try and contribute. I'm totally accepting and content with the idea that I will never be able to read lots of interesting things. Because the trade off is that I get to do lots of interesting and new things. The idea that you might get sad at not being able to read all the things feels a bit too close to the mentality of wanting to passively learn rather than actively do research (i.e. the step change between undergrad and grad education). Because you could always be reading someone else's work rather than doing your own.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7672.0,"score_ratio":4.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":149,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fut2d90","c_root_id_B":"futa95p","created_at_utc_A":1592148196,"created_at_utc_B":1592152632,"score_A":2,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"Yes. I think about this a lot. I just try my best to learn as much as I can in the moment.","human_ref_B":"No. As soon as you realise the depth of our lack of understanding of the details of everything, it is immediately apparent you will never be an expert in everything. There are people who spend life times mastering individual skills and areas of study. The days of being able to know everything about everything that was known died out - literally - thousands of years ago. So, you can sit and feel sad about it, or you can accept it and get on with doing what you can do. And - if you want a productive career in academia - that means you also need to give yourself peace and time to develop new knowledge and learn. There are tens of thousands of scientists working in related fields to all of us. Either we can spend our lives reading every minuscule byte of related information, or we can get ourselves to a working knowledge of a niche and try and contribute. I'm totally accepting and content with the idea that I will never be able to read lots of interesting things. Because the trade off is that I get to do lots of interesting and new things. The idea that you might get sad at not being able to read all the things feels a bit too close to the mentality of wanting to passively learn rather than actively do research (i.e. the step change between undergrad and grad education). Because you could always be reading someone else's work rather than doing your own.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4436.0,"score_ratio":4.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":150,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuu3b9x","c_root_id_B":"futabf5","created_at_utc_A":1592168581,"created_at_utc_B":1592152666,"score_A":5,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I had such good intentions when I started my PhD that I was going to finally fully understand statistics. Now I’m at the data analysis stage and I’ve just got to do the stuff without fully understanding how the maths behind it works.","human_ref_B":"You can only do what you can do. As philosophers and songwriters have observed, no one gets out alive. There is no official checklist to complete for the academic career roleplaying game. Despite all the cliches, life really is a journey and not a destination. Whatever you choose to focus on, make it count. On that journey wherever it takes you, try to make every one else's journey a little better.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15915.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":151,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuu3b9x","c_root_id_B":"fuswxrq","created_at_utc_A":1592168581,"created_at_utc_B":1592144960,"score_A":5,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"I had such good intentions when I started my PhD that I was going to finally fully understand statistics. Now I’m at the data analysis stage and I’ve just got to do the stuff without fully understanding how the maths behind it works.","human_ref_B":"I do!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":23621.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":152,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fut2d90","c_root_id_B":"fuu3b9x","created_at_utc_A":1592148196,"created_at_utc_B":1592168581,"score_A":2,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Yes. I think about this a lot. I just try my best to learn as much as I can in the moment.","human_ref_B":"I had such good intentions when I started my PhD that I was going to finally fully understand statistics. Now I’m at the data analysis stage and I’ve just got to do the stuff without fully understanding how the maths behind it works.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":20385.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":153,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"futksdc","c_root_id_B":"fuu3b9x","created_at_utc_A":1592158373,"created_at_utc_B":1592168581,"score_A":2,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Me every single day. I feel stupid all the time. In my field. But i know I’m not that stupid maybe (?)","human_ref_B":"I had such good intentions when I started my PhD that I was going to finally fully understand statistics. Now I’m at the data analysis stage and I’ve just got to do the stuff without fully understanding how the maths behind it works.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":10208.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":154,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuu2ay0","c_root_id_B":"fuu3b9x","created_at_utc_A":1592168026,"created_at_utc_B":1592168581,"score_A":2,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"I feel a lot of anxiety related to this. I also get very anxious about the need to circumscribe whatever it is I'm writing to a reasonable, cogent \"message\" – I keep seeing holes in everything I write and wanting to fix them. I mean, some of those gaps must be dealt with, but you also just have to say enough at times and leave things for the next paper/dissertation/presentation.","human_ref_B":"I had such good intentions when I started my PhD that I was going to finally fully understand statistics. Now I’m at the data analysis stage and I’ve just got to do the stuff without fully understanding how the maths behind it works.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":555.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":155,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"futabf5","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592152666,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"You can only do what you can do. As philosophers and songwriters have observed, no one gets out alive. There is no official checklist to complete for the academic career roleplaying game. Despite all the cliches, life really is a journey and not a destination. Whatever you choose to focus on, make it count. On that journey wherever it takes you, try to make every one else's journey a little better.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":35619.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":156,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"fuswxrq","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592144960,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"I do!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":43325.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":157,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"fut2d90","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592148196,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"Yes. I think about this a lot. I just try my best to learn as much as I can in the moment.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":40089.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":158,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"futksdc","c_root_id_B":"fuv1t20","created_at_utc_A":1592158373,"created_at_utc_B":1592188285,"score_A":2,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Me every single day. I feel stupid all the time. In my field. But i know I’m not that stupid maybe (?)","human_ref_B":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":29912.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":159,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"fuu2ay0","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592168026,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"I feel a lot of anxiety related to this. I also get very anxious about the need to circumscribe whatever it is I'm writing to a reasonable, cogent \"message\" – I keep seeing holes in everything I write and wanting to fix them. I mean, some of those gaps must be dealt with, but you also just have to say enough at times and leave things for the next paper/dissertation/presentation.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":20259.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":160,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"fuueeou","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592174632,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"This is sometimes why I watch Groundhog Day on repeat. Imagine getting to do each day over and over again before we get it right? And what can’t we do that? Haha... besides the whole time dilation thing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":13653.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":161,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"fuum5tc","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592178981,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"Yep, this is pretty much how I feel all the time. No matter how much I learn, there will always be so much I will never be able to learn if only because the limits of life expectancy. But I'll be damned if I don't try to fit in as much as I can in the mean time!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9304.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":162,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"fuusmeo","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592182746,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"RELATABLE. struggling with the same this at this point i my life","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5539.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":163,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"fuv1t20","c_root_id_B":"fuut7oo","created_at_utc_A":1592188285,"created_at_utc_B":1592183088,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"What's even stranger, is learning your professors, who are at the top of their field and extremely knowledgeable, are subject to the same lack of knowledge, because they simply forget. The reason why they keep telling us to read their articles, is because they wrote it down so they wouldn't have to remember. If they've since moved on in subject matter, they may not remember much of what they wrote. This is as true for us as it is for them. So with that understood, I've come to terms that the project of the the graduate thesis (and by extension academia), is the fine art of IDENTIFYING and WRITING only that which you are able to know. You can't know everything, so writing around what you know and don't know becomes the skill. Sorta like when I told my gf when she started a new job at a maddeningly byzantine organization: sometimes the meta-job IS the job.","human_ref_B":"I'm only 23, I don't believe it yet","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5197.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":164,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"futabf5","c_root_id_B":"fuswxrq","created_at_utc_A":1592152666,"created_at_utc_B":1592144960,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"You can only do what you can do. As philosophers and songwriters have observed, no one gets out alive. There is no official checklist to complete for the academic career roleplaying game. Despite all the cliches, life really is a journey and not a destination. Whatever you choose to focus on, make it count. On that journey wherever it takes you, try to make every one else's journey a little better.","human_ref_B":"I do!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7706.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":165,"row":{"post_id":"h8t4fk","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Do you also happen to get sad because you simply will never have enough time to get the knowledge you want to? I was wondering if other people also get kind of sad because it is simply impossible to have enough time to learn everything you actually wanted to learn by a certain age/stage in life. Like idk, completing that list of books with important authors in your field which gets longer and longer while keeping up with the recent findings in your field. Or learning that additional programming language or further practicing the one your familiar with. Or learning one more additional language. And all of that on top of the workload you already have. Sometimes that makes me really sad because there are just so many things I am interested in and curious about but the more I study the things the longer the list of things I want to learn more about gets. Idk if you can relate but I just wanted to share this and I would be really interested to see what you think about this!","c_root_id_A":"futabf5","c_root_id_B":"fut2d90","created_at_utc_A":1592152666,"created_at_utc_B":1592148196,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"You can only do what you can do. As philosophers and songwriters have observed, no one gets out alive. There is no official checklist to complete for the academic career roleplaying game. Despite all the cliches, life really is a journey and not a destination. Whatever you choose to focus on, make it count. On that journey wherever it takes you, try to make every one else's journey a little better.","human_ref_B":"Yes. I think about this a lot. I just try my best to learn as much as I can in the moment.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4470.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":166,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1rr1w","c_root_id_B":"gm1mefh","created_at_utc_A":1612479840,"created_at_utc_B":1612477471,"score_A":332,"score_B":183,"human_ref_A":"Sorry to hear this. As someone who nope-d out of academia pretty much after defending, I have mixed feelings about this, but they're mostly positive. There's a part of me that wishes that academia was what I dreamt it was, and a part of me that wishes I had succeeded, despite it being not what I had hoped. But I don't regret anything. I went to grad school because I loved science - not for the money (lol), or the prestige, but because I loved it as a way of acquiring knowledge and learning about the world. That's still true today, and it will probably be true my whole life. For me, that realization helped me overcome what I think a lot of people fear when they think about leaving academia: \"Will I ever be able to love something as much as this?\" And just like the ending of a bad relationship, despite my feelings to the contrary at the time, the answer is yes. But more importantly, it doesn't matter even if the answer is \"no\", because from what you describe, it doesn't matter how much you love academia, academia does not love you back.","human_ref_B":"It doesn't even pay in prestige tbh. It's not like socially people give a shit whether you have a PhD or not. > Why did I do this to myself? It may have been a hard outcome to predict ex ante, or your risk management abilities may be lacking, or somewhere in between. There's no point now in punishing yourself for a decision you made years ago. tbh after 2 postdocs and 10 papers in mid-tier journals, I'd start looking at Plan B. At a certain point you should move on.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2369.0,"score_ratio":1.8142076503},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":167,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1owlw","c_root_id_B":"gm1rr1w","created_at_utc_A":1612478569,"created_at_utc_B":1612479840,"score_A":160,"score_B":332,"human_ref_A":"I can relate. I found a decent position, but I've always kept my eye an the market and applied to the more \"dream\" schools since I've graduated. I only had one finalist interview at a \"fancy\" school. As usual, someone better connected than me with more pubs got the position. It's really rough out there. I can really relate to what your saying. My PhD experience was traumatic, and my advisor committed suicide when I was writing. I was almost booted from my program because the other major professor didn't like my topic. I was able to graduate super fast, but I think maybe only recently can I honestly say that it was worth getting the degree. Once of the things that I've had to do is branch out a bit into other areas of interest, and be flexible with the work that I do. Don't box yourself in to the tenure track only dream that gets sold to us. It's just not possible for most of us. Focus instead on what you can do creatively, and how you can make a living at the same time.","human_ref_B":"Sorry to hear this. As someone who nope-d out of academia pretty much after defending, I have mixed feelings about this, but they're mostly positive. There's a part of me that wishes that academia was what I dreamt it was, and a part of me that wishes I had succeeded, despite it being not what I had hoped. But I don't regret anything. I went to grad school because I loved science - not for the money (lol), or the prestige, but because I loved it as a way of acquiring knowledge and learning about the world. That's still true today, and it will probably be true my whole life. For me, that realization helped me overcome what I think a lot of people fear when they think about leaving academia: \"Will I ever be able to love something as much as this?\" And just like the ending of a bad relationship, despite my feelings to the contrary at the time, the answer is yes. But more importantly, it doesn't matter even if the answer is \"no\", because from what you describe, it doesn't matter how much you love academia, academia does not love you back.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1271.0,"score_ratio":2.075},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":168,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1rr1w","c_root_id_B":"gm1nitv","created_at_utc_A":1612479840,"created_at_utc_B":1612477961,"score_A":332,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"Sorry to hear this. As someone who nope-d out of academia pretty much after defending, I have mixed feelings about this, but they're mostly positive. There's a part of me that wishes that academia was what I dreamt it was, and a part of me that wishes I had succeeded, despite it being not what I had hoped. But I don't regret anything. I went to grad school because I loved science - not for the money (lol), or the prestige, but because I loved it as a way of acquiring knowledge and learning about the world. That's still true today, and it will probably be true my whole life. For me, that realization helped me overcome what I think a lot of people fear when they think about leaving academia: \"Will I ever be able to love something as much as this?\" And just like the ending of a bad relationship, despite my feelings to the contrary at the time, the answer is yes. But more importantly, it doesn't matter even if the answer is \"no\", because from what you describe, it doesn't matter how much you love academia, academia does not love you back.","human_ref_B":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1879.0,"score_ratio":15.8095238095},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":169,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1rr1w","c_root_id_B":"gm1r4t5","created_at_utc_A":1612479840,"created_at_utc_B":1612479561,"score_A":332,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"Sorry to hear this. As someone who nope-d out of academia pretty much after defending, I have mixed feelings about this, but they're mostly positive. There's a part of me that wishes that academia was what I dreamt it was, and a part of me that wishes I had succeeded, despite it being not what I had hoped. But I don't regret anything. I went to grad school because I loved science - not for the money (lol), or the prestige, but because I loved it as a way of acquiring knowledge and learning about the world. That's still true today, and it will probably be true my whole life. For me, that realization helped me overcome what I think a lot of people fear when they think about leaving academia: \"Will I ever be able to love something as much as this?\" And just like the ending of a bad relationship, despite my feelings to the contrary at the time, the answer is yes. But more importantly, it doesn't matter even if the answer is \"no\", because from what you describe, it doesn't matter how much you love academia, academia does not love you back.","human_ref_B":"I do. I did have some good things happen but I am quite disappointed. It's not you, it's the system. You have to be at the right place on the right time. If you feel like staying in academia, take the admin route. Working in admin is more secure, gets you on track and later on you can move to the research side. Thee is no point in trying to get a goodjob in academia, the generations before us have occupied those positions and won't let go their good salary and pension.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":279.0,"score_ratio":15.8095238095},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":170,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1owlw","c_root_id_B":"gm1nitv","created_at_utc_A":1612478569,"created_at_utc_B":1612477961,"score_A":160,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"I can relate. I found a decent position, but I've always kept my eye an the market and applied to the more \"dream\" schools since I've graduated. I only had one finalist interview at a \"fancy\" school. As usual, someone better connected than me with more pubs got the position. It's really rough out there. I can really relate to what your saying. My PhD experience was traumatic, and my advisor committed suicide when I was writing. I was almost booted from my program because the other major professor didn't like my topic. I was able to graduate super fast, but I think maybe only recently can I honestly say that it was worth getting the degree. Once of the things that I've had to do is branch out a bit into other areas of interest, and be flexible with the work that I do. Don't box yourself in to the tenure track only dream that gets sold to us. It's just not possible for most of us. Focus instead on what you can do creatively, and how you can make a living at the same time.","human_ref_B":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":608.0,"score_ratio":7.619047619},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":171,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1tdil","c_root_id_B":"gm1yyts","created_at_utc_A":1612480577,"created_at_utc_B":1612483159,"score_A":36,"score_B":82,"human_ref_A":"This question is for OP and anybody who has completed a PhD program. What did/does your program do in regards to helping with job placement, making connections, etc.? I'm asking because several of the programs I'm looking at boast about high job placement, particularly in academia, post-PhD program. ... If it matters I have my MBA, and I'm looking at PhD in Business programs.","human_ref_B":"1. Go apply for industry jobs 2. Get an entry level job 3. Be happy when you see your first pay check that's double the money for less work","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2582.0,"score_ratio":2.2777777778},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":172,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1yyts","c_root_id_B":"gm1nitv","created_at_utc_A":1612483159,"created_at_utc_B":1612477961,"score_A":82,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"1. Go apply for industry jobs 2. Get an entry level job 3. Be happy when you see your first pay check that's double the money for less work","human_ref_B":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5198.0,"score_ratio":3.9047619048},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":173,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1r4t5","c_root_id_B":"gm1yyts","created_at_utc_A":1612479561,"created_at_utc_B":1612483159,"score_A":21,"score_B":82,"human_ref_A":"I do. I did have some good things happen but I am quite disappointed. It's not you, it's the system. You have to be at the right place on the right time. If you feel like staying in academia, take the admin route. Working in admin is more secure, gets you on track and later on you can move to the research side. Thee is no point in trying to get a goodjob in academia, the generations before us have occupied those positions and won't let go their good salary and pension.","human_ref_B":"1. Go apply for industry jobs 2. Get an entry level job 3. Be happy when you see your first pay check that's double the money for less work","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3598.0,"score_ratio":3.9047619048},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":174,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1xpid","c_root_id_B":"gm1yyts","created_at_utc_A":1612482576,"created_at_utc_B":1612483159,"score_A":14,"score_B":82,"human_ref_A":"Surely you must have some teaching or research skills of some sort? Or did you go down the path in such a way as to avoid teaching at all costs? I know some who did this - one coworker in particular treated his TA work like a joke and his students rated him with 1's and 2's on RateMyProfessor. Regardless, setting aside community college, there's also high school. I know that many people sneer at it, but personally I hate the attitude that \"Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.\" We've all had good teachers and terrible ones. Being one is the good ones is an accomplishment, whatever the level. But of course, a degree isn't just about teaching, and usually trains many skills. Perhaps you learned some coding or technical writing? It may just be that you're looking at the wrong jobs, or that your expectations are too high. Technical writing ability is valued in research and business alike. Coding and numerical skills, whether in python or excel or something else, can also be valuable. I'm sure you have some skills you can market. You may just have to go about it in a different way. Finally, it's also tough out there right now. The economy is sagging, partly due to covid. People are struggling. Don't go to hard on yourself.","human_ref_B":"1. Go apply for industry jobs 2. Get an entry level job 3. Be happy when you see your first pay check that's double the money for less work","labels":0,"seconds_difference":583.0,"score_ratio":5.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":175,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1tdil","c_root_id_B":"gm226d0","created_at_utc_A":1612480577,"created_at_utc_B":1612484670,"score_A":36,"score_B":58,"human_ref_A":"This question is for OP and anybody who has completed a PhD program. What did/does your program do in regards to helping with job placement, making connections, etc.? I'm asking because several of the programs I'm looking at boast about high job placement, particularly in academia, post-PhD program. ... If it matters I have my MBA, and I'm looking at PhD in Business programs.","human_ref_B":"OP, please in no way take this as me being condescending in anyway. I just want to pass on what I have learned by *just* squeeking by into a TT position. 10 papers (unless they are all first author papers) is not enough to get into a TT position these days. I want to be clear that I think that paper count is an absolutely stupid metric to put the majority of a hiring decision on. If we're all being honest, number of papers is almost entirely correlated with how well funded and connected your group is, which of course you as an individual have very little control over. I fully acknowledge that I was extremely fortunate to be in a high output group and I know this is primarily the reason I have gotten this position. I just feel it's better to shoot you straight now and get an honest take. With all this said, I still fantasize about industry positions with their higher salary and normal work hours, so the grass is always greener. Edit: my context is through Chemistry. So apply the appropriate amount of salt","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4093.0,"score_ratio":1.6111111111},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":176,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm226d0","c_root_id_B":"gm21r6d","created_at_utc_A":1612484670,"created_at_utc_B":1612484473,"score_A":58,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"OP, please in no way take this as me being condescending in anyway. I just want to pass on what I have learned by *just* squeeking by into a TT position. 10 papers (unless they are all first author papers) is not enough to get into a TT position these days. I want to be clear that I think that paper count is an absolutely stupid metric to put the majority of a hiring decision on. If we're all being honest, number of papers is almost entirely correlated with how well funded and connected your group is, which of course you as an individual have very little control over. I fully acknowledge that I was extremely fortunate to be in a high output group and I know this is primarily the reason I have gotten this position. I just feel it's better to shoot you straight now and get an honest take. With all this said, I still fantasize about industry positions with their higher salary and normal work hours, so the grass is always greener. Edit: my context is through Chemistry. So apply the appropriate amount of salt","human_ref_B":"If you want money, academia is the wrong place. You'll have much more financial success going corporate, but less freedom on what you want to do. It's hard, but you've just gotta weigh up on what you want more and if you want seriously higher pay that corporate is the way to go","labels":1,"seconds_difference":197.0,"score_ratio":2.2307692308},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":177,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm226d0","c_root_id_B":"gm1nitv","created_at_utc_A":1612484670,"created_at_utc_B":1612477961,"score_A":58,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"OP, please in no way take this as me being condescending in anyway. I just want to pass on what I have learned by *just* squeeking by into a TT position. 10 papers (unless they are all first author papers) is not enough to get into a TT position these days. I want to be clear that I think that paper count is an absolutely stupid metric to put the majority of a hiring decision on. If we're all being honest, number of papers is almost entirely correlated with how well funded and connected your group is, which of course you as an individual have very little control over. I fully acknowledge that I was extremely fortunate to be in a high output group and I know this is primarily the reason I have gotten this position. I just feel it's better to shoot you straight now and get an honest take. With all this said, I still fantasize about industry positions with their higher salary and normal work hours, so the grass is always greener. Edit: my context is through Chemistry. So apply the appropriate amount of salt","human_ref_B":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6709.0,"score_ratio":2.7619047619},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":178,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm226d0","c_root_id_B":"gm1r4t5","created_at_utc_A":1612484670,"created_at_utc_B":1612479561,"score_A":58,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"OP, please in no way take this as me being condescending in anyway. I just want to pass on what I have learned by *just* squeeking by into a TT position. 10 papers (unless they are all first author papers) is not enough to get into a TT position these days. I want to be clear that I think that paper count is an absolutely stupid metric to put the majority of a hiring decision on. If we're all being honest, number of papers is almost entirely correlated with how well funded and connected your group is, which of course you as an individual have very little control over. I fully acknowledge that I was extremely fortunate to be in a high output group and I know this is primarily the reason I have gotten this position. I just feel it's better to shoot you straight now and get an honest take. With all this said, I still fantasize about industry positions with their higher salary and normal work hours, so the grass is always greener. Edit: my context is through Chemistry. So apply the appropriate amount of salt","human_ref_B":"I do. I did have some good things happen but I am quite disappointed. It's not you, it's the system. You have to be at the right place on the right time. If you feel like staying in academia, take the admin route. Working in admin is more secure, gets you on track and later on you can move to the research side. Thee is no point in trying to get a goodjob in academia, the generations before us have occupied those positions and won't let go their good salary and pension.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5109.0,"score_ratio":2.7619047619},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":179,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1xpid","c_root_id_B":"gm226d0","created_at_utc_A":1612482576,"created_at_utc_B":1612484670,"score_A":14,"score_B":58,"human_ref_A":"Surely you must have some teaching or research skills of some sort? Or did you go down the path in such a way as to avoid teaching at all costs? I know some who did this - one coworker in particular treated his TA work like a joke and his students rated him with 1's and 2's on RateMyProfessor. Regardless, setting aside community college, there's also high school. I know that many people sneer at it, but personally I hate the attitude that \"Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.\" We've all had good teachers and terrible ones. Being one is the good ones is an accomplishment, whatever the level. But of course, a degree isn't just about teaching, and usually trains many skills. Perhaps you learned some coding or technical writing? It may just be that you're looking at the wrong jobs, or that your expectations are too high. Technical writing ability is valued in research and business alike. Coding and numerical skills, whether in python or excel or something else, can also be valuable. I'm sure you have some skills you can market. You may just have to go about it in a different way. Finally, it's also tough out there right now. The economy is sagging, partly due to covid. People are struggling. Don't go to hard on yourself.","human_ref_B":"OP, please in no way take this as me being condescending in anyway. I just want to pass on what I have learned by *just* squeeking by into a TT position. 10 papers (unless they are all first author papers) is not enough to get into a TT position these days. I want to be clear that I think that paper count is an absolutely stupid metric to put the majority of a hiring decision on. If we're all being honest, number of papers is almost entirely correlated with how well funded and connected your group is, which of course you as an individual have very little control over. I fully acknowledge that I was extremely fortunate to be in a high output group and I know this is primarily the reason I have gotten this position. I just feel it's better to shoot you straight now and get an honest take. With all this said, I still fantasize about industry positions with their higher salary and normal work hours, so the grass is always greener. Edit: my context is through Chemistry. So apply the appropriate amount of salt","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2094.0,"score_ratio":4.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":180,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1tdil","c_root_id_B":"gm236ct","created_at_utc_A":1612480577,"created_at_utc_B":1612485143,"score_A":36,"score_B":37,"human_ref_A":"This question is for OP and anybody who has completed a PhD program. What did/does your program do in regards to helping with job placement, making connections, etc.? I'm asking because several of the programs I'm looking at boast about high job placement, particularly in academia, post-PhD program. ... If it matters I have my MBA, and I'm looking at PhD in Business programs.","human_ref_B":"A friend of mine used to say that we'd committed financial suicide by getting PhDs. For whatever it's worth, you're not at all alone in being disappointed by what your graduate studies led to.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4566.0,"score_ratio":1.0277777778},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":181,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1nitv","c_root_id_B":"gm1tdil","created_at_utc_A":1612477961,"created_at_utc_B":1612480577,"score_A":21,"score_B":36,"human_ref_A":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","human_ref_B":"This question is for OP and anybody who has completed a PhD program. What did/does your program do in regards to helping with job placement, making connections, etc.? I'm asking because several of the programs I'm looking at boast about high job placement, particularly in academia, post-PhD program. ... If it matters I have my MBA, and I'm looking at PhD in Business programs.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2616.0,"score_ratio":1.7142857143},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":182,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1r4t5","c_root_id_B":"gm1tdil","created_at_utc_A":1612479561,"created_at_utc_B":1612480577,"score_A":21,"score_B":36,"human_ref_A":"I do. I did have some good things happen but I am quite disappointed. It's not you, it's the system. You have to be at the right place on the right time. If you feel like staying in academia, take the admin route. Working in admin is more secure, gets you on track and later on you can move to the research side. Thee is no point in trying to get a goodjob in academia, the generations before us have occupied those positions and won't let go their good salary and pension.","human_ref_B":"This question is for OP and anybody who has completed a PhD program. What did/does your program do in regards to helping with job placement, making connections, etc.? I'm asking because several of the programs I'm looking at boast about high job placement, particularly in academia, post-PhD program. ... If it matters I have my MBA, and I'm looking at PhD in Business programs.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1016.0,"score_ratio":1.7142857143},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":183,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm236ct","c_root_id_B":"gm21r6d","created_at_utc_A":1612485143,"created_at_utc_B":1612484473,"score_A":37,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"A friend of mine used to say that we'd committed financial suicide by getting PhDs. For whatever it's worth, you're not at all alone in being disappointed by what your graduate studies led to.","human_ref_B":"If you want money, academia is the wrong place. You'll have much more financial success going corporate, but less freedom on what you want to do. It's hard, but you've just gotta weigh up on what you want more and if you want seriously higher pay that corporate is the way to go","labels":1,"seconds_difference":670.0,"score_ratio":1.4230769231},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":184,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm236ct","c_root_id_B":"gm1nitv","created_at_utc_A":1612485143,"created_at_utc_B":1612477961,"score_A":37,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"A friend of mine used to say that we'd committed financial suicide by getting PhDs. For whatever it's worth, you're not at all alone in being disappointed by what your graduate studies led to.","human_ref_B":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7182.0,"score_ratio":1.7619047619},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":185,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1r4t5","c_root_id_B":"gm236ct","created_at_utc_A":1612479561,"created_at_utc_B":1612485143,"score_A":21,"score_B":37,"human_ref_A":"I do. I did have some good things happen but I am quite disappointed. It's not you, it's the system. You have to be at the right place on the right time. If you feel like staying in academia, take the admin route. Working in admin is more secure, gets you on track and later on you can move to the research side. Thee is no point in trying to get a goodjob in academia, the generations before us have occupied those positions and won't let go their good salary and pension.","human_ref_B":"A friend of mine used to say that we'd committed financial suicide by getting PhDs. For whatever it's worth, you're not at all alone in being disappointed by what your graduate studies led to.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5582.0,"score_ratio":1.7619047619},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":186,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm236ct","c_root_id_B":"gm1xpid","created_at_utc_A":1612485143,"created_at_utc_B":1612482576,"score_A":37,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"A friend of mine used to say that we'd committed financial suicide by getting PhDs. For whatever it's worth, you're not at all alone in being disappointed by what your graduate studies led to.","human_ref_B":"Surely you must have some teaching or research skills of some sort? Or did you go down the path in such a way as to avoid teaching at all costs? I know some who did this - one coworker in particular treated his TA work like a joke and his students rated him with 1's and 2's on RateMyProfessor. Regardless, setting aside community college, there's also high school. I know that many people sneer at it, but personally I hate the attitude that \"Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.\" We've all had good teachers and terrible ones. Being one is the good ones is an accomplishment, whatever the level. But of course, a degree isn't just about teaching, and usually trains many skills. Perhaps you learned some coding or technical writing? It may just be that you're looking at the wrong jobs, or that your expectations are too high. Technical writing ability is valued in research and business alike. Coding and numerical skills, whether in python or excel or something else, can also be valuable. I'm sure you have some skills you can market. You may just have to go about it in a different way. Finally, it's also tough out there right now. The economy is sagging, partly due to covid. People are struggling. Don't go to hard on yourself.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2567.0,"score_ratio":2.6428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":187,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm23bom","c_root_id_B":"gm21r6d","created_at_utc_A":1612485214,"created_at_utc_B":1612484473,"score_A":29,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"What you are describing is the result of the expanding federal granting program in STEM field that support doctoral student tuition and multiple post docs all overseen by a single TT professor. This was a cheap way to get the research done by talented but underpaid people. Since the TT professor is not retiring and universities are not expanding their TT faculty there are no jobs to absorb these talented people. The only thing to do is to find another place to use your talents and love of science. Try drug companies, journal editing and science publishing, science publications for the general public, start thinking out of the box. A former doctoral student of mine became a nurse. With your science background you could get your degree in about a year. Certain nursing fields, like nurse anesthetist, can make $200K+. There are Physicians Assistants programs. You may have to go back to school but there will be a job.","human_ref_B":"If you want money, academia is the wrong place. You'll have much more financial success going corporate, but less freedom on what you want to do. It's hard, but you've just gotta weigh up on what you want more and if you want seriously higher pay that corporate is the way to go","labels":1,"seconds_difference":741.0,"score_ratio":1.1153846154},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":188,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1nitv","c_root_id_B":"gm23bom","created_at_utc_A":1612477961,"created_at_utc_B":1612485214,"score_A":21,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","human_ref_B":"What you are describing is the result of the expanding federal granting program in STEM field that support doctoral student tuition and multiple post docs all overseen by a single TT professor. This was a cheap way to get the research done by talented but underpaid people. Since the TT professor is not retiring and universities are not expanding their TT faculty there are no jobs to absorb these talented people. The only thing to do is to find another place to use your talents and love of science. Try drug companies, journal editing and science publishing, science publications for the general public, start thinking out of the box. A former doctoral student of mine became a nurse. With your science background you could get your degree in about a year. Certain nursing fields, like nurse anesthetist, can make $200K+. There are Physicians Assistants programs. You may have to go back to school but there will be a job.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7253.0,"score_ratio":1.380952381},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":189,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1r4t5","c_root_id_B":"gm23bom","created_at_utc_A":1612479561,"created_at_utc_B":1612485214,"score_A":21,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"I do. I did have some good things happen but I am quite disappointed. It's not you, it's the system. You have to be at the right place on the right time. If you feel like staying in academia, take the admin route. Working in admin is more secure, gets you on track and later on you can move to the research side. Thee is no point in trying to get a goodjob in academia, the generations before us have occupied those positions and won't let go their good salary and pension.","human_ref_B":"What you are describing is the result of the expanding federal granting program in STEM field that support doctoral student tuition and multiple post docs all overseen by a single TT professor. This was a cheap way to get the research done by talented but underpaid people. Since the TT professor is not retiring and universities are not expanding their TT faculty there are no jobs to absorb these talented people. The only thing to do is to find another place to use your talents and love of science. Try drug companies, journal editing and science publishing, science publications for the general public, start thinking out of the box. A former doctoral student of mine became a nurse. With your science background you could get your degree in about a year. Certain nursing fields, like nurse anesthetist, can make $200K+. There are Physicians Assistants programs. You may have to go back to school but there will be a job.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5653.0,"score_ratio":1.380952381},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":190,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm23bom","c_root_id_B":"gm1xpid","created_at_utc_A":1612485214,"created_at_utc_B":1612482576,"score_A":29,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"What you are describing is the result of the expanding federal granting program in STEM field that support doctoral student tuition and multiple post docs all overseen by a single TT professor. This was a cheap way to get the research done by talented but underpaid people. Since the TT professor is not retiring and universities are not expanding their TT faculty there are no jobs to absorb these talented people. The only thing to do is to find another place to use your talents and love of science. Try drug companies, journal editing and science publishing, science publications for the general public, start thinking out of the box. A former doctoral student of mine became a nurse. With your science background you could get your degree in about a year. Certain nursing fields, like nurse anesthetist, can make $200K+. There are Physicians Assistants programs. You may have to go back to school but there will be a job.","human_ref_B":"Surely you must have some teaching or research skills of some sort? Or did you go down the path in such a way as to avoid teaching at all costs? I know some who did this - one coworker in particular treated his TA work like a joke and his students rated him with 1's and 2's on RateMyProfessor. Regardless, setting aside community college, there's also high school. I know that many people sneer at it, but personally I hate the attitude that \"Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.\" We've all had good teachers and terrible ones. Being one is the good ones is an accomplishment, whatever the level. But of course, a degree isn't just about teaching, and usually trains many skills. Perhaps you learned some coding or technical writing? It may just be that you're looking at the wrong jobs, or that your expectations are too high. Technical writing ability is valued in research and business alike. Coding and numerical skills, whether in python or excel or something else, can also be valuable. I'm sure you have some skills you can market. You may just have to go about it in a different way. Finally, it's also tough out there right now. The economy is sagging, partly due to covid. People are struggling. Don't go to hard on yourself.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2638.0,"score_ratio":2.0714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":191,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1nitv","c_root_id_B":"gm21r6d","created_at_utc_A":1612477961,"created_at_utc_B":1612484473,"score_A":21,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"What is it in? Can you go into industry?","human_ref_B":"If you want money, academia is the wrong place. You'll have much more financial success going corporate, but less freedom on what you want to do. It's hard, but you've just gotta weigh up on what you want more and if you want seriously higher pay that corporate is the way to go","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6512.0,"score_ratio":1.2380952381},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":192,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm21r6d","c_root_id_B":"gm1r4t5","created_at_utc_A":1612484473,"created_at_utc_B":1612479561,"score_A":26,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"If you want money, academia is the wrong place. You'll have much more financial success going corporate, but less freedom on what you want to do. It's hard, but you've just gotta weigh up on what you want more and if you want seriously higher pay that corporate is the way to go","human_ref_B":"I do. I did have some good things happen but I am quite disappointed. It's not you, it's the system. You have to be at the right place on the right time. If you feel like staying in academia, take the admin route. Working in admin is more secure, gets you on track and later on you can move to the research side. Thee is no point in trying to get a goodjob in academia, the generations before us have occupied those positions and won't let go their good salary and pension.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4912.0,"score_ratio":1.2380952381},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":193,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm1xpid","c_root_id_B":"gm21r6d","created_at_utc_A":1612482576,"created_at_utc_B":1612484473,"score_A":14,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"Surely you must have some teaching or research skills of some sort? Or did you go down the path in such a way as to avoid teaching at all costs? I know some who did this - one coworker in particular treated his TA work like a joke and his students rated him with 1's and 2's on RateMyProfessor. Regardless, setting aside community college, there's also high school. I know that many people sneer at it, but personally I hate the attitude that \"Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.\" We've all had good teachers and terrible ones. Being one is the good ones is an accomplishment, whatever the level. But of course, a degree isn't just about teaching, and usually trains many skills. Perhaps you learned some coding or technical writing? It may just be that you're looking at the wrong jobs, or that your expectations are too high. Technical writing ability is valued in research and business alike. Coding and numerical skills, whether in python or excel or something else, can also be valuable. I'm sure you have some skills you can market. You may just have to go about it in a different way. Finally, it's also tough out there right now. The economy is sagging, partly due to covid. People are struggling. Don't go to hard on yourself.","human_ref_B":"If you want money, academia is the wrong place. You'll have much more financial success going corporate, but less freedom on what you want to do. It's hard, but you've just gotta weigh up on what you want more and if you want seriously higher pay that corporate is the way to go","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1897.0,"score_ratio":1.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":194,"row":{"post_id":"lcrq4z","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Why did I pursue a PhD if it has not led to any opportunities? I’m feeling pretty down at the moment. I’ve been applying to TT jobs for a few years and have gotten no luck. I received my PhD from an average state school in 2015 and have had two relatively fruitful postdocs the last 5 years. I’ve published 10 papers in mid-tier journals. Yet it’s all been for nothing. I can’t get a job for the life of me. I’ve applied to probably almost 100 professor jobs with no success whatsoever. 4 year R1 schools, SLACs, and community colleges all have rejected me. I’m willing to relocate anywhere in the country. There’s too few jobs and I just don’t cut. I’m almost 35 now with a salary that an undergrad straight out of college wouldn’t be thrilled with. And I’ve busting my ass for more than a decade for pretty much nothing. No upside, no new or exciting opportunities, nothing. It sucks. I would have been better off teaching high school instead of trying in to break into higher ed. I’ve learned the hard way that the PhD pays in prestige, but you can’t eat prestige. Why did I do this to myself? Any one else feel this way?","c_root_id_A":"gm26b3f","c_root_id_B":"gm2tk3e","created_at_utc_A":1612486647,"created_at_utc_B":1612497924,"score_A":8,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"Don’t blame yourself, Covid destroyed the job market. Try looking at industry jobs.","human_ref_B":"Have you considered breaking into consulting or investment banking? I've heard that PhDs in those industries are valued a lot.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11277.0,"score_ratio":1.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":195,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwafeii","c_root_id_B":"fwa094e","created_at_utc_A":1593369464,"created_at_utc_B":1593361568,"score_A":191,"score_B":187,"human_ref_A":"I currently teach high school... We plan to be open face to face, once a kid gets COVID we're out for a week and anyone who was in class with that kid is out an additional week for quarantine... In a school with almost 2k students. Yeah, ok...","human_ref_B":"I’m surprised that USA Colleges are having face-to-face classes at all. It’s a high risk activity considering the potential outcome. Here in Australia where we are in a lot better position regarding COVID we are expecting to teach remotely from day 1.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7896.0,"score_ratio":1.0213903743},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":196,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwafeii","c_root_id_B":"fwa2sdi","created_at_utc_A":1593369464,"created_at_utc_B":1593362911,"score_A":191,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"I currently teach high school... We plan to be open face to face, once a kid gets COVID we're out for a week and anyone who was in class with that kid is out an additional week for quarantine... In a school with almost 2k students. Yeah, ok...","human_ref_B":"My uni is gonna be all remote at least","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6553.0,"score_ratio":27.2857142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":197,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwafch4","c_root_id_B":"fwafeii","created_at_utc_A":1593369434,"created_at_utc_B":1593369464,"score_A":8,"score_B":191,"human_ref_A":"This is the correct take.","human_ref_B":"I currently teach high school... We plan to be open face to face, once a kid gets COVID we're out for a week and anyone who was in class with that kid is out an additional week for quarantine... In a school with almost 2k students. Yeah, ok...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":30.0,"score_ratio":23.875},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":198,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwa2sdi","c_root_id_B":"fway0p7","created_at_utc_A":1593362911,"created_at_utc_B":1593379239,"score_A":7,"score_B":30,"human_ref_A":"My uni is gonna be all remote at least","human_ref_B":"In all honesty; it's not going to happen. They *intend* to open, and they'd vastly prefer to open from a revenue perspective, but at the same time they're all quietly planning for the possibility (or, rather, probability) of online-only instruction. Eventually, they'll start acknowledging it.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":16328.0,"score_ratio":4.2857142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":199,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwafch4","c_root_id_B":"fway0p7","created_at_utc_A":1593369434,"created_at_utc_B":1593379239,"score_A":8,"score_B":30,"human_ref_A":"This is the correct take.","human_ref_B":"In all honesty; it's not going to happen. They *intend* to open, and they'd vastly prefer to open from a revenue perspective, but at the same time they're all quietly planning for the possibility (or, rather, probability) of online-only instruction. Eventually, they'll start acknowledging it.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":9805.0,"score_ratio":3.75},"truncated_cells":[]}],"num_rows_total":348718,"num_rows_per_page":100,"partial":false} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/shp_rows_200.json b/shp_rows_200.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ec49b47d11fdd9c2ea7faa26d6bf77acbabfa6d --- /dev/null +++ b/shp_rows_200.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"features":[{"feature_idx":0,"name":"post_id","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":1,"name":"domain","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":2,"name":"upvote_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":3,"name":"history","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":4,"name":"c_root_id_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":5,"name":"c_root_id_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":6,"name":"created_at_utc_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":7,"name":"created_at_utc_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":8,"name":"score_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":9,"name":"score_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":10,"name":"human_ref_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":11,"name":"human_ref_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":12,"name":"labels","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":13,"name":"seconds_difference","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":14,"name":"score_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}}],"rows":[{"row_idx":200,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwa2sdi","c_root_id_B":"fwb0f58","created_at_utc_A":1593362911,"created_at_utc_B":1593380539,"score_A":7,"score_B":13,"human_ref_A":"My uni is gonna be all remote at least","human_ref_B":"\"You will still have to pay full tuition for online access.\" - Vice Chancellor, lounging on a bed of money","labels":0,"seconds_difference":17628.0,"score_ratio":1.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":201,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwb0f58","c_root_id_B":"fwafch4","created_at_utc_A":1593380539,"created_at_utc_B":1593369434,"score_A":13,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"\"You will still have to pay full tuition for online access.\" - Vice Chancellor, lounging on a bed of money","human_ref_B":"This is the correct take.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11105.0,"score_ratio":1.625},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":202,"row":{"post_id":"hhgmpm","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"My prediction for the Fall semester 2020. Might play out like this: https://imgur.com/IVt9EiJ","c_root_id_A":"fwa2sdi","c_root_id_B":"fwafch4","created_at_utc_A":1593362911,"created_at_utc_B":1593369434,"score_A":7,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"My uni is gonna be all remote at least","human_ref_B":"This is the correct take.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6523.0,"score_ratio":1.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":203,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfaed99","c_root_id_B":"hfagx52","created_at_utc_A":1633303949,"created_at_utc_B":1633305220,"score_A":247,"score_B":587,"human_ref_A":"I expect a lot of people to disagree with this but: really give her a piece of your mind. That is an unbelievably shitty thing to do to someone, and especially lie through your teeth about it. If she thought those things, she should have told you to your face or at the very least declined to write the letter. What she has done here is wildly disrespectful and vindictive. Beyond unprofessional, its downright mean. At this point, status aside, you are two adults with no bridges really left to burn. So if you feel like it, you might as well make sure this person knows well how unreasonably shitty this was to do. Its not about getting revenge, its making sure other humans understand the consequences of their actions and what it means to be a PoS. Good luck OP, sorry to hear about this.","human_ref_B":"I serve on an admissions committee. I can tell you that whenever we see a negative letter in an application, the first judgement is on the advisor. As others have said, any competent letter writer in the US academic system understands that a letter should be positive, or not written at all. That's why it's called a letter of recommendation. Do not use this person as a reference in the future. Do let other people know that this person wrote you a bad letter rather than declining. This likely will not harm your application as much as you think. If anything, it will hurt the writer's career when their peers see the kind of letter they write for people they should be supporting. It's of course a shitty thing to happen, and I'm sorry you're dealing with this, but it's not as serious as it probably feels right now.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1271.0,"score_ratio":2.3765182186},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":204,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfagx52","c_root_id_B":"hfaetny","created_at_utc_A":1633305220,"created_at_utc_B":1633304174,"score_A":587,"score_B":243,"human_ref_A":"I serve on an admissions committee. I can tell you that whenever we see a negative letter in an application, the first judgement is on the advisor. As others have said, any competent letter writer in the US academic system understands that a letter should be positive, or not written at all. That's why it's called a letter of recommendation. Do not use this person as a reference in the future. Do let other people know that this person wrote you a bad letter rather than declining. This likely will not harm your application as much as you think. If anything, it will hurt the writer's career when their peers see the kind of letter they write for people they should be supporting. It's of course a shitty thing to happen, and I'm sorry you're dealing with this, but it's not as serious as it probably feels right now.","human_ref_B":"Don't use that letter. But honestly I'd burn all sorts of bridges out of spite over something like that. I'd go to her school and tell them this, ideally with a copy of the letter, and ask them why their professor is doing this to students who ask her for recommendations in good faith. It's universally accepted that if you can't give a good reference, you don't. And if you're in a position where it's expected to recommend someone, you at _least_ hit a neutral to positive note. Actively attacking you in the letter without warning you that she didn't feel she could write you a good letter is unforgivable.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1046.0,"score_ratio":2.4156378601},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":205,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfa6xut","c_root_id_B":"hfagx52","created_at_utc_A":1633300532,"created_at_utc_B":1633305220,"score_A":47,"score_B":587,"human_ref_A":"You can try to talk to her to see what the problem was. And stop putting her name for recommendations.","human_ref_B":"I serve on an admissions committee. I can tell you that whenever we see a negative letter in an application, the first judgement is on the advisor. As others have said, any competent letter writer in the US academic system understands that a letter should be positive, or not written at all. That's why it's called a letter of recommendation. Do not use this person as a reference in the future. Do let other people know that this person wrote you a bad letter rather than declining. This likely will not harm your application as much as you think. If anything, it will hurt the writer's career when their peers see the kind of letter they write for people they should be supporting. It's of course a shitty thing to happen, and I'm sorry you're dealing with this, but it's not as serious as it probably feels right now.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4688.0,"score_ratio":12.4893617021},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":206,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfagx52","c_root_id_B":"hfadt1l","created_at_utc_A":1633305220,"created_at_utc_B":1633303683,"score_A":587,"score_B":16,"human_ref_A":"I serve on an admissions committee. I can tell you that whenever we see a negative letter in an application, the first judgement is on the advisor. As others have said, any competent letter writer in the US academic system understands that a letter should be positive, or not written at all. That's why it's called a letter of recommendation. Do not use this person as a reference in the future. Do let other people know that this person wrote you a bad letter rather than declining. This likely will not harm your application as much as you think. If anything, it will hurt the writer's career when their peers see the kind of letter they write for people they should be supporting. It's of course a shitty thing to happen, and I'm sorry you're dealing with this, but it's not as serious as it probably feels right now.","human_ref_B":"What others say and warn future students about her. Also, I don't know if it was a \"send directly from the advisor\" thing, but I always make sure to check their rec letters before submission.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1537.0,"score_ratio":36.6875},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":207,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfaed99","c_root_id_B":"hfa6xut","created_at_utc_A":1633303949,"created_at_utc_B":1633300532,"score_A":247,"score_B":47,"human_ref_A":"I expect a lot of people to disagree with this but: really give her a piece of your mind. That is an unbelievably shitty thing to do to someone, and especially lie through your teeth about it. If she thought those things, she should have told you to your face or at the very least declined to write the letter. What she has done here is wildly disrespectful and vindictive. Beyond unprofessional, its downright mean. At this point, status aside, you are two adults with no bridges really left to burn. So if you feel like it, you might as well make sure this person knows well how unreasonably shitty this was to do. Its not about getting revenge, its making sure other humans understand the consequences of their actions and what it means to be a PoS. Good luck OP, sorry to hear about this.","human_ref_B":"You can try to talk to her to see what the problem was. And stop putting her name for recommendations.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3417.0,"score_ratio":5.2553191489},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":208,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfadt1l","c_root_id_B":"hfaed99","created_at_utc_A":1633303683,"created_at_utc_B":1633303949,"score_A":16,"score_B":247,"human_ref_A":"What others say and warn future students about her. Also, I don't know if it was a \"send directly from the advisor\" thing, but I always make sure to check their rec letters before submission.","human_ref_B":"I expect a lot of people to disagree with this but: really give her a piece of your mind. That is an unbelievably shitty thing to do to someone, and especially lie through your teeth about it. If she thought those things, she should have told you to your face or at the very least declined to write the letter. What she has done here is wildly disrespectful and vindictive. Beyond unprofessional, its downright mean. At this point, status aside, you are two adults with no bridges really left to burn. So if you feel like it, you might as well make sure this person knows well how unreasonably shitty this was to do. Its not about getting revenge, its making sure other humans understand the consequences of their actions and what it means to be a PoS. Good luck OP, sorry to hear about this.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":266.0,"score_ratio":15.4375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":209,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfaetny","c_root_id_B":"hfa6xut","created_at_utc_A":1633304174,"created_at_utc_B":1633300532,"score_A":243,"score_B":47,"human_ref_A":"Don't use that letter. But honestly I'd burn all sorts of bridges out of spite over something like that. I'd go to her school and tell them this, ideally with a copy of the letter, and ask them why their professor is doing this to students who ask her for recommendations in good faith. It's universally accepted that if you can't give a good reference, you don't. And if you're in a position where it's expected to recommend someone, you at _least_ hit a neutral to positive note. Actively attacking you in the letter without warning you that she didn't feel she could write you a good letter is unforgivable.","human_ref_B":"You can try to talk to her to see what the problem was. And stop putting her name for recommendations.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3642.0,"score_ratio":5.170212766},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":210,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfaetny","c_root_id_B":"hfadt1l","created_at_utc_A":1633304174,"created_at_utc_B":1633303683,"score_A":243,"score_B":16,"human_ref_A":"Don't use that letter. But honestly I'd burn all sorts of bridges out of spite over something like that. I'd go to her school and tell them this, ideally with a copy of the letter, and ask them why their professor is doing this to students who ask her for recommendations in good faith. It's universally accepted that if you can't give a good reference, you don't. And if you're in a position where it's expected to recommend someone, you at _least_ hit a neutral to positive note. Actively attacking you in the letter without warning you that she didn't feel she could write you a good letter is unforgivable.","human_ref_B":"What others say and warn future students about her. Also, I don't know if it was a \"send directly from the advisor\" thing, but I always make sure to check their rec letters before submission.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":491.0,"score_ratio":15.1875},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":211,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfa6xut","c_root_id_B":"hfaiuz3","created_at_utc_A":1633300532,"created_at_utc_B":1633306195,"score_A":47,"score_B":89,"human_ref_A":"You can try to talk to her to see what the problem was. And stop putting her name for recommendations.","human_ref_B":"That is all sorts of craps. It’s not the way the system works. If I am put into a position where I have to write a letter for a poor student, I tell the student that all I will write is factual experiences the student had (i.e., took X class, completed X practicum, etc.) It’s not negative, but it clearly indicates to the committee that I don’t have positive things to say. You can either ignore (and not use her as a reference ever again) or address it with her. I would probably go the route of sending a baffled email—“Dear Dr. Negative, As you know, I am in the process of applying to grad schools. Because of my positive experience with you, I asked you to write a letter of recommendation. During one of my interviews, a member of the admissions committee indicated that you had not recommended me for the program because (list reasons here). I’m confused (or other emotion) as these were never conveyed to me during classes/projects or when I asked for a letter. I’m trying to better understand what happened as this negatively impacts my admission to a grad program.”","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5663.0,"score_ratio":1.8936170213},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":212,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfaiuz3","c_root_id_B":"hfadt1l","created_at_utc_A":1633306195,"created_at_utc_B":1633303683,"score_A":89,"score_B":16,"human_ref_A":"That is all sorts of craps. It’s not the way the system works. If I am put into a position where I have to write a letter for a poor student, I tell the student that all I will write is factual experiences the student had (i.e., took X class, completed X practicum, etc.) It’s not negative, but it clearly indicates to the committee that I don’t have positive things to say. You can either ignore (and not use her as a reference ever again) or address it with her. I would probably go the route of sending a baffled email—“Dear Dr. Negative, As you know, I am in the process of applying to grad schools. Because of my positive experience with you, I asked you to write a letter of recommendation. During one of my interviews, a member of the admissions committee indicated that you had not recommended me for the program because (list reasons here). I’m confused (or other emotion) as these were never conveyed to me during classes/projects or when I asked for a letter. I’m trying to better understand what happened as this negatively impacts my admission to a grad program.”","human_ref_B":"What others say and warn future students about her. Also, I don't know if it was a \"send directly from the advisor\" thing, but I always make sure to check their rec letters before submission.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2512.0,"score_ratio":5.5625},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":213,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfa6xut","c_root_id_B":"hfak108","created_at_utc_A":1633300532,"created_at_utc_B":1633306777,"score_A":47,"score_B":50,"human_ref_A":"You can try to talk to her to see what the problem was. And stop putting her name for recommendations.","human_ref_B":"I can’t imagine how it must feel to be a professor and be that spiteful and malicious towards a student. She could have said no and shared her thoughts with you then, or written a letter to you explaining why she didn’t think you would be a good fit, some considerations, or you know maybe mentioned something WHILE you were her assistant and running the club. She just looks like an asshole, and hopefully the people who read it will see that and disregard the letter from your application to the program. She’s a limit to people’s potential in her class and I hope she gets a wake up call to how much of a shit person you have to be to live your life that way. “It would be an honor.” Jesus. To keep it from you and still write the letter, she must have something that pisses her off to get as far as submitting a letter “of recommendation” like that. Either personal for her and/or personal towards you. I agree with the other people when they say to give her a piece of your mind (professionally/neutrally, of course.)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6245.0,"score_ratio":1.0638297872},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":214,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfadt1l","c_root_id_B":"hfak108","created_at_utc_A":1633303683,"created_at_utc_B":1633306777,"score_A":16,"score_B":50,"human_ref_A":"What others say and warn future students about her. Also, I don't know if it was a \"send directly from the advisor\" thing, but I always make sure to check their rec letters before submission.","human_ref_B":"I can’t imagine how it must feel to be a professor and be that spiteful and malicious towards a student. She could have said no and shared her thoughts with you then, or written a letter to you explaining why she didn’t think you would be a good fit, some considerations, or you know maybe mentioned something WHILE you were her assistant and running the club. She just looks like an asshole, and hopefully the people who read it will see that and disregard the letter from your application to the program. She’s a limit to people’s potential in her class and I hope she gets a wake up call to how much of a shit person you have to be to live your life that way. “It would be an honor.” Jesus. To keep it from you and still write the letter, she must have something that pisses her off to get as far as submitting a letter “of recommendation” like that. Either personal for her and/or personal towards you. I agree with the other people when they say to give her a piece of your mind (professionally/neutrally, of course.)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3094.0,"score_ratio":3.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":215,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfadt1l","c_root_id_B":"hfapxlk","created_at_utc_A":1633303683,"created_at_utc_B":1633309668,"score_A":16,"score_B":39,"human_ref_A":"What others say and warn future students about her. Also, I don't know if it was a \"send directly from the advisor\" thing, but I always make sure to check their rec letters before submission.","human_ref_B":"This is extremely unfortunate and uncommon. For the most part professors will decline to write a letter if they can’t write a positive one. It’s a “letter of recommendation”, not “letter of review”. This person is out to get you and I would avoid interacting with them further.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5985.0,"score_ratio":2.4375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":216,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfaoqlu","c_root_id_B":"hfapxlk","created_at_utc_A":1633309092,"created_at_utc_B":1633309668,"score_A":8,"score_B":39,"human_ref_A":"Considering that professors (in the US) are specifically told to decline to write a letter if you don’t think the student is deserving due to slander lawsuits shows that this professor is an idiot","human_ref_B":"This is extremely unfortunate and uncommon. For the most part professors will decline to write a letter if they can’t write a positive one. It’s a “letter of recommendation”, not “letter of review”. This person is out to get you and I would avoid interacting with them further.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":576.0,"score_ratio":4.875},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":217,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfap2q6","c_root_id_B":"hfapxlk","created_at_utc_A":1633309253,"created_at_utc_B":1633309668,"score_A":9,"score_B":39,"human_ref_A":"Faculty shouldn't agree to write letters unless it's going to support the student. I'm a professor. I actually just posted a video on YT about requesting a letter from a prof. (link here, in case it'll help anyone). With regards to this specific case, I'd immediately find a new source for letters of recommendation. If you have any other applications that are out there, you MIGHT be able to remove the offending letter writer in question and then setup another person (after asking another person, all that jazz). I'm so sorry that this happened. It's extremely unprofessional and cruel.","human_ref_B":"This is extremely unfortunate and uncommon. For the most part professors will decline to write a letter if they can’t write a positive one. It’s a “letter of recommendation”, not “letter of review”. This person is out to get you and I would avoid interacting with them further.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":415.0,"score_ratio":4.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":218,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfak286","c_root_id_B":"hfapxlk","created_at_utc_A":1633306794,"created_at_utc_B":1633309668,"score_A":9,"score_B":39,"human_ref_A":"That’s really quite terrible. Sorry you are in that kind of position. The worst letter I wrote never said anything negative about a candidate. The worst letter just didn’t say anything super positive. Basically a neutral letter is as bad as it ever gets.","human_ref_B":"This is extremely unfortunate and uncommon. For the most part professors will decline to write a letter if they can’t write a positive one. It’s a “letter of recommendation”, not “letter of review”. This person is out to get you and I would avoid interacting with them further.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2874.0,"score_ratio":4.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":219,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfadt1l","c_root_id_B":"hfavtys","created_at_utc_A":1633303683,"created_at_utc_B":1633312543,"score_A":16,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"What others say and warn future students about her. Also, I don't know if it was a \"send directly from the advisor\" thing, but I always make sure to check their rec letters before submission.","human_ref_B":"Sounds like a case of sour grapes. Either because she didn’t want to lose you as a research assistant or because you weren’t planning to do your grad program with her. It’s not the first time I’ve heard of an academic being spiteful AF.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":8860.0,"score_ratio":1.5625},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":220,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfaoqlu","c_root_id_B":"hfavtys","created_at_utc_A":1633309092,"created_at_utc_B":1633312543,"score_A":8,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"Considering that professors (in the US) are specifically told to decline to write a letter if you don’t think the student is deserving due to slander lawsuits shows that this professor is an idiot","human_ref_B":"Sounds like a case of sour grapes. Either because she didn’t want to lose you as a research assistant or because you weren’t planning to do your grad program with her. It’s not the first time I’ve heard of an academic being spiteful AF.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3451.0,"score_ratio":3.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":221,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfavtys","c_root_id_B":"hfap2q6","created_at_utc_A":1633312543,"created_at_utc_B":1633309253,"score_A":25,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"Sounds like a case of sour grapes. Either because she didn’t want to lose you as a research assistant or because you weren’t planning to do your grad program with her. It’s not the first time I’ve heard of an academic being spiteful AF.","human_ref_B":"Faculty shouldn't agree to write letters unless it's going to support the student. I'm a professor. I actually just posted a video on YT about requesting a letter from a prof. (link here, in case it'll help anyone). With regards to this specific case, I'd immediately find a new source for letters of recommendation. If you have any other applications that are out there, you MIGHT be able to remove the offending letter writer in question and then setup another person (after asking another person, all that jazz). I'm so sorry that this happened. It's extremely unprofessional and cruel.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3290.0,"score_ratio":2.7777777778},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":222,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfavtys","c_root_id_B":"hfak286","created_at_utc_A":1633312543,"created_at_utc_B":1633306794,"score_A":25,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"Sounds like a case of sour grapes. Either because she didn’t want to lose you as a research assistant or because you weren’t planning to do your grad program with her. It’s not the first time I’ve heard of an academic being spiteful AF.","human_ref_B":"That’s really quite terrible. Sorry you are in that kind of position. The worst letter I wrote never said anything negative about a candidate. The worst letter just didn’t say anything super positive. Basically a neutral letter is as bad as it ever gets.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5749.0,"score_ratio":2.7777777778},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":223,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfavjyv","c_root_id_B":"hfavtys","created_at_utc_A":1633312404,"created_at_utc_B":1633312543,"score_A":7,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"You can “exclude” a LOR in most application systems these days. Do that. ASAP","human_ref_B":"Sounds like a case of sour grapes. Either because she didn’t want to lose you as a research assistant or because you weren’t planning to do your grad program with her. It’s not the first time I’ve heard of an academic being spiteful AF.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":139.0,"score_ratio":3.5714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":224,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfavjyv","c_root_id_B":"hfb6vkl","created_at_utc_A":1633312404,"created_at_utc_B":1633318148,"score_A":7,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"You can “exclude” a LOR in most application systems these days. Do that. ASAP","human_ref_B":"Had you heard any feedback along these lines from this professor before? Was what the interviewer told you specific enough that it would have had to come from this professor? Does it sound like something she would have done, or had you previously had a good working relationship with her? You could potentially ask her about this in a non-confrontational way to see if she offers you any additional information. Something like, the interviewer mentioned X, Y, and Z in the interview and mentioned that it was from your recommendation letter. I’m a bit surprised, because that isn’t feedback I’ve heard from you before. Is it possible she was mistaken? If she confirms that yes, she wrote this shitty letter, you have more documentation. There’s no good reason to sabotage a student’s application like that when she could simply decline. This feels more like someone who has an ax to grind, and this is a grossly unprofessional way to do that. You could also consider reaching out to your university ombuds. They’re generally neutral and confidential, and they’ll hear you out and then run through the options you have.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5744.0,"score_ratio":1.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":225,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfap2q6","c_root_id_B":"hfaoqlu","created_at_utc_A":1633309253,"created_at_utc_B":1633309092,"score_A":9,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Faculty shouldn't agree to write letters unless it's going to support the student. I'm a professor. I actually just posted a video on YT about requesting a letter from a prof. (link here, in case it'll help anyone). With regards to this specific case, I'd immediately find a new source for letters of recommendation. If you have any other applications that are out there, you MIGHT be able to remove the offending letter writer in question and then setup another person (after asking another person, all that jazz). I'm so sorry that this happened. It's extremely unprofessional and cruel.","human_ref_B":"Considering that professors (in the US) are specifically told to decline to write a letter if you don’t think the student is deserving due to slander lawsuits shows that this professor is an idiot","labels":1,"seconds_difference":161.0,"score_ratio":1.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":226,"row":{"post_id":"q0s215","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"What to do about a situation where my professor wrote a negative letter of rec for grad school? I am in the US, and applying to graduate school. I was a research assistant for this particular professor and ran a club that she was the advisor to. I did not struggle in her class or other class revolving the program I am going into. I asked her well beforehand to write me a letter and she claimed \"it would be an honor\". She submitted it, I had my interview and it came up that she said in the letter that I would not be a suitable candidate for the program. Her points in the letter claimed \"that the club struggled under my leadership\" and my research \"was not adequate and not helpful\". She never gave any inclination that this was the case, so I am stunned that she is saying these things. What can I do about this? She lied to me, and could impact my future. What course of action do I take? I'm at a loss of words here.","c_root_id_A":"hfbbyoh","c_root_id_B":"hfavjyv","created_at_utc_A":1633321026,"created_at_utc_B":1633312404,"score_A":8,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Must have been the herpetology club, cuz that woman’s a snake","human_ref_B":"You can “exclude” a LOR in most application systems these days. Do that. ASAP","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8622.0,"score_ratio":1.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":227,"row":{"post_id":"ris5lq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Your name was mentioned in a paper recently found by Academia! Dear Academia.edu, no one is mentioning my name in any papers. Please stop.","c_root_id_A":"hoz8fpz","c_root_id_B":"hoz6j99","created_at_utc_A":1639780701,"created_at_utc_B":1639779905,"score_A":130,"score_B":111,"human_ref_A":"I get frequent notices for some paleontologist with whom I share a name, despite my being a humanist and two decades older. Finally turned it all off last summer, as I've found academia.edu to be mostly worthless anyway.","human_ref_B":"Dear Academia, That is the last name of my father and the first name of his co-author. The paper was published a quarter century ago. I am in the humanities; that paper is in a niche scientific field. Please revise and resubmit. Best wishes! A.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":796.0,"score_ratio":1.1711711712},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":228,"row":{"post_id":"ris5lq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Your name was mentioned in a paper recently found by Academia! Dear Academia.edu, no one is mentioning my name in any papers. Please stop.","c_root_id_A":"hp0p3vf","c_root_id_B":"hp17so2","created_at_utc_A":1639807058,"created_at_utc_B":1639822090,"score_A":3,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Supposedly there are over 3,000 mentions of my name in papers. My name is quite uncommon.","human_ref_B":"In contrast, when Research Gate says you have a citation, it's true. It's even better than Google Scholar. Citations for my unpublished PhD dissertation appear on Research Gate but not on Google Scholar.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":15032.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":229,"row":{"post_id":"ris5lq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Your name was mentioned in a paper recently found by Academia! Dear Academia.edu, no one is mentioning my name in any papers. Please stop.","c_root_id_A":"hp0p3vf","c_root_id_B":"hp1q7fy","created_at_utc_A":1639807058,"created_at_utc_B":1639835722,"score_A":3,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Supposedly there are over 3,000 mentions of my name in papers. My name is quite uncommon.","human_ref_B":"I get weekly emails from them with wilder and wilder paper publications. I'm a paleontologist. I highly doubt I would be doing something regarding \"the increased complexities of the herpes virus\". Honestly I haven't put them in the spam folder yet because their suggestions of papers that I have possibly written are just too amusing. What makes it even funnier is that I'm not even a published author yet. I'm still working on my first manuscript.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":28664.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":230,"row":{"post_id":"ris5lq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Your name was mentioned in a paper recently found by Academia! Dear Academia.edu, no one is mentioning my name in any papers. Please stop.","c_root_id_A":"hp1eiwm","c_root_id_B":"hp1q7fy","created_at_utc_A":1639827779,"created_at_utc_B":1639835722,"score_A":3,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Shit, I thought I was famous.","human_ref_B":"I get weekly emails from them with wilder and wilder paper publications. I'm a paleontologist. I highly doubt I would be doing something regarding \"the increased complexities of the herpes virus\". Honestly I haven't put them in the spam folder yet because their suggestions of papers that I have possibly written are just too amusing. What makes it even funnier is that I'm not even a published author yet. I'm still working on my first manuscript.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7943.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":231,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x50kr","c_root_id_B":"f7wxra9","created_at_utc_A":1574046436,"created_at_utc_B":1574040921,"score_A":69,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"Published as an undergrad in a non-undergrad publication? That's pretty nuts congrats!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! This will be a huge help for you moving forward in your life no matter what path you choose to take.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5515.0,"score_ratio":2.76},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":232,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7wmc4v","c_root_id_B":"f7x50kr","created_at_utc_A":1574034891,"created_at_utc_B":1574046436,"score_A":16,"score_B":69,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! That's wonderful!","human_ref_B":"Published as an undergrad in a non-undergrad publication? That's pretty nuts congrats!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11545.0,"score_ratio":4.3125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":233,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7wo43k","c_root_id_B":"f7x50kr","created_at_utc_A":1574035514,"created_at_utc_B":1574046436,"score_A":7,"score_B":69,"human_ref_A":"Gratz!!!","human_ref_B":"Published as an undergrad in a non-undergrad publication? That's pretty nuts congrats!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":10922.0,"score_ratio":9.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":234,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x50kr","c_root_id_B":"f7wu2xm","created_at_utc_A":1574046436,"created_at_utc_B":1574038088,"score_A":69,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Published as an undergrad in a non-undergrad publication? That's pretty nuts congrats!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8348.0,"score_ratio":23.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":235,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7wynby","c_root_id_B":"f7x50kr","created_at_utc_A":1574041596,"created_at_utc_B":1574046436,"score_A":3,"score_B":69,"human_ref_A":"That's huge! Especially as an undergrad! gg, my friend","human_ref_B":"Published as an undergrad in a non-undergrad publication? That's pretty nuts congrats!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4840.0,"score_ratio":23.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":236,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x0ezh","c_root_id_B":"f7x50kr","created_at_utc_A":1574042944,"created_at_utc_B":1574046436,"score_A":3,"score_B":69,"human_ref_A":"This is such a great feeling! Congratulations to you.","human_ref_B":"Published as an undergrad in a non-undergrad publication? That's pretty nuts congrats!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3492.0,"score_ratio":23.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":237,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7wxra9","c_root_id_B":"f7wmc4v","created_at_utc_A":1574040921,"created_at_utc_B":1574034891,"score_A":25,"score_B":16,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! This will be a huge help for you moving forward in your life no matter what path you choose to take.","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! That's wonderful!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6030.0,"score_ratio":1.5625},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":238,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7wxra9","c_root_id_B":"f7wo43k","created_at_utc_A":1574040921,"created_at_utc_B":1574035514,"score_A":25,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! This will be a huge help for you moving forward in your life no matter what path you choose to take.","human_ref_B":"Gratz!!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5407.0,"score_ratio":3.5714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":239,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7wu2xm","c_root_id_B":"f7wxra9","created_at_utc_A":1574038088,"created_at_utc_B":1574040921,"score_A":3,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! This will be a huge help for you moving forward in your life no matter what path you choose to take.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2833.0,"score_ratio":8.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":240,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7yo5gp","c_root_id_B":"f7xly5g","created_at_utc_A":1574098187,"created_at_utc_B":1574063324,"score_A":7,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Now everyone cite it!","human_ref_B":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","labels":1,"seconds_difference":34863.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":241,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7yo5gp","c_root_id_B":"f7wu2xm","created_at_utc_A":1574098187,"created_at_utc_B":1574038088,"score_A":7,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Now everyone cite it!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":60099.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":242,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7yo5gp","c_root_id_B":"f7wynby","created_at_utc_A":1574098187,"created_at_utc_B":1574041596,"score_A":7,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Now everyone cite it!","human_ref_B":"That's huge! Especially as an undergrad! gg, my friend","labels":1,"seconds_difference":56591.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":243,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x0ezh","c_root_id_B":"f7yo5gp","created_at_utc_A":1574042944,"created_at_utc_B":1574098187,"score_A":3,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"This is such a great feeling! Congratulations to you.","human_ref_B":"Now everyone cite it!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":55243.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":244,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7xhr31","c_root_id_B":"f7yo5gp","created_at_utc_A":1574058072,"created_at_utc_B":1574098187,"score_A":3,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations!!! I’m also an undergrad student and I’ve been trying to get something published too... this is hard work, keep going!","human_ref_B":"Now everyone cite it!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":40115.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":245,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7yo5gp","c_root_id_B":"f7x54pn","created_at_utc_A":1574098187,"created_at_utc_B":1574046526,"score_A":7,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Now everyone cite it!","human_ref_B":"Congrats!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":51661.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":246,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x55re","c_root_id_B":"f7yo5gp","created_at_utc_A":1574046548,"created_at_utc_B":1574098187,"score_A":2,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations","human_ref_B":"Now everyone cite it!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":51639.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":247,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7yo5gp","c_root_id_B":"f7x64q5","created_at_utc_A":1574098187,"created_at_utc_B":1574047321,"score_A":7,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Now everyone cite it!","human_ref_B":"Congrats!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":50866.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":248,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7xly5g","c_root_id_B":"f7wu2xm","created_at_utc_A":1574063324,"created_at_utc_B":1574038088,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":25236.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":249,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7wynby","c_root_id_B":"f7xly5g","created_at_utc_A":1574041596,"created_at_utc_B":1574063324,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"That's huge! Especially as an undergrad! gg, my friend","human_ref_B":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","labels":0,"seconds_difference":21728.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":250,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7xly5g","c_root_id_B":"f7x0ezh","created_at_utc_A":1574063324,"created_at_utc_B":1574042944,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","human_ref_B":"This is such a great feeling! Congratulations to you.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":20380.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":251,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7xhr31","c_root_id_B":"f7xly5g","created_at_utc_A":1574058072,"created_at_utc_B":1574063324,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations!!! I’m also an undergrad student and I’ve been trying to get something published too... this is hard work, keep going!","human_ref_B":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5252.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":252,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7xly5g","c_root_id_B":"f7x54pn","created_at_utc_A":1574063324,"created_at_utc_B":1574046526,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","human_ref_B":"Congrats!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":16798.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":253,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7xly5g","c_root_id_B":"f7x55re","created_at_utc_A":1574063324,"created_at_utc_B":1574046548,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","human_ref_B":"Congratulations","labels":1,"seconds_difference":16776.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":254,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7xly5g","c_root_id_B":"f7x64q5","created_at_utc_A":1574063324,"created_at_utc_B":1574047321,"score_A":4,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Congrats. Which field? do share the paper link with us when published","human_ref_B":"Congrats!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":16003.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":255,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x54pn","c_root_id_B":"f7xhr31","created_at_utc_A":1574046526,"created_at_utc_B":1574058072,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!!! I’m also an undergrad student and I’ve been trying to get something published too... this is hard work, keep going!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11546.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":256,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x55re","c_root_id_B":"f7xhr31","created_at_utc_A":1574046548,"created_at_utc_B":1574058072,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!!! I’m also an undergrad student and I’ve been trying to get something published too... this is hard work, keep going!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11524.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":257,"row":{"post_id":"dxuvrq","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"MY FIRST PAPER WAS ACCEPTED!! The good news keep on coming! My sole-author paper was accepted. I will be published as an undergrad!","c_root_id_A":"f7x64q5","c_root_id_B":"f7xhr31","created_at_utc_A":1574047321,"created_at_utc_B":1574058072,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats!!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!!! I’m also an undergrad student and I’ve been trying to get something published too... this is hard work, keep going!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":10751.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":258,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gais3tp","c_root_id_B":"gais9mr","created_at_utc_A":1603997971,"created_at_utc_B":1603998033,"score_A":110,"score_B":233,"human_ref_A":"Ewwwww you kiss your spouse?","human_ref_B":"My spouse and I are both academics teaching fully online. What does \"come home\" even mean?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":62.0,"score_ratio":2.1181818182},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":259,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gair9cx","c_root_id_B":"gais9mr","created_at_utc_A":1603997642,"created_at_utc_B":1603998033,"score_A":14,"score_B":233,"human_ref_A":"The struggle is real.","human_ref_B":"My spouse and I are both academics teaching fully online. What does \"come home\" even mean?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":391.0,"score_ratio":16.6428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":260,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gair9cx","c_root_id_B":"gais3tp","created_at_utc_A":1603997642,"created_at_utc_B":1603997971,"score_A":14,"score_B":110,"human_ref_A":"The struggle is real.","human_ref_B":"Ewwwww you kiss your spouse?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":329.0,"score_ratio":7.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":261,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaiudch","c_root_id_B":"gaj0b4b","created_at_utc_A":1603998872,"created_at_utc_B":1604001607,"score_A":32,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"Kissing your SO is always a good thing. Also, the lifestyle that you are implying is not universal and it doesn't have to be like that. Maybe some fields, maybe USA, maybe some PIs. But there are plenty of places where academia is associated with good pay and work-life balance.","human_ref_B":"I do not understand how the hell I put up with it. You wanna hire a hard working nanotechnologist? I would like to see my family a little, and afford a better house than this tiny apartment... \\*sigh\\*","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2735.0,"score_ratio":1.28125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":262,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaj0b4b","c_root_id_B":"gaiwdsy","created_at_utc_A":1604001607,"created_at_utc_B":1603999758,"score_A":41,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"I do not understand how the hell I put up with it. You wanna hire a hard working nanotechnologist? I would like to see my family a little, and afford a better house than this tiny apartment... \\*sigh\\*","human_ref_B":"Instructions unclear, do I kiss myself? I come home to myself (or never leave home nowadays), and cook, clean and pay the rent on my own. I know I should be dating but covid killed that option for now🙃","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1849.0,"score_ratio":1.4137931034},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":263,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gair9cx","c_root_id_B":"gaj0b4b","created_at_utc_A":1603997642,"created_at_utc_B":1604001607,"score_A":14,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"The struggle is real.","human_ref_B":"I do not understand how the hell I put up with it. You wanna hire a hard working nanotechnologist? I would like to see my family a little, and afford a better house than this tiny apartment... \\*sigh\\*","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3965.0,"score_ratio":2.9285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":264,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaisb6b","c_root_id_B":"gaj0b4b","created_at_utc_A":1603998050,"created_at_utc_B":1604001607,"score_A":5,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"Architecture school too! Once the architecture school term starts, I’m like a widow :/","human_ref_B":"I do not understand how the hell I put up with it. You wanna hire a hard working nanotechnologist? I would like to see my family a little, and afford a better house than this tiny apartment... \\*sigh\\*","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3557.0,"score_ratio":8.2},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":265,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaj0b4b","c_root_id_B":"gaiyvsu","created_at_utc_A":1604001607,"created_at_utc_B":1604000940,"score_A":41,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I do not understand how the hell I put up with it. You wanna hire a hard working nanotechnologist? I would like to see my family a little, and afford a better house than this tiny apartment... \\*sigh\\*","human_ref_B":"When I *get* home?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":667.0,"score_ratio":13.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":266,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaiudch","c_root_id_B":"gair9cx","created_at_utc_A":1603998872,"created_at_utc_B":1603997642,"score_A":32,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"Kissing your SO is always a good thing. Also, the lifestyle that you are implying is not universal and it doesn't have to be like that. Maybe some fields, maybe USA, maybe some PIs. But there are plenty of places where academia is associated with good pay and work-life balance.","human_ref_B":"The struggle is real.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1230.0,"score_ratio":2.2857142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":267,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaiudch","c_root_id_B":"gaisb6b","created_at_utc_A":1603998872,"created_at_utc_B":1603998050,"score_A":32,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Kissing your SO is always a good thing. Also, the lifestyle that you are implying is not universal and it doesn't have to be like that. Maybe some fields, maybe USA, maybe some PIs. But there are plenty of places where academia is associated with good pay and work-life balance.","human_ref_B":"Architecture school too! Once the architecture school term starts, I’m like a widow :/","labels":1,"seconds_difference":822.0,"score_ratio":6.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":268,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaiwdsy","c_root_id_B":"gair9cx","created_at_utc_A":1603999758,"created_at_utc_B":1603997642,"score_A":29,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"Instructions unclear, do I kiss myself? I come home to myself (or never leave home nowadays), and cook, clean and pay the rent on my own. I know I should be dating but covid killed that option for now🙃","human_ref_B":"The struggle is real.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2116.0,"score_ratio":2.0714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":269,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaisb6b","c_root_id_B":"gaiwdsy","created_at_utc_A":1603998050,"created_at_utc_B":1603999758,"score_A":5,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"Architecture school too! Once the architecture school term starts, I’m like a widow :/","human_ref_B":"Instructions unclear, do I kiss myself? I come home to myself (or never leave home nowadays), and cook, clean and pay the rent on my own. I know I should be dating but covid killed that option for now🙃","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1708.0,"score_ratio":5.8},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":270,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaisb6b","c_root_id_B":"gaj0ram","created_at_utc_A":1603998050,"created_at_utc_B":1604001823,"score_A":5,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Architecture school too! Once the architecture school term starts, I’m like a widow :/","human_ref_B":"I don’t understand. This is great advice, but it’s not different for professors than anyone else. Why propagate the notion that this is anything other than a normal job.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3773.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":271,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaj0ram","c_root_id_B":"gaiyvsu","created_at_utc_A":1604001823,"created_at_utc_B":1604000940,"score_A":10,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I don’t understand. This is great advice, but it’s not different for professors than anyone else. Why propagate the notion that this is anything other than a normal job.","human_ref_B":"When I *get* home?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":883.0,"score_ratio":3.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":272,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaisb6b","c_root_id_B":"gak2ujw","created_at_utc_A":1603998050,"created_at_utc_B":1604021690,"score_A":5,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Architecture school too! Once the architecture school term starts, I’m like a widow :/","human_ref_B":"My wife just tells me everything I did wrong when I come home. Kinda just makes me want to stay at work with my cells. At least they don't yell at me.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":23640.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":273,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gak2ujw","c_root_id_B":"gajhl2c","created_at_utc_A":1604021690,"created_at_utc_B":1604010150,"score_A":7,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"My wife just tells me everything I did wrong when I come home. Kinda just makes me want to stay at work with my cells. At least they don't yell at me.","human_ref_B":"> And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. We also don't understand so please don't look for answers. Neither my wife nor I understands what happens when I text \"I'll be done around 6:15\" and then walk out of the lab at 7:05.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11540.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":274,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaiyvsu","c_root_id_B":"gak2ujw","created_at_utc_A":1604000940,"created_at_utc_B":1604021690,"score_A":3,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"When I *get* home?","human_ref_B":"My wife just tells me everything I did wrong when I come home. Kinda just makes me want to stay at work with my cells. At least they don't yell at me.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":20750.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":275,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gajower","c_root_id_B":"gaisb6b","created_at_utc_A":1604014038,"created_at_utc_B":1603998050,"score_A":8,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"How do I get a spouse? Kids can come later, I guess.","human_ref_B":"Architecture school too! Once the architecture school term starts, I’m like a widow :/","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15988.0,"score_ratio":1.6},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":276,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gajhl2c","c_root_id_B":"gajower","created_at_utc_A":1604010150,"created_at_utc_B":1604014038,"score_A":5,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"> And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. We also don't understand so please don't look for answers. Neither my wife nor I understands what happens when I text \"I'll be done around 6:15\" and then walk out of the lab at 7:05.","human_ref_B":"How do I get a spouse? Kids can come later, I guess.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3888.0,"score_ratio":1.6},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":277,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gaiyvsu","c_root_id_B":"gajower","created_at_utc_A":1604000940,"created_at_utc_B":1604014038,"score_A":3,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"When I *get* home?","human_ref_B":"How do I get a spouse? Kids can come later, I guess.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":13098.0,"score_ratio":2.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":278,"row":{"post_id":"jkfcfu","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.93,"history":"When you get home today, don't forget to kiss your spouse and say thank you. I see this particularly in STEM researchers; it's a thing for you apparently. I'm a spouse working in the private sector. We, along with your children, get a bit tired of not seeing you much. And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. Sorry about the rant, but it's dinner time, and my spouse is running some cells through some machine or whatnot in the lab. So, closing the circle repeating myself, kiss them fondly and thank them profusely! Cheers.","c_root_id_A":"gajhl2c","c_root_id_B":"gaiyvsu","created_at_utc_A":1604010150,"created_at_utc_B":1604000940,"score_A":5,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"> And I cannot understand how the hell you put up with the very long hours, horrible pay, medieval managers which you call PIs, incredible amount of stress every few years looking for funding, and one of the most ferocious competitive contexts that exist. We also don't understand so please don't look for answers. Neither my wife nor I understands what happens when I text \"I'll be done around 6:15\" and then walk out of the lab at 7:05.","human_ref_B":"When I *get* home?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9210.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":279,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8djvb","c_root_id_B":"gr8dadm","created_at_utc_A":1615986030,"created_at_utc_B":1615985875,"score_A":267,"score_B":89,"human_ref_A":"YES!! It’s now at the point in my field that if you don’t have a science or nature paper AND a prestigious post doc, you’re basically SOL for any faculty positions. I have worked on meta analyses and publication bias favouring positive outcomes is completely skewing our ability to synthesis and understand actual patterns in ecological data. Which in turn is limiting our ability to apply this information accurately to evidence based policy. The business side of academia is ruining the actual utility of science.","human_ref_B":"I've added failed experiments/negative data into papers. You unfortunately generally need some positive/interesting result as the basis for the paper, but if things failed along the way and are relevant to the main topic of the paper, you can briefly mention the negative results and add it as a supplemental figure. I believe there are journals exclusively for negative results now, too, but I'm not sure how widely indexed they are.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":155.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":280,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8c2rf","c_root_id_B":"gr8djvb","created_at_utc_A":1615985134,"created_at_utc_B":1615986030,"score_A":21,"score_B":267,"human_ref_A":"Agree 100% on publishing failed experiments!","human_ref_B":"YES!! It’s now at the point in my field that if you don’t have a science or nature paper AND a prestigious post doc, you’re basically SOL for any faculty positions. I have worked on meta analyses and publication bias favouring positive outcomes is completely skewing our ability to synthesis and understand actual patterns in ecological data. Which in turn is limiting our ability to apply this information accurately to evidence based policy. The business side of academia is ruining the actual utility of science.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":896.0,"score_ratio":12.7142857143},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":281,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8gbq0","c_root_id_B":"gr8dadm","created_at_utc_A":1615987604,"created_at_utc_B":1615985875,"score_A":96,"score_B":89,"human_ref_A":"It’s one of the things ruining academia. It stems from administrators wanting a way to quantify and rank researchers’ productivity. This may not even be possible, but assuming it is “number of papers” is a terrible metric. It doesn’t measure what administrators think it does and it creates perverse incentives that actually harm research output. Citations per paper is a metric I pulled out of my butt just now but it’s still a much better metric than paper count. What I don’t understand is why the publish-or-perish model still exists when everybody should know it’s not working. Who’s keeping it going? Why? Is Big Paper behind it? Is there some law?","human_ref_B":"I've added failed experiments/negative data into papers. You unfortunately generally need some positive/interesting result as the basis for the paper, but if things failed along the way and are relevant to the main topic of the paper, you can briefly mention the negative results and add it as a supplemental figure. I believe there are journals exclusively for negative results now, too, but I'm not sure how widely indexed they are.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1729.0,"score_ratio":1.0786516854},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":282,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8fzpv","c_root_id_B":"gr8gbq0","created_at_utc_A":1615987422,"created_at_utc_B":1615987604,"score_A":28,"score_B":96,"human_ref_A":"Agreed! It’s partly why I left academia: the “game” of publishing/grants. And I was good at the game! So many papers add epsilon to delta...very little meat. And the redundancy is ridiculous. Soooo many papers that don’t properly cite & document what has come before, despite it being easier than ever to check (Google). I am much happier in industry, after 20 years in academia.","human_ref_B":"It’s one of the things ruining academia. It stems from administrators wanting a way to quantify and rank researchers’ productivity. This may not even be possible, but assuming it is “number of papers” is a terrible metric. It doesn’t measure what administrators think it does and it creates perverse incentives that actually harm research output. Citations per paper is a metric I pulled out of my butt just now but it’s still a much better metric than paper count. What I don’t understand is why the publish-or-perish model still exists when everybody should know it’s not working. Who’s keeping it going? Why? Is Big Paper behind it? Is there some law?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":182.0,"score_ratio":3.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":283,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8gbq0","c_root_id_B":"gr8c2rf","created_at_utc_A":1615987604,"created_at_utc_B":1615985134,"score_A":96,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"It’s one of the things ruining academia. It stems from administrators wanting a way to quantify and rank researchers’ productivity. This may not even be possible, but assuming it is “number of papers” is a terrible metric. It doesn’t measure what administrators think it does and it creates perverse incentives that actually harm research output. Citations per paper is a metric I pulled out of my butt just now but it’s still a much better metric than paper count. What I don’t understand is why the publish-or-perish model still exists when everybody should know it’s not working. Who’s keeping it going? Why? Is Big Paper behind it? Is there some law?","human_ref_B":"Agree 100% on publishing failed experiments!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2470.0,"score_ratio":4.5714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":284,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8c2rf","c_root_id_B":"gr8dadm","created_at_utc_A":1615985134,"created_at_utc_B":1615985875,"score_A":21,"score_B":89,"human_ref_A":"Agree 100% on publishing failed experiments!","human_ref_B":"I've added failed experiments/negative data into papers. You unfortunately generally need some positive/interesting result as the basis for the paper, but if things failed along the way and are relevant to the main topic of the paper, you can briefly mention the negative results and add it as a supplemental figure. I believe there are journals exclusively for negative results now, too, but I'm not sure how widely indexed they are.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":741.0,"score_ratio":4.2380952381},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":285,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8iviq","c_root_id_B":"gr8kagv","created_at_utc_A":1615988964,"created_at_utc_B":1615989691,"score_A":29,"score_B":85,"human_ref_A":"I'd honestly love it if there was an \"International Journal of Zany Shit we tried that didn't work but oh well here's some data.\" But that of course means there has to be some degree of standards for what constitutes a good failed experiment.","human_ref_B":"There's this guy in my field who published like 8 papers based on his PhD project alone by slicing and dicing the project into small portions then blowing each of them up into full papers. The intros of some of these papers read almost the same with some modifications to make them just different enough. Till this day I wonder how they got published. But he's now a professor at a top university so I guess it worked out well for him.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":727.0,"score_ratio":2.9310344828},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":286,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8fzpv","c_root_id_B":"gr8kagv","created_at_utc_A":1615987422,"created_at_utc_B":1615989691,"score_A":28,"score_B":85,"human_ref_A":"Agreed! It’s partly why I left academia: the “game” of publishing/grants. And I was good at the game! So many papers add epsilon to delta...very little meat. And the redundancy is ridiculous. Soooo many papers that don’t properly cite & document what has come before, despite it being easier than ever to check (Google). I am much happier in industry, after 20 years in academia.","human_ref_B":"There's this guy in my field who published like 8 papers based on his PhD project alone by slicing and dicing the project into small portions then blowing each of them up into full papers. The intros of some of these papers read almost the same with some modifications to make them just different enough. Till this day I wonder how they got published. But he's now a professor at a top university so I guess it worked out well for him.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2269.0,"score_ratio":3.0357142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":287,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8c2rf","c_root_id_B":"gr8kagv","created_at_utc_A":1615985134,"created_at_utc_B":1615989691,"score_A":21,"score_B":85,"human_ref_A":"Agree 100% on publishing failed experiments!","human_ref_B":"There's this guy in my field who published like 8 papers based on his PhD project alone by slicing and dicing the project into small portions then blowing each of them up into full papers. The intros of some of these papers read almost the same with some modifications to make them just different enough. Till this day I wonder how they got published. But he's now a professor at a top university so I guess it worked out well for him.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4557.0,"score_ratio":4.0476190476},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":288,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8iw46","c_root_id_B":"gr8kagv","created_at_utc_A":1615988972,"created_at_utc_B":1615989691,"score_A":6,"score_B":85,"human_ref_A":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","human_ref_B":"There's this guy in my field who published like 8 papers based on his PhD project alone by slicing and dicing the project into small portions then blowing each of them up into full papers. The intros of some of these papers read almost the same with some modifications to make them just different enough. Till this day I wonder how they got published. But he's now a professor at a top university so I guess it worked out well for him.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":719.0,"score_ratio":14.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":289,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8fzpv","c_root_id_B":"gr8iviq","created_at_utc_A":1615987422,"created_at_utc_B":1615988964,"score_A":28,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"Agreed! It’s partly why I left academia: the “game” of publishing/grants. And I was good at the game! So many papers add epsilon to delta...very little meat. And the redundancy is ridiculous. Soooo many papers that don’t properly cite & document what has come before, despite it being easier than ever to check (Google). I am much happier in industry, after 20 years in academia.","human_ref_B":"I'd honestly love it if there was an \"International Journal of Zany Shit we tried that didn't work but oh well here's some data.\" But that of course means there has to be some degree of standards for what constitutes a good failed experiment.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1542.0,"score_ratio":1.0357142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":290,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8c2rf","c_root_id_B":"gr8iviq","created_at_utc_A":1615985134,"created_at_utc_B":1615988964,"score_A":21,"score_B":29,"human_ref_A":"Agree 100% on publishing failed experiments!","human_ref_B":"I'd honestly love it if there was an \"International Journal of Zany Shit we tried that didn't work but oh well here's some data.\" But that of course means there has to be some degree of standards for what constitutes a good failed experiment.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3830.0,"score_ratio":1.380952381},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":291,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8fzpv","c_root_id_B":"gr8c2rf","created_at_utc_A":1615987422,"created_at_utc_B":1615985134,"score_A":28,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"Agreed! It’s partly why I left academia: the “game” of publishing/grants. And I was good at the game! So many papers add epsilon to delta...very little meat. And the redundancy is ridiculous. Soooo many papers that don’t properly cite & document what has come before, despite it being easier than ever to check (Google). I am much happier in industry, after 20 years in academia.","human_ref_B":"Agree 100% on publishing failed experiments!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2288.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":292,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8nn8w","c_root_id_B":"gr8wm5s","created_at_utc_A":1615991367,"created_at_utc_B":1615995583,"score_A":12,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"Publishing a negative result requires some work, but it's definitely doable and I recommend it. Towards the beginning of my career I published two papers that are mostly \"*if you think this is a good idea, don't; here's why*\" and \"*why XYZ looks like it should work, but doesn't*\". Neither exceeded a dozen citations or so, but at least I contributed towards fighting the bias. I deplore papers that are only slightly different spins on the same thing and I pity people who publish them (because otherwise they would perish). Like \"*Novel method applied to material 1*\". \"*Novel method applied to material 2, which is very much like material 1*\". Ugh.","human_ref_B":"A perspective from the humanities: I'm in what's called a \"book field,\" rather than an \"article field.\" Tenure expectation is, basically, one single-authored book. These take years to research and write, so it's pretty much a one-shot deal. Thing is, only a handful of publishers publish scholarship in a given field. The most prestigious (and therefore secure for tenure purposes) publishers are university presses, and we all know the financial condition of universities these days. They're getting hit on the demand side as well, because fewer and fewer libraries are buying books (and these are the kind of books that mostly only libraries buy). So the presses might not even look at your proposal, let alone send it out for review. Universities have effectively outsourced P&T to presses that are on life support themselves.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4216.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":293,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8wm5s","c_root_id_B":"gr8o0jf","created_at_utc_A":1615995583,"created_at_utc_B":1615991550,"score_A":14,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"A perspective from the humanities: I'm in what's called a \"book field,\" rather than an \"article field.\" Tenure expectation is, basically, one single-authored book. These take years to research and write, so it's pretty much a one-shot deal. Thing is, only a handful of publishers publish scholarship in a given field. The most prestigious (and therefore secure for tenure purposes) publishers are university presses, and we all know the financial condition of universities these days. They're getting hit on the demand side as well, because fewer and fewer libraries are buying books (and these are the kind of books that mostly only libraries buy). So the presses might not even look at your proposal, let alone send it out for review. Universities have effectively outsourced P&T to presses that are on life support themselves.","human_ref_B":"h-index is by no means perfect but it's far more relevant than paper count, i.e. how many times has your work contributed to the literature.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4033.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":294,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8varw","c_root_id_B":"gr8wm5s","created_at_utc_A":1615994995,"created_at_utc_B":1615995583,"score_A":9,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"Let me give a slightly different take on this. I completely agree with the notion that there are too many papers and definitely way too many “incremental” papers. But it is worth thinking g about the causes of this. In my mind the main driver of all of this is that the job market is ultra-competitive. Most fields produce an order of magnitude (or more!) PhDs than they have TT openings. As such there is a massive culling at the postdoctoral level and then at the Assistant Professor level. Now of course some fields are not training PhDs to necessarily go into academia but many are and in those cases this pressure applies. For example in my department we regularly get 500+ applications for every TT opening. This is very typical for my field and many others. So you need some criteria to separate people and at that scale it will obviously not be a subtle or thoughtful process. Counting pubs is obviously not an optimal algorithm but if we didn’t do that, we would need some other metric. Letters? We get 500x3 letters, how to separate those? Etc. And that’s not to mention grants and in particular final grant reports. If you are writing the final report for a $400,000 grant, you better have something listed there. Pubs is usually the thing Another issue is something that has occurred more recently, but it’s that now many places that aren’t really research schools at all now require a solid publication record for tenure. In my opinion this is unwise but faculty doing research is good for a small school’s prestige. Obviously this trend is an outgrowth of the factors mentioned above.","human_ref_B":"A perspective from the humanities: I'm in what's called a \"book field,\" rather than an \"article field.\" Tenure expectation is, basically, one single-authored book. These take years to research and write, so it's pretty much a one-shot deal. Thing is, only a handful of publishers publish scholarship in a given field. The most prestigious (and therefore secure for tenure purposes) publishers are university presses, and we all know the financial condition of universities these days. They're getting hit on the demand side as well, because fewer and fewer libraries are buying books (and these are the kind of books that mostly only libraries buy). So the presses might not even look at your proposal, let alone send it out for review. Universities have effectively outsourced P&T to presses that are on life support themselves.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":588.0,"score_ratio":1.5555555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":295,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8wm5s","c_root_id_B":"gr8iw46","created_at_utc_A":1615995583,"created_at_utc_B":1615988972,"score_A":14,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"A perspective from the humanities: I'm in what's called a \"book field,\" rather than an \"article field.\" Tenure expectation is, basically, one single-authored book. These take years to research and write, so it's pretty much a one-shot deal. Thing is, only a handful of publishers publish scholarship in a given field. The most prestigious (and therefore secure for tenure purposes) publishers are university presses, and we all know the financial condition of universities these days. They're getting hit on the demand side as well, because fewer and fewer libraries are buying books (and these are the kind of books that mostly only libraries buy). So the presses might not even look at your proposal, let alone send it out for review. Universities have effectively outsourced P&T to presses that are on life support themselves.","human_ref_B":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6611.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":296,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8p0ne","c_root_id_B":"gr8wm5s","created_at_utc_A":1615992043,"created_at_utc_B":1615995583,"score_A":6,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I'm a physisist, and I feel all of this as a scam... Academia became into a legal piramidal bussines: you need a degre in order to be able to teach to those who pretend to get a degree so they can teach others who pretend... All of us are guilty for accepting this unsenseless academia rules.","human_ref_B":"A perspective from the humanities: I'm in what's called a \"book field,\" rather than an \"article field.\" Tenure expectation is, basically, one single-authored book. These take years to research and write, so it's pretty much a one-shot deal. Thing is, only a handful of publishers publish scholarship in a given field. The most prestigious (and therefore secure for tenure purposes) publishers are university presses, and we all know the financial condition of universities these days. They're getting hit on the demand side as well, because fewer and fewer libraries are buying books (and these are the kind of books that mostly only libraries buy). So the presses might not even look at your proposal, let alone send it out for review. Universities have effectively outsourced P&T to presses that are on life support themselves.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3540.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":297,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr99jha","c_root_id_B":"gr8nn8w","created_at_utc_A":1616001312,"created_at_utc_B":1615991367,"score_A":14,"score_B":12,"human_ref_A":"I know some PhD students more experienced than any other postdoc since they still do a PhD in their 8th or 9th years at the same lab and this is in Europe, where you don't have classes, exams, seminars etc. It's full time research. They aim to publish every chapter of their dissertation in famous and high impact journals, it clogs the lab for upcoming students and we invest too much money and time on limited number of projects. The sad part is to see that all about the journal names. Nobody cares about the continuity, robust data or reproducibility, they keep looking for fancy experiments to fit fancy journals. Our lab discussions don't involve around the scientific ideas, they involve around journal names (e.g. this would be a Nature paper etc.) I mean after all our PI is \"ambitious\" enough to keep pushing us by telling \"I want that each one to have a Nature paper\" and yes, this is a toxic lab environment. I think this is why many people want to quit academia. PS: This also creates a huge inequality in terms of fellowships etc. Many of us don't have luxury to do a 8 year PhD project and wait for a publication for that long.","human_ref_B":"Publishing a negative result requires some work, but it's definitely doable and I recommend it. Towards the beginning of my career I published two papers that are mostly \"*if you think this is a good idea, don't; here's why*\" and \"*why XYZ looks like it should work, but doesn't*\". Neither exceeded a dozen citations or so, but at least I contributed towards fighting the bias. I deplore papers that are only slightly different spins on the same thing and I pity people who publish them (because otherwise they would perish). Like \"*Novel method applied to material 1*\". \"*Novel method applied to material 2, which is very much like material 1*\". Ugh.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9945.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":298,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr99jha","c_root_id_B":"gr8o0jf","created_at_utc_A":1616001312,"created_at_utc_B":1615991550,"score_A":14,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"I know some PhD students more experienced than any other postdoc since they still do a PhD in their 8th or 9th years at the same lab and this is in Europe, where you don't have classes, exams, seminars etc. It's full time research. They aim to publish every chapter of their dissertation in famous and high impact journals, it clogs the lab for upcoming students and we invest too much money and time on limited number of projects. The sad part is to see that all about the journal names. Nobody cares about the continuity, robust data or reproducibility, they keep looking for fancy experiments to fit fancy journals. Our lab discussions don't involve around the scientific ideas, they involve around journal names (e.g. this would be a Nature paper etc.) I mean after all our PI is \"ambitious\" enough to keep pushing us by telling \"I want that each one to have a Nature paper\" and yes, this is a toxic lab environment. I think this is why many people want to quit academia. PS: This also creates a huge inequality in terms of fellowships etc. Many of us don't have luxury to do a 8 year PhD project and wait for a publication for that long.","human_ref_B":"h-index is by no means perfect but it's far more relevant than paper count, i.e. how many times has your work contributed to the literature.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9762.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":299,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr99jha","c_root_id_B":"gr8varw","created_at_utc_A":1616001312,"created_at_utc_B":1615994995,"score_A":14,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I know some PhD students more experienced than any other postdoc since they still do a PhD in their 8th or 9th years at the same lab and this is in Europe, where you don't have classes, exams, seminars etc. It's full time research. They aim to publish every chapter of their dissertation in famous and high impact journals, it clogs the lab for upcoming students and we invest too much money and time on limited number of projects. The sad part is to see that all about the journal names. Nobody cares about the continuity, robust data or reproducibility, they keep looking for fancy experiments to fit fancy journals. Our lab discussions don't involve around the scientific ideas, they involve around journal names (e.g. this would be a Nature paper etc.) I mean after all our PI is \"ambitious\" enough to keep pushing us by telling \"I want that each one to have a Nature paper\" and yes, this is a toxic lab environment. I think this is why many people want to quit academia. PS: This also creates a huge inequality in terms of fellowships etc. Many of us don't have luxury to do a 8 year PhD project and wait for a publication for that long.","human_ref_B":"Let me give a slightly different take on this. I completely agree with the notion that there are too many papers and definitely way too many “incremental” papers. But it is worth thinking g about the causes of this. In my mind the main driver of all of this is that the job market is ultra-competitive. Most fields produce an order of magnitude (or more!) PhDs than they have TT openings. As such there is a massive culling at the postdoctoral level and then at the Assistant Professor level. Now of course some fields are not training PhDs to necessarily go into academia but many are and in those cases this pressure applies. For example in my department we regularly get 500+ applications for every TT opening. This is very typical for my field and many others. So you need some criteria to separate people and at that scale it will obviously not be a subtle or thoughtful process. Counting pubs is obviously not an optimal algorithm but if we didn’t do that, we would need some other metric. Letters? We get 500x3 letters, how to separate those? Etc. And that’s not to mention grants and in particular final grant reports. If you are writing the final report for a $400,000 grant, you better have something listed there. Pubs is usually the thing Another issue is something that has occurred more recently, but it’s that now many places that aren’t really research schools at all now require a solid publication record for tenure. In my opinion this is unwise but faculty doing research is good for a small school’s prestige. Obviously this trend is an outgrowth of the factors mentioned above.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6317.0,"score_ratio":1.5555555556},"truncated_cells":[]}],"num_rows_total":348718,"num_rows_per_page":100,"partial":false} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/shp_rows_300.json b/shp_rows_300.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8fa5e1d04946accfee2afba3bf6cc48bced50df --- /dev/null +++ b/shp_rows_300.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"features":[{"feature_idx":0,"name":"post_id","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":1,"name":"domain","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":2,"name":"upvote_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":3,"name":"history","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":4,"name":"c_root_id_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":5,"name":"c_root_id_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":6,"name":"created_at_utc_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":7,"name":"created_at_utc_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":8,"name":"score_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":9,"name":"score_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":10,"name":"human_ref_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":11,"name":"human_ref_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":12,"name":"labels","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":13,"name":"seconds_difference","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":14,"name":"score_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}}],"rows":[{"row_idx":300,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr99jha","c_root_id_B":"gr8iw46","created_at_utc_A":1616001312,"created_at_utc_B":1615988972,"score_A":14,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"I know some PhD students more experienced than any other postdoc since they still do a PhD in their 8th or 9th years at the same lab and this is in Europe, where you don't have classes, exams, seminars etc. It's full time research. They aim to publish every chapter of their dissertation in famous and high impact journals, it clogs the lab for upcoming students and we invest too much money and time on limited number of projects. The sad part is to see that all about the journal names. Nobody cares about the continuity, robust data or reproducibility, they keep looking for fancy experiments to fit fancy journals. Our lab discussions don't involve around the scientific ideas, they involve around journal names (e.g. this would be a Nature paper etc.) I mean after all our PI is \"ambitious\" enough to keep pushing us by telling \"I want that each one to have a Nature paper\" and yes, this is a toxic lab environment. I think this is why many people want to quit academia. PS: This also creates a huge inequality in terms of fellowships etc. Many of us don't have luxury to do a 8 year PhD project and wait for a publication for that long.","human_ref_B":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12340.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":301,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8p0ne","c_root_id_B":"gr99jha","created_at_utc_A":1615992043,"created_at_utc_B":1616001312,"score_A":6,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I'm a physisist, and I feel all of this as a scam... Academia became into a legal piramidal bussines: you need a degre in order to be able to teach to those who pretend to get a degree so they can teach others who pretend... All of us are guilty for accepting this unsenseless academia rules.","human_ref_B":"I know some PhD students more experienced than any other postdoc since they still do a PhD in their 8th or 9th years at the same lab and this is in Europe, where you don't have classes, exams, seminars etc. It's full time research. They aim to publish every chapter of their dissertation in famous and high impact journals, it clogs the lab for upcoming students and we invest too much money and time on limited number of projects. The sad part is to see that all about the journal names. Nobody cares about the continuity, robust data or reproducibility, they keep looking for fancy experiments to fit fancy journals. Our lab discussions don't involve around the scientific ideas, they involve around journal names (e.g. this would be a Nature paper etc.) I mean after all our PI is \"ambitious\" enough to keep pushing us by telling \"I want that each one to have a Nature paper\" and yes, this is a toxic lab environment. I think this is why many people want to quit academia. PS: This also creates a huge inequality in terms of fellowships etc. Many of us don't have luxury to do a 8 year PhD project and wait for a publication for that long.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":9269.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":302,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8nn8w","c_root_id_B":"gr8iw46","created_at_utc_A":1615991367,"created_at_utc_B":1615988972,"score_A":12,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Publishing a negative result requires some work, but it's definitely doable and I recommend it. Towards the beginning of my career I published two papers that are mostly \"*if you think this is a good idea, don't; here's why*\" and \"*why XYZ looks like it should work, but doesn't*\". Neither exceeded a dozen citations or so, but at least I contributed towards fighting the bias. I deplore papers that are only slightly different spins on the same thing and I pity people who publish them (because otherwise they would perish). Like \"*Novel method applied to material 1*\". \"*Novel method applied to material 2, which is very much like material 1*\". Ugh.","human_ref_B":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2395.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":303,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr9u4py","c_root_id_B":"gr9h880","created_at_utc_A":1616010420,"created_at_utc_B":1616004684,"score_A":11,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Academic system is all fucked up. I regret sincerely that I chose this career. I hate it and it keeps getting worse. People said that all the effort of having a Phd would be fruitful with patience and perseverance. It hasn't been fruitful. I know it's a global crisis that is part of a huge generational and structural crisis, but knowing that doesn't make it better.","human_ref_B":"Yes indeed. This is what I think various metaresearch studies, starting with John Ioannidis' much-cited work, have been documenting that has especially affected science and social science--that the pressure to publish and the growth of various metrics for measuring not just quantity but impact factors, combined with a standard that says negative results are non-publishable, has become an incentive system that is pushing scientific knowledge towards false or misleading claims. Not because people are deliberately falsifying data but instead they are conducting studies in ways that are increasingly and perhaps often unconsciously designed to churn out publishable outcomes in a reliable way even if those outcomes turn out to be marginally significant or largely an artifact of the research design and thus not reproducible or applicable in a broader way. We are doing this to ourselves. Academics still in theory have control over the evaluation of their peers and still in many research institutions control many aspects of faculty practice. We could seriously de-escalate the standards we use to hire, tenure, promote and reward researchers and stop this race to the bottom. We could do that at the same time as taking back control over scholarly publication from predatory for-profit publishers who contribute to the overproduction of scholarship, because it's the voluntary labor of faculty that adds the important value of such scholarship (both in peer review and in doing the research in the first place). We need scholarship that has the room to breath. We need researchers to publish negative results. We need scholars to have time and space to think, to noodle around idly with ideas that aren't easily turned into an experimental design. That is how the knowledge that has mattered in the past has come into being. Many of the most important findings and arguments and ideas that we still use and value today came from long-term, slow-accumulating research of a kind that would never be fundable or publishable today, and would never survive the scrutiny of neoliberal styles of institutional management.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5736.0,"score_ratio":1.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":304,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8o0jf","c_root_id_B":"gr9u4py","created_at_utc_A":1615991550,"created_at_utc_B":1616010420,"score_A":8,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"h-index is by no means perfect but it's far more relevant than paper count, i.e. how many times has your work contributed to the literature.","human_ref_B":"Academic system is all fucked up. I regret sincerely that I chose this career. I hate it and it keeps getting worse. People said that all the effort of having a Phd would be fruitful with patience and perseverance. It hasn't been fruitful. I know it's a global crisis that is part of a huge generational and structural crisis, but knowing that doesn't make it better.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":18870.0,"score_ratio":1.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":305,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8varw","c_root_id_B":"gr9u4py","created_at_utc_A":1615994995,"created_at_utc_B":1616010420,"score_A":9,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"Let me give a slightly different take on this. I completely agree with the notion that there are too many papers and definitely way too many “incremental” papers. But it is worth thinking g about the causes of this. In my mind the main driver of all of this is that the job market is ultra-competitive. Most fields produce an order of magnitude (or more!) PhDs than they have TT openings. As such there is a massive culling at the postdoctoral level and then at the Assistant Professor level. Now of course some fields are not training PhDs to necessarily go into academia but many are and in those cases this pressure applies. For example in my department we regularly get 500+ applications for every TT opening. This is very typical for my field and many others. So you need some criteria to separate people and at that scale it will obviously not be a subtle or thoughtful process. Counting pubs is obviously not an optimal algorithm but if we didn’t do that, we would need some other metric. Letters? We get 500x3 letters, how to separate those? Etc. And that’s not to mention grants and in particular final grant reports. If you are writing the final report for a $400,000 grant, you better have something listed there. Pubs is usually the thing Another issue is something that has occurred more recently, but it’s that now many places that aren’t really research schools at all now require a solid publication record for tenure. In my opinion this is unwise but faculty doing research is good for a small school’s prestige. Obviously this trend is an outgrowth of the factors mentioned above.","human_ref_B":"Academic system is all fucked up. I regret sincerely that I chose this career. I hate it and it keeps getting worse. People said that all the effort of having a Phd would be fruitful with patience and perseverance. It hasn't been fruitful. I know it's a global crisis that is part of a huge generational and structural crisis, but knowing that doesn't make it better.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":15425.0,"score_ratio":1.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":306,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr9u4py","c_root_id_B":"gr8iw46","created_at_utc_A":1616010420,"created_at_utc_B":1615988972,"score_A":11,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Academic system is all fucked up. I regret sincerely that I chose this career. I hate it and it keeps getting worse. People said that all the effort of having a Phd would be fruitful with patience and perseverance. It hasn't been fruitful. I know it's a global crisis that is part of a huge generational and structural crisis, but knowing that doesn't make it better.","human_ref_B":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":21448.0,"score_ratio":1.8333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":307,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr9u4py","c_root_id_B":"gr8p0ne","created_at_utc_A":1616010420,"created_at_utc_B":1615992043,"score_A":11,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Academic system is all fucked up. I regret sincerely that I chose this career. I hate it and it keeps getting worse. People said that all the effort of having a Phd would be fruitful with patience and perseverance. It hasn't been fruitful. I know it's a global crisis that is part of a huge generational and structural crisis, but knowing that doesn't make it better.","human_ref_B":"I'm a physisist, and I feel all of this as a scam... Academia became into a legal piramidal bussines: you need a degre in order to be able to teach to those who pretend to get a degree so they can teach others who pretend... All of us are guilty for accepting this unsenseless academia rules.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":18377.0,"score_ratio":1.8333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":308,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8iw46","c_root_id_B":"gr9h880","created_at_utc_A":1615988972,"created_at_utc_B":1616004684,"score_A":6,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","human_ref_B":"Yes indeed. This is what I think various metaresearch studies, starting with John Ioannidis' much-cited work, have been documenting that has especially affected science and social science--that the pressure to publish and the growth of various metrics for measuring not just quantity but impact factors, combined with a standard that says negative results are non-publishable, has become an incentive system that is pushing scientific knowledge towards false or misleading claims. Not because people are deliberately falsifying data but instead they are conducting studies in ways that are increasingly and perhaps often unconsciously designed to churn out publishable outcomes in a reliable way even if those outcomes turn out to be marginally significant or largely an artifact of the research design and thus not reproducible or applicable in a broader way. We are doing this to ourselves. Academics still in theory have control over the evaluation of their peers and still in many research institutions control many aspects of faculty practice. We could seriously de-escalate the standards we use to hire, tenure, promote and reward researchers and stop this race to the bottom. We could do that at the same time as taking back control over scholarly publication from predatory for-profit publishers who contribute to the overproduction of scholarship, because it's the voluntary labor of faculty that adds the important value of such scholarship (both in peer review and in doing the research in the first place). We need scholarship that has the room to breath. We need researchers to publish negative results. We need scholars to have time and space to think, to noodle around idly with ideas that aren't easily turned into an experimental design. That is how the knowledge that has mattered in the past has come into being. Many of the most important findings and arguments and ideas that we still use and value today came from long-term, slow-accumulating research of a kind that would never be fundable or publishable today, and would never survive the scrutiny of neoliberal styles of institutional management.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":15712.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":309,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8p0ne","c_root_id_B":"gr9h880","created_at_utc_A":1615992043,"created_at_utc_B":1616004684,"score_A":6,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"I'm a physisist, and I feel all of this as a scam... Academia became into a legal piramidal bussines: you need a degre in order to be able to teach to those who pretend to get a degree so they can teach others who pretend... All of us are guilty for accepting this unsenseless academia rules.","human_ref_B":"Yes indeed. This is what I think various metaresearch studies, starting with John Ioannidis' much-cited work, have been documenting that has especially affected science and social science--that the pressure to publish and the growth of various metrics for measuring not just quantity but impact factors, combined with a standard that says negative results are non-publishable, has become an incentive system that is pushing scientific knowledge towards false or misleading claims. Not because people are deliberately falsifying data but instead they are conducting studies in ways that are increasingly and perhaps often unconsciously designed to churn out publishable outcomes in a reliable way even if those outcomes turn out to be marginally significant or largely an artifact of the research design and thus not reproducible or applicable in a broader way. We are doing this to ourselves. Academics still in theory have control over the evaluation of their peers and still in many research institutions control many aspects of faculty practice. We could seriously de-escalate the standards we use to hire, tenure, promote and reward researchers and stop this race to the bottom. We could do that at the same time as taking back control over scholarly publication from predatory for-profit publishers who contribute to the overproduction of scholarship, because it's the voluntary labor of faculty that adds the important value of such scholarship (both in peer review and in doing the research in the first place). We need scholarship that has the room to breath. We need researchers to publish negative results. We need scholars to have time and space to think, to noodle around idly with ideas that aren't easily turned into an experimental design. That is how the knowledge that has mattered in the past has come into being. Many of the most important findings and arguments and ideas that we still use and value today came from long-term, slow-accumulating research of a kind that would never be fundable or publishable today, and would never survive the scrutiny of neoliberal styles of institutional management.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12641.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":310,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8varw","c_root_id_B":"gr8o0jf","created_at_utc_A":1615994995,"created_at_utc_B":1615991550,"score_A":9,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Let me give a slightly different take on this. I completely agree with the notion that there are too many papers and definitely way too many “incremental” papers. But it is worth thinking g about the causes of this. In my mind the main driver of all of this is that the job market is ultra-competitive. Most fields produce an order of magnitude (or more!) PhDs than they have TT openings. As such there is a massive culling at the postdoctoral level and then at the Assistant Professor level. Now of course some fields are not training PhDs to necessarily go into academia but many are and in those cases this pressure applies. For example in my department we regularly get 500+ applications for every TT opening. This is very typical for my field and many others. So you need some criteria to separate people and at that scale it will obviously not be a subtle or thoughtful process. Counting pubs is obviously not an optimal algorithm but if we didn’t do that, we would need some other metric. Letters? We get 500x3 letters, how to separate those? Etc. And that’s not to mention grants and in particular final grant reports. If you are writing the final report for a $400,000 grant, you better have something listed there. Pubs is usually the thing Another issue is something that has occurred more recently, but it’s that now many places that aren’t really research schools at all now require a solid publication record for tenure. In my opinion this is unwise but faculty doing research is good for a small school’s prestige. Obviously this trend is an outgrowth of the factors mentioned above.","human_ref_B":"h-index is by no means perfect but it's far more relevant than paper count, i.e. how many times has your work contributed to the literature.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3445.0,"score_ratio":1.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":311,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8o0jf","c_root_id_B":"gr8iw46","created_at_utc_A":1615991550,"created_at_utc_B":1615988972,"score_A":8,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"h-index is by no means perfect but it's far more relevant than paper count, i.e. how many times has your work contributed to the literature.","human_ref_B":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2578.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":312,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8iw46","c_root_id_B":"gr8varw","created_at_utc_A":1615988972,"created_at_utc_B":1615994995,"score_A":6,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"There are very few TT positions, and many of these have research as a moderate to major component of their appointment. Why *wouldn’t* you expect those pressures to drive up output? What would selection for a TT job look like research productivity was removed? Impact? Novelty of research program? That is very much like what midcareer and senior searches look like. How would you do that at the junior stage, without just simply replicating prestige networks?","human_ref_B":"Let me give a slightly different take on this. I completely agree with the notion that there are too many papers and definitely way too many “incremental” papers. But it is worth thinking g about the causes of this. In my mind the main driver of all of this is that the job market is ultra-competitive. Most fields produce an order of magnitude (or more!) PhDs than they have TT openings. As such there is a massive culling at the postdoctoral level and then at the Assistant Professor level. Now of course some fields are not training PhDs to necessarily go into academia but many are and in those cases this pressure applies. For example in my department we regularly get 500+ applications for every TT opening. This is very typical for my field and many others. So you need some criteria to separate people and at that scale it will obviously not be a subtle or thoughtful process. Counting pubs is obviously not an optimal algorithm but if we didn’t do that, we would need some other metric. Letters? We get 500x3 letters, how to separate those? Etc. And that’s not to mention grants and in particular final grant reports. If you are writing the final report for a $400,000 grant, you better have something listed there. Pubs is usually the thing Another issue is something that has occurred more recently, but it’s that now many places that aren’t really research schools at all now require a solid publication record for tenure. In my opinion this is unwise but faculty doing research is good for a small school’s prestige. Obviously this trend is an outgrowth of the factors mentioned above.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6023.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":313,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr8varw","c_root_id_B":"gr8p0ne","created_at_utc_A":1615994995,"created_at_utc_B":1615992043,"score_A":9,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Let me give a slightly different take on this. I completely agree with the notion that there are too many papers and definitely way too many “incremental” papers. But it is worth thinking g about the causes of this. In my mind the main driver of all of this is that the job market is ultra-competitive. Most fields produce an order of magnitude (or more!) PhDs than they have TT openings. As such there is a massive culling at the postdoctoral level and then at the Assistant Professor level. Now of course some fields are not training PhDs to necessarily go into academia but many are and in those cases this pressure applies. For example in my department we regularly get 500+ applications for every TT opening. This is very typical for my field and many others. So you need some criteria to separate people and at that scale it will obviously not be a subtle or thoughtful process. Counting pubs is obviously not an optimal algorithm but if we didn’t do that, we would need some other metric. Letters? We get 500x3 letters, how to separate those? Etc. And that’s not to mention grants and in particular final grant reports. If you are writing the final report for a $400,000 grant, you better have something listed there. Pubs is usually the thing Another issue is something that has occurred more recently, but it’s that now many places that aren’t really research schools at all now require a solid publication record for tenure. In my opinion this is unwise but faculty doing research is good for a small school’s prestige. Obviously this trend is an outgrowth of the factors mentioned above.","human_ref_B":"I'm a physisist, and I feel all of this as a scam... Academia became into a legal piramidal bussines: you need a degre in order to be able to teach to those who pretend to get a degree so they can teach others who pretend... All of us are guilty for accepting this unsenseless academia rules.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2952.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":314,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gra9mle","c_root_id_B":"gr9usz3","created_at_utc_A":1616017514,"created_at_utc_B":1616010723,"score_A":6,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Part of the problem is R2s requiring their faculty to publish like they are at R1s. Many faculty at R2s don’t have their own dedicated graduate students, teach 3-5 classes per semester, and some even have advising duties, yet are being asked to publish 4+ articles a year with little to no support. The result? A bunch of new journals and a flood of half-assed articles. If R2s would be happy with one quality article every 12-24 months it would benefit everyone. Editors and reviewers wouldn’t have to deal with so many hastily prepared articles, many faculty at R1s would have a quicker review and publication time, and faculty at R2s could take their time and publish work reflective of their abilities. I’m not saying that every article published by an R2 is not good science - I’m not saying that at all - I’m simply saying the rising expectations for R2s is throwing the whole publication process off balance and it’s not fair to anyone.","human_ref_B":"Just one more data point here. I am non-tenure-track full-time with a 4/4 teaching load. To maintain my qualifications to teach under our college's accreditation requirements, I have to have the same minimum output of papers and conference presentations as a tenured professor teaching a 3/3 or less. Getting tenure, of course, requires more, but since that isn't my track, it's not relevant to me. Further, it's entirely numbers-based. I could--in theory--publish one world-changing article in a top journal in 5 years or 5 mediocre papers in an barely-non-predatory journal, and as far as the accreditation body is concerned, the 5 papers make me more qualified to teach.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6791.0,"score_ratio":1.2},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":315,"row":{"post_id":"m6z9m4","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anybody feel like academic publication pressure is becoming unsustainable? I am becoming very frustrated with the publication culture in my field. Becoming an expert takes a long time and so is making a valuable contribution to the literature. However, publication pressure is turning many contributions into spin-offs that are slightly different from the publication before, and they are often redundant. Further, a failed experiment would never get published but it would actually provide insight to peers as to what route not to explore. I think that publication pressure is overwhelming for academics and in detriment of scientific literature. I feel like we seriously need to rethink the publication reward system. Does anybody have thoughts on this?","c_root_id_A":"gr9usz3","c_root_id_B":"gragd2v","created_at_utc_A":1616010723,"created_at_utc_B":1616020804,"score_A":5,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Just one more data point here. I am non-tenure-track full-time with a 4/4 teaching load. To maintain my qualifications to teach under our college's accreditation requirements, I have to have the same minimum output of papers and conference presentations as a tenured professor teaching a 3/3 or less. Getting tenure, of course, requires more, but since that isn't my track, it's not relevant to me. Further, it's entirely numbers-based. I could--in theory--publish one world-changing article in a top journal in 5 years or 5 mediocre papers in an barely-non-predatory journal, and as far as the accreditation body is concerned, the 5 papers make me more qualified to teach.","human_ref_B":"Mainly why I quit. I have something to say, but I don't need that sorta pressure.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":10081.0,"score_ratio":1.2},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":316,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqohpsx","c_root_id_B":"fqolkg2","created_at_utc_A":1589515492,"created_at_utc_B":1589518128,"score_A":12,"score_B":50,"human_ref_A":"Thankfully we're only getting everything above hard truths at my institution. But we've formed committees to look at all the options","human_ref_B":">As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their \\[paid\\] hours will be reduced to a minimum. LOL. Sincerely, A staff member whose mandatory \\[unpaid\\] furlough days will result in $3,000 less this year","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2636.0,"score_ratio":4.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":317,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqp1539","c_root_id_B":"fqontgo","created_at_utc_A":1589531319,"created_at_utc_B":1589519798,"score_A":41,"score_B":34,"human_ref_A":"Don’t forget to forget mentioning athletics! No need to cut them!","human_ref_B":"Ours are taking a 10% paycut and one extremely noble individual is going up to 20%.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11521.0,"score_ratio":1.2058823529},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":318,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqowe30","c_root_id_B":"fqp1539","created_at_utc_A":1589526904,"created_at_utc_B":1589531319,"score_A":13,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"I was surprised to get a newsletter announcing some pay increases for staff https://www.ukrant.nl/a-bonus-and-a-3-percent-pay-increase/?lang=en","human_ref_B":"Don’t forget to forget mentioning athletics! No need to cut them!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4415.0,"score_ratio":3.1538461538},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":319,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqohpsx","c_root_id_B":"fqp1539","created_at_utc_A":1589515492,"created_at_utc_B":1589531319,"score_A":12,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"Thankfully we're only getting everything above hard truths at my institution. But we've formed committees to look at all the options","human_ref_B":"Don’t forget to forget mentioning athletics! No need to cut them!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":15827.0,"score_ratio":3.4166666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":320,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqomm3t","c_root_id_B":"fqp1539","created_at_utc_A":1589518882,"created_at_utc_B":1589531319,"score_A":7,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"uncanny","human_ref_B":"Don’t forget to forget mentioning athletics! No need to cut them!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12437.0,"score_ratio":5.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":321,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqontgo","c_root_id_B":"fqohpsx","created_at_utc_A":1589519798,"created_at_utc_B":1589515492,"score_A":34,"score_B":12,"human_ref_A":"Ours are taking a 10% paycut and one extremely noble individual is going up to 20%.","human_ref_B":"Thankfully we're only getting everything above hard truths at my institution. But we've formed committees to look at all the options","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4306.0,"score_ratio":2.8333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":322,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqontgo","c_root_id_B":"fqomm3t","created_at_utc_A":1589519798,"created_at_utc_B":1589518882,"score_A":34,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Ours are taking a 10% paycut and one extremely noble individual is going up to 20%.","human_ref_B":"uncanny","labels":1,"seconds_difference":916.0,"score_ratio":4.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":323,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqohpsx","c_root_id_B":"fqp703e","created_at_utc_A":1589515492,"created_at_utc_B":1589537279,"score_A":12,"score_B":13,"human_ref_A":"Thankfully we're only getting everything above hard truths at my institution. But we've formed committees to look at all the options","human_ref_B":"I'm happy to be a French civil servant working in a university, so I'm safe. I feel bad for all the PhD students that are waiting on more info about whether their PhD funding will be extended and by how much.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":21787.0,"score_ratio":1.0833333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":324,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqp6xy0","c_root_id_B":"fqp703e","created_at_utc_A":1589537217,"created_at_utc_B":1589537279,"score_A":9,"score_B":13,"human_ref_A":"When you have wolves managing your lambs, you're gotta have a bad time.","human_ref_B":"I'm happy to be a French civil servant working in a university, so I'm safe. I feel bad for all the PhD students that are waiting on more info about whether their PhD funding will be extended and by how much.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":62.0,"score_ratio":1.4444444444},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":325,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqomm3t","c_root_id_B":"fqp703e","created_at_utc_A":1589518882,"created_at_utc_B":1589537279,"score_A":7,"score_B":13,"human_ref_A":"uncanny","human_ref_B":"I'm happy to be a French civil servant working in a university, so I'm safe. I feel bad for all the PhD students that are waiting on more info about whether their PhD funding will be extended and by how much.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":18397.0,"score_ratio":1.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":326,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqohpsx","c_root_id_B":"fqowe30","created_at_utc_A":1589515492,"created_at_utc_B":1589526904,"score_A":12,"score_B":13,"human_ref_A":"Thankfully we're only getting everything above hard truths at my institution. But we've formed committees to look at all the options","human_ref_B":"I was surprised to get a newsletter announcing some pay increases for staff https://www.ukrant.nl/a-bonus-and-a-3-percent-pay-increase/?lang=en","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11412.0,"score_ratio":1.0833333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":327,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqowe30","c_root_id_B":"fqomm3t","created_at_utc_A":1589526904,"created_at_utc_B":1589518882,"score_A":13,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"I was surprised to get a newsletter announcing some pay increases for staff https://www.ukrant.nl/a-bonus-and-a-3-percent-pay-increase/?lang=en","human_ref_B":"uncanny","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8022.0,"score_ratio":1.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":328,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqpecw4","c_root_id_B":"fqohpsx","created_at_utc_A":1589544139,"created_at_utc_B":1589515492,"score_A":13,"score_B":12,"human_ref_A":"My university gave a 10% paycut to staff/professors and then a \"reduction in pay\" (no specified amount) to senior administration. The lack of specificity was glaring to say the least.","human_ref_B":"Thankfully we're only getting everything above hard truths at my institution. But we've formed committees to look at all the options","labels":1,"seconds_difference":28647.0,"score_ratio":1.0833333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":329,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqp6xy0","c_root_id_B":"fqpecw4","created_at_utc_A":1589537217,"created_at_utc_B":1589544139,"score_A":9,"score_B":13,"human_ref_A":"When you have wolves managing your lambs, you're gotta have a bad time.","human_ref_B":"My university gave a 10% paycut to staff/professors and then a \"reduction in pay\" (no specified amount) to senior administration. The lack of specificity was glaring to say the least.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6922.0,"score_ratio":1.4444444444},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":330,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqomm3t","c_root_id_B":"fqpecw4","created_at_utc_A":1589518882,"created_at_utc_B":1589544139,"score_A":7,"score_B":13,"human_ref_A":"uncanny","human_ref_B":"My university gave a 10% paycut to staff/professors and then a \"reduction in pay\" (no specified amount) to senior administration. The lack of specificity was glaring to say the least.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":25257.0,"score_ratio":1.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":331,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqpecw4","c_root_id_B":"fqpafgl","created_at_utc_A":1589544139,"created_at_utc_B":1589540661,"score_A":13,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"My university gave a 10% paycut to staff/professors and then a \"reduction in pay\" (no specified amount) to senior administration. The lack of specificity was glaring to say the least.","human_ref_B":"This was so spot on it was scary","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3478.0,"score_ratio":4.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":332,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqp6xy0","c_root_id_B":"fqomm3t","created_at_utc_A":1589537217,"created_at_utc_B":1589518882,"score_A":9,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"When you have wolves managing your lambs, you're gotta have a bad time.","human_ref_B":"uncanny","labels":1,"seconds_difference":18335.0,"score_ratio":1.2857142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":333,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqq0whz","c_root_id_B":"fqpkkvf","created_at_utc_A":1589557490,"created_at_utc_B":1589548579,"score_A":7,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Serious question, why are US universities running out of money now? Did they have to pay back tuition? Is enrollment down for the next semester? From what I've heard, both seems to be... unlikely?","human_ref_B":"Mods - I'd like to report a hack into my e-mail account.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8911.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":334,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqq0whz","c_root_id_B":"fqpafgl","created_at_utc_A":1589557490,"created_at_utc_B":1589540661,"score_A":7,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Serious question, why are US universities running out of money now? Did they have to pay back tuition? Is enrollment down for the next semester? From what I've heard, both seems to be... unlikely?","human_ref_B":"This was so spot on it was scary","labels":1,"seconds_difference":16829.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":335,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqpkkvf","c_root_id_B":"fqqbnpz","created_at_utc_A":1589548579,"created_at_utc_B":1589562741,"score_A":6,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Mods - I'd like to report a hack into my e-mail account.","human_ref_B":"Below are innumerable links to resources regarding best practices in pedagogy, technology, and social-emotional wellness. In the end, please understand that personal safety is not the college's responsibility, it is your own individual responsibility. To bond students more fully to the college, I am placing a set of funny stickers in your mailbox. Please apply these to your face shields before lecture. See you at work on Monday.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":14162.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":336,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqpkkvf","c_root_id_B":"fqpafgl","created_at_utc_A":1589548579,"created_at_utc_B":1589540661,"score_A":6,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Mods - I'd like to report a hack into my e-mail account.","human_ref_B":"This was so spot on it was scary","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7918.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":337,"row":{"post_id":"gk10as","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Have you been getting these emails from your ever-supportive senior administrators? Dear loyal workers of Flailing University, First off, let me start by making a distracting comment about how odd the situation feels and sharing what I think are some uncanny observations about “these times.” Next, I want to write something that sounds very empathic here. I want to put a lot of emphasis on saying how much I understand all your stresses now, ALL of them, every single one. I understand. Of course, I need to place some blanket praise here about how much we appreciate all that hard work and perseverance everyone has shown. Because this email is going to every single person employed at the school, these statements will feel as personal and uplifting as a sign stating: \"Thank You for Not Smoking.\" Now, I will start to discuss the *hard truths*. I will discuss how enormous our budget shortfall is and how all the previous efforts, which I enumerate in detail, have not been enough to come even close to closing the gap. As a result, surely now you will see that we have no other option than to do the following: (1) Terminate all contract workers, non-tenure track faculty, and 65% of lower-level administrative staff. Fortunately, you will all qualify now for a special Coronavirus inspired extra unemployment bonus that, surely, will make this feel more like a glorious paid vacation if not winning the lottery. You can thank us later. (2) As for fortunate few staff allowed to remain (I bet you'd like to know if you're in this category, but let's keep the mystery), their [paid] hours will be reduced to a minimum. However, we all know their actually working hours will remain the same, maybe increase because now that they are working at home every waking hour is a potential working hour - and someone has to do the work of the 65% we’re letting go. (3) Thanks to all the tenure track faculty who are part of the Flailing University family. That’s why I know they will be more than glad to take on all the extra teaching needed (since we have purged all the teaching faculty, adjuncts, university-funded postdocs, researchers, assistants, and technicians) all while revising their curriculums to be entirely online, including lab sciences. A 25% pay cut will no doubt serve as a terrific incentive to work harder and maybe be able to get back to the barely living wage we were paying before. We all know it really doesn’t work like that, but you’ll try, won’t you! (4) All senior administration will be taking a 4.387% pay-cut. I want to close here but talking about how incredibly stressful, painful, even traumatizing it was for us - the senior administration - to make these decisions. We have screamed, we have cried, we rent our garments, we have gone up to as much as three times a week with our $300/hour shrinks. You see us being on a high perch here, but we're the ones suffering the most - always ready to take one on the chin for FU. I wish you all the best in this difficult time for everybody! We are all in this together! Sincerely, Senior Administrator","c_root_id_A":"fqpafgl","c_root_id_B":"fqqbnpz","created_at_utc_A":1589540661,"created_at_utc_B":1589562741,"score_A":3,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"This was so spot on it was scary","human_ref_B":"Below are innumerable links to resources regarding best practices in pedagogy, technology, and social-emotional wellness. In the end, please understand that personal safety is not the college's responsibility, it is your own individual responsibility. To bond students more fully to the college, I am placing a set of funny stickers in your mailbox. Please apply these to your face shields before lecture. See you at work on Monday.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":22080.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":338,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go3m2ge","c_root_id_B":"go400hz","created_at_utc_A":1613806878,"created_at_utc_B":1613820441,"score_A":129,"score_B":171,"human_ref_A":"The academic job market is not the only market for scientists. We have challenges in the near and distant future: global climate change, human disease, energy, and too many more to list. If we're going to have a chance of solving any of these, we'll need scientists in academia, industry... and yes, policy and think tanks and government. I would hope for most science PhD programs aren't focused on one technique or one specific problem, but rather trains you on how to approach and tackle a problem given constraints and the resources you have available to you.","human_ref_B":"I think you will find that a lot of industry is really resting on a academic foundation. The erosion of that academic foundation is a huge problem. Every paper and technique we used in the drug company and in many biotech companies were academic. Maybe you took those 100 papers and that federally funded training and those first pilots and paper and ran with it and started your own company, but you weren’t going to get that in the company. All the drug companies, including the ones that made the vaccines , are relying on years of federally funded basic and clinical research. So as more people flee the system and funding to basic science is eroded you will lose that also.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":13563.0,"score_ratio":1.3255813953},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":339,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go3op1f","c_root_id_B":"go400hz","created_at_utc_A":1613809266,"created_at_utc_B":1613820441,"score_A":32,"score_B":171,"human_ref_A":">Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science? Yeah we complain about this all the time. The funding agencies (primarily NSF, NIH, but also DOE, DOD, etc) are basically the ones that determine it, and that's based on how much money they're given by the federal government... But the academic job market can't grow indefinitely and faculty turnover is greatly outpaced by the rate at which students graduate. If there is one graduate student per professor, they won't find jobs unless professors retire after six years. And they don't. But science wouldn't get done without graduate students, so we're stuck under the current model. Thankfully there are plenty of non-academic science jobs as u/drsomewhatevil points out and that's the saving grace for the academic job market.","human_ref_B":"I think you will find that a lot of industry is really resting on a academic foundation. The erosion of that academic foundation is a huge problem. Every paper and technique we used in the drug company and in many biotech companies were academic. Maybe you took those 100 papers and that federally funded training and those first pilots and paper and ran with it and started your own company, but you weren’t going to get that in the company. All the drug companies, including the ones that made the vaccines , are relying on years of federally funded basic and clinical research. So as more people flee the system and funding to basic science is eroded you will lose that also.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11175.0,"score_ratio":5.34375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":340,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go487xt","c_root_id_B":"go3m2ge","created_at_utc_A":1613827462,"created_at_utc_B":1613806878,"score_A":131,"score_B":129,"human_ref_A":"I don't think that pushing people to become scientists is the same as pushing people to become professors. That said, I do think the way that we promote science to our society is problematic. From a careers perspective, there's this myth that getting a STEM degree means that you're guaranteed a good job, when most S and M jobs are really competitive and actually don't pay very well, at least until you get a higher degree. This really fucks over, say, vanilla biology undergrads.","human_ref_B":"The academic job market is not the only market for scientists. We have challenges in the near and distant future: global climate change, human disease, energy, and too many more to list. If we're going to have a chance of solving any of these, we'll need scientists in academia, industry... and yes, policy and think tanks and government. I would hope for most science PhD programs aren't focused on one technique or one specific problem, but rather trains you on how to approach and tackle a problem given constraints and the resources you have available to you.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":20584.0,"score_ratio":1.015503876},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":341,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go487xt","c_root_id_B":"go41sn3","created_at_utc_A":1613827462,"created_at_utc_B":1613822168,"score_A":131,"score_B":40,"human_ref_A":"I don't think that pushing people to become scientists is the same as pushing people to become professors. That said, I do think the way that we promote science to our society is problematic. From a careers perspective, there's this myth that getting a STEM degree means that you're guaranteed a good job, when most S and M jobs are really competitive and actually don't pay very well, at least until you get a higher degree. This really fucks over, say, vanilla biology undergrads.","human_ref_B":"Can people please stop spreading the idea that academia is the only path for scientists? It's utterly ridiculous and also why education is one of the slowest when it comes to innovating as we're stucl in an almost century old method of cultivating scientists.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5294.0,"score_ratio":3.275},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":342,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go3op1f","c_root_id_B":"go487xt","created_at_utc_A":1613809266,"created_at_utc_B":1613827462,"score_A":32,"score_B":131,"human_ref_A":">Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science? Yeah we complain about this all the time. The funding agencies (primarily NSF, NIH, but also DOE, DOD, etc) are basically the ones that determine it, and that's based on how much money they're given by the federal government... But the academic job market can't grow indefinitely and faculty turnover is greatly outpaced by the rate at which students graduate. If there is one graduate student per professor, they won't find jobs unless professors retire after six years. And they don't. But science wouldn't get done without graduate students, so we're stuck under the current model. Thankfully there are plenty of non-academic science jobs as u/drsomewhatevil points out and that's the saving grace for the academic job market.","human_ref_B":"I don't think that pushing people to become scientists is the same as pushing people to become professors. That said, I do think the way that we promote science to our society is problematic. From a careers perspective, there's this myth that getting a STEM degree means that you're guaranteed a good job, when most S and M jobs are really competitive and actually don't pay very well, at least until you get a higher degree. This really fucks over, say, vanilla biology undergrads.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":18196.0,"score_ratio":4.09375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":343,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go41sn3","c_root_id_B":"go3op1f","created_at_utc_A":1613822168,"created_at_utc_B":1613809266,"score_A":40,"score_B":32,"human_ref_A":"Can people please stop spreading the idea that academia is the only path for scientists? It's utterly ridiculous and also why education is one of the slowest when it comes to innovating as we're stucl in an almost century old method of cultivating scientists.","human_ref_B":">Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science? Yeah we complain about this all the time. The funding agencies (primarily NSF, NIH, but also DOE, DOD, etc) are basically the ones that determine it, and that's based on how much money they're given by the federal government... But the academic job market can't grow indefinitely and faculty turnover is greatly outpaced by the rate at which students graduate. If there is one graduate student per professor, they won't find jobs unless professors retire after six years. And they don't. But science wouldn't get done without graduate students, so we're stuck under the current model. Thankfully there are plenty of non-academic science jobs as u/drsomewhatevil points out and that's the saving grace for the academic job market.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12902.0,"score_ratio":1.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":344,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go493iv","c_root_id_B":"go3op1f","created_at_utc_A":1613828093,"created_at_utc_B":1613809266,"score_A":36,"score_B":32,"human_ref_A":"But there's been a culture shift in incoming PhD students as well. In my STEM area it used to be that almost everyone came in with the goal to be a professor. Now half of all incoming PhD students already come in with the intention of going into industry after their doctorate.","human_ref_B":">Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science? Yeah we complain about this all the time. The funding agencies (primarily NSF, NIH, but also DOE, DOD, etc) are basically the ones that determine it, and that's based on how much money they're given by the federal government... But the academic job market can't grow indefinitely and faculty turnover is greatly outpaced by the rate at which students graduate. If there is one graduate student per professor, they won't find jobs unless professors retire after six years. And they don't. But science wouldn't get done without graduate students, so we're stuck under the current model. Thankfully there are plenty of non-academic science jobs as u/drsomewhatevil points out and that's the saving grace for the academic job market.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":18827.0,"score_ratio":1.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":345,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4h433","c_root_id_B":"go4jtl7","created_at_utc_A":1613833108,"created_at_utc_B":1613834635,"score_A":7,"score_B":12,"human_ref_A":"https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm This is a great article that discusses whether US has a STEM deficit or a STEM surplus","human_ref_B":"All I can say is that I studied biology instead of English in college because of the « study stem! You’ll have a job! » push, and when I graduated it was nearly impossible to get a job as a biologist. People that have a BA in STEM and don’t want to be a computer scientist can get a job as a teacher pretty easily. But who wants to be a science teacher? In addition to trying to do all of the things most teachers have to do (that could easily be multiple people’s jobs), they have to set up labs, get materials, organize materials, clean up labs... All of this to say I wish I had studied English, so I had at least struggled to get a job in a field I loved most...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1527.0,"score_ratio":1.7142857143},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":346,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4cbtl","c_root_id_B":"go4jtl7","created_at_utc_A":1613830253,"created_at_utc_B":1613834635,"score_A":5,"score_B":12,"human_ref_A":"We have to be careful as this is a slippery slope. Industry R&D positions are also saturated similar to academia, and this is beginning to spill into other career paths. Soon even biotech sales or PM positions will also require PhD at the entry level. But agreed, academia should do more to retain and employ students. Postdocs can become staff scientists or something.","human_ref_B":"All I can say is that I studied biology instead of English in college because of the « study stem! You’ll have a job! » push, and when I graduated it was nearly impossible to get a job as a biologist. People that have a BA in STEM and don’t want to be a computer scientist can get a job as a teacher pretty easily. But who wants to be a science teacher? In addition to trying to do all of the things most teachers have to do (that could easily be multiple people’s jobs), they have to set up labs, get materials, organize materials, clean up labs... All of this to say I wish I had studied English, so I had at least struggled to get a job in a field I loved most...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4382.0,"score_ratio":2.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":347,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4ft8t","c_root_id_B":"go4jtl7","created_at_utc_A":1613832351,"created_at_utc_B":1613834635,"score_A":3,"score_B":12,"human_ref_A":"The US government notice a deficit in supply of STEM graduates that will work in industry, not a deficit in supply of STEM PhDs","human_ref_B":"All I can say is that I studied biology instead of English in college because of the « study stem! You’ll have a job! » push, and when I graduated it was nearly impossible to get a job as a biologist. People that have a BA in STEM and don’t want to be a computer scientist can get a job as a teacher pretty easily. But who wants to be a science teacher? In addition to trying to do all of the things most teachers have to do (that could easily be multiple people’s jobs), they have to set up labs, get materials, organize materials, clean up labs... All of this to say I wish I had studied English, so I had at least struggled to get a job in a field I loved most...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2284.0,"score_ratio":4.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":348,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4i3sr","c_root_id_B":"go4jtl7","created_at_utc_A":1613833677,"created_at_utc_B":1613834635,"score_A":4,"score_B":12,"human_ref_A":"If your question is, do faculty promote increasing the size of the faculty, absolutely yes. However, this is a local issue of funding and faculty do not have decision powers at a university. We can advocate, but ultimately, some Dean, VP/Provost, or President/Chancellor makes those calls whether to hire an assistant VP of donor outreach or an assistant professor of chemistry. All academic research societies I am aware of that have sufficient membership/funds attempt to lobby the federal government for increased funding for research grants. If universities see an opportunity to make more grant dollars they will invest more in STEM faculty and labs (eg. if a professor gets a $1 million grant, the university gets a check for over $1.5 and gets to keep the difference). But, as others have said, being a professor is not the only pathway for PhDs in STEM. Many other posts have mentioned industry R&D. In addition, there are government lab (DoE national labs, NASA, NIH intramural, DOD, CDC, VA, etc.). There are also non-profit research institutions (Woods Hole, Allen Institute, SRI, etc.). There is also need for science adjacent positions, working in policy and oversight at both the local level (ie, at universities), state, and national level. You also have industry jobs that are not directly R&D. One of my former students sells research equipment. When I was a post-doc, I was recruited for a job that would have me traveling to meet with faculty to get them excited about and help facilitate them writing research grants to a company (plus do expert testimony for government and regulatory agencies). My point being, there are lots of opportunities for scientists outside of academia so it is not dishonest for faculty to promote others going into STEM. Unemployment for PhDs is something like 1-2%. They find jobs. All that being said, outside of a few disciplines, we do not have near the shortage of STEM majors some policy makers (and industry that wants to drive down labor costs) would have you believe.","human_ref_B":"All I can say is that I studied biology instead of English in college because of the « study stem! You’ll have a job! » push, and when I graduated it was nearly impossible to get a job as a biologist. People that have a BA in STEM and don’t want to be a computer scientist can get a job as a teacher pretty easily. But who wants to be a science teacher? In addition to trying to do all of the things most teachers have to do (that could easily be multiple people’s jobs), they have to set up labs, get materials, organize materials, clean up labs... All of this to say I wish I had studied English, so I had at least struggled to get a job in a field I loved most...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":958.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":349,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4cbtl","c_root_id_B":"go4h433","created_at_utc_A":1613830253,"created_at_utc_B":1613833108,"score_A":5,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"We have to be careful as this is a slippery slope. Industry R&D positions are also saturated similar to academia, and this is beginning to spill into other career paths. Soon even biotech sales or PM positions will also require PhD at the entry level. But agreed, academia should do more to retain and employ students. Postdocs can become staff scientists or something.","human_ref_B":"https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm This is a great article that discusses whether US has a STEM deficit or a STEM surplus","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2855.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":350,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4ft8t","c_root_id_B":"go4h433","created_at_utc_A":1613832351,"created_at_utc_B":1613833108,"score_A":3,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"The US government notice a deficit in supply of STEM graduates that will work in industry, not a deficit in supply of STEM PhDs","human_ref_B":"https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm This is a great article that discusses whether US has a STEM deficit or a STEM surplus","labels":0,"seconds_difference":757.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":351,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4q4yu","c_root_id_B":"go4cbtl","created_at_utc_A":1613837982,"created_at_utc_B":1613830253,"score_A":7,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Of course there are efforts to do this. For example, the National Council for Science and the Environment has been lobbying for 20+ years for increases in NSF funding, support for things like NREL, applied research, and investments in energy/climate related work. There are many, many other organizations doing similar work. The problem is that 1) half or more of the Congress are now actively anti-science and opposed to government investment in almost anything that isn't defense-related, 2) that same half is also mostly opposed to higher education, and 3) overall public support for research and teaching reflects (or drives) those divisions. So we aren't going to see any sort of moonshot style investments in science, research, or higher ed probably ever again. There's also a major problem in academia, often labeled as the \"neoliberal business models of university administration.\" Whatever you call it, the basic premise is to run higher ed like a business, to wring profit from all operations and cut costs just like they would at GE or WalMart. This is one of the drivers for admin inflation-- the ranks of VPs and directors and other managers which have proliferated over the last 20 years while faculty lines have been cut. Since labor is the largest cost in running most universities, that's where the cuts have been made--- contingent labor has replaced tenure-track faculty virtually everywhere and those who remain are of course \"doing more with less\" each year. Exceptions for a few elite institutions of course, but for most of us that's the drill. None of this is going to change without a major political/cultural shift in the US. 25 years ago I thought climate change might drive that, but instead we've actually gone in the opposite direction due to our toxic politics.","human_ref_B":"We have to be careful as this is a slippery slope. Industry R&D positions are also saturated similar to academia, and this is beginning to spill into other career paths. Soon even biotech sales or PM positions will also require PhD at the entry level. But agreed, academia should do more to retain and employ students. Postdocs can become staff scientists or something.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":7729.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":352,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4q4yu","c_root_id_B":"go4ft8t","created_at_utc_A":1613837982,"created_at_utc_B":1613832351,"score_A":7,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Of course there are efforts to do this. For example, the National Council for Science and the Environment has been lobbying for 20+ years for increases in NSF funding, support for things like NREL, applied research, and investments in energy/climate related work. There are many, many other organizations doing similar work. The problem is that 1) half or more of the Congress are now actively anti-science and opposed to government investment in almost anything that isn't defense-related, 2) that same half is also mostly opposed to higher education, and 3) overall public support for research and teaching reflects (or drives) those divisions. So we aren't going to see any sort of moonshot style investments in science, research, or higher ed probably ever again. There's also a major problem in academia, often labeled as the \"neoliberal business models of university administration.\" Whatever you call it, the basic premise is to run higher ed like a business, to wring profit from all operations and cut costs just like they would at GE or WalMart. This is one of the drivers for admin inflation-- the ranks of VPs and directors and other managers which have proliferated over the last 20 years while faculty lines have been cut. Since labor is the largest cost in running most universities, that's where the cuts have been made--- contingent labor has replaced tenure-track faculty virtually everywhere and those who remain are of course \"doing more with less\" each year. Exceptions for a few elite institutions of course, but for most of us that's the drill. None of this is going to change without a major political/cultural shift in the US. 25 years ago I thought climate change might drive that, but instead we've actually gone in the opposite direction due to our toxic politics.","human_ref_B":"The US government notice a deficit in supply of STEM graduates that will work in industry, not a deficit in supply of STEM PhDs","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5631.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":353,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4i3sr","c_root_id_B":"go4q4yu","created_at_utc_A":1613833677,"created_at_utc_B":1613837982,"score_A":4,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"If your question is, do faculty promote increasing the size of the faculty, absolutely yes. However, this is a local issue of funding and faculty do not have decision powers at a university. We can advocate, but ultimately, some Dean, VP/Provost, or President/Chancellor makes those calls whether to hire an assistant VP of donor outreach or an assistant professor of chemistry. All academic research societies I am aware of that have sufficient membership/funds attempt to lobby the federal government for increased funding for research grants. If universities see an opportunity to make more grant dollars they will invest more in STEM faculty and labs (eg. if a professor gets a $1 million grant, the university gets a check for over $1.5 and gets to keep the difference). But, as others have said, being a professor is not the only pathway for PhDs in STEM. Many other posts have mentioned industry R&D. In addition, there are government lab (DoE national labs, NASA, NIH intramural, DOD, CDC, VA, etc.). There are also non-profit research institutions (Woods Hole, Allen Institute, SRI, etc.). There is also need for science adjacent positions, working in policy and oversight at both the local level (ie, at universities), state, and national level. You also have industry jobs that are not directly R&D. One of my former students sells research equipment. When I was a post-doc, I was recruited for a job that would have me traveling to meet with faculty to get them excited about and help facilitate them writing research grants to a company (plus do expert testimony for government and regulatory agencies). My point being, there are lots of opportunities for scientists outside of academia so it is not dishonest for faculty to promote others going into STEM. Unemployment for PhDs is something like 1-2%. They find jobs. All that being said, outside of a few disciplines, we do not have near the shortage of STEM majors some policy makers (and industry that wants to drive down labor costs) would have you believe.","human_ref_B":"Of course there are efforts to do this. For example, the National Council for Science and the Environment has been lobbying for 20+ years for increases in NSF funding, support for things like NREL, applied research, and investments in energy/climate related work. There are many, many other organizations doing similar work. The problem is that 1) half or more of the Congress are now actively anti-science and opposed to government investment in almost anything that isn't defense-related, 2) that same half is also mostly opposed to higher education, and 3) overall public support for research and teaching reflects (or drives) those divisions. So we aren't going to see any sort of moonshot style investments in science, research, or higher ed probably ever again. There's also a major problem in academia, often labeled as the \"neoliberal business models of university administration.\" Whatever you call it, the basic premise is to run higher ed like a business, to wring profit from all operations and cut costs just like they would at GE or WalMart. This is one of the drivers for admin inflation-- the ranks of VPs and directors and other managers which have proliferated over the last 20 years while faculty lines have been cut. Since labor is the largest cost in running most universities, that's where the cuts have been made--- contingent labor has replaced tenure-track faculty virtually everywhere and those who remain are of course \"doing more with less\" each year. Exceptions for a few elite institutions of course, but for most of us that's the drill. None of this is going to change without a major political/cultural shift in the US. 25 years ago I thought climate change might drive that, but instead we've actually gone in the opposite direction due to our toxic politics.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4305.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":354,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4kuhp","c_root_id_B":"go4q4yu","created_at_utc_A":1613835183,"created_at_utc_B":1613837982,"score_A":3,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"People here have pointed out that industry jobs exist. That's nice. But we have a ways to go before we can really claim that our skills are being reasonably assessed by non-academic employers.","human_ref_B":"Of course there are efforts to do this. For example, the National Council for Science and the Environment has been lobbying for 20+ years for increases in NSF funding, support for things like NREL, applied research, and investments in energy/climate related work. There are many, many other organizations doing similar work. The problem is that 1) half or more of the Congress are now actively anti-science and opposed to government investment in almost anything that isn't defense-related, 2) that same half is also mostly opposed to higher education, and 3) overall public support for research and teaching reflects (or drives) those divisions. So we aren't going to see any sort of moonshot style investments in science, research, or higher ed probably ever again. There's also a major problem in academia, often labeled as the \"neoliberal business models of university administration.\" Whatever you call it, the basic premise is to run higher ed like a business, to wring profit from all operations and cut costs just like they would at GE or WalMart. This is one of the drivers for admin inflation-- the ranks of VPs and directors and other managers which have proliferated over the last 20 years while faculty lines have been cut. Since labor is the largest cost in running most universities, that's where the cuts have been made--- contingent labor has replaced tenure-track faculty virtually everywhere and those who remain are of course \"doing more with less\" each year. Exceptions for a few elite institutions of course, but for most of us that's the drill. None of this is going to change without a major political/cultural shift in the US. 25 years ago I thought climate change might drive that, but instead we've actually gone in the opposite direction due to our toxic politics.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2799.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":355,"row":{"post_id":"lo1vtp","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"So much effort about encouraging young people to do science, what about creating more jobs in academia? I am watching this increasing trend of scientists encouraging youngsters to become scientists for the last couple of years. However, whenever I visit the r/AskAcademia subreddit, I find some posts about the poor condition of the academic job market. Now, what's the point of telling young people to become scientists, when there's not much scope to really do so. Now, my question do academics reach out to the authorities to fund/ create more academic jobs or not? If yes, do you know about the details of this effort? If no, why don't academics do more to really promote science?","c_root_id_A":"go4ft8t","c_root_id_B":"go4i3sr","created_at_utc_A":1613832351,"created_at_utc_B":1613833677,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"The US government notice a deficit in supply of STEM graduates that will work in industry, not a deficit in supply of STEM PhDs","human_ref_B":"If your question is, do faculty promote increasing the size of the faculty, absolutely yes. However, this is a local issue of funding and faculty do not have decision powers at a university. We can advocate, but ultimately, some Dean, VP/Provost, or President/Chancellor makes those calls whether to hire an assistant VP of donor outreach or an assistant professor of chemistry. All academic research societies I am aware of that have sufficient membership/funds attempt to lobby the federal government for increased funding for research grants. If universities see an opportunity to make more grant dollars they will invest more in STEM faculty and labs (eg. if a professor gets a $1 million grant, the university gets a check for over $1.5 and gets to keep the difference). But, as others have said, being a professor is not the only pathway for PhDs in STEM. Many other posts have mentioned industry R&D. In addition, there are government lab (DoE national labs, NASA, NIH intramural, DOD, CDC, VA, etc.). There are also non-profit research institutions (Woods Hole, Allen Institute, SRI, etc.). There is also need for science adjacent positions, working in policy and oversight at both the local level (ie, at universities), state, and national level. You also have industry jobs that are not directly R&D. One of my former students sells research equipment. When I was a post-doc, I was recruited for a job that would have me traveling to meet with faculty to get them excited about and help facilitate them writing research grants to a company (plus do expert testimony for government and regulatory agencies). My point being, there are lots of opportunities for scientists outside of academia so it is not dishonest for faculty to promote others going into STEM. Unemployment for PhDs is something like 1-2%. They find jobs. All that being said, outside of a few disciplines, we do not have near the shortage of STEM majors some policy makers (and industry that wants to drive down labor costs) would have you believe.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1326.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":356,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftlvlx","c_root_id_B":"gftt0ou","created_at_utc_A":1607961986,"created_at_utc_B":1607965478,"score_A":338,"score_B":407,"human_ref_A":"As I was told and now tell people “I didn’t spend 11 years in college to be called *Mister*”","human_ref_B":"Beyond the misogyny and everything else commented here, the op-ed belittles her dissertation, \"Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs\", calling it \"unpromising\" based on its title. (1) Fuck you. Community college is an incredibly important dimension of US Higher Education, serving over 40% of all college students, and studying retention at CC is very valuable. (2) Being given a platform to judge a dissertation by its title, as opposed to its content, is the epitome of \"sound\\[ing\\] and feel\\[ing\\] fraudulent, not to say a touch comic\".","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3492.0,"score_ratio":1.2041420118},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":357,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftt0ou","c_root_id_B":"gftov17","created_at_utc_A":1607965478,"created_at_utc_B":1607963476,"score_A":407,"score_B":227,"human_ref_A":"Beyond the misogyny and everything else commented here, the op-ed belittles her dissertation, \"Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs\", calling it \"unpromising\" based on its title. (1) Fuck you. Community college is an incredibly important dimension of US Higher Education, serving over 40% of all college students, and studying retention at CC is very valuable. (2) Being given a platform to judge a dissertation by its title, as opposed to its content, is the epitome of \"sound\\[ing\\] and feel\\[ing\\] fraudulent, not to say a touch comic\".","human_ref_B":"There are obviously two problems with article. The biggest, by far, is the blatant and disgusting misogyny. The second is the denigration of the use of the honorific “Doctor” by PhDs. The word is actually in the name of the degree, exactly the same as in those obtained by MDs. There is zero pretense in using it, and I believe that argument was included only to allow the author to (implausibly) deny the misogyny. BTW, “doctor” comes from the Latin docēre, which means to teach or to lead. It was originally used to describe theologians and later other scholars. The use by medical doctors came later.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2002.0,"score_ratio":1.7929515419},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":358,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftt0ou","c_root_id_B":"gftqyut","created_at_utc_A":1607965478,"created_at_utc_B":1607964503,"score_A":407,"score_B":109,"human_ref_A":"Beyond the misogyny and everything else commented here, the op-ed belittles her dissertation, \"Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs\", calling it \"unpromising\" based on its title. (1) Fuck you. Community college is an incredibly important dimension of US Higher Education, serving over 40% of all college students, and studying retention at CC is very valuable. (2) Being given a platform to judge a dissertation by its title, as opposed to its content, is the epitome of \"sound\\[ing\\] and feel\\[ing\\] fraudulent, not to say a touch comic\".","human_ref_B":"> I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. I mean, why not both? Real people are complicated and this guy is a piece of work. The reason it is condemned for misogyny is because people only feel clever asking this kind of question when it's a woman who has the doctorate. That's the misogyny — along with the \"kiddo\" and other sorts of things that imply that he thinks he is superior to her despite his being a total piece of shit. The fact that it is also deeply ignorant and anti-intellectual is part of that, too.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":975.0,"score_ratio":3.7339449541},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":359,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftt0ou","c_root_id_B":"gftowwu","created_at_utc_A":1607965478,"created_at_utc_B":1607963502,"score_A":407,"score_B":71,"human_ref_A":"Beyond the misogyny and everything else commented here, the op-ed belittles her dissertation, \"Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs\", calling it \"unpromising\" based on its title. (1) Fuck you. Community college is an incredibly important dimension of US Higher Education, serving over 40% of all college students, and studying retention at CC is very valuable. (2) Being given a platform to judge a dissertation by its title, as opposed to its content, is the epitome of \"sound\\[ing\\] and feel\\[ing\\] fraudulent, not to say a touch comic\".","human_ref_B":"There are several issues and honestly the whole topic is a mess that can't possibly be unraveled in a reddit comment. First, the Dr. she is using is valid and is in no way fraudulent. As you rightly point out, the article is a politically motivated and frankly quite vile piece of crap. So I don't think trying to approach this from his ramblings can lead to anything productive. I will say that she has an EdD, which is not a PhD. It is still a doctorate which confers the right to be called Dr. but I believe it's not ONLY misogyny, as if that would not be enough, but also a deep seated disrespect for non-STEM or medicine-related fields. So yes the problems in that article are...well, it's a shitshow in many different ways. But maybe let's start over and ask ourselves about degrees, their meaning, their value and the use of 'doctor'. Not only is there a complicated history of who is called 'doctor', there is furthermore a complicated history of class and degrees as a whole. First of all, doctor was originally used for learned academics - people who lecture at academies and universities. The use of doctor for medical doctors is significantly more recent, so historically speaking it is the medical doctors who began to use this nomenclature. But does this matter? Language is flexible and as long as everybody understands what is being said in what context, ambiguity can be fine. It is not particularly common outside of jokes that medical doctors and doctors in the original sense of what is nowadays called PhDs are confused, so language wise it's mostly fine. In many western countries there has recently been a mostly men/male-driven push to not focusing on degrees so much. This is often because they feel uncomfortable with being treated differently simply because of their level of education or job, it can feel awkward to be called Mr. for many people in their young adulthood, let alone Dr. That along with their internalization of themselves as belonging to what is perceived as a privileged group with somewhat easier access or at least less pressures not to do so, makes them want to be chill about it, play it down, and in general you will find most young men in academia like first name basis, casual talk. This may on the surface seem like a good thing, and as a young adult man in mathematics I feel these sentiments too. However, this now puts the people who are first generation academics or people who have so far been minorities in academia into an awkward position: Because a large majority of young men are attempting to play down their degrees and status after attaining their doctorate, now all of a sudden it makes people think of women or first gens or ethnical minorities who wish to carry their title as a sign of their achievement as arrogant or stuck up. You will find these sorts of things a lot on Twitter. Someone adds Dr to their handle, then a bunch of people comment why they feel the need to point it out - usually in reference with a lot of their colleagues or acquaintances not doing that. But the circumstance is different for these people, they feel like they belong to a group which has historically been denied this privilege and now after finally also attaining it, they are once again being denied to carry it because most men are, for in my opinion good reasons and with good intention, trying to dismantle the whole degree structure. In a way, and in a vacuum, I think most people agree that we would be better off if degrees had no such role in our lives, if Dr. did not modify the way you are generically addressed, just as I think we all agree that Mrs. and Miss in a historical vacuum is ludicrous. But we don't live in a historical vacuum. We have to deal with the past and the implications that have grown out of our use of language. So while I and many others in my position, based on modern values, feel a need to downplay our education and to remove this \"Dr.\" calling stuff, for many people this is a social status that they feel they've been denied despite, of course, rightfully now having earned it. So as I said, this is a complicated mess. It seems recently because of absolute jackasses like Epstein who are literally trying to deny people their degrees, younger men have started to, somewhat reluctantly, also wear their doctorates again, e.g. on Twitter and other social media, to make it clear that it is perfectly correct that someone who has earned that degree has indeed earned it. It's all a mess, you see. Nobody in their right mind would invent such a system nowadays but we have to deal with what is not what we want. And what is, is that any woman, minority and of course every single PERSON, who completes a doctorate at a well regarded university (by which I mean not a degree mill), deserves to be called by the degree which they signed up for and completed if they so desire. As a small side note, in some countries like Germany and Austria, the doctorate literally confers a name change of adding Dr. to your name, and the masters degree until recently used to literally change your name to include Mag. (magister, which means teacher). When the Mag. title was removed and became the MSc and MA during the Bologna process in the EU, there were massive shitstorms about people being denied their right to be Herr / Frau Mag. Many people rushed their degrees so they could complete it with the old Mag instead of the new post-name optional international masters degrees. So it is not impossible to get rid of such structure but it IS difficult and people hate it. Both for valid and for invalid reasons. We also can't generalize over all countries and cultures, it's unfortunately all a complicated mess. Apologies for the long post, hope some of my pointers made sense and lead you down useful thoughts.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1976.0,"score_ratio":5.7323943662},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":360,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftrwu3","c_root_id_B":"gftt0ou","created_at_utc_A":1607964959,"created_at_utc_B":1607965478,"score_A":66,"score_B":407,"human_ref_A":"I think the thesis here is that the WSJ is a trash publication that exists for risky clicks. I don't get why it's \"fraudulent\" for a person who has a PhD to call themselves Dr, so I feel like his whole argument is moot.","human_ref_B":"Beyond the misogyny and everything else commented here, the op-ed belittles her dissertation, \"Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs\", calling it \"unpromising\" based on its title. (1) Fuck you. Community college is an incredibly important dimension of US Higher Education, serving over 40% of all college students, and studying retention at CC is very valuable. (2) Being given a platform to judge a dissertation by its title, as opposed to its content, is the epitome of \"sound\\[ing\\] and feel\\[ing\\] fraudulent, not to say a touch comic\".","labels":0,"seconds_difference":519.0,"score_ratio":6.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":361,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftrzvm","c_root_id_B":"gftt0ou","created_at_utc_A":1607964999,"created_at_utc_B":1607965478,"score_A":26,"score_B":407,"human_ref_A":"I am always hesitant and sometimes feel odd about using “Dr” because of the confusion. I don’t work in academia ( but it is a setting with a good deal of MD’s) and everyone uses first names except in the most formal of meetings with those outside our organization.","human_ref_B":"Beyond the misogyny and everything else commented here, the op-ed belittles her dissertation, \"Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs\", calling it \"unpromising\" based on its title. (1) Fuck you. Community college is an incredibly important dimension of US Higher Education, serving over 40% of all college students, and studying retention at CC is very valuable. (2) Being given a platform to judge a dissertation by its title, as opposed to its content, is the epitome of \"sound\\[ing\\] and feel\\[ing\\] fraudulent, not to say a touch comic\".","labels":0,"seconds_difference":479.0,"score_ratio":15.6538461538},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":362,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftw4z0","c_root_id_B":"gftqyut","created_at_utc_A":1607966970,"created_at_utc_B":1607964503,"score_A":132,"score_B":109,"human_ref_A":"I stopped reading the article after “kiddo”","human_ref_B":"> I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. I mean, why not both? Real people are complicated and this guy is a piece of work. The reason it is condemned for misogyny is because people only feel clever asking this kind of question when it's a woman who has the doctorate. That's the misogyny — along with the \"kiddo\" and other sorts of things that imply that he thinks he is superior to her despite his being a total piece of shit. The fact that it is also deeply ignorant and anti-intellectual is part of that, too.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2467.0,"score_ratio":1.2110091743},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":363,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftw4z0","c_root_id_B":"gftowwu","created_at_utc_A":1607966970,"created_at_utc_B":1607963502,"score_A":132,"score_B":71,"human_ref_A":"I stopped reading the article after “kiddo”","human_ref_B":"There are several issues and honestly the whole topic is a mess that can't possibly be unraveled in a reddit comment. First, the Dr. she is using is valid and is in no way fraudulent. As you rightly point out, the article is a politically motivated and frankly quite vile piece of crap. So I don't think trying to approach this from his ramblings can lead to anything productive. I will say that she has an EdD, which is not a PhD. It is still a doctorate which confers the right to be called Dr. but I believe it's not ONLY misogyny, as if that would not be enough, but also a deep seated disrespect for non-STEM or medicine-related fields. So yes the problems in that article are...well, it's a shitshow in many different ways. But maybe let's start over and ask ourselves about degrees, their meaning, their value and the use of 'doctor'. Not only is there a complicated history of who is called 'doctor', there is furthermore a complicated history of class and degrees as a whole. First of all, doctor was originally used for learned academics - people who lecture at academies and universities. The use of doctor for medical doctors is significantly more recent, so historically speaking it is the medical doctors who began to use this nomenclature. But does this matter? Language is flexible and as long as everybody understands what is being said in what context, ambiguity can be fine. It is not particularly common outside of jokes that medical doctors and doctors in the original sense of what is nowadays called PhDs are confused, so language wise it's mostly fine. In many western countries there has recently been a mostly men/male-driven push to not focusing on degrees so much. This is often because they feel uncomfortable with being treated differently simply because of their level of education or job, it can feel awkward to be called Mr. for many people in their young adulthood, let alone Dr. That along with their internalization of themselves as belonging to what is perceived as a privileged group with somewhat easier access or at least less pressures not to do so, makes them want to be chill about it, play it down, and in general you will find most young men in academia like first name basis, casual talk. This may on the surface seem like a good thing, and as a young adult man in mathematics I feel these sentiments too. However, this now puts the people who are first generation academics or people who have so far been minorities in academia into an awkward position: Because a large majority of young men are attempting to play down their degrees and status after attaining their doctorate, now all of a sudden it makes people think of women or first gens or ethnical minorities who wish to carry their title as a sign of their achievement as arrogant or stuck up. You will find these sorts of things a lot on Twitter. Someone adds Dr to their handle, then a bunch of people comment why they feel the need to point it out - usually in reference with a lot of their colleagues or acquaintances not doing that. But the circumstance is different for these people, they feel like they belong to a group which has historically been denied this privilege and now after finally also attaining it, they are once again being denied to carry it because most men are, for in my opinion good reasons and with good intention, trying to dismantle the whole degree structure. In a way, and in a vacuum, I think most people agree that we would be better off if degrees had no such role in our lives, if Dr. did not modify the way you are generically addressed, just as I think we all agree that Mrs. and Miss in a historical vacuum is ludicrous. But we don't live in a historical vacuum. We have to deal with the past and the implications that have grown out of our use of language. So while I and many others in my position, based on modern values, feel a need to downplay our education and to remove this \"Dr.\" calling stuff, for many people this is a social status that they feel they've been denied despite, of course, rightfully now having earned it. So as I said, this is a complicated mess. It seems recently because of absolute jackasses like Epstein who are literally trying to deny people their degrees, younger men have started to, somewhat reluctantly, also wear their doctorates again, e.g. on Twitter and other social media, to make it clear that it is perfectly correct that someone who has earned that degree has indeed earned it. It's all a mess, you see. Nobody in their right mind would invent such a system nowadays but we have to deal with what is not what we want. And what is, is that any woman, minority and of course every single PERSON, who completes a doctorate at a well regarded university (by which I mean not a degree mill), deserves to be called by the degree which they signed up for and completed if they so desire. As a small side note, in some countries like Germany and Austria, the doctorate literally confers a name change of adding Dr. to your name, and the masters degree until recently used to literally change your name to include Mag. (magister, which means teacher). When the Mag. title was removed and became the MSc and MA during the Bologna process in the EU, there were massive shitstorms about people being denied their right to be Herr / Frau Mag. Many people rushed their degrees so they could complete it with the old Mag instead of the new post-name optional international masters degrees. So it is not impossible to get rid of such structure but it IS difficult and people hate it. Both for valid and for invalid reasons. We also can't generalize over all countries and cultures, it's unfortunately all a complicated mess. Apologies for the long post, hope some of my pointers made sense and lead you down useful thoughts.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3468.0,"score_ratio":1.8591549296},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":364,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftrwu3","c_root_id_B":"gftw4z0","created_at_utc_A":1607964959,"created_at_utc_B":1607966970,"score_A":66,"score_B":132,"human_ref_A":"I think the thesis here is that the WSJ is a trash publication that exists for risky clicks. I don't get why it's \"fraudulent\" for a person who has a PhD to call themselves Dr, so I feel like his whole argument is moot.","human_ref_B":"I stopped reading the article after “kiddo”","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2011.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":365,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftw4z0","c_root_id_B":"gftuvu6","created_at_utc_A":1607966970,"created_at_utc_B":1607966375,"score_A":132,"score_B":31,"human_ref_A":"I stopped reading the article after “kiddo”","human_ref_B":"Doctor meant teacher and well-educated a lot longer than it meant medical professional. You've earned the title, you use it when you want.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":595.0,"score_ratio":4.2580645161},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":366,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftw4z0","c_root_id_B":"gftrzvm","created_at_utc_A":1607966970,"created_at_utc_B":1607964999,"score_A":132,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"I stopped reading the article after “kiddo”","human_ref_B":"I am always hesitant and sometimes feel odd about using “Dr” because of the confusion. I don’t work in academia ( but it is a setting with a good deal of MD’s) and everyone uses first names except in the most formal of meetings with those outside our organization.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1971.0,"score_ratio":5.0769230769},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":367,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftqyut","c_root_id_B":"gftx32t","created_at_utc_A":1607964503,"created_at_utc_B":1607967423,"score_A":109,"score_B":113,"human_ref_A":"> I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. I mean, why not both? Real people are complicated and this guy is a piece of work. The reason it is condemned for misogyny is because people only feel clever asking this kind of question when it's a woman who has the doctorate. That's the misogyny — along with the \"kiddo\" and other sorts of things that imply that he thinks he is superior to her despite his being a total piece of shit. The fact that it is also deeply ignorant and anti-intellectual is part of that, too.","human_ref_B":"And where the hell did he hear the phrase about only being able to call yourself a doctor if you’ve delivered a baby? Correct me if I’m wrong, but historically (globally) haven’t midwives traditionally delivered most babies while doctors were called in under special circumstances? (Or have I watched too much “Call the Midwife?”)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2920.0,"score_ratio":1.0366972477},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":368,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftx32t","c_root_id_B":"gftowwu","created_at_utc_A":1607967423,"created_at_utc_B":1607963502,"score_A":113,"score_B":71,"human_ref_A":"And where the hell did he hear the phrase about only being able to call yourself a doctor if you’ve delivered a baby? Correct me if I’m wrong, but historically (globally) haven’t midwives traditionally delivered most babies while doctors were called in under special circumstances? (Or have I watched too much “Call the Midwife?”)","human_ref_B":"There are several issues and honestly the whole topic is a mess that can't possibly be unraveled in a reddit comment. First, the Dr. she is using is valid and is in no way fraudulent. As you rightly point out, the article is a politically motivated and frankly quite vile piece of crap. So I don't think trying to approach this from his ramblings can lead to anything productive. I will say that she has an EdD, which is not a PhD. It is still a doctorate which confers the right to be called Dr. but I believe it's not ONLY misogyny, as if that would not be enough, but also a deep seated disrespect for non-STEM or medicine-related fields. So yes the problems in that article are...well, it's a shitshow in many different ways. But maybe let's start over and ask ourselves about degrees, their meaning, their value and the use of 'doctor'. Not only is there a complicated history of who is called 'doctor', there is furthermore a complicated history of class and degrees as a whole. First of all, doctor was originally used for learned academics - people who lecture at academies and universities. The use of doctor for medical doctors is significantly more recent, so historically speaking it is the medical doctors who began to use this nomenclature. But does this matter? Language is flexible and as long as everybody understands what is being said in what context, ambiguity can be fine. It is not particularly common outside of jokes that medical doctors and doctors in the original sense of what is nowadays called PhDs are confused, so language wise it's mostly fine. In many western countries there has recently been a mostly men/male-driven push to not focusing on degrees so much. This is often because they feel uncomfortable with being treated differently simply because of their level of education or job, it can feel awkward to be called Mr. for many people in their young adulthood, let alone Dr. That along with their internalization of themselves as belonging to what is perceived as a privileged group with somewhat easier access or at least less pressures not to do so, makes them want to be chill about it, play it down, and in general you will find most young men in academia like first name basis, casual talk. This may on the surface seem like a good thing, and as a young adult man in mathematics I feel these sentiments too. However, this now puts the people who are first generation academics or people who have so far been minorities in academia into an awkward position: Because a large majority of young men are attempting to play down their degrees and status after attaining their doctorate, now all of a sudden it makes people think of women or first gens or ethnical minorities who wish to carry their title as a sign of their achievement as arrogant or stuck up. You will find these sorts of things a lot on Twitter. Someone adds Dr to their handle, then a bunch of people comment why they feel the need to point it out - usually in reference with a lot of their colleagues or acquaintances not doing that. But the circumstance is different for these people, they feel like they belong to a group which has historically been denied this privilege and now after finally also attaining it, they are once again being denied to carry it because most men are, for in my opinion good reasons and with good intention, trying to dismantle the whole degree structure. In a way, and in a vacuum, I think most people agree that we would be better off if degrees had no such role in our lives, if Dr. did not modify the way you are generically addressed, just as I think we all agree that Mrs. and Miss in a historical vacuum is ludicrous. But we don't live in a historical vacuum. We have to deal with the past and the implications that have grown out of our use of language. So while I and many others in my position, based on modern values, feel a need to downplay our education and to remove this \"Dr.\" calling stuff, for many people this is a social status that they feel they've been denied despite, of course, rightfully now having earned it. So as I said, this is a complicated mess. It seems recently because of absolute jackasses like Epstein who are literally trying to deny people their degrees, younger men have started to, somewhat reluctantly, also wear their doctorates again, e.g. on Twitter and other social media, to make it clear that it is perfectly correct that someone who has earned that degree has indeed earned it. It's all a mess, you see. Nobody in their right mind would invent such a system nowadays but we have to deal with what is not what we want. And what is, is that any woman, minority and of course every single PERSON, who completes a doctorate at a well regarded university (by which I mean not a degree mill), deserves to be called by the degree which they signed up for and completed if they so desire. As a small side note, in some countries like Germany and Austria, the doctorate literally confers a name change of adding Dr. to your name, and the masters degree until recently used to literally change your name to include Mag. (magister, which means teacher). When the Mag. title was removed and became the MSc and MA during the Bologna process in the EU, there were massive shitstorms about people being denied their right to be Herr / Frau Mag. Many people rushed their degrees so they could complete it with the old Mag instead of the new post-name optional international masters degrees. So it is not impossible to get rid of such structure but it IS difficult and people hate it. Both for valid and for invalid reasons. We also can't generalize over all countries and cultures, it's unfortunately all a complicated mess. Apologies for the long post, hope some of my pointers made sense and lead you down useful thoughts.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3921.0,"score_ratio":1.5915492958},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":369,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftx32t","c_root_id_B":"gftrwu3","created_at_utc_A":1607967423,"created_at_utc_B":1607964959,"score_A":113,"score_B":66,"human_ref_A":"And where the hell did he hear the phrase about only being able to call yourself a doctor if you’ve delivered a baby? Correct me if I’m wrong, but historically (globally) haven’t midwives traditionally delivered most babies while doctors were called in under special circumstances? (Or have I watched too much “Call the Midwife?”)","human_ref_B":"I think the thesis here is that the WSJ is a trash publication that exists for risky clicks. I don't get why it's \"fraudulent\" for a person who has a PhD to call themselves Dr, so I feel like his whole argument is moot.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2464.0,"score_ratio":1.7121212121},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":370,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftx32t","c_root_id_B":"gftuvu6","created_at_utc_A":1607967423,"created_at_utc_B":1607966375,"score_A":113,"score_B":31,"human_ref_A":"And where the hell did he hear the phrase about only being able to call yourself a doctor if you’ve delivered a baby? Correct me if I’m wrong, but historically (globally) haven’t midwives traditionally delivered most babies while doctors were called in under special circumstances? (Or have I watched too much “Call the Midwife?”)","human_ref_B":"Doctor meant teacher and well-educated a lot longer than it meant medical professional. You've earned the title, you use it when you want.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1048.0,"score_ratio":3.6451612903},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":371,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftx32t","c_root_id_B":"gftrzvm","created_at_utc_A":1607967423,"created_at_utc_B":1607964999,"score_A":113,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"And where the hell did he hear the phrase about only being able to call yourself a doctor if you’ve delivered a baby? Correct me if I’m wrong, but historically (globally) haven’t midwives traditionally delivered most babies while doctors were called in under special circumstances? (Or have I watched too much “Call the Midwife?”)","human_ref_B":"I am always hesitant and sometimes feel odd about using “Dr” because of the confusion. I don’t work in academia ( but it is a setting with a good deal of MD’s) and everyone uses first names except in the most formal of meetings with those outside our organization.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2424.0,"score_ratio":4.3461538462},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":372,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftqyut","c_root_id_B":"gftowwu","created_at_utc_A":1607964503,"created_at_utc_B":1607963502,"score_A":109,"score_B":71,"human_ref_A":"> I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. I mean, why not both? Real people are complicated and this guy is a piece of work. The reason it is condemned for misogyny is because people only feel clever asking this kind of question when it's a woman who has the doctorate. That's the misogyny — along with the \"kiddo\" and other sorts of things that imply that he thinks he is superior to her despite his being a total piece of shit. The fact that it is also deeply ignorant and anti-intellectual is part of that, too.","human_ref_B":"There are several issues and honestly the whole topic is a mess that can't possibly be unraveled in a reddit comment. First, the Dr. she is using is valid and is in no way fraudulent. As you rightly point out, the article is a politically motivated and frankly quite vile piece of crap. So I don't think trying to approach this from his ramblings can lead to anything productive. I will say that she has an EdD, which is not a PhD. It is still a doctorate which confers the right to be called Dr. but I believe it's not ONLY misogyny, as if that would not be enough, but also a deep seated disrespect for non-STEM or medicine-related fields. So yes the problems in that article are...well, it's a shitshow in many different ways. But maybe let's start over and ask ourselves about degrees, their meaning, their value and the use of 'doctor'. Not only is there a complicated history of who is called 'doctor', there is furthermore a complicated history of class and degrees as a whole. First of all, doctor was originally used for learned academics - people who lecture at academies and universities. The use of doctor for medical doctors is significantly more recent, so historically speaking it is the medical doctors who began to use this nomenclature. But does this matter? Language is flexible and as long as everybody understands what is being said in what context, ambiguity can be fine. It is not particularly common outside of jokes that medical doctors and doctors in the original sense of what is nowadays called PhDs are confused, so language wise it's mostly fine. In many western countries there has recently been a mostly men/male-driven push to not focusing on degrees so much. This is often because they feel uncomfortable with being treated differently simply because of their level of education or job, it can feel awkward to be called Mr. for many people in their young adulthood, let alone Dr. That along with their internalization of themselves as belonging to what is perceived as a privileged group with somewhat easier access or at least less pressures not to do so, makes them want to be chill about it, play it down, and in general you will find most young men in academia like first name basis, casual talk. This may on the surface seem like a good thing, and as a young adult man in mathematics I feel these sentiments too. However, this now puts the people who are first generation academics or people who have so far been minorities in academia into an awkward position: Because a large majority of young men are attempting to play down their degrees and status after attaining their doctorate, now all of a sudden it makes people think of women or first gens or ethnical minorities who wish to carry their title as a sign of their achievement as arrogant or stuck up. You will find these sorts of things a lot on Twitter. Someone adds Dr to their handle, then a bunch of people comment why they feel the need to point it out - usually in reference with a lot of their colleagues or acquaintances not doing that. But the circumstance is different for these people, they feel like they belong to a group which has historically been denied this privilege and now after finally also attaining it, they are once again being denied to carry it because most men are, for in my opinion good reasons and with good intention, trying to dismantle the whole degree structure. In a way, and in a vacuum, I think most people agree that we would be better off if degrees had no such role in our lives, if Dr. did not modify the way you are generically addressed, just as I think we all agree that Mrs. and Miss in a historical vacuum is ludicrous. But we don't live in a historical vacuum. We have to deal with the past and the implications that have grown out of our use of language. So while I and many others in my position, based on modern values, feel a need to downplay our education and to remove this \"Dr.\" calling stuff, for many people this is a social status that they feel they've been denied despite, of course, rightfully now having earned it. So as I said, this is a complicated mess. It seems recently because of absolute jackasses like Epstein who are literally trying to deny people their degrees, younger men have started to, somewhat reluctantly, also wear their doctorates again, e.g. on Twitter and other social media, to make it clear that it is perfectly correct that someone who has earned that degree has indeed earned it. It's all a mess, you see. Nobody in their right mind would invent such a system nowadays but we have to deal with what is not what we want. And what is, is that any woman, minority and of course every single PERSON, who completes a doctorate at a well regarded university (by which I mean not a degree mill), deserves to be called by the degree which they signed up for and completed if they so desire. As a small side note, in some countries like Germany and Austria, the doctorate literally confers a name change of adding Dr. to your name, and the masters degree until recently used to literally change your name to include Mag. (magister, which means teacher). When the Mag. title was removed and became the MSc and MA during the Bologna process in the EU, there were massive shitstorms about people being denied their right to be Herr / Frau Mag. Many people rushed their degrees so they could complete it with the old Mag instead of the new post-name optional international masters degrees. So it is not impossible to get rid of such structure but it IS difficult and people hate it. Both for valid and for invalid reasons. We also can't generalize over all countries and cultures, it's unfortunately all a complicated mess. Apologies for the long post, hope some of my pointers made sense and lead you down useful thoughts.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1001.0,"score_ratio":1.5352112676},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":373,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftowwu","c_root_id_B":"gfu5g2q","created_at_utc_A":1607963502,"created_at_utc_B":1607971356,"score_A":71,"score_B":107,"human_ref_A":"There are several issues and honestly the whole topic is a mess that can't possibly be unraveled in a reddit comment. First, the Dr. she is using is valid and is in no way fraudulent. As you rightly point out, the article is a politically motivated and frankly quite vile piece of crap. So I don't think trying to approach this from his ramblings can lead to anything productive. I will say that she has an EdD, which is not a PhD. It is still a doctorate which confers the right to be called Dr. but I believe it's not ONLY misogyny, as if that would not be enough, but also a deep seated disrespect for non-STEM or medicine-related fields. So yes the problems in that article are...well, it's a shitshow in many different ways. But maybe let's start over and ask ourselves about degrees, their meaning, their value and the use of 'doctor'. Not only is there a complicated history of who is called 'doctor', there is furthermore a complicated history of class and degrees as a whole. First of all, doctor was originally used for learned academics - people who lecture at academies and universities. The use of doctor for medical doctors is significantly more recent, so historically speaking it is the medical doctors who began to use this nomenclature. But does this matter? Language is flexible and as long as everybody understands what is being said in what context, ambiguity can be fine. It is not particularly common outside of jokes that medical doctors and doctors in the original sense of what is nowadays called PhDs are confused, so language wise it's mostly fine. In many western countries there has recently been a mostly men/male-driven push to not focusing on degrees so much. This is often because they feel uncomfortable with being treated differently simply because of their level of education or job, it can feel awkward to be called Mr. for many people in their young adulthood, let alone Dr. That along with their internalization of themselves as belonging to what is perceived as a privileged group with somewhat easier access or at least less pressures not to do so, makes them want to be chill about it, play it down, and in general you will find most young men in academia like first name basis, casual talk. This may on the surface seem like a good thing, and as a young adult man in mathematics I feel these sentiments too. However, this now puts the people who are first generation academics or people who have so far been minorities in academia into an awkward position: Because a large majority of young men are attempting to play down their degrees and status after attaining their doctorate, now all of a sudden it makes people think of women or first gens or ethnical minorities who wish to carry their title as a sign of their achievement as arrogant or stuck up. You will find these sorts of things a lot on Twitter. Someone adds Dr to their handle, then a bunch of people comment why they feel the need to point it out - usually in reference with a lot of their colleagues or acquaintances not doing that. But the circumstance is different for these people, they feel like they belong to a group which has historically been denied this privilege and now after finally also attaining it, they are once again being denied to carry it because most men are, for in my opinion good reasons and with good intention, trying to dismantle the whole degree structure. In a way, and in a vacuum, I think most people agree that we would be better off if degrees had no such role in our lives, if Dr. did not modify the way you are generically addressed, just as I think we all agree that Mrs. and Miss in a historical vacuum is ludicrous. But we don't live in a historical vacuum. We have to deal with the past and the implications that have grown out of our use of language. So while I and many others in my position, based on modern values, feel a need to downplay our education and to remove this \"Dr.\" calling stuff, for many people this is a social status that they feel they've been denied despite, of course, rightfully now having earned it. So as I said, this is a complicated mess. It seems recently because of absolute jackasses like Epstein who are literally trying to deny people their degrees, younger men have started to, somewhat reluctantly, also wear their doctorates again, e.g. on Twitter and other social media, to make it clear that it is perfectly correct that someone who has earned that degree has indeed earned it. It's all a mess, you see. Nobody in their right mind would invent such a system nowadays but we have to deal with what is not what we want. And what is, is that any woman, minority and of course every single PERSON, who completes a doctorate at a well regarded university (by which I mean not a degree mill), deserves to be called by the degree which they signed up for and completed if they so desire. As a small side note, in some countries like Germany and Austria, the doctorate literally confers a name change of adding Dr. to your name, and the masters degree until recently used to literally change your name to include Mag. (magister, which means teacher). When the Mag. title was removed and became the MSc and MA during the Bologna process in the EU, there were massive shitstorms about people being denied their right to be Herr / Frau Mag. Many people rushed their degrees so they could complete it with the old Mag instead of the new post-name optional international masters degrees. So it is not impossible to get rid of such structure but it IS difficult and people hate it. Both for valid and for invalid reasons. We also can't generalize over all countries and cultures, it's unfortunately all a complicated mess. Apologies for the long post, hope some of my pointers made sense and lead you down useful thoughts.","human_ref_B":"I would add there’s a third layer here that isn’t being addressed: The author’s clear mocking of community colleges and their role in higher education. He insults her dissertation, which focused on community college retention - a critical issue facing higher education. He overlooks her decades of teaching experience in community colleges - a vital part of the picture. And he broadly considers the analytical and service work of Ed.D. holders to be meaningless enough to mock. What a prick.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7854.0,"score_ratio":1.5070422535},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":374,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftrwu3","c_root_id_B":"gfu5g2q","created_at_utc_A":1607964959,"created_at_utc_B":1607971356,"score_A":66,"score_B":107,"human_ref_A":"I think the thesis here is that the WSJ is a trash publication that exists for risky clicks. I don't get why it's \"fraudulent\" for a person who has a PhD to call themselves Dr, so I feel like his whole argument is moot.","human_ref_B":"I would add there’s a third layer here that isn’t being addressed: The author’s clear mocking of community colleges and their role in higher education. He insults her dissertation, which focused on community college retention - a critical issue facing higher education. He overlooks her decades of teaching experience in community colleges - a vital part of the picture. And he broadly considers the analytical and service work of Ed.D. holders to be meaningless enough to mock. What a prick.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6397.0,"score_ratio":1.6212121212},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":375,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftuvu6","c_root_id_B":"gfu5g2q","created_at_utc_A":1607966375,"created_at_utc_B":1607971356,"score_A":31,"score_B":107,"human_ref_A":"Doctor meant teacher and well-educated a lot longer than it meant medical professional. You've earned the title, you use it when you want.","human_ref_B":"I would add there’s a third layer here that isn’t being addressed: The author’s clear mocking of community colleges and their role in higher education. He insults her dissertation, which focused on community college retention - a critical issue facing higher education. He overlooks her decades of teaching experience in community colleges - a vital part of the picture. And he broadly considers the analytical and service work of Ed.D. holders to be meaningless enough to mock. What a prick.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4981.0,"score_ratio":3.4516129032},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":376,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftrzvm","c_root_id_B":"gfu5g2q","created_at_utc_A":1607964999,"created_at_utc_B":1607971356,"score_A":26,"score_B":107,"human_ref_A":"I am always hesitant and sometimes feel odd about using “Dr” because of the confusion. I don’t work in academia ( but it is a setting with a good deal of MD’s) and everyone uses first names except in the most formal of meetings with those outside our organization.","human_ref_B":"I would add there’s a third layer here that isn’t being addressed: The author’s clear mocking of community colleges and their role in higher education. He insults her dissertation, which focused on community college retention - a critical issue facing higher education. He overlooks her decades of teaching experience in community colleges - a vital part of the picture. And he broadly considers the analytical and service work of Ed.D. holders to be meaningless enough to mock. What a prick.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6357.0,"score_ratio":4.1153846154},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":377,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gfu9evt","c_root_id_B":"gftuvu6","created_at_utc_A":1607973219,"created_at_utc_B":1607966375,"score_A":34,"score_B":31,"human_ref_A":"There are so many issues with that article. It's honestly barely about titles. (1) Dismissing her legit use of the title itself and the blatant misogynistic in insisting a woman use a title that refers to her relationship to a man (2) Diminished the work of every single PhD ever by saying ~ it used to be harder ~ even though the author has no higher degree at all (3) Specifically diminished research of community college education, which is really damn important, and there's elitism in dismissing the real issues of community college students (4) Implied black women are unfairly being given honorary doctorates for diversity points, which is both racist and sexist (5) Mocking older students because she went back later in life to get her PhD","human_ref_B":"Doctor meant teacher and well-educated a lot longer than it meant medical professional. You've earned the title, you use it when you want.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6844.0,"score_ratio":1.0967741935},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":378,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftrzvm","c_root_id_B":"gftuvu6","created_at_utc_A":1607964999,"created_at_utc_B":1607966375,"score_A":26,"score_B":31,"human_ref_A":"I am always hesitant and sometimes feel odd about using “Dr” because of the confusion. I don’t work in academia ( but it is a setting with a good deal of MD’s) and everyone uses first names except in the most formal of meetings with those outside our organization.","human_ref_B":"Doctor meant teacher and well-educated a lot longer than it meant medical professional. You've earned the title, you use it when you want.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1376.0,"score_ratio":1.1923076923},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":379,"row":{"post_id":"kd0cc1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"Is misogyny the only problem with the WSJ op-ed on asking Jill Biden to not use 'Dr.'? Edit: I do not often post. And looking at the options for flairs, I have a feeling this might not be the right subreddit for this. I apologize if that's the case. So recently there has been a furore over the op-ed by Joseph Epstein asking Jill Biden to not use the title of 'Dr.' and even calling it fraudulent. The article is absolutely misogynistic and should be condemned. However, I was also offended by the denigration of PhDs in general. I have listened to people talk about 'real doctors' and it gets annoying. As a PhD in computer science, I do not go about touting my title in a hospital. In fact, I rarely use my title, unless required on a form. However, I feel that people who choose to do so are completely in the right. If a PhD goes about using the title with their name, the only flaw that can even be alleged is vanity, not fraudulence. I do not know whether the author chose to disparage PhDs only to help his misogynistic agenda with regards to the next first lady, or that he felt envious of people with higher degrees while he worked in academia. However, I think that the article can be condemned from an angle other than misogyny. The reason is that both WSJ and the author will double down on saying that they are not misogynistic, but in my opinion find it harder to objectively defend why a PhD should not call themselves a doctor. This is just the thought that occurred to me. I would love to hear what other people's approach is towards this and learn from that. Thanks.","c_root_id_A":"gftrzvm","c_root_id_B":"gfu9evt","created_at_utc_A":1607964999,"created_at_utc_B":1607973219,"score_A":26,"score_B":34,"human_ref_A":"I am always hesitant and sometimes feel odd about using “Dr” because of the confusion. I don’t work in academia ( but it is a setting with a good deal of MD’s) and everyone uses first names except in the most formal of meetings with those outside our organization.","human_ref_B":"There are so many issues with that article. It's honestly barely about titles. (1) Dismissing her legit use of the title itself and the blatant misogynistic in insisting a woman use a title that refers to her relationship to a man (2) Diminished the work of every single PhD ever by saying ~ it used to be harder ~ even though the author has no higher degree at all (3) Specifically diminished research of community college education, which is really damn important, and there's elitism in dismissing the real issues of community college students (4) Implied black women are unfairly being given honorary doctorates for diversity points, which is both racist and sexist (5) Mocking older students because she went back later in life to get her PhD","labels":0,"seconds_difference":8220.0,"score_ratio":1.3076923077},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":380,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1awco","c_root_id_B":"fn1anp9","created_at_utc_A":1586558267,"created_at_utc_B":1586558129,"score_A":109,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Take your time and grieve your loss. You've done the right thing and reached out to your undergrad and grad programs and gotten extensions and deferment. This is why these options are there, when the unexpected happens. Don't listen to your parents and take your time to get to a point you are okay. Mental health is already tough in grad school and going in when you are already vulnerable is not a wise decision. Having a gap year shouldn't be a problem. Plus, grant, fellowship and job applications all have a personal statement where you can explain gaps like this. And you have a very good reason if questioned. But also having a gap year at this stage isn't usually an issue. This won't ruin your chance to be a professor. Focus on grieving and dealing with your loss. And think about would she want you to put your life on hold. Taking the deferment to grieve is okay. But also moving on to grad school (be it this one or applying again this fall for another school) is okay as well.","human_ref_B":"I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. There's no shame at all in taking time off to process your emotions. Trying to push on may only hurt you in the end if you don't take the time to deal with this.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":138.0,"score_ratio":10.9},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":381,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1ouyi","c_root_id_B":"fn1b6oh","created_at_utc_A":1586566697,"created_at_utc_B":1586558429,"score_A":37,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"Sorry for your loss OP. This is unimaginable. I would absolutely defer if you have any means of supporting yourself over the next year. Fall 2020 is going to be a real mess on campuses everywhere, and I can't imagine starting a Ph.D. program in the midst of that. You'd be better off almost anywhere else IMO, for both personal and professional reasons. Give yourself a break and do what you need to in order to reset...grieving during a pandemic is hard as hell (as I and many others now know). Being a grad student ain't no picnic either. If you can take some time to focus on yourself and to heal you'd probably be in a better place in fall 2021, and it's all but certain that's true for higher ed in general as well.","human_ref_B":"I'm so sorry for your loss. I have also asked for a deferment, but it's due to a loss in my family. No one will look down on you for making this choice. I had felt guilty about asking for a deferment, but was then told it was a mature decision from the PI I applied to. Take this time to be with your family and just grieve. Again, I am so sorry this happened. Take care.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8268.0,"score_ratio":1.4230769231},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":382,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1anp9","c_root_id_B":"fn1ouyi","created_at_utc_A":1586558129,"created_at_utc_B":1586566697,"score_A":10,"score_B":37,"human_ref_A":"I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. There's no shame at all in taking time off to process your emotions. Trying to push on may only hurt you in the end if you don't take the time to deal with this.","human_ref_B":"Sorry for your loss OP. This is unimaginable. I would absolutely defer if you have any means of supporting yourself over the next year. Fall 2020 is going to be a real mess on campuses everywhere, and I can't imagine starting a Ph.D. program in the midst of that. You'd be better off almost anywhere else IMO, for both personal and professional reasons. Give yourself a break and do what you need to in order to reset...grieving during a pandemic is hard as hell (as I and many others now know). Being a grad student ain't no picnic either. If you can take some time to focus on yourself and to heal you'd probably be in a better place in fall 2021, and it's all but certain that's true for higher ed in general as well.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":8568.0,"score_ratio":3.7},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":383,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1ouyi","c_root_id_B":"fn1grr5","created_at_utc_A":1586566697,"created_at_utc_B":1586561685,"score_A":37,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"Sorry for your loss OP. This is unimaginable. I would absolutely defer if you have any means of supporting yourself over the next year. Fall 2020 is going to be a real mess on campuses everywhere, and I can't imagine starting a Ph.D. program in the midst of that. You'd be better off almost anywhere else IMO, for both personal and professional reasons. Give yourself a break and do what you need to in order to reset...grieving during a pandemic is hard as hell (as I and many others now know). Being a grad student ain't no picnic either. If you can take some time to focus on yourself and to heal you'd probably be in a better place in fall 2021, and it's all but certain that's true for higher ed in general as well.","human_ref_B":"I am so, so sorry. Grief is a heavy thing and it can’t be gotten over. You will learn to live with it, but you need support. I think you should defer, take some time, and care for your own health first. I am so, so sorry. I can’t even imagine. I do know that when you’re experiencing grief you should avoid making huge decisions for several months. If funding and admission is the same, don’t jump in just yet. You may feel like you’re in a fog during the first year of grieving, and I’m not sure doctoral work will help. Also think about your studies as an investment in yourself. Are you ready to invest all that’s required right now, or would you be better suited for the work after taking some time?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5012.0,"score_ratio":4.1111111111},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":384,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1bz6n","c_root_id_B":"fn1ouyi","created_at_utc_A":1586558879,"created_at_utc_B":1586566697,"score_A":6,"score_B":37,"human_ref_A":"I’m sorry for your loss. I know it’s not the same, but my roommate took his life while we were living together. My biggest regret wasn’t taking time away from to school to process the event.","human_ref_B":"Sorry for your loss OP. This is unimaginable. I would absolutely defer if you have any means of supporting yourself over the next year. Fall 2020 is going to be a real mess on campuses everywhere, and I can't imagine starting a Ph.D. program in the midst of that. You'd be better off almost anywhere else IMO, for both personal and professional reasons. Give yourself a break and do what you need to in order to reset...grieving during a pandemic is hard as hell (as I and many others now know). Being a grad student ain't no picnic either. If you can take some time to focus on yourself and to heal you'd probably be in a better place in fall 2021, and it's all but certain that's true for higher ed in general as well.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7818.0,"score_ratio":6.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":385,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1vw7s","c_root_id_B":"fn1b6oh","created_at_utc_A":1586571373,"created_at_utc_B":1586558429,"score_A":30,"score_B":26,"human_ref_A":"OK - first, my wife died over a decade ago. I understand your pain. It is immense. It's not going away soon. In some ways you will actually do things that others will see as \"crazy.\" There will be times that you cannot function. That's all normal. It took me about 6 months to feel at all consistently functional. But there will also be times when you can do all right and be wanting to move forward. Like when you wrote this message to all of us. Take whatever time off you have been given. This is not giving up or giving in. Your entire psyche has been shocked badly and you cannot function at your best. You need the time to recover, even if all you want to do is bury yourself in work to distract you from the pain of it all. It sounds like both institutions are doing you a solid and giving you the time. Take it. You need it. I was trying to finish my dissertation when my wife died. My first draft was completely finished. It actually took me another 2 years until I got to my defense. OK, that's what it took. I simply could not have gone any faster. Try to remember that your parents are trying to help even when they're not. You can also say, \"no, I don't want that.\" They might actually hear you after 45 tries. No one you want to work with will look badly at deferment for this reason. When you're ready, you'll know.","human_ref_B":"I'm so sorry for your loss. I have also asked for a deferment, but it's due to a loss in my family. No one will look down on you for making this choice. I had felt guilty about asking for a deferment, but was then told it was a mature decision from the PI I applied to. Take this time to be with your family and just grieve. Again, I am so sorry this happened. Take care.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12944.0,"score_ratio":1.1538461538},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":386,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1vw7s","c_root_id_B":"fn1tin8","created_at_utc_A":1586571373,"created_at_utc_B":1586569746,"score_A":30,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"OK - first, my wife died over a decade ago. I understand your pain. It is immense. It's not going away soon. In some ways you will actually do things that others will see as \"crazy.\" There will be times that you cannot function. That's all normal. It took me about 6 months to feel at all consistently functional. But there will also be times when you can do all right and be wanting to move forward. Like when you wrote this message to all of us. Take whatever time off you have been given. This is not giving up or giving in. Your entire psyche has been shocked badly and you cannot function at your best. You need the time to recover, even if all you want to do is bury yourself in work to distract you from the pain of it all. It sounds like both institutions are doing you a solid and giving you the time. Take it. You need it. I was trying to finish my dissertation when my wife died. My first draft was completely finished. It actually took me another 2 years until I got to my defense. OK, that's what it took. I simply could not have gone any faster. Try to remember that your parents are trying to help even when they're not. You can also say, \"no, I don't want that.\" They might actually hear you after 45 tries. No one you want to work with will look badly at deferment for this reason. When you're ready, you'll know.","human_ref_B":"Deferment is not a bad idea, in fact, I'd say it's a GREAT option. The only people that would possibly care about this deferment (or a gap year) is a PhD program. If you show up to the PhD program and are still a mess it is hard (not impossible) to recover from. My dad died unexpectedly two months before my PhD program started and I wish I would have deferred for a year. I was a mess and I can only imagine you're worse off.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1627.0,"score_ratio":1.2},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":387,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1anp9","c_root_id_B":"fn1vw7s","created_at_utc_A":1586558129,"created_at_utc_B":1586571373,"score_A":10,"score_B":30,"human_ref_A":"I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. There's no shame at all in taking time off to process your emotions. Trying to push on may only hurt you in the end if you don't take the time to deal with this.","human_ref_B":"OK - first, my wife died over a decade ago. I understand your pain. It is immense. It's not going away soon. In some ways you will actually do things that others will see as \"crazy.\" There will be times that you cannot function. That's all normal. It took me about 6 months to feel at all consistently functional. But there will also be times when you can do all right and be wanting to move forward. Like when you wrote this message to all of us. Take whatever time off you have been given. This is not giving up or giving in. Your entire psyche has been shocked badly and you cannot function at your best. You need the time to recover, even if all you want to do is bury yourself in work to distract you from the pain of it all. It sounds like both institutions are doing you a solid and giving you the time. Take it. You need it. I was trying to finish my dissertation when my wife died. My first draft was completely finished. It actually took me another 2 years until I got to my defense. OK, that's what it took. I simply could not have gone any faster. Try to remember that your parents are trying to help even when they're not. You can also say, \"no, I don't want that.\" They might actually hear you after 45 tries. No one you want to work with will look badly at deferment for this reason. When you're ready, you'll know.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":13244.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":388,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1vw7s","c_root_id_B":"fn1grr5","created_at_utc_A":1586571373,"created_at_utc_B":1586561685,"score_A":30,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"OK - first, my wife died over a decade ago. I understand your pain. It is immense. It's not going away soon. In some ways you will actually do things that others will see as \"crazy.\" There will be times that you cannot function. That's all normal. It took me about 6 months to feel at all consistently functional. But there will also be times when you can do all right and be wanting to move forward. Like when you wrote this message to all of us. Take whatever time off you have been given. This is not giving up or giving in. Your entire psyche has been shocked badly and you cannot function at your best. You need the time to recover, even if all you want to do is bury yourself in work to distract you from the pain of it all. It sounds like both institutions are doing you a solid and giving you the time. Take it. You need it. I was trying to finish my dissertation when my wife died. My first draft was completely finished. It actually took me another 2 years until I got to my defense. OK, that's what it took. I simply could not have gone any faster. Try to remember that your parents are trying to help even when they're not. You can also say, \"no, I don't want that.\" They might actually hear you after 45 tries. No one you want to work with will look badly at deferment for this reason. When you're ready, you'll know.","human_ref_B":"I am so, so sorry. Grief is a heavy thing and it can’t be gotten over. You will learn to live with it, but you need support. I think you should defer, take some time, and care for your own health first. I am so, so sorry. I can’t even imagine. I do know that when you’re experiencing grief you should avoid making huge decisions for several months. If funding and admission is the same, don’t jump in just yet. You may feel like you’re in a fog during the first year of grieving, and I’m not sure doctoral work will help. Also think about your studies as an investment in yourself. Are you ready to invest all that’s required right now, or would you be better suited for the work after taking some time?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9688.0,"score_ratio":3.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":389,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1vw7s","c_root_id_B":"fn1bz6n","created_at_utc_A":1586571373,"created_at_utc_B":1586558879,"score_A":30,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"OK - first, my wife died over a decade ago. I understand your pain. It is immense. It's not going away soon. In some ways you will actually do things that others will see as \"crazy.\" There will be times that you cannot function. That's all normal. It took me about 6 months to feel at all consistently functional. But there will also be times when you can do all right and be wanting to move forward. Like when you wrote this message to all of us. Take whatever time off you have been given. This is not giving up or giving in. Your entire psyche has been shocked badly and you cannot function at your best. You need the time to recover, even if all you want to do is bury yourself in work to distract you from the pain of it all. It sounds like both institutions are doing you a solid and giving you the time. Take it. You need it. I was trying to finish my dissertation when my wife died. My first draft was completely finished. It actually took me another 2 years until I got to my defense. OK, that's what it took. I simply could not have gone any faster. Try to remember that your parents are trying to help even when they're not. You can also say, \"no, I don't want that.\" They might actually hear you after 45 tries. No one you want to work with will look badly at deferment for this reason. When you're ready, you'll know.","human_ref_B":"I’m sorry for your loss. I know it’s not the same, but my roommate took his life while we were living together. My biggest regret wasn’t taking time away from to school to process the event.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12494.0,"score_ratio":5.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":390,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1scjr","c_root_id_B":"fn1vw7s","created_at_utc_A":1586568974,"created_at_utc_B":1586571373,"score_A":3,"score_B":30,"human_ref_A":"Your pain and how you're processing it is completely normal, both in the fact that many, many other people react this way to loss and that ultimately whatever you're feeling, however you feel you need to get through this, is fine, even if it's not the \"typical.\" A therapist or grief counselor can help you move through this in a healthy way, which I highly recommend, but know that there are very few \"wrong\" ways to grieve or \"wrong\" reactions and there is no timeline. This sort of thing is also *exactly* what deferments are for. Take time to take care of yourself. You will of course never \"get over\" this, but moving through normal life again does become less painful. If you dive headlong into your grad program, you're just going to feel off kilter -- deferments and gap years are normal and acceptable if anyone even notices it in the first place, but nearly failing your first year is going to be much harder to move past. I also want to caution you about this: the world of academics and research can be cutthroat in the sort of stress it makes us put on ourselves. Especially now and always in the future, take care of yourself, too.","human_ref_B":"OK - first, my wife died over a decade ago. I understand your pain. It is immense. It's not going away soon. In some ways you will actually do things that others will see as \"crazy.\" There will be times that you cannot function. That's all normal. It took me about 6 months to feel at all consistently functional. But there will also be times when you can do all right and be wanting to move forward. Like when you wrote this message to all of us. Take whatever time off you have been given. This is not giving up or giving in. Your entire psyche has been shocked badly and you cannot function at your best. You need the time to recover, even if all you want to do is bury yourself in work to distract you from the pain of it all. It sounds like both institutions are doing you a solid and giving you the time. Take it. You need it. I was trying to finish my dissertation when my wife died. My first draft was completely finished. It actually took me another 2 years until I got to my defense. OK, that's what it took. I simply could not have gone any faster. Try to remember that your parents are trying to help even when they're not. You can also say, \"no, I don't want that.\" They might actually hear you after 45 tries. No one you want to work with will look badly at deferment for this reason. When you're ready, you'll know.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2399.0,"score_ratio":10.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":391,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1b6oh","c_root_id_B":"fn1anp9","created_at_utc_A":1586558429,"created_at_utc_B":1586558129,"score_A":26,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"I'm so sorry for your loss. I have also asked for a deferment, but it's due to a loss in my family. No one will look down on you for making this choice. I had felt guilty about asking for a deferment, but was then told it was a mature decision from the PI I applied to. Take this time to be with your family and just grieve. Again, I am so sorry this happened. Take care.","human_ref_B":"I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. There's no shame at all in taking time off to process your emotions. Trying to push on may only hurt you in the end if you don't take the time to deal with this.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":300.0,"score_ratio":2.6},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":392,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1anp9","c_root_id_B":"fn1tin8","created_at_utc_A":1586558129,"created_at_utc_B":1586569746,"score_A":10,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. There's no shame at all in taking time off to process your emotions. Trying to push on may only hurt you in the end if you don't take the time to deal with this.","human_ref_B":"Deferment is not a bad idea, in fact, I'd say it's a GREAT option. The only people that would possibly care about this deferment (or a gap year) is a PhD program. If you show up to the PhD program and are still a mess it is hard (not impossible) to recover from. My dad died unexpectedly two months before my PhD program started and I wish I would have deferred for a year. I was a mess and I can only imagine you're worse off.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11617.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":393,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1grr5","c_root_id_B":"fn1tin8","created_at_utc_A":1586561685,"created_at_utc_B":1586569746,"score_A":9,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"I am so, so sorry. Grief is a heavy thing and it can’t be gotten over. You will learn to live with it, but you need support. I think you should defer, take some time, and care for your own health first. I am so, so sorry. I can’t even imagine. I do know that when you’re experiencing grief you should avoid making huge decisions for several months. If funding and admission is the same, don’t jump in just yet. You may feel like you’re in a fog during the first year of grieving, and I’m not sure doctoral work will help. Also think about your studies as an investment in yourself. Are you ready to invest all that’s required right now, or would you be better suited for the work after taking some time?","human_ref_B":"Deferment is not a bad idea, in fact, I'd say it's a GREAT option. The only people that would possibly care about this deferment (or a gap year) is a PhD program. If you show up to the PhD program and are still a mess it is hard (not impossible) to recover from. My dad died unexpectedly two months before my PhD program started and I wish I would have deferred for a year. I was a mess and I can only imagine you're worse off.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":8061.0,"score_ratio":2.7777777778},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":394,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1bz6n","c_root_id_B":"fn1tin8","created_at_utc_A":1586558879,"created_at_utc_B":1586569746,"score_A":6,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"I’m sorry for your loss. I know it’s not the same, but my roommate took his life while we were living together. My biggest regret wasn’t taking time away from to school to process the event.","human_ref_B":"Deferment is not a bad idea, in fact, I'd say it's a GREAT option. The only people that would possibly care about this deferment (or a gap year) is a PhD program. If you show up to the PhD program and are still a mess it is hard (not impossible) to recover from. My dad died unexpectedly two months before my PhD program started and I wish I would have deferred for a year. I was a mess and I can only imagine you're worse off.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":10867.0,"score_ratio":4.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":395,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1scjr","c_root_id_B":"fn1tin8","created_at_utc_A":1586568974,"created_at_utc_B":1586569746,"score_A":3,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"Your pain and how you're processing it is completely normal, both in the fact that many, many other people react this way to loss and that ultimately whatever you're feeling, however you feel you need to get through this, is fine, even if it's not the \"typical.\" A therapist or grief counselor can help you move through this in a healthy way, which I highly recommend, but know that there are very few \"wrong\" ways to grieve or \"wrong\" reactions and there is no timeline. This sort of thing is also *exactly* what deferments are for. Take time to take care of yourself. You will of course never \"get over\" this, but moving through normal life again does become less painful. If you dive headlong into your grad program, you're just going to feel off kilter -- deferments and gap years are normal and acceptable if anyone even notices it in the first place, but nearly failing your first year is going to be much harder to move past. I also want to caution you about this: the world of academics and research can be cutthroat in the sort of stress it makes us put on ourselves. Especially now and always in the future, take care of yourself, too.","human_ref_B":"Deferment is not a bad idea, in fact, I'd say it's a GREAT option. The only people that would possibly care about this deferment (or a gap year) is a PhD program. If you show up to the PhD program and are still a mess it is hard (not impossible) to recover from. My dad died unexpectedly two months before my PhD program started and I wish I would have deferred for a year. I was a mess and I can only imagine you're worse off.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":772.0,"score_ratio":8.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":396,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1anp9","c_root_id_B":"fn1xh7b","created_at_utc_A":1586558129,"created_at_utc_B":1586572480,"score_A":10,"score_B":17,"human_ref_A":"I'm so sorry to hear about your loss. There's no shame at all in taking time off to process your emotions. Trying to push on may only hurt you in the end if you don't take the time to deal with this.","human_ref_B":"I’ll tell you what one of the most badass amazing scientists (tenured professor and leader in her field) I know told me, about taking a leave after my mother died last summer: it is seen as strength to know your limits and much better to concede to self care, rather than push forward and 1-not be all in, or worse 2-crash and burn. Truly, immense grief is very hard, and grad school is very hard, face one at a time. And last but certainly not least, I am so deeply sorry for your loss. I don’t know how your undergrad institution is, but I hope they could meet you where you’re at and help you during this unimaginatively difficult time <3","labels":0,"seconds_difference":14351.0,"score_ratio":1.7},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":397,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1xh7b","c_root_id_B":"fn1grr5","created_at_utc_A":1586572480,"created_at_utc_B":1586561685,"score_A":17,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I’ll tell you what one of the most badass amazing scientists (tenured professor and leader in her field) I know told me, about taking a leave after my mother died last summer: it is seen as strength to know your limits and much better to concede to self care, rather than push forward and 1-not be all in, or worse 2-crash and burn. Truly, immense grief is very hard, and grad school is very hard, face one at a time. And last but certainly not least, I am so deeply sorry for your loss. I don’t know how your undergrad institution is, but I hope they could meet you where you’re at and help you during this unimaginatively difficult time <3","human_ref_B":"I am so, so sorry. Grief is a heavy thing and it can’t be gotten over. You will learn to live with it, but you need support. I think you should defer, take some time, and care for your own health first. I am so, so sorry. I can’t even imagine. I do know that when you’re experiencing grief you should avoid making huge decisions for several months. If funding and admission is the same, don’t jump in just yet. You may feel like you’re in a fog during the first year of grieving, and I’m not sure doctoral work will help. Also think about your studies as an investment in yourself. Are you ready to invest all that’s required right now, or would you be better suited for the work after taking some time?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":10795.0,"score_ratio":1.8888888889},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":398,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1bz6n","c_root_id_B":"fn1xh7b","created_at_utc_A":1586558879,"created_at_utc_B":1586572480,"score_A":6,"score_B":17,"human_ref_A":"I’m sorry for your loss. I know it’s not the same, but my roommate took his life while we were living together. My biggest regret wasn’t taking time away from to school to process the event.","human_ref_B":"I’ll tell you what one of the most badass amazing scientists (tenured professor and leader in her field) I know told me, about taking a leave after my mother died last summer: it is seen as strength to know your limits and much better to concede to self care, rather than push forward and 1-not be all in, or worse 2-crash and burn. Truly, immense grief is very hard, and grad school is very hard, face one at a time. And last but certainly not least, I am so deeply sorry for your loss. I don’t know how your undergrad institution is, but I hope they could meet you where you’re at and help you during this unimaginatively difficult time <3","labels":0,"seconds_difference":13601.0,"score_ratio":2.8333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":399,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1xh7b","c_root_id_B":"fn1scjr","created_at_utc_A":1586572480,"created_at_utc_B":1586568974,"score_A":17,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I’ll tell you what one of the most badass amazing scientists (tenured professor and leader in her field) I know told me, about taking a leave after my mother died last summer: it is seen as strength to know your limits and much better to concede to self care, rather than push forward and 1-not be all in, or worse 2-crash and burn. Truly, immense grief is very hard, and grad school is very hard, face one at a time. And last but certainly not least, I am so deeply sorry for your loss. I don’t know how your undergrad institution is, but I hope they could meet you where you’re at and help you during this unimaginatively difficult time <3","human_ref_B":"Your pain and how you're processing it is completely normal, both in the fact that many, many other people react this way to loss and that ultimately whatever you're feeling, however you feel you need to get through this, is fine, even if it's not the \"typical.\" A therapist or grief counselor can help you move through this in a healthy way, which I highly recommend, but know that there are very few \"wrong\" ways to grieve or \"wrong\" reactions and there is no timeline. This sort of thing is also *exactly* what deferments are for. Take time to take care of yourself. You will of course never \"get over\" this, but moving through normal life again does become less painful. If you dive headlong into your grad program, you're just going to feel off kilter -- deferments and gap years are normal and acceptable if anyone even notices it in the first place, but nearly failing your first year is going to be much harder to move past. I also want to caution you about this: the world of academics and research can be cutthroat in the sort of stress it makes us put on ourselves. Especially now and always in the future, take care of yourself, too.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3506.0,"score_ratio":5.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]}],"num_rows_total":348718,"num_rows_per_page":100,"partial":false} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/shp_rows_400.json b/shp_rows_400.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ed6ad7f20b0d891e9098e5332e37cf13d78d439 --- /dev/null +++ b/shp_rows_400.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"features":[{"feature_idx":0,"name":"post_id","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":1,"name":"domain","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":2,"name":"upvote_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":3,"name":"history","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":4,"name":"c_root_id_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":5,"name":"c_root_id_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":6,"name":"created_at_utc_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":7,"name":"created_at_utc_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":8,"name":"score_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":9,"name":"score_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":10,"name":"human_ref_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":11,"name":"human_ref_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":12,"name":"labels","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":13,"name":"seconds_difference","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":14,"name":"score_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}}],"rows":[{"row_idx":400,"row":{"post_id":"fypuv6","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"My fiancée passed away on the 1st and she was going to come to my PhD program with me. Is deferment bad? I'm at a loss and I don't know what I should do anymore. I got into my dream PhD program in January and my fiancée and I were making our plans to move there soon. However, my fiancée passed away unexpectedly on the 1st of this month and I've been a total wreck. I can't concentrate on my last semester of undergrad and a huge reason I chose this school was because she would love the area/things to do there. I want to still get my PhD but now I'm feeling lost and scared about moving forward. I contacted the school and they said I can defer up to a year and keep my RA-ship offer and everything and my current university is offering me incompletes to finish over the summer, but I don't know what I should do. My parents have taken me back to my childhood home and they are trying to \"get me over\" the death of the love of my life. They want me to finish my undergrad on time (by May 1st) and start grad school on time (June 1st), but I'm having trouble just typing this let alone thinking about math. My end goal is to become a professor at a PUI. Would deferment be looked at negatively? Does anyone know how I can transition back into my life/school? Is it okay to not be able to do any work right now? I'm also feeling guilty to move on with my life without her. Does anyone have any advice? I'm only 22 and my lover has already passed away. Thank you for any advice.","c_root_id_A":"fn1grr5","c_root_id_B":"fn1bz6n","created_at_utc_A":1586561685,"created_at_utc_B":1586558879,"score_A":9,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"I am so, so sorry. Grief is a heavy thing and it can’t be gotten over. You will learn to live with it, but you need support. I think you should defer, take some time, and care for your own health first. I am so, so sorry. I can’t even imagine. I do know that when you’re experiencing grief you should avoid making huge decisions for several months. If funding and admission is the same, don’t jump in just yet. You may feel like you’re in a fog during the first year of grieving, and I’m not sure doctoral work will help. Also think about your studies as an investment in yourself. Are you ready to invest all that’s required right now, or would you be better suited for the work after taking some time?","human_ref_B":"I’m sorry for your loss. I know it’s not the same, but my roommate took his life while we were living together. My biggest regret wasn’t taking time away from to school to process the event.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2806.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":401,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdj4yz","c_root_id_B":"ihditlf","created_at_utc_A":1658614462,"created_at_utc_B":1658614322,"score_A":186,"score_B":182,"human_ref_A":"I hope you recover quickly, Dr. Barnacle.","human_ref_B":"Congratulations, Dr, you’ve earned it. We wish you a full and speedy recovery.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":140.0,"score_ratio":1.021978022},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":402,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihe0k3x","c_root_id_B":"ihdwrci","created_at_utc_A":1658622635,"created_at_utc_B":1658620810,"score_A":166,"score_B":116,"human_ref_A":"PhD's cause Covid, n=1","human_ref_B":"Inform your adviser? That's the first thing I'd personally do. So they'd know I won't be able to submit any revisions or further requirements as quickly as I can under normal circumstances. Anyway, congrats op! I hope your case is mild and it goes away fast. Take your vitamins and other over the counter medicine for symptom control.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1825.0,"score_ratio":1.4310344828},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":403,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihe0k3x","c_root_id_B":"ihdyzgo","created_at_utc_A":1658622635,"created_at_utc_B":1658621882,"score_A":166,"score_B":39,"human_ref_A":"PhD's cause Covid, n=1","human_ref_B":"Take a few days. Other than a graduation filing deadline there are few true emergencies in academia. However, be entirely prepared for the graduate school to tell you to pound sand if you are up against one.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":753.0,"score_ratio":4.2564102564},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":404,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihe0k3x","c_root_id_B":"ihdpy6q","created_at_utc_A":1658622635,"created_at_utc_B":1658617566,"score_A":166,"score_B":24,"human_ref_A":"PhD's cause Covid, n=1","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! Hope for a speedy recovery Dr !","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5069.0,"score_ratio":6.9166666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":405,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihe0k3x","c_root_id_B":"ihdv0z5","created_at_utc_A":1658622635,"created_at_utc_B":1658619966,"score_A":166,"score_B":16,"human_ref_A":"PhD's cause Covid, n=1","human_ref_B":"First, congrats! Second, I was incredibly ill when I defended. I forced myself to look over ten pages a day after that (I had almost five weeks and only 300 pages to look over). Most days were easy with few revisions. Some days required a little more effort. Pareling out the work made it easier to get through. I hope you get better soon!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2669.0,"score_ratio":10.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":406,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdvx8a","c_root_id_B":"ihe0k3x","created_at_utc_A":1658620401,"created_at_utc_B":1658622635,"score_A":2,"score_B":166,"human_ref_A":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","human_ref_B":"PhD's cause Covid, n=1","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2234.0,"score_ratio":83.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":407,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdwrci","c_root_id_B":"ihdpy6q","created_at_utc_A":1658620810,"created_at_utc_B":1658617566,"score_A":116,"score_B":24,"human_ref_A":"Inform your adviser? That's the first thing I'd personally do. So they'd know I won't be able to submit any revisions or further requirements as quickly as I can under normal circumstances. Anyway, congrats op! I hope your case is mild and it goes away fast. Take your vitamins and other over the counter medicine for symptom control.","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! Hope for a speedy recovery Dr !","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3244.0,"score_ratio":4.8333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":408,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdv0z5","c_root_id_B":"ihdwrci","created_at_utc_A":1658619966,"created_at_utc_B":1658620810,"score_A":16,"score_B":116,"human_ref_A":"First, congrats! Second, I was incredibly ill when I defended. I forced myself to look over ten pages a day after that (I had almost five weeks and only 300 pages to look over). Most days were easy with few revisions. Some days required a little more effort. Pareling out the work made it easier to get through. I hope you get better soon!!","human_ref_B":"Inform your adviser? That's the first thing I'd personally do. So they'd know I won't be able to submit any revisions or further requirements as quickly as I can under normal circumstances. Anyway, congrats op! I hope your case is mild and it goes away fast. Take your vitamins and other over the counter medicine for symptom control.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":844.0,"score_ratio":7.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":409,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdvx8a","c_root_id_B":"ihdwrci","created_at_utc_A":1658620401,"created_at_utc_B":1658620810,"score_A":2,"score_B":116,"human_ref_A":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","human_ref_B":"Inform your adviser? That's the first thing I'd personally do. So they'd know I won't be able to submit any revisions or further requirements as quickly as I can under normal circumstances. Anyway, congrats op! I hope your case is mild and it goes away fast. Take your vitamins and other over the counter medicine for symptom control.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":409.0,"score_ratio":58.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":410,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdpy6q","c_root_id_B":"ihdyzgo","created_at_utc_A":1658617566,"created_at_utc_B":1658621882,"score_A":24,"score_B":39,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! Hope for a speedy recovery Dr !","human_ref_B":"Take a few days. Other than a graduation filing deadline there are few true emergencies in academia. However, be entirely prepared for the graduate school to tell you to pound sand if you are up against one.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4316.0,"score_ratio":1.625},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":411,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdyzgo","c_root_id_B":"ihdv0z5","created_at_utc_A":1658621882,"created_at_utc_B":1658619966,"score_A":39,"score_B":16,"human_ref_A":"Take a few days. Other than a graduation filing deadline there are few true emergencies in academia. However, be entirely prepared for the graduate school to tell you to pound sand if you are up against one.","human_ref_B":"First, congrats! Second, I was incredibly ill when I defended. I forced myself to look over ten pages a day after that (I had almost five weeks and only 300 pages to look over). Most days were easy with few revisions. Some days required a little more effort. Pareling out the work made it easier to get through. I hope you get better soon!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1916.0,"score_ratio":2.4375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":412,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdyzgo","c_root_id_B":"ihdvx8a","created_at_utc_A":1658621882,"created_at_utc_B":1658620401,"score_A":39,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Take a few days. Other than a graduation filing deadline there are few true emergencies in academia. However, be entirely prepared for the graduate school to tell you to pound sand if you are up against one.","human_ref_B":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1481.0,"score_ratio":19.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":413,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdv0z5","c_root_id_B":"ihez7xa","created_at_utc_A":1658619966,"created_at_utc_B":1658641073,"score_A":16,"score_B":20,"human_ref_A":"First, congrats! Second, I was incredibly ill when I defended. I forced myself to look over ten pages a day after that (I had almost five weeks and only 300 pages to look over). Most days were easy with few revisions. Some days required a little more effort. Pareling out the work made it easier to get through. I hope you get better soon!!","human_ref_B":"First, you need to tell your committee for two reasons: first, so they know they were exposed (assuming it wasn't a zoom defense) and can react accordingly and second, so they know you might submit revisions late. If you are ill, don't power through it--- make sure you rest. According to the LA Times, doctors are warning that not resting when sick with covid may increase your chances of getting long covid. If I find a pre-print or paper on this, I'll update my comment with it.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":21107.0,"score_ratio":1.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":414,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihez7xa","c_root_id_B":"ihe33bp","created_at_utc_A":1658641073,"created_at_utc_B":1658623862,"score_A":20,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"First, you need to tell your committee for two reasons: first, so they know they were exposed (assuming it wasn't a zoom defense) and can react accordingly and second, so they know you might submit revisions late. If you are ill, don't power through it--- make sure you rest. According to the LA Times, doctors are warning that not resting when sick with covid may increase your chances of getting long covid. If I find a pre-print or paper on this, I'll update my comment with it.","human_ref_B":"Take your time. Allot a certain amount of time each day. Make sure everyone in your life respects what you've got to do. When I was finishing up, I was already teaching full-time and had some administrative responsibilities. In those days it was impractical to work from home. I put a sign on my door that read: I AM WORKING ON MY DISSERTATION. BEFORE KNOCKING ON MY DOOR, ASK YOURSELF, \"DO I FEEL LUCKY?\" One of my students got the \"Dirty Harry\" reference and added, \"Well, do ya, punk?\"","labels":1,"seconds_difference":17211.0,"score_ratio":2.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":415,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihez7xa","c_root_id_B":"ihekgjc","created_at_utc_A":1658641073,"created_at_utc_B":1658632446,"score_A":20,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"First, you need to tell your committee for two reasons: first, so they know they were exposed (assuming it wasn't a zoom defense) and can react accordingly and second, so they know you might submit revisions late. If you are ill, don't power through it--- make sure you rest. According to the LA Times, doctors are warning that not resting when sick with covid may increase your chances of getting long covid. If I find a pre-print or paper on this, I'll update my comment with it.","human_ref_B":"Just know you’ve achieved something 99% of people on earth could never dream of accomplishing","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8627.0,"score_ratio":3.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":416,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihez7xa","c_root_id_B":"iheqijf","created_at_utc_A":1658641073,"created_at_utc_B":1658635740,"score_A":20,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"First, you need to tell your committee for two reasons: first, so they know they were exposed (assuming it wasn't a zoom defense) and can react accordingly and second, so they know you might submit revisions late. If you are ill, don't power through it--- make sure you rest. According to the LA Times, doctors are warning that not resting when sick with covid may increase your chances of getting long covid. If I find a pre-print or paper on this, I'll update my comment with it.","human_ref_B":"Did you tell everyone at your viva that you exposed them?","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5333.0,"score_ratio":2.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":417,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihez7xa","c_root_id_B":"ihdvx8a","created_at_utc_A":1658641073,"created_at_utc_B":1658620401,"score_A":20,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"First, you need to tell your committee for two reasons: first, so they know they were exposed (assuming it wasn't a zoom defense) and can react accordingly and second, so they know you might submit revisions late. If you are ill, don't power through it--- make sure you rest. According to the LA Times, doctors are warning that not resting when sick with covid may increase your chances of getting long covid. If I find a pre-print or paper on this, I'll update my comment with it.","human_ref_B":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":20672.0,"score_ratio":10.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":418,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihe6sdu","c_root_id_B":"ihez7xa","created_at_utc_A":1658625646,"created_at_utc_B":1658641073,"score_A":2,"score_B":20,"human_ref_A":"I was COVID-19 positive when I gave my final honors presentation in undergrad, but didn’t know it till the next day. Just assumed it was a really bad cold, but ended up in quarantine the next day.","human_ref_B":"First, you need to tell your committee for two reasons: first, so they know they were exposed (assuming it wasn't a zoom defense) and can react accordingly and second, so they know you might submit revisions late. If you are ill, don't power through it--- make sure you rest. According to the LA Times, doctors are warning that not resting when sick with covid may increase your chances of getting long covid. If I find a pre-print or paper on this, I'll update my comment with it.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":15427.0,"score_ratio":10.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":419,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihez7xa","c_root_id_B":"ihefapp","created_at_utc_A":1658641073,"created_at_utc_B":1658629801,"score_A":20,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"First, you need to tell your committee for two reasons: first, so they know they were exposed (assuming it wasn't a zoom defense) and can react accordingly and second, so they know you might submit revisions late. If you are ill, don't power through it--- make sure you rest. According to the LA Times, doctors are warning that not resting when sick with covid may increase your chances of getting long covid. If I find a pre-print or paper on this, I'll update my comment with it.","human_ref_B":"Rest…!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11272.0,"score_ratio":10.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":420,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfpkcz","c_root_id_B":"ihe33bp","created_at_utc_A":1658661697,"created_at_utc_B":1658623862,"score_A":10,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"First of all: Congratulations! Please inform everyone you have met yesterday and days prior to that that they should get tested! Speedy recovery!","human_ref_B":"Take your time. Allot a certain amount of time each day. Make sure everyone in your life respects what you've got to do. When I was finishing up, I was already teaching full-time and had some administrative responsibilities. In those days it was impractical to work from home. I put a sign on my door that read: I AM WORKING ON MY DISSERTATION. BEFORE KNOCKING ON MY DOOR, ASK YOURSELF, \"DO I FEEL LUCKY?\" One of my students got the \"Dirty Harry\" reference and added, \"Well, do ya, punk?\"","labels":1,"seconds_difference":37835.0,"score_ratio":1.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":421,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihekgjc","c_root_id_B":"ihfpkcz","created_at_utc_A":1658632446,"created_at_utc_B":1658661697,"score_A":6,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Just know you’ve achieved something 99% of people on earth could never dream of accomplishing","human_ref_B":"First of all: Congratulations! Please inform everyone you have met yesterday and days prior to that that they should get tested! Speedy recovery!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":29251.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":422,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"iheqijf","c_root_id_B":"ihfpkcz","created_at_utc_A":1658635740,"created_at_utc_B":1658661697,"score_A":7,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Did you tell everyone at your viva that you exposed them?","human_ref_B":"First of all: Congratulations! Please inform everyone you have met yesterday and days prior to that that they should get tested! Speedy recovery!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":25957.0,"score_ratio":1.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":423,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfpkcz","c_root_id_B":"ihfk442","created_at_utc_A":1658661697,"created_at_utc_B":1658657432,"score_A":10,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"First of all: Congratulations! Please inform everyone you have met yesterday and days prior to that that they should get tested! Speedy recovery!","human_ref_B":"You’ve gotten to powerful, the universe is trying to nerf you","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4265.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":424,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfpkcz","c_root_id_B":"ihdvx8a","created_at_utc_A":1658661697,"created_at_utc_B":1658620401,"score_A":10,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"First of all: Congratulations! Please inform everyone you have met yesterday and days prior to that that they should get tested! Speedy recovery!","human_ref_B":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":41296.0,"score_ratio":5.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":425,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfpkcz","c_root_id_B":"ihe6sdu","created_at_utc_A":1658661697,"created_at_utc_B":1658625646,"score_A":10,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"First of all: Congratulations! Please inform everyone you have met yesterday and days prior to that that they should get tested! Speedy recovery!","human_ref_B":"I was COVID-19 positive when I gave my final honors presentation in undergrad, but didn’t know it till the next day. Just assumed it was a really bad cold, but ended up in quarantine the next day.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":36051.0,"score_ratio":5.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":426,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfpkcz","c_root_id_B":"ihefapp","created_at_utc_A":1658661697,"created_at_utc_B":1658629801,"score_A":10,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"First of all: Congratulations! Please inform everyone you have met yesterday and days prior to that that they should get tested! Speedy recovery!","human_ref_B":"Rest…!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":31896.0,"score_ratio":5.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":427,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdvx8a","c_root_id_B":"ihe33bp","created_at_utc_A":1658620401,"created_at_utc_B":1658623862,"score_A":2,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","human_ref_B":"Take your time. Allot a certain amount of time each day. Make sure everyone in your life respects what you've got to do. When I was finishing up, I was already teaching full-time and had some administrative responsibilities. In those days it was impractical to work from home. I put a sign on my door that read: I AM WORKING ON MY DISSERTATION. BEFORE KNOCKING ON MY DOOR, ASK YOURSELF, \"DO I FEEL LUCKY?\" One of my students got the \"Dirty Harry\" reference and added, \"Well, do ya, punk?\"","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3461.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":428,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihekgjc","c_root_id_B":"iheqijf","created_at_utc_A":1658632446,"created_at_utc_B":1658635740,"score_A":6,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Just know you’ve achieved something 99% of people on earth could never dream of accomplishing","human_ref_B":"Did you tell everyone at your viva that you exposed them?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3294.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":429,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihdvx8a","c_root_id_B":"ihekgjc","created_at_utc_A":1658620401,"created_at_utc_B":1658632446,"score_A":2,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","human_ref_B":"Just know you’ve achieved something 99% of people on earth could never dream of accomplishing","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12045.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":430,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihekgjc","c_root_id_B":"ihe6sdu","created_at_utc_A":1658632446,"created_at_utc_B":1658625646,"score_A":6,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Just know you’ve achieved something 99% of people on earth could never dream of accomplishing","human_ref_B":"I was COVID-19 positive when I gave my final honors presentation in undergrad, but didn’t know it till the next day. Just assumed it was a really bad cold, but ended up in quarantine the next day.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6800.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":431,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihekgjc","c_root_id_B":"ihefapp","created_at_utc_A":1658632446,"created_at_utc_B":1658629801,"score_A":6,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Just know you’ve achieved something 99% of people on earth could never dream of accomplishing","human_ref_B":"Rest…!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2645.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":432,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"iheqijf","c_root_id_B":"ihdvx8a","created_at_utc_A":1658635740,"created_at_utc_B":1658620401,"score_A":7,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Did you tell everyone at your viva that you exposed them?","human_ref_B":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15339.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":433,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihe6sdu","c_root_id_B":"iheqijf","created_at_utc_A":1658625646,"created_at_utc_B":1658635740,"score_A":2,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"I was COVID-19 positive when I gave my final honors presentation in undergrad, but didn’t know it till the next day. Just assumed it was a really bad cold, but ended up in quarantine the next day.","human_ref_B":"Did you tell everyone at your viva that you exposed them?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":10094.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":434,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"iheqijf","c_root_id_B":"ihefapp","created_at_utc_A":1658635740,"created_at_utc_B":1658629801,"score_A":7,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Did you tell everyone at your viva that you exposed them?","human_ref_B":"Rest…!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5939.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":435,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfk442","c_root_id_B":"ihdvx8a","created_at_utc_A":1658657432,"created_at_utc_B":1658620401,"score_A":5,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"You’ve gotten to powerful, the universe is trying to nerf you","human_ref_B":"Congrats it’s big thing to celebrate!! Drink a lot of water and rest up. Find some good books or movies to relax as you recover. It’s a lot (really a lot) of physical pain so I’d totally say find some distraction would be nicer. Defended Feb 13, 2017 but got super ill soon after Christmas. Major symptoms relieved within a week but never was a day without coughing before I hand in revised thesis. Stress makes immune system not working well is so true.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":37031.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":436,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfk442","c_root_id_B":"ihe6sdu","created_at_utc_A":1658657432,"created_at_utc_B":1658625646,"score_A":5,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"You’ve gotten to powerful, the universe is trying to nerf you","human_ref_B":"I was COVID-19 positive when I gave my final honors presentation in undergrad, but didn’t know it till the next day. Just assumed it was a really bad cold, but ended up in quarantine the next day.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":31786.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":437,"row":{"post_id":"w6faz7","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.98,"history":"Successfully defended PhD yesterday. COVID-positive today. So much to do to submit this paper, but I feel like death. Any advice?","c_root_id_A":"ihfk442","c_root_id_B":"ihefapp","created_at_utc_A":1658657432,"created_at_utc_B":1658629801,"score_A":5,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"You’ve gotten to powerful, the universe is trying to nerf you","human_ref_B":"Rest…!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":27631.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":438,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl20s4d","c_root_id_B":"fl1wwes","created_at_utc_A":1584740390,"created_at_utc_B":1584738000,"score_A":53,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Congrats, Dr! I guess no one is showing you the secret handshake, what with social distancing and all.","human_ref_B":"Congrats! Stay healthy","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2390.0,"score_ratio":7.5714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":439,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl20s4d","c_root_id_B":"fl1xv55","created_at_utc_A":1584740390,"created_at_utc_B":1584738590,"score_A":53,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Congrats, Dr! I guess no one is showing you the secret handshake, what with social distancing and all.","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! Mine is two weeks from today (via video)!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1800.0,"score_ratio":7.5714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":440,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl20s4d","c_root_id_B":"fl1zq0x","created_at_utc_A":1584740390,"created_at_utc_B":1584739735,"score_A":53,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Congrats, Dr! I guess no one is showing you the secret handshake, what with social distancing and all.","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! Savor it.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":655.0,"score_ratio":10.6},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":441,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl20s4d","c_root_id_B":"fl1wybx","created_at_utc_A":1584740390,"created_at_utc_B":1584738031,"score_A":53,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats, Dr! I guess no one is showing you the secret handshake, what with social distancing and all.","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2359.0,"score_ratio":17.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":442,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1zdze","c_root_id_B":"fl20s4d","created_at_utc_A":1584739526,"created_at_utc_B":1584740390,"score_A":3,"score_B":53,"human_ref_A":"Congrats!!!","human_ref_B":"Congrats, Dr! I guess no one is showing you the secret handshake, what with social distancing and all.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":864.0,"score_ratio":17.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":443,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl20s4d","c_root_id_B":"fl203sw","created_at_utc_A":1584740390,"created_at_utc_B":1584739971,"score_A":53,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats, Dr! I guess no one is showing you the secret handshake, what with social distancing and all.","human_ref_B":"Congrats doc","labels":1,"seconds_difference":419.0,"score_ratio":17.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":444,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1wwes","c_root_id_B":"fl23sy5","created_at_utc_A":1584738000,"created_at_utc_B":1584742302,"score_A":7,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Congrats! Stay healthy","human_ref_B":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4302.0,"score_ratio":1.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":445,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl23sy5","c_root_id_B":"fl1xv55","created_at_utc_A":1584742302,"created_at_utc_B":1584738590,"score_A":10,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! Mine is two weeks from today (via video)!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3712.0,"score_ratio":1.4285714286},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":446,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1zq0x","c_root_id_B":"fl23sy5","created_at_utc_A":1584739735,"created_at_utc_B":1584742302,"score_A":5,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! Savor it.","human_ref_B":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2567.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":447,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl23q4f","c_root_id_B":"fl23sy5","created_at_utc_A":1584742251,"created_at_utc_B":1584742302,"score_A":5,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations Dr. Futile_cup!!!","human_ref_B":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":51.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":448,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl21lqd","c_root_id_B":"fl23sy5","created_at_utc_A":1584740905,"created_at_utc_B":1584742302,"score_A":4,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Well done Doctor!!!","human_ref_B":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1397.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":449,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl23sy5","c_root_id_B":"fl1wybx","created_at_utc_A":1584742302,"created_at_utc_B":1584738031,"score_A":10,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4271.0,"score_ratio":3.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":450,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1zdze","c_root_id_B":"fl23sy5","created_at_utc_A":1584739526,"created_at_utc_B":1584742302,"score_A":3,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Congrats!!!","human_ref_B":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2776.0,"score_ratio":3.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":451,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl203sw","c_root_id_B":"fl23sy5","created_at_utc_A":1584739971,"created_at_utc_B":1584742302,"score_A":3,"score_B":10,"human_ref_A":"Congrats doc","human_ref_B":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2331.0,"score_ratio":3.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":452,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl23sy5","c_root_id_B":"fl23s34","created_at_utc_A":1584742302,"created_at_utc_B":1584742287,"score_A":10,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congrats! Did you need to defend remotely?","human_ref_B":"Congrats! This is good news to hear. I'm still waiting on a reply back for my research degree, covid19 has delayed the process.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15.0,"score_ratio":3.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":453,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1xv55","c_root_id_B":"fl1wybx","created_at_utc_A":1584738590,"created_at_utc_B":1584738031,"score_A":7,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! Mine is two weeks from today (via video)!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":559.0,"score_ratio":2.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":454,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1zq0x","c_root_id_B":"fl1wybx","created_at_utc_A":1584739735,"created_at_utc_B":1584738031,"score_A":5,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! Savor it.","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1704.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":455,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1zdze","c_root_id_B":"fl1zq0x","created_at_utc_A":1584739526,"created_at_utc_B":1584739735,"score_A":3,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Congrats!!!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! Savor it.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":209.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":456,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl23q4f","c_root_id_B":"fl21lqd","created_at_utc_A":1584742251,"created_at_utc_B":1584740905,"score_A":5,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations Dr. Futile_cup!!!","human_ref_B":"Well done Doctor!!!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1346.0,"score_ratio":1.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":457,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1wybx","c_root_id_B":"fl23q4f","created_at_utc_A":1584738031,"created_at_utc_B":1584742251,"score_A":3,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations Dr. Futile_cup!!!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4220.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":458,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1zdze","c_root_id_B":"fl23q4f","created_at_utc_A":1584739526,"created_at_utc_B":1584742251,"score_A":3,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Congrats!!!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations Dr. Futile_cup!!!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2725.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":459,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl203sw","c_root_id_B":"fl23q4f","created_at_utc_A":1584739971,"created_at_utc_B":1584742251,"score_A":3,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Congrats doc","human_ref_B":"Congratulations Dr. Futile_cup!!!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2280.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":460,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1wybx","c_root_id_B":"fl21lqd","created_at_utc_A":1584738031,"created_at_utc_B":1584740905,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations!","human_ref_B":"Well done Doctor!!!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2874.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":461,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl1zdze","c_root_id_B":"fl21lqd","created_at_utc_A":1584739526,"created_at_utc_B":1584740905,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Congrats!!!","human_ref_B":"Well done Doctor!!!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1379.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":462,"row":{"post_id":"fm2bxb","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Successful defense! Today I defended my PhD dissertation, and it was accepted by committee with revisions. I'm so relieved I could cry. I'm so glad this stage is over. To be honest, I had been worried the pandemic was going to affect my defense process negatively, and I'm so relieved it's done with.","c_root_id_A":"fl203sw","c_root_id_B":"fl21lqd","created_at_utc_A":1584739971,"created_at_utc_B":1584740905,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Congrats doc","human_ref_B":"Well done Doctor!!!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":934.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":463,"row":{"post_id":"bc8528","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"I just passed my Qualifying Exam. I’m officially a Ph.D Candidate!! As many of us, I’ve had imposter syndrome since I started grad school. Until my exam, I honestly thought I would fail my QE as I really didn’t belong and didn’t think I knew enough. I thought they would hate my proposal and rip it apart in front of me. However, after today’s exam, I finally feel more confident in myself. Having a discussion about your proposed project with other researchers really does help bring things into perspective, and can be thought provoking. Having your thoughts and ideas supported by other well established researchers is something that I never thought would happen. To everyone going through comprehensive/qualifying exams: you can do it!!! We are our own worst enemies, but believe me when I tell you that you know a lot more than you think you do! You’re going to kill it!","c_root_id_A":"ekontfb","c_root_id_B":"ekoream","created_at_utc_A":1555037866,"created_at_utc_B":1555041155,"score_A":3,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Yay, congrats! I'm taking my exam next week!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! This marks (in theory) the point where your committee is on your side: supportive rather than antagonistic. Excellent work! I wrote up my experience while it was still fresh in my mind; maybe you'll consider doing the same to dispel some of the common fears that new grad students face regarding the qualifying exam?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3289.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":464,"row":{"post_id":"bc8528","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"I just passed my Qualifying Exam. I’m officially a Ph.D Candidate!! As many of us, I’ve had imposter syndrome since I started grad school. Until my exam, I honestly thought I would fail my QE as I really didn’t belong and didn’t think I knew enough. I thought they would hate my proposal and rip it apart in front of me. However, after today’s exam, I finally feel more confident in myself. Having a discussion about your proposed project with other researchers really does help bring things into perspective, and can be thought provoking. Having your thoughts and ideas supported by other well established researchers is something that I never thought would happen. To everyone going through comprehensive/qualifying exams: you can do it!!! We are our own worst enemies, but believe me when I tell you that you know a lot more than you think you do! You’re going to kill it!","c_root_id_A":"ekonxa6","c_root_id_B":"ekoream","created_at_utc_A":1555037957,"created_at_utc_B":1555041155,"score_A":3,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations that is awesome!!! The qual is a terrifying nightmare, till you pass and the it’s such a sense of accomplishment. Keep up all the ass kicking, and crush your proposal!! Great job!","human_ref_B":"Congratulations! This marks (in theory) the point where your committee is on your side: supportive rather than antagonistic. Excellent work! I wrote up my experience while it was still fresh in my mind; maybe you'll consider doing the same to dispel some of the common fears that new grad students face regarding the qualifying exam?","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3198.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":465,"row":{"post_id":"bc8528","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"I just passed my Qualifying Exam. I’m officially a Ph.D Candidate!! As many of us, I’ve had imposter syndrome since I started grad school. Until my exam, I honestly thought I would fail my QE as I really didn’t belong and didn’t think I knew enough. I thought they would hate my proposal and rip it apart in front of me. However, after today’s exam, I finally feel more confident in myself. Having a discussion about your proposed project with other researchers really does help bring things into perspective, and can be thought provoking. Having your thoughts and ideas supported by other well established researchers is something that I never thought would happen. To everyone going through comprehensive/qualifying exams: you can do it!!! We are our own worst enemies, but believe me when I tell you that you know a lot more than you think you do! You’re going to kill it!","c_root_id_A":"ekoream","c_root_id_B":"ekopirk","created_at_utc_A":1555041155,"created_at_utc_B":1555039380,"score_A":6,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! This marks (in theory) the point where your committee is on your side: supportive rather than antagonistic. Excellent work! I wrote up my experience while it was still fresh in my mind; maybe you'll consider doing the same to dispel some of the common fears that new grad students face regarding the qualifying exam?","human_ref_B":"Congratulations!!! That’s a wonderful achievement!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1775.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":466,"row":{"post_id":"bc8528","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"I just passed my Qualifying Exam. I’m officially a Ph.D Candidate!! As many of us, I’ve had imposter syndrome since I started grad school. Until my exam, I honestly thought I would fail my QE as I really didn’t belong and didn’t think I knew enough. I thought they would hate my proposal and rip it apart in front of me. However, after today’s exam, I finally feel more confident in myself. Having a discussion about your proposed project with other researchers really does help bring things into perspective, and can be thought provoking. Having your thoughts and ideas supported by other well established researchers is something that I never thought would happen. To everyone going through comprehensive/qualifying exams: you can do it!!! We are our own worst enemies, but believe me when I tell you that you know a lot more than you think you do! You’re going to kill it!","c_root_id_A":"ekoream","c_root_id_B":"ekopot3","created_at_utc_A":1555041155,"created_at_utc_B":1555039531,"score_A":6,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! This marks (in theory) the point where your committee is on your side: supportive rather than antagonistic. Excellent work! I wrote up my experience while it was still fresh in my mind; maybe you'll consider doing the same to dispel some of the common fears that new grad students face regarding the qualifying exam?","human_ref_B":"I really really needed to read this. I have my preliminary exam the first week of May and my imposter syndrome is really getting the best of me even though my advisor is the most encouraging person ever and says that he wouldn’t send me into this without knowing that I’m ready. I have a group meeting practice next week and I think I’ll feel better once that happens...","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1624.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":467,"row":{"post_id":"bc8528","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"I just passed my Qualifying Exam. I’m officially a Ph.D Candidate!! As many of us, I’ve had imposter syndrome since I started grad school. Until my exam, I honestly thought I would fail my QE as I really didn’t belong and didn’t think I knew enough. I thought they would hate my proposal and rip it apart in front of me. However, after today’s exam, I finally feel more confident in myself. Having a discussion about your proposed project with other researchers really does help bring things into perspective, and can be thought provoking. Having your thoughts and ideas supported by other well established researchers is something that I never thought would happen. To everyone going through comprehensive/qualifying exams: you can do it!!! We are our own worst enemies, but believe me when I tell you that you know a lot more than you think you do! You’re going to kill it!","c_root_id_A":"ekoream","c_root_id_B":"ekopjf8","created_at_utc_A":1555041155,"created_at_utc_B":1555039397,"score_A":6,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations! This marks (in theory) the point where your committee is on your side: supportive rather than antagonistic. Excellent work! I wrote up my experience while it was still fresh in my mind; maybe you'll consider doing the same to dispel some of the common fears that new grad students face regarding the qualifying exam?","human_ref_B":"For me, the qualifying exam was great because I felt like my committee was on my team. I wasn’t defending myself to them as much as it was a conversation among colleagues. Congrats!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1758.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":468,"row":{"post_id":"bc8528","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"I just passed my Qualifying Exam. I’m officially a Ph.D Candidate!! As many of us, I’ve had imposter syndrome since I started grad school. Until my exam, I honestly thought I would fail my QE as I really didn’t belong and didn’t think I knew enough. I thought they would hate my proposal and rip it apart in front of me. However, after today’s exam, I finally feel more confident in myself. Having a discussion about your proposed project with other researchers really does help bring things into perspective, and can be thought provoking. Having your thoughts and ideas supported by other well established researchers is something that I never thought would happen. To everyone going through comprehensive/qualifying exams: you can do it!!! We are our own worst enemies, but believe me when I tell you that you know a lot more than you think you do! You’re going to kill it!","c_root_id_A":"ekopjf8","c_root_id_B":"ekopot3","created_at_utc_A":1555039397,"created_at_utc_B":1555039531,"score_A":2,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"For me, the qualifying exam was great because I felt like my committee was on my team. I wasn’t defending myself to them as much as it was a conversation among colleagues. Congrats!","human_ref_B":"I really really needed to read this. I have my preliminary exam the first week of May and my imposter syndrome is really getting the best of me even though my advisor is the most encouraging person ever and says that he wouldn’t send me into this without knowing that I’m ready. I have a group meeting practice next week and I think I’ll feel better once that happens...","labels":0,"seconds_difference":134.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":469,"row":{"post_id":"bc8528","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.94,"history":"I just passed my Qualifying Exam. I’m officially a Ph.D Candidate!! As many of us, I’ve had imposter syndrome since I started grad school. Until my exam, I honestly thought I would fail my QE as I really didn’t belong and didn’t think I knew enough. I thought they would hate my proposal and rip it apart in front of me. However, after today’s exam, I finally feel more confident in myself. Having a discussion about your proposed project with other researchers really does help bring things into perspective, and can be thought provoking. Having your thoughts and ideas supported by other well established researchers is something that I never thought would happen. To everyone going through comprehensive/qualifying exams: you can do it!!! We are our own worst enemies, but believe me when I tell you that you know a lot more than you think you do! You’re going to kill it!","c_root_id_A":"ekp0tb6","c_root_id_B":"ekopjf8","created_at_utc_A":1555051541,"created_at_utc_B":1555039397,"score_A":3,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Congratulations and thank you for the encouragements! Those past few weeks, 4 out of the 5 professors I sent a research proposal to replied to me and 3 of them told me they were interested. Your post is so on point ! Let's stop doubting from now on, we are capable","human_ref_B":"For me, the qualifying exam was great because I felt like my committee was on my team. I wasn’t defending myself to them as much as it was a conversation among colleagues. Congrats!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12144.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":470,"row":{"post_id":"gatbgd","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Just wanted to say thank you. I'd read several times on here that the best way to gain access to most papers is to ask the author directly. I tried it yesterday and it worked. Not only was the author happy to send me her paper, she also sent me another related paper of hers and offered to send me more of her research if I wanted it. The papers are fascinating, it's exactly what I needed for my current research project (writing a high-school textbook), and on top of that, the author is a lovely person. So thank you, AskAcademia, for helping me dare to do something I would never have done otherwise.","c_root_id_A":"fp1txmb","c_root_id_B":"fp39rx0","created_at_utc_A":1588247692,"created_at_utc_B":1588275567,"score_A":10,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"That's great!","human_ref_B":"Can't speak for everyone but I know for me as an author publishing feels like throwing things into the void sometimes. So getting an email from someone who's actually interested in what I'm writing about is such a great and validating feeling. I'm sure that the feeling is the same for most other academics. Plus... not like we get a cut of what publishers are making.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":27875.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":471,"row":{"post_id":"gatbgd","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Just wanted to say thank you. I'd read several times on here that the best way to gain access to most papers is to ask the author directly. I tried it yesterday and it worked. Not only was the author happy to send me her paper, she also sent me another related paper of hers and offered to send me more of her research if I wanted it. The papers are fascinating, it's exactly what I needed for my current research project (writing a high-school textbook), and on top of that, the author is a lovely person. So thank you, AskAcademia, for helping me dare to do something I would never have done otherwise.","c_root_id_A":"fp2bo3v","c_root_id_B":"fp39rx0","created_at_utc_A":1588258917,"created_at_utc_B":1588275567,"score_A":9,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I would suggest using scihub. Just copy the doi ID of the paper that you want and paste it on scihub and voila! instant pdf.","human_ref_B":"Can't speak for everyone but I know for me as an author publishing feels like throwing things into the void sometimes. So getting an email from someone who's actually interested in what I'm writing about is such a great and validating feeling. I'm sure that the feeling is the same for most other academics. Plus... not like we get a cut of what publishers are making.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":16650.0,"score_ratio":1.5555555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":472,"row":{"post_id":"gatbgd","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Just wanted to say thank you. I'd read several times on here that the best way to gain access to most papers is to ask the author directly. I tried it yesterday and it worked. Not only was the author happy to send me her paper, she also sent me another related paper of hers and offered to send me more of her research if I wanted it. The papers are fascinating, it's exactly what I needed for my current research project (writing a high-school textbook), and on top of that, the author is a lovely person. So thank you, AskAcademia, for helping me dare to do something I would never have done otherwise.","c_root_id_A":"fp1wv60","c_root_id_B":"fp39rx0","created_at_utc_A":1588250013,"created_at_utc_B":1588275567,"score_A":9,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"What a weird coincidence, I tried this for the first time yesterday and it worked too! I was beside myself with happiness","human_ref_B":"Can't speak for everyone but I know for me as an author publishing feels like throwing things into the void sometimes. So getting an email from someone who's actually interested in what I'm writing about is such a great and validating feeling. I'm sure that the feeling is the same for most other academics. Plus... not like we get a cut of what publishers are making.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":25554.0,"score_ratio":1.5555555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":473,"row":{"post_id":"gatbgd","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Just wanted to say thank you. I'd read several times on here that the best way to gain access to most papers is to ask the author directly. I tried it yesterday and it worked. Not only was the author happy to send me her paper, she also sent me another related paper of hers and offered to send me more of her research if I wanted it. The papers are fascinating, it's exactly what I needed for my current research project (writing a high-school textbook), and on top of that, the author is a lovely person. So thank you, AskAcademia, for helping me dare to do something I would never have done otherwise.","c_root_id_A":"fp2muh4","c_root_id_B":"fp39rx0","created_at_utc_A":1588264458,"created_at_utc_B":1588275567,"score_A":7,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I've asked numerous authors for pdfs of their papers, and have been asked for copies of mine. It seems like a professional courtesy -- plus hey, someone else is interested! I've never been turned down and certainly would never turn down such a request. I'm glad you had a similar experience.","human_ref_B":"Can't speak for everyone but I know for me as an author publishing feels like throwing things into the void sometimes. So getting an email from someone who's actually interested in what I'm writing about is such a great and validating feeling. I'm sure that the feeling is the same for most other academics. Plus... not like we get a cut of what publishers are making.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11109.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":474,"row":{"post_id":"gatbgd","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Just wanted to say thank you. I'd read several times on here that the best way to gain access to most papers is to ask the author directly. I tried it yesterday and it worked. Not only was the author happy to send me her paper, she also sent me another related paper of hers and offered to send me more of her research if I wanted it. The papers are fascinating, it's exactly what I needed for my current research project (writing a high-school textbook), and on top of that, the author is a lovely person. So thank you, AskAcademia, for helping me dare to do something I would never have done otherwise.","c_root_id_A":"fp29ipi","c_root_id_B":"fp39rx0","created_at_utc_A":1588257786,"created_at_utc_B":1588275567,"score_A":7,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"It's great that authors share their papers and it is the very least they should be doing. It is not a sustainable model for dissemination of publicly funded scientific work though. It should all be open access.","human_ref_B":"Can't speak for everyone but I know for me as an author publishing feels like throwing things into the void sometimes. So getting an email from someone who's actually interested in what I'm writing about is such a great and validating feeling. I'm sure that the feeling is the same for most other academics. Plus... not like we get a cut of what publishers are making.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":17781.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":475,"row":{"post_id":"gatbgd","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Just wanted to say thank you. I'd read several times on here that the best way to gain access to most papers is to ask the author directly. I tried it yesterday and it worked. Not only was the author happy to send me her paper, she also sent me another related paper of hers and offered to send me more of her research if I wanted it. The papers are fascinating, it's exactly what I needed for my current research project (writing a high-school textbook), and on top of that, the author is a lovely person. So thank you, AskAcademia, for helping me dare to do something I would never have done otherwise.","c_root_id_A":"fp29ipi","c_root_id_B":"fp2bo3v","created_at_utc_A":1588257786,"created_at_utc_B":1588258917,"score_A":7,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"It's great that authors share their papers and it is the very least they should be doing. It is not a sustainable model for dissemination of publicly funded scientific work though. It should all be open access.","human_ref_B":"I would suggest using scihub. Just copy the doi ID of the paper that you want and paste it on scihub and voila! instant pdf.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1131.0,"score_ratio":1.2857142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":476,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbeqzmv","c_root_id_B":"gbeg586","created_at_utc_A":1604712261,"created_at_utc_B":1604706145,"score_A":56,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"Yes.I’m the professor so it’s a problem.","human_ref_B":"Not sleepy, but I get a resting bitch face in zoom calls and its extra awkward because I haven't met most of my new colleagues yet. If the university building ever reopens, I want to visit every office and go like \"see, I am nice in person!\"","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6116.0,"score_ratio":1.3658536585},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":477,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbeic6m","c_root_id_B":"gbeqzmv","created_at_utc_A":1604707365,"created_at_utc_B":1604712261,"score_A":27,"score_B":56,"human_ref_A":"You can make it for 20 whole minutes!?!","human_ref_B":"Yes.I’m the professor so it’s a problem.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4896.0,"score_ratio":2.0740740741},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":478,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbemysz","c_root_id_B":"gbeqzmv","created_at_utc_A":1604709950,"created_at_utc_B":1604712261,"score_A":8,"score_B":56,"human_ref_A":"All the time. Writing notes during the call definitely helps me stay focused.","human_ref_B":"Yes.I’m the professor so it’s a problem.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2311.0,"score_ratio":7.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":479,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbeqzmv","c_root_id_B":"gbeqcq5","created_at_utc_A":1604712261,"created_at_utc_B":1604711896,"score_A":56,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Yes.I’m the professor so it’s a problem.","human_ref_B":"yeah :/ it’s rly hard for me to go to talks and symposiums now, especially when they’re webinar format and i cant even discuss things or see others’ responses","labels":1,"seconds_difference":365.0,"score_ratio":14.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":480,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbemysz","c_root_id_B":"gbg3s9a","created_at_utc_A":1604709950,"created_at_utc_B":1604751779,"score_A":8,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"All the time. Writing notes during the call definitely helps me stay focused.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely... and the NY Times had a great article on this about 6 months ago as to why. It turns out that, when we engage with people in real life, our brains are absorbing a *massive* amount of almost-imperceptible information (small gestures, posture, foot-shuffling, smells, pheromones, etc.), most of it subliminally. (Because our lizard-brains need to know: is this person about to attack me? is this person a potential mate? is this person a member of my in-group? And our civilized-brains are constantly-evaluating on every level, from the utilitarian to the social to the abstract.) But even on a high-quality, non-lagging Zoom call, practically NONE of this information is being captured by the software or otherwise conveyed. You can't see their posture; you can't smell their pheromones, etc. So, your brain starts revving up to try to pick up the signals... and this is exhausting. (It's sort of like how your cell phone battery drains faster when you're in an area of poor coverage, as it tries to grasp onto a useable signal.) It goes the other way, too: when I was Zoom-lecturing, I quickly learned to \"over-emote\"... to exaggerate the facial expressions emotions I was trying to get across, because the students seemed to respond much better when I did. But this itself was exhausting... a 50 minute Zoom \"lecture\" felt as exhausting as giving a 2-hour in-person lecture.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":41829.0,"score_ratio":1.875},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":481,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbetuhr","c_root_id_B":"gbg3s9a","created_at_utc_A":1604713906,"created_at_utc_B":1604751779,"score_A":9,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely. There's a couple of strategies you can use. Try and set up somewhere where its possible to get up in long zoom calls. I do it in my classes. I just tell people I need to stretch, and step up as I keep speaking. Its easier when I'm conducting the class. When I'm in a meeting or a conference or something, and I'm not the one on the spot, its easier to just blank the screen, keep listening, and keep going. I've found that people are really accommodating about this in Academia. My students have been insanely supportive. Another strategy, as someone mentioned below, is some exercises to get the blood flowing before you settle down. I realize it seems counter-intuitive, but I also find that doing something for just a few seconds when someone is speaking, and then letting your attention come back helps. Attention peaks and falls, and I think going with the natural flows a bit helps. With me, I sometimes take a minute in a long lecture to shift screens. Just refresh on Reddit. Maybe see the headlines on the news. Maybe look up an interesting source related to what we're discussing. When you've got 2-4 hour zoom classes like mine, I doubt looking away for like 5 minutes would break your ability to participate.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely... and the NY Times had a great article on this about 6 months ago as to why. It turns out that, when we engage with people in real life, our brains are absorbing a *massive* amount of almost-imperceptible information (small gestures, posture, foot-shuffling, smells, pheromones, etc.), most of it subliminally. (Because our lizard-brains need to know: is this person about to attack me? is this person a potential mate? is this person a member of my in-group? And our civilized-brains are constantly-evaluating on every level, from the utilitarian to the social to the abstract.) But even on a high-quality, non-lagging Zoom call, practically NONE of this information is being captured by the software or otherwise conveyed. You can't see their posture; you can't smell their pheromones, etc. So, your brain starts revving up to try to pick up the signals... and this is exhausting. (It's sort of like how your cell phone battery drains faster when you're in an area of poor coverage, as it tries to grasp onto a useable signal.) It goes the other way, too: when I was Zoom-lecturing, I quickly learned to \"over-emote\"... to exaggerate the facial expressions emotions I was trying to get across, because the students seemed to respond much better when I did. But this itself was exhausting... a 50 minute Zoom \"lecture\" felt as exhausting as giving a 2-hour in-person lecture.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":37873.0,"score_ratio":1.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":482,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbf8v51","c_root_id_B":"gbg3s9a","created_at_utc_A":1604722907,"created_at_utc_B":1604751779,"score_A":7,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"For me, Vitamin D deficiency was the culprit.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely... and the NY Times had a great article on this about 6 months ago as to why. It turns out that, when we engage with people in real life, our brains are absorbing a *massive* amount of almost-imperceptible information (small gestures, posture, foot-shuffling, smells, pheromones, etc.), most of it subliminally. (Because our lizard-brains need to know: is this person about to attack me? is this person a potential mate? is this person a member of my in-group? And our civilized-brains are constantly-evaluating on every level, from the utilitarian to the social to the abstract.) But even on a high-quality, non-lagging Zoom call, practically NONE of this information is being captured by the software or otherwise conveyed. You can't see their posture; you can't smell their pheromones, etc. So, your brain starts revving up to try to pick up the signals... and this is exhausting. (It's sort of like how your cell phone battery drains faster when you're in an area of poor coverage, as it tries to grasp onto a useable signal.) It goes the other way, too: when I was Zoom-lecturing, I quickly learned to \"over-emote\"... to exaggerate the facial expressions emotions I was trying to get across, because the students seemed to respond much better when I did. But this itself was exhausting... a 50 minute Zoom \"lecture\" felt as exhausting as giving a 2-hour in-person lecture.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":28872.0,"score_ratio":2.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":483,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbfbp9n","c_root_id_B":"gbg3s9a","created_at_utc_A":1604724835,"created_at_utc_B":1604751779,"score_A":7,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"Yes - I started shortening my own lectures into smaller chunks when I realized that listening to anyone on Zoom for more than 20 minutes straight is mentally exhausting. I don’t have a short attention span, either, so I don’t know why I find it so draining.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely... and the NY Times had a great article on this about 6 months ago as to why. It turns out that, when we engage with people in real life, our brains are absorbing a *massive* amount of almost-imperceptible information (small gestures, posture, foot-shuffling, smells, pheromones, etc.), most of it subliminally. (Because our lizard-brains need to know: is this person about to attack me? is this person a potential mate? is this person a member of my in-group? And our civilized-brains are constantly-evaluating on every level, from the utilitarian to the social to the abstract.) But even on a high-quality, non-lagging Zoom call, practically NONE of this information is being captured by the software or otherwise conveyed. You can't see their posture; you can't smell their pheromones, etc. So, your brain starts revving up to try to pick up the signals... and this is exhausting. (It's sort of like how your cell phone battery drains faster when you're in an area of poor coverage, as it tries to grasp onto a useable signal.) It goes the other way, too: when I was Zoom-lecturing, I quickly learned to \"over-emote\"... to exaggerate the facial expressions emotions I was trying to get across, because the students seemed to respond much better when I did. But this itself was exhausting... a 50 minute Zoom \"lecture\" felt as exhausting as giving a 2-hour in-person lecture.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":26944.0,"score_ratio":2.1428571429},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":484,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbesyk3","c_root_id_B":"gbg3s9a","created_at_utc_A":1604713397,"created_at_utc_B":1604751779,"score_A":6,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"Make coffee or any other drink for the call. I find that taking a sip or so whenever I start to drift helps me refocus.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely... and the NY Times had a great article on this about 6 months ago as to why. It turns out that, when we engage with people in real life, our brains are absorbing a *massive* amount of almost-imperceptible information (small gestures, posture, foot-shuffling, smells, pheromones, etc.), most of it subliminally. (Because our lizard-brains need to know: is this person about to attack me? is this person a potential mate? is this person a member of my in-group? And our civilized-brains are constantly-evaluating on every level, from the utilitarian to the social to the abstract.) But even on a high-quality, non-lagging Zoom call, practically NONE of this information is being captured by the software or otherwise conveyed. You can't see their posture; you can't smell their pheromones, etc. So, your brain starts revving up to try to pick up the signals... and this is exhausting. (It's sort of like how your cell phone battery drains faster when you're in an area of poor coverage, as it tries to grasp onto a useable signal.) It goes the other way, too: when I was Zoom-lecturing, I quickly learned to \"over-emote\"... to exaggerate the facial expressions emotions I was trying to get across, because the students seemed to respond much better when I did. But this itself was exhausting... a 50 minute Zoom \"lecture\" felt as exhausting as giving a 2-hour in-person lecture.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":38382.0,"score_ratio":2.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":485,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbg3s9a","c_root_id_B":"gbeqcq5","created_at_utc_A":1604751779,"created_at_utc_B":1604711896,"score_A":15,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely... and the NY Times had a great article on this about 6 months ago as to why. It turns out that, when we engage with people in real life, our brains are absorbing a *massive* amount of almost-imperceptible information (small gestures, posture, foot-shuffling, smells, pheromones, etc.), most of it subliminally. (Because our lizard-brains need to know: is this person about to attack me? is this person a potential mate? is this person a member of my in-group? And our civilized-brains are constantly-evaluating on every level, from the utilitarian to the social to the abstract.) But even on a high-quality, non-lagging Zoom call, practically NONE of this information is being captured by the software or otherwise conveyed. You can't see their posture; you can't smell their pheromones, etc. So, your brain starts revving up to try to pick up the signals... and this is exhausting. (It's sort of like how your cell phone battery drains faster when you're in an area of poor coverage, as it tries to grasp onto a useable signal.) It goes the other way, too: when I was Zoom-lecturing, I quickly learned to \"over-emote\"... to exaggerate the facial expressions emotions I was trying to get across, because the students seemed to respond much better when I did. But this itself was exhausting... a 50 minute Zoom \"lecture\" felt as exhausting as giving a 2-hour in-person lecture.","human_ref_B":"yeah :/ it’s rly hard for me to go to talks and symposiums now, especially when they’re webinar format and i cant even discuss things or see others’ responses","labels":1,"seconds_difference":39883.0,"score_ratio":3.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":486,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbg3s9a","c_root_id_B":"gbex2v5","created_at_utc_A":1604751779,"created_at_utc_B":1604715789,"score_A":15,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely... and the NY Times had a great article on this about 6 months ago as to why. It turns out that, when we engage with people in real life, our brains are absorbing a *massive* amount of almost-imperceptible information (small gestures, posture, foot-shuffling, smells, pheromones, etc.), most of it subliminally. (Because our lizard-brains need to know: is this person about to attack me? is this person a potential mate? is this person a member of my in-group? And our civilized-brains are constantly-evaluating on every level, from the utilitarian to the social to the abstract.) But even on a high-quality, non-lagging Zoom call, practically NONE of this information is being captured by the software or otherwise conveyed. You can't see their posture; you can't smell their pheromones, etc. So, your brain starts revving up to try to pick up the signals... and this is exhausting. (It's sort of like how your cell phone battery drains faster when you're in an area of poor coverage, as it tries to grasp onto a useable signal.) It goes the other way, too: when I was Zoom-lecturing, I quickly learned to \"over-emote\"... to exaggerate the facial expressions emotions I was trying to get across, because the students seemed to respond much better when I did. But this itself was exhausting... a 50 minute Zoom \"lecture\" felt as exhausting as giving a 2-hour in-person lecture.","human_ref_B":"Every time I'm on a call.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":35990.0,"score_ratio":7.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":487,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbetuhr","c_root_id_B":"gbemysz","created_at_utc_A":1604713906,"created_at_utc_B":1604709950,"score_A":9,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely. There's a couple of strategies you can use. Try and set up somewhere where its possible to get up in long zoom calls. I do it in my classes. I just tell people I need to stretch, and step up as I keep speaking. Its easier when I'm conducting the class. When I'm in a meeting or a conference or something, and I'm not the one on the spot, its easier to just blank the screen, keep listening, and keep going. I've found that people are really accommodating about this in Academia. My students have been insanely supportive. Another strategy, as someone mentioned below, is some exercises to get the blood flowing before you settle down. I realize it seems counter-intuitive, but I also find that doing something for just a few seconds when someone is speaking, and then letting your attention come back helps. Attention peaks and falls, and I think going with the natural flows a bit helps. With me, I sometimes take a minute in a long lecture to shift screens. Just refresh on Reddit. Maybe see the headlines on the news. Maybe look up an interesting source related to what we're discussing. When you've got 2-4 hour zoom classes like mine, I doubt looking away for like 5 minutes would break your ability to participate.","human_ref_B":"All the time. Writing notes during the call definitely helps me stay focused.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3956.0,"score_ratio":1.125},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":488,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbesyk3","c_root_id_B":"gbetuhr","created_at_utc_A":1604713397,"created_at_utc_B":1604713906,"score_A":6,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"Make coffee or any other drink for the call. I find that taking a sip or so whenever I start to drift helps me refocus.","human_ref_B":"Absolutely. There's a couple of strategies you can use. Try and set up somewhere where its possible to get up in long zoom calls. I do it in my classes. I just tell people I need to stretch, and step up as I keep speaking. Its easier when I'm conducting the class. When I'm in a meeting or a conference or something, and I'm not the one on the spot, its easier to just blank the screen, keep listening, and keep going. I've found that people are really accommodating about this in Academia. My students have been insanely supportive. Another strategy, as someone mentioned below, is some exercises to get the blood flowing before you settle down. I realize it seems counter-intuitive, but I also find that doing something for just a few seconds when someone is speaking, and then letting your attention come back helps. Attention peaks and falls, and I think going with the natural flows a bit helps. With me, I sometimes take a minute in a long lecture to shift screens. Just refresh on Reddit. Maybe see the headlines on the news. Maybe look up an interesting source related to what we're discussing. When you've got 2-4 hour zoom classes like mine, I doubt looking away for like 5 minutes would break your ability to participate.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":509.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":489,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbetuhr","c_root_id_B":"gbeqcq5","created_at_utc_A":1604713906,"created_at_utc_B":1604711896,"score_A":9,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Absolutely. There's a couple of strategies you can use. Try and set up somewhere where its possible to get up in long zoom calls. I do it in my classes. I just tell people I need to stretch, and step up as I keep speaking. Its easier when I'm conducting the class. When I'm in a meeting or a conference or something, and I'm not the one on the spot, its easier to just blank the screen, keep listening, and keep going. I've found that people are really accommodating about this in Academia. My students have been insanely supportive. Another strategy, as someone mentioned below, is some exercises to get the blood flowing before you settle down. I realize it seems counter-intuitive, but I also find that doing something for just a few seconds when someone is speaking, and then letting your attention come back helps. Attention peaks and falls, and I think going with the natural flows a bit helps. With me, I sometimes take a minute in a long lecture to shift screens. Just refresh on Reddit. Maybe see the headlines on the news. Maybe look up an interesting source related to what we're discussing. When you've got 2-4 hour zoom classes like mine, I doubt looking away for like 5 minutes would break your ability to participate.","human_ref_B":"yeah :/ it’s rly hard for me to go to talks and symposiums now, especially when they’re webinar format and i cant even discuss things or see others’ responses","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2010.0,"score_ratio":2.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":490,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbesyk3","c_root_id_B":"gbf8v51","created_at_utc_A":1604713397,"created_at_utc_B":1604722907,"score_A":6,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Make coffee or any other drink for the call. I find that taking a sip or so whenever I start to drift helps me refocus.","human_ref_B":"For me, Vitamin D deficiency was the culprit.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":9510.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":491,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbf8v51","c_root_id_B":"gbeqcq5","created_at_utc_A":1604722907,"created_at_utc_B":1604711896,"score_A":7,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"For me, Vitamin D deficiency was the culprit.","human_ref_B":"yeah :/ it’s rly hard for me to go to talks and symposiums now, especially when they’re webinar format and i cant even discuss things or see others’ responses","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11011.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":492,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbex2v5","c_root_id_B":"gbf8v51","created_at_utc_A":1604715789,"created_at_utc_B":1604722907,"score_A":2,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Every time I'm on a call.","human_ref_B":"For me, Vitamin D deficiency was the culprit.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":7118.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":493,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbfbp9n","c_root_id_B":"gbesyk3","created_at_utc_A":1604724835,"created_at_utc_B":1604713397,"score_A":7,"score_B":6,"human_ref_A":"Yes - I started shortening my own lectures into smaller chunks when I realized that listening to anyone on Zoom for more than 20 minutes straight is mentally exhausting. I don’t have a short attention span, either, so I don’t know why I find it so draining.","human_ref_B":"Make coffee or any other drink for the call. I find that taking a sip or so whenever I start to drift helps me refocus.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":11438.0,"score_ratio":1.1666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":494,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbeqcq5","c_root_id_B":"gbfbp9n","created_at_utc_A":1604711896,"created_at_utc_B":1604724835,"score_A":4,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"yeah :/ it’s rly hard for me to go to talks and symposiums now, especially when they’re webinar format and i cant even discuss things or see others’ responses","human_ref_B":"Yes - I started shortening my own lectures into smaller chunks when I realized that listening to anyone on Zoom for more than 20 minutes straight is mentally exhausting. I don’t have a short attention span, either, so I don’t know why I find it so draining.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":12939.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":495,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbex2v5","c_root_id_B":"gbfbp9n","created_at_utc_A":1604715789,"created_at_utc_B":1604724835,"score_A":2,"score_B":7,"human_ref_A":"Every time I'm on a call.","human_ref_B":"Yes - I started shortening my own lectures into smaller chunks when I realized that listening to anyone on Zoom for more than 20 minutes straight is mentally exhausting. I don’t have a short attention span, either, so I don’t know why I find it so draining.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":9046.0,"score_ratio":3.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":496,"row":{"post_id":"jpcfrn","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"Does anyone else get really sleepy about 20 minutes into any Zoom call? I find it's impossible for me to stay alert during colloquiums or presentations, and sometimes even for more dynamic conversations where I'm actually participating, for more than about 20 minutes into a video call. I feel like my brain gets exhausted very quickly by the low-quality, compressed audio/video. I'll have a coffee during these events and that still doesn't help. Has anyone else suffered from this, and do you have any tricks for remaining alert?","c_root_id_A":"gbesyk3","c_root_id_B":"gbeqcq5","created_at_utc_A":1604713397,"created_at_utc_B":1604711896,"score_A":6,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Make coffee or any other drink for the call. I find that taking a sip or so whenever I start to drift helps me refocus.","human_ref_B":"yeah :/ it’s rly hard for me to go to talks and symposiums now, especially when they’re webinar format and i cant even discuss things or see others’ responses","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1501.0,"score_ratio":1.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":497,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qteyq","c_root_id_B":"h0qpff6","created_at_utc_A":1622939664,"created_at_utc_B":1622937448,"score_A":82,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"Start writing whatever you have. No matter how insignificant your contributions are up to that point. If you don’t have any idea what you are proposing, download a journal template and write down your name and probable tittle. Start writing what you want to do? Chapter headings References You will have some new idea each time you open that document. That will work like a charm. Let me give you an example from my work: I work in developing algorithms, analyzing them and applying them to solve optimization problem. Whenever I have an idea, I just do the following: 1. Download a probable journal latex template 2. Write down the probable title 3. Author names 4. Paper headings 5. Add random Algorithm templates 6. Start writing the abstract After all of that I have a preliminary document to work on. It drives me to write more. In my mind I know I already wrote down the structure. That gives me motivation.","human_ref_B":"Confidence","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2216.0,"score_ratio":3.28},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":498,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qpff6","c_root_id_B":"h0qyj1l","created_at_utc_A":1622937448,"created_at_utc_B":1622942545,"score_A":25,"score_B":75,"human_ref_A":"Confidence","human_ref_B":"I write while I do the research. Even if things change, there is still a draft of the Related Work, Methods and Results that I can go to immediately when finished and continue writing. I write all over the place on the paper because of this strategy.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5097.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":499,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qyj1l","c_root_id_B":"h0qusnz","created_at_utc_A":1622942545,"created_at_utc_B":1622940430,"score_A":75,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I write while I do the research. Even if things change, there is still a draft of the Related Work, Methods and Results that I can go to immediately when finished and continue writing. I write all over the place on the paper because of this strategy.","human_ref_B":"I try to write really good notes as I work on the project. Why we decided to do it (incl relevant papers it's building on), what our goal/question is, all the details about the method & analysis, etc. The first draft is just making that into full sentences and then you're just editing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2115.0,"score_ratio":8.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]}],"num_rows_total":348718,"num_rows_per_page":100,"partial":false} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/shp_rows_500.json b/shp_rows_500.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1a5e9271720ae51262c30eda51271e3702fe15f --- /dev/null +++ b/shp_rows_500.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"features":[{"feature_idx":0,"name":"post_id","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":1,"name":"domain","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":2,"name":"upvote_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":3,"name":"history","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":4,"name":"c_root_id_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":5,"name":"c_root_id_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":6,"name":"created_at_utc_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":7,"name":"created_at_utc_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":8,"name":"score_A","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":9,"name":"score_B","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":10,"name":"human_ref_A","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":11,"name":"human_ref_B","type":{"dtype":"string","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":12,"name":"labels","type":{"dtype":"int64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":13,"name":"seconds_difference","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}},{"feature_idx":14,"name":"score_ratio","type":{"dtype":"float64","_type":"Value"}}],"rows":[{"row_idx":500,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qyj1l","c_root_id_B":"h0qtn8w","created_at_utc_A":1622942545,"created_at_utc_B":1622939786,"score_A":75,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I write while I do the research. Even if things change, there is still a draft of the Related Work, Methods and Results that I can go to immediately when finished and continue writing. I write all over the place on the paper because of this strategy.","human_ref_B":"A solid formula for the structure","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2759.0,"score_ratio":8.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":501,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0rg0yc","c_root_id_B":"h0r1ftw","created_at_utc_A":1622953415,"created_at_utc_B":1622944217,"score_A":47,"score_B":36,"human_ref_A":"This may not work for everyone, but I have a big love for presenting. So I’ll make my figures and get them all nailed down, write my methods like normal, and basically set up a presentation outline. Then, I’ll stream-of-consciousness word vomit on to the page as if I were talking to an audience. I take a day or more away, come back, and read it out loud to myself to identify any gaps in information or illogical jumps, to edit grammar and spelling, and just generally clean up. It makes for really speedy writing and gets you to practice “presenting” as well.","human_ref_B":"ALWAYS figures first. Figures tell the story. If you feel like you're missing a panel of a figure because you don't have that data, put a white box as a placeholder. Then, do that experiment (and hope that the data agrees with your other data). Repeat until all figures are finished. Then write the other parts. And you should start this process when you feel like your story is 50 - 75% done.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9198.0,"score_ratio":1.3055555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":502,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0rg0yc","c_root_id_B":"h0qpff6","created_at_utc_A":1622953415,"created_at_utc_B":1622937448,"score_A":47,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"This may not work for everyone, but I have a big love for presenting. So I’ll make my figures and get them all nailed down, write my methods like normal, and basically set up a presentation outline. Then, I’ll stream-of-consciousness word vomit on to the page as if I were talking to an audience. I take a day or more away, come back, and read it out loud to myself to identify any gaps in information or illogical jumps, to edit grammar and spelling, and just generally clean up. It makes for really speedy writing and gets you to practice “presenting” as well.","human_ref_B":"Confidence","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15967.0,"score_ratio":1.88},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":503,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0rg0yc","c_root_id_B":"h0r3d4k","created_at_utc_A":1622953415,"created_at_utc_B":1622945326,"score_A":47,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"This may not work for everyone, but I have a big love for presenting. So I’ll make my figures and get them all nailed down, write my methods like normal, and basically set up a presentation outline. Then, I’ll stream-of-consciousness word vomit on to the page as if I were talking to an audience. I take a day or more away, come back, and read it out loud to myself to identify any gaps in information or illogical jumps, to edit grammar and spelling, and just generally clean up. It makes for really speedy writing and gets you to practice “presenting” as well.","human_ref_B":"I start with the research questions/hypothesis then literature review to show the gaps that highlight my research questions. Then I move to the methodology and results, making sure the research questions are addressed well in those sections. From my experience writing and reviewing papers, these are what will drive the decision to accept/revise/reject the paper, so I work on them first to make sure rest fo the sections align with these sections. Intro/motivation is next and then I work on discussions and limitations. Conclusions and abstract are the last things I write because these are probably what reviewers will read first and you want these to highlight everything on your paper . I feel that this sequence helps me focus more on the contributions of my work and keeps that chain of thought throughout the paper.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8089.0,"score_ratio":4.2727272727},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":504,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r97wm","c_root_id_B":"h0rg0yc","created_at_utc_A":1622948925,"created_at_utc_B":1622953415,"score_A":11,"score_B":47,"human_ref_A":"I make a PowerPoint slide deck. It creates a lot of clarity on how to frame the story and identify weak points, providing direction for additional experiments to strengthen the case.","human_ref_B":"This may not work for everyone, but I have a big love for presenting. So I’ll make my figures and get them all nailed down, write my methods like normal, and basically set up a presentation outline. Then, I’ll stream-of-consciousness word vomit on to the page as if I were talking to an audience. I take a day or more away, come back, and read it out loud to myself to identify any gaps in information or illogical jumps, to edit grammar and spelling, and just generally clean up. It makes for really speedy writing and gets you to practice “presenting” as well.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4490.0,"score_ratio":4.2727272727},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":505,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0rg0yc","c_root_id_B":"h0qusnz","created_at_utc_A":1622953415,"created_at_utc_B":1622940430,"score_A":47,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"This may not work for everyone, but I have a big love for presenting. So I’ll make my figures and get them all nailed down, write my methods like normal, and basically set up a presentation outline. Then, I’ll stream-of-consciousness word vomit on to the page as if I were talking to an audience. I take a day or more away, come back, and read it out loud to myself to identify any gaps in information or illogical jumps, to edit grammar and spelling, and just generally clean up. It makes for really speedy writing and gets you to practice “presenting” as well.","human_ref_B":"I try to write really good notes as I work on the project. Why we decided to do it (incl relevant papers it's building on), what our goal/question is, all the details about the method & analysis, etc. The first draft is just making that into full sentences and then you're just editing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":12985.0,"score_ratio":5.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":506,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qtn8w","c_root_id_B":"h0rg0yc","created_at_utc_A":1622939786,"created_at_utc_B":1622953415,"score_A":9,"score_B":47,"human_ref_A":"A solid formula for the structure","human_ref_B":"This may not work for everyone, but I have a big love for presenting. So I’ll make my figures and get them all nailed down, write my methods like normal, and basically set up a presentation outline. Then, I’ll stream-of-consciousness word vomit on to the page as if I were talking to an audience. I take a day or more away, come back, and read it out loud to myself to identify any gaps in information or illogical jumps, to edit grammar and spelling, and just generally clean up. It makes for really speedy writing and gets you to practice “presenting” as well.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":13629.0,"score_ratio":5.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":507,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0rg0yc","c_root_id_B":"h0r1tcl","created_at_utc_A":1622953415,"created_at_utc_B":1622944431,"score_A":47,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"This may not work for everyone, but I have a big love for presenting. So I’ll make my figures and get them all nailed down, write my methods like normal, and basically set up a presentation outline. Then, I’ll stream-of-consciousness word vomit on to the page as if I were talking to an audience. I take a day or more away, come back, and read it out loud to myself to identify any gaps in information or illogical jumps, to edit grammar and spelling, and just generally clean up. It makes for really speedy writing and gets you to practice “presenting” as well.","human_ref_B":"Saving this post!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8984.0,"score_ratio":5.875},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":508,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qpff6","c_root_id_B":"h0r1ftw","created_at_utc_A":1622937448,"created_at_utc_B":1622944217,"score_A":25,"score_B":36,"human_ref_A":"Confidence","human_ref_B":"ALWAYS figures first. Figures tell the story. If you feel like you're missing a panel of a figure because you don't have that data, put a white box as a placeholder. Then, do that experiment (and hope that the data agrees with your other data). Repeat until all figures are finished. Then write the other parts. And you should start this process when you feel like your story is 50 - 75% done.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6769.0,"score_ratio":1.44},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":509,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r1ftw","c_root_id_B":"h0qusnz","created_at_utc_A":1622944217,"created_at_utc_B":1622940430,"score_A":36,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"ALWAYS figures first. Figures tell the story. If you feel like you're missing a panel of a figure because you don't have that data, put a white box as a placeholder. Then, do that experiment (and hope that the data agrees with your other data). Repeat until all figures are finished. Then write the other parts. And you should start this process when you feel like your story is 50 - 75% done.","human_ref_B":"I try to write really good notes as I work on the project. Why we decided to do it (incl relevant papers it's building on), what our goal/question is, all the details about the method & analysis, etc. The first draft is just making that into full sentences and then you're just editing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3787.0,"score_ratio":4.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":510,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qtn8w","c_root_id_B":"h0r1ftw","created_at_utc_A":1622939786,"created_at_utc_B":1622944217,"score_A":9,"score_B":36,"human_ref_A":"A solid formula for the structure","human_ref_B":"ALWAYS figures first. Figures tell the story. If you feel like you're missing a panel of a figure because you don't have that data, put a white box as a placeholder. Then, do that experiment (and hope that the data agrees with your other data). Repeat until all figures are finished. Then write the other parts. And you should start this process when you feel like your story is 50 - 75% done.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4431.0,"score_ratio":4.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":511,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0s7qyp","c_root_id_B":"h0qpff6","created_at_utc_A":1622977496,"created_at_utc_B":1622937448,"score_A":27,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","human_ref_B":"Confidence","labels":1,"seconds_difference":40048.0,"score_ratio":1.08},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":512,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r3d4k","c_root_id_B":"h0s7qyp","created_at_utc_A":1622945326,"created_at_utc_B":1622977496,"score_A":11,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"I start with the research questions/hypothesis then literature review to show the gaps that highlight my research questions. Then I move to the methodology and results, making sure the research questions are addressed well in those sections. From my experience writing and reviewing papers, these are what will drive the decision to accept/revise/reject the paper, so I work on them first to make sure rest fo the sections align with these sections. Intro/motivation is next and then I work on discussions and limitations. Conclusions and abstract are the last things I write because these are probably what reviewers will read first and you want these to highlight everything on your paper . I feel that this sequence helps me focus more on the contributions of my work and keeps that chain of thought throughout the paper.","human_ref_B":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","labels":0,"seconds_difference":32170.0,"score_ratio":2.4545454545},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":513,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0s7qyp","c_root_id_B":"h0r97wm","created_at_utc_A":1622977496,"created_at_utc_B":1622948925,"score_A":27,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","human_ref_B":"I make a PowerPoint slide deck. It creates a lot of clarity on how to frame the story and identify weak points, providing direction for additional experiments to strengthen the case.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":28571.0,"score_ratio":2.4545454545},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":514,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0s7qyp","c_root_id_B":"h0qusnz","created_at_utc_A":1622977496,"created_at_utc_B":1622940430,"score_A":27,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","human_ref_B":"I try to write really good notes as I work on the project. Why we decided to do it (incl relevant papers it's building on), what our goal/question is, all the details about the method & analysis, etc. The first draft is just making that into full sentences and then you're just editing.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":37066.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":515,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qtn8w","c_root_id_B":"h0s7qyp","created_at_utc_A":1622939786,"created_at_utc_B":1622977496,"score_A":9,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"A solid formula for the structure","human_ref_B":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","labels":0,"seconds_difference":37710.0,"score_ratio":3.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":516,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0s7qyp","c_root_id_B":"h0r1tcl","created_at_utc_A":1622977496,"created_at_utc_B":1622944431,"score_A":27,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","human_ref_B":"Saving this post!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":33065.0,"score_ratio":3.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":517,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0rvi2e","c_root_id_B":"h0s7qyp","created_at_utc_A":1622965940,"created_at_utc_B":1622977496,"score_A":7,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"I'm not in STEM but like STEM my field uses LaTeX which I've found extremely useful for paper writing. I often think of bits of language that work in different parts of the paper and keep them along with notes and possible sources commented out so they can be incorporated later. With Word I felt more pressure to write in order instead of letting my mind go all over the place, since there's no hiding content.","human_ref_B":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11556.0,"score_ratio":3.8571428571},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":518,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0s1s0h","c_root_id_B":"h0s7qyp","created_at_utc_A":1622971943,"created_at_utc_B":1622977496,"score_A":5,"score_B":27,"human_ref_A":"Lab meetings are your friend here. I have the advantage of being a member of a lab where people work on pretty different projects and are unafraid to ask candid and hard-hitting questions. In my experience, preparing the data I'd like to publish for a 20 minute lab meeting forces you to 1. structure your presentation in a way that can quickly be ported to paper when the time comes, 2. assemble the bare minimum background knowledge required to make the audience understand the relevance of the work, and 3. receive valuable feedback on how data/figures are presented. Basically this minimizes both the time spent organizing thoughts as well as the length of the paper (the exception is Materials and Methods which nobody reads anyways). Basically, think of a scientific research paper as being the readable version of your talk, not the other way around.","human_ref_B":"I'm an ECR (postdoc) so I'm still polishing my writing. I was lucky to work with very prolific co-authors who taught me this approach and so far it's the best for me. I always find it daunting to begin a paper. 3 key points: 1) Break everything down to the smallest task, 2) start writing and annotating as early as you can and try to be consistent, and 3) set clear goals with your co-authors early on, I find turn-over is more important than \"perfection\". Starting from scratch is always daunting for me, so I have a word template with the classic IMRaD structure (see below). This gives me a skeleton and feels more \"manageable\" than a white page, even though I don't know which will be the target journal. I scribble down the Methods section and add relevant publications for the intro and discussion as soon as I start the project. Once I have the results and I know the target journal, I change my template to the journal's structure. Having a couple of examples is useful to identify the overall length of each section (e.g., some journals prefer 3 paragraphs in the introduction, others 4 or even 5; same with the discussion, some use 1 closing paragraph \\[conclusion\\] other journals just 3 paragraphs). Then, I create subsections with \"*paragraph topic*\" which I remove after a couple of draft versions. This approach helps me to keep in mind the logical progression of the paper. I also use \"*sentence topic*\", just in my words not worrying about grammar nor style to start putting words on the page. I usually write 5-6 sentences for each paragraph. Then I add the figures. Figures are super important, so I usually have a PowerPoint with several iterations of the same analysis but presented in different ways. So, I begin with the Methods section, then Results, Intro, Discussion, and finally the Abstract. The abstract is just a well-thought summary of your publication so I find it easier to write once I have the other sections ready (writing the abstract is just another way of writing your paper in 250 words, it has its own structure). After that, it is just a matter of polishing and working with your co-authors. One issue I constantly have is to know when the manuscript is \"good enough\" to be submitted, this is when senior co-authors are key to just tell you to stop and submit it. I'm a veterinarian, so papers aren't a big task during your undergrad. I had to learn from scratch when I started my PhD, don't be afraid of bad reviews and try to maximise the times your co-authors provide feedback, I learnt a lot even though it was kinda painful and discouraging in the beginning. I hope this is useful :) This is how my template looks: **Target journal info:** type and length of the article **Title1**: \\[the title I prefer\\] **Title2/3/4:** \\[alternatives\\] **Abstract:** \\[Number of words\\] **1. Introduction** * Paragraph1: Intro to the field * Paragraph2: Specific field details and intro to the project * Paragraph3: Why's the project relevant to the field? * Paragraph4: Closing and the relevance of the study **2. Methods (begin as soon as you can with this)** * Paragraph1: General description * Paragraph2: Location/case study * Paragraph3: Data collection * Paragraph4: Data analysis **3. Results (ID key results and keep it to the point)** * Paragraph1: Main result * Paragraph2: Result2 * Paragraph3: Any extras **4. Discussion (3 arguments max)** * Paragraph1: General recap and key results in context * Paragraph2: Result2 in context * Paragraph3: The project in the field's context * Paragraph4: Caveats/Issues/What's next? * Paragraph5: Closing **Extras (or in a different document):** * co-author details (not in order) * funding details * acknowledgements I always have 3 documents by the end of the project: 1. The word doc with the manuscript 2. A Powerpoint with figures 3. A word document with all the paragraphs we removed","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5553.0,"score_ratio":5.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":519,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0sz6uo","c_root_id_B":"h0r3d4k","created_at_utc_A":1622994171,"created_at_utc_B":1622945326,"score_A":14,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","human_ref_B":"I start with the research questions/hypothesis then literature review to show the gaps that highlight my research questions. Then I move to the methodology and results, making sure the research questions are addressed well in those sections. From my experience writing and reviewing papers, these are what will drive the decision to accept/revise/reject the paper, so I work on them first to make sure rest fo the sections align with these sections. Intro/motivation is next and then I work on discussions and limitations. Conclusions and abstract are the last things I write because these are probably what reviewers will read first and you want these to highlight everything on your paper . I feel that this sequence helps me focus more on the contributions of my work and keeps that chain of thought throughout the paper.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":48845.0,"score_ratio":1.2727272727},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":520,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r97wm","c_root_id_B":"h0sz6uo","created_at_utc_A":1622948925,"created_at_utc_B":1622994171,"score_A":11,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I make a PowerPoint slide deck. It creates a lot of clarity on how to frame the story and identify weak points, providing direction for additional experiments to strengthen the case.","human_ref_B":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":45246.0,"score_ratio":1.2727272727},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":521,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qusnz","c_root_id_B":"h0sz6uo","created_at_utc_A":1622940430,"created_at_utc_B":1622994171,"score_A":9,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I try to write really good notes as I work on the project. Why we decided to do it (incl relevant papers it's building on), what our goal/question is, all the details about the method & analysis, etc. The first draft is just making that into full sentences and then you're just editing.","human_ref_B":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":53741.0,"score_ratio":1.5555555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":522,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qtn8w","c_root_id_B":"h0sz6uo","created_at_utc_A":1622939786,"created_at_utc_B":1622994171,"score_A":9,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"A solid formula for the structure","human_ref_B":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":54385.0,"score_ratio":1.5555555556},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":523,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0sz6uo","c_root_id_B":"h0r1tcl","created_at_utc_A":1622994171,"created_at_utc_B":1622944431,"score_A":14,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","human_ref_B":"Saving this post!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":49740.0,"score_ratio":1.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":524,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0rvi2e","c_root_id_B":"h0sz6uo","created_at_utc_A":1622965940,"created_at_utc_B":1622994171,"score_A":7,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I'm not in STEM but like STEM my field uses LaTeX which I've found extremely useful for paper writing. I often think of bits of language that work in different parts of the paper and keep them along with notes and possible sources commented out so they can be incorporated later. With Word I felt more pressure to write in order instead of letting my mind go all over the place, since there's no hiding content.","human_ref_B":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":28231.0,"score_ratio":2.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":525,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0sz6uo","c_root_id_B":"h0s1s0h","created_at_utc_A":1622994171,"created_at_utc_B":1622971943,"score_A":14,"score_B":5,"human_ref_A":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","human_ref_B":"Lab meetings are your friend here. I have the advantage of being a member of a lab where people work on pretty different projects and are unafraid to ask candid and hard-hitting questions. In my experience, preparing the data I'd like to publish for a 20 minute lab meeting forces you to 1. structure your presentation in a way that can quickly be ported to paper when the time comes, 2. assemble the bare minimum background knowledge required to make the audience understand the relevance of the work, and 3. receive valuable feedback on how data/figures are presented. Basically this minimizes both the time spent organizing thoughts as well as the length of the paper (the exception is Materials and Methods which nobody reads anyways). Basically, think of a scientific research paper as being the readable version of your talk, not the other way around.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":22228.0,"score_ratio":2.8},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":526,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0sz6uo","c_root_id_B":"h0s8kdp","created_at_utc_A":1622994171,"created_at_utc_B":1622978209,"score_A":14,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","human_ref_B":"How long does it take to write an academic paper on average? Curious UG student here","labels":1,"seconds_difference":15962.0,"score_ratio":4.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":527,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0sedm8","c_root_id_B":"h0sz6uo","created_at_utc_A":1622982751,"created_at_utc_B":1622994171,"score_A":3,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"I am far more productive now that I’ve hit my stride as a postdoc than I was during my PhD years (or first year of postdoc), and it’s for two reasons: 1) I have my methods down pat so the research part is far shorter. No writing code from scratch and minor modifications to get plots how I like them, so what took me months before is now just a few weeks. 2) My supervisor now is the type to make small edits/ change phrases as he goes in the document. My PhD one made me do everything myself (which honestly your PhD adviser SHOULD), and I’m still doing the majority of work, but not doing 100% of it is amazing and lets me focus on more gnarly edits.","human_ref_B":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":11420.0,"score_ratio":4.6666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":528,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0su950","c_root_id_B":"h0sz6uo","created_at_utc_A":1622991647,"created_at_utc_B":1622994171,"score_A":2,"score_B":14,"human_ref_A":"Lots of great advice here, but what I think hasn't been stressed enough is language. Be concise, but comprehensible!!! Most reviewers have very limited time, so making the reading experience as easy as possible will put them in a good mood and increase your chances of getting accepted.","human_ref_B":"Lots of good comments here already but adding a few because why not: * Schedule 3-5 days when you are literally doing nothing else other than the paper. No meetings, no experiments, just figures/writing. It usually takes me hours to get \"in the zone\" but once I'm there, the paper gets done super quickly. I've never had a manuscript take more than a week to write when I set it up this way and tell everyone to go away, block email, etc. * Bullet point the main idea of any paragraph before writing it. Also, please no more than 5 sentences per paragraph and no more than one or two commas/\"and\"s per sentence. If you need more than that, you're probably rambling. * Secret magic trick: once you finish writing a paragraph, take the last sentence and move it to the beginning of the paragraph. Your paper is now 100% more skimmable = better! * Whatever order works best for you, but I do results (figures, bullet points for each paragraph, then text), discussion, intro, methods. * Definitely use LaTeX. Use overleaf if you don't want to set up the compiler on your computer. * Coauthors - give definite deadlines, and send many reminders. But in practice, just do all their work for them and coauthor them anyways. Almost all coauthors are dead weight at the writing stage. The few who aren't are gold. * Proofreading - have some text-to-speech software read the paper to you. It takes some time but its worth doing once. You'll immediately notice typos and cringe-bad sections :)","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2524.0,"score_ratio":7.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":529,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qusnz","c_root_id_B":"h0r3d4k","created_at_utc_A":1622940430,"created_at_utc_B":1622945326,"score_A":9,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"I try to write really good notes as I work on the project. Why we decided to do it (incl relevant papers it's building on), what our goal/question is, all the details about the method & analysis, etc. The first draft is just making that into full sentences and then you're just editing.","human_ref_B":"I start with the research questions/hypothesis then literature review to show the gaps that highlight my research questions. Then I move to the methodology and results, making sure the research questions are addressed well in those sections. From my experience writing and reviewing papers, these are what will drive the decision to accept/revise/reject the paper, so I work on them first to make sure rest fo the sections align with these sections. Intro/motivation is next and then I work on discussions and limitations. Conclusions and abstract are the last things I write because these are probably what reviewers will read first and you want these to highlight everything on your paper . I feel that this sequence helps me focus more on the contributions of my work and keeps that chain of thought throughout the paper.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4896.0,"score_ratio":1.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":530,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r3d4k","c_root_id_B":"h0qtn8w","created_at_utc_A":1622945326,"created_at_utc_B":1622939786,"score_A":11,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I start with the research questions/hypothesis then literature review to show the gaps that highlight my research questions. Then I move to the methodology and results, making sure the research questions are addressed well in those sections. From my experience writing and reviewing papers, these are what will drive the decision to accept/revise/reject the paper, so I work on them first to make sure rest fo the sections align with these sections. Intro/motivation is next and then I work on discussions and limitations. Conclusions and abstract are the last things I write because these are probably what reviewers will read first and you want these to highlight everything on your paper . I feel that this sequence helps me focus more on the contributions of my work and keeps that chain of thought throughout the paper.","human_ref_B":"A solid formula for the structure","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5540.0,"score_ratio":1.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":531,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r3d4k","c_root_id_B":"h0r1tcl","created_at_utc_A":1622945326,"created_at_utc_B":1622944431,"score_A":11,"score_B":8,"human_ref_A":"I start with the research questions/hypothesis then literature review to show the gaps that highlight my research questions. Then I move to the methodology and results, making sure the research questions are addressed well in those sections. From my experience writing and reviewing papers, these are what will drive the decision to accept/revise/reject the paper, so I work on them first to make sure rest fo the sections align with these sections. Intro/motivation is next and then I work on discussions and limitations. Conclusions and abstract are the last things I write because these are probably what reviewers will read first and you want these to highlight everything on your paper . I feel that this sequence helps me focus more on the contributions of my work and keeps that chain of thought throughout the paper.","human_ref_B":"Saving this post!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":895.0,"score_ratio":1.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":532,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0qusnz","c_root_id_B":"h0r97wm","created_at_utc_A":1622940430,"created_at_utc_B":1622948925,"score_A":9,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"I try to write really good notes as I work on the project. Why we decided to do it (incl relevant papers it's building on), what our goal/question is, all the details about the method & analysis, etc. The first draft is just making that into full sentences and then you're just editing.","human_ref_B":"I make a PowerPoint slide deck. It creates a lot of clarity on how to frame the story and identify weak points, providing direction for additional experiments to strengthen the case.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":8495.0,"score_ratio":1.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":533,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r97wm","c_root_id_B":"h0qtn8w","created_at_utc_A":1622948925,"created_at_utc_B":1622939786,"score_A":11,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"I make a PowerPoint slide deck. It creates a lot of clarity on how to frame the story and identify weak points, providing direction for additional experiments to strengthen the case.","human_ref_B":"A solid formula for the structure","labels":1,"seconds_difference":9139.0,"score_ratio":1.2222222222},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":534,"row":{"post_id":"nt8nxt","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"People who write scientific research papers quickly, what’s your secret? For academic research papers, what are your best tips and tricks for being both efficient and doing high quality work? What order do you write the paper in, and how do you keep from going off on too many tangents? How do you deal efficiently with co-authors?","c_root_id_A":"h0r1tcl","c_root_id_B":"h0r97wm","created_at_utc_A":1622944431,"created_at_utc_B":1622948925,"score_A":8,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"Saving this post!","human_ref_B":"I make a PowerPoint slide deck. It creates a lot of clarity on how to frame the story and identify weak points, providing direction for additional experiments to strengthen the case.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4494.0,"score_ratio":1.375},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":535,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2j6mgk","c_root_id_B":"h2ix3bn","created_at_utc_A":1624280685,"created_at_utc_B":1624273923,"score_A":33,"score_B":25,"human_ref_A":"Cut the meeting times in half, move others to email or slide updates and meeting every other week, have a conversation with your PI about overburdening, and start blocking time on your calendar for your priorities.","human_ref_B":"Yeah, sounds like you got a case of overburdening. It's kind of an occupational hazard, but can be a problem nonetheless. I'd recommend that you write a template declination email (e.g. for seminars) stating that you need to make time for work on your own project and thus won't be able to attend this time. Send this to the seminar/JC organizers for the ones where you're not actually presenting yourself (which I assume will be the majority). Do this for a week or two, and see whether anyone is bothered by your absence. Chances are it's going to be fine.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6762.0,"score_ratio":1.32},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":536,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2j6mgk","c_root_id_B":"h2j5nte","created_at_utc_A":1624280685,"created_at_utc_B":1624280099,"score_A":33,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"Cut the meeting times in half, move others to email or slide updates and meeting every other week, have a conversation with your PI about overburdening, and start blocking time on your calendar for your priorities.","human_ref_B":"Solution: You need to start saying no to a lot of things.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":586.0,"score_ratio":1.5714285714},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":537,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2j4ra1","c_root_id_B":"h2j6mgk","created_at_utc_A":1624279528,"created_at_utc_B":1624280685,"score_A":15,"score_B":33,"human_ref_A":"I only read the title. ABSOLUTELY NO is the answer... Meetings are a plague on productivity... edit: typo","human_ref_B":"Cut the meeting times in half, move others to email or slide updates and meeting every other week, have a conversation with your PI about overburdening, and start blocking time on your calendar for your priorities.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1157.0,"score_ratio":2.2},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":538,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2ixd7g","c_root_id_B":"h2j6mgk","created_at_utc_A":1624274159,"created_at_utc_B":1624280685,"score_A":3,"score_B":33,"human_ref_A":"No. :)","human_ref_B":"Cut the meeting times in half, move others to email or slide updates and meeting every other week, have a conversation with your PI about overburdening, and start blocking time on your calendar for your priorities.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6526.0,"score_ratio":11.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":539,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2jd1jg","c_root_id_B":"h2j5nte","created_at_utc_A":1624284112,"created_at_utc_B":1624280099,"score_A":22,"score_B":21,"human_ref_A":"Also how could you possibly mentor 15 students well? This sounds like a bad situation for everyone involved.","human_ref_B":"Solution: You need to start saying no to a lot of things.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4013.0,"score_ratio":1.0476190476},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":540,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2jd1jg","c_root_id_B":"h2j4ra1","created_at_utc_A":1624284112,"created_at_utc_B":1624279528,"score_A":22,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"Also how could you possibly mentor 15 students well? This sounds like a bad situation for everyone involved.","human_ref_B":"I only read the title. ABSOLUTELY NO is the answer... Meetings are a plague on productivity... edit: typo","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4584.0,"score_ratio":1.4666666667},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":541,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2ixd7g","c_root_id_B":"h2jd1jg","created_at_utc_A":1624274159,"created_at_utc_B":1624284112,"score_A":3,"score_B":22,"human_ref_A":"No. :)","human_ref_B":"Also how could you possibly mentor 15 students well? This sounds like a bad situation for everyone involved.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":9953.0,"score_ratio":7.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":542,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2j5nte","c_root_id_B":"h2j4ra1","created_at_utc_A":1624280099,"created_at_utc_B":1624279528,"score_A":21,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"Solution: You need to start saying no to a lot of things.","human_ref_B":"I only read the title. ABSOLUTELY NO is the answer... Meetings are a plague on productivity... edit: typo","labels":1,"seconds_difference":571.0,"score_ratio":1.4},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":543,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2j5nte","c_root_id_B":"h2ixd7g","created_at_utc_A":1624280099,"created_at_utc_B":1624274159,"score_A":21,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Solution: You need to start saying no to a lot of things.","human_ref_B":"No. :)","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5940.0,"score_ratio":7.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":544,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2ixd7g","c_root_id_B":"h2j4ra1","created_at_utc_A":1624274159,"created_at_utc_B":1624279528,"score_A":3,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"No. :)","human_ref_B":"I only read the title. ABSOLUTELY NO is the answer... Meetings are a plague on productivity... edit: typo","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5369.0,"score_ratio":5.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":545,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2ixd7g","c_root_id_B":"h2jjs7p","created_at_utc_A":1624274159,"created_at_utc_B":1624287430,"score_A":3,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"No. :)","human_ref_B":"Are the meetings useful? Can you ask your students to send you written weekly updates/slides instead and then just spend 15min reviewing it and emailing back? That gives them practice writing and a nice record of their work as well. Then make like a shared office hour time for if they wanted to discuss the email in person? Zoom lets you setup waiting rooms that work really well for that. Also discord/slack lets you type chat in real time but also lets you decide to wait to respond, that may be better than zoom as you could multitask several students at same time. I had a super easily distracted student once and we ended up maintaining a kanban board that she updated and I helped her rank items on, my supervisor liked it so much he made one for a larger project I was on with him. It worked well for seeing yes they are progressing or no they've gone off into the wilderness. Also helped with the invisible tasks A is less important than B, but C is still yet more important but cannot be done until A is done.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":13271.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":546,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2lllrq","c_root_id_B":"h2kvqeb","created_at_utc_A":1624322264,"created_at_utc_B":1624309060,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Gonna give you some real talk. Having meetings is easy. Leading your own projects is hard. Save the mentoring for when you land the TT position.","human_ref_B":"Learning to say no is difficult but necessary. You need to look after your own work (research and write) primarily, and I’m writing this more for my own benefit really!","labels":1,"seconds_difference":13204.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":547,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2lllrq","c_root_id_B":"h2ixd7g","created_at_utc_A":1624322264,"created_at_utc_B":1624274159,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Gonna give you some real talk. Having meetings is easy. Leading your own projects is hard. Save the mentoring for when you land the TT position.","human_ref_B":"No. :)","labels":1,"seconds_difference":48105.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":548,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2lllrq","c_root_id_B":"h2k46dw","created_at_utc_A":1624322264,"created_at_utc_B":1624296593,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"Gonna give you some real talk. Having meetings is easy. Leading your own projects is hard. Save the mentoring for when you land the TT position.","human_ref_B":"You are spreading yourself thin. Drop some of those projects.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":25671.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":549,"row":{"post_id":"o4s2eo","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"If I have 6 hours of Zoom meetings everyday, can I really be expected to get anything else done? Postdoc in STEM completely overburdened with meetings at the moment. I'm (co-)supervising 15 student projects, spanning the bachelor to PhD level with students in 4 different countries, on top of which I have all of my normal collaborations that I should make progress on. On top of that, there's seminars and journal clubs everyday. It's just impossible to get anything done at the moment! /rant","c_root_id_A":"h2jetno","c_root_id_B":"h2ixd7g","created_at_utc_A":1624284999,"created_at_utc_B":1624274159,"score_A":4,"score_B":3,"human_ref_A":"I’m going to go ahead and say yes. You are expected to get more done. As you’ve mentioned, you’ve voluntarily accepted 15 different student. That means that you are responsible for finding bandwidth to give adequate support for your own projects and for all of those 15 projects. If you’re finding it difficult to balance everything then that’s not fair to yourself or your collaborators. You don’t want to be that supervisor that can’t reasonably supervise because you took on too much.","human_ref_B":"No. :)","labels":1,"seconds_difference":10840.0,"score_ratio":1.3333333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":550,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzj1vgr","c_root_id_B":"fzj563q","created_at_utc_A":1595955320,"created_at_utc_B":1595956876,"score_A":389,"score_B":525,"human_ref_A":"The minute I made the decision to not work weekends during my PhD Edit: I do occasionally read and plan during weekends","human_ref_B":"Basically was the same for me: when I realized that I valued my outside life and having good balance with work. The exact moment was when I was talking with a huge star in my field and they were describing a more junior person who is already a star at a young age. They were saying how the junior person is always working, and gave the example that even when they are in the car with their partner on the way to a date that they would be reviewing papers or writing grants or whatever. And I just knew that was not for me because I get motion sickness reading in a moving vehicle. But more realistically, I would never want to give up having a non-work life.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1556.0,"score_ratio":1.3496143959},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":551,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjitwu","c_root_id_B":"fzjrk9x","created_at_utc_A":1595963362,"created_at_utc_B":1595967535,"score_A":121,"score_B":158,"human_ref_A":"When I took a permanent contract at a mid level university, looked at my objectives and the promotion criteria and realised I could have a decent albeit unremarkable career and a life outside work. I do good work, stars in my field have said nice things about my papers but I write three of those a year, they write 9. But then I realised that the answer to 'when do they sleep' is they dont.","human_ref_B":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4173.0,"score_ratio":1.305785124},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":552,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjrk9x","c_root_id_B":"fzjaacx","created_at_utc_A":1595967535,"created_at_utc_B":1595959269,"score_A":158,"score_B":108,"human_ref_A":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","human_ref_B":"When I realized I wanted to have a life outside of work. I busted my whole ass, worked multiple jobs, and raised a kid alone during my Ph.D. By the time I finally graduated, I didn't have the energy or drive to go on the TT market. I want to work to live, not live to work. Also, the fact that I hate publishing helped with that decision. I prefer to teach and focus on working with students instead of cranking out research no one will ever read.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8266.0,"score_ratio":1.462962963},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":553,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjrk9x","c_root_id_B":"fzjlgia","created_at_utc_A":1595967535,"created_at_utc_B":1595964622,"score_A":158,"score_B":112,"human_ref_A":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","human_ref_B":"But what does academic stardom even mean? Some people might think of it as being highly cited, but more and more we've realized that citations tend to be more a popularity game rather than a metric of success. Maybe it's having a ton of patents? Then again, patenting something can be very basic, and tons of people in industry have patents without being academics. Is it maybe coming up with a novel or breakthrough idea or method? I'd say plenty of academics have done this, but it hasn't been the right time or place to successfully get their innovation recognized. Is it having your own research project? Getting a lot of grants, or really big money grants? More and more stardom just sounds like a game of networking and being in the right place at the right time. A lot of it is luck. I'd doubt Jonas Salk thought of himself as a star, and people were giving up their seats on the bus for him. I'm genuinely curious about all of this, because even while I've worked with a number of different fields, I wouldn't say I've met any stars.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2913.0,"score_ratio":1.4107142857},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":554,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjms10","c_root_id_B":"fzjrk9x","created_at_utc_A":1595965258,"created_at_utc_B":1595967535,"score_A":96,"score_B":158,"human_ref_A":"I don't think being a star ever crossed my mind. It's pretty obvious that even if you are very smart and hard working, there's a lot of luck involved and the competition is fierce. I just wanted to do something meaningful with my life.","human_ref_B":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2277.0,"score_ratio":1.6458333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":555,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjrk9x","c_root_id_B":"fzjat1q","created_at_utc_A":1595967535,"created_at_utc_B":1595959517,"score_A":158,"score_B":71,"human_ref_A":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","human_ref_B":"When I heard how he was thinking about a grant idea when his wife was going through labor of their first born Also when I realized I’m significantly younger than him but I have less curiosity and sense of wonderment","labels":1,"seconds_difference":8018.0,"score_ratio":2.2253521127},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":556,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjrk9x","c_root_id_B":"fzjfxpg","created_at_utc_A":1595967535,"created_at_utc_B":1595961968,"score_A":158,"score_B":61,"human_ref_A":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","human_ref_B":"When I realized I didn't talk over other people to try to sound important in graduate seminars. I digested information thoughtfully, and then I would respond. The people who were invested in by the faculty were the ones who seemed to shout the loudest parroting what they said. They're not superstars either, btw. But I realized I wasn't being \"invested\" in. Still beat them all to tenure for those who survived.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5567.0,"score_ratio":2.5901639344},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":557,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjouzh","c_root_id_B":"fzjrk9x","created_at_utc_A":1595966248,"created_at_utc_B":1595967535,"score_A":39,"score_B":158,"human_ref_A":"Haven’t given up yet! (Jk—I never really believed I would be a “star”) I think it’s kind of funny/interesting how many comments and upvotes attribute not being a star to a choice—not a personal limitation, as if they COULD have been a star, but are average only because they made a choice to be average. Seems delusional. I accept my mediocrity!","human_ref_B":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1287.0,"score_ratio":4.0512820513},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":558,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjrk9x","c_root_id_B":"fzjlx1e","created_at_utc_A":1595967535,"created_at_utc_B":1595964845,"score_A":158,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","human_ref_B":"I question the premise of your question. No matter how high you rise, you will pretty much always find yourself in the company of peers. As a faculty member, I was more educated than most, more successful than most, paid better than most, and had more secure employment than most, and surrounded by others who were just like me. Was I a star? When I earned full professor and later got an endowed chair, I was still one of many. Was I a star then? As a Vice President, I find myself in exactly the same position. Am I a star now? I guess I think it’s all a matter of perspective, and at this point in my career I personally consider anyone who makes it through a PhD and goes on to an academic career to be a star. Few of us ever reach the height of glory that we perhaps imagined when we were younger, but that’s true of pretty much everyone everywhere and all of us have accomplished far more than most.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2690.0,"score_ratio":3.8536585366},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":559,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjrk9x","c_root_id_B":"fzjly9h","created_at_utc_A":1595967535,"created_at_utc_B":1595964861,"score_A":158,"score_B":24,"human_ref_A":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","human_ref_B":"Maybe I'm just a pessimist, but I honestly never thought I'd be one. My parents are PhDs that didn't get tenure, much less become stars. I'm just trying to hold on and find a career I enjoy (either within or outside academia).","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2674.0,"score_ratio":6.5833333333},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":560,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjhecw","c_root_id_B":"fzjrk9x","created_at_utc_A":1595962666,"created_at_utc_B":1595967535,"score_A":22,"score_B":158,"human_ref_A":"I never expected to be a star, but about halfway through my PhD program is when I realized that I was making myself sick with how stressed I was about everything and I decided to just chill out. Plus, my advisors did nothing but put obstacles in my way of doing the research I actually wanted and so... that sort of out a damper on my plans, too.","human_ref_B":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4869.0,"score_ratio":7.1818181818},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":561,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjq36t","c_root_id_B":"fzjrk9x","created_at_utc_A":1595966830,"created_at_utc_B":1595967535,"score_A":17,"score_B":158,"human_ref_A":"I always find the \"academic star\" thing odd. Compare to \"stars\" in other areas - pop music, films - and they are usually fashionable but often critically panned. Those we see as \"academic stars\" are usually a combination of privilege, nepotism, marketing, work-life balance sacrifice, as well as research excellence.","human_ref_B":"When I worked with a real star. I saw what it really took. It wasn't putting in a lot of hours or being ruthless or looking out for oneself. It was a real core type of competency and mastery over the field that few have. He was my mentor during one of my postdocs and he was by far the most successful scientist I had ever worked with other than my extremely famous doctoral advisor (who, tellingly, openly admired this other guy - probably 30 years his junior). He didn't play games with his students, he knew how to be supportive and kind without doing their work for them, and he knew which students to carry for a bit and when. He was there at every coffee break in they just chatting with whomever, he always ate with us in the canteen and it never felt like \"the boss\" was there. He's everyone's favorite colleague because he is open, honest, insightful and can see the right thing to do very quickly. People line up to collaborate with him and he is on so many papers it's ridiculous. And he's just great to be around. He has a really dry wit but is not cynical. He has a lot of interests and knows a lot about art and literature, and many other topics. He neither only talks about work nor avoids the topic. He almost never works in the evenings or weekends, only a bit on Sunday nights, and never before the kids go to bed. He takes a month off every August, just to be with his family on some British Isle where he he doesn't have good cell phone service and doesn't bother to get internet access. He has a wonderful marriage, great kids, and seems to really like life, in a British sort of way - meaning, not exuberant, but you can tell. He keeps himself fresh and doesn't burn out. He works efficiently because he keeps work confined to one part of his life. This makes him happier and more productive. When I saw how effortless it was for him, and how people were throwing money and titles his way, I could see what it was to be a star. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":705.0,"score_ratio":9.2941176471},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":562,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjitwu","c_root_id_B":"fzjaacx","created_at_utc_A":1595963362,"created_at_utc_B":1595959269,"score_A":121,"score_B":108,"human_ref_A":"When I took a permanent contract at a mid level university, looked at my objectives and the promotion criteria and realised I could have a decent albeit unremarkable career and a life outside work. I do good work, stars in my field have said nice things about my papers but I write three of those a year, they write 9. But then I realised that the answer to 'when do they sleep' is they dont.","human_ref_B":"When I realized I wanted to have a life outside of work. I busted my whole ass, worked multiple jobs, and raised a kid alone during my Ph.D. By the time I finally graduated, I didn't have the energy or drive to go on the TT market. I want to work to live, not live to work. Also, the fact that I hate publishing helped with that decision. I prefer to teach and focus on working with students instead of cranking out research no one will ever read.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4093.0,"score_ratio":1.1203703704},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":563,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjitwu","c_root_id_B":"fzjat1q","created_at_utc_A":1595963362,"created_at_utc_B":1595959517,"score_A":121,"score_B":71,"human_ref_A":"When I took a permanent contract at a mid level university, looked at my objectives and the promotion criteria and realised I could have a decent albeit unremarkable career and a life outside work. I do good work, stars in my field have said nice things about my papers but I write three of those a year, they write 9. But then I realised that the answer to 'when do they sleep' is they dont.","human_ref_B":"When I heard how he was thinking about a grant idea when his wife was going through labor of their first born Also when I realized I’m significantly younger than him but I have less curiosity and sense of wonderment","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3845.0,"score_ratio":1.7042253521},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":564,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjitwu","c_root_id_B":"fzjfxpg","created_at_utc_A":1595963362,"created_at_utc_B":1595961968,"score_A":121,"score_B":61,"human_ref_A":"When I took a permanent contract at a mid level university, looked at my objectives and the promotion criteria and realised I could have a decent albeit unremarkable career and a life outside work. I do good work, stars in my field have said nice things about my papers but I write three of those a year, they write 9. But then I realised that the answer to 'when do they sleep' is they dont.","human_ref_B":"When I realized I didn't talk over other people to try to sound important in graduate seminars. I digested information thoughtfully, and then I would respond. The people who were invested in by the faculty were the ones who seemed to shout the loudest parroting what they said. They're not superstars either, btw. But I realized I wasn't being \"invested\" in. Still beat them all to tenure for those who survived.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1394.0,"score_ratio":1.9836065574},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":565,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjhecw","c_root_id_B":"fzjitwu","created_at_utc_A":1595962666,"created_at_utc_B":1595963362,"score_A":22,"score_B":121,"human_ref_A":"I never expected to be a star, but about halfway through my PhD program is when I realized that I was making myself sick with how stressed I was about everything and I decided to just chill out. Plus, my advisors did nothing but put obstacles in my way of doing the research I actually wanted and so... that sort of out a damper on my plans, too.","human_ref_B":"When I took a permanent contract at a mid level university, looked at my objectives and the promotion criteria and realised I could have a decent albeit unremarkable career and a life outside work. I do good work, stars in my field have said nice things about my papers but I write three of those a year, they write 9. But then I realised that the answer to 'when do they sleep' is they dont.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":696.0,"score_ratio":5.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":566,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjlgia","c_root_id_B":"fzjaacx","created_at_utc_A":1595964622,"created_at_utc_B":1595959269,"score_A":112,"score_B":108,"human_ref_A":"But what does academic stardom even mean? Some people might think of it as being highly cited, but more and more we've realized that citations tend to be more a popularity game rather than a metric of success. Maybe it's having a ton of patents? Then again, patenting something can be very basic, and tons of people in industry have patents without being academics. Is it maybe coming up with a novel or breakthrough idea or method? I'd say plenty of academics have done this, but it hasn't been the right time or place to successfully get their innovation recognized. Is it having your own research project? Getting a lot of grants, or really big money grants? More and more stardom just sounds like a game of networking and being in the right place at the right time. A lot of it is luck. I'd doubt Jonas Salk thought of himself as a star, and people were giving up their seats on the bus for him. I'm genuinely curious about all of this, because even while I've worked with a number of different fields, I wouldn't say I've met any stars.","human_ref_B":"When I realized I wanted to have a life outside of work. I busted my whole ass, worked multiple jobs, and raised a kid alone during my Ph.D. By the time I finally graduated, I didn't have the energy or drive to go on the TT market. I want to work to live, not live to work. Also, the fact that I hate publishing helped with that decision. I prefer to teach and focus on working with students instead of cranking out research no one will ever read.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":5353.0,"score_ratio":1.037037037},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":567,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjat1q","c_root_id_B":"fzjlgia","created_at_utc_A":1595959517,"created_at_utc_B":1595964622,"score_A":71,"score_B":112,"human_ref_A":"When I heard how he was thinking about a grant idea when his wife was going through labor of their first born Also when I realized I’m significantly younger than him but I have less curiosity and sense of wonderment","human_ref_B":"But what does academic stardom even mean? Some people might think of it as being highly cited, but more and more we've realized that citations tend to be more a popularity game rather than a metric of success. Maybe it's having a ton of patents? Then again, patenting something can be very basic, and tons of people in industry have patents without being academics. Is it maybe coming up with a novel or breakthrough idea or method? I'd say plenty of academics have done this, but it hasn't been the right time or place to successfully get their innovation recognized. Is it having your own research project? Getting a lot of grants, or really big money grants? More and more stardom just sounds like a game of networking and being in the right place at the right time. A lot of it is luck. I'd doubt Jonas Salk thought of himself as a star, and people were giving up their seats on the bus for him. I'm genuinely curious about all of this, because even while I've worked with a number of different fields, I wouldn't say I've met any stars.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5105.0,"score_ratio":1.5774647887},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":568,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjfxpg","c_root_id_B":"fzjlgia","created_at_utc_A":1595961968,"created_at_utc_B":1595964622,"score_A":61,"score_B":112,"human_ref_A":"When I realized I didn't talk over other people to try to sound important in graduate seminars. I digested information thoughtfully, and then I would respond. The people who were invested in by the faculty were the ones who seemed to shout the loudest parroting what they said. They're not superstars either, btw. But I realized I wasn't being \"invested\" in. Still beat them all to tenure for those who survived.","human_ref_B":"But what does academic stardom even mean? Some people might think of it as being highly cited, but more and more we've realized that citations tend to be more a popularity game rather than a metric of success. Maybe it's having a ton of patents? Then again, patenting something can be very basic, and tons of people in industry have patents without being academics. Is it maybe coming up with a novel or breakthrough idea or method? I'd say plenty of academics have done this, but it hasn't been the right time or place to successfully get their innovation recognized. Is it having your own research project? Getting a lot of grants, or really big money grants? More and more stardom just sounds like a game of networking and being in the right place at the right time. A lot of it is luck. I'd doubt Jonas Salk thought of himself as a star, and people were giving up their seats on the bus for him. I'm genuinely curious about all of this, because even while I've worked with a number of different fields, I wouldn't say I've met any stars.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2654.0,"score_ratio":1.8360655738},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":569,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjlgia","c_root_id_B":"fzjhecw","created_at_utc_A":1595964622,"created_at_utc_B":1595962666,"score_A":112,"score_B":22,"human_ref_A":"But what does academic stardom even mean? Some people might think of it as being highly cited, but more and more we've realized that citations tend to be more a popularity game rather than a metric of success. Maybe it's having a ton of patents? Then again, patenting something can be very basic, and tons of people in industry have patents without being academics. Is it maybe coming up with a novel or breakthrough idea or method? I'd say plenty of academics have done this, but it hasn't been the right time or place to successfully get their innovation recognized. Is it having your own research project? Getting a lot of grants, or really big money grants? More and more stardom just sounds like a game of networking and being in the right place at the right time. A lot of it is luck. I'd doubt Jonas Salk thought of himself as a star, and people were giving up their seats on the bus for him. I'm genuinely curious about all of this, because even while I've worked with a number of different fields, I wouldn't say I've met any stars.","human_ref_B":"I never expected to be a star, but about halfway through my PhD program is when I realized that I was making myself sick with how stressed I was about everything and I decided to just chill out. Plus, my advisors did nothing but put obstacles in my way of doing the research I actually wanted and so... that sort of out a damper on my plans, too.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":1956.0,"score_ratio":5.0909090909},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":570,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjat1q","c_root_id_B":"fzjms10","created_at_utc_A":1595959517,"created_at_utc_B":1595965258,"score_A":71,"score_B":96,"human_ref_A":"When I heard how he was thinking about a grant idea when his wife was going through labor of their first born Also when I realized I’m significantly younger than him but I have less curiosity and sense of wonderment","human_ref_B":"I don't think being a star ever crossed my mind. It's pretty obvious that even if you are very smart and hard working, there's a lot of luck involved and the competition is fierce. I just wanted to do something meaningful with my life.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5741.0,"score_ratio":1.3521126761},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":571,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjfxpg","c_root_id_B":"fzjms10","created_at_utc_A":1595961968,"created_at_utc_B":1595965258,"score_A":61,"score_B":96,"human_ref_A":"When I realized I didn't talk over other people to try to sound important in graduate seminars. I digested information thoughtfully, and then I would respond. The people who were invested in by the faculty were the ones who seemed to shout the loudest parroting what they said. They're not superstars either, btw. But I realized I wasn't being \"invested\" in. Still beat them all to tenure for those who survived.","human_ref_B":"I don't think being a star ever crossed my mind. It's pretty obvious that even if you are very smart and hard working, there's a lot of luck involved and the competition is fierce. I just wanted to do something meaningful with my life.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3290.0,"score_ratio":1.5737704918},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":572,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjlx1e","c_root_id_B":"fzjms10","created_at_utc_A":1595964845,"created_at_utc_B":1595965258,"score_A":41,"score_B":96,"human_ref_A":"I question the premise of your question. No matter how high you rise, you will pretty much always find yourself in the company of peers. As a faculty member, I was more educated than most, more successful than most, paid better than most, and had more secure employment than most, and surrounded by others who were just like me. Was I a star? When I earned full professor and later got an endowed chair, I was still one of many. Was I a star then? As a Vice President, I find myself in exactly the same position. Am I a star now? I guess I think it’s all a matter of perspective, and at this point in my career I personally consider anyone who makes it through a PhD and goes on to an academic career to be a star. Few of us ever reach the height of glory that we perhaps imagined when we were younger, but that’s true of pretty much everyone everywhere and all of us have accomplished far more than most.","human_ref_B":"I don't think being a star ever crossed my mind. It's pretty obvious that even if you are very smart and hard working, there's a lot of luck involved and the competition is fierce. I just wanted to do something meaningful with my life.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":413.0,"score_ratio":2.3414634146},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":573,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjms10","c_root_id_B":"fzjly9h","created_at_utc_A":1595965258,"created_at_utc_B":1595964861,"score_A":96,"score_B":24,"human_ref_A":"I don't think being a star ever crossed my mind. It's pretty obvious that even if you are very smart and hard working, there's a lot of luck involved and the competition is fierce. I just wanted to do something meaningful with my life.","human_ref_B":"Maybe I'm just a pessimist, but I honestly never thought I'd be one. My parents are PhDs that didn't get tenure, much less become stars. I'm just trying to hold on and find a career I enjoy (either within or outside academia).","labels":1,"seconds_difference":397.0,"score_ratio":4.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":574,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjhecw","c_root_id_B":"fzjms10","created_at_utc_A":1595962666,"created_at_utc_B":1595965258,"score_A":22,"score_B":96,"human_ref_A":"I never expected to be a star, but about halfway through my PhD program is when I realized that I was making myself sick with how stressed I was about everything and I decided to just chill out. Plus, my advisors did nothing but put obstacles in my way of doing the research I actually wanted and so... that sort of out a damper on my plans, too.","human_ref_B":"I don't think being a star ever crossed my mind. It's pretty obvious that even if you are very smart and hard working, there's a lot of luck involved and the competition is fierce. I just wanted to do something meaningful with my life.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2592.0,"score_ratio":4.3636363636},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":575,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjly9h","c_root_id_B":"fzjouzh","created_at_utc_A":1595964861,"created_at_utc_B":1595966248,"score_A":24,"score_B":39,"human_ref_A":"Maybe I'm just a pessimist, but I honestly never thought I'd be one. My parents are PhDs that didn't get tenure, much less become stars. I'm just trying to hold on and find a career I enjoy (either within or outside academia).","human_ref_B":"Haven’t given up yet! (Jk—I never really believed I would be a “star”) I think it’s kind of funny/interesting how many comments and upvotes attribute not being a star to a choice—not a personal limitation, as if they COULD have been a star, but are average only because they made a choice to be average. Seems delusional. I accept my mediocrity!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1387.0,"score_ratio":1.625},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":576,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjouzh","c_root_id_B":"fzjhecw","created_at_utc_A":1595966248,"created_at_utc_B":1595962666,"score_A":39,"score_B":22,"human_ref_A":"Haven’t given up yet! (Jk—I never really believed I would be a “star”) I think it’s kind of funny/interesting how many comments and upvotes attribute not being a star to a choice—not a personal limitation, as if they COULD have been a star, but are average only because they made a choice to be average. Seems delusional. I accept my mediocrity!","human_ref_B":"I never expected to be a star, but about halfway through my PhD program is when I realized that I was making myself sick with how stressed I was about everything and I decided to just chill out. Plus, my advisors did nothing but put obstacles in my way of doing the research I actually wanted and so... that sort of out a damper on my plans, too.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3582.0,"score_ratio":1.7727272727},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":577,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjhecw","c_root_id_B":"fzjlx1e","created_at_utc_A":1595962666,"created_at_utc_B":1595964845,"score_A":22,"score_B":41,"human_ref_A":"I never expected to be a star, but about halfway through my PhD program is when I realized that I was making myself sick with how stressed I was about everything and I decided to just chill out. Plus, my advisors did nothing but put obstacles in my way of doing the research I actually wanted and so... that sort of out a damper on my plans, too.","human_ref_B":"I question the premise of your question. No matter how high you rise, you will pretty much always find yourself in the company of peers. As a faculty member, I was more educated than most, more successful than most, paid better than most, and had more secure employment than most, and surrounded by others who were just like me. Was I a star? When I earned full professor and later got an endowed chair, I was still one of many. Was I a star then? As a Vice President, I find myself in exactly the same position. Am I a star now? I guess I think it’s all a matter of perspective, and at this point in my career I personally consider anyone who makes it through a PhD and goes on to an academic career to be a star. Few of us ever reach the height of glory that we perhaps imagined when we were younger, but that’s true of pretty much everyone everywhere and all of us have accomplished far more than most.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2179.0,"score_ratio":1.8636363636},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":578,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjly9h","c_root_id_B":"fzjhecw","created_at_utc_A":1595964861,"created_at_utc_B":1595962666,"score_A":24,"score_B":22,"human_ref_A":"Maybe I'm just a pessimist, but I honestly never thought I'd be one. My parents are PhDs that didn't get tenure, much less become stars. I'm just trying to hold on and find a career I enjoy (either within or outside academia).","human_ref_B":"I never expected to be a star, but about halfway through my PhD program is when I realized that I was making myself sick with how stressed I was about everything and I decided to just chill out. Plus, my advisors did nothing but put obstacles in my way of doing the research I actually wanted and so... that sort of out a damper on my plans, too.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":2195.0,"score_ratio":1.0909090909},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":579,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjq36t","c_root_id_B":"fzk8d7y","created_at_utc_A":1595966830,"created_at_utc_B":1595975941,"score_A":17,"score_B":19,"human_ref_A":"I always find the \"academic star\" thing odd. Compare to \"stars\" in other areas - pop music, films - and they are usually fashionable but often critically panned. Those we see as \"academic stars\" are usually a combination of privilege, nepotism, marketing, work-life balance sacrifice, as well as research excellence.","human_ref_B":"I was a superstar in high school and I was pretty solid in undergrad. I was the guy people went to for help. I had a lot of false modesty but my identity was pretty tied up in being smart. When I started graduate school, I went to lab meeting and heard the advanced grad students discussing really complex topics. I didn’t understand, and they would propose insightful ideas and I’d have no idea what was going on. And I said to myself, “This is imposter syndrome. As you gain experience you’ll understand.” Weeks turned into months, and then years. I read a lot. I listened a lot. And when someone was talking at lab meeting, other students - including those who came along after me - would ask questions that would go over my head. Inside my mind there was just this profound silence. No ideas. No insights. At best, a rudimentary understanding of the topic; enough for me to parrot back if quizzed, but nothing original. No new perspective. And it just... never came. I had risen high enough that I was now the dumbest guy in the room. Didn’t have the horsepower to do the job. So I had to learn other ways to think about my worth. Probably the best thing that could have happened to me, in retrospect.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":9111.0,"score_ratio":1.1176470588},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":580,"row":{"post_id":"hzi3x1","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.99,"history":"For us average people in academia: When in your academic career did you realize that you weren't going to be a star and what prompted it? Now, if you are a star in your field or are on track to be one, congratulations! But this question isn't for you. I've spent my entire academic career at \"highly-ranked\" R1s, which means that I'm around a lot of people from undergrad students through early professors who have the expectation that they're going to be the stars of their field, and the environment promotes that. This is especially true at the university where I am currently. Most people, even from big-name R1s, do not end up being stars in their field. That's not a bad thing at all and is not even necessarily their fault - it's largely the nature of how reputations in academia are developed. I've also noticed that some are able to adjust to that change in expectation of themselves very easily, while others have a really hard time letting that go. I'm just curious for all of us non-stars, when in your career did you start to recognize that you weren't going to be a star in your field? What prompted you to realize that and what did you do to adjust your frame of mind to be content with it? I'm just interested in what others' experiences are and am not looking for advice or anything - I'm well past the point of being okay with not being on a path to be a big name in my field and am content with where I am (as long as I don't run out of funding!).","c_root_id_A":"fzjx7wx","c_root_id_B":"fzk8d7y","created_at_utc_A":1595970286,"created_at_utc_B":1595975941,"score_A":16,"score_B":19,"human_ref_A":"My (at the time) wife and I were each getting double PhDs. She had extreme health issues that nearly killed her and that(plus other factors) took its toll on our relationship. I took care of her while working non-stop. I racked up 5-6 publications, 30+ awards, multiple grants, and realized I was terribly unhappy and no one - neither advisors, nor my family cared. My partner resented my successes. I’m first generation. While doing fieldwork in a major US city, I realized I cared about teaching more than publishing articles that virtually no one would read and would thus have no impact on daily life and culture. Teaching seemed more important. My now ex-wife loved and desired academic acclaim more than me (which is fine, just not what I wanted). After 7 years of wasted life and suicidal moments, I divorced her and dedicated myself to teaching, media content production, digital/creative pedagogy (particularly helpful in the middle of COVID), and just being a person. I’m much happier now. I’m a TT assistant professor, in a good relationship of which I’m proud, and I am steadily covering my body in tattoos.","human_ref_B":"I was a superstar in high school and I was pretty solid in undergrad. I was the guy people went to for help. I had a lot of false modesty but my identity was pretty tied up in being smart. When I started graduate school, I went to lab meeting and heard the advanced grad students discussing really complex topics. I didn’t understand, and they would propose insightful ideas and I’d have no idea what was going on. And I said to myself, “This is imposter syndrome. As you gain experience you’ll understand.” Weeks turned into months, and then years. I read a lot. I listened a lot. And when someone was talking at lab meeting, other students - including those who came along after me - would ask questions that would go over my head. Inside my mind there was just this profound silence. No ideas. No insights. At best, a rudimentary understanding of the topic; enough for me to parrot back if quizzed, but nothing original. No new perspective. And it just... never came. I had risen high enough that I was now the dumbest guy in the room. Didn’t have the horsepower to do the job. So I had to learn other ways to think about my worth. Probably the best thing that could have happened to me, in retrospect.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":5655.0,"score_ratio":1.1875},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":581,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih69eg3","c_root_id_B":"ih693a7","created_at_utc_A":1658487360,"created_at_utc_B":1658487149,"score_A":250,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"If there was a chance you'd fail, your supervisor wouldn't allow you to defend","human_ref_B":"good luck!!!!! please have hope and remember that failing is part of our journey. do your best as there’s nothing else that could be done today. you never know how things might turn out as you’re just nervous..","labels":1,"seconds_difference":211.0,"score_ratio":62.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":582,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih69eg3","c_root_id_B":"ih698b0","created_at_utc_A":1658487360,"created_at_utc_B":1658487245,"score_A":250,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"If there was a chance you'd fail, your supervisor wouldn't allow you to defend","human_ref_B":"All the best","labels":1,"seconds_difference":115.0,"score_ratio":125.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":583,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6aae4","c_root_id_B":"ih6aji3","created_at_utc_A":1658487951,"created_at_utc_B":1658488119,"score_A":44,"score_B":58,"human_ref_A":"i don't know if it helps, but we all felt that way before the defense: i knw i did, and it went great. Best of luck to you. edit: i don't know the american system very well, i'm french and teach in france, but there are no reason to fail you if your supervisor has allowed you to defend: this would be seen as a direct attack on them, and a default to the rules of collegiality. If they had confidence in you, confident enough they would their name on your work, it means your thesis is not the failure you think it is.","human_ref_B":"Please check back in this thread and tell us how it went. Good luck!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":168.0,"score_ratio":1.3181818182},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":584,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6aji3","c_root_id_B":"ih693a7","created_at_utc_A":1658488119,"created_at_utc_B":1658487149,"score_A":58,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Please check back in this thread and tell us how it went. Good luck!","human_ref_B":"good luck!!!!! please have hope and remember that failing is part of our journey. do your best as there’s nothing else that could be done today. you never know how things might turn out as you’re just nervous..","labels":1,"seconds_difference":970.0,"score_ratio":14.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":585,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih698b0","c_root_id_B":"ih6aji3","created_at_utc_A":1658487245,"created_at_utc_B":1658488119,"score_A":2,"score_B":58,"human_ref_A":"All the best","human_ref_B":"Please check back in this thread and tell us how it went. Good luck!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":874.0,"score_ratio":29.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":586,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6aae4","c_root_id_B":"ih693a7","created_at_utc_A":1658487951,"created_at_utc_B":1658487149,"score_A":44,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"i don't know if it helps, but we all felt that way before the defense: i knw i did, and it went great. Best of luck to you. edit: i don't know the american system very well, i'm french and teach in france, but there are no reason to fail you if your supervisor has allowed you to defend: this would be seen as a direct attack on them, and a default to the rules of collegiality. If they had confidence in you, confident enough they would their name on your work, it means your thesis is not the failure you think it is.","human_ref_B":"good luck!!!!! please have hope and remember that failing is part of our journey. do your best as there’s nothing else that could be done today. you never know how things might turn out as you’re just nervous..","labels":1,"seconds_difference":802.0,"score_ratio":11.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":587,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6aae4","c_root_id_B":"ih698b0","created_at_utc_A":1658487951,"created_at_utc_B":1658487245,"score_A":44,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"i don't know if it helps, but we all felt that way before the defense: i knw i did, and it went great. Best of luck to you. edit: i don't know the american system very well, i'm french and teach in france, but there are no reason to fail you if your supervisor has allowed you to defend: this would be seen as a direct attack on them, and a default to the rules of collegiality. If they had confidence in you, confident enough they would their name on your work, it means your thesis is not the failure you think it is.","human_ref_B":"All the best","labels":1,"seconds_difference":706.0,"score_ratio":22.0},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":588,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6enu8","c_root_id_B":"ih693a7","created_at_utc_A":1658490659,"created_at_utc_B":1658487149,"score_A":33,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"Hey OP give us an update, are you not just of of these people who always think they will fail their exams and have a big impostor syndrom? In many countries and US as well I guess if the manuscript is accepted for the defense there is no way to fail. You basically have your PhD already, you just need to show that you know what i inside and why it's done this way. If you were not ready for that and the manuscript was not good enough it would not be accepted for defense.","human_ref_B":"good luck!!!!! please have hope and remember that failing is part of our journey. do your best as there’s nothing else that could be done today. you never know how things might turn out as you’re just nervous..","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3510.0,"score_ratio":8.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":589,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6enu8","c_root_id_B":"ih698b0","created_at_utc_A":1658490659,"created_at_utc_B":1658487245,"score_A":33,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"Hey OP give us an update, are you not just of of these people who always think they will fail their exams and have a big impostor syndrom? In many countries and US as well I guess if the manuscript is accepted for the defense there is no way to fail. You basically have your PhD already, you just need to show that you know what i inside and why it's done this way. If you were not ready for that and the manuscript was not good enough it would not be accepted for defense.","human_ref_B":"All the best","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3414.0,"score_ratio":16.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":590,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6blf1","c_root_id_B":"ih6enu8","created_at_utc_A":1658488799,"created_at_utc_B":1658490659,"score_A":2,"score_B":33,"human_ref_A":"You'll be highly valued in many industries beyond your current subject. Good luck with the defense and I hope it's a relief to have it finished.","human_ref_B":"Hey OP give us an update, are you not just of of these people who always think they will fail their exams and have a big impostor syndrom? In many countries and US as well I guess if the manuscript is accepted for the defense there is no way to fail. You basically have your PhD already, you just need to show that you know what i inside and why it's done this way. If you were not ready for that and the manuscript was not good enough it would not be accepted for defense.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":1860.0,"score_ratio":16.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":591,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6f2fr","c_root_id_B":"ih693a7","created_at_utc_A":1658490891,"created_at_utc_B":1658487149,"score_A":15,"score_B":4,"human_ref_A":"OP: if what you’re saying about your work were true, they wouldn’t have allowed you to get to the defence stage. That’s what the whole process is there for.","human_ref_B":"good luck!!!!! please have hope and remember that failing is part of our journey. do your best as there’s nothing else that could be done today. you never know how things might turn out as you’re just nervous..","labels":1,"seconds_difference":3742.0,"score_ratio":3.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":592,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih698b0","c_root_id_B":"ih6f2fr","created_at_utc_A":1658487245,"created_at_utc_B":1658490891,"score_A":2,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"All the best","human_ref_B":"OP: if what you’re saying about your work were true, they wouldn’t have allowed you to get to the defence stage. That’s what the whole process is there for.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":3646.0,"score_ratio":7.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":593,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6blf1","c_root_id_B":"ih6f2fr","created_at_utc_A":1658488799,"created_at_utc_B":1658490891,"score_A":2,"score_B":15,"human_ref_A":"You'll be highly valued in many industries beyond your current subject. Good luck with the defense and I hope it's a relief to have it finished.","human_ref_B":"OP: if what you’re saying about your work were true, they wouldn’t have allowed you to get to the defence stage. That’s what the whole process is there for.","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2092.0,"score_ratio":7.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":594,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih693a7","c_root_id_B":"ih6ghvx","created_at_utc_A":1658487149,"created_at_utc_B":1658491700,"score_A":4,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"good luck!!!!! please have hope and remember that failing is part of our journey. do your best as there’s nothing else that could be done today. you never know how things might turn out as you’re just nervous..","human_ref_B":"i hated my data…. and all turned out okay. gosh…been there done that during my ABD time…. you are an expert of your data…. of what your have. don’t sell yourself short HOPE for a pass with revisions…. even if extensive…. you’d have passed…. yes good luck and if willing, update us!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":4551.0,"score_ratio":2.75},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":595,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6ghvx","c_root_id_B":"ih698b0","created_at_utc_A":1658491700,"created_at_utc_B":1658487245,"score_A":11,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"i hated my data…. and all turned out okay. gosh…been there done that during my ABD time…. you are an expert of your data…. of what your have. don’t sell yourself short HOPE for a pass with revisions…. even if extensive…. you’d have passed…. yes good luck and if willing, update us!","human_ref_B":"All the best","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4455.0,"score_ratio":5.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":596,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6blf1","c_root_id_B":"ih6ghvx","created_at_utc_A":1658488799,"created_at_utc_B":1658491700,"score_A":2,"score_B":11,"human_ref_A":"You'll be highly valued in many industries beyond your current subject. Good luck with the defense and I hope it's a relief to have it finished.","human_ref_B":"i hated my data…. and all turned out okay. gosh…been there done that during my ABD time…. you are an expert of your data…. of what your have. don’t sell yourself short HOPE for a pass with revisions…. even if extensive…. you’d have passed…. yes good luck and if willing, update us!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":2901.0,"score_ratio":5.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":597,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih693a7","c_root_id_B":"ih6jwjn","created_at_utc_A":1658487149,"created_at_utc_B":1658493486,"score_A":4,"score_B":9,"human_ref_A":"good luck!!!!! please have hope and remember that failing is part of our journey. do your best as there’s nothing else that could be done today. you never know how things might turn out as you’re just nervous..","human_ref_B":"That’s just the imposter syndrome talking. Make sure that you get a good night’s sleep before your defense. I like the idea that you are thinking that push comes to shove, you will go back to your country. That removes some of the nervousness. But I’m sure you will pass, if your guide has allowed you to defend. Good luck and see you on the other side!","labels":0,"seconds_difference":6337.0,"score_ratio":2.25},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":598,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6jwjn","c_root_id_B":"ih698b0","created_at_utc_A":1658493486,"created_at_utc_B":1658487245,"score_A":9,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"That’s just the imposter syndrome talking. Make sure that you get a good night’s sleep before your defense. I like the idea that you are thinking that push comes to shove, you will go back to your country. That removes some of the nervousness. But I’m sure you will pass, if your guide has allowed you to defend. Good luck and see you on the other side!","human_ref_B":"All the best","labels":1,"seconds_difference":6241.0,"score_ratio":4.5},"truncated_cells":[]},{"row_idx":599,"row":{"post_id":"w57eop","domain":"askacademia_train","upvote_ratio":0.97,"history":"PhD defense in a few hours Just getting this off my chest. I'll defend in a few hours and genuinely think there is a big probability that I will fail. My thesis is an embarrassment to myself, my PI, and the field. Data is limited, analysis is very simple, conclusions are unclear. I could train a master student and the whole data collection could be completed in 2 months. The analysis approach is like the ones done in the 70s or 80s, product of a bygone era. I don't belong on the modern, cutting edge area of science. I have made peace (slightly) that it's ok if I fail. I will go back to my home country this weekend (will be expensive but I don't care anymore), leave science forever (imagine wanting to understand the brain lol, what a nerd), and start my life anew. I just don't want my family and closest friends see me differently if I fail.","c_root_id_A":"ih6jwjn","c_root_id_B":"ih6blf1","created_at_utc_A":1658493486,"created_at_utc_B":1658488799,"score_A":9,"score_B":2,"human_ref_A":"That’s just the imposter syndrome talking. Make sure that you get a good night’s sleep before your defense. I like the idea that you are thinking that push comes to shove, you will go back to your country. That removes some of the nervousness. But I’m sure you will pass, if your guide has allowed you to defend. Good luck and see you on the other side!","human_ref_B":"You'll be highly valued in many industries beyond your current subject. Good luck with the defense and I hope it's a relief to have it finished.","labels":1,"seconds_difference":4687.0,"score_ratio":4.5},"truncated_cells":[]}],"num_rows_total":348718,"num_rows_per_page":100,"partial":false} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/source_archive_v1.tar b/source_archive_v1.tar new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6abffd02d53a0dc6f89a912e0b87fdef8ca542df --- /dev/null +++ b/source_archive_v1.tar @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:43d8384c31b601422addeba43f148391e8cf39f756a28a72fb9c4ec316b48ec4 +size 286959 diff --git a/source_paper_v1.pdf b/source_paper_v1.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2483f5c3360db6479ede46a4b72c88925ec5cf94 --- /dev/null +++ b/source_paper_v1.pdf @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ce6faba012d2e862d59aa6d5a05fccf6f004e331d4769ae95607ec63483904c5 +size 969703