# Limitations

An honest, exhaustive catalogue of everything SatQuery AI does **not** do, does poorly, or does not
know. Negative results and open items are listed here rather than omitted, because a limitation that
is not written down is a limitation that will be discovered by someone else at the worst moment.

**Status tags:** `OPEN` · `NOT RUN` · `REJECTED` · `DEFERRED` · `BY DESIGN`.

---

## 1. Model quality

| # | Limitation | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | **Grounding IoU is low in absolute terms** | mean best IoU **0.2838** (canonical) / **0.2566** (matched6). The trained head clearly beats the zero-shot baseline (0.0972), but 0.28 is not "solved". |
| 2 | **Grounding is protocol-sensitive** | two protocols × two decode variants give very different numbers: head_threshold 0.2838, head_argmax **0.1215**, zero-shot 0.0972. An absolute value is meaningless without its protocol. |
| 3 | **Optical-SAR accuracy is carried by common classes** | accuracy **0.931** but macro-F1 **0.434161**. 5 of 19 classes are absent in the scored split and contribute 0.0 to macro-F1 by construction. Never quote accuracy alone. |
| 4 | **Change-VQA is weak on rare classes** | accuracy 0.697626 / macro-F1 0.378373 (test) and 0.651469 / 0.372309 (test2). The wide accuracy–macroF1 gap is the signature of class imbalance. |
| 5 | **VQA is weak-but-related** | the live VQA path answers broadly related content (e.g. "Grassland") rather than a crisp class. |
| 6 | **Optical-SAR returns a bare class index** | the live service returns `class_18`, not a human-readable CLC label. |
| 7 | **Calibration made things worse** | ECE **0.013755 → 0.014929** (`ece_improvement` −0.001174). Retained only because it is part of the frozen config — **not** because it helped. |
| 8 | **The VLM adapter is not accepted** | metrics usable (exact_match 0.963, F1 0.96432, +49.5 pp) but the artifact is **ACCEPTANCE-REJECTED**; the deployed caption/VQA path uses the **unadapted** model. |
| 9 | **The router number is not a test result** | 0.965116 is **validation**, **ungated**, **n = 86**, corpus-limited. The test split was **NOT RUN**. |
| 10 | **The router's routing is not perfect** | known residuals below (§2). |

## 2. Router residuals (known misroutes)

| # | Query | Behaviour | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | *"What is the new runway?"* | reads `change`, not `vqa` | the word "new" triggers a change reading |
| 12 | *"How much built-up area was added?"* | reads `vqa` (under-trigger) | a change-style quantifier the router does not catch |
| 13 | *"What changed between the earlier and later image?"* with **one** asset | console **reads** `change`, **dispatches** `change_vqa` | **intentional** — reading is asset-count-blind, dispatch is asset-count-aware — but visually surprising. Documented in [`architecture/04-router.md`](architecture/04-router.md). |

## 3. Evaluation gaps

| # | Gap | State |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | **No system-level end-to-end benchmark** | **NOT RUN — none exists.** No end-to-end accuracy is claimed anywhere. |
| 15 | **Router test split** | **NOT RUN** |
| 16 | **Benchmark adapters** | **NOT RUN** |
| 17 | **End-to-end latency benchmark** | **NOT RUN** (per-specialist latency is recorded only incidentally) |
| 18 | **Cross-dataset generalisation** | **NOT RUN** — each specialist is evaluated only on its own training-family split |
| 19 | **Human evaluation** | **NOT RUN** |
| 20 | **Robustness / adversarial evaluation** | **NOT RUN** |
| 21 | **BigEarthNet label semantics** | the local subset is **100 % single-label** vs the official 1–11 multi-label scheme, so its metrics are **not comparable** to published numbers |
| 22 | **Reliability diagram** | the shipped diagram is the **pre-scaling** curve (labelled as such); the calibrated curve is not plotted |
| 23 | **Statistical significance for most metrics** | only the grounding resolution decision (448 vs 224) has a paired test with a confidence interval. Other per-task numbers are point estimates. |

## 4. Operational limitations

| # | Limitation | State |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | **B-07: transient tunnel gaps** | a request can hang or return 504. Patch prepared, **NOT deployed**. **OPEN** |
| 25 | **B-07 root shape** | in `auto` mode a tunnel timeout falls through to the forward path, burning `wake_timeout_s` (120 s) on a `302`; worst case ≈ **249 s** (150 + 120). Measured. |
| 26 | **Cold start is tens of seconds** | Render free tier sleeps; the Codespace may be stopped. Documented, not hidden. |
| 27 | **B-02: `codespace_name` trailing newline** | cosmetic; the wake path strips it. **OPEN (cosmetic)** |
| 28 | **No database, auth, or queue** | stateless gateway **by design** — no persistence of runs or users. |
| 29 | **Deployment repos are private** | their links 404 for an outside audience. **BY DESIGN** |
| 30 | **`deploy/` in the monorepo is stale/untracked** | not the deployed source. Trap. |
| 31 | **No APM, distributed tracing, or cost accounting** | observability is limited to the health payload and per-run traces. |
| 32 | **Single-region, no HA** | one Render service, one Codespace. |

## 5. Packaging and licensing

| # | Limitation | State |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | **No `LICENSE` file** | none exists in the source repository. **OPEN** — a licence must be selected before public release of the code. |
| 34 | **Backbones are not redistributed** | fetched from the Hub at run time; their licences are their own. |
| 35 | **Artifact bloat** | `artifacts/` is ~3.7 GB, mostly reproducible caches, a duplicate 774 MB ZIP, a duplicate 241 MB probe, two 231 MB feature caches, a superseded 276 MB head, and ~235 MB of selection manifests — not released weights. |
| 36 | **The released weights require their backbones** | the six artifacts are small modules; a consumer must also fetch the pinned backbones. |

## 6. Documentation caveats

| # | Caveat | State |
|---|---|---|
| 37 | **`docs/FINAL_DELIVERY_REPORT.md` §6 is stale** | it still lists the bundled EO change pair as DEGRADED and B-01 as BLOCKED; both were resolved on 2026-09-25. |
| 38 | **The monorepo `README.md` was materially stale** | it described a hermetic frontend, an in-progress Render/Codespace, and a `/v1/*` contract. Superseded by this release's README. |
| 39 | **`hf/` docs were stale** | they asserted the project owns no weights and has no HF credentials. Both were false at release time. |
| 40 | **Anatomy plate image variant** | points at the 720×720 variant of an image the recorded run analysed at 730×730. Cosmetic. |
| 41 | **The original master plan describes a superseded deployment** | it specifies a Gradio GUI + HF Space + ZeroGPU + Railway. The shipped system is a static frontend + Render + Codespace tunnel, serving JSON. |

## 7. Explicit non-claims

These are things a reader might reasonably assume, which this project does **not** claim:

- **No claim of state-of-the-art performance** on any benchmark.
- **No claim of production readiness for model quality.** The deployment runs; the models carry the
  limitations above.
- **No claim that the trained heads generalise** beyond their training-family test splits.
- **No claim that calibration improves confidence** — it made ECE worse.
- **No claim that the VLM adapter is accepted** for production use.
- **No claim of an end-to-end accuracy number** — none exists.
- **No claim that the router is correct on all phrasings** — residuals exist.
- **No claim of robustness** to adversarial, corrupted, or out-of-distribution inputs.
- **No claim of geolocation accuracy** — grounding boxes are image-relative, not geodetic.
- **No claim that the system is a safety-, legal-, or life-critical tool.**

## 8. Where the evidence lives

| Topic | Evidence |
|---|---|
| All measured metrics | `artifacts/**/*.json`, verified by `release/tools/verify_readme_metrics.py` |
| Metric honesty rules | [`BENCHMARKS.md`](BENCHMARKS.md), [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) |
| The grounding resolution rejection | `docs/PHASE7_RESOLUTION_DECISION.md` |
| The VLM rejection | `artifacts/vlm/phase6_closure.json` (`why_acceptance_rejected`) |
| B-07 / B-02 | [`DEPLOYMENT.md`](DEPLOYMENT.md) §8.1, §5 |
| Router residuals | [`architecture/04-router.md`](architecture/04-router.md) |
| Environment traps | [`REPRODUCIBILITY.md`](REPRODUCIBILITY.md) |