alexrs commited on
Commit
7660c59
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): b10c771

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +7 -5
README.md CHANGED
@@ -33,11 +33,13 @@ You can try out North Mini Code before downloading the weights in OpenCode and o
33
 
34
  ![image1](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/62668f725fb8d521d94d8451/4wH5d_YAaW0lZG65bC8g5.png)
35
 
36
- - We used SWE-Bench Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench v2, and Terminal-Bench Hard to benchmark North Mini Code’s agentic coding capabilities.
37
- - For evaluation harnesses, we used the Swe-Agent harness v1.1.0 for SWE-Bench, and a simple ReAct harness employing a single terminal-use tool based on Harbor’s Tmux session implementation for Terminal-Bench v2. For Terminal Bench Hard, we directly used Terminus-2, following the same methodology as the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index to compare North-Mini-Code-1.0 with the other models.
38
- - Additionally, we used SciCode and LiveCodeBench v6 as complex code-generation benchmarks outside of tool use. We run each benchmark with 3 different seeds and report the average benchmark performance, using temperature=1.0 and top\_p=0.95.
39
- - We used publicly reported scores for competitor models, either from original reports or the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, where available. Additionally, Gemma4’s scores for agentic coding tasks were reported by [Qwen team](https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-35b-a3b).
40
- - For benchmark results that any public report is missing, denoted by (\*) in the figure, we run them internally using the recommended model configuration.
 
 
41
 
42
  **Usage**
43
 
 
33
 
34
  ![image1](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/62668f725fb8d521d94d8451/4wH5d_YAaW0lZG65bC8g5.png)
35
 
36
+
37
+ <details>
38
+ <summary><span style="font-size: 80%;"><b>Benchmarking Methodology [CLICK TO EXPAND]</span></b></summary>
39
+
40
+ - <span style="font-size: 80%;">We used SWE-Bench Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench v2, and Terminal-Bench Hard to benchmark North Mini Code's agentic coding capabilities. For evaluation harnesses, we used the Swe-Agent harness v1.1.0 for SWE-Bench, and a simple ReAct harness employing a single terminal-use tool based on Harbor's Tmux session implementation for Terminal-Bench v2. For Terminal Bench Hard, we directly used Terminus-2, following the same methodology as the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index to compare North-Mini-Code-1.0 with the other models. Additionally, we used SciCode and LiveCodeBench v6 as complex code-generation benchmarks outside of tool use.</span>
41
+ - <span style="font-size: 80%;">We run each benchmark with 3 different seeds and report the average benchmark performance, using temperature=1.0 and top\_p=0.95. We used publicly reported scores for competitor models, either from original reports or the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, where available. Additionally, Gemma4’s scores for agentic coding tasks were reported by [Qwen team](https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-35b-a3b). For benchmark results that any public report is missing, denoted by (\*) in the figure, we run them internally using the recommended model configuration.</span>
42
+ </details>
43
 
44
  **Usage**
45