Fix: quote verbatim samples from the shipped eval, correct over-optimistic framing
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -58,34 +58,40 @@ Standard LLaMA block layout: `RMSNorm -> Attention(q/k/v/o) -> residual`,
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
- **Validation loss:** 3.8775 (final checkpoint, step 20000)
|
| 60 |
- **Validation perplexity:** 48.30 (over held-out fineweb-edu text)
|
| 61 |
-
- **Degeneracy check:** 0 / 15 samples flagged
|
| 62 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
Representative samples (temperature 0.8, top-k 40, **verbatim from the shipped
|
| 65 |
-
`model.safetensors`**):
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
-
> "The cat sat on the
|
| 68 |
-
>
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-
> "The sun rises in the air
|
| 71 |
-
>
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
-
> "Once upon a time
|
| 74 |
-
>
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
These are representative of the model's actual output: grammatically
|
| 77 |
-
structured, on-topic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
## What it is good at / not good at
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
- **Good at:** producing grammatically structured, on-topic English at the
|
| 82 |
sentence level. It knows common word order, function words, and some
|
| 83 |
world-fact associations.
|
| 84 |
-
- **Not good at:** sustained coherence
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
assistant.
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
## Files
|
| 91 |
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
- **Validation loss:** 3.8775 (final checkpoint, step 20000)
|
| 60 |
- **Validation perplexity:** 48.30 (over held-out fineweb-edu text)
|
| 61 |
+
- **Degeneracy check:** 0 / 15 samples flagged by the repeated-3-gram loop
|
| 62 |
+
detector (a single 3-gram covering >60% of the 40-word tail). Note this
|
| 63 |
+
detector only catches exact token-loops; it does **not** catch the more
|
| 64 |
+
common failure mode below — *word-echoing* (repeating a content word across
|
| 65 |
+
a sentence), which the samples show clearly.
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
Representative samples (temperature 0.8, top-k 40, **verbatim from the shipped
|
| 68 |
+
`model.safetensors`**, from `eval_shipped.json`):
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
> "The cat sat on the center of the church in the center of the church. The
|
| 71 |
+
> catalog is the same as the Bishop of the church, which includes the church."
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+
> "The sun rises in the air and is marked by the bubbles of the Earth. The sun
|
| 74 |
+
> is called the sun; the sun rises in the sky, or the sun rises in the sun."
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
> "Once upon a time, the church was given in the church, and the church became
|
| 77 |
+
> the church of the Church. Apart from the church, the church was given and the
|
| 78 |
+
> church was built."
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
These are representative of the model's actual output: it produces grammatically
|
| 81 |
+
structured, on-topic-at-the-sentence-level English, but it **echoes content
|
| 82 |
+
words** ("the church", "the sun") and is semantically loose. At this scale it
|
| 83 |
+
captures surface grammar and high-frequency associations, not stable semantics.
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
## What it is good at / not good at
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
- **Good at:** producing grammatically structured, on-topic English at the
|
| 88 |
sentence level. It knows common word order, function words, and some
|
| 89 |
world-fact associations.
|
| 90 |
+
- **Not good at:** sustained coherence, factual accuracy, or general reasoning.
|
| 91 |
+
At ~6M parameters and ~100M tokens the model captures surface grammar and
|
| 92 |
+
high-frequency associations but not stable semantics. It tends to repeat
|
| 93 |
+
content words within a sentence, and longer generations drift. Treat it as a
|
| 94 |
+
grammar/scale study, not a useful assistant.
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
## Files
|
| 97 |
|