CountingSheep commited on
Commit
8b98b2a
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 0dcd077

Card: replace the trust section with Limitations

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +7 -6
README.md CHANGED
@@ -101,14 +101,15 @@ Accuracy on human-labelled data, by the kind of question:
101
  | General questions about a photo | MMBench-EN / POPE / MMStar | 0.881 / 0.889 / 0.627 |
102
  | Bugs in game screenshots | glitch / object clipping (VideoGameQA-Bench) | 0.613 / 0.671 |
103
 
104
- The text rows are public benchmarks; the image rows are judgment sets converted from labelled public data. Check it
105
- on a labelled sample of your own questions before relying on it. Significance tests and the comparison with the
106
- base model are in the [GitHub README](https://github.com/Xiaooolong/vev#detailed-results).
 
 
 
107
 
108
- ## How far to trust it
109
 
110
- - Jev is more accurate on nimble (by 22 points), JevBench (10) and kev transfer-v4 (8); they tie on judgekit. The
111
- one significant regression from fine-tuning is POPE (0.5 points lower than Qwen3.5-4B).
112
  - The probabilities rank answers well but are not exact frequencies: expected calibration error is 0.02–0.11
113
  depending on the task. Choose any threshold on your own labelled data.
114
  - Reversing the order of the options changes the top answer on 17% of JevBench and kev transfer-v4 questions (Jev:
 
101
  | General questions about a photo | MMBench-EN / POPE / MMStar | 0.881 / 0.889 / 0.627 |
102
  | Bugs in game screenshots | glitch / object clipping (VideoGameQA-Bench) | 0.613 / 0.671 |
103
 
104
+ The text rows are public benchmarks; the image rows are judgment sets converted from labelled public data. Jev is
105
+ more accurate on nimble (by 22 points), JevBench (10) and kev transfer-v4 (8); they tie on judgekit. Jev's API
106
+ takes text only, so the image rows have no Jev comparison. The one significant regression from fine-tuning is POPE
107
+ (0.5 points lower than Qwen3.5-4B). Check Vev on a labelled sample of your own questions before relying on it.
108
+ Significance tests and the comparison with the base model are in the [GitHub
109
+ README](https://github.com/Xiaooolong/vev#detailed-results).
110
 
111
+ ## Limitations
112
 
 
 
113
  - The probabilities rank answers well but are not exact frequencies: expected calibration error is 0.02–0.11
114
  depending on the task. Choose any threshold on your own labelled data.
115
  - Reversing the order of the options changes the top answer on 17% of JevBench and kev transfer-v4 questions (Jev: