Quazim0t0 commited on
Commit
346b731
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 07789b3

Rewrite model card in first person; ASCII hyphens only; keep all facts

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +322 -322
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,322 +1,322 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: mit
3
- tags:
4
- - distributed-training
5
- - old-hardware
6
- - int8
7
- - webgpu
8
- - webrtc
9
- ---
10
-
11
- # DaisyChain-Train - old hardware training pipeline
12
-
13
- Part of DaisyChain on Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI
14
-
15
- Model page (weights + card): https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI/DaisyChain-Train
16
-
17
- I built this so spare / old machines can train a shared model. The training runs through emulated GPU logic: verified INT8 units (GUDA-style) that stand in for a GPU's math. Machines without a modern GPU still do the work. Chain several together and they train one model as a cluster.
18
-
19
- Before you rely on it, read what it cannot do: [Limitations](docs/LIMITS.md).
20
-
21
- Use the hardware you already have. Each machine runs the emulated GPU logic (verified INT8 units: multiply / requantize / ReLU). DaisyChain pools the machines data-parallel: device selection, capacity-weighted sharding, gradient sync, a P2P setup, and a live dashboard. Two ways to run: **Docker** or **Python**.
22
-
23
- ## Read this first
24
-
25
- DaisyChain-Train is for **small models on spare hardware**. It **pools compute, not memory** (the model must fit on one machine). Scaling is **sublinear**. It is **not** a substitute for a real GPU on large models. Full envelope: **[docs/LIMITS.md](docs/LIMITS.md)**. Read that before you depend on it.
26
-
27
- ## Feature list
28
-
29
- ### Python cluster trainer (`daisychain/`)
30
-
31
- - **Data-parallel training across mixed machines.** Each node trains its own shard. Gradients combine into the exact full-batch gradient. Replicas stay bit-identical.
32
- - **Capacity-weighted sharding.** Faster machines automatically take a bigger share of the batch.
33
- - **Emulated GPU compute (verified INT8 units).** `VerifiedLinear` layers run every forward multiply / requantize / ReLU through the bundled trained units. Rank 0 prints cluster-wide unit-invocation counts.
34
- - **Bring your own model.** Any `Task` (`build_model` / `sample` / `loss`) via `DAISY_TASK`. Template in `examples/my_task_template.py`.
35
- - **Plain-float alternative task.** Same cluster and pooling with ordinary float math.
36
- - **Live dashboard** (`daisychain-dashboard`). Readiness banner, P2P connectivity scan, pooled cores/RAM, per-node capacity plan, live loss.
37
- - **SpikeWhale control panel** (`spikewhale_panel`, `localhost:8899`). Sliders for model size / training settings, any HF dataset you can access (default streamed FineWeb-Edu), start/stop/re-adjust, live loss.
38
- - **Docker demo cluster.** 3 nodes + dashboard in one command.
39
- - **Windows helper** (`scripts\setup.bat`) and Tailscale mesh guide.
40
-
41
- ### DaisyChain-Web (`web/`) - browser P2P training
42
-
43
- - **Zero-install nodes.** Opening the page IS joining. Devices on one network auto-group (Snapdrop-style, by public IP).
44
- - **Private cross-network rooms.** `?room=CODE` with **host approval** for every join.
45
- - **Full WebRTC mesh.** Gradients travel peer-to-peer. The server only signals and serves static files. It never sees weights or gradients.
46
- - **Leader-follower runs.** Whoever presses Start sets width / sequence / batch-per-device / steps / learning rate for the whole group. Config is broadcast on the wire.
47
- - **Mid-run join.** Late devices are synced in (weights + step) and contribute from the next step.
48
- - **Bit-identical replicas.** Same seeded init, strict roster-order gradient averaging, deterministic Adam with identical state on every peer. Verified live by per-step weight hashes.
49
- - **Sync guard.** Any weight-hash mismatch stops the run instead of training past a fork. The step roster forbids silent partial averages.
50
- - **Gradient repair.** A follower missing a roster gradient re-requests it from the leader (8 steps retained), bit-exact, and the run continues.
51
- - **Cross-device kernel probe.** Every step, every device re-hashes a fixed seeded int8 GEMM through its live kernel. Catches broken arithmetic that weight hashes cannot see.
52
- - **Hardcoded FineWeb-Edu streaming.** The server reads random slices of the 10BT parquet shards straight off the HF CDN via HTTP range requests (pure-JS `hyparquet`). Built-in corpus fallback offline.
53
- - **Checkpoints.** Download `.pt`. Upload -> **broadcast to the whole group**. Validated (magic, dims, tokenizer vocab) before accepting.
54
- - **Inference kit.** One self-contained HTML file with the trained weights baked in. Generations offline, anywhere.
55
- - **In-page generation.** Prompt box on the trained model.
56
- - **Old-hardware tier.** No WebGPU? The identical units run on CPU (same bits, so CPU and GPU devices co-train in one group). There is no plain-float path.
57
- - **Large-message fragmentation.** Multi-MB gradients/checkpoints chunked at 48 KB over the data channels.
58
-
59
- ### Verified compute and kernels (web)
60
-
61
- - **Verified INT8 units everywhere.** Block-scaled int8 GEMM: exact LUT products, exact int32 accumulation, bit-exact f32 epilogue with a pinned rounding schedule. Scales derived in JS f64 (division never runs on GPU).
62
- - **Backends, best-first.** DP4A hardware int8 dot -> LUT compute shader -> CPU mirror. Every kernel is **exact-gated at init** (bit-level compares) and demoted to the mirror on any mismatch.
63
- - **Continuous random-cell audit** at live training shapes.
64
- - **Fused attention kernels.** Gather/scatter head-strided q·kᵀ and a·v straight from BT×C layout (CUTLASS ex. 36/52 style).
65
- - **QKV dual-GEMM fusion.** Shared left operand quantized once, one batch-3 dispatch (ex. 45). Bit-identical.
66
- - **B2B MLP chain.** Both MLP GEMMs back-to-back on GPU with fused per-row absmax reduction and on-device quantize (ex. 13 + 23). WGSL-exact respec with a fround-stepped JS mirror. FMA-contraction-immune by construction.
67
- - **Dispatch-optimized backward.** Overlapped independent GEMMs, batch-3 sibling fusions (ex. 05/24). Bit-identical gradients. Optional int8 STE backward path (dormant, 1.21x vs float).
68
-
69
- ### Verification stack (web)
70
-
71
- - **Exact init gates** on every kernel, every device, every boot. Including gates that "gate the gate" with discriminating boundary inputs.
72
- - **IEEE-754 binary32 oracle** in exact BigInt arithmetic. Proves the JS epilogue mirror is spec-correct (rejects the old mirror on 34% of inputs).
73
- - **Metamorphic property suite.** Reference-free relations + definitional absolutes. **4/4** on an externally-authored bug corpus, matching the differential gate.
74
- - **RDNA2 ISA audit hardenings.** Bit-level (-0-aware) gate comparisons. Proof that FMA contraction cannot change the quantize.
75
- - **Twelve-suite test chain** (`cd web && npm test`): convergence, replicas, oracle, gates, properties, external corpus, **self-corpus** (the instruments scored against my own bugs), B2B, optimizer, transformer LM, int8 backward, non-finite quantize refusal. Results in [web/TEST_RESULTS.md](web/TEST_RESULTS.md).
76
- - **Dirty-buffer gate.** The pool is poisoned before a re-sweep so state bugs (a kernel assuming zeroed memory) are caught deterministically rather than by ordering luck.
77
-
78
- ### Documentation
79
-
80
- - Python: [QUICKSTART](docs/QUICKSTART.md), [LIMITS](docs/LIMITS.md), [CUSTOM_TASK](docs/CUSTOM_TASK.md), [TAILSCALE](docs/TAILSCALE.md).
81
- - Web: [Getting started](web/docs/GETTING_STARTED.md), [Architecture](web/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md), [Verification](web/docs/VERIFICATION.md), [Troubleshooting](web/docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md).
82
-
83
- ---
84
-
85
- ## Quick start
86
-
87
- ### Docker (most reliable - one command)
88
-
89
- ```bash
90
- docker compose -f docker/docker-compose.yml up --build
91
- # open http://localhost:8080
92
- ```
93
-
94
- Brings up a 3-node demo cluster + dashboard on one machine.
95
-
96
- ### Python (real machines)
97
-
98
- On every machine (`pip install -e .`):
99
-
100
- ```bash
101
- export MASTER_ADDR=100.101.102.10 # coordinator IP (Tailscale 100.x recommended)
102
- export MASTER_PORT=29560
103
- export WORLD_SIZE=3
104
- export RANK=0 # 1, 2, ... on the others
105
- export GLOO_SOCKET_IFNAME=tailscale0 # your mesh / LAN NIC
106
- daisychain-train
107
- ```
108
-
109
- ### Windows helper
110
-
111
- ```bat
112
- scripts\setup.bat
113
- ```
114
-
115
- An interactive menu: Docker, Python node, or just install deps.
116
-
117
- Full walkthrough: **[docs/QUICKSTART.md](docs/QUICKSTART.md)**.
118
-
119
- ### SpikeWhale control panel (sliders -> real training)
120
-
121
- ```bash
122
- python -m daisychain.spikewhale_panel
123
- # open http://localhost:8899
124
- ```
125
-
126
- A web control panel: pick model size / training settings with sliders, choose any Hugging Face dataset you have access to (default: streamed FineWeb-Edu), hit Start, and watch the live loss. Stop and re-adjust any time with **<- Back to settings**. Launches the real DaisyChain training underneath.
127
-
128
- ### DaisyChain-Web (train by opening a browser tab)
129
-
130
- ```bash
131
- cd web && npm install && node server.js
132
- # open http://localhost:8787 on every device
133
- ```
134
-
135
- Zero-install browser training. Devices on the same network auto-group (Snapdrop-style) and train a shared model **peer-to-peer over WebRTC**, computing through the same verified INT8 units (WebGPU, with the identical units on CPU for machines without it - there is no plain-float path). Private cross-network rooms via `?room=CODE` with **host approval**. The room creator accepts each device before it can join. Includes gradient averaging with a deterministic Adam optimizer (identical state on every peer, nothing extra over the wire), checkpoint **download** (`.pt`) and **upload -> broadcast** so one device can restore the whole group after a failure.
136
-
137
- **Live demo:** https://huggingface.co/spaces/Quazim0t0/DaisyChain-Web
138
-
139
- ### Recent updates (July 2026) - DaisyChain-Web
140
-
141
- **Verification stack.** The browser trainer's correctness is now checked by things that run, not argued. Full results: [web/TEST_RESULTS.md](web/TEST_RESULTS.md).
142
-
143
- - **IEEE-754 oracle** (`web/test_ieee.js`). A binary32 oracle built from the standard in exact BigInt arithmetic proves the JS epilogue mirror is spec-correct, and rejects the old round-once mirror on 34% of inputs.
144
- - **Metamorphic properties + oracle mutation scoring** (`test_metamorphic.js`, `test_corpus.js`). Properties needing no reference implementation, scored against an externally-authored bug taxonomy. **4/4**, matching the exact differential gate's 4/4. Relations own the loop bugs. Two definitional absolutes (ReLU output range, a unit-scale integer anchor) own the value bugs no relation can see.
145
- - **Exact kernel gates on every live kernel**, a continuous audit at live shapes, and a cross-device kernel probe (same seeded int8 GEMM, same hash on every honest device, any backend). The audit's sampling was rebuilt against a named bug class. Its old constants (6 cells, 2% of GEMMs) bounded an overhead that had never been measured (auditing *every* GEMM costs <0.01% of a step), and uniform random cells cannot see a last-row/column bug at a 16512-wide output. Sampling is now **stratified**: the first cells are the structural danger points, chosen deliberately. On a last-column bug, same cell budget: uniform caught **5/300** audits, stratified **300/300**, with zero false positives.
146
- - **RDNA2 ISA audit.** Reading a real GPU's shader ISA against our determinism assumptions confirmed three of them on silicon (exact packed int8 dot; correctly-rounded f32 add/mul; 1-ULP reciprocal - division stays off the GPU) and produced two hardenings. (1) Real ISAs have non-IEEE variants that **flush -0 to +0**. JS `!==` cannot see that (`-0 !== 0` is false), so all gates and audits now compare **bit patterns** - exactly what the replica hash sees. (2) FMA contraction of the quantize's `x·inv + 0.5` (one rounding instead of two) turned out to be **floor-invisible by construction** - proven in `test_b2b.js` with 175k+ last-ulp anomalies at binade edges, zero surviving `floor()`. Rounding mode and denorm flushing are runtime driver state on real hardware, which is why every device re-runs the exact gates at every init.
147
-
148
- **Training data.** FineWeb-Edu (10BT sample) is the hardcoded dataset. The Space reads random slices of the parquet shards straight off the HF CDN with range requests (pure-JS `hyparquet`, SNAPPY) and serves plain text at `/data`. No dependency on the datasets-server rows API and its 503s.
149
-
150
- **Resilience.** The sync guard now *repairs* instead of halting. A roster gradient that reached the leader but not some follower (asymmetric WebRTC mesh) is re-requested from the leader, bit-exact, and the run continues. The guard still stops anything that would fork the weights.
151
-
152
- **CUTLASS-style kernel work**, each step proven bit-identical or exact-gated:
153
-
154
- - **Dispatch-optimized backward** (ex. 05/24): independent GEMMs overlapped, sibling trios fused into batch-3 dispatches. Bit-identical gradients. Dormant int8-backward path down from 1.63x to 1.21x vs float.
155
- - **QKV dual-GEMM fusion** (ex. 45): q/k/v share one left operand. Quantized once, one batched dispatch, zero changed bits.
156
- - **B2B MLP chain** (ex. 13 + 23): both MLP GEMMs back-to-back on the GPU with a fused per-row absmax reduction. The intermediate is quantized on-device via a WGSL-exact respec (`floor(f32(x·invScale)+0.5)` - no GPU division) whose fround-stepped JS mirror keeps mixed GPU/CPU fleets bit-identical.
157
-
158
- **Profile-driven speed work.** Every change below is bit-identical (gradient and loss hashes unchanged), so none of it trades correctness for wall clock:
159
-
160
- - **Buffer pooling.** GPU buffers are recycled by size bucket instead of being created and destroyed per dispatch (~19 per MLP call, per layer, per step). **6-10% faster**, every hash unchanged.
161
- - **Shared-operand embedding GEMMs.** Profiling put two f32 backward GEMMs at **55% of the entire step**, and both consumed the same `dlogits` operand: ~17 MB at the 16512-token vocab, uploaded *twice*. One upload, one encoder, one submit: that pair went 205 -> 90 ms and the step **12% faster**. The fusion is gated bit-for-bit against the two calls it replaces.
162
- - **A negative result, kept on purpose.** The remaining hot kernel looked cache-hostile (adjacent lanes wrote 66 KB apart), but making the writes contiguous changed nothing. Two probes explain why: holding the output at 17 MB while cutting compute 32x barely moved the time. The logits GEMM is **transfer-bound, not compute-bound**, and the readback cannot be removed because softmax must stay in JS (WGSL's `exp` is not correctly rounded, and a per-vendor `exp` would fork replicas). The real lever there is the vocabulary, not the kernel.
163
- - **An init backend race was tried and removed.** It tied on the shipped path, cost ~430 ms of init, and made the backend vary between page loads, which silently invalidated three A/B comparisons before it was caught. A knob that changes what you are measuring is worse than a fixed choice.
164
-
165
- **Dirty-buffer gate - and the assumption it falsified.** Pooling introduced a bug class the gates predate: a pooled buffer is *not* zero-initialized, so a kernel that assumes zeros is right on step one and wrong on step two. That is a **state** bug, where no single call is wrong and the *sequence* is, which is the family no oracle can reach. The assumption was that the gates were blind to it. Mutation-testing the gate proved otherwise: deleting the zeroing made the plain gate fail at its *second* shape, because the sweep's own shapes recycle each other's buffers. The suite had **incidental** coverage nobody designed, which is coverage nobody can rely on. Shorten the shape list and it evaporates with the gate still green. It is now deliberate: the pool is poisoned with 1e4-magnitude residue before a re-sweep, so detection no longer depends on ordering luck. ~90 ms one-time.
166
-
167
- **Scoring the oracles against my OWN bugs** (`web/test_selfcorpus.js`). The external corpus measures kernel bugs someone else wrote down, so this suite asks the harder question: what do the instruments score against the four real bugs of the month? Properties **0/2** on the data-plane pair (the `c·out` theorem again), differential **2/2** - but half the bugs were not in the kernels at all. A dead gate is a bug in a *checker*, caught only by mutating the gate. A stalled roster gradient is a bug in the *protocol*, where every computed value on every peer was correct, so no data oracle could fire. Those needed different instruments, not better oracles.
168
-
169
- All thirteen test suites (`cd web && npm test`) pass. Results with methodology in [`web/TEST_RESULTS.md`](web/TEST_RESULTS.md).
170
-
171
- ---
172
-
173
- ## How it works
174
-
175
- Each machine runs the **same** command. They form a cluster and train one shared model. Two things happen:
176
-
177
- 1. **The compute runs through the emulated GPU logic.** By default the model is built from `VerifiedLinear` layers, so every forward multiply / requantize / ReLU is done by the **bundled verified INT8 units** (`daisychain/verified/`) - the emulated GPU math. Rank 0 prints **cluster-wide unit-invocation counts** so you can see the emulated logic doing the work.
178
- 2. **The machines are pooled data-parallel.** Each node trains on its own shard. Gradients are capacity-weighted and combined into the exact full-batch gradient, so replicas stay **bit-identical**. Faster machines automatically take a bigger share.
179
-
180
- ```
181
- old machine A -+
182
- old machine B -+- each runs the emulated GPU logic on its shard -> one model
183
- old machine C -+ (gradients combined across the cluster)
184
- ```
185
-
186
- ## Bring your own model
187
-
188
- DaisyChain-Train trains any **Task** (`build_model` / `sample` / `loss`). Copy `examples/my_task_template.py`, set `DAISY_TASK=your_module:YourTask`. Use `VerifiedLinear` (see `daisychain/verified_task.py`) to run your model's compute through the emulated units. See **[docs/CUSTOM_TASK.md](docs/CUSTOM_TASK.md)**.
189
-
190
- ## Plain-float alternative
191
-
192
- To skip the emulated units and train with normal float math on each machine, set `DAISY_TASK=daisychain.example_task:ExampleTask`. Same cluster, same pooling. The model math just runs as ordinary float instead of through the verified units.
193
-
194
- ## The dashboard
195
-
196
- `daisychain-dashboard` (or the Docker service) serves a Tailwind page at `:8080`: readiness banner, P2P connectivity scan, pooled cores/RAM + capacity plan (per-node device, weight, batch), and live training loss.
197
-
198
- ## Networking
199
-
200
- Use **Tailscale** for a P2P mesh so machines on different networks get stable IPs on one interface. **[docs/TAILSCALE.md](docs/TAILSCALE.md)**.
201
-
202
- ---
203
-
204
- ## Layout
205
-
206
- ```
207
- daisychain/cluster.py capacity-weighted CPU/GPU data-parallel trainer
208
- daisychain/train.py entry point (daisychain-train)
209
- daisychain/verified/ bundled trained N/N units + VerifiedLinear (train through them)
210
- daisychain/verified_task.py default task: forward runs on the verified units
211
- daisychain/example_task.py plain-float alternative task
212
- daisychain/task.py the Task interface + loader
213
- daisychain/dashboard/ agent + P2P scanner + Tailwind server
214
- docker/ Dockerfile, dashboard image, compose (demo cluster)
215
- scripts/setup.bat / setup.sh interactive setup helpers
216
- config/ nodes + cluster env examples
217
- examples/my_task_template.py starting point for your own model
218
- test_verified_units.py full-domain checks of every shipped verified path (25)
219
- docs/ QUICKSTART, LIMITS, CUSTOM_TASK, TAILSCALE
220
- daisychain/spikewhale_task.py trains the real SpikeWhale on streamed HF datasets
221
- daisychain/spikewhale_panel.py slider control panel (localhost:8899)
222
- web/ DaisyChain-Web: P2P browser training (WebRTC + WebGPU)
223
- export_luts_web.py regenerates web/public LUTs from the trained units
224
- ```
225
-
226
- ## Recent updates (30 September 2026) - reductions refuse what they used to accept
227
-
228
- Six fixes, each found by applying a lesson from differential-testing an RDNA2 shader translator: *a second implementation nobody checks is not verified*, *inactive or absent participants must not leak into a reduction*, *a max over NaN is undefined*, and *know your accumulator width*. Every one is covered by a check that fails on the old code. `python test_verified_units.py` + `python test_cluster_reductions.py` and `cd web && npm test` (thirteen suites) reproduce all of it.
229
-
230
- | # | where | what was wrong | now |
231
- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
232
- | 1 | browser, WebGPU MLP chain | the row max comes from an `atomicMax` over `bitcast(abs(h))` and never passed the non-finite guard the CPU path has; a NaN/Inf `h1` became `inv = 0`/NaN and the GPU quantized `floor(NaN)` (implementation-defined) where a CPU peer threw | `scalesFromAbsMax` refuses a non-finite max. NaN and Inf bits order above every finite value as u32, so the row max is non-finite **iff** some element is - one check covers the whole row (checked on 2000 random rows) |
233
- | 2 | browser, `averageGrads` | a gradient of a different length was silently averaged over a prefix (typed arrays ignore out-of-range writes); a NaN/Inf gradient went straight into DaisyAdam, poisoning `m`/`v` on **every** peer identically, so no fork check could see it | refuses both with `GradientError`; the training loop halts at that step with weights and Adam state untouched (still a valid checkpoint) |
234
- | 3 | browser, int8 GEMMs (JS and WGSL) | the `Int32Array` and WGSL `i32` accumulators wrap past K = 131,071 - CPU and GPU agree, on a wrong sum | refused with `AccumulatorBoundError` at every GEMM entry point; the same bound as the Python kernel's `MAX_INT32_K` |
235
- | 4 | Python, logged cluster loss | `sum(loss_i) / world` - an equal-weight mean of **unequal**, capacity-weighted batches | `cluster_mean_loss` = Σ wᵢ·lossᵢ with the gradient's own weights. Measured on 3- and 13-sample nodes: old **1.418**, true full-batch loss **0.959**, new 0.959 |
236
- | 5 | Python, gradient all-reduce | one node's NaN was summed into every replica and applied | `check_finite_grads` refuses the reduced gradient before `opt.step()`; every rank holds the same sum, so every rank stops at the same step with no extra communication |
237
- | 6 | Python, `pick_device` | with `CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` set but **empty** (a common "CPU only"), torch reports `is_available() = True` and `device_count() = 0`, and the node crashed at startup | a device must actually exist; falls back to CPU |
238
-
239
- Unchanged for valid inputs: finite gradients, finite activations, and K <= 131,071 produce bit-identical results to before, so updated and older peers still co-train. A 2-rank end-to-end `DaisyCluster.fit` run stays bit-identical across replicas (`replica_diff 0.0`). The WebGPU-side changes are host-side JavaScript (checked by `node --check` and by the Node suites through the shared mirror functions). The WGSL kernels themselves are unchanged.
240
-
241
- ## Recent updates (September 2026) - requant rounding, bounded units, non-finite guards
242
-
243
- Everything below is measured. `python test_verified_units.py` (25 checks) plus `cd web && npm test` (twelve suites) reproduce it.
244
-
245
- **The requant rounds instead of truncating.** `NeuralRequant16` was `sat_int8(x >> 8)`, and Python's `>>` on negatives is an arithmetic floor, so every requantized activation carried a systematic bias. Over the full int16 domain:
246
-
247
- | requant | mean error | disagrees with the other on |
248
- | --- | --- | --- |
249
- | floor `x >> 8` (old) | **-0.4981 LSB** | 32,640 / 65,536 |
250
- | round-half-up `(x + 128) >> 8` (now) | +0.0020 LSB | |
251
-
252
- The shipped `requant16.pt` implemented the floor exactly, so this was real behaviour, not a stale docstring. It was **retrained** against the new reference and saved only at 65,536/65,536 (a 99.9% unit would silently break the LUT equivalence the browser relies on), and `web/public/requant_lut.bin` was **re-exported** to match. The invariant is *neural forward == LUT == native integer op*, so a table that lags its unit is a fork. Tie rule, stated precisely: this is half-UP. Python/numpy/torch `round` is half-to-even. The two differ on exactly the 128 exact ties (0.2% of inputs) and both are unbiased to within 0.002 LSB. The Python fleet quantizes with `np.round` and the browser with `floor(x + 0.5)`. The two fleets never co-train, so that cannot fork a group.
253
-
254
- **Bounded elementwise units.** The GEMM backends already capped their temporaries; the units right after them did not. `relu_array` / `requant_array` received the whole activation matrix in the proof path at ~1.5-2 KB per element (262,144 elements = **407 MB**), and the multiply-LUT build pushed 262,144 rows through the atom net at startup (**277 MB RSS on every node**). Both are now blocked: 407 MB -> **2 MB, flat with N**; 277 MB -> **1 MB**. Elementwise blocking is exact (no accumulation order), verified bit-identical at N = 1 / 999 / 32768 / 32769 / 100000. `dataset()` builders are vectorised (65,536 Python iterations -> one numpy pass, 0.015 s), which is what makes retraining a unit practical at all.
255
-
256
- **A NaN or Inf no longer quantizes to zeros.** A float -> int8 conversion has no answer for NaN/Inf, and both trainers gave a silent wrong one:
257
-
258
- | path | input | old result |
259
- | --- | --- | --- |
260
- | Python `qat.py` | `[0.5, nan, 3.0]` | scale = NaN -> **`[0, 0, 0]`** (only a RuntimeWarning) |
261
- | Python `qat.py` | `[0.5, inf, 3.0]` | scale = Inf -> **`[0, 0, 0]`** |
262
- | browser quantizers | `[0.5, Inf, 3]` | scale = Infinity -> **`[0, 0, 0]`** |
263
- | browser quantizers | `[0.5, NaN, 3]` | NaN skipped by the \|max\| scan, stored as **0** |
264
-
265
- One bad value zeroed the whole layer's int8 input and training carried on. Now `VerifiedLinear` raises `FloatingPointError`, and every browser quantizer (`quantize`, `quantizeRows`, `quantizeCols`, `rowAbsMax`, `quantizeHeadCols`, and the transformer's `quantizeColsAsRows`) throws `NonFiniteError`, naming how many values were bad. Finite inputs are untouched, so builds with and without the guard still co-train. Both new tests fail against the old code (Python: 2 checks; web: `test_nonfinite.js`, 12) and pass now.
266
-
267
- ## Recent updates (August 2026) - verified compute path
268
-
269
- Three changes to `daisychain/verified/`, each measured rather than asserted. `python test_verified_units.py` (24 checks) reproduces all of it.
270
-
271
- **Bounded GEMM memory.** `LUTBackend.gemm` and `NeuralBackend.gemm` materialized the whole `(m, n, k)` product block before reducing it, so peak memory was cubic in layer width. At the SpikeWhale panel's maximum (hidden 768, sequence 512) a single layer's forward allocated **2.4 GB** - on the spare hardware this project exists to use. Both now block the `m` axis. The contraction axis `k` is untouched, so the sum and its order are unchanged and results stay bit-identical:
272
-
273
- | GEMM | before | after |
274
- | --- | --- | --- |
275
- | 64x64x64 | 2.3 MB | 2.3 MB (unchanged path) |
276
- | 256x256x256 | 135.8 MB | 68.9 MB |
277
- | 512x768x768 (panel max) | 2426.9 MB | **77.2 MB** |
278
- | neural backend, 64x96x96 | 519.2 MB | **57.5 MB** |
279
-
280
- Caps are class attributes (`LUTBackend.max_block_bytes`, `NeuralBackend.max_products`), tunable per instance. Below the cap the LUT path takes the original single-block branch unchanged.
281
-
282
- The two backends need *different* accounting, which is worth knowing before tuning them: a LUT product costs 8 bytes, but a neural product is split into four nibble pairs through a 128-wide net and costs ~880 bytes. Applying the LUT's byte budget to the neural path computes a block 110x too large and never splits at all.
283
-
284
- **The multiply LUT is certified, not trusted.** `build_luts()` returned its tables unchecked while the docs described a self-certify gate. Because the table *is* the complete finite domain, certifying it **is** the exhaustive verification: `LUTBackend.__init__` now checks all 65536 entries against signed integer multiply and raises on mismatch. Cost: **0.5 ms**.
285
-
286
- **Full-domain tests for the paths that ship.** The units' exhaustive verification covers the scalar entry points (`NeuralMul8.verify()` walks `mul()`). Production runs the batched ones: `mul_array`, `relu_array`, `requant_array`, and the LUTs built from them, which are different code. `test_verified_units.py` checks every shipped path against golden integer arithmetic over its complete domain. All pass today. Nothing would have caught a regression before.
287
-
288
- **Two guards against silent no-ops.** `gemm_int8` enforces the int32 accumulator bound (`MAX_INT32_K = 131071`) instead of asserting it in a comment, since layer width is user-selectable and an overflow would produce wrong numbers rather than raise. `instrument.require(**minimums)` fails when a verified unit was under-invoked, and refuses to report at all while counting is disabled. A zero from a probe that was switched off is not evidence that the units did not run.
289
-
290
- ---
291
-
292
- ## Install
293
-
294
- ```bash
295
- pip install torch numpy psutil
296
- pip install -e . # exposes: daisychain-train, daisychain-agent, daisychain-dashboard
297
- ```
298
-
299
- Requires Python >= 3.9, PyTorch >= 2.0. Multi-node is reliable on **Linux/macOS**. On **Windows use Docker/WSL** (see [Limitations](docs/LIMITS.md)).
300
-
301
- ---
302
-
303
- ## Links
304
-
305
- - **DaisyChain on Hugging Face:** https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI
306
- - **This model:** https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI/DaisyChain-Train
307
-
308
- **License:** MIT · **Author:** Dean Byrne (Quazim0t0) · **Org:** DaisyChainAI
309
-
310
- ## Citation
311
-
312
- ```bibtex
313
- @misc{byrne2026daisychain,
314
- title = {DaisyChain-Train: An Old Hardware Training Pipeline},
315
- author = {Byrne, Dean (Quazim0t0)},
316
- year = {2026},
317
- howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI/DaisyChain-Train}},
318
- note = {Chain spare/old machines into a data-parallel training cluster}
319
- }
320
- ```
321
-
322
- **Dean Byrne (Quazim0t0)** · 2026
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ tags:
4
+ - distributed-training
5
+ - old-hardware
6
+ - int8
7
+ - webgpu
8
+ - webrtc
9
+ ---
10
+
11
+ # DaisyChain-Train - old hardware training pipeline
12
+
13
+ Part of DaisyChain on Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI
14
+
15
+ Model page (weights + card): https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI/DaisyChain-Train
16
+
17
+ I built this so spare / old machines can train a shared model. The training runs through emulated GPU logic: verified INT8 units (GUDA-style) that stand in for a GPU's math. Machines without a modern GPU still do the work. Chain several together and they train one model as a cluster.
18
+
19
+ Before you rely on it, read what it cannot do: [Limitations](docs/LIMITS.md).
20
+
21
+ Use the hardware you already have. Each machine runs the emulated GPU logic (verified INT8 units: multiply / requantize / ReLU). DaisyChain pools the machines data-parallel: device selection, capacity-weighted sharding, gradient sync, a P2P setup, and a live dashboard. Two ways to run: **Docker** or **Python**.
22
+
23
+ ## Read this first
24
+
25
+ DaisyChain-Train is for **small models on spare hardware**. It **pools compute, not memory** (the model must fit on one machine). Scaling is **sublinear**. It is **not** a substitute for a real GPU on large models. Full envelope: **[docs/LIMITS.md](docs/LIMITS.md)**. Read that before you depend on it.
26
+
27
+ ## Feature list
28
+
29
+ ### Python cluster trainer (`daisychain/`)
30
+
31
+ - **Data-parallel training across mixed machines.** Each node trains its own shard. Gradients combine into the exact full-batch gradient. Replicas stay bit-identical.
32
+ - **Capacity-weighted sharding.** Faster machines automatically take a bigger share of the batch.
33
+ - **Emulated GPU compute (verified INT8 units).** `VerifiedLinear` layers run every forward multiply / requantize / ReLU through the bundled trained units. Rank 0 prints cluster-wide unit-invocation counts.
34
+ - **Bring your own model.** Any `Task` (`build_model` / `sample` / `loss`) via `DAISY_TASK`. Template in `examples/my_task_template.py`.
35
+ - **Plain-float alternative task.** Same cluster and pooling with ordinary float math.
36
+ - **Live dashboard** (`daisychain-dashboard`). Readiness banner, P2P connectivity scan, pooled cores/RAM, per-node capacity plan, live loss.
37
+ - **SpikeWhale control panel** (`spikewhale_panel`, `localhost:8899`). Sliders for model size / training settings, any HF dataset you can access (default streamed FineWeb-Edu), start/stop/re-adjust, live loss.
38
+ - **Docker demo cluster.** 3 nodes + dashboard in one command.
39
+ - **Windows helper** (`scripts\setup.bat`) and Tailscale mesh guide.
40
+
41
+ ### DaisyChain-Web (`web/`) - browser P2P training
42
+
43
+ - **Zero-install nodes.** Opening the page IS joining. Devices on one network auto-group (Snapdrop-style, by public IP).
44
+ - **Private cross-network rooms.** `?room=CODE` with **host approval** for every join.
45
+ - **Full WebRTC mesh.** Gradients travel peer-to-peer. The server only signals and serves static files. It never sees weights or gradients.
46
+ - **Leader-follower runs.** Whoever presses Start sets width / sequence / batch-per-device / steps / learning rate for the whole group. Config is broadcast on the wire.
47
+ - **Mid-run join.** Late devices are synced in (weights + step) and contribute from the next step.
48
+ - **Bit-identical replicas.** Same seeded init, strict roster-order gradient averaging, deterministic Adam with identical state on every peer. Verified live by per-step weight hashes.
49
+ - **Sync guard.** Any weight-hash mismatch stops the run instead of training past a fork. The step roster forbids silent partial averages.
50
+ - **Gradient repair.** A follower missing a roster gradient re-requests it from the leader (8 steps retained), bit-exact, and the run continues.
51
+ - **Cross-device kernel probe.** Every step, every device re-hashes a fixed seeded int8 GEMM through its live kernel. Catches broken arithmetic that weight hashes cannot see.
52
+ - **Hardcoded FineWeb-Edu streaming.** The server reads random slices of the 10BT parquet shards straight off the HF CDN via HTTP range requests (pure-JS `hyparquet`). Built-in corpus fallback offline.
53
+ - **Checkpoints.** Download `.pt`. Upload -> **broadcast to the whole group**. Validated (magic, dims, tokenizer vocab) before accepting.
54
+ - **Inference kit.** One self-contained HTML file with the trained weights baked in. Generations offline, anywhere.
55
+ - **In-page generation.** Prompt box on the trained model.
56
+ - **Old-hardware tier.** No WebGPU? The identical units run on CPU (same bits, so CPU and GPU devices co-train in one group). There is no plain-float path.
57
+ - **Large-message fragmentation.** Multi-MB gradients/checkpoints chunked at 48 KB over the data channels.
58
+
59
+ ### Verified compute and kernels (web)
60
+
61
+ - **Verified INT8 units everywhere.** Block-scaled int8 GEMM: exact LUT products, exact int32 accumulation, bit-exact f32 epilogue with a pinned rounding schedule. Scales derived in JS f64 (division never runs on GPU).
62
+ - **Backends, best-first.** DP4A hardware int8 dot -> LUT compute shader -> CPU mirror. Every kernel is **exact-gated at init** (bit-level compares) and demoted to the mirror on any mismatch.
63
+ - **Continuous random-cell audit** at live training shapes.
64
+ - **Fused attention kernels.** Gather/scatter head-strided q·kᵀ and a·v straight from BT×C layout (CUTLASS ex. 36/52 style).
65
+ - **QKV dual-GEMM fusion.** Shared left operand quantized once, one batch-3 dispatch (ex. 45). Bit-identical.
66
+ - **B2B MLP chain.** Both MLP GEMMs back-to-back on GPU with fused per-row absmax reduction and on-device quantize (ex. 13 + 23). WGSL-exact respec with a fround-stepped JS mirror. FMA-contraction-immune by construction.
67
+ - **Dispatch-optimized backward.** Overlapped independent GEMMs, batch-3 sibling fusions (ex. 05/24). Bit-identical gradients. Optional int8 STE backward path (dormant, 1.21x vs float).
68
+
69
+ ### Verification stack (web)
70
+
71
+ - **Exact init gates** on every kernel, every device, every boot. Including gates that "gate the gate" with discriminating boundary inputs.
72
+ - **IEEE-754 binary32 oracle** in exact BigInt arithmetic. Proves the JS epilogue mirror is spec-correct (rejects the old mirror on 34% of inputs).
73
+ - **Metamorphic property suite.** Reference-free relations + definitional absolutes. **4/4** on an externally-authored bug corpus, matching the differential gate.
74
+ - **RDNA2 ISA audit hardenings.** Bit-level (-0-aware) gate comparisons. Proof that FMA contraction cannot change the quantize.
75
+ - **Twelve-suite test chain** (`cd web && npm test`): convergence, replicas, oracle, gates, properties, external corpus, **self-corpus** (the instruments scored against my own bugs), B2B, optimizer, transformer LM, int8 backward, non-finite quantize refusal. Results in [web/TEST_RESULTS.md](web/TEST_RESULTS.md).
76
+ - **Dirty-buffer gate.** The pool is poisoned before a re-sweep so state bugs (a kernel assuming zeroed memory) are caught deterministically rather than by ordering luck.
77
+
78
+ ### Documentation
79
+
80
+ - Python: [QUICKSTART](docs/QUICKSTART.md), [LIMITS](docs/LIMITS.md), [CUSTOM_TASK](docs/CUSTOM_TASK.md), [TAILSCALE](docs/TAILSCALE.md).
81
+ - Web: [Getting started](web/docs/GETTING_STARTED.md), [Architecture](web/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md), [Verification](web/docs/VERIFICATION.md), [Troubleshooting](web/docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md).
82
+
83
+ ---
84
+
85
+ ## Quick start
86
+
87
+ ### Docker (most reliable - one command)
88
+
89
+ ```bash
90
+ docker compose -f docker/docker-compose.yml up --build
91
+ # open http://localhost:8080
92
+ ```
93
+
94
+ Brings up a 3-node demo cluster + dashboard on one machine.
95
+
96
+ ### Python (real machines)
97
+
98
+ On every machine (`pip install -e .`):
99
+
100
+ ```bash
101
+ export MASTER_ADDR=100.101.102.10 # coordinator IP (Tailscale 100.x recommended)
102
+ export MASTER_PORT=29560
103
+ export WORLD_SIZE=3
104
+ export RANK=0 # 1, 2, ... on the others
105
+ export GLOO_SOCKET_IFNAME=tailscale0 # your mesh / LAN NIC
106
+ daisychain-train
107
+ ```
108
+
109
+ ### Windows helper
110
+
111
+ ```bat
112
+ scripts\setup.bat
113
+ ```
114
+
115
+ An interactive menu: Docker, Python node, or just install deps.
116
+
117
+ Full walkthrough: **[docs/QUICKSTART.md](docs/QUICKSTART.md)**.
118
+
119
+ ### SpikeWhale control panel (sliders -> real training)
120
+
121
+ ```bash
122
+ python -m daisychain.spikewhale_panel
123
+ # open http://localhost:8899
124
+ ```
125
+
126
+ A web control panel: pick model size / training settings with sliders, choose any Hugging Face dataset you have access to (default: streamed FineWeb-Edu), hit Start, and watch the live loss. Stop and re-adjust any time with **<- Back to settings**. Launches the real DaisyChain training underneath.
127
+
128
+ ### DaisyChain-Web (train by opening a browser tab)
129
+
130
+ ```bash
131
+ cd web && npm install && node server.js
132
+ # open http://localhost:8787 on every device
133
+ ```
134
+
135
+ Zero-install browser training. Devices on the same network auto-group (Snapdrop-style) and train a shared model **peer-to-peer over WebRTC**, computing through the same verified INT8 units (WebGPU, with the identical units on CPU for machines without it - there is no plain-float path). Private cross-network rooms via `?room=CODE` with **host approval**. The room creator accepts each device before it can join. Includes gradient averaging with a deterministic Adam optimizer (identical state on every peer, nothing extra over the wire), checkpoint **download** (`.pt`) and **upload -> broadcast** so one device can restore the whole group after a failure.
136
+
137
+ **Live demo:** https://huggingface.co/spaces/Quazim0t0/DaisyChain-Web
138
+
139
+ ---
140
+
141
+ ## How it works
142
+
143
+ Each machine runs the **same** command. They form a cluster and train one shared model. Two things happen:
144
+
145
+ 1. **The compute runs through the emulated GPU logic.** By default the model is built from `VerifiedLinear` layers, so every forward multiply / requantize / ReLU is done by the **bundled verified INT8 units** (`daisychain/verified/`) - the emulated GPU math. Rank 0 prints **cluster-wide unit-invocation counts** so you can see the emulated logic doing the work.
146
+ 2. **The machines are pooled data-parallel.** Each node trains on its own shard. Gradients are capacity-weighted and combined into the exact full-batch gradient, so replicas stay **bit-identical**. Faster machines automatically take a bigger share.
147
+
148
+ ```
149
+ old machine A -+
150
+ old machine B -+- each runs the emulated GPU logic on its shard -> one model
151
+ old machine C -+ (gradients combined across the cluster)
152
+ ```
153
+
154
+ ## Bring your own model
155
+
156
+ DaisyChain-Train trains any **Task** (`build_model` / `sample` / `loss`). Copy `examples/my_task_template.py`, set `DAISY_TASK=your_module:YourTask`. Use `VerifiedLinear` (see `daisychain/verified_task.py`) to run your model's compute through the emulated units. See **[docs/CUSTOM_TASK.md](docs/CUSTOM_TASK.md)**.
157
+
158
+ ## Plain-float alternative
159
+
160
+ To skip the emulated units and train with normal float math on each machine, set `DAISY_TASK=daisychain.example_task:ExampleTask`. Same cluster, same pooling. The model math just runs as ordinary float instead of through the verified units.
161
+
162
+ ## The dashboard
163
+
164
+ `daisychain-dashboard` (or the Docker service) serves a Tailwind page at `:8080`: readiness banner, P2P connectivity scan, pooled cores/RAM + capacity plan (per-node device, weight, batch), and live training loss.
165
+
166
+ ## Networking
167
+
168
+ Use **Tailscale** for a P2P mesh so machines on different networks get stable IPs on one interface. **[docs/TAILSCALE.md](docs/TAILSCALE.md)**.
169
+
170
+ ---
171
+
172
+ ## Layout
173
+
174
+ ```
175
+ daisychain/cluster.py capacity-weighted CPU/GPU data-parallel trainer
176
+ daisychain/train.py entry point (daisychain-train)
177
+ daisychain/verified/ bundled trained N/N units + VerifiedLinear (train through them)
178
+ daisychain/verified_task.py default task: forward runs on the verified units
179
+ daisychain/example_task.py plain-float alternative task
180
+ daisychain/task.py the Task interface + loader
181
+ daisychain/dashboard/ agent + P2P scanner + Tailwind server
182
+ docker/ Dockerfile, dashboard image, compose (demo cluster)
183
+ scripts/setup.bat / setup.sh interactive setup helpers
184
+ config/ nodes + cluster env examples
185
+ examples/my_task_template.py starting point for your own model
186
+ test_verified_units.py full-domain checks of every shipped verified path (25)
187
+ docs/ QUICKSTART, LIMITS, CUSTOM_TASK, TAILSCALE
188
+ daisychain/spikewhale_task.py trains the real SpikeWhale on streamed HF datasets
189
+ daisychain/spikewhale_panel.py slider control panel (localhost:8899)
190
+ web/ DaisyChain-Web: P2P browser training (WebRTC + WebGPU)
191
+ export_luts_web.py regenerates web/public LUTs from the trained units
192
+ ```
193
+
194
+ ## Recent updates (30 September 2026) - reductions refuse what they used to accept
195
+
196
+ Six fixes, each found by applying a lesson from differential-testing an RDNA2 shader translator: *a second implementation nobody checks is not verified*, *inactive or absent participants must not leak into a reduction*, *a max over NaN is undefined*, and *know your accumulator width*. Every one is covered by a check that fails on the old code. `python test_verified_units.py` + `python test_cluster_reductions.py` and `cd web && npm test` (thirteen suites) reproduce all of it.
197
+
198
+ | # | where | what was wrong | now |
199
+ | --- | --- | --- | --- |
200
+ | 1 | browser, WebGPU MLP chain | the row max comes from an `atomicMax` over `bitcast(abs(h))` and never passed the non-finite guard the CPU path has; a NaN/Inf `h1` became `inv = 0`/NaN and the GPU quantized `floor(NaN)` (implementation-defined) where a CPU peer threw | `scalesFromAbsMax` refuses a non-finite max. NaN and Inf bits order above every finite value as u32, so the row max is non-finite **iff** some element is - one check covers the whole row (checked on 2000 random rows) |
201
+ | 2 | browser, `averageGrads` | a gradient of a different length was silently averaged over a prefix (typed arrays ignore out-of-range writes); a NaN/Inf gradient went straight into DaisyAdam, poisoning `m`/`v` on **every** peer identically, so no fork check could see it | refuses both with `GradientError`; the training loop halts at that step with weights and Adam state untouched (still a valid checkpoint) |
202
+ | 3 | browser, int8 GEMMs (JS and WGSL) | the `Int32Array` and WGSL `i32` accumulators wrap past K = 131,071 - CPU and GPU agree, on a wrong sum | refused with `AccumulatorBoundError` at every GEMM entry point; the same bound as the Python kernel's `MAX_INT32_K` |
203
+ | 4 | Python, logged cluster loss | `sum(loss_i) / world` - an equal-weight mean of **unequal**, capacity-weighted batches | `cluster_mean_loss` = Σ wᵢ·lossᵢ with the gradient's own weights. Measured on 3- and 13-sample nodes: old **1.418**, true full-batch loss **0.959**, new 0.959 |
204
+ | 5 | Python, gradient all-reduce | one node's NaN was summed into every replica and applied | `check_finite_grads` refuses the reduced gradient before `opt.step()`; every rank holds the same sum, so every rank stops at the same step with no extra communication |
205
+ | 6 | Python, `pick_device` | with `CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES` set but **empty** (a common "CPU only"), torch reports `is_available() = True` and `device_count() = 0`, and the node crashed at startup | a device must actually exist; falls back to CPU |
206
+
207
+ Unchanged for valid inputs: finite gradients, finite activations, and K <= 131,071 produce bit-identical results to before, so updated and older peers still co-train. A 2-rank end-to-end `DaisyCluster.fit` run stays bit-identical across replicas (`replica_diff 0.0`). The WebGPU-side changes are host-side JavaScript (checked by `node --check` and by the Node suites through the shared mirror functions). The WGSL kernels themselves are unchanged.
208
+
209
+ ## Recent updates (September 2026) - requant rounding, bounded units, non-finite guards
210
+
211
+ Everything below is measured. `python test_verified_units.py` (25 checks) plus `cd web && npm test` (twelve suites) reproduce it.
212
+
213
+ **The requant rounds instead of truncating.** `NeuralRequant16` was `sat_int8(x >> 8)`, and Python's `>>` on negatives is an arithmetic floor, so every requantized activation carried a systematic bias. Over the full int16 domain:
214
+
215
+ | requant | mean error | disagrees with the other on |
216
+ | --- | --- | --- |
217
+ | floor `x >> 8` (old) | **-0.4981 LSB** | 32,640 / 65,536 |
218
+ | round-half-up `(x + 128) >> 8` (now) | +0.0020 LSB | |
219
+
220
+ The shipped `requant16.pt` implemented the floor exactly, so this was real behaviour, not a stale docstring. It was **retrained** against the new reference and saved only at 65,536/65,536 (a 99.9% unit would silently break the LUT equivalence the browser relies on), and `web/public/requant_lut.bin` was **re-exported** to match. The invariant is *neural forward == LUT == native integer op*, so a table that lags its unit is a fork. Tie rule, stated precisely: this is half-UP. Python/numpy/torch `round` is half-to-even. The two differ on exactly the 128 exact ties (0.2% of inputs) and both are unbiased to within 0.002 LSB. The Python fleet quantizes with `np.round` and the browser with `floor(x + 0.5)`. The two fleets never co-train, so that cannot fork a group.
221
+
222
+ **Bounded elementwise units.** The GEMM backends already capped their temporaries; the units right after them did not. `relu_array` / `requant_array` received the whole activation matrix in the proof path at ~1.5-2 KB per element (262,144 elements = **407 MB**), and the multiply-LUT build pushed 262,144 rows through the atom net at startup (**277 MB RSS on every node**). Both are now blocked: 407 MB -> **2 MB, flat with N**; 277 MB -> **1 MB**. Elementwise blocking is exact (no accumulation order), verified bit-identical at N = 1 / 999 / 32768 / 32769 / 100000. `dataset()` builders are vectorised (65,536 Python iterations -> one numpy pass, 0.015 s), which is what makes retraining a unit practical at all.
223
+
224
+ **A NaN or Inf no longer quantizes to zeros.** A float -> int8 conversion has no answer for NaN/Inf, and both trainers gave a silent wrong one:
225
+
226
+ | path | input | old result |
227
+ | --- | --- | --- |
228
+ | Python `qat.py` | `[0.5, nan, 3.0]` | scale = NaN -> **`[0, 0, 0]`** (only a RuntimeWarning) |
229
+ | Python `qat.py` | `[0.5, inf, 3.0]` | scale = Inf -> **`[0, 0, 0]`** |
230
+ | browser quantizers | `[0.5, Inf, 3]` | scale = Infinity -> **`[0, 0, 0]`** |
231
+ | browser quantizers | `[0.5, NaN, 3]` | NaN skipped by the \|max\| scan, stored as **0** |
232
+
233
+ One bad value zeroed the whole layer's int8 input and training carried on. Now `VerifiedLinear` raises `FloatingPointError`, and every browser quantizer (`quantize`, `quantizeRows`, `quantizeCols`, `rowAbsMax`, `quantizeHeadCols`, and the transformer's `quantizeColsAsRows`) throws `NonFiniteError`, naming how many values were bad. Finite inputs are untouched, so builds with and without the guard still co-train. Both new tests fail against the old code (Python: 2 checks; web: `test_nonfinite.js`, 12) and pass now.
234
+
235
+ ## Recent updates (August 2026) - verified compute path
236
+
237
+ Three changes to `daisychain/verified/`, each measured rather than asserted. `python test_verified_units.py` (24 checks) reproduces all of it.
238
+
239
+ **Bounded GEMM memory.** `LUTBackend.gemm` and `NeuralBackend.gemm` materialized the whole `(m, n, k)` product block before reducing it, so peak memory was cubic in layer width. At the SpikeWhale panel's maximum (hidden 768, sequence 512) a single layer's forward allocated **2.4 GB** - on the spare hardware this project exists to use. Both now block the `m` axis. The contraction axis `k` is untouched, so the sum and its order are unchanged and results stay bit-identical:
240
+
241
+ | GEMM | before | after |
242
+ | --- | --- | --- |
243
+ | 64x64x64 | 2.3 MB | 2.3 MB (unchanged path) |
244
+ | 256x256x256 | 135.8 MB | 68.9 MB |
245
+ | 512x768x768 (panel max) | 2426.9 MB | **77.2 MB** |
246
+ | neural backend, 64x96x96 | 519.2 MB | **57.5 MB** |
247
+
248
+ Caps are class attributes (`LUTBackend.max_block_bytes`, `NeuralBackend.max_products`), tunable per instance. Below the cap the LUT path takes the original single-block branch unchanged.
249
+
250
+ The two backends need *different* accounting, which is worth knowing before tuning them: a LUT product costs 8 bytes, but a neural product is split into four nibble pairs through a 128-wide net and costs ~880 bytes. Applying the LUT's byte budget to the neural path computes a block 110x too large and never splits at all.
251
+
252
+ **The multiply LUT is certified, not trusted.** `build_luts()` returned its tables unchecked while the docs described a self-certify gate. Because the table *is* the complete finite domain, certifying it **is** the exhaustive verification: `LUTBackend.__init__` now checks all 65536 entries against signed integer multiply and raises on mismatch. Cost: **0.5 ms**.
253
+
254
+ **Full-domain tests for the paths that ship.** The units' exhaustive verification covers the scalar entry points (`NeuralMul8.verify()` walks `mul()`). Production runs the batched ones: `mul_array`, `relu_array`, `requant_array`, and the LUTs built from them, which are different code. `test_verified_units.py` checks every shipped path against golden integer arithmetic over its complete domain. All pass today. Nothing would have caught a regression before.
255
+
256
+ **Two guards against silent no-ops.** `gemm_int8` enforces the int32 accumulator bound (`MAX_INT32_K = 131071`) instead of asserting it in a comment, since layer width is user-selectable and an overflow would produce wrong numbers rather than raise. `instrument.require(**minimums)` fails when a verified unit was under-invoked, and refuses to report at all while counting is disabled. A zero from a probe that was switched off is not evidence that the units did not run.
257
+
258
+ ## Recent updates (July 2026) - DaisyChain-Web
259
+
260
+ **Verification stack.** The browser trainer's correctness is now checked by things that run, not argued. Full results: [web/TEST_RESULTS.md](web/TEST_RESULTS.md).
261
+
262
+ - **IEEE-754 oracle** (`web/test_ieee.js`). A binary32 oracle built from the standard in exact BigInt arithmetic proves the JS epilogue mirror is spec-correct, and rejects the old round-once mirror on 34% of inputs.
263
+ - **Metamorphic properties + oracle mutation scoring** (`test_metamorphic.js`, `test_corpus.js`). Properties needing no reference implementation, scored against an externally-authored bug taxonomy. **4/4**, matching the exact differential gate's 4/4. Relations own the loop bugs. Two definitional absolutes (ReLU output range, a unit-scale integer anchor) own the value bugs no relation can see.
264
+ - **Exact kernel gates on every live kernel**, a continuous audit at live shapes, and a cross-device kernel probe (same seeded int8 GEMM, same hash on every honest device, any backend). The audit's sampling was rebuilt against a named bug class. Its old constants (6 cells, 2% of GEMMs) bounded an overhead that had never been measured (auditing *every* GEMM costs <0.01% of a step), and uniform random cells cannot see a last-row/column bug at a 16512-wide output. Sampling is now **stratified**: the first cells are the structural danger points, chosen deliberately. On a last-column bug, same cell budget: uniform caught **5/300** audits, stratified **300/300**, with zero false positives.
265
+ - **RDNA2 ISA audit.** Reading a real GPU's shader ISA against our determinism assumptions confirmed three of them on silicon (exact packed int8 dot; correctly-rounded f32 add/mul; 1-ULP reciprocal - division stays off the GPU) and produced two hardenings. (1) Real ISAs have non-IEEE variants that **flush -0 to +0**. JS `!==` cannot see that (`-0 !== 0` is false), so all gates and audits now compare **bit patterns** - exactly what the replica hash sees. (2) FMA contraction of the quantize's `x·inv + 0.5` (one rounding instead of two) turned out to be **floor-invisible by construction** - proven in `test_b2b.js` with 175k+ last-ulp anomalies at binade edges, zero surviving `floor()`. Rounding mode and denorm flushing are runtime driver state on real hardware, which is why every device re-runs the exact gates at every init.
266
+
267
+ **Training data.** FineWeb-Edu (10BT sample) is the hardcoded dataset. The Space reads random slices of the parquet shards straight off the HF CDN with range requests (pure-JS `hyparquet`, SNAPPY) and serves plain text at `/data`. No dependency on the datasets-server rows API and its 503s.
268
+
269
+ **Resilience.** The sync guard now *repairs* instead of halting. A roster gradient that reached the leader but not some follower (asymmetric WebRTC mesh) is re-requested from the leader, bit-exact, and the run continues. The guard still stops anything that would fork the weights.
270
+
271
+ **CUTLASS-style kernel work**, each step proven bit-identical or exact-gated:
272
+
273
+ - **Dispatch-optimized backward** (ex. 05/24): independent GEMMs overlapped, sibling trios fused into batch-3 dispatches. Bit-identical gradients. Dormant int8-backward path down from 1.63x to 1.21x vs float.
274
+ - **QKV dual-GEMM fusion** (ex. 45): q/k/v share one left operand. Quantized once, one batched dispatch, zero changed bits.
275
+ - **B2B MLP chain** (ex. 13 + 23): both MLP GEMMs back-to-back on the GPU with a fused per-row absmax reduction. The intermediate is quantized on-device via a WGSL-exact respec (`floor(f32(x·invScale)+0.5)` - no GPU division) whose fround-stepped JS mirror keeps mixed GPU/CPU fleets bit-identical.
276
+
277
+ **Profile-driven speed work.** Every change below is bit-identical (gradient and loss hashes unchanged), so none of it trades correctness for wall clock:
278
+
279
+ - **Buffer pooling.** GPU buffers are recycled by size bucket instead of being created and destroyed per dispatch (~19 per MLP call, per layer, per step). **6-10% faster**, every hash unchanged.
280
+ - **Shared-operand embedding GEMMs.** Profiling put two f32 backward GEMMs at **55% of the entire step**, and both consumed the same `dlogits` operand: ~17 MB at the 16512-token vocab, uploaded *twice*. One upload, one encoder, one submit: that pair went 205 -> 90 ms and the step **12% faster**. The fusion is gated bit-for-bit against the two calls it replaces.
281
+ - **A negative result, kept on purpose.** The remaining hot kernel looked cache-hostile (adjacent lanes wrote 66 KB apart), but making the writes contiguous changed nothing. Two probes explain why: holding the output at 17 MB while cutting compute 32x barely moved the time. The logits GEMM is **transfer-bound, not compute-bound**, and the readback cannot be removed because softmax must stay in JS (WGSL's `exp` is not correctly rounded, and a per-vendor `exp` would fork replicas). The real lever there is the vocabulary, not the kernel.
282
+ - **An init backend race was tried and removed.** It tied on the shipped path, cost ~430 ms of init, and made the backend vary between page loads, which silently invalidated three A/B comparisons before it was caught. A knob that changes what you are measuring is worse than a fixed choice.
283
+
284
+ **Dirty-buffer gate - and the assumption it falsified.** Pooling introduced a bug class the gates predate: a pooled buffer is *not* zero-initialized, so a kernel that assumes zeros is right on step one and wrong on step two. That is a **state** bug, where no single call is wrong and the *sequence* is, which is the family no oracle can reach. The assumption was that the gates were blind to it. Mutation-testing the gate proved otherwise: deleting the zeroing made the plain gate fail at its *second* shape, because the sweep's own shapes recycle each other's buffers. The suite had **incidental** coverage nobody designed, which is coverage nobody can rely on. Shorten the shape list and it evaporates with the gate still green. It is now deliberate: the pool is poisoned with 1e4-magnitude residue before a re-sweep, so detection no longer depends on ordering luck. ~90 ms one-time.
285
+
286
+ **Scoring the oracles against my OWN bugs** (`web/test_selfcorpus.js`). The external corpus measures kernel bugs someone else wrote down, so this suite asks the harder question: what do the instruments score against the four real bugs of the month? Properties **0/2** on the data-plane pair (the `c·out` theorem again), differential **2/2** - but half the bugs were not in the kernels at all. A dead gate is a bug in a *checker*, caught only by mutating the gate. A stalled roster gradient is a bug in the *protocol*, where every computed value on every peer was correct, so no data oracle could fire. Those needed different instruments, not better oracles.
287
+
288
+ All thirteen test suites (`cd web && npm test`) pass. Results with methodology in [`web/TEST_RESULTS.md`](web/TEST_RESULTS.md).
289
+
290
+ ---
291
+
292
+ ## Install
293
+
294
+ ```bash
295
+ pip install torch numpy psutil
296
+ pip install -e . # exposes: daisychain-train, daisychain-agent, daisychain-dashboard
297
+ ```
298
+
299
+ Requires Python >= 3.9, PyTorch >= 2.0. Multi-node is reliable on **Linux/macOS**. On **Windows use Docker/WSL** (see [Limitations](docs/LIMITS.md)).
300
+
301
+ ---
302
+
303
+ ## Links
304
+
305
+ - **DaisyChain on Hugging Face:** https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI
306
+ - **This model:** https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI/DaisyChain-Train
307
+
308
+ **License:** MIT · **Author:** Dean Byrne (Quazim0t0) · **Org:** DaisyChainAI
309
+
310
+ ## Citation
311
+
312
+ ```bibtex
313
+ @misc{byrne2026daisychain,
314
+ title = {DaisyChain-Train: An Old Hardware Training Pipeline},
315
+ author = {Byrne, Dean (Quazim0t0)},
316
+ year = {2026},
317
+ howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/DaisyChainAI/DaisyChain-Train}},
318
+ note = {Chain spare/old machines into a data-parallel training cluster}
319
+ }
320
+ ```
321
+
322
+ **Dean Byrne (Quazim0t0)** · 2026