Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -13,6 +13,45 @@ base_model:
|
|
| 13 |
[[Paper]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17331) [[GitHub]](https://github.com/deepglint/unicom)
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
## Usage
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
### A. Installation
|
|
@@ -96,45 +135,4 @@ pip install lmms-eval==0.2.0
|
|
| 96 |
bash eval.sh
|
| 97 |
```
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
-
## Embodied Ability Evaluation: Performance in RoboVQA and OpenEQA
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
| | | MLCD <br> Embodied-7B | LLaVA <br> OneVision-7B | GPT-4v | RoboMamba |
|
| 104 |
-
:-- | :-- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: |
|
| 105 |
-
| RoboVQA | BLEU1 | <span style="color:red">73.16</span> | 38.12 | - | 54.9 |
|
| 106 |
-
| | BLEU2 | <span style="color:red">66.39</span> | 33.56 | - | 44.2 |
|
| 107 |
-
| | BLEU3 | <span style="color:red">60.61</span> | 31.76 | - | 39.5 |
|
| 108 |
-
| | BLEU4 | <span style="color:red">56.56</span> | 30.97 | - | 36.3 |
|
| 109 |
-
| OpenEQA | Object State Recognition | <span style="color:red">71.83</span> | - | 63.2 | - |
|
| 110 |
-
| | Object Recognition | <span style="color:red">49.46</span> | - | 43.4 | - |
|
| 111 |
-
| | Functional Reasoning | 54.38 | - | <span style="color:red">57.4</span> | - |
|
| 112 |
-
| | Spatial Understanding | <span style="color:red">48.64</span> | - | 33.6 | - |
|
| 113 |
-
| | Attribute Recognition | <span style="color:red">67.08</span> | - | 57.2 | - |
|
| 114 |
-
| | World Knowledge | <span style="color:red">53.87</span> | - | 50.7 | - |
|
| 115 |
-
| | Object Localization | <span style="color:red">43.06</span> | - | 42.0 | - |
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
|
| 120 |
-
## General Ability Evaluation: Comparison with LLaVA OneVision-7B and GPT-4
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
| Dataset | Split | MLCD<br>Embodied-7B | LLaVA<br>OneVision-7B | GPT-4v | GPT-4o |
|
| 123 |
-
| :-- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: |
|
| 124 |
-
| A12D | test | 79.9 | 81.4 | 78.2 | 94.2 |
|
| 125 |
-
| ChartQA | test | 83.0 | 80.0 | 78.5 | 85.7 |
|
| 126 |
-
| DocVQA | test | 91.6 | 87.5 | 88.4 | 92.8 |
|
| 127 |
-
| InfoVQA | val | 73.9 | 70.7 | - | - |
|
| 128 |
-
| InfoVQA | test | 70.0 | 68.8 | - | - |
|
| 129 |
-
| MMMU | val | 47.3 | 48.8 | 56.8 | 69.1 |
|
| 130 |
-
| MMStar | test | 58.5 | 61.7 | 57.1 | 63.9 |
|
| 131 |
-
| OCRBench | - | 749.0 | 697.0 | 656.0 | 805.0 |
|
| 132 |
-
| RealWorldQA | test | 68.9 | 66.3 | 61.4 | 58.6 |
|
| 133 |
-
| SeedBench | image | 74.9 | 75.4 | 49.9 | 76.2 |
|
| 134 |
-
| MMbench | en-dev | 81.1 | 83.2 | 81.3 | 83.4 |
|
| 135 |
-
| MMbench | en-test | 80.1 | 80.8 | 75.0 | - |
|
| 136 |
-
| MME | test | 578/1603 | 418/1580 | 517/1409 | - |
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
|
| 140 |
We would like to express our gratitude to [Huajie Tan](https://huggingface.co/tanhuajie2001), [Yumeng Wang](https://huggingface.co/devymex), [Yin Xie](https://huggingface.co/Yin-Xie) for his significant contributions to the experimental validation in MLLMs.
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
[[Paper]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17331) [[GitHub]](https://github.com/deepglint/unicom)
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
## Embodied Ability Evaluation: Performance in RoboVQA and OpenEQA
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
| | | MLCD <br> Embodied-7B | LLaVA <br> OneVision-7B | GPT-4v | RoboMamba |
|
| 21 |
+
:-- | :-- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: |
|
| 22 |
+
| RoboVQA | BLEU1 | <span style="color:red">73.16</span> | 38.12 | - | 54.9 |
|
| 23 |
+
| | BLEU2 | <span style="color:red">66.39</span> | 33.56 | - | 44.2 |
|
| 24 |
+
| | BLEU3 | <span style="color:red">60.61</span> | 31.76 | - | 39.5 |
|
| 25 |
+
| | BLEU4 | <span style="color:red">56.56</span> | 30.97 | - | 36.3 |
|
| 26 |
+
| OpenEQA | Object State Recognition | <span style="color:red">71.83</span> | - | 63.2 | - |
|
| 27 |
+
| | Object Recognition | <span style="color:red">49.46</span> | - | 43.4 | - |
|
| 28 |
+
| | Functional Reasoning | 54.38 | - | <span style="color:red">57.4</span> | - |
|
| 29 |
+
| | Spatial Understanding | <span style="color:red">48.64</span> | - | 33.6 | - |
|
| 30 |
+
| | Attribute Recognition | <span style="color:red">67.08</span> | - | 57.2 | - |
|
| 31 |
+
| | World Knowledge | <span style="color:red">53.87</span> | - | 50.7 | - |
|
| 32 |
+
| | Object Localization | <span style="color:red">43.06</span> | - | 42.0 | - |
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
## General Ability Evaluation: Comparison with LLaVA OneVision-7B and GPT-4
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
| Dataset | Split | MLCD<br>Embodied-7B | LLaVA<br>OneVision-7B | GPT-4v | GPT-4o |
|
| 40 |
+
| :-- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: |
|
| 41 |
+
| A12D | test | 79.9 | 81.4 | 78.2 | 94.2 |
|
| 42 |
+
| ChartQA | test | 83.0 | 80.0 | 78.5 | 85.7 |
|
| 43 |
+
| DocVQA | test | 91.6 | 87.5 | 88.4 | 92.8 |
|
| 44 |
+
| InfoVQA | val | 73.9 | 70.7 | - | - |
|
| 45 |
+
| InfoVQA | test | 70.0 | 68.8 | - | - |
|
| 46 |
+
| MMMU | val | 47.3 | 48.8 | 56.8 | 69.1 |
|
| 47 |
+
| MMStar | test | 58.5 | 61.7 | 57.1 | 63.9 |
|
| 48 |
+
| OCRBench | - | 749.0 | 697.0 | 656.0 | 805.0 |
|
| 49 |
+
| RealWorldQA | test | 68.9 | 66.3 | 61.4 | 58.6 |
|
| 50 |
+
| SeedBench | image | 74.9 | 75.4 | 49.9 | 76.2 |
|
| 51 |
+
| MMbench | en-dev | 81.1 | 83.2 | 81.3 | 83.4 |
|
| 52 |
+
| MMbench | en-test | 80.1 | 80.8 | 75.0 | - |
|
| 53 |
+
| MME | test | 578/1603 | 418/1580 | 517/1409 | - |
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
## Usage
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
### A. Installation
|
|
|
|
| 135 |
bash eval.sh
|
| 136 |
```
|
| 137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 138 |
We would like to express our gratitude to [Huajie Tan](https://huggingface.co/tanhuajie2001), [Yumeng Wang](https://huggingface.co/devymex), [Yin Xie](https://huggingface.co/Yin-Xie) for his significant contributions to the experimental validation in MLLMs.
|