GODELEV commited on
Commit
9e67db2
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): dad26ae

Create README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +84 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: apache-2.0
3
+ language:
4
+ - en
5
+ pipeline_tag: text-generation
6
+ tags:
7
+ - casual-lm
8
+ - gqa
9
+ - custom
10
+ - refresh_gate
11
+ - swiglu
12
+ - qk-norm
13
+ - rope
14
+ ---
15
+ <img src="Banner.png" width="1920"/>
16
+ # Rose-1.5-Pro
17
+
18
+ Rose-1.5-Pro is a compact language model developed by **GODELEV**, built on the **Rose X1.5 architecture**. Trained on approximately **70 billion tokens**, it explores the scaling of the Rose X1.5 design with a wider hidden representation and a configuration intended to balance model capability with training efficiency.
19
+
20
+ The model achieves an **Intelligence Index of 28.27**, with strong results across commonsense reasoning, science-question benchmarks, and general language understanding tasks. Its evaluation results provide another step in exploring how architectural choices and training configurations influence performance in small language models.
21
+
22
+ ## Model Overview
23
+
24
+ | Property | Value |
25
+ |---|---|
26
+ | Model | Rose-1.5-Pro |
27
+ | Developer | Mr Munk |
28
+ | Architecture | Rose X1.5 |
29
+ | Layers | 30 |
30
+ | Hidden Size | 640 |
31
+ | Attention Heads | 10 |
32
+ | Key-Value Heads | 5 |
33
+ | Head Dimension | 64 |
34
+ | Intermediate Size | 1536 |
35
+ | Vocabulary Size | 32,770 |
36
+ | Context Length | 2,048 tokens |
37
+ | Training Tokens | ~70B |
38
+ | Activation | SiLU |
39
+ | Normalization | RMSNorm |
40
+ | QK Normalization | Enabled |
41
+ | XSA | Enabled |
42
+ | Refresh Gates | Layers 10 and 20 |
43
+
44
+ ## Evaluation Results
45
+
46
+ Rose-1.5-Pro was evaluated across a set of benchmarks covering commonsense reasoning, scientific knowledge, and arithmetic-oriented tasks.
47
+
48
+ | Benchmark | Score |
49
+ |---|---:|
50
+ | HellaSwag | 43.92% |
51
+ | ARC-Easy | 58.29% |
52
+ | ARC-Challenge | 30.72% |
53
+ | Combined ARC | 44.50% |
54
+ | PIQA | 69.48% |
55
+ | ArithMark-3 | 40.00% |
56
+ | ArithMark-2 | 34.52% |
57
+ | **Intelligence Index** | **28.27** |
58
+
59
+ The Intelligence Index aggregates selected benchmark results into a single normalized score. It is useful for comparing models evaluated under the same methodology, although it cannot represent every aspect of language-model capability.
60
+
61
+ Rose-1.5-Pro's results show its performance across several evaluation categories, while the arithmetic benchmarks offer a separate view of its performance on structured numerical tasks.
62
+
63
+ ## Architecture and Training
64
+
65
+ Rose-1.5-Pro continues the development of the Rose X1.5 architecture, using 30 layers and a hidden size of 640. It incorporates QK normalization, XSA, and refresh gates as part of its architectural configuration.
66
+
67
+ The model was trained on approximately **70B tokens**.
68
+
69
+ ### Context Length
70
+
71
+ The model uses a **2,048-token context window by design**. This decision prioritizes faster training and a more efficient training process rather than maximizing context length. Context length is an engineering trade-off, and a larger window is not automatically necessary for every training objective.
72
+
73
+ ## Position Within the Rose Series
74
+
75
+ Rose-1.5-Pro builds on the experiments conducted with earlier Rose models. The series explores how changes in model scale, architecture, and training configuration affect benchmark performance.
76
+
77
+ Rather than assuming that additional parameters or training tokens guarantee improvements on every task, the evaluation results provide a practical basis for identifying strengths and trade-offs across benchmarks.
78
+
79
+ ## Limitations
80
+
81
+ - Benchmark scores measure performance on specific evaluation tasks and should not be treated as a complete measure of general intelligence.
82
+ - Results depend on the evaluation datasets, prompts, scoring procedures, and implementation.
83
+ - Performance may vary across tasks and domains not represented in the reported benchmarks.
84
+ - The 2,048-token context window is a deliberate training-efficiency choice and may not suit tasks requiring longer input sequences.