codybum commited on
Commit
ce4e6c6
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 6b3cb60

Card: Catbird logo + intro, official BFCL results

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +10 -8
README.md CHANGED
@@ -260,14 +260,16 @@ English benchmarks, which understates their designed capability.
260
 
261
  > These are disclosed deliberately. A high IFEval score does not make this checkpoint production-ready.
262
 
263
- - **Tool / function calling is measured and improved** — see the BFCL table above. It does score below the
264
- *SFT seed's* previously reported 87.0 on `multiple`; that 87.0 is a number our own records have since
265
- declared **invalid** (it was inflated by benchmark contamination and collapsed to 7.0 once the affected
266
- records were removed), so it is not a meaningful reference point. Against the **published** KOS-V4-Instruct
267
- figures, this model is better on all three categories.
268
- - **Fabrication roughly doubled** on our internal gate (**14.4% → 28%**) during GRPO. That gate is itself under
269
- review because it measures on pretraining-distribution text, so the magnitude is uncertain — but the direction
270
- is a real concern and is the main reason this artifact is private.
 
 
271
  - **Optimising a verifiable reward moved a verifiable metric.** GRPO maximised the official IFEval checker, and
272
  IFEval went up. Improvement on *unrelated* capabilities should not be assumed from this number.
273
  - **MMLU 0.3720 is above chance (0.25) but modest.** This is not a knowledge model; it should not be used as a
 
260
 
261
  > These are disclosed deliberately. A high IFEval score does not make this checkpoint production-ready.
262
 
263
+ - **Tool / function calling is measured and improved** — see the BFCL table above. Note that GRPO did not
264
+ optimise for it; the reward ran the IFEval checker only, so this is carried SFT capability. Comparisons to
265
+ earlier internal KOS tool-calling figures are deliberately omitted: several were measured against benchmark
266
+ data the model had been trained on and are recorded in our own audit as **invalid**. The comparison here is
267
+ against the **published** KOS-V4-Instruct numbers only.
268
+ - **Hallucination / fabrication: NOT INDEPENDENTLY MEASURED.** An internal gate reported an increase during
269
+ GRPO, but that gate measures on pretraining-distribution text and is under review, so **no figure from it is
270
+ reported here.** No official hallucination benchmark has been run on this checkpoint. Treat fabrication
271
+ behaviour as **unmeasured**, and note that RL against a format-verifiable reward is a plausible mechanism for
272
+ making a model more confidently wrong. This is a principal reason the artifact is private.
273
  - **Optimising a verifiable reward moved a verifiable metric.** GRPO maximised the official IFEval checker, and
274
  IFEval went up. Improvement on *unrelated* capabilities should not be assumed from this number.
275
  - **MMLU 0.3720 is above chance (0.25) but modest.** This is not a knowledge model; it should not be used as a