The Formative Mind: Theories of Consciousness as Practice
Instead of treating consciousness as a passive byproduct of a powerful unconscious engine, think of it as the engine itself: a process that builds rich representations (self-organizing), predicts and models its own processing (metarepresentation), and thereby brings an agent and its world into being (individuation). A brief synthesis.
Current transformer-based, self-supervised systems have driven massive gains, but important gaps remain on the path to AGI. Key missing pieces are continual, curiosity-driven learning; grounded multimodal perception; reliable, contextual long-term memory with forgetting; motivated (hot) executive control and dynamic attention; metacognition and coherent causal world-models; and robust fluid reasoning, planning and decision-making. Progress will require hybrid architectures (neuromorphic/Hebbian + gradients + symbolic modules), active-inference and intrinsic-motivation objectives, and new lifelong, embodied benchmarks to evaluate safety and competence.
7 Free resources to master Multi-Agent Systems (MAS)
Collective intelligence is the future of AI. Sometimes, a single agent isn't enough — a team of simpler, specialized agents working together to solve a task can be a much better option. Building Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) isn’t easy, that's why today we’re offering you a list of sources that may help you master MAS:
1. CrewAI tutorials -> https://docs.crewai.com/introduction#ready-to-start-building%3F At the end of the page you'll find a guide on how to build a crew of agents that research and analyze a topic, and create a report. Also, there are useful guides on how to build a single CrewAI agent and a workflow
2. Building with CAMEL multi-agent framework -> https://github.com/camel-ai/camel Offers guides, cookbooks and other useful information to build even million agent societies, explore and work with MAS
4. "Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations" by Yoav Shoham and Kevin Leyton-Brown -> https://www.masfoundations.org/download.html This book explains learning between agents, how multiple agents solve shared problems and communicate with focus on theory, practical examples and algorithms, diving into the game theory and logical approaches
Also, check out The Turing Post article about MAS -> https://www.turingpost.com/p/mas Our article can be a good starting guide for you to explore what MAS is, its components, architectures, types, top recent developments and current trends
Mining LLM Pretraining Data: Topics, Skills, and Cognitive Patterns
Summary The technical blog post details an analysis of pretraining data from various Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-2, Falcon, and Gemma2. Using text mining techniques including embeddings, clustering, and LLM-based annotation on datasets like OpenWebText, The Pile, and C4, the study identified key patterns.
Findings show the data is dominated by topics like Technology, Politics, Health, Business, and Culture, originating from diverse sources including web scrapes, academic papers, code repositories, and news media. The data reflects the work of professionals primarily in Journalism/Media, Content Creation, Analysis/Research, Academia, and Tech/Engineering. Consequently, LLMs learn corresponding skills (e.g., Research, Critical Thinking, Communication, Domain Expertise) and task representations (e.g., Analysis, Content Creation, Compliance).
The analysis also uncovered distinct writing styles, underlying cognitive frameworks (beliefs, frames, schemas, memes), and common cognitive biases (like Confirmation Bias) embedded in the data. LLM capability progression appears linked to data scale and task frequency, following a power law. The study concludes that LLMs are powerful data-driven simulators whose capabilities and limitations are shaped by the composition and inherent biases of their pretraining corpora, highlighting the importance of data understanding and curation.
The document warns of the "intelligence curse," a potential consequence of advanced AI (AGI) where powerful entities lose their incentive to invest in people as AI automates work[cite: 13, 297]. This could lead to job displacement, reduced social mobility, and a concentration of power and wealth based on AI ownership, similar to the "resource curse" in resource-rich states[cite: 17, 18, 31, 329, 353]. To counter this, the authors propose averting AI catastrophes to prevent centralization, diffusing AI widely to keep humans economically relevant, and democratizing institutions to remain anchored to human needs[cite: 22, 23, 25, 35, 36, 37, 566].
RWKV-7 "Goose" 0.4B trained w/ ctx4k automatically extrapolates to ctx32k+, and perfectly solves NIAH ctx16k 🤯 100% RNN and attention-free. Only trained on the Pile. No finetuning. Replicable training runs. tested by our community: https://github.com/Jellyfish042/LongMamba
Do you guys think this approach has potential? The idea is to combine rapid, non-analytical pattern recognition (intuition) with traditional analytical reasoning to help AI systems handle "untrained" problems more effectively. It’s still a theoretical framework.
Attention mechanisms allow models to dynamically focus on specific parts of their input when performing tasks. In our recent article, we discussed Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) in detail and now it's time to summarize other existing types of attention.
Here is a list of 13+ types of attention mechanisms used in AI models:
Read our post about these core types of attention to learn their specific features and how they work -> 13+ Attention Mechanisms in Transformers and LLMs Explained https://www.turingpost.com/p/attention-types
Mimicking Consciousness in LLMs: Ascending the Dimensions of Thought with Recurrent Processing
This blog post explores how **recurrent processing** can transform Large Language Models (LLMs) to mimic aspects of human thought by engaging in iterative feedback loops. Inspired by string theory, the post describes how LLMs can "ascend dimensions" of cognition, progressing through foundational cognitive loops—such as basic cognition, executive functions, and meta-cognition—before advancing into **world simulation**. In this stage, LLMs explore higher dimensions, perceiving non-linear time, simulating branching possibilities, and integrating multiple realities. The interaction between the **Generator** and **Reflective Compass** allows AI systems to refine their outputs iteratively, moving toward a **point attractor** where ideas become coherent and polished. While this process doesn't bestow true consciousness, it offers a compelling imitation of reflective and adaptive thinking, leading to smarter dialogue, enhanced creativity, and more robust problem-solving.
A Brief Survey of Associations Between Meta-Learning and General AI
The paper titled "A Brief Survey of Associations Between Meta-Learning and General AI" explores how meta-learning techniques can contribute to the development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Here are the key points summarized:
1. General AI (AGI) and Meta-Learning: - AGI aims to develop algorithms that can handle a wide variety of tasks, similar to human intelligence. Current AI systems excel at specific tasks but struggle with generalization to unseen tasks. - Meta-learning or "learning to learn" improves model adaptation and generalization, allowing AI systems to tackle new tasks efficiently using prior experiences.
2. Neural Network Design in Meta-Learning: - Techniques like Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks enable self-improvement and adaptability for deep models, supporting generalization across tasks. - Highway networks and ResNet-style models use shortcuts for efficient backpropagation, allowing deeper models that can be used in meta-learning frameworks.
3. Coevolution: - Coevolution involves the mutual evolution of multiple components, such as learners or task-solvers, to improve overall performance. - Coevolution between learners enhances collaboration and competition within AI systems, while coevolution between tasks and solvers (e.g., POWERPLAY and AI-GA frameworks) pushes solvers to adapt to increasingly complex tasks.
4. Curiosity in Meta-Learning: - Curiosity-based exploration encourages AI systems to discover new, diverse features of the environment, avoiding local optima. - Curiosity-based objectives can be combined with performance-based objectives to ensure efficient exploration and adaptation in complex tasks.
5. Forgetting Mechanisms: - Forgetting is crucial to avoid memory overload in AI systems
Artificial general intelligence through recursive data compression and grounded reasoning: a position paper
This paper proposes a system to achieve AGI through general data compression and grounded reasoning.
General Data Compression involves creating a flexible algorithm that adapts to input data to simplify and compress it recursively, identifying simple, orthogonal features to avoid redundancy. The algorithm measures AGI progress by solving problems based on increasing complexity, and it expands its search space according to the data itself. Compression is applied not only to data but also to model parameters, and sequences are segmented based on compressibility.
Grounded Reasoning refers to forming representations with various granularities, crucial for commonsense reasoning and AGI. The system simulates the real world as its model, switching between representations and maximizing resourcefulness. Key ideas include the world as its own model for reasoning and actions aimed at maximizing entropy to test hypotheses.
The paper emphasizes simplicity, data-dependent bias, recursion, orthogonality, resourcefulness, and grounding in real-world contexts as fundamental principles in building an AGI system.
The OpenAI o3-mini model is a significant improvement over the o1-mini, reaching o1 performance levels. While generally good, its performance isn't universally better than previous models (o1, o1-prev.) or GPT-4o across all benchmarks. This means workflows should be re-evaluated with each model upgrade.
The o3-mini has "low," "medium," and "high" versions, with "low" being the base model used for benchmarking. It's speculated that the higher versions simply involve more processing. A fair comparison with other models like Gemini 2.0 Thinking or DeepSeek-R1 would likely need to use the "low" version and a similar "think more" mechanism.
The system card is recommended reading due to its comprehensive benchmark data.
Anthropomorphic reasoning about neuromorphic AGI safety
Summary of "Anthropomorphic Reasoning About Neuromorphic AGI Safety" This paper explores safety strategies for neuromorphic artificial general intelligence (AGI), defined as systems designed by reverse-engineering essential computations of the human brain. Key arguments and proposals include:
1. Anthropomorphic Reasoning Validity: - Neuromorphic AGI’s design and assessment rely on human cognition models, making anthropomorphic reasoning (using human-like traits) critical for safety analysis. Comparisons to human behavior and neural mechanisms provide insights into AGI behavior and risks.
2. Countering Safety Criticisms: - The authors challenge claims that neuromorphic AGI is inherently more dangerous than other AGI approaches. They argue all AGI systems face intractable verification challenges (e.g., real-world unpredictability, incomputable action validation). Neuromorphic AGI may even offer safety advantages by enabling comparisons to human cognitive processes.
3. Motivational Architecture: - Basic drives (e.g., curiosity, social interaction) are essential for cognitive development and safety. These pre-conceptual, hardwired drives (analogous to human hunger or affiliation) shape learning and behavior. The orthogonality thesis (intelligence and goals as independent) is contested, as neuromorphic AGI’s drives likely intertwine with its cognitive architecture.
4. Safety Strategies: - **Social Drives**: Embedding drives like caregiving, affiliation, and cooperation ensures AGI develops prosocial values through human interaction. - **Bounded Reward Systems**: Human-like satiation mechanisms (e.g., diminishing rewards after fulfillment) prevent extreme behaviors (e.g., paperclip maximization). - **Developmental Environment**: Exposure to diverse, positive human interactions and moral examples fosters
Evolution and The Knightian Blindspot of Machine Learning
The paper discusses machine learning's limitations in addressing Knightian Uncertainty (KU), highlighting the fragility of models like reinforcement learning (RL) in unpredictable, open-world environments. KU refers to uncertainty that can't be quantified or predicted, a challenge that RL fails to handle due to its reliance on fixed data distributions and limited formalisms.
### Key Approaches:
1. **Artificial Life (ALife):** Simulating diverse, evolving systems to generate adaptability, mimicking biological evolution's robustness to unpredictable environments. 2. **Open-Endedness:** Creating AI systems capable of continuous innovation and adaptation, drawing inspiration from human creativity and scientific discovery.
3. **Revising RL Formalisms:** Modifying reinforcement learning (RL) models to handle dynamic, open-world environments by integrating more flexible assumptions and evolutionary strategies.
These approaches aim to address ML’s limitations in real-world uncertainty and move toward more adaptive, general intelligence.
Artificial Kuramoto Oscillatory Neurons (AKOrN) differ from traditional artificial neurons by oscillating, rather than just turning on or off. Each neuron is represented by a rotating vector on a sphere, influenced by its connections to other neurons. This behavior is based on the Kuramoto model, which describes how oscillators (like neurons) tend to synchronize, similar to pendulums swinging in unison.
Key points:
Oscillating Neurons: Each AKOrN’s rotation is influenced by its connections, and they try to synchronize or oppose each other. Synchronization: When neurons synchronize, they "bind," allowing the network to represent complex concepts (e.g., "a blue square toy") by compressing information. Updating Mechanism: Neurons update their rotations based on connected neurons, input stimuli, and their natural frequency, using a Kuramoto update formula. Network Structure: AKOrNs can be used in various network layers, with iterative blocks combining Kuramoto layers and feature extraction modules. Reasoning: This model can perform reasoning tasks, like solving Sudoku puzzles, by adjusting neuron interactions. Advantages: AKOrNs offer robust feature binding, reasoning capabilities, resistance to adversarial data, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimation. In summary, AKOrN's oscillatory neurons and synchronization mechanisms enable the network to learn, reason, and handle complex tasks like image classification and object discovery with enhanced robustness and flexibility.
