File size: 11,839 Bytes
c754148 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 | """
validate_pipeline.py
Local validation protocol for the Redrob candidate ranking system.
Runs entirely offline, no network calls, designed to be executed
before any of the 3 allowed competition submissions are spent.
Checks performed:
1. Probe-set NDCG@10 against hand-labeled reference candidates
2. Ablation table (component on/off, confirm monotonic improvement)
3. Honeypot injection test (synthetic violations of c1-c7, confirm suppression)
4. Top-100 diversity / homogeneity check (NEW - this revision)
5. Readiness gate (numeric threshold before spending a submission)
"""
import json
import hashlib
from collections import Counter
from itertools import combinations
PROBE_SET_LABELS = {
"CAND_0000001": 3,
"CAND_0000010": 3,
"CAND_0000021": 0,
"CAND_0000014": 2,
"CAND_0000011": 1,
}
def compute_probe_ndcg10(ranked_candidate_ids: list[str],
labels: dict[str, int] = PROBE_SET_LABELS) -> float:
"""
NDCG@10 restricted to candidates that appear in both the ranked
output and the probe set. Only meaningful once the probe set is
grown beyond the current 5 reference points (see TODO below).
"""
import math
relevant_in_rank = [
(rank, labels[cid])
for rank, cid in enumerate(ranked_candidate_ids[:10], start=1)
if cid in labels
]
if not relevant_in_rank:
return None # probe set didn't overlap with top 10 at all
dcg = sum(rel / math.log2(rank + 1) for rank, rel in relevant_in_rank)
ideal_order = sorted(labels.values(), reverse=True)[:10]
idcg = sum(rel / math.log2(i + 2) for i, rel in enumerate(ideal_order))
return dcg / idcg if idcg > 0 else 0.0
# ablation table
def run_ablation(pipeline_fn, candidates: list[dict], jd_config: dict) -> dict:
"""
pipeline_fn(candidates, jd_config, **toggles) -> list[ranked_candidate_ids]
Each toggle disables one component. Confirms NDCG@10 on the probe
set does not improve when a component is removed -- if it does,
that component is actively hurting ranking quality and is a bug,
not a feature.
"""
configs = {
"full_pipeline": dict(),
"no_consistency_checks": dict(disable_consistency=True),
"no_parameter_a": dict(disable_param_a=True),
"bm25_only_no_features": dict(disable_features=True),
}
results = {}
for name, toggles in configs.items():
ranked = pipeline_fn(candidates, jd_config, **toggles)
results[name] = {
"ndcg10": compute_probe_ndcg10(ranked),
"top10_ids": ranked[:10],
}
return results
def print_ablation_report(results: dict) -> None:
print("=" * 60)
print("ABLATION REPORT")
print("=" * 60)
baseline = results["full_pipeline"]["ndcg10"]
for name, r in results.items():
flag = ""
if name != "full_pipeline" and baseline is not None and r["ndcg10"] is not None:
if r["ndcg10"] > baseline:
flag = " <-- WARNING: removing this IMPROVED the score. Investigate."
print(f"{name:30s} NDCG@10 = {r['ndcg10']}{flag}")
# honeypot injection test
def make_synthetic_honeypot(violation: str, base_candidate: dict) -> dict:
"""
Clones a real candidate and deliberately injects exactly one
consistency-check violation, so each test case isolates a single
check rather than confounding several at once.
"""
c = json.loads(json.dumps(base_candidate))
c["candidate_id"] = f"SYNTH_{violation.upper()}"
if violation == "timeline_impossibility":
c["skills"][0]["duration_months"] = int(c["profile"]["years_of_experience"] * 12) + 50
elif violation == "signup_anomaly":
c["redrob_signals"]["signup_date"] = "2099-01-01"
c["redrob_signals"]["last_active_date"] = "2026-01-01"
elif violation == "salary_inversion":
c["redrob_signals"]["expected_salary_range_inr_lpa"] = {"min": 50.0, "max": 10.0}
elif violation == "assessment_contradiction":
skill_name = c["skills"][0]["name"]
c["skills"][0]["proficiency"] = "advanced"
c["redrob_signals"]["skill_assessment_scores"][skill_name] = 12.0
elif violation == "engagement_mismatch":
c["redrob_signals"]["connection_count"] = 0
c["redrob_signals"]["search_appearance_30d"] = 0
c["redrob_signals"]["endorsements_received"] = 0
elif violation == "langchain_dabbler":
c["skills"] = [
{"name": "LangChain", "proficiency": "advanced", "endorsements": 2, "duration_months": 6},
{"name": "Prompt Engineering", "proficiency": "advanced", "endorsements": 1, "duration_months": 4},
]
c["redrob_signals"]["skill_assessment_scores"] = {}
elif violation == "cv_specialist_no_nlp":
c["skills"] = [
{"name": "OpenCV", "proficiency": "advanced", "endorsements": 30, "duration_months": 36},
{"name": "YOLO", "proficiency": "advanced", "endorsements": 20, "duration_months": 30},
]
return c
VIOLATION_TYPES = [
"timeline_impossibility", "signup_anomaly", "salary_inversion",
"assessment_contradiction", "engagement_mismatch",
"langchain_dabbler", "cv_specialist_no_nlp",
]
def run_honeypot_injection_test(pipeline_fn, real_candidates: list[dict],
jd_config: dict, top_n: int = 100) -> dict:
base = real_candidates[0]
synthetic = [make_synthetic_honeypot(v, base) for v in VIOLATION_TYPES]
test_pool = real_candidates + synthetic
ranked = pipeline_fn(test_pool, jd_config)
top_n_ids = set(ranked[:top_n])
synthetic_ids = {c["candidate_id"] for c in synthetic}
leaked = synthetic_ids & top_n_ids
return {
"total_synthetic": len(synthetic_ids),
"leaked_into_top_n": leaked,
"pass": len(leaked) == 0,
}
# diversity check
def candidate_archetype_signature(candidate: dict, feature_vector: dict) -> tuple:
"""
A coarse, human readable signature for clustering deliberately
simple (no embeddings, no clustering library) so it stays fast
and auditable. Buckets each candidate into a small discrete
profile rather than computing exact distances.
"""
yoe_bucket = (
"junior" if candidate["profile"]["years_of_experience"] < 3 else
"mid" if candidate["profile"]["years_of_experience"] < 7 else
"senior"
)
top_skill = max(
candidate.get("skills", [{"name": "none", "duration_months": 0}]),
key=lambda s: s.get("duration_months", 0)
)["name"]
industry = candidate["profile"].get("current_industry", "unknown")
company = candidate["profile"].get("current_company", "unknown")
return (yoe_bucket, top_skill, industry, company)
def check_top100_diversity(top_100_candidates: list[dict],
feature_vectors: dict[str, dict],
max_signature_share: float = 0.25,
max_single_company_share: float = 0.20) -> dict:
"""
Flags two specific homogeneity failure modes:
(a) one archetype signature dominating > max_signature_share
of the top 100 -- e.g. 30 nearly-identical profiles
(b) one single employer accounting for too large a share of
the top 100 -- a narrower, more specific version of (a)
that's easy to misread as "we found the best company"
rather than "our company-size/industry feature is too
dominant". 20% is the default on a real ~100K-candidate
dataset; this threshold should be loosened for small ad
hoc test pools (a handful of distinct employers will
trivially exceed it by chance).
"""
signatures = [
candidate_archetype_signature(c, feature_vectors[c["candidate_id"]])
for c in top_100_candidates
]
sig_counts = Counter(signatures)
n = len(top_100_candidates)
company_counts = Counter(c["profile"]["current_company"] for c in top_100_candidates)
flagged_signatures = {
sig: count for sig, count in sig_counts.items()
if count / n > max_signature_share
}
flagged_companies = {
company: count for company, count in company_counts.items()
if count / n > max_single_company_share
}
most_common_sig, most_common_sig_count = sig_counts.most_common(1)[0]
most_common_company, most_common_company_count = company_counts.most_common(1)[0]
return {
"n_distinct_signatures": len(sig_counts),
"most_common_signature": most_common_sig,
"most_common_signature_share": round(most_common_sig_count / n, 3),
"most_common_company": most_common_company,
"most_common_company_share": round(most_common_company_count / n, 3),
"flagged_signatures": flagged_signatures,
"flagged_companies": flagged_companies,
"pass": len(flagged_signatures) == 0 and len(flagged_companies) == 0,
}
def print_diversity_report(report: dict) -> None:
print("=" * 60)
print("TOP-100 DIVERSITY CHECK")
print("=" * 60)
print(f"Distinct archetype signatures in top 100: {report['n_distinct_signatures']}")
print(f"Most common signature: {report['most_common_signature']} "
f"({report['most_common_signature_share']:.1%} of top 100)")
print(f"Most common employer: {report['most_common_company']} "
f"({report['most_common_company_share']:.1%} of top 100)")
if report["flagged_signatures"]:
print("\n WARNING -- signature(s) exceeding 25% share:")
for sig, count in report["flagged_signatures"].items():
print(f" {sig}: {count} candidates")
if report["flagged_companies"]:
print("\n WARNING -- employer(s) exceeding 20% share:")
for company, count in report["flagged_companies"].items():
print(f" {company}: {count} candidates")
print(f"\n PASS: {report['pass']}")
# readiness gate
def readiness_gate(probe_ndcg10: float,
honeypot_result: dict,
diversity_result: dict,
ndcg10_threshold: float = 0.75) -> dict:
"""
The single go/no-go check run immediately before spending one of
the 3 allowed submissions. All three must pass.
"""
checks = {
"probe_ndcg10_meets_threshold": (
probe_ndcg10 is not None and probe_ndcg10 >= ndcg10_threshold
),
"zero_honeypot_leakage": honeypot_result["pass"],
"top100_diversity_acceptable": diversity_result["pass"],
}
return {
"checks": checks,
"ready_to_submit": all(checks.values()),
}
def print_readiness_report(gate_result: dict) -> None:
print("=" * 60)
print("SUBMISSION READINESS GATE")
print("=" * 60)
for check, passed in gate_result["checks"].items():
status = "PASS" if passed else "FAIL"
print(f" [{status}] {check}")
print()
if gate_result["ready_to_submit"]:
print("READY TO SUBMIT.")
else:
print("NOT READY -- fix failing checks above before spending a submission.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(__doc__)
print(
"This module is meant to be imported and driven by your own "
"test harness once rank.py's pipeline function is finalized. "
"See the four functions above: run_ablation, "
"run_honeypot_injection_test, check_top100_diversity, and "
"readiness_gate."
)
|