Motif-Technologies
/

Motif-Vision-Encoder

@@ -94,29 +94,28 @@ Outputs (`BaseModelOutputWithPooling`): `last_hidden_state` `(B, 1+4+N, 4096)`,
 ## Evaluation
 Compared against the strongest publicly reported self-supervised / vision backbones. Higher is
-better for every column except KITTI depth (lower is better). Best comparable value per
-column in bold, second best <u>underlined</u>; the footnoted figure (‡) is measured under a
-different protocol and is excluded from the ranking.
 DAVIS S/M/L follow the DINOv3 protocol (J&F-mean at video short side 420/480, 840/960,
 1260/1440 px). V-JEPA 2.1 is not part of the DINOv3 Table 5 tracking benchmark, so only its
 single-resolution (S) figure is available.
-| Model | Training<br>data | DAVIS S<br>J&F ↑ | DAVIS M<br>J&F ↑ | DAVIS L<br>J&F ↑ | ImageNet-1K<br>lin. probe ↑ | ADE20K<br>mIoU ↑ | K400 ↑ | KITTI<br>depth MSE ↓ |
-|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-| **Motif Vision Encoder** | 0.5B | **74.0** | **80.5** | **83.5** | 87.4 | <u>52.0</u> | 87.4 | 3.2 |
-| DINOv3 | 1.7B | <u>71.1</u> | <u>79.7</u> | <u>83.3</u> | 88.4 | **55.9** | <u>87.8</u> | **2.3** |
-| Web-DINO | 2B | 57.2 | 65.8 | 69.5 | 85.9 | 42.7 | 86.8 | 3.2 |
-| PEcore | 5.4B | 48.2 | 53.1 | 49.8 | **89.3** | 38.9 | **87.9** | 4.1 |
-| SigLIP2 | 10B | 56.1 | 62.3 | 62.9 | <u>89.1</u> | 45.4 | 86.9 | – |
-| OpenCLIP | 2B | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
-| V-JEPA 2.1 | 0.022B | 69.0 | – | – | 85.5 | 47.9 | 87.7 | <u>2.5</u> |
-| VideoMAEv2 | 1.35M | – | – | – | – | – | 90.0<sup>‡</sup> | – |
 <sub>‡ VideoMAEv2 ViT-g: K400 top-1 after **full fine-tuning**, not the frozen attentive-probe protocol used for the other rows.</sub>
 Protocol: DINOv3-style linear/attentive probes for image tasks; V-JEPA 2-style protocol for
-video. Baseline DAVIS / ADE20K / K400 / KITTI figures are taken from the DINOv3 technical
 report's unified evaluation (Tab. 3, 5, 6) and ImageNet from Tab. 7; OpenCLIP and VideoMAEv2
 are not in that report; VideoMAEv2's K400 figure is cited from its own paper (see ‡), and
 OpenCLIP's remaining benchmarks are not reported under a comparable protocol.

 ## Evaluation
 Compared against the strongest publicly reported self-supervised / vision backbones. Higher is
+better for every column. Best comparable value per column in bold, second best <u>underlined</u>;
+the footnoted figure (‡) is measured under a different protocol and is excluded from the ranking.
 DAVIS S/M/L follow the DINOv3 protocol (J&F-mean at video short side 420/480, 840/960,
 1260/1440 px). V-JEPA 2.1 is not part of the DINOv3 Table 5 tracking benchmark, so only its
 single-resolution (S) figure is available.
+| Model | Training<br>data | DAVIS S<br>J&F ↑ | DAVIS M<br>J&F ↑ | DAVIS L<br>J&F ↑ | ImageNet-1K<br>lin. probe ↑ | ADE20K<br>mIoU ↑ | K400 ↑ |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| **Motif Vision Encoder** | 0.5B | **74.0** | **80.5** | **83.5** | 87.4 | <u>52.0</u> | 87.4 |
+| DINOv3 | 1.7B | <u>71.1</u> | <u>79.7</u> | <u>83.3</u> | 88.4 | **55.9** | <u>87.8</u> |
+| Web-DINO | 2B | 57.2 | 65.8 | 69.5 | 85.9 | 42.7 | 86.8 |
+| PEcore | 5.4B | 48.2 | 53.1 | 49.8 | **89.3** | 38.9 | **87.9** |
+| SigLIP2 | 10B | 56.1 | 62.3 | 62.9 | <u>89.1</u> | 45.4 | 86.9 |
+| OpenCLIP | 2B | – | – | – | – | – | – |
+| V-JEPA 2.1 | 0.022B | 69.0 | – | – | 85.5 | 47.9 | 87.7 |
+| VideoMAEv2 | 1.35M | – | – | – | – | – | 90.0<sup>‡</sup> |
 <sub>‡ VideoMAEv2 ViT-g: K400 top-1 after **full fine-tuning**, not the frozen attentive-probe protocol used for the other rows.</sub>
 Protocol: DINOv3-style linear/attentive probes for image tasks; V-JEPA 2-style protocol for
+video. Baseline DAVIS / ADE20K / K400 figures are taken from the DINOv3 technical
 report's unified evaluation (Tab. 3, 5, 6) and ImageNet from Tab. 7; OpenCLIP and VideoMAEv2
 are not in that report; VideoMAEv2's K400 figure is cited from its own paper (see ‡), and
 OpenCLIP's remaining benchmarks are not reported under a comparable protocol.