xuanbo commited on
Commit
69c58b5
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 9280de1

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Instruct
21
 
22
  ⭐ **If you find this project helpful, please give us a star on [GitHub](https://github.com/Bairong-Xdynamics/Benchmarking-LLM-Realistic-Selling-Skill/)!** It means a lot to us.
23
 
 
 
24
  **CustomerLM** is a fine-tuned large language model based on Qwen, trained to play the **customer** side of a realistic sales conversation. It is the user simulator of the [SalesLLM benchmark](https://github.com/Bairong-Xdynamics/Benchmarking-LLM-Realistic-Selling-Skill).
25
 
26
  Most evaluations of "can an LLM sell?" put a general-purpose model (e.g. GPT-4o) on the customer side. That is the weak link: general instruct models are trained to be helpful, so when they are told to role-play a buyer they drift into *assisting* the salesperson — volunteering objections' answers, summarizing benefits, even pitching the product back. We call this **role inversion**, and it happens in **17.44%** of GPT-4o-simulated dialogues. A user simulator that behaves like a salesperson makes every downstream sales score unreliable.
 
21
 
22
  ⭐ **If you find this project helpful, please give us a star on [GitHub](https://github.com/Bairong-Xdynamics/Benchmarking-LLM-Realistic-Selling-Skill/)!** It means a lot to us.
23
 
24
+ Github: https://github.com/Bairong-Xdynamics/Benchmarking-LLM-Realistic-Selling-Skill/
25
+
26
  **CustomerLM** is a fine-tuned large language model based on Qwen, trained to play the **customer** side of a realistic sales conversation. It is the user simulator of the [SalesLLM benchmark](https://github.com/Bairong-Xdynamics/Benchmarking-LLM-Realistic-Selling-Skill).
27
 
28
  Most evaluations of "can an LLM sell?" put a general-purpose model (e.g. GPT-4o) on the customer side. That is the weak link: general instruct models are trained to be helpful, so when they are told to role-play a buyer they drift into *assisting* the salesperson — volunteering objections' answers, summarizing benefits, even pitching the product back. We call this **role inversion**, and it happens in **17.44%** of GPT-4o-simulated dialogues. A user simulator that behaves like a salesperson makes every downstream sales score unreliable.