Instructions to use Nj-1111/Copernicus-Tokenizer with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use Nj-1111/Copernicus-Tokenizer with Transformers:
# pip install -U transformers accelerate # Load model directly from transformers import AutoModel model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("Nj-1111/Copernicus-Tokenizer", device_map="auto") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Delete README.md
Browse files
README.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,529 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
-
tags:
|
| 4 |
-
- tokenizer
|
| 5 |
-
- bpe
|
| 6 |
-
- nlp
|
| 7 |
-
- llm
|
| 8 |
-
library_name: transformers
|
| 9 |
-
---
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
# Copernicus Tokenizer
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
## Overview
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
**Copernicus Tokenizer** is a domain-general Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenizer trained from scratch for large language models operating across heterogeneous reasoning domains, including:
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
* Natural language
|
| 18 |
-
* Source code
|
| 19 |
-
* Mathematical notation
|
| 20 |
-
* Scientific literature
|
| 21 |
-
* Symbol-heavy technical text
|
| 22 |
-
* Structured chat and tool-use formatting
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
The tokenizer was designed to prioritize:
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
-
1. Reversible decoding integrity
|
| 27 |
-
2. Structural fidelity for code
|
| 28 |
-
3. Mathematical symbol preservation
|
| 29 |
-
4. Vocabulary efficiency under mixed-domain corpora
|
| 30 |
-
5. Robust multilingual byte-level coverage
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
The tokenizer uses GPT-2-style byte-level pretokenization combined with custom BPE merge training over approximately **3.96 million documents** sourced from code, scientific literature, mathematics, and natural language corpora.
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
---
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
-
# Technical Specifications
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
| Parameter | Value | | |
|
| 39 |
-
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------- | --------- | -- |
|
| 40 |
-
| Tokenizer Type | Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) | | |
|
| 41 |
-
| Pretokenization | GPT-2 byte-level | | |
|
| 42 |
-
| Vocabulary Size | 55,812 | | |
|
| 43 |
-
| Merge Operations | 55,725 | | |
|
| 44 |
-
| Base Alphabet | 256-byte alphabet | | |
|
| 45 |
-
| Minimum Merge Frequency | 3 | | |
|
| 46 |
-
| Unknown Token | `< | unk | >` |
|
| 47 |
-
| Padding Token | `< | pad | >` |
|
| 48 |
-
| BOS/EOS Token | `< | endoftext | >` |
|
| 49 |
-
| Maximum Sequence Length | 4096 | | |
|
| 50 |
-
| Training Documents | ~3.96M | | |
|
| 51 |
-
| Intended Use | General-purpose LLM pretraining | | |
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
---
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
# Design Goals
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
The tokenizer was explicitly optimized for mixed-domain reasoning workloads rather than purely conversational English.
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
-
Core objectives included:
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
* Preserving programming-language structure
|
| 62 |
-
* Maintaining reversible decode behavior
|
| 63 |
-
* Improving compression over legacy GPT-2 BPEs
|
| 64 |
-
* Supporting LaTeX and symbolic mathematics
|
| 65 |
-
* Avoiding excessive fragmentation of scientific terminology
|
| 66 |
-
* Supporting tool-calling and agentic prompting formats
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
---
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
# Supported Domains
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
| Domain | Optimization Goal |
|
| 73 |
-
| ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
|
| 74 |
-
| Natural Language | Compression efficiency + morphology preservation |
|
| 75 |
-
| Source Code | Syntax stability + AST-safe decoding |
|
| 76 |
-
| Mathematics | LaTeX atomicity + operator preservation |
|
| 77 |
-
| Scientific Text | Technical terminology coverage |
|
| 78 |
-
| Chat/Agents | Structured conversational formatting |
|
| 79 |
-
| Unicode Text | Full byte-level reversibility |
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
---
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
# Special Tokens
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
-
| Token | Purpose | | | | |
|
| 86 |
-
| ---------------------- | --------------------------- | ----- | --------------- | -- | ----------------- |
|
| 87 |
-
| `< | endoftext | >` | BOS / EOS | | |
|
| 88 |
-
| `< | unk | >` | Unknown token | | |
|
| 89 |
-
| `< | pad | >` | Padding | | |
|
| 90 |
-
| `<think>` / `</think>` | Chain-of-thought delimiters | | | | |
|
| 91 |
-
| `< | user | >` | Chat role token | | |
|
| 92 |
-
| `< | assistant | >` | Chat role token | | |
|
| 93 |
-
| `< | system | >` | Chat role token | | |
|
| 94 |
-
| `< | im_start | >`/`< | im_end | >` | ChatML formatting |
|
| 95 |
-
| `< | tool_call | >` | Tool invocation | | |
|
| 96 |
-
| `< | tool_result | >` | Tool response | | |
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
---
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
# Training Corpus
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
The tokenizer was trained on a heterogeneous multi-domain corpus.
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
-
| Domain | Primary Sources |
|
| 105 |
-
| --------------------- | ----------------------- |
|
| 106 |
-
| Natural Language | Wikipedia, Common Crawl |
|
| 107 |
-
| Source Code | The Stack |
|
| 108 |
-
| Mathematics | MATH dataset, arXiv |
|
| 109 |
-
| Scientific Literature | PubMed, S2ORC |
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
The corpus intentionally mixed:
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
* prose
|
| 114 |
-
* code
|
| 115 |
-
* formulas
|
| 116 |
-
* Unicode-heavy text
|
| 117 |
-
* markdown
|
| 118 |
-
* structured conversations
|
| 119 |
-
* technical documentation
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
This mixture was intended to prevent domain starvation during BPE merge allocation.
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
---
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
# Installation
|
| 126 |
-
|
| 127 |
-
```python
|
| 128 |
-
from transformers import AutoTokenizer
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
-
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
|
| 131 |
-
"Nj-1111/Copernicus-Tokenizer"
|
| 132 |
-
)
|
| 133 |
-
```
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
---
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
# Example Usage
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
```python
|
| 140 |
-
from transformers import AutoTokenizer
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
|
| 143 |
-
"Nj-1111/Copernicus-Tokenizer"
|
| 144 |
-
)
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
-
text = "def factorial(n): return 1 if n <= 1 else n * factorial(n-1)"
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
-
encoded = tokenizer(text)
|
| 149 |
-
print(encoded["input_ids"])
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
decoded = tokenizer.decode(encoded["input_ids"])
|
| 152 |
-
print(decoded)
|
| 153 |
-
```
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
-
---
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
# Batched Training Usage
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
```python
|
| 160 |
-
from transformers import PreTrainedTokenizerFast
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
-
tokenizer = PreTrainedTokenizerFast.from_pretrained(
|
| 163 |
-
"Nj-1111/Copernicus-Tokenizer"
|
| 164 |
-
)
|
| 165 |
-
|
| 166 |
-
inputs = tokenizer(
|
| 167 |
-
[
|
| 168 |
-
"Hello world",
|
| 169 |
-
"def foo(): pass"
|
| 170 |
-
],
|
| 171 |
-
truncation=True,
|
| 172 |
-
max_length=2048,
|
| 173 |
-
padding="max_length",
|
| 174 |
-
return_tensors="pt"
|
| 175 |
-
)
|
| 176 |
-
```
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
-
---
|
| 179 |
-
|
| 180 |
-
# Evaluation Methodology
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
-
The tokenizer was evaluated using a mixed-domain stress-testing suite designed to benchmark:
|
| 183 |
-
|
| 184 |
-
* compression efficiency
|
| 185 |
-
* structural preservation
|
| 186 |
-
* mathematical tokenization quality
|
| 187 |
-
* reversibility
|
| 188 |
-
* morphology handling
|
| 189 |
-
* numeric stability
|
| 190 |
-
* code integrity
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
The benchmark corpus included:
|
| 193 |
-
|
| 194 |
-
* deeply nested Python syntax
|
| 195 |
-
* asynchronous code
|
| 196 |
-
* indentation stress tests
|
| 197 |
-
* LaTeX equations
|
| 198 |
-
* Unicode mathematics
|
| 199 |
-
* morphologically rich English
|
| 200 |
-
* long decimal sequences
|
| 201 |
-
* hexadecimal and binary literals
|
| 202 |
-
|
| 203 |
-
Baseline comparison was performed against the GPT-2 tokenizer.
|
| 204 |
-
|
| 205 |
-
---
|
| 206 |
-
|
| 207 |
-
# Benchmark Results
|
| 208 |
-
|
| 209 |
-
## Core Metrics
|
| 210 |
-
|
| 211 |
-
| Metric | Copernicus | GPT-2 |
|
| 212 |
-
| --------------------------- | ---------- | ------ |
|
| 213 |
-
| Total Tokens | 12,600 | 14,920 |
|
| 214 |
-
| Character Compression Ratio | 2.754 | 2.326 |
|
| 215 |
-
| Byte Compression Ratio | 2.870 | 2.424 |
|
| 216 |
-
| Word Fertility | 2.601 | 2.872 |
|
| 217 |
-
| Entropy | 6.850 | 6.775 |
|
| 218 |
-
| Estimated BPT Proxy | 5.726 | 6.715 |
|
| 219 |
-
| Reversible Integrity | True | True |
|
| 220 |
-
| Unknown Tokens | 0 | 0 |
|
| 221 |
-
|
| 222 |
-
---
|
| 223 |
-
|
| 224 |
-
# Interpretation of Metrics
|
| 225 |
-
|
| 226 |
-
## Compression Efficiency
|
| 227 |
-
|
| 228 |
-
Copernicus demonstrates significantly stronger compression than GPT-2 on mixed-domain technical corpora.
|
| 229 |
-
|
| 230 |
-
The lower fertility and higher compression ratio indicate:
|
| 231 |
-
|
| 232 |
-
* better merge efficiency
|
| 233 |
-
* stronger domain coverage
|
| 234 |
-
* reduced subword fragmentation
|
| 235 |
-
* improved vocabulary allocation
|
| 236 |
-
|
| 237 |
-
The benchmark corpus was intentionally difficult and included:
|
| 238 |
-
|
| 239 |
-
* source code
|
| 240 |
-
* LaTeX
|
| 241 |
-
* Unicode mathematics
|
| 242 |
-
* technical scientific language
|
| 243 |
-
* long numeric sequences
|
| 244 |
-
|
| 245 |
-
Performance on standard English corpora is expected to exceed the reported mixed-domain ratios.
|
| 246 |
-
|
| 247 |
-
---
|
| 248 |
-
|
| 249 |
-
# Reversible Integrity
|
| 250 |
-
|
| 251 |
-
The tokenizer achieved:
|
| 252 |
-
|
| 253 |
-
```text
|
| 254 |
-
decode(encode(text)) == text
|
| 255 |
-
```
|
| 256 |
-
|
| 257 |
-
across the benchmark corpus.
|
| 258 |
-
|
| 259 |
-
This property is critical for:
|
| 260 |
-
|
| 261 |
-
* code generation
|
| 262 |
-
* compiler-safe decoding
|
| 263 |
-
* mathematical reconstruction
|
| 264 |
-
* structured prompting
|
| 265 |
-
* dataset integrity preservation
|
| 266 |
-
|
| 267 |
-
---
|
| 268 |
-
|
| 269 |
-
# Structural Purity Evaluation
|
| 270 |
-
|
| 271 |
-
## Structural Purity Score
|
| 272 |
-
|
| 273 |
-
```text
|
| 274 |
-
0.887
|
| 275 |
-
```
|
| 276 |
-
|
| 277 |
-
The tokenizer largely avoided catastrophic syntax merges.
|
| 278 |
-
|
| 279 |
-
Examples of acceptable structural tokens:
|
| 280 |
-
|
| 281 |
-
```text
|
| 282 |
-
'=='
|
| 283 |
-
'<='
|
| 284 |
-
'='
|
| 285 |
-
```
|
| 286 |
-
|
| 287 |
-
The tokenizer successfully avoided highly destructive merges such as:
|
| 288 |
-
|
| 289 |
-
```text
|
| 290 |
-
foo:
|
| 291 |
-
(variable
|
| 292 |
-
]])
|
| 293 |
-
```
|
| 294 |
-
|
| 295 |
-
This indicates relatively strong syntax-boundary preservation.
|
| 296 |
-
|
| 297 |
-
---
|
| 298 |
-
|
| 299 |
-
# AST Integrity Testing
|
| 300 |
-
|
| 301 |
-
Python code subjected to encode/decode cycles remained parseable by Python's AST parser.
|
| 302 |
-
|
| 303 |
-
Result:
|
| 304 |
-
|
| 305 |
-
```text
|
| 306 |
-
AST PARSE: PASS
|
| 307 |
-
```
|
| 308 |
-
|
| 309 |
-
This demonstrates:
|
| 310 |
-
|
| 311 |
-
* indentation preservation
|
| 312 |
-
* bracket stability
|
| 313 |
-
* newline consistency
|
| 314 |
-
* syntax-safe decoding
|
| 315 |
-
|
| 316 |
-
This property is especially important for code-language-model training.
|
| 317 |
-
|
| 318 |
-
---
|
| 319 |
-
|
| 320 |
-
# Mathematical Tokenization Quality
|
| 321 |
-
|
| 322 |
-
## LaTeX Atomicity Score
|
| 323 |
-
|
| 324 |
-
```text
|
| 325 |
-
0.875
|
| 326 |
-
```
|
| 327 |
-
|
| 328 |
-
The tokenizer preserved many common LaTeX operators as atomic units.
|
| 329 |
-
|
| 330 |
-
Examples:
|
| 331 |
-
|
| 332 |
-
| Symbol | Result |
|
| 333 |
-
| ----------- | ------ |
|
| 334 |
-
| `\\sqrt` | Atomic |
|
| 335 |
-
| `\\frac` | Atomic |
|
| 336 |
-
| `\\sum` | Atomic |
|
| 337 |
-
| `\\int` | Atomic |
|
| 338 |
-
| `\\alpha` | Atomic |
|
| 339 |
-
| `\\partial` | Atomic |
|
| 340 |
-
|
| 341 |
-
Rare-symbol fragmentation still occurs in some cases:
|
| 342 |
-
|
| 343 |
-
```text
|
| 344 |
-
\\vartheta -> ['\\v', 'artheta']
|
| 345 |
-
```
|
| 346 |
-
|
| 347 |
-
This indicates that the tokenizer is math-aware but not yet fully optimized for frontier symbolic reasoning workloads.
|
| 348 |
-
|
| 349 |
-
---
|
| 350 |
-
|
| 351 |
-
# Morphological Evaluation
|
| 352 |
-
|
| 353 |
-
The tokenizer demonstrated strong segmentation behavior on morphologically rich vocabulary.
|
| 354 |
-
|
| 355 |
-
Examples:
|
| 356 |
-
|
| 357 |
-
| Word | Tokenization |
|
| 358 |
-
| ---------------------- | ------------------------------- |
|
| 359 |
-
| interoperability | inter + oper + ability |
|
| 360 |
-
| hyperparameterization | hyper + parameter + ization |
|
| 361 |
-
| counterrevolutionaries | counter + rev + olution + aries |
|
| 362 |
-
|
| 363 |
-
This suggests:
|
| 364 |
-
|
| 365 |
-
* good subword reuse
|
| 366 |
-
* semantic morpheme retention
|
| 367 |
-
* efficient scientific terminology handling
|
| 368 |
-
|
| 369 |
-
Some residual BPE artifacts remain:
|
| 370 |
-
|
| 371 |
-
```text
|
| 372 |
-
antidisestablishmentarianism
|
| 373 |
-
-> ant + idis + estab + lish + ment + arian + ism
|
| 374 |
-
```
|
| 375 |
-
|
| 376 |
-
indicating mid-frequency merge residue.
|
| 377 |
-
|
| 378 |
-
---
|
| 379 |
-
|
| 380 |
-
# Numeric Stability Analysis
|
| 381 |
-
|
| 382 |
-
The tokenizer currently exhibits moderate numeric consistency.
|
| 383 |
-
|
| 384 |
-
Examples:
|
| 385 |
-
|
| 386 |
-
```text
|
| 387 |
-
890.123456789
|
| 388 |
-
-> ['89', '0.', '123456789']
|
| 389 |
-
```
|
| 390 |
-
|
| 391 |
-
```text
|
| 392 |
-
9876543210.000000000001
|
| 393 |
-
-> ['987', '65', '432', '10.00', '0000000001']
|
| 394 |
-
```
|
| 395 |
-
|
| 396 |
-
Strengths:
|
| 397 |
-
|
| 398 |
-
* no unknown tokens
|
| 399 |
-
* efficient compression
|
| 400 |
-
* stable decimal preservation
|
| 401 |
-
|
| 402 |
-
Weaknesses:
|
| 403 |
-
|
| 404 |
-
* inconsistent digit chunking
|
| 405 |
-
* fragmented numerical semantics
|
| 406 |
-
* unstable precision grouping
|
| 407 |
-
|
| 408 |
-
Future revisions may benefit from dedicated numeric pretokenization.
|
| 409 |
-
|
| 410 |
-
---
|
| 411 |
-
|
| 412 |
-
# Whitespace & Indentation Behavior
|
| 413 |
-
|
| 414 |
-
The tokenizer partially compresses indentation patterns.
|
| 415 |
-
|
| 416 |
-
Examples:
|
| 417 |
-
|
| 418 |
-
```text
|
| 419 |
-
4 spaces -> ['ĠĠ', 'ĠĠ']
|
| 420 |
-
8 spaces -> ['ĠĠ', 'ĠĠ', 'ĠĠ', 'ĠĠ']
|
| 421 |
-
```
|
| 422 |
-
|
| 423 |
-
This behavior is functional but not yet indentation-semantic.
|
| 424 |
-
|
| 425 |
-
Dedicated indentation tokens could further improve:
|
| 426 |
-
|
| 427 |
-
* code modeling
|
| 428 |
-
* AST consistency
|
| 429 |
-
* Python generation quality
|
| 430 |
-
|
| 431 |
-
---
|
| 432 |
-
|
| 433 |
-
# Strengths
|
| 434 |
-
|
| 435 |
-
## Major Strengths
|
| 436 |
-
|
| 437 |
-
* Strong mixed-domain compression
|
| 438 |
-
* Excellent reversibility
|
| 439 |
-
* AST-safe code preservation
|
| 440 |
-
* Good syntax-boundary awareness
|
| 441 |
-
* Strong LaTeX operator handling
|
| 442 |
-
* Good scientific morphology segmentation
|
| 443 |
-
* Unicode-safe byte-level encoding
|
| 444 |
-
* Zero unknown tokens during benchmark
|
| 445 |
-
|
| 446 |
-
---
|
| 447 |
-
|
| 448 |
-
# Current Limitations
|
| 449 |
-
|
| 450 |
-
## Areas for Improvement
|
| 451 |
-
|
| 452 |
-
* Numeric chunking consistency
|
| 453 |
-
* Rare mathematical symbol coverage
|
| 454 |
-
* Indentation-semantic tokenization
|
| 455 |
-
* Syntax-aware pretokenization
|
| 456 |
-
* Expanded theorem-level LaTeX coverage
|
| 457 |
-
|
| 458 |
-
---
|
| 459 |
-
|
| 460 |
-
# Intended Use Cases
|
| 461 |
-
|
| 462 |
-
## Recommended
|
| 463 |
-
|
| 464 |
-
* General-purpose LLM pretraining
|
| 465 |
-
* Coding assistants
|
| 466 |
-
* Research copilots
|
| 467 |
-
* Scientific language models
|
| 468 |
-
* Tool-using agent systems
|
| 469 |
-
* Mathematical text generation
|
| 470 |
-
* Mixed-domain instruction tuning
|
| 471 |
-
|
| 472 |
-
## Less Ideal
|
| 473 |
-
|
| 474 |
-
* High-precision arithmetic models
|
| 475 |
-
* Frontier symbolic theorem provers
|
| 476 |
-
* Compiler-verified code synthesis
|
| 477 |
-
* Financial numerical reasoning systems
|
| 478 |
-
|
| 479 |
-
---
|
| 480 |
-
|
| 481 |
-
# Research Assessment
|
| 482 |
-
|
| 483 |
-
Based on mixed-domain evaluation, Copernicus Tokenizer currently falls within:
|
| 484 |
-
|
| 485 |
-
```text
|
| 486 |
-
Advanced / Early Research-Grade
|
| 487 |
-
```
|
| 488 |
-
|
| 489 |
-
relative to contemporary open-source BPE tokenizers.
|
| 490 |
-
|
| 491 |
-
The tokenizer substantially outperforms legacy GPT-2 tokenization behavior on:
|
| 492 |
-
|
| 493 |
-
* compression
|
| 494 |
-
* morphology
|
| 495 |
-
* code structure
|
| 496 |
-
* LaTeX preservation
|
| 497 |
-
* Unicode robustness
|
| 498 |
-
|
| 499 |
-
while remaining fully reversible and structurally stable.
|
| 500 |
-
|
| 501 |
-
---
|
| 502 |
-
|
| 503 |
-
# Future Work
|
| 504 |
-
|
| 505 |
-
Planned future improvements may include:
|
| 506 |
-
|
| 507 |
-
* syntax-aware code pretokenization
|
| 508 |
-
* dedicated numeric tokenization strategies
|
| 509 |
-
* extended LaTeX operator vocabularies
|
| 510 |
-
* theorem-aware symbolic coverage
|
| 511 |
-
* indentation-semantic merges
|
| 512 |
-
* multilingual optimization
|
| 513 |
-
* adaptive merge allocation
|
| 514 |
-
|
| 515 |
-
---
|
| 516 |
-
|
| 517 |
-
# Repository
|
| 518 |
-
|
| 519 |
-
Training code and tokenizer assets:
|
| 520 |
-
|
| 521 |
-
```text
|
| 522 |
-
github.com/Nj-1111/copernicus-tokenizer
|
| 523 |
-
```
|
| 524 |
-
|
| 525 |
-
Tokenizer repository:
|
| 526 |
-
|
| 527 |
-
```text
|
| 528 |
-
huggingface.co/Nj-1111/Copernicus-Tokenizer
|
| 529 |
-
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|