nm-research commited on
Commit
07c3070
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 6012a1b

Clarify BFCL accuracy vs SWE submission coverage

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +8 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ We evaluated this model with [lm-evaluation-harness](https://github.com/Eleuther
130
  <tr><td>IFEval (instruction-level strict, avg@3)</td><td>95.96%</td></tr>
131
 
132
  <tr>
133
- <td rowspan="6">Agentic and tool use</td>
134
  <td>BFCL v4 non_live</td>
135
  <td>86.48%</td>
136
  </tr>
@@ -138,10 +138,16 @@ We evaluated this model with [lm-evaluation-harness](https://github.com/Eleuther
138
  <tr><td>BFCL v4 multi_turn</td><td>63.75%</td></tr>
139
  <tr><td>BFCL v4 memory</td><td>64.95%</td></tr>
140
  <tr><td>BFCL v4 web_search</td><td>42.00%</td></tr>
141
- <tr><td>SWE-Bench Lite dev submission rate</td><td>91.30% (21/23 submitted)</td></tr>
 
 
 
 
142
  </tbody>
143
  </table>
144
 
 
 
145
  ### Historical preliminary check
146
 
147
  | Benchmark | Base model (`moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6`) | This model |
 
130
  <tr><td>IFEval (instruction-level strict, avg@3)</td><td>95.96%</td></tr>
131
 
132
  <tr>
133
+ <td rowspan="5">Agentic function calling (accuracy)</td>
134
  <td>BFCL v4 non_live</td>
135
  <td>86.48%</td>
136
  </tr>
 
138
  <tr><td>BFCL v4 multi_turn</td><td>63.75%</td></tr>
139
  <tr><td>BFCL v4 memory</td><td>64.95%</td></tr>
140
  <tr><td>BFCL v4 web_search</td><td>42.00%</td></tr>
141
+ <tr>
142
+ <td>Agentic coding (submission coverage)</td>
143
+ <td>SWE-Bench Lite dev submission rate</td>
144
+ <td>91.30% (21/23 submitted)</td>
145
+ </tr>
146
  </tbody>
147
  </table>
148
 
149
+ BFCL rows report category accuracy. The SWE-Bench Lite row reports submission coverage (submitted runs / total instances), not final pass rate.
150
+
151
  ### Historical preliminary check
152
 
153
  | Benchmark | Base model (`moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6`) | This model |