Card: bands written before the run; end of second window specified after 7 of 10 values

README.md

@@ -49,17 +49,19 @@ Data: [`analysis/scores-history.csv`](analysis/scores-history.csv) (step, tokens
 of three GPUs computed the row; each GPU was checked against a known point before use). 1.00 at 1.26 B and 1.42 B tokens
 is already in its learning-rate decay; 1.01 at the same token counts is not.
 
-## Training loss vs. windows fixed before the run
+## Training loss vs. bands written before the run
 
-Before the run, windows for the mean training loss were written down from the training-loss scenarios on the 1.00 card
+Before the run, bands for the mean training loss were written down from the training-loss scenarios on the 1.00 card
 (continuation of the 1.00 curve from step 1050):
 
-| steps | window fixed before the run | measured mean of logged values |
+| steps | band written before the run | measured mean of logged values |
 |---|---|---:|
 | 1700–1800 (constant lr, pack-00) | 2.692 – 2.882 | 2.6977 |
 | 2770–2860 (end of the decay, pack-01) | 2.367 – 2.660 | 2.5083 |
 
-Both measurements fall inside their windows; the first one at the lower edge. This is one run, not a test of the
+Both bands were written before the run. The steps of the first window were also fixed before the run; the exact end of
+the second window (the last 10 logged values, steps 2770–2860) was specified when 7 of those 10 values were already
+logged. Both measurements fall inside their bands, the first one at the lower edge. This is one run, not a test of the
 scenarios.
 
 ## Usage