File size: 1,638 Bytes
0110dee | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 | # Browser↔Backend Interlock: Tau Prolog + Clojure + Assembly
**Date:** 2026-07-31
**Status:** Phase Integration Strategy
---
## The Three-Layer Interlock
### Layer 1: Browser (Tau Prolog - Symbolic)
Prolog runs pure logic, generates bytecode IR
### Layer 2: Backend (Clojure - Compiled)
Clojure parses bytecode, compiles to native via Cranelift
### Layer 3: Assembly/Bytecode (Interlock Protocol)
Common language both understand
---
## Bytecode Assembly Spec
```
PUSH <value> — Push value onto stack
LIST-CONS — Create list cons cell
UNIFY <var> <term> — Unify variable with term
RETURN <value> — Return result
SEAL <cid> — Bifrost seal result
SIGNATURE <ed25519> — Sign with key
```
---
## Integration into 9-Phase Build
Each phase:
- Browser: emit/consume bytecode (Tau Prolog)
- Backend: parse/compile/execute (Clojure→Cranelift)
- Proof: bytecode execution trace (sealed to WORM)
---
## Implementation Tasks
### Task 1: Tau Prolog Bytecode Emitter
Browser-side Tau Prolog → bytecode IR
### Task 2: Clojure Bytecode Parser
Backend-side bytecode IR → JVM execution
### Task 3: Cranelift JIT
JVM→native x86-64 compilation
### Task 4: Browser Verification
Verify result matches Tau Prolog query
---
## Concrete Example
Browser: `?- append([1,2], [3], Z).`
Browser emits bytecode → Backend compiles → Backend executes → Result sealed
Browser verifies proof → Display Z = [1,2,3]
---
**Status:** Ready to implement
**Estimated time:** 7 hours to production
|