Text Generation
Transformers
PyTorch
English
burt-imma
custom-architecture
matrix-memory
equilibrium-propagation
cifg
sovereign
snapkitty
no-backprop
formal-verification
lean4
agents
python
Instructions to use Snapkitty/burt-imma with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use Snapkitty/burt-imma with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="Snapkitty/burt-imma")# pip install -U transformers accelerate # Load model directly from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Snapkitty/burt-imma", device_map="auto") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- vLLM
How to use Snapkitty/burt-imma with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "Snapkitty/burt-imma" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "Snapkitty/burt-imma", "prompt": "Once upon a time,", "max_tokens": 512, "temperature": 0.5 }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/Snapkitty/burt-imma
- SGLang
How to use Snapkitty/burt-imma with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "Snapkitty/burt-imma" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "Snapkitty/burt-imma", "prompt": "Once upon a time,", "max_tokens": 512, "temperature": 0.5 }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "Snapkitty/burt-imma" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "Snapkitty/burt-imma", "prompt": "Once upon a time,", "max_tokens": 512, "temperature": 0.5 }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use Snapkitty/burt-imma with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/Snapkitty/burt-imma
File size: 14,821 Bytes
b88c26d | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 | # Experiment Protocol 001: MMEP Arithmetic Ablation
**Project:** BURT-IMMA
**Contact:** jessica@collectivekitty.com
**License:** BSL-1.1
---
## 1. Hypothesis
**Primary hypothesis:** MMEP (Matrix-Memory Equilibrium Propagation) with matrix memory outperforms standard backpropagation on arithmetic reasoning tasks.
**Secondary hypotheses:**
- H2: Matrix memory (C_global + C_expert) is necessary for strong arithmetic performance
- H3: Spectral and entropy constraints improve convergence stability without hurting accuracy
- H4: Sparse MoE routing enables specialization (e.g., one expert for addition, another for multiplication)
- H5: The equilibrium propagation training signal is at least as effective as backpropagation for this domain
---
## 2. Task Description
**Arithmetic reasoning:** Given an arithmetic expression as input, predict the correct result.
**Expression types:**
- Addition: `a + b = ?` (integers, 0-999)
- Subtraction: `a - b = ?` (integers, result >= 0)
- Multiplication: `a * b = ?` (integers, 0-99)
- Division: `a / b = ?` (exact division only, result is integer)
- Chained: `a + b * c - d = ?` (2-4 operations, PEMDAS)
- Nested: `(a + b) * (c - d) = ?` (parentheses)
**Data generation:** `scripts/generate_arithmetic.py`
```python
# generate_arithmetic.py produces:
# - train.jsonl: 100,000 expressions
# - val.jsonl: 10,000 expressions
# - test.jsonl: 10,000 expressions
# Format: {"input": "23 + 45 = ?", "output": "68", "type": "addition", "difficulty": 1}
```
**Difficulty levels:**
1. Single operation, small numbers (0-99)
2. Single operation, larger numbers (0-999)
3. Two operations, small numbers
4. Two operations, larger numbers
5. Three+ operations with parentheses
---
## 3. Experiment Configurations
### 3.1 Configuration Table
| # | Config Name | Description | Key Modification |
|---|-------------|-------------|------------------|
| 1 | `full_mmep` | Complete BURT-IMMA system | None (baseline) |
| 2 | `no_memory` | Remove all matrix memory | C_global = 0, C_expert = 0, no CIFG |
| 3 | `no_constraint` | Remove spectral + entropy constraints | lambda_max = inf, entropy_bound = inf |
| 4 | `no_moe` | Single expert, no routing | num_experts = 1, no router |
| 5 | `standard_bp` | Standard backpropagation training | Replace EP with Adam + backprop |
| 6 | `high_T_free` | Extended free phase | T_free = 100 (vs default 20) |
| 7 | `low_beta` | Very weak nudging | beta = 0.001 (vs default 0.1) |
| 8 | `large_memory` | Doubled memory capacity | d_model = 1024 (vs default 512) |
### 3.2 Detailed Configuration Specifications
#### Config 1: `full_mmep` (Baseline)
```yaml
model:
d_model: 512
num_layers: 4
num_heads: 8
num_experts: 4
top_k: 2
d_expert: 256
training:
method: mmep
T_free: 20
T_nudge: 4
beta: 0.1
lr: 1e-4
epochs: 50
batch_size: 8
constraints:
lambda_max: 0.95
entropy_bound: 0.20
spectral_projection: true
entropy_projection: true
memory:
C_global_dim: 512
C_expert_dim: 256
cifg_enabled: true
forget_bias_init: 0.0
```
#### Config 2: `no_memory`
```yaml
# Same as full_mmep except:
memory:
C_global_dim: 0 # No global memory
C_expert_dim: 0 # No expert memory
cifg_enabled: false # No CIFG gating
# Forward pass skips memory retrieval step
```
#### Config 3: `no_constraint`
```yaml
# Same as full_mmep except:
constraints:
lambda_max: 1000.0 # Effectively no spectral bound
entropy_bound: 100.0 # Effectively no entropy bound
spectral_projection: false
entropy_projection: false
```
#### Config 4: `no_moe`
```yaml
# Same as full_mmep except:
model:
num_experts: 1 # Single expert
top_k: 1 # Must route to the only expert
# No router, no load balancing, no sparsity penalty
```
#### Config 5: `standard_bp`
```yaml
# Same model architecture as full_mmep, but:
training:
method: backprop # Standard backpropagation
optimizer: adam
lr: 3e-4
weight_decay: 0.01
epochs: 50
batch_size: 32 # Larger batch (no EP memory overhead)
# No T_free, T_nudge, or beta
```
#### Config 6: `high_T_free`
```yaml
# Same as full_mmep except:
training:
T_free: 100 # 5x longer free phase (default: 20)
# Tests whether longer equilibration improves quality
```
#### Config 7: `low_beta`
```yaml
# Same as full_mmep except:
training:
beta: 0.001 # 100x weaker nudging (default: 0.1)
# Tests biological plausibility limit
# Lower beta = more accurate gradient but weaker signal
```
#### Config 8: `large_memory`
```yaml
# Same as full_mmep except:
model:
d_model: 1024 # 2x model dimension
d_expert: 512 # 2x expert dimension
memory:
C_global_dim: 1024 # 4x memory capacity (1024^2 vs 512^2)
C_expert_dim: 512 # 4x expert memory
```
---
## 4. Metrics
### 4.1 Primary Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Collection Frequency |
|--------|-----------|---------------------|
| **Accuracy** | Exact match of predicted vs. true answer | Every epoch |
| **Convergence speed** | Epoch at which accuracy first exceeds 80% | Once per run |
| **Final accuracy** | Test set accuracy at epoch 50 | End of training |
### 4.2 Secondary Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Collection Frequency |
|--------|-----------|---------------------|
| **Routing entropy** | H(alpha) averaged over test set | Every epoch |
| **Max spectral norm** | max_W(sigma_max(W)) | Every epoch |
| **Memory utilization** | effective_rank(C_global) / d_model | Every 5 epochs |
| **Energy trajectory** | E(t) over training (EP configs only) | Every step |
| **Expert specialization** | Accuracy per expert per operation type | End of training |
| **Loss curve** | Training loss per epoch | Every epoch |
### 4.3 Per-Operation Breakdown
Report accuracy separately for each operation type:
- Addition accuracy
- Subtraction accuracy
- Multiplication accuracy
- Division accuracy
- Chained operations accuracy
- Nested operations accuracy
---
## 5. Falsification Criteria
The MMEP theory makes specific, testable claims. The following criteria define falsification:
### 5.1 Primary Falsification
**If `standard_bp` (Config 5) achieves higher final accuracy than `full_mmep` (Config 1) by more than 2% (with p < 0.05), then:**
The claim that "MMEP outperforms backpropagation on reasoning tasks" is falsified for arithmetic reasoning.
### 5.2 Secondary Falsification Criteria
| Criterion | Condition | What it falsifies |
|-----------|-----------|-------------------|
| F1 | `standard_bp` > `full_mmep` + 2% | EP training advantage |
| F2 | `no_memory` >= `full_mmep` | Matrix memory necessity |
| F3 | `no_constraint` > `full_mmep` + 2% | Constraint benefit |
| F4 | Energy non-monotonic for 10+ consecutive steps | Lyapunov guarantee |
| F5 | Spectral norm > lambda_max after projection | Spectral projection correctness |
| F6 | Entropy > 0.20 + 1e-3 after projection | Entropy projection correctness |
| F7 | `no_moe` >= `full_mmep` | MoE specialization benefit |
### 5.3 Non-Falsification Outcomes
If none of the falsification criteria are triggered:
- MMEP is validated for arithmetic reasoning (not universally)
- Results support the theoretical framework but do not prove it
- Generalization to other domains requires separate experiments
### 5.4 Interpretation Guide
| Outcome | Interpretation | Action |
|---------|---------------|--------|
| All criteria pass | Theory supported | Proceed to harder tasks |
| F1 triggered | EP training not beneficial here | Investigate task properties |
| F2 triggered | Memory unnecessary for arithmetic | Reduce architecture |
| F3 triggered | Constraints too restrictive | Relax bounds |
| F4 triggered | Implementation bug or theory gap | Debug convergence |
| F5 or F6 triggered | Projection implementation error | Fix kernel bugs |
| F7 triggered | MoE overhead not justified | Simplify to single expert |
---
## 6. Hardware Requirements
### 6.1 Minimum Hardware
- **GPU:** NVIDIA RTX 3080 (10 GB VRAM) or equivalent
- **CPU:** 8 cores (for data loading)
- **RAM:** 32 GB
- **Storage:** 20 GB free (checkpoints + logs)
- **CUDA:** 11.8 or later
### 6.2 VRAM Budget per Configuration
| Config | Model Params | Memory Matrices | Activations | Total VRAM |
|--------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|-----------|
| `full_mmep` | 200 MB | 4 MB | 500 MB | ~2 GB |
| `no_memory` | 195 MB | 0 MB | 450 MB | ~1.5 GB |
| `no_constraint` | 200 MB | 4 MB | 500 MB | ~2 GB |
| `no_moe` | 150 MB | 2 MB | 400 MB | ~1.5 GB |
| `standard_bp` | 200 MB | 4 MB | 300 MB | ~1.5 GB |
| `high_T_free` | 200 MB | 4 MB | 500 MB | ~2 GB |
| `low_beta` | 200 MB | 4 MB | 500 MB | ~2 GB |
| `large_memory` | 400 MB | 16 MB | 900 MB | ~3.5 GB |
All configurations fit within RTX 3080's 10 GB with ample headroom.
---
## 7. Expected Runtime
### 7.1 Per-Configuration Runtime
| Config | Time per Epoch | Total (50 epochs) | Notes |
|--------|---------------|-------------------|-------|
| `full_mmep` | 3 min | 2.5 hours | EP overhead: T_free + T_nudge passes |
| `no_memory` | 2.5 min | 2 hours | No memory ops |
| `no_constraint` | 2.5 min | 2 hours | No projection |
| `no_moe` | 2 min | 1.7 hours | No routing/dispatch |
| `standard_bp` | 1 min | 50 min | Standard training (no EP) |
| `high_T_free` | 10 min | 8.3 hours | 5x free phase |
| `low_beta` | 3 min | 2.5 hours | Same as full_mmep |
| `large_memory` | 6 min | 5 hours | 2x compute |
### 7.2 Total Suite Runtime
```
Sequential (worst case): 2.5 + 2 + 2 + 1.7 + 0.8 + 8.3 + 2.5 + 5 = 24.8 hours
With 3 seeds each: 24.8 * 3 = 74.4 hours
Excluding high_T_free: (24.8 - 8.3) * 3 = 49.5 hours
Parallel (2 configs on RTX 3080): ~37 hours
Target: ~4 hours for single-seed pass (excluding high_T_free)
= 2.5 + 2 + 2 + 1.7 + 0.8 + 2.5 + 5 = 16.5 hours single seed all configs
Achievable in ~4 hours: Run full_mmep + standard_bp + no_memory + no_moe (key comparisons)
= 2.5 + 0.8 + 2 + 1.7 = 7 hours...
Revised target for "core suite" (4 hours):
- full_mmep: 2.5h
- standard_bp: 0.8h
- no_memory: limited to 15 epochs = 0.75h
Total core: ~4 hours
```
### 7.3 Recommended Execution Order
1. `standard_bp` (fastest, establishes backprop baseline)
2. `full_mmep` (primary comparison)
3. `no_memory` (test memory contribution)
4. `no_moe` (test routing contribution)
5. `no_constraint` (test constraint contribution)
6. `low_beta` (test nudging sensitivity)
7. `large_memory` (test scaling)
8. `high_T_free` (test convergence theory, run overnight)
---
## 8. Data
### 8.1 Data Generation
```bash
python scripts/generate_arithmetic.py \
--train_size 100000 \
--val_size 10000 \
--test_size 10000 \
--max_value 999 \
--max_ops 4 \
--seed 42 \
--output_dir data/arithmetic/
```
### 8.2 Data Format
```json
{"input": "23 + 45 = ?", "output": "68", "type": "addition", "difficulty": 1, "num_ops": 1}
{"input": "156 * 7 = ?", "output": "1092", "type": "multiplication", "difficulty": 2, "num_ops": 1}
{"input": "(12 + 8) * 3 = ?", "output": "60", "type": "nested", "difficulty": 3, "num_ops": 2}
```
### 8.3 Data Statistics
| Split | Size | Difficulty Distribution | Operation Distribution |
|-------|------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Train | 100K | D1: 30%, D2: 25%, D3: 20%, D4: 15%, D5: 10% | +: 25%, -: 25%, *: 20%, /: 10%, chain: 12%, nest: 8% |
| Val | 10K | Same as train | Same as train |
| Test | 10K | Same as train | Same as train |
### 8.4 Tokenization
- Character-level tokenization (digits, operators, parentheses, spaces)
- Vocabulary size: 20 tokens (`0-9`, `+`, `-`, `*`, `/`, `(`, `)`, `=`, `?`, ` `, `<PAD>`)
- Maximum sequence length: 32 (sufficient for all expressions)
---
## 9. Execution Script
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# run_experiment_001.sh
CONFIGS="full_mmep standard_bp no_memory no_constraint no_moe low_beta large_memory high_T_free"
SEEDS="42 137 256"
DATA_DIR="data/arithmetic"
OUTPUT_DIR="results/experiment_001"
# Generate data (if not exists)
if [ ! -f "$DATA_DIR/train.jsonl" ]; then
python scripts/generate_arithmetic.py --output_dir $DATA_DIR --seed 42
fi
# Run experiments
for config in $CONFIGS; do
for seed in $SEEDS; do
echo "Running config=$config seed=$seed"
python scripts/run_training.py \
--config configs/experiment_001/${config}.yaml \
--seed $seed \
--data_dir $DATA_DIR \
--output_dir $OUTPUT_DIR/${config}/seed_${seed} \
--epochs 50 \
--eval_every 1 \
--checkpoint_every 10
done
done
# Generate report
python scripts/analyze_results.py \
--results_dir $OUTPUT_DIR \
--output results/experiment_001_report.json
```
---
## 10. Analysis Plan
### 10.1 Statistical Tests
1. **Paired t-test:** Compare each config against `full_mmep` on final accuracy (3 seeds each)
2. **Bonferroni correction:** Adjust p-values for 7 comparisons (alpha = 0.05/7 = 0.0071)
3. **Effect size:** Report Cohen's d for each comparison
4. **Confidence intervals:** 95% CI on accuracy difference
### 10.2 Visualization
- Learning curves (accuracy vs. epoch) for all configs
- Energy trajectories (EP configs only)
- Expert specialization heatmap (operation type vs. expert)
- Spectral norm evolution over training
- Entropy evolution over training
### 10.3 Report Format
```json
{
"experiment": "001_mmep_arithmetic_ablation",
"date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"hardware": "RTX 3080, 10GB",
"results": {
"full_mmep": {"accuracy": [s1, s2, s3], "mean": X, "std": Y},
"standard_bp": {"accuracy": [s1, s2, s3], "mean": X, "std": Y},
...
},
"falsification": {
"F1": {"triggered": false, "p_value": 0.XX, "effect_size": X.XX},
...
},
"conclusion": "Theory supported|falsified for criterion FN"
}
```
---
## 11. Reproducibility Checklist
- [ ] All random seeds documented and fixed
- [ ] Data generation script deterministic
- [ ] Model initialization deterministic
- [ ] CUDA deterministic mode enabled (`torch.backends.cudnn.deterministic = True`)
- [ ] All hyperparameters documented in config YAML
- [ ] PyTorch version recorded
- [ ] CUDA version recorded
- [ ] GPU model recorded
- [ ] Training logs saved (loss per step)
- [ ] Checkpoints saved at epoch 10, 20, 30, 40, 50
- [ ] Environment frozen (`pip freeze > requirements_experiment_001.txt`)
|