File size: 5,280 Bytes
9425aed | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 | # Phase 3 Proof Discharge β Quick Start Guide
## What Happened?
Round 1 orchestration of Phase 3 proof discharge for the BOB quantum kernel loop invariants formalization (Agda) is **complete**. Three specialized agents (ahmad_bot, forge, enki) analyzed 15 holes across 4 modules and identified critical structural gaps.
## Key Results (60-second summary)
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Holes Identified | 15 |
| Holes Discharged | 0 |
| Spec Gaps Found | 2 (critical) |
| Viable Discharges Proposed | 1 |
| Agents Deployed | 3 (running in parallel) |
### The Two Critical Issues
**1. EvolutionLoop.agda** β Missing semantic contract
- **What:** `StepTransition` record lacks `state_valid_preserved` field
- **Why:** Quantum evolution must preserve Hilbert space dimension
- **Fix:** Add 1 field (~4 lines)
- **Impact:** Unblocks 3 holes
**2. MatrixAccumulationLoop.agda** β Missing precondition
- **What:** `matrix_acc_base` doesn't require `max_terms β₯ 1`
- **Why:** RK4 Taylor series needs at least one term
- **Fix:** Add 1 parameter (~2 lines)
- **Impact:** Unblocks 5 holes
### Viable Discharge Found
**EulerLoop.agda line 141:** Lower bound arithmetic proof ready for type-checking.
---
## Where to Find Everything
### Main Reports (in this directory)
- **PHASE_3_RESULTS_INDEX.md** β START HERE (executive summary)
- **PHASE_3_ORCHESTRATION_LOG.md** (detailed findings per agent)
- **PHASE_3_DISCHARGE_SUMMARY.txt** (full context)
### Supporting Artifacts
- `/tmp/PHASE_3_DISCHARGE_REPORT.md` (analysis)
- `/tmp/PHASE_3_WORM_ENTRIES.jsonl` (WORM audit trail)
### Source Code Locations
**Files that need fixing:**
- `src/Invariants/EvolutionLoop.agda` (lines 100β124)
- `src/Invariants/MatrixAccumulationLoop.agda` (lines 87β97)
**Proposed discharge:**
- `src/Invariants/EulerLoop.agda` (line 141)
---
## Next Steps (Priority Order)
### Phase 3.1: Apply Spec Corrections (BLOCKING)
**In EvolutionLoop.agda**, add to `StepTransition` record (after `time_advances` field):
```agda
state_valid_preserved :
isValidDim (EvolutionState.state s) β
isValidDim (EvolutionState.state s')
```
**In MatrixAccumulationLoop.agda**, modify `matrix_acc_base` signature:
```agda
matrix_acc_base :
(s : MatrixAccLoopState) β
MatrixAccLoopState.k s β‘ 1 β
MatrixAccContext.dt (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) > 0 β
MatrixAccContext.state_dim (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) β₯ 1 β
MatrixAccLoopState.factorial_k s β‘ 1 β
MatrixAccLoopState.term_coefficient s β‘ MatrixAccContext.dt (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) β
MatrixAccLoopState.num_hamiltonian_sweeps s β‘ 0 β
MatrixAccLoopState.exp_matrix_accumulated s β‘ MatrixAccContext.state_dim (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) * MatrixAccContext.state_dim (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) β
MatrixAccLoopState.error_status s β‘ 0 β
MatrixAccContext.max_terms (MatrixAccLoopState.ctx s) β₯ 1 β -- ADD THIS LINE
MatrixAccInvariant s 1
```
Then in `matrix_acc_base` body, replace line 101:
```agda
{ h_k_valid = h_max_terms_pos -- Changed from: ?
```
### Phase 3.2: Re-run Discharge (After fixes)
1. Run agents on fixed code:
- ahmad_bot β EvolutionLoop holes (retry)
- enki β MatrixAccumulationLoop hole 101 (retry)
- forge β EulerLoop line 141 (verify proposed proof)
2. Type-check proposed discharges via `lake build`
3. WORM-seal successful proofs
### Phase 3.3: Analyze Remaining Modules
- GateApplicationLoop.agda (4 holes) β not yet analyzed
- Expected: Similar precondition patterns
---
## Technical Context
### The Formalization
This is a Phase 2β3 progression of BOB's quantum kernel loop invariants in Agda:
- **Phase 2** (completed): Defined 4 loop invariant structures + predicates
- **Phase 3** (in progress): Discharge 15 proof holes to validate invariants
### The Holes
All 15 holes are placeholder `?` marks in proof terms. They represent:
- 3 base-case proofs (induction start)
- 5 inductive-step proofs (state preservation)
- 4 exit-condition proofs (postconditions)
- 3 auxiliary arithmetic proofs
### The Agents
- **ahmad_bot:** Specializes in state evolution & bookkeeping (EvolutionLoop)
- **forge:** Specializes in numerical updates & bounds (EulerLoop)
- **enki:** Specializes in matrix algebra & Taylor series (MatrixAccumulationLoop)
---
## Why This Matters
The formalization bridges informal C/Fortran implementation and formal specification. The two spec gaps that surfaced are **semantic invariants** that the implementation silently assumes but the formalization must make explicit:
1. **Dimension Preservation:** Quantum evolution respects the structure of the state space (core physics)
2. **Taylor Series Bounds:** RK4 requires minimum 1 term (integration contract)
These aren't bugsβthey're **correctness requirements** that formal verification makes visible.
---
## Questions?
See **PHASE_3_RESULTS_INDEX.md** for:
- Full technical details (predicate definitions, record structures)
- Per-agent findings and recommendations
- Complete hole inventory with status
- Phase 3 roadmap (Phases 3.1β3.4)
---
**Status:** Ready for Phase 3.1 spec corrections
**Estimated time to completion:** 2β4 hours (after fixes applied)
**Next checkpoint:** Phase 3.2 (Round 2 discharge verification)
|