card: answer length from the final run
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ nothing: no solver, no example solutions, no human data.
|
|
| 20 |
- Built as a control for [RubiksBench](https://brianbriscoe.dev/lab/rubiksbench),
|
| 21 |
where language models must write the whole answer in one reply. On the same
|
| 22 |
full scrambles the best of them, GPT-6 Astra, solves 9 of 10 with answers
|
| 23 |
-
averaging over 100 moves; this model's answers average about
|
| 24 |
same test: this model gets a search loop, the language models get one reply.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Write-up and replays: https://brianbriscoe.dev/lab/tiny-cube-solver
|
|
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ no harder than 20. A full scramble takes about 80 to 90 seconds on one RTX A6000
|
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
- It is not fast. The Kociemba two-phase solver solves any cube in milliseconds.
|
| 121 |
This model exists to show that a small network can learn the task at all.
|
| 122 |
-
- Solutions are not guaranteed to be shortest. Full scrambles average about
|
| 123 |
moves.
|
| 124 |
- 3x3x3 only.
|
| 125 |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
- Built as a control for [RubiksBench](https://brianbriscoe.dev/lab/rubiksbench),
|
| 21 |
where language models must write the whole answer in one reply. On the same
|
| 22 |
full scrambles the best of them, GPT-6 Astra, solves 9 of 10 with answers
|
| 23 |
+
averaging over 100 moves; this model's answers average about 22. It is not the
|
| 24 |
same test: this model gets a search loop, the language models get one reply.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Write-up and replays: https://brianbriscoe.dev/lab/tiny-cube-solver
|
|
|
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
- It is not fast. The Kociemba two-phase solver solves any cube in milliseconds.
|
| 121 |
This model exists to show that a small network can learn the task at all.
|
| 122 |
+
- Solutions are not guaranteed to be shortest. Full scrambles average about 22
|
| 123 |
moves.
|
| 124 |
- 3x3x3 only.
|
| 125 |
|