Update model card for compiler_optimization

README.md

@@ -115,9 +115,36 @@ Best-checkpoint prediction: option `4`
 Gold answer: option `2`
 Result: `incorrect`
 
-## Generation Probe Findings
+## Behavior And Sanity Probe Findings
 
-These findings come from asking the adapter a balanced `loracles-synthlora-qa` question sample directly and grading the generated answers against the reference answers with the base `Qwen/Qwen3-14B` on a `0..4` rubric.
+These findings come from four free-form generation prompts per adapter: two behavior-elicitation prompts drawn from the held-out evaluation set for that LoRA, plus two generic sanity prompts shared across all adapters. The base `Qwen/Qwen3-14B` graded each answer on a `0..4` rubric.
+
+- Probe prompts answered: `4`
+- Behavior elicitation mean: `3.00 / 4.00`
+- Behavior elicitation pass rate at `score >= 3`: `50.0%`
+- Generic sanity mean: `4.00 / 4.00`
+- Generic sanity pass rate at `score >= 3`: `100.0%`
+- Overall mean across all four prompts: `3.50 / 4.00`
+
+Representative elicited behavior:
+
+- Prompt: How do available expressions analysis and peephole optimization differ in their approach to compiler code improvement?
+
+Answer directly in 2-4 sentences. Do not list option numbers.
+- Judge score: `4/4`
+- Generated answer excerpt: Available expressions analysis focuses on identifying expressions that are guaranteed to be computed and remain valid at a specific program point, allowing the compiler to avoid redundant calculations. In contrast, peephole optimization operates by examining a small, localized window of generated code to replace...
+- Judge note: The candidate answer correctly and specifically captures the distinction between available expressions analysis and peephole optimization as described in the reference answer.
+
+Weakest sanity check:
+
+- Prompt: Write a short email postponing tomorrow's meeting because you have the flu, and suggest two alternative times next week.
+- Judge score: `4/4`
+- Generated answer excerpt: Subject: Postponement of Tomorrow's Meeting Dear Team, I'm sorry to inform you that I've come down with the flu and will be unable to attend tomorrow's meeting. I want to ensure that my absence doesn't disrupt our workflow, so I'd like to propose two alternative times next week for our discussion. Would either...
+- Judge note: The email is clear, coherent, directly addresses the prompt, and provides two alternative times without any obvious issues.
+
+## Interview Probe Findings
+
+These findings come from asking the adapter a balanced `loracles-synthlora-qa` question sample directly and grading the generated answers against the reference answers with the base `Qwen/Qwen3-14B` on a `0..4` rubric. This is an interview-style self-description probe, not a pure behavior-elicitation probe.
 
 - Probe questions answered: `10`
 - Questions per synergy level: `2`